Hours of Service of Drivers; Parts and Accessories: ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor, LLC, Application for Exemptions, 65574-65576 [2016-22963]
Download as PDF
65574
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
carriers to use approved equipment
which is required to be installed such as
an ignition cut-off switch, or carried on
board, such as a fire extinguisher, and/
or stricter blood alcohol concentration
(BAC) standards for drivers, etc.),
equipment approval, and/or equipment
carriage requirements (e.g. fire
extinguishers and flares). A Categorical
Exclusion Determination is available for
inspection or copying in the
Regulations.gov.
FMCSA also analyzed this final rule
under the Clean Air Act, as amended
(CAA), section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7401 et
seq.), and implementing regulations
promulgated by the Environmental
Protection Agency. Approval of this
action is exempt from the CAA’s general
conformity requirement since it does
not affect direct or indirect emissions of
criteria pollutants.
Under E.O. 12898, each Federal
agency must identify and address, as
appropriate, ‘‘disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of its programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations’’ in the United States, its
possessions, and territories. FMCSA
evaluated the environmental justice
effects of this final rule in accordance
with the Executive Order, and has
determined that it has none, nor is there
any collective environmental impact
that would result from its promulgation.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 393
Highway safety, Motor carriers, Motor
vehicle safety.
For the reasons stated above, FMCSA
amends 49 CFR chapter III, subchapter
B, as follows:
collision warning or mitigation system,
active cruise control system, and
transponder.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 393.60 by revising
paragraph (e)(1) to read as follows:
§ 393.60
Glazing in specified openings.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Prohibition on obstructions to the
driver’s field of view—(1) Devices
mounted on the interior of the
windshield. (i) Antennas, and similar
devices must not be mounted more than
152 mm (6 inches) below the upper edge
of the windshield. These devices must
be located outside the area swept by the
windshield wipers, and outside the
driver’s sight lines to the road and
highway signs and signals.
(ii) Paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section
does not apply to vehicle safety
technologies, as defined in § 393.5, that
are mounted on the interior of a
windshield. Devices with vehicle safety
technologies must be mounted:
(A) Not more than 100 mm (4 inches)
below the upper edge of the area swept
by the windshield wipers;
(B) Not more than 175 mm (7 inches)
above the lower edge of the area swept
by the windshield wipers; and
(C) Outside the driver’s sight lines to
the road and highway signs and signals.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued under the authority of delegation in
49 CFR 1.87 on: September 12, 2016.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–22923 Filed 9–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PART 393—PARTS AND
ACCESSORIES NECESSARY FOR
SAFE OPERATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
1. The authority citation for part 393
is revised to read as follows:
49 CFR Parts 393 and 395
[Docket No. FMCSA–2016–0050]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136, 31151, and
31502; sec. 1041(b) of Pub. L. 102–240, 105
Stat. 1914, 1993 (1991); sec. 5301 and 5524
of Pub. L. 114–94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1543, 1560;
and 49 CFR 1.87.
2. Amend § 393.5 by adding a
definition for ‘‘Vehicle safety
technology’’ in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
■
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition; grant
of application for exemptions.
*
*
*
*
Vehicle safety technology. Vehicle
safety technology includes a fleetrelated incident management system,
performance or behavior management
system, speed management system, lane
departure warning system, forward
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
Hours of Service of Drivers; Parts and
Accessories: ArcelorMittal Indiana
Harbor, LLC, Application for
Exemptions
AGENCY:
Definitions.
*
These exemptions are effective
from September 23, 2016 through
September 23, 2021.
DATES:
Mr.
Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of
Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone: (614) 942–6477.
Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, ‘‘FMCSA–2016–0050’’
in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, click ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ button and choose the
document listed to review. If you do not
have access to the Internet, you may
view the docket online by visiting the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
II. Legal Basis
■
§ 393.5
driver’s licenses (CDLs) who transport
steel coils between their production and
shipping locations on public roads to
work up to 16 hours per day and return
to work with less than the mandatory 10
consecutive hours off duty. The other
exemption will allow ArcelorMittal to
use coil carriers that do not meet the
‘‘heavy hauler trailer’’ definition, height
of rear side marker lights restrictions,
tire loading restrictions, and the coil
securement requirements.
