Air Plan Approval; VT; Prevention of Significant Deterioration, PM2.5, 63102-63104 [2016-21881]
Download as PDF
63102
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: September 9, 2016.
John B. King, Jr.,
Secretary of Education.
[FR Doc. 2016–22104 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2016–0441; A–1–FRL–
9952–11–Region I]
Air Plan Approval; VT; Prevention of
Significant Deterioration, PM2.5
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Vermont. The
revision sets the amount of PM2.5
increment sources are permitted to
consume when obtaining a prevention
of significant deterioration (PSD)
preconstruction permit and requires
PM2.5 emission offsets under certain
circumstances. This action is being
taken in accordance with the Clean Air
Act.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective November 14, 2016, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
October 14, 2016. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
OAR–2016–0441 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
McDonnell.Ida@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the ‘‘For
Further Information Contact’’ section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida
E. McDonnell, Manager, Air Permits,
Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, 5 Post
Office Square, Suite 100, (OEP05–2),
Boston, MA 02109–3912, phone number
(617) 918–1653, fax number (617) 918–
0653, email McDonnell.Ida@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Organization of this document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in this preamble.
I. Background and Purpose
II. Summary of State Submittal
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On October 20, 2010, EPA issued the
final rule on the ‘‘Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) for
Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5
Micrometers (PM2.5)—Increments,
Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and
Significant Monitoring Concentration
(SMC)’’ (2010 PSD Rule). See 75 FR
64864. This rule established several
components for making PSD permitting
determinations for PM2.5, including a
system of ‘‘increments,’’ which is the
mechanism used to estimate significant
deterioration of ambient air quality for
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
a pollutant. These increments are
codified in 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40
CFR 52.21(c).
II. Summary of State Submittal
On July 25, 2014, the VT DEC
submitted a revision to its state
implementation plan (SIP) primarily
addressing permitting requirements for
PM2.5 emissions. In a letter dated July
13, 2016, VT DEC withdrew some, but
not all, of the revisions the State
requested in its 2014 SIP submittal. The
State withdrew these provisions for
various reasons; either because more
information would be needed before
certain provisions could be approved by
EPA into the SIP, one provision was
erroneously submitted, or Vermont
intends in the near future to revise
certain provisions and resubmit them to
EPA. On July 20, 2016, EPA’s Region I
Administrator signed a direct final
notice approving the remaining
revisions except for revisions Vermont
made to its Air Pollution Control
Regulations (APCR), Table 2 (Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
Increments) and Table 3 (Levels of
Significant Impact).
Vermont revised Table 2 by adding
increments for PM2.5 as well as some
minor grammatical changes. Vermont
revised Table 3 by changing the table’s
title, removing the level of significant
impact for Total Suspended Particles,
and adding levels for PM2.5. Tables 2
and 3 address different aspects of
permitting. Table 2 addresses the
amount of a pollutant (increment
consumption) a major new or modified
source may contribute to the ambient air
consistent with the CAA’s requirements.
Table 3 addresses situations in which
Vermont’s regulations would require
emissions offsets, even for major new or
modified sources that are subject to PSD
preconstruction permitting
requirements.
III. Final Action
EPA has found the PSD increment
values added to Table 2 to be consistent
with 40 CFR 51.166(c) and has also
found that the increment values meet
the anti-back sliding requirements of
Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act.
Therefore, EPA is approving revised
Table 2 into the Vermont SIP.
Vermont revised Table 3 by adding
thresholds for PM2.5 for Class I, II, and
III areas. Major new or modified sources
subject to PSD permitting requirements
must obtain emissions offsets if the
listed thresholds would be exceeded in
an area found not to be attaining the
national ambient air quality standard.
The thresholds in Table 3 for PM2.5 for
Class II and Class III areas are consistent
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
with the PM2.5 thresholds in 40 CFR
51.165(b)(2), while Vermont’s
thresholds for Class I areas are
significantly more stringent than the
federal regulation. Vermont also
removed from Table 3 the threshold for
Total Suspended Particles because
EPA’s regulations no longer contain a
threshold for this pollutant. EPA
currently sets the National Ambient Air
Quality Standard for particulate matter
as PM10 and PM2.5 and no longer sets a
standard for Total Suspended Particles.
