Metropolitan Planning Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform, 65592-65593 [2016-22907]
Download as PDF
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
65592
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
reasonably believe that a requester or a
group of requesters acting in concert, is
dividing a request into a series of
requests for the purpose of avoiding or
minimizing fees. For example, we may
aggregate multiple requests for similar
information filed within a short period
of time.
(f) If we anticipate fees will exceed
$25. Unless you have indicated in
advance a willingness to pay fees as
high as anticipated, we will notify you
if we estimate that charges will exceed
$25.
(1) We will not process your request
until you either commit in writing to
pay the actual or estimated total fee, or
designate some amount of fees you are
willing to pay. If you are a
noncommercial use requester and we
have not yet provided your statutory
entitlements (i.e., two hours of search
time and 100 free pages), you can tell us
to stop when we exhaust the statutory
entitlements. We will start the twentyday response clock when we receive
your written reply.
(2) If you agree to pay some
designated amount of fees, but we
estimate that the total fee will exceed
that amount, we will toll processing
when we notify you of the estimated
fees in excess of the amount you had
indicated a willingness to pay. When we
receive your written commitment to pay
the actual or estimated total fee, or
designate an additional amount of fees
you are willing to pay, we will restart
the processing clock.
(3) If you decide to reformulate your
request to reduce costs, we will consider
it to be a new request that restarts the
twenty-day response clock. You can
contact USTR’s FOIA Public Liaison at
FOIA@ustr.eop.gov for assistance.
(4) We will close your request if you
do not respond in writing within thirty
calendar days after the date we notify
you of the fee estimate.
(g) Advance payments. (1) If we
determine or estimate that the total fee
will exceed $250, we may require you
to make an advance payment up to the
amount of the entire anticipated fee
before we begin to process your request.
(2) If you previously failed to pay a
properly charged FOIA fee to any
Federal agency within thirty calendar
days of the billing date, we may require
proof that you paid the full amount due,
plus any applicable interest on that
prior request, and that you make an
advance payment to us of the full
amount of any anticipated fee before we
begin to process a new request or
continue to process a pending request or
any pending appeal. If we have a
reasonable basis to believe that you have
misrepresented your identity in order to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
avoid paying outstanding fees, we may
require you to provide proof of identity.
(3) If we require advance payment, we
will not consider your request received
and will not do any additional work
until we receive the required payment.
We will close your request if you do not
pay the advance payment within thirty
calendar days after the date of our fee
determination.
(h) Requirements for waiver or
reduction of fees. (1) You can seek a fee
waiver or reduction by explaining in
writing how disclosure of the requested
information is in the public interest
because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government and is not primarily in your
commercial interest. In determining
whether to waive or reduce a fee we will
consider whether disclosure of the
requested information would:
(i) Shed light on the operations or
activities of the government. The subject
of the request must specifically concern
identifiable operations or activities of
the Federal government with a
connection that is direct and clear, not
remote or attenuated.
(ii) Likely contribute significantly to
public understanding of those
operations or activities. Disclosure of
the requested records must be
meaningfully informative about
government operations or activities. The
disclosure of information that already is
in the public domain, in either the same
or a substantially identical form, would
not be meaningfully informative if
nothing new would be added to the
public’s understanding. The disclosure
must contribute to the understanding of
a reasonably broad audience—the
public-at-large as opposed to a narrow
segment of the population. We will
consider your expertise in the subject
area as well as your ability and
intention to effectively convey
information to the public.
(iii) Is to further an identified
commercial interest and whether that is
the primary interest advanced by the
request. For example, we ordinarily
presume that the public’s interest is
greater than the requester’s commercial
interest when we receive a request from
a representative of the news media. We
will not presume that disclosure to data
brokers or others who merely compile
and market government information for
direct economic return primarily serves
the public interest.
(2) We will grant a partial waiver
when only some of the records to be
released satisfy the requirements in this
section.
(3) You should include your fee
waiver or reduction request when you
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
first submit your FOIA request to us.
