Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), 64347-64349 [2016-22503]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
64347
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO § 100.1102
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
20. IJSBA World Finals
Sponsor ...........................................
Event Description ............................
Date .................................................
Location ...........................................
Regulated Area ...............................
International Jet Sporting Association (IJSBA).
Personal Watercraft Race.
October 1, 2016 through October 9, 2016.
Lake Havasu City, AZ.
The navigable waters of Lake Havasu, AZ in the area known as Crazy Horse Campgrounds.
Dated: September 6, 2016.
E.M. Cooper,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting,
Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2016–22611 Filed 9–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0877]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Willamette River, Portland, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs three Multnomah
County, Oregon bridges: the Broadway
Bridge; the Burnside Bridge; and the
Hawthorne Bridge; all crossing the
Willamette River at Portland, OR. The
deviation is necessary to accommodate
the Portland Marathon foot race event.
This deviation allows the bridges to
remain in the closed-to-navigation
position to allow for the safe movement
of event participants.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
5 a.m. to 3 p.m. on October 9, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2016–0877] is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Mr. Steven
Fischer, Bridge Administrator,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District;
telephone 206–220–7282, email d13-pfd13bridges@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Multnomah County, Oregon has
requested a temporary deviation from
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:00 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
the operating schedule for the Broadway
Bridge, mile 11.7; Burnside Bridge, mile
12.4; and Hawthorne Bridge, mile 13.1;
all crossing the Willamette River at
Portland, OR. The deviation is necessary
to accommodate Portland Marathon
participants’ safe movement over the
bridges. To facilitate this event, the
draws of theses bridges will be
maintained as follows: The Broadway
Bridge provides a vertical clearance of
90 feet in the closed-to-navigation
position; the Burnside Bridge provides a
vertical clearance of 64 feet in the
closed-to-navigation position; and the
Hawthorne Bridge provides a vertical
clearance of 49 feet in the closed-tonavigation position; all clearances are
referenced to the vertical clearance
above Columbia River Datum 0.0. The
normal operating schedule for all three
bridges is in 33 CFR 117.897.
The deviation period is from 5 a.m.
until 3 p.m. on October 9, 2016.
Waterway usage on the Willamette River
ranges from commercial tug and barge to
small pleasure craft. Vessels able to pass
through the Broadway Bridge, the
Burnside Bridge, and the Hawthorne
Bridge in the closed-to-navigation
position may do so at anytime. These
bridges will be able to open for
emergency vessels in route to a call. The
Willamette River has no immediate
alternate route for vessels to pass. The
Coast Guard will also inform the users
of the waterways through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
change in operating schedule for the
bridge so that vessels can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused
by the temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: September 9, 2016.
Steven M. Fischer,
Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2016–22548 Filed 9–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0407; FRL–9952–55–
Region 7]
Partial Approval and Partial
Disapproval of Implementation Plans;
State of Iowa; Infrastructure SIP
Requirements for the 2008 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
partially approve and partially
disapprove elements of the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
from the State of Iowa addressing the
applicable requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) section 110 for the 2008
ozone NAAQS. Section 110 requires
that each state adopt and submit a SIP
to support the implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of each
new or revised NAAQS promulgated by
the EPA. These SIPs are commonly
referred to as ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The
infrastructure requirements are designed
to ensure that the structural components
of each state’s air quality management
program are adequate to meet the state’s
responsibilities under the CAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0407. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available electronically at
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
64348
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
www.regulations.gov and at EPA Region
7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
Kansas 66219. Please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7039, or by email at
Hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
EPA is taking final action to partially
approve and partially disapprove the
infrastructure SIP submission received
from the State of Iowa on January 17,
2013. EPA is approving the following
elements of section 110(a)(2): (A), (B),
(C), (D)(i)(II)—prong 3 only, (E) through
(H), and (J) through (M).
EPA is disapproving element
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4. EPA did not
act on sections 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prongs
1 and 2, and 110(a)(2)(I).
