Deposit of Biological Materials, 64875-64877 [2016-22684]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Notices
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–22648 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
Deposit of Biological Materials
ACTION:
Notice and request for comment.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on the renewal of
a continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before November 21,
2016.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0022
comment’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records
Management Division Director, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo,
Senior Legal Advisor, Office of Patent
Legal Administration, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–7728; or by email
to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with ‘‘0651–
0022 comment’’ in the subject line.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This information collection covers
both deposits of biological materials and
the depositories in which they are
stored. While these two topics are
related, the information collection
requirements for a respondent
depositing biological material are not
the same as those that must be followed
by a respondent seeking approval from
the USPTO to store biological materials.
These different requirements are
addressed in separate sections. Section
I.A. deals with the deposit of biological
materials and section I.B. deals with the
depositories. There are no forms
associated with this collection.
A. Deposits of Biological Materials
The deposit of biological materials as
part of a patent application is
authorized by 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2). The
term ‘‘biological material’’ is defined in
37 CFR 1.801 as including material that
is capable of self-replication, either
directly or indirectly. When an
invention involves a biological material,
sometimes words and figures are not
sufficient to satisfy the statutory
requirement for patentability under 35
U.S.C. 112 (every patent must contain a
description of the invention sufficient to
enable a person (knowledgeable in the
relevant science), to make and use the
invention as specified by 35 U.S.C. 112).
In such cases, the required biological
material must either be: (1) Known and
readily available (neither condition
alone is sufficient) or (2) deposited in a
suitable depository that has been
recognized as an International
Depositary Authority (IDA) established
under the Budapest Treaty, or a
depository recognized by the USPTO to
meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112.
Under the authority of 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2),
the deposit rules (37 CFR 1.801–1.809)
set forth examining procedures and
conditions of deposit which must be
satisfied in the event a deposit is
required. The rules do not address the
substantive issue of whether a deposit is
required under any particular set of
facts.
In cases where a deposit is necessary,
the USPTO collects information to
determine whether the depositor is in
compliance with the deposit rules. This
includes statements proving notification
to the interested public on where to
obtain samples of the deposits and
confirming that all restriction on access
to the deposit will be irrevocably
removed upon issuance of the patent. A
viability statement also must be
submitted to the USPTO showing that
the biological material was tested by the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64875
depository or another, the conditions of
the test, and that it is a viable or
acceptable deposit. A viability statement
is not required when a deposit is made
and accepted under the Budapest
Treaty.
Once a depositor has deposited
biological materials into a recognized
depository, occasions may arise
necessitating additional communication
between the depositor and the USPTO.
For example, depositors may be
required to submit verification
statements for biological materials
deposited after the effective filing date
of a patent application or written
notification that an acceptable deposit
will be made.
Occasionally a deposit may be lost,
contaminated, or otherwise is not able
to self-replicate, and a replacement or
supplemental deposit needs to be made.
In that event, the depositor must submit
a written notification to the USPTO
concerning the particulars of the
situation and request a certificate of
correction by the USPTO authorizing
the replacement or supplemental
deposit.
To summarize, the nature of the
information collected by the USPTO in
association with the deposit of
biological materials is that of
certifications/statements, as described
above, regarding a biological sample
deposited at a depository. There is no
form associated with the information
collected by the USPTO in connection
with the deposit of biological materials.
B. Depositories
Institutions that wish to be recognized
by the USPTO as a suitable depository
to receive deposits for patent purposes
are required by 37 CFR 1.803 to make
a request demonstrating that they are
qualified to store and test the biological
materials submitted to them under
patent applications. A depository
seeking recognition from the USPTO to
store biological materials must show
that internal practices (both technical
and administrative) and the technical
ability of the staff and the facility are
sufficient to protect the integrity of the
biological materials being stored.
USPTO rules are stringent to ensure
the competence and quality of
depositories. Depositories must submit
documentation to the USPTO that
verifies that their practices and
procedures, the technical competence of
their staff, and their facilities fulfill the
stringent requirements spelled out
under the rules.