FMCSA announces its
decision to grant ArcelorMittal Indiana
Harbor, LLC (ArcelorMittal) exemptions
from the hours of service (HOS) and
parts and accessories rules. One
exemption will allow ArcelorMittal’s
employee-drivers with commercial
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions
from certain parts of the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations. FMCSA must
publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must also
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses
and public comments submitted, and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register (49
CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons for
denying or granting the application and,
if granted, the name of the person or
class of persons receiving the
exemption, and the regulatory provision
from which the exemption is granted.
The notice must also specify the
effective period of the exemption (up to
5 years), and explain its terms and
conditions. The exemption may be
renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
Section 5206(a)(3) of the ‘‘Fixing
America’s Surface Transportation Act,’’
(FAST Act) [Pub. L. 114–94, 129 Stat.
1312, 1537, Dec. 4, 2015], amended 49
U.S.C. 31315(b) by adding a new
paragraph (2) which permits exemptions
for no longer than 5 years from their
dates of inception, instead of the
previous 2 years. This statutory
provision was codified in 49 CFR
381.300, effective July 22, 2016 (81 FR
47714).
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Request for Exemptions
ArcelorMittal (USDOT 1098829)
operates a steel plant in East Chicago,
Indiana, its principal place of business.
Several public roadways run through
the plant area. Steel coils produced in
one portion of the plant must be
transported over two short segments of
public highway to another section of the
plant for further processing or shipment
to customers. Both points where the
vehicles cross are controlled
intersections, having either traffic lights
or a combination of traffic lights and
signs. The first public road the CMVs
cross is Riley Road. The crossing is
controlled by a 4-way traffic signal. The
distance traveled is 80 feet. The average
number of crossings at this intersection
is 24 per day. The second crossing is at
Dickey Road and 129th Street. The
distance traveled here is .2 miles. The
trucks cross 129th Street 24 times per
day.
The trailers are specially designed
with cradles to hold steel coils in place.
The trailers have a bed height and width
of 68 and 114 inches, respectively, and
a maximum height of 14 feet.
Unloaded, these tractor-trailer
combinations have a gross weight of
77,000 pounds. When fully loaded their
gross weight is 263,171 pounds. The
trailers have off-road tires to distribute
this weight and avoid damaging roads,
both inside and outside the plant. The
tractors’ maximum speed is 30–35 mph,
but only 15 mph when moving a fully
loaded trailer. These vehicles have
many of the same features of a typical
tractor and trailer, but do not meet all
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:10 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
of the parts and accessories
requirements in 49 CFR part 393.
All employee-drivers are required to
hold CDLs and adhere to the regulations
that apply to CMV drivers. When
employee-drivers move these vehicles,
they are fully marked as an ‘‘oversize
load’’ and have flags on the front of the
tractor. Driving these vehicles amounts
to 10 percent of the employee-drivers’
total work day. ArcelorMittal contends
that these employee-drivers do not work
more than 16 hours per day and advises
that a 16-hour work day is the
exception, not the rule.
According to ArcelorMittal, the
current hours-of-service (HOS)
regulations create problems as
employee-drivers typically work an 8hour shift plus overtime while
employees in the production and
shipping areas work 12-hour shifts.
Employee-drivers must go home under
the current arrangement, leaving a 4hour gap between production and the
driver’s schedule, creating a possible
shortage of coils for shipping or
processing. ArcelorMittal asserts that
the limited number of employees who
drive the CMVs make it difficult to
schedule moves. ArcelorMittal
anticipates that only 3 of the 24
crossings at each noted intersection
would occur after the 14th hour onduty.
ArcelorMittal requested a complete
exemption from 49 CFR part 395 for its
‘‘internal logistics’’ drivers to enable
them to follow the same schedule as the
employees in the production and
shipping areas. The applicant could
then minimize the chances of possible
shortages of coils for shipping or
processing. ArcelorMittal advised that it
would ensure that all employee-drivers
would not work more than 16 hours per
shift, would receive 8 hours off duty
between shifts, and would not be
allowed to drive more than 10 percent
of their total work day.
