Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 63718-63721 [2016-22249]
Download as PDF
63718
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 180
Friday, September 16, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–16–0062; SC16–984–2
PR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
implement a recommendation from the
California Walnut Board (Board) to
increase the assessment rate established
for the 2016–17 and subsequent
marketing years from $0.0379 to $0.0465
per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board locally administers
the marketing order and is comprised of
growers and handlers of walnuts
operating within the area of production.
Assessments upon walnut handlers are
used by the Board to fund reasonable
and necessary expenses of the program.
The marketing year begins September 1
and ends August 31. The assessment
rate would remain in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
October 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:06 Sep 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
submitted in response to this proposed
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional
Director, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part
984), regulating the handling of walnuts
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the order now in
effect, California walnut handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein
would be applicable to all assessable
walnuts beginning on September 1,
2016, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This proposed rule would increase
the assessment rate for the 2016–17 and
subsequent marketing years from
$0.0379 to $0.0465 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts.
The order provides authority for the
Board, with the approval of USDA, to
formulate an annual budget of expenses
and collect assessments from handlers
to administer the program. All members
of the Board, but one, are growers and
handlers of California walnuts. They are
familiar with the Board’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2015–16 and subsequent
marketing years, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an
assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts that would continue in effect
from year to year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on June 9, 2016, and
unanimously recommended 2016–17
expenditures of $23,143,050 and an
assessment rate of $0.0465 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. In comparison, last year’s
budgeted expenditures were
$22,668,980. The assessment rate of
$0.0465 is $0.0086 per pound higher
than the rate currently in effect. The
quantity of assessable walnuts for the
2016–17 marketing year is estimated at
553,000 tons inshell or 497,700,000
kernelweight pounds, which is the fiveyear average of walnut production. At
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
the recommended higher assessment
rate of $0.0465 per kernelweight pound,
the Board should collect approximately
$23,143,050 in assessment income,
making income and expenses equal. The
Board estimates it will begin the 2016–
17 marketing year with $9,827,284 in
their monetary reserve, which is well
within the requirements of the order.
The Board noted that sales of
California walnuts in the domestic
market have been declining in recent
years, and embarked upon an enhanced
market development and promotion
program that would reverse the trend.
Noting that making such a commitment
for a single year would likely not result
in long-term gains, they voted to
continue such market development and
promotion programs yet another year.
Thus, they are maintaining their
programs at a level near that of the
2015–16 marketing year.
In addition, personnel changes will
result in an overlap of duties and
expenses, as some positions will be
added so that experience and continuity
can be maintained in spite of staff
retirements. Thus, employee costs are
expected to be higher this marketing
year. Added to that, the implementation
of the Food Safety Modernization Act
(FSMA) may result in added costs to the
industry, and in some cases, to the
Board as well. For that reason, the
Grades and Standards Committee and
the Research Committee requested
increased budgets.
The following table compares major
budget expenditures recommended by
the Board for the 2015–16 and 2016–17
marketing years:
Budget expense categories
2015–16
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Employee Expenses ................................................................................................................................................
Travel/Board Expenses/Annual Audit ......................................................................................................................
Office Expenses .......................................................................................................................................................
Controlled Purchases ..............................................................................................................................................
Crop Acreage Survey ..............................................................................................................................................
Crop Estimate ..........................................................................................................................................................
Production Research Director .................................................................................................................................
Production Research ...............................................................................................................................................
Sustainability Project ...............................................................................................................................................
Grades and Standards Research ............................................................................................................................
Domestic Market Development ...............................................................................................................................
Reserve for Contingency .........................................................................................................................................
The assessment rate recommended by
the Board was derived by dividing
anticipated assessment revenue needed
by estimated shipments of California
walnuts certified as merchantable. The
553,000 ton (inshell) estimate for
merchantable shipments is an average of
shipments during three prior years.
Pursuant to § 984.51(b) of the order, this
figure is converted to a merchantable
kernelweight basis using a factor of 0.45
(553,000 tons × 2,000 pounds per ton ×
0.45), which yields 497,700,000
kernelweight pounds. At $0.0465 per
pound, the new assessment rate should
generate $23,143,050 in assessment
income, which is equal to estimated
expenses.
