The Judicious Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing Animals; Establishing Appropriate Durations of Therapeutic Administration; Request for Comments, 63187-63191 [2016-21972]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Notices
533–6800, Toll Free 1–800–CDC–INFO,
Email ocas@cdc.gov.
The Director, Management Analysis
and Services Office, has been delegated
the authority to sign Federal Register
notices pertaining to announcements of
meetings and other committee
management activities, for both the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2016–22058 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–D–2635]
The Judicious Use of Medically
Important Antimicrobial Drugs in FoodProducing Animals; Establishing
Appropriate Durations of Therapeutic
Administration; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, we)
is soliciting comments regarding the
establishment of appropriately targeted
durations of use of antimicrobial drugs
of importance to human medicine (i.e.,
medically important antimicrobial
drugs) when they are administered in
the feed or water of food-producing
animals for therapeutic purposes. This
activity is consistent with previous
efforts by FDA to protect public health
by promoting the judicious use of these
drugs in food-producing animals.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments by December 13,
2016.
SUMMARY:
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments
as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:55 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–D–2635 for ‘‘Establishing
Appropriate Durations of Therapeutic
Administration.’’ Received comments
will be placed in the docket and, except
for those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63187
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Burnsteel, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–130), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–0817,
cindy.burnsteel@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On September 18, 2014, the President
issued Executive Order 13676 on
‘‘Combating Antibiotic-Resistant
Bacteria’’ (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/
pkg/FR-2014-09-23/pdf/201422805.pdf), underscoring the urgent
need to address the global threat of
antimicrobial resistance. The National
Action Plan for Combating AntibioticResistant Bacteria (National Action
Plan) (March 2015, https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
docs/national_action_plan_for_
combating_antibotic-resistant_
bacteria.pdf) was developed in response
to this Executive order, and presents a
strategy for collaborative action by the
U.S. Government in coordination with
individuals and organizations within
the human and animal health sectors.
The plan establishes specific goals and
objectives within a 5-year timeframe,
outlines steps for implementing certain
measures, and informs national policy
development in order to combat the
emergence of antimicrobial-resistant
bacteria.
FDA is actively engaged in several
ongoing efforts to address antimicrobial
resistance originating from the use of
antimicrobial drugs that are important
in human medicine (medically
important antimicrobials) in food-
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
63188
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Notices
producing animals. These efforts have
supported and continue to support the
initiatives of the National Action Plan.
Judicious use of medically important
antimicrobials, which includes
implementation of interventions (e.g.,
good husbandry practices) that can
reduce the spread of antimicrobial
resistance, is the cornerstone of Goal 1
in the National Action Plan, to ‘‘Slow
the Emergence of Resistant Bacteria and
Prevent the Spread of Resistant
Infections.’’ FDA’s approach to ensuring
the judicious use of medically important
antimicrobial drugs in food-producing
animals has been presented in two
Guidance for Industry (GFI) documents,
GFI #209, ‘‘The Judicious Use of
Medically Important Antimicrobial
Drugs in Food-Producing Animals’’ 1
(GFI #209) and GFI #213, ‘‘New Animal
Drugs and New Animal Drug
Combination Products Administered in
or on Medicated Feed or Drinking Water
of Food-Producing Animals:
Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for
Voluntarily Aligning Product Use
Conditions with GFI #209’’ 2 (GFI #213).
GFI #209, published in April 2012,
outlines FDA’s fundamental principles
of judicious use. These are: (1) Limiting
medically important antimicrobial drugs
to uses in food-producing animals that
are considered necessary for assuring
animal health and (2) limiting such
drugs to uses that include veterinary
oversight or consultation. In GFI #209,
FDA stated that it generally considers
uses that are associated with the
treatment, control, or prevention of
specific diseases to be uses that are
necessary for assuring the health of
food-producing animals, in contrast to
uses for production purposes (e.g., for
growth promotion or improved feed
efficiency) to enhance the production of
animal-derived products.
As discussed in GFI #209, FDA’s
current methodology for assessing
antimicrobial risks associated with the
use of antimicrobial new animal drugs
in food-producing animals is premised
on the concept that increasing the
exposure of bacterial populations to
antimicrobial drugs increases the risk of
generating resistance to those
antimicrobial drugs. Because feed or
water use antimicrobial drugs are
typically administered to entire herds or
flocks of food-producing animals, such
uses pose higher risk to public health
1 https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
AnimalVeterinary/
GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/
GuidanceforIndustry/UCM216936.pdf.
2 https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
AnimalVeterinary/
GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/
GuidanceforIndustry/UCM299624.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:55 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
than the administration of such drugs to
individual animals or targeted groups of
animals, as is done with dosage form
drugs (e.g., injectables, tablets, etc.).