A Technical Support Document (TSD)
is included as part of the docket to
discuss the details of this rulemaking.
The proposal to approve the
infrastructure SIP submission was
published on Friday July 29, 2016, in
the Federal Register. 81 FR 49911. The
comment period ended August 29, 2016.
There were no comments on the
proposal.
II. What action is EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to
partially approve and partially
disapprove the January 17, 2013
submission from the State of Iowa
which addresses the requirements of
CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as
applicable to the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
Based on review of the state’s
infrastructure SIP submissions and
relevant statutory and regulatory
authorities and provisions referenced in
those submissions or referenced in
Iowa’s SIP, EPA believes that Iowa’s SIP
meets the elements of sections 110(a)(1)
and (2) with respect to the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. EPA is taking final action to
partially approve and partially
disapprove the infrastructure SIP
submission received from the State of
Iowa on January 17, 2013. EPA is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:00 Sep 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
approving the following elements of
section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)—
prong 3 only, (E) through (H), and (J)
through (M). EPA is disapproving
element 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4. The
EPA is not required to take further
action with respect to prong 4 because
the CSAPR Federal Implementation
Plan already in place achieves the
necessary emission reductions. EPA did
not act on sections 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—
prongs 1 and 2, and 110(a)(2)(I).
The EPA’s analysis of these
submissions is addressed in a TSD as
part of the docket.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 21, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Prevention of significant
deterioration, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 8, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
64349
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.820
*
Subpart Q—Iowa
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
2. In section 52.820(e), the table is
amended by adding entry (43) in
numerical order to read as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
EPA-APPROVED IOWA NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS
Name of
non-regulatory
SIP revision
*
(43) Sections 110(a)(1)
and (2) Infrastructure
Requirements 2008
Ozone NAAQS.
*
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
*
Statewide ..........
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0501; FRL–9952–44–
Region 7]
Approval of Iowa’s Air Quality
Implementation Plans; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) inadvertently approved
and codified incorrect entries for final
rule actions published in the Federal
Register. This technical amendment
corrects the entries.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 20, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan
Simpson at (913) 551–7089, or by email
at simpson.jan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA
inadvertently approved and codified
incorrect entries in paragraph (c) to 40
CFR 52.820 for three separate final rule
actions published in the Federal
Register. The first published on June 11,
2015, the second published on August
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
14:00 Sep 19, 2016
*
1/17/13
*
[FR Doc. 2016–22503 Filed 9–19–16; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
State submittal
date
Jkt 238001
EPA Approval date
Explanation
*
9/20/16 and [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
*
This action approves the following CAA elements:
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)—prong 3 only,
(E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M).
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4 is disapproved.
110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. [EPA–R07–OAR–
2016–0407; FRL–9952–55–Region 7].
*
*
14, 2015, and the third published on
June 17, 2016.
The June 11, 2015 (80 FR 33192),
Federal Register direct final action
approving revisions to chapter 22 rule
567–22.3 ‘‘Issuing Permits’’ omitted the
following sentence in the explanation
column on page 33194 ‘‘Subrule 22.3(6)
has not been approved as part of the
SIP. Subrule 22.3(6), Limits on
Hazardous Air Pollutants, has been
approved under Title V and section
112(l). The remainder of the rule has not
been approved pursuant to Title V and
section 112(l)’’. Therefore we are
correcting page 33194 of the June 11,
2015, Federal Register direct final rule
to add the missing language to the
explanation column in table section
52.820 (c). The August 14, 2015 (80 FR
48718), Federal Register final rule
codification of this same rule, chapter
22 rule 567–22.3 ‘‘Issuing Permits’’,
state effective date and the citation
information in the EPA approval date
column is incorrect. Therefore, we are
correcting page 48720 of the August 14,
2015, Federal Register final rule to
reflect the most current Federallyapproved information by changing the
state effective date and the EPA
approval date column information.
