Service Rules Governing Narrowband Operations in the 769-775/799-805 MHz Bands, 65984-65987 [2016-22978]
Download as PDF
65984
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Proposed Rules
9. On page 50670, second column, the
third line of paragraph (c)(2)(i), the
language, ‘‘provided in paragraphs
(c)(2)(ii) of this’’ is corrected to read
‘‘provided in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of
this’’.
■ 10. On page 50671, first column, the
fifth line of paragraph (g), the language,
‘‘31, 2003, except that paragraphs (a)(2)’’
is corrected to read ‘‘31, 2003, except
that paragraphs (a)(2),’’.
■
Martin V. Franks,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2016–22938 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[PS Docket No. 13–87; PS Docket No. 06–
229, WT Docket No. 96–86, RM–11433 and
RM–11577, FCC 16–111]
Service Rules Governing Narrowband
Operations in the 769–775/799–805
MHz Bands
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) seeks comment on
proposals to amend the Commission’s
rules to promote spectrum efficiency,
interoperability, and flexibility in 700
MHz public safety narrowband
operations (769–775/799–805 MHz). By
this action, the Commission affords
interested parties an opportunity to
submit comments on these proposed
rule changes.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
October 26, 2016 and reply comments
are due on or before November 10, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Evanoff, Policy and Licensing Division,
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau, (202) 418–0848 or
john.evanoff@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(FNPRM) in PS Docket No. 13–87, FCC
16–111, released on August 22, 2016.
The document is available for download
at https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/.
The complete text of this document is
also available for inspection and
copying during normal business hours
in the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an email to
FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY).
In this FNPRM, the Commission seeks
comment on a proposal to facilitate the
use of Vehicular Repeater Systems
(VRS) on 700 MHz narrowband General
Use and State License channels. In
particular, it seeks comment on whether
to amend the 700 MHz narrowband
trunking rule and asks for comment on
additional rule changes that may be
necessary to accommodate vehicular
repeater systems’ operation on 700 MHz
narrowband channels.
This FNPRM also seeks comment on
the Department of Homeland Security’s
(DHS) Project 25 Compliance
Assessment Advisory Council (P25 CAP
AP) list of 15 recommended feature sets
and capabilities to facilitate
interoperable communications between
radios when operating in the
conventional mode of P25 using the
Common Air Interface (CAI) on the
designated 700 MHz interoperability
channels. The Commission seeks
comment on whether to adopt all, some,
or none, of the additional feature sets
and capabilities recommended.
This FNPRM also seeks comment on
a recommendation by Motorola
Solutions, Inc. (Motorola) to clarify
Sections 90.547 and 90.548 of the
Commission’s rules that require that 700
MHz radios must be capable of being
programmed to operate on the
designated interoperability channels.
Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419
of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR
1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS). See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://fjall
foss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
Interested parties may view
documents filed in this proceeding on
the Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS) using the
following steps: (1) Access ECFS at
https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. (2) In the
introductory screen, click on ‘‘Search
for Filed Comments.’’ (3) In the
‘‘Proceeding’’ box, enter the numerals in
the docket number. (4) Click on the box
marked ‘‘Retrieve Document List.’’ A
link to each document is provided in
the document list. The public may
inspect and copy filings and comments
during regular business hours at the
FCC Reference Information Center, 445
12th Street SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The public may
also download this FNPRM from the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.fcc.gov/.
This proceeding shall be treated as a
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. Persons making ex parte
presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with 47 CFR
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Proposed Rules
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
47 CFR 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
ensure that radios operating in the
conventional mode on the designated
700 MHz narrowband interoperability
channels are in fact interoperable across
vendors. Adopting such a list would
promote certainty for public safety and
manufacturers as well as promote
competition in the public safety
equipment market. We also seek
comment on whether the Commission
should instead informally encourage the
agencies, funders and manufacturers to
adopt voluntary best practices directed
to improving interoperability, both
technically and operationally.
