Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the Magnetic Surgical Instrument System, 64761-64763 [2016-22709]
Download as PDF
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
considering several factors including the
anticipated 2016–17 crop size, the
committee’s estimates of the incoming
reserve funds and other income, and its
anticipated expenses.
A review of historical and preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
crop year indicates that the producer
price for the 2015–16 crop year was
approximately $78.00 per
hundredweight of dates. Utilizing that
price, the estimated crop size, and the
assessment rate of $0.05 per
hundredweight, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2016–17
crop year as a percentage of total
producer revenue is approximately
.00064 percent.
This action decreases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and decreasing the
assessment rate reduces the burden on
handlers, and may reduce the burden on
producers. In addition, the committee
meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California date industry,
and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meetings and encouraged
to participate in committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
committee meetings, the June 22, 2016,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue. Industry
members also discussed the various
possible assessment rates, potential crop
size, and estimated expenses at this
meeting. Finally, interested persons are
invited to submit comments on this
interim rule, including the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178,
‘‘Vegetable and Specialty Crop
Marketing Orders.’’ No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Riverside
County, California date handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Richard Lower at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect, and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2016–17 crop year
begins on October 1, 2016, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of
assessment for each crop year apply to
all assessable dates handled during such
crop year; (2) the action decreases the
assessment rate for assessable dates
beginning with the 2016–17 crop year;
(3) handlers are aware of this action
which was unanimously recommended
by the committee at a public meeting
and is similar to other assessment rate
actions issued in past years; and (4) this
interim rule provides a 60-day comment
period, and all comments timely
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as
follows:
PART 987—DOMESTIC DATES
PRODUCED OR PACKED IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 987 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 987.339 is revised to read
as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 987.339
64761
Assessment rate.
On and after October 1, 2016, an
assessment rate of $0.05 per
hundredweight is established for dates
produced or packed in Riverside
County, California.
Dated: September 16, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–22745 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–2562]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic
Surgery Devices; Classification of the
Magnetic Surgical Instrument System
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
Magnetic Surgical Instrument System
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that will apply to the
device are identified in this order and
will be part of the codified language for
the magnetic surgical instrument
system’s classification. The Agency is
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) in order to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective September
21, 2016. The classification was
applicable on June 13, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Varun Pattani, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G452, Silver Spring,
MD, 20993–0002, 301–796–6368,
varun.pattani@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28,
1976 (the date of enactment of the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976),
generally referred to as postamendments
devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
64762
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i), to a predicate device that does
not require premarket approval. The
Agency determines whether new
devices are substantially equivalent to
predicate devices by means of
premarket notification procedures in
section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part
807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by section 607 of the Food and
Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144),
provides two procedures by which a
person may request FDA to classify a
device under the criteria set forth in
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a premarket notification under
section 510(k) of the FD&C Act for a
device that has not previously been
classified and, within 30 days of
receiving an order classifying the device
into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than
first submitting a premarket notification
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
and then a request for classification
under the first procedure, the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence and requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
If the person submits a request to
classify the device under this second
procedure, FDA may decline to
undertake the classification request if
FDA identifies a legally marketed device
that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with
the device or if FDA determines that the
device submitted is not of ‘‘lowmoderate risk’’ or that general controls
would be inadequate to control the risks
and special controls to mitigate the risks
cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a
device under either procedure provided
by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act,
FDA shall classify the device by written
order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial
classification of the device.
On February 9, 2015, Levita
Magnetics International Corp.,
submitted a request for classification of
the Levita Magnetic Surgical System
under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act. FDA classifies devices into class II
if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its
intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request,
FDA determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
believes these special controls, in
addition to general controls, will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on June 13, 2016, FDA
issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding 21 CFR 878.4815.
Following the effective date of this
final classification order, any firm
submitting a premarket notification
(510(k)) for a magnetic surgical
instrument system will need to comply
with the special controls named in this
final order. The device is assigned the
generic name magnetic surgical
instrument system, and it is identified
as a prescription device used in
laparoscopic surgical procedures
consisting of several components, such
as surgical instruments, and a magnetic
controller. The magnetic controller is
provided separately from the surgical
instrument and is used outside the
patient. The external magnetic
controller is magnetically coupled with
the internal surgical instrument(s) at the
surgical site to grasp, hold, retract,
mobilize, or manipulate soft tissue and
organs.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device, as well as the
mitigation measures required to mitigate
these risks in table 1.
TABLE 1—MAGNETIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT SYSTEM RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risk
Mitigation measures
Tissue Damage ...............................................................................................................................
Need for Extended or Additional Surgery:
• Inability to couple the external magnet with the internal surgical instrument
• Inability to retrieve or maneuver device
• Inability to visualize critical anatomical structures
Abdominal Wall Injury .....................................................................................................................
Electromagnetic Field Incompatibility or Interference (including ferromagnetic implants in users
and patients, electrosurgical devices, etc.).
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Adverse Tissue Reaction ................................................................................................................
