Biosimilar User Fee Act; Public Meeting, 64171-64175 [2016-22442]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices
The burden for this collection of
information is as follows. For each data
collection, the respondents includes: (1)
The person in charge of the selected
facility type (whether it be a health care
facility, school, or supermarket/grocery
store); and (2) the program director (or
designated individual) of the respective
regulatory authority. To provide the
sufficient number of observations
needed to conduct a statistically
significant analysis of the data, FDA has
determined that 400 data collections
will be required in each of the three
facility types. Therefore, the total
number of responses will be 2,400 (400
data collections × 3 facility types × 2
respondents per data collection).
The burden associated with the
completion of Sections 1 and 3 of the
form is specific to the persons in charge
of the selected facilities. It includes the
time it will take the persons in charge
to accompany the data collectors during
the site visit and answer the data
collectors’ questions. The burden
related to the completion of Section 2 of
the form is specific to the program
directors (or designated individuals) of
the respective regulatory authorities. It
includes the time it will take to answer
the data collectors’ questions and is the
same regardless of the facility type.
To calculate the estimate of the hours
per response, FDA uses the average data
collection duration for similar facility
types during FDA’s 2008 Risk Factor
Study (Ref. 3) plus an extra 30 minutes
(0.5 hours) for the information
collection related to Section 3, Part B of
the form. FDA estimates that it will take
the persons in charge of health care
facility types, schools, and retail food
stores 150 minutes (2.5 hours), 120
minutes (2 hours), and 180 minutes (3
hours), respectively, to accompany the
data collectors while they complete
Sections 1 and 3 of the form. FDA
64171
estimates that it will take the program
director (or designated individual) of
the respective regulatory authority 30
minutes (0.5 hours) to answer the
questions related to Section 2 of the
form. The total burden estimate for a
data collection, including both the
program director’s and the person in
charge’s responses, in health care
facility types is 180 minutes (150+30)(3
hours), in schools is 150 minutes
(120+30)(2.5 hours), and in retail food
stores is 210 minutes (180+30)(3.5
hours).
Based on the number of entry refusals
from the 2013–2014 Risk Factor Study
in the restaurant facility types, we
estimate a refusal rate of 2 percent in the
institutional foodservice and retail food
store facility types. The estimate of the
time per non-respondent is 5 minutes
(0.08 hours) for the person in charge to
listen to the purpose of the visit and
provide a verbal refusal of entry.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
Activity
2015–2016 Data Collection (Health Care Facilities)—Completion of Sections 1 and 3.
2015–2016 Data Collection (Schools)—Completion
of Sections 1 and 3.
2015–2016 Data Collection (Retail Food Stores)—
Completion of Sections 1 and 3.
2015–2016 Data Collection-Completion of Section
2—All Facility Types.
2017–2018 Data Collection-Entry Refusals—All Facility Types.
Total Hours ..........................................................
1 There
Total annual
responses
400
Number of
non-respondents
Number of
responses per
non-respondent
Total annual
non-responses
Average burden per
response
Total hours
........................
........................
........................
2.5 ..........................
1,000
400
1
400
1
400
........................
........................
........................
2 .............................
800
400
1
400
........................
........................
........................
3 .............................
1,200
1,200
1
1,200
........................
........................
........................
0.5 ..........................
600
........................
........................
........................
24
1
24
0.08 (5 minutes) .....
1.92
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
................................
3,601.92
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
II. References
The following references are on
display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) and are
available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, and are
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. FDA has verified
the Web site addresses, as of the date
this document publishes in the Federal
Register, but Web sites are subject to
change over time.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Number of
responses per
respondent
1. ‘‘Report of the FDA Retail Food Program
Database of Foodborne Illness Risk
Factors (2000).’’ Available at: https://
www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/Food
Safety/RetailFoodProtection/Foodborne
IllnessandRiskFactorReduction/Retail
FoodRiskFactorStudies/ucm123546.pdf.
2. ‘‘FDA Report on the Occurrence of
Foodborne Illness Risk Factors in
Selected Institutional Foodservice,
Restaurant, and Retail Food Store
Facility Types (2004).’’ Available at:
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/
GuidanceRegulation/RetailFood
Protection/FoodborneIllnessRiskFactor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:47 Sep 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
Reduction/UCM423850.pdf.
3. ‘‘FDA Report on the Occurrence of
Foodborne Illness Risk Factors in
Selected Institutional Foodservice,
Restaurant, and Retail Food Store
Facility Types (2009).’’ Available at:
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/
FoodSafety/RetailFoodProtection/Food
borneIllnessandRiskFactorReduction/
RetailFoodRiskFactorStudies/
UCM224682.pdf.
4. FDA National Retail Food Team. ‘‘FDA
Trend Analysis Report on the
Occurrence of Foodborne Illness Risk
Factors in Selected Institutional
Foodservice, Restaurant, and Retail Food
Store Facility Types (1998–2008).’’
Available at: https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/Food/FoodSafety/RetailFood
Protection/FoodborneIllnessandRisk
FactorReduction/RetailFoodRiskFactor
Studies/UCM224152.pdf.
5. ‘‘FDA Food Code.’’ Available at: https://
www.fda.gov/FoodCode.
