Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 62679-62681 [2016-21149]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330@airbus.com; Internet
https://www.airbus.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
24, 2016.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–21164 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9066; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–113–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011–10–
17, for all Airbus Model A300 and A310
series airplanes, and Model A300 B4–
600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series
airplanes, and Model C4–605R Variant F
airplanes (collectively called A300–600
series airplanes). AD 2011–10–17
currently requires revising the
maintenance program by incorporating
certain airworthiness limitation items
(ALIs). Since we issued AD 2011–10–17,
the manufacturer has revised certain
ALI documents, which specify more
restrictive instructions and/or
airworthiness limitations. This
proposed AD would require revising the
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate new or
revised structural inspection
requirements. This proposed AD would
also remove Model A310 and A300–600
series airplanes from the applicability.
We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking, damage, and
corrosion in certain structure; such
fatigue cracking, damage, and corrosion
could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 27, 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:07 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
9066; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; telephone 425–227–2125; fax
425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–9066; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–113–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62679
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On May 2, 2011, we issued AD 2011–
10–17, Amendment 39–16698 (76 FR
27875, May 13, 2011) (‘‘AD 2011–10–
17’’). AD 2011–10–17 requires actions
intended to address an unsafe condition
on all Airbus Model A300 and A310
series airplanes, and Model A300 B4–
600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series
airplanes, and Model C4–605R Variant F
airplanes (collectively called A300–600
series airplanes).
Since we issued AD 2011–10–17, the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued Airworthiness
Directive 2015–0115, dated June 23,
2015; (collectively referred to after this
as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’) to correct an unsafe condition.
The MCAI states:
The airworthiness limitations applicable to
the Damage Tolerant Airworthiness
Limitation Items (DT ALIs) are currently
listed in the Airbus Airworthiness
Limitations Sections [ALS] Part 2.
Airbus recently revised the A300 ALS Part
2 and this Revision 02 was approved by
EASA. Airbus A300 ALS Part 2 Revision 02
introduces more restrictive maintenance
requirements and airworthiness limitations,
which have been identified as mandatory
actions for continued airworthiness.
EASA issued AD 2014–0124 to require
compliance with the maintenance
requirements and associated airworthiness
limitations defined in Airbus A300 ALS Part
2 Revision 01.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD retains the requirements of EASA
AD 2014–0124 for A300 aeroplanes and
requires implementation of new or more
restrictive maintenance instructions and/or
airworthiness limitations as specified in
Airbus A300 ALS Part 2 Revision 02.
The requirements for A310 and A300–600
aeroplanes remain unchanged and are
covered by EASA AD 2014–0124R1 [FAA AD
2013–13–13, Amendment 39–17501 (79 FR
47857, August 19, 2014), contains the
corresponding requirements for the Model
A300–600 and A310 series airplanes].
The unsafe condition is fatigue
cracking, damage, or corrosion in
certain structure (principal structural
E:\FR\FM\12SEP1.SGM
12SEP1
62680
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules
elements), which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the
airplane. You may examine the MCAI in
the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
9066.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Airbus A300
Airworthiness Limitations Section Part
2, Damage-Tolerant Airworthiness
Limitation Items (DT ALIs), Revision 02,
dated October 3, 2014. This service
information describes airworthiness
limitations applicable to the DT ALIs.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD requires revisions
to certain operator maintenance
documents to include new inspections.
Compliance with these inspections is
required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously
modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections,
the operator may not be able to
accomplish the inspections described in
the revisions. In this situation, to
comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the
operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance
according to paragraph (j)(1) of this
proposed AD. The request should
include a description of changes to the
required inspections that will ensure the
continued damage tolerance of the
affected structure.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 11 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2011–10–17 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 1 work-hour
per product, at an average labor rate of
$85 per work-hour. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the actions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:07 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
that are required by AD 2011–10–17 is
$85 per product.
We also estimate that it would take
about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $935, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2011–10–17, Amendment 39–16698 (76
FR 27875, May 13, 2011), and adding
the following new AD:
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2016–9066;
Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–113–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by October 27,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2011–10–17,
Amendment 39–16698 (76 FR 27875, May 13,
2011) (‘‘AD 2011–10–17’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A300
B2–1A, B2–1C, B4–2C, B2K–3C, B4–103, B2–
203, and B4–203 airplanes, certificated in
any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Codes 52, Doors; 53, Fuselage; 54,
Nacelles/pylons; 55, Stabilizers; and 57,
Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a revision of
certain airworthiness limitations items (ALI)
documents, which specify more restrictive
instructions and/or airworthiness limitations.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking, damage, and corrosion in
certain structure; such fatigue cracking,
damage, and corrosion could result in
reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Revision of the ALS of the
Instructions for ICA, With Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (s) of AD 2011–10–17, with
changes. Within 3 months after June 17, 2011
(the effective date of AD 2011–10–17): Revise
the maintenance program to incorporate the
structural inspections and inspection
intervals defined in the Airbus A300 ALI
Document AI/SE–M2/95A.1308/07, Issue 4,
dated June 2008. Thereafter, except as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD and
except as provided by paragraph (j)(1) of this
AD, no alternative structural inspections and
inspection intervals may be approved. The
actions must be accomplished in accordance
with the applicable issue of the ALI. The
initial ALI tasks must be done at the times
specified in Airbus A300 ALI Document AI/
E:\FR\FM\12SEP1.SGM
12SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules
SE–M2/95A.1308/07, Issue 4, dated June
2008.