As previously noted, the vehicles
used to transport steel coils have many
of the same features as a typical tractor
and trailer, but do not meet all of the
requirements for parts and accessories
in 49 CFR part 393. ArcelorMittal
therefore requested exemptions for its
coil-carrier trailers from the heavy
hauler trailer definition in § 393.5; the
required height of rear side marker
lights in § 393.11 Table 1—Footnote 4;
the tire loading restrictions in
§ 393.75(f); and the coil securement
requirements in § 393.120.
According to ArcelorMittal, its
equipment was designed for in-facility
use and very limited road use. Public
roadways are crossed only when
necessary, and oversize-overweight
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65575
permits are obtained from local
authorities when required. The
applicant advises that it has never had
an issue with its equipment or drivers
at the crossings mentioned above. The
coils are well-secured in the trailers due
to the design of the cradles. The time
needed to secure the coils in
compliance with part 393 would be
longer than the transit time from one
part of the plant to another.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or
Greater Level of Safety
ArcelorMittal asserted that it has
taken additional precautions to use
public roadways for the shortest
possible distances and only at
controlled intersections. The applicant
ensures that all lights are properly
working on both the tractor and trailer.
It also flags and marks the vehicles as
‘‘oversize’’ loads. Trailers have
conspicuity tape down the entire side to
make them more visible to other traffic.
The applicant believes that its
additional precautions ensure a level of
safety that is equivalent to or exceeds
the level of safety achieved by following
the regulations.
ArcelorMittal acknowledged in its
application that these ‘‘internal
logistics’’ drivers would remain subject
to all of the other applicable Federal
regulations. This includes qualification
of drivers, controlled substance and
alcohol testing and inspection, and
maintenance and repair of vehicles.
Included in ArcelorMittal’s
application are illustrations of the
plant’s location, public roads crossed,
and pictures of the tractors and trailers
used to transport the steel coils. A copy
of ArcelorMittal’s application for the
exemptions is available for review in the
docket for this notice.
V. Public Comments
On March 22, 2016, FMCSA
published notice of this application and
requested public comment (81 FR
15217). Four comments were submitted.
Mr. Keith Case wrote, ‘‘There are
other options to handle this situation
that do not include having a special
exemption for one company. The
company can hire additional drivers/
workers to do this.’’ Ms. Ingrid Harris
commented, ‘‘I do not think that it’s ok
to give any company waivers to have
drivers work longer hours. At the end of
the day the driver still has to drive
home and is tired. This will just cause
more issues.’’ Mr. Scott Olson stated, ‘‘I
do not support any exemptions for
anybody for any reason. If we make a
rule, everybody needs to abide by it. If
we don’t like the rule, get rid of it.’’
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
65576
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
The Advocates for Highway and Auto
Safety stated that ‘‘ArcelorMittal’s
request for an exemption from the HOS
regulations should be denied as granting
such an exemption would result in a
substantial reduction in the level of
safety currently provided by the
regulations. In addition, there is
practical and common sense alternative
readily available to the company other
than the exemption. Finally, while
Advocates does not oppose
ArcelorMittal’s request for an exemption
for its vehicles from certain sections of
49 CFR part 393, FMCSA must be
explicit that such an exemption is
strictly limited in its scope to those
vehicles and roadways described in the
application.’’
VI. FMCSA Response and Decision
Prior to publishing the Federal
Register notice announcing the receipt
of ArcelorMittal’s exemptions request,
FMCSA ensured that the motor carrier
possessed an active USDOT registration,
minimum required levels of insurance,
and was not subject to any ‘‘imminent
hazard’’ or other out-of-service orders.
The Agency conducted a comprehensive
investigation of the safety performance
history of the motor carrier during the
review process. As part of this process,
FMCSA reviewed its Motor Carrier
Management Information System safety
records, including inspection and
accident reports submitted to FMCSA
by State agencies.
The FMCSA has evaluated
ArcelorMittal’s application for
exemptions and the public comments.
The Agency believes that
ArcelorMittal’s overall safety
performance, as well as a number of
other factors discussed below, will
enable it to achieve a level of safety that
is equivalent to, or greater than the level
of safety achieved without the
exemptions (49 CFR 381.305(a)).
These exemptions are being granted
under extremely narrow conditions.
