Equal Access in Accordance With an Individual's Gender Identity in Community Planning and Development Programs, 64763-64782 [2016-22589]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
FDA believes that the special controls,
in addition to the general controls,
address these risks to health and
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness.
A magnetic surgical instrument
system device is not safe for use except
under the supervision of a practitioner
licensed by law to direct the use of the
device. As such, the device is a
prescription device and must satisfy
prescription labeling requirements (see
21 CFR 801.109, Prescription devices).
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act, if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification
is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. Therefore, this device
type is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who
intend to market this type of device
must submit to FDA a premarket
notification, prior to marketing the
device, which contains information
about the magnetic surgical instrument
system they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120, and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 878 is
amended as follows:
PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC
SURGERY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 878
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 878.4815 to subpart E to read
as follows:
■
§ 878.4815
system.
Magnetic surgical instrument
(a) Identification. A magnetic surgical
instrument system is a prescription
device used in laparoscopic surgical
procedures consisting of several
components, such as surgical
instruments, and a magnetic controller.
The magnetic controller is provided
separately from the surgical instrument
and is used outside the patient. The
external magnetic controller is
magnetically coupled with the internal
surgical instrument(s) at the surgical site
to grasp, hold, retract, mobilize, or
manipulate soft tissue and organs.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) In vivo performance data must
demonstrate that the device performs as
intended under anticipated conditions
of use. Testing must demonstrate the
ability of the device to grasp, hold,
retract, mobilize, or manipulate soft
tissue and organs.
(2) Non-clinical performance data
must demonstrate that the system
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be
tested:
(i) Magnetic field strength testing
characterization to identify the
distances from the magnet that are safe
for patients and users with
ferromagnetic implants, devices, or
objects.
(ii) Ability of the internal surgical
instrument(s) to be coupled, de-coupled,
and re-coupled with the external magnet
over the external magnet use life.
(3) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance data must
demonstrate the sterility of the device
components that are patient-contacting.
(5) Methods and instructions for
reprocessing reusable components must
be validated.
(6) Performance data must support
shelf life by demonstrating continued
sterility of the device or the sterile
components and device functionality
over the labeled shelf life.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64763
(7) Training must be developed and
validated by human factors testing and
analysis to ensure users can follow the
instructions for use to allow safe use of
the device.
(8) Labeling must include:
(i) Magnetic field safe zones.
(ii) Instructions for proper device use.
(iii) A screening checklist to ensure
that all patients and operating staff are
screened from bringing ferromagnetic
implants, devices, or objects near the
external magnet.
(iv) Reprocessing instructions for any
reusable components.
(v) Shelf life.
(vi) Use life.
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–22709 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. FR 5863–F–02]
RIN 2506–AC40
Equal Access in Accordance With an
Individual’s Gender Identity in
Community Planning and Development
Programs
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Through this final rule, HUD
ensures equal access for individuals in
accordance with their gender identity in
programs and shelter funded under
programs administered by HUD’s Office
of Community Planning and
Development (CPD). This rule builds
upon HUD’s February 2012 final rule
entitled ‘‘Equal Access to Housing in
HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual
Orientation or Gender Identity’’ (2012
Equal Access Rule), which aimed to
ensure that HUD’s housing programs
would be open to all eligible individuals
and families regardless of sexual
orientation, gender identity, or marital
status. The 2012 Equal Access Rule,
however, did not address how
transgender and gender non-conforming
individuals should be accommodated in
temporary, emergency shelters, and
other buildings and facilities used for
shelter, that have physical limitations or
configurations that require and that are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities.
This final rule follows HUD’s November
2015 proposed rule, which addressed
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
64764
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
this issue and solicited public comment
on measures to ensure that recipients
and subrecipients of CPD funding—as
well as owners, operators, and managers
of shelters and other buildings and
facilities and providers of services
funded by CPD—grant equal access to
such facilities and services to
individuals in accordance with an
individual’s gender identity.
This rule amends HUD’s definition of
‘‘gender identity’’ to more clearly reflect
the difference between actual and
perceived gender identity and
eliminates the prohibition on inquiries
related to sexual orientation or gender
identity, so that service providers can
ensure compliance with this rule. The
removal of the prohibition on inquiries
related to sexual orientation or gender
identity does not alter the requirement
to make housing assisted by HUD and
housing insured by the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) available without
regard to actual or perceived sexual
orientation or gender identity. Lastly,
without changing the scope of the
requirement to provide equal access
without regard to sexual orientation,
this rule makes a technical amendment
to the definition of ‘‘sexual orientation,’’
which HUD adopted from the Office of
Personnel Management’s (OPM)
definition of the term in 2012, to
conform to OPM’s current definition.
In order to ensure that individuals are
aware of their rights to equal access,
HUD is publishing elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register for public
comment, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a
document entitled ‘‘Equal Access
Regardless of Sexual Orientation,
Gender Identity, or Marital Status’’ for
owners or operators of CPD-funded
shelters, housing, facilities, and other
buildings to post on bulletin boards and
in other public spaces where
information is typically made available.
DATES:
Effective: October 21, 2016.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Norm Suchar, Director, Office of Special
Needs Assistance Programs, Office of
Community Planning and Development,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20410–7000; telephone
number 202–708–4300 (this is not a tollfree number). Persons with who are deaf
or hard of hearing or have speech
impairments can access this number
through TTY by calling the Federal
Relay Service at 800–877–8339 (this is
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
I. Background
A. HUD’s Previous Efforts To Ensure
Equal Access
On February 3, 2012, at 77 FR 5662,
HUD issued its 2012 Equal Access Rule,
which defined the terms ‘‘sexual
orientation’’ and ‘‘gender identity,’’ and
required that HUD-assisted housing,
including all housing funded by CPD,
and housing insured by FHA be made
available to individuals and families
without regard to actual or perceived
sexual orientation, gender identity, or
marital status. The 2012 Equal Access
Rule also generally prohibited inquiries
into sexual orientation or gender
identity for the purpose of determining
eligibility for, or availability of, such
housing. In the 2012 Equal Access Rule,
HUD declined to adopt a national policy
on the placement of transgender persons
in temporary, emergency shelters with
shared sleeping quarters or shared
bathing facilities, deciding instead to
conduct research and monitor its
programs to determine whether
additional guidance or national policy
was needed to ensure equal access for
transgender and gender nonconforming
persons.1 HUD also decided to conduct
a similar review to determine whether
additional guidance was needed with
regard to the prohibition on inquiries.
As a result of its review, HUD
determined that the 2012 Equal Access
Rule did not adequately address the
significant barriers faced by transgender
and gender nonconforming persons
when accessing temporary, emergency
shelters and other facilities with
physical limitations or configurations
that require and are permitted to have
shared sleeping quarters or bathing
facilities. Specifically, HUD found that
transgender and gender nonconforming
persons continue to experience
significant violence, harassment, and
discrimination in attempting to access
programs, benefits, services, and
accommodations. For instance, at a
listening session on lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) issues
conducted with the U.S. Interagency
Council on Homelessness, homeless
service providers reported that
transgender persons are often
discriminatorily excluded from shelters
or face dangerous conditions in the
shelters that correspond to their sex
assigned at birth. Some commenters
reported that, if given the choice
between a shelter designated for
assigned birth sex or sleeping on the
1 Gender nonconforming persons are persons who
do not follow other people’s ideas or stereotypes
about how they should look or act based on their
sex assigned at birth.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
streets, many transgender shelterseekers would choose the streets.
HUD also investigated individual
cases where transgender persons were
not provided equal access as required by
the 2012 Equal Access Rule, or they
faced unlawful discrimination under the
Fair Housing Act. HUD also reviewed
national research that revealed that lack
of access to shelter for transgender and
gender nonconforming persons,
particularly those who were also
homeless youths, was a pervasive
problem and reviewed the efforts of
other Federal agencies to provide equal
access to transgender and gender
nonconforming persons. HUD found
that multiple agencies prohibit
discrimination on the basis of sexual
orientation and gender identity and also
require that grant recipients treat
transgender persons consistent with
their gender identity. Specifically, HUD
found guidance from other Federal
agencies supporting the position that
grant recipients could accommodate
transgender individuals in accordance
with their gender identity in Federal
programs, including those program that
funded single-sex facilities.
On February 20, 2015, CPD issued
guidance, entitled ‘‘Appropriate
Placement for Transgender Persons in
Single-Sex Emergency Shelters and
Other Facilities’’ (CPD–15–02), which
applied to the following CPD programs:
Housing Opportunities for Persons With
AIDS (HOPWA), Emergency Solutions
Grants (ESG), and Continuum of Care
(CoC). This guidance clarified that HUD
expected recipients and subrecipients
under these programs to base placement
decisions on the gender with which a
person identifies—and not on another
person’s stereotype-based complaints—
taking into consideration health and
safety concerns and giving serious
consideration to the transgender or
gender nonconforming person’s own
personal health and safety concerns.
The guidance also outlined best
practices for providers.
B. The November 2015 Proposed Rule
On November 20, 2015, at 80 FR
72642, following careful review of
information about the treatment of
transgender persons in temporary,
emergency shelters, HUD proposed a
second Equal Access rule, entitled
‘‘Equal Access in Accordance with an
Individual’s Gender Identity in
Community Planning and Development
Programs’’ (CPD Equal Access). In this
rulemaking, HUD proposed to add a
new section to its regulations in 24 CFR
part 5 that would require recipients and
subrecipients of assistance under CPD
programs—as well as owners, operators,
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
and managers of shelters and other
buildings and facilities and providers of
services funded in whole or in part by
CPD programs—to provide equal access
to programs, benefits, services, and
accommodations in accordance with an
individual’s gender identity.
Specifically, the rule proposed to add
to 24 CFR part 5 a new § 5.106, which
would contain equal access provisions
tailored to CPD programs. Section
5.106(a) proposed to identify the scope
of its coverage as including recipients
and subrecipients of assistance under
the following CPD programs: HOME
Investment Partnerships (HOME) (24
CFR part 92), Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) (24 CFR part 570),
HOPWA (24 CFR part 574), ESG (24
CFR part 576), CoC (24 CFR part 578),
as well as owners, operators, managers
of shelters and other buildings and
facilities and providers of services
funded in whole or in part by any of
these programs.
Section 5.106(b) proposed to require
CPD recipients, subrecipients, owners,
operators, managers, and providers to
establish or amend, as necessary, and
administer program admissions,
occupancy, and operating policies and
procedures, including policies and
procedures to protect individuals’
privacy and security, so that equal
access to programs, shelters, other
buildings and facilities, benefits,
services, and accommodations are
provided to individuals in accordance
with their gender identity. That section
also proposed to require that such equal
access be provided in a manner that
affords equal access to the individual’s
family.
Section 5.106(c) proposed to require
that the placement and accommodation
of individuals in facilities that are
permitted to be single-sex must be made
in accordance with the individual’s
gender identity. The proposed rule
provided that, under narrow
circumstances, a written case-by-case
determination could be made as to
whether an alternative accommodation
is necessary to ensure health and safety.
The proposed rule contained a
prohibition for such a determination to
be based solely on a person’s actual or
perceived gender identity or on
complaints of other shelter residents
when those complaints are based on
actual or perceived gender identity. It
also proposed to prohibit the denial of
appropriate placement based on a
perceived threat to health or safety that
can be mitigated some other, less
burdensome way (e.g., by providing the
transgender shelter seeker the option to
use single occupant bathing facilities).
Lastly, the rule proposed that, to avoid
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
unwarranted denials of placement in
accordance with an individual’s gender
identity, decisions to provide
accommodations based on concern for
the health and safety of the individual
seeking accommodations should be
based on the individual’s own request to
be otherwise accommodated.
Section 5.106(d) proposed to require
that when a case-by-case determination
based on health and safety is made
under § 5.106(c), the entity providing
the alternative accommodation must
provide either (1) equivalent alternative
accommodation, benefits, and services
or (2) a referral to a comparable
alternative program with availability
that meets the needs of the individual.
Section 5.106(e) proposed to require
recipients, subrecipients, or providers to
keep records of compliance with
paragraphs (b) and the case-by-case
determinations under paragraph (c) of
this section, including the facts,
circumstances, and reasoning relied
upon that lead to any alternative
admission, accommodation, benefit, or
service to an individual and the
individual’s family; the facts and
circumstances regarding the
opportunities to access alternative
accommodations provided to an
individual and the individual’s family;
and the outcomes regarding referral to
an alternative program of an individual
and the individual’s family.
In addition, the rule proposed to
amend the definition of ‘‘gender
identity’’ at § 5.100 to separate the
definitions of ‘‘actual’’ and ‘‘perceived’’
gender identity. In brief, the rule
proposed to replace HUD’s current
definition, which mirrored the
definition in the Matthew Shepard/
James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act
of 2009 (Public Law 114–38, approved
October 28, 2009) and instead adopt a
definition that clarified the difference
between actual and perceived gender
identity.
Lastly, the proposed rule sought to
remove the prohibition on inquiries
provision at § 5.105(a)(2)(ii), which
prohibited providers in most
circumstances from asking individuals
their sexual orientation or gender
identity. HUD reasoned that the
provision raised several legitimate
questions about implementation, and its
removal would allow temporary,
emergency shelters or other buildings
and facilities with physical limitations
or configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities to
ask an individual’s gender identity for
nondiscriminatory purposes, such as to
determine the appropriate placement for
the individual or the number of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64765
bedrooms to which a household is
entitled.
C. Recent Developments in the
Interpretation of Federal Law and
Applicable Research
After HUD issued the November 2015
proposed rule, the Center for American
Progress released a new study
specifically focusing on discrimination
experienced by transgender individuals
seeking access to shelters, the
Department of Justice (DOJ) and the
Department of Education issued
guidance for educators on providing
equal access for transgender students in
schools, and the Department of Health
and Human Services issued a final rule
to ensure equal access to health
programs and activities administered by
that Department or established under
title I of the Affordable Care Act.
On January 7, 2016, the Center for
American Progress released the results
of a discrimination telephone test,
carried out across four States, that
measured the degree to which
transgender homeless women can access
a shelter in accordance with their
gender identity, as well as the types of
discrimination and mistreatment they
face in the process.2 The study
consisted of 100 phone calls to
homeless shelters in four States, over 3
months, by testers who identified
themselves as transgender women
seeking access to both women’s shelters
and general shelters. The study found
that only 30 percent of the shelters
contacted by the testers were willing to
house the transgender women with
other women, 13 percent offered to
house the transgender women in
isolation or with men, 21 percent
refused service altogether, and another
21 percent were unsure or unclear as to
whether they could house transgender
women with other women. The survey
results also found that women’s shelters
were more likely to provide services
consistent with an individual’s gender
identity than were mixed gender
shelters. During interactions on the
phone with shelter employees, testers
experienced the following: they were
often referred to using the wrong gender
or shelter employees made other
statements to discredit their gender
identity, shelter employees made
references to the testers’ genitalia or to
surgery as requirements for appropriate
housing, and shelter employees stated
2 Caitlin Rooney, et al., Center for American
Progress and the Equal Rights Center
Discrimination Against Transgender Women
Seeking Access to Homeless Shelters, January 7,
2016, available at: https://
cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/
2016/01/06113001/HomelessTransgender.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
64766
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
that other residents would be made
uncomfortable or unsafe by the tester.
Of the shelters called, 27 percent had
received HUD funds at some point.
In May 2016, DOJ and the Department
of Education released guidance
summarizing the legal obligations of
schools regarding transgender students.3
The guidance specifically emphasizes
that schools must ‘‘treat a student’s
gender identity as the student’s sex for
purposes of Title IX and its
implementing regulations.’’ In sexsegregated activities and facilities,
transgender students ‘‘must be allowed
to participate in such activities and
access such facilities consistent with
their gender identity.’’ The guidance
also requires schools to provide a safe
environment for all students, including
transgender students, and requires that
schools treat students consistent with
their gender identity regardless of
records or identification documents
indicating a different sex.
Also in May 2016, the Department of
Health and Human Services issued final
regulations entitled ‘‘Nondiscrimination
in Health Programs and Activities,’’
which implement section 1557 of the
Affordable Care Act.4 Section 1557
prohibits discrimination in health
programs and activities on the basis of
sex, and the rule provides that ‘‘a
covered entity shall treat individuals
consistent with their gender identity,
except that a covered entity may not
deny or limit health services that are
ordinarily or exclusively available to
individuals of one sex, to a transgender
individual based on the fact that the
individual’s sex assigned at birth,
gender identity, or gender otherwise
recorded is different from the one to
which such health services are
ordinarily or exclusively available.’’
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
II. Changes Made at the Final Rule
Stage
In response to public comment and
upon further consideration by HUD of
the issues presented in this rulemaking,
HUD makes the following changes at
this final rule stage:
In § 5.100, the proposed definition of
‘‘perceived gender identity’’ is modified
so that the definition states that
‘‘perceived gender identity’’ means the
gender with which a person is perceived
to identify based on that person’s
appearance, behavior, expression, other
gender-related characteristics, sex
3 Dear Colleague Letter on Transgender Students
May 13, 2016, https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/
850986/download.
4 See 81 FR 31375, https://
www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/05/18/201611458/nondiscrimination-in-health-programs-andactivities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
assigned at birth, or identification in
documents. This change was made in
response to public comments stating
that transgender persons often face
difficulty in being accommodated in
accordance with their gender identity
because it is difficult to obtain identity
documents that accurately list their
gender identity. The words ‘‘identified
in documents’’ were added to the
definition to make clear that the
identification of gender or sex on an
individual’s identity document may be
different than a person’s actual gender
identity. The definition of ‘‘gender
identity’’ in the final rule, which is
unchanged from the proposed rule,
makes clear that ‘‘gender identity’’
means the gender with which a person
identifies, regardless of the sex assigned
to that person at birth and regardless of
the person’s perceived gender identity.
Reading these definitions together,
‘‘gender identity’’ is therefore
determined regardless of the gender
identified on an individual’s identity
documents.
This rule also makes a technical
amendment to the definition of ‘‘sexual
orientation.’’ The 2012 Equal Access
Rule defined ‘‘sexual orientation’’ as
‘‘homosexuality, heterosexuality, or
bisexuality,’’ following a definition that
OPM used in the context of the Federal
workforce in its publication
‘‘Addressing Sexual Orientation in
Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide
to Employee Rights.’’ OPM’s publication
was revised in June 2015, and HUD is
amending its definition to conform to
the new OPM definition, which is
‘‘sexual orientation means one’s
emotional or physical attraction to the
same and/or opposite sex.’’ (See https://
www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/
diversity-and-inclusion/referencematerials/addressing-sexualorientation-and-gender-identitydiscrimination-in-federal-civilianemployment.pdf.) This change in
definition does not change the coverage
provided by the prior definition but is
simply intended to use terminology that
is up-to-date.
In § 5.105(a)(2), HUD adopts the
proposal to eliminate the inquiries
provision in § 5.105(a)(2)(ii). With the
removal of § 5.105(a)(2)(ii),
§ 5.105(a)(2)(i) is redesignated as
§ 5.105(a)(2).
In § 5.106, HUD makes several
changes. HUD has changed the heading
of this section from ‘‘Providing access in
accordance with the individual’s gender
identity in community planning and
development programs’’ to ‘‘Equal
access in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity in
community planning and development
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
programs.’’ Although this is not a
substantive change, the change
appropriately emphasizes that the
purpose of the rule is equal access in
accordance with an individual’s gender
identity in CPD programs generally.
Equal access ensures that, when
consideration of sex is prohibited or not
relevant, individuals will not be
discriminated against based on actual or
perceived gender identity, and where
legitimate consideration of sex or gender
is appropriate, such as in a facility
providing temporary, short term shelter
that is not covered by the Fair Housing
Act 5 and which is legally permitted to
operate as a single-sex facility,6 the
individual’s own self-identified gender
identity will govern.
Section 5.106(a) is revised at the final
rule stage to clarify that § 5.106 applies
to recipients and subrecipients of
assistance from CPD, which include the
specific programs identified at the
proposed rule stage (HOME, CDBG,
HOPWA, ESG, and CoC), as well as to
the Housing Trust Fund program (with
regulations at 24 CFR part 93) and the
Rural Housing Stability Assistance
Program (with regulations to be codified
in 24 CFR part 579). As noted
throughout the proposed rule, the rule
was always intended to apply to
recipients and subrecipients of CPD
programs, as well as those who
administer programs and services and
provide temporary, emergency shelter
funded by CPD programs, and HUD did
not intend to exclude the new Housing
Trust Fund and Rural Housing Stability
5 The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination
in the sale, rental, making unavailable, or financing
of dwellings and in other housing-related activities
on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability,
familial status, and national origin, and thus
prohibits making housing unavailable to a person
because of that person’s sex. 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.
The Fair Housing Act contains no exemptions that
permit covered housing to be sex-segregated. See 42
U.S.C. 3603(b) (limited exemptions from Fair
Housing Act coverage for sales of certain single
family homes and for rooms or units in certain
owner-occupied dwellings), and § 3607 (exemptions
from Fair Housing Act coverage for private clubs
and religious organizations).
6 Temporary, emergency shelters and other
buildings and facilities that are not covered by the
Fair Housing Act because they provide short-term,
temporary accommodations may provide sexsegregated accommodations, which they sometimes
do to protect the privacy and security of individuals
when the buildings and facilities have physical
limitations or configurations that require shared
sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities. For
purposes of this rule, shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities are those that are designed
for simultaneous accommodation of multiple
individuals in the same space. For example, a
single-user bathing facility with a lock on the door
is not designated for simultaneous occupancy by
multiple individuals, so it is not a ‘‘shared bathing
facility’’ for purposes of the Equal Access Rule or
this rule.
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Assistance programs from the list of
CPD programs in this paragraph.
Section 5.106(b) addresses the
admissions, occupancy, and operating
policies and procedures of recipients,
subrecipients, owners, operators,
managers, and providers covered by this
rule. Revised paragraph (b) adds that
policies and procedures to protect
health and safety, as well as privacy and
security noted in the proposed rule,
must be established, maintained, or
amended, as necessary, and provides
that all policies must be administered in
a nondiscriminatory manner. HUD
recognizes that in the temporary,
emergency shelters covered by this rule,
privacy, security, safety, and health
concerns may arise as a result of the
varied populations that reside in such
facilities at any given time. The rule
requires policies and procedures, if such
policies and procedures have not
already been updated, to reflect the
obligation and to document the
commitment of the provider to maintain
a healthy and safe environment for all
occupants and respect individual
privacy without doing so in a way that
is discriminatory or violates applicable
Federal laws and regulations.
HUD also revises paragraph (b) to add
a provision that the policies and
procedures must ensure that individuals
are not subjected to intrusive
questioning or asked to provide
anatomical information or documentary,
physical, or medical evidence of the
individual’s gender identity. This
revision was made in response to public
comment advising that transgender
persons and gender nonconforming
persons are often asked inappropriate,
intrusive questions; asked to provide
evidence about their physical anatomy;
or asked for medical records relating to
their gender identity or identification
documents that record their gender
identity. There are multiple reasons
why this documentation is problematic
and prohibited by this rule. Homeless
persons encounter difficulties in
maintaining their identification
documents, and individuals whose
gender identities differ from sex
assigned at birth experience varying
levels of difficulty in updating gender
markers on identification documents.
These barriers make it likely that an
individual seeking homeless services
and whose gender identity differs from
their sex assigned at birth will possess
identification documents that do not
reflect that individual’s gender identity,
if they have identification documents at
all. Further, gender identity is distinct
from sex assigned at birth, is not
associated with physical anatomy, and
may not be indicated in medical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
records. For these reasons, HUD agrees
with public commenters that it is
important that transgender or gender
nonconforming persons can self-identify
their gender identity orally and not be
asked intrusive questions or asked to
provide documentary, physical, or
medical evidence to prove their gender
identity.
Lastly, revised paragraph (b) also
requires that such revisions ensure that
amendments to CPD programs policies
and procedures continue to include the
existing requirement in § 5.105(a)(2) that
individuals are provided equal access to
housing in CPD programs without
regard to actual or perceived gender
identity. While this rule’s focus is on
programs, owners, operators, and
managers of shelters, buildings, and
other facilities and providers of CPDfunded services that were not covered
under HUD’s 2012 Equal Access Rule,
housing under CPD programs has
already been required to ensure equal
access to individuals based on their
gender identity. HUD adds this
provision to clarify that, when
amending CPD program policies and
procedures, they should continue to
reflect the existing 2012 Equal Access
Rule requirement that housing be made
available without regard to gender
identity.
In § 5.106(c), which addresses
placement and accommodation in
temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities with
physical limitations or configurations
that require and are permitted to have
shared sleeping quarters or shared
bathing facilities, HUD removes the
proposed rule language that under
narrow circumstances, a written caseby-case determination could be made on
whether an alternative accommodation
for a transgender individual would be
necessary to ensure health and safety.
Public commenters expressed concern
that the exception could be
inappropriately used to avoid
compliance with the equal access
requirement, and that this ‘‘exception’’
also targeted transgender individuals as
a cause of concern with respect to
health and safety. HUD was persuaded
by the public commenters that the
‘‘exception’’ provision had the opposite
effect than that intended by HUD.
HUD’s intention in the inclusion of this
language was to strive to ensure the
health and safety of transgender
individuals in temporary, emergency
shelters and other buildings and
facilities. It was not to indicate that the
very presence of transgender
individuals was a cause for health and
safety concerns nor to indicate, by
allowing alternative accommodation,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64767
that HUD’s only concern was the health
and safety of transgender individuals
and HUD was not concerned about any
other occupants. HUD’s regulations for
the ESG program and the implementing
guidance, make clear that temporary,
emergency shelters, and other buildings
and facilities with physical limitations
or configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities have
had, and continue to have, a
responsibility to create a safe
environment for all occupants,
particularly those of special populations
(see 24 CFR 576.400(e)(3)(iii) for more
information).
This final rule thus revises paragraph
(c) of § 5.106 to provide that placement
and accommodation of individuals shall
be made in accordance with an
individual’s gender identity, and it
removes language that permits an
exception to this rule where a provider
makes a written case-by-case
determination on whether an alternative
accommodation for a transgender
individual would be necessary to ensure
health and safety. There are various
measures that HUD’s providers may take
to fulfill their duty to create a safe
environment for all, including
transgender and gender nonconforming
individuals, and to ensure that HUDfunded projects are free from
discrimination. As preemptive steps,
providers are strongly encouraged to
post a notice of rights under this rule
and under HUD’s 2012 Equal Access
Rule on bulletin boards and in other
public spaces where information is
made available, to clearly establish
expectations. In order to ensure that
individuals are aware of their rights to
equal access, HUD proposes to require
owners and operators of CPD-funded
shelters and facilities to post on bulletin
boards and in other public spaces where
information is typically made available
a notice entitled ‘‘Equal Access
Regardless of Sexual Orientation,
Gender Identity, or Marital Status for
HUD’s Community Planning and
Development Programs,’’ which HUD is
publishing in today’s Federal Register
for public comment, in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
In addition, HUD Technical Assistance
materials provide a sample
antidiscrimination policy that providers
may consider adopting to further clarify
expectations to persons as they enter the
project.7
7 See Equal Access for Transgender People:
Supporting Inclusive Housing and Shelters https://
www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/
Equal-Access-for-Transgender-People-SupportingInclusive-Housing-and-Shelters.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
64768
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Even with antidiscrimination policies
clearly articulated, occupants may
express concerns or engage in other
behavior toward transgender or gender
nonconforming persons. If some
occupants initially present concerns
about transgender or gender
nonconforming occupants to project
staff and managers, staff should treat
those concerns as opportunities to
educate and refocus the occupants. HUD
recognizes that, even then, conflicts may
persist and complaints may escalate to
verbal or physical harassment. In these
situations, providers should have
policies and procedures in place to
support residents and staff in addressing
and resolving conflicts that escalate to
harassment. These policies should
include specific behaviors that violate
standards of respectful behavior,
escalate corrective actions if an
individual repeats the same violation of
standards after educational
opportunities are offered, and focus
corrective actions on aggressors who
violate project rules, not on the person
targeted by the harassment. If an
occupant continues to harass a
transgender individual, the provider
should consider requiring that the
harassing occupant stay away from the
transgender individual, making changes
in sleeping arrangements without
limiting the freedom of the transgender
individual, or pursuing other
interventions. When appropriate,
providers may consider expelling
harassing residents, or any staff or
volunteer members who perpetuate
discrimination. In no instance, however,
should any steps taken to address
harassment or discrimination involve
expulsion of harassed occupants.