Once a depository has been
recognized by the USPTO, occasions
may arise where additional
communication between the depository
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
64876
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Notices
and the USPTO is necessary. For
example, a depository must request and
obtain written approval from the
USPTO to handle additional types of
biological materials other than the
material originally recognized.
Depositories may (on behalf of
depositors) submit viability statements
for deposits tested at the depository
and/or documentation proving the
public has been notified about where to
obtain samples.
To summarize, the nature of the
information collected by the USPTO in
connection with a respondent seeking
approval from the USPTO to store
biological materials is that of a written
request to the Director of the USPTO
containing the information outlined
above. There is no form for the request.
of biological materials. The USPTO
estimates that it will take the average
depository seeking approval to store
biological materials approximately 5
hours to collect and submit the
necessary approval information.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 905 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $27,0327.55. The USPTO
estimates a professional hourly rate of
$30 for a senior administrative assistant
to collect and submit the deposit
information. The USPTO expects that
the average depository seeking approval
to store biological material will be
prepared by attorneys at an estimated
rate of $65.51 (BLS rate; 23–1011
Lawyers) per hour. Therefore, the
USPTO estimates that the respondent
cost burden for this collection will be
approximately $27,327.55 per year.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, hand delivery, or
electronically to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0022.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits; and not-for-profit
institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
901 responses per year. The USPTO
estimates that approximately 3% of
these responses will be from small
entities.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public 1 hour to gather the necessary
information, prepare the appropriate
form or documents, and submit the
information to the USPTO for a deposit
1 .................
2 .................
Estimated
time for
response
(minutes)
Item
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
annual
burden
hours
Rate
($/hr)
Total
costs
(a)
No.
(b)
(a) × (b)/60 = (c)
e
(c) × (d) = (hourly
cost burden)
Deposited Materials .............................
Depository Approval ............................
1 hour
5 hours
900
1
900
5
30
65.51
27,000
327.55
Total ..................................................................................................
901
905
....................
27,327.55
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $2,674,644.45.
There are no maintenance costs,
recordkeeping costs, or filing fees
associated with this information
collection. However, this collection has
annual (non-hour) costs in the form of
capital start-up and postage costs.
Depositories charge fees to depositors;
all depositories charge about the same
rates for their services. For example, the
American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC), one of the world’s leading
biological supply houses and recognized
patent depositories, offers
comprehensive patent services for
$2,500 per deposit. Most deposits
received from outside the United States
require an import permit from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) as
well as a Public Health Service (PHS)
permit, available from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
for importation of agents infectious to
Item No.
humans. There is no extra charge for
this permit application processing. The
USPTO estimates that the total non-hour
respondent cost burden in the form of
capital start-up costs amounts to
$2,250,000.
In addition, this collection has
postage costs. Biological deposits are
generally shipped to the depository
‘‘Domestic Overnight’’ by Federal
Express (FedEx) and, since depositors
are urged to supply frozen or freezedried material, it must be packed in dry
ice according to a representative from
the Patent Department at ATCC. Dry ice
itself is considered a dangerous good
and requires special packaging.
Additional FedEx special handling
charges for inaccessible dangerous
goods shipments of $40 per shipment
apply for temperature-sensitive
biological materials and also for the dry
ice. An average cost for shipping by
FedEx ‘‘Domestic Overnight’’ is
estimated to be $75. If the shipment
requires pick-up by FedEx, there is an
additional charge of $4. Special
packaging is also required for these
shipments. According to DG Supplies
Inc., a supplier of infectious and
diagnostic goods packaging, the average
cost of frozen infectious shippers is
estimated to be $352.82 per package of
four for specimen shipments requiring
refrigeration or dry ice. Therefore,
postage costs average $471.82 per
shipment. The postage cost for a
depository seeking recognition is
estimated to be $6.45, sent to the
USPTO by priority mail through the
United States Postal Service. Since the
USPTO estimates that it receives one
request for recognition from a
depository every four years, the average
postage cost to respondents is $6.45 per
year.