Dated: September 13, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–22438 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–3326]
Biosimilar User Fee Act; Public
Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing a public meeting to discuss
proposed recommendations for the
reauthorization of the Biosimilar User
Fee Act (BsUFA) for fiscal years (FYs)
2018 through 2022. BsUFA authorizes
FDA to collect fees and use them for the
process for the review of biosimilar
biological product applications. The
current legislative authority for BsUFA
expires in September 2017. At that time,
new legislation will be required for FDA
to continue collecting biosimilar
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
64172
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices
biological product user fees in future
fiscal years. Following an initial
consultation with public stakeholders
and discussions with the regulated
industry, the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) directs
FDA to publish the recommendations
for the reauthorized program in the
Federal Register, hold a meeting at
which the public may present its views
on such recommendations, and provide
for a period of 30 days for the public to
provide written comments on such
recommendations. FDA will then
consider the public views and
comments and revise the
recommendations as necessary.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on October 20, 2016, from 9 a.m. to 2
p.m. Please register for the meeting by
October 19, 2016, at https://
bsufapublicmeeting.eventbrite.com.
Submit electronic or written comments
to the public docket by October 19,
2016.
The meeting will be held at
the FDA White Oak Campus, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (rm.
1503, Section A), Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002. Participants must enter
through Building 1 and undergo
security screening. For more
information on parking and security
procedures, please refer to https://
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/
WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/
WhiteOakCampusInformation/ucm
241740.htm.
You may submit comments as
follows:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:47 Sep 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2015–N–3326 for ‘‘Biosimilar User Fee
Act; Public Meeting.’’ Received
comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FDA will post the agenda
approximately 5 days before the meeting
at: https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/
UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/
ucm461774.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Roache, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1176,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
4548, FAX: 301–847–8443,
amanda.roache@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
FDA is announcing a public meeting
to discuss proposed recommendations
for the reauthorization of BsUFA, the
legislation that authorizes FDA to
collect user fees and use them for the
process for the review of biosimilar
biological product applications. The
current authorization of the program
(BsUFA I) expires in September 2017.
Without new legislation, FDA will no
longer be able to collect user fees for
future fiscal years to fund the process
for the review of biosimilar biological
product applications. Section 744I(e)(2)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 379j–
53(e)(2)) requires that after FDA holds
negotiations with regulated industry, we
do the following: (1) Present
recommendations to the relevant
Congressional committees, (2) publish
recommendations in the Federal
Register, (3) provide a period of 30 days
for the public to provide written
comments on the recommendations, (4)
hold a meeting at which the public may
present its views on the
recommendations, and (5) after
consideration of public views and
comments, revise the recommendations
as necessary.
This notice, the 30-day comment
period, and the public meeting will
satisfy some of these requirements.
The purpose of the meeting is to hear
the public’s views on the proposed
recommendations for the
reauthorization of BsUFA II. The
following information is provided to
help potential meeting participants
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices
better understand the history and
evolution of the BsUFA program and the
proposed BsUFA II recommendations.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
II. What is BsUFA and what does it do?
BsUFA is a law that authorizes FDA
to collect fees from drug companies that
submit marketing applications for
certain biosimilar biological products.
BsUFA was originally enacted in 2012
as the Biosimilar User Fee Act (Pub. L.
112–144) for a period of 5 years.
BsUFA’s intent is to provide
additional revenues so that FDA can
hire more staff, improve systems, and
establish a better-managed biosimilar
biological product review process to
make important therapies available to
patients sooner without compromising
review quality or FDA’s high standards
for safety, efficacy, and quality. As part
of FDA’s agreement with industry
during each reauthorization, the Agency
agrees to certain performance goals.
These goals apply to the process for the
review of new biosimilar biological
product applications, resubmissions of
original applications, and new and
resubmitted supplements to approved
applications. Phased in over the 5 years
of BsUFA I, the goals were to review
and act on 90 percent of original
biosimilar biological product
application submissions within 10
months of receipt and resubmitted
original biosimilar biological product
applications within 6 months of receipt;
to review and act on 90 percent of
original supplements with clinical data
within 10 months of receipt and
resubmitted supplements with clinical
data within 6 months of receipt; and
review and act on 90 percent of
manufacturing supplements within 6
months of receipt.
III. Proposed BsUFA II
Recommendations
In preparing the proposed
recommendations to Congress for
BsUFA reauthorization, FDA conducted
discussions with the regulated industry
and consulted with stakeholders, as
required by the law. We began the
BsUFA reauthorization process by
publishing a notice in the Federal
Register requesting public input on the
reauthorization and announcing a
public meeting that was held on
December 18, 2015. The meeting
included presentations by FDA and a
series of panels with representatives of
different stakeholder groups, including
patient advocates, consumer groups,
regulated industry, health professionals,
and academic researchers. The materials
from the meeting, including a transcript
and Webcast recording, can be found at
https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:47 Sep 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
64173
UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/
ucm461774.htm.
Following the December 2015 public
meeting, FDA conducted negotiations
with the regulated industry from March
2016 through May 2016. FDA posted
minutes of these meetings on its Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/
UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/
ucm461774.htm.
The proposed enhancements for
BsUFA II address many of the top
priorities identified by public
stakeholders, the regulated industry,
and FDA. While some of the proposed
enhancements are new, many either
build on successful enhancements or
refine elements from the existing
program. The enhancements are
proposed in the following areas: Review
performance, meeting management,
guidance development, and
administrative areas (hiring and
financial management). The full text of
the proposed BsUFA II commitment
letter can be found here at https://
www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/
BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/
ucm461774.htm. Each significant new
or modified enhancement is described
briefly in sections III.A through III.K.
biological products in the form of presubmission meetings, mid-cycle
communications, and late-cycle
meetings, while also adding 60 days to
the review timeframe to accommodate
this additional interaction.
