RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation 30-Day Notice, 64159-64161 [2016-22458]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
64159
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices
NIOSH information in the current
digital environment.
The survey will be directed to the
community of occupational safety and
health (OSH) professionals as well as
business and trade association
intermediaries as this audience
represents the primary and traditional
customer base for NIOSH information
materials. Intermediaries use their
connections to small businesses and
other organizations to disseminate
information to stakeholders who might
not otherwise receive it. Intermediaries
include occupational health service
providers, labor organizations, chambers
of commerce, and insurance companies.
NIOSH estimates that it will take 315
total burden hours to complete
information collections, compared to
204 burden hours estimated for the 2010
CSS. There are no costs to the
respondents other than their time.
Customer Satisfaction and Impact
(CSI) Survey:
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents
AIHA members ..................................
AIHA Members ..................................
AAOHN Members .............................
AAOHN Members .............................
ACOEM members .............................
ACOEM members .............................
ASSE members ................................
ASSE members ................................
Other members* ................................
Other members .................................
Total ...........................................
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—full version.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—full version.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—full version Work,.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—short version.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—full version.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—short version.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—full version.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—short version.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—full version.
NIOSH Customer Satisfaction
vey—short version.
1
20/60
50
Sur-
150
1
5/60
13
Sur-
150
1
20/60
50
Sur-
150
1
5/60
13
Sur-
150
1
20/60
50
Sur-
150
1
5/60
13
Sur-
150
1
20/60
50
Sur-
150
1
5/60
13
Sur-
150
1
20/60
50
Sur-
150
1
5/60
13
...........................................................
........................
........................
........................
315
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation
30-Day Notice
Children’s Bureau,
Administration for Children and
Families, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services.
ACTION: Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Total burden
(in hrs.)
150
[FR Doc. 2016–22447 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]
Title: RPG National Cross-Site
Evaluation and Evaluation Technical
Assistance.
OMB No.: 0970–0444.
Description: The Children’s Bureau
within the Administration for Children
21:47 Sep 16, 2016
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs.)
Sur-
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Form name
Jkt 238001
and Families of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services seeks a
renewal of clearance to collect
information for the Regional Partnership
Grants to Increase the Well-being of and
to Improve Permanency Outcomes for
Children Affected by Substance Abuse
Cross-Site Evaluation and EvaluationRelated Technical Assistance and Data
Collection Support for Regional
Partnership Grant Program Round Three
Sites or ‘‘RPG’’ projects. Under RPG, the
Children’s Bureau has issued 21 grants
to organizations such as child welfare or
substance abuse treatment providers or
family court systems to develop
interagency collaborations and
integration of programs, activities, and
services designed to increase well-being,
improve permanency, and enhance the
safety of children who are in an out-ofhome placement or are at risk of being
placed in out-of-home care as a result of
a parent’s or caretaker’s substance use
dependence. The Child and Family
Services Improvement and Innovation
Act (Pub. L. 112–34) includes a targeted
grants program (section 437(f) of the
Social Security Act) that directs the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to reserve a specified portion of the
appropriation for these Regional
Partnership Grants, to be used to
improve the well-being of children
affected by substance abuse. The overall
objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation
and Technical Assistance projects (the
RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to plan,
develop, and implement a rigorous
national cross-site evaluation of the RPG
Grant Program, provide legislativelymandated performance measurement,
furnish evaluation-related technical
assistance to the grantees in order to
improve the quality and rigor of their
local evaluations, and support their
participation in the cross-site
evaluation. The project will evaluate the
programs and activities conducted
through the RPG Program. The
evaluation is being undertaken by the
Children’s Bureau and its contractor
Mathematica Policy Research. The
evaluation is being implemented by
Mathematica Policy Research and its
subcontractors, WRMA, Inc., and
Synergy Enterprises.
