Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of Board Approval Under Delegated Authority and Submission to OMB, 62129-62135 [2016-21524]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
that may be required to be executed by
the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in
its sole discretion, deems necessary;
including but not limited to releases,
discharges, satisfactions, endorsements,
assignments and deeds.
Effective September 1, 2016, the
Receivership Estate has been
terminated, the Receiver discharged,
and the Receivership Estate has ceased
to exist as a legal entity.
Parties: Crowley Latin America
Services, LLC and Antillean Marine
Shipping Corp.
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor, 1627 I Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The Agreement would
revise the agreement to authorize the
reciprocal, rather than one-way,
chartering of space in the trade covered
by the Agreement.
Dated: September 1, 2016.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
Dated: September 2, 2016.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–21464 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
[FR Doc. 2016–21595 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Agreements Filed
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 011741–021.
Title: U.S. Pacific Coast-Oceania
Agreement.
Parties: ANL Singapore Pte Ltd./CMA
CGM S.A.; Hamburg-Sud; and HapagLloyd AG.
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Conner; 1200 19th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20036.
Synopsis: The amendment revises the
space allocations of the parties.
Agreement No.: 012297–003.
Title: ECNA/ECSA Vessel Sharing
Agreement.
Parties: Hamburg Sud; Alianca
Navegacao e Logistica Ltds. E CIA;
Companhia Libra de Navegacao; Hapaglloyd AG.
Filing Party: Wayne Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1200 19th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20036.
Synopsis: The Amendment would
revise the space allocations of the
parties and add authority for the parties
to make minor adjustments to those
allocations in the future without having
to amend the Agreement.
Agreement No.: 012310–001.
Title: Crowley Latin America
Services, LLC/Antillean Marine
Shipping Corp. Space Charter
Agreement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies;
Correction
This notice corrects a notice FR Doc.
2016–20202 published on page 57910 of
the issue for August 24, 2016.
Under the Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta heading, the entry for Sunshine
Bancorp, Inc., Plant City, Florida
(‘‘Sunshine’’) is revised to read as
follows:
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can
also be sent electronically to
Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org:
1. Sunshine Bancorp, Inc., Plant City,
Florida (‘‘Sunshine’’); to become a
savings and loan holding company.
Sunshine currently is a savings and loan
holding company; Sunshine proposes to
become a bank holding company for a
moment in time by merging with FBC
Bancorp Inc., Orlando, Florida and
acquire its subsidiary bank, Florida
Bank of Commerce, Orlando Florida,
(‘‘FB Bank’’). Sunshine also has applied
to retain its savings association,
Sunshine Bank, Plant City, Florida.
After the acquisition, Sunshine
proposes to merge FB Bank with
Sunshine Bank, with Sunshine Bank as
the surviving entity, and become a
savings and loan holding company.
Comments on this application must
be received by September 21, 2016.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, September 1, 2016.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–21471 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62129
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Announcement of Board
Approval Under Delegated Authority
and Submission to OMB
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board or
Federal Reserve) is adopting a proposal
to revise, with extension, the mandatory
Consolidated Financial Statements for
Holding Companies (FR Y–9C). The
Board also proposes to extend, without
revision, the other forms that make up
the family of FR Y–9 reporting forms.
These are: The Parent Company Only
Financial Statements for Large Holding
Companies (FR Y–9LP) The Parent
Company Only Financial Statements for
Small Holding Companies (FR Y–9SP)
The Financial Statements for Employee
Stock Ownership Plan Holding
Companies (FR Y–9ES) The Supplement
to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for Holding Companies (FR
Y–9CS). The revisions to this mandatory
information collection become effective
on September 30, 2016, and March 31,
2017. The Board is also adopting a
proposal to extend, without revision,
the other reports that are part of this
information collection.
On June 15, 1984, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
delegated to the Board authority under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) to
approve of and assign OMB control
numbers to collection of information
requests and requirements conducted or
sponsored by the Board. In exercising
this delegated authority, the Board is
directed to take every reasonable step to
solicit comment. In determining
whether to approve a collection of
information, the Board will consider all
comments received from the public and
other agencies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Federal Reserve Board Clearance
Officer—Nuha Elmaghrabi—Office of
the Chief Data Officer, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, DC 20551 (202)
452–3829. Telecommunications Device
for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact
(202) 263–4869, Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, DC 20551.
OMB Desk Officer—Shagufta
Ahmed—Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
62130
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Final approval under OMB delegated
authority of the extension for three
years, with revision, of the following
report:
Report title: Consolidated Financial
Statements for Holding Companies,
Parent Company Only Financial
Statements for Large Holding
Companies, Parent Company Only
Financial Statements for Small Holding
Companies, Financial Statement for
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Holding Companies, and the
Supplemental to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for Holding
Companies.
OMB control number: 7100–0128.
Agency form number: FR Y–9C, FR Y–
9LP, FR Y–9SP, FR Y–9ES, and FR Y–
9CS.
Frequency: Quarterly, semiannually,
and annually.
Reporters: Bank holding companies
(BHCs), savings and loan holding
companies (SLHCs), securities holding
companies (SHCs) and Intermediate
Holding Companies (IHCs) (collectively,
holding companies).
Estimated annual reporting hours: FR
Y–9C (non-Advanced Approaches
holding companies): 131,245 hours; FR
Y–9C (Advanced Approaches holding
companies): 2,674 hours; FR Y–9LP:
16,632 hours; FR Y–9SP: 44,518 hours;
FR Y–9ES: 44 hours; FR Y–CS: 472
hours.
Estimated average hours per response:
FR Y–9C (non-Advanced Approaches
holding companies): 50.17 hours; FR Y–
9C (Advanced Approaches holding
companies): 51.42 hours; FR Y–9LP:
5.25 hours; FR Y–9SP: 5.40 hours; FR
Y–9ES: 0.50 hours; FR Y–9CS: 0.50
hours.
Number of respondents: FR Y–9C
(non-Advanced Approaches holding
companies): 654; FR Y–9C (Advanced
Approaches holding companies): 13; FR
Y–9LP: 792; FR Y–9SP: 4,122; FR Y–
9ES: 88; FR Y–9CS: 236.
General description of report: This
information collection is mandatory for
BHCs (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)(1)(A)).
Additionally, 12 U.S.C. 1467a (b)(2)(A)
and 1850a(c)(1)(A), respectively,
authorize the Federal Reserve to require
that SLHCs and supervised SHCs file
with the Federal Reserve. Lastly, 12
U.S.C. 5365 authorizes the Federal
Reserve to require that U.S. IHCs file
with the Federal Reserve. Confidential
treatment is not routinely given to the
financial data in this report. However,
confidential treatment for the reporting
information, in whole or in part, can be
requested in accordance with the
instructions to the form, pursuant to
sections (b)(4), (b)(6), or (b)(8) of FOIA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
(5 U.S.C. 522(b)(4), (b)(6), and (b)(8)).
The applicability of these exemptions
would need to be reviewed on a case by
case basis.
Abstract: The FR Y–9C is a
standardized financial statement for the
consolidated holding company. The FR
Y–9LP and the FR Y 9SP serve as
standardized financial statements for
parent holding companies; the FR Y–
9ES is a financial statement for holding
companies that are Employee Stock
Ownership Plans (ESOPs). The Federal
Reserve also has the authority to use the
FR Y–9CS (a free-form supplement) to
collect additional information deemed
to be (1) critical and (2) needed in an
expedited manner. The FR Y–9 family
of reporting forms continues to be the
primary source of holding company
financial data that examiners rely on in
the intervals between on-site
inspections. Financial data from these
reporting forms are used to detect
emerging financial problems, to review
performance and conduct preinspection analysis, to monitor and
evaluate capital adequacy, to evaluate
holding company mergers and
acquisitions, and to analyze a holding
company’s overall financial condition to
ensure the safety and soundness of its
operations.
Current Actions: On December 2,
2015, the Federal Reserve published a
notice in the Federal Register
requesting public comment for 60 days
on the proposed revisions to the FR Y–
9C.1 As proposed, the revisions would
have become effective in March 2016.