This enhancement is described in
section I.B. of the proposed BsUFA II
commitment letter.
A. The Review Cycle
FDA and the regulated industry
jointly identified an opportunity to
reduce multiple review cycles for
biosimilar biological products by
increasing transparency and
communication during the review
process of a 351(k) application. For
BsUFA II, it is therefore proposed to
establish a model for the review of
biosimilar biological products similar to
the Program for Enhanced Review
Transparency and Communication for
New Molecular Entity New Drug
Applications and original Biologics
License Applications (the Program) that
was established in the fifth
authorization of the Prescription Drug
User Fee Act (PDUFA).
The Program was first established for
PDUFA in 2012. An interim assessment
of the Program suggested that it has
created conditions that enhance the
ability of applicants and FDA reviewers
to work toward application approval in
the first cycle (see https://www.fda.gov/
ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrug
UserFee/ucm327030.htm). Likewise, it
is anticipated that the review model will
promote efficiency and effectiveness of
the first cycle review process and
minimize the number of review cycles
necessary for approval for 351(k)
applications.
The Program will allow for additional
communication between FDA review
teams and the applicants of biosimilar
Further clarity is needed regarding the
types of clinical study protocols that
may qualify for a Special Protocol
Assessment and Agreement under
BsUFA. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and
Pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity
studies should be added to the examples
provided in the goals letter. It is
proposed that the language in the goals
is revised to include PK and PD
similarity studies. This enhancement is
described in section I.H.1.c of the
proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. Review Goal Extension for Missing
Manufacturing Facilities
When manufacturing facilities are not
adequately identified, this may result in
the need for FDA to conduct inspections
late in the review process. This can
adversely impact FDA’s ability to
complete application review within the
performance goal timeframes.
Accordingly, FDA proposes to extend
the goal date for an original application
or a supplement when FDA identifies a
need to inspect a facility that was not
included in a comprehensive and
readily located list of manufacturing
facilities. This enhancement is
described in section I.A.5.b of the
proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
C. Special Protocol Assessment and
Agreement
D. Prior Approval Manufacturing
Supplements
The review goal date for biosimilar
prior approval manufacturing
supplements is currently 6 months
under BsUFA I, compared to 4 months
for stand-alone biologics under PDUFA.
Therefore, to increase consistency
among user fee programs, it is proposed
that prior approval manufacturing
supplements are reviewed in 4 months,
instead of 6 months, with a phased-in
performance goal. The language for
prior approval supplements is included
in section I.A.3 of the proposed BsUFA
II commitment letter.
E. Meeting Management
The enhancements in this section
focus on FDA’s ability to better manage
meetings with sponsors of 351(k)
applications. The details for these
enhancements can be found in section
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
64174
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices
I.I of the proposed BsUFA II
commitment letter.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
1. Addition of a Written Response
Meeting Format for Biosimilar Initial
Advisory (BIA) and Biosimilar Program
Development (BPD) Type 2 Meetings
Currently, there is no mechanism to
grant a meeting request and provide a
written response in place of a face-toface meeting, videoconference, or
teleconference. From FY 2013 to
FY2015, FDA provided written
responses to sponsors for 16 out of 22
meetings that were denied or cancelled
due to incomplete, premature, or
unnecessary requests in order to support
biosimilar development programs. Such
responses are not on a user fee clock
and are not tracked work. For BsUFA II,
it is proposed that for BIA and BPD
Type 2 meetings, the sponsor may
request a written response to questions
rather than a face-to-face meeting,
videoconference, or teleconference. If a
written response is deemed appropriate,
FDA will notify the requester of the date
it intends to send the written response.
This date will be consistent with the
timeframes specified for the specific
meeting type.
2. Increase the Scheduling Timeframe
for BPD Type 2 Meetings
The FDA has had challenges
scheduling BPD type 2 meetings within
the 75-day timeframe. Scheduling
challenges occur due to an increasing
number of Type 2 meetings to discuss
novel and complex aspects of
development that require extensive
internal discussion. A review committee
must address many of these aspects to
ensure implementation of consistent
scientific advice and policy concerning
biosimilar development. Consequently,
FDA is unable to answer and provide
comprehensive responses to such
questions at meetings within the 75-day
timeframe. This results in unresolved
issues and additional followup
questions that ultimately leads to a
delay in a sponsor’s overall
development program. To provide the
necessary time for FDA discussions and
to develop comprehensive responses, it
is proposed that BPD Type 2 Meetings
occur within 90 calendar days, instead
of 75 days, from receipt of the meeting
request and meeting package with a
phased in performance goal.
Additionally, it is proposed that the
Agency will send preliminary responses
to the sponsor’s questions contained in
the background package no later than
five calendar days before the face-to-face
videoconference or teleconference
meeting date for BPD Type 2 and Type
3 meetings.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:47 Sep 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
3. Reduce the Scheduling Timeframe for
Biosimilar Initial Advisory (BIA)
Meetings
On average, five BIA meetings were
scheduled per fiscal year from 2013 to
2015. The content of a BIA meeting is
limited to a general discussion on
whether a proposed product could be
developed as a biosimilar product and
to provide high-level advice on the
expected content of the development
program. Targeted advice on the
adequacy of any comparative data or
extensive advice for any aspect of an
ongoing biosimilar development
program is not expected to be provided
in a BIA meeting. The current 90-day
scheduling timeframe may no longer be
appropriate and should be shortened.
