Sale and Disposal of National Forest System Timber; Forest Products for Traditional and Cultural Purposes, 65891-65897 [2016-22929]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: September 20, 2016.
J.L. Adams,
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard,
Acting Captain of the Port, Memphis,
Tennessee.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2016–23122 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 223
RIN 0596–AD00
Sale and Disposal of National Forest
System Timber; Forest Products for
Traditional and Cultural Purposes
Forest Service, USDA.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The USDA Forest Service is
implementing regulations under the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008 (hereinafter the ‘‘2008 Farm Bill’’).
This rule provides for the provision of
trees, portions of trees, or forest
products from National Forest System
lands, free of charge, to federally
recognized Indian tribes (Indian tribes)
for traditional and cultural purposes.
This rule implements section 8105 of
the 2008 Farm Bill.
DATES: This rule is effective October 26,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Information on this final
rule may be obtained via written request
addressed to Director, Forest
Management Staff, USDA Forest
Service, Mail Stop 1103, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250 or by email to
FarmBillForestProductsRule@fs.fed.us.
The public may inspect comments
previously received at the Office of the
Director, Forest Management Staff,
Sidney Yates Building, Third Floor SW
Wing, 201 14th Street SW., Washington,
DC or via the world wide web/Internet
at https://www.fs.fed.us/
forestmanagement/traditional_cultural/
index.shtml. Visitors are encouraged to
call ahead to 202–205–1766 to facilitate
entry to the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Reddan, Assistant Director, Forest
Products, 202–557–6591 or Sharon
Nygaard-Scott, Forest Service, Forest
Management Staff, 202–205–1766,
during normal business hours.
Individuals who use telecommunication
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8
a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time,
Monday through Friday.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
I. Background
The Forest Service is issuing this final
rule to implement section 8105 of the
2008 Farm Bill (section 8105). Section
8105 has also been codified in Title 25
of the U.S. Code, chapter 32A—Cultural
and Heritage Cooperation Authority (25
U.S.C. 3055—Forest Products for
Traditional and Cultural Purposes).
Subject to certain statutory limitations,
section 8105 allows the Secretary of
Agriculture to provide Indian tribes
with trees, portions of trees, or forest
products for traditional and cultural
purposes. In this preamble to the final
rule, the term ‘‘forest products’’ is used
as a shorthand for ‘‘trees, portions of
trees, or forest products’’. Specifically,
section 8105(a) provides that the
Secretary may provide free of charge to
Indian tribes any trees, portions of trees,
or forest products from National Forest
System land for traditional and cultural
purposes.
However, pursuant to section 8105(b),
Indian tribes are prohibited from using
any trees, portions of trees, or forest
products provided under section
8105(a) for commercial purposes. While
the 2008 Farm Bill does not define
commercial purposes, it does define
Indian tribe and traditional and cultural
purpose. Section 8102(5) defines Indian
tribe as any Indian or Alaska Native
tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or
other community the name of which is
included on a list published by the
Secretary of the Interior pursuant to
section 104 of the Federally Recognized
Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C.
479a–1). In addition, per section
8102(9), traditional and cultural
purpose, with respect to a definable use,
area, or practice, means that the use,
area, or practice is identified by an
Indian tribe as traditional or cultural
because of the long-established
significance or ceremonial nature of the
use, area, or practice to the Indian tribe.
On December 2, 2009, the Forest
Service published an Interim Directive
(ID) to the Forest Service Handbook
(FSH) 2409.18 to implement section
8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill. The ID was
reissued, without change, four times
(effective March 8, 2011 (ID 2409.18–
2011–1), June 7, 2012 (ID 2409.18–
2012–2), December 6, 2013 (ID 2409.18–
2013–3), and May 14, 2015 (ID 2409.18–
2015–1), and remains in effect until
November 14, 2016. This final rule will
replace the Interim Directive, which
will be entered in FSH 2409.18, chapter
80, section 82.5.
The proposed rule was published in
the Federal Register on July 31, 2014
(79 FR 44327), and a comment period
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65891
ensued over a period of 60 days. The
Forest Service received 12 written
comments through 10 letters, and all
were considered in the development of
this final rule.
This rule establishes Forest Service
policy for providing Indian tribes with
trees, portions of trees, or forest
products for traditional and cultural
purposes. Based on the comments
received on the ID during formal
government-to-government
consultation, and those received during
the proposed rulemaking, as well as the
Agency’s experience using the ID to
implement section 8105 over the last 7
years, the Agency is now publishing this
final rule.
This final rule adds § 223.15 to 36
CFR part 223, subpart A. Section
223.15(a) authorizes Regional Foresters
or designated Forest Officers to provide
trees, portions of trees, or forest
products to Indian tribes free of charge
for traditional and cultural purposes.
Section 223.15(b) restates the 2008 Farm
Bill’s statutory definitions of ‘‘Indian
tribe’’ and ‘‘traditional and cultural
purpose,’’ and includes the Forest
Services’ regulatory definition of ‘‘tribal
officials.’’
Sections 223.15(c) and (d) describe
who can request trees, portions of trees,
or forest products for traditional and
cultural purposes, and where those
requests should be directed. Tribal
officials should submit requests for
trees, portions of trees, or forest
products to their local Forest Service
District Ranger’s office for routing to the
appropriate designated authority. In
addition, tribal officials are encouraged
to explain their requests to the Regional
Forester or designated Forest Officer,
and if necessary, how the request fits a
traditional and cultural purpose.
A designated Forest Officer is an
individual whom the Regional Forester
has granted written authority to provide
products under § 223.15. Currently,
there is no limitation on the number of
requests or authorizations per unit of a
forest product or the number of requests
or authorizations per Indian tribe. There
is currently no limitation on the amount
of trees, portions of trees, or forest
products that can be requested at any
one time. However, Forest Officers
cannot grant materials in excess of the
value limitations at § 223.15(e) in any
given fiscal year.
Section 223.15(f) explains that the
Forest Service may condition or deny
requests for trees, portions of trees, or
forest products under § 223.15. Finally,
§ 223.15(g) provides that all decisions
made under § 223.15 must comply with
the National Forest Management Act,
relevant land management plans, the
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
65892
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
National Environmental Policy Act, the
Endangered Species Act, and all other
applicable laws and regulations, and are
subject to tribal treaty and other
reserved rights and the savings
provisions of the Cultural and Heritage
Cooperation Authority (25 U.S.C.
8107(b)). The Forest Service will do its
best to process requests received in a
reasonable period of time, in light of
these statutory and regulatory
requirements.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
II. Formal Government-to-Government
Consultation
After issuance of the December 2,
2009, Interim Directive (ID 2409.18–
2009–2), the Forest Service formally
entered into consultation with Indian
tribes, with the Regional Foresters
extending invitations to Indian tribes by
May 1, 2010. This consultation was
conducted under Executive Order (EO)
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments. Indian
tribes were provided the ID to FSH
2409.18, and were invited to consult on
proposed changes to 36 CFR part 223.
Government-to-government consultation
occurred over a period of at least 120
days, through September 1, 2010.
Regional Foresters were directed to
invite all federally recognized Indian
tribes in their Region to consult. In
addition, they were directed to invite
any federally recognized Indian tribes
who have expressed a historical
connection to National Forest System
lands in their Region, even if they no
longer reside there. To make the
consultation more effective, the Forest
Service provided Indian tribes with a
question and answer document
describing the Interim Directive and
Forest Services’ intent to implement
section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill
through proposed changes to 36 CFR
part 223. Recommendations from the
Indian tribes have been incorporated, as
appropriate, into this final rule.
III. Summary of Comments and
Responses
The Forest Service received 12
comments in response to the proposed
rule, several of which were similar in
scope and nature. A summary of the
comments and the Agency’s responses
and actions taken to the comments
follow.
Savings Provisions comment: Three
commenters expressed concern that the
proposed rule did not incorporate the
savings provisions at 25 U.S.C. 3057(b),
which protect existing tribal treaty and
other reserved rights, as well as
agreements between the Forest Service
and an Indian tribe. Section 8105 has
been codified in 25 U.S.C. 3055—Forest
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
Products for Traditional and Cultural
Purposes. The savings provisions at 25
U.S.C. 3057(b) apply to forest products
for traditional and cultural purposes.
These savings provisions state that:
Nothing in the chapter—
(1) diminishes or expands the trust
responsibility of the United States to
Indian tribes, or any legal obligation or
remedy resulting from that
responsibility;
(2) alters, abridges, repeals, or affects
any valid agreement between the Forest
Service and an Indian tribe;
(3) alters, abridges, diminishes,
repeals, or affects any reserved or other
right of an Indian tribe; or
(4) alters, abridges, diminishes,
repeals, or affects any other valid
existing right relating to National Forest
System land or other public land.
Savings Provisions response: The
Forest Service has revised § 223.15(g) of
the final rule to incorporate the savings
provisions codified at 25 U.S.C. 3057(b).