Revised paragraph (c) provides for
post-admission accommodations, where
after an individual has been admitted to
a temporary, emergency shelter, or other
building or facility with shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities, the
provider must take non-discriminatory
steps that may be necessary and
appropriate to address privacy concerns
raised by all residents or occupants,
and, as needed, update its admissions,
occupancy, and operating policies and
procedures. These provisions apply to
all individuals, regardless of gender
identity. If an individual requests
certain accommodations because of
privacy concerns, staff may offer those
accommodations to that individual but
may not require that the individual use
the accommodations. For example, if
available, staff may offer that occupant
a room, floor, or bed that is close to staff
workstations or access to rooms, floors,
or beds set aside for residents with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
increased vulnerability. At the request
of an individual, providers may also
offer use of a single-occupant bathroom
or provide certain times during the day
that a shared bathroom can be
scheduled by any client with a request
to use a private bathing facility. If
feasible, providers can ensure that toilet
and shower stalls have locking doors or,
at a minimum, curtains to allow for
modesty and privacy. For shower use,
providers may consider implementing a
schedule for all clients if communal
showers are the only available type of
shower. HUD stresses that all such
accommodations should be offered only
to fulfill the request of individuals
seeking accommodations for
themselves, should be available to
clients based on a variety of factors that
can increase one’s vulnerability, and
should not be restricted for use only by
transgender or gender nonconforming
residents. In no case may a provider’s
policies isolate or segregate transgender
or gender nonconforming occupants.
This final rule removes from
§ 5.105(d) in the proposed rule the
language relating to referrals, HUD has
removed the provision from the
proposed rule that permitted housing
providers to make a written case-by-case
determination that a transgender
individual should receive an alternative
accommodation for health and safety
reasons. This does not preclude the
possibility that any occupant may
request a referral to an alternate project
for health and safety reasons, and in
such cases staff may provide a referral
or offer clients a hotel or motel
voucher.8
This final rule redesignates the
recordkeeping requirements from
§ 5.106(e) to 5.106(d) and states that
providers must document and maintain,
for a period of 5 years, records of
compliance with the requirements of
this rule regarding establishing or
amending policies and procedures. This
rule also removes the more specific
requirements related to case-by-case
determinations and referrals.
To strengthen enforcement
mechanisms for this rule, HUD is
publishing in today’s Federal Register a
notice for public comment, in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, entitled ‘‘Equal
Access Regardless of Sexual
Orientation, Gender Identity, or Marital
Status for HUD’s Community Planning
and Development Programs.’’ HUD
proposes to require owners and
8 In the ESG program, a hotel or motel voucher
may be offered only if there are no other accessible
or appropriate emergency shelter beds available for
that night.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
operators of CPD-funded shelters and
facilities to post this notice on bulletin
boards and in other public spaces where
information is typically made available.
III. Public Comments Submitted on
Proposed Rule and HUD’s Responses
A. Overview of Public Comments
The public comment period for the
November 20, 2015, proposed rule
closed on January 19, 2016. As of the
close of the comment period, HUD
received approximately 184 public
comments, in addition to a number of
mass mailings, from a variety of
commenters, including housing
authorities, direct legal services
providers, community development
agencies, homeless shelters, healthcare
providers, social workers, clergy,
counselors, nonprofit social service
providers, and LGBT advocacy
organizations. The overwhelming
majority of comments were supportive
of the rule. Some commenters, while
supporting the rule, suggested
modifications, and a minority of the
commenters opposed the rule.
Commenters opposing the rule stated
that it failed to balance the needs of all
shelter occupants and lacks flexibility.
All comments can be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov.
1. Commenters Supporting the Rule
Many commenters supporting the rule
suggested no changes and offered a
variety of reasons why they supported
the rule and why HUD should conclude
the rulemaking as expeditiously as
possible. Commenters stated that
transgender persons, like all persons,
need access to safe shelter and housing
and that transgender persons are some
of the most vulnerable members of
society. Commenters stated that
transgender individuals are
disproportionately represented in the
homeless population because of the
frequent discrimination they face at
home, in school, and on the job. Some
cited a survey showing that one in five
transgender or gender nonconforming
individuals experienced homelessness
at some point in their lives because of
their transgender status. Commenters
stated that transgender individuals were
at greater overall risk of violence,
murder, and homelessness-related death
than people who are not transgender
and may also experience mental and
physical health problems because of the
abuse they face.
Commenters stated that the rule
would promote civil rights and
expanded housing opportunity by
addressing the effects of stigma on equal
access to housing for transgender and
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
gender nonconforming persons.
Commenters supporting the rule
frequently stated that the rule would
eliminate major barriers to access to
safe, temporary, emergency shelter and
other facilities and programs for
transgender and gender nonconforming
persons, particularly vulnerable
subgroups within the population that
need access to such accommodations.
Some commenters stated that the rule
will yield other positive societal
outcomes. Many commenters provided
extensive data to support the rule,
including a January 2016 study
conducted by the Center for American
Progress that found, among other things,
that only 30 percent of shelters studied
were willing to accommodate
transgender women in accordance with
their gender identity. The commenters
stated that LGBT providers were twice
as likely to be willing to provide a
shelter-seeker with accommodations in
accordance with the individual’s gender
identity; that women’s shelters were
more likely than mixed-gender shelters
to provide a shelter-seeker with
accommodations in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity; and that
many shelters did not correctly classify
shelter-seekers in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity or stated
that transgender or gender
nonconforming individuals would have
to submit to invasive medical
examinations or inquiries, or
demonstrate that they had undergone
surgery, as a prerequisite to obtaining
shelter.9
Other commenters supporting HUD’s
rule stated that the rule is needed
because the willingness to house
transgender people in accordance with
their gender identity currently varies,
depending on State laws and shelter
type, and HUD’s rule would provide
some consistency. Commenters stated
that because 32 States lack explicit
gender identity protections in housing,
HUD’s rule will help ensure equal
access to shelters nationwide for
transgender and gender nonconforming
individuals. Commenters said that even
in jurisdictions with express protections
for transgender individuals,
discriminatory practices still persist.
Commenters stated that HUD’s rule is in
step with recent Federal case law
holding that discrimination on the basis
of sexual orientation and gender
identity constitutes unlawful
discrimination on the ‘‘basis of sex,’’ in
9 Center
for American Progress, Discrimination
Against Transgender Women Seeking Access to
Homeless Shelters (Jan. 7, 2016), available at
https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/
uploads/2016/01/06113001/
HomelessTransgender.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act and Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972.
2. Comments Opposing the Rule
Commenters opposing the rule
provided many reasons for their
opposition but the primary reason
concerned the safety of nontransgender
individuals in a shelter. Commenters
stated that the rule should not open
female, single-sex spaces to individuals
who were born male, citing their fear
that individuals could deliberately
misrepresent their gender identities and
compromise the privacy or safety of
vulnerable women and children.
Commenters stated that there is a risk of
causing female survivors of maleperpetrated domestic or sexual violence,
who are disproportionately represented
in the homeless population and shelters,
to feel unsafe. Commenters said the rule
does not respect legitimate safety and
privacy concerns of biological women,
and that the rule treats women’s fear of
being assaulted in a shelter as
unreasonable ‘‘bigotry.’’ Commenters
stated that the rule should require
providers to create segregated facilities
for transgender individuals, rather than
placing individuals into male or female
facilities that correspond to the
individual’s gender identity.
Commenters stated that transgender
men are also vulnerable to assault in
shelters. Several commenters opposing
the rule cited to articles recounting the
stories of individuals who had been
raped in shelters. A commenter stated
that it is untrue that transgender women
can be safe only in a women’s shelter.
Commenters stated that the rule must
balance the various needs, perspectives,
personal histories, and expectations of
privacy of both transgender individuals
and other shelter seekers. Commenters
stated that the rule should provide equal
consideration to the health and safety
concerns of transgender and
nontransgender individuals and
guidelines on what constitutes threats to
health and safety for transgender and
nontransgender individuals.
3. Responses to Comments in Support
and Opposition
HUD appreciates all of the comments
offered in response to HUD’s proposed
rule. Comments supporting the rule as
well as comments opposing the rule
gave HUD much to consider in the
development of this final rule. While
HUD is proceeding with this
rulemaking, HUD is making the changes
highlighted in Section II of this
preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64769
B. Significant Public Comments and
HUD’s Responses
This section presents significant
issues raised by commenters and HUD’s
responses to these comments. The
issues presented in this section
highlight changes requested by
commenters, and questions about or
requests for clarifications about certain
provisions of the rule.
Comment: Commenters stated that the
rule exceeds HUD’s current statutory
mandate because Congress has not given
HUD the authority to prohibit
discrimination based on gender identity.
Commenters stated that the rule’s
definitions of ‘‘gender identity’’ and
‘‘perceived gender identity’’ are
overbroad and exceed HUD’s authority
by creating a new protected class and
that HUD failed to specify the basis for
this prohibition of discrimination.
HUD Response: The rule creates
additional program requirements to
ensure equal access for transgender and
gender nonconforming persons, in
accordance with their gender identity,
in shelters, buildings, facilities, and
programs funded in whole or in part by
CPD. The creation of such program
requirements is well within the scope of
HUD’s authority. HUD’s mission is to
create strong, sustainable, inclusive
communities and quality affordable
homes for all. This mission
encompasses providing shelter for
transgender and gender nonconforming
persons, who have faced significant
difficulty in obtaining access to shelters,
and buildings and facilities that provide
shelter. Excluding any eligible person
from HUD-funded temporary,
emergency shelters, buildings, facilities,
housing, or programs because of that
person’s gender identity or
nonconformance with gender
stereotypes would contravene HUD’s
responsibility under the Department of
Housing and Urban Development Act to
work to address ‘‘the needs and interests
of the Nation’s communities and of the
people who live and work in them.’’
(See 42 U.S.C. 3531.) Congress has
repeatedly charged HUD with serving
the existing housing needs of all
Americans.10
Congress has not only given HUD this
broad mission but also given HUD broad
authority to fulfill this mission and
implement its responsibilities through
rulemaking. Section 7(d) of the
Department of Housing and Urban
10 See section 2 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42
U.S.C. 1441); section 2 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701t), sections
101 and 102 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National
Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12701–702), and
section 2(b) of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301 note).
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
64770
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Development Act specifically states that
the Secretary ‘‘may make such rules and
regulations as may be necessary to carry
out his functions, powers, and duties.’’
Moreover, as discussed in the preamble
to HUD’s 2012 Equal Access Rule and
as discussed in greater detail in
response to the following comment,
HUD is charged with administering and
enforcing the Fair Housing Act, which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of
protected characteristics, including sex.
Discrimination because of gender
identity is covered within the Fair
Housing Act’s prohibition of sex
discrimination. In 2010, HUD issued a
memorandum recognizing that sex
discrimination includes discrimination
because of gender identity. In 2012, the
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC) reached the same
conclusion with regard to gender
identity claims, ‘‘clarifying that claims
of discrimination based on transgender
status, also referred to as claims of
discrimination based on gender identity,
are cognizable under Title VII’s sex
discrimination prohibition.’’ 11
Following the EEOC’s decision, the U.S.
Attorney General also concluded that:
the best reading of Title VII’s prohibition of
sex discrimination is that it encompasses
discrimination based on gender identity,
including transgender status. The most
straightforward reading of Title VII is that
discrimination ‘‘because of . . . sex’’
includes discrimination because an
employee’s gender identification is as a
member of a particular sex, or because the
employee is transitioning, or has
transitioned, to another sex.12
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
HUD reaffirms its view that
discrimination based on gender identity
is sex discrimination.
Comment: HUD received comments
on sex discrimination under the Fair
Housing Act and the proposed
requirement that individuals be
provided accommodations in
accordance with their gender identity. A
commenter stated that, while it is
11 Macy v. Dept. of Justice, No. 0120120821, 2012
EEOPUB LEXIS 1181, *13 (EEOC Apr. 20, 2012);
see also Lusardi v. Dept. of the Army, No.
0120133395, 2015 EEOPUB LEXIS 896, *17 (EEOC
Apr. 1, 2015).
12 Attorney General Memorandum, Treatment of
Transgender Employment Discrimination Claims
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Dec.
15, 2014), posted at https://www.justice.gov/file/
188671/download. Similarly, the Office of
Personnel Management revised its
nondiscrimination regulations to make clear that
sex discrimination under Title VII includes
discrimination based on gender identity. See, e.g.,
5 CFR 300.102–300.103; see also OFCCP Directive
2014–02, Gender Identity and Sex Discrimination
(Aug. 19, 2014) (stating that discrimination based
on gender identity or transgender status is
discrimination based on sex), posted at https://
www.dol.gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/directives/
Directive_2014-02_508c.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
helpful that HUD already considers the
Fair Housing Act’s provision against
discrimination on the basis of sex to
cover nonconforming gender
expression, it would be helpful to make
that protection explicit in the new rule.
HUD Response: HUD does not believe
it is necessary to modify the proposed
regulatory text as the commenter
recommends. In § 5.100 of the proposed
rule, HUD included a definition of
‘‘perceived gender identity’’ in order to
differentiate between actual gender
identity and perceived gender identity
for purposes of this rule and the 2012
Equal Access Rule. Under that
definition, perceived gender identity
means the gender with which a person
is perceived to identify based on that
person’s appearance, behavior,
expression, other gender-related
characteristics, or sex assigned to the
individual at birth. In the final rule, the
definition is amended to read as
follows: Perceived gender identity
means the gender with which a person
is perceived to identify based on that
person’s appearance, behavior,
expression, other gender-related
characteristics, or sex assigned to the
individual at birth or identified in
documents. Because the definition of
perceived gender identity included in
the proposed rule and adopted by this
rule includes gender expression,
§ 5.105(a)(2) of the rule addresses the
commenter’s concern that HUD-assisted
or -insured housing shall be made
available without regard to an
individual’s gender expression. HUD
does not believe any revision to the text
of § 5.105(a)(2) is necessary to address
this concern. Any suggested amendment
to Fair Housing Act regulations is
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
Comment: Some commenters stated
that the rule should create similar equal
access to housing policies for
transgender or gender nonconforming
persons in all emergency shelters and
facilities. Another commenter stated
that the Fair Housing Act does not
prohibit discrimination based on gender
identity in shelters. A commenter stated
that the lack of a law prohibiting
discrimination against transgender
persons in shelters has not stopped
rescue missions and other shelter
providers from meeting the diverse
needs of transgender persons in crisis.
HUD Response: While HUD
appreciates that commenters want to
have this rule apply to all emergency
shelters, the scope of this rulemaking is
limited to shelters, other buildings and
facilities, and programs funded in whole
or in part by CPD. CPD is the HUD office
that funds various types of shelters.
While HUD believes that all emergency
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
shelters, including those temporary,
emergency shelters that are not subject
to the requirements of the Fair Housing
Act and that HUD does not fund, should
provide equal access in accordance with
an individual’s gender identity,
imposing those requirements on all
emergency shelters is outside the scope
of this rulemaking.
With respect to the commenter’s
statement about the Fair Housing Act,
HUD seeks to clarify that, contrary to
the commenter’s stated view, the Fair
Housing Act’s prohibition of
discrimination because of sex does
include the prohibition of
discrimination based on gender identity
or nonconformance with gender
stereotypes, which includes
discrimination against an individual
having a gender identity that does not
conform to an individual’s sex assigned
at birth. While HUD disagrees with the
commenter’s broad statement that there
is no law prohibiting discrimination
based on gender identity in shelters,
HUD agrees that it is beneficial for all
shelters, including rescue missions, to
continue to provide accommodation and
services to transgender persons.
Comment: A commenter sought
clarity regarding the application of the
Fair Housing Act to shelters. The
commenter asserted that the Fair
Housing Act does not apply to homeless
shelters because, in the commenter’s
view, they are not ‘‘dwellings’’ covered
under the Fair Housing Act. The
commenter stated that the term
‘‘dwelling’’ is not well-defined in case
law, that emergency shelters are not
dwellings under the Act; and that the
prohibitions of section 3604 of the Fair
Housing Act do not apply to ‘‘free’’
shelters and similar facilities because, in
the commenter’s view, such
prohibitions only apply to housing that
is for sale or rental. The commenter
stated that, if HUD adopted a statement
that the Fair Housing Act does not apply
to homeless shelters, such adoption
would ‘‘strengthen fair housing and
mitigate confusion and
misinterpretation among providers, fairhousing agencies, and shelter guests.’’
HUD Response: The commenter
misunderstands HUD’s statement about
emergency shelters and the coverage of
the Fair Housing Act. Contrary to the
commenter’s assertion, HUD does not
categorically exclude temporary,
emergency shelters providing short-term
housing accommodations from coverage
under the Fair Housing Act. In fact,
HUD’s established policy and
regulations explicitly identify homeless
shelters and other short-term or
transient housing as ‘‘dwellings’’ subject
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
to the Act.13 The Act defines ‘‘dwelling’’
as ‘‘any building, structure, or portion
thereof which is occupied as, or
designed or intended for occupancy as,
a residence by one or more families’’
and includes vacant land.14 Thus,
shelters generally are covered within the
definition of dwelling, and many courts
have held shelters and other short-term
accommodations to be dwellings
covered by the Fair Housing Act.15
However, some shelters may not qualify
as a ‘‘dwelling’’ under the Fair Housing
Act, and, therefore, HUD has endorsed
the following multiple factor analysis
for determining whether a shelter is a
covered dwelling for purposes of the
Fair Housing Act: (1) Length of stay; (2)
whether the rental rate for the unit will
be calculated based on a daily, weekly,
monthly, or yearly basis; (3) whether the
terms and length of occupancy will be
established through a lease or other
written agreement; (4) what amenities
will be included inside the unit,
including kitchen facilities; (5) how the
purpose of the property will be
marketed to the public; (6) whether the
resident possesses the right to return to
the property; and (7) whether the
resident has anywhere else to which to
return.16
Determining whether a particular
emergency shelter is a covered dwelling
for purposes of the Fair Housing Act
13 See, e.g., Final Report of HUD Review of Model
Building Codes, 65 FR 15740, 15746, 15747 (March
23, 2000) (‘‘HUD specified as dwellings covered by
the Act . . . such short-term housing as . . .
homeless shelters.’’). See also, e.g., 24 CFR 100.201
(the definition of ‘‘dwelling units’’ includes, e.g.,
sleeping accommodations in shelters intended for
occupancy as a residence for homeless persons);
Supplement to Notice of Fair Housing Accessibility
Guidelines: Questions and Answers about the
Guidelines, 56 FR 9472, 9500 (March 6, 1991)
(same); Implementation of the Fair Housing
Amendments Act, 54 FR 3232, 3245 (January 23,
1989) (same).
14 42 U.S.C. 3602(b).
15 See, e.g., Schwartz v. City of Treasure Island,
544 F.3d 1201, 1215 (11th Cir. 2008) (halfway
houses for recovering addicts); Lakeside Resort
Enter. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Palmyra Twp., 455
F.3d 154, 158–60 (3rd Cir. 2006) (treatment facility);
Turning Point, Inc. v. City of Caldwell, 74 F.3d 941,
942 (9th Cir. 1996) (homeless shelter); Hovsons, Inc.
v. Twp. of Brick, 89 F.3d 1096, 1103 (3rd Cir. 1996)
(nursing home); U.S. v. Columbus Country Club,
915 F.2d 877, 881 (3rd Cir. 1990) (summer
bungalows); Connecticut Hosp. v. City of New
London, 129 F. Supp. 2d 123, 135 (D. Conn. 2001)
(halfway houses for substance abuse treatment);
Lauer Farms, Inc. v. Waushara County Board of
Adjustment, 986 F. Supp. 544, 557, 559 (E.D. Wis.
1997) (migrant farmworker housing); Louisiana
Acorn Fair Hous. v. Quarter House, 952 F.Supp.
352, 359–60 (E.D. La. 1997) (time-share unit);
Woods v. Foster, 884 F. Supp. 1169, 1175 (N.D. Ill.
1995) (homeless shelter); Baxter v. City of Belleville,
720 F. Supp. 720, 731 (S.D. Ill. 1989) (residence for
terminally ill); U.S. v. Hughes Mem’l Home, 396 F.
Supp. 544, 549 (W.D. Va. 1975) (home for needy
children).
16 See 65 FR at 15746.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
requires application of the multiple
factors to its operation. No single factor
is determinative. For instance, the
absence of a rental fee or lease does not
disqualify an accommodation from
coverage under the Fair Housing Act.17
Further, contrary to the commenter’s
view, section 3604 of the Fair Housing
Act does not only apply to
discriminatory conduct that involves a
sale or rental. The Fair Housing Act has
no such limitation. In addition to
prohibitions against refusals ‘‘to sell or
rent after making of a bona fide offer’’
and ‘‘to refuse to negotiate for the sale
or rental,’’ section 3604(a) also prohibits
‘‘otherwise mak[ing] unavailable or
deny[ing]’’ a dwelling to any person
protected under the Fair Housing Act.18
HUD and courts have long made clear
that a variety of conduct that does not
involve sale or rental can make housing
otherwise unavailable.19 Similarly,
section 3604(b) is not limited to conduct
involving a sale or rental, as it also
prohibits discrimination in the
‘‘provision of services or facilities in
connection’’ with a dwelling.20 HUD
strongly disagrees that adopting a broad
statement that the Fair Housing Act
does not apply to homeless shelters
would strengthen fair housing. HUD
also emphasizes that this rule covers
CPD-funded shelters and other
buildings and facilities regardless of
whether the facility qualifies as a
dwelling under the Fair Housing Act.
Comment: Some commenters stated
that the proposed rule is inconsistent
with the Fair Housing Act, which
forbids sex discrimination as to covered
dwellings but not as to free, temporary,
emergency shelters or other buildings or
facilities, and which, therefore, evinces
the intent of Congress to permit singlesex housing in the latter case.
Commenters expressed concern that the
decision by Congress to allow single-sex
facilities that do not qualify as
dwellings would be unenforceable if
this rule is implemented as proposed;
for example, if a women’s shelter were
required to admit a biological man
based merely upon his assertion that he
17 See, e.g., Woods v. Foster, 884 F. Supp. 1169,
1175 (N.D. Ill. 1995) (homeless shelter did not
charge rent).
18 42 U.S.C. 3604(a).
19 See, e.g., Ojo v. Farmers Grp., Inc., 600 F.3d
1205, 1208 (9th Cir. 2010) (discriminatory pricing
and denial of homeowners insurance violates 804(a)
and (b)); Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cisneros, 52
F.3d 1351, 1357–58 (6th Cir. 1995) (same); Keith v.
Volpe, 858 F.2d 467, 482–484 (9th Cir. 1988)
(municipal’s refusal to permit low-income housing
violates 804(a)). See also, e.g., 24 CFR 100.70(d)(4)
(refusing to provide municipal services or property
or hazard insurance because of protected class).
20 42 U.S.C. 3604(b); see, e.g., 24 CFR 100.65(b)(2)
(failing or delaying maintenance because of
protected class).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64771
‘‘identifies as’’ a woman, or if a men’s
shelter were required to admit a
biological woman based merely upon
her assertion that she ‘‘identifies as’’ a
man.
HUD Response: As previously stated,
the rule is not inconsistent with the Fair
Housing Act. While the Fair Housing
Act includes nondiscrimination
requirements applicable to dwellings
covered by the Act, it does not prohibit
HUD from establishing additional
program requirements through
rulemaking. Temporary, emergency
shelters and other buildings and
facilities with physical limitations or
configurations that require shared
sleeping quarters or bathing facilities
and that do not qualify as dwellings
under the Fair Housing Act may operate
single-sex shelters unless doing so
would violate some other Federal, State,
or local law. Under this rule, such
shelters or other buildings and facilities
funded by programs administered by
CPD 21 must determine placement in
such single-sex facilities in accordance
with each applicant’s or occupant’s
gender identity, regardless of sex
assigned at birth or other factors. As
noted in response to a prior comment,
HUD’s establishment of programmatic
requirements for temporary, emergency
shelters and other buildings and
facilities funded through HUD programs
is well within HUD’s statutory authority
and an important part of HUD’s mission
in ensuring access to housing for all
Americans. Contrary to the public
comment that suggests what Congress’s
intent was in creating single-sex
facilities, HUD does not opine on
Congress’s intent behind permitting
single-sex facilities, but does make clear
in this rule that, for purposes of
determining placement in a single-sex
facility, placement should be made
consistent with an individual’s gender
identity. This rule does not attempt to
interpret or define sex.
Comment: One commenter expressed
concern that Congress would see no
need to enact the Equality Act, a bill
that would expressly forbid
discrimination in housing on the basis
of sexual orientation and gender
identity, once HUD issued a rule
prohibiting such discrimination.
HUD Response: While HUD
appreciates the commenter’s desire to
see Congress enact new legislation
expanding antidiscrimination
21 HUD provided similar guidance to recipients
and subrecipients that place eligible persons in
single-sex temporary, emergency shelters or other
facilities receiving ESG, CoC, or HOPWA funds. See
Appropriate Placement for Transgender Persons in
Single-Sex Emergency Shelters and Other Facilities,
(Notice: CPD–15–02 (February 20, 2015)).
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
64772
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
protections in housing, HUD does not
believe the introduction of such
legislation warrants delaying issuance of
this important rule. Because many
transgender persons are being denied
access to temporary, emergency shelters
and other building and facilities or are
being placed and served in such shelters
in accordance with their sex assigned at
birth instead of in accordance with their
gender identity, HUD believes it is
necessary to issue this rule at this time
to ensure that transgender and gender
nonconforming persons are accorded
equal access and are accommodated in
accordance with their gender identity in
programs, shelters, buildings, and
facilities assisted by CPD. Given that
this rulemaking applies only to
providers that receive HUD funds and
not more broadly, HUD does not believe
that its rulemaking in this important
area will impact any broader legislative
action that Congress may choose to take.
Comment: Commenters stated that the
rule is not based on sufficiently
exhaustive research and data, such as
interviews with people not in the LGBT
community, and only presents onesided research on the issue of gender
identity. A commenter said that while
the rule notes that many transgender
shelter-seekers would choose sleeping
on the street rather than a shelter for
their sex assigned at birth, HUD’s rule
does not address whether biological
women would choose to sleep on the
streets if their only other option were to
share sleeping and bathing spaces with
anatomically biological males who selfidentify as women. Commenters stated
that, before HUD institutes this rule,
HUD needs more research on what risks
placing males in female-only facilities
will pose to women, and HUD should
continue to search for solutions for
providing safe services for particularly
vulnerable males and, if vulnerable
males must be placed at a women’s
shelter, female clients should be able to
sleep, bathe, and use the toilet away
from biological males.
HUD Response: As HUD program
participants and the public are aware,
HUD spent considerable time studying
this issue. During the development of
HUD’s 2012 Equal Access Rule,
commenters requested HUD to address
the issue of temporary, emergency
shelters that contain shared sleeping
quarters and shared bathing facilities.