Therefore, it is proposed for BIA
meetings to occur within 75 calendar
days, instead of 90 days, from receipt of
the meeting request and meeting
package.
F. Guidance Development
FDA has received feedback that
additional clarity is needed on
regulatory processes and the scientific
criteria for biosimilar development and
approval to provide certainty to
industry and other stakeholders related
to Agency expectations. Therefore, it is
proposed that FDA revise its guidance
entitled ‘‘Formal Meetings Between the
FDA and Biosimilar Biological Product
Sponsors or Applicants’’ and update the
draft guidance entitled ‘‘Best Practices
for Communication Between IND
Sponsors and FDA During Drug
Development’’ to include
communications between IND sponsors
and FDA during biosimilar biological
product development. Additionally, it is
proposed that FDA publish draft or final
guidance on several issues related to
biosimilar biological product
development including considerations
in demonstrating interchangeability
with a reference product; statistical
considerations for analytic similarity for
biosimilar biological products;
processes and further considerations
related to post-approval manufacturing
changes for biosimilar biological
products; clinical pharmacology data to
support a demonstration of biosimilarity
to a reference product; nonproprietary
naming of biological products; and
labeling for biosimilar biological
products. The proposed goals related to
guidance development are described in
sections I.I.6 and II of the proposed
BsUFA II commitment letter.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
G. Improving FDA Hiring and Retention
of Review Staff
To speed and improve development
of safe and effective biosimilar
biological products for patients, FDA
must hire and retain sufficient numbers
and types of technical and scientific
experts to efficiently conduct reviews of
351(k) applications. In order to
strengthen this core function during
BsUFA II, FDA proposes to implement
a full time equivalent staff-based
position management system capability
and an online position classification
system. In addition, FDA will complete
implementation of corporate recruiting
practices, augment hiring capacity with
expert contractor support, establish a
dedicated function for staffing of the
human drug review program, establish
clear goals for biosimilar review
program hiring, and conduct
comprehensive and continuous
assessments of hiring and retention
performance. These enhancements are
described in section V of the proposed
BsUFA II commitment letter.
H. Enhancing Capacity for Biosimilar
Guidance Development, Reviewer
Training, and Timely Communication
In order to accelerate patient access to
safe and effective biosimilar biological
products and ensure accuracy,
consistency, and timeliness FDA needs
a more focused and better resourced
capacity to coordinate key legal,
scientific, review, and outreach
functions in FDA’s development phase
advice and premarket review. It is
proposed that FDA strengthen its staff
capacity to: (1) Develop new regulations
and guidance to clarify scientific criteria
for biosimilar development and
approval, and to provide certainty to
industry and other stakeholders on key
regulatory issues including the scope of
eligible biosimilar biological products;
(2) develop or revise manuals of policy
and procedures, standard operating
procedures, and review templates to
facilitate rapid update and application
of new policies and guidance by review
staff, and to develop and deliver timely,
comprehensive training to all Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research and
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research review staff and special
government employees involved in the
review of 351(k) BLAs; (3) deliver
timely information to the public to
improve public understanding of
biosimilarity and interchangeability;
and (4) deliver information concerning
the date of first licensure and the
reference product exclusivity expiry
date, to be included in the Purple
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices
Book.1 The language for enhanced
capacity is included in section III of the
proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
I. Enhancing Management of User Fee
Resources
FDA is committed to enhancing
management of BsUFA resources and
ensuring BsUFA user fee resources are
administered, allocated, and reported in
an efficient and transparent manner. In
BsUFA II, FDA proposes to establish a
resource capacity planning function to
improve its ability to analyze current
resource needs and project future
resource needs, to modernize its time
reporting approach, to conduct an
evaluation of BsUFA program resource
management, to publish a 5-year BsUFA
financial plan with annual updates, and
to convene an annual public meeting,
beginning in FY 2019, to discuss the
financial plan and progress towards the
financial management enhancements.
FDA also proposes to reduce the
carryover balance to no greater than 21
weeks of the FY 2022 target revenue by
the end of FY 2022. These
enhancements are described in section
IV of the proposed BsUFA II
commitment letter.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
J. Enhancements to Fee Structure and
Related Mechanisms for Increased
Predictability, Stability, and Efficiency
The current BsUFA fee structure
references PDUFA fees each fiscal year
and calculates biosimilar biological
product development program (BPD)
fees based on the PDUFA application
fee. FDA and industry agreed that the
BsUFA II fee structure and the fee
setting process could be updated to
enhance the predictability and stability
of fee amounts and revenues in a
manner to improve FDA’s ability to
engage in long-term financial planning.
To address these issues, FDA proposes
to discontinue the reduction of the
biosimilar biological product
application fee by the cumulative BPD
fees paid by sponsors, to discontinue
the establishment and supplement fees,
to rename the product fee as the BsUFA
Program fee, to modify the Program fee
billing date to minimize the need for
multiple billing cycles, and to add a
limitation that a sponsor shall not be
assessed more than five BsUFA Program
fees for a fiscal year for products
identified in each distinct approved
biosimilar biological product
application held by that sponsor.