Based on comments received on the
proposal and other factors, the Federal
Reserve notified institutions that the
revisions would be deferred until no
earlier than September 2016. Most of the
proposed revisions were reporting
burden reductions consistent with
proposed changes to the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination
Council (FFIEC) Consolidated Reports of
Condition and Income (Call Reports)
(FFIEC 031 & 041; OMB No. 7100–
0036). The proposed revisions included
deletions of existing data items,
increases in existing thresholds for
certain data items, a number of
instructional revisions and the addition
of new and revised data items.
The Federal Reserve received one
comment letter from a bankers’
association regarding proposed
revisions to the FR Y–9C. The Federal
Reserve also considered the comments
on the Call Reports in developing the
draft final notice for consistency. The
A. Deletions of Existing Data Items
The Federal Reserve proposed that the
continued collection of the following
items was no longer necessary and
proposed to eliminate them effective
March 2016:
(1) Schedule HI, Memorandum items
17(a) and 17(b), on other-thantemporary impairments; 2
(2) Schedule HC–C, Memorandum
items 1(f)(2), 1(f)(5), and 1(f)(6) on
troubled debt restructurings in certain
loan categories that are in compliance
with their modified terms;
(3) Schedule HC–N, Memorandum
items 1(f)(2), 1(f)(5), and 1(f)(6) on
troubled debt restructurings in certain
loan categories that are 30 days or more
past due or on nonaccrual;
(4) Schedule HC–M, items 6(a)(5)(a)
through (d) on loans in certain loan
categories that are covered by FDIC losssharing agreements; and
(5) Schedule HC–N, items 12(e)(1)
through (4) on loans in certain loan
categories that are covered by FDIC losssharing agreements and are 30 days or
more past due or on nonaccrual.
In addition, when Schedule HC–R,
Part II, is completed properly, item 18(b)
on unused commitments to asset-backed
commercial paper conduits with an
original maturity of one year or less is
not needed because such commitments
should already have been reported in
item 10 as off-balance sheet
securitization exposures. The
instructions for item 18(b) explain that
these unused commitments should be
reported in item 10 and that amounts
should not be reported in item 18(b).
1 Notice of the proposed action was published in
the Federal Register; the comment period expired
on February 1, 2016. See FR 80 75457.
2 Institutions would continue to complete
Schedule HI, Memorandum item 17(c), on net
impairment losses recognized in earnings.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Board, Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC), and Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) (the
agencies) collectively received comment
letters from seven banking
organizations, four bankers’ associations
and two consulting firms on similar
proposed revisions to the Call Reports.
The commenters generally supported
the proposal, but suggested delayed
implementation of the revisions. The
Federal Reserve has delayed the
effective dates for these changes
consistent with the timing suggested by
commenters. The Federal Reserve
adopted most of the revisions as
proposed, except for a few instructional
changes due to comments received.
The following is a detailed discussion
of the comments received and the
Federal Reserve’s responses to the
comments.
Detailed Discussion of Public Comment
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
Accordingly, the Federal Reserve
proposed to delete existing item 18(b)
from Schedule HC–R, Part II. Existing
item 18(c) of Schedule HC–R, Part II, for
unused commitments with an original
maturity exceeding one year would then
be renumbered as item 18(b).
Comments were received from two
consulting firms and one banking
organization regarding those proposed
deletions. The banking organization
stated that these revisions would have
no impact on its reporting. One
consulting firm agreed with all of the
proposed deletions except the one
involving information on other-thantemporary impairment (OTTI) losses in
Schedule HI, Memorandum items 17(a)
and 17(b). The firm believed the
deletion of the two OTTI items would
eliminate the reporting of important
information about the performance of
institutions’ securities portfolios and
how they recognize OTTI. While the
Federal Reserve acknowledges that this
proposal would result in the loss of
information on the total year-to-date
amount of OTTI losses and the portion
of these losses recognized in other
comprehensive income, institutions
would continue to report the portion of
OTTI losses recognized in earnings. It is
this portion of OTTI losses that is of
greatest interest and concern to the
Federal Reserve. Because some or all of
each OTTI loss must be recognized in
earnings, when an institution reports a
substantial amount of OTTI losses in
earnings, it is this item that serves as a
red flag for further supervisory followup. Additionally, the portion of OTTI
losses that passes through other
comprehensive income and accumulates
in other comprehensive income is
excluded from regulatory capital for the
vast majority of institutions.
One consulting firm expressed
concern about the proposed deletion of
Memorandum items on troubled debt
restructurings in certain loan categories
in Schedules HC–C and HC–N. This
firm stated that this information is
important for understanding the specific
nature of troubled loans relative to
restructured loans and suggested that
the loan categories being deleted may
need to be added back if there is a
significant economic downturn. The
Federal Reserve notes that each of the
loan categories proposed for deletion is
a subset of the larger loan category ‘‘All
other loans,’’ which institutions would
continue to report. Furthermore, the
amount of troubled debt restructurings
in each of these subset categories is
reported only when it exceeds 10
percent of the total amount of troubled
debt restructurings in compliance with
their modified terms (Schedule HC–C)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
or not in compliance with their
modified terms (Schedule HC–N), as
appropriate. Thus, the total amount of
an institution’s troubled debt
restructurings, both those in compliance
with their modified terms and those that
are not, would continue to be reported.
After considering these comments, the
Federal Reserve will remove all of the
items proposed for deletion from the FR
Y–9C effective September 30, 2016,
except for the deletion relating to OTTI,
which would take effect March 31,
2017.
B. New Reporting Threshold and
Increases in Existing Reporting
Thresholds
In three FR Y–9C schedules, holding
companies are currently required to
itemize and describe each component of
an existing item when the component
exceeds both a specified percentage of
the item and a specified dollar amount.
Based on a preliminary evaluation of the
existing reporting thresholds, the
Federal Reserve proposed that the dollar
portion of the thresholds that currently
apply to these items could be increased
to provide a reduction in reporting
burden without a loss of data that would
be necessary for supervisory or other
public policy purposes. The percentage
portion of the existing thresholds would
not be changed. Accordingly, the
Federal Reserve proposed to raise from
$25,000 to $100,000 the dollar portion
of the threshold for itemizing and
describing components of:
(1) Schedule HI, memo item 6, ‘‘Other
noninterest income;’’
(2) Schedule HI, memo item 7, ‘‘Other
noninterest expense;’’
(3) Schedule HC–Q, Memorandum
item 1, ‘‘All other assets;’’ and
(4) Schedule HC–Q, Memorandum
item 2, ‘‘All other liabilities.’’
To reduce burden, the Federal
Reserve also proposed to raise from
$25,000 to $1,000,000 the dollar portion
of the threshold for itemizing and
describing components of ‘‘Other
trading assets’’ and ‘‘Other trading
liabilities’’ in Schedule HC–D,
Memorandum items 9(b) and 10.
Based on the Federal Reserve’s review
of items reported on Schedule HC–I,
Insurance-Related Underwriting
Activities (Including Reinsurance), the
Federal Reserve proposed to add a
$10,000,000 threshold to provide a
reduction in reporting burden for
reinsurance recoverables reported on
Schedule HC–I, Part I line item 1 and
HC–I, Part II line item 1, due to the
limited activity and immateriality on
these line items. Reporting of these data
items would be determined as of the
end of each quarter.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62131
Two bankers’ associations, two
consulting firms, and two banking
organizations commented on the
proposed changes involving reporting
thresholds. One banking organization
supported the higher thresholds, stating
that raising the thresholds would reduce
reporting burden, but the other said that
this change would not have an impact
on its reporting. The two bankers’
associations expressed support for the
targeted approach to increasing the
reporting thresholds, but observed that
an increase from $25,000 to $100,000
would do little to reduce reporting
burden for most institutions. The
associations recommended increasing
the percentage portion of the reporting
threshold for which components must
be itemized and described. At present,
the percentage portion of the reporting
threshold applicable to reporting
components of ‘‘Other noninterest
income’’ and ‘‘Other noninterest
expense’’ in Schedule HI is three
percent.3 The associations
recommended increasing this
percentage to a range of 5 to 7 percent.
Because of the interaction between
the dollar and percentage portions of the
reporting thresholds on the total amount
of an item that is subject to component
itemization and description, the Federal
Reserve acknowledges that the proposed
increase in the dollar portion of the
reporting threshold from $25,000 to
$100,000 may not benefit all holding
companies, particularly larger holding
companies. One consulting firm
supported the increase in the dollar
portion of the reporting threshold for
Schedule HC–Q, but recommended
retaining the $25,000 threshold for the
‘‘Other noninterest income’’ and ‘‘Other
noninterest expense’’ in Schedule HI.