The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation
includes the following components:
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
64160
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices
1. Implementation and Partnership
Study. The RPG cross-site
implementation and partnership study
will contribute to building the
knowledge base about effective
implementation strategies by examining
the process of implementation in the 21
RPG projects, with a focus on factors
shown in the research literature to be
associated with quality implementation
of evidence-based programs. This
component of the study describes the
RPG projects’ target populations,
selected interventions and their fit with
the target populations, inputs to
implementation, and actual services
provided (including dosage, duration,
content, adherence to curricula, and
participant responsiveness). It examines
the key attributes of the regional
partnerships that grantees develop (for
example, partnerships among child
welfare and substance abuse treatment
providers, social services, and family
courts). It describes the characteristics
and roles of the partner organizations,
the extent of coordination and
collaboration, and their potential to
sustain the partnerships after the grant
ends. Key data collection activities of
the implementation and partnership
study are: (1) Conducting site visits
during which researchers interview RPG
program directors, managers,
supervisors, and frontline staff who
work directly with families; (2)
administering a survey to frontline staff
involved in providing direct services to
children, adults, and families; (3) asking
grantees to provide information about
implementation and their partnerships
as part of their federally required semiannual progress reports; (4) obtaining
service use data from grantees,
enrollment date and demographics of
enrollees, exit date and reason, and
service participation, which are entered
into a web-based system operated by
Mathematica Policy Research and its
subcontractors; and (5) administering a
survey to representatives of the partner
organizations.
2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the
outcomes study is to describe the
changes that occur in children and
families who participate in the RPG
programs. This study will describe
participant outcomes in five domains:
(1) Child well-being, (2) family
functioning/stability, (3) adult recovery
from substance use disorder, (4) child
permanency, and (5) child safety. Two
main types of outcome data will be
used—both of which are being collected
by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative
child welfare and adult substance abuse
treatment records and (2) standardized
instruments administered to the parents
and/or caregivers. The Children’s
Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain
and report specified administrative
records, and to use a prescribed set of
standardized instruments. Grantees will
provide these data to the cross-site
evaluation team twice a year by
uploading them to a data system
operated by Mathematica Policy
Research and its subcontractors.
3. Impact Study. The goal of the
impact study is to assess the impact of
the RPG interventions on child, adult,
and family outcomes by comparing
outcomes for people enrolled in RPG
services to those in comparison groups,
such as people who do not receive RPG
services or receive only a subset of the
services. The impact study will use
demographic and outcome data on both
program (treatment) and comparison
groups from a subset of grantees with
appropriate local evaluation designs
such as randomized controlled trials or
strong quasi-experimental designs; 5 of
the 21 grantees have such designs. Sitespecific impacts will be estimated for
these seven grantees. Aggregated impact
estimates will be created by pooling
impact estimates across appropriate
sites to obtain a more powerful
summary of the effectiveness of RPG
interventions.
In addition to conducting local
evaluations and participating in the RPG
Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees
are legislatively required to report
performance indicators aligned with
their proposed program strategies and
activities. A key strategy of the RPG
Cross-Site Evaluation is to minimize
burden on the grantees by ensuring that
the cross-site evaluation, which
includes all grantees in a study that
collects data to report on
implementation, the partnerships, and
participant characteristics and
outcomes, fully meets the need for
performance reporting. Thus, rather
than collecting separate evaluation and
performance indicator data, the grantees
need only participate in the cross-site
evaluation. In addition, using the
standardized instruments that the
Children’s Bureau has specified will
ensure that grantees have valid and
reliable data on child and family
outcomes for their local evaluations.
The inclusion of an impact study
conducted on a subset of grantees with
rigorous designs will also provide the
Children’s Bureau, Congress, grantees,
providers, and researchers with
information about the effectiveness of
RPG programs.