Procedural Matters
C. Legal Basis
The legal basis for any action that may
be taken pursuant to this FNPRM is
contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 303, 316,
332, and 337 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 1,
154(i), 303, 316, 332, and 337.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(‘‘RFA’’), the Commission has prepared
this Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (‘‘IRFA’’) of the possible
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities that
might result from adoption of the rules
proposed in the FNPRM. Written public
comments are requested on this IRFA.
Comments must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and must be filed
by the applicable deadlines for initial
comments, or reply comments, as
specified in the FNPRM.
B. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
In the FNPRM, we seek comment on
whether to amend the Commission’s
rules governing 700 MHz public safety
narrowband spectrum at 769–775 MHz
and 799–805 MHz. The rule changes we
seek comment on are intended to
promote flexible and efficient use of
public safety narrowband spectrum in
the 700 MHz band while reducing the
regulatory burdens on licensees
wherever possible. In order to achieve
these objectives, we seek comment in
the FNPRM on exempting low power
vehicular repeater systems from the
narrowband trunking requirements.
Exempting low power vehicular
repeaters systems from the trunking
requirements would facilitate rapid
deployment of low power vehicular
repeater systems as well as reduce
burdens on public safety entities. We
seek comment on whether to clarify the
rules concerning the requirement that
700 MHz radios be capable of being
programmed to operate on the
designated interoperability channels.
Clarification would provide greater
certainty to equipment manufacturers
on the required performance of their
equipment. We also seek comment on
whether to adopt a list of recommended
feature sets and capabilities in order to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
D. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules Will Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide
a description of and, where feasible, an
estimate of the number of small entities
that may be affected by the proposed
rules. The RFA generally defines the
term ‘‘small entity’’ as having the same
meaning as the terms ‘‘small business,’’
‘‘small organization,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction.’’ In addition,
the term ‘‘small business’’ has the same
meaning as the term ‘‘small business
concern’’ under the Small Business Act.
A small business concern is one which:
(1) Is independently owned and
operated; (2) is not dominant in its field
of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
Public Safety Radio Licensees. As a
general matter, Public Safety Radio
licensees include police, fire, local
government, forestry conservation,
highway maintenance, and emergency
medical services. For the purpose of
determining whether a Public Safety
Radio licensee is a small business as
defined by the SBA, we use the broad
census category, Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite).
The Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except satellite) industry
comprises establishments engaged in
operating and maintaining switching
and transmission facilities to provide
communications via the airwaves.
Establishments in this industry have
spectrum licenses and provide services
using that spectrum, such as cellular
phone services, paging services,
wireless Internet access, and wireless
video services. The appropriate size
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65985
standard under SBA rules for the
category Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except satellite) is that a
business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. Census data for 2007 show
that there were 1,383 firms that operated
for the entire year. Of this total, 1,368
firms had employment of fewer than
1000 employees. Thus under this
category and the associated small
business size standard, the Commission
estimates that the majority of wireless
telecommunications carriers (except
satellite) are small.
The Commission does not require
Public Safety Radio licensees to disclose
information about number of
employees, so the Commission does not
have information that could be used to
determine how many Public Safety
Radio licensees constitute small entities
under this definition.
Radio and Television Broadcasting
and Wireless Communications
Equipment Manufacturing. The U.S.
Census defines this industry as
comprising ‘‘establishments primarily
engaged in manufacturing radio and
television broadcast and wireless
communications equipment. Examples
of products made by the establishments
are: Transmitting and receiving
antennas, cable television equipment,
GPS equipment, pagers, cellular phones,
mobile communications equipment, and
radio and television studio and
broadcasting equipment. The SBA has
established a size standard for this
industry which classifies any businesses
in this industry as small if it has 750 or
fewer employees. Census data for 2007
indicate that 939 such businesses
operated in that year. Of that number,
912 businesses operated with fewer than
500 employees. Based on this data, we
conclude that a majority of businesses
in this industry are small by the SBA
standard.
E. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
No rule proposed in the FNPRM will
entail additional reporting,
recordkeeping, and/or third-party
consultation or other compliance
requirement.
F. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant, specifically
small business alternatives that it has
considered in reaching its proposed
approach, which may include the
following four alternatives (among
others): ‘‘(1) the establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
65986
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Proposed Rules
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) and exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.’’
The FNPRM seeks comment on a
proposed change to the rules covering
operation of public safety systems on
narrowband spectrum in the 700 MHz
band. Specifically, the FNPRM seeks
comment on whether the proposed rule
changes to section 90.537 of the
Commission’s rules will promote
efficient use of public safety
narrowband spectrum in the band while
reducing economic burdens on
licensees. For the 700 MHz General Use
and State License channels, section
90.537 provides that ‘‘[a]ll systems
using six or more narrowband channels
in the 769–775 MHz and 799–805 MHz
frequency bands must be trunked
systems, except for those described in
paragraph (b) of this section.’’ In order
to strike the proper balance between
these two objectives, the FNPRM seeks
comment, inter alia, on exempting low
power vehicular repeaters from the 700
MHz narrowband trunking
requirements. The FNPRM also seeks
comment on maximizing
interoperability by adopting a list of
feature sets and capabilities in radios
designed to operate in the conventional
mode on the designated 700 MHz
narrowband interoperability channels.
Currently, the Commission’s rules do
not specify feature sets or capabilities
that will promote interoperability across
vendors and between users. Thus, we
seek comment on whether it would be
beneficial to incorporate into our rule
specific feature sets and capabilities for
radios designed to operate on the 700
MHz narrowband interoperability
channels.
G. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
None.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
H. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Analysis
This document does not contain
proposed information collection(s)
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13. In
addition, therefore, it does not contain
any new or modified information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees,
pursuant to the Small Business
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
*
Ordering Clauses
Accordingly, It is ordered that,
pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 303, 316,
332, 337, and 405 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 303,
316, 332, 337, 405, this Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking is hereby
adopted.
It is further ordered that pursuant to
applicable procedures set forth in
§§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission’s
rules, 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties
may file comments on the NPRM on or
before October 26, 2016, and reply
comments on or before November 10,
2016.
it is further ordered, that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, including the the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 90
Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 90 as follows:
PART 90—PRIVATE LAND MOBILE
RADIO SERVICE
1. The authority citation for part 90
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sections 4(i), 11, 303(g), 303(r),
and 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161,
303(g), 303(r), and 332(c)(7), and Title VI of
the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation
Act of 2012, Pub. L. 112–96, 126 Stat. 156.
2. Amend § 90.537 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 90.537
Trunking requirement.
(a) General use and State License
channels. All systems using six or more
narrowband channels in the 769–775
MHz and 799–805 MHz frequency
bands must be trunked systems, except
for low power vehicular repeaters
(MO3) authorized on General Use and
State License channels and those
described in paragraph (b) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 90.548 by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
§ 90.548 Interoperability Technical
Standards.
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
(d) Mobile and portable transceivers
must at a minimum include the
following feature sets and capabilities
while operating in the conventional
mode in order to be validated for
compliance with the Project 25
standards.
(1) A subscriber unit must be capable
of issuing an emergency alarm in a
conventional system conforming to the
following standard: TIA 102.BAAD–A
Conventional Procedures, Section 4.2.2.,
released February 2010.
(2) A subscriber unit must be capable
of setting the emergency bit on all voice
transmissions to notify units operating
on the same channel that the user has
declared an emergency situation
conforming to the following standard:
Project 25 Statement of Requirements,
Section 2.1.2.25.1., released December
11, 2013.
(3) A subscriber unit must conform to
the unit and accessory mil-spec
requirements in accordance with the
following standard: Project 25 Statement
of Requirements, Sections 1.3.3 through
1.3.3.5., released December 11, 2013.
(4) A subscriber unit must be capable
of issuing group calls in a conventional
system in conformance with the
following standard: Project 25 Statement
of Requirements, Section 2.1.2.1.,
released December 11, 2013.
