Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2017, 64747-64753 [2016-22823]
Download as PDF
Vol. 81
Tuesday,
No. 182
September 20, 2016
Part VII
The President
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS
Presidential Determination No. 2016–10 of September 12, 2016—
Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug
Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2017
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 059060
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\20SEO0.SGM
20SEO0
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 059060
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\20SEO0.SGM
20SEO0
64749
Presidential Documents
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 182
Tuesday, September 20, 2016
Title 3—
Presidential Determination No. 2016–10 of September 12, 2016
The President
Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major
Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2017
Memorandum for the Secretary of State
Pursuant to section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal
Year 2003 (Public Law 107–228) (FRAA), I hereby identify the following
countries as major drug transit and/or major illicit drug producing countries:
Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Burma, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras,
India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela.
A country’s presence on the foregoing Major Drug Transit and Major Illicit
Drug Producing Countries List is not a reflection of its government’s counternarcotics efforts or level of cooperation with the United States. Consistent
with the statutory definition of a major drug transit or drug producing
country set forth in section 481(e)(2) and (5) of the Foreign Assistance
Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), the reason major drug transit or illicit
drug producing countries are placed on the list is the combination of geographic, commercial, and economic factors that allow drugs to transit or
be produced, even if a government has carried out the most assiduous
narcotics control law enforcement measures.
Pursuant to section 706(2)(A) of the FRAA, I hereby designate Bolivia, Burma,
and Venezuela as countries that have failed demonstrably during the previous
12 months to adhere to their obligations under international counternarcotics
agreements and take the measures set forth in section 489(a)(1) of the FAA.
Included in this report are justifications for the determinations on Bolivia,
Burma, and Venezuela, as required by section 706(2)(B). Explanations for
these decisions are published with this determination.
I have also determined, in accordance with provisions of section 706(3)(A)
of the FRAA, that support for programs to aid Burma and Venezuela is
vital to the national interests of the United States.
In addition to emphasizing the importance of international cooperation,
this determination highlights a number of recent developments concerning
various aspects associated with the worldwide drug problem.
Growing Consensus on International Narcotics
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS
There is a growing international consensus that counternarcotics programs
must be designed and implemented with the aim of improving the health
and safety of individuals while preventing and reducing violence and other
harmful consequences to communities.
In concert with international partners, the United States is expanding its
domestic and international funding for drug treatment and recovery support
programs based on empirical scientific evidence that shows that substance
use disorders are medical conditions and must be treated as such. To achieve
greater balance, U.S. drug policy also includes stepped-up promotion of
effective alternative development programs for farmers and others who agree
to stop illegal drug cultivation and associated activities. Such efforts also
focus on advancing the rule of law through improving and strengthening
civil and law enforcement institutions. United States polices support overall
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 059060
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\20SEO0.SGM
20SEO0
64750
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Presidential Documents
citizen security, including deepening worldwide adherence to fundamental
human rights guaranteed by international law.
This consensus was demonstrated at the United Nations General Assembly
Special Session on the World Drug Problem (UNGASS) held on April 19–
21, 2016, in New York. The meeting served as the first high-level, global
gathering on counternarcotics in a generation, and its resulting outcome
document forged international consensus behind a balanced and pragmatic
approach to drug control. A central theme of UNGASS was to further develop
and implement strategies based on the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs
(CND) 2009 Political Declaration and Action Plan aimed at reducing drug
production, trafficking, and use from the standpoint of effective public health
practices. UNGASS participants, including the United States, also highlighted
the importance of substantive advancement of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development, which for the first time in history incorporates
rule of law objectives into global development policy.
UNGASS further underscored the broad consensus among United Nations
member states with regard to many major drug control themes. At the
special session, member states demonstrated their common cause to reinforce
efforts to counter drug cultivation, production, distribution, and use through
pragmatic approaches that balance both law enforcement and public health
perspectives. As stated by the UN International Narcotics Control Board
(INCB), we have a ‘‘common obligation to employ effective drug abuse
prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation of our citizens.’’ Participants also
reaffirmed their ongoing commitment to the 1961, 1971, and 1988 UN conventions on drugs as the essential backdrop for worldwide drug control efforts.