A 60-Day Federal Register Notice was
published for this study on June 24,
2016. This 30-Day Federal Register
Notice covers the following data
collection activities: (1) The site visits
with grantees; (2) the web-based survey
of frontline staff who provide direct
services to children, adults, and
families, and their supervisors; (3) the
semi-annual progress reports; (4)
enrollment and service data provided by
grantees; (5) the web-based survey of
grantee partners; and (6) outcome data
provided by grantees.
Respondents. Respondents include
grantee staff or contractors (such as local
evaluators) and partner staff. Specific
types of respondents and the expected
number per data collection effort are
noted in the burden table below.
Annual burden estimates. The
following instruments are proposed for
public comment under this 30-Day
Federal Register Notice. Burden for all
components is annualized over three
years.
RPG CROSS-SITE EVALUATION ANNUALIZED BURDEN ESTIMATES
Total
number of
respondents
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Data collection activity
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
(in hours)
Estimated
Total
burden hours
Total
Annual
burden hours
Implementation and Partnership Study
Program director individual interview ...................................
Program manager/supervisor group interview .....................
Program manager/supervisor individual interviews .............
Frontline staff individual interviews ......................................
Semi-annual progress reports .............................................
Case enrollment data ...........................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:47 Sep 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
4
36
24
24
21
63
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1
1
1
1
6
90
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
2
2
1
1
16.5
0.25
19SEN1
8
72
24
24
2,079
1,417.5
2.67
24
8
8
693
472.5
64161
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices
RPG CROSS-SITE EVALUATION ANNUALIZED BURDEN ESTIMATES—Continued
Total
number of
respondents
Data collection activity
Service log entries ...............................................................
Staff survey ..........................................................................
Partner survey ......................................................................
Number of
responses per
respondent
126
80
80
Average
burden hours
per response
(in hours)
2,340
1
1
Estimated
Total
burden hours
Total
Annual
burden hours
0.05
0.42
0.33
14,742
33.6
26.4
4,914
11.2
8.8
Data Entry for Outcomes Study
Administrative Data:
Obtain access to administrative data ...........................
Report administrative data ............................................
Standardized instruments:
Enter data into local database ......................................
Review records and submit ..........................................
21
21
2
6
18
144
378
18,144
126
6,048
21
21
6
6
112.5
100
14,175
12,600
4,725
4,200
Additional Data Entry for Impact Study
Data entry for comparison study sites (7 grantees) ............
5
1
.25
1,085
361.6
Estimated Total Burden Hours ............................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
21,602.77
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Children’s Bureau within the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416, Attn: ACF
Reports Clearance Officer. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All
requests should be identified by the title
of the information collection.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Email:
OIRASUBMISSION@OMB.EoP.GOV,
Attn: Desk Officer for the
Administration of Children and
Families.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–22458 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Child Care and
Development Fund Financial Report
(ACF–696) for States and Territories
OMB No.: 0970–0163.
Description: States and Territories use
the Financial Report Form ACF–696 to
report Child Care and Development
Fund (CCDF) expenditures. Authority to
collect and report this information is
found in section 658G of the Child Care
and Development Block Grant Act of
1990, as revised. In addition to the
Program Reporting Requirements set
forth in 45 CFR part 98, subpart H, the
regulations at 45 CFR 98.65(g) and
98.67(c)(1) authorize the Secretary to
require financial reports as necessary.
The form provides specific data
regarding claims and provides a
mechanism for States to request Child
Care grant awards and to certify the
availability of State matching funds.
Failure to collect this data would
seriously compromise ACF’s ability to
monitor Child Care and Development
Fund expenditures. This information is
also used to estimate outlays and may
be used to prepare ACF budget
submissions to Congress.
The previous information collection
requirements related to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
of 2009, (Pub. L.111–5) have been
deleted from this reporting form.
Respondents: States and territories.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Total burden
hours
ACF–696 ..........................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Instrument
56
4
5
1120
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1120.
Additional Information: Copies of the
proposed collection may be obtained by
writing to the Administration for
Children and Families, Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:47 Sep 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
Planning, Research and Evaluation, 330
C Street SW., Washington, DC 20201.
