Establishment of the Willcox Viticultural Area, 62626-62629 [2016-21849]
Download as PDF
62626
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 29, 2016.
Suzanne Palmieri,
Acting Administrator, Foreign Agricultural
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–21347 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2016–0002; T.D. TTB–143;
Ref: Notice No. 157]
RIN 1513–AC23
Establishment of the Willcox
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 526,000-acre ‘‘Willcox’’
viticultural area in portions of Graham
and Cochise Counties in southeastern
Arizona. The ‘‘Willcox’’ viticultural area
is not located within any other
viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
October 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on Viticultural Areas
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:01 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Order 120–01, dated January
24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to
perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these
laws.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes standards for petitions for the
establishment or modification of AVAs.
Petitions to establish an AVA must
include the following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed AVA boundary is nationally
or locally known by the AVA name
specified in the petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
AVA;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed AVA affecting
viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation,
that make the proposed AVA distinctive
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
AVA, with the boundary of the
proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon;
and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed AVA boundary based on
USGS map markings.
Willcox Petition
TTB received a petition from Paul S.
Hagar, the special projects manager of
Dragoon Mountain Vineyard, on behalf
of Dragoon Mountain Vineyard and
other local winery and vineyard owners,
proposing the establishment of the
‘‘Willcox’’ AVA. The proposed AVA
contains approximately 526,000 acres,
and there are 21 commerciallyproducing vineyards covering a total of
approximately 454 acres distributed
throughout the proposed AVA, along
with 18 wineries. According to the
petition, an additional 650 acres of
vineyards are planned for the near
future. The proposed Willcox AVA is
not located within any established AVA.
According to the petition, the
distinguishing features of the proposed
Willcox AVA are its geology,
topography, soils, and climate.
The proposed AVA is in the Arizona
geological province known as the
‘‘basin-and-range’’ province, which is
characterized by high mountain ranges
that are separated by valleys. The
proposed Willcox AVA is located
within a broad, shallow basin and is
surrounded by higher mountain ranges
including the Chiricahua, Dos Cabezas,
Pinalenos, Dragoon, Little Dragoon, and
Winchester Mountains. The underlying
geology of the proposed AVA is
comprised mainly of water-borne and
wind-borne deposits, in contrast to the
surrounding mountain ranges which are
comprised of igneous rock and other
volcanic materials. Over time, the
geologic activity of the region has
disrupted the flow of creeks, rivers, and
drainage systems and has left the
proposed AVA in a ‘‘closed basin.’’
Because the basin is ‘‘closed,’’ the
aquifer beneath the proposed AVA is
recharged only through rainfall, in
contrast to the nearby ‘‘open basin’’
valleys which have year-round or
seasonal creeks. Therefore, vineyard
owners within the proposed AVA use
drip irrigation to conserve water.
The topography within the proposed
Willcox AVA is relatively uniform and
very flat, with slope angles ranging from
0 to 1.5 percent. The very shallow
slopes, combined with the lack of creeks
or streams, reduces the risk of erosion
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
within the proposed AVA. Because the
proposed AVA is surrounded by higher,
steeper mountains, cool nighttime air
flowing down from those mountains
settles in the vineyards within the
proposed AVA. In the early spring, this
cool air can increase the risk of frost
damage to new shoots and buds, so
vineyard owners often install large fans
to mix the warmer ambient air with the
cooler descending air streams and
prevent the cool air from pooling.
The most prevalent soils within the
proposed Willcox AVA are Tubac,
Sonoita, Forrest, and Frye soils, which
are predominately loams comprised of
sand, silt, and clay in relatively even
proportions. Loamy soils retain
adequate amounts of moisture to
hydrate vineyards while allowing excess
water to percolate quickly through to
the aquifer. Loamy soils are also
generally high in nutrients and,
therefore, are not typically preferred for
vineyards because the nutrient levels
can promote overly vigorous vine and
leaf growth. However, the petition states
that the stress placed on vines by the
hot, dry climate of the proposed AVA
keeps vine and leaf growth in check.
The soils of the surrounding regions are
also mostly loams. However, the four
major soils of the proposed AVA do not
make up as large a percentage of the
surrounding area, except within the
Chiricahua Mountains to the southeast
of the proposed AVA, where Tubac soils
are more prevalent than within the
proposed Willcox AVA.