(5) A subscriber unit must be capable
of issuing private calls in a conventional
system in conformance with the
following standard: Project 25 Statement
of Requirements, Section 2.1.2.3.,
released December 11, 2013.
(6) The three Project 25 standard
squelch modes must be supported in
conformance with the following
standard: Project 25 Statement of
Requirements, Section 2.1.2.30, as
effective on December 11, 2013.
(7) A subscriber unit must properly
implement the special ‘‘Reserved’’
conventional network access code
(NAC) and talkgroup in conformance
with the following standard: TIA TSB–
102.CABA, released October 2010.
(8) A subscriber unit must include
‘‘No Call’’ Talk Group ($0000) and ‘‘All
Call’’ Talk Group ($FFFF) in
conformance with the following
standard: Project 25 Statement of
Requirements, Section 2.1.2.34.,
released December 11, 2013.
(9) A subscriber unit must be able to
transmit and receive the appropriate
status symbols to indicate that a channel
is busy in both direct and repeater mode
in conformance with the following
standard: TIA TSB–102.CABA, released
October 2010.
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(10) A subscriber units must be
compatible with C4FM and CQPSK
Modulation in conformance with the
following standard: TIA TSB–
102.CABA, released December 11, 2013.
(11) A fixed conventional repeater
must be able to repeat the correct/
matching network access code (NAC) for
all subscriber call types (clear and
encrypted) using the same output NAC
in conformance with the following
standard: TIA TSB–102.CABA, released
December 11, 2013.
(12) A fixed conventional repeater
must be able to repeat the correct/
matching network access code (NAC) for
all subscriber call types (clear and
encrypted) using a different output NAC
in conformance with the following
standard: TIA TSB–102.CABA, released
December 11, 2013.
(13) A fixed conventional repeater
must be able to reject (no repeat) all
input transmissions with incorrect
network access code (NAC) in
conformance with the following
standard; TIA TSB–102.CABA, released
December 11, 2013.
(14) A fixed conventional repeater
must be able to support the correct
status symbol indicating when an input
channel is busy in conformance with
the following standard: TIA TSB–
102.CABA, released December 11, 2013.
(15) A fixed conventional repeater
must be able to support the correct
implementation of special reserved
network access code (NAC) values $293,
$F7E, and $F7F in conformance with
the following standard: TIA TSB–
102.CABA, released December 11, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2016–22978 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
49 CFR Parts 1201, 1242
[Docket No. EP 681]
Class I Railroad Accounting and
Financial Reporting—Transportation of
Hazardous Materials
Surface Transportation Board.
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking, withdrawal.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Surface Transportation
Board is withdrawing the advance
notice of proposed rulemaking and
discontinuing the EP 681 rulemaking
proceeding which sought comment on
whether and how it should update its
accounting and financial reporting for
Class I rail carriers to better capture the
operating costs of transporting
hazardous materials.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:13 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
The advance notice of proposed
rulemaking published on January 5,
2009 (74 FR 248) is withdrawn and the
rulemaking proceeding is discontinued
on September 22, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Davis at (202) 245–0378.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 5, 2009, in the above titled
docket, the Board issued an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR)
seeking public comment on whether
and how it should update its accounting
and financial reporting for Class I rail
carriers and refine its Uniform Railroad
Costing System (URCS) to better capture
the operating costs of transporting
hazardous materials. For the reasons
stated below, we will discontinue this
proceeding.
The Board uses URCS to determine a
carrier’s variable costs in a variety of
regulatory proceedings. The URCS
model determines, for each Class I
railroad, what portion of each category
of costs shown in that carrier’s Annual
Report to the Board (STB Form R–1)
represents its system-average variable
cost for that year, expressed as a unit
cost. In the ANPR, the Board noted that
there may be unique operating costs
associated with the transportation of
hazardous materials that URCS does not
attribute to those movements. As an
example, the Board suggested that the
transportation of hazardous materials
may require carriers to pay high
insurance premiums, which would be
spread across all traffic of the railroad
rather than being attributed specifically
to the transportation of the hazardous
materials. Additionally, the Board noted
that the Uniform System of Accounts
(USOA)—the accounting standards
which Class I carriers must use to
prepare the financial statements that
they submit to the Board—does not
include a separate classification for
hazardous material operations that
would allow for an accounting of the
assets used and costs incurred in
providing such service.
