Special Conditions: Lufthansa Technik, AG, Boeing Model 737-700 Airplanes; Large, Non-Structural Glass in the Passenger Compartment, 63051-63053 [2016-22048]
Download as PDF
63051
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 178
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
first column the following correction is
made to the Headings section, RIN
Number: Remove RIN 0572–AC06 and
replace it with RIN 0572–AC34.
Dated: September 7, 2016.
Joshua Cohen,
Deputy Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–21958 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Rural Utilities Service
Federal Aviation Administration
7 CFR Part 1738
14 CFR Part 25
RIN 0572–AC34
[Docket No. FAA–2016–8832; Special
Conditions No. 25–638–SC]
Rural Broadband Access Loans and
Loan Guarantees; Correction
Special Conditions: Lufthansa
Technik, AG, Boeing Model 737–700
Airplanes; Large, Non-Structural Glass
in the Passenger Compartment
Rural Utilities Service,
Agriculture.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS), an agency of the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA), is
correcting a final rule that appeared in
the Federal Register of June 9, 2016 (81
FR 37121). The document confirmed the
interim rule which amends the Agency’s
regulation for the Rural Broadband
Access Loan and Loan Guarantee
Program (Broadband Loan Program).
DATES: Effective September 14, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas P. Dickson, Acting Director,
Program Development and Regulatory
Analysis, Rural Utilities Service, United
States Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9011,
Telephone: 202–690–4492, email:
Thomas.Dickson@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RUS
published a final rule in the Federal
Register on June 9, 2016, 81 FR 37121,
confirming the interim rule which
amends its regulation for the Rural
Broadband Access Loan and Loan
Guarantee Program (Broadband Loan
Program). Inadvertently, an incorrect
regulatory identifier number (RIN) was
referenced in the headings section of the
document. Under the Congressional
Review Act (CRA), this rule was not
designated as a ‘‘major’’ rule.
In FR Doc. 2016–13302, on page
37121 in the Federal Register of
Thursday, June 9, 2016, appearing in the
SUMMARY:
These special conditions are
issued for Boeing Model 737–700
airplanes. This airplane, as modified by
Lufthansa Technik, AG (Lufthansa), will
have a novel or unusual design feature
when compared to the state of
technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transportcategory airplanes. This design feature
is large, non-structural glass panels in
the passenger compartment of Very
Important Person (VIP) interiors of
Model 737–700 airplanes modified by
Lufthansa. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on
Lufthansa on September 14, 2016. We
must receive your comments by October
31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2016–8832
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot
.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Shelden, Airframe and Cabin Safety,
ANM–115, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2785; facsimile
425–227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice of, and
opportunity for prior public comment
on, these special conditions is
impracticable because these procedures
would significantly delay issuance of
the design approval and thus delivery of
the affected airplanes.
In addition, the substance of these
special conditions has been subjected to
the notice and comment period in
several prior instances, and has been
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
63052
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
derived without substantive change
from those previously issued. The FAA
made changes for clarity in response to
one recent comment on similar special
conditions. It is unlikely that prior
public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Therefore, because a
delay would significantly affect the
certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are
unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these
special conditions upon publication in
the Federal Register.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the applicant apply
for a supplemental type certificate to
modify any other model included on the
same type certificate to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also
apply to the other model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Boeing Model 737–700
airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34, and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 737–700 airplane,
as modified by Lufthansa, will
incorporate a novel or unusual design
feature associated with a VIP interior
and cabin system, which is the
installation of large, non-structural glass
panels in the passenger compartment.
Background
Discussion
On October 15, 2015, Lufthansa
applied for a supplemental type
certificate to install a VIP interior and
cabin system, which includes
installation of large, non-structural glass
panels in the passenger compartment of
Boeing Model 737–700 airplanes. This
airplane is a twin-jet engine, transportcategory airplane. The airplane seating
accommodates 34 passengers, 5 cabin
crewmembers, and 4 flightcrew
members. Maximum takeoff weight is
171,000 lbs.
No specific regulations address the
design and installation of large glass
components in airplane passenger
cabins. Existing requirements, such as
§§ 25.561, 25.562, 25.601, 25.603,
25.613, 25.775, and 25.789, provide
some design standards appropriate for
large glass component installations.
However, additional design standards
for non-structural glass augmenting the
existing design are needed to
complement the existing requirements.
The addition of glass involved in this
installation, and the potentially unsafe
conditions caused by damage to such
components from external sources,
necessitate assuring that adequate safety
standards are applied to the design and
installation of the feature in Boeing
Model 737–700 airplanes.
For purposes of these special
conditions, a large glass component is
defined as a glass component weighing
4 kg (9 lbs) or more. Groupings of glass
items that individually weigh less than
4 kg, but collectively weigh 4 kg or
more, also would need to be included.
