Air Plan Approval/Disapproval; MS Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2, 63705-63707 [2016-22226]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this action for the state of
South Carolina does not have Tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). The Catawba Indian Nation
Reservation is located within the State
of South Carolina. Pursuant to the
Catawba Indian Claims Settlement Act,
South Carolina statute 27–16–120, ‘‘all
state and local environmental laws and
regulations apply to the [Catawba Indian
Nation] and Reservation and are fully
enforceable by all relevant state and
local agencies and authorities.’’
However, EPA has determined that this
rule does not have substantial direct
effects on an Indian Tribe because this
action is not approving any specific
rule, but rather approving that South
Carolina’s already approved SIP meets
certain CAA requirements. EPA notes
this action will not impose substantial
direct costs on Tribal governments or
preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 15, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
State
effective
date
Provision
*
*
*
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for
the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS.
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2016–22239 Filed 9–15–16; 8:45 am]
*
09/16/2016, [Insert
Federal Register
citation].
*
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0751; FRL–9952–33–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval/Disapproval; MS
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2010 NO2 NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:04 Sep 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve in part, and disapprove in part,
portions of the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submission, submitted by the
State of Mississippi, through the
Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on
February 28, 2013, to demonstrate that
the State meets the infrastructure
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) for the 2010 1-hour nitrogen
dioxide (NO2) national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS). The CAA
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 2, 2016.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart PP—South Carolina
2. In § 52.2120, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding the entry
‘‘110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2
NAAQS’’ at the end of the table to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.2120
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
With the exception of sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong
3 of D(i), and (J) and sections 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
and (II) (prongs 1, 2, and 4).
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
40 CFR Part 52
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Explanation
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
EPA approval
date
04/30/2014
63705
requires that each state adopt and
submit a SIP for the implementation,
maintenance and enforcement of each
NAAQS promulgated by EPA, which is
commonly referred to as an
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. The MDEQ
certified that the Mississippi SIP
contains provisions that ensure the 2010
NO2 NAAQS are implemented,
enforced, and maintained in
Mississippi. With the exception of the
state board majority requirements
respecting significant portion of income,
for which EPA is disapproving, EPA has
determined portions of Mississippi’s SIP
submission, provided to EPA on
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
63706
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
February 28, 2013, satisfies certain
required infrastructure elements for the
2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS.
DATES: This rule will be effective
October 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2014–0751. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Wong, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, Region 4,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562–8726. Mr. Richard Wong can
also be reached via electronic mail at
wong.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Overview
On January 22, 2010, (published at 75
FR 6474, February 9, 2010), EPA
promulgated a new 1-hour primary
NAAQS for NO2 at a level of 100 parts
per billion (ppb), based on a 3-year
average of the 98th percentile of the
yearly distribution of 1-hour daily
maximum concentrations. Pursuant to
section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, states are
required to submit SIPs meeting the
requirements of section 110(a)(2) within
three years after promulgation of a new
or revised NAAQS or within such
shorter period as EPA may prescribe.
Section 110(a)(2) requires states to
address basic SIP elements such as
requirements for monitoring, basic
program requirements and legal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:04 Sep 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
authority that are designed to assure
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS. States were required to submit
such SIPs for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS to
EPA no later than January 22, 2013.
In a proposed rulemaking published
on May 24, 2016, EPA proposed to
approve Mississippi’s 2010 1-hour NO2
NAAQS infrastructure SIP submission
submitted on February 28, 2013, with
the exception of the preconstruction
PSD permitting requirements for major
sources of sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3
of (D)(i), and (J), the interstate transport
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
and (II) (prongs 1, 2, and 4), and the
state board majority requirements
respecting significant portion of income
of 110(a)(2)(E)(ii). On March 18, 2015
(80 FR 14019), EPA approved
Mississippi’s February 28, 2013,
infrastructure SIP submission regarding
the PSD permitting requirements for
major sources of sections 110(a)(2)(C),
prong 3 of D(i), and (J) for the 2010 1hour NO2 NAAQS. Therefore, EPA is
not taking any action today pertaining to
sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of D(i),
and (J). Additionally, on May 25, 2016,
EPA took final action on prong 4 of D(i)
element of Mississippi’s February 28,
2013, SIP submission for the 2010 1hour NO2 NAAQS and is not acting on
this prong in this action. See 81 FR
33139. With respect to the interstate
transport requirements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2),
Mississippi provided a separate
submission on July 14, 2016. EPA is
considering action on Mississippi’s
submission related to 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
(prongs 1 and 2) through a separate
action. The details of Mississippi’s
submission and the rationale for EPA’s
actions for this final rulemaking are
explained in the May 24, 2016,
proposed rulemaking. Comments on the
proposed rulemaking were due on or
before June 23, 2016. EPA received no
adverse comments on the proposed
action.