The revised § 223.15(g) states: All
decisions made under this section must
comply with the National Forest
Management Act, relevant land
management plans, the National
Environmental Policy Act, the
Endangered Species Act, all other
applicable laws and regulations, and are
subject to tribal treaty and other
reserved rights and the savings
provisions of the Cultural and Heritage
Cooperation Authority (25 U.S.C.
3057(b)).
Additionally, the authority citation
under part 223 now includes references
to both 25 U.S.C. 3055 and 3057.
Prioritized Use and Access comment:
One commenter proposed that the
collection of forest products for
traditional and cultural purposes be
prioritized over other uses and that
traditional gathering areas be closed to
other uses. The commenter indicated
that frequently the collection of forest
materials occurs immediately preceding
a traditional or religious ceremony and
requested assurance that access to the
traditional resources be prioritized and
allowed, regardless of the situation or
season.
Prioritized Use and Access response:
Authorized timeframes for gathering,
prioritization over other uses and needs,
and access to specific gathering areas
may vary by request. The Forest Service
is responsible for balancing requests
made under section 8105 of the 2008
Farm Bill with other planned, possible,
and mandated uses in accordance with
its mandate to manage the national
forests for multiple uses (16 U.S.C. 528–
531). This rule provides one path for
collection of forest products, but
prioritization of the various uses and
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
purposes of forest products and access
to National Forest System lands are
outside the scope of this rule. Instead,
the Forest Service determines how to
balance competing demands for forest
products and land use when revising or
amending land management plans using
the National Forest System Land
Management Planning process (36 CFR
part 219). The planning process requires
responsible officials to actively engage
stakeholders, the public, and federally
recognized Indian tribes using
collaborative processes where feasible
and appropriate (36 CFR 219.4).
Proposed individual actions and
projects subject to the NEPA
requirements also require opportunities
for public participation and comment
(36 CFR 220.4).
Indian tribes are encouraged to
participate in these processes and to
work with and regularly communicate
to local Forest Service Officials the
location of forest products used for
traditional and cultural purposes. Local
Forest Service Officers will then be
aware of potential gathering areas and
times when planning projects to
mitigate potential conflicting activities
and requests. Information regarding the
locations of resources shared with
Forest Service officials are protected
from sharing by the Prohibition on
Disclosure (25 U.S.C. 3056). Assessment
and determination for priority of use
and access to areas will be made at the
Regional, National Forest, or local
Ranger District levels as appropriate
based on local considerations, land
management plans, needs, and
consultation with local Indian tribes.
This rule does not designate gathering
areas. Section 223.15(f) of the rule
authorizes, however, denials of or the
placing of conditions on requests for
access to gather. The reasons for the
denials or conditions include, but are
not limited to:
(1) Protecting public health and
safety;
(2) Preventing interference with
Forest Service and/or commercial
operations;
(3) Complying with Federal and State
laws and regulations;
(4) Ensuring sustainability; or
(5) Otherwise protecting National
Forest System land and resources.
Adoption of Region 5 Policy as the
National Rule comment: One
commenter represents an Indian Tribe
within the State of California that has
been using the existing Region 5
Traditional Gathering Policy. The
Indian tribe is satisfied with the policy
and has recommended that this policy
be used as a model and applied
nationwide. The policy referenced by
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
the commenter exists as a Regional
Supplement to the Forest Service
Manual (FS Region 5, FSM 1500, ch.
1560, Amendment No: 1500–2007–1)
which sets out direction on traditional
gathering policy within the Region to
promote consistency between Forest
Service and Bureau of Land
Management in collaboration with local
tribal communities.
Adoption of Region 5 Policy as the
National Rule response: Regional Forest
Service and tribal interests, needs, and
agreements may vary by location,
tradition, culture, and practice. Forest
Service Regions have the opportunity to
supplement this rule, consistent with
the policy established herein, for best
use in their area of administration. The
Region 5 policy was developed through
collaboration and interests specific to
parties in the Region 5 area. Forest
Service Region 9 also has a document
for use that includes considerations and
direction for application within FS
Region 9 (Tribal Relations Strategic
Framework for the Eastern Region,
Northeastern Area State & Private
Forestry, and Northern Research
Station—2015). While the sharing of
direction and guidance on this topic is
appropriate between Regions, the
Regions may implement this rule
through supplements that are consistent
with the rule and that meet the
particular needs of a Region based on
applicable laws, tribal treaty or other
reserved rights, the parties involved,
and other local needs. Any new
supplements must be consistent with
the rule. Any existing Regional
supplements or policies should
continue to be implemented in
accordance with § 223.15(g). The Region
5 Traditional Gathering Policy will not
be adopted as Agency-wide direction in
this rule.
Requests by Individuals comment:
One commenter sought clarification as
to whether this rule allows individual
tribal members to request trees, portions
of trees, or forest products for traditional
and cultural purposes, or whether such
requests must be submitted by tribal
officials. Section 8105 of the 2008 Farm
Bill states, ‘‘the Secretary may provide
free of charge to Indian tribes any trees,
portions of trees, or forest products from
National Forest System land for
traditional and cultural purposes.’’
Section 8102 expressly defines the
terms ‘‘Indian’’ and ‘‘Indian Tribe’’
separately. The term ‘‘Indian’’
references an individual member of an
Indian tribe. As defined in section 8102,
the term ‘‘Indian Tribe’’ references a
‘‘tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or
other community’’ which is included on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe
List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a–1).
Requests by Individuals response: For
purposes of this rule, authorization is
limited to government (Forest Service)to-government (Indian tribe), rather than
government-to-individual, provision of
trees, portions of trees, or forest
products. Tribal officials should submit
requests on behalf of the Indian tribe.
Individual members of federally
recognized Indian tribes should
coordinate requests through their tribal
officials. Individual members of
federally recognized Indian tribes may
also use existing provisions at 36 CFR
part 223, subpart A, which authorize
free-use of trees, portions of trees, or
forest products to individuals, subject to
limitations or circumstances as stated in
the regulations.
Scale of detail for requested material
comment: One commenter sought
clarification as to whether requests are
required to include details as to the type
and quantity of material being
requested. The 2008 Farm Bill does not
specify a process for requesting
materials authorized within section
8105.
Scale of detail for requested material
response: It is important that the
requests for trees, portions of trees, and
forest products under this rule be
complete, in order to prevent any
misunderstandings, or delays in
processing, and to provide for efficient
field administration and gathering
under authorized permits. The level of
detail required for requests may vary by
location and type of material due to the
level of sensitivity and abundance of the
item being requested, to insure that
Forest Service Officers can maintain
accountability and sustainable
management of the forest products.
Additionally, tribal officials are
encouraged to explain their requests to
Regional Foresters or designated Forest
Service Officers, and if necessary, how
the request fits a traditional and cultural
purpose. Requests which do not include
sufficient information for a Forest
Service Officer to make an assessment
that the request fits a traditional and
cultural purpose and does not conflict
with existing plans, or maintain
sustainable levels and management of
the material(s) requested, may be
delayed or denied.
Levels for Authorizing Requests
comment: One commenter requested
that the delegations of authority
limitations within the proposed rule (36
CFR 223.15(e)) be removed.
Levels for Authorizing Requests
response: The levels set in the proposed
rule have not been removed or modified
for the final rule. ‘‘Limitations’’ as
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65893
specified in this final rule pertain to the
level of delegation authorized for
approving free use requests as specified
in 36 CFR 223.8. The levels proposed in
this rule (§ 223.15) are an increase from
those which apply to other activities
specified in § 223.8. There is no
limitation on the number of requests
that can be made or authorized per
Indian tribe. These levels for delegating
authority of approval for requests made
under this rule are necessary to ensure
consistency with the levels of
accountability assigned to each Forest
Service Officer for management of
National Forest System lands and
resources within their respective areas
of responsibility.
The value limitations do not limit the
amount of trees, portions of trees, or
forest products that Indian tribes may
request through this rule. If an Indian
tribe makes a request that has a higher
value than the maximum which can be
authorized by a local official, then the
request will be forwarded to a Forest
Service Officer who has the authority to
grant the request. Pursuant to this rule,
if the value of the forest products
requested is greater than the value that
may be locally granted, the request will
be forwarded as follows—District
Ranger (value limitation $25,000),
Forest Supervisor, (value limitation
$50,000), and Regional Forester (value
limitation $100,000). Requests that
exceed $100,000 in value will be
reviewed and approved by the Chief of
the Forest Service.
Definition of commercial comment:
One commenter requested clarification
as to the definition for the term
‘‘commercial purposes’’. Although the
term ‘‘commercial purposes’’ was used
in the 2008 Farm Bill (section 8105), a
definition of the term was not included
in the definitions at section 8102.
Definition of commercial response: In
consideration of this request for
clarification of the definition of the term
‘‘commercial purposes’’, the Agency
reviewed a number of existing
definitions, consulted existing Regional
policy, and considered defining the
term within the final regulatory text.