These conventions leave sufficient room for individual states to pursue
drug policies that are in accord with their own laws and national realities.
The foreign policy approaches to drug control of the United States are
explained in detail in the U.S. National Drug Control Strategy, and our
policies and programs are designed to help reach the goals established
at UNGASS and work effectively with partners around the world. They
include, for example, on going bilateral cooperation and collaborative work
through numerous regional and sub-regional multilateral organizations such
as the Organization of American States; the European Union; regional affiliates of the global Financial Action Task Force; the Economic Community
of West African States; the Association of Southeast Asian Nations; and
many others. The United States also joins other nations in supporting the
important, positive contributions of many nongovernmental organizations
in the academic and private sectors that work on improving counternarcotics
policies and programs.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS
Growing Challenges of Heroin Use, Adulterants, and Opium Poppy Cultivation
According to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the use of
heroin and other opium poppy derivatives is the greatest worldwide drug
problem today. Heroin is also the greatest drug threat in the United States,
according to the 2015 U.S. National Drug Threat Assessment published
by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. Especially dangerous is the
increasing adulteration of heroin with synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl,
leading to an increase in the number of deaths as the result of drug overdoses.
In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control reported that approximately 10,500
Americans died from heroin-related overdoses; the true number likely is
higher given inconsistent testing across the States.
Opium poppy cultivation is expanding beyond Afghanistan, Burma, and
Laos the traditional primary producing countries in the world. While Afghanistan is still the major supplier of opium derivatives to Europe and Canada,
nearly all opium derivatives found in the United States are primarily grown
in or trafficked through Mexico or by Mexican-based drug trafficking organizations. In Mexico, for example, international officials estimate that the
number of hectares of heroin poppy under cultivation increased from 11,000
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 059060
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\20SEO0.SGM
20SEO0
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Presidential Documents
64751
hectares in 2013 to as much as 28,000 hectares in 2015. Limited poppy
cultivation also has been detected in Colombia and Guatemala.
According to UNODC, 201,000 hectares of opium poppy were cultivated
in Afghanistan in 2015, a 5 percent decline from 2014. Comparative data
shows, however, that while cultivation and yields declined relative to previous years, cultivation is still at historically high levels.
The 2016 U.S. International Narcotics Control Strategy indicates that insurgent groups in Afghanistan generate significant revenue by taxing drugs
passing through regions they control. Afghan government drug control efforts
are hampered by broad security challenges associated with intensive, longterm conflict and combat. The U.S. Government continues to support a
broad range of multilateral and bilateral drug control programs in Afghanistan.
Although many treatment and recovery facilities established in Afghanistan
show great promise, the 2015 Afghanistan National Drug Use Survey conducted by the Department of State and the Afghan Ministry of Health Institutional Review Board found an 11 percent drug positive rate in Afghanistan.
Use of heroin and other opium poppy products, according to international
analysis, is also significant in Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan.
The INCB is also concerned about the increasing use of Afghan sourced
heroin throughout the Middle East.
Heroin in the United States is being increasingly adulterated with lowcost synthetic opioids, especially fentanyl. Research has shown that fentanyl
and its analogues can be 25 to 50 times more potent than heroin. According
to U.S. law enforcement, most illicit fentanyl, precursors, and fentanyl analogues that have been identified in the United States originate in China
and enter the country via Mexico, Canada, or direct mail. The United States
has taken a number of steps to address this issue. The United States is
working with Mexico and Canada to develop bilateral and multilateral approaches to combating opioid production and trafficking, particularly heroin
and fentanyl. Law enforcement cooperation with Mexico includes programs
to strengthen Mexico’s capacity to identify, investigate, interdict and dismantle clandestine drug laboratories and disrupt trafficking networks. The
United States conducts regular and positive discussions with China to enhance controls on many chemicals used to make fentanyl and other synthetic
drugs. In a welcome development in late 2015, China placed controls on
116 substances including a dangerous analogue to fentanyl, acetyl fentanyl.