Southeast Arizona, including the
region of the proposed Willcox AVA, is
generally considered to have an arid
climate. The most significant rainfall
occurs during the monsoon season, in
July and August, when humid air flows
into the region from both the Gulf of
Mexico and the Gulf of California. As
the humid air rises over the mountains
that surround the proposed AVA, the air
cools and eventually reaches the point
where it releases the moisture in the
form of rain. As the storms move
beyond the mountains and foothills,
they begin to weaken and dissipate.
Therefore, growing season precipitation
amounts are typically lower in the
proposed Willcox AVA than in the
surrounding mountains.
In the region of the proposed Willcox
AVA, elevation also plays a role in
climate. Regions at higher elevations
typically have lower growing season
temperatures than regions at lower
elevations. The proposed AVA has
higher growing season temperatures
than the higher surrounding mountains,
including the Chiricahua Mountains to
the southeast. Large valleys lie beyond
the mountain ranges that surround the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:01 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
proposed AVA. These valleys are at
lower elevations than the proposed
Willcox AVA and, therefore, have
higher growing season temperatures.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 157 in the
Federal Register on January 21, 2016
(81 FR 3356), proposing to establish the
Willcox AVA. In that document, TTB
summarized the evidence from the
petition regarding the name, boundary,
and distinguishing features for the
proposed AVA. The proposed rule also
compared the distinguishing features of
the proposed AVA to the features of the
surrounding areas. For a detailed
description of the evidence relating to
the name, boundary, and distinguishing
features of the proposed AVA, and for
a detailed comparison of the
distinguishing features of the proposed
AVA to the surrounding areas, see
Notice No. 157.
In Notice No. 157, TTB solicited
comments on the accuracy of the name,
boundary, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. The comment period closed on
March 21, 2016. TTB received three
comments in response to Notice No.
157. Two of the three comments were
from local residents who supported the
proposed AVA. One of the supporting
comments (comment 3) was submitted
by a representative of Cellar 433 winery
and its Dragoon Mountain Vineyard and
included three letters of support for the
proposed AVA from other wine industry
members within the proposed AVA. The
three letters were dated in 2013 and
were provided at that time to the
Willcox AVA petitioner, who was also
an employee of Dragoon Mountain
Vineyards. However the letters were not
included with the proposed Willcox
AVA petition, nor had they been
received by TTB prior to the opening of
the comment period. The three letters
support the proposed Willcox AVA and
also mention support for a ‘‘Chiricahua
Foothills’’ AVA. TTB notes that the
proposed Willcox AVA petition was
submitted simultaneously with a
petition to establish an adjacent
‘‘Chiricahua Foothills’’ AVA, but that
petition was not accepted as perfected
by TTB, and the comments regarding
the petitioned-for Chiricahua Foothills
are not being considered as part of this
rulemaking.
TTB received one comment from a
local resident (comment 2) opposing the
establishment of an AVA ‘‘in the
foothills of the Chiricahua Mountains
* * *.’’ The commenter states his belief
that vineyards ‘‘fragment the open
spaces that ranches provide, disrupt the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62627
watershed and block wildlife patterns.’’
The commenter also states his belief
that the vineyards in the Willcox region
do not provide economic benefit to the
community because most of the
vineyards ‘‘are not sustainable
economically’’ and employ seasonal
workers from outside the area.
TTB’s purpose in establishing an AVA
is to allow winemakers to more
accurately describe the origins of the
grapes used to make their wine, so that
consumers can have more information
about the wines they may purchase.
Economic benefits and other impacts
derived from the use of an AVA name
are the result of a proprietor’s efforts
and consumer acceptance of wines from
that area.
Section 4.25 of the TTB regulations
defines an AVA as a delimited grapegrowing region having distinguishing
features and a name and delineated
boundary as described in part 9 of the
regulations. Section 9.12 of the TTB
regulations requires an AVA petition to
provide sufficient name and
geographical and/or climatic
information, data, and evidence to
enable TTB to determine whether the
features of the proposed AVA are
distinguishable from the surrounding
regions and have an effect on
viticulture. TTB determined that the
petition to establish the proposed
Willcox AVA contained sufficient
evidence to merit notice and comment.