Section 984.69 of the order authorizes
the Board to carry over excess funds
into subsequent marketing years as a
reserve, provided that funds already in
the reserve do not exceed approximately
two years’ budgeted expenses. Current
reserve funds total $9,827,284 and are
well within that requirement.
The proposed assessment rate would
continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Board or
other available information.
Although this assessment rate would
be effective for an indefinite period, the
Board would continue to meet prior to
or during each marketing year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:06 Sep 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Board meetings are
available from the Board or USDA.
Board meetings are open to the public
and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA
would evaluate Board recommendations
and other available information to
determine whether modification of the
assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking would be undertaken as
necessary. The Board’s 2016–17 budget
and those for subsequent marketing
years would be reviewed, and, as
appropriate, approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
proposed rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 5,700
growers of California walnuts in the
production area and approximately 90
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
63719
Sfmt 4702
2016–17
$ 1,846,500
191,000
254,000
10,000
100,000
130,000
94,500
1,700,000
75,000
600,000
18,478,440
32,790
$ 2,292,000
206,000
262,000
10,000
0
130,000
175,000
1,800,000
75,000
800,000
18,398,040
59,010
handlers subject to regulation under the
order. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) defines small
agricultural businesses (13 CFR 121.201)
as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000, and small agricultural
service firms are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $7,500,000.
According to USDA’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service’s
(NASS’s) 2012 Census of Agriculture,
approximately 86 percent of California’s
walnut farms were smaller than 100
acres. Further, NASS reports that the
average yield for 2014 was 1.97 tons per
acre, and the average price received for
2014 was $3,230 per ton.
A 100-acre farm with an average yield
of 1.97 tons per acre would therefore
have been expected to produce about
197 tons of walnuts during 2014–15
marketing year. At $3,230 per ton, that
farm’s production would have had an
approximate value of $636,310. Since
Census of Agriculture information
indicates that the majority of
California’s walnut farms are smaller
than 100 acres, it could be concluded
that the majority of the growers had
receipts of less than $636,310 in 2014–
15, which is well below the SBA
threshold of $750,000. Thus, the
majority of California’s walnut growers
would be considered small growers
according to SBA’s definition.
According to information supplied by
the Board, approximately two-thirds of
California’s walnut handlers shipped
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
63720
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
merchantable walnuts valued under
$7,500,000 during the 2014–15
marketing year, and would, therefore, be
considered small businesses according
to the SBA definition.
This proposed rule would increase
the assessment rate and collected from
handlers for the 2016–17 and
subsequent marketing years from
$0.0379 to $0.0465 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts. The Board
unanimously recommended 2016–17
expenditures of $23,143,050 and an
assessment rate of $0.0465 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The proposed assessment rate
of $0.0465 is $0.0086 higher than the
2015–16 rate. The quantity of assessable
walnuts for the 2016–17 marketing year
is estimated at 553,000 tons inshell
weight, or 497,700,000 kernelweight
pounds. Thus, the $0.0465 rate should
provide $23,143,050 in assessment
income.
The increased assessment rate is due
to continuing domestic marketing and
promotion programs, as well as to
increased personnel and committee
expenses. The Board believes that
California walnut sales can be improved
in the domestic market through
continued promotional activities. In
addition, the Grades and Standards and
Research Committees have asked for
additional funds in case the
implementation of FSMA requires new
methods or processes for growing,
harvesting, and shipping walnuts.
The major expenses for the 2016–17
marketing year include: $2,292,000 for
employee expenses; $206,000 for travel,
board expenses, and annual audit
expenses; $262,000 for office expenses;
$10,000 for controlled purchases; $0 for
the crop acreage survey; $130,000 for
the crop estimate; $175,000 for the
salary of the Production Research
Director; $1,800,000 for production
research; $75,000 for sustainability;
$800,000 for grades and standards
research; $18,398,040 for domestic
market development projects; and
$59,010 for the contingency reserve.