EPA has found both revisions to Table
3 to be consistent with 40 CFR
51.165(b)(2) and Section 110(l) of the
Clean Air Act. Therefore, EPA is
approving revised Table 3 into the
Vermont SIP.
The EPA is publishing this action
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should relevant adverse comments be
filed. This rule will be effective
November 14, 2016 without further
notice unless the Agency receives
relevant adverse comments by October
14, 2016.
If the EPA receives such comments,
then EPA will publish a notice
withdrawing the final rule and
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on
the proposed rule. All parties interested
in commenting on the proposed rule
should do so at this time. If no such
comments are received, the public is
advised that this rule will be effective
on November 14, 2016 and no further
action will be taken on the proposed
rule. Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if
that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of Vermont’s
Air Pollution Control Regulations
described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63103
in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 14,
2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of this Federal Register, rather
than file an immediate petition for
judicial review of this direct final rule,
so that EPA can withdraw this direct
final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action
may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
63104
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 8, 2016.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
Subpart UU—Vermont
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
2. In § 52.2370(c), the table ‘‘EPA
Approved Vermont Regulations’’ is
amended by revising the state citation
entries for Table 2 and Table 3 to read
as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
§ 52.2370
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED VERMONT REGULATIONS
State citation
Title/subject
State effective
date
*
*
*
Table 2 .................................... Table 2—PSD increments .....
*
7/5/2014
Table 3 ....................................
7/5/2014
*
Table 3—Levels of significant
impact.
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–21881 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0042; FRL–9952–09–
Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Colorado; Second Ten-Year PM10
Maintenance Plan for Lamar
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Colorado. On
May 13, 2013, the Governor of
Colorado’s designee submitted to the
EPA a revised maintenance plan for the
Lamar area for the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to 10
microns (PM10). The EPA is approving
the revised maintenance plan with the
exception of one aspect of the plan’s
contingency measures.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0042. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
*
EPA approval date
*
9/14/2016, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
9/14/2016, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. The EPA requests that if at
all possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Hou, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6210,
hou.james@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Lamar area was designated
nonattainment for PM10 and classified
as moderate by operation of law upon
enactment of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
Amendments of 1990. See 56 FR 56694,
56705, 56736 (November 6, 1991). EPA
approved Colorado’s nonattainment area
SIP for the Lamar PM10 nonattainment
area on June 9, 1994 (59 FR 29732).
On May 13, 2013, the Governor of
Colorado’s designee submitted the
second 10-year update of the PM10
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanations
*
*
Added increment thresholds
for PM2.5.
Added levels for PM2.5.
*
*
maintenance plan for the Lamar area to
the EPA. On June 1, 2016, the EPA
published a proposed rulemaking in
which we proposed to approve the 10year update because it demonstrates
continued maintenance of the PM10
NAAQS through 2025.
II. Response to Comments
We received one comment letter
during the public comment period,
which was submitted anonymously.
Comment: Given the high number of
high wind occurrences, and given the
consistently windy nature of the Lamar
area, the EPA cannot rely on the
Exceptional Events Rule (EER) to ignore
PM10 exceedances. In doing so, the EPA
is failing to provide environmental
justice for people in rural areas, by
failing to provide them with clean air.
Response: 55 exceedances between
two monitors over the course of 14 years
were reported by the City of Lamar. The
EPA notes that high wind events do not
have to be rare to be considered an
exceptional event. Quoting from the
‘‘Interim Guidance on the Preparation of
Demonstrations in Support of Requests
to Exclude Ambient Air Quality Data
Affected by High Winds Under the
Exceptional Events Rule,’’ U.S. EPA
May 2013 page 20, it states,
The EPA will use a weight-of-evidence
approach to assess each demonstration and
comparison of the concentrations during
event(s) in question with historical
concentration data on a case-by-case basis.
The EPA acknowledges that natural events,
such as high wind dust events, can recur and
still be eligible for exclusion under the EER.
Therefore, events do not necessarily have to
be rare to satisfy this element.
E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM
14SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63102-63104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21881]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2016-0441; A-1-FRL-9952-11-Region I]
Air Plan Approval; VT; Prevention of Significant Deterioration,
PM2.5
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Vermont.
The revision sets the amount of PM2.5 increment sources are
permitted to consume when obtaining a prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) preconstruction permit and requires
PM2.5 emission offsets under certain circumstances. This
action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective November 14, 2016,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by October 14, 2016. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2016-0441 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
McDonnell.Ida@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida E. McDonnell, Manager, Air
Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, (OEP05-2), Boston, MA
02109-3912, phone number (617) 918-1653, fax number (617) 918-0653,
email McDonnell.Ida@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in this preamble.
