Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Interstate 495 (Long Island Expressway) Rest Area Upgrade Project Between Exits 51 & 52 (Eastbound) in the Town of Huntington, Suffolk County, New York, 65695-65696 [2016-22700]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
original new alignment Tier 1 corridors
for Segment II/III were deemed not
reasonable due to their potential for
significant environmental impacts and
extensive public controversy.
ODOT is moving forward with the
project development process to consider
alternatives that have the potential for
lower overall impacts, focusing on
improvements to existing transportation
corridors rather than new alignments
through this environmentally complex
area. Alignment alternatives on existing
SR 32, US 50 and other roadways could
include: Adding turn lanes, interchange
improvements, widening to enhance
capacity; minor realignments;
improving signal timing and/or
coordination; installing new signal(s);
and other improvements. If any of these
improvements require the preparation of
an Environmental Impact Statement,
future Notices of Intent may be filed.
The environmental review,
consultation, and other actions required
by applicable Federal environmental
laws for this project are being, or have
been, carried-out by ODOT pursuant to
23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of
Understanding dated December 11,
2015, and executed by FHWA and
ODOT.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway
Planning and Construction. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
this program.)
actions relate to the proposed Interstate
495 (Long Island Expressway) Rest Area
Upgrade Project between Exits 51 & 52
(eastbound) in the Town of Huntington,
Suffolk County, New York (NYSDOT
Project Identification Number: 0229.14).
Those actions rescind the Record of
Decision (ROD) and the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
dated May 21, 2007. The ROD was
signed by FHWA on August 6, 2007.
By this notice, FHWA is advising
the public of final agency actions
subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim
seeking judicial review of the Federal
agency actions on the highway project
will be barred unless the claim is filed
on or before 150 days after publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Osborn, Division Administrator,
Federal Highway Administration, New
York Division, Leo W. O’Brien Federal
Building, Suite 719, Clinton Avenue
and North Pearl Street, Albany, New
York 12207. Telephone (518) 431–4127
Notice is
hereby given that FHWA has taken final
agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C.
139(l)(1) by issuing a Rescission of the
Record of Decision and a Rescission of
the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for the proposed
Interstate 495 (Long Island Expressway)
Rest Area Upgrade Project between Exits
51 & 52 (eastbound) in the Town of
Huntington, Suffolk County, New York.
The FHWA, as the lead Federal agency,
in cooperation with the New York State
Department of Transportation
Issued on: September 6, 2016.
(NYSDOT) signed a ROD on August 6,
Robert L. Griffith,
2007, for the proposed Interstate 495
Acting Division Administrator, Federal
(Long Island Expressway) Rest Area
Highway Administration, Columbus, Ohio.
Upgrade Project between Exits 51 & 52
[FR Doc. 2016–22910 Filed 9–22–16; 8:45 am]
(eastbound). The proposed project
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
evaluated alternatives for upgrading the
existing rest area for cars and trucks
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION located on I–495/LIE eastbound between
Exits 51 and 52. Since the ROD was
signed, NYSDOT notified FHWA that
Federal Highway Administration
Federal funds will not be utilized
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions during the final design and construction
on Proposed Interstate 495 (Long
of the project. Therefore, FHWA has
Island Expressway) Rest Area Upgrade determined that the ROD and the Final
Project Between Exits 51 & 52
Environmental Impact Statement dated
(Eastbound) in the Town of
May 21, 2007, will be rescinded since
Huntington, Suffolk County, New York
there will be no Federal action, and the
requirements of the National
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Environmental Policy Act pursuant to
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq. and 23 Code of
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
Federal Regulations 771 no longer
for Judicial Review of Actions by
apply.
FHWA.
This notice applies to all Federal
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions agency decisions as of the issuance date
of this notice and all laws under which
taken by FHWA and other Federal
such actions were taken, including but
agencies that are final within the
not limited to:
meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65695
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q)].
3. Land: Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]; Landscaping and
Scenic Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23
U.S.C. 319].
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act
[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section
1536]; Marine Mammal Protection Act
[16 U.S.C. 1361]; Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661–
667(d)]; Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16
U.S.C. 703–712].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
[16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]; Archeological
Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16
U.S.C. 470(aa)–470(ll)]; Archeological
and Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C.
469–469(c)]; Native American Grave
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001–3013].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights
Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)–
2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious
Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland
Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C.
4201–4209].
7. Wetlands and Water Resources:
Clean Water Act (Section 404, Section
401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251–
1377]; Land and Water Conservation
Fund (LWCF) [16 U.S.C. 4601–4604];
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) [42
U.S.C. 300(f)–300(j)(6)]; Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899 [33 U.S.C. 401–
406]; Wild and Scenic Rivers Act [16
U.S.C. 1271–1287]; Emergency
Wetlands Resources Act, [16 U.S.C.