The Agency has decided, however, not
to define the term ‘‘commercial
purposes’’ in this rule for the reasons
discussed herin.
The term ‘‘commercial’’ is used in
other subparts of 36 CFR part 223
without definition. The need to define
this term, and a definition appropriate
for application and administration, may
vary by location and the accepted
traditional and cultural practices of the
Indian tribe(s) involved. In particular,
Regional Forest Service representatives
expressed concern that defining the
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
65894
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
term in the body of the rule could
preclude varying levels of locally
accepted traditional and cultural
practices. Regional Representatives
requested that we leave a definition of
this term to Regional discretion in order
to best suit the partnerships and
agreements developed in consultation
with Indian tribes and used within the
regions. Regions implementing this rule
under the existing interim directive and
supplemental Regional guidance,
specific for the region, have not
experienced issues to this point
regarding what is or is not deemed
commercial for purposes of this rule.
Based on the lack of a definition for
‘‘commercial purposes’’ in the 2008
Farm Bill, regular and undefined use of
the term in other Forest Service
documents, and Forest Service Regional
Staff’s request that the term be left
undefined, this final rule does not
include a definition within the
regulatory text.
Traditional barter and trade
comment: One commenter requested
clarification of whether barter and trade
is permitted for materials obtained
through this rule. Specifically, whether
an Indian tribe may barter or trade
materials obtained pursuant to this rule
as a means of recouping the costs an
Indian tribe incurs for planning,
gathering, and processing such
materials.
Traditional barter and trade response:
Barter and trade is not expressly
addressed in the regulatory text for this
rule.
This rule derives from the authority
and prohibitions within section 8105 of
the 2008 Farm Bill. The Forest Service
is authorized to provide trees, portions
of trees, or forest products free-of-charge
from National Forest System land to
Indian tribes for traditional and cultural
purposes, except when those purposes
involve commercial use. According to
the definition in section 8102 of the
2008 Farm Bill, the term ‘‘traditional
and cultural purpose,’’ with respect to a
definable use, area, or practice, means
that the use, area, or practice is
identified by an Indian tribe as
traditional or cultural because of the
long-established significance or
ceremonial nature of the use, area, or
practice to the Indian tribe. Barter and
trade of materials obtained through
requests made under this rule, which
meet the definition for a traditional and
cultural purpose and are not considered
to be commercial, may be acceptable.
Tribal officials are encouraged to
explain their requests to Regional
Foresters or designated Forest Service
Officers and, if necessary, describe how
the request fits a traditional and cultural
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
purpose. Requests that do not include
enough information for a Forest Service
Officer to make a reasonable assessment
that the request fits a traditional and
cultural purpose and will not be used
for commercial purposes may be denied.
Similar to the term ‘‘commercial’’, the
need to address barter and trade may
vary by location and the accepted
traditional and cultural practices of the
Indian tribe(s) involved. Regions
implementing this rule under the
existing interim directive and
supplemental Regional guidance,
specific for the region, have not
experienced issues to this point
regarding barter and trade for purposes
of this rule. Authorization of barter and
trade will be left to Regional discretion
in order to best suit the partnerships
and agreements developed in
consultation with Indian tribes and used
within the region. Any forms of barter
and trade which are authorized in
previous agreements, tribal treaty, or
other reserved rights will not be affected
by this rule.
General Comment (1): One
commenter expressed direct support of
the previously proposed rule.
General comment (1) response: This
comment is acknowledged but deemed
outside of the scope of this rule. The
Agency is adopting this rule for the
reasons stated within including the
rule’s consistency with section 8105 and
it meets the Agency’s needs.
General Comment (2): One
commenter offered to share information
regarding an organization that funds
forest associations.
General Comment (2) response: The
comment is is found to be outside the
scope of this rule.
Summary of Additional Changes
Use of the term ‘‘noncommercial’’—
No comments were received in response
to the proposed rule’s use of the term
‘‘noncommercial’’. However, the term
has been removed from both the title of
section 223.15 as well as from section
223.15(d). Noncommercial was being
used, in the proposed rule, as a
reference to the Farm Bill’s prohibition
on commercial purposes, but, because it
was not used in the Farm Bill, the term
has been removed from this final rule,
to avoid any confusion and for
clarification purposes.
Section 223.15(d)—Although no
comments were received, a minor
change was made to the wording in the
last sentence, in section 223.15(d),
describing how notification should take
place when two or more National
Forests are involved in a single request.
This was done to ensure clarity
regarding the notification requirement.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Impact
This final rule has been reviewed
under U.S. Department of Agriculture
procedures and Executive Order 12866
on Regulatory Planning and Review as
amended by 13422. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
determined that this is not a significant
rule. This final rule will not have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy nor adversely affect
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety,
nor State or local governments. This
final rule will not interfere with an
action taken or planned by another
agency nor raise new legal or policy
issues. Finally, this action will not alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients of
such programs. Accordingly, this final
rule is not subject to OMB review under
Executive Order 12866.
Proper Consideration of Small Entities
This final rule has been considered in
light of Executive Order 13272 regarding
consideration of small entities and the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Act of 1996 (SBREFA), which amended
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.). It has been determined that
this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as defined by
the Executive Order. The final rule will
have no adverse impact on small
business, small not-for-profit
organizations, or small units of
government.
Environmental Impact
This final rule has no direct or
indirect effect on the environment. The
rules at 36 CFR 220.6(d)(2) exclude from
documentation in an environmental
assessment or impact statement rules,
regulations, or policies to establish
Service-wide administrative procedures,
program processes, or instructions that
do not significantly affect the quality of
the human environment. The
Department’s assessment is that this
final rule falls within this category of
actions, and that no extraordinary
circumstances exist that would require
preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement.
Federalism
The Department has considered this
final rule under the requirements of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and
concluded that this action will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, the
Department has determined that no
further assessment of federalism
implications is necessary at this time.
Consultation With Tribal Governments
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, the Forest
Service entered into consultation with
Indian tribes regarding this proposed
rule. Beginning on or before May 1,
2010, Indian tribes were provided with
the Forest Service’s Interim Directive on
section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill, and
were invited to consult on changes to 36
CFR part 223. In addition, the Forest
Service provided a question and answer
document related to the Interim
Directive and regulatory actions the
Agency was considering to implement
section 8105. Government-togovernment consultation occurred over
a period of at least 120 days, through
September 1, 2010. The Forest Service
received 88 comments as a result of
consultation, including some received
after September 1; all were considered
in the development of the proposed
rule.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
No Takings Implications
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
12360, and it has been determined that
this action will not pose the risk of a
taking of private property.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the
Public
With this submission, and upon OMB
approval, the addition of the collection
requirements of Rule Identification
Number 0596–AD00, OMB no. 0596–
0233 for federally recognized Indian
tribes wishing to request free use under
the authority of section 8105 of the 2008
Farm Bill are being added to OMB
control number 0596–0085 Forest
Products Removal Permits and
Contracts.
Title: Sale and Disposal of National
Forest System Timber; Forest Products
for Traditional and Cultural Purposes.
OMB Control Number: 0596–0233.
Abstract: The information collection
associated with the proposed rule Sale
and Disposal of National Forest System
Timber; Forest Products for Traditional
and Cultural Purposes was published in
the Federal Register on July 31, 2014
(79 FR 44327) as OMB control number
0596–0085 Forest Products Removal
Permits and Contracts, Regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
Identification Number 0596–AD00. The
information collection included updates
made to charge permits and contracts as
well as revisions made to accommodate
requests from Indian tribes for free use
under section 8105 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(Pub. L. 110–246, 122 Stat. 1651)
[hereinafter the ‘‘2008 Farm Bill’’], per
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and
implementing regulations at 5 CFR part
1320. No comments were received
regarding the information collection
during the proposed rule’s 60-day notice
and comment period. However, OMB
has requested the information collection
requirements specific to the 2008 Farm
Bill, be disclosed separately as OMB
0596–0233. Upon review and approval
from OMB, the two information
collections (OMB 0596–0223 and OMB
0596–0085) will be merged. Therefore,
through this Federal Register notice, the
Agency is providing an opportunity to
comment on the information collection
associated with the final rule during the
30-day period between the publication
date and the effective date of the final
rule.
As stated earlier in this final rule,
section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill
provides the Secretary of Agriculture
with discretionary authority to provide
trees, portions of trees, or forest
products to Indian tribes free of charge
for traditional and cultural purposes
provided that the trees, portions of trees,
or forest products are provided to tribal
officials on behalf of an Indian tribe for
traditional and cultural purposes; and
the trees, portions of trees, or forest
products will not be used for
commercial purposes.