Furthermore, TTB has determined that
the opposing comment did not contain
any evidence to contradict the name or
distinguishing features data contained
in the petition. Therefore, TTB does not
believe that there is sufficient evidence
to warrant the withdrawal or
modification of the proposal to establish
the Willcox AVA.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition
and the comments received, TTB finds
that the evidence provided by the
petitioner supports the establishment of
the Willcox AVA. Accordingly, under
the authority of the FAA Act, section
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of
2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the TTB
regulations, TTB establishes the
‘‘Willcox’’ AVA in southeastern
Arizona, effective 30 days from the
publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the AVA in the regulatory
text published at the end of this final
rule.
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
62628
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Maps
Executive Order 12866
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
regulatory text.
It has been determined that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for
labeling with an AVA name and that
name appears in the brand name, then
the label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of this AVA,
its name, ‘‘Willcox,’’ will be recognized
as a name of viticultural significance
under § 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations
(27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the
regulation clarifies this point.
Consequently, wine bottlers using the
name ‘‘Willcox’’ in a brand name,
including a trademark, or in another
label reference as to the origin of the
wine, will have to ensure that the
product is eligible to use the AVA name
as an appellation of origin.
The establishment of the Willcox
AVA will not affect any existing AVA.
The establishment of the Willcox AVA
will allow vintners to use ‘‘Willcox’’ as
an appellation of origin for wines made
primarily from grapes grown within the
Willcox AVA if the wines meet the
eligibility requirements for the
appellation.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:01 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Subpart C is amended by adding
§ 9.259 to read as follows:
■
§ 9.259
Willcox.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is
‘‘Willcox’’. For purposes of part 4 of this
chapter, ‘‘Willcox’’ is a term of
viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The 21 United
States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to
determine the boundary of the Willcox
viticultural area are titled:
(1) Fort Grant, AZ, 1996;
(2) West of Greasewood Mountain,
AZ, 1996;
(3) Greasewood Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(4) Willcox North, AZ, 1996;
(5) Railroad Pass, Ariz., 1979;
(6) Simmons Peak, AZ, 1996;
(7) Dos Cabezas, AZ, 1996;
(8) Pat Hills North, Ariz., 1974;
(9) Pat Hills South, Arizona, 1986
provisional edition;
(10) Sulphur Hills, AZ, 1996;
(11) Pearce, AZ., 1996;
(12) Turquoise Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(13) Black Diamond Peak, AZ, 1996;
(14) Cochise Stronghold, AZ, 1996;
(15) Cochise, AZ, 1996;
(16) Red Bird Hills, AZ, 1996;
(17) Steele Hills, AZ, 1996;
(18) Square Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(19) Muskhog Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(20) Reiley Peak, AZ, 1996; and
(21) Sierra Bonita Ranch, Ariz., 1972.
(c) Boundary. The Willcox viticultural
area is located in Cochise and Graham
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Counties in southeastern Arizona. The
boundary of the Willcox viticultural
area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the Fort
Grant map at the intersection of State
Highway 266 and an unnamed lightduty road known locally as Curtis
Parkway, in Fort Grant, section 35, T9S/
R23E. From the beginning point,
proceed south-southeast in a straight
line approximately 20.4 miles, crossing
over the West of Greasewood Mountain
and the Greasewood Mountain map and
onto the Willcox North map, to the
intersection of three unnamed light-duty
roads known locally as Porters Ranch
Road, East Saguaro Road, and North
Circle I Road, near benchmark (BM)
4,243 on the Willcox North map, section
36, T12S/R24E; then
(2) Proceed east in a straight line
approximately 5 miles to Interstate
Highway 10 near the community of
Raso, section 1, T13S/R25E; then
(3) Proceed south in a straight line
approximately 0.8 mile to the 4,400-foot
elevation contour, section 1, T13S/
R25E; then
(4) Proceed southwesterly along the
4,400-foot elevation contour around the
west end of the Dos Cabezas Mountains
and continue southeasterly along the
4,400-foot elevation contour for a total
of approximately 13.3 miles, crossing
over the Railroad Pass map and onto the
Simmons Peak map, to State Highway
186 on the Simmons Peak map, section
28, T14S/R26E; then
(5) Proceed south-southeast in a
straight line approximately 15.8 miles,
crossing over the Dos Cabezas map and
onto the Pat Hills North map, to the