By comparison, the major expenses
for the 2015–16 marketing year include:
$1,846,500 for employee expenses;
$191,000 for travel, board expenses, and
annual audit expenses; $254,000 for
office expenses; $10,000 for controlled
purchases; $100,000 for the crop acreage
survey; $130,000 for the crop estimate;
$94,500 for the salary of the Production
Research Director; $1,700,000 for
production research; $75,000 for
sustainability; $600,000 for grades and
standards research; $18,478,440 for
domestic market development projects;
and $32,790 for the contingency reserve.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:06 Sep 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
The Board reviewed and unanimously
recommended 2016–17 expenditures of
$23,143,050. Prior to arriving at this
budget, the Board considered a
recommendation from the Budget and
Personnel Committee (committee),
which also reviewed the proposed
budget. The committee debated the
relative value of the increased
assessment rate, given the focus on
domestic promotion programs. They
also considered information from
various other committees, who
deliberated and formulated their own
budgets of expenses and made their
recommendations to the committee.
Those committees include the Market
Development, Production Research, and
Grades and Standards Committees.
The Budget and Personnel Committee
considered alternative expenditure
levels, such as reducing the proposed
budgets recommended by the other
committees, and changing the funding
for domestic marketing projects, as well
as not increasing the assessment rate.
The committee ultimately decided that
the proposed expenditures and
assessment rate were reasonable and
necessary to assist in improving
domestic sales, maintaining staff
continuity, and preparing for potential
FSMA mandates. Thus, the committee
unanimously agreed to recommend the
proposed budget to the Board.
The assessment rate of $0.0465 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts was derived by dividing
anticipated assessment revenue needed
by expected shipments of California
walnuts certified as merchantable.
Merchantable shipments for the year are
estimated at 497,700,000 pounds. It was
determined that $23,143,050 in
assessment income was needed, and
assessment income would equal
expenses of $23,143,050.
Unexpended funds may be retained in
a financial reserve, provided that funds
in the financial reserve do not exceed
approximately two years’ budgeted
expenses.
According to NASS, the season
average grower prices for the years 2013
and 2014 were $3,710 and $3,230 per
ton, respectively. These prices provide a
range within which the 2016–17 season
average price could fall. Dividing these
average grower prices by 2,000 pounds
per ton provides an inshell price per
pound range of $1.62 to $1.86. Dividing
these inshell per pound prices by the
0.45 conversion factor (inshell to
kernelweight) established in the order
yields a 2016–17 price range estimate of
$3.60 to $4.13 per kernelweight pound
of assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower
revenue represented by the assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rate, the assessment rate of $0.0465 per
kernelweight pound is divided by the
low and high estimates of the price
range. The estimated assessment
revenue for the 2016–17 marketing year
as a percentage of total grower revenue
will thus likely range between 1.13 and
1.29 percent.
This action would increase the
assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose
some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. However, these costs would
be offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the marketing order. In
addition, the Board’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
California walnut industry, and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and encouraged to
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the June
9, 2016, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were free to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 (Walnuts
Grown in California). No changes in
those requirements as a result of this
action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
California walnut handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this action.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Thirty days is
deemed appropriate because: (1) The
2016–17 marketing year begins on
September 1, 2016, and the marketing
order requires that the rate of
assessment for each marketing year
apply to all assessable walnuts handled
during the year; and (2) handlers are
aware of this action, which was
unanimously recommended by the
Board at a public meeting and is similar
to other assessment rate actions issued
in past years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 984 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 984.347
Assessment rate.
On and after September 1, 2016, an
assessment rate of $0.0465 per kernel
weight pound is established for
California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: September 12, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–22249 Filed 9–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–16–0053, SC–16–984–1
PR]
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Walnuts Grown in California; Proposed
Amendment to Marketing Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule invites
public comments on a proposed
amendment to Marketing Order No. 984,
which regulates the handling of walnuts
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:06 Sep 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
grown in California. The California
Walnut Board (Board), which is
responsible for the local administration
of the order and is comprised of walnut
producers and handlers operating
within the production area,
recommended an amendment that
would authorize the Board to borrow
from a commercial lending institution to
fund operations and marketing/research
expenses. Allowing the Committee to
utilize this customary business practice
would provide flexibility for the Board
while increasing its effectiveness.