One exemption is restricted to
ArcelorMittal’s employee-drivers to
enable them to work up to 16
consecutive hours in a duty period and
return to work with a minimum of at
least 8 hours off duty when necessary.
This is somewhat comparable to current
HOS regulations that allow certain
‘‘short-haul’’ drivers a 16-hour driving
‘‘window’’ once a week (49 CFR
395.1(o)) and other non-CDL short-haul
drivers two 16-hour duty periods per
week (49 CFR 395.1(e)(2)), provided
specified conditions are met. However,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:10 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
current regulations require a minimum
of 10 hours off duty between duty
periods.
Section 381.305(a) specifies that
motor carriers ‘‘. . . may apply for an
exemption if one or more Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations prevents you
from implementing more efficient or
effective operations that would maintain
a level of safety equivalent to, or greater
than, the level achieved without the
exemption.’’
The other exemption is restricted to
ArcelorMittal’s coil carriers as described
in its application. The exemption
enables ArcelorMittal’s CMVs that do
not meet the parts and accessories
requirements in part 393 to use two
short segments of public highway to
move coils from one part of the plant to
another for shipment to its customers.
The CMVs operated by ArcelorMittal’s
drivers will be exposed to other traffic
for very brief periods. The CMVs cross
Riley Road, where they travel 80 feet.
The length of the crossing at Dickey
Road and 129th Street is .2 mile. The
CMVs cross both points 24 times per
day.
Terms of the Exemptions
Period of the Exemption
The exemptions from the
requirements of 49 CFR part 395 and
certain sections in 49 CFR part 393
(§§ 393.5; 393.11 Table 1—Footnote 4;
393.75(f); and 393.120) are granted for
the period from September 23,
2016through September 23, 2021, for
drivers employed by ArcelorMittal and
certain CMVs used by ArcelorMittal to
transport coils.
Extent of the Exemptions
The exemption from the requirements
of 49 CFR part 395 is restricted to
ArcelorMittal’s internal logistics drivers.
Drivers utilizing the exemption may
work up to 16 consecutive hours in a
duty period and return to work with a
minimum of at least 8 hours off duty
when necessary.
The exemption from certain sections
in 49 CFR part 393 (§§ 393.5; 393.11
Table 1—Footnote 4; 393.75(f); and
393.120) is restricted to ArcelorMittal’s
CMVs that transport coils. The CMVs
must only cross on Riley Road, where
they travel 80 feet and Dickey Road and
129th Street where they travel .2 miles
to move coils from one part of the plant
to another for shipment to its customers.
All drivers must have CDLs and drivers
and vehicles must comply with all other
applicable provisions of the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.
ArcelorMittal must maintain any
oversize-overweight permits required by
local authorities.
Preemption
In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
31315(d), during the period these
exemptions are in effect, no State shall
enforce any law or regulation that
conflicts with or is inconsistent with
these exemptions with respect to a firm
or person operating under these
exemptions.
Notification to FMCSA
ArcelorMittal must notify FMCSA
within 5 business days of any accident
(as defined in 49 CFR 390.5), involving
any of the motor carrier’s CMVs
operating under the terms of these
exemptions. The notification must be by
email to MCPSD@DOT.GOV, and
include the following information:
a. Exemption Identifier: ‘‘ArcelorMittal’’
b. Name and USDOT number of the
motor carrier,
c. Date of the accident,
d. City or town, and State, in which the
accident occurred, or which is
closest to the scene of the accident,
e. Driver’s name and driver’s license
number,
f. Vehicle number and State license
number,
g. Number of individuals suffering
physical injury,
h. Number of fatalities,
i. The police-reported cause of the
accident,
j. Whether the driver was cited for
violation of any traffic laws, or
motor carrier safety regulations, and
k. The total driving time and the total
on-duty time of the CMV driver at
the time of the accident.
Termination
The FMCSA does not believe the
motor carrier, the drivers, and CMVs
covered by the exemptions will
experience any deterioration of their
safety record. However, should this
occur, FMCSA will take all steps
necessary to protect the public interest,
including revocation of the exemptions.
The FMCSA will immediately revoke
the exemptions for failure to comply
with its terms and conditions.