Therefore, FDA is more concerned with
medically important antimicrobial new
animal drugs and combination new
animal drug products intended for use
in feed or water of food-producing
animals.
GFI #213, published in December
2013, is based on the two fundamental
principles of judicious use described in
GFI #209 and provides specific
recommendations for drug sponsors.
These recommendations for sponsors of
approved medically important
antimicrobial drugs administered in
feed or water to food-producing animals
include: (1) Removing production
indications 3 (e.g., increased rate of
weight gain and improved feed
efficiency) and (2) incorporating
veterinary oversight for the remaining
therapeutic indications.
FDA is working collaboratively with
the sponsors of affected applications to
facilitate the revision of product
labeling to reflect the voluntary
withdrawal of approval of production
indications. Incorporating veterinary
oversight is accomplished by changing
the marketing status from over-thecounter (OTC) use to use by either
veterinary feed directive (VFD), in the
case of drugs administered in feed, or by
veterinary prescription (Rx), in the case
of drugs administered in water.
In Section III of GFI #213, FDA states,
‘‘all antimicrobial drugs listed in
Appendix A to GFI #152 4 (Appendix A)
[are considered] to be ‘medically
important’ in the context of
implementing the recommendations
outlined in GFI #209 and further
discussed in this guidance document
(GFI #213). We believe that the policy
in GFI #209 and GFI #213 applies to all
three tiers [‘‘critically important,’’
‘‘highly important,’’ or ‘‘important’’] of
medically important antimicrobial drugs
at this time because each tier (and thus
all of the drugs listed in Appendix A)
contains drugs that have been
previously assessed through the public
processes used to develop GFI #152 and
determined to be important for treating
bacterial infections in people. . . . The
current list of medically important
3 Production uses are also referred to as
‘‘nontherapeutic’’ or ‘‘subtherapeutic’’ uses, terms
that we believe lack sufficient clarity (GFI #209).
4 GFI #152, ‘‘Evaluating the Safety of
Antimicrobial New Animal Drugs with Regard to
their Microbiological Effects on Bacteria of Human
Health Concern.’’ (https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
AnimalVeterinary/
GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/
GuidanceforIndustry/UCM052519.pdf).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
antimicrobial drug classes that are the
subject of this guidance includes:
Aminoglycosides, lincosamides,
macrolides, penicillins, streptogramins,
sulfonamides, and tetracyclines.’’
The implementation of GFI #213 is a
critical step toward improving judicious
use in veterinary practice, thereby
minimizing the selection of
antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms
to help preserve the therapeutic
effectiveness of medically important
antimicrobial drugs. As stated
previously, incorporating veterinary
oversight is accomplished by changing
the existing OTC marketing status of
these drugs to either VFD marketing
status, in the case of drugs administered
in feed, or to veterinary Rx status, in the
case of drugs administered in water. In
GFI #213 and outreach related to the
2015 revisions made to the VFD
regulations (https://www.fda.gov/
AnimalVeterinary/
DevelopmentApprovalProcess/
ucm449019.htm), FDA has stated that,
in addition to veterinary oversight, use
of these antimicrobials should be linked
to a specific etiologic agent and that the
antimicrobial should be administered
for an appropriately targeted period of
time, i.e., have a defined duration of
use.
As explained in GFI #213, we expect,
among other things, that any new
indications for medically important
antimicrobials, including those used in
feed or in drinking water, have defined
durations of use. Consistent with this
expectation, the recently revised VFD
regulations in 21 CFR part 558 state that
a lawful VFD, among other
requirements, must document the
duration of use of the VFD drug
contained in the medicated feed (see 21
CFR 558.6(b)(3)(x)).
Although GFI #213 sets out our
expectation that new indications of
medically important antimicrobial drugs
used in or on feed and water will have
defined durations of use, it does not
address what to do with respect to some
currently approved therapeutics that
lack defined durations of use.
Establishing defined durations of use for
currently approved therapeutics will
support FDA’s efforts to foster
stewardship of medically important
antimicrobial drugs in food-producing
animals and help preserve the
effectiveness of these antimicrobials in
animal and human medicine. Some
examples of defined durations of use on
the labeling of currently approved
therapeutics are ‘‘Feed continuously for
5 days,’’ ‘‘Feed continuously for 5 days
as the sole ration,’’ ‘‘Feed from weaning
up to 120 pounds,’’ and ‘‘Do not feed to
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Notices
chickens over 16 weeks (112 days) of
age.’’