(h) New Requirement of This AD:
Maintenance or Inspection Program
Revision
Within 3 months the effective date of this
AD: Revise the maintenance program or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the structural inspections and
inspection intervals defined in Airbus A300
ALS Part 2, Damage-Tolerant Airworthiness
Limitation Items, Revision 02, dated October
3, 2014. The initial compliance time for the
ALI tasks identified in Airbus A300 ALS Part
2, Damage-Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation
Items, Revision 02, dated October 3, 2014, is
at the applicable times specified in Airbus
A300 ALS Part 2, Damage-Tolerant
Airworthiness Limitation Items, Revision 02,
dated October 3, 2014, or within 3 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later. Accomplishing the applicable
initial ALI tasks constitutes terminating
action for the requirements of paragraphs (g)
of this AD for that airplane only.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) No Alternative Actions and Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be
used unless the actions or intervals are
approved as an AMOC in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2125; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD
2011–10–17 are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the
effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by
the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:07 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0124R1, dated
June 23, 2015, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2016–9066.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
24, 2016.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–21149 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 305
RIN 3084–AB15
Energy Labeling Rule
Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Commission proposes
amendments to the Energy Labeling
Rule to require labels for portable air
conditioners, large-diameter and highspeed small diameter ceiling fans, and
instantaneous electric water heaters.
Additionally, it proposes eliminating
certain marking requirements for
plumbing products.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before November 14,
2016.
SUMMARY:
Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Energy Labeling
Amendments (16 CFR part 305) (Project
No. R611004)’’ on your comment, and
file your comment online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
plumbingnprm, by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62681
paper, mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
CC–5610 (Annex E), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex E),
Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hampton Newsome, Attorney, (202)
326–2889, Division of Enforcement,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal
Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Commission issued the Energy
Labeling Rule (‘‘Rule’’) in 1979,1
pursuant to the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA).2 The
Rule requires energy labeling for major
home appliances and other consumer
products to help consumers compare
competing models. It also contains
labeling requirements for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, freezers,
dishwashers, water heaters, clothes
washers, room air conditioners,
furnaces, central air conditioners, heat
pumps, plumbing products, lighting
products, ceiling fans, and televisions.
The Rule requires manufacturers to
attach yellow EnergyGuide labels to
many of the covered products and
prohibits retailers from removing these
labels or rendering them illegible. In
addition, it directs sellers, including
retailers, to post label information on
Web sites and in paper catalogs from
which consumers can order products.
EnergyGuide labels for most covered
products contain three key disclosures:
Estimated annual energy cost, a
product’s energy consumption or energy
efficiency rating as determined by DOE
test procedures, and a comparability
range displaying the highest and lowest
energy costs or efficiency ratings for all
similar models. For cost calculations,
the Rule specifies national average costs
for applicable energy sources (e.g.,
electricity, natural gas, oil) as calculated
by DOE. Under the Rule, the
Commission periodically updates
comparability range and annual energy
cost information based on manufacturer
1 44
FR 66466 (Nov. 19, 1979).
U.S.C. 6294. EPCA also requires the
Department of Energy (DOE) to develop test
procedures that measure how much energy
appliances use, and to determine the representative
average cost a consumer pays for different types of
energy.
2 42
E:\FR\FM\12SEP1.SGM
12SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62679-62681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-9066; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-113-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011-10-
17, for all Airbus Model A300 and A310 series airplanes, and Model A300
B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series airplanes, and Model C4-605R
Variant F airplanes (collectively called A300-600 series airplanes). AD
2011-10-17 currently requires revising the maintenance program by
incorporating certain airworthiness limitation items (ALIs). Since we
issued AD 2011-10-17, the manufacturer has revised certain ALI
documents, which specify more restrictive instructions and/or
airworthiness limitations. This proposed AD would require revising the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or
revised structural inspection requirements. This proposed AD would also
remove Model A310 and A300-600 series airplanes from the applicability.