You can submit a fee waiver or
reduction request at a later time so long
as the underlying record request is
pending or on administrative appeal. If
you already committed to pay fees and
subsequently request a waiver of those
fees that we deny, you must pay any
costs incurred up to the date the fee
waiver request was received.
Janice Kaye,
Chief Counsel for Administrative Law, Office
of the U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2016–22863 Filed 9–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290–F6–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 450
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 613
[Docket No. FHWA–2016–0016; FHWA RIN
2125–AF68; FTA RIN 2132–AB28]
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Coordination and Planning Area
Reform
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Federal
Transit Administration (FTA); U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM); reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
The FHWA and FTA are
reopening the comment period for the
NPRM that was published on June 27,
2016, at 81 FR 41473, in order to receive
additional public comment on targeted
issues. The NPRM proposes revisions to
the transportation planning regulations
to promote more effective regional
planning by States and metropolitan
planning organizations (MPO). The
original comment period closed on
August 26, 2016. The FHWA and FTA
received a number of requests to extend
the comment period. The FHWA and
FTA recognize that those interested in
commenting on this important program
may not have had the opportunity to
provide comments and that the
comment period should be reopened.
Therefore, the comment period is being
reopened.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 24, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver
comments to: Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, or
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23SEP1.SGM
23SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
submit electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, or fax comments
to (202) 493–2251. All comments should
include the docket number that appears
in the heading of this document. All
comments received will be available for
examination and copying at the above
address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. Those desiring notification of
receipt of comments must include a selfaddressed, stamped postcard or may
print the acknowledgment page that
appears after submitting comments
electronically. Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments in
any one of our dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business, or
labor union). You may review the DOT
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).
Electronic Access and Filing
This document and all comments
received may be viewed online through
the Federal eRulemaking portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. The Web
site is available 24 hours each day, 365
days each year. An electronic copy of
this document may also be downloaded
by accessing the Office of the Federal
Register’s home page at: https://
www.federalregister.gov and the
Government Publishing Office’s Web
site at: https://www.gpo.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
FHWA: Mr. Harlan W. Miller, Planning
Oversight and Stewardship Team
(HEPP–10), (202) 366–0847; or Ms. Janet
Myers, Office of the Chief Counsel
(HCC–30), (202) 366–2019. For FTA:
Ms. Sherry Riklin, Office of Planning
and Environment, (202) 366–5407; Mr.
Dwayne Weeks, Office of Planning and
Environment, (202) 493–0316; or Mr.
Christopher Hall, Office of Chief
Counsel, (202) 366–5218. Both agencies
are located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office
hours are from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., ET
for FHWA, and 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., ET
for FTA, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
On June 27, 2016, the FHWA and FTA
published a proposed rule to revise the
transportation planning regulations to
promote more effective regional
planning by States and MPOs. See 81 FR
41473. The goal of the proposed
revisions is to promote unified planning
products for each urbanized area, even
if there are multiple MPOs designated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
within that urbanized area. Specifically,
the NPRM proposed that MPOs would
develop a single metropolitan
transportation plan, a single
transportation improvement program
(TIP), and a jointly established set of
performance targets for the entire
urbanized area and contiguous area
expected to become urbanized within a
20-year forecast period for the
transportation plan. If multiple MPOs
are designated within that urbanized
area, they would jointly prepare these
unified planning products. To
accomplish this, the proposed revisions
would clarify that the metropolitan
planning area (MPA) must include the
entire urbanized area and contiguous
area expected to become urbanized
within 20 years.
As discussed in the NPRM, these
proposed revisions would better align
the planning regulations with statutory
provisions concerning the establishment
of MPA boundaries and the designation
of MPOs. This includes the statutory
requirement for the MPA to include an
urbanized area in its entirety together
with the contiguous area expected to
become urbanized within 20 years, and
the exception provision to allow more
than one MPO to serve a single MPA if
warranted by the size and complexity of
the MPA. This return to the original
legislative intent is in alignment with
the findings of the draft report Beyond
Traffic: Trends and Choices 2045.