II. Final Action
With regard to the state board
majority requirements respecting
significant portion of income, EPA is
finalizing a disapproval of Mississippi’s
February 28, 2013, infrastructure
submission. Under section 179(a) of the
CAA, final disapproval of a submittal
that addresses a requirement of a CAA
Part D Plan, or is required in response
to a finding of substantial inadequacy as
described in CAA section 110(k)(5) (SIP
call), starts a sanctions clock. The
portion of the submittal being
disapproved in this notice (the portion
addressing certain provisions of section
110(a)(2)(E)(ii)) was not submitted to
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
meet requirements for Part D or a SIP
call, and therefore, no sanctions will be
triggered. However, this final action will
trigger the requirement under section
110(c) that EPA promulgate a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) no later than
two years from the date of the
disapproval unless the State corrects the
deficiency, and EPA approves the plan
or plan revision before EPA promulgates
such FIP. With the exceptions described
above, EPA is taking final action to
approve Mississippi’s infrastructure SIP
submission for the 2010 1-hour NO2
NAAQS because these portions of the
submission are consistent with section
110 of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 15, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
63707
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 2, 2016.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Z—Mississippi
2. Section 52.1270(e), is amended by
adding an entry for ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010
1-hour NO2 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard’’ at the end of the table
to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1270
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED MISSISSIPPI NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Name of
nonregulatory
SIP provision
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
State
submittal
date/
effective
date
*
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the
2010 1-hour NO2 National Ambient Air Quality
Standard.
*
Mississippi .....
*
02/28/2013
3. Section 52.1272 is amended by
adding a paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1272
Approval status.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Disapproval. Submittal from the
State of Mississippi, through the
Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on
February 28, 2013, to address the Clean
Air Act section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the
2010 1-hour nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) concerning state board
majority requirements respecting
significant portion of income of section
128(a)(1). EPA is disapproving MDEQ’s
submittal with respect to section
110(a)(2)(E)(ii) because a majority of
board members may still derive a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:04 Sep 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
EPA approval date
*
09/16/2016, [Insert
Federal Register
citation].
Explanation
*
*
*
With the exception of sections: 110(a)(2)(C) and (J)
concerning
PSD
permitting
requirements;
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) (prongs 1 through 4) concerning interstate transport requirements and the
state board majority requirements respecting significant portion of income of section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii).
significant portion of income from
persons subject to permits or
enforcement orders issued by the
Mississippi Boards, and therefore, its
current SIP does not meet the section
128(a)(1) majority requirements
respecting significant portion of income
for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2016–22226 Filed 9–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0742; FRL–9951–44]
Aspergillus flavus strains TC16F,
TC35C, TC38B, and TC46G; Temporary
Exemptions From the Requirement of
a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
temporary exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of Aspergillus flavus strains TC16F,
TC35C, TC38B, and TC46G in or on the
food and feed commodities of corn,
field; corn, pop; and corn, sweet when
SUMMARY:
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63705-63707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22226]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2014-0751; FRL-9952-33-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval/Disapproval; MS Infrastructure Requirements for
the 2010 NO2 NAAQS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve in part, and disapprove in part, portions of the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission, submitted by the State of
Mississippi, through the Mississippi Department of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ) on February 28, 2013, to demonstrate that the State
meets the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)
for the 2010 1-hour nitrogen dioxide (NO2) national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS). The CAA requires that each state adopt
and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of
each NAAQS promulgated by EPA, which is commonly referred to as an
``infrastructure'' SIP. The MDEQ certified that the Mississippi SIP
contains provisions that ensure the 2010 NO2 NAAQS are
implemented, enforced, and maintained in Mississippi. With the
exception of the state board majority requirements respecting
significant portion of income, for which EPA is disapproving, EPA has
determined portions of Mississippi's SIP submission, provided to EPA on
[[Page 63706]]
February 28, 2013, satisfies certain required infrastructure elements
for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS.
