Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review (Renewal), 64902-64904 [2016-22770]

Download as PDF 64902 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Notices TABLE 3—REGISTRANTS OF CANCELLED AND AMENDED REGISTRATION—Continued EPA company No. 60061 67619 70627 74655 ........................... ........................... ........................... ........................... Company name and address Kop-Coat, Inc, 436 Seventh Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. Clorox Professional Products Co, C/O PS&RC, P.O. Box 493, Pleasanton, CA 94566. Diversey, Inc., 8310 16th Street, MS 707, Sturtevant, WI 53177. Solenis, LLC., 7910 Baymeadows Way, Suite 100, Jacksonville, FL 32256. III. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to Comments During the public comment period, EPA received one comment. The comment was from Lonza Inc. on behalf of H&S Chemicals Division requesting that EPA Reg. No. 47371–58 be retained because the voluntary cancellation request was made in error. As a result of this comment, the Agency is retaining the registration of EPA Reg. No. 47371– 58. mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES IV. Cancellation Order Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f) (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)), EPA hereby approves the requested cancellations and amendment to terminate a certain use of dodecylguanidine hydrochloride (DGH) registration identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Unit II. Accordingly, the Agency orders that the product registrations identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Unit II. are hereby cancelled and amended to terminate the affected use. Any distribution, sale, or use of existing stocks of the products identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Unit II. in a manner inconsistent with any of the Provisions for Disposition of Existing Stocks set forth in Unit VI. will be considered a violation of FIFRA. V. What is the agency’s authority for taking this action? Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA provides that a registrant of a pesticide product may at any time request that any of its pesticide registrations be cancelled or amended to terminate one or more uses. FIFRA further provides that, before acting on the request, EPA must publish a notice of receipt of any such request in the Federal Register. Thereafter, following the public comment period, the EPA Administrator may approve such a request. The notice of receipt for this action was published for comment in the Federal Register of July 21, 2016 (81 FR 47381) (FRL–9948–85). The comment period closed on August 22, 2016. VI. Provisions for Disposition of Existing Stocks EPA’s existing stocks policy published in the Federal Register of June 26, 1991 (56 FR 29362) provides VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Sep 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 that: ‘‘If a registrant requests to voluntarily cancel a registration where the Agency has identified no particular risk concerns, the registrant has complied with all applicable conditions of reregistration, conditional registration, and data call ins, and the registration is not subject to a Registration Standard, Label Improvement Program, or reregistration decision, the Agency will generally permit a registrant to sell or distribute existing stocks for 1 year after the cancellation request was received. Persons other than registrants will generally be allowed to sell, distribute, or use existing stocks until such stocks are exhausted.’’ Existing stocks are those stocks of registered pesticide products which are currently in the United States and which were packaged, labeled, and released for shipment prior to the effective date of the cancellation action. A. For Products 10324–64, 10324–73, 10324–79, 10324–82, 10324–83, 10324– 84, 10324–86, 10324–109, 10324–131, 10324–134, 10324–144, 10324–146, 10324–147, 10324–163, 10324–168, 10324–179, 10324–180, 10324–181, 10324–189, 10324–190, 10324–191, 10324–192, 10324–213, 10324–215, and 10324–216 The registrant has requested to the Agency via letter to sell existing stocks for an 18-month period for products 10324–64, 10324–73, 10324–79, 10324– 82, 10324–83, 10324–84, 10324–86, 10324–109, 10324–131, 10324–134, 10324–144, 10324–146, 10324–147, 10324–163, 10324–168, 10324–179, 10324–180, 10324–181, 10324–189, 10324–190, 10324–191, 10324–192, 10324–213, 10324–215, and 10324–216. The effective date of this cancellation is September 21, 2016. Because the Agency has identified no significant potential risk concerns associated with these pesticide products, upon cancellation, EPA anticipates allowing registrants to sell and distribute existing stocks of these products until March 21, 2018. Thereafter, registrants will be prohibited from selling or distributing the pesticides identified in Table 1 of Unit II., except for export consistent with FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 136o) or for proper disposal. Persons other PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 than registrants may sell, distribute, or use existing stocks of these products until existing stocks are exhausted, provided that such sale, distribution, or use is consistent with the terms of the previously approved labeling on, or that accompanied, the canceled products. B. For All Other Products Identified in Table 1 and Table 2 of Unit II Because the Agency has identified no significant potential risk concerns associated with these pesticide products, upon cancellation of the products or uses identified in Table 1 and Table 2 of Unit II., EPA anticipates allowing registrants to sell and distribute existing stocks of these products until September 21, 2017. Thereafter, registrants will be prohibited from selling or distributing the pesticides identified in Table 1 and Table 2 of Unit II., except for export consistent with FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 136o) or for proper disposal. Persons other than registrants will generally be allowed to sell, distribute, or use existing stocks until such stocks are exhausted, provided that such sale, distribution, or use is consistent with the terms of the previously approved labeling on, or that accompanied, the canceled products. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. Dated: September 14, 2016. Steve Knizner, Director, Antimicrobials Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [FR Doc. 2016–22764 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0901; FRL–952–70– OAR] Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review (Renewal) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to submit an SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Notices information collection request (ICR), ‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review’’ (EPA ICR No. 1230.32, OMB Control No. 2060–0003) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, the EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as described below. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through April 30, 2017. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 21, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2011–0901, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Garwood, Air Quality Policy Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, C504–03, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; telephone number: (919) 541–1358; fax number: (919) 541–5509; email address: garwood.ben@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting document(s) which explain in detail the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at https:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Sep 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is (202) 566–1744. For additional information about the EPA’s public docket, visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., allowing electronic submission of responses. The EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. Abstract: This ICR is for activities related to the implementation of the EPA’s New Source Review (NSR) program, for the time period between May 1, 2017, and April 30, 2020, and renews the previous ICR. Title I, part C of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act)— ‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration,’’ and part D—‘‘Plan Requirements for Nonattainment Areas,’’ require all states to adopt preconstruction review programs for new or modified stationary sources of air pollution. In addition, the provisions of section 110 of the Act include a requirement for states to have a preconstruction review program to manage the emissions from the construction and modification of any stationary source of air pollution to assure that the National Ambient Air Quality Standards are achieved and maintained. Tribes may choose to develop implementation plans to address these requirements. Implementing regulations for these three programs are promulgated at 40 CFR 49.101 through 49.105; 40 CFR 49.151 through 49.173; 40 CFR 51.160 through 51.166; 40 CFR part 51, PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 64903 Appendix S; and 40 CFR 52.21 and 52.24. In order to receive a construction permit for a major new source or major modification, the applicant must conduct the necessary research, perform the appropriate analyses and prepare the permit application with documentation to demonstrate that their project meets all applicable statutory and regulatory NSR requirements. Specific activities and requirements are listed and described in the Supporting Statement for the ICR. State, local, tribal or federal reviewing authorities review permit applications and provide for public review of proposed projects and issue permits based on their consideration of all technical factors and public input. The EPA, more broadly, reviews a fraction of the total applications and audits the state and local programs for their effectiveness. Consequently, information prepared and submitted by sources is essential for sources to receive permits, and for federal, state, and local environmental agencies to adequately review the permit applications and thereby properly administer and manage the NSR programs. Information that is collected is handled according to EPA’s policies set forth in title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B—Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR part 2). See also section 114(c) of the Act. Form numbers: 5900–246, 5900–247, 5900–248, 5900–340, 5900–341, 5900– 342, 5900–343, 5900–344, 5900–390, and 5900–391. Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are those which must apply for and obtain a preconstruction permit under part C or D or section 110(a)(2)(C) of title I of the Act. In addition, state, local and tribal reviewing authorities that must review permit applications and issue permits are affected entities. Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review (Renewal). Respondent’s obligation to respond: Mandatory [see 40 CFR part 49, subpart C; 40 CFR part 51, subpart I; 40 CFR part 52, subpart A; 40 CFR part 124, subparts A and C]. Estimated number of respondents: 73,762 (total); 73,639 industrial facilities and 123 state, local and tribal reviewing authorities. Frequency of response: On occasion, as necessary. Total estimated burden: 5,516,675 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b). Total estimated cost: $428,760,519 (per year). This includes $3,466,314 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1 64904 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Notices annually in outsourced start-up costs for preconstruction monitoring. Changes in estimates: There is a decrease of 2,417,665 hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by OMB. This decrease has two primary causes: (1) A significant decrease in the estimated number of industrial facilities subject to CAA title I, part C permitting as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. EPA (134 S.Ct. 2427 (2014)); and (2) a significant decrease in the estimated number of permits and registrations on tribal lands based on the progress in, and experience with, implementing the tribal NSR program. Dated: September 9, 2016. Anna Marie Wood, Director, Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS. [FR Doc. 2016–22770 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL–9945–98–OEI] Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision Approval, State of Oregon Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This notice announces EPA’s approval of the State of Oregon’s request to revise/modify certain of its EPAauthorized programs to allow electronic reporting. DATES: EPA’s approval is effective September 21, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving, electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to EPA for a mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:19 Sep 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures available under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements. On July 5, 2016, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (OR DEQ) submitted an application titled ‘‘National Network Discharge Monitoring Report System’’ for revisions/modifications to its EPAapproved programs under title 40 CFR to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed OR DEQ’s request to revise/ modify its EPA-authorized programs and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of authorized program revisions/modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve Oregon’s request to revise/modify its following EPA-authorized programs to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR parts 122 and 403, is being published in the Federal Register: Part 123—EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; and Part 403—General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New Sources of Pollution. OR DEQ was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to the authorized programs listed above. Matthew Leopard, Director, Office of Information Collection. [FR Doc. 2016–22671 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL–9926–08–OEI] Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision Approval, State of Alaska Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This notice announces EPA’s approval of the State of Alaska’s request to revise/modify its EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System EPAauthorized program to allow electronic reporting. DATES: EPA’s approval is effective September 21, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving, electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures available under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64902-64904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0901; FRL-952-70-OAR]


Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; 
Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source 
Review (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to 
submit an

[[Page 64903]]

information collection request (ICR), ``Prevention of Significant 
Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review'' (EPA ICR No. 
1230.32, OMB Control No. 2060-0003) to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, the EPA 
is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed 
information collection as described below. This is a proposed extension 
of the ICR, which is currently approved through April 30, 2017. An 
agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to 
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 21, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2011-0901, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The 
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not 
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential 
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must 
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered 
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you 
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment 
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, 
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission 
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or 
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective 
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Garwood, Air Quality Policy 
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, C504-03, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; 
telephone number: (919) 541-1358; fax number: (919) 541-5509; email 
address: garwood.ben@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting document(s) which explain in 
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in 
the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at 
https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC 
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The 
telephone number for the Docket Center is (202) 566-1744. For 
additional information about the EPA's public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting 
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the 
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of 
the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information 
to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, including through the use of 
appropriate automated electronic, mechanical or other technological 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., 
allowing electronic submission of responses. The EPA will consider the 
comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR 
package will then be submitted to OMB for review and approval. At that 
time, the EPA will issue another Federal Register notice to announce 
the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit 
additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: This ICR is for activities related to the implementation 
of the EPA's New Source Review (NSR) program, for the time period 
between May 1, 2017, and April 30, 2020, and renews the previous ICR. 
Title I, part C of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act)--``Prevention of 
Significant Deterioration,'' and part D--``Plan Requirements for 
Nonattainment Areas,'' require all states to adopt preconstruction 
review programs for new or modified stationary sources of air 
pollution. In addition, the provisions of section 110 of the Act 
include a requirement for states to have a preconstruction review 
program to manage the emissions from the construction and modification 
of any stationary source of air pollution to assure that the National 
Ambient Air Quality Standards are achieved and maintained. Tribes may 
choose to develop implementation plans to address these requirements.
    Implementing regulations for these three programs are promulgated 
at 40 CFR 49.101 through 49.105; 40 CFR 49.151 through 49.173; 40 CFR 
51.160 through 51.166; 40 CFR part 51, Appendix S; and 40 CFR 52.21 and 
52.24. In order to receive a construction permit for a major new source 
or major modification, the applicant must conduct the necessary 
research, perform the appropriate analyses and prepare the permit 
application with documentation to demonstrate that their project meets 
all applicable statutory and regulatory NSR requirements. Specific 
activities and requirements are listed and described in the Supporting 
Statement for the ICR.
    State, local, tribal or federal reviewing authorities review permit 
applications and provide for public review of proposed projects and 
issue permits based on their consideration of all technical factors and 
public input. The EPA, more broadly, reviews a fraction of the total 
applications and audits the state and local programs for their 
effectiveness. Consequently, information prepared and submitted by 
sources is essential for sources to receive permits, and for federal, 
state, and local environmental agencies to adequately review the permit 
applications and thereby properly administer and manage the NSR 
programs.
    Information that is collected is handled according to EPA's 
policies set forth in title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B--
Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR part 2). See also 
section 114(c) of the Act.
    Form numbers: 5900-246, 5900-247, 5900-248, 5900-340, 5900-341, 
5900-342, 5900-343, 5900-344, 5900-390, and 5900-391.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by 
this action are those which must apply for and obtain a preconstruction 
permit under part C or D or section 110(a)(2)(C) of title I of the Act. 
In addition, state, local and tribal reviewing authorities that must 
review permit applications and issue permits are affected entities.
    Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment 
New Source Review (Renewal).
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory [see 40 CFR part 49, 
subpart C; 40 CFR part 51, subpart I; 40 CFR part 52, subpart A; 40 CFR 
part 124, subparts A and C].
    Estimated number of respondents: 73,762 (total); 73,639 industrial 
facilities and 123 state, local and tribal reviewing authorities.
    Frequency of response: On occasion, as necessary.
    Total estimated burden: 5,516,675 hours (per year). Burden is 
defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $428,760,519 (per year). This includes 
$3,466,314

[[Page 64904]]

annually in outsourced start-up costs for preconstruction monitoring.
    Changes in estimates: There is a decrease of 2,417,665 hours in the 
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently 
approved by OMB. This decrease has two primary causes: (1) A 
significant decrease in the estimated number of industrial facilities 
subject to CAA title I, part C permitting as a result of the U.S. 
Supreme Court ruling in Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. EPA (134 
S.Ct. 2427 (2014)); and (2) a significant decrease in the estimated 
number of permits and registrations on tribal lands based on the 
progress in, and experience with, implementing the tribal NSR program.

    Dated: September 9, 2016.
Anna Marie Wood,
Director, Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS.
[FR Doc. 2016-22770 Filed 9-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.