Beyond Traffic was released by the
Department in February 2015. It
examines the long-term and emerging
trends affecting our Nation’s
transportation system and the
implications of those trends. It describes
how demographic and economic trends,
as well as changes in technology,
governance, and our climate, will
increase the importance of our
metropolitan regions in making
decisions that cross State, political,
socioeconomic, and often transportation
planning lines. By 2045, the population
is anticipated to increase by 70 million
people, with most of that growth
occurring in metropolitan areas.
The rulemaking would establish
clearer operating procedures, and
reinstate certain coordination and
decisionmaking requirements for
situations where there is more than one
MPO serving an MPA. The proposed
rule would require unified planning
products for the MPA, including jointly
established performance targets within
an MPA, and a single metropolitan
transportation plan and TIP for the
entire MPA in order to result in
planning products that reflect the
regional needs of the entire urbanized
area. These unified planning products
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
65593
would be jointly developed by the
multiple MPOs in such MPAs where
more than one MPO is designated.
The FHWA and FTA propose to phase
in implementation of these proposed
coordination requirements and the
proposed requirements for MPA
boundary and MPO boundaries
agreements over 2 years.
Additional Public Comments Sought on
Specific Issues
The FHWA and FTA are reopening
the comment period in order to receive
public comment on certain issues raised
in the NPRM. Specifically, the FHWA
and FTA are looking for specific and
detailed comments that contribute to the
understanding of the impact of the
proposed requirements for unified
planning products where multiple
MPOs serve the same urbanized area,
potential exceptions that should be
included in the final rule, and criteria
for applying such exceptions. The
FHWA and FTA also seek specific and
detailed comments on the expected
costs of implementing the proposed
rule. The FHWA and FTA are seeking
comments specific to these issues as we
decide whether to finalize any
provisions within the scope of the
NPRM. Previously submitted comments
should not be resubmitted.
The original comment period for the
NPRM closed on August 26, 2016. The
FHWA and FTA ask commenters to
focus on the specific issues open for
public comment, as discussed in the
above paragraph. Other comments will
be considered to the extent practicable.
To allow time for interested parties to
submit comments on the targeted issues
highlighted above, the comment period
is being reopened until October 24,
2016.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
19th 2016, under authority delegated in 49
CFR 1.85 and 1.91.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
Carolyn Flowers,
Acting Administrator, Federal Transit
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–22907 Filed 9–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
E:\FR\FM\23SEP1.SGM
23SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65592-65593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22907]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 450
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 613
[Docket No. FHWA-2016-0016; FHWA RIN 2125-AF68; FTA RIN 2132-AB28]
Metropolitan Planning Organization Coordination and Planning Area
Reform
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit
Administration (FTA); U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of comment
period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA and FTA are reopening the comment period for the NPRM
that was published on June 27, 2016, at 81 FR 41473, in order to
receive additional public comment on targeted issues. The NPRM proposes
revisions to the transportation planning regulations to promote more
effective regional planning by States and metropolitan planning
organizations (MPO). The original comment period closed on August 26,
2016. The FHWA and FTA received a number of requests to extend the
comment period. The FHWA and FTA recognize that those interested in
commenting on this important program may not have had the opportunity
to provide comments and that the comment period should be reopened.
Therefore, the comment period is being reopened.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 24, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver comments to: Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590, or
[[Page 65593]]
submit electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, or fax comments to
(202) 493-2251. All comments should include the docket number that
appears in the heading of this document. All comments received will be
available for examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those
desiring notification of receipt of comments must include a self-
addressed, stamped postcard or may print the acknowledgment page that
appears after submitting comments electronically. Anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all comments in any one of our dockets by
the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, or labor
union). You may review the DOT complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).
Electronic Access and Filing
This document and all comments received may be viewed online
through the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
The Web site is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. An
electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded by accessing
the Office of the Federal Register's home page at: https://www.federalregister.gov and the Government Publishing Office's Web site
at: https://www.gpo.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For FHWA: Mr. Harlan W. Miller,
Planning Oversight and Stewardship Team (HEPP-10), (202) 366-0847; or
Ms. Janet Myers, Office of the Chief Counsel (HCC-30), (202) 366-2019.