intersection of the 4,700-foot elevation
contour and an unnamed light-duty
road known locally as East Creasey
Ranch Road on the Pat Hills North map
near BM 4,695, section 21, T16S/R28E;
then
(6) Proceed southerly along the 4,700foot elevation contour approximately
10.6 miles, crossing onto the Pat Hills
South map, to an unnamed light-duty
road known locally as East Uncle Curtis
Lane, section 7, T18S/R28 E; then
(7) Proceed west along East Uncle
Curtis Lane approximately 0.5 mile to
an unnamed light-duty road known
locally as South Single Tree Lane near
the marked 4,664-foot elevation point,
section 7, T18S/R28E; then
(8) Proceed south along South Single
Tree Lane approximately 0.5 mile to
State Highway 181, section 7, T18S/
R28E; then
(9) Proceed west along State Highway
181 approximately 9.9 miles, crossing
onto the Sulphur Hills map, to State
Highway 191, section 10, T18S/R26E;
then
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(10) Proceed north-northeasterly, then
west, along State Highway 191
approximately 4.8 miles, crossing onto
the Pearce map, to an unnamed lightduty road known locally as Kansas
Settlement Road, near BM 4,327, section
36, T17S/R25E; then
(11) Proceed southwest in a straight
line approximately 8.9 miles, crossing
over the Turquoise Mountain map and
onto the Black Diamond Peak map, to
the southeastern-most corner of the
boundary of the Coronado National
Forest on the Black Diamond Peak map,
section 35, T18S/R24 E; then
(12) Proceed north along the boundary
of the Coronado National Forest
approximately 2 miles to the marked
4,821-foot elevation point, section 26,
T18S/R24E; then
(13) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 13 miles,
crossing over the Cochise Stronghold
map and onto the Cochise map, to the
northeastern corner of the boundary of
the Coronado National Forest at the
marked 4,642 elevation point on the
Cochise map, section 26, T16S/R23E;
then
(14) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 1.2 miles to
the intersection of the 4,450-foot
elevation contour and an unnamed
secondary highway known locally as
West Dragoon Road, section 23, T16S/
R23E; then
(15) Proceed north in a straight line
approximately 1.3 miles to the 4,400foot elevation contour, section 11, T16S/
R23E; then
(16) Proceed generally northerly along
the 4,400-foot elevation contour
approximately 10 miles, crossing onto
the Red Bird Hills map, to Interstate
Highway 10, section 3, T15S/R23E; then
(17) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 5.8 miles,
crossing onto the Steele Hills map, to
the intersection of the 4,600-foot
elevation contour and an unnamed
light-duty road known locally as West
Airport Road, section 7, T14S/R23E;
then
(18) Proceed east-northeasterly, then
easterly, then northerly, then easterly
along West Airport Road approximately
7.2 miles, crossing back onto the Red
Bird Hills map and then onto the Square
Mountain map, to the 4,240-foot
elevation contour east of BM 4,264,
section 6, T14S/R24E; then
(19) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 20.5 miles,
crossing over the Muskhog Mountain
and Reiley Peak maps and onto the
Sierra Bonita Ranch map, to the
intersection of two unnamed light-duty
roads known locally as West Ash Creek
Road and South Wells Road, near BM
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:01 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
4,487 on the Sierra Bonita Ranch map,
section 3, T11S/R22E; then
(20) Proceed generally northerly along
South Wells Road to BM 4,502, then
continuing northerly along the western
fork of the road for a total of
approximately 7.7 miles to an unnamed
light-duty road known locally as Bonita
Aravaipa Road, section 27, T9S/R22E;
then
(21) Proceed east in a straight line
approximately 8.2 miles, crossing onto
the Fort Grant map, to the beginning
point.
Signed: July 25, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: August 22, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–21849 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 269
[Docket ID: DOD–2016–OS–0045]
RIN 0790–AJ42
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation
Adjustment
Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller), Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
On November 2, 2015, the
President signed into law the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015
Act), which further amended the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990. The 2015 Act
updates the process by which agencies
adjust applicable civil monetary
penalties (CMP) for inflation to retain
the deterrent effect of those penalties.
The 2015 Act requires that not later than
July 1, 2016, and not later than January
15 of every year thereafter, the head of
each agency must, by regulation
published in the Federal Register,
adjust each CMP within its jurisdiction
by the inflation adjustment described in
the 2015 Act. Accordingly, the
Department of Defense must adjust the
level of all civil monetary penalties
under its jurisdiction through a final
rule and make subsequent annual
adjustments for inflation.