We are proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking,
damage, and corrosion in certain structure; such fatigue cracking,
damage, and corrosion could result in reduced structural integrity of
the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 27,
2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9066; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2125;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9066;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-113-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On May 2, 2011, we issued AD 2011-10-17, Amendment 39-16698 (76 FR
27875, May 13, 2011) (``AD 2011-10-17''). AD 2011-10-17 requires
actions intended to address an unsafe condition on all Airbus Model
A300 and A310 series airplanes, and Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-
600R series airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called A300-600 series airplanes).
Since we issued AD 2011-10-17, the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued Airworthiness Directive 2015-0115, dated
June 23, 2015; (collectively referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI'') to correct an
unsafe condition. The MCAI states:
The airworthiness limitations applicable to the Damage Tolerant
Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT ALIs) are currently listed in the
Airbus Airworthiness Limitations Sections [ALS] Part 2.
Airbus recently revised the A300 ALS Part 2 and this Revision 02
was approved by EASA. Airbus A300 ALS Part 2 Revision 02 introduces
more restrictive maintenance requirements and airworthiness
limitations, which have been identified as mandatory actions for
continued airworthiness.
EASA issued AD 2014-0124 to require compliance with the
maintenance requirements and associated airworthiness limitations
defined in Airbus A300 ALS Part 2 Revision 01.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2014-0124 for A300 aeroplanes and requires
implementation of new or more restrictive maintenance instructions
and/or airworthiness limitations as specified in Airbus A300 ALS
Part 2 Revision 02.
The requirements for A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes remain
unchanged and are covered by EASA AD 2014-0124R1 [FAA AD 2013-13-13,
Amendment 39-17501 (79 FR 47857, August 19, 2014), contains the
corresponding requirements for the Model A300-600 and A310 series
airplanes].
The unsafe condition is fatigue cracking, damage, or corrosion in
certain structure (principal structural
[[Page 62680]]
elements), which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2016-9066.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Airbus A300 Airworthiness Limitations Section
Part 2, Damage-Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT ALIs),
Revision 02, dated October 3, 2014. This service information describes
airworthiness limitations applicable to the DT ALIs.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD requires revisions to certain operator maintenance
documents to include new inspections. Compliance with these inspections
is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that have been
previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by
these inspections, the operator may not be able to accomplish the
inspections described in the revisions. In this situation, to comply
with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance according to paragraph (j)(1) of this
proposed AD. The request should include a description of changes to the
required inspections that will ensure the continued damage tolerance of
the affected structure.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 11 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2011-10-17 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 1 work-hour per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost
of the actions that are required by AD 2011-10-17 is $85 per product.
We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $935, or $85 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2011-10-17, Amendment 39-16698 (76 FR 27875, May 13, 2011), and adding
the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-9066; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-
113-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by October 27, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2011-10-17, Amendment 39-16698 (76 FR 27875,
May 13, 2011) (``AD 2011-10-17'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B4-2C,
B2K-3C, B4-103, B2-203, and B4-203 airplanes, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Codes 52, Doors; 53,
Fuselage; 54, Nacelles/pylons; 55, Stabilizers; and 57, Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a revision of certain airworthiness
limitations items (ALI) documents, which specify more restrictive
instructions and/or airworthiness limitations. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking, damage, and corrosion in
certain structure; such fatigue cracking, damage, and corrosion
could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Revision of the ALS of the Instructions for ICA, With
Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (s) of AD
2011-10-17, with changes. Within 3 months after June 17, 2011 (the
effective date of AD 2011-10-17): Revise the maintenance program to
incorporate the structural inspections and inspection intervals
defined in the Airbus A300 ALI Document AI/SE-M2/95A.1308/07, Issue
4, dated June 2008. Thereafter, except as required by paragraph (h)
of this AD and except as provided by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, no
alternative structural inspections and inspection intervals may be
approved. The actions must be accomplished in accordance with the
applicable issue of the ALI. The initial ALI tasks must be done at
the times specified in Airbus A300 ALI Document AI/
[[Page 62681]]
SE-M2/95A.1308/07, Issue 4, dated June 2008.
(h) New Requirement of This AD: Maintenance or Inspection Program
Revision
Within 3 months the effective date of this AD: Revise the
maintenance program or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the structural inspections and inspection intervals
defined in Airbus A300 ALS Part 2, Damage-Tolerant Airworthiness
Limitation Items, Revision 02, dated October 3, 2014. The initial
compliance time for the ALI tasks identified in Airbus A300 ALS Part
2, Damage-Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation Items, Revision 02,
dated October 3, 2014, is at the applicable times specified in
Airbus A300 ALS Part 2, Damage-Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation
Items, Revision 02, dated October 3, 2014, or within 3 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. Accomplishing
the applicable initial ALI tasks constitutes terminating action for
the requirements of paragraphs (g) of this AD for that airplane
only.
(i) No Alternative Actions and Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
telephone 425-227-2125; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed
to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2011-10-17 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0124R1, dated June 23,
2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9066.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 24, 2016.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-21149 Filed 9-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P