3921, 3931]; Wetlands Mitigation [23
U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(M) and 133(b)(11)];
Flood Disaster Protection Act, 42 U.S.C.
4001–4128.
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990
Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898,
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and
Enhancement of Cultural Resources;
E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O.
13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514
Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112
Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
65696
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Notices
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1)
Issued on: September 12, 2016.
Peter Osborn,
Division Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration, Albany, New York.
[FR Doc. 2016–22700 Filed 9–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2015–0480]
Commercial Driver’s License
Standards: Application for Exemption;
CRST Expedited
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Notice of final disposition; grant
of application for exemption.
ACTION:
FMCSA announces its
decision to grant CRST Expedited
(CRST) an exemption from the
regulation that requires a commercial
learner’s permit (CLP) holder to be
accompanied by a commercial driver’s
license (CDL) holder with the proper
CDL class and endorsements, seated in
the front seat of the vehicle while the
CLP holder performs behind-the-wheel
training on public roads or highways.
Under the terms and conditions of this
exemption, a CLP holder who has
documentation of passing the CDL skills
test may drive a commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) for CRST without being
accompanied by a CDL holder in the
front seat of the vehicle. The exemption
enables CLP holders to drive as part of
a team and have the same regulatory
flexibility as CRST team drivers with
CDLs. FMCSA has analyzed the
exemption application and the public
comments and has determined that the
exemption, subject to the terms and
conditions imposed, will achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater
than, the level that would be achieved
absent such exemption.
SUMMARY:
The exemption is effective from
September 23, 2016 through September
24, 2018.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
Mr.
Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of
Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone: (614) 942–6477.
Email: MCPSD@dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Sep 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
Background
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions
from some of the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations. FMCSA must
publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must also
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews the safety
analyses and the public comments, and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register (49
CFR 381.315(b)) with the reason for the
grant or denial, and, if granted, the
specific person or class of persons
receiving the exemption, and the
regulatory provision or provisions from
which exemption is granted. The notice
must also specify the effective period of
the exemption, and explain the terms
and conditions of the exemption. The
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR
381.300(b)).
Request for Exemption
CRST is one of the nation’s largest
transportation companies with a fleet of
more than 4,500 CMVs. CRST seeks an
exemption from 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1)
that would allow CLP holders who have
successfully passed a CDL skills test and
are thus eligible to receive a CDL, to
drive a truck without a CDL holder
being present in the front seat of the
vehicle. CRST indicates that the CDL
holder will remain in the vehicle at all
times while the CLP holder is driving—
just not in the front seat. This would
allow a CLP holder to participate in a
revenue-producing trip back to his or
her State of domicile to obtain the CDL
document, as the CDL can only be
issued by the State of domicile in
accordance with 49 CFR part 383.
CRST noted the trucking industry’s
need for qualified and well-trained
drivers to meet increasing shipping
demands. CRST believes that 49 CFR
383.25(a)(1) limits its ability to
efficiently recruit, train, and employ
new entrants to the industry. Prior to
the implementation of section
385.25(a)(1), States routinely issued
temporary CDLs to drivers who passed
the CDL skills test. The temporary CDL
allowed CRST time to route the new
driver to his or her State of domicile to
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
obtain the permanent CDL and place the
new driver into an on-the-job training
position with a driver-trainer. The
driver-trainer supervised and observed
the new driver, but was not required to
be on duty and in the front seat at all
times. Thus, the new driver became
productive immediately, allowing more
freight movement for CRST and
compensation for the new driver.
CRST contends that compliance with
the CDL rule places them in a very
difficult position regarding how they
return CLP holders who have passed
their skills testing to their State of
domicile to obtain their CDL. According
to CRST, the two possible courses of
action in this scenario are simple, yet
costly: (1) CRST sends CLP holders to
their home State by public
transportation to obtain the CDL and
hopes the drivers return to CRST for
employment; or (2) CRST sends CLP
holders back to their home State as
passengers on one of its trucks. Granting
the exemption would allow the CLP
holder to drive as part of a team on that
trip, resulting in reduced costs and
increased productivity.
CRST asserts that the exemption
would be consistent with the Agency’s
comments in the preamble to the final
rule adopting § 383.25 that ‘‘FMCSA
does not believe that it is safe to permit
inexperienced drivers who have not
passed the CDL skills test to drive
unaccompanied.’’ (76 FR 26854, 26861
May 9, 2011). The exemption sought
would apply only to those CRST drivers
who have passed the CDL skills test and
hold a CLP. CRST believes that the
exemption would result in a level of
safety that is equivalent to or greater
than the level of safety provided under
the rule. The only difference between a
CLP holder who has passed the CDL
skills test and a CDL holder is that the
latter has received the actual CDL
document from a State driver licensing
agency.