The consulting firm commented that, for
smaller institutions, information on the
components of these noninterest items
‘‘is an important indicator of the activity
of the institution, its style and
management ability’’ and ‘‘provide[s]
regulators with a clearer insight into the
activities of a bank.’’ This firm also
observed that the component
information is or should be captured in
the internal accounting systems. The
Federal Reserve recognizes that the
proposed increase in the dollar portion
of the threshold for reporting
components of other noninterest income
and expense would result in a reduced
number of their components being
itemized and described in the FR Y–9C
3 For the other items for which Federal Reserve
proposed an increase in the dollar portion of the
existing reporting threshold, the percentage portion
of the threshold is 25 percent of the total amount
of the item.
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
62132
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
Schedule HI, particularly by smaller
holding companies. However, in
carrying out on- and off-site supervision
of holding companies, the Federal
Reserve is able to follow up directly
with an individual holding company
when the level and trend of noninterest
income and expense, and other
elements of net income (or loss), that are
reflected in its FR Y–9C raise questions
about the quality of, and the factors
affecting, the holding company’s
reported earnings. The Federal Reserve
does not believe the proposed increase
in the dollar portion of the reporting
thresholds in Schedule HI will impede
the ability to evaluate holding
companies’ earnings.
Another consulting firm questioned
the proposed increase from $25,000 to
$1,000,000 in the dollar portion of the
threshold for itemizing and describing
components of ‘‘Other trading assets’’
and ‘‘Other trading liabilities’’ in
Schedule HC–D, Memorandum items 9
and 10. In addition to meeting the dollar
portion of the threshold, a component
must exceed 25 percent of the total
amount of ‘‘Other trading assets’’ or
‘‘Other trading liabilities’’ in order to be
itemized and described in
Memorandum item 9 or 10, respectively.
These two memorandum items are to be
completed only by holding companies
that report average trading assets of $1
billion or more in any of the four
preceding calendar quarters. Thus, at
$1,000,000, the proposed higher dollar
threshold for component itemization
and description in Memorandum items
9 and 10 of Schedule HC–D would
represent one tenth of one percent of the
amount of average trading assets that a
holding company must have in order to
be subject to the requirement to report
components of its other trading assets
and liabilities that exceed the reporting
threshold. As a result, the Federal
Reserve believes that raising the dollar
portion of the threshold for reporting
components of Memorandum items 9
and 10 of Schedule HC–D to $1,000,000
will continue to provide meaningful
data while reducing burden for holding
companies that must complete these
items.
No comments were received on the
proposal to add a $10,000,000 threshold
on HC–I. After considering the
comments about the proposed new and
increased reporting thresholds, the
Federal Reserve will implement all of
these changes effective September 30,
2016.4
4 Although the proposed reporting threshold
changes would take effect as of September 30, 2016,
holding companies may choose, but are not
required, to continue using $25,000 as the dollar
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
C. Instructional Revisions
1. Reporting Home Equity Lines of
Credit that Convert from Revolving to
Non Revolving Status.
Holding companies report the amount
outstanding under revolving, open-end
lines of credit secured by 1–4 family
residential properties (commonly
known as home equity lines of credit or
HELOCs) in item 1(c)(1) of Schedule
HC–C, Loans and Leases. Closed-end
loans secured by 1–4 family residential
properties are reported in Schedule
HC–C, item 1(c)(2)(a) or (b), depending
on whether the loan is a first or a junior
lien.5
A HELOC is a line of credit secured
by a lien on a 1–4 family residential
property that generally provides a draw
period followed by a repayment period.
During the draw period, a borrower has
revolving access to unused amounts
under a specified line of credit. During
the repayment period, the borrower can
no longer draw on the line of credit, and
the outstanding principal is either due
immediately in a balloon payment or is
repaid over the remaining loan term
through monthly payments. The FR
Y–9C instructions do not address the
reporting treatment for a home equity
line of credit when it reaches its end-ofdraw period and converts from
revolving to nonrevolving status. Such a
loan no longer has the characteristics of
a revolving, open-end line of credit and,
instead, becomes a closed-end loan. In
the absence of instructional guidance
that specifically addresses this situation,
the Federal Reserve has found diversity
in how these credits are reported in
Schedule HC–C. Some holding
companies continue to report home
equity lines of credit that have
converted to non-revolving closed-end
status in item 1(c)(1) of Schedule
HC–C, as if they were still revolving
open-end lines of credit, while other
holding companies recategorize such
loans and report them as closed-end
loans in item 1(c)(2)(a) or (b), as
appropriate.
Therefore, to address this absence of
instructional guidance and promote
consistency in reporting, the Federal
Reserve proposed to clarify the
instructions for reporting loans secured
by 1–4 family residential properties to
specify that after a revolving open-end
portion of the threshold for reporting components
of the specified items in the three previously
identified schedules rather than the higher dollar
thresholds.
5 Information also is separately reported for openend and closed-end loans secured by 1–4 family
residential properties in Schedule HI–B, Part I,
Charge-offs and Recoveries on Loans and Leases;
Memorandum items in Schedule HC–C; Schedule
HC–D; Schedule HC–M; and Schedule HC–N.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
line of credit has converted to nonrevolving closed-end status, the loan
should be reported in Schedule HC–C,
item 1(c)(2)(a) or (b), as appropriate.
Two bankers’ associations, one
consulting firm, and one banking
organization commented on the
proposed instructional clarification for
HELOCs. The consulting firm agreed
with this clarification because of the
consistency in reporting that it would
provide. The two bankers’ associations
stated that they appreciated the
proposed clarification, but noted that
‘‘material definitional changes would
require a whole recoding of these
credits.’’ The associations observed that
the proposed clarification would likely
have implications for other regulatory
requirements such as the
Comprehensive Capital Analysis and
Review, which evaluates the capital
planning processes and capital
adequacy of the largest U.S.-based bank
holding companies. They also described
two situations involving HELOCs for
which further guidance would be
needed if the proposed instructional
change were to be implemented and
recommended that examples be
provided with the instructions for
reporting HELOCs.
The banking organization opposed the
proposed instructional clarification for
HELOCs and requested that it be
withdrawn, citing several difficulties it
would encounter if the clarification
were made. These difficulties include
identifying when a HELOC has begun
the repayment period and the lien
position of a HELOC at that time
because the bank’s loan system for
HELOCs has not been set up to generate
this information. The bank requested
time for systems reprogramming if the
proposed instructional clarification
were to be adopted.
Based on the issues raised in the
comments received on the proposed
HELOC instructional clarification, the
Federal Reserve will give further
consideration to this proposal,
including its effect on and relationship
to other regulatory reporting
requirements. Accordingly, the Federal
Reserve will not proceed with this
proposed instructional clarification at
this time and the existing instructions
for reporting HELOCs in item 1.c(1) of
Schedule HC–C, will remain in effect.
Once the Federal Reserve completes its
consideration of this instructional
matter and determines whether and how
the FR Y–9C instructions should be
clarified with respect to the reporting of
revolving open-end lines of credit that
have converted to non-revolving closedend status, any proposed instructional
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
clarification will be published in the
Federal Register for comment.
2. Reporting Treatment for Securities for
Which a Fair Value Option Is Elected
The FR Y–9C Glossary entry for
‘‘Trading Account’’ currently states that
‘‘all securities within the scope of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board’s
(FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 320,
Investments-Debt and Equity Securities
(formerly FASB Statement No. 115,
‘‘Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities’’), that a
holding company has elected to report
at fair value under a fair value option
with changes in fair value reported in
current earnings should be classified as
trading securities.’’ This reporting
treatment was based on language
contained in former FASB Statement
No. 159, ‘‘The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities,’’ but that language was not
codified when Statement No. 159 was
superseded by current ASC Topic 825,
Financial Instruments. Thus, under U.S.
GAAP as currently in effect, the
classification of all securities within the
scope of ASC Topic 320 that are
accounted for under a fair value option
as trading securities is no longer
required. Accordingly, to bring the
‘‘Trading Account’’ Glossary entry into
conformity with current U.S. GAAP, the
Federal Reserve proposed to revise the
statement from the Glossary entry
quoted above by replacing ‘‘should be
classified’’ with ‘‘may be classified.’’