1 The ‘‘Purple Book’’ lists biological products,
including any interchangeable biological products,
licensed by FDA under the Public Health Service
Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:47 Sep 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
K. Enhancements to User Fee Revenue
Amounts and Adjustments
FDA and industry agreed that the
BsUFA II user fee revenue amounts and
fee amounts should be independent of
PDUFA and based on BsUFA program
costs. FDA proposes to establish fees to
generate a total of $45 million in user
fee revenue for FY 2018. However, FDA
also proposes that it can adjust this
amount when setting the user fee
amounts published in the FY 2018
Federal Register notice to reflect an
updated assessment of the BsUFA
workload, with the limitation that this
adjustment cannot increase user fee
revenue by more than $9 million (i.e.
relative to the $45 million specified for
FY 2018 user fee revenue). To enhance
the predictability of user fee amounts,
FDA proposes that the amount for each
BsUFA fee cannot increase more than 25
percent from the respective FY2018 fee
amount until the capacity planning
adjustment is effective and that FDA can
otherwise modify the amount of the user
fee revenue generated from each fee
type each fiscal year. FDA proposes to
adjust the annual user fee revenue
amount for inflation, to develop a robust
methodology for adjusting fees based on
the capacity needs of the program, and
to introduce an annual operating reserve
adjustment to provide for adequate
carryover resources.
64175
industry). We will also provide an
opportunity for other organizations and
individuals to make presentations at the
meeting or to submit written comments
to the docket before the meeting.
FDA will also hold an open public
comment period at the meeting to give
the public an opportunity to present
their comments. Registration for open
public comment will occur at the
registration desk on the day of the
meeting and workshop on a first-come,
first-served basis.
Transcripts: As soon as a transcript is
available, FDA will post it at https://
www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/
BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/
ucm461774.htm.
Dated: September 13, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–22442 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–2673]
Progress Toward Implementing the
Product Identification Requirements of
the Drug Supply Chain Security Act;
Public Meeting; Request for Comments
IV. Purpose and Scope of the Meeting
AGENCY:
If you wish to attend this meeting,
visit https://
bsufapublicmeeting.eventbrite.com.
Please register by October 19, 2016. If
you are unable to attend the meeting in
person, you can register to view a live
Webcast of the meeting. You will be
asked to indicate in your registration if
you plan to attend in person or via the
Webcast. Seating will be limited, so
early registration is recommended.
Registration is free and will be on a firstcome, first-served basis. However, FDA
may limit the number of participants
from each organization based on space
limitations. Registrants will receive
confirmation once they have been
accepted. Onsite registration on the day
of the meeting will be based on space
availability. If you need special
accommodations because of a disability,
please contact Amanda Roache (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 7
days before the meeting.
The meeting will include a
presentation by FDA and a series of
invited panels representing different
stakeholder groups identified in the
statute (such as patient advocacy
groups, consumer advocacy groups,
health professionals, and regulated
HHS.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Food and Drug Administration,
Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing a
public meeting entitled ‘‘Progress
Toward Implementing the Product
Identification Requirements of the Drug
Supply Chain Security Act.’’ This
public meeting is intended to provide
members of the pharmaceutical
distribution supply chain and other
interested stakeholders an opportunity
to share information with FDA about the
efforts underway to implement the Drug
Supply Chain Security Act’s (DSCSA’s)
product identification requirements,
including the use of product identifiers
to enhance tracing at the product level.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on October 14, 2016, from 9 a.m. to 4
p.m. To permit the widest possible
opportunity to obtain public comment,
FDA is soliciting either electronic or
written comments on all aspects of the
public meeting topics. The deadline for
submitting comments related to this
public meeting is November 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at FDA’s White Oak Campus,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64171-64175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22442]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-3326]
Biosimilar User Fee Act; Public Meeting
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
a public meeting to discuss proposed recommendations for the
reauthorization of the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA) for fiscal years
(FYs) 2018 through 2022. BsUFA authorizes FDA to collect fees and use
them for the process for the review of biosimilar biological product
applications. The current legislative authority for BsUFA expires in
September 2017. At that time, new legislation will be required for FDA
to continue collecting biosimilar
[[Page 64172]]
biological product user fees in future fiscal years. Following an
initial consultation with public stakeholders and discussions with the
regulated industry, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C
Act) directs FDA to publish the recommendations for the reauthorized
program in the Federal Register, hold a meeting at which the public may
present its views on such recommendations, and provide for a period of
30 days for the public to provide written comments on such
recommendations. FDA will then consider the public views and comments
and revise the recommendations as necessary.
DATES: The public meeting will be held on October 20, 2016, from 9 a.m.
to 2 p.m. Please register for the meeting by October 19, 2016, at
https://bsufapublicmeeting.eventbrite.com. Submit electronic or written
comments to the public docket by October 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the FDA White Oak Campus, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31 Conference Center, the Great Room (rm.
1503, Section A), Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Participants must enter
through Building 1 and undergo security screening. For more information
on parking and security procedures, please refer to https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOakCampusInformation/ucm241740.htm.
You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2015-N-3326 for ``Biosimilar User Fee Act; Public Meeting.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FDA will post the agenda approximately 5 days before the meeting
at: https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/ucm461774.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Roache, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1176, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-
4548, FAX: 301-847-8443, amanda.roache@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
FDA is announcing a public meeting to discuss proposed
recommendations for the reauthorization of BsUFA, the legislation that
authorizes FDA to collect user fees and use them for the process for
the review of biosimilar biological product applications. The current
authorization of the program (BsUFA I) expires in September 2017.