Estimated
annual
responses
Item/type of cost
Amount
Totals
FEES
1 ........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Deposited Materials ......................................................................................
18:19 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
900
21SEN1
$2,500.00
$2,250,000
64877
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Notices
Estimated
annual
responses
Item No.
Item/type of cost
2 ........................
Request for Depository Approval .................................................................
Amount
1
Totals
0.00
0.00
Total Fees .....................................................................................................................................................................................
2,250,000
PACKAGING/POSTAGE COSTS
1 ........................
1 ........................
2 ........................
Deposited Materials—Federal Express ........................................................
Deposited Materials—Packaging Supplies ...................................................
Request for Depository Approval .................................................................
$119.00
352.82
6.45
$107,100.00
317,538.00
6.45
Total Postage/Packaging ..............................................................................................................................................................
424,644.45
Total Annual (Non-Hour) Cost Burden .........................................................................................................................................
2,674,644.45
The USPTO estimates that the (nonhour) respondent cost burden in the
form of mailing costs amounts to
$424,644.45.
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that
the total (non-hour) respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
capital start-up costs and postage costs
is $2,674,644.45.
IV. Request for Comments
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request, Pro Bono Survey;
Correction
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice; correction.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office published a document
in the Federal Register on August 22,
2016, concerning requests for comments
on a Pro Bono Survey. The Pro Bono
Survey is used by the Pro Bono
Advisory Council (PBAC) and the
USPTO to provide information to the
USPTO regarding the current status and
effectiveness of each region’s pro bono
hub. The document contained an
incorrect cost burden based on the
estimate of the hourly burden rate. The
hourly rate estimate should use the
Bureau of Labor Statistics hourly wage
for lawyers instead of the American
Intellectual Property Law Association
hourly wage for intellectual property
lawyers.
SUMMARY:
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public
comments to:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director, OCIO
United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2016–22684 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
John
Kirkpatrick, 571–270–3343 or email
InformationCollection@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘Pro Bono Survey’’ in the
subject line of the message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Correction
In the Federal Register notice
published on August 22, 2016 (81 FR
56612), in the second column, correct
the ‘‘Cost Burden’’ caption to read:
Cost Burden: $10,480.00
Dated: September 13, 2016.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director,
USPTO Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–22683 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
900
900
1
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Legal Processes
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USTPO) will submit
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance the following
proposal for collection of information
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Agency: United States Patent and
Trademark Office, (USPTO).
Title: Legal Processes.
OMB Control Number: 0651–0046.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Renewal.
Number of Respondents: 309
responses per year.
Average Hours per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public from 5 minutes (0.08 hours) to 6
hours to prepare a single item in this
collection, including gathering the
necessary information, preparing the
appropriate documents, and submitting
the information required for this
collection.
Burden Hours: 130 hours.
Cost Burden: $8,479.54. The USPTO
expects that the information in this
collection will be prepared by attorneys
and former employees at an hourly rate
of $65.51. Using these hourly rates, the
USPTO estimates that the total
respondent cost burden for this
collection will be approximately
$8,479.54 per year.
Needs and Uses: The purpose of this
collection is to cover information
requirements related to civil actions and
claims involving current and former
employees of the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (USPTO). The
rules for these legal processes may be
found under 37 CFR part 104, which
outlines procedures for service of
process, demands for employee
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64875-64877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22684]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Deposit of Biological Materials
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on the
renewal of a continuing information collection, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before November 21,
2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0022 comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director,
Office of the Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Raul Tamayo, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of
Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7728;
or by email to Raul.Tamayo@uspto.gov with ``0651-0022 comment'' in the
subject line. Additional information about this collection is also
available at https://www.reginfo.gov under ``Information Collection
Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This information collection covers both deposits of biological
materials and the depositories in which they are stored. While these
two topics are related, the information collection requirements for a
respondent depositing biological material are not the same as those
that must be followed by a respondent seeking approval from the USPTO
to store biological materials. These different requirements are
addressed in separate sections. Section I.A. deals with the deposit of
biological materials and section I.B. deals with the depositories.