This revision to the ‘‘Trading
Account’’ Glossary entry would have
meant that a holding company that
elects the fair value option for securities
within the scope of ASC Topic 320
would have been able to classify such
securities as held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale in accordance with
this topic based on the holding
company’s intent and ability with
respect to the securities. In addition, a
holding company could have chosen to
classify securities for which a fair value
option is elected as trading securities.
Holding companies that have been
required to classify all securities within
the scope of ASC Topic 320 that are
accounted for under a fair value option
as trading securities also should
consider the related proposed changes
to Schedule HC–Q, Assets and
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a
Recurring Basis, which are discussed
below.
Comments from two bankers’
associations and one consulting firm
were received regarding the proposed
instructional revision for the
classification of securities for which the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
fair value option is elected. The
consulting firm welcomed the proposal.
The two bankers’ associations stated
that they understood the purpose of the
proposed instructional revision, but
they requested further clarification of
the reporting treatment for ‘‘securities
for which an institution has elected to
use the trading measurement
classification,’’ i.e., fair value through
earnings.
The Federal Reserve has reconsidered
this proposed instructional revision in
light of the comments received,
including the requested further
clarification. Based on this
reconsideration, the Federal Reserve has
decided not to implement the proposed
instructional revision and to retain the
existing FR Y–9C instructions directing
institutions to classify securities
reported at fair value under a fair value
option as trading securities.
3. Net Gains (Losses) on Sales of, and
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on,
Equity Securities That Do Not Have
Readily Determinable Fair Values
Holding companies report
investments in equity securities that do
not have readily determinable fair
values and are not held for trading (and
to which the equity method of
accounting does not apply) in Schedule
HC–F, item 4, and on the FR Y–9C
balance sheet in Schedule HC, item 11,
‘‘Other assets.’’ If such equity securities
are held for trading, they are reported in
Schedule HC, item 5, and in Schedule
HC–D, item 9 and Memorandum item
7.b, if applicable. In contrast,
investments in equity securities with
readily determinable fair values that are
not held for trading are reported as
available-for-sale securities in Schedule
HC, item 2(b), and in Schedule HC–B,
item 7, whereas those held for trading
are reported in Schedule HC, item 5,
and in Schedule HC–D, item 9 and
Memorandum item 7(a), if applicable.
In general, investments in equity
securities that do not have readily
determinable fair values are accounted
for in accordance with ASC Subtopic
325–20, Investments—Other—Cost
Method Investments (formerly
Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 18, ‘‘The Equity Method of
Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock’’), but are subject to the
impairment guidance in ASC Topic 320,
Investments-Debt and Equity Securities
(formerly FASB Staff Position No. FAS
115–2 and FAS 124–2, ‘‘Recognition
and Presentation of Other-ThanTemporary Impairments’’).
The FR Y–9C instructions for
Schedule HI, Income Statement, address
the reporting of realized gains (losses),
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62133
including other-than-temporary
impairments, on held to-maturity and
available-for-sale securities as well as
the reporting of realized and unrealized
gains (losses) on trading securities and
other assets held for trading. However,
the Schedule HI instructions do not
specifically explain where to report
realized gains (losses) on sales or other
disposals of, and other-than-temporary
impairments on, equity securities that
do not have readily determinable fair
values and are not held for trading (and
to which the equity method of
accounting does not apply).
The instructions for Schedule HI, item
5.k, ‘‘Net gains (losses) on sales of other
assets (excluding securities),’’ direct
holding companies to ‘‘report the
amount of net gains (losses) on sales and
other disposals of assets not required to
be reported elsewhere in the income
statement (Schedule HI).’’ The
instructions for item 5(k) further advise
holding companies to exclude net gains
(losses) on sales and other disposals of
securities and trading assets. The intent
of this wording was to cover securities
designated as held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale, and trading securities
because there are separate specific items
elsewhere in Schedule HI for the
reporting of realized gains (losses) on
such securities (items 6(a), 6(b), and
5(c), respectively).
Thus, the Federal Reserve proposed to
revise the instructions for Schedule HI,
item 5(k), by clarifying that the
exclusions from this item of net gains
(losses) on securities and trading assets
apply to held-to-maturity, available-forsale, and trading securities and other
assets held for trading. At the same
time, the Federal Reserve proposed to
add language to the instructions for
Schedule HI, item 5(k), that explains
that net gains (losses) on sales and other
disposals of equity securities that do not
have readily determinable fair values
and are not held for trading (and to
which the equity method of accounting
does not apply), as well as other-thantemporary impairments on such
securities, should be reported in item
5(k). In addition, the Federal Reserve
proposed to remove the parenthetic
‘‘(excluding securities)’’ from the
caption for item 5(k) and add in its
place a footnote to this item advising
holding companies to exclude net gains
(losses) on sales of trading assets and
held-to-maturity and available-for-sale
securities.
No comments were received on these
proposed changes to the instructions
and report form caption for Schedule
HI, item 5(k). Accordingly, the changes
would take effect March 31, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
62134
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
D. New and Revised Data Items
1. Increase in the Time Deposit Size
Threshold
The Federal Reserve proposed to
increase the time deposit size threshold
from $100,000 to $250,000 in Schedule
HC–E, memorandum item 3, Time
Deposits of $100,000 or more with a
remaining maturity of one year or less.
The comparable line item on the Call
Report is being revised to reflect the
permanent $250,000 deposit insurance
limit. Therefore, the Federal Reserve
proposed this change to maintain
consistency between the two reports.
The agencies received comments on
the proposed increases in time deposit
thresholds from four banking
organizations, one consulting firm and
two bankers’ associations. Three
banking organizations and two bankers’
associations supported the proposed
increase and further recommended
increasing the deposit size threshold on
brokered deposit items and time
deposits of less than $100,000.
In response to these comments, the
Federal Reserve reviewed the collection
and use of brokered deposit information
reported in HC–E Memorandum items
and has determined that HC–E
Memorandum item 1, Brokered Deposits
less than $100,000 with a remaining
maturity of one year or less and HC–E
Memorandum 2, Brokered deposits less
than $100,000 with a remaining
maturity of more than one year can be
revised to reflect the $250,000 deposit
size threshold. The Federal Reserve also
reviewed the use of deposit information
reported in HC–E 1(d) and 1(e) and
HC–E 2(d) and (2e), time deposits of less
than $100,000 and time deposits greater
than $100,000 in domestic offices of
commercial bank subsidiaries of the
reporting holding company, and time
deposits held in domestic offices of
other depository institutions that are
subsidiaries of the reporting holding
company, and determined that these
items can be revised to reflect the
$250,000 threshold.
One commenter questioned why the
FR Y–9C proposal did not modify
Schedule HI to reflect the increased
deposit threshold similar to the Call
Report. The commenter stated that by
not aligning the reports may create
confusion and delays as banks would
have to maintain separate reporting
systems. The Federal Reserve has
reviewed the data collection and use of
the deposit information reported in
Schedule HI line item 2(a)1(a), Interest
on Time Deposits of $100,000 or more
and HI 2(a)1(b) Interest on Time
Deposits of less than $100,000 and
determined that these items can also be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
revised to reflect the $250,000
threshold.
The proposed changes to Schedule
HC–E as well as the proposed change to
HI would take effect March 31, 2017.
2. Changes to Schedule RC–Q, Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
on a Recurring Basis
Holding companies reporting on
Schedule HC–Q are currently required
to treat securities they have elected to
report at fair value under a fair value
option as part of their trading securities.
As a consequence, institutions must
include fair value information for their
fair value option securities, if any, in
Schedule HC–Q two times: First, as part
of the fair value information they report
for their ‘‘Other trading assets’’ in item
5(b) of the schedule, and then on a
standalone basis in item 5(b)(1),
‘‘Nontrading securities at fair value with
changes in fair value reported in current
earnings.’’ This reporting treatment
flows from the existing provision of the
Glossary entry for ‘‘Trading Account’’
that, as discussed above, requires an
institution that has elected to report
securities at fair value under a fair value
option to classify the securities as
trading securities. However, as
discussed above, the Federal Reserve
proposed to remove this requirement,
which would have permitted an
institution to classify fair value option
securities as held-to-maturity, availablefor-sale, or trading securities.