HUD, however, declined to address that
issue in the 2012 Equal Access Rule
because of the need to conduct further
research and examination of the issue.
During the time since the 2012 Equal
Access Rule was issued, HUD
monitored and reviewed its own
programs, national research, and other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
Federal agency policy to determine if
transgender individuals had sufficient
access to temporary, emergency shelters
or if additional guidance or a national
policy was warranted. HUD considered
the issue not only from the perspective
of transgender persons and other gender
nonconforming persons, but also from
the perspective of individuals whose
sex assigned at birth and whose gender
identity are the same. HUD has learned
through its review that all individuals,
including transgender persons and other
gender nonconforming persons, can be
safely accommodated in shelters and
other buildings and facilities in
accordance with their gender identity.
Privacy concerns can be addressed
through policy adjustments, such as the
use of schedules that provide equal
access to bathing facilities, and
modifications to facilities, such as the
use of privacy screens and, where
feasible, the installation of single
occupant restrooms and bathing
facilities. Further, the 2016 Center for
American Progress study cited in the
Background section of this preamble
revealed that shelters were willing to
provide transgender women with
appropriate shelter only 30 percent of
the time. Given the 4-year examination
of this issue prior to this rule and the
recent evidence of continued and
widespread practices that deny access
or subject transgender individuals to
unequal treatment, HUD is ready to
address this matter in regulation and
believes that this final rule sets the right
approach.
Comment: Commenters stated that
because the rule requires shelters and
other programs and services to change
their policies and procedures, oversight
and accountability should be created or
strengthened. Commenters stated that
current lack of oversight within the
shelter and emergency housing system
threatens the lives of transgender,
gender nonconforming, and intersex
people; subjects them to violence and
degradation without any accountability
or protection; and violates their basic
human rights and the equal protections
that should be accorded them.
Commenters stated that HUD should
clarify, in the final rule or in another
form, how HUD will monitor and
enforce the CPD Equal Access Rule,
including an amendment stating that
without meaningful monitoring and
enforcement as is done for protected
groups under the Fair Housing Act, the
promise of the rule may go unfulfilled.
Other commenters stated that the
system for filing complaints needs to be
improved, and a complaint filing system
needs to be incorporated at the local
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
level, where marginalized transgender
and gender nonconforming individuals
seeking shelter have ready access to
advocates who can assist them. A
commenter stated that no organization
should receive Federal funds without
standing proof of compliance.
HUD Response: HUD agrees that
safety, respectful treatment, and equal
access are critical issues for transgender
and gender nonconforming individuals,
as they are for everyone, and HUD’s
regulations for the ESG program make it
clear that all ESG-funded emergency
shelters, including those with
configurations that require shared
sleeping quarters or shared bathing
facilities, have had, and continue to
have, a responsibility to create a safe
environment for all occupants,
particularly those of special populations
(see 24 CFR 576.400(e)(3)(iii) for more
information). Recipients, subrecipients,
owners, operators, and managers of
temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities and
providers of services are expected to
take the steps necessary to comply with
this rule and maintain safe conditions
for all shelter and facility residents and
employees. When there is a threat to the
safety of any resident, HUD expects
recipients, subrecipients, and shelter or
facility owners, operators, managers,
and providers to take appropriate steps
to address such threats. Such mitigating
steps may include proactive measures to
reduce risks such as increasing the
shelter’s security personnel, making
adjustments to a facility’s operating
policies and schedules, and modifying
shelter facilities to provide a single
occupant bathing facility. HUD has
heard from providers that adjusting a
facility’s operating policies and
schedules is usually sufficient and does
not cost additional funds, and thus HUD
encourages agencies to start with this
modification. HUD also notes that, for
additional modifications that are
necessary, some funded facilities, such
as those under the ESG program, can
use ESG funds to modify the shelter
facility or provide additional security.
HUD believes that by requiring equal
access for transgender individuals and
other gender nonconforming persons in
this regulation, HUD will be better able
to monitor and enforce actions required
to ensure equal access in temporary,
emergency and other CPD-assisted
buildings, facilities, and programs.
Section 5.106(b) requires that recipients,
subrecipients, operators, managers, and
providers of temporary, emergency
shelters, other buildings and facilities,
programs, and services update their
policies, if not already updated, to
comply with providing equal access,
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
which HUD can review when
monitoring its recipients’,
subrecipients’, and providers’
compliance with the new requirements
established by this final rule. In
addition, § 5.106(d) requires that
providers must document and maintain
records of compliance with the
requirements in § 5.106(b) of this rule
for a period of 5 years.
Transgender and other gender
nonconforming persons are encouraged
to file complaints if they have been
denied equal access to temporary,
emergency shelters, other buildings and
facilities, programs, or services in
accordance with their gender identity.
Individuals may file complaints of
discrimination based on gender identity
by calling 1–800–669–9777 (toll-free) or
online at https://portal.hud.gov/
hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/
fair_housing_equal_opp/onlinecomplaint. Persons who are deaf or hard
of hearing or who have speech
impairments may file a complaint via
TTY by calling the Federal Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339 (toll-free).
Transgender and other gender
nonconforming persons are encouraged
to file complaints with HUD’s CPD
program office if they have been denied
equal access to any services,
accommodations, or benefits under CPD
programs. Whenever a recipient
(including subrecipients) of HUD funds
fails or refuses to comply with program
requirements, whether in statute or
regulation, such failure or refusal shall
constitute a violation of the
requirements under the program in
which the recipient is operating, and the
recipient is subject to all sanctions and
penalties for violation of program
requirements, as provided for under the
applicable program. Sanctions may
include the withholding of HUD
assistance. In addition, HUD may
pursue an enforcement action when the
Fair Housing Act is implicated. A
housing provider who is found to have
violated the Fair Housing Act may be
liable for actual damages, injunctive and
other equitable relief, civil penalties,
and attorney’s fees. As previously
discussed, along with this rule, HUD is
publishing in today’s Federal Register
for public comment a notice entitled
‘‘Equal Access Regardless of Sexual
Orientation, Gender Identity, or Marital
Status for HUD’s Community Planning
and Development Programs’’ that HUD
proposes to require owners or operators
of CPD-funded programs and facilities
to post on bulletin boards and in other
public spaces.
Comment: A commenter stated that
the rule may place a significant burden
upon the associational and religious
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
liberty of beneficiaries and other
stakeholders; for example, by requiring
residents to share facilities with
opposite-sex adults where their
religions prohibit that.
HUD Response: The exclusion of an
individual or family from CPD-funded
shelter because the individual is
transgender or the family has one or
more transgender members is
inconsistent with HUD’s mission to
ensure decent housing and a suitable
living environment for all. It is equally
inappropriate to isolate or ostracize
individuals because their gender
identity is not the same as their sex
assigned at birth. It is incumbent on
HUD to ensure that the regulations
governing its housing programs make
clear that such arbitrary exclusion,
isolation, and ostracism will not be
tolerated in HUD-assisted housing and
shelters. Moreover, as noted in response
to prior comments, in dwellings covered
by the Fair Housing Act, exclusion or
unequal treatment based on an
individual’s gender identity or
nonconformance with gender
stereotypes is discrimination because of
sex and violates the Act. HUD would
not tolerate denial of access, isolation,
or ostracism on the basis of race, color,
national origin, or disability relating to
one shelter resident in order to
accommodate the religious views of
another shelter resident. The same is
true with respect to the treatment of
transgender and other gender
nonconforming persons.
Faith-based organizations have long
been involved in HUD’s programs and
provide many valuable services to lowincome populations served by HUD. It
is HUD’s hope that faith-based
organizations will continue to actively
participate in HUD’s CPD programs and
provide services to transgender persons
in accordance with the requirements set
in this rule.
Comment: A commenter stated that
the rule does not reflect the reality of
providing shelter to people in
challenging environments and with
limited resources. Commenters stated
that HUD should consider the following:
(1) Providing additional resources to
shelters to help them meet the privacy,
health, and safety needs of clients; (2)
examining what scope of client
interview is permissible to enable staff
to identify an attempted misuse of the
proposed mandate without fear of legal
challenge; (3) determining whether staff
would be placed in an untenable
position of pressure to accede to a
request or demand contrary to their
situational awareness and the
reasonable concerns of other (often
traumatized) shelter clients; (4)
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64773
examining how a provider would gather
timely and appropriate information that
it believes is relevant to the actual
situation but not necessarily a matter of
health or safety; (5) determining
whether the privacy concerns of other
clients are legitimate criteria for
placement; (6) examining how singlesex women shelter providers will
reconcile differences between the
Violence Against Women Act’s (VAWA)
‘‘due consideration’’ approach for
single-sex housing and the mandate in
this rule, and how shelter providers will
be expected to reconcile differences
between the mandate of this regulation
and the often conflicting regulations and
guidance provided by other Federal,
State and local housing agencies. A
commenter said that the proposed rule
will increase guesswork and the
paperwork burden surrounding client
placement and expressed concern about
the legal repercussions to a provider for
denying placement where there is a
question as to ‘‘valid’’ gender identity.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates the
items for consideration raised by the
commenters and these were the very
issues that HUD did, in fact, take into
consideration before issuing this CPD
Equal Access Rule, more than 4 years
after the 2012 Equal Access Rule. In
addition, before commencing this
rulemaking, on February 20, 2015, CPD
released Notice CPD–015–02,
‘‘Appropriate Placement for
Transgender Persons in Single-Sex
Emergency Shelters and Other
Facilities,’’ applicable to CPD’s
HOPWA, ESG, and CoC programs. This
notice provides that HUD expects
recipients, subrecipients, and providers
to accommodate individuals in
accordance with the individual’s gender
identity.22 HUD has had over 1 year of
experience with this guidance in place
and such experience further informed
HUD in development of the final rule.
There is no reason to assume that
transgender persons pose risks to health
or safety. Indeed, experience under this
guidance has shown that transgender
and other gender nonconforming
persons can be and have been safely
accommodated in accordance with their
gender identity in single-sex facilities
without the types of disruptions feared
by the commenter.
In response to the commenter’s
concern about the extent of questioning
and investigation that shelter staff may
perform prior to determining
appropriate accommodations for
22 See notice at https://www.hudexchange.info/
resources/documents/Notice-CPD-15-02Appropriate-Placement-for-Transgender-Persons-inSingle-Sex-Emergency-Shelters-and-OtherFacilities.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
64774
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
transgender and other gender
nonconforming persons, HUD has made
modifications to the proposed rule at
this final rule stage. Specifically, in
§ 5.106(b) of this final rule, HUD makes
clear that it is inappropriate to subject
individuals seeking accommodations to
unnecessary, intrusive questioning
about their gender identity or to ask
them to provide anatomical information
or documentary, physical, or medical
evidence of their gender identity.
Examples of unnecessary, intrusive
questioning would be asking about
surgeries, anatomy, and any other topics
that are not necessary for placing and
serving a client in the facility.
Consistent with the approach taken by
other Federal agencies, HUD has
determined that the most appropriate
way for shelter staff to determine an
individual’s gender identity for
purposes of a placement decision is to
rely on the individual’s selfidentification of gender identity. As for
the comment about how to ‘‘reconcile
differences between the VAWA’s ‘due
consideration’ approach to single-sex
housing,’’ HUD reviewed DOJ’s
guidance regarding the VAWA’s
nondiscrimination provision and does
not see a conflict that needs to be
reconciled.
HUD recognizes that emergency
shelters are not the ideal placement for
anyone, and that is why HUD is
encouraging communities to move
individuals and families into permanent
housing as quickly as possible. In the
meantime, HUD recognizes that there
are security risks in operating shelters,
but the obligation to provide for safety
and security is not new, and the denial
of equal access cannot be justified based
on unfounded concerns about safety or
security. Under this final rule, policies
and procedures for CPD programs
covered by this rule will have to
include, if appropriate, provisions on
nondiscriminatory measures to ensure
the health, safety, security, and privacy
of all occupants and staff in accordance
with applicable Federal laws and
regulations. Further, under this rule,
recipients, subrecipients, owners,
operators, managers, and providers of
shelters and other buildings and
facilities with physical limitations or
configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities
must take nondiscriminatory steps that
may be necessary and appropriate to
address privacy concerns raised by
residents or occupants, and, as needed,
update their admissions, occupancy,
and operating policies and procedures.
It would be appropriate for a recipient,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
subrecipient, owner, operator, manager,
or provider to update its operating
policies and procedures to reflect
nondiscriminatory steps to address
privacy concerns if providers repeatedly
receive the same request from occupants
that can be accommodated in the same
manner. However, an update to their
policies and procedures in order to
address rare case-specific situations may
not be necessary, although an exception
to policies and procedures may be
appropriate in such circumstances to
avoid infringement on an individual’s
privacy concern. HUD believes that this
final rule clarifies compliance and
greatly reduces responsibility of the staff
to determine gender identity for the
purposes of placement.
Comment: A commenter stated that
the proposed paperwork and record
retention requirements of the proposed
rule distract from the prime objective of
shelters, disincentivizes participation in
HUD programs, and make meeting the
overarching objective of ensuring access
to shelter for all more costly and
burdensome.
HUD Response: This final rule
eliminates most of the provisions of the
proposed rule that required
recordkeeping requirements, and as a
result HUD has removed most of the
recordkeeping requirements in this final
rule. The only recordkeeping
requirement that remains is the
requirement to maintain records of
policies and procedures to ensure that
equal access is provided, and
individuals are accommodated, in
accordance with their gender identity.
This requirement will aid HUD in
monitoring compliance with this rule
and taking enforcement action where
needed.
Comment: Commenters expressed
support for the rule’s definitions of
gender identity and perceived gender
identity. A commenter said the original
definition of gender identity encouraged
discrimination by implying or directly
giving providers the ability to determine
gender through discriminatory
perceptions based on gender
stereotypes. A commenter stated that
‘‘transgender women are women and
transgender men are men.’’ Commenters
stated that the rule’s separation of
definitions of actual and perceived
gender identity will help to ensure that
LGBT individuals receive equal access
to shelter, for example, by clarifying
concepts that may be unfamiliar to grant
recipients.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates the
commenter’s support for the revised
definition and agrees that it is important
to differentiate between actual gender
identity and perceived gender identity.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
As discussed earlier, the definition of
‘‘perceived gender identity’’ in this final
rule includes a perception based on
documents, to make clear that the
identification of gender or sex on an
individual’s identity document may be
different than a person’s actual gender
identity, and that the perceived gender
identity of an individual based on
information on the documents may not
be the basis of discrimination against
that individual.
Comment: Commenters stated that
HUD’s rule should allow persons to
determine gender identity and
expression free from harassment and
violence, whether actual or perceived
gender. Commenters stated that they
appreciated that the definition of
‘‘perceived gender identity’’ covers
discrimination based on gender
expression, and they urged HUD to
include consistent clarifying language to
this effect in both the preamble to the
final rule and in training and technical
assistance for grantees.
HUD Response: As HUD noted in a
prior response, by incorporating gender
expression into the definition of
perceived gender identity, the final rule
requires recipients, subrecipients, and
providers to make shelter available
without regard to gender expression.
HUD will take the commenter’s
recommendations into account when
developing training and technical
assistance materials.
Comment: Commenters stated their
belief that self-reported gender identity
should be afforded a lesser status than
binary biological sex, because gender is
subjective, mutable, and theoretical,
whereas biological sex is objective,
immutable, and demonstrable.
Commenters stated that research
demonstrates a lack of scientific
consensus as to transgender status or
that gender fluidity is a mental illness.
Commenters stated that the rule
contravenes the Constitution’s
recognition of a ‘‘fundamental,
irreducible reproductive asymmetry’’
between women and men. Commenters
stated that the rule should require the
use of verifiable criteria, e.g., medical
history, to establish the authenticity of
a self-identified transgender individual.
A commenter stated that the rule puts
‘‘staff in the position of adjudicating
who is a (transgender) woman and who
is not,’’ and that this is unfair to such
staff and the populations they serve. A
commenter stated that biological sex is
relevant to decisions about single-sex
housing and shared sleeping and
bathing areas. Another commenter said
HUD conflates the definitions of ‘‘sex,’’
and ‘‘gender,’’ and suggested that HUD
define ‘‘sex’’ as the actual biological
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
maleness or femaleness of a person and
‘‘gender’’ as the cultural sex-role,
although the commenter stated that
even this revision is still problematic
because there are no universally agreed
upon attributes for what constitutes
particular roles.
Other commenters stated that sex is
not ‘‘assigned’’ at birth, but is presented,
observed, and recorded, and
commenters recommended that the rule
refer to the sex ‘‘presented’’ at birth
rather than the sex ‘‘assigned’’ at birth.
This commenter also supported the
view that ‘‘perceived’’ gender identity is
problematic, as perception varies from
individual to individual, and asked how
a provider is expected to perceive
somebody else’s identity. The
commenter suggested that the rule state
that perceived gender identity means
the social sex-role the person is
assumed to have an affinity for based on
exhibited stereotyped behaviors
commonly acknowledged to be
associated with being either male or
female and/or the actual biological sex
of the person, but stated that there still
needs to be some objective criteria for
the definition to be of any real use, but
using stereotyped behaviors in place of
biological sex is problematic. A
commenter said that the rule also does
not define ‘‘transgender’’ or explain how
a provider could distinguish between
those who are sincere in their sex-role
identity and those who are not. Further,
the commenter said that because this
rule enshrines expressions and
characteristics as a legal sex category, it
will negatively affect other laws
concerning women’s rights, and the
definition of ‘‘woman’’ should be based
on biological sex.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates and
has considered the suggested revisions
to the definition of ‘‘gender identity’’
offered by commenters. However, HUD
declines to make the suggested changes
at this final rule stage. As HUD observed
in the 2012 Equal Access Rule, the
number of suggested revisions to the
definition of ‘‘gender identity’’
highlights a range of differing views
among commenters regarding the
meaning of this term. Consequently,
HUD was required to determine which
definition makes the most sense in this
context. As noted earlier in this
preamble, in the 2012 Equal Access
Rule, HUD based its definition on the
Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr.,
Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, on
the basis that both this statute and
HUD’s policy sought to protect LGBT
individuals. Subsequently, however,
HUD evaluated its program recipient
practices, reviewed research on
discrimination of transgender
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
individuals in shelter settings, solicited
input on the experiences and concerns
of both clients and providers, and
reviewed its own guidance, as well as
several other Federal agencies’ genderidentity nondiscrimination policies.
HUD found helpful, for instance, that
the DOJ’s guidance states that a program
recipient ‘‘should ask a transgender
beneficiary which group or service the
beneficiary wishes to join,’’ but may not
‘‘ask questions about the beneficiary’s
anatomy or medical history or make
burdensome demands for identity
documents.’’ As noted in the proposed
rule, HUD determined, in light of its
review, that it would be more effective
for the specific purpose of ensuring
equal access to HUD programs to
separate the definitions of actual and
perceived gender identity and to require
that any gender identity determinations
in the context of CPD programs be based
on an individual’s self-identification.
That does not mean that staff workers
conducting intake procedures must
account for perceived gender identity in
determining placement. In fact, it means
that staff workers must not use
perceived gender identity and must only
place an individual based on the
individual’s actual gender identity,
without additional questions about
anatomy, medical history, or
identification documents. Transgender
and gender nonconforming persons
must not be placed based on perceived
gender identity when it is in conflict
with an individual’s self-identified
gender identity. This approach is
consistent with current research, with
HUD’s existing guidance, and with other
Federal agency policy. This approach
does not require the provider to make
any determination as to an individual’s
sincerity with respect to their gender.
In response to the comment with
regard to this rule’s impact on a ‘‘legal
sex category,’’ this rule does not provide
a definition of ‘‘woman’’ or ‘‘sex.’’ In
this rule, HUD notes that gender
identity—and whether a person
identifies with their sex assigned at
birth or not—is a component of sex. As
such, HUD believes it was important to
recognize the role of gender identity in
its 2012 Equal Access Rule and to
provide further guidance on how
individuals are treated based on gender
identity in this rule. In view of its role
in ensuring access to housing for all
Americans, HUD could not countenance
denying equal access to shelter on the
basis of gender identity, just as it could
not countenance such treatment for
characteristics such as race, color,
national origin, or disability. As
previously noted, HUD does not believe
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64775
it is appropriate to isolate, ostracize, or
treat people differently because of the
way others, such as other shelter
residents or shelter employees, view
them.
Given the comments requesting
guidance on the efforts a provider may
use to identify an individual’s gender
identity, HUD revised the proposed
rule, in this final rule, to provide clarity
on this point. Specifically, HUD has
included a provision in § 5.106(b) that
makes clear that individuals may not be
asked to answer intrusive questions,
provide anatomical information, or
provide documentary, physical, or
medical evidence of the individual’s
gender identity. HUD notes that
documents such as identification
documents may list an individual’s sex
assigned at birth and not an individual’s
gender identity. Thus, an identification
card or other document is not
dispositive of an individual’s gender
identity. By including language that
prohibits intrusive questioning or
requests for anatomical information,
documentation, or physical or medical
evidence, HUD makes clear to
providers, owners, operators, and
managers that an individual’s selfidentification of gender identity is
sufficient evidence of the individual’s
gender identity for purposes of making
a decision regarding admission,
placement, accommodation, placement,
or services under this final rule. While
documentation of gender identity may
not be required for purposes of
establishing an individual’s gender
identity or determining eligibility for a
program, HUD recognizes that an
individual may need to provide
documentation of identity in order to
apply for certain types of assistance,
such as healthcare, Social Security
benefits, or employment. In instances
where the provider receives
documentation and that documentation
states a different gender marker than
was identified by the individual as their
gender identity, the provider must
continue to serve the individual in
accordance with their self-identified
gender identity.
As previously stated, it is not
uncommon for transgender persons to
have identification documents that
indicate the individual’s sex assigned at
birth instead of the individual’s gender
identity, so identity documents should
not be viewed as evidence contesting an
individual’s self-identification of gender
identity.
Comment: A commenter stated that
the rule recognizes that some people do
not identify as either male or female and
that such persons must be permitted to
choose which option is most consistent
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
64776
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
with their gender when accessing
single-sex shelters or other buildings or
facilities or services. Commenters asked
HUD to clarify how the rule applies to
people who identify in nonbinary,
gender-fluid, intersex, or gender
nonconforming terms. Commenters
stated that nonbinary individuals
constitute a vulnerable subgroup within
the transgender population, particularly
because their identity may be less
familiar to program staff, but they are
nevertheless entitled to the same
acceptance and respect for their gender
identities as are others. A commenter
said the medical community has widely
recognized the importance of
recognizing gender identities other than
male or female, or nonbinary genders,
and providing those with nonbinary
genders equal access to services.
Commenters stated that an individual
whose gender identity is neither male
nor female should have the right to state
which program or facility is most
consistent with their identity and asked
HUD to include language to this effect
in the preamble to the final rule. The
commenters also asked HUD to discuss
in its training and technical assistance
for grantees the rule’s application to
persons who are gender nonconforming
or who do not identify as male or
female, in training and technical
assistance for grantees. Commenters
stated that the rule should expressly
state that refusing service or access to
individuals who are gender
nonconforming or who do not identify
as either male or female violates the
proposed rule. Commenters stated that
when only male or female
accommodations are available, equal
access requires that persons who do not
identify as either male or female must
be permitted to determine which option
is most consistent with their gender
identity. A commenter stated that HUD
should amend its forms and databases to
permit individuals to identify as
something other than male or female
and to instruct program staff that
individuals must be permitted to selfidentify their own gender. Another
commenter said that the rule does not
mention intersex persons or persons
with a difference of sexual development
(DSD) and, consistent with current
trends in case law, coverage of the rule
should be expanded to include persons
with intersex conditions and DSD.
Another commenter said that while it
understands that the proposed
regulations are requiring nonbinary
users to choose between facilities for the
two majority genders, the commenter
believes that, over the long term, singlesex systems are going to have to become
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
integrated if they are to cost-effectively
serve an expanding variety of gender
identities. This commenter asked HUD
to start conceptualizing a new system
that can comfortably accommodate
nonbinary users. A commenter said
HUD should encourage recipients to
undertake the following: The
development and creation of all-gender
spaces; the creation of policies,
practices, and staffing structures that
would allow programs and facilities to
be safely designated as all-gender; and
the creation of practices and facility
upgrades that afford all residents
increased personal privacy.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates the
comments regarding individuals who do
not identify as either male or female and
individuals who are nonbinary, genderfluid, intersex, or gender
nonconforming. While HUD did not
reference each of these groups in its
proposed rule or the regulatory text of
this final rule, HUD’s use of terminology
is not intended to exclude people
because of the words they use to
describe themselves. HUD recognizes
that there is more work to do in this area
to ensure that, to the greatest extent
possible, all individuals are treated
equally and appropriately
accommodated in HUD-funded
programs, shelters, services, and other
facilities. In circumstances where an
individual does not identify as male or
female and such information is relevant
to placement and accommodation, the
individual should be asked the gender
with which the individual most closely
identifies. In these circumstances, the
individual is in the best position to
specify the more appropriate genderbased placement as well as the
placement that is most likely to be the
safest for the individual—either
placement with males or placement
with females.
While HUD appreciates the
suggestions about future actions it may
take to better accommodate everyone in
shelters, HUD declines to address these
comments in detail as these issues are
beyond the scope of this rulemaking.
HUD will consider these issues for
future rulemaking. As the commenters
suggest, HUD will also consider training
and guidance for shelter providers,
operators, and managers on best
practices for dealing with individuals
who do not identify as male or female
and individuals who are nonbinary,
intersex, or gender nonconforming.
HUD agrees that individuals in these
groups may be particularly vulnerable,
and that training and technical
assistance may be helpful in addressing
the needs of these populations of shelter
residents.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comment: A commenter stated that
HUD should not follow the approach
taken by DOJ in implementation of the
Prison Rape Elimination Act because
DOJ regulations included provisions
allowing correctional agencies broad
discretion to make ‘‘case-by-case’’
decisions regarding whether placement
in a male or female facility would
ensure the individual’s health and
safety. The commenter stated that while
DOJ explained in its rule’s preamble
that ‘‘an agency may not simply assign
the inmate to a facility based on genital
status,’’ few, if any, State agencies are
complying with this provision, with the
result that agencies are maintaining
their prior practices of automatically
placing individuals exclusively based
on their genital anatomy, even when
nominally adopting policy language that
mirrors the Federal rule. The
commenter stated that such discretion is
not appropriate or permissible under
regulations implementing Federal
nondiscrimination requirements.
Another commenter stated that the most
essential element of a successful
nondiscrimination policy is the basic
rule that housing must be based on a
person’s self-identified gender, not on
their sex assigned at birth. A commenter
stated that placement should not be
conditioned on whether a transgender
person has undergone any medical
treatment or been able to change the
gender markers on their identification
documents, or have to look a certain
way. Another commenter stated, citing
several examples in the United States
and elsewhere, that shelters that have
adopted a rule basing gender on selfidentification, as opposed to sex
assigned at birth, report uniform success
in being able to serve and integrate
transgender people into their programs
and services.
HUD Response: HUD has never
intended to give broad discretion to
recipients and providers to make caseby-case decisions. The proposed rule
required providers of temporary,
emergency shelter and services to
document the specific facts,
circumstances, and reasoning relied
upon in any case-by-case determination
that results in an alternative admission,
accommodation, benefit, or service to an
individual or their family.
To clarify that placement is to be
made on the basis of an individual’s
self-identification of gender, § 5.106(b)
of this final rule includes a provision
stating that individuals may not be
subjected to intrusive questioning
relating to their gender identity or asked
to provide anatomical information,
documentation, or physical or medical
evidence of gender identity. Therefore,
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
this final rule makes clear that
placement in accordance with an
individual’s gender identity cannot be
conditioned on whether a transgender
person has undergone medical
treatment, has been able to change
identification documents to reflect their
gender identity, or has a certain
appearance or gender expression.