DATES: This rule will be effective October 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2014-0751. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Wong, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562-8726. Mr. Richard Wong can also be
reached via electronic mail at wong.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Overview
On January 22, 2010, (published at 75 FR 6474, February 9, 2010),
EPA promulgated a new 1-hour primary NAAQS for NO2 at a
level of 100 parts per billion (ppb), based on a 3-year average of the
98th percentile of the yearly distribution of 1-hour daily maximum
concentrations. Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, states are
required to submit SIPs meeting the requirements of section 110(a)(2)
within three years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS or
within such shorter period as EPA may prescribe. Section 110(a)(2)
requires states to address basic SIP elements such as requirements for
monitoring, basic program requirements and legal authority that are
designed to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. States were
required to submit such SIPs for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS to EPA
no later than January 22, 2013.
In a proposed rulemaking published on May 24, 2016, EPA proposed to
approve Mississippi's 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS infrastructure
SIP submission submitted on February 28, 2013, with the exception of
the preconstruction PSD permitting requirements for major sources of
sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of (D)(i), and (J), the interstate
transport requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) (prongs
1, 2, and 4), and the state board majority requirements respecting
significant portion of income of 110(a)(2)(E)(ii). On March 18, 2015
(80 FR 14019), EPA approved Mississippi's February 28, 2013,
infrastructure SIP submission regarding the PSD permitting requirements
for major sources of sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of D(i), and (J)
for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS. Therefore, EPA is not taking
any action today pertaining to sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of D(i),
and (J). Additionally, on May 25, 2016, EPA took final action on prong
4 of D(i) element of Mississippi's February 28, 2013, SIP submission
for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS and is not acting on this
prong in this action. See 81 FR 33139. With respect to the interstate
transport requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2),
Mississippi provided a separate submission on July 14, 2016. EPA is
considering action on Mississippi's submission related to
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2) through a separate action. The
details of Mississippi's submission and the rationale for EPA's actions
for this final rulemaking are explained in the May 24, 2016, proposed
rulemaking. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before
June 23, 2016. EPA received no adverse comments on the proposed action.
II. Final Action
With regard to the state board majority requirements respecting
significant portion of income, EPA is finalizing a disapproval of
Mississippi's February 28, 2013, infrastructure submission. Under
section 179(a) of the CAA, final disapproval of a submittal that
addresses a requirement of a CAA Part D Plan, or is required in
response to a finding of substantial inadequacy as described in CAA
section 110(k)(5) (SIP call), starts a sanctions clock. The portion of
the submittal being disapproved in this notice (the portion addressing
certain provisions of section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii)) was not submitted to
meet requirements for Part D or a SIP call, and therefore, no sanctions
will be triggered. However, this final action will trigger the
requirement under section 110(c) that EPA promulgate a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) no later than two years from the date of the
disapproval unless the State corrects the deficiency, and EPA approves
the plan or plan revision before EPA promulgates such FIP. With the
exceptions described above, EPA is taking final action to approve
Mississippi's infrastructure SIP submission for the 2010 1-hour
NO2 NAAQS because these portions of the submission are
consistent with section 110 of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because
[[Page 63707]]
application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA;
and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 15, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 2, 2016.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Z--Mississippi
0
2. Section 52.1270(e), is amended by adding an entry for ``110(a)(1)
and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2
National Ambient Air Quality Standard'' at the end of the table to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1270 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA Approved Mississippi Non-Regulatory Provisions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
submittal
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision Applicable geographic or date/ EPA approval date Explanation
nonattainment area effective
date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Mississippi................. 02/28/2013 09/16/2016, [Insert Federal With the exception of
Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2 Register citation]. sections: 110(a)(2)(C) and
National Ambient Air Quality Standard. (J) concerning PSD
permitting requirements;
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II)
(prongs 1 through 4)
concerning interstate
transport requirements and
the state board majority
requirements respecting
significant portion of
income of section
110(a)(2)(E)(ii).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. Section 52.1272 is amended by adding a paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.1272 Approval status.
* * * * *
(d) Disapproval. Submittal from the State of Mississippi, through
the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on February
28, 2013, to address the Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the
2010 1-hour nitrogen dioxide (NO2) National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) concerning state board majority requirements
respecting significant portion of income of section 128(a)(1). EPA is
disapproving MDEQ's submittal with respect to section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii)
because a majority of board members may still derive a significant
portion of income from persons subject to permits or enforcement orders
issued by the Mississippi Boards, and therefore, its current SIP does
not meet the section 128(a)(1) majority requirements respecting
significant portion of income for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2016-22226 Filed 9-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P