The Board therefore sought comment
on ‘‘whether and how it should improve
its informational tools to better identify
and attribute the costs of hazardousmaterial transportation movements,’’
including any revisions to the USOA
and improvements to the analytic
capabilities of URCS. ANPR, slip op. at
2. The Board specifically sought
comment on several items, including
how hazardous material operations and
expenses could be reported in a
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65987
subschedule of the annual R–1 reports,
a specific definition of what should
constitute a movement of hazardous
material for this purpose, whether that
definition should be limited to
movements of ‘‘Toxic Inhalation
Hazards’’ or not, and the best operating
statistic (such as car-miles, revenue tonmiles, or revenue tons of hazardous
materials movements) for URCS to use
to allocate specified hazardous material
costs to individual movements. In
response to the ANPR, the Board
received comments from multiple
stakeholders, as discussed below.1
DOT agrees that ‘‘additional data
should be reported to [USOA] in order
to identify and quantify these
[hazardous material] costs, and that
URCS should attribute these costs to
hazmat traffic alone rather than to the
entirety of a carrier’s business.’’ (DOT
Comment 2.)
AAR, BNSF, CP, and UP generally
agree with the Board’s stated goals in
this proceeding. (AAR Comment 2;
BNSF Comment 2, CP Comment 7, 9; UP
Comment 7.) However, they also argue
that changes to URCS would not
sufficiently address the railroad
industry’s concerns with transporting
hazardous material. BNSF and NSR
underscore the risk of liability from a
catastrophic accident (BNSF Comment
2; NSR Comment 2–3), while UP
stresses the importance of fairly
apportioning risk across all participants
in the supply chain (UP Comment 2).
The railroads argue that, even if the
Board were to change URCS, they
should also be allowed to present the
unique costs of transporting hazardous
materials in rate proceedings involving
hazardous materials. (See AAR
Comment 2; CP Comment 3–4, 9; NSR
Comment 3; UP Comment 8–9.)
ACC, AECC, and Diversified CPC
argue that the Board should not limit a
review of URCS by any single issue or
commodity, but should instead conduct
a broader review of URCS. (ACC
Comment 2; AECC Comment 2;
Diversified CPC Comment 8.) ACC also
argues that the proposed rulemaking
would be arbitrary and ill-advised
because, while some railroads have
faced one-time costs from settlements of
claims, the railroads have reported few
1 The Board received comments from: The
American Chemistry Council, the Chlorine
Institute, The Fertilizer Institute, and the Edison
Electric Institute (collectively, ACC); Arkansas
Electric Cooperative Corporation (AECC); the
Association of American Railroads (AAR); BNSF
Railway Company (BNSF); Canadian Pacific
Railway Company (CP); Diversified CPC
International, Inc. (Diversified CPC); Norfolk
Southern Railway Company (NSR); Union Pacific
Railroad Company (UP); and the U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65984-65987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22978]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[PS Docket No. 13-87; PS Docket No. 06-229, WT Docket No. 96-86, RM-
11433 and RM-11577, FCC 16-111]
Service Rules Governing Narrowband Operations in the 769-775/799-
805 MHz Bands
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission
(Commission) seeks comment on proposals to amend the Commission's rules
to promote spectrum efficiency, interoperability, and flexibility in
700 MHz public safety narrowband operations (769-775/799-805 MHz). By
this action, the Commission affords interested parties an opportunity
to submit comments on these proposed rule changes.
DATES: Comments are due on or before October 26, 2016 and reply
comments are due on or before November 10, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Evanoff, Policy and Licensing
Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0848 or
john.evanoff@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) in PS Docket No. 13-87,
FCC 16-111, released on August 22, 2016. The document is available for
download at https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/. The complete text
of this document is also available for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals
II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. To request
materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille,
large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to
FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at
202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY).