In section II, FDA invites comment on
the establishment of appropriately
targeted durations of use of medically
important antimicrobial drugs
administered to food-producing animals
in feed or water for those therapeutics
for which a defined durations of use is
not included on currently approved
labeling. Along with labeling that is
silent on limits to the duration of use,
some examples in which the duration of
use is not defined on currently
approved labeling are ‘‘Feed
continuously’’ and ‘‘Feed continuously
as the sole ration.’’
FDA will consider submitted
comments as we develop a process by
which sponsors of currently approved,
medically important antimicrobial
drugs, administered in feed or water to
food-producing animals for therapeutic
purposes, could establish appropriately
targeted durations of use. We recognize
that, in certain circumstances, some
medically important antimicrobial drugs
may have a range of safe and effective
durations (see 21 CFR 514.4(b)(2)(i)).
Approval of defined durations of use
may be supported by existing
effectiveness data, target animal safety
data, human food safety studies, clinical
pharmacology studies, disease
pathophysiology, and/or other available
information.
Based on an April 2016 review, FDA
identified six species (cattle, swine,
chickens, turkeys, sheep, and honey
bees) for which there are approved,
medically important antimicrobials
administered in medicated feed or
drinking water for therapeutic purposes
that do not currently have a defined
duration of use included on labeling.
We have summarized, in tabular form,
the species and disease indications for
which these drugs are approved without
defined durations of use (see tables 1
through 6). Indications are summarized
as disease conditions (see column
entitled ‘‘Indication/Disease’’) and are
listed with their associated
antimicrobial drugs (see column titled
‘‘Ingredient(s)’’). These tables may assist
members of the public who wish to
comment on establishing appropriately
targeted durations of use.
II. Issues for Consideration
A key objective of FDA is to optimize
the use of medically important
antimicrobials by using a dosage
strategy that maximizes drug
effectiveness, minimizes target animal
toxicity, and has an appropriately
targeted duration of use to minimize the
development of resistance to
antimicrobial drugs of human medical
importance. FDA invites comments on
the questions below to assist in
evaluating appropriately targeted
durations of use for medically important
antimicrobial drugs administered to
food-producing animals in or on feed or
in drinking water for those therapeutics
for which a defined duration of use is
not included on the currently approved
labeling.
For the species and disease
indications listed in tables 1 through 6,
this request for comments is intended
to: (1) Obtain additional information,
especially from the animal agriculture,
animal health, and veterinary
communities, on the underlying
diseases for these therapeutic
indications, including periods when
livestock or poultry are at risk of
developing these diseases; (2) seek input
on more-targeted antimicrobial use
regimens for these diseases, and
husbandry practices that may help
avoid the need for these antimicrobials,
or that may help make more-targeted
antimicrobial use regimens more
effective; and (3) seek comment on
strategies for updating affected product
labeling, as appropriate, that does not
currently include a defined duration of
use.
When commenting on an
appropriately targeted duration of use
for a medicated feed for use in a foodproducing major species, please
consider the target animal classes
described in Appendix III of GFI #191,
‘‘Changes to Approved NADAs—New
ANDAs vs Category II Supplemental
NADAs,’’ 5 and the periods when that
63189
class of animal is at risk of developing
that disease. For the diseases/
indications and antimicrobials listed in
tables 1 through 6 for which the
duration of use is undefined on labeling,
please address the following questions
based on your current practices:
1. When is the animal/class at risk of
developing the disease?
2. For how long do you administer X
antimicrobial for Y indication if the
labeling says ‘‘feed continuously,’’ or is
silent on duration of use?
3. What factors influence your
decision when determining the duration
of use?
4. In addition to the drug labeling,
what sources of information do you use
in making a decision regarding duration
of use?
a. Past personal experience;
b. drug industry representatives;
c. extension agents;
d. producer or veterinary medicine
magazines;
e. online resources;
f. formularies; and
g. other.
5. What pros and cons do you see if
durations of use are defined for all of
these antimicrobials?
6. What reasonable alternatives to
medically important antimicrobials,
including other pharmaceutical or nonpharmaceutical approaches, are
available for managing the diseases
listed in tables 1 through 6?
In the following tables, undefined
durations of use means, for example,
therapeutics that include the statement
‘‘feed continuously,’’ ‘‘feed
continuously as the sole ration’’ or other
similar language on their labeling, or
that have labeling that is silent on limits
to the duration of use. Ingredient(s)
means a medically important
antimicrobial ingredient and any feed
use combination approvals including
that ingredient. When more than one
ingredient is listed, that drug
combination is only available in a fixedratio, combination drug Type A
medicated article for use in complete
Type C medicated feeds.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 1—ANTIMICROBIALS WITH APPROVED THERAPEUTIC (TREATMENT/CONTROL/PREVENTION) INDICATIONS WITH
UNDEFINED DURATIONS OF USE IN CATTLE
Indication/disease
Ingredient(s)
Anaplasmosis ...........................................................................................