Indian tribes seeking products under
the 2008 Farm Bill authority must make
a request for free use. ‘‘Requests . . .
must be submitted to the local Forest
Service District Ranger’s Office(s) in
writing. Requests may be made: (1)
Directly by a tribal official(s) who has
been authorized by the Indian tribe to
make such requests; or (2) By providing
a copy of a formal resolution approved
by the tribal council or other governing
body of the Indian tribe.’’ Additionally,
‘‘[t]ribal officials are encouraged to
explain their requests to the Regional
Forester or designated Forest Officer
and, if necessary, describe how the
request fits a traditional and cultural
purpose. When an Indian tribe requests
forest products located on two or more
National Forests, authorized tribal
officials should notify each of the
affected Forest Service District Ranger’s
Offices of the requests made on other
forests.’’ Under section 8105 of the 2008
Farm Bill, there is no stated maximum
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65895
free use limitation for products
requested by Indian tribes. Additionally,
there is no limitation to the number of
requests that each federally recognized
Indian tribe may make under this final
rule.
Should Indian tribes wish to obtain
proof of possession, as may be required
in some States, they could be issued a
FS–2400–8 free use permit by the Forest
Service. The FS–2400–8 form allows use
of timber or forest products at no charge
(36 CFR 223.5–223.13). No changes are
being made to the free-use form as a
result of the 2008 Farm Bill provision.
Upon receiving the permit, the
permittee must comply with its terms
(36 CFR 261.6), which designate forest
products that can be harvested and
under what conditions, such as limiting
harvest to a designated area or
permitting harvest of only specifically
designated material. Only the minimum
information necessary to comply with
Federal laws and regulations is
collected. Agency personnel enter the
information provided by Indian tribes
into a computerized database to use for
any subsequent requests made by the
Indian tribe. The information is printed
on paper, which the applicant signs and
dates. Agency personnel discuss the
terms and conditions of the permit or
contract with the applicant. The data
gathered is not available from other
sources. The collected information will
help the Forest Service oversee the
approval and use of forest products
under section 8105 of the 2008 Farm
Bill. For example, the collected
information will be used to ensure
applicants meet the criteria for free use
of timber or forest products authorized
under section 8105 and to identify
permittees in the field by Forest Service
personnel.
The following summarizes the
information collection associated with
the final directive:
Estimate of burden: Reporting burden
for the collection of information is
estimated to average 5 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Federally recognized
Indian tribes under section 8105 of the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008 (Pub. L. 110–246, 122 Stat. 1651).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,132.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses per Respondent: 1.5.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
2,123.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 241.
Comment is invited on (1) whether
this information collection is necessary
for the stated purposes and proper
performance of the functions of the
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
65896
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Agency, including whether the
information will have practical or
scientific utility; (2) the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of burden associated
with the information collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
All comments received in response to
this notice, including names and
addresses when provided, will be a
matter of public record. The comments
will be summarized and included in the
request to OMB for approval.
Energy Effects
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 13211 of May 18,
2001, and it has been determined that it
has no effect on the supply, distribution,
or use of energy. This rule is
administrative in nature and, therefore,
the preparation of a statement of energy
effects is not required.
Civil Justice Reform
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. When the final rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that conflict with the final
rule or that would impede full
implementation of this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will
be given to the final rule; and (3) the
Department will not require the use of
administrative proceedings before
parties could file suit in court
challenging its provisions.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538), which the President signed
into law on March 22, 1995, the
Department has assessed the effects of
this final rule on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This action will not compel the
expenditure of $100 million or more by
any State, local, or tribal government or
anyone in the private sector. Therefore,
a statement under section 202 of the Act
is not required.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 223
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Forests and forest
products, Government contracts,
National forests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Forest Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, amends 36
CFR part 223 as follows:
PART 223—SALE AND DISPOSAL OF
NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM TIMBER,
SPECIAL FOREST PRODUCTS, AND
FOREST BOTANICAL PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for part 223
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 90 Stat. 2958, 16 U.S.C. 472a; 98
Stat. 2213, 16 U.S.C. 618, 104 Stat. 714–726,
16 U.S.C. 620–620j, 25 U.S.C. 3055 and 3057,
113 Stat. 1501a, 16 U.S.C. 528 note; unless
otherwise noted.
2. Add § 223.15 to subpart A to read
as follows:
■
§ 223.15 Provision of trees, portions of
trees, or forest products to Indian tribes for
traditional and cultural purposes.
(a) Pursuant to section 8105 of the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008 (Pub. L. 110–246, 122 Stat. 1651)
[hereinafter the ‘‘2008 Farm Bill’’],
Regional Foresters or designated Forest
Officers may, at their discretion, provide
trees, portions of trees, or forest
products to Indian tribes free of charge
for traditional and cultural purposes
provided that:
(1) The trees, portions of trees, or
forest products are provided to tribal
officials on behalf of an Indian tribe for
traditional and cultural purposes; and
(2) The trees, portions of trees, or
forest products will not be used for
commercial purposes.
(b) The following definitions apply to
this section:
Indian tribe. The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’
means any Indian or Alaska Native
tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or
other community the name of which is
included on a list published by the
Secretary of the Interior pursuant to
section 104 of the Federally Recognized
Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C.
479a–1).
Traditional and cultural purpose. The
term ‘‘traditional and cultural purpose,’’
with respect to a definable use, area, or
practice, means that the use, area, or
practice is identified by an Indian tribe
as traditional or cultural because of the
long-established significance or
ceremonial nature of the use, area, or
practice to the Indian tribe.
Tribal officials: The term ‘‘tribal
officials’’ means elected or duly
appointed officials of Indian tribal
governments.
(c) Requests for trees, portions of
trees, or forest products made under this
section must be submitted to the local
Forest Service District Ranger’s Office(s)
in writing. Requests may be made:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(1) Directly by a tribal official(s) who
has been authorized by the Indian tribe
to make such requests; or
(2) By providing a copy of a formal
resolution approved by the tribal
council or other governing body of the
Indian tribe.
(d) Requests for trees, portions of
trees, and forest products made under
this section must be directed to the
appropriate Forest Service District
Ranger(s)’ Office from which the items
are being requested. Tribal officials are
encouraged to explain their requests to
the Regional Forester or designated
Forest Officer and, if necessary, describe
how the request fits a traditional and
cultural purpose. When an Indian tribe
requests forest products located on two
or more National Forests, authorized
tribal officials should notify each of the
affected Forest Service District Ranger’s
Offices of the requests made on other
forests.
(e) Agency Line Officers and
managers (who have been authorized by
name through official Forest Service
correspondence) are authorized to
provide trees, portions of trees, and
forest products under this section
subject to the following limitations:
(1) District Rangers and Forest
Officers may provide material not
exceeding $25,000 in value in any one
fiscal year to an Indian tribe;
(2) Forest Supervisors may provide
material not exceeding $50,000 in value
in any one fiscal year to an Indian tribe;
(3) Regional Foresters may provide
material not exceeding $100,000 in
value in any one fiscal year to an Indian
tribe; and
(4) The Chief of the Forest Service
may provide material exceeding
$100,000 in value to an Indian tribe.
(f) A request for trees, portions of
trees, or forest products under this
section may be conditioned or denied
for reasons including, but not limited to
the following:
(1) Protecting public health and
safety;
(2) Preventing interference with
Forest Service and/or commercial
operations;
(3) Complying with Federal and State
laws and regulations;
(4) Ensuring sustainability; or
(5) Otherwise protecting National
Forest System land and resources.
(g) All decisions made under this
section must comply with the National
Forest Management Act, relevant land
management plans, the National
Environmental Policy Act, the
Endangered Species Act, all other
applicable laws and regulations, and are
subject to tribal treaty and other
reserved rights and the savings
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
provisions of the Cultural and Heritage
Cooperation Authority (25 U.S.C.
3057(b)).
CONTACT section for additional
information.
Dated: July 29, 2016.
Thomas L. Tidwell,
Chief, Forest Service.
Stephanie Doolan, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7719, or by email at
doolan.stephanie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
[FR Doc. 2016–22929 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Table of Contents
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0835; FRL 9952–79–
Region 7]
Approval of Air Quality Implementation
Plans; Missouri State Implementation
Plan for the 2008 Lead Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
of Missouri. This final action will
approve Missouri’s SIP for the lead
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) received by EPA on October
20, 2014. EPA proposed approval of this
plan on February 29, 2016. The
applicable standard addressed in this
action is the lead NAAQS promulgated
by EPA in 2008. EPA believes that the
SIP submitted by the state satisfies the
applicable requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) identified in EPA’s Final
Rule published in the Federal Register
on October 15, 2008, and will bring the
area surrounding the Exide
Technologies Canon Hollow facility in
Forest City, Missouri, into attainment of
the 0.15 microgram per cubic meter
(ug/m3) lead NAAQS.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 26, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0835. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through www.regulations.gov
or please contact the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:07 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. EPA’s Response to Comments
IV. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
In this document, EPA is granting
final approval of Missouri’s SIP to
address violations of the lead NAAQS
near the Exide Technologies—Canon
Hollow facility in Holt County,
Missouri. The applicable standard
addressed in this action is the lead
NAAQS promulgated by EPA in 2008.