DATES: This rule is effective September
12, 2016.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62629
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Banal, 703–571–1652.
On
Thursday, May 26, 2016 (81 FR 33389–
33391), the Department of Defense
published an interim final rule titled
‘‘Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation
Adjustment’’ for a 60-day public
comment period. The public comment
period ended on July 25, 2016. No
public comments were received.
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 requires agencies to adjust the
level of civil monetary penalties through
a final rule in the Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law
101–410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. 2461,
note), as amended by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996,
Public Law 104–134, April 26, 1996,
and further amended by the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015
Act), Public Law 114–74, November 2,
2015, requires agencies to annually
adjust the level of Civil Monetary
Penalties (CMP) for inflation to improve
their effectiveness and maintain their
deterrent effect. The 2015 Act requires
that not later than July 1, 2016, and not
later than January 15 of every year
thereafter, the head of each agency must
adjust each CMP within its jurisdiction
by the inflation adjustment described in
the 2015 Act. The inflation adjustment
must be determined by increasing the
maximum CMP or the range of
minimum and maximum CMPs, as
applicable, for each CMP by the cost-ofliving adjustment, rounded to the
nearest multiple of $1. The cost-ofliving adjustment is the percentage (if
any) for each CMP by which the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the
month of October preceding the date of
the adjustment (January 15), exceeds the
CPI for the month of October in the
previous calendar year. The initial
adjustment to a CMP may not exceed
150 percent of the corresponding level
in effect on November 2, 2015.
Any increased penalties will only
apply to violations which occur after the
date on which the increase takes effect.
Each CMP subject to the jurisdiction
of the Department of Defense has been
adjusted in accordance with the 2015
Act. In compliance with the 2015 Act,
the Department of Defense is amending
its CMP penalty amounts.
Executive Summary
On November 2, 2015, the President
signed into law the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
E:\FR\FM\12SER1.SGM
12SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62626-62629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21849]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2016-0002; T.D. TTB-143; Ref: Notice No. 157]
RIN 1513-AC23
Establishment of the Willcox Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes
the approximately 526,000-acre ``Willcox'' viticultural area in
portions of Graham and Cochise Counties in southeastern Arizona. The
``Willcox'' viticultural area is not located within any other
viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners
to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective October 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated December
10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120-01, dated January 24, 2003),
to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these laws.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9
of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes
standards for petitions for the establishment or modification of AVAs.
Petitions to establish an AVA must include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is
nationally or locally known by the AVA name specified in the petition;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed AVA;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
AVA affecting viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical
features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and
distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the boundary of
the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA
boundary based on USGS map markings.
Willcox Petition
TTB received a petition from Paul S. Hagar, the special projects
manager of Dragoon Mountain Vineyard, on behalf of Dragoon Mountain
Vineyard and other local winery and vineyard owners, proposing the
establishment of the ``Willcox'' AVA. The proposed AVA contains
approximately 526,000 acres, and there are 21 commercially-producing
vineyards covering a total of approximately 454 acres distributed
throughout the proposed AVA, along with 18 wineries. According to the
petition, an additional 650 acres of vineyards are planned for the near
future. The proposed Willcox AVA is not located within any established
AVA. According to the petition, the distinguishing features of the
proposed Willcox AVA are its geology, topography, soils, and climate.
The proposed AVA is in the Arizona geological province known as the
``basin-and-range'' province, which is characterized by high mountain
ranges that are separated by valleys. The proposed Willcox AVA is
located within a broad, shallow basin and is surrounded by higher
mountain ranges including the Chiricahua, Dos Cabezas, Pinalenos,
Dragoon, Little Dragoon, and Winchester Mountains. The underlying
geology of the proposed AVA is comprised mainly of water-borne and
wind-borne deposits, in contrast to the surrounding mountain ranges
which are comprised of igneous rock and other volcanic materials. Over
time, the geologic activity of the region has disrupted the flow of
creeks, rivers, and drainage systems and has left the proposed AVA in a
``closed basin.'' Because the basin is ``closed,'' the aquifer beneath
the proposed AVA is recharged only through rainfall, in contrast to the
nearby ``open basin'' valleys which have year-round or seasonal creeks.