In its current form, Schedule HC–Q
contains an item for available-for-sale
securities along with the items
identified above for ‘‘Other trading
assets,’’ which includes securities
designated as trading securities, and
‘‘Nontrading securities at fair value with
changes in fair value reported in current
earnings.’’ However, given the existing
instructional requirements for fair value
option securities, Schedule HC–Q does
not include an item for reporting heldto-maturity securities because only
securities reported at amortized cost are
included in this category of securities.
Along with proposing to remove the
requirement to report fair value option
securities as trading securities, as
discussed earlier in this notice, the
Federal Reserve also proposed to
replace item 5(b)(1) of Schedule HC–Q
for nontrading securities accounted for
under a fair value option with a new
item for any ‘‘Held-to-Maturity
securities’’ to which a fair value option
is applied.
In addition, at present, holding
companies that have elected to measure
loans (not held for trading) at fair value
under a fair value option are required to
report the fair value and unpaid
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
principal balance of such loans in
Memorandum items 10 and 11 of
Schedule HC–C, Loans and Lease
Financing Receivables. This information
is also collected on the Call Report
Schedule RC–C Loans and Leases. The
FDIC and the OCC (the agencies) have
proposed to move this information in
the Call Report from Schedule RC–C to
Schedule RC–Q, Assets and Liabilities
Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis. Holding companies have
commented in the past that retaining a
consistent format between the Call
Report and the FR Y–9C on the
reporting of comparable information
reduces reporting burden to the holding
companies. Accordingly, the Federal
Reserve proposed to move
Memorandum items 10 and 11 on the
fair value and unpaid principal balance
of fair value option loans from Schedule
HC–C, to Schedule HC–Q effective
March 31, 2017, and to designate them
as Memorandum items 3 and 4.
Two bankers’ association requested
clarification on the proposed reporting
of held-to-maturity securities, availablefor-sale securities and securities for
which a trading measurement
classification has been elected in
Schedule HC–Q. As stated above, the
Federal Reserve reconsidered, and
decided not to implement, the proposed
instructional revision that would no
longer have required an institution to
classify fair value option securities as
trading securities. Based on this
decision, the Federal Reserve also will
not implement the proposed elimination
of the existing Schedule HC–Q item for
nontrading securities accounted for
under a fair value option and their
proposed addition to the schedule of a
new item for held-to-maturity securities.
No comments were received on the
proposal to move the Memorandum
items in Schedule HC–C, on the fair
value and unpaid principal balance of
fair value option loans to Schedule
HC–Q, where they would be designated
as Memorandum items 3 and 4.
Therefore, the Federal Reserve will
proceed with this change effective
March 31, 2017.
3. Extraordinary Items
In January 2015, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2015–01, ‘‘Simplifying Income
Statement Presentation by Eliminating
the Concept of Extraordinary Items.’’
This ASU eliminates the concept of
extraordinary items from U.S. GAAP. At
present, ASC Subtopic 225–20, Income
Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual
Items (formerly Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 30, ‘‘Reporting the
Results of Operations’’), requires an
entity to separately classify, present,
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
and disclose extraordinary events and
transactions. An event or transaction is
presumed to be an ordinary and usual
activity of the reporting entity unless
evidence clearly supports its
classification as an extraordinary item.
ASU 2015–01 is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning after December
15, 2015. Thus, for example, holding
companies with a calendar year fiscal
year must begin to apply the ASU in
their FR Y–9C for March 31, 2016.6
After a holding company adopts ASU
2015–01, any event or transaction that
would have met the criteria for
extraordinary classification before the
adoption of the ASU should be reported
in Schedule HI, item 5(l), ‘‘Other
noninterest income,’’ or item 7(d),
‘‘Other noninterest expense,’’ as
appropriate, unless the event or
transaction would otherwise be
reportable in another item of Schedule
HI.
Consistent with the elimination of the
concept of extraordinary items in ASU
2015–01, the Federal Reserve proposed
to revise the instructions for Schedule
HI, item 11, and remove the term
‘‘extraordinary items’’ and revise the
captions for Schedule HI, item 8,
‘‘Income (loss) before income taxes and
extraordinary items and other
adjustments,’’ item 10, ‘‘Income (loss)
before extraordinary items and other
adjustments’’ and item 11,
‘‘Extraordinary items and other
adjustment, net of income taxes
effective March 31, 2016. After the
concept of extraordinary items has been
eliminated and such items would no
longer be reportable in Schedule HI,
item 11, only the results of discontinued
operations would be reportable in item
11. Accordingly, effective March 31,
2016, the revised captions for Schedule
HI, items 8, 10 and 11 would become
‘‘Income (loss) before income taxes and
discontinued operations,’’ ‘‘Income
(loss) before discontinued operations,’’
and ‘‘discontinued operations, net of
applicable income taxes’’ respectively.
The captions for Schedule HI,
memorandum items 2 and 8, and items
8 and 11 on the Predecessor Financial
Items and applicable Glossary
references would also be revised to
eliminate the concept of extraordinary
items.
No comments were received on the
planned changes related to
extraordinary items. Accordingly,
effective September 30, 2016, the
captions for Schedule HI, items 8, 10,
6 Early adoption of ASU 2015–01 is permitted
provided that the guidance is applied from the
beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
and 11, would be revised to say
‘‘Income (loss) before income taxes and
discontinued operations,’’ ‘‘Income
(loss) before discontinued operations,’’
and ‘‘Discontinued operations, net of
applicable income taxes,’’ respectively.
Similarly, the captions for Schedule HI,
memorandum items 2 and 8, and items
8 and 11 on the Predecessor Financial
Items and applicable Glossary
references would also be revised to
eliminate the concept of extraordinary
items.
Additional Comments
One commenter requested
clarification on why the proposed
change to the Call Report regarding
trading revenues due to changes in
credit and debit valuation adjustments
was not proposed on the FR Y–9C
report. The Federal Reserve reviewed
this information and determined that
the proposed changes are not necessary
for the FR Y–9C and that the current
information is adequate to meet the
Federal Reserve’s supervisory needs.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, September 1, 2016.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–21524 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62135
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than October 3,
2016.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
(Robert L. Triplett III, Senior Vice
President) 2200 North Pearl Street,
Dallas, Texas 75201–2272:
1. Greater State Bancshares Corp.,
McAllen, Texas, to become a bank
holding company through the
acquisition of Greater State Bank,
Falfurrias, Texas.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, September 2, 2016.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–21597 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies;
Correction
This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc.
2016–21009) published on pages 60354
of the issue for Thursday, September 1,
2016.
Under the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago heading, the entry for The
Stephen L. LaFrance, Jr. GW
Investments Trust, the Jason P.
LaFrance GW Investments Trust, the
Amy Beth LaFrance GW Investments
Trust, all of Little Rock, Arkansas,
Stephen L. LaFrance, Jr., Little Rock,
Arkansas, as trustee of the Stephen L.
LaFrance, Jr. GW Investments Trust and
co-trustee of the Jason P. LaFrance GW
Investments Trust, and Jason P.
LaFrance, Little Rock, Arkansas, as cotrustee of the Jason P. LaFrance GW
Investments Trust and as trustee of the
Amy Beth LaFrance GW Investments
Trust and the Amy LaFrance Bancroft
GW Investments Revocable Trust, Little
Rock, Arkansas is revised to read as
follows:
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414:
1. The Stephen L. LaFrance, Jr. GW
Investments Trust, the Jason P.
LaFrance GW Investments Trust, the
Amy Beth LaFrance GW Investments
Trust, all of Little Rock, Arkansas,
Stephen L. LaFrance, Jr., Little Rock,
Arkansas, as trustee of the Stephen L.
LaFrance, Jr. GW Investments Trust and
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62129-62135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21524]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of Board
Approval Under Delegated Authority and Submission to OMB
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board or
Federal Reserve) is adopting a proposal to revise, with extension, the
mandatory Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR
Y-9C). The Board also proposes to extend, without revision, the other
forms that make up the family of FR Y-9 reporting forms. These are: The
Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Large Holding Companies
(FR Y-9LP) The Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small
Holding Companies (FR Y-9SP) The Financial Statements for Employee
Stock Ownership Plan Holding Companies (FR Y-9ES) The Supplement to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9CS). The
revisions to this mandatory information collection become effective on
September 30, 2016, and March 31, 2017. The Board is also adopting a
proposal to extend, without revision, the other reports that are part
of this information collection.