Infection ...........................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
In vivo Performance Testing.
Human Factors Testing and Analysis.
Training.
Labeling.
In vivo Performance Testing.
Non-clinical Performance Testing.
Human Factors Testing and Analysis.
Training.
Labeling.
In vivo Performance Testing.
Human Factors Testing and Analysis.
Labeling.
Non-clinical Performance Testing.
Human Factors Testing and Analysis.
Training.
Labeling.
Biocompatibility Evaluation.
Sterilization Validation.
Reprocessing Validation.
Shelf Life Validation.
Labeling.
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
FDA believes that the special controls,
in addition to the general controls,
address these risks to health and
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness.
A magnetic surgical instrument
system device is not safe for use except
under the supervision of a practitioner
licensed by law to direct the use of the
device. As such, the device is a
prescription device and must satisfy
prescription labeling requirements (see
21 CFR 801.109, Prescription devices).
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act, if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification
is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. Therefore, this device
type is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who
intend to market this type of device
must submit to FDA a premarket
notification, prior to marketing the
device, which contains information
about the magnetic surgical instrument
system they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120, and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 878 is
amended as follows:
PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC
SURGERY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 878
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 878.4815 to subpart E to read
as follows:
■
§ 878.4815
system.
Magnetic surgical instrument
(a) Identification. A magnetic surgical
instrument system is a prescription
device used in laparoscopic surgical
procedures consisting of several
components, such as surgical
instruments, and a magnetic controller.
The magnetic controller is provided
separately from the surgical instrument
and is used outside the patient. The
external magnetic controller is
magnetically coupled with the internal
surgical instrument(s) at the surgical site
to grasp, hold, retract, mobilize, or
manipulate soft tissue and organs.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) In vivo performance data must
demonstrate that the device performs as
intended under anticipated conditions
of use. Testing must demonstrate the
ability of the device to grasp, hold,
retract, mobilize, or manipulate soft
tissue and organs.
(2) Non-clinical performance data
must demonstrate that the system
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be
tested:
(i) Magnetic field strength testing
characterization to identify the
distances from the magnet that are safe
for patients and users with
ferromagnetic implants, devices, or
objects.
(ii) Ability of the internal surgical
instrument(s) to be coupled, de-coupled,
and re-coupled with the external magnet
over the external magnet use life.
(3) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance data must
demonstrate the sterility of the device
components that are patient-contacting.
(5) Methods and instructions for
reprocessing reusable components must
be validated.
(6) Performance data must support
shelf life by demonstrating continued
sterility of the device or the sterile
components and device functionality
over the labeled shelf life.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64763
(7) Training must be developed and
validated by human factors testing and
analysis to ensure users can follow the
instructions for use to allow safe use of
the device.
(8) Labeling must include:
(i) Magnetic field safe zones.
(ii) Instructions for proper device use.
(iii) A screening checklist to ensure
that all patients and operating staff are
screened from bringing ferromagnetic
implants, devices, or objects near the
external magnet.
(iv) Reprocessing instructions for any
reusable components.
(v) Shelf life.
(vi) Use life.
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–22709 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. FR 5863–F–02]
RIN 2506–AC40
Equal Access in Accordance With an
Individual’s Gender Identity in
Community Planning and Development
Programs
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Through this final rule, HUD
ensures equal access for individuals in
accordance with their gender identity in
programs and shelter funded under
programs administered by HUD’s Office
of Community Planning and
Development (CPD). This rule builds
upon HUD’s February 2012 final rule
entitled ‘‘Equal Access to Housing in
HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual
Orientation or Gender Identity’’ (2012
Equal Access Rule), which aimed to
ensure that HUD’s housing programs
would be open to all eligible individuals
and families regardless of sexual
orientation, gender identity, or marital
status. The 2012 Equal Access Rule,
however, did not address how
transgender and gender non-conforming
individuals should be accommodated in
temporary, emergency shelters, and
other buildings and facilities used for
shelter, that have physical limitations or
configurations that require and that are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities.
This final rule follows HUD’s November
2015 proposed rule, which addressed
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64761-64763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22709]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-2562]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices;
Classification of the Magnetic Surgical Instrument System
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
Magnetic Surgical Instrument System into class II (special controls).
The special controls that will apply to the device are identified in
this order and will be part of the codified language for the magnetic
surgical instrument system's classification. The Agency is classifying
the device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective September 21, 2016. The classification
was applicable on June 13, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Varun Pattani, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G452, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, 301-796-6368,
varun.pattani@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were
not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred
to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain
in class III and require
[[Page 64762]]
premarket approval, unless and until the device is classified or
reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues an order finding the
device to be substantially equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i), to a predicate device that does not require premarket approval.