For FTA: Ms. Sherry Riklin, Office of Planning and Environment, (202)
366-5407; Mr. Dwayne Weeks, Office of Planning and Environment, (202)
493-0316; or Mr. Christopher Hall, Office of Chief Counsel, (202) 366-
5218. Both agencies are located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., ET for
FHWA, and 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., ET for FTA, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 27, 2016, the FHWA and FTA published a proposed rule to
revise the transportation planning regulations to promote more
effective regional planning by States and MPOs. See 81 FR 41473. The
goal of the proposed revisions is to promote unified planning products
for each urbanized area, even if there are multiple MPOs designated
within that urbanized area. Specifically, the NPRM proposed that MPOs
would develop a single metropolitan transportation plan, a single
transportation improvement program (TIP), and a jointly established set
of performance targets for the entire urbanized area and contiguous
area expected to become urbanized within a 20-year forecast period for
the transportation plan. If multiple MPOs are designated within that
urbanized area, they would jointly prepare these unified planning
products. To accomplish this, the proposed revisions would clarify that
the metropolitan planning area (MPA) must include the entire urbanized
area and contiguous area expected to become urbanized within 20 years.
As discussed in the NPRM, these proposed revisions would better
align the planning regulations with statutory provisions concerning the
establishment of MPA boundaries and the designation of MPOs. This
includes the statutory requirement for the MPA to include an urbanized
area in its entirety together with the contiguous area expected to
become urbanized within 20 years, and the exception provision to allow
more than one MPO to serve a single MPA if warranted by the size and
complexity of the MPA. This return to the original legislative intent
is in alignment with the findings of the draft report Beyond Traffic:
Trends and Choices 2045. Beyond Traffic was released by the Department
in February 2015. It examines the long-term and emerging trends
affecting our Nation's transportation system and the implications of
those trends. It describes how demographic and economic trends, as well
as changes in technology, governance, and our climate, will increase
the importance of our metropolitan regions in making decisions that
cross State, political, socioeconomic, and often transportation
planning lines. By 2045, the population is anticipated to increase by
70 million people, with most of that growth occurring in metropolitan
areas.
The rulemaking would establish clearer operating procedures, and
reinstate certain coordination and decisionmaking requirements for
situations where there is more than one MPO serving an MPA. The
proposed rule would require unified planning products for the MPA,
including jointly established performance targets within an MPA, and a
single metropolitan transportation plan and TIP for the entire MPA in
order to result in planning products that reflect the regional needs of
the entire urbanized area. These unified planning products would be
jointly developed by the multiple MPOs in such MPAs where more than one
MPO is designated.
The FHWA and FTA propose to phase in implementation of these
proposed coordination requirements and the proposed requirements for
MPA boundary and MPO boundaries agreements over 2 years.
Additional Public Comments Sought on Specific Issues
The FHWA and FTA are reopening the comment period in order to
receive public comment on certain issues raised in the NPRM.
Specifically, the FHWA and FTA are looking for specific and detailed
comments that contribute to the understanding of the impact of the
proposed requirements for unified planning products where multiple MPOs
serve the same urbanized area, potential exceptions that should be
included in the final rule, and criteria for applying such exceptions.
The FHWA and FTA also seek specific and detailed comments on the
expected costs of implementing the proposed rule. The FHWA and FTA are
seeking comments specific to these issues as we decide whether to
finalize any provisions within the scope of the NPRM. Previously
submitted comments should not be resubmitted.
The original comment period for the NPRM closed on August 26, 2016.
The FHWA and FTA ask commenters to focus on the specific issues open
for public comment, as discussed in the above paragraph. Other comments
will be considered to the extent practicable. To allow time for
interested parties to submit comments on the targeted issues
highlighted above, the comment period is being reopened until October
24, 2016.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 19th 2016, under
authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.85 and 1.91.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
Carolyn Flowers,
Acting Administrator, Federal Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-22907 Filed 9-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P