These special conditions also apply
when showing compliance with the
applicable performance standards in the
regulations for the installation of these
components. For example, heat-release
and smoke-density testing must not
result in fragmentation of the
component.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.101,
Lufthansa must show that the Boeing
Model 737–700 airplane, as changed,
continues to meet the applicable
provisions of the regulations listed in
Type Certificate No. A16WE, or the
applicable regulations in effect on the
date of application for the change,
except for earlier amendments as agreed
upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Boeing Model 737–700 airplane
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The use of glass has resulted in tradeoffs between the one unique
characteristic of glass—its capability for
undistorted or controlled light
transmittance, or transparency—and the
negative aspects of the material, such as
extreme notch-sensitivity, low fracture
resistance, low modulus of elasticity,
and highly variable properties. While
reasonably strong, glass is nonetheless
not a desirable material for traditional
airplane applications because it is heavy
(about the same density as aluminum),
and when it fails, it breaks into
extremely sharp fragments that have the
potential for injury and have been
known to be lethal. Likewise, the use of
glass traditionally has been limited to
windshields, and instrument and
display transparencies. The regulations
for certification of transport-category
airplanes only address, and thus only
recognize, the use of glass in windshield
or window applications. These
regulations do address the adverse
properties of glass, but even so, pilots
are occasionally injured from shattered
glass windshields. FAA policy allows
glass on instruments and display
transparencies.
Other installations of large, nonstructural glass items have included the
following:
• Glass panels integrated onto a
stairway handrail closeout.
• Glass panels mounted in doors to
allow visibility through the door when
desired.
• Glass doors on some galley
compartments containing small
amounts of service items.
These special conditions will reduce
the hazards from breakage, or from these
panels’ potential separation from the
cabin interior.
The FAA recently received comments
on proposed special conditions similar
to the special conditions in this
document. Notice of Proposed Special
Conditions no. 25–16–03–SC, for
Lufthansa modifications to the Boeing
Model 747–8 airplane, was published in
the Federal Register on February 25,
2016 (81 FR 9363). The Boeing
Company provided comments to that
notice by letter no. B–H020–REG–16–
TLM–17, dated March 24, 2016. The
first comment referred to the first two
conditions in Notice no. 25–16–03–SC,
and recommended revising the text in
special condition no. 2 to more clearly
define how it is different from special
condition no. 1. We agreed that those
two conditions could be addressed with
a single test, so we combined those two
conditions into a single condition,
special condition no. 1, for clarity. This
document also reflects that change.
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Boeing commented that the load
conditions in special condition no. 4, in
Notice no. 25–16–03–SC, which
corresponds to special condition no. 3
in this document, should include all
flight and landing loads, rather than
only emergency landing. These special
conditions are in addition to the load
requirements in the certification basis
for the glass installation, rather than in
lieu of the load requirements. Thus, is
it not necessary to repeat that all of
these loads apply to this installation.
The emergency-landing load condition
is not normally applied to installations
of this type, but for the use of large glass
in the cabin, we determined that this
additional safety standard is necessary.
We made no changes to special
condition number 3 in response to the
Boeing comments.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to Boeing
Model 737–700 airplanes modified by
Lufthansa. Should Lufthansa apply at a
later date for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model
included on Type Certificate No.
A16WE to incorporate the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
series of airplane. It is not a rule of
general applicability and affects only
the applicant who applied to the FAA
for approval of these features on the
airplane.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
■ The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Boeing Model
737–700 airplanes modified by
Lufthansa.
1. Material Fragmentation—The
applicant must use tempered or
otherwise treated glass to ensure that,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
when fractured, the glass breaks into
small pieces with relatively dull edges.
The glass component installation must
retain all glass fragments to minimize
the danger from flying glass shards or
pieces. The applicant must demonstrate
this characteristic by impact and
puncture testing, and testing to failure.
The applicant may conduct this test
with or without any glass coating that
may be utilized in the design.
2. Strength—In addition to meeting
the load requirements for all flight and
landing loads, including any of the
applicable emergency-landing
conditions in subparts C & D of 14 CFR
part 25, the glass components that are
located such that they are not protected
from contact with cabin occupants must
not fail due to abusive loading, such as
impact from occupants stumbling into,
leaning against, sitting on, or performing
other intentional or unintentional
forceful contact with the glass
component. The applicant must assess
the effect of design details such as
geometric discontinuities or surface
finish, including but not limited to
embossing and etching.
3. Retention—The glass component,
as installed in the airplane, must not
come free of its restraint or mounting
system in the event of an emergency
landing, considering both the
directional loading and resulting
rebound conditions. The applicant must
assess the effect of design details such
as geometric discontinuities or surface
finish, including but not limited to
embossing and etching.