The June 17, 2016 (81 FR 39585),
Federal Register direct final action
approving revisions to chapter 20 rule
567.20.2 ‘‘Definitions’’ state effective
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
date of May 7, 2008, on page 39587 is
correct, however the state effective date
April 22, 2015, published on June 11,
2015 (80 FR 33192) is the most current
chronological effective date of this rule.
By using the most current chronological
effective date, we provide the reader a
clear understanding of the Federallyapproved state effective date of this rule.
Therefore, we are correcting page 39587
of the June 17, 2016, Federal Register
direct final action to reflect the
information of the most chronological
effective and EPA approval dates.
Dated: September 6, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Q—Iowa
2. Amend § 52.820(c) by revising the
entries for 567–20.2 and 567–22.3 to
read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
■
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64347-64349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22503]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2016-0407; FRL-9952-55-Region 7]
Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Implementation Plans;
State of Iowa; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2008 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to partially approve and partially disapprove elements of the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Iowa
addressing the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
section 110 for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Section 110 requires that each
state adopt and submit a SIP to support the implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of each new or revised NAAQS promulgated
by the EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred to as ``infrastructure''
SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the
structural components of each state's air quality management program
are adequate to meet the state's responsibilities under the CAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on October 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R07-OAR-2016-0407. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically at
[[Page 64348]]
www.regulations.gov and at EPA Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Please schedule an appointment during normal
business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7039, or by email at
Hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
EPA is taking final action to partially approve and partially
disapprove the infrastructure SIP submission received from the State of
Iowa on January 17, 2013. EPA is approving the following elements of
section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)--prong 3 only, (E) through
(H), and (J) through (M).
EPA is disapproving element 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--prong 4. EPA did
not act on sections 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--prongs 1 and 2, and
110(a)(2)(I).
A Technical Support Document (TSD) is included as part of the
docket to discuss the details of this rulemaking.
The proposal to approve the infrastructure SIP submission was
published on Friday July 29, 2016, in the Federal Register. 81 FR
49911. The comment period ended August 29, 2016. There were no comments
on the proposal.
II. What action is EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to partially approve and partially
disapprove the January 17, 2013 submission from the State of Iowa which
addresses the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as
applicable to the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
Based on review of the state's infrastructure SIP submissions and
relevant statutory and regulatory authorities and provisions referenced
in those submissions or referenced in Iowa's SIP, EPA believes that
Iowa's SIP meets the elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) with
respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA is taking final action to
partially approve and partially disapprove the infrastructure SIP
submission received from the State of Iowa on January 17, 2013. EPA is
approving the following elements of section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C),
(D)(i)(II)--prong 3 only, (E) through (H), and (J) through (M). EPA is
disapproving element 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--prong 4. The EPA is not
required to take further action with respect to prong 4 because the
CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan already in place achieves the
necessary emission reductions. EPA did not act on sections
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--prongs 1 and 2, and 110(a)(2)(I).
The EPA's analysis of these submissions is addressed in a TSD as
part of the docket.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 21, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Prevention of
significant deterioration, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 8, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
[[Page 64349]]
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Q--Iowa
0
2. In section 52.820(e), the table is amended by adding entry (43) in
numerical order to read as follows:
Sec. 52.820 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Iowa Nonregulatory SIP Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable geographic State
revision or nonattainment area submittal date EPA Approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(43) Sections 110(a)(1) and Statewide............. 1/17/13 9/20/16 and This action approves
(2) Infrastructure [Insert Federal the following CAA
Requirements 2008 Ozone NAAQS. Register elements:
citation]. 110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D)(i)(II)--
prong 3 only, (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J),
(K), (L), and (M).
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)-
-prong 4 is
disapproved.
110(a)(2)(I) is not
applicable. [EPA-R07-
OAR-2016-0407; FRL-
9952-55-Region 7].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2016-22503 Filed 9-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