Much work remains to be done in this area, and developing compatible,
consistent, enforceable international standards is crucial to successfully controlling this growing drug threat.
Cocaine and Coca Cultivation
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS
Although international and U.S. surveys indicate overall production of coca
leaf for cocaine has remained stable from a decade ago, Colombia has seen
a 42 percent increase in illegal coca crop cultivation from 2014 to 2015.
Colombia remains the major provider of cocaine available in the United
States, though data shows that cocaine use is declining in the United States
and in Europe. Nevertheless, U.S. rates of overdose involving cocaine were
up in 2014.
Increased Colombian coca cultivation can be attributed to a number of
factors, including Colombia’s decision to end the aerial coca eradication
program in October 2015 throughout the country. Even prior to the end
of spray eradication, coca growers began to implement ‘‘counter’’ eradication
techniques, such as by migrating their plantings to areas where spray was
not permitted by law or policy. Illegal coca cultivators also began to cultivate
smaller, better concealed fields to avoid detection by law enforcement. Colombia has reformulated its counternarcotics strategy to prioritize robust
law enforcement activity against criminal drug trafficking organizations, including enhanced interdiction, over that of crop eradication. In 2015, the
country seized 295 metric tons of cocaine along with other illegal drugs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 059060
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\20SEO0.SGM
20SEO0
64752
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Presidential Documents
To reach the United States, cocaine is primarily trafficked by land, air,
and sea via Central America, Mexico, and the Caribbean. Over the past
decade, roughly 97 percent of U.S. bound cocaine is smuggled out of South
America on noncommercial maritime conveyances. Smaller amounts are
smuggled via commercial maritime vessels and noncommercial aircraft. Using
similar conveyances, cocaine destined for Europe is often routed through
Brazil, Bolivia, and Venezuela, as well as via West Africa.
Numerous large shipping containers have been interdicted on Atlantic routes,
sometimes with a first stop in Portuguese speaking countries in Africa.
Using these routes reduces language barriers before the drugs are smuggled
to their final destination. A variety of U.S. assistance programs, especially
those designed to enhance national interdiction capabilities and target kingpin traffickers, are carried out in Africa.
United States assistance programs are designed to disrupt the flow of cocaine
and other harmful products to the United States by building the capacity
of judicial, law enforcement, and treatment institutions in partner countries.
For example, in Central America these programs are carried out through
the Central America Regional Security Initiative, while those in the Caribbean
are conducted through the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative. The Merida
Initiative provides the framework for assistance and bilateral cooperation
with Mexico. Key activities of these programs include drug interdiction
cooperation, especially maritime-based efforts in Central America and the
Caribbean; law enforcement capacity building; anticorruption initiatives and
support; and enhanced prosecution and judicial reform strengthening efforts.
Looking to the Future
Future action by the international community to address drug cultivation,
production, trafficking, and use should be closely tied to the important
priorities described in the 2016 UNGASS outcome document. These include,
for example, utilization of sound scientific evidence for prevention and
treatment programs, effective law enforcement, and appropriately balanced
responses to drug-related crime. Areas of special concern include the connections between drug use and human rights, especially as they pertain to
vulnerable groups such as women and children. The exchange of information
among nations and between professionals engaged in reducing drug trafficking and use, and efforts to stay ahead of new and threatening developments, such as synthetic substances, are central to progress by communities,
countries, and regions around the world.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS
The U.S. Government will continue to work with fellow United Nations
member states to galvanize the international community toward implementation of the principles that were agreed upon at the 2016 UNGASS. General
coordination among concerned United Nations entities is particularly important. This includes collaboration among bodies within the UN structure
as a whole, but particularly those that concern themselves to some extent
with drug control and related social issues.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 059060
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\20SEO0.SGM
20SEO0
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Presidential Documents
64753
You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this report, with its
Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela memoranda of justification, under section
706 of the FRAA, to the Congress, and publish it in the Federal Register.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, September 12, 2016
[FR Doc. 2016–22823
Filed 9–19–16; 11:15 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 059060
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\20SEO0.SGM
20SEO0
OB#1.EPS
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PRES DOCS
Billing code 4710–10–P
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2016)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 64747-64753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22823]
[[Page 64747]]
Vol. 81
Tuesday,
No. 182
September 20, 2016
Part VII
The President
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presidential Determination No. 2016-10 of September 12, 2016--
Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug
Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2017
Presidential Documents
Federal Register / Vol. 81 , No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 /
Presidential Documents
___________________________________________________________________
Title 3--
The President
[[Page 64749]]
Presidential Determination No. 2016-10 of September 12,
2016
Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit
or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal
Year 2017
Memorandum for the Secretary of State
Pursuant to section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-
228) (FRAA), I hereby identify the following countries
as major drug transit and/or major illicit drug
producing countries: Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Belize,
Bolivia, Burma, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican
Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti,
Honduras, India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua,
Pakistan, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela.