Issued on: September 15, 2016.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–22963 Filed 9–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65574-65576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22963]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 393 and 395
[Docket No. FMCSA-2016-0050]
Hours of Service of Drivers; Parts and Accessories: ArcelorMittal
Indiana Harbor, LLC, Application for Exemptions
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition; grant of application for
exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to grant ArcelorMittal Indiana
Harbor, LLC (ArcelorMittal) exemptions from the hours of service (HOS)
and parts and accessories rules. One exemption will allow
ArcelorMittal's employee-drivers with commercial driver's licenses
(CDLs) who transport steel coils between their production and shipping
locations on public roads to work up to 16 hours per day and return to
work with less than the mandatory 10 consecutive hours off duty. The
other exemption will allow ArcelorMittal to use coil carriers that do
not meet the ``heavy hauler trailer'' definition, height of rear side
marker lights restrictions, tire loading restrictions, and the coil
securement requirements.
DATES: These exemptions are effective from September 23, 2016 through
September 23, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle
Safety Standards; Telephone: (614) 942-6477. Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to www.regulations.gov and insert
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2016-0050'' in the ``Keyword'' box and click
``Search.'' Next, click ``Open Docket Folder'' button and choose the
document listed to review. If you do not have access to the Internet,
you may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations. FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in
the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the
[[Page 65575]]
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons
for denying or granting the application and, if granted, the name of
the person or class of persons receiving the exemption, and the
regulatory provision from which the exemption is granted. The notice
must also specify the effective period of the exemption (up to 5
years), and explain its terms and conditions. The exemption may be
renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
Section 5206(a)(3) of the ``Fixing America's Surface Transportation
Act,'' (FAST Act) [Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1537, Dec. 4, 2015],
amended 49 U.S.C. 31315(b) by adding a new paragraph (2) which permits
exemptions for no longer than 5 years from their dates of inception,
instead of the previous 2 years. This statutory provision was codified
in 49 CFR 381.300, effective July 22, 2016 (81 FR 47714).
III. Request for Exemptions
ArcelorMittal (USDOT 1098829) operates a steel plant in East
Chicago, Indiana, its principal place of business. Several public
roadways run through the plant area. Steel coils produced in one
portion of the plant must be transported over two short segments of
public highway to another section of the plant for further processing
or shipment to customers. Both points where the vehicles cross are
controlled intersections, having either traffic lights or a combination
of traffic lights and signs. The first public road the CMVs cross is
Riley Road. The crossing is controlled by a 4-way traffic signal. The
distance traveled is 80 feet. The average number of crossings at this
intersection is 24 per day. The second crossing is at Dickey Road and
129th Street. The distance traveled here is .2 miles. The trucks cross
129th Street 24 times per day.
The trailers are specially designed with cradles to hold steel
coils in place. The trailers have a bed height and width of 68 and 114
inches, respectively, and a maximum height of 14 feet.
Unloaded, these tractor-trailer combinations have a gross weight of
77,000 pounds. When fully loaded their gross weight is 263,171 pounds.
The trailers have off-road tires to distribute this weight and avoid
damaging roads, both inside and outside the plant. The tractors'
maximum speed is 30-35 mph, but only 15 mph when moving a fully loaded
trailer. These vehicles have many of the same features of a typical
tractor and trailer, but do not meet all of the parts and accessories
requirements in 49 CFR part 393.
All employee-drivers are required to hold CDLs and adhere to the
regulations that apply to CMV drivers. When employee-drivers move these
vehicles, they are fully marked as an ``oversize load'' and have flags
on the front of the tractor. Driving these vehicles amounts to 10
percent of the employee-drivers' total work day. ArcelorMittal contends
that these employee-drivers do not work more than 16 hours per day and
advises that a 16-hour work day is the exception, not the rule.
According to ArcelorMittal, the current hours-of-service (HOS)
regulations create problems as employee-drivers typically work an 8-
hour shift plus overtime while employees in the production and shipping
areas work 12-hour shifts. Employee-drivers must go home under the
current arrangement, leaving a 4-hour gap between production and the
driver's schedule, creating a possible shortage of coils for shipping
or processing. ArcelorMittal asserts that the limited number of
employees who drive the CMVs make it difficult to schedule moves.
ArcelorMittal anticipates that only 3 of the 24 crossings at each noted
intersection would occur after the 14th hour on-duty.