I. Background and Purpose
II. Summary of State Submittal
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On October 20, 2010, EPA issued the final rule on the ``Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5
Micrometers (PM2.5)--Increments, Significant Impact Levels
(SILs) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC)'' (2010 PSD
Rule). See 75 FR 64864. This rule established several components for
making PSD permitting determinations for PM2.5, including a
system of ``increments,'' which is the mechanism used to estimate
significant deterioration of ambient air quality for a pollutant. These
increments are codified in 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40 CFR 52.21(c).
II. Summary of State Submittal
On July 25, 2014, the VT DEC submitted a revision to its state
implementation plan (SIP) primarily addressing permitting requirements
for PM2.5 emissions. In a letter dated July 13, 2016, VT DEC
withdrew some, but not all, of the revisions the State requested in its
2014 SIP submittal. The State withdrew these provisions for various
reasons; either because more information would be needed before certain
provisions could be approved by EPA into the SIP, one provision was
erroneously submitted, or Vermont intends in the near future to revise
certain provisions and resubmit them to EPA. On July 20, 2016, EPA's
Region I Administrator signed a direct final notice approving the
remaining revisions except for revisions Vermont made to its Air
Pollution Control Regulations (APCR), Table 2 (Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increments) and Table 3 (Levels of
Significant Impact).
Vermont revised Table 2 by adding increments for PM2.5
as well as some minor grammatical changes. Vermont revised Table 3 by
changing the table's title, removing the level of significant impact
for Total Suspended Particles, and adding levels for PM2.5.
Tables 2 and 3 address different aspects of permitting. Table 2
addresses the amount of a pollutant (increment consumption) a major new
or modified source may contribute to the ambient air consistent with
the CAA's requirements. Table 3 addresses situations in which Vermont's
regulations would require emissions offsets, even for major new or
modified sources that are subject to PSD preconstruction permitting
requirements.
III. Final Action
EPA has found the PSD increment values added to Table 2 to be
consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(c) and has also found that the increment
values meet the anti-back sliding requirements of Section 110(l) of the
Clean Air Act. Therefore, EPA is approving revised Table 2 into the
Vermont SIP.
Vermont revised Table 3 by adding thresholds for PM2.5
for Class I, II, and III areas. Major new or modified sources subject
to PSD permitting requirements must obtain emissions offsets if the
listed thresholds would be exceeded in an area found not to be
attaining the national ambient air quality standard. The thresholds in
Table 3 for PM2.5 for Class II and Class III areas are
consistent
[[Page 63103]]
with the PM2.5 thresholds in 40 CFR 51.165(b)(2), while
Vermont's thresholds for Class I areas are significantly more stringent
than the federal regulation. Vermont also removed from Table 3 the
threshold for Total Suspended Particles because EPA's regulations no
longer contain a threshold for this pollutant. EPA currently sets the
National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter as
PM10 and PM2.5 and no longer sets a standard for
Total Suspended Particles. EPA has found both revisions to Table 3 to
be consistent with 40 CFR 51.165(b)(2) and Section 110(l) of the Clean
Air Act. Therefore, EPA is approving revised Table 3 into the Vermont
SIP.
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates
no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
relevant adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective
November 14, 2016 without further notice unless the Agency receives
relevant adverse comments by October 14, 2016.
If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. All parties
interested in commenting on the proposed rule should do so at this
time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this
rule will be effective on November 14, 2016 and no further action will
be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Vermont's
Air Pollution Control Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these documents generally available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 14, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 63104]]
Dated: August 8, 2016.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart UU--Vermont
0
2. In Sec. 52.2370(c), the table ``EPA Approved Vermont Regulations''
is amended by revising the state citation entries for Table 2 and Table
3 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2370 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Vermont Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Table 2.......................... Table 2--PSD 7/5/2014 9/14/2016, [Insert Added increment
increments. Federal Register thresholds for
citation]. PM2.5.
Table 3.......................... Table 3--Levels of 7/5/2014 9/14/2016, [Insert Added levels for
significant impact. Federal Register PM2.5.
citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2016-21881 Filed 9-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P