A country's presence on the foregoing Major Drug
Transit and Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries List
is not a reflection of its government's
counternarcotics efforts or level of cooperation with
the United States. Consistent with the statutory
definition of a major drug transit or drug producing
country set forth in section 481(e)(2) and (5) of the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), the
reason major drug transit or illicit drug producing
countries are placed on the list is the combination of
geographic, commercial, and economic factors that allow
drugs to transit or be produced, even if a government
has carried out the most assiduous narcotics control
law enforcement measures.
Pursuant to section 706(2)(A) of the FRAA, I hereby
designate Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela as countries
that have failed demonstrably during the previous 12
months to adhere to their obligations under
international counternarcotics agreements and take the
measures set forth in section 489(a)(1) of the FAA.
Included in this report are justifications for the
determinations on Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela, as
required by section 706(2)(B). Explanations for these
decisions are published with this determination.
I have also determined, in accordance with provisions
of section 706(3)(A) of the FRAA, that support for
programs to aid Burma and Venezuela is vital to the
national interests of the United States.
In addition to emphasizing the importance of
international cooperation, this determination
highlights a number of recent developments concerning
various aspects associated with the worldwide drug
problem.
Growing Consensus on International Narcotics
There is a growing international consensus that
counternarcotics programs must be designed and
implemented with the aim of improving the health and
safety of individuals while preventing and reducing
violence and other harmful consequences to communities.
In concert with international partners, the United
States is expanding its domestic and international
funding for drug treatment and recovery support
programs based on empirical scientific evidence that
shows that substance use disorders are medical
conditions and must be treated as such. To achieve
greater balance, U.S. drug policy also includes
stepped-up promotion of effective alternative
development programs for farmers and others who agree
to stop illegal drug cultivation and associated
activities. Such efforts also focus on advancing the
rule of law through improving and strengthening civil
and law enforcement institutions. United States polices
support overall
[[Page 64750]]
citizen security, including deepening worldwide
adherence to fundamental human rights guaranteed by
international law.
This consensus was demonstrated at the United Nations
General Assembly Special Session on the World Drug
Problem (UNGASS) held on April 19-21, 2016, in New
York. The meeting served as the first high-level,
global gathering on counternarcotics in a generation,
and its resulting outcome document forged international
consensus behind a balanced and pragmatic approach to
drug control. A central theme of UNGASS was to further
develop and implement strategies based on the UN
Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) 2009 Political
Declaration and Action Plan aimed at reducing drug
production, trafficking, and use from the standpoint of
effective public health practices. UNGASS participants,
including the United States, also highlighted the
importance of substantive advancement of the UN's 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development, which for the first
time in history incorporates rule of law objectives
into global development policy.
UNGASS further underscored the broad consensus among
United Nations member states with regard to many major
drug control themes. At the special session, member
states demonstrated their common cause to reinforce
efforts to counter drug cultivation, production,
distribution, and use through pragmatic approaches that
balance both law enforcement and public health
perspectives. As stated by the UN International
Narcotics Control Board (INCB), we have a ``common
obligation to employ effective drug abuse prevention,
treatment, and rehabilitation of our citizens.''