Additionally, as discussed earlier in
this preamble, in § 5.106(c) of this final
rule, which addresses placement and
accommodation in temporary,
emergency shelters and other facilities
with physical limitations or
configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities,
HUD removes the proposed rule
language that, under narrow
circumstances, a written case-by-case
determination could be made on
whether an alternative accommodation
for a transgender individual would be
necessary to ensure health and safety. In
its place, HUD provides that placement
and accommodation of individuals in
shelters and other buildings and
facilities with physical limitations or
configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities
shall be made in accordance with an
individual’s gender identity. Further,
this revised paragraph (c) provides for
post-admission accommodations,
where, after an individual has been
admitted to a shelter or other building
and facilities, providers must take
nondiscriminatory steps that may be
necessary and appropriate to address
privacy concerns raised by residents or
occupants. This provision for postadmission accommodations applies to
all individuals, regardless of gender
identity.
Comment: In contrast to the preceding
comment, commenters stated that the
requirements that an accommodation be
permitted only in ‘‘narrow’’ or ‘‘rare’’
circumstances, and then only when
‘‘necessary’’ to ensure two specified
interests—health and safety— is too
circumscribed to adequately protect the
interests of all residents. The
commenter stated that an
accommodation that furthers the
interests in protecting the health and
safety of residents should be allowed,
for example, even if not, strictly
speaking, ‘‘necessary,’’ and not only at
the request of the person ‘‘claiming’’ to
be transgender. Commenters stated that,
even as to housing facilities that admit
both men and women, residents should
not be required to share with persons of
the opposite sex those areas, such as
sleeping and bathing areas, properly
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
reserved to persons of one sex, for
reasons of privacy.
HUD Response: As discussed above,
this final rule notes that providers need
to take nondiscriminatory steps that
may be necessary and appropriate to
address privacy concerns raised by
residents or occupants. HUD stresses the
use of the term ‘‘nondiscriminatory’’ in
this provision. An example of a
nondiscriminatory step to address
privacy concerns would be
accommodating a request of a domestic
violence victim who has specific
privacy concerns to bathe at specific,
separate times from other shelter or
facility occupants.
As HUD has noted, it has studied the
issue for 4 years and determined,
following the lead of other Federal
agencies, that to ensure equal access, the
general rule must be that individuals are
accommodated in accordance with their
gender identity. If HUD were to provide
broader discretion, placement decisions
would rely on more subjective factors
that might differ from provider to
provider based on the views, beliefs,
and unsubstantiated fears of individual
shelter staff.
Comment: A commenter said the rule
prohibits a determination from being
based on complaints of other shelter
residents when those complaints are
based on actual or perceived gender
identity, but HUD should provide
guidelines to help providers distinguish
complaints that are based on recognition
of threat because of a client’s biological
sex, as opposed to ‘‘gender identity.’’
HUD Response: HUD agrees that the
language referenced by the commenter
could cause confusion. HUD, therefore,
has removed the language and makes
clear that in temporary, emergency
shelters and other buildings and
facilities with physical limitations or
configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities,
placements and accommodations shall
be made in accordance with an
individual’s gender identity. Once an
individual is accommodated, providers
shall take appropriate steps to address
privacy concerns raised by all residents
and occupants. By considering
complaints, and taking appropriate
action in response, a provider will
minimize the risk of harassment
occurring among occupants and
between staff and occupants.23 Such
23 Unlawful harassment in shelters that qualify as
dwellings violates the Fair Housing Act. See Quid
Pro Quo and Hostile Environment Harassment and
Liability for Discriminatory Housing Practices
Under the Fair Housing Act, proposed rule, 80 FR
63720 (Oct. 21, 2015).
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64777
actions must, however, be
nondiscriminatory.
Comment: Commenters stated that the
rule should clarify that shelters may
give transgender people case-by-case
alternative or modified accommodations
only when they request them and not at
the mandate of shelter staff and/or to
accommodate the wishes, fears, or
discomfort of others—and that such
alternatives or modifications shall not
be based on a person’s actual or
perceived gender identity. Commenters
also stated that the rule should clarify
that shelters shall provide
accommodations requested by a
transgender shelter-seeker, and only
when those accommodations are
reasonable and appropriate to protect
the health, safety or privacy of that
individual. Commenters stated that a
person’s ability to request an alternative
or modified placement should not be
limited to ‘‘shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities’’ and
recommended that the provision for
such accommodations be incorporated
into paragraph (b) of § 5.106 (which is
titled Equal Access in accordance with
gender identity) rather than in separate
paragraph (d) of § 5.106 (which is titled
Referrals). A commenter said that many
shelters find that, where possible,
providing increased privacy for all
residents is ideal; for example, private
rooms and bathrooms and showers with
locks. A commenter stated that the rule
should mandate that shelters provide
unisex bathrooms with individual
showers.
Commenters stated that the rule
should clarify that any alternative or
modified placements must provide
access to the same or substantially
equivalent services, or a ‘‘comparable
alternative program.’’ Commenters
stated that HUD should clarify that
shelters will be in noncompliance with
the rule if they provide some services
(e.g., hotel vouchers) but otherwise deny
equivalent services, such as the same
length of stay, other supportive services
offered by the shelter, or services
provided at the primary program site
due to a lack of transportation. A
commenter stated that a provider that
refers an individual to another program
should be required to confirm that the
individual received shelter or services at
that alternative program.
HUD Response: As previously
discussed, this final rule removes the
case-by-case determination language in
the proposed rule and establishes that
individuals in HUD-funded shelters and
other buildings and facilities with
physical limitations or configurations
that require and are permitted to have
shared sleeping quarters or shared
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
64778
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
bathing facilities must be
accommodated in accordance with their
gender identity. This final rule makes
clear that providers do not have the
discretion to suggest that individuals
may not be accommodated in shelters
that match their gender identity because
their gender identity differs from their
sex assigned at birth. As a result, HUD
has eliminated the referral provision
that was in § 5.106 (d) of the proposed
rule. Section 5.106(b) of this final rule
broadly discusses how policies and
procedures must ensure equal access to
CPD programs based on gender identity.
As discussed earlier in this preamble,
the revisions to this final rule do not
preclude the existing possibility that
any occupant may request a referral to
an alternate project or that, in such
cases, staff may provide a referral to
another project or, where none is
available and funding permits, offer
clients a hotel or motel voucher. HUD
appreciates the commenters’ concerns
that a transgender individual who is
provided an alternative accommodation
at the individual’s request should be
provided an accommodation that is
comparable to the shelter within which
the individual originally sought
accommodation and agrees that when
providers make referrals they should
ensure that an opportunity to access
equivalent alternative accommodations,
benefits, and services is provided, or the
requestor should receive a referral to a
comparable alternative program with
availability and equivalent
accommodations, benefits, and services.
HUD is encouraged that many shelters
are providing increased privacy for all
residents, such as private rooms and
bathrooms and showers with locks, and
as discussed earlier in this preamble,
HUD encourages this where feasible.
This rule, however, does not mandate
this configuration. Mandatory
configuration of shelters is beyond the
scope of this rulemaking.
Comment: Other commenters stated
that they oppose any exception to the
requirement that shelter be provided
based on gender identity to protect the
health and safety of shelter employees
or other people staying in the shelter,
because such an exception is not
necessary and will be used as pretext to
deny shelter to transgender individuals.
Commenters stated that under the
proposed rule language, it is not clear
whose health and safety the exception is
intended to protect. A commenter stated
that the very allowance of an exception
reinforces the attitude that a person is
a threat to others based solely on her or
his status as a transgender individual.
The commenter stated that if a shelter
provider is concerned that a transgender
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
individual’s behavior or conduct poses
a threat to others’ health or safety, then
the provider can and should address
that in the same way that it addresses
the problematic conduct of any other
person staying in the shelter.
Another commenter stated that the
exception, which is ambiguous, should
be removed, because it is unclear from
the preamble what kind of ‘‘health and
safety’’ circumstances would (or should)
ever justify denying shelter to a
transgender individual in accordance
with their gender identity. A commenter
stated that the exception should apply
only to the health and safety of the
shelter seeker, meaning that only shelter
seekers could make these requests for
other accommodations for themselves.
Other commenters stated that HUD
should take special care to ensure that
providers are not choosing these
alternatives in order to circumvent the
general prohibition on discrimination. A
commenter stated that it would be very
helpful for HUD to provide guidance in
the form of specific examples of
effective policy adjustments, as well as
other ways shelter and housing
providers can mitigate actual or
perceived threats to health or safety, in
a less burdensome way. A commenter
stated that guidance is needed to
address what covered providers should
do in scenarios where they lack
financial resources to provide
alternative accommodations or referrals,
so as not to violate the rule.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates
these comments and, as discussed
previously, HUD has revised the rule to
clarify that placement and
accommodation must be made in
accordance with an individual’s gender
identity.
Comment: A commenter stated that
the goals of this rule could conflict with
the goals of ‘‘Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013:
Implementation in HUD Housing
Programs,’’ a rule that seeks to offer
expanded protections to victims of
domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, and stalking within
HUD-assisted and HUD-insured
housing. The commenter suggested that
HUD provide additional guidance to
operating facilities with shared sleeping
quarters on how to offer alternative
accommodations to transgender
individuals when there are residents
that are sensitive to sharing facilities
with the opposite sex due to their
experiences with domestic violence.
HUD Response: HUD’s proposed rule
implementing the housing protections
of VAWA, which as the commenter
noted would expand protections to
victims of domestic violence, dating
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
violence, sexual assault, and stalking in
HUD-assisted and HUD-insured
housing, does not conflict with this final
rule. HUD’s proposed rule on VAWA
would implement statutory
requirements that: (1) Prohibit housing
providers under certain HUD programs
(covered housing providers) from
denying or terminating assistance or
occupancy rights to individuals because
they are or have been victims of
domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, or stalking; (2) require
covered housing providers to notify
tenants and applicants of their rights
under VAWA, and detail what
documentation covered housing
providers may ask for; (3) require
covered housing providers to create
emergency transfer plans; and (4)
provide for lease bifurcations. Nothing
in HUD’s rule proposing to implement
VAWA contradicts this rulemaking
requiring that individuals be housed
and receive services in accordance with
their gender identity.
Further, as HUD explained in the CPD
Equal Access proposed rule, VAWA
imposed a new grant condition that
prohibits discrimination by recipients of
grants administered by DOJ, including
grants to provide housing assistance for
survivors of domestic violence.
Although this provision relates to DOJ,
and not to HUD, HUD noted that on
April 9, 2014, DOJ’s published guidance
entitled ‘‘Frequently Asked Questions:
Nondiscrimination Grant Condition in
the Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013,’’ which
addresses how a recipient of DOJ funds
can operate a single-sex facility funded
through VAWA and not discriminate on
the basis of gender identity. The DOJ
guidance states that recipients that
operate sex-segregated or sex-specific
programs should assign a beneficiary to
the group or service that corresponds to
the gender with which the beneficiary
identifies, and may consider on a caseby-case basis whether a particular
housing assignment would ensure the
victim’s health and safety, but recipients
may not make a determination about
services for one beneficiary based on the
complaints of another beneficiary when
those complaints are based on gender
identity. The guidance further states
that, for the purpose of assigning a
beneficiary to sex-segregated or sexspecific services, best practices dictate
that the recipient should ask a
transgender beneficiary which group or
service the beneficiary wishes to join,
but the recipient may not ask questions
about the beneficiary’s anatomy or
medical history or make burdensome
demands for identity documents.
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
HUD’s rule requires that individuals
be accommodated in accordance with
their gender identity. It is beyond the
scope of this rule to detail methods for
best serving victims of domestic
violence, dating violence, sexual
assault, or stalking. However, as
discussed earlier, this final rule requires
that providers must take
nondiscriminatory steps that may be
necessary and appropriate to address
privacy concerns raised by all residents
or occupants. HUD notes that both
victims and perpetrators of domestic
violence and other VAWA crimes
include persons who are transgender or
gender nonconforming individuals and
persons who are not.
Comment: Commenters asked that
HUD include other CPD programs that
will be active in the near future,
including the Housing Trust Fund and
the Rural Housing Stability Assistance
program, or provide an indicator that
the list is nonexhaustive so the
Secretary can add more CPD programs.
HUD Response: HUD’s intent was to
cover all CPD programs, as noted in the
preamble to the proposed rule.
Therefore, HUD makes clear in
§ 5.106(a) that additional CPD programs,
such as the Housing Trust Fund and
Rural Housing Stability Assistance
programs, are included.
Comment: Commenters stated that the
rule should clarify that transgender
persons have a right to housing and
treatment consistent with their gender
identity in all circumstances—in the
preamble and training and technical
assistance. Other commenters said it is
essential that the rule address more
directly the problem of violence,
including the high rates of sexual
assault, against LGBT and gender
nonconforming persons in federally
funded shelters.
HUD Response: HUD’s 2012 Equal
Access Rule and this CPD Equal Access
Rule explicitly acknowledge the higher
rate of discrimination and acts of
violence experienced by transgender
persons and both rules address the issue
that transgender individuals and other
gender nonconforming persons must be
able to participate in HUD programs on
an equal basis as all other program
participants. HUD guidance and training
on its Equal Access rules cover these
subjects.
Comment: The rule must address
public and staff perceptions.
HUD Response: The final rule makes
clear that transgender and other gender
nonconforming individuals are to be
admitted, placed, accommodated, and
provided with services in accordance
with their gender identity. Public and
staff perceptions are not an appropriate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
basis for denial or limitation of access.
Any additional rulemaking to address
public and staff perceptions of
transgender and gender nonconforming
persons is beyond the scope of this
rulemaking. HUD acknowledges,
however, that such topics may be
appropriate for training and technical
assistance materials for shelter
providers.
Comment: Commenters stated that
HUD-funded programs should be
required to create and implement
written policies specifying how they
will combat harassment, violence, and
sexual assault and, in particular, how
they will protect the health and safety
of LGBT and gender nonconforming
persons and others who are at increased
risk of sexual violence. A commenter
recommended that HUD require its
recipients and subrecipients to create
written policy and guidelines combating
violence against persons marginalized
due to their sexual orientation or gender
identity and to require data collection to
help monitor accountability.
Commenters stated that HUD should
provide guidance detailing necessary
provisions of such policies and
recommended best practices, for
example, guidance or best practices
pertaining to the shelter-seeker’s own
individualized safety assessment,
through training and technical
assistance for grantees. Commenters also
stated that HUD should specify that the
failure to create and implement such
policies could result in noncompliance
with the regulations and, thereby,
jeopardize Federal funding and/or result
in HUD taking action under its
regulations. Another commenter stated
that it is unclear who has the
responsibility to establish and amend
policies and procedures under the rule,
so HUD should clarify that the covered
recipients, subrecipients, owners,
operators, managers, and providers must
create, implement, and revise these
policies and procedures as necessary.
The commenter stated that HUD should
identify in a subsequent notice the
specific types of individuals and entities
that have these duties within each
housing program. The commenter also
stated that HUD should provide sample
policies and procedures, especially
regarding privacy and security, so that
covered individuals or entities that are
unfamiliar with gender identity issues
can have access to models in devising
their own policies and procedures.
Commenters stated that the rule
should mandate training for shelter staff
as a prerequisite to receiving HUD
funding. Another commenter stated that
guidance from advocacy organizations
suggests that ongoing resident training
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64779
should be implemented in addition to
current HUD-required staff training. A
commenter stated that HUD should
ensure that community organizations
are made aware of the rule, once the
rule is implemented, in order to better
support their outreach work to
transgender and gender nonconforming
people in poverty.
Other commenters asked HUD to
provide training on the requirement that
recipients and subrecipients must treat
transgender individuals respectfully by
using an individual’s self-identified
name and pronouns, regardless of
whether they have been able to legally
change it.
HUD Response: HUD agrees with the
commenters that successful
implementation of this rule depends in
no small part on guidance and training.
HUD undertook intensive training
efforts following publication of its 2012
Equal Access Rule and 2015 Notice
CPD–15–02, and HUD intends to do the
same for this CPD Equal Access Rule.
With respect to commenters’ questions
about the establishment of policies,
§ 5.106(b) of this final rule (and of the
proposed rule) requires that the
admissions, occupancy, and operating
policies and procedures of recipients,
subrecipients, owners, operators,
managers, and providers (covered by
this rule), including policies and
procedures to protect privacy, health,
safety, and security, shall be established
or amended, as necessary, and
administered in a nondiscriminatory
manner so: (1) Equal access to programs,
shelters and other buildings and
facilities, benefits, services, and
accommodations is provided to an
individual in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity, and in a
manner that affords equal access to the
individual’s family; (2) an individual is
placed, served, and accommodated in
accordance with the individual’s gender
identity; (3) an individual is not
subjected to intrusive questioning or
asked to provide anatomical information
or documentary, physical, or medical
evidence of the individual’s gender
identity; and (4) consistent with
§ 5.105(a)(2),eligibility determinations
are made and assisted housing is made
available in CPD programs without
regard to actual or perceived gender
identity.
Comment: A commenter stated that
the rule’s case-by-case analysis, training,
and referral requirements will involve
more time and resources than HUD
estimates. The commenter stated that
HUD should provide additional
resources and tools to program grantees
so that proper training can be
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
64780
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
conducted, particularly for small
grantees with limited resources.
HUD Response: As discussed earlier,
this final rule eliminates the provision
regarding a case-by-case analysis. As
HUD noted in response to the preceding
comment, HUD will undertake training
and provide training and guidance to
assist recipients and subrecipients
under the CPD programs covered by this
rule.
Comment: Commenters stated that
they support the elimination of the
inquiries prohibition provision for the
following reasons: (1) The prohibition
would likely cause confusion in the
context of applying § 5.106, as it may be
construed to prohibit any discussion of
gender identity and (2) it appears to
prohibit the routine and voluntary
collection of demographic data
regarding sexual orientation and gender
identity for purposes of program
evaluation—and, while an inquiry
regarding sexual orientation or gender
identity may constitute discrimination
or be evidence of discrimination under
the rule, inquiries for legitimate and
nondiscriminatory purposes should be
permitted. Commenters stated that they
supported the removal of the
prohibition to the extent that the final
rule is clear that shelter and housing
providers can only inquire about an
applicant’s or resident’s sexual
orientation and gender identity for
lawful purposes; for example, to
determine unit size and as part of the
routine and voluntary collection of
demographic data concerning sexual
orientation and gender identity for
program evaluation, so long as the data
is collected and used for
nondiscriminatory purposes in a
nondiscriminatory fashion. A
commenter stated, in support of
removing the prohibition, and providing
suggested language, that they urged
HUD to require that specific protocols
be put in place to protect the
confidentiality of information about
sexual orientation or transgender status.
HUD Response: HUD is committed to
ensuring the safety and privacy of all
individuals, including transgender and
gender nonconforming individuals, in
CPD programs. In the proposed rule,
HUD expressed its intent in proposing
the removal of the inquiries prohibition.
HUD emphasized that it would only
permit recipients or subrecipients to
inquire about a person’s sexual
orientation or gender identity for lawful,
nondiscriminatory purposes. In the final
rule, to prohibit inappropriate inquiries
related to gender identity, HUD
included language in § 5.106(b) stating
that it would be inappropriate to subject
individuals to intrusive questioning or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
ask them to provide anatomical
information or documentary, physical,
or medical evidence of the individual’s
gender identity. In addition, as noted
previously in this preamble, CPD
previously issued guidance,
‘‘Appropriate Placement for
Transgender Persons in Single-Sex
Emergency Shelters and Other
Facilities’’ (Notice CPD–15–02, Feb. 20,
2015), which outlines best practices for
appropriate and inappropriate inquiries
related to sex and provides guidance,
and recommends staff training, on
addressing safety or privacy concerns.
HUD intends to issue further guidance
in connection with the issuance of this
final rule.
Comment: A commenter stated, citing
recommended guidance and model
policies, that Massachusetts prohibits
gender-based inquiries only in cases
where shelter guests are perceived as
transgender, suggesting that
implementation of the proposed rule
would be possible without removing the
prohibition.
HUD Response: As noted in HUD’s
proposed rule, removal of the inquiries
prohibition would allow temporary,
emergency shelters and other facilities
with physical limitations or
configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities to
ask the individual’s gender identity, and
it would permit inquiries of the
individual’s gender identity and sexual
orientation to determine the number of
bedrooms to which a household is
entitled. This is an inquiry that could be
asked of all individuals, and not solely
of those who are perceived to be
transgender. Further, as HUD has stated,
removal of the inquiries prohibition also
reaffirms that HUD permits mechanisms
for voluntary and anonymous reporting
of sexual orientation or gender identity
for compliance with data collection
requirements of State and local
governments or Federal assistance
programs.
Comment: Commenters stated that the
rule should expressly prohibit program
staff from asking individuals questions
about their anatomy, medical
procedures, or medical history or
making requests for identity documents
or other documentation of gender as a
precondition for being housed
consistent with their gender identity,
HUD Response: Although the final
rule removes the provision of § 5.105
that prohibited inquiries into an
individual’s sexual orientation or
gender identity for purposes of
facilitating providers’ compliance with
the requirement of § 5.106 that an
individual is to be admitted, placed,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
accommodated, and provided services
in accordance with the individual’s
gender identity, HUD agrees with
commenters that transgender and
gender nonconforming individuals
should not be required to answer
invasive questions about their anatomy
or medical history in order to be
accommodated and provided services in
CPD programs. To address this concern,
HUD has revised § 5.106(b) to prohibit
intrusive questions related to gender
identity and prohibit requests for
anatomical information and requests for
documentary, physical, or medical
evidence.
Comment: Commenters recommend
that HUD emphasize in the preamble,
and in training and technical assistance,
the importance of protecting the privacy
of information related to a shelter
seeker’s sexual orientation and gender
identity. A commenter stated that
transgender people in particular face
serious risks of danger, including verbal
harassment and physical assault, when
their transgender status or gender
identity is revealed without their
consent. The commenter said that steps
to keep a shelter seeker’s sexual
orientation and/or gender identity
confidential include, without limitation:
(1) Safeguarding all documents and
electronic files, (2) containing this
information and having conversations
about these topics in private to prevent
disclosure, (3) establishing explicit
nondiscrimination provisions, (4)
ensuring safe environments in programs
and shelters, (5) implementing rigorous
confidentiality safeguards, and (6)
ensuring that shelter staff members
receive appropriate training. The
commenter said that successful
implementation of these important
requirements will facilitate the
collection of much needed data,
allowing HUD to better determine the
populations its programs serve, their
needs and consumer experiences, and
their use of programs and facilities.
HUD Response: Many of CPD’s
programs that govern temporary,
emergency shelters and other buildings
and facilities impose strict
confidentiality requirements to ensure
the privacy of individuals that are
housed in these facilities. (See
§§ 574.440, 576.500(x), 578.103(b) and
(d)(2), and 578.23(c)(4)(i).) This final
rule requires that privacy be considered
in adopting admissions, occupancy, and
operating policies and procedures in
§ 5.106(b) and provides that shelters and
other buildings and facilities take
nondiscriminatory steps that may be
necessary and appropriate to address
privacy concerns raised by residents or
occupants in § 5.106(c). Further
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
guidance will address privacy and
confidentiality in data collection.
Comment: Commenters stated that
HUD should clarify in the preamble to
the final rule, and in training and
technical assistance to its field staff, that
inquiries that are used to limit the
provision of shelters or housing, to
harass an individual, or to further any
other discriminatory purpose fall under
the prohibition on discrimination.
Commenters stated that, by contrast,
HUD should state clearly in those areas
that the routine and voluntary collection
of demographic information from all
clients or program participants is
permissible, so long as it is collected
and used in a nondiscriminatory
fashion.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates the
commenters raising this issue and will
address this issue in guidance. HUD
reiterates that conduct that violates the
rule may also violate the Fair Housing
Act if the facility is subject to the Fair
Housing Act’s nondiscrimination
requirements and the conduct is
because of race, color, religion, national
origin, familial status, sex, or disability.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
IV. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review—Executive Order
12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health, and safety
effects; distributive impacts; and
equity). Under Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), a
determination must be made on whether
a regulatory action is significant and,
therefore, subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) in
accordance with the requirements of the
order. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. A determination
was made that this final rule is a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 (although not economically
significant, as provided in section 3(f)(1)
of that order).
This final rule is consistent with
Administration policy in its direction
that providers in all CPD programs must
ensure that their policies and
procedures to protect privacy, health,
safety, and security are administered so
that equal access is provided to HUD
programs in accordance with an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
individual’s gender identity. This final
rule also clarifies how temporary,
emergency shelters and other buildings
and facilities with physical limitations
or configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities
comply with the requirement that equal
access be provided to programs,
buildings, facilities, services, benefits,
and accommodations in accordance
with an individual’s gender identity.
This clarification will benefit clients
accessing CPD-funded programs,
including those with temporary,
emergency shelters and other buildings
and facilities, by assuring that all clients
receive equal access and will benefit the
CPD-funded facilities by making
compliance with HUD’s equal access
requirements easier.
These requirements benefit all
occupants by ensuring that providers
understand that they need to be
responsive to individual health, safety,
security, and privacy concerns, while
ensuring that they do not take any
discriminatory steps to address these
concerns. This final rule also amends
the definition of gender identity and
sexual orientation in § 5.100 to clarify
the difference between actual and
perceived gender identity, which is
necessary to the adoption of § 5.106, and
to reflect recent changes in the
definition of sexual orientation that uses
updated terminology but does not
expand the coverage of the term. This
final rule eliminates the prohibition on
inquiries relating to sexual orientation
or gender identity in § 5.105(a)(2)(ii).
Both of these changes make it easier for
recipients and subrecipients of CPD
funding, as well as owners, operators,
and managers of shelters, buildings, and
other facilities, and providers of services
funded by CPD programs to comply
with the requirements of both
§§ 5.105(a)(2)(i) and 5.106.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
an agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Approximately
4,000 providers participating in the CPD
programs covered by this rule are small
organizations, but the rules requirement
that organizations maintain records will
be limited. Organizations are already
required to maintain up-to-date policies
and procedures in accordance with
HUD guidance and regulations. The
only change is that all CPD programs
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64781
must now maintain records of prior
policies and procedures for up to 5
years from when they make changes to
comply with these requirements. HUD
believes that these limited
recordkeeping requirements on small
organizations are reasonable to ensure
equal access to CPD programs, facilities,
services, benefits, and accommodations
in accordance with an individual’s
gender identity. Accordingly, for the
foregoing reasons, the undersigned
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information,
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The information collection requirements
for the CPD programs impacted by this
rule—HOME, CDBG (State and
entitlement), HOPWA, ESG, and CoC—
have been approved by OMB and
assigned OMB control numbers 2506–
0171, 2506–0085, 2506–0077, 2506–
0133, 2506–0089, and 2506–0199. The
information collection requirements for
CPD’s Housing Trust Fund and Rural
Housing Stability Assistance programs
will be included when those programs
are implemented.