Bacterial enteritis ......................................................................................
Chlortetracycline.
Chlortetracycline.
Oxytetracycline.
5 https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
animalveterinary/guidancecomplianceenforcement/
guidanceforindustry/ucm052460.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:55 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
63190
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Notices
TABLE 1—ANTIMICROBIALS WITH APPROVED THERAPEUTIC (TREATMENT/CONTROL/PREVENTION) INDICATIONS WITH
UNDEFINED DURATIONS OF USE IN CATTLE—Continued
Indication/disease
Ingredient(s)
Liver Abscesses .......................................................................................
Pneumonia ................................................................................................
Chlortetracycline.
Tylosin.
Oxytetracycline.
Neomycin With Oxytetracycline.
Virginiamycin.
Chlortetracycline.
TABLE 2—ANTIMICROBIALS WITH APPROVED THERAPEUTIC (TREATMENT/CONTROL/PREVENTION) INDICATIONS WITH
UNDEFINED DURATIONS OF USE IN SWINE
Indication/disease
Ingredient(s)
Atrophic rhinitis .........................................................................................
Pneumonia ................................................................................................
GI-Parasites 1 ............................................................................................
GI-Bacterial 2 .............................................................................................
Jowl abscesses ........................................................................................
Tylosin.
Tylosin With Sulfamethazine.
Chlortetracycline.
Sulfamethazine.
Tylosin With Sulfamethazine.
Oxytetracycline.
Hygromycin B.
Tylosin With Sulfamethazine.
Lincomycin.
Chlortetracycline With Sulfamethazine.
Chlortetracycline.
Oxytetracycline.
Chlortetracycline.
1 An example of Gastrointestinal (GI)-Parasite indication is ‘‘Control of infestations of large roundworms (Ascaris suis), nodular worms
(Oesophagostomum dentatum), and whipworms (Trichuris suis).’’
2 Examples of Gastrointestinal (GI)-Bacterial indications are: ‘‘For treatment of swine dysentery’’; ‘‘To help prevent bacterial swine enteritis’’;
and ‘‘Treatment of bacterial swine enteritis (salmonellosis or necrotic enteritis caused by Salmonella choleraesuis and vibrionic dysentery).’’
TABLE 3—ANTIMICROBIALS WITH APPROVED THERAPEUTIC (TREATMENT/CONTROL/PREVENTION) INDICATIONS WITH
UNDEFINED DURATIONS OF USE IN CHICKENS
Indication/disease
Ingredient(s)
Infectious Coryza ......................................................................................
Chronic Respiratory Disease ....................................................................
Necrotic Enteritis/Colibacillosis .................................................................
Fowl Cholera ............................................................................................
Gastrointestinal (GI)-Parasites 1 ...............................................................
Coccidiosis ................................................................................................
Ormetoprim with
Oxytetracycline.
Oxytetracycline.
Ormetoprim with
Lincomycin.
Virginiamycin.
Ormetoprim with
Hygromycin B.
Ormetoprim with
Sulfadimethoxine.
Sulfadimethoxine.
Sulfadimethoxine.
Sulfadimethoxine.
1 An
example of Gastrointestinal (GI)-Parasite indication is, ‘‘As an aid in the control of infections of large roundworms (Ascaris galli), cecal
worms (Heterakis gallinae), and capillary worms (Capillaria obsignata).’’
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 4—ANTIMICROBIALS WITH APPROVED THERAPEUTIC (TREATMENT/CONTROL/PREVENTION) INDICATIONS WITH
UNDEFINED DURATIONS OF USE IN TURKEYS
Indication/disease
Ingredient(s)
Coccidiosis ................................................................................................
Fowl Cholera ............................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:55 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Ormetoprim with Sulfadimethoxine.
Ormetoprim with Sulfadimethoxine.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Notices
63191
TABLE 5—ANTIMICROBIALS WITH APPROVED THERAPEUTIC (TREATMENT/CONTROL/PREVENTION) INDICATIONS WITH
UNDEFINED DURATIONS OF USE IN SHEEP
Indication/disease
Ingredient(s)
Vibrionic Abortion .....................................................................................
Enterotoxemia ...........................................................................................
Chlortetracycline.
Chlortetracycline.
TABLE 6—ANTIMICROBIALS WITH APPROVED THERAPEUTIC (TREATMENT/CONTROL/PREVENTION) INDICATIONS WITH
UNDEFINED DURATIONS OF USE IN HONEY BEES
Indication/disease
Ingredient(s)
Foulbrood ..................................................................................................