Participants also reaffirmed their ongoing commitment
to the 1961, 1971, and 1988 UN conventions on drugs as
the essential backdrop for worldwide drug control
efforts. These conventions leave sufficient room for
individual states to pursue drug policies that are in
accord with their own laws and national realities.
The foreign policy approaches to drug control of the
United States are explained in detail in the U.S.
National Drug Control Strategy, and our policies and
programs are designed to help reach the goals
established at UNGASS and work effectively with
partners around the world. They include, for example,
on going bilateral cooperation and collaborative work
through numerous regional and sub-regional multilateral
organizations such as the Organization of American
States; the European Union; regional affiliates of the
global Financial Action Task Force; the Economic
Community of West African States; the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations; and many others. The United
States also joins other nations in supporting the
important, positive contributions of many
nongovernmental organizations in the academic and
private sectors that work on improving counternarcotics
policies and programs.
Growing Challenges of Heroin Use, Adulterants, and
Opium Poppy Cultivation
According to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC),
the use of heroin and other opium poppy derivatives is
the greatest worldwide drug problem today. Heroin is
also the greatest drug threat in the United States,
according to the 2015 U.S. National Drug Threat
Assessment published by the U.S. Drug Enforcement
Administration. Especially dangerous is the increasing
adulteration of heroin with synthetic opioids, such as
fentanyl, leading to an increase in the number of
deaths as the result of drug overdoses. In 2014, the
Centers for Disease Control reported that approximately
10,500 Americans died from heroin-related overdoses;
the true number likely is higher given inconsistent
testing across the States.
Opium poppy cultivation is expanding beyond
Afghanistan, Burma, and Laos the traditional primary
producing countries in the world. While Afghanistan is
still the major supplier of opium derivatives to Europe
and Canada, nearly all opium derivatives found in the
United States are primarily grown in or trafficked
through Mexico or by Mexican-based drug trafficking
organizations. In Mexico, for example, international
officials estimate that the number of hectares of
heroin poppy under cultivation increased from 11,000
[[Page 64751]]
hectares in 2013 to as much as 28,000 hectares in 2015.
Limited poppy cultivation also has been detected in
Colombia and Guatemala.
According to UNODC, 201,000 hectares of opium poppy
were cultivated in Afghanistan in 2015, a 5 percent
decline from 2014. Comparative data shows, however,
that while cultivation and yields declined relative to
previous years, cultivation is still at historically
high levels.
The 2016 U.S. International Narcotics Control Strategy
indicates that insurgent groups in Afghanistan generate
significant revenue by taxing drugs passing through
regions they control. Afghan government drug control
efforts are hampered by broad security challenges
associated with intensive, long-term conflict and
combat. The U.S. Government continues to support a
broad range of multilateral and bilateral drug control
programs in Afghanistan.
Although many treatment and recovery facilities
established in Afghanistan show great promise, the 2015
Afghanistan National Drug Use Survey conducted by the
Department of State and the Afghan Ministry of Health
Institutional Review Board found an 11 percent drug
positive rate in Afghanistan. Use of heroin and other
opium poppy products, according to international
analysis, is also significant in Iran, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. The INCB is also concerned
about the increasing use of Afghan sourced heroin
throughout the Middle East.
Heroin in the United States is being increasingly
adulterated with low-cost synthetic opioids, especially
fentanyl. Research has shown that fentanyl and its
analogues can be 25 to 50 times more potent than
heroin. According to U.S. law enforcement, most illicit
fentanyl, precursors, and fentanyl analogues that have
been identified in the United States originate in China
and enter the country via Mexico, Canada, or direct
mail. The United States has taken a number of steps to
address this issue. The United States is working with
Mexico and Canada to develop bilateral and multilateral
approaches to combating opioid production and
trafficking, particularly heroin and fentanyl. Law
enforcement cooperation with Mexico includes programs
to strengthen Mexico's capacity to identify,
investigate, interdict and dismantle clandestine drug
laboratories and disrupt trafficking networks. The
United States conducts regular and positive discussions
with China to enhance controls on many chemicals used
to make fentanyl and other synthetic drugs. In a
welcome development in late 2015, China placed controls
on 116 substances including a dangerous analogue to
fentanyl, acetyl fentanyl. Much work remains to be done
in this area, and developing compatible, consistent,
enforceable international standards is crucial to
successfully controlling this growing drug threat.