Environmental Impact
This rule sets forth nondiscrimination
standards. Accordingly, under 24 CFR
50.19(c)(3), this rule is categorically
excluded from environmental review
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either: (i)
imposes substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments
and is not required by statute or (ii)
preempts State law, unless the agency
meets the consultation and funding
requirements of section 6 of the
Executive order. This rule does not have
federalism implications and would not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments or
preempt State law within the meaning
of the Executive order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements
for Federal agencies to assess the effects
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
64782
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
of their regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments and on the
private sector. This rule does not
impose any Federal mandates on any
State, local, or tribal governments, or on
the private sector, within the meaning of
the UMRA.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Claims, Drug abuse,
Drug traffic control, Grant programs—
housing and community development,
Grant programs—Indians, Individuals
with disabilities, Loan programs—
housing and community development,
Low and moderate income housing,
Mortgage insurance, Pets, Public
housing, Rent subsidies, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
the preamble, and in accordance with
HUD’s authority in 42 U.S.C. 3535(d),
HUD amends 24 CFR part 5 as follows.
PART 5—GENERAL HUD PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437d,
1437f, 1437n, 3535(d), Sec. 327, Pub. L. 109–
115, 119 Stat. 2936, and Sec. 607, Pub. L.
109–162, 119 Stat. 3051.
2. In § 5.100, revise the definitions for
‘‘Gender identity’’ and ‘‘Sexual
orientation’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 5.100
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
Gender identity means the gender
with which a person identifies,
regardless of the sex assigned to that
person at birth and regardless of the
person’s perceived gender identity.
Perceived gender identity means the
gender with which a person is perceived
to identify based on that person’s
appearance, behavior, expression, other
gender related characteristics, or sex
assigned to the individual at birth or
identified in documents.
*
*
*
*
*
Sexual orientation means one’s
emotional or physical attraction to the
same and/or opposite sex (e.g.,
homosexuality, heterosexuality, or
bisexuality).
*
*
*
*
*
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
*
§ 5.105
[Amended]
3. In § 5.105, remove paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) and the paragraph (a)(2)(i)
heading and redesignate paragraph
(a)(2)(i) as (a)(2).
■
■
4. Add § 5.106 to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:23 Sep 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
§ 5.106 Equal access in accordance with
the individual’s gender identity in
community planning and development
programs.
(a) Applicability. This section applies
to assistance provided under
Community Planning and Development
(CPD) programs, including assistance
under the following CPD programs:
HOME Investment Partnerships program
(24 CFR part 92), Housing Trust Fund
program (24 CFR part 93), Community
Development Block Grant program (24
CFR part 570), Housing Opportunities
for Persons With AIDS program (24 CFR
part 574), Emergency Solutions Grants
program (24 CFR part 576), Continuum
of Care program (24 CFR part 578), or
Rural Housing Stability Assistance
Program (24 CFR part 579). The
requirements of this section apply to
recipients and subrecipients, as well as
to owners, operators, and managers of
shelters and other buildings and
facilities and providers of services
funded in whole or in part by any CPD
program.
(b) Equal access in accordance with
gender identity. The admissions,
occupancy, and operating policies and
procedures of recipients, subrecipients,
owners, operators, managers, and
providers identified in paragraph (a) of
this section, including policies and
procedures to protect privacy, health,
safety, and security, shall be established
or amended, as necessary, and
administered in a nondiscriminatory
manner to ensure that:
(1) Equal access to CPD programs,
shelters, other buildings and facilities,
benefits, services, and accommodations
is provided to an individual in
accordance with the individual’s gender
identity, and in a manner that affords
equal access to the individual’s family;
(2) An individual is placed, served,
and accommodated in accordance with
the gender identity of the individual;
(3) An individual is not subjected to
intrusive questioning or asked to
provide anatomical information or
documentary, physical, or medical
evidence of the individual’s gender
identity; and
(4) Eligibility determinations are
made and assisted housing is made
available in CPD programs as required
by § 5.105(a)(2).
(c) Placement and accommodation in
temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities with
shared sleeping quarters or shared
bathing facilities—(1) Placement and
accommodation. Placement and
accommodation of an individual in
temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities with
physical limitations or configurations
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that require and are permitted to have
shared sleeping quarters or shared
bathing facilities shall be made in
accordance with the individual’s gender
identity.
(2) Post-admission accommodations.
A recipient, subrecipient, owner,
operator, manager, or provider must
take nondiscriminatory steps that may
be necessary and appropriate to address
privacy concerns raised by residents or
occupants and, as needed, update its
admissions, occupancy, and operating
policies and procedures in accordance
with paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Documentation and record
retention. Providers shall document and
maintain records of compliance with the
requirements in paragraph (b) of this
section for a period of 5 years.
Dated: September 14, 2016.
´
Julian Castro,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–22589 Filed 9–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 150916863–6211–02]
RIN 0648–XE880
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Exchange of Flatfish
in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; reallocation.
AGENCY:
NMFS is exchanging unused
flathead sole and rock sole Community
Development Quota (CDQ) for yellowfin
sole CDQ acceptable biological catch
(ABC) reserves in the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands management area. This
action is necessary to allow the 2016
total allowable catch of yellowfin sole in
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
management area to be harvested.
DATES: Effective September 21, 2016
through December 31, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Whitney, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
management area (BSAI) according to
the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM
21SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64763-64782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22589]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. FR 5863-F-02]
RIN 2506-AC40
Equal Access in Accordance With an Individual's Gender Identity
in Community Planning and Development Programs
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Through this final rule, HUD ensures equal access for
individuals in accordance with their gender identity in programs and
shelter funded under programs administered by HUD's Office of Community
Planning and Development (CPD). This rule builds upon HUD's February
2012 final rule entitled ``Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs
Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity'' (2012 Equal
Access Rule), which aimed to ensure that HUD's housing programs would
be open to all eligible individuals and families regardless of sexual
orientation, gender identity, or marital status. The 2012 Equal Access
Rule, however, did not address how transgender and gender non-
conforming individuals should be accommodated in temporary, emergency
shelters, and other buildings and facilities used for shelter, that
have physical limitations or configurations that require and that are
permitted to have shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing
facilities. This final rule follows HUD's November 2015 proposed rule,
which addressed
[[Page 64764]]
this issue and solicited public comment on measures to ensure that
recipients and subrecipients of CPD funding--as well as owners,
operators, and managers of shelters and other buildings and facilities
and providers of services funded by CPD--grant equal access to such
facilities and services to individuals in accordance with an
individual's gender identity.
This rule amends HUD's definition of ``gender identity'' to more
clearly reflect the difference between actual and perceived gender
identity and eliminates the prohibition on inquiries related to sexual
orientation or gender identity, so that service providers can ensure
compliance with this rule. The removal of the prohibition on inquiries
related to sexual orientation or gender identity does not alter the
requirement to make housing assisted by HUD and housing insured by the
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) available without regard to actual
or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. Lastly, without
changing the scope of the requirement to provide equal access without
regard to sexual orientation, this rule makes a technical amendment to
the definition of ``sexual orientation,'' which HUD adopted from the
Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) definition of the term in 2012,
to conform to OPM's current definition.
In order to ensure that individuals are aware of their rights to
equal access, HUD is publishing elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register for public comment, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, a document entitled ``Equal Access Regardless of Sexual
Orientation, Gender Identity, or Marital Status'' for owners or
operators of CPD-funded shelters, housing, facilities, and other
buildings to post on bulletin boards and in other public spaces where
information is typically made available.
DATES: Effective: October 21, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norm Suchar, Director, Office of
Special Needs Assistance Programs, Office of Community Planning and
Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20410-7000; telephone number 202-708-4300
(this is not a toll-free number). Persons with who are deaf or hard of
hearing or have speech impairments can access this number through TTY
by calling the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339 (this is a toll-
free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. HUD's Previous Efforts To Ensure Equal Access
On February 3, 2012, at 77 FR 5662, HUD issued its 2012 Equal
Access Rule, which defined the terms ``sexual orientation'' and
``gender identity,'' and required that HUD-assisted housing, including
all housing funded by CPD, and housing insured by FHA be made available
to individuals and families without regard to actual or perceived
sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status. The 2012 Equal
Access Rule also generally prohibited inquiries into sexual orientation
or gender identity for the purpose of determining eligibility for, or
availability of, such housing. In the 2012 Equal Access Rule, HUD
declined to adopt a national policy on the placement of transgender
persons in temporary, emergency shelters with shared sleeping quarters
or shared bathing facilities, deciding instead to conduct research and
monitor its programs to determine whether additional guidance or
national policy was needed to ensure equal access for transgender and
gender nonconforming persons.\1\ HUD also decided to conduct a similar
review to determine whether additional guidance was needed with regard
to the prohibition on inquiries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Gender nonconforming persons are persons who do not follow
other people's ideas or stereotypes about how they should look or
act based on their sex assigned at birth.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result of its review, HUD determined that the 2012 Equal
Access Rule did not adequately address the significant barriers faced
by transgender and gender nonconforming persons when accessing
temporary, emergency shelters and other facilities with physical
limitations or configurations that require and are permitted to have
shared sleeping quarters or bathing facilities. Specifically, HUD found
that transgender and gender nonconforming persons continue to
experience significant violence, harassment, and discrimination in
attempting to access programs, benefits, services, and accommodations.
For instance, at a listening session on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender (LGBT) issues conducted with the U.S. Interagency Council
on Homelessness, homeless service providers reported that transgender
persons are often discriminatorily excluded from shelters or face
dangerous conditions in the shelters that correspond to their sex
assigned at birth. Some commenters reported that, if given the choice
between a shelter designated for assigned birth sex or sleeping on the
streets, many transgender shelter-seekers would choose the streets.
HUD also investigated individual cases where transgender persons
were not provided equal access as required by the 2012 Equal Access
Rule, or they faced unlawful discrimination under the Fair Housing Act.
HUD also reviewed national research that revealed that lack of access
to shelter for transgender and gender nonconforming persons,
particularly those who were also homeless youths, was a pervasive
problem and reviewed the efforts of other Federal agencies to provide
equal access to transgender and gender nonconforming persons. HUD found
that multiple agencies prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual
orientation and gender identity and also require that grant recipients
treat transgender persons consistent with their gender identity.
Specifically, HUD found guidance from other Federal agencies supporting
the position that grant recipients could accommodate transgender
individuals in accordance with their gender identity in Federal
programs, including those program that funded single-sex facilities.
On February 20, 2015, CPD issued guidance, entitled ``Appropriate
Placement for Transgender Persons in Single-Sex Emergency Shelters and
Other Facilities'' (CPD-15-02), which applied to the following CPD
programs: Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA),
Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), and Continuum of Care (CoC). This
guidance clarified that HUD expected recipients and subrecipients under
these programs to base placement decisions on the gender with which a
person identifies--and not on another person's stereotype-based
complaints--taking into consideration health and safety concerns and
giving serious consideration to the transgender or gender nonconforming
person's own personal health and safety concerns. The guidance also
outlined best practices for providers.
B. The November 2015 Proposed Rule
On November 20, 2015, at 80 FR 72642, following careful review of
information about the treatment of transgender persons in temporary,
emergency shelters, HUD proposed a second Equal Access rule, entitled
``Equal Access in Accordance with an Individual's Gender Identity in
Community Planning and Development Programs'' (CPD Equal Access). In
this rulemaking, HUD proposed to add a new section to its regulations
in 24 CFR part 5 that would require recipients and subrecipients of
assistance under CPD programs--as well as owners, operators,
[[Page 64765]]
and managers of shelters and other buildings and facilities and
providers of services funded in whole or in part by CPD programs--to
provide equal access to programs, benefits, services, and
accommodations in accordance with an individual's gender identity.
Specifically, the rule proposed to add to 24 CFR part 5 a new Sec.
5.106, which would contain equal access provisions tailored to CPD
programs. Section 5.106(a) proposed to identify the scope of its
coverage as including recipients and subrecipients of assistance under
the following CPD programs: HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) (24 CFR
part 92), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (24 CFR part 570),
HOPWA (24 CFR part 574), ESG (24 CFR part 576), CoC (24 CFR part 578),
as well as owners, operators, managers of shelters and other buildings
and facilities and providers of services funded in whole or in part by
any of these programs.
Section 5.106(b) proposed to require CPD recipients, subrecipients,
owners, operators, managers, and providers to establish or amend, as
necessary, and administer program admissions, occupancy, and operating
policies and procedures, including policies and procedures to protect
individuals' privacy and security, so that equal access to programs,
shelters, other buildings and facilities, benefits, services, and
accommodations are provided to individuals in accordance with their
gender identity. That section also proposed to require that such equal
access be provided in a manner that affords equal access to the
individual's family.
Section 5.106(c) proposed to require that the placement and
accommodation of individuals in facilities that are permitted to be
single-sex must be made in accordance with the individual's gender
identity. The proposed rule provided that, under narrow circumstances,
a written case-by-case determination could be made as to whether an
alternative accommodation is necessary to ensure health and safety. The
proposed rule contained a prohibition for such a determination to be
based solely on a person's actual or perceived gender identity or on
complaints of other shelter residents when those complaints are based
on actual or perceived gender identity. It also proposed to prohibit
the denial of appropriate placement based on a perceived threat to
health or safety that can be mitigated some other, less burdensome way
(e.g., by providing the transgender shelter seeker the option to use
single occupant bathing facilities). Lastly, the rule proposed that, to
avoid unwarranted denials of placement in accordance with an
individual's gender identity, decisions to provide accommodations based
on concern for the health and safety of the individual seeking
accommodations should be based on the individual's own request to be
otherwise accommodated.
Section 5.106(d) proposed to require that when a case-by-case
determination based on health and safety is made under Sec. 5.106(c),
the entity providing the alternative accommodation must provide either
(1) equivalent alternative accommodation, benefits, and services or (2)
a referral to a comparable alternative program with availability that
meets the needs of the individual.
Section 5.106(e) proposed to require recipients, subrecipients, or
providers to keep records of compliance with paragraphs (b) and the
case-by-case determinations under paragraph (c) of this section,
including the facts, circumstances, and reasoning relied upon that lead
to any alternative admission, accommodation, benefit, or service to an
individual and the individual's family; the facts and circumstances
regarding the opportunities to access alternative accommodations
provided to an individual and the individual's family; and the outcomes
regarding referral to an alternative program of an individual and the
individual's family.
In addition, the rule proposed to amend the definition of ``gender
identity'' at Sec. 5.100 to separate the definitions of ``actual'' and
``perceived'' gender identity. In brief, the rule proposed to replace
HUD's current definition, which mirrored the definition in the Matthew
Shepard/James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (Public Law 114-
38, approved October 28, 2009) and instead adopt a definition that
clarified the difference between actual and perceived gender identity.
Lastly, the proposed rule sought to remove the prohibition on
inquiries provision at Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii), which prohibited
providers in most circumstances from asking individuals their sexual
orientation or gender identity. HUD reasoned that the provision raised
several legitimate questions about implementation, and its removal
would allow temporary, emergency shelters or other buildings and
facilities with physical limitations or configurations that require and
are permitted to have shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing
facilities to ask an individual's gender identity for nondiscriminatory
purposes, such as to determine the appropriate placement for the
individual or the number of bedrooms to which a household is entitled.
C. Recent Developments in the Interpretation of Federal Law and
Applicable Research
After HUD issued the November 2015 proposed rule, the Center for
American Progress released a new study specifically focusing on
discrimination experienced by transgender individuals seeking access to
shelters, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of
Education issued guidance for educators on providing equal access for
transgender students in schools, and the Department of Health and Human
Services issued a final rule to ensure equal access to health programs
and activities administered by that Department or established under
title I of the Affordable Care Act.
On January 7, 2016, the Center for American Progress released the
results of a discrimination telephone test, carried out across four
States, that measured the degree to which transgender homeless women
can access a shelter in accordance with their gender identity, as well
as the types of discrimination and mistreatment they face in the
process.\2\ The study consisted of 100 phone calls to homeless shelters
in four States, over 3 months, by testers who identified themselves as
transgender women seeking access to both women's shelters and general
shelters. The study found that only 30 percent of the shelters
contacted by the testers were willing to house the transgender women
with other women, 13 percent offered to house the transgender women in
isolation or with men, 21 percent refused service altogether, and
another 21 percent were unsure or unclear as to whether they could
house transgender women with other women. The survey results also found
that women's shelters were more likely to provide services consistent
with an individual's gender identity than were mixed gender shelters.
During interactions on the phone with shelter employees, testers
experienced the following: they were often referred to using the wrong
gender or shelter employees made other statements to discredit their
gender identity, shelter employees made references to the testers'
genitalia or to surgery as requirements for appropriate housing, and
shelter employees stated
[[Page 64766]]
that other residents would be made uncomfortable or unsafe by the
tester. Of the shelters called, 27 percent had received HUD funds at
some point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Caitlin Rooney, et al., Center for American Progress and the
Equal Rights Center Discrimination Against Transgender Women Seeking
Access to Homeless Shelters, January 7, 2016, available at: https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/06113001/HomelessTransgender.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In May 2016, DOJ and the Department of Education released guidance
summarizing the legal obligations of schools regarding transgender
students.\3\ The guidance specifically emphasizes that schools must
``treat a student's gender identity as the student's sex for purposes
of Title IX and its implementing regulations.'' In sex-segregated
activities and facilities, transgender students ``must be allowed to
participate in such activities and access such facilities consistent
with their gender identity.'' The guidance also requires schools to
provide a safe environment for all students, including transgender
students, and requires that schools treat students consistent with
their gender identity regardless of records or identification documents
indicating a different sex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Dear Colleague Letter on Transgender Students May 13, 2016,
https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/850986/download.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also in May 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services
issued final regulations entitled ``Nondiscrimination in Health
Programs and Activities,'' which implement section 1557 of the
Affordable Care Act.\4\ Section 1557 prohibits discrimination in health
programs and activities on the basis of sex, and the rule provides that
``a covered entity shall treat individuals consistent with their gender
identity, except that a covered entity may not deny or limit health
services that are ordinarily or exclusively available to individuals of
one sex, to a transgender individual based on the fact that the
individual's sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender
otherwise recorded is different from the one to which such health
services are ordinarily or exclusively available.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 81 FR 31375, https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/05/18/2016-11458/nondiscrimination-in-health-programs-and-activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Changes Made at the Final Rule Stage
In response to public comment and upon further consideration by HUD
of the issues presented in this rulemaking, HUD makes the following
changes at this final rule stage:
In Sec. 5.100, the proposed definition of ``perceived gender
identity'' is modified so that the definition states that ``perceived
gender identity'' means the gender with which a person is perceived to
identify based on that person's appearance, behavior, expression, other
gender-related characteristics, sex assigned at birth, or
identification in documents. This change was made in response to public
comments stating that transgender persons often face difficulty in
being accommodated in accordance with their gender identity because it
is difficult to obtain identity documents that accurately list their
gender identity. The words ``identified in documents'' were added to
the definition to make clear that the identification of gender or sex
on an individual's identity document may be different than a person's
actual gender identity. The definition of ``gender identity'' in the
final rule, which is unchanged from the proposed rule, makes clear that
``gender identity'' means the gender with which a person identifies,
regardless of the sex assigned to that person at birth and regardless
of the person's perceived gender identity. Reading these definitions
together, ``gender identity'' is therefore determined regardless of the
gender identified on an individual's identity documents.
This rule also makes a technical amendment to the definition of
``sexual orientation.'' The 2012 Equal Access Rule defined ``sexual
orientation'' as ``homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality,''
following a definition that OPM used in the context of the Federal
workforce in its publication ``Addressing Sexual Orientation in Federal
Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee Rights.'' OPM's publication
was revised in June 2015, and HUD is amending its definition to conform
to the new OPM definition, which is ``sexual orientation means one's
emotional or physical attraction to the same and/or opposite sex.''
(See https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/diversity-and-inclusion/reference-materials/addressing-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-discrimination-in-federal-civilian-employment.pdf.) This change in
definition does not change the coverage provided by the prior
definition but is simply intended to use terminology that is up-to-
date.
In Sec. 5.105(a)(2), HUD adopts the proposal to eliminate the
inquiries provision in Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii). With the removal of Sec.
5.105(a)(2)(ii), Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(i) is redesignated as Sec.
5.105(a)(2).
In Sec. 5.106, HUD makes several changes. HUD has changed the
heading of this section from ``Providing access in accordance with the
individual's gender identity in community planning and development
programs'' to ``Equal access in accordance with the individual's gender
identity in community planning and development programs.'' Although
this is not a substantive change, the change appropriately emphasizes
that the purpose of the rule is equal access in accordance with an
individual's gender identity in CPD programs generally. Equal access
ensures that, when consideration of sex is prohibited or not relevant,
individuals will not be discriminated against based on actual or
perceived gender identity, and where legitimate consideration of sex or
gender is appropriate, such as in a facility providing temporary, short
term shelter that is not covered by the Fair Housing Act \5\ and which
is legally permitted to operate as a single-sex facility,\6\ the
individual's own self-identified gender identity will govern.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in the sale,
rental, making unavailable, or financing of dwellings and in other
housing-related activities on the basis of race, color, religion,
sex, disability, familial status, and national origin, and thus
prohibits making housing unavailable to a person because of that
person's sex. 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq. The Fair Housing Act contains
no exemptions that permit covered housing to be sex-segregated. See
42 U.S.C. 3603(b) (limited exemptions from Fair Housing Act coverage
for sales of certain single family homes and for rooms or units in
certain owner-occupied dwellings), and Sec. 3607 (exemptions from
Fair Housing Act coverage for private clubs and religious
organizations).
\6\ Temporary, emergency shelters and other buildings and
facilities that are not covered by the Fair Housing Act because they
provide short-term, temporary accommodations may provide sex-
segregated accommodations, which they sometimes do to protect the
privacy and security of individuals when the buildings and
facilities have physical limitations or configurations that require
shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities. For purposes
of this rule, shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities
are those that are designed for simultaneous accommodation of
multiple individuals in the same space. For example, a single-user
bathing facility with a lock on the door is not designated for
simultaneous occupancy by multiple individuals, so it is not a
``shared bathing facility'' for purposes of the Equal Access Rule or
this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 5.106(a) is revised at the final rule stage to clarify that
Sec. 5.106 applies to recipients and subrecipients of assistance from
CPD, which include the specific programs identified at the proposed
rule stage (HOME, CDBG, HOPWA, ESG, and CoC), as well as to the Housing
Trust Fund program (with regulations at 24 CFR part 93) and the Rural
Housing Stability Assistance Program (with regulations to be codified
in 24 CFR part 579). As noted throughout the proposed rule, the rule
was always intended to apply to recipients and subrecipients of CPD
programs, as well as those who administer programs and services and
provide temporary, emergency shelter funded by CPD programs, and HUD
did not intend to exclude the new Housing Trust Fund and Rural Housing
Stability
[[Page 64767]]
Assistance programs from the list of CPD programs in this paragraph.
Section 5.106(b) addresses the admissions, occupancy, and operating
policies and procedures of recipients, subrecipients, owners,
operators, managers, and providers covered by this rule. Revised
paragraph (b) adds that policies and procedures to protect health and
safety, as well as privacy and security noted in the proposed rule,
must be established, maintained, or amended, as necessary, and provides
that all policies must be administered in a nondiscriminatory manner.
HUD recognizes that in the temporary, emergency shelters covered by
this rule, privacy, security, safety, and health concerns may arise as
a result of the varied populations that reside in such facilities at
any given time. The rule requires policies and procedures, if such
policies and procedures have not already been updated, to reflect the
obligation and to document the commitment of the provider to maintain a
healthy and safe environment for all occupants and respect individual
privacy without doing so in a way that is discriminatory or violates
applicable Federal laws and regulations.
HUD also revises paragraph (b) to add a provision that the policies
and procedures must ensure that individuals are not subjected to
intrusive questioning or asked to provide anatomical information or
documentary, physical, or medical evidence of the individual's gender
identity. This revision was made in response to public comment advising
that transgender persons and gender nonconforming persons are often
asked inappropriate, intrusive questions; asked to provide evidence
about their physical anatomy; or asked for medical records relating to
their gender identity or identification documents that record their
gender identity. There are multiple reasons why this documentation is
problematic and prohibited by this rule. Homeless persons encounter
difficulties in maintaining their identification documents, and
individuals whose gender identities differ from sex assigned at birth
experience varying levels of difficulty in updating gender markers on
identification documents. These barriers make it likely that an
individual seeking homeless services and whose gender identity differs
from their sex assigned at birth will possess identification documents
that do not reflect that individual's gender identity, if they have
identification documents at all. Further, gender identity is distinct
from sex assigned at birth, is not associated with physical anatomy,
and may not be indicated in medical records. For these reasons, HUD
agrees with public commenters that it is important that transgender or
gender nonconforming persons can self-identify their gender identity
orally and not be asked intrusive questions or asked to provide
documentary, physical, or medical evidence to prove their gender
identity.
Lastly, revised paragraph (b) also requires that such revisions
ensure that amendments to CPD programs policies and procedures continue
to include the existing requirement in Sec. 5.105(a)(2) that
individuals are provided equal access to housing in CPD programs
without regard to actual or perceived gender identity. While this
rule's focus is on programs, owners, operators, and managers of
shelters, buildings, and other facilities and providers of CPD-funded
services that were not covered under HUD's 2012 Equal Access Rule,
housing under CPD programs has already been required to ensure equal
access to individuals based on their gender identity. HUD adds this
provision to clarify that, when amending CPD program policies and
procedures, they should continue to reflect the existing 2012 Equal
Access Rule requirement that housing be made available without regard
to gender identity.
In Sec. 5.106(c), which addresses placement and accommodation in
temporary, emergency shelters and other buildings and facilities with
physical limitations or configurations that require and are permitted
to have shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities, HUD
removes the proposed rule language that under narrow circumstances, a
written case-by-case determination could be made on whether an
alternative accommodation for a transgender individual would be
necessary to ensure health and safety. Public commenters expressed
concern that the exception could be inappropriately used to avoid
compliance with the equal access requirement, and that this
``exception'' also targeted transgender individuals as a cause of
concern with respect to health and safety. HUD was persuaded by the
public commenters that the ``exception'' provision had the opposite
effect than that intended by HUD. HUD's intention in the inclusion of
this language was to strive to ensure the health and safety of
transgender individuals in temporary, emergency shelters and other
buildings and facilities. It was not to indicate that the very presence
of transgender individuals was a cause for health and safety concerns
nor to indicate, by allowing alternative accommodation, that HUD's only
concern was the health and safety of transgender individuals and HUD
was not concerned about any other occupants. HUD's regulations for the
ESG program and the implementing guidance, make clear that temporary,
emergency shelters, and other buildings and facilities with physical
limitations or configurations that require and are permitted to have
shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities have had, and
continue to have, a responsibility to create a safe environment for all
occupants, particularly those of special populations (see 24 CFR
576.400(e)(3)(iii) for more information).