DATES: Comments must be received by
November 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the document number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
proposal will be included in the record
and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the
identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be made
public on the internet at the address
provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Geronimo Quinones, Marketing
Specialist, or Michelle P. Sharrow,
Rulemaking Branch Chief, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA;
1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or Email:
Geronimo.Quinones@ams.usda.gov or
Michelle.Sharrow@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part
984), regulating the handling of walnuts
grown in California, hereinafter referred
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63721
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
Section 1504 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110–246)
amended section 18c(17) of the Act,
which in turn required the addition of
supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR
part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21,
2008). The additional supplemental
rules of practice authorize the use of
informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to
amend Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut
marketing agreements and orders. USDA
may use informal rulemaking to amend
marketing orders based on the nature
and complexity of the proposed
amendments, the potential regulatory
and economic impacts on affected
entities, and any other relevant matters.
AMS has considered these factors and
has determined that the amendment
proposal is not unduly complex and the
nature of the proposed amendment is
appropriate for utilizing the informal
rulemaking process to amend the order.
A discussion of the potential regulatory
and economic impacts on affected
entities is discussed later in the ‘‘Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis’’ section
of this rule.
The proposed amendment was
unanimously recommended by the
Board following deliberations at a
public meeting held on February 19,
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63718-63721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22249]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 63718]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-16-0062; SC16-984-2 PR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation from the
California Walnut Board (Board) to increase the assessment rate
established for the 2016-17 and subsequent marketing years from $0.0379
to $0.0465 per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. The Board
locally administers the marketing order and is comprised of growers and
handlers of walnuts operating within the area of production.
Assessments upon walnut handlers are used by the Board to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The marketing year
begins September 1 and ends August 31. The assessment rate would remain
in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available
to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals
or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet
at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or
Email: Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part 984), regulating the handling of
walnuts grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. Under the order now in effect, California walnut
handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order are
derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate
as proposed herein would be applicable to all assessable walnuts
beginning on September 1, 2016, and continue until amended, suspended,
or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule would increase the assessment rate for the 2016-
17 and subsequent marketing years from $0.0379 to $0.0465 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts.
The order provides authority for the Board, with the approval of
USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments
from handlers to administer the program. All members of the Board, but
one, are growers and handlers of California walnuts. They are familiar
with the Board's needs and with the costs for goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and provide input.
For the 2015-16 and subsequent marketing years, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts that would continue in effect
from year to year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on June 9, 2016, and unanimously recommended 2016-17
expenditures of $23,143,050 and an assessment rate of $0.0465 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. In comparison, last year's
budgeted expenditures were $22,668,980. The assessment rate of $0.0465
is $0.0086 per pound higher than the rate currently in effect. The
quantity of assessable walnuts for the 2016-17 marketing year is
estimated at 553,000 tons inshell or 497,700,000 kernelweight pounds,
which is the five-year average of walnut production. At
[[Page 63719]]
the recommended higher assessment rate of $0.0465 per kernelweight
pound, the Board should collect approximately $23,143,050 in assessment
income, making income and expenses equal. The Board estimates it will
begin the 2016-17 marketing year with $9,827,284 in their monetary
reserve, which is well within the requirements of the order.
The Board noted that sales of California walnuts in the domestic
market have been declining in recent years, and embarked upon an
enhanced market development and promotion program that would reverse
the trend. Noting that making such a commitment for a single year would
likely not result in long-term gains, they voted to continue such
market development and promotion programs yet another year. Thus, they
are maintaining their programs at a level near that of the 2015-16
marketing year.
In addition, personnel changes will result in an overlap of duties
and expenses, as some positions will be added so that experience and
continuity can be maintained in spite of staff retirements. Thus,
employee costs are expected to be higher this marketing year. Added to
that, the implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)
may result in added costs to the industry, and in some cases, to the
Board as well. For that reason, the Grades and Standards Committee and
the Research Committee requested increased budgets.