Therefore, vineyard owners within the proposed AVA use drip irrigation
to conserve water.
The topography within the proposed Willcox AVA is relatively
uniform and very flat, with slope angles ranging from 0 to 1.5 percent.
The very shallow slopes, combined with the lack of creeks or streams,
reduces the risk of erosion
[[Page 62627]]
within the proposed AVA. Because the proposed AVA is surrounded by
higher, steeper mountains, cool nighttime air flowing down from those
mountains settles in the vineyards within the proposed AVA. In the
early spring, this cool air can increase the risk of frost damage to
new shoots and buds, so vineyard owners often install large fans to mix
the warmer ambient air with the cooler descending air streams and
prevent the cool air from pooling.
The most prevalent soils within the proposed Willcox AVA are Tubac,
Sonoita, Forrest, and Frye soils, which are predominately loams
comprised of sand, silt, and clay in relatively even proportions. Loamy
soils retain adequate amounts of moisture to hydrate vineyards while
allowing excess water to percolate quickly through to the aquifer.
Loamy soils are also generally high in nutrients and, therefore, are
not typically preferred for vineyards because the nutrient levels can
promote overly vigorous vine and leaf growth. However, the petition
states that the stress placed on vines by the hot, dry climate of the
proposed AVA keeps vine and leaf growth in check. The soils of the
surrounding regions are also mostly loams. However, the four major
soils of the proposed AVA do not make up as large a percentage of the
surrounding area, except within the Chiricahua Mountains to the
southeast of the proposed AVA, where Tubac soils are more prevalent
than within the proposed Willcox AVA.
Southeast Arizona, including the region of the proposed Willcox
AVA, is generally considered to have an arid climate. The most
significant rainfall occurs during the monsoon season, in July and
August, when humid air flows into the region from both the Gulf of
Mexico and the Gulf of California. As the humid air rises over the
mountains that surround the proposed AVA, the air cools and eventually
reaches the point where it releases the moisture in the form of rain.
As the storms move beyond the mountains and foothills, they begin to
weaken and dissipate. Therefore, growing season precipitation amounts
are typically lower in the proposed Willcox AVA than in the surrounding
mountains.
In the region of the proposed Willcox AVA, elevation also plays a
role in climate. Regions at higher elevations typically have lower
growing season temperatures than regions at lower elevations. The
proposed AVA has higher growing season temperatures than the higher
surrounding mountains, including the Chiricahua Mountains to the
southeast. Large valleys lie beyond the mountain ranges that surround
the proposed AVA. These valleys are at lower elevations than the
proposed Willcox AVA and, therefore, have higher growing season
temperatures.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 157 in the Federal Register on January 21,
2016 (81 FR 3356), proposing to establish the Willcox AVA. In that
document, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding the
name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed AVA. The
proposed rule also compared the distinguishing features of the proposed
AVA to the features of the surrounding areas. For a detailed
description of the evidence relating to the name, boundary, and
distinguishing features of the proposed AVA, and for a detailed
comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed AVA to the
surrounding areas, see Notice No. 157.
In Notice No. 157, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, and other required information submitted in support of
the petition. The comment period closed on March 21, 2016. TTB received
three comments in response to Notice No. 157. Two of the three comments
were from local residents who supported the proposed AVA. One of the
supporting comments (comment 3) was submitted by a representative of
Cellar 433 winery and its Dragoon Mountain Vineyard and included three
letters of support for the proposed AVA from other wine industry
members within the proposed AVA. The three letters were dated in 2013
and were provided at that time to the Willcox AVA petitioner, who was
also an employee of Dragoon Mountain Vineyards. However the letters
were not included with the proposed Willcox AVA petition, nor had they
been received by TTB prior to the opening of the comment period. The
three letters support the proposed Willcox AVA and also mention support
for a ``Chiricahua Foothills'' AVA. TTB notes that the proposed Willcox
AVA petition was submitted simultaneously with a petition to establish
an adjacent ``Chiricahua Foothills'' AVA, but that petition was not
accepted as perfected by TTB, and the comments regarding the
petitioned-for Chiricahua Foothills are not being considered as part of
this rulemaking.