On June 15, 1984, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
delegated to the Board authority under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) to approve of and assign OMB control numbers to collection of
information requests and requirements conducted or sponsored by the
Board. In exercising this delegated authority, the Board is directed to
take every reasonable step to solicit comment. In determining whether
to approve a collection of information, the Board will consider all
comments received from the public and other agencies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Federal Reserve Board Clearance
Officer--Nuha Elmaghrabi--Office of the Chief Data Officer, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551 (202)
452-3829. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may
contact (202) 263-4869, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, DC 20551.
OMB Desk Officer--Shagufta Ahmed--Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive
Office Building, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
[[Page 62130]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Final approval under OMB delegated authority of the extension for
three years, with revision, of the following report:
Report title: Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding
Companies, Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Large Holding
Companies, Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Holding
Companies, Financial Statement for Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Holding Companies, and the Supplemental to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for Holding Companies.
OMB control number: 7100-0128.
Agency form number: FR Y-9C, FR Y-9LP, FR Y-9SP, FR Y-9ES, and FR
Y-9CS.
Frequency: Quarterly, semiannually, and annually.
Reporters: Bank holding companies (BHCs), savings and loan holding
companies (SLHCs), securities holding companies (SHCs) and Intermediate
Holding Companies (IHCs) (collectively, holding companies).
Estimated annual reporting hours: FR Y-9C (non-Advanced Approaches
holding companies): 131,245 hours; FR Y-9C (Advanced Approaches holding
companies): 2,674 hours; FR Y-9LP: 16,632 hours; FR Y-9SP: 44,518
hours; FR Y-9ES: 44 hours; FR Y-CS: 472 hours.
Estimated average hours per response: FR Y-9C (non-Advanced
Approaches holding companies): 50.17 hours; FR Y-9C (Advanced
Approaches holding companies): 51.42 hours; FR Y-9LP: 5.25 hours; FR Y-
9SP: 5.40 hours; FR Y-9ES: 0.50 hours; FR Y-9CS: 0.50 hours.
Number of respondents: FR Y-9C (non-Advanced Approaches holding
companies): 654; FR Y-9C (Advanced Approaches holding companies): 13;
FR Y-9LP: 792; FR Y-9SP: 4,122; FR Y-9ES: 88; FR Y-9CS: 236.
General description of report: This information collection is
mandatory for BHCs (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)(1)(A)). Additionally, 12 U.S.C.
1467a (b)(2)(A) and 1850a(c)(1)(A), respectively, authorize the Federal
Reserve to require that SLHCs and supervised SHCs file with the Federal
Reserve. Lastly, 12 U.S.C. 5365 authorizes the Federal Reserve to
require that U.S. IHCs file with the Federal Reserve. Confidential
treatment is not routinely given to the financial data in this report.
However, confidential treatment for the reporting information, in whole
or in part, can be requested in accordance with the instructions to the
form, pursuant to sections (b)(4), (b)(6), or (b)(8) of FOIA (5 U.S.C.
522(b)(4), (b)(6), and (b)(8)). The applicability of these exemptions
would need to be reviewed on a case by case basis.
Abstract: The FR Y-9C is a standardized financial statement for the
consolidated holding company. The FR Y-9LP and the FR Y 9SP serve as
standardized financial statements for parent holding companies; the FR
Y-9ES is a financial statement for holding companies that are Employee
Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs). The Federal Reserve also has the
authority to use the FR Y-9CS (a free-form supplement) to collect
additional information deemed to be (1) critical and (2) needed in an
expedited manner. The FR Y-9 family of reporting forms continues to be
the primary source of holding company financial data that examiners
rely on in the intervals between on-site inspections. Financial data
from these reporting forms are used to detect emerging financial
problems, to review performance and conduct pre-inspection analysis, to
monitor and evaluate capital adequacy, to evaluate holding company
mergers and acquisitions, and to analyze a holding company's overall
financial condition to ensure the safety and soundness of its
operations.
Current Actions: On December 2, 2015, the Federal Reserve published
a notice in the Federal Register requesting public comment for 60 days
on the proposed revisions to the FR Y-9C.\1\ As proposed, the revisions
would have become effective in March 2016. Based on comments received
on the proposal and other factors, the Federal Reserve notified
institutions that the revisions would be deferred until no earlier than
September 2016. Most of the proposed revisions were reporting burden
reductions consistent with proposed changes to the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) Consolidated Reports of
Condition and Income (Call Reports) (FFIEC 031 & 041; OMB No. 7100-
0036). The proposed revisions included deletions of existing data
items, increases in existing thresholds for certain data items, a
number of instructional revisions and the addition of new and revised
data items.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of the proposed action was published in the Federal
Register; the comment period expired on February 1, 2016. See FR 80
75457.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Federal Reserve received one comment letter from a bankers'
association regarding proposed revisions to the FR Y-9C. The Federal
Reserve also considered the comments on the Call Reports in developing
the draft final notice for consistency. The Board, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (OCC) (the agencies) collectively received comment letters
from seven banking organizations, four bankers' associations and two
consulting firms on similar proposed revisions to the Call Reports.
The commenters generally supported the proposal, but suggested
delayed implementation of the revisions. The Federal Reserve has
delayed the effective dates for these changes consistent with the
timing suggested by commenters. The Federal Reserve adopted most of the
revisions as proposed, except for a few instructional changes due to
comments received.
The following is a detailed discussion of the comments received and
the Federal Reserve's responses to the comments.
Detailed Discussion of Public Comment
A. Deletions of Existing Data Items
The Federal Reserve proposed that the continued collection of the
following items was no longer necessary and proposed to eliminate them
effective March 2016:
(1) Schedule HI, Memorandum items 17(a) and 17(b), on other-than-
temporary impairments; \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Institutions would continue to complete Schedule HI,
Memorandum item 17(c), on net impairment losses recognized in
earnings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Schedule HC-C, Memorandum items 1(f)(2), 1(f)(5), and 1(f)(6)
on troubled debt restructurings in certain loan categories that are in
compliance with their modified terms;
(3) Schedule HC-N, Memorandum items 1(f)(2), 1(f)(5), and 1(f)(6)
on troubled debt restructurings in certain loan categories that are 30
days or more past due or on nonaccrual;
(4) Schedule HC-M, items 6(a)(5)(a) through (d) on loans in certain
loan categories that are covered by FDIC loss-sharing agreements; and
(5) Schedule HC-N, items 12(e)(1) through (4) on loans in certain
loan categories that are covered by FDIC loss-sharing agreements and
are 30 days or more past due or on nonaccrual.
In addition, when Schedule HC-R, Part II, is completed properly,
item 18(b) on unused commitments to asset-backed commercial paper
conduits with an original maturity of one year or less is not needed
because such commitments should already have been reported in item 10
as off-balance sheet securitization exposures. The instructions for
item 18(b) explain that these unused commitments should be reported in
item 10 and that amounts should not be reported in item 18(b).
[[Page 62131]]
Accordingly, the Federal Reserve proposed to delete existing item 18(b)
from Schedule HC-R, Part II. Existing item 18(c) of Schedule HC-R, Part
II, for unused commitments with an original maturity exceeding one year
would then be renumbered as item 18(b).
Comments were received from two consulting firms and one banking
organization regarding those proposed deletions. The banking
organization stated that these revisions would have no impact on its
reporting. One consulting firm agreed with all of the proposed
deletions except the one involving information on other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) losses in Schedule HI, Memorandum items 17(a) and
17(b). The firm believed the deletion of the two OTTI items would
eliminate the reporting of important information about the performance
of institutions' securities portfolios and how they recognize OTTI.
While the Federal Reserve acknowledges that this proposal would result
in the loss of information on the total year-to-date amount of OTTI
losses and the portion of these losses recognized in other
comprehensive income, institutions would continue to report the portion
of OTTI losses recognized in earnings. It is this portion of OTTI
losses that is of greatest interest and concern to the Federal Reserve.