ArcelorMittal requested a complete exemption from 49 CFR part 395
for its ``internal logistics'' drivers to enable them to follow the
same schedule as the employees in the production and shipping areas.
The applicant could then minimize the chances of possible shortages of
coils for shipping or processing. ArcelorMittal advised that it would
ensure that all employee-drivers would not work more than 16 hours per
shift, would receive 8 hours off duty between shifts, and would not be
allowed to drive more than 10 percent of their total work day.
As previously noted, the vehicles used to transport steel coils
have many of the same features as a typical tractor and trailer, but do
not meet all of the requirements for parts and accessories in 49 CFR
part 393. ArcelorMittal therefore requested exemptions for its coil-
carrier trailers from the heavy hauler trailer definition in Sec.
393.5; the required height of rear side marker lights in Sec. 393.11
Table 1--Footnote 4; the tire loading restrictions in Sec. 393.75(f);
and the coil securement requirements in Sec. 393.120.
According to ArcelorMittal, its equipment was designed for in-
facility use and very limited road use. Public roadways are crossed
only when necessary, and oversize-overweight permits are obtained from
local authorities when required. The applicant advises that it has
never had an issue with its equipment or drivers at the crossings
mentioned above. The coils are well-secured in the trailers due to the
design of the cradles. The time needed to secure the coils in
compliance with part 393 would be longer than the transit time from one
part of the plant to another.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety
ArcelorMittal asserted that it has taken additional precautions to
use public roadways for the shortest possible distances and only at
controlled intersections. The applicant ensures that all lights are
properly working on both the tractor and trailer. It also flags and
marks the vehicles as ``oversize'' loads. Trailers have conspicuity
tape down the entire side to make them more visible to other traffic.
The applicant believes that its additional precautions ensure a level
of safety that is equivalent to or exceeds the level of safety achieved
by following the regulations.
ArcelorMittal acknowledged in its application that these ``internal
logistics'' drivers would remain subject to all of the other applicable
Federal regulations. This includes qualification of drivers, controlled
substance and alcohol testing and inspection, and maintenance and
repair of vehicles.
Included in ArcelorMittal's application are illustrations of the
plant's location, public roads crossed, and pictures of the tractors
and trailers used to transport the steel coils. A copy of
ArcelorMittal's application for the exemptions is available for review
in the docket for this notice.
V. Public Comments
On March 22, 2016, FMCSA published notice of this application and
requested public comment (81 FR 15217). Four comments were submitted.
Mr. Keith Case wrote, ``There are other options to handle this
situation that do not include having a special exemption for one
company. The company can hire additional drivers/workers to do this.''
Ms. Ingrid Harris commented, ``I do not think that it's ok to give any
company waivers to have drivers work longer hours. At the end of the
day the driver still has to drive home and is tired. This will just
cause more issues.'' Mr. Scott Olson stated, ``I do not support any
exemptions for anybody for any reason. If we make a rule, everybody
needs to abide by it. If we don't like the rule, get rid of it.''
[[Page 65576]]
The Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety stated that
``ArcelorMittal's request for an exemption from the HOS regulations
should be denied as granting such an exemption would result in a
substantial reduction in the level of safety currently provided by the
regulations. In addition, there is practical and common sense
alternative readily available to the company other than the exemption.
Finally, while Advocates does not oppose ArcelorMittal's request for an
exemption for its vehicles from certain sections of 49 CFR part 393,
FMCSA must be explicit that such an exemption is strictly limited in
its scope to those vehicles and roadways described in the
application.''
VI. FMCSA Response and Decision
Prior to publishing the Federal Register notice announcing the
receipt of ArcelorMittal's exemptions request, FMCSA ensured that the
motor carrier possessed an active USDOT registration, minimum required
levels of insurance, and was not subject to any ``imminent hazard'' or
other out-of-service orders. The Agency conducted a comprehensive
investigation of the safety performance history of the motor carrier
during the review process. As part of this process, FMCSA reviewed its
Motor Carrier Management Information System safety records, including
inspection and accident reports submitted to FMCSA by State agencies.
The FMCSA has evaluated ArcelorMittal's application for exemptions
and the public comments. The Agency believes that ArcelorMittal's
overall safety performance, as well as a number of other factors
discussed below, will enable it to achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than the level of safety achieved without the
exemptions (49 CFR 381.305(a)).