TTB received one comment from a local resident (comment 2) opposing
the establishment of an AVA ``in the foothills of the Chiricahua
Mountains * * *.'' The commenter states his belief that vineyards
``fragment the open spaces that ranches provide, disrupt the watershed
and block wildlife patterns.'' The commenter also states his belief
that the vineyards in the Willcox region do not provide economic
benefit to the community because most of the vineyards ``are not
sustainable economically'' and employ seasonal workers from outside the
area.
TTB's purpose in establishing an AVA is to allow winemakers to more
accurately describe the origins of the grapes used to make their wine,
so that consumers can have more information about the wines they may
purchase. Economic benefits and other impacts derived from the use of
an AVA name are the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area.
Section 4.25 of the TTB regulations defines an AVA as a delimited
grape-growing region having distinguishing features and a name and
delineated boundary as described in part 9 of the regulations. Section
9.12 of the TTB regulations requires an AVA petition to provide
sufficient name and geographical and/or climatic information, data, and
evidence to enable TTB to determine whether the features of the
proposed AVA are distinguishable from the surrounding regions and have
an effect on viticulture. TTB determined that the petition to establish
the proposed Willcox AVA contained sufficient evidence to merit notice
and comment. Furthermore, TTB has determined that the opposing comment
did not contain any evidence to contradict the name or distinguishing
features data contained in the petition. Therefore, TTB does not
believe that there is sufficient evidence to warrant the withdrawal or
modification of the proposal to establish the Willcox AVA.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition and the comments received, TTB
finds that the evidence provided by the petitioner supports the
establishment of the Willcox AVA. Accordingly, under the authority of
the FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and
parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations, TTB establishes the ``Willcox''
AVA in southeastern Arizona, effective 30 days from the publication
date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the AVA in the
regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
[[Page 62628]]
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another
reference on the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have
to obtain approval of a new label. Different rules apply if a wine has
a brand name containing an AVA name that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of this AVA, its name, ``Willcox,'' will be
recognized as a name of viticultural significance under Sec.
4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the
regulation clarifies this point. Consequently, wine bottlers using the
name ``Willcox'' in a brand name, including a trademark, or in another
label reference as to the origin of the wine, will have to ensure that
the product is eligible to use the AVA name as an appellation of
origin.
The establishment of the Willcox AVA will not affect any existing
AVA. The establishment of the Willcox AVA will allow vintners to use
``Willcox'' as an appellation of origin for wines made primarily from
grapes grown within the Willcox AVA if the wines meet the eligibility
requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted
this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Subpart C is amended by adding Sec. 9.259 to read as follows:
Sec. 9.259 Willcox.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Willcox''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
``Willcox'' is a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The 21 United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the
Willcox viticultural area are titled:
(1) Fort Grant, AZ, 1996;
(2) West of Greasewood Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(3) Greasewood Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(4) Willcox North, AZ, 1996;
(5) Railroad Pass, Ariz., 1979;
(6) Simmons Peak, AZ, 1996;
(7) Dos Cabezas, AZ, 1996;
(8) Pat Hills North, Ariz., 1974;
(9) Pat Hills South, Arizona, 1986 provisional edition;
(10) Sulphur Hills, AZ, 1996;
(11) Pearce, AZ., 1996;
(12) Turquoise Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(13) Black Diamond Peak, AZ, 1996;
(14) Cochise Stronghold, AZ, 1996;
(15) Cochise, AZ, 1996;
(16) Red Bird Hills, AZ, 1996;
(17) Steele Hills, AZ, 1996;
(18) Square Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(19) Muskhog Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(20) Reiley Peak, AZ, 1996; and
(21) Sierra Bonita Ranch, Ariz., 1972.