Dated: September 7, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–21972 Filed 9–12–16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–0002]
Withdrawal of Approval of Part of a
New Animal Drug Application;
Chlortetracycline, Procaine Penicillin,
and Sulfamethazine
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notification of withdrawal of
approval.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is withdrawing
approval of those parts of a new animal
drug application (NADA) for a 3-way,
fixed-ratio, combination drug Type A
medicated article that pertain to use of
the procaine penicillin component for
production indications in swine. This
action is being taken at the sponsor’s
request because the 3-way Type A
medicated article is no longer
manufactured.
SUMMARY:
Withdrawal of approval is
effective September 14, 2016.
DATES:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy L. Burnsteel, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV–130), Food
and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish
Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–
0817, cindy.burnsteel@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pharmgate
LLC (Pharmgate), 1015 Ashes Dr., Suite
102, Wilmington, NC 28405 has
requested that FDA withdraw approval
of those parts of NADA 138–934 for
PENNCHLOR SP 500 (chlortetracycline,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:55 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Oxytetracycline.
procaine penicillin, and sulfamethazine)
Type A medicated article that pertain to
use of the procaine penicillin
component for the production
indications of growth promotion and
increased feed efficiency in swine.
Pharmgate requested voluntary
withdrawal of approval of these
indications for use because
PENNCHLOR SP 500 Type A medicated
article is no longer manufactured.
Therefore, under authority delegated
to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs
and redelegated to the Director of the
Center for Veterinary Medicine, and in
accordance with § 514.116 Notice of
withdrawal of approval of application
(21 CFR 514.116), notice is given that
approval of those parts of NADA 138–
934 that pertain to use of procaine
penicillin for the production indications
of growth promotion and increased feed
efficiency in swine are hereby
withdrawn, effective September 14,
2016.
NADA 138–934 was identified as
being affected by guidance for industry
(GFI) #213 ‘‘New Animal Drugs and
New Animal Drug Combination
Products Administered in or on
Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of
Food-Producing Animals:
Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for
Voluntarily Aligning Product Use
Conditions with GFI #209,’’ December
2013.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, FDA is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect the
withdrawal of approval of these parts of
NADA 138–934.
Dated: September 6, 2016.
William T. Flynn,
Acting Director, Center for Veterinary
Medicine.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–0001]
Vaccines and Related Biological
Products Advisory Committee;
Cancellation
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The meeting of the Vaccines
and Related Biological Products
Advisory Committee scheduled for
November 16, 2016, is cancelled. This
meeting was announced in the Federal
Register of August 30, 2016 (81 FR
59634).
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sujata Vijh, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 6128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–7107, sujata.vijh@fda.hhs.gov; or
FDA Advisory Committee Information
Line, 1–800–741–8138 (301–443–0572
in the Washington, DC area), and follow
the prompts to the desired center or
product area. Please call the Information
Line for up-to-date information on this
meeting.
Dated: September 8, 2016.
Janice M. Soreth,
Acting Associate Commissioner, Special
Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016–22051 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
[FR Doc. 2016–21984 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63187-63191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21972]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2016-D-2635]
The Judicious Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in
Food-Producing Animals; Establishing Appropriate Durations of
Therapeutic Administration; Request for Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, we) is
soliciting comments regarding the establishment of appropriately
targeted durations of use of antimicrobial drugs of importance to human
medicine (i.e., medically important antimicrobial drugs) when they are
administered in the feed or water of food-producing animals for
therapeutic purposes. This activity is consistent with previous efforts
by FDA to protect public health by promoting the judicious use of these
drugs in food-producing animals.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by December 13,
2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-D-2635 for ``Establishing Appropriate Durations of Therapeutic
Administration.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Burnsteel, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-130), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-402-0817, cindy.burnsteel@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On September 18, 2014, the President issued Executive Order 13676
on ``Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria'' (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-09-23/pdf/2014-22805.pdf), underscoring the urgent
need to address the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. The
National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria
(National Action Plan) (March 2015, https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/national_action_plan_for_combating_antibotic-resistant_bacteria.pdf) was developed in response to this Executive
order, and presents a strategy for collaborative action by the U.S.
Government in coordination with individuals and organizations within
the human and animal health sectors. The plan establishes specific
goals and objectives within a 5-year timeframe, outlines steps for
implementing certain measures, and informs national policy development
in order to combat the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.