These exemptions are being granted under extremely narrow
conditions. One exemption is restricted to ArcelorMittal's employee-
drivers to enable them to work up to 16 consecutive hours in a duty
period and return to work with a minimum of at least 8 hours off duty
when necessary. This is somewhat comparable to current HOS regulations
that allow certain ``short-haul'' drivers a 16-hour driving ``window''
once a week (49 CFR 395.1(o)) and other non-CDL short-haul drivers two
16-hour duty periods per week (49 CFR 395.1(e)(2)), provided specified
conditions are met. However, current regulations require a minimum of
10 hours off duty between duty periods.
Section 381.305(a) specifies that motor carriers ``. . . may apply
for an exemption if one or more Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations prevents you from implementing more efficient or effective
operations that would maintain a level of safety equivalent to, or
greater than, the level achieved without the exemption.''
The other exemption is restricted to ArcelorMittal's coil carriers
as described in its application. The exemption enables ArcelorMittal's
CMVs that do not meet the parts and accessories requirements in part
393 to use two short segments of public highway to move coils from one
part of the plant to another for shipment to its customers. The CMVs
operated by ArcelorMittal's drivers will be exposed to other traffic
for very brief periods. The CMVs cross Riley Road, where they travel 80
feet. The length of the crossing at Dickey Road and 129th Street is .2
mile. The CMVs cross both points 24 times per day.
Terms of the Exemptions
Period of the Exemption
The exemptions from the requirements of 49 CFR part 395 and certain
sections in 49 CFR part 393 (Sec. Sec. 393.5; 393.11 Table 1--Footnote
4; 393.75(f); and 393.120) are granted for the period from September
23, 2016through September 23, 2021, for drivers employed by
ArcelorMittal and certain CMVs used by ArcelorMittal to transport
coils.
Extent of the Exemptions
The exemption from the requirements of 49 CFR part 395 is
restricted to ArcelorMittal's internal logistics drivers. Drivers
utilizing the exemption may work up to 16 consecutive hours in a duty
period and return to work with a minimum of at least 8 hours off duty
when necessary.
The exemption from certain sections in 49 CFR part 393 (Sec. Sec.
393.5; 393.11 Table 1--Footnote 4; 393.75(f); and 393.120) is
restricted to ArcelorMittal's CMVs that transport coils. The CMVs must
only cross on Riley Road, where they travel 80 feet and Dickey Road and
129th Street where they travel .2 miles to move coils from one part of
the plant to another for shipment to its customers. All drivers must
have CDLs and drivers and vehicles must comply with all other
applicable provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.
ArcelorMittal must maintain any oversize-overweight permits required by
local authorities.
Preemption
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(d), during the period these
exemptions are in effect, no State shall enforce any law or regulation
that conflicts with or is inconsistent with these exemptions with
respect to a firm or person operating under these exemptions.
Notification to FMCSA
ArcelorMittal must notify FMCSA within 5 business days of any
accident (as defined in 49 CFR 390.5), involving any of the motor
carrier's CMVs operating under the terms of these exemptions. The
notification must be by email to MCPSD@DOT.GOV, and include the
following information:
a. Exemption Identifier: ``ArcelorMittal''
b. Name and USDOT number of the motor carrier,
c. Date of the accident,
d. City or town, and State, in which the accident occurred, or which is
closest to the scene of the accident,
e. Driver's name and driver's license number,
f. Vehicle number and State license number,
g. Number of individuals suffering physical injury,
h. Number of fatalities,
i. The police-reported cause of the accident,
j. Whether the driver was cited for violation of any traffic laws, or
motor carrier safety regulations, and
k. The total driving time and the total on-duty time of the CMV driver
at the time of the accident.
Termination
The FMCSA does not believe the motor carrier, the drivers, and CMVs
covered by the exemptions will experience any deterioration of their
safety record. However, should this occur, FMCSA will take all steps
necessary to protect the public interest, including revocation of the
exemptions. The FMCSA will immediately revoke the exemptions for
failure to comply with its terms and conditions.
Issued on: September 15, 2016.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-22963 Filed 9-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P