(c) Boundary. The Willcox viticultural area is located in Cochise
and Graham Counties in southeastern Arizona. The boundary of the
Willcox viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the Fort Grant map at the
intersection of State Highway 266 and an unnamed light-duty road known
locally as Curtis Parkway, in Fort Grant, section 35, T9S/R23E. From
the beginning point, proceed south-southeast in a straight line
approximately 20.4 miles, crossing over the West of Greasewood Mountain
and the Greasewood Mountain map and onto the Willcox North map, to the
intersection of three unnamed light-duty roads known locally as Porters
Ranch Road, East Saguaro Road, and North Circle I Road, near benchmark
(BM) 4,243 on the Willcox North map, section 36, T12S/R24E; then
(2) Proceed east in a straight line approximately 5 miles to
Interstate Highway 10 near the community of Raso, section 1, T13S/R25E;
then
(3) Proceed south in a straight line approximately 0.8 mile to the
4,400-foot elevation contour, section 1, T13S/R25E; then
(4) Proceed southwesterly along the 4,400-foot elevation contour
around the west end of the Dos Cabezas Mountains and continue
southeasterly along the 4,400-foot elevation contour for a total of
approximately 13.3 miles, crossing over the Railroad Pass map and onto
the Simmons Peak map, to State Highway 186 on the Simmons Peak map,
section 28, T14S/R26E; then
(5) Proceed south-southeast in a straight line approximately 15.8
miles, crossing over the Dos Cabezas map and onto the Pat Hills North
map, to the intersection of the 4,700-foot elevation contour and an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as East Creasey Ranch Road on the
Pat Hills North map near BM 4,695, section 21, T16S/R28E; then
(6) Proceed southerly along the 4,700-foot elevation contour
approximately 10.6 miles, crossing onto the Pat Hills South map, to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as East Uncle Curtis Lane,
section 7, T18S/R28 E; then
(7) Proceed west along East Uncle Curtis Lane approximately 0.5
mile to an unnamed light-duty road known locally as South Single Tree
Lane near the marked 4,664-foot elevation point, section 7, T18S/R28E;
then
(8) Proceed south along South Single Tree Lane approximately 0.5
mile to State Highway 181, section 7, T18S/R28E; then
(9) Proceed west along State Highway 181 approximately 9.9 miles,
crossing onto the Sulphur Hills map, to State Highway 191, section 10,
T18S/R26E; then
[[Page 62629]]
(10) Proceed north-northeasterly, then west, along State Highway
191 approximately 4.8 miles, crossing onto the Pearce map, to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as Kansas Settlement Road, near
BM 4,327, section 36, T17S/R25E; then
(11) Proceed southwest in a straight line approximately 8.9 miles,
crossing over the Turquoise Mountain map and onto the Black Diamond
Peak map, to the southeastern-most corner of the boundary of the
Coronado National Forest on the Black Diamond Peak map, section 35,
T18S/R24 E; then
(12) Proceed north along the boundary of the Coronado National
Forest approximately 2 miles to the marked 4,821-foot elevation point,
section 26, T18S/R24E; then
(13) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 13
miles, crossing over the Cochise Stronghold map and onto the Cochise
map, to the northeastern corner of the boundary of the Coronado
National Forest at the marked 4,642 elevation point on the Cochise map,
section 26, T16S/R23E; then
(14) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 1.2
miles to the intersection of the 4,450-foot elevation contour and an
unnamed secondary highway known locally as West Dragoon Road, section
23, T16S/R23E; then
(15) Proceed north in a straight line approximately 1.3 miles to
the 4,400-foot elevation contour, section 11, T16S/R23E; then
(16) Proceed generally northerly along the 4,400-foot elevation
contour approximately 10 miles, crossing onto the Red Bird Hills map,
to Interstate Highway 10, section 3, T15S/R23E; then
(17) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 5.8
miles, crossing onto the Steele Hills map, to the intersection of the
4,600-foot elevation contour and an unnamed light-duty road known
locally as West Airport Road, section 7, T14S/R23E; then
(18) Proceed east-northeasterly, then easterly, then northerly,
then easterly along West Airport Road approximately 7.2 miles, crossing
back onto the Red Bird Hills map and then onto the Square Mountain map,
to the 4,240-foot elevation contour east of BM 4,264, section 6, T14S/
R24E; then
(19) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 20.5
miles, crossing over the Muskhog Mountain and Reiley Peak maps and onto
the Sierra Bonita Ranch map, to the intersection of two unnamed light-
duty roads known locally as West Ash Creek Road and South Wells Road,
near BM 4,487 on the Sierra Bonita Ranch map, section 3, T11S/R22E;
then
(20) Proceed generally northerly along South Wells Road to BM
4,502, then continuing northerly along the western fork of the road for
a total of approximately 7.7 miles to an unnamed light-duty road known
locally as Bonita Aravaipa Road, section 27, T9S/R22E; then
(21) Proceed east in a straight line approximately 8.2 miles,
crossing onto the Fort Grant map, to the beginning point.
Signed: July 25, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: August 22, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-21849 Filed 9-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P