The applicable requirements of the CAA
identified in EPA’s Final Rule (73 FR
66964, October 15, 2008), and will bring
the area into compliance with the 0.15
microgram per cubic meter (ug/m3) lead
NAAQS. EPA’s proposal containing the
background information for this action
can be found at 81 FR 10182, February
29, 2016.
II. Have the requirements for the
approval of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, the revision
meets the substantive SIP requirements
of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
III. EPA’s Response to Comments
The public comment period on EPA’s
proposed rule opened February 29,
2016, the date of its publication in the
Federal Register, and closed on March
30, 2016. During this period, EPA
received two comments posted
anonymously to the Regulations.gov
Web site.
One comment pertains to mold in
indoor air and not the subject of the
proposed approval of the SIP revision to
address lead in ambient air. Because the
comment is anonymous, EPA is unable
to contact the commenter directly to
offer assistance. However, EPA offers
that the commenter may contact Ms.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65897
Gina Grier of EPA Region 7 directly at
(913) 551–7078 for more information
and assistance on the commenter’s
concerns about mold.
The second comment states that he/
she is in agreement with EPA’s
proposed action to approve the revision
to the SIP and the commenter offers two
suggestions. The first suggestion is to
estimate the cost of water washing to
clean haul routes on the facility
property and the second is a concern
that limiting truck traffic on the facility
property may reduce the resources
purchased in the state of Missouri.
EPA’s response to the first suggestion
regarding water washing to clean the onsite haul routes is that the use of water
to remove lead from on-site roads was
studied and determined to be a costeffective and necessary strategy to
control lead during the development of
the National Emissions Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for
Secondary Lead Smelters, promulgated
January 5, 2012 (77 FR 580). Because the
Exide Canon Hollow facility is a
secondary lead smelter, it must comply
with the requirements of this rule,
including, among other things, the
requirement to conduct twice daily
water washing of on-site haul routes.
This cleaning is necessary to control
lead-containing dust in order to meet
the 2008 lead NAAQS. The NESHAP is
related to the NAAQS in that the
NESHAP requires attainment of the
same 0.15 ug/m3 standard for lead at the
fenceline. No change has been made to
address this suggestion.
Regarding the concern that limiting
truck traffic may reduce the resources
purchased in the state of Missouri, the
state and facility arrived at the
limitations on truck traffic using EPA’s
AERMOD computer-based modeling.
Truck traffic along haul routes is known
to increase the amount of leadcontaining dust that becomes reentrained in ambient air. Modeling was
used to estimate the amount of truck
traffic along facility haul routes that
could be allowed without causing a
NAAQS violation at the fenceline. Thus,
the limitations are necessary to
safeguard the NAAQS level which EPA
has determined to be protective of
human health and the environment. It
also should be noted that the
restrictions on truck traffic that are
required by the SIP only pertain to
traffic on the facility property; there are
no limitations on the amount of truck
traffic on public roads. No change has
been made to address this concern.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking final action to amend
the Missouri SIP to approve the SIP
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65891-65897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22929]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 223
RIN 0596-AD00
Sale and Disposal of National Forest System Timber; Forest
Products for Traditional and Cultural Purposes
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service is implementing regulations under the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (hereinafter the ``2008 Farm
Bill''). This rule provides for the provision of trees, portions of
trees, or forest products from National Forest System lands, free of
charge, to federally recognized Indian tribes (Indian tribes) for
traditional and cultural purposes. This rule implements section 8105 of
the 2008 Farm Bill.
DATES: This rule is effective October 26, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Information on this final rule may be obtained via written
request addressed to Director, Forest Management Staff, USDA Forest
Service, Mail Stop 1103, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20250 or by email to FarmBillForestProductsRule@fs.fed.us. The public
may inspect comments previously received at the Office of the Director,
Forest Management Staff, Sidney Yates Building, Third Floor SW Wing,
201 14th Street SW., Washington, DC or via the world wide web/Internet
at https://www.fs.fed.us/forestmanagement/traditional_cultural/index.shtml. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 202-205-1766 to
facilitate entry to the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Reddan, Assistant Director, Forest
Products, 202-557-6591 or Sharon Nygaard-Scott, Forest Service, Forest
Management Staff, 202-205-1766, during normal business hours.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Forest Service is issuing this final rule to implement section
8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill (section 8105). Section 8105 has also been
codified in Title 25 of the U.S. Code, chapter 32A--Cultural and
Heritage Cooperation Authority (25 U.S.C. 3055--Forest Products for
Traditional and Cultural Purposes). Subject to certain statutory
limitations, section 8105 allows the Secretary of Agriculture to
provide Indian tribes with trees, portions of trees, or forest products
for traditional and cultural purposes. In this preamble to the final
rule, the term ``forest products'' is used as a shorthand for ``trees,
portions of trees, or forest products''. Specifically, section 8105(a)
provides that the Secretary may provide free of charge to Indian tribes
any trees, portions of trees, or forest products from National Forest
System land for traditional and cultural purposes.
However, pursuant to section 8105(b), Indian tribes are prohibited
from using any trees, portions of trees, or forest products provided
under section 8105(a) for commercial purposes. While the 2008 Farm Bill
does not define commercial purposes, it does define Indian tribe and
traditional and cultural purpose. Section 8102(5) defines Indian tribe
as any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or
other community the name of which is included on a list published by
the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to section 104 of the Federally
Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a-1). In
addition, per section 8102(9), traditional and cultural purpose, with
respect to a definable use, area, or practice, means that the use,
area, or practice is identified by an Indian tribe as traditional or
cultural because of the long-established significance or ceremonial
nature of the use, area, or practice to the Indian tribe.
On December 2, 2009, the Forest Service published an Interim
Directive (ID) to the Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 2409.18 to
implement section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill. The ID was reissued,
without change, four times (effective March 8, 2011 (ID 2409.18-2011-
1), June 7, 2012 (ID 2409.18-2012-2), December 6, 2013 (ID 2409.18-
2013-3), and May 14, 2015 (ID 2409.18-2015-1), and remains in effect
until November 14, 2016. This final rule will replace the Interim
Directive, which will be entered in FSH 2409.18, chapter 80, section
82.5.
The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on July 31,
2014 (79 FR 44327), and a comment period ensued over a period of 60
days. The Forest Service received 12 written comments through 10
letters, and all were considered in the development of this final rule.
This rule establishes Forest Service policy for providing Indian
tribes with trees, portions of trees, or forest products for
traditional and cultural purposes. Based on the comments received on
the ID during formal government-to-government consultation, and those
received during the proposed rulemaking, as well as the Agency's
experience using the ID to implement section 8105 over the last 7
years, the Agency is now publishing this final rule.
This final rule adds Sec. 223.15 to 36 CFR part 223, subpart A.
Section 223.15(a) authorizes Regional Foresters or designated Forest
Officers to provide trees, portions of trees, or forest products to
Indian tribes free of charge for traditional and cultural purposes.
Section 223.15(b) restates the 2008 Farm Bill's statutory definitions
of ``Indian tribe'' and ``traditional and cultural purpose,'' and
includes the Forest Services' regulatory definition of ``tribal
officials.''
Sections 223.15(c) and (d) describe who can request trees, portions
of trees, or forest products for traditional and cultural purposes, and
where those requests should be directed. Tribal officials should submit
requests for trees, portions of trees, or forest products to their
local Forest Service District Ranger's office for routing to the
appropriate designated authority. In addition, tribal officials are
encouraged to explain their requests to the Regional Forester or
designated Forest Officer, and if necessary, how the request fits a
traditional and cultural purpose.
A designated Forest Officer is an individual whom the Regional
Forester has granted written authority to provide products under Sec.
223.15. Currently, there is no limitation on the number of requests or
authorizations per unit of a forest product or the number of requests
or authorizations per Indian tribe. There is currently no limitation on
the amount of trees, portions of trees, or forest products that can be
requested at any one time. However, Forest Officers cannot grant
materials in excess of the value limitations at Sec. 223.15(e) in any
given fiscal year.
Section 223.15(f) explains that the Forest Service may condition or
deny requests for trees, portions of trees, or forest products under
Sec. 223.15. Finally, Sec. 223.15(g) provides that all decisions made
under Sec. 223.15 must comply with the National Forest Management Act,
relevant land management plans, the
[[Page 65892]]
National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, and all
other applicable laws and regulations, and are subject to tribal treaty
and other reserved rights and the savings provisions of the Cultural
and Heritage Cooperation Authority (25 U.S.C. 8107(b)). The Forest
Service will do its best to process requests received in a reasonable
period of time, in light of these statutory and regulatory
requirements.