Because some or all of each OTTI loss must be recognized in earnings,
when an institution reports a substantial amount of OTTI losses in
earnings, it is this item that serves as a red flag for further
supervisory follow-up. Additionally, the portion of OTTI losses that
passes through other comprehensive income and accumulates in other
comprehensive income is excluded from regulatory capital for the vast
majority of institutions.
One consulting firm expressed concern about the proposed deletion
of Memorandum items on troubled debt restructurings in certain loan
categories in Schedules HC-C and HC-N. This firm stated that this
information is important for understanding the specific nature of
troubled loans relative to restructured loans and suggested that the
loan categories being deleted may need to be added back if there is a
significant economic downturn. The Federal Reserve notes that each of
the loan categories proposed for deletion is a subset of the larger
loan category ``All other loans,'' which institutions would continue to
report. Furthermore, the amount of troubled debt restructurings in each
of these subset categories is reported only when it exceeds 10 percent
of the total amount of troubled debt restructurings in compliance with
their modified terms (Schedule HC-C) or not in compliance with their
modified terms (Schedule HC-N), as appropriate. Thus, the total amount
of an institution's troubled debt restructurings, both those in
compliance with their modified terms and those that are not, would
continue to be reported.
After considering these comments, the Federal Reserve will remove
all of the items proposed for deletion from the FR Y-9C effective
September 30, 2016, except for the deletion relating to OTTI, which
would take effect March 31, 2017.
B. New Reporting Threshold and Increases in Existing Reporting
Thresholds
In three FR Y-9C schedules, holding companies are currently
required to itemize and describe each component of an existing item
when the component exceeds both a specified percentage of the item and
a specified dollar amount. Based on a preliminary evaluation of the
existing reporting thresholds, the Federal Reserve proposed that the
dollar portion of the thresholds that currently apply to these items
could be increased to provide a reduction in reporting burden without a
loss of data that would be necessary for supervisory or other public
policy purposes. The percentage portion of the existing thresholds
would not be changed. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve proposed to
raise from $25,000 to $100,000 the dollar portion of the threshold for
itemizing and describing components of:
(1) Schedule HI, memo item 6, ``Other noninterest income;''
(2) Schedule HI, memo item 7, ``Other noninterest expense;''
(3) Schedule HC-Q, Memorandum item 1, ``All other assets;'' and
(4) Schedule HC-Q, Memorandum item 2, ``All other liabilities.''
To reduce burden, the Federal Reserve also proposed to raise from
$25,000 to $1,000,000 the dollar portion of the threshold for itemizing
and describing components of ``Other trading assets'' and ``Other
trading liabilities'' in Schedule HC-D, Memorandum items 9(b) and 10.
Based on the Federal Reserve's review of items reported on Schedule
HC-I, Insurance-Related Underwriting Activities (Including
Reinsurance), the Federal Reserve proposed to add a $10,000,000
threshold to provide a reduction in reporting burden for reinsurance
recoverables reported on Schedule HC-I, Part I line item 1 and HC-I,
Part II line item 1, due to the limited activity and immateriality on
these line items. Reporting of these data items would be determined as
of the end of each quarter.
Two bankers' associations, two consulting firms, and two banking
organizations commented on the proposed changes involving reporting
thresholds. One banking organization supported the higher thresholds,
stating that raising the thresholds would reduce reporting burden, but
the other said that this change would not have an impact on its
reporting. The two bankers' associations expressed support for the
targeted approach to increasing the reporting thresholds, but observed
that an increase from $25,000 to $100,000 would do little to reduce
reporting burden for most institutions. The associations recommended
increasing the percentage portion of the reporting threshold for which
components must be itemized and described. At present, the percentage
portion of the reporting threshold applicable to reporting components
of ``Other noninterest income'' and ``Other noninterest expense'' in
Schedule HI is three percent.\3\ The associations recommended
increasing this percentage to a range of 5 to 7 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For the other items for which Federal Reserve proposed an
increase in the dollar portion of the existing reporting threshold,
the percentage portion of the threshold is 25 percent of the total
amount of the item.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the interaction between the dollar and percentage
portions of the reporting thresholds on the total amount of an item
that is subject to component itemization and description, the Federal
Reserve acknowledges that the proposed increase in the dollar portion
of the reporting threshold from $25,000 to $100,000 may not benefit all
holding companies, particularly larger holding companies. One
consulting firm supported the increase in the dollar portion of the
reporting threshold for Schedule HC-Q, but recommended retaining the
$25,000 threshold for the ``Other noninterest income'' and ``Other
noninterest expense'' in Schedule HI. The consulting firm commented
that, for smaller institutions, information on the components of these
noninterest items ``is an important indicator of the activity of the
institution, its style and management ability'' and ``provide[s]
regulators with a clearer insight into the activities of a bank.'' This
firm also observed that the component information is or should be
captured in the internal accounting systems. The Federal Reserve
recognizes that the proposed increase in the dollar portion of the
threshold for reporting components of other noninterest income and
expense would result in a reduced number of their components being
itemized and described in the FR Y-9C
[[Page 62132]]
Schedule HI, particularly by smaller holding companies. However, in
carrying out on- and off-site supervision of holding companies, the
Federal Reserve is able to follow up directly with an individual
holding company when the level and trend of noninterest income and
expense, and other elements of net income (or loss), that are reflected
in its FR Y-9C raise questions about the quality of, and the factors
affecting, the holding company's reported earnings. The Federal Reserve
does not believe the proposed increase in the dollar portion of the
reporting thresholds in Schedule HI will impede the ability to evaluate
holding companies' earnings.
Another consulting firm questioned the proposed increase from
$25,000 to $1,000,000 in the dollar portion of the threshold for
itemizing and describing components of ``Other trading assets'' and
``Other trading liabilities'' in Schedule HC-D, Memorandum items 9 and
10. In addition to meeting the dollar portion of the threshold, a
component must exceed 25 percent of the total amount of ``Other trading
assets'' or ``Other trading liabilities'' in order to be itemized and
described in Memorandum item 9 or 10, respectively. These two
memorandum items are to be completed only by holding companies that
report average trading assets of $1 billion or more in any of the four
preceding calendar quarters. Thus, at $1,000,000, the proposed higher
dollar threshold for component itemization and description in
Memorandum items 9 and 10 of Schedule HC-D would represent one tenth of
one percent of the amount of average trading assets that a holding
company must have in order to be subject to the requirement to report
components of its other trading assets and liabilities that exceed the
reporting threshold. As a result, the Federal Reserve believes that
raising the dollar portion of the threshold for reporting components of
Memorandum items 9 and 10 of Schedule HC-D to $1,000,000 will continue
to provide meaningful data while reducing burden for holding companies
that must complete these items.
No comments were received on the proposal to add a $10,000,000
threshold on HC-I. After considering the comments about the proposed
new and increased reporting thresholds, the Federal Reserve will
implement all of these changes effective September 30, 2016.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Although the proposed reporting threshold changes would take
effect as of September 30, 2016, holding companies may choose, but
are not required, to continue using $25,000 as the dollar portion of
the threshold for reporting components of the specified items in the
three previously identified schedules rather than the higher dollar
thresholds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Instructional Revisions
1. Reporting Home Equity Lines of Credit that Convert from
Revolving to Non Revolving Status.
Holding companies report the amount outstanding under revolving,
open-end lines of credit secured by 1-4 family residential properties
(commonly known as home equity lines of credit or HELOCs) in item
1(c)(1) of Schedule HC-C, Loans and Leases. Closed-end loans secured by
1-4 family residential properties are reported in Schedule HC-C, item
1(c)(2)(a) or (b), depending on whether the loan is a first or a junior
lien.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Information also is separately reported for open-end and
closed-end loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties in
Schedule HI-B, Part I, Charge-offs and Recoveries on Loans and
Leases; Memorandum items in Schedule HC-C; Schedule HC-D; Schedule
HC-M; and Schedule HC-N.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A HELOC is a line of credit secured by a lien on a 1-4 family
residential property that generally provides a draw period followed by
a repayment period. During the draw period, a borrower has revolving
access to unused amounts under a specified line of credit. During the
repayment period, the borrower can no longer draw on the line of
credit, and the outstanding principal is either due immediately in a
balloon payment or is repaid over the remaining loan term through
monthly payments. The FR Y-9C instructions do not address the reporting
treatment for a home equity line of credit when it reaches its end-of-
draw period and converts from revolving to nonrevolving status. Such a
loan no longer has the characteristics of a revolving, open-end line of
credit and, instead, becomes a closed-end loan. In the absence of
instructional guidance that specifically addresses this situation, the
Federal Reserve has found diversity in how these credits are reported
in Schedule HC-C. Some holding companies continue to report home equity
lines of credit that have converted to non-revolving closed-end status
in item 1(c)(1) of Schedule HC-C, as if they were still revolving open-
end lines of credit, while other holding companies recategorize such
loans and report them as closed-end loans in item 1(c)(2)(a) or (b), as
appropriate.