This final rule thus revises paragraph (c) of Sec. 5.106 to
provide that placement and accommodation of individuals shall be made
in accordance with an individual's gender identity, and it removes
language that permits an exception to this rule where a provider makes
a written case-by-case determination on whether an alternative
accommodation for a transgender individual would be necessary to ensure
health and safety. There are various measures that HUD's providers may
take to fulfill their duty to create a safe environment for all,
including transgender and gender nonconforming individuals, and to
ensure that HUD-funded projects are free from discrimination. As
preemptive steps, providers are strongly encouraged to post a notice of
rights under this rule and under HUD's 2012 Equal Access Rule on
bulletin boards and in other public spaces where information is made
available, to clearly establish expectations. In order to ensure that
individuals are aware of their rights to equal access, HUD proposes to
require owners and operators of CPD-funded shelters and facilities to
post on bulletin boards and in other public spaces where information is
typically made available a notice entitled ``Equal Access Regardless of
Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, or Marital Status for HUD's
Community Planning and Development Programs,'' which HUD is publishing
in today's Federal Register for public comment, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In addition, HUD Technical Assistance
materials provide a sample antidiscrimination policy that providers may
consider adopting to further clarify expectations to persons as they
enter the project.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Equal Access for Transgender People: Supporting
Inclusive Housing and Shelters https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Equal-Access-for-Transgender-People-Supporting-Inclusive-Housing-and-Shelters.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 64768]]
Even with antidiscrimination policies clearly articulated,
occupants may express concerns or engage in other behavior toward
transgender or gender nonconforming persons. If some occupants
initially present concerns about transgender or gender nonconforming
occupants to project staff and managers, staff should treat those
concerns as opportunities to educate and refocus the occupants. HUD
recognizes that, even then, conflicts may persist and complaints may
escalate to verbal or physical harassment. In these situations,
providers should have policies and procedures in place to support
residents and staff in addressing and resolving conflicts that escalate
to harassment. These policies should include specific behaviors that
violate standards of respectful behavior, escalate corrective actions
if an individual repeats the same violation of standards after
educational opportunities are offered, and focus corrective actions on
aggressors who violate project rules, not on the person targeted by the
harassment. If an occupant continues to harass a transgender
individual, the provider should consider requiring that the harassing
occupant stay away from the transgender individual, making changes in
sleeping arrangements without limiting the freedom of the transgender
individual, or pursuing other interventions. When appropriate,
providers may consider expelling harassing residents, or any staff or
volunteer members who perpetuate discrimination. In no instance,
however, should any steps taken to address harassment or discrimination
involve expulsion of harassed occupants.
Revised paragraph (c) provides for post-admission accommodations,
where after an individual has been admitted to a temporary, emergency
shelter, or other building or facility with shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities, the provider must take non-discriminatory
steps that may be necessary and appropriate to address privacy concerns
raised by all residents or occupants, and, as needed, update its
admissions, occupancy, and operating policies and procedures. These
provisions apply to all individuals, regardless of gender identity. If
an individual requests certain accommodations because of privacy
concerns, staff may offer those accommodations to that individual but
may not require that the individual use the accommodations. For
example, if available, staff may offer that occupant a room, floor, or
bed that is close to staff workstations or access to rooms, floors, or
beds set aside for residents with increased vulnerability. At the
request of an individual, providers may also offer use of a single-
occupant bathroom or provide certain times during the day that a shared
bathroom can be scheduled by any client with a request to use a private
bathing facility. If feasible, providers can ensure that toilet and
shower stalls have locking doors or, at a minimum, curtains to allow
for modesty and privacy. For shower use, providers may consider
implementing a schedule for all clients if communal showers are the
only available type of shower. HUD stresses that all such
accommodations should be offered only to fulfill the request of
individuals seeking accommodations for themselves, should be available
to clients based on a variety of factors that can increase one's
vulnerability, and should not be restricted for use only by transgender
or gender nonconforming residents. In no case may a provider's policies
isolate or segregate transgender or gender nonconforming occupants.
This final rule removes from Sec. 5.105(d) in the proposed rule
the language relating to referrals, HUD has removed the provision from
the proposed rule that permitted housing providers to make a written
case-by-case determination that a transgender individual should receive
an alternative accommodation for health and safety reasons. This does
not preclude the possibility that any occupant may request a referral
to an alternate project for health and safety reasons, and in such
cases staff may provide a referral or offer clients a hotel or motel
voucher.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In the ESG program, a hotel or motel voucher may be offered
only if there are no other accessible or appropriate emergency
shelter beds available for that night.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This final rule redesignates the recordkeeping requirements from
Sec. 5.106(e) to 5.106(d) and states that providers must document and
maintain, for a period of 5 years, records of compliance with the
requirements of this rule regarding establishing or amending policies
and procedures. This rule also removes the more specific requirements
related to case-by-case determinations and referrals.
To strengthen enforcement mechanisms for this rule, HUD is
publishing in today's Federal Register a notice for public comment, in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, entitled ``Equal
Access Regardless of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, or Marital
Status for HUD's Community Planning and Development Programs.'' HUD
proposes to require owners and operators of CPD-funded shelters and
facilities to post this notice on bulletin boards and in other public
spaces where information is typically made available.
III. Public Comments Submitted on Proposed Rule and HUD's Responses
A. Overview of Public Comments
The public comment period for the November 20, 2015, proposed rule
closed on January 19, 2016. As of the close of the comment period, HUD
received approximately 184 public comments, in addition to a number of
mass mailings, from a variety of commenters, including housing
authorities, direct legal services providers, community development
agencies, homeless shelters, healthcare providers, social workers,
clergy, counselors, nonprofit social service providers, and LGBT
advocacy organizations. The overwhelming majority of comments were
supportive of the rule. Some commenters, while supporting the rule,
suggested modifications, and a minority of the commenters opposed the
rule. Commenters opposing the rule stated that it failed to balance the
needs of all shelter occupants and lacks flexibility. All comments can
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov.
1. Commenters Supporting the Rule
Many commenters supporting the rule suggested no changes and
offered a variety of reasons why they supported the rule and why HUD
should conclude the rulemaking as expeditiously as possible. Commenters
stated that transgender persons, like all persons, need access to safe
shelter and housing and that transgender persons are some of the most
vulnerable members of society. Commenters stated that transgender
individuals are disproportionately represented in the homeless
population because of the frequent discrimination they face at home, in
school, and on the job. Some cited a survey showing that one in five
transgender or gender nonconforming individuals experienced
homelessness at some point in their lives because of their transgender
status. Commenters stated that transgender individuals were at greater
overall risk of violence, murder, and homelessness-related death than
people who are not transgender and may also experience mental and
physical health problems because of the abuse they face.
Commenters stated that the rule would promote civil rights and
expanded housing opportunity by addressing the effects of stigma on
equal access to housing for transgender and
[[Page 64769]]
gender nonconforming persons. Commenters supporting the rule frequently
stated that the rule would eliminate major barriers to access to safe,
temporary, emergency shelter and other facilities and programs for
transgender and gender nonconforming persons, particularly vulnerable
subgroups within the population that need access to such
accommodations. Some commenters stated that the rule will yield other
positive societal outcomes. Many commenters provided extensive data to
support the rule, including a January 2016 study conducted by the
Center for American Progress that found, among other things, that only
30 percent of shelters studied were willing to accommodate transgender
women in accordance with their gender identity. The commenters stated
that LGBT providers were twice as likely to be willing to provide a
shelter-seeker with accommodations in accordance with the individual's
gender identity; that women's shelters were more likely than mixed-
gender shelters to provide a shelter-seeker with accommodations in
accordance with the individual's gender identity; and that many
shelters did not correctly classify shelter-seekers in accordance with
the individual's gender identity or stated that transgender or gender
nonconforming individuals would have to submit to invasive medical
examinations or inquiries, or demonstrate that they had undergone
surgery, as a prerequisite to obtaining shelter.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Center for American Progress, Discrimination Against
Transgender Women Seeking Access to Homeless Shelters (Jan. 7,
2016), available at https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/06113001/HomelessTransgender.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other commenters supporting HUD's rule stated that the rule is
needed because the willingness to house transgender people in
accordance with their gender identity currently varies, depending on
State laws and shelter type, and HUD's rule would provide some
consistency. Commenters stated that because 32 States lack explicit
gender identity protections in housing, HUD's rule will help ensure
equal access to shelters nationwide for transgender and gender
nonconforming individuals. Commenters said that even in jurisdictions
with express protections for transgender individuals, discriminatory
practices still persist. Commenters stated that HUD's rule is in step
with recent Federal case law holding that discrimination on the basis
of sexual orientation and gender identity constitutes unlawful
discrimination on the ``basis of sex,'' in violation of Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
2. Comments Opposing the Rule
Commenters opposing the rule provided many reasons for their
opposition but the primary reason concerned the safety of
nontransgender individuals in a shelter. Commenters stated that the
rule should not open female, single-sex spaces to individuals who were
born male, citing their fear that individuals could deliberately
misrepresent their gender identities and compromise the privacy or
safety of vulnerable women and children. Commenters stated that there
is a risk of causing female survivors of male-perpetrated domestic or
sexual violence, who are disproportionately represented in the homeless
population and shelters, to feel unsafe. Commenters said the rule does
not respect legitimate safety and privacy concerns of biological women,
and that the rule treats women's fear of being assaulted in a shelter
as unreasonable ``bigotry.'' Commenters stated that the rule should
require providers to create segregated facilities for transgender
individuals, rather than placing individuals into male or female
facilities that correspond to the individual's gender identity.
Commenters stated that transgender men are also vulnerable to assault
in shelters. Several commenters opposing the rule cited to articles
recounting the stories of individuals who had been raped in shelters. A
commenter stated that it is untrue that transgender women can be safe
only in a women's shelter. Commenters stated that the rule must balance
the various needs, perspectives, personal histories, and expectations
of privacy of both transgender individuals and other shelter seekers.
Commenters stated that the rule should provide equal consideration to
the health and safety concerns of transgender and nontransgender
individuals and guidelines on what constitutes threats to health and
safety for transgender and nontransgender individuals.
3. Responses to Comments in Support and Opposition
HUD appreciates all of the comments offered in response to HUD's
proposed rule. Comments supporting the rule as well as comments
opposing the rule gave HUD much to consider in the development of this
final rule. While HUD is proceeding with this rulemaking, HUD is making
the changes highlighted in Section II of this preamble.
B. Significant Public Comments and HUD's Responses
This section presents significant issues raised by commenters and
HUD's responses to these comments. The issues presented in this section
highlight changes requested by commenters, and questions about or
requests for clarifications about certain provisions of the rule.
Comment: Commenters stated that the rule exceeds HUD's current
statutory mandate because Congress has not given HUD the authority to
prohibit discrimination based on gender identity. Commenters stated
that the rule's definitions of ``gender identity'' and ``perceived
gender identity'' are overbroad and exceed HUD's authority by creating
a new protected class and that HUD failed to specify the basis for this
prohibition of discrimination.
HUD Response: The rule creates additional program requirements to
ensure equal access for transgender and gender nonconforming persons,
in accordance with their gender identity, in shelters, buildings,
facilities, and programs funded in whole or in part by CPD. The
creation of such program requirements is well within the scope of HUD's
authority. HUD's mission is to create strong, sustainable, inclusive
communities and quality affordable homes for all. This mission
encompasses providing shelter for transgender and gender nonconforming
persons, who have faced significant difficulty in obtaining access to
shelters, and buildings and facilities that provide shelter. Excluding
any eligible person from HUD-funded temporary, emergency shelters,
buildings, facilities, housing, or programs because of that person's
gender identity or nonconformance with gender stereotypes would
contravene HUD's responsibility under the Department of Housing and
Urban Development Act to work to address ``the needs and interests of
the Nation's communities and of the people who live and work in them.''
(See 42 U.S.C. 3531.) Congress has repeatedly charged HUD with serving
the existing housing needs of all Americans.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See section 2 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1441);
section 2 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12
U.S.C. 1701t), sections 101 and 102 of the Cranston-Gonzalez
National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12701-702), and section
2(b) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
5301 note).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congress has not only given HUD this broad mission but also given
HUD broad authority to fulfill this mission and implement its
responsibilities through rulemaking. Section 7(d) of the Department of
Housing and Urban
[[Page 64770]]
Development Act specifically states that the Secretary ``may make such
rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out his functions,
powers, and duties.'' Moreover, as discussed in the preamble to HUD's
2012 Equal Access Rule and as discussed in greater detail in response
to the following comment, HUD is charged with administering and
enforcing the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of protected characteristics, including sex. Discrimination
because of gender identity is covered within the Fair Housing Act's
prohibition of sex discrimination. In 2010, HUD issued a memorandum
recognizing that sex discrimination includes discrimination because of
gender identity. In 2012, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC) reached the same conclusion with regard to gender identity
claims, ``clarifying that claims of discrimination based on transgender
status, also referred to as claims of discrimination based on gender
identity, are cognizable under Title VII's sex discrimination
prohibition.'' \11\ Following the EEOC's decision, the U.S. Attorney
General also concluded that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Macy v. Dept. of Justice, No. 0120120821, 2012 EEOPUB LEXIS
1181, *13 (EEOC Apr. 20, 2012); see also Lusardi v. Dept. of the
Army, No. 0120133395, 2015 EEOPUB LEXIS 896, *17 (EEOC Apr. 1,
2015).
the best reading of Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination is
that it encompasses discrimination based on gender identity,
including transgender status. The most straightforward reading of
Title VII is that discrimination ``because of . . . sex'' includes
discrimination because an employee's gender identification is as a
member of a particular sex, or because the employee is
transitioning, or has transitioned, to another sex.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Attorney General Memorandum, Treatment of Transgender
Employment Discrimination Claims Under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Dec. 15, 2014), posted at https://www.justice.gov/file/188671/download. Similarly, the Office of Personnel Management
revised its nondiscrimination regulations to make clear that sex
discrimination under Title VII includes discrimination based on
gender identity. See, e.g., 5 CFR 300.102-300.103; see also OFCCP
Directive 2014-02, Gender Identity and Sex Discrimination (Aug. 19,
2014) (stating that discrimination based on gender identity or
transgender status is discrimination based on sex), posted at https://www.dol.gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/directives/Directive_2014-02_508c.pdf.
HUD reaffirms its view that discrimination based on gender identity
is sex discrimination.
Comment: HUD received comments on sex discrimination under the Fair
Housing Act and the proposed requirement that individuals be provided
accommodations in accordance with their gender identity. A commenter
stated that, while it is helpful that HUD already considers the Fair
Housing Act's provision against discrimination on the basis of sex to
cover nonconforming gender expression, it would be helpful to make that
protection explicit in the new rule.
HUD Response: HUD does not believe it is necessary to modify the
proposed regulatory text as the commenter recommends. In Sec. 5.100 of
the proposed rule, HUD included a definition of ``perceived gender
identity'' in order to differentiate between actual gender identity and
perceived gender identity for purposes of this rule and the 2012 Equal
Access Rule. Under that definition, perceived gender identity means the
gender with which a person is perceived to identify based on that
person's appearance, behavior, expression, other gender-related
characteristics, or sex assigned to the individual at birth. In the
final rule, the definition is amended to read as follows: Perceived
gender identity means the gender with which a person is perceived to
identify based on that person's appearance, behavior, expression, other
gender-related characteristics, or sex assigned to the individual at
birth or identified in documents. Because the definition of perceived
gender identity included in the proposed rule and adopted by this rule
includes gender expression, Sec. 5.105(a)(2) of the rule addresses the
commenter's concern that HUD-assisted or -insured housing shall be made
available without regard to an individual's gender expression. HUD does
not believe any revision to the text of Sec. 5.105(a)(2) is necessary
to address this concern. Any suggested amendment to Fair Housing Act
regulations is outside the scope of this rulemaking.
Comment: Some commenters stated that the rule should create similar
equal access to housing policies for transgender or gender
nonconforming persons in all emergency shelters and facilities. Another
commenter stated that the Fair Housing Act does not prohibit
discrimination based on gender identity in shelters. A commenter stated
that the lack of a law prohibiting discrimination against transgender
persons in shelters has not stopped rescue missions and other shelter
providers from meeting the diverse needs of transgender persons in
crisis.
HUD Response: While HUD appreciates that commenters want to have
this rule apply to all emergency shelters, the scope of this rulemaking
is limited to shelters, other buildings and facilities, and programs
funded in whole or in part by CPD. CPD is the HUD office that funds
various types of shelters. While HUD believes that all emergency
shelters, including those temporary, emergency shelters that are not
subject to the requirements of the Fair Housing Act and that HUD does
not fund, should provide equal access in accordance with an
individual's gender identity, imposing those requirements on all
emergency shelters is outside the scope of this rulemaking.
With respect to the commenter's statement about the Fair Housing
Act, HUD seeks to clarify that, contrary to the commenter's stated
view, the Fair Housing Act's prohibition of discrimination because of
sex does include the prohibition of discrimination based on gender
identity or nonconformance with gender stereotypes, which includes
discrimination against an individual having a gender identity that does
not conform to an individual's sex assigned at birth. While HUD
disagrees with the commenter's broad statement that there is no law
prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity in shelters, HUD
agrees that it is beneficial for all shelters, including rescue
missions, to continue to provide accommodation and services to
transgender persons.
Comment: A commenter sought clarity regarding the application of
the Fair Housing Act to shelters. The commenter asserted that the Fair
Housing Act does not apply to homeless shelters because, in the
commenter's view, they are not ``dwellings'' covered under the Fair
Housing Act. The commenter stated that the term ``dwelling'' is not
well-defined in case law, that emergency shelters are not dwellings
under the Act; and that the prohibitions of section 3604 of the Fair
Housing Act do not apply to ``free'' shelters and similar facilities
because, in the commenter's view, such prohibitions only apply to
housing that is for sale or rental. The commenter stated that, if HUD
adopted a statement that the Fair Housing Act does not apply to
homeless shelters, such adoption would ``strengthen fair housing and
mitigate confusion and misinterpretation among providers, fair-housing
agencies, and shelter guests.''
HUD Response: The commenter misunderstands HUD's statement about
emergency shelters and the coverage of the Fair Housing Act. Contrary
to the commenter's assertion, HUD does not categorically exclude
temporary, emergency shelters providing short-term housing
accommodations from coverage under the Fair Housing Act. In fact, HUD's
established policy and regulations explicitly identify homeless
shelters and other short-term or transient housing as ``dwellings''
subject
[[Page 64771]]
to the Act.\13\ The Act defines ``dwelling'' as ``any building,
structure, or portion thereof which is occupied as, or designed or
intended for occupancy as, a residence by one or more families'' and
includes vacant land.\14\ Thus, shelters generally are covered within
the definition of dwelling, and many courts have held shelters and
other short-term accommodations to be dwellings covered by the Fair
Housing Act.\15\ However, some shelters may not qualify as a
``dwelling'' under the Fair Housing Act, and, therefore, HUD has
endorsed the following multiple factor analysis for determining whether
a shelter is a covered dwelling for purposes of the Fair Housing Act:
(1) Length of stay; (2) whether the rental rate for the unit will be
calculated based on a daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly basis; (3)
whether the terms and length of occupancy will be established through a
lease or other written agreement; (4) what amenities will be included
inside the unit, including kitchen facilities; (5) how the purpose of
the property will be marketed to the public; (6) whether the resident
possesses the right to return to the property; and (7) whether the
resident has anywhere else to which to return.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See, e.g., Final Report of HUD Review of Model Building
Codes, 65 FR 15740, 15746, 15747 (March 23, 2000) (``HUD specified
as dwellings covered by the Act . . . such short-term housing as . .
. homeless shelters.''). See also, e.g., 24 CFR 100.201 (the
definition of ``dwelling units'' includes, e.g., sleeping
accommodations in shelters intended for occupancy as a residence for
homeless persons); Supplement to Notice of Fair Housing
Accessibility Guidelines: Questions and Answers about the
Guidelines, 56 FR 9472, 9500 (March 6, 1991) (same); Implementation
of the Fair Housing Amendments Act, 54 FR 3232, 3245 (January 23,
1989) (same).
\14\ 42 U.S.C. 3602(b).
\15\ See, e.g., Schwartz v. City of Treasure Island, 544 F.3d
1201, 1215 (11th Cir. 2008) (halfway houses for recovering addicts);
Lakeside Resort Enter. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Palmyra Twp., 455
F.3d 154, 158-60 (3rd Cir. 2006) (treatment facility); Turning
Point, Inc. v. City of Caldwell, 74 F.3d 941, 942 (9th Cir. 1996)
(homeless shelter); Hovsons, Inc. v. Twp. of Brick, 89 F.3d 1096,
1103 (3rd Cir. 1996) (nursing home); U.S. v. Columbus Country Club,
915 F.2d 877, 881 (3rd Cir. 1990) (summer bungalows); Connecticut
Hosp. v. City of New London, 129 F. Supp. 2d 123, 135 (D. Conn.
2001) (halfway houses for substance abuse treatment); Lauer Farms,
Inc. v. Waushara County Board of Adjustment, 986 F. Supp. 544, 557,
559 (E.D. Wis. 1997) (migrant farmworker housing); Louisiana Acorn
Fair Hous. v. Quarter House, 952 F.Supp. 352, 359-60 (E.D. La. 1997)
(time-share unit); Woods v. Foster, 884 F. Supp. 1169, 1175 (N.D.
Ill. 1995) (homeless shelter); Baxter v. City of Belleville, 720 F.
Supp. 720, 731 (S.D. Ill. 1989) (residence for terminally ill); U.S.
v. Hughes Mem'l Home, 396 F. Supp. 544, 549 (W.D. Va. 1975) (home
for needy children).
\16\ See 65 FR at 15746.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determining whether a particular emergency shelter is a covered
dwelling for purposes of the Fair Housing Act requires application of
the multiple factors to its operation. No single factor is
determinative. For instance, the absence of a rental fee or lease does
not disqualify an accommodation from coverage under the Fair Housing
Act.\17\ Further, contrary to the commenter's view, section 3604 of the
Fair Housing Act does not only apply to discriminatory conduct that
involves a sale or rental. The Fair Housing Act has no such limitation.
In addition to prohibitions against refusals ``to sell or rent after
making of a bona fide offer'' and ``to refuse to negotiate for the sale
or rental,'' section 3604(a) also prohibits ``otherwise mak[ing]
unavailable or deny[ing]'' a dwelling to any person protected under the
Fair Housing Act.\18\ HUD and courts have long made clear that a
variety of conduct that does not involve sale or rental can make
housing otherwise unavailable.\19\ Similarly, section 3604(b) is not
limited to conduct involving a sale or rental, as it also prohibits
discrimination in the ``provision of services or facilities in
connection'' with a dwelling.\20\ HUD strongly disagrees that adopting
a broad statement that the Fair Housing Act does not apply to homeless
shelters would strengthen fair housing. HUD also emphasizes that this
rule covers CPD-funded shelters and other buildings and facilities
regardless of whether the facility qualifies as a dwelling under the
Fair Housing Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See, e.g., Woods v. Foster, 884 F. Supp. 1169, 1175 (N.D.
Ill. 1995) (homeless shelter did not charge rent).
\18\ 42 U.S.C. 3604(a).
\19\ See, e.g., Ojo v. Farmers Grp., Inc., 600 F.3d 1205, 1208
(9th Cir. 2010) (discriminatory pricing and denial of homeowners
insurance violates 804(a) and (b)); Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v.
Cisneros, 52 F.3d 1351, 1357-58 (6th Cir. 1995) (same); Keith v.
Volpe, 858 F.2d 467, 482-484 (9th Cir. 1988) (municipal's refusal to
permit low-income housing violates 804(a)). See also, e.g., 24 CFR
100.70(d)(4) (refusing to provide municipal services or property or
hazard insurance because of protected class).
\20\ 42 U.S.C. 3604(b); see, e.g., 24 CFR 100.65(b)(2) (failing
or delaying maintenance because of protected class).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: Some commenters stated that the proposed rule is
inconsistent with the Fair Housing Act, which forbids sex
discrimination as to covered dwellings but not as to free, temporary,
emergency shelters or other buildings or facilities, and which,
therefore, evinces the intent of Congress to permit single-sex housing
in the latter case. Commenters expressed concern that the decision by
Congress to allow single-sex facilities that do not qualify as
dwellings would be unenforceable if this rule is implemented as
proposed; for example, if a women's shelter were required to admit a
biological man based merely upon his assertion that he ``identifies
as'' a woman, or if a men's shelter were required to admit a biological
woman based merely upon her assertion that she ``identifies as'' a man.
HUD Response: As previously stated, the rule is not inconsistent
with the Fair Housing Act. While the Fair Housing Act includes
nondiscrimination requirements applicable to dwellings covered by the
Act, it does not prohibit HUD from establishing additional program
requirements through rulemaking. Temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities with physical limitations or
configurations that require shared sleeping quarters or bathing
facilities and that do not qualify as dwellings under the Fair Housing
Act may operate single-sex shelters unless doing so would violate some
other Federal, State, or local law. Under this rule, such shelters or
other buildings and facilities funded by programs administered by CPD
\21\ must determine placement in such single-sex facilities in
accordance with each applicant's or occupant's gender identity,
regardless of sex assigned at birth or other factors. As noted in
response to a prior comment, HUD's establishment of programmatic
requirements for temporary, emergency shelters and other buildings and
facilities funded through HUD programs is well within HUD's statutory
authority and an important part of HUD's mission in ensuring access to
housing for all Americans. Contrary to the public comment that suggests
what Congress's intent was in creating single-sex facilities, HUD does
not opine on Congress's intent behind permitting single-sex facilities,
but does make clear in this rule that, for purposes of determining
placement in a single-sex facility, placement should be made consistent
with an individual's gender identity. This rule does not attempt to
interpret or define sex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ HUD provided similar guidance to recipients and
subrecipients that place eligible persons in single-sex temporary,
emergency shelters or other facilities receiving ESG, CoC, or HOPWA
funds. See Appropriate Placement for Transgender Persons in Single-
Sex Emergency Shelters and Other Facilities, (Notice: CPD-15-02
(February 20, 2015)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: One commenter expressed concern that Congress would see no
need to enact the Equality Act, a bill that would expressly forbid
discrimination in housing on the basis of sexual orientation and gender
identity, once HUD issued a rule prohibiting such discrimination.
HUD Response: While HUD appreciates the commenter's desire to see
Congress enact new legislation expanding antidiscrimination
[[Page 64772]]
protections in housing, HUD does not believe the introduction of such
legislation warrants delaying issuance of this important rule. Because
many transgender persons are being denied access to temporary,
emergency shelters and other building and facilities or are being
placed and served in such shelters in accordance with their sex
assigned at birth instead of in accordance with their gender identity,
HUD believes it is necessary to issue this rule at this time to ensure
that transgender and gender nonconforming persons are accorded equal
access and are accommodated in accordance with their gender identity in
programs, shelters, buildings, and facilities assisted by CPD. Given
that this rulemaking applies only to providers that receive HUD funds
and not more broadly, HUD does not believe that its rulemaking in this
important area will impact any broader legislative action that Congress
may choose to take.
Comment: Commenters stated that the rule is not based on
sufficiently exhaustive research and data, such as interviews with
people not in the LGBT community, and only presents one-sided research
on the issue of gender identity. A commenter said that while the rule
notes that many transgender shelter-seekers would choose sleeping on
the street rather than a shelter for their sex assigned at birth, HUD's
rule does not address whether biological women would choose to sleep on
the streets if their only other option were to share sleeping and
bathing spaces with anatomically biological males who self-identify as
women. Commenters stated that, before HUD institutes this rule, HUD
needs more research on what risks placing males in female-only
facilities will pose to women, and HUD should continue to search for
solutions for providing safe services for particularly vulnerable males
and, if vulnerable males must be placed at a women's shelter, female
clients should be able to sleep, bathe, and use the toilet away from
biological males.
HUD Response: As HUD program participants and the public are aware,
HUD spent considerable time studying this issue. During the development
of HUD's 2012 Equal Access Rule, commenters requested HUD to address
the issue of temporary, emergency shelters that contain shared sleeping
quarters and shared bathing facilities. HUD, however, declined to
address that issue in the 2012 Equal Access Rule because of the need to
conduct further research and examination of the issue. During the time
since the 2012 Equal Access Rule was issued, HUD monitored and reviewed
its own programs, national research, and other Federal agency policy to
determine if transgender individuals had sufficient access to
temporary, emergency shelters or if additional guidance or a national
policy was warranted. HUD considered the issue not only from the
perspective of transgender persons and other gender nonconforming
persons, but also from the perspective of individuals whose sex
assigned at birth and whose gender identity are the same. HUD has
learned through its review that all individuals, including transgender
persons and other gender nonconforming persons, can be safely
accommodated in shelters and other buildings and facilities in
accordance with their gender identity. Privacy concerns can be
addressed through policy adjustments, such as the use of schedules that
provide equal access to bathing facilities, and modifications to
facilities, such as the use of privacy screens and, where feasible, the
installation of single occupant restrooms and bathing facilities.