In this FNPRM, the Commission seeks comment on a proposal to
facilitate the use of Vehicular Repeater Systems (VRS) on 700 MHz
narrowband General Use and State License channels. In particular, it
seeks comment on whether to amend the 700 MHz narrowband trunking rule
and asks for comment on additional rule changes that may be necessary
to accommodate vehicular repeater systems' operation on 700 MHz
narrowband channels.
This FNPRM also seeks comment on the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS) Project 25 Compliance Assessment Advisory Council (P25
CAP AP) list of 15 recommended feature sets and capabilities to
facilitate interoperable communications between radios when operating
in the conventional mode of P25 using the Common Air Interface (CAI) on
the designated 700 MHz interoperability channels. The Commission seeks
comment on whether to adopt all, some, or none, of the additional
feature sets and capabilities recommended.
This FNPRM also seeks comment on a recommendation by Motorola
Solutions, Inc. (Motorola) to clarify Sections 90.547 and 90.548 of the
Commission's rules that require that 700 MHz radios must be capable of
being programmed to operate on the designated interoperability
channels.
Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47
CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply
comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this
document. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS). See Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket
or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,
Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or
call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530
(voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).
Interested parties may view documents filed in this proceeding on
the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) using the
following steps: (1) Access ECFS at https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. (2) In
the introductory screen, click on ``Search for Filed Comments.'' (3) In
the ``Proceeding'' box, enter the numerals in the docket number. (4)
Click on the box marked ``Retrieve Document List.'' A link to each
document is provided in the document list. The public may inspect and
copy filings and comments during regular business hours at the FCC
Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The public may also download this FNPRM from the
Commission's Web site at https://www.fcc.gov/.
This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose''
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons
making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within
two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex
parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise
participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was
made, and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during
the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of
the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the
presenter's written comments, memoranda or other filings in the
proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings
(specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data
or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex
parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must
be filed consistent with 47 CFR
[[Page 65985]]
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by 47 CFR 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and
must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt,
searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
Procedural Matters
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(``RFA''), the Commission has prepared this Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') of the possible significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities that might result from
adoption of the rules proposed in the FNPRM. Written public comments
are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to
the IRFA and must be filed by the applicable deadlines for initial
comments, or reply comments, as specified in the FNPRM.
B. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
In the FNPRM, we seek comment on whether to amend the Commission's
rules governing 700 MHz public safety narrowband spectrum at 769-775
MHz and 799-805 MHz. The rule changes we seek comment on are intended
to promote flexible and efficient use of public safety narrowband
spectrum in the 700 MHz band while reducing the regulatory burdens on
licensees wherever possible. In order to achieve these objectives, we
seek comment in the FNPRM on exempting low power vehicular repeater
systems from the narrowband trunking requirements. Exempting low power
vehicular repeaters systems from the trunking requirements would
facilitate rapid deployment of low power vehicular repeater systems as
well as reduce burdens on public safety entities. We seek comment on
whether to clarify the rules concerning the requirement that 700 MHz
radios be capable of being programmed to operate on the designated
interoperability channels. Clarification would provide greater
certainty to equipment manufacturers on the required performance of
their equipment. We also seek comment on whether to adopt a list of
recommended feature sets and capabilities in order to ensure that
radios operating in the conventional mode on the designated 700 MHz
narrowband interoperability channels are in fact interoperable across
vendors. Adopting such a list would promote certainty for public safety
and manufacturers as well as promote competition in the public safety
equipment market. We also seek comment on whether the Commission should
instead informally encourage the agencies, funders and manufacturers to
adopt voluntary best practices directed to improving interoperability,
both technically and operationally.
C. Legal Basis
The legal basis for any action that may be taken pursuant to this
FNPRM is contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 303, 316, 332, and 337 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 1, 154(i), 303, 316,
332, and 337.
D. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which
the Proposed Rules Will Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules. The RFA generally defines the term
``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small
business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental
jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same
meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business
Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned
and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3)
satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
Public Safety Radio Licensees. As a general matter, Public Safety
Radio licensees include police, fire, local government, forestry
conservation, highway maintenance, and emergency medical services. For
the purpose of determining whether a Public Safety Radio licensee is a
small business as defined by the SBA, we use the broad census category,
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite).
The Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except satellite)
industry comprises establishments engaged in operating and maintaining
switching and transmission facilities to provide communications via the
airwaves. Establishments in this industry have spectrum licenses and
provide services using that spectrum, such as cellular phone services,
paging services, wireless Internet access, and wireless video services.
The appropriate size standard under SBA rules for the category Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except satellite) is that a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. Census data for 2007 show
that there were 1,383 firms that operated for the entire year. Of this
total, 1,368 firms had employment of fewer than 1000 employees. Thus
under this category and the associated small business size standard,
the Commission estimates that the majority of wireless
telecommunications carriers (except satellite) are small.
The Commission does not require Public Safety Radio licensees to
disclose information about number of employees, so the Commission does
not have information that could be used to determine how many Public
Safety Radio licensees constitute small entities under this definition.
Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications
Equipment Manufacturing. The U.S. Census defines this industry as
comprising ``establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing radio
and television broadcast and wireless communications equipment.
Examples of products made by the establishments are: Transmitting and
receiving antennas, cable television equipment, GPS equipment, pagers,
cellular phones, mobile communications equipment, and radio and
television studio and broadcasting equipment. The SBA has established a
size standard for this industry which classifies any businesses in this
industry as small if it has 750 or fewer employees. Census data for
2007 indicate that 939 such businesses operated in that year. Of that
number, 912 businesses operated with fewer than 500 employees. Based on
this data, we conclude that a majority of businesses in this industry
are small by the SBA standard.
E. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements
No rule proposed in the FNPRM will entail additional reporting,
recordkeeping, and/or third-party consultation or other compliance
requirement.
F. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant,
specifically small business alternatives that it has considered in
reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four
alternatives (among others): ``(1) the establishment of differing
compliance or reporting
[[Page 65986]]
requirements or timetables that take into account the resources
available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or
simplification of compliance or reporting requirements under the rule
for small entities; (3) the use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) and exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for small entities.''
The FNPRM seeks comment on a proposed change to the rules covering
operation of public safety systems on narrowband spectrum in the 700
MHz band. Specifically, the FNPRM seeks comment on whether the proposed
rule changes to section 90.537 of the Commission's rules will promote
efficient use of public safety narrowband spectrum in the band while
reducing economic burdens on licensees. For the 700 MHz General Use and
State License channels, section 90.537 provides that ``[a]ll systems
using six or more narrowband channels in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805
MHz frequency bands must be trunked systems, except for those described
in paragraph (b) of this section.'' In order to strike the proper
balance between these two objectives, the FNPRM seeks comment, inter
alia, on exempting low power vehicular repeaters from the 700 MHz
narrowband trunking requirements. The FNPRM also seeks comment on
maximizing interoperability by adopting a list of feature sets and
capabilities in radios designed to operate in the conventional mode on
the designated 700 MHz narrowband interoperability channels. Currently,
the Commission's rules do not specify feature sets or capabilities that
will promote interoperability across vendors and between users. Thus,
we seek comment on whether it would be beneficial to incorporate into
our rule specific feature sets and capabilities for radios designed to
operate on the 700 MHz narrowband interoperability channels.
G. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rules
None.
H. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
This document does not contain proposed information collection(s)
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-
13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified
information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act
of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Ordering Clauses
Accordingly, It is ordered that, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 303,
316, 332, 337, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 303, 316, 332, 337, 405, this Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking is hereby adopted.