The following table compares major budget expenditures recommended
by the Board for the 2015-16 and 2016-17 marketing years:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget expense categories 2015-16 2016-17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Employee Expenses....................... $ 1,846,500 $ 2,292,000
Travel/Board Expenses/Annual Audit...... 191,000 206,000
Office Expenses......................... 254,000 262,000
Controlled Purchases.................... 10,000 10,000
Crop Acreage Survey..................... 100,000 0
Crop Estimate........................... 130,000 130,000
Production Research Director............ 94,500 175,000
Production Research..................... 1,700,000 1,800,000
Sustainability Project.................. 75,000 75,000
Grades and Standards Research........... 600,000 800,000
Domestic Market Development............. 18,478,440 18,398,040
Reserve for Contingency................. 32,790 59,010
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by
dividing anticipated assessment revenue needed by estimated shipments
of California walnuts certified as merchantable. The 553,000 ton
(inshell) estimate for merchantable shipments is an average of
shipments during three prior years. Pursuant to Sec. 984.51(b) of the
order, this figure is converted to a merchantable kernelweight basis
using a factor of 0.45 (553,000 tons x 2,000 pounds per ton x 0.45),
which yields 497,700,000 kernelweight pounds. At $0.0465 per pound, the
new assessment rate should generate $23,143,050 in assessment income,
which is equal to estimated expenses.
Section 984.69 of the order authorizes the Board to carry over
excess funds into subsequent marketing years as a reserve, provided
that funds already in the reserve do not exceed approximately two
years' budgeted expenses. Current reserve funds total $9,827,284 and
are well within that requirement.
The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation
and information submitted by the Board or other available information.
Although this assessment rate would be effective for an indefinite
period, the Board would continue to meet prior to or during each
marketing year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Board meetings are available from the Board or USDA. Board
meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Board
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Board's 2016-17 budget and those for
subsequent marketing years would be reviewed, and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 5,700 growers of California walnuts in the
production area and approximately 90 handlers subject to regulation
under the order. The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines small
agricultural businesses (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms
are defined as those having annual receipts of less than $7,500,000.
According to USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service's
(NASS's) 2012 Census of Agriculture, approximately 86 percent of
California's walnut farms were smaller than 100 acres. Further, NASS
reports that the average yield for 2014 was 1.97 tons per acre, and the
average price received for 2014 was $3,230 per ton.
A 100-acre farm with an average yield of 1.97 tons per acre would
therefore have been expected to produce about 197 tons of walnuts
during 2014-15 marketing year. At $3,230 per ton, that farm's
production would have had an approximate value of $636,310. Since
Census of Agriculture information indicates that the majority of
California's walnut farms are smaller than 100 acres, it could be
concluded that the majority of the growers had receipts of less than
$636,310 in 2014-15, which is well below the SBA threshold of $750,000.
Thus, the majority of California's walnut growers would be considered
small growers according to SBA's definition.
According to information supplied by the Board, approximately two-
thirds of California's walnut handlers shipped
[[Page 63720]]
merchantable walnuts valued under $7,500,000 during the 2014-15
marketing year, and would, therefore, be considered small businesses
according to the SBA definition.
This proposed rule would increase the assessment rate and collected
from handlers for the 2016-17 and subsequent marketing years from
$0.0379 to $0.0465 per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. The
Board unanimously recommended 2016-17 expenditures of $23,143,050 and
an assessment rate of $0.0465 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The proposed assessment rate of $0.0465 is $0.0086 higher than
the 2015-16 rate. The quantity of assessable walnuts for the 2016-17
marketing year is estimated at 553,000 tons inshell weight, or
497,700,000 kernelweight pounds. Thus, the $0.0465 rate should provide
$23,143,050 in assessment income.
The increased assessment rate is due to continuing domestic
marketing and promotion programs, as well as to increased personnel and
committee expenses. The Board believes that California walnut sales can
be improved in the domestic market through continued promotional
activities. In addition, the Grades and Standards and Research
Committees have asked for additional funds in case the implementation
of FSMA requires new methods or processes for growing, harvesting, and
shipping walnuts.