II. Formal Government-to-Government Consultation
After issuance of the December 2, 2009, Interim Directive (ID
2409.18-2009-2), the Forest Service formally entered into consultation
with Indian tribes, with the Regional Foresters extending invitations
to Indian tribes by May 1, 2010. This consultation was conducted under
Executive Order (EO) 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments. Indian tribes were provided the ID to FSH 2409.18,
and were invited to consult on proposed changes to 36 CFR part 223.
Government-to-government consultation occurred over a period of at
least 120 days, through September 1, 2010.
Regional Foresters were directed to invite all federally recognized
Indian tribes in their Region to consult. In addition, they were
directed to invite any federally recognized Indian tribes who have
expressed a historical connection to National Forest System lands in
their Region, even if they no longer reside there. To make the
consultation more effective, the Forest Service provided Indian tribes
with a question and answer document describing the Interim Directive
and Forest Services' intent to implement section 8105 of the 2008 Farm
Bill through proposed changes to 36 CFR part 223. Recommendations from
the Indian tribes have been incorporated, as appropriate, into this
final rule.
III. Summary of Comments and Responses
The Forest Service received 12 comments in response to the proposed
rule, several of which were similar in scope and nature. A summary of
the comments and the Agency's responses and actions taken to the
comments follow.
Savings Provisions comment: Three commenters expressed concern that
the proposed rule did not incorporate the savings provisions at 25
U.S.C. 3057(b), which protect existing tribal treaty and other reserved
rights, as well as agreements between the Forest Service and an Indian
tribe. Section 8105 has been codified in 25 U.S.C. 3055--Forest
Products for Traditional and Cultural Purposes. The savings provisions
at 25 U.S.C. 3057(b) apply to forest products for traditional and
cultural purposes. These savings provisions state that:
Nothing in the chapter--
(1) diminishes or expands the trust responsibility of the United
States to Indian tribes, or any legal obligation or remedy resulting
from that responsibility;
(2) alters, abridges, repeals, or affects any valid agreement
between the Forest Service and an Indian tribe;
(3) alters, abridges, diminishes, repeals, or affects any reserved
or other right of an Indian tribe; or
(4) alters, abridges, diminishes, repeals, or affects any other
valid existing right relating to National Forest System land or other
public land.
Savings Provisions response: The Forest Service has revised Sec.
223.15(g) of the final rule to incorporate the savings provisions
codified at 25 U.S.C. 3057(b). The revised Sec. 223.15(g) states: All
decisions made under this section must comply with the National Forest
Management Act, relevant land management plans, the National
Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, all other
applicable laws and regulations, and are subject to tribal treaty and
other reserved rights and the savings provisions of the Cultural and
Heritage Cooperation Authority (25 U.S.C. 3057(b)).
Additionally, the authority citation under part 223 now includes
references to both 25 U.S.C. 3055 and 3057.
Prioritized Use and Access comment: One commenter proposed that the
collection of forest products for traditional and cultural purposes be
prioritized over other uses and that traditional gathering areas be
closed to other uses. The commenter indicated that frequently the
collection of forest materials occurs immediately preceding a
traditional or religious ceremony and requested assurance that access
to the traditional resources be prioritized and allowed, regardless of
the situation or season.
Prioritized Use and Access response: Authorized timeframes for
gathering, prioritization over other uses and needs, and access to
specific gathering areas may vary by request. The Forest Service is
responsible for balancing requests made under section 8105 of the 2008
Farm Bill with other planned, possible, and mandated uses in accordance
with its mandate to manage the national forests for multiple uses (16
U.S.C. 528-531). This rule provides one path for collection of forest
products, but prioritization of the various uses and purposes of forest
products and access to National Forest System lands are outside the
scope of this rule. Instead, the Forest Service determines how to
balance competing demands for forest products and land use when
revising or amending land management plans using the National Forest
System Land Management Planning process (36 CFR part 219). The planning
process requires responsible officials to actively engage stakeholders,
the public, and federally recognized Indian tribes using collaborative
processes where feasible and appropriate (36 CFR 219.4). Proposed
individual actions and projects subject to the NEPA requirements also
require opportunities for public participation and comment (36 CFR
220.4).
Indian tribes are encouraged to participate in these processes and
to work with and regularly communicate to local Forest Service
Officials the location of forest products used for traditional and
cultural purposes. Local Forest Service Officers will then be aware of
potential gathering areas and times when planning projects to mitigate
potential conflicting activities and requests. Information regarding
the locations of resources shared with Forest Service officials are
protected from sharing by the Prohibition on Disclosure (25 U.S.C.
3056). Assessment and determination for priority of use and access to
areas will be made at the Regional, National Forest, or local Ranger
District levels as appropriate based on local considerations, land
management plans, needs, and consultation with local Indian tribes.
This rule does not designate gathering areas. Section 223.15(f) of
the rule authorizes, however, denials of or the placing of conditions
on requests for access to gather. The reasons for the denials or
conditions include, but are not limited to:
(1) Protecting public health and safety;
(2) Preventing interference with Forest Service and/or commercial
operations;
(3) Complying with Federal and State laws and regulations;
(4) Ensuring sustainability; or
(5) Otherwise protecting National Forest System land and resources.
Adoption of Region 5 Policy as the National Rule comment: One
commenter represents an Indian Tribe within the State of California
that has been using the existing Region 5 Traditional Gathering Policy.
The Indian tribe is satisfied with the policy and has recommended that
this policy be used as a model and applied nationwide. The policy
referenced by
[[Page 65893]]
the commenter exists as a Regional Supplement to the Forest Service
Manual (FS Region 5, FSM 1500, ch. 1560, Amendment No: 1500-2007-1)
which sets out direction on traditional gathering policy within the
Region to promote consistency between Forest Service and Bureau of Land
Management in collaboration with local tribal communities.
Adoption of Region 5 Policy as the National Rule response: Regional
Forest Service and tribal interests, needs, and agreements may vary by
location, tradition, culture, and practice. Forest Service Regions have
the opportunity to supplement this rule, consistent with the policy
established herein, for best use in their area of administration. The
Region 5 policy was developed through collaboration and interests
specific to parties in the Region 5 area. Forest Service Region 9 also
has a document for use that includes considerations and direction for
application within FS Region 9 (Tribal Relations Strategic Framework
for the Eastern Region, Northeastern Area State & Private Forestry, and
Northern Research Station--2015). While the sharing of direction and
guidance on this topic is appropriate between Regions, the Regions may
implement this rule through supplements that are consistent with the
rule and that meet the particular needs of a Region based on applicable
laws, tribal treaty or other reserved rights, the parties involved, and
other local needs. Any new supplements must be consistent with the
rule. Any existing Regional supplements or policies should continue to
be implemented in accordance with Sec. 223.15(g). The Region 5
Traditional Gathering Policy will not be adopted as Agency-wide
direction in this rule.
Requests by Individuals comment: One commenter sought clarification
as to whether this rule allows individual tribal members to request
trees, portions of trees, or forest products for traditional and
cultural purposes, or whether such requests must be submitted by tribal
officials. Section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill states, ``the Secretary
may provide free of charge to Indian tribes any trees, portions of
trees, or forest products from National Forest System land for
traditional and cultural purposes.'' Section 8102 expressly defines the
terms ``Indian'' and ``Indian Tribe'' separately. The term ``Indian''
references an individual member of an Indian tribe. As defined in
section 8102, the term ``Indian Tribe'' references a ``tribe, band,
nation, pueblo, village, or other community'' which is included on the
Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a-1).
Requests by Individuals response: For purposes of this rule,
authorization is limited to government (Forest Service)-to-government
(Indian tribe), rather than government-to-individual, provision of
trees, portions of trees, or forest products. Tribal officials should
submit requests on behalf of the Indian tribe. Individual members of
federally recognized Indian tribes should coordinate requests through
their tribal officials. Individual members of federally recognized
Indian tribes may also use existing provisions at 36 CFR part 223,
subpart A, which authorize free-use of trees, portions of trees, or
forest products to individuals, subject to limitations or circumstances
as stated in the regulations.
Scale of detail for requested material comment: One commenter
sought clarification as to whether requests are required to include
details as to the type and quantity of material being requested. The
2008 Farm Bill does not specify a process for requesting materials
authorized within section 8105.
Scale of detail for requested material response: It is important
that the requests for trees, portions of trees, and forest products
under this rule be complete, in order to prevent any misunderstandings,
or delays in processing, and to provide for efficient field
administration and gathering under authorized permits. The level of
detail required for requests may vary by location and type of material
due to the level of sensitivity and abundance of the item being
requested, to insure that Forest Service Officers can maintain
accountability and sustainable management of the forest products.
Additionally, tribal officials are encouraged to explain their requests
to Regional Foresters or designated Forest Service Officers, and if
necessary, how the request fits a traditional and cultural purpose.
Requests which do not include sufficient information for a Forest
Service Officer to make an assessment that the request fits a
traditional and cultural purpose and does not conflict with existing
plans, or maintain sustainable levels and management of the material(s)
requested, may be delayed or denied.