Without new legislation, FDA will no longer be able to collect user
fees for future fiscal years to fund the process for the review of
biosimilar biological product applications. Section 744I(e)(2) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 379j-53(e)(2)) requires that after FDA holds
negotiations with regulated industry, we do the following: (1) Present
recommendations to the relevant Congressional committees, (2) publish
recommendations in the Federal Register, (3) provide a period of 30
days for the public to provide written comments on the recommendations,
(4) hold a meeting at which the public may present its views on the
recommendations, and (5) after consideration of public views and
comments, revise the recommendations as necessary.
This notice, the 30-day comment period, and the public meeting will
satisfy some of these requirements.
The purpose of the meeting is to hear the public's views on the
proposed recommendations for the reauthorization of BsUFA II. The
following information is provided to help potential meeting
participants
[[Page 64173]]
better understand the history and evolution of the BsUFA program and
the proposed BsUFA II recommendations.
II. What is BsUFA and what does it do?
BsUFA is a law that authorizes FDA to collect fees from drug
companies that submit marketing applications for certain biosimilar
biological products. BsUFA was originally enacted in 2012 as the
Biosimilar User Fee Act (Pub. L. 112-144) for a period of 5 years.
BsUFA's intent is to provide additional revenues so that FDA can
hire more staff, improve systems, and establish a better-managed
biosimilar biological product review process to make important
therapies available to patients sooner without compromising review
quality or FDA's high standards for safety, efficacy, and quality. As
part of FDA's agreement with industry during each reauthorization, the
Agency agrees to certain performance goals. These goals apply to the
process for the review of new biosimilar biological product
applications, resubmissions of original applications, and new and
resubmitted supplements to approved applications. Phased in over the 5
years of BsUFA I, the goals were to review and act on 90 percent of
original biosimilar biological product application submissions within
10 months of receipt and resubmitted original biosimilar biological
product applications within 6 months of receipt; to review and act on
90 percent of original supplements with clinical data within 10 months
of receipt and resubmitted supplements with clinical data within 6
months of receipt; and review and act on 90 percent of manufacturing
supplements within 6 months of receipt.
III. Proposed BsUFA II Recommendations
In preparing the proposed recommendations to Congress for BsUFA
reauthorization, FDA conducted discussions with the regulated industry
and consulted with stakeholders, as required by the law. We began the
BsUFA reauthorization process by publishing a notice in the Federal
Register requesting public input on the reauthorization and announcing
a public meeting that was held on December 18, 2015. The meeting
included presentations by FDA and a series of panels with
representatives of different stakeholder groups, including patient
advocates, consumer groups, regulated industry, health professionals,
and academic researchers. The materials from the meeting, including a
transcript and Webcast recording, can be found at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/ucm461774.htm.
Following the December 2015 public meeting, FDA conducted
negotiations with the regulated industry from March 2016 through May
2016. FDA posted minutes of these meetings on its Web site at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/ucm461774.htm.
The proposed enhancements for BsUFA II address many of the top
priorities identified by public stakeholders, the regulated industry,
and FDA. While some of the proposed enhancements are new, many either
build on successful enhancements or refine elements from the existing
program. The enhancements are proposed in the following areas: Review
performance, meeting management, guidance development, and
administrative areas (hiring and financial management). The full text
of the proposed BsUFA II commitment letter can be found here at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/ucm461774.htm. Each significant new or modified enhancement is
described briefly in sections III.A through III.K.
A. The Review Cycle
FDA and the regulated industry jointly identified an opportunity to
reduce multiple review cycles for biosimilar biological products by
increasing transparency and communication during the review process of
a 351(k) application. For BsUFA II, it is therefore proposed to
establish a model for the review of biosimilar biological products
similar to the Program for Enhanced Review Transparency and
Communication for New Molecular Entity New Drug Applications and
original Biologics License Applications (the Program) that was
established in the fifth authorization of the Prescription Drug User
Fee Act (PDUFA).
The Program was first established for PDUFA in 2012. An interim
assessment of the Program suggested that it has created conditions that
enhance the ability of applicants and FDA reviewers to work toward
application approval in the first cycle (see https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/ucm327030.htm). Likewise,
it is anticipated that the review model will promote efficiency and
effectiveness of the first cycle review process and minimize the number
of review cycles necessary for approval for 351(k) applications.
The Program will allow for additional communication between FDA
review teams and the applicants of biosimilar biological products in
the form of pre-submission meetings, mid-cycle communications, and
late-cycle meetings, while also adding 60 days to the review timeframe
to accommodate this additional interaction.
This enhancement is described in section I.B. of the proposed BsUFA
II commitment letter.
B. Review Goal Extension for Missing Manufacturing Facilities
When manufacturing facilities are not adequately identified, this
may result in the need for FDA to conduct inspections late in the
review process. This can adversely impact FDA's ability to complete
application review within the performance goal timeframes. Accordingly,
FDA proposes to extend the goal date for an original application or a
supplement when FDA identifies a need to inspect a facility that was
not included in a comprehensive and readily located list of
manufacturing facilities. This enhancement is described in section
I.A.5.b of the proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
C. Special Protocol Assessment and Agreement
Further clarity is needed regarding the types of clinical study
protocols that may qualify for a Special Protocol Assessment and
Agreement under BsUFA. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD)
similarity studies should be added to the examples provided in the
goals letter. It is proposed that the language in the goals is revised
to include PK and PD similarity studies. This enhancement is described
in section I.H.1.c of the proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
D. Prior Approval Manufacturing Supplements
The review goal date for biosimilar prior approval manufacturing
supplements is currently 6 months under BsUFA I, compared to 4 months
for stand-alone biologics under PDUFA. Therefore, to increase
consistency among user fee programs, it is proposed that prior approval
manufacturing supplements are reviewed in 4 months, instead of 6
months, with a phased-in performance goal. The language for prior
approval supplements is included in section I.A.3 of the proposed BsUFA
II commitment letter.