Further, the 2016 Center for American Progress study cited in the
Background section of this preamble revealed that shelters were willing
to provide transgender women with appropriate shelter only 30 percent
of the time. Given the 4-year examination of this issue prior to this
rule and the recent evidence of continued and widespread practices that
deny access or subject transgender individuals to unequal treatment,
HUD is ready to address this matter in regulation and believes that
this final rule sets the right approach.
Comment: Commenters stated that because the rule requires shelters
and other programs and services to change their policies and
procedures, oversight and accountability should be created or
strengthened. Commenters stated that current lack of oversight within
the shelter and emergency housing system threatens the lives of
transgender, gender nonconforming, and intersex people; subjects them
to violence and degradation without any accountability or protection;
and violates their basic human rights and the equal protections that
should be accorded them. Commenters stated that HUD should clarify, in
the final rule or in another form, how HUD will monitor and enforce the
CPD Equal Access Rule, including an amendment stating that without
meaningful monitoring and enforcement as is done for protected groups
under the Fair Housing Act, the promise of the rule may go unfulfilled.
Other commenters stated that the system for filing complaints needs to
be improved, and a complaint filing system needs to be incorporated at
the local level, where marginalized transgender and gender
nonconforming individuals seeking shelter have ready access to
advocates who can assist them. A commenter stated that no organization
should receive Federal funds without standing proof of compliance.
HUD Response: HUD agrees that safety, respectful treatment, and
equal access are critical issues for transgender and gender
nonconforming individuals, as they are for everyone, and HUD's
regulations for the ESG program make it clear that all ESG-funded
emergency shelters, including those with configurations that require
shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities, have had, and
continue to have, a responsibility to create a safe environment for all
occupants, particularly those of special populations (see 24 CFR
576.400(e)(3)(iii) for more information). Recipients, subrecipients,
owners, operators, and managers of temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities and providers of services are expected
to take the steps necessary to comply with this rule and maintain safe
conditions for all shelter and facility residents and employees. When
there is a threat to the safety of any resident, HUD expects
recipients, subrecipients, and shelter or facility owners, operators,
managers, and providers to take appropriate steps to address such
threats. Such mitigating steps may include proactive measures to reduce
risks such as increasing the shelter's security personnel, making
adjustments to a facility's operating policies and schedules, and
modifying shelter facilities to provide a single occupant bathing
facility. HUD has heard from providers that adjusting a facility's
operating policies and schedules is usually sufficient and does not
cost additional funds, and thus HUD encourages agencies to start with
this modification. HUD also notes that, for additional modifications
that are necessary, some funded facilities, such as those under the ESG
program, can use ESG funds to modify the shelter facility or provide
additional security.
HUD believes that by requiring equal access for transgender
individuals and other gender nonconforming persons in this regulation,
HUD will be better able to monitor and enforce actions required to
ensure equal access in temporary, emergency and other CPD-assisted
buildings, facilities, and programs. Section 5.106(b) requires that
recipients, subrecipients, operators, managers, and providers of
temporary, emergency shelters, other buildings and facilities,
programs, and services update their policies, if not already updated,
to comply with providing equal access,
[[Page 64773]]
which HUD can review when monitoring its recipients', subrecipients',
and providers' compliance with the new requirements established by this
final rule. In addition, Sec. 5.106(d) requires that providers must
document and maintain records of compliance with the requirements in
Sec. 5.106(b) of this rule for a period of 5 years.
Transgender and other gender nonconforming persons are encouraged
to file complaints if they have been denied equal access to temporary,
emergency shelters, other buildings and facilities, programs, or
services in accordance with their gender identity. Individuals may file
complaints of discrimination based on gender identity by calling 1-800-
669-9777 (toll-free) or online at https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/online-complaint.
Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing or who have speech impairments
may file a complaint via TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-
800-877-8339 (toll-free).
Transgender and other gender nonconforming persons are encouraged
to file complaints with HUD's CPD program office if they have been
denied equal access to any services, accommodations, or benefits under
CPD programs. Whenever a recipient (including subrecipients) of HUD
funds fails or refuses to comply with program requirements, whether in
statute or regulation, such failure or refusal shall constitute a
violation of the requirements under the program in which the recipient
is operating, and the recipient is subject to all sanctions and
penalties for violation of program requirements, as provided for under
the applicable program. Sanctions may include the withholding of HUD
assistance. In addition, HUD may pursue an enforcement action when the
Fair Housing Act is implicated. A housing provider who is found to have
violated the Fair Housing Act may be liable for actual damages,
injunctive and other equitable relief, civil penalties, and attorney's
fees. As previously discussed, along with this rule, HUD is publishing
in today's Federal Register for public comment a notice entitled
``Equal Access Regardless of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, or
Marital Status for HUD's Community Planning and Development Programs''
that HUD proposes to require owners or operators of CPD-funded programs
and facilities to post on bulletin boards and in other public spaces.
Comment: A commenter stated that the rule may place a significant
burden upon the associational and religious liberty of beneficiaries
and other stakeholders; for example, by requiring residents to share
facilities with opposite-sex adults where their religions prohibit
that.
HUD Response: The exclusion of an individual or family from CPD-
funded shelter because the individual is transgender or the family has
one or more transgender members is inconsistent with HUD's mission to
ensure decent housing and a suitable living environment for all. It is
equally inappropriate to isolate or ostracize individuals because their
gender identity is not the same as their sex assigned at birth. It is
incumbent on HUD to ensure that the regulations governing its housing
programs make clear that such arbitrary exclusion, isolation, and
ostracism will not be tolerated in HUD-assisted housing and shelters.
Moreover, as noted in response to prior comments, in dwellings covered
by the Fair Housing Act, exclusion or unequal treatment based on an
individual's gender identity or nonconformance with gender stereotypes
is discrimination because of sex and violates the Act. HUD would not
tolerate denial of access, isolation, or ostracism on the basis of
race, color, national origin, or disability relating to one shelter
resident in order to accommodate the religious views of another shelter
resident. The same is true with respect to the treatment of transgender
and other gender nonconforming persons.
Faith-based organizations have long been involved in HUD's programs
and provide many valuable services to low-income populations served by
HUD. It is HUD's hope that faith-based organizations will continue to
actively participate in HUD's CPD programs and provide services to
transgender persons in accordance with the requirements set in this
rule.
Comment: A commenter stated that the rule does not reflect the
reality of providing shelter to people in challenging environments and
with limited resources. Commenters stated that HUD should consider the
following: (1) Providing additional resources to shelters to help them
meet the privacy, health, and safety needs of clients; (2) examining
what scope of client interview is permissible to enable staff to
identify an attempted misuse of the proposed mandate without fear of
legal challenge; (3) determining whether staff would be placed in an
untenable position of pressure to accede to a request or demand
contrary to their situational awareness and the reasonable concerns of
other (often traumatized) shelter clients; (4) examining how a provider
would gather timely and appropriate information that it believes is
relevant to the actual situation but not necessarily a matter of health
or safety; (5) determining whether the privacy concerns of other
clients are legitimate criteria for placement; (6) examining how
single-sex women shelter providers will reconcile differences between
the Violence Against Women Act's (VAWA) ``due consideration'' approach
for single-sex housing and the mandate in this rule, and how shelter
providers will be expected to reconcile differences between the mandate
of this regulation and the often conflicting regulations and guidance
provided by other Federal, State and local housing agencies. A
commenter said that the proposed rule will increase guesswork and the
paperwork burden surrounding client placement and expressed concern
about the legal repercussions to a provider for denying placement where
there is a question as to ``valid'' gender identity.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates the items for consideration raised by
the commenters and these were the very issues that HUD did, in fact,
take into consideration before issuing this CPD Equal Access Rule, more
than 4 years after the 2012 Equal Access Rule. In addition, before
commencing this rulemaking, on February 20, 2015, CPD released Notice
CPD-015-02, ``Appropriate Placement for Transgender Persons in Single-
Sex Emergency Shelters and Other Facilities,'' applicable to CPD's
HOPWA, ESG, and CoC programs. This notice provides that HUD expects
recipients, subrecipients, and providers to accommodate individuals in
accordance with the individual's gender identity.\22\ HUD has had over
1 year of experience with this guidance in place and such experience
further informed HUD in development of the final rule. There is no
reason to assume that transgender persons pose risks to health or
safety. Indeed, experience under this guidance has shown that
transgender and other gender nonconforming persons can be and have been
safely accommodated in accordance with their gender identity in single-
sex facilities without the types of disruptions feared by the
commenter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See notice at https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-Appropriate-Placement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-Sex-Emergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to the commenter's concern about the extent of
questioning and investigation that shelter staff may perform prior to
determining appropriate accommodations for
[[Page 64774]]
transgender and other gender nonconforming persons, HUD has made
modifications to the proposed rule at this final rule stage.
Specifically, in Sec. 5.106(b) of this final rule, HUD makes clear
that it is inappropriate to subject individuals seeking accommodations
to unnecessary, intrusive questioning about their gender identity or to
ask them to provide anatomical information or documentary, physical, or
medical evidence of their gender identity. Examples of unnecessary,
intrusive questioning would be asking about surgeries, anatomy, and any
other topics that are not necessary for placing and serving a client in
the facility. Consistent with the approach taken by other Federal
agencies, HUD has determined that the most appropriate way for shelter
staff to determine an individual's gender identity for purposes of a
placement decision is to rely on the individual's self-identification
of gender identity. As for the comment about how to ``reconcile
differences between the VAWA's `due consideration' approach to single-
sex housing,'' HUD reviewed DOJ's guidance regarding the VAWA's
nondiscrimination provision and does not see a conflict that needs to
be reconciled.
HUD recognizes that emergency shelters are not the ideal placement
for anyone, and that is why HUD is encouraging communities to move
individuals and families into permanent housing as quickly as possible.
In the meantime, HUD recognizes that there are security risks in
operating shelters, but the obligation to provide for safety and
security is not new, and the denial of equal access cannot be justified
based on unfounded concerns about safety or security. Under this final
rule, policies and procedures for CPD programs covered by this rule
will have to include, if appropriate, provisions on nondiscriminatory
measures to ensure the health, safety, security, and privacy of all
occupants and staff in accordance with applicable Federal laws and
regulations. Further, under this rule, recipients, subrecipients,
owners, operators, managers, and providers of shelters and other
buildings and facilities with physical limitations or configurations
that require and are permitted to have shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities must take nondiscriminatory steps that may be
necessary and appropriate to address privacy concerns raised by
residents or occupants, and, as needed, update their admissions,
occupancy, and operating policies and procedures. It would be
appropriate for a recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or
provider to update its operating policies and procedures to reflect
nondiscriminatory steps to address privacy concerns if providers
repeatedly receive the same request from occupants that can be
accommodated in the same manner. However, an update to their policies
and procedures in order to address rare case-specific situations may
not be necessary, although an exception to policies and procedures may
be appropriate in such circumstances to avoid infringement on an
individual's privacy concern. HUD believes that this final rule
clarifies compliance and greatly reduces responsibility of the staff to
determine gender identity for the purposes of placement.
Comment: A commenter stated that the proposed paperwork and record
retention requirements of the proposed rule distract from the prime
objective of shelters, disincentivizes participation in HUD programs,
and make meeting the overarching objective of ensuring access to
shelter for all more costly and burdensome.
HUD Response: This final rule eliminates most of the provisions of
the proposed rule that required recordkeeping requirements, and as a
result HUD has removed most of the recordkeeping requirements in this
final rule. The only recordkeeping requirement that remains is the
requirement to maintain records of policies and procedures to ensure
that equal access is provided, and individuals are accommodated, in
accordance with their gender identity. This requirement will aid HUD in
monitoring compliance with this rule and taking enforcement action
where needed.
Comment: Commenters expressed support for the rule's definitions of
gender identity and perceived gender identity. A commenter said the
original definition of gender identity encouraged discrimination by
implying or directly giving providers the ability to determine gender
through discriminatory perceptions based on gender stereotypes. A
commenter stated that ``transgender women are women and transgender men
are men.'' Commenters stated that the rule's separation of definitions
of actual and perceived gender identity will help to ensure that LGBT
individuals receive equal access to shelter, for example, by clarifying
concepts that may be unfamiliar to grant recipients.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates the commenter's support for the
revised definition and agrees that it is important to differentiate
between actual gender identity and perceived gender identity. As
discussed earlier, the definition of ``perceived gender identity'' in
this final rule includes a perception based on documents, to make clear
that the identification of gender or sex on an individual's identity
document may be different than a person's actual gender identity, and
that the perceived gender identity of an individual based on
information on the documents may not be the basis of discrimination
against that individual.
Comment: Commenters stated that HUD's rule should allow persons to
determine gender identity and expression free from harassment and
violence, whether actual or perceived gender. Commenters stated that
they appreciated that the definition of ``perceived gender identity''
covers discrimination based on gender expression, and they urged HUD to
include consistent clarifying language to this effect in both the
preamble to the final rule and in training and technical assistance for
grantees.
HUD Response: As HUD noted in a prior response, by incorporating
gender expression into the definition of perceived gender identity, the
final rule requires recipients, subrecipients, and providers to make
shelter available without regard to gender expression. HUD will take
the commenter's recommendations into account when developing training
and technical assistance materials.
Comment: Commenters stated their belief that self-reported gender
identity should be afforded a lesser status than binary biological sex,
because gender is subjective, mutable, and theoretical, whereas
biological sex is objective, immutable, and demonstrable. Commenters
stated that research demonstrates a lack of scientific consensus as to
transgender status or that gender fluidity is a mental illness.
Commenters stated that the rule contravenes the Constitution's
recognition of a ``fundamental, irreducible reproductive asymmetry''
between women and men. Commenters stated that the rule should require
the use of verifiable criteria, e.g., medical history, to establish the
authenticity of a self-identified transgender individual. A commenter
stated that the rule puts ``staff in the position of adjudicating who
is a (transgender) woman and who is not,'' and that this is unfair to
such staff and the populations they serve. A commenter stated that
biological sex is relevant to decisions about single-sex housing and
shared sleeping and bathing areas. Another commenter said HUD conflates
the definitions of ``sex,'' and ``gender,'' and suggested that HUD
define ``sex'' as the actual biological
[[Page 64775]]
maleness or femaleness of a person and ``gender'' as the cultural sex-
role, although the commenter stated that even this revision is still
problematic because there are no universally agreed upon attributes for
what constitutes particular roles.
Other commenters stated that sex is not ``assigned'' at birth, but
is presented, observed, and recorded, and commenters recommended that
the rule refer to the sex ``presented'' at birth rather than the sex
``assigned'' at birth. This commenter also supported the view that
``perceived'' gender identity is problematic, as perception varies from
individual to individual, and asked how a provider is expected to
perceive somebody else's identity. The commenter suggested that the
rule state that perceived gender identity means the social sex-role the
person is assumed to have an affinity for based on exhibited
stereotyped behaviors commonly acknowledged to be associated with being
either male or female and/or the actual biological sex of the person,
but stated that there still needs to be some objective criteria for the
definition to be of any real use, but using stereotyped behaviors in
place of biological sex is problematic. A commenter said that the rule
also does not define ``transgender'' or explain how a provider could
distinguish between those who are sincere in their sex-role identity
and those who are not. Further, the commenter said that because this
rule enshrines expressions and characteristics as a legal sex category,
it will negatively affect other laws concerning women's rights, and the
definition of ``woman'' should be based on biological sex.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates and has considered the suggested
revisions to the definition of ``gender identity'' offered by
commenters. However, HUD declines to make the suggested changes at this
final rule stage. As HUD observed in the 2012 Equal Access Rule, the
number of suggested revisions to the definition of ``gender identity''
highlights a range of differing views among commenters regarding the
meaning of this term. Consequently, HUD was required to determine which
definition makes the most sense in this context. As noted earlier in
this preamble, in the 2012 Equal Access Rule, HUD based its definition
on the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act
of 2009, on the basis that both this statute and HUD's policy sought to
protect LGBT individuals. Subsequently, however, HUD evaluated its
program recipient practices, reviewed research on discrimination of
transgender individuals in shelter settings, solicited input on the
experiences and concerns of both clients and providers, and reviewed
its own guidance, as well as several other Federal agencies' gender-
identity nondiscrimination policies. HUD found helpful, for instance,
that the DOJ's guidance states that a program recipient ``should ask a
transgender beneficiary which group or service the beneficiary wishes
to join,'' but may not ``ask questions about the beneficiary's anatomy
or medical history or make burdensome demands for identity documents.''
As noted in the proposed rule, HUD determined, in light of its review,
that it would be more effective for the specific purpose of ensuring
equal access to HUD programs to separate the definitions of actual and
perceived gender identity and to require that any gender identity
determinations in the context of CPD programs be based on an
individual's self-identification. That does not mean that staff workers
conducting intake procedures must account for perceived gender identity
in determining placement. In fact, it means that staff workers must not
use perceived gender identity and must only place an individual based
on the individual's actual gender identity, without additional
questions about anatomy, medical history, or identification documents.
Transgender and gender nonconforming persons must not be placed based
on perceived gender identity when it is in conflict with an
individual's self-identified gender identity. This approach is
consistent with current research, with HUD's existing guidance, and
with other Federal agency policy. This approach does not require the
provider to make any determination as to an individual's sincerity with
respect to their gender.
In response to the comment with regard to this rule's impact on a
``legal sex category,'' this rule does not provide a definition of
``woman'' or ``sex.'' In this rule, HUD notes that gender identity--and
whether a person identifies with their sex assigned at birth or not--is
a component of sex. As such, HUD believes it was important to recognize
the role of gender identity in its 2012 Equal Access Rule and to
provide further guidance on how individuals are treated based on gender
identity in this rule. In view of its role in ensuring access to
housing for all Americans, HUD could not countenance denying equal
access to shelter on the basis of gender identity, just as it could not
countenance such treatment for characteristics such as race, color,
national origin, or disability. As previously noted, HUD does not
believe it is appropriate to isolate, ostracize, or treat people
differently because of the way others, such as other shelter residents
or shelter employees, view them.
Given the comments requesting guidance on the efforts a provider
may use to identify an individual's gender identity, HUD revised the
proposed rule, in this final rule, to provide clarity on this point.
Specifically, HUD has included a provision in Sec. 5.106(b) that makes
clear that individuals may not be asked to answer intrusive questions,
provide anatomical information, or provide documentary, physical, or
medical evidence of the individual's gender identity. HUD notes that
documents such as identification documents may list an individual's sex
assigned at birth and not an individual's gender identity. Thus, an
identification card or other document is not dispositive of an
individual's gender identity. By including language that prohibits
intrusive questioning or requests for anatomical information,
documentation, or physical or medical evidence, HUD makes clear to
providers, owners, operators, and managers that an individual's self-
identification of gender identity is sufficient evidence of the
individual's gender identity for purposes of making a decision
regarding admission, placement, accommodation, placement, or services
under this final rule. While documentation of gender identity may not
be required for purposes of establishing an individual's gender
identity or determining eligibility for a program, HUD recognizes that
an individual may need to provide documentation of identity in order to
apply for certain types of assistance, such as healthcare, Social
Security benefits, or employment. In instances where the provider
receives documentation and that documentation states a different gender
marker than was identified by the individual as their gender identity,
the provider must continue to serve the individual in accordance with
their self-identified gender identity.
As previously stated, it is not uncommon for transgender persons to
have identification documents that indicate the individual's sex
assigned at birth instead of the individual's gender identity, so
identity documents should not be viewed as evidence contesting an
individual's self-identification of gender identity.
Comment: A commenter stated that the rule recognizes that some
people do not identify as either male or female and that such persons
must be permitted to choose which option is most consistent
[[Page 64776]]
with their gender when accessing single-sex shelters or other buildings
or facilities or services. Commenters asked HUD to clarify how the rule
applies to people who identify in nonbinary, gender-fluid, intersex, or
gender nonconforming terms. Commenters stated that nonbinary
individuals constitute a vulnerable subgroup within the transgender
population, particularly because their identity may be less familiar to
program staff, but they are nevertheless entitled to the same
acceptance and respect for their gender identities as are others. A
commenter said the medical community has widely recognized the
importance of recognizing gender identities other than male or female,
or nonbinary genders, and providing those with nonbinary genders equal
access to services. Commenters stated that an individual whose gender
identity is neither male nor female should have the right to state
which program or facility is most consistent with their identity and
asked HUD to include language to this effect in the preamble to the
final rule. The commenters also asked HUD to discuss in its training
and technical assistance for grantees the rule's application to persons
who are gender nonconforming or who do not identify as male or female,
in training and technical assistance for grantees. Commenters stated
that the rule should expressly state that refusing service or access to
individuals who are gender nonconforming or who do not identify as
either male or female violates the proposed rule. Commenters stated
that when only male or female accommodations are available, equal
access requires that persons who do not identify as either male or
female must be permitted to determine which option is most consistent
with their gender identity. A commenter stated that HUD should amend
its forms and databases to permit individuals to identify as something
other than male or female and to instruct program staff that
individuals must be permitted to self-identify their own gender.
Another commenter said that the rule does not mention intersex persons
or persons with a difference of sexual development (DSD) and,
consistent with current trends in case law, coverage of the rule should
be expanded to include persons with intersex conditions and DSD.
Another commenter said that while it understands that the proposed
regulations are requiring nonbinary users to choose between facilities
for the two majority genders, the commenter believes that, over the
long term, single-sex systems are going to have to become integrated if
they are to cost-effectively serve an expanding variety of gender
identities. This commenter asked HUD to start conceptualizing a new
system that can comfortably accommodate nonbinary users. A commenter
said HUD should encourage recipients to undertake the following: The
development and creation of all-gender spaces; the creation of
policies, practices, and staffing structures that would allow programs
and facilities to be safely designated as all-gender; and the creation
of practices and facility upgrades that afford all residents increased
personal privacy.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates the comments regarding individuals
who do not identify as either male or female and individuals who are
nonbinary, gender-fluid, intersex, or gender nonconforming. While HUD
did not reference each of these groups in its proposed rule or the
regulatory text of this final rule, HUD's use of terminology is not
intended to exclude people because of the words they use to describe
themselves. HUD recognizes that there is more work to do in this area
to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, all individuals are
treated equally and appropriately accommodated in HUD-funded programs,
shelters, services, and other facilities. In circumstances where an
individual does not identify as male or female and such information is
relevant to placement and accommodation, the individual should be asked
the gender with which the individual most closely identifies. In these
circumstances, the individual is in the best position to specify the
more appropriate gender-based placement as well as the placement that
is most likely to be the safest for the individual--either placement
with males or placement with females.
While HUD appreciates the suggestions about future actions it may
take to better accommodate everyone in shelters, HUD declines to
address these comments in detail as these issues are beyond the scope
of this rulemaking. HUD will consider these issues for future
rulemaking. As the commenters suggest, HUD will also consider training
and guidance for shelter providers, operators, and managers on best
practices for dealing with individuals who do not identify as male or
female and individuals who are nonbinary, intersex, or gender
nonconforming. HUD agrees that individuals in these groups may be
particularly vulnerable, and that training and technical assistance may
be helpful in addressing the needs of these populations of shelter
residents.
Comment: A commenter stated that HUD should not follow the approach
taken by DOJ in implementation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act
because DOJ regulations included provisions allowing correctional
agencies broad discretion to make ``case-by-case'' decisions regarding
whether placement in a male or female facility would ensure the
individual's health and safety. The commenter stated that while DOJ
explained in its rule's preamble that ``an agency may not simply assign
the inmate to a facility based on genital status,'' few, if any, State
agencies are complying with this provision, with the result that
agencies are maintaining their prior practices of automatically placing
individuals exclusively based on their genital anatomy, even when
nominally adopting policy language that mirrors the Federal rule. The
commenter stated that such discretion is not appropriate or permissible
under regulations implementing Federal nondiscrimination requirements.
Another commenter stated that the most essential element of a
successful nondiscrimination policy is the basic rule that housing must
be based on a person's self-identified gender, not on their sex
assigned at birth. A commenter stated that placement should not be
conditioned on whether a transgender person has undergone any medical
treatment or been able to change the gender markers on their
identification documents, or have to look a certain way. Another
commenter stated, citing several examples in the United States and
elsewhere, that shelters that have adopted a rule basing gender on
self-identification, as opposed to sex assigned at birth, report
uniform success in being able to serve and integrate transgender people
into their programs and services.
HUD Response: HUD has never intended to give broad discretion to
recipients and providers to make case-by-case decisions. The proposed
rule required providers of temporary, emergency shelter and services to
document the specific facts, circumstances, and reasoning relied upon
in any case-by-case determination that results in an alternative
admission, accommodation, benefit, or service to an individual or their
family.
To clarify that placement is to be made on the basis of an
individual's self-identification of gender, Sec. 5.106(b) of this
final rule includes a provision stating that individuals may not be
subjected to intrusive questioning relating to their gender identity or
asked to provide anatomical information, documentation, or physical or
medical evidence of gender identity. Therefore,
[[Page 64777]]
this final rule makes clear that placement in accordance with an
individual's gender identity cannot be conditioned on whether a
transgender person has undergone medical treatment, has been able to
change identification documents to reflect their gender identity, or
has a certain appearance or gender expression.
Additionally, as discussed earlier in this preamble, in Sec.
5.106(c) of this final rule, which addresses placement and
accommodation in temporary, emergency shelters and other facilities
with physical limitations or configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing
facilities, HUD removes the proposed rule language that, under narrow
circumstances, a written case-by-case determination could be made on
whether an alternative accommodation for a transgender individual would
be necessary to ensure health and safety. In its place, HUD provides
that placement and accommodation of individuals in shelters and other
buildings and facilities with physical limitations or configurations
that require and are permitted to have shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities shall be made in accordance with an
individual's gender identity. Further, this revised paragraph (c)
provides for post-admission accommodations, where, after an individual
has been admitted to a shelter or other building and facilities,
providers must take nondiscriminatory steps that may be necessary and
appropriate to address privacy concerns raised by residents or
occupants. This provision for post-admission accommodations applies to
all individuals, regardless of gender identity.
Comment: In contrast to the preceding comment, commenters stated
that the requirements that an accommodation be permitted only in
``narrow'' or ``rare'' circumstances, and then only when ``necessary''
to ensure two specified interests--health and safety-- is too
circumscribed to adequately protect the interests of all residents. The
commenter stated that an accommodation that furthers the interests in
protecting the health and safety of residents should be allowed, for
example, even if not, strictly speaking, ``necessary,'' and not only at
the request of the person ``claiming'' to be transgender. Commenters
stated that, even as to housing facilities that admit both men and
women, residents should not be required to share with persons of the
opposite sex those areas, such as sleeping and bathing areas, properly
reserved to persons of one sex, for reasons of privacy.
HUD Response: As discussed above, this final rule notes that
providers need to take nondiscriminatory steps that may be necessary
and appropriate to address privacy concerns raised by residents or
occupants. HUD stresses the use of the term ``nondiscriminatory'' in
this provision. An example of a nondiscriminatory step to address
privacy concerns would be accommodating a request of a domestic
violence victim who has specific privacy concerns to bathe at specific,
separate times from other shelter or facility occupants.
As HUD has noted, it has studied the issue for 4 years and
determined, following the lead of other Federal agencies, that to
ensure equal access, the general rule must be that individuals are
accommodated in accordance with their gender identity. If HUD were to
provide broader discretion, placement decisions would rely on more
subjective factors that might differ from provider to provider based on
the views, beliefs, and unsubstantiated fears of individual shelter
staff.