Levels for Authorizing Requests comment: One commenter requested
that the delegations of authority limitations within the proposed rule
(36 CFR 223.15(e)) be removed.
Levels for Authorizing Requests response: The levels set in the
proposed rule have not been removed or modified for the final rule.
``Limitations'' as specified in this final rule pertain to the level of
delegation authorized for approving free use requests as specified in
36 CFR 223.8. The levels proposed in this rule (Sec. 223.15) are an
increase from those which apply to other activities specified in Sec.
223.8. There is no limitation on the number of requests that can be
made or authorized per Indian tribe. These levels for delegating
authority of approval for requests made under this rule are necessary
to ensure consistency with the levels of accountability assigned to
each Forest Service Officer for management of National Forest System
lands and resources within their respective areas of responsibility.
The value limitations do not limit the amount of trees, portions of
trees, or forest products that Indian tribes may request through this
rule. If an Indian tribe makes a request that has a higher value than
the maximum which can be authorized by a local official, then the
request will be forwarded to a Forest Service Officer who has the
authority to grant the request. Pursuant to this rule, if the value of
the forest products requested is greater than the value that may be
locally granted, the request will be forwarded as follows--District
Ranger (value limitation $25,000), Forest Supervisor, (value limitation
$50,000), and Regional Forester (value limitation $100,000). Requests
that exceed $100,000 in value will be reviewed and approved by the
Chief of the Forest Service.
Definition of commercial comment: One commenter requested
clarification as to the definition for the term ``commercial
purposes''. Although the term ``commercial purposes'' was used in the
2008 Farm Bill (section 8105), a definition of the term was not
included in the definitions at section 8102.
Definition of commercial response: In consideration of this request
for clarification of the definition of the term ``commercial
purposes'', the Agency reviewed a number of existing definitions,
consulted existing Regional policy, and considered defining the term
within the final regulatory text. The Agency has decided, however, not
to define the term ``commercial purposes'' in this rule for the reasons
discussed herin.
The term ``commercial'' is used in other subparts of 36 CFR part
223 without definition. The need to define this term, and a definition
appropriate for application and administration, may vary by location
and the accepted traditional and cultural practices of the Indian
tribe(s) involved. In particular, Regional Forest Service
representatives expressed concern that defining the
[[Page 65894]]
term in the body of the rule could preclude varying levels of locally
accepted traditional and cultural practices. Regional Representatives
requested that we leave a definition of this term to Regional
discretion in order to best suit the partnerships and agreements
developed in consultation with Indian tribes and used within the
regions. Regions implementing this rule under the existing interim
directive and supplemental Regional guidance, specific for the region,
have not experienced issues to this point regarding what is or is not
deemed commercial for purposes of this rule.
Based on the lack of a definition for ``commercial purposes'' in
the 2008 Farm Bill, regular and undefined use of the term in other
Forest Service documents, and Forest Service Regional Staff's request
that the term be left undefined, this final rule does not include a
definition within the regulatory text.
Traditional barter and trade comment: One commenter requested
clarification of whether barter and trade is permitted for materials
obtained through this rule. Specifically, whether an Indian tribe may
barter or trade materials obtained pursuant to this rule as a means of
recouping the costs an Indian tribe incurs for planning, gathering, and
processing such materials.
Traditional barter and trade response: Barter and trade is not
expressly addressed in the regulatory text for this rule.
This rule derives from the authority and prohibitions within
section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill. The Forest Service is authorized to
provide trees, portions of trees, or forest products free-of-charge
from National Forest System land to Indian tribes for traditional and
cultural purposes, except when those purposes involve commercial use.
According to the definition in section 8102 of the 2008 Farm Bill, the
term ``traditional and cultural purpose,'' with respect to a definable
use, area, or practice, means that the use, area, or practice is
identified by an Indian tribe as traditional or cultural because of the
long-established significance or ceremonial nature of the use, area, or
practice to the Indian tribe. Barter and trade of materials obtained
through requests made under this rule, which meet the definition for a
traditional and cultural purpose and are not considered to be
commercial, may be acceptable. Tribal officials are encouraged to
explain their requests to Regional Foresters or designated Forest
Service Officers and, if necessary, describe how the request fits a
traditional and cultural purpose. Requests that do not include enough
information for a Forest Service Officer to make a reasonable
assessment that the request fits a traditional and cultural purpose and
will not be used for commercial purposes may be denied.
Similar to the term ``commercial'', the need to address barter and
trade may vary by location and the accepted traditional and cultural
practices of the Indian tribe(s) involved. Regions implementing this
rule under the existing interim directive and supplemental Regional
guidance, specific for the region, have not experienced issues to this
point regarding barter and trade for purposes of this rule.
Authorization of barter and trade will be left to Regional discretion
in order to best suit the partnerships and agreements developed in
consultation with Indian tribes and used within the region. Any forms
of barter and trade which are authorized in previous agreements, tribal
treaty, or other reserved rights will not be affected by this rule.
General Comment (1): One commenter expressed direct support of the
previously proposed rule.
General comment (1) response: This comment is acknowledged but
deemed outside of the scope of this rule. The Agency is adopting this
rule for the reasons stated within including the rule's consistency
with section 8105 and it meets the Agency's needs.
General Comment (2): One commenter offered to share information
regarding an organization that funds forest associations.
General Comment (2) response: The comment is is found to be outside
the scope of this rule.
Summary of Additional Changes
Use of the term ``noncommercial''--No comments were received in
response to the proposed rule's use of the term ``noncommercial''.
However, the term has been removed from both the title of section
223.15 as well as from section 223.15(d). Noncommercial was being used,
in the proposed rule, as a reference to the Farm Bill's prohibition on
commercial purposes, but, because it was not used in the Farm Bill, the
term has been removed from this final rule, to avoid any confusion and
for clarification purposes.
Section 223.15(d)--Although no comments were received, a minor
change was made to the wording in the last sentence, in section
223.15(d), describing how notification should take place when two or
more National Forests are involved in a single request. This was done
to ensure clarity regarding the notification requirement.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Impact
This final rule has been reviewed under U.S. Department of
Agriculture procedures and Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning
and Review as amended by 13422. The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this is not a significant rule. This final
rule will not have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the
economy nor adversely affect productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, nor State or local governments.
This final rule will not interfere with an action taken or planned by
another agency nor raise new legal or policy issues. Finally, this
action will not alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
of such programs. Accordingly, this final rule is not subject to OMB
review under Executive Order 12866.
Proper Consideration of Small Entities
This final rule has been considered in light of Executive Order
13272 regarding consideration of small entities and the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996 (SBREFA), which amended the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). It has been
determined that this action will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities as defined by the Executive
Order. The final rule will have no adverse impact on small business,
small not-for-profit organizations, or small units of government.
Environmental Impact
This final rule has no direct or indirect effect on the
environment. The rules at 36 CFR 220.6(d)(2) exclude from documentation
in an environmental assessment or impact statement rules, regulations,
or policies to establish Service-wide administrative procedures,
program processes, or instructions that do not significantly affect the
quality of the human environment. The Department's assessment is that
this final rule falls within this category of actions, and that no
extraordinary circumstances exist that would require preparation of an
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.
Federalism
The Department has considered this final rule under the
requirements of Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and concluded that
this action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
[[Page 65895]]
on the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, the Department has determined that no
further assessment of federalism implications is necessary at this
time.
Consultation With Tribal Governments
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments, the Forest Service entered into
consultation with Indian tribes regarding this proposed rule. Beginning
on or before May 1, 2010, Indian tribes were provided with the Forest
Service's Interim Directive on section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill, and
were invited to consult on changes to 36 CFR part 223. In addition, the
Forest Service provided a question and answer document related to the
Interim Directive and regulatory actions the Agency was considering to
implement section 8105. Government-to-government consultation occurred
over a period of at least 120 days, through September 1, 2010. The
Forest Service received 88 comments as a result of consultation,
including some received after September 1; all were considered in the
development of the proposed rule.
No Takings Implications
This final rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 12360, and it has been
determined that this action will not pose the risk of a taking of
private property.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public
With this submission, and upon OMB approval, the addition of the
collection requirements of Rule Identification Number 0596-AD00, OMB
no. 0596-0233 for federally recognized Indian tribes wishing to request
free use under the authority of section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill are
being added to OMB control number 0596-0085 Forest Products Removal
Permits and Contracts.
Title: Sale and Disposal of National Forest System Timber; Forest
Products for Traditional and Cultural Purposes.
OMB Control Number: 0596-0233.