E. Meeting Management
The enhancements in this section focus on FDA's ability to better
manage meetings with sponsors of 351(k) applications. The details for
these enhancements can be found in section
[[Page 64174]]
I.I of the proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
1. Addition of a Written Response Meeting Format for Biosimilar Initial
Advisory (BIA) and Biosimilar Program Development (BPD) Type 2 Meetings
Currently, there is no mechanism to grant a meeting request and
provide a written response in place of a face-to-face meeting,
videoconference, or teleconference. From FY 2013 to FY2015, FDA
provided written responses to sponsors for 16 out of 22 meetings that
were denied or cancelled due to incomplete, premature, or unnecessary
requests in order to support biosimilar development programs. Such
responses are not on a user fee clock and are not tracked work. For
BsUFA II, it is proposed that for BIA and BPD Type 2 meetings, the
sponsor may request a written response to questions rather than a face-
to-face meeting, videoconference, or teleconference. If a written
response is deemed appropriate, FDA will notify the requester of the
date it intends to send the written response. This date will be
consistent with the timeframes specified for the specific meeting type.
2. Increase the Scheduling Timeframe for BPD Type 2 Meetings
The FDA has had challenges scheduling BPD type 2 meetings within
the 75-day timeframe. Scheduling challenges occur due to an increasing
number of Type 2 meetings to discuss novel and complex aspects of
development that require extensive internal discussion. A review
committee must address many of these aspects to ensure implementation
of consistent scientific advice and policy concerning biosimilar
development. Consequently, FDA is unable to answer and provide
comprehensive responses to such questions at meetings within the 75-day
timeframe. This results in unresolved issues and additional followup
questions that ultimately leads to a delay in a sponsor's overall
development program. To provide the necessary time for FDA discussions
and to develop comprehensive responses, it is proposed that BPD Type 2
Meetings occur within 90 calendar days, instead of 75 days, from
receipt of the meeting request and meeting package with a phased in
performance goal. Additionally, it is proposed that the Agency will
send preliminary responses to the sponsor's questions contained in the
background package no later than five calendar days before the face-to-
face videoconference or teleconference meeting date for BPD Type 2 and
Type 3 meetings.
3. Reduce the Scheduling Timeframe for Biosimilar Initial Advisory
(BIA) Meetings
On average, five BIA meetings were scheduled per fiscal year from
2013 to 2015. The content of a BIA meeting is limited to a general
discussion on whether a proposed product could be developed as a
biosimilar product and to provide high-level advice on the expected
content of the development program. Targeted advice on the adequacy of
any comparative data or extensive advice for any aspect of an ongoing
biosimilar development program is not expected to be provided in a BIA
meeting. The current 90-day scheduling timeframe may no longer be
appropriate and should be shortened. Therefore, it is proposed for BIA
meetings to occur within 75 calendar days, instead of 90 days, from
receipt of the meeting request and meeting package.
F. Guidance Development
FDA has received feedback that additional clarity is needed on
regulatory processes and the scientific criteria for biosimilar
development and approval to provide certainty to industry and other
stakeholders related to Agency expectations. Therefore, it is proposed
that FDA revise its guidance entitled ``Formal Meetings Between the FDA
and Biosimilar Biological Product Sponsors or Applicants'' and update
the draft guidance entitled ``Best Practices for Communication Between
IND Sponsors and FDA During Drug Development'' to include
communications between IND sponsors and FDA during biosimilar
biological product development. Additionally, it is proposed that FDA
publish draft or final guidance on several issues related to biosimilar
biological product development including considerations in
demonstrating interchangeability with a reference product; statistical
considerations for analytic similarity for biosimilar biological
products; processes and further considerations related to post-approval
manufacturing changes for biosimilar biological products; clinical
pharmacology data to support a demonstration of biosimilarity to a
reference product; nonproprietary naming of biological products; and
labeling for biosimilar biological products. The proposed goals related
to guidance development are described in sections I.I.6 and II of the
proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
G. Improving FDA Hiring and Retention of Review Staff
To speed and improve development of safe and effective biosimilar
biological products for patients, FDA must hire and retain sufficient
numbers and types of technical and scientific experts to efficiently
conduct reviews of 351(k) applications. In order to strengthen this
core function during BsUFA II, FDA proposes to implement a full time
equivalent staff-based position management system capability and an
online position classification system. In addition, FDA will complete
implementation of corporate recruiting practices, augment hiring
capacity with expert contractor support, establish a dedicated function
for staffing of the human drug review program, establish clear goals
for biosimilar review program hiring, and conduct comprehensive and
continuous assessments of hiring and retention performance. These
enhancements are described in section V of the proposed BsUFA II
commitment letter.