Comment: A commenter said the rule prohibits a determination from
being based on complaints of other shelter residents when those
complaints are based on actual or perceived gender identity, but HUD
should provide guidelines to help providers distinguish complaints that
are based on recognition of threat because of a client's biological
sex, as opposed to ``gender identity.''
HUD Response: HUD agrees that the language referenced by the
commenter could cause confusion. HUD, therefore, has removed the
language and makes clear that in temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities with physical limitations or
configurations that require and are permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities, placements and accommodations
shall be made in accordance with an individual's gender identity. Once
an individual is accommodated, providers shall take appropriate steps
to address privacy concerns raised by all residents and occupants. By
considering complaints, and taking appropriate action in response, a
provider will minimize the risk of harassment occurring among occupants
and between staff and occupants.\23\ Such actions must, however, be
nondiscriminatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Unlawful harassment in shelters that qualify as dwellings
violates the Fair Housing Act. See Quid Pro Quo and Hostile
Environment Harassment and Liability for Discriminatory Housing
Practices Under the Fair Housing Act, proposed rule, 80 FR 63720
(Oct. 21, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: Commenters stated that the rule should clarify that
shelters may give transgender people case-by-case alternative or
modified accommodations only when they request them and not at the
mandate of shelter staff and/or to accommodate the wishes, fears, or
discomfort of others--and that such alternatives or modifications shall
not be based on a person's actual or perceived gender identity.
Commenters also stated that the rule should clarify that shelters shall
provide accommodations requested by a transgender shelter-seeker, and
only when those accommodations are reasonable and appropriate to
protect the health, safety or privacy of that individual. Commenters
stated that a person's ability to request an alternative or modified
placement should not be limited to ``shared sleeping quarters or shared
bathing facilities'' and recommended that the provision for such
accommodations be incorporated into paragraph (b) of Sec. 5.106 (which
is titled Equal Access in accordance with gender identity) rather than
in separate paragraph (d) of Sec. 5.106 (which is titled Referrals). A
commenter said that many shelters find that, where possible, providing
increased privacy for all residents is ideal; for example, private
rooms and bathrooms and showers with locks. A commenter stated that the
rule should mandate that shelters provide unisex bathrooms with
individual showers.
Commenters stated that the rule should clarify that any alternative
or modified placements must provide access to the same or substantially
equivalent services, or a ``comparable alternative program.''
Commenters stated that HUD should clarify that shelters will be in
noncompliance with the rule if they provide some services (e.g., hotel
vouchers) but otherwise deny equivalent services, such as the same
length of stay, other supportive services offered by the shelter, or
services provided at the primary program site due to a lack of
transportation. A commenter stated that a provider that refers an
individual to another program should be required to confirm that the
individual received shelter or services at that alternative program.
HUD Response: As previously discussed, this final rule removes the
case-by-case determination language in the proposed rule and
establishes that individuals in HUD-funded shelters and other buildings
and facilities with physical limitations or configurations that require
and are permitted to have shared sleeping quarters or shared
[[Page 64778]]
bathing facilities must be accommodated in accordance with their gender
identity. This final rule makes clear that providers do not have the
discretion to suggest that individuals may not be accommodated in
shelters that match their gender identity because their gender identity
differs from their sex assigned at birth. As a result, HUD has
eliminated the referral provision that was in Sec. 5.106 (d) of the
proposed rule. Section 5.106(b) of this final rule broadly discusses
how policies and procedures must ensure equal access to CPD programs
based on gender identity.
As discussed earlier in this preamble, the revisions to this final
rule do not preclude the existing possibility that any occupant may
request a referral to an alternate project or that, in such cases,
staff may provide a referral to another project or, where none is
available and funding permits, offer clients a hotel or motel voucher.
HUD appreciates the commenters' concerns that a transgender individual
who is provided an alternative accommodation at the individual's
request should be provided an accommodation that is comparable to the
shelter within which the individual originally sought accommodation and
agrees that when providers make referrals they should ensure that an
opportunity to access equivalent alternative accommodations, benefits,
and services is provided, or the requestor should receive a referral to
a comparable alternative program with availability and equivalent
accommodations, benefits, and services.
HUD is encouraged that many shelters are providing increased
privacy for all residents, such as private rooms and bathrooms and
showers with locks, and as discussed earlier in this preamble, HUD
encourages this where feasible. This rule, however, does not mandate
this configuration. Mandatory configuration of shelters is beyond the
scope of this rulemaking.
Comment: Other commenters stated that they oppose any exception to
the requirement that shelter be provided based on gender identity to
protect the health and safety of shelter employees or other people
staying in the shelter, because such an exception is not necessary and
will be used as pretext to deny shelter to transgender individuals.
Commenters stated that under the proposed rule language, it is not
clear whose health and safety the exception is intended to protect. A
commenter stated that the very allowance of an exception reinforces the
attitude that a person is a threat to others based solely on her or his
status as a transgender individual. The commenter stated that if a
shelter provider is concerned that a transgender individual's behavior
or conduct poses a threat to others' health or safety, then the
provider can and should address that in the same way that it addresses
the problematic conduct of any other person staying in the shelter.
Another commenter stated that the exception, which is ambiguous,
should be removed, because it is unclear from the preamble what kind of
``health and safety'' circumstances would (or should) ever justify
denying shelter to a transgender individual in accordance with their
gender identity. A commenter stated that the exception should apply
only to the health and safety of the shelter seeker, meaning that only
shelter seekers could make these requests for other accommodations for
themselves. Other commenters stated that HUD should take special care
to ensure that providers are not choosing these alternatives in order
to circumvent the general prohibition on discrimination. A commenter
stated that it would be very helpful for HUD to provide guidance in the
form of specific examples of effective policy adjustments, as well as
other ways shelter and housing providers can mitigate actual or
perceived threats to health or safety, in a less burdensome way. A
commenter stated that guidance is needed to address what covered
providers should do in scenarios where they lack financial resources to
provide alternative accommodations or referrals, so as not to violate
the rule.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates these comments and, as discussed
previously, HUD has revised the rule to clarify that placement and
accommodation must be made in accordance with an individual's gender
identity.
Comment: A commenter stated that the goals of this rule could
conflict with the goals of ``Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act
of 2013: Implementation in HUD Housing Programs,'' a rule that seeks to
offer expanded protections to victims of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, and stalking within HUD-assisted and HUD-
insured housing. The commenter suggested that HUD provide additional
guidance to operating facilities with shared sleeping quarters on how
to offer alternative accommodations to transgender individuals when
there are residents that are sensitive to sharing facilities with the
opposite sex due to their experiences with domestic violence.
HUD Response: HUD's proposed rule implementing the housing
protections of VAWA, which as the commenter noted would expand
protections to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual
assault, and stalking in HUD-assisted and HUD-insured housing, does not
conflict with this final rule. HUD's proposed rule on VAWA would
implement statutory requirements that: (1) Prohibit housing providers
under certain HUD programs (covered housing providers) from denying or
terminating assistance or occupancy rights to individuals because they
are or have been victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual
assault, or stalking; (2) require covered housing providers to notify
tenants and applicants of their rights under VAWA, and detail what
documentation covered housing providers may ask for; (3) require
covered housing providers to create emergency transfer plans; and (4)
provide for lease bifurcations. Nothing in HUD's rule proposing to
implement VAWA contradicts this rulemaking requiring that individuals
be housed and receive services in accordance with their gender
identity.
Further, as HUD explained in the CPD Equal Access proposed rule,
VAWA imposed a new grant condition that prohibits discrimination by
recipients of grants administered by DOJ, including grants to provide
housing assistance for survivors of domestic violence. Although this
provision relates to DOJ, and not to HUD, HUD noted that on April 9,
2014, DOJ's published guidance entitled ``Frequently Asked Questions:
Nondiscrimination Grant Condition in the Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013,'' which addresses how a recipient of DOJ
funds can operate a single-sex facility funded through VAWA and not
discriminate on the basis of gender identity. The DOJ guidance states
that recipients that operate sex-segregated or sex-specific programs
should assign a beneficiary to the group or service that corresponds to
the gender with which the beneficiary identifies, and may consider on a
case-by-case basis whether a particular housing assignment would ensure
the victim's health and safety, but recipients may not make a
determination about services for one beneficiary based on the
complaints of another beneficiary when those complaints are based on
gender identity. The guidance further states that, for the purpose of
assigning a beneficiary to sex-segregated or sex-specific services,
best practices dictate that the recipient should ask a transgender
beneficiary which group or service the beneficiary wishes to join, but
the recipient may not ask questions about the beneficiary's anatomy or
medical history or make burdensome demands for identity documents.
[[Page 64779]]
HUD's rule requires that individuals be accommodated in accordance
with their gender identity. It is beyond the scope of this rule to
detail methods for best serving victims of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, or stalking. However, as discussed earlier,
this final rule requires that providers must take nondiscriminatory
steps that may be necessary and appropriate to address privacy concerns
raised by all residents or occupants. HUD notes that both victims and
perpetrators of domestic violence and other VAWA crimes include persons
who are transgender or gender nonconforming individuals and persons who
are not.
Comment: Commenters asked that HUD include other CPD programs that
will be active in the near future, including the Housing Trust Fund and
the Rural Housing Stability Assistance program, or provide an indicator
that the list is nonexhaustive so the Secretary can add more CPD
programs.
HUD Response: HUD's intent was to cover all CPD programs, as noted
in the preamble to the proposed rule. Therefore, HUD makes clear in
Sec. 5.106(a) that additional CPD programs, such as the Housing Trust
Fund and Rural Housing Stability Assistance programs, are included.
Comment: Commenters stated that the rule should clarify that
transgender persons have a right to housing and treatment consistent
with their gender identity in all circumstances--in the preamble and
training and technical assistance. Other commenters said it is
essential that the rule address more directly the problem of violence,
including the high rates of sexual assault, against LGBT and gender
nonconforming persons in federally funded shelters.
HUD Response: HUD's 2012 Equal Access Rule and this CPD Equal
Access Rule explicitly acknowledge the higher rate of discrimination
and acts of violence experienced by transgender persons and both rules
address the issue that transgender individuals and other gender
nonconforming persons must be able to participate in HUD programs on an
equal basis as all other program participants. HUD guidance and
training on its Equal Access rules cover these subjects.
Comment: The rule must address public and staff perceptions.
HUD Response: The final rule makes clear that transgender and other
gender nonconforming individuals are to be admitted, placed,
accommodated, and provided with services in accordance with their
gender identity. Public and staff perceptions are not an appropriate
basis for denial or limitation of access. Any additional rulemaking to
address public and staff perceptions of transgender and gender
nonconforming persons is beyond the scope of this rulemaking. HUD
acknowledges, however, that such topics may be appropriate for training
and technical assistance materials for shelter providers.
Comment: Commenters stated that HUD-funded programs should be
required to create and implement written policies specifying how they
will combat harassment, violence, and sexual assault and, in
particular, how they will protect the health and safety of LGBT and
gender nonconforming persons and others who are at increased risk of
sexual violence. A commenter recommended that HUD require its
recipients and subrecipients to create written policy and guidelines
combating violence against persons marginalized due to their sexual
orientation or gender identity and to require data collection to help
monitor accountability. Commenters stated that HUD should provide
guidance detailing necessary provisions of such policies and
recommended best practices, for example, guidance or best practices
pertaining to the shelter-seeker's own individualized safety
assessment, through training and technical assistance for grantees.
Commenters also stated that HUD should specify that the failure to
create and implement such policies could result in noncompliance with
the regulations and, thereby, jeopardize Federal funding and/or result
in HUD taking action under its regulations. Another commenter stated
that it is unclear who has the responsibility to establish and amend
policies and procedures under the rule, so HUD should clarify that the
covered recipients, subrecipients, owners, operators, managers, and
providers must create, implement, and revise these policies and
procedures as necessary. The commenter stated that HUD should identify
in a subsequent notice the specific types of individuals and entities
that have these duties within each housing program. The commenter also
stated that HUD should provide sample policies and procedures,
especially regarding privacy and security, so that covered individuals
or entities that are unfamiliar with gender identity issues can have
access to models in devising their own policies and procedures.
Commenters stated that the rule should mandate training for shelter
staff as a prerequisite to receiving HUD funding. Another commenter
stated that guidance from advocacy organizations suggests that ongoing
resident training should be implemented in addition to current HUD-
required staff training. A commenter stated that HUD should ensure that
community organizations are made aware of the rule, once the rule is
implemented, in order to better support their outreach work to
transgender and gender nonconforming people in poverty.
Other commenters asked HUD to provide training on the requirement
that recipients and subrecipients must treat transgender individuals
respectfully by using an individual's self-identified name and
pronouns, regardless of whether they have been able to legally change
it.
HUD Response: HUD agrees with the commenters that successful
implementation of this rule depends in no small part on guidance and
training. HUD undertook intensive training efforts following
publication of its 2012 Equal Access Rule and 2015 Notice CPD-15-02,
and HUD intends to do the same for this CPD Equal Access Rule. With
respect to commenters' questions about the establishment of policies,
Sec. 5.106(b) of this final rule (and of the proposed rule) requires
that the admissions, occupancy, and operating policies and procedures
of recipients, subrecipients, owners, operators, managers, and
providers (covered by this rule), including policies and procedures to
protect privacy, health, safety, and security, shall be established or
amended, as necessary, and administered in a nondiscriminatory manner
so: (1) Equal access to programs, shelters and other buildings and
facilities, benefits, services, and accommodations is provided to an
individual in accordance with the individual's gender identity, and in
a manner that affords equal access to the individual's family; (2) an
individual is placed, served, and accommodated in accordance with the
individual's gender identity; (3) an individual is not subjected to
intrusive questioning or asked to provide anatomical information or
documentary, physical, or medical evidence of the individual's gender
identity; and (4) consistent with Sec. 5.105(a)(2),eligibility
determinations are made and assisted housing is made available in CPD
programs without regard to actual or perceived gender identity.
Comment: A commenter stated that the rule's case-by-case analysis,
training, and referral requirements will involve more time and
resources than HUD estimates. The commenter stated that HUD should
provide additional resources and tools to program grantees so that
proper training can be
[[Page 64780]]
conducted, particularly for small grantees with limited resources.
HUD Response: As discussed earlier, this final rule eliminates the
provision regarding a case-by-case analysis. As HUD noted in response
to the preceding comment, HUD will undertake training and provide
training and guidance to assist recipients and subrecipients under the
CPD programs covered by this rule.
Comment: Commenters stated that they support the elimination of the
inquiries prohibition provision for the following reasons: (1) The
prohibition would likely cause confusion in the context of applying
Sec. 5.106, as it may be construed to prohibit any discussion of
gender identity and (2) it appears to prohibit the routine and
voluntary collection of demographic data regarding sexual orientation
and gender identity for purposes of program evaluation--and, while an
inquiry regarding sexual orientation or gender identity may constitute
discrimination or be evidence of discrimination under the rule,
inquiries for legitimate and nondiscriminatory purposes should be
permitted. Commenters stated that they supported the removal of the
prohibition to the extent that the final rule is clear that shelter and
housing providers can only inquire about an applicant's or resident's
sexual orientation and gender identity for lawful purposes; for
example, to determine unit size and as part of the routine and
voluntary collection of demographic data concerning sexual orientation
and gender identity for program evaluation, so long as the data is
collected and used for nondiscriminatory purposes in a
nondiscriminatory fashion. A commenter stated, in support of removing
the prohibition, and providing suggested language, that they urged HUD
to require that specific protocols be put in place to protect the
confidentiality of information about sexual orientation or transgender
status.
HUD Response: HUD is committed to ensuring the safety and privacy
of all individuals, including transgender and gender nonconforming
individuals, in CPD programs. In the proposed rule, HUD expressed its
intent in proposing the removal of the inquiries prohibition. HUD
emphasized that it would only permit recipients or subrecipients to
inquire about a person's sexual orientation or gender identity for
lawful, nondiscriminatory purposes. In the final rule, to prohibit
inappropriate inquiries related to gender identity, HUD included
language in Sec. 5.106(b) stating that it would be inappropriate to
subject individuals to intrusive questioning or ask them to provide
anatomical information or documentary, physical, or medical evidence of
the individual's gender identity. In addition, as noted previously in
this preamble, CPD previously issued guidance, ``Appropriate Placement
for Transgender Persons in Single-Sex Emergency Shelters and Other
Facilities'' (Notice CPD-15-02, Feb. 20, 2015), which outlines best
practices for appropriate and inappropriate inquiries related to sex
and provides guidance, and recommends staff training, on addressing
safety or privacy concerns. HUD intends to issue further guidance in
connection with the issuance of this final rule.
Comment: A commenter stated, citing recommended guidance and model
policies, that Massachusetts prohibits gender-based inquiries only in
cases where shelter guests are perceived as transgender, suggesting
that implementation of the proposed rule would be possible without
removing the prohibition.
HUD Response: As noted in HUD's proposed rule, removal of the
inquiries prohibition would allow temporary, emergency shelters and
other facilities with physical limitations or configurations that
require and are permitted to have shared sleeping quarters or shared
bathing facilities to ask the individual's gender identity, and it
would permit inquiries of the individual's gender identity and sexual
orientation to determine the number of bedrooms to which a household is
entitled. This is an inquiry that could be asked of all individuals,
and not solely of those who are perceived to be transgender. Further,
as HUD has stated, removal of the inquiries prohibition also reaffirms
that HUD permits mechanisms for voluntary and anonymous reporting of
sexual orientation or gender identity for compliance with data
collection requirements of State and local governments or Federal
assistance programs.
Comment: Commenters stated that the rule should expressly prohibit
program staff from asking individuals questions about their anatomy,
medical procedures, or medical history or making requests for identity
documents or other documentation of gender as a precondition for being
housed consistent with their gender identity,
HUD Response: Although the final rule removes the provision of
Sec. 5.105 that prohibited inquiries into an individual's sexual
orientation or gender identity for purposes of facilitating providers'
compliance with the requirement of Sec. 5.106 that an individual is to
be admitted, placed, accommodated, and provided services in accordance
with the individual's gender identity, HUD agrees with commenters that
transgender and gender nonconforming individuals should not be required
to answer invasive questions about their anatomy or medical history in
order to be accommodated and provided services in CPD programs. To
address this concern, HUD has revised Sec. 5.106(b) to prohibit
intrusive questions related to gender identity and prohibit requests
for anatomical information and requests for documentary, physical, or
medical evidence.
Comment: Commenters recommend that HUD emphasize in the preamble,
and in training and technical assistance, the importance of protecting
the privacy of information related to a shelter seeker's sexual
orientation and gender identity. A commenter stated that transgender
people in particular face serious risks of danger, including verbal
harassment and physical assault, when their transgender status or
gender identity is revealed without their consent. The commenter said
that steps to keep a shelter seeker's sexual orientation and/or gender
identity confidential include, without limitation: (1) Safeguarding all
documents and electronic files, (2) containing this information and
having conversations about these topics in private to prevent
disclosure, (3) establishing explicit nondiscrimination provisions, (4)
ensuring safe environments in programs and shelters, (5) implementing
rigorous confidentiality safeguards, and (6) ensuring that shelter
staff members receive appropriate training. The commenter said that
successful implementation of these important requirements will
facilitate the collection of much needed data, allowing HUD to better
determine the populations its programs serve, their needs and consumer
experiences, and their use of programs and facilities.
HUD Response: Many of CPD's programs that govern temporary,
emergency shelters and other buildings and facilities impose strict
confidentiality requirements to ensure the privacy of individuals that
are housed in these facilities. (See Sec. Sec. 574.440, 576.500(x),
578.103(b) and (d)(2), and 578.23(c)(4)(i).) This final rule requires
that privacy be considered in adopting admissions, occupancy, and
operating policies and procedures in Sec. 5.106(b) and provides that
shelters and other buildings and facilities take nondiscriminatory
steps that may be necessary and appropriate to address privacy concerns
raised by residents or occupants in Sec. 5.106(c). Further
[[Page 64781]]
guidance will address privacy and confidentiality in data collection.
Comment: Commenters stated that HUD should clarify in the preamble
to the final rule, and in training and technical assistance to its
field staff, that inquiries that are used to limit the provision of
shelters or housing, to harass an individual, or to further any other
discriminatory purpose fall under the prohibition on discrimination.
Commenters stated that, by contrast, HUD should state clearly in those
areas that the routine and voluntary collection of demographic
information from all clients or program participants is permissible, so
long as it is collected and used in a nondiscriminatory fashion.
HUD Response: HUD appreciates the commenters raising this issue and
will address this issue in guidance. HUD reiterates that conduct that
violates the rule may also violate the Fair Housing Act if the facility
is subject to the Fair Housing Act's nondiscrimination requirements and
the conduct is because of race, color, religion, national origin,
familial status, sex, or disability.
IV. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review--Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health, and safety effects; distributive impacts; and equity). Under
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), a determination
must be made on whether a regulatory action is significant and,
therefore, subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the order. Executive Order
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. A
determination was made that this final rule is a ``significant
regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
(although not economically significant, as provided in section 3(f)(1)
of that order).
This final rule is consistent with Administration policy in its
direction that providers in all CPD programs must ensure that their
policies and procedures to protect privacy, health, safety, and
security are administered so that equal access is provided to HUD
programs in accordance with an individual's gender identity. This final
rule also clarifies how temporary, emergency shelters and other
buildings and facilities with physical limitations or configurations
that require and are permitted to have shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities comply with the requirement that equal access
be provided to programs, buildings, facilities, services, benefits, and
accommodations in accordance with an individual's gender identity. This
clarification will benefit clients accessing CPD-funded programs,
including those with temporary, emergency shelters and other buildings
and facilities, by assuring that all clients receive equal access and
will benefit the CPD-funded facilities by making compliance with HUD's
equal access requirements easier.
These requirements benefit all occupants by ensuring that providers
understand that they need to be responsive to individual health,
safety, security, and privacy concerns, while ensuring that they do not
take any discriminatory steps to address these concerns. This final
rule also amends the definition of gender identity and sexual
orientation in Sec. 5.100 to clarify the difference between actual and
perceived gender identity, which is necessary to the adoption of Sec.
5.106, and to reflect recent changes in the definition of sexual
orientation that uses updated terminology but does not expand the
coverage of the term. This final rule eliminates the prohibition on
inquiries relating to sexual orientation or gender identity in Sec.
5.105(a)(2)(ii). Both of these changes make it easier for recipients
and subrecipients of CPD funding, as well as owners, operators, and
managers of shelters, buildings, and other facilities, and providers of
services funded by CPD programs to comply with the requirements of both
Sec. Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(i) and 5.106.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Approximately 4,000 providers participating in the CPD programs covered
by this rule are small organizations, but the rules requirement that
organizations maintain records will be limited. Organizations are
already required to maintain up-to-date policies and procedures in
accordance with HUD guidance and regulations. The only change is that
all CPD programs must now maintain records of prior policies and
procedures for up to 5 years from when they make changes to comply with
these requirements. HUD believes that these limited recordkeeping
requirements on small organizations are reasonable to ensure equal
access to CPD programs, facilities, services, benefits, and
accommodations in accordance with an individual's gender identity.
Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the undersigned certifies that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless the
collection displays a currently valid OMB control number. The
information collection requirements for the CPD programs impacted by
this rule--HOME, CDBG (State and entitlement), HOPWA, ESG, and CoC--
have been approved by OMB and assigned OMB control numbers 2506-0171,
2506-0085, 2506-0077, 2506-0133, 2506-0089, and 2506-0199. The
information collection requirements for CPD's Housing Trust Fund and
Rural Housing Stability Assistance programs will be included when those
programs are implemented.
Environmental Impact
This rule sets forth nondiscrimination standards. Accordingly,
under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(3), this rule is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either: (i) imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and
local governments and is not required by statute or (ii) preempts State
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This rule does not have federalism
implications and would not impose substantial direct compliance costs
on State and local governments or preempt State law within the meaning
of the Executive order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects
[[Page 64782]]
of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
on the private sector. This rule does not impose any Federal mandates
on any State, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector,
within the meaning of the UMRA.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Claims, Drug abuse,
Drug traffic control, Grant programs--housing and community
development, Grant programs--Indians, Individuals with disabilities,
Loan programs--housing and community development, Low and moderate
income housing, Mortgage insurance, Pets, Public housing, Rent
subsidies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, and in
accordance with HUD's authority in 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), HUD amends 24 CFR
part 5 as follows.
PART 5--GENERAL HUD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437d, 1437f, 1437n,
3535(d), Sec. 327, Pub. L. 109-115, 119 Stat. 2936, and Sec. 607,
Pub. L. 109-162, 119 Stat. 3051.
0
2. In Sec. 5.100, revise the definitions for ``Gender identity'' and
``Sexual orientation'' to read as follows:
Sec. 5.100 Definitions.
* * * * *
Gender identity means the gender with which a person identifies,
regardless of the sex assigned to that person at birth and regardless
of the person's perceived gender identity. Perceived gender identity
means the gender with which a person is perceived to identify based on
that person's appearance, behavior, expression, other gender related
characteristics, or sex assigned to the individual at birth or
identified in documents.
* * * * *
Sexual orientation means one's emotional or physical attraction to
the same and/or opposite sex (e.g., homosexuality, heterosexuality, or
bisexuality).
* * * * *
Sec. 5.105 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 5.105, remove paragraph (a)(2)(ii) and the paragraph
(a)(2)(i) heading and redesignate paragraph (a)(2)(i) as (a)(2).
0
4. Add Sec. 5.106 to read as follows:
Sec. 5.106 Equal access in accordance with the individual's gender
identity in community planning and development programs.
(a) Applicability. This section applies to assistance provided
under Community Planning and Development (CPD) programs, including
assistance under the following CPD programs: HOME Investment
Partnerships program (24 CFR part 92), Housing Trust Fund program (24
CFR part 93), Community Development Block Grant program (24 CFR part
570), Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS program (24 CFR part
574), Emergency Solutions Grants program (24 CFR part 576), Continuum
of Care program (24 CFR part 578), or Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program (24 CFR part 579). The requirements of this section
apply to recipients and subrecipients, as well as to owners, operators,
and managers of shelters and other buildings and facilities and
providers of services funded in whole or in part by any CPD program.
(b) Equal access in accordance with gender identity. The
admissions, occupancy, and operating policies and procedures of
recipients, subrecipients, owners, operators, managers, and providers
identified in paragraph (a) of this section, including policies and
procedures to protect privacy, health, safety, and security, shall be
established or amended, as necessary, and administered in a
nondiscriminatory manner to ensure that:
(1) Equal access to CPD programs, shelters, other buildings and
facilities, benefits, services, and accommodations is provided to an
individual in accordance with the individual's gender identity, and in
a manner that affords equal access to the individual's family;
(2) An individual is placed, served, and accommodated in accordance
with the gender identity of the individual;
(3) An individual is not subjected to intrusive questioning or
asked to provide anatomical information or documentary, physical, or
medical evidence of the individual's gender identity; and
(4) Eligibility determinations are made and assisted housing is
made available in CPD programs as required by Sec. 5.105(a)(2).
(c) Placement and accommodation in temporary, emergency shelters
and other buildings and facilities with shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities--(1) Placement and accommodation. Placement
and accommodation of an individual in temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities with physical limitations or
configurations that require and are permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities shall be made in accordance with
the individual's gender identity.
(2) Post-admission accommodations. A recipient, subrecipient,
owner, operator, manager, or provider must take nondiscriminatory steps
that may be necessary and appropriate to address privacy concerns
raised by residents or occupants and, as needed, update its admissions,
occupancy, and operating policies and procedures in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Documentation and record retention. Providers shall document
and maintain records of compliance with the requirements in paragraph
(b) of this section for a period of 5 years.
Dated: September 14, 2016.
Juli[aacute]n Castro,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-22589 Filed 9-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P