Cocaine and Coca Cultivation
Although international and U.S. surveys indicate
overall production of coca leaf for cocaine has
remained stable from a decade ago, Colombia has seen a
42 percent increase in illegal coca crop cultivation
from 2014 to 2015. Colombia remains the major provider
of cocaine available in the United States, though data
shows that cocaine use is declining in the United
States and in Europe. Nevertheless, U.S. rates of
overdose involving cocaine were up in 2014.
Increased Colombian coca cultivation can be attributed
to a number of factors, including Colombia's decision
to end the aerial coca eradication program in October
2015 throughout the country. Even prior to the end of
spray eradication, coca growers began to implement
``counter'' eradication techniques, such as by
migrating their plantings to areas where spray was not
permitted by law or policy. Illegal coca cultivators
also began to cultivate smaller, better concealed
fields to avoid detection by law enforcement. Colombia
has reformulated its counternarcotics strategy to
prioritize robust law enforcement activity against
criminal drug trafficking organizations, including
enhanced interdiction, over that of crop eradication.
In 2015, the country seized 295 metric tons of cocaine
along with other illegal drugs.
[[Page 64752]]
To reach the United States, cocaine is primarily
trafficked by land, air, and sea via Central America,
Mexico, and the Caribbean. Over the past decade,
roughly 97 percent of U.S. bound cocaine is smuggled
out of South America on noncommercial maritime
conveyances. Smaller amounts are smuggled via
commercial maritime vessels and noncommercial aircraft.
Using similar conveyances, cocaine destined for Europe
is often routed through Brazil, Bolivia, and Venezuela,
as well as via West Africa.
Numerous large shipping containers have been
interdicted on Atlantic routes, sometimes with a first
stop in Portuguese speaking countries in Africa. Using
these routes reduces language barriers before the drugs
are smuggled to their final destination. A variety of
U.S. assistance programs, especially those designed to
enhance national interdiction capabilities and target
kingpin traffickers, are carried out in Africa.
United States assistance programs are designed to
disrupt the flow of cocaine and other harmful products
to the United States by building the capacity of
judicial, law enforcement, and treatment institutions
in partner countries. For example, in Central America
these programs are carried out through the Central
America Regional Security Initiative, while those in
the Caribbean are conducted through the Caribbean Basin
Security Initiative. The Merida Initiative provides the
framework for assistance and bilateral cooperation with
Mexico. Key activities of these programs include drug
interdiction cooperation, especially maritime-based
efforts in Central America and the Caribbean; law
enforcement capacity building; anticorruption
initiatives and support; and enhanced prosecution and
judicial reform strengthening efforts.
Looking to the Future
Future action by the international community to address
drug cultivation, production, trafficking, and use
should be closely tied to the important priorities
described in the 2016 UNGASS outcome document. These
include, for example, utilization of sound scientific
evidence for prevention and treatment programs,
effective law enforcement, and appropriately balanced
responses to drug-related crime. Areas of special
concern include the connections between drug use and
human rights, especially as they pertain to vulnerable
groups such as women and children. The exchange of
information among nations and between professionals
engaged in reducing drug trafficking and use, and
efforts to stay ahead of new and threatening
developments, such as synthetic substances, are central
to progress by communities, countries, and regions
around the world.
The U.S. Government will continue to work with fellow
United Nations member states to galvanize the
international community toward implementation of the
principles that were agreed upon at the 2016 UNGASS.
General coordination among concerned United Nations
entities is particularly important. This includes
collaboration among bodies within the UN structure as a
whole, but particularly those that concern themselves
to some extent with drug control and related social
issues.
[[Page 64753]]
You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this
report, with its Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela
memoranda of justification, under section 706 of the
FRAA, to the Congress, and publish it in the Federal
Register.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, September 12, 2016
[FR Doc. 2016-22823
Filed 9-19-16; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P