There are no forms associated with this collection.
A. Deposits of Biological Materials
The deposit of biological materials as part of a patent application
is authorized by 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2). The term ``biological material'' is
defined in 37 CFR 1.801 as including material that is capable of self-
replication, either directly or indirectly. When an invention involves
a biological material, sometimes words and figures are not sufficient
to satisfy the statutory requirement for patentability under 35 U.S.C.
112 (every patent must contain a description of the invention
sufficient to enable a person (knowledgeable in the relevant science),
to make and use the invention as specified by 35 U.S.C. 112). In such
cases, the required biological material must either be: (1) Known and
readily available (neither condition alone is sufficient) or (2)
deposited in a suitable depository that has been recognized as an
International Depositary Authority (IDA) established under the Budapest
Treaty, or a depository recognized by the USPTO to meet the
requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112. Under the authority of 35 U.S.C.
2(b)(2), the deposit rules (37 CFR 1.801-1.809) set forth examining
procedures and conditions of deposit which must be satisfied in the
event a deposit is required. The rules do not address the substantive
issue of whether a deposit is required under any particular set of
facts.
In cases where a deposit is necessary, the USPTO collects
information to determine whether the depositor is in compliance with
the deposit rules. This includes statements proving notification to the
interested public on where to obtain samples of the deposits and
confirming that all restriction on access to the deposit will be
irrevocably removed upon issuance of the patent. A viability statement
also must be submitted to the USPTO showing that the biological
material was tested by the depository or another, the conditions of the
test, and that it is a viable or acceptable deposit. A viability
statement is not required when a deposit is made and accepted under the
Budapest Treaty.
Once a depositor has deposited biological materials into a
recognized depository, occasions may arise necessitating additional
communication between the depositor and the USPTO. For example,
depositors may be required to submit verification statements for
biological materials deposited after the effective filing date of a
patent application or written notification that an acceptable deposit
will be made.
Occasionally a deposit may be lost, contaminated, or otherwise is
not able to self-replicate, and a replacement or supplemental deposit
needs to be made. In that event, the depositor must submit a written
notification to the USPTO concerning the particulars of the situation
and request a certificate of correction by the USPTO authorizing the
replacement or supplemental deposit.
To summarize, the nature of the information collected by the USPTO
in association with the deposit of biological materials is that of
certifications/statements, as described above, regarding a biological
sample deposited at a depository. There is no form associated with the
information collected by the USPTO in connection with the deposit of
biological materials.
B. Depositories
Institutions that wish to be recognized by the USPTO as a suitable
depository to receive deposits for patent purposes are required by 37
CFR 1.803 to make a request demonstrating that they are qualified to
store and test the biological materials submitted to them under patent
applications. A depository seeking recognition from the USPTO to store
biological materials must show that internal practices (both technical
and administrative) and the technical ability of the staff and the
facility are sufficient to protect the integrity of the biological
materials being stored.
USPTO rules are stringent to ensure the competence and quality of
depositories. Depositories must submit documentation to the USPTO that
verifies that their practices and procedures, the technical competence
of their staff, and their facilities fulfill the stringent requirements
spelled out under the rules.
Once a depository has been recognized by the USPTO, occasions may
arise where additional communication between the depository
[[Page 64876]]
and the USPTO is necessary. For example, a depository must request and
obtain written approval from the USPTO to handle additional types of
biological materials other than the material originally recognized.
Depositories may (on behalf of depositors) submit viability statements
for deposits tested at the depository and/or documentation proving the
public has been notified about where to obtain samples.
To summarize, the nature of the information collected by the USPTO
in connection with a respondent seeking approval from the USPTO to
store biological materials is that of a written request to the Director
of the USPTO containing the information outlined above. There is no
form for the request.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, hand delivery, or electronically to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0022.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits; and not-for-
profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 901 responses per year. The USPTO
estimates that approximately 3% of these responses will be from small
entities.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public 1 hour to gather the necessary information, prepare the
appropriate form or documents, and submit the information to the USPTO
for a deposit of biological materials. The USPTO estimates that it will
take the average depository seeking approval to store biological
materials approximately 5 hours to collect and submit the necessary
approval information.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 905 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $27,0327.55. The
USPTO estimates a professional hourly rate of $30 for a senior
administrative assistant to collect and submit the deposit information.