FDA is actively engaged in several ongoing efforts to address
antimicrobial resistance originating from the use of antimicrobial
drugs that are important in human medicine (medically important
antimicrobials) in food-
[[Page 63188]]
producing animals. These efforts have supported and continue to support
the initiatives of the National Action Plan. Judicious use of medically
important antimicrobials, which includes implementation of
interventions (e.g., good husbandry practices) that can reduce the
spread of antimicrobial resistance, is the cornerstone of Goal 1 in the
National Action Plan, to ``Slow the Emergence of Resistant Bacteria and
Prevent the Spread of Resistant Infections.'' FDA's approach to
ensuring the judicious use of medically important antimicrobial drugs
in food-producing animals has been presented in two Guidance for
Industry (GFI) documents, GFI #209, ``The Judicious Use of Medically
Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing Animals'' \1\ (GFI
#209) and GFI #213, ``New Animal Drugs and New Animal Drug Combination
Products Administered in or on Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of
Food-Producing Animals: Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for
Voluntarily Aligning Product Use Conditions with GFI #209'' \2\ (GFI
#213).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM216936.pdf.
\2\ https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM299624.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GFI #209, published in April 2012, outlines FDA's fundamental
principles of judicious use. These are: (1) Limiting medically
important antimicrobial drugs to uses in food-producing animals that
are considered necessary for assuring animal health and (2) limiting
such drugs to uses that include veterinary oversight or consultation.
In GFI #209, FDA stated that it generally considers uses that are
associated with the treatment, control, or prevention of specific
diseases to be uses that are necessary for assuring the health of food-
producing animals, in contrast to uses for production purposes (e.g.,
for growth promotion or improved feed efficiency) to enhance the
production of animal-derived products.
As discussed in GFI #209, FDA's current methodology for assessing
antimicrobial risks associated with the use of antimicrobial new animal
drugs in food-producing animals is premised on the concept that
increasing the exposure of bacterial populations to antimicrobial drugs
increases the risk of generating resistance to those antimicrobial
drugs. Because feed or water use antimicrobial drugs are typically
administered to entire herds or flocks of food-producing animals, such
uses pose higher risk to public health than the administration of such
drugs to individual animals or targeted groups of animals, as is done
with dosage form drugs (e.g., injectables, tablets, etc.). Therefore,
FDA is more concerned with medically important antimicrobial new animal
drugs and combination new animal drug products intended for use in feed
or water of food-producing animals.
GFI #213, published in December 2013, is based on the two
fundamental principles of judicious use described in GFI #209 and
provides specific recommendations for drug sponsors. These
recommendations for sponsors of approved medically important
antimicrobial drugs administered in feed or water to food-producing
animals include: (1) Removing production indications \3\ (e.g.,
increased rate of weight gain and improved feed efficiency) and (2)
incorporating veterinary oversight for the remaining therapeutic
indications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Production uses are also referred to as ``nontherapeutic''
or ``subtherapeutic'' uses, terms that we believe lack sufficient
clarity (GFI #209).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA is working collaboratively with the sponsors of affected
applications to facilitate the revision of product labeling to reflect
the voluntary withdrawal of approval of production indications.
Incorporating veterinary oversight is accomplished by changing the
marketing status from over-the-counter (OTC) use to use by either
veterinary feed directive (VFD), in the case of drugs administered in
feed, or by veterinary prescription (Rx), in the case of drugs
administered in water.
In Section III of GFI #213, FDA states, ``all antimicrobial drugs
listed in Appendix A to GFI #152 \4\ (Appendix A) [are considered] to
be `medically important' in the context of implementing the
recommendations outlined in GFI #209 and further discussed in this
guidance document (GFI #213). We believe that the policy in GFI #209
and GFI #213 applies to all three tiers [``critically important,''
``highly important,'' or ``important''] of medically important
antimicrobial drugs at this time because each tier (and thus all of the
drugs listed in Appendix A) contains drugs that have been previously
assessed through the public processes used to develop GFI #152 and
determined to be important for treating bacterial infections in people.
. . . The current list of medically important antimicrobial drug
classes that are the subject of this guidance includes:
Aminoglycosides, lincosamides, macrolides, penicillins, streptogramins,
sulfonamides, and tetracyclines.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ GFI #152, ``Evaluating the Safety of Antimicrobial New
Animal Drugs with Regard to their Microbiological Effects on
Bacteria of Human Health Concern.'' (https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM052519.pdf).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The implementation of GFI #213 is a critical step toward improving
judicious use in veterinary practice, thereby minimizing the selection
of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms to help preserve the
therapeutic effectiveness of medically important antimicrobial drugs.
As stated previously, incorporating veterinary oversight is
accomplished by changing the existing OTC marketing status of these
drugs to either VFD marketing status, in the case of drugs administered
in feed, or to veterinary Rx status, in the case of drugs administered
in water. In GFI #213 and outreach related to the 2015 revisions made
to the VFD regulations (https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/ucm449019.htm), FDA has stated that, in
addition to veterinary oversight, use of these antimicrobials should be
linked to a specific etiologic agent and that the antimicrobial should
be administered for an appropriately targeted period of time, i.e.,
have a defined duration of use.