Public Comments
On January 5, 2016, FMCSA
published notice of this application and
requested public comment (81 FR 291).
The Agency received 56 comments.
Most of the comments opposed to the
CRST request were from truck drivers,
driver-trainers, and other individuals.
These respondents do not believe that it
is safe for a CLP holder to operate a
CMV without the supervision of a CDL
driver-trainer in the front seat of the
truck.
The Iowa Motor Truck Association
(IMTA) supported the exemption
request, commenting that if CLP holders
are properly trained and tested, the fact
that they have not yet obtained their
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65695-65696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22700]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Interstate 495
(Long Island Expressway) Rest Area Upgrade Project Between Exits 51 &
52 (Eastbound) in the Town of Huntington, Suffolk County, New York
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions
by FHWA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions taken by FHWA and other Federal
agencies that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The
actions relate to the proposed Interstate 495 (Long Island Expressway)
Rest Area Upgrade Project between Exits 51 & 52 (eastbound) in the Town
of Huntington, Suffolk County, New York (NYSDOT Project Identification
Number: 0229.14). Those actions rescind the Record of Decision (ROD)
and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) dated May 21, 2007.
The ROD was signed by FHWA on August 6, 2007.
DATES: By this notice, FHWA is advising the public of final agency
actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking judicial review
of the Federal agency actions on the highway project will be barred
unless the claim is filed on or before 150 days after publication of
this notice in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Osborn, Division Administrator,
Federal Highway Administration, New York Division, Leo W. O'Brien
Federal Building, Suite 719, Clinton Avenue and North Pearl Street,
Albany, New York 12207. Telephone (518) 431-4127
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that FHWA has taken
final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing a
Rescission of the Record of Decision and a Rescission of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the proposed Interstate 495
(Long Island Expressway) Rest Area Upgrade Project between Exits 51 &
52 (eastbound) in the Town of Huntington, Suffolk County, New York. The
FHWA, as the lead Federal agency, in cooperation with the New York
State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) signed a ROD on August 6,
2007, for the proposed Interstate 495 (Long Island Expressway) Rest
Area Upgrade Project between Exits 51 & 52 (eastbound). The proposed
project evaluated alternatives for upgrading the existing rest area for
cars and trucks located on I-495/LIE eastbound between Exits 51 and 52.
Since the ROD was signed, NYSDOT notified FHWA that Federal funds will
not be utilized during the final design and construction of the
project. Therefore, FHWA has determined that the ROD and the Final
Environmental Impact Statement dated May 21, 2007, will be rescinded
since there will be no Federal action, and the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.
and 23 Code of Federal Regulations 771 no longer apply.
This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions as of the
issuance date of this notice and all laws under which such actions were
taken, including but not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C.
4321-4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q)].
3. Land: Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]; Landscaping and Scenic Enhancement (Wildflowers)
[23 U.S.C. 319].
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531-1544 and
Section 1536]; Marine Mammal Protection Act [16 U.S.C. 1361]; Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661-667(d)]; Migratory Bird Treaty
Act [16 U.S.C. 703-712].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources: Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et
seq.]; Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16 U.S.C.
470(aa)-470(ll)]; Archeological and Historic Preservation Act [16
U.S.C. 469-469(c)]; Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation
Act (NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001-3013].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C.
2000(d)-2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious Freedom Act [42 U.S.C.
1996]; Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. 4201-4209].
7. Wetlands and Water Resources: Clean Water Act (Section 404,
Section 401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251-1377]; Land and Water
Conservation Fund (LWCF) [16 U.S.C. 4601-4604]; Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 300(f)-300(j)(6)]; Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 [33
U.S.C. 401-406]; Wild and Scenic Rivers Act [16 U.S.C. 1271-1287];
Emergency Wetlands Resources Act, [16 U.S.C. 3921, 3931]; Wetlands
Mitigation [23 U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(M) and 133(b)(11)]; Flood Disaster
Protection Act, 42 U.S.C. 4001-4128.
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898, Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income
Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and Enhancement of Cultural
Resources; E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O. 13287 Preserve America;
E.O. 13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments; E.O. 11514 Protection and Enhancement of Environmental
Quality; E.O. 13112 Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
[[Page 65696]]
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1)
Issued on: September 12, 2016.
Peter Osborn,
Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Albany, New
York.
[FR Doc. 2016-22700 Filed 9-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P