The USPTO expects that the average depository seeking approval to store
biological material will be prepared by attorneys at an estimated rate
of $65.51 (BLS rate; 23-1011 Lawyers) per hour. Therefore, the USPTO
estimates that the respondent cost burden for this collection will be
approximately $27,327.55 per year.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated time Estimated
No. Item for response annual Estimated annual Rate ($/hr) Total costs
(minutes) responses burden hours
(a) (b) (a) x (b)/60 = e (c) x (d) =
(c) (hourly cost
burden)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................. Deposited Materials.............. 1 hour 900 900 30 27,000
2................................. Depository Approval.............. 5 hours 1 5 65.51 327.55
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................................................ 901 905 ........... 27,327.55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden:
$2,674,644.45. There are no maintenance costs, recordkeeping costs, or
filing fees associated with this information collection. However, this
collection has annual (non-hour) costs in the form of capital start-up
and postage costs.
Depositories charge fees to depositors; all depositories charge
about the same rates for their services. For example, the American Type
Culture Collection (ATCC), one of the world's leading biological supply
houses and recognized patent depositories, offers comprehensive patent
services for $2,500 per deposit. Most deposits received from outside
the United States require an import permit from the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) as well as a Public Health Service (PHS) permit,
available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
for importation of agents infectious to humans. There is no extra
charge for this permit application processing. The USPTO estimates that
the total non-hour respondent cost burden in the form of capital start-
up costs amounts to $2,250,000.
In addition, this collection has postage costs. Biological deposits
are generally shipped to the depository ``Domestic Overnight'' by
Federal Express (FedEx) and, since depositors are urged to supply
frozen or freeze-dried material, it must be packed in dry ice according
to a representative from the Patent Department at ATCC. Dry ice itself
is considered a dangerous good and requires special packaging.
Additional FedEx special handling charges for inaccessible dangerous
goods shipments of $40 per shipment apply for temperature-sensitive
biological materials and also for the dry ice. An average cost for
shipping by FedEx ``Domestic Overnight'' is estimated to be $75. If the
shipment requires pick-up by FedEx, there is an additional charge of
$4. Special packaging is also required for these shipments. According
to DG Supplies Inc., a supplier of infectious and diagnostic goods
packaging, the average cost of frozen infectious shippers is estimated
to be $352.82 per package of four for specimen shipments requiring
refrigeration or dry ice. Therefore, postage costs average $471.82 per
shipment. The postage cost for a depository seeking recognition is
estimated to be $6.45, sent to the USPTO by priority mail through the
United States Postal Service. Since the USPTO estimates that it
receives one request for recognition from a depository every four
years, the average postage cost to respondents is $6.45 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Item No. Item/type of cost annual Amount Totals
responses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................. Deposited Materials......... 900 $2,500.00 $2,250,000
[[Page 64877]]
2................................. Request for Depository 1 0.00 0.00
Approval.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Fees.................................................................................. 2,250,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PACKAGING/POSTAGE COSTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................. Deposited Materials--Federal 900 $119.00 $107,100.00
Express.
1................................. Deposited Materials-- 900 352.82 317,538.00
Packaging Supplies.
2................................. Request for Depository 1 6.45 6.45
Approval.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Postage/Packaging..................................................................... 424,644.45
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Annual (Non-Hour) Cost Burden......................................................... 2,674,644.45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The USPTO estimates that the (non-hour) respondent cost burden in
the form of mailing costs amounts to $424,644.45.
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the total (non-hour) respondent
cost burden for this collection in the form of capital start-up costs
and postage costs is $2,674,644.45.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public comments to:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (b)
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director, OCIO United States Patent and
Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2016-22684 Filed 9-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P