As explained in GFI #213, we expect, among other things, that any
new indications for medically important antimicrobials, including those
used in feed or in drinking water, have defined durations of use.
Consistent with this expectation, the recently revised VFD regulations
in 21 CFR part 558 state that a lawful VFD, among other requirements,
must document the duration of use of the VFD drug contained in the
medicated feed (see 21 CFR 558.6(b)(3)(x)).
Although GFI #213 sets out our expectation that new indications of
medically important antimicrobial drugs used in or on feed and water
will have defined durations of use, it does not address what to do with
respect to some currently approved therapeutics that lack defined
durations of use. Establishing defined durations of use for currently
approved therapeutics will support FDA's efforts to foster stewardship
of medically important antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals
and help preserve the effectiveness of these antimicrobials in animal
and human medicine. Some examples of defined durations of use on the
labeling of currently approved therapeutics are ``Feed continuously for
5 days,'' ``Feed continuously for 5 days as the sole ration,'' ``Feed
from weaning up to 120 pounds,'' and ``Do not feed to
[[Page 63189]]
chickens over 16 weeks (112 days) of age.''
In section II, FDA invites comment on the establishment of
appropriately targeted durations of use of medically important
antimicrobial drugs administered to food-producing animals in feed or
water for those therapeutics for which a defined durations of use is
not included on currently approved labeling. Along with labeling that
is silent on limits to the duration of use, some examples in which the
duration of use is not defined on currently approved labeling are
``Feed continuously'' and ``Feed continuously as the sole ration.''
FDA will consider submitted comments as we develop a process by
which sponsors of currently approved, medically important antimicrobial
drugs, administered in feed or water to food-producing animals for
therapeutic purposes, could establish appropriately targeted durations
of use. We recognize that, in certain circumstances, some medically
important antimicrobial drugs may have a range of safe and effective
durations (see 21 CFR 514.4(b)(2)(i)). Approval of defined durations of
use may be supported by existing effectiveness data, target animal
safety data, human food safety studies, clinical pharmacology studies,
disease pathophysiology, and/or other available information.
Based on an April 2016 review, FDA identified six species (cattle,
swine, chickens, turkeys, sheep, and honey bees) for which there are
approved, medically important antimicrobials administered in medicated
feed or drinking water for therapeutic purposes that do not currently
have a defined duration of use included on labeling. We have
summarized, in tabular form, the species and disease indications for
which these drugs are approved without defined durations of use (see
tables 1 through 6). Indications are summarized as disease conditions
(see column entitled ``Indication/Disease'') and are listed with their
associated antimicrobial drugs (see column titled ``Ingredient(s)'').
These tables may assist members of the public who wish to comment on
establishing appropriately targeted durations of use.
II. Issues for Consideration
A key objective of FDA is to optimize the use of medically
important antimicrobials by using a dosage strategy that maximizes drug
effectiveness, minimizes target animal toxicity, and has an
appropriately targeted duration of use to minimize the development of
resistance to antimicrobial drugs of human medical importance. FDA
invites comments on the questions below to assist in evaluating
appropriately targeted durations of use for medically important
antimicrobial drugs administered to food-producing animals in or on
feed or in drinking water for those therapeutics for which a defined
duration of use is not included on the currently approved labeling.
For the species and disease indications listed in tables 1 through
6, this request for comments is intended to: (1) Obtain additional
information, especially from the animal agriculture, animal health, and
veterinary communities, on the underlying diseases for these
therapeutic indications, including periods when livestock or poultry
are at risk of developing these diseases; (2) seek input on more-
targeted antimicrobial use regimens for these diseases, and husbandry
practices that may help avoid the need for these antimicrobials, or
that may help make more-targeted antimicrobial use regimens more
effective; and (3) seek comment on strategies for updating affected
product labeling, as appropriate, that does not currently include a
defined duration of use.
When commenting on an appropriately targeted duration of use for a
medicated feed for use in a food-producing major species, please
consider the target animal classes described in Appendix III of GFI
#191, ``Changes to Approved NADAs--New ANDAs vs Category II
Supplemental NADAs,'' \5\ and the periods when that class of animal is
at risk of developing that disease. For the diseases/indications and
antimicrobials listed in tables 1 through 6 for which the duration of
use is undefined on labeling, please address the following questions
based on your current practices:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ https://www.fda.gov/downloads/animalveterinary/guidancecomplianceenforcement/guidanceforindustry/ucm052460.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. When is the animal/class at risk of developing the disease?
2. For how long do you administer X antimicrobial for Y indication
if the labeling says ``feed continuously,'' or is silent on duration of
use?