Abstract: The information collection associated with the proposed
rule Sale and Disposal of National Forest System Timber; Forest
Products for Traditional and Cultural Purposes was published in the
Federal Register on July 31, 2014 (79 FR 44327) as OMB control number
0596-0085 Forest Products Removal Permits and Contracts, Regulatory
Identification Number 0596-AD00. The information collection included
updates made to charge permits and contracts as well as revisions made
to accommodate requests from Indian tribes for free use under section
8105 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-
246, 122 Stat. 1651) [hereinafter the ``2008 Farm Bill''], per the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and
implementing regulations at 5 CFR part 1320. No comments were received
regarding the information collection during the proposed rule's 60-day
notice and comment period. However, OMB has requested the information
collection requirements specific to the 2008 Farm Bill, be disclosed
separately as OMB 0596-0233. Upon review and approval from OMB, the two
information collections (OMB 0596-0223 and OMB 0596-0085) will be
merged. Therefore, through this Federal Register notice, the Agency is
providing an opportunity to comment on the information collection
associated with the final rule during the 30-day period between the
publication date and the effective date of the final rule.
As stated earlier in this final rule, section 8105 of the 2008 Farm
Bill provides the Secretary of Agriculture with discretionary authority
to provide trees, portions of trees, or forest products to Indian
tribes free of charge for traditional and cultural purposes provided
that the trees, portions of trees, or forest products are provided to
tribal officials on behalf of an Indian tribe for traditional and
cultural purposes; and the trees, portions of trees, or forest products
will not be used for commercial purposes.
Indian tribes seeking products under the 2008 Farm Bill authority
must make a request for free use. ``Requests . . . must be submitted to
the local Forest Service District Ranger's Office(s) in writing.
Requests may be made: (1) Directly by a tribal official(s) who has been
authorized by the Indian tribe to make such requests; or (2) By
providing a copy of a formal resolution approved by the tribal council
or other governing body of the Indian tribe.'' Additionally, ``[t]ribal
officials are encouraged to explain their requests to the Regional
Forester or designated Forest Officer and, if necessary, describe how
the request fits a traditional and cultural purpose. When an Indian
tribe requests forest products located on two or more National Forests,
authorized tribal officials should notify each of the affected Forest
Service District Ranger's Offices of the requests made on other
forests.'' Under section 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill, there is no stated
maximum free use limitation for products requested by Indian tribes.
Additionally, there is no limitation to the number of requests that
each federally recognized Indian tribe may make under this final rule.
Should Indian tribes wish to obtain proof of possession, as may be
required in some States, they could be issued a FS-2400-8 free use
permit by the Forest Service. The FS-2400-8 form allows use of timber
or forest products at no charge (36 CFR 223.5-223.13). No changes are
being made to the free-use form as a result of the 2008 Farm Bill
provision. Upon receiving the permit, the permittee must comply with
its terms (36 CFR 261.6), which designate forest products that can be
harvested and under what conditions, such as limiting harvest to a
designated area or permitting harvest of only specifically designated
material. Only the minimum information necessary to comply with Federal
laws and regulations is collected. Agency personnel enter the
information provided by Indian tribes into a computerized database to
use for any subsequent requests made by the Indian tribe. The
information is printed on paper, which the applicant signs and dates.
Agency personnel discuss the terms and conditions of the permit or
contract with the applicant. The data gathered is not available from
other sources. The collected information will help the Forest Service
oversee the approval and use of forest products under section 8105 of
the 2008 Farm Bill. For example, the collected information will be used
to ensure applicants meet the criteria for free use of timber or forest
products authorized under section 8105 and to identify permittees in
the field by Forest Service personnel.
The following summarizes the information collection associated with
the final directive:
Estimate of burden: Reporting burden for the collection of
information is estimated to average 5 minutes per response.
Respondents: Federally recognized Indian tribes under section 8105
of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-246, 122
Stat. 1651).
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,132.
Estimated Number of Annual Responses per Respondent: 1.5.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 2,123.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 241.
Comment is invited on (1) whether this information collection is
necessary for the stated purposes and proper performance of the
functions of the
[[Page 65896]]
Agency, including whether the information will have practical or
scientific utility; (2) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of burden
associated with the information collection, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents,
including automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. All
comments received in response to this notice, including names and
addresses when provided, will be a matter of public record. The
comments will be summarized and included in the request to OMB for
approval.
Energy Effects
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13211 of
May 18, 2001, and it has been determined that it has no effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy. This rule is administrative in
nature and, therefore, the preparation of a statement of energy effects
is not required.
Civil Justice Reform
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. When the final rule is adopted: (1) All State and
local laws and regulations that conflict with the final rule or that
would impede full implementation of this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to the final rule; and (3) the
Department will not require the use of administrative proceedings
before parties could file suit in court challenging its provisions.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2
U.S.C. 1531-1538), which the President signed into law on March 22,
1995, the Department has assessed the effects of this final rule on
State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This
action will not compel the expenditure of $100 million or more by any
State, local, or tribal government or anyone in the private sector.
Therefore, a statement under section 202 of the Act is not required.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 223
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Forests and forest
products, Government contracts, National forests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Forest Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, amends 36 CFR part 223 as follows:
PART 223--SALE AND DISPOSAL OF NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM TIMBER,
SPECIAL FOREST PRODUCTS, AND FOREST BOTANICAL PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 223 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 90 Stat. 2958, 16 U.S.C. 472a; 98 Stat. 2213, 16
U.S.C. 618, 104 Stat. 714-726, 16 U.S.C. 620-620j, 25 U.S.C. 3055
and 3057, 113 Stat. 1501a, 16 U.S.C. 528 note; unless otherwise
noted.
0
2. Add Sec. 223.15 to subpart A to read as follows:
Sec. 223.15 Provision of trees, portions of trees, or forest
products to Indian tribes for traditional and cultural purposes.
(a) Pursuant to section 8105 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy
Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-246, 122 Stat. 1651) [hereinafter the ``2008
Farm Bill''], Regional Foresters or designated Forest Officers may, at
their discretion, provide trees, portions of trees, or forest products
to Indian tribes free of charge for traditional and cultural purposes
provided that:
(1) The trees, portions of trees, or forest products are provided
to tribal officials on behalf of an Indian tribe for traditional and
cultural purposes; and
(2) The trees, portions of trees, or forest products will not be
used for commercial purposes.
(b) The following definitions apply to this section:
Indian tribe. The term ``Indian tribe'' means any Indian or Alaska
Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or other community the
name of which is included on a list published by the Secretary of the
Interior pursuant to section 104 of the Federally Recognized Indian
Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a-1).
Traditional and cultural purpose. The term ``traditional and
cultural purpose,'' with respect to a definable use, area, or practice,
means that the use, area, or practice is identified by an Indian tribe
as traditional or cultural because of the long-established significance
or ceremonial nature of the use, area, or practice to the Indian tribe.
Tribal officials: The term ``tribal officials'' means elected or
duly appointed officials of Indian tribal governments.
(c) Requests for trees, portions of trees, or forest products made
under this section must be submitted to the local Forest Service
District Ranger's Office(s) in writing. Requests may be made:
(1) Directly by a tribal official(s) who has been authorized by the
Indian tribe to make such requests; or
(2) By providing a copy of a formal resolution approved by the
tribal council or other governing body of the Indian tribe.
(d) Requests for trees, portions of trees, and forest products made
under this section must be directed to the appropriate Forest Service
District Ranger(s)' Office from which the items are being requested.
Tribal officials are encouraged to explain their requests to the
Regional Forester or designated Forest Officer and, if necessary,
describe how the request fits a traditional and cultural purpose. When
an Indian tribe requests forest products located on two or more
National Forests, authorized tribal officials should notify each of the
affected Forest Service District Ranger's Offices of the requests made
on other forests.
(e) Agency Line Officers and managers (who have been authorized by
name through official Forest Service correspondence) are authorized to
provide trees, portions of trees, and forest products under this
section subject to the following limitations:
(1) District Rangers and Forest Officers may provide material not
exceeding $25,000 in value in any one fiscal year to an Indian tribe;
(2) Forest Supervisors may provide material not exceeding $50,000
in value in any one fiscal year to an Indian tribe;
(3) Regional Foresters may provide material not exceeding $100,000
in value in any one fiscal year to an Indian tribe; and
(4) The Chief of the Forest Service may provide material exceeding
$100,000 in value to an Indian tribe.
(f) A request for trees, portions of trees, or forest products
under this section may be conditioned or denied for reasons including,
but not limited to the following:
(1) Protecting public health and safety;
(2) Preventing interference with Forest Service and/or commercial
operations;
(3) Complying with Federal and State laws and regulations;
(4) Ensuring sustainability; or
(5) Otherwise protecting National Forest System land and resources.
(g) All decisions made under this section must comply with the
National Forest Management Act, relevant land management plans, the
National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, all
other applicable laws and regulations, and are subject to tribal treaty
and other reserved rights and the savings
[[Page 65897]]
provisions of the Cultural and Heritage Cooperation Authority (25
U.S.C. 3057(b)).
Dated: July 29, 2016.
Thomas L. Tidwell,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-22929 Filed 9-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P