Attention Reports Clearance Officer. All
requests should be identified by the title
of the information collection. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OMB Comment: OMB is required to
make a decision concerning the
collection of information between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64159-64161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22458]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation 30-Day Notice
AGENCY: Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families,
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation Technical
Assistance.
OMB No.: 0970-0444.
Description: The Children's Bureau within the Administration for
Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services seeks a renewal of clearance to collect information for the
Regional Partnership Grants to Increase the Well-being of and to
Improve Permanency Outcomes for Children Affected by Substance Abuse
Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation-Related Technical Assistance and
Data Collection Support for Regional Partnership Grant Program Round
Three Sites or ``RPG'' projects. Under RPG, the Children's Bureau has
issued 21 grants to organizations such as child welfare or substance
abuse treatment providers or family court systems to develop
interagency collaborations and integration of programs, activities, and
services designed to increase well-being, improve permanency, and
enhance the safety of children who are in an out-of-home placement or
are at risk of being placed in out-of-home care as a result of a
parent's or caretaker's substance use dependence. The Child and Family
Services Improvement and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-34) includes a
targeted grants program (section 437(f) of the Social Security Act)
that directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reserve a
specified portion of the appropriation for these Regional Partnership
Grants, to be used to improve the well-being of children affected by
substance abuse. The overall objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation and
Technical Assistance projects (the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to
plan, develop, and implement a rigorous national cross-site evaluation
of the RPG Grant Program, provide legislatively-mandated performance
measurement, furnish evaluation-related technical assistance to the
grantees in order to improve the quality and rigor of their local
evaluations, and support their participation in the cross-site
evaluation. The project will evaluate the programs and activities
conducted through the RPG Program. The evaluation is being undertaken
by the Children's Bureau and its contractor Mathematica Policy
Research. The evaluation is being implemented by Mathematica Policy
Research and its subcontractors, WRMA, Inc., and Synergy Enterprises.
The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation includes the following components:
[[Page 64160]]
1. Implementation and Partnership Study. The RPG cross-site
implementation and partnership study will contribute to building the
knowledge base about effective implementation strategies by examining
the process of implementation in the 21 RPG projects, with a focus on
factors shown in the research literature to be associated with quality
implementation of evidence-based programs. This component of the study
describes the RPG projects' target populations, selected interventions
and their fit with the target populations, inputs to implementation,
and actual services provided (including dosage, duration, content,
adherence to curricula, and participant responsiveness). It examines
the key attributes of the regional partnerships that grantees develop
(for example, partnerships among child welfare and substance abuse
treatment providers, social services, and family courts). It describes
the characteristics and roles of the partner organizations, the extent
of coordination and collaboration, and their potential to sustain the
partnerships after the grant ends. Key data collection activities of
the implementation and partnership study are: (1) Conducting site
visits during which researchers interview RPG program directors,
managers, supervisors, and frontline staff who work directly with
families; (2) administering a survey to frontline staff involved in
providing direct services to children, adults, and families; (3) asking
grantees to provide information about implementation and their
partnerships as part of their federally required semi-annual progress
reports; (4) obtaining service use data from grantees, enrollment date
and demographics of enrollees, exit date and reason, and service
participation, which are entered into a web-based system operated by
Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors; and (5)
administering a survey to representatives of the partner organizations.
2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the outcomes study is to describe
the changes that occur in children and families who participate in the
RPG programs. This study will describe participant outcomes in five
domains: (1) Child well-being, (2) family functioning/stability, (3)
adult recovery from substance use disorder, (4) child permanency, and
(5) child safety. Two main types of outcome data will be used--both of
which are being collected by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative child
welfare and adult substance abuse treatment records and (2)
standardized instruments administered to the parents and/or caregivers.