H. Enhancing Capacity for Biosimilar Guidance Development, Reviewer
Training, and Timely Communication
In order to accelerate patient access to safe and effective
biosimilar biological products and ensure accuracy, consistency, and
timeliness FDA needs a more focused and better resourced capacity to
coordinate key legal, scientific, review, and outreach functions in
FDA's development phase advice and premarket review. It is proposed
that FDA strengthen its staff capacity to: (1) Develop new regulations
and guidance to clarify scientific criteria for biosimilar development
and approval, and to provide certainty to industry and other
stakeholders on key regulatory issues including the scope of eligible
biosimilar biological products; (2) develop or revise manuals of policy
and procedures, standard operating procedures, and review templates to
facilitate rapid update and application of new policies and guidance by
review staff, and to develop and deliver timely, comprehensive training
to all Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research review staff and special government employees
involved in the review of 351(k) BLAs; (3) deliver timely information
to the public to improve public understanding of biosimilarity and
interchangeability; and (4) deliver information concerning the date of
first licensure and the reference product exclusivity expiry date, to
be included in the Purple
[[Page 64175]]
Book.\1\ The language for enhanced capacity is included in section III
of the proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The ``Purple Book'' lists biological products, including any
interchangeable biological products, licensed by FDA under the
Public Health Service Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Enhancing Management of User Fee Resources
FDA is committed to enhancing management of BsUFA resources and
ensuring BsUFA user fee resources are administered, allocated, and
reported in an efficient and transparent manner. In BsUFA II, FDA
proposes to establish a resource capacity planning function to improve
its ability to analyze current resource needs and project future
resource needs, to modernize its time reporting approach, to conduct an
evaluation of BsUFA program resource management, to publish a 5-year
BsUFA financial plan with annual updates, and to convene an annual
public meeting, beginning in FY 2019, to discuss the financial plan and
progress towards the financial management enhancements. FDA also
proposes to reduce the carryover balance to no greater than 21 weeks of
the FY 2022 target revenue by the end of FY 2022. These enhancements
are described in section IV of the proposed BsUFA II commitment letter.
J. Enhancements to Fee Structure and Related Mechanisms for Increased
Predictability, Stability, and Efficiency
The current BsUFA fee structure references PDUFA fees each fiscal
year and calculates biosimilar biological product development program
(BPD) fees based on the PDUFA application fee. FDA and industry agreed
that the BsUFA II fee structure and the fee setting process could be
updated to enhance the predictability and stability of fee amounts and
revenues in a manner to improve FDA's ability to engage in long-term
financial planning. To address these issues, FDA proposes to
discontinue the reduction of the biosimilar biological product
application fee by the cumulative BPD fees paid by sponsors, to
discontinue the establishment and supplement fees, to rename the
product fee as the BsUFA Program fee, to modify the Program fee billing
date to minimize the need for multiple billing cycles, and to add a
limitation that a sponsor shall not be assessed more than five BsUFA
Program fees for a fiscal year for products identified in each distinct
approved biosimilar biological product application held by that
sponsor.
K. Enhancements to User Fee Revenue Amounts and Adjustments
FDA and industry agreed that the BsUFA II user fee revenue amounts
and fee amounts should be independent of PDUFA and based on BsUFA
program costs. FDA proposes to establish fees to generate a total of
$45 million in user fee revenue for FY 2018. However, FDA also proposes
that it can adjust this amount when setting the user fee amounts
published in the FY 2018 Federal Register notice to reflect an updated
assessment of the BsUFA workload, with the limitation that this
adjustment cannot increase user fee revenue by more than $9 million
(i.e. relative to the $45 million specified for FY 2018 user fee
revenue). To enhance the predictability of user fee amounts, FDA
proposes that the amount for each BsUFA fee cannot increase more than
25 percent from the respective FY2018 fee amount until the capacity
planning adjustment is effective and that FDA can otherwise modify the
amount of the user fee revenue generated from each fee type each fiscal
year. FDA proposes to adjust the annual user fee revenue amount for
inflation, to develop a robust methodology for adjusting fees based on
the capacity needs of the program, and to introduce an annual operating
reserve adjustment to provide for adequate carryover resources.
IV. Purpose and Scope of the Meeting
If you wish to attend this meeting, visit https://bsufapublicmeeting.eventbrite.com. Please register by October 19, 2016.
If you are unable to attend the meeting in person, you can register to
view a live Webcast of the meeting. You will be asked to indicate in
your registration if you plan to attend in person or via the Webcast.
Seating will be limited, so early registration is recommended.
Registration is free and will be on a first-come, first-served basis.
However, FDA may limit the number of participants from each
organization based on space limitations. Registrants will receive
confirmation once they have been accepted. Onsite registration on the
day of the meeting will be based on space availability. If you need
special accommodations because of a disability, please contact Amanda
Roache (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 7 days before the
meeting.
The meeting will include a presentation by FDA and a series of
invited panels representing different stakeholder groups identified in
the statute (such as patient advocacy groups, consumer advocacy groups,
health professionals, and regulated industry). We will also provide an
opportunity for other organizations and individuals to make
presentations at the meeting or to submit written comments to the
docket before the meeting.
FDA will also hold an open public comment period at the meeting to
give the public an opportunity to present their comments. Registration
for open public comment will occur at the registration desk on the day
of the meeting and workshop on a first-come, first-served basis.
Transcripts: As soon as a transcript is available, FDA will post it
at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/ucm461774.htm.
Dated: September 13, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-22442 Filed 9-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P