The Agency determines whether new devices are substantially equivalent
to predicate devices by means of premarket notification procedures in
section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR
part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as amended by section 607 of the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-
144), provides two procedures by which a person may request FDA to
classify a device under the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1) of
the FD&C Act. Under the first procedure, the person submits a premarket
notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that has
not previously been classified and, within 30 days of receiving an
order classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person requests a classification under section
513(f)(2). Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a
premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act and then a
request for classification under the first procedure, the person
determines that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base
a determination of substantial equivalence and requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. If the person
submits a request to classify the device under this second procedure,
FDA may decline to undertake the classification request if FDA
identifies a legally marketed device that could provide a reasonable
basis for review of substantial equivalence with the device or if FDA
determines that the device submitted is not of ``low-moderate risk'' or
that general controls would be inadequate to control the risks and
special controls to mitigate the risks cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a device under either
procedure provided by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA shall
classify the device by written order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial classification of the device.
On February 9, 2015, Levita Magnetics International Corp.,
submitted a request for classification of the Levita Magnetic Surgical
System under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. FDA
classifies devices into class II if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request, FDA determined that the device
can be classified into class II with the establishment of special
controls. FDA believes these special controls, in addition to general
controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on June 13, 2016, FDA issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 878.4815.
Following the effective date of this final classification order,
any firm submitting a premarket notification (510(k)) for a magnetic
surgical instrument system will need to comply with the special
controls named in this final order. The device is assigned the generic
name magnetic surgical instrument system, and it is identified as a
prescription device used in laparoscopic surgical procedures consisting
of several components, such as surgical instruments, and a magnetic
controller. The magnetic controller is provided separately from the
surgical instrument and is used outside the patient. The external
magnetic controller is magnetically coupled with the internal surgical
instrument(s) at the surgical site to grasp, hold, retract, mobilize,
or manipulate soft tissue and organs.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device, as well as the mitigation
measures required to mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Magnetic Surgical Instrument System Risks and Mitigation
Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risk Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tissue Damage................................ In vivo Performance
Testing.
Human Factors Testing and
Analysis.
Training.
Labeling.
Need for Extended or Additional Surgery: In vivo Performance
Inability to couple the external Testing.
magnet with the internal surgical instrument Non-clinical Performance
Inability to retrieve or maneuver Testing.
device Human Factors Testing and
Inability to visualize critical Analysis.
anatomical structures Training.
Labeling.
Abdominal Wall Injury........................ In vivo Performance
Testing.
Human Factors Testing and
Analysis.
Labeling.
Electromagnetic Field Incompatibility or Non-clinical Performance
Interference (including ferromagnetic Testing.
implants in users and patients,
electrosurgical devices, etc.).
Human Factors Testing and
Analysis.
Training.
Labeling.
Adverse Tissue Reaction...................... Biocompatibility
Evaluation.
Infection.................................... Sterilization Validation.
Reprocessing Validation.
Shelf Life Validation.
Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 64763]]
FDA believes that the special controls, in addition to the general
controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness.
A magnetic surgical instrument system device is not safe for use
except under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law to
direct the use of the device. As such, the device is a prescription
device and must satisfy prescription labeling requirements (see 21 CFR
801.109, Prescription devices).
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act, if FDA determines that premarket notification
is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this device type is not exempt from premarket notification
requirements. Persons who intend to market this type of device must
submit to FDA a premarket notification, prior to marketing the device,
which contains information about the magnetic surgical instrument
system they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in
part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120, and the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
878 is amended as follows:
PART 878--GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 878 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 878.4815 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 878.4815 Magnetic surgical instrument system.
(a) Identification. A magnetic surgical instrument system is a
prescription device used in laparoscopic surgical procedures consisting
of several components, such as surgical instruments, and a magnetic
controller. The magnetic controller is provided separately from the
surgical instrument and is used outside the patient. The external
magnetic controller is magnetically coupled with the internal surgical
instrument(s) at the surgical site to grasp, hold, retract, mobilize,
or manipulate soft tissue and organs.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) In vivo performance data must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. Testing must
demonstrate the ability of the device to grasp, hold, retract,
mobilize, or manipulate soft tissue and organs.
(2) Non-clinical performance data must demonstrate that the system
performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Magnetic field strength testing characterization to identify
the distances from the magnet that are safe for patients and users with
ferromagnetic implants, devices, or objects.
(ii) Ability of the internal surgical instrument(s) to be coupled,
de-coupled, and re-coupled with the external magnet over the external
magnet use life.
(3) The patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the device
components that are patient-contacting.
(5) Methods and instructions for reprocessing reusable components
must be validated.
(6) Performance data must support shelf life by demonstrating
continued sterility of the device or the sterile components and device
functionality over the labeled shelf life.
(7) Training must be developed and validated by human factors
testing and analysis to ensure users can follow the instructions for
use to allow safe use of the device.
(8) Labeling must include:
(i) Magnetic field safe zones.
(ii) Instructions for proper device use.
(iii) A screening checklist to ensure that all patients and
operating staff are screened from bringing ferromagnetic implants,
devices, or objects near the external magnet.
(iv) Reprocessing instructions for any reusable components.
(v) Shelf life.
(vi) Use life.
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-22709 Filed 9-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P