4. Instruction for Continued
Airworthiness—The instructions for
continued airworthiness must reflect the
glass-panel fastening method used, and
must ensure the reliability of the
methods used (e.g., life limit of
adhesives, or clamp connection).
Inspection methods and intervals must
be defined based upon adhesion data
from the manufacturer of the adhesive,
or actual adhesion test data, if
necessary.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 7, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–22048 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63053
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 558
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–0002]
New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal
Feeds; Chlortetracycline and
Sulfamethazine; Chlortetracycline,
Procaine Penicillin, and
Sulfamethazine
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect the
withdrawal of approval of those parts of
a new animal drug application (NADA)
for a 3-way, fixed-ratio, combination
drug Type A medicated article that
pertain to use of the procaine penicillin
component for production indications
in swine and to reflect the reformulation
of the Type A medicated article as a
2-way, fixed-ratio, combination drug
product without penicillin.
DATES: This rule is effective September
14, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy L. Burnsteel, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV–130), Food
and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish
Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–
0817, email: cindy.burnsteel@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
Pharmgate
LLC (Pharmgate), 1015 Ashes Dr., Suite
102, Wilmington, NC 28405 has
requested that FDA withdraw approval
of those parts of NADA 138–934 for
PENNCHLOR SP 500 (chlortetracycline,
procaine penicillin, and sulfamethazine)
Type A medicated article that pertain to
use of the procaine penicillin
component for the production
indications of growth promotion and
increased feed efficiency in swine.
Pharmgate requested voluntary
withdrawal of approval of these
indications for use because
PENNCHLOR SP 500 Type A medicated
article is no longer manufactured.
With the withdrawal of approval of
the production indications for procaine
penicillin, the product approved under
NADA 138–934 was reformulated as
PENNCHLOR S 40/40 (chlortetracycline
and sulfamethazine) Type A Medicated
Article, a 2-way, fixed-ratio,
combination drug Type A medicated
article that does not contain penicillin
procaine and is not labeled for
production indications.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63051-63053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22048]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2016-8832; Special Conditions No. 25-638-SC]
Special Conditions: Lufthansa Technik, AG, Boeing Model 737-700
Airplanes; Large, Non-Structural Glass in the Passenger Compartment
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Boeing Model 737-700
airplanes. This airplane, as modified by Lufthansa Technik, AG
(Lufthansa), will have a novel or unusual design feature when compared
to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards
for transport-category airplanes. This design feature is large, non-
structural glass panels in the passenger compartment of Very Important
Person (VIP) interiors of Model 737-700 airplanes modified by
Lufthansa. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on Lufthansa on September 14, 2016. We
must receive your comments by October 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2016-8832
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Shelden, Airframe and Cabin
Safety, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
425-227-2785; facsimile 425-227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice of, and
opportunity for prior public comment on, these special conditions is
impracticable because these procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and thus delivery of the affected
airplanes.
In addition, the substance of these special conditions has been
subjected to the notice and comment period in several prior instances,
and has been
[[Page 63052]]
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. The
FAA made changes for clarity in response to one recent comment on
similar special conditions. It is unlikely that prior public comment
would result in a significant change from the substance contained
herein. Therefore, because a delay would significantly affect the
certification of the airplane, which is imminent, the FAA has
determined that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and
impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting these special
conditions upon publication in the Federal Register.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments
we receive.
Background
On October 15, 2015, Lufthansa applied for a supplemental type
certificate to install a VIP interior and cabin system, which includes
installation of large, non-structural glass panels in the passenger
compartment of Boeing Model 737-700 airplanes. This airplane is a twin-
jet engine, transport-category airplane. The airplane seating
accommodates 34 passengers, 5 cabin crewmembers, and 4 flightcrew
members. Maximum takeoff weight is 171,000 lbs.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.101, Lufthansa must show that the Boeing Model 737-700
airplane, as changed, continues to meet the applicable provisions of
the regulations listed in Type Certificate No. A16WE, or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of application for the change, except
for earlier amendments as agreed upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Boeing Model 737-700 airplane
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model included on the same type
certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also apply to the other model under
Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Boeing Model 737-700 airplane must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 737-700 airplane, as modified by Lufthansa, will
incorporate a novel or unusual design feature associated with a VIP
interior and cabin system, which is the installation of large, non-
structural glass panels in the passenger compartment.
Discussion
No specific regulations address the design and installation of
large glass components in airplane passenger cabins. Existing
requirements, such as Sec. Sec. 25.561, 25.562, 25.601, 25.603,
25.613, 25.775, and 25.789, provide some design standards appropriate
for large glass component installations. However, additional design
standards for non-structural glass augmenting the existing design are
needed to complement the existing requirements. The addition of glass
involved in this installation, and the potentially unsafe conditions
caused by damage to such components from external sources, necessitate
assuring that adequate safety standards are applied to the design and
installation of the feature in Boeing Model 737-700 airplanes.