The major expenses for the 2016-17 marketing year include:
$2,292,000 for employee expenses; $206,000 for travel, board expenses,
and annual audit expenses; $262,000 for office expenses; $10,000 for
controlled purchases; $0 for the crop acreage survey; $130,000 for the
crop estimate; $175,000 for the salary of the Production Research
Director; $1,800,000 for production research; $75,000 for
sustainability; $800,000 for grades and standards research; $18,398,040
for domestic market development projects; and $59,010 for the
contingency reserve.
By comparison, the major expenses for the 2015-16 marketing year
include: $1,846,500 for employee expenses; $191,000 for travel, board
expenses, and annual audit expenses; $254,000 for office expenses;
$10,000 for controlled purchases; $100,000 for the crop acreage survey;
$130,000 for the crop estimate; $94,500 for the salary of the
Production Research Director; $1,700,000 for production research;
$75,000 for sustainability; $600,000 for grades and standards research;
$18,478,440 for domestic market development projects; and $32,790 for
the contingency reserve.
The Board reviewed and unanimously recommended 2016-17 expenditures
of $23,143,050. Prior to arriving at this budget, the Board considered
a recommendation from the Budget and Personnel Committee (committee),
which also reviewed the proposed budget. The committee debated the
relative value of the increased assessment rate, given the focus on
domestic promotion programs. They also considered information from
various other committees, who deliberated and formulated their own
budgets of expenses and made their recommendations to the committee.
Those committees include the Market Development, Production Research,
and Grades and Standards Committees.
The Budget and Personnel Committee considered alternative
expenditure levels, such as reducing the proposed budgets recommended
by the other committees, and changing the funding for domestic
marketing projects, as well as not increasing the assessment rate. The
committee ultimately decided that the proposed expenditures and
assessment rate were reasonable and necessary to assist in improving
domestic sales, maintaining staff continuity, and preparing for
potential FSMA mandates. Thus, the committee unanimously agreed to
recommend the proposed budget to the Board.
The assessment rate of $0.0465 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts was derived by dividing anticipated assessment revenue needed
by expected shipments of California walnuts certified as merchantable.
Merchantable shipments for the year are estimated at 497,700,000
pounds. It was determined that $23,143,050 in assessment income was
needed, and assessment income would equal expenses of $23,143,050.
Unexpended funds may be retained in a financial reserve, provided
that funds in the financial reserve do not exceed approximately two
years' budgeted expenses.
According to NASS, the season average grower prices for the years
2013 and 2014 were $3,710 and $3,230 per ton, respectively. These
prices provide a range within which the 2016-17 season average price
could fall. Dividing these average grower prices by 2,000 pounds per
ton provides an inshell price per pound range of $1.62 to $1.86.
Dividing these inshell per pound prices by the 0.45 conversion factor
(inshell to kernelweight) established in the order yields a 2016-17
price range estimate of $3.60 to $4.13 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower revenue represented by the
assessment rate, the assessment rate of $0.0465 per kernelweight pound
is divided by the low and high estimates of the price range. The
estimated assessment revenue for the 2016-17 marketing year as a
percentage of total grower revenue will thus likely range between 1.13
and 1.29 percent.
This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. However, these costs
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the
marketing order. In addition, the Board's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California walnut industry, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and encouraged to participate in
Board deliberations on all issues. Like all Board meetings, the June 9,
2016, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were free to express views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including
the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 (Walnuts Grown in California). No changes in
those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California walnut
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this action.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower
[[Page 63721]]
at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. Thirty days is deemed appropriate
because: (1) The 2016-17 marketing year begins on September 1, 2016,
and the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each
marketing year apply to all assessable walnuts handled during the year;
and (2) handlers are aware of this action, which was unanimously
recommended by the Board at a public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 984 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 984.347 Assessment rate.
On and after September 1, 2016, an assessment rate of $0.0465 per
kernel weight pound is established for California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: September 12, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-22249 Filed 9-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P