It is further ordered that pursuant to applicable procedures set
forth in Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 1.415
and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the NPRM on or
before October 26, 2016, and reply comments on or before November 10,
2016.
it is further ordered, that the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a
copy of this Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 90
Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 90 as follows:
PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICE
0
1. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 4(i), 11, 303(g), 303(r), and 332(c)(7) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161,
303(g), 303(r), and 332(c)(7), and Title VI of the Middle Class Tax
Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. 112-96, 126 Stat. 156.
0
2. Amend Sec. 90.537 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 90.537 Trunking requirement.
(a) General use and State License channels. All systems using six
or more narrowband channels in the 769-775 MHz and 799-805 MHz
frequency bands must be trunked systems, except for low power vehicular
repeaters (MO3) authorized on General Use and State License channels
and those described in paragraph (b) of this section.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 90.548 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 90.548 Interoperability Technical Standards.
* * * * *
(d) Mobile and portable transceivers must at a minimum include the
following feature sets and capabilities while operating in the
conventional mode in order to be validated for compliance with the
Project 25 standards.
(1) A subscriber unit must be capable of issuing an emergency alarm
in a conventional system conforming to the following standard: TIA
102.BAAD-A Conventional Procedures, Section 4.2.2., released February
2010.
(2) A subscriber unit must be capable of setting the emergency bit
on all voice transmissions to notify units operating on the same
channel that the user has declared an emergency situation conforming to
the following standard: Project 25 Statement of Requirements, Section
2.1.2.25.1., released December 11, 2013.
(3) A subscriber unit must conform to the unit and accessory mil-
spec requirements in accordance with the following standard: Project 25
Statement of Requirements, Sections 1.3.3 through 1.3.3.5., released
December 11, 2013.
(4) A subscriber unit must be capable of issuing group calls in a
conventional system in conformance with the following standard: Project
25 Statement of Requirements, Section 2.1.2.1., released December 11,
2013.
(5) A subscriber unit must be capable of issuing private calls in a
conventional system in conformance with the following standard: Project
25 Statement of Requirements, Section 2.1.2.3., released December 11,
2013.
(6) The three Project 25 standard squelch modes must be supported
in conformance with the following standard: Project 25 Statement of
Requirements, Section 2.1.2.30, as effective on December 11, 2013.
(7) A subscriber unit must properly implement the special
``Reserved'' conventional network access code (NAC) and talkgroup in
conformance with the following standard: TIA TSB-102.CABA, released
October 2010.
(8) A subscriber unit must include ``No Call'' Talk Group ($0000)
and ``All Call'' Talk Group ($FFFF) in conformance with the following
standard: Project 25 Statement of Requirements, Section 2.1.2.34.,
released December 11, 2013.
(9) A subscriber unit must be able to transmit and receive the
appropriate status symbols to indicate that a channel is busy in both
direct and repeater mode in conformance with the following standard:
TIA TSB-102.CABA, released October 2010.
[[Page 65987]]
(10) A subscriber units must be compatible with C4FM and CQPSK
Modulation in conformance with the following standard: TIA TSB-
102.CABA, released December 11, 2013.
(11) A fixed conventional repeater must be able to repeat the
correct/matching network access code (NAC) for all subscriber call
types (clear and encrypted) using the same output NAC in conformance
with the following standard: TIA TSB-102.CABA, released December 11,
2013.
(12) A fixed conventional repeater must be able to repeat the
correct/matching network access code (NAC) for all subscriber call
types (clear and encrypted) using a different output NAC in conformance
with the following standard: TIA TSB-102.CABA, released December 11,
2013.
(13) A fixed conventional repeater must be able to reject (no
repeat) all input transmissions with incorrect network access code
(NAC) in conformance with the following standard; TIA TSB-102.CABA,
released December 11, 2013.
(14) A fixed conventional repeater must be able to support the
correct status symbol indicating when an input channel is busy in
conformance with the following standard: TIA TSB-102.CABA, released
December 11, 2013.
(15) A fixed conventional repeater must be able to support the
correct implementation of special reserved network access code (NAC)
values $293, $F7E, and $F7F in conformance with the following standard:
TIA TSB-102.CABA, released December 11, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2016-22978 Filed 9-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P