For purposes of these special conditions, a large glass component
is defined as a glass component weighing 4 kg (9 lbs) or more.
Groupings of glass items that individually weigh less than 4 kg, but
collectively weigh 4 kg or more, also would need to be included. These
special conditions also apply when showing compliance with the
applicable performance standards in the regulations for the
installation of these components. For example, heat-release and smoke-
density testing must not result in fragmentation of the component.
The use of glass has resulted in trade-offs between the one unique
characteristic of glass--its capability for undistorted or controlled
light transmittance, or transparency--and the negative aspects of the
material, such as extreme notch-sensitivity, low fracture resistance,
low modulus of elasticity, and highly variable properties. While
reasonably strong, glass is nonetheless not a desirable material for
traditional airplane applications because it is heavy (about the same
density as aluminum), and when it fails, it breaks into extremely sharp
fragments that have the potential for injury and have been known to be
lethal. Likewise, the use of glass traditionally has been limited to
windshields, and instrument and display transparencies. The regulations
for certification of transport-category airplanes only address, and
thus only recognize, the use of glass in windshield or window
applications. These regulations do address the adverse properties of
glass, but even so, pilots are occasionally injured from shattered
glass windshields. FAA policy allows glass on instruments and display
transparencies.
Other installations of large, non-structural glass items have
included the following:
Glass panels integrated onto a stairway handrail closeout.
Glass panels mounted in doors to allow visibility through
the door when desired.
Glass doors on some galley compartments containing small
amounts of service items.
These special conditions will reduce the hazards from breakage, or
from these panels' potential separation from the cabin interior.
The FAA recently received comments on proposed special conditions
similar to the special conditions in this document. Notice of Proposed
Special Conditions no. 25-16-03-SC, for Lufthansa modifications to the
Boeing Model 747-8 airplane, was published in the Federal Register on
February 25, 2016 (81 FR 9363). The Boeing Company provided comments to
that notice by letter no. B-H020-REG-16-TLM-17, dated March 24, 2016.
The first comment referred to the first two conditions in Notice no.
25-16-03-SC, and recommended revising the text in special condition no.
2 to more clearly define how it is different from special condition no.
1. We agreed that those two conditions could be addressed with a single
test, so we combined those two conditions into a single condition,
special condition no. 1, for clarity. This document also reflects that
change.
[[Page 63053]]
Boeing commented that the load conditions in special condition no.
4, in Notice no. 25-16-03-SC, which corresponds to special condition
no. 3 in this document, should include all flight and landing loads,
rather than only emergency landing. These special conditions are in
addition to the load requirements in the certification basis for the
glass installation, rather than in lieu of the load requirements. Thus,
is it not necessary to repeat that all of these loads apply to this
installation. The emergency-landing load condition is not normally
applied to installations of this type, but for the use of large glass
in the cabin, we determined that this additional safety standard is
necessary. We made no changes to special condition number 3 in response
to the Boeing comments.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to
Boeing Model 737-700 airplanes modified by Lufthansa. Should Lufthansa
apply at a later date for a supplemental type certificate to modify any
other model included on Type Certificate No. A16WE to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model series of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the airplane.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Boeing Model 737-700 airplanes
modified by Lufthansa.
1. Material Fragmentation--The applicant must use tempered or
otherwise treated glass to ensure that, when fractured, the glass
breaks into small pieces with relatively dull edges. The glass
component installation must retain all glass fragments to minimize the
danger from flying glass shards or pieces. The applicant must
demonstrate this characteristic by impact and puncture testing, and
testing to failure. The applicant may conduct this test with or without
any glass coating that may be utilized in the design.
2. Strength--In addition to meeting the load requirements for all
flight and landing loads, including any of the applicable emergency-
landing conditions in subparts C & D of 14 CFR part 25, the glass
components that are located such that they are not protected from
contact with cabin occupants must not fail due to abusive loading, such
as impact from occupants stumbling into, leaning against, sitting on,
or performing other intentional or unintentional forceful contact with
the glass component. The applicant must assess the effect of design
details such as geometric discontinuities or surface finish, including
but not limited to embossing and etching.
3. Retention--The glass component, as installed in the airplane,
must not come free of its restraint or mounting system in the event of
an emergency landing, considering both the directional loading and
resulting rebound conditions. The applicant must assess the effect of
design details such as geometric discontinuities or surface finish,
including but not limited to embossing and etching.
4. Instruction for Continued Airworthiness--The instructions for
continued airworthiness must reflect the glass-panel fastening method
used, and must ensure the reliability of the methods used (e.g., life
limit of adhesives, or clamp connection). Inspection methods and
intervals must be defined based upon adhesion data from the
manufacturer of the adhesive, or actual adhesion test data, if
necessary.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 7, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-22048 Filed 9-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P