3. What factors influence your decision when determining the
duration of use?
4. In addition to the drug labeling, what sources of information do
you use in making a decision regarding duration of use?
a. Past personal experience;
b. drug industry representatives;
c. extension agents;
d. producer or veterinary medicine magazines;
e. online resources;
f. formularies; and
g. other.
5. What pros and cons do you see if durations of use are defined
for all of these antimicrobials?
6. What reasonable alternatives to medically important
antimicrobials, including other pharmaceutical or non-pharmaceutical
approaches, are available for managing the diseases listed in tables 1
through 6?
In the following tables, undefined durations of use means, for
example, therapeutics that include the statement ``feed continuously,''
``feed continuously as the sole ration'' or other similar language on
their labeling, or that have labeling that is silent on limits to the
duration of use. Ingredient(s) means a medically important
antimicrobial ingredient and any feed use combination approvals
including that ingredient. When more than one ingredient is listed,
that drug combination is only available in a fixed-ratio, combination
drug Type A medicated article for use in complete Type C medicated
feeds.
Table 1--Antimicrobials With Approved Therapeutic (Treatment/Control/
Prevention) Indications With Undefined Durations of Use in Cattle
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indication/disease Ingredient(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anaplasmosis........................... Chlortetracycline.
Bacterial enteritis.................... Chlortetracycline.
Oxytetracycline.
[[Page 63190]]
Liver Abscesses........................ Chlortetracycline.
Tylosin.
Oxytetracycline.
Neomycin With Oxytetracycline.
Virginiamycin.
Pneumonia.............................. Chlortetracycline.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--Antimicrobials With Approved Therapeutic (Treatment/Control/
Prevention) Indications With Undefined Durations of Use in Swine
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indication/disease Ingredient(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atrophic rhinitis...................... Tylosin.
Tylosin With Sulfamethazine.
Chlortetracycline.
Sulfamethazine.
Pneumonia.............................. Tylosin With Sulfamethazine.
Oxytetracycline.
GI-Parasites \1\....................... Hygromycin B.
GI-Bacterial \2\....................... Tylosin With Sulfamethazine.
Lincomycin.
Chlortetracycline With
Sulfamethazine.
Chlortetracycline.
Oxytetracycline.
Jowl abscesses......................... Chlortetracycline.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ An example of Gastrointestinal (GI)-Parasite indication is ``Control
of infestations of large roundworms (Ascaris suis), nodular worms
(Oesophagostomum dentatum), and whipworms (Trichuris suis).''
\2\ Examples of Gastrointestinal (GI)-Bacterial indications are: ``For
treatment of swine dysentery''; ``To help prevent bacterial swine
enteritis''; and ``Treatment of bacterial swine enteritis
(salmonellosis or necrotic enteritis caused by Salmonella choleraesuis
and vibrionic dysentery).''
Table 3--Antimicrobials With Approved Therapeutic (Treatment/Control/
Prevention) Indications With Undefined Durations of Use in Chickens
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indication/disease Ingredient(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infectious Coryza...................... Ormetoprim with
Sulfadimethoxine.
Chronic Respiratory Disease............ Oxytetracycline.
Oxytetracycline.
Necrotic Enteritis/Colibacillosis...... Ormetoprim with
Sulfadimethoxine.
Lincomycin.
Virginiamycin.
Fowl Cholera........................... Ormetoprim with
Sulfadimethoxine.
Gastrointestinal (GI)-Parasites \1\.... Hygromycin B.
Coccidiosis............................ Ormetoprim with
Sulfadimethoxine.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ An example of Gastrointestinal (GI)-Parasite indication is, ``As an
aid in the control of infections of large roundworms (Ascaris galli),
cecal worms (Heterakis gallinae), and capillary worms (Capillaria
obsignata).''
Table 4--Antimicrobials With Approved Therapeutic (Treatment/Control/
Prevention) Indications With Undefined Durations of Use in Turkeys
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indication/disease Ingredient(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coccidiosis............................ Ormetoprim with
Sulfadimethoxine.
Fowl Cholera........................... Ormetoprim with
Sulfadimethoxine.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 63191]]
Table 5--Antimicrobials With Approved Therapeutic (Treatment/Control/
Prevention) Indications With Undefined Durations of Use in Sheep
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indication/disease Ingredient(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vibrionic Abortion..................... Chlortetracycline.
Enterotoxemia.......................... Chlortetracycline.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 6--Antimicrobials With Approved Therapeutic (Treatment/Control/
Prevention) Indications With Undefined Durations of Use in Honey Bees
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indication/disease Ingredient(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foulbrood.............................. Oxytetracycline.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: September 7, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-21972 Filed 9-12-16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P