The Children's Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain and report
specified administrative records, and to use a prescribed set of
standardized instruments. Grantees will provide these data to the
cross-site evaluation team twice a year by uploading them to a data
system operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors.
3. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to assess the
impact of the RPG interventions on child, adult, and family outcomes by
comparing outcomes for people enrolled in RPG services to those in
comparison groups, such as people who do not receive RPG services or
receive only a subset of the services. The impact study will use
demographic and outcome data on both program (treatment) and comparison
groups from a subset of grantees with appropriate local evaluation
designs such as randomized controlled trials or strong quasi-
experimental designs; 5 of the 21 grantees have such designs. Site-
specific impacts will be estimated for these seven grantees. Aggregated
impact estimates will be created by pooling impact estimates across
appropriate sites to obtain a more powerful summary of the
effectiveness of RPG interventions.
In addition to conducting local evaluations and participating in
the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees are legislatively
required to report performance indicators aligned with their proposed
program strategies and activities. A key strategy of the RPG Cross-Site
Evaluation is to minimize burden on the grantees by ensuring that the
cross-site evaluation, which includes all grantees in a study that
collects data to report on implementation, the partnerships, and
participant characteristics and outcomes, fully meets the need for
performance reporting. Thus, rather than collecting separate evaluation
and performance indicator data, the grantees need only participate in
the cross-site evaluation. In addition, using the standardized
instruments that the Children's Bureau has specified will ensure that
grantees have valid and reliable data on child and family outcomes for
their local evaluations. The inclusion of an impact study conducted on
a subset of grantees with rigorous designs will also provide the
Children's Bureau, Congress, grantees, providers, and researchers with
information about the effectiveness of RPG programs.
A 60-Day Federal Register Notice was published for this study on
June 24, 2016. This 30-Day Federal Register Notice covers the following
data collection activities: (1) The site visits with grantees; (2) the
web-based survey of frontline staff who provide direct services to
children, adults, and families, and their supervisors; (3) the semi-
annual progress reports; (4) enrollment and service data provided by
grantees; (5) the web-based survey of grantee partners; and (6) outcome
data provided by grantees.
Respondents. Respondents include grantee staff or contractors (such
as local evaluators) and partner staff. Specific types of respondents
and the expected number per data collection effort are noted in the
burden table below.
Annual burden estimates. The following instruments are proposed for
public comment under this 30-Day Federal Register Notice. Burden for
all components is annualized over three years.
RPG Cross-Site Evaluation Annualized Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden
Total number Number of hours per Estimated Total Annual
Data collection activity of respondents responses per response (in Total burden burden hours
respondent hours) hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation and Partnership Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program director individual 4 1 2 8 2.67
interview......................
Program manager/supervisor group 36 1 2 72 24
interview......................
Program manager/supervisor 24 1 1 24 8
individual interviews..........
Frontline staff individual 24 1 1 24 8
interviews.....................
Semi-annual progress reports.... 21 6 16.5 2,079 693
Case enrollment data............ 63 90 0.25 1,417.5 472.5
[[Page 64161]]
Service log entries............. 126 2,340 0.05 14,742 4,914
Staff survey.................... 80 1 0.42 33.6 11.2
Partner survey.................. 80 1 0.33 26.4 8.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data Entry for Outcomes Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Data:
Obtain access to 21 2 18 378 126
administrative data........
Report administrative data.. 21 6 144 18,144 6,048
Standardized instruments:
Enter data into local 21 6 112.5 14,175 4,725
database...................
Review records and submit... 21 6 100 12,600 4,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Data Entry for Impact Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data entry for comparison study 5 1 .25 1,085 361.6
sites (7 grantees).............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Burden Hours.... .............. .............. .............. .............. 21,602.77
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Children's Bureau within the
Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing to Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street
SW., Washington, DC 20416, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of
information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document
in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having
its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Email:
OIRASUBMISSION@OMB.EoP.GOV, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration
of Children and Families.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-22458 Filed 9-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