Therefore, to address this absence of instructional guidance and
promote consistency in reporting, the Federal Reserve proposed to
clarify the instructions for reporting loans secured by 1-4 family
residential properties to specify that after a revolving open-end line
of credit has converted to non-revolving closed-end status, the loan
should be reported in Schedule HC-C, item 1(c)(2)(a) or (b), as
appropriate.
Two bankers' associations, one consulting firm, and one banking
organization commented on the proposed instructional clarification for
HELOCs. The consulting firm agreed with this clarification because of
the consistency in reporting that it would provide. The two bankers'
associations stated that they appreciated the proposed clarification,
but noted that ``material definitional changes would require a whole
recoding of these credits.'' The associations observed that the
proposed clarification would likely have implications for other
regulatory requirements such as the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and
Review, which evaluates the capital planning processes and capital
adequacy of the largest U.S.-based bank holding companies. They also
described two situations involving HELOCs for which further guidance
would be needed if the proposed instructional change were to be
implemented and recommended that examples be provided with the
instructions for reporting HELOCs.
The banking organization opposed the proposed instructional
clarification for HELOCs and requested that it be withdrawn, citing
several difficulties it would encounter if the clarification were made.
These difficulties include identifying when a HELOC has begun the
repayment period and the lien position of a HELOC at that time because
the bank's loan system for HELOCs has not been set up to generate this
information. The bank requested time for systems reprogramming if the
proposed instructional clarification were to be adopted.
Based on the issues raised in the comments received on the proposed
HELOC instructional clarification, the Federal Reserve will give
further consideration to this proposal, including its effect on and
relationship to other regulatory reporting requirements. Accordingly,
the Federal Reserve will not proceed with this proposed instructional
clarification at this time and the existing instructions for reporting
HELOCs in item 1.c(1) of Schedule HC-C, will remain in effect. Once the
Federal Reserve completes its consideration of this instructional
matter and determines whether and how the FR Y-9C instructions should
be clarified with respect to the reporting of revolving open-end lines
of credit that have converted to non-revolving closed-end status, any
proposed instructional
[[Page 62133]]
clarification will be published in the Federal Register for comment.
2. Reporting Treatment for Securities for Which a Fair Value Option Is
Elected
The FR Y-9C Glossary entry for ``Trading Account'' currently states
that ``all securities within the scope of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board's (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic
320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities (formerly FASB Statement
No. 115, ``Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities''), that a holding company has elected to report at fair
value under a fair value option with changes in fair value reported in
current earnings should be classified as trading securities.'' This
reporting treatment was based on language contained in former FASB
Statement No. 159, ``The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities,'' but that language was not codified when
Statement No. 159 was superseded by current ASC Topic 825, Financial
Instruments. Thus, under U.S. GAAP as currently in effect, the
classification of all securities within the scope of ASC Topic 320 that
are accounted for under a fair value option as trading securities is no
longer required. Accordingly, to bring the ``Trading Account'' Glossary
entry into conformity with current U.S. GAAP, the Federal Reserve
proposed to revise the statement from the Glossary entry quoted above
by replacing ``should be classified'' with ``may be classified.''
This revision to the ``Trading Account'' Glossary entry would have
meant that a holding company that elects the fair value option for
securities within the scope of ASC Topic 320 would have been able to
classify such securities as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale in
accordance with this topic based on the holding company's intent and
ability with respect to the securities. In addition, a holding company
could have chosen to classify securities for which a fair value option
is elected as trading securities.
Holding companies that have been required to classify all
securities within the scope of ASC Topic 320 that are accounted for
under a fair value option as trading securities also should consider
the related proposed changes to Schedule HC-Q, Assets and Liabilities
Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis, which are discussed below.
Comments from two bankers' associations and one consulting firm
were received regarding the proposed instructional revision for the
classification of securities for which the fair value option is
elected. The consulting firm welcomed the proposal. The two bankers'
associations stated that they understood the purpose of the proposed
instructional revision, but they requested further clarification of the
reporting treatment for ``securities for which an institution has
elected to use the trading measurement classification,'' i.e., fair
value through earnings.
The Federal Reserve has reconsidered this proposed instructional
revision in light of the comments received, including the requested
further clarification. Based on this reconsideration, the Federal
Reserve has decided not to implement the proposed instructional
revision and to retain the existing FR Y-9C instructions directing
institutions to classify securities reported at fair value under a fair
value option as trading securities.
3. Net Gains (Losses) on Sales of, and Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
on, Equity Securities That Do Not Have Readily Determinable Fair Values
Holding companies report investments in equity securities that do
not have readily determinable fair values and are not held for trading
(and to which the equity method of accounting does not apply) in
Schedule HC-F, item 4, and on the FR Y-9C balance sheet in Schedule HC,
item 11, ``Other assets.'' If such equity securities are held for
trading, they are reported in Schedule HC, item 5, and in Schedule HC-
D, item 9 and Memorandum item 7.b, if applicable. In contrast,
investments in equity securities with readily determinable fair values
that are not held for trading are reported as available-for-sale
securities in Schedule HC, item 2(b), and in Schedule HC-B, item 7,
whereas those held for trading are reported in Schedule HC, item 5, and
in Schedule HC-D, item 9 and Memorandum item 7(a), if applicable.
In general, investments in equity securities that do not have
readily determinable fair values are accounted for in accordance with
ASC Subtopic 325-20, Investments--Other--Cost Method Investments
(formerly Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, ``The Equity
Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock''), but are
subject to the impairment guidance in ASC Topic 320, Investments-Debt
and Equity Securities (formerly FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2, ``Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments'').
The FR Y-9C instructions for Schedule HI, Income Statement, address
the reporting of realized gains (losses), including other-than-
temporary impairments, on held to-maturity and available-for-sale
securities as well as the reporting of realized and unrealized gains
(losses) on trading securities and other assets held for trading.
However, the Schedule HI instructions do not specifically explain where
to report realized gains (losses) on sales or other disposals of, and
other-than-temporary impairments on, equity securities that do not have
readily determinable fair values and are not held for trading (and to
which the equity method of accounting does not apply).
The instructions for Schedule HI, item 5.k, ``Net gains (losses) on
sales of other assets (excluding securities),'' direct holding
companies to ``report the amount of net gains (losses) on sales and
other disposals of assets not required to be reported elsewhere in the
income statement (Schedule HI).'' The instructions for item 5(k)
further advise holding companies to exclude net gains (losses) on sales
and other disposals of securities and trading assets. The intent of
this wording was to cover securities designated as held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale, and trading securities because there are separate
specific items elsewhere in Schedule HI for the reporting of realized
gains (losses) on such securities (items 6(a), 6(b), and 5(c),
respectively).
Thus, the Federal Reserve proposed to revise the instructions for
Schedule HI, item 5(k), by clarifying that the exclusions from this
item of net gains (losses) on securities and trading assets apply to
held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, and trading securities and other
assets held for trading. At the same time, the Federal Reserve proposed
to add language to the instructions for Schedule HI, item 5(k), that
explains that net gains (losses) on sales and other disposals of equity
securities that do not have readily determinable fair values and are
not held for trading (and to which the equity method of accounting does
not apply), as well as other-than-temporary impairments on such
securities, should be reported in item 5(k). In addition, the Federal
Reserve proposed to remove the parenthetic ``(excluding securities)''
from the caption for item 5(k) and add in its place a footnote to this
item advising holding companies to exclude net gains (losses) on sales
of trading assets and held-to-maturity and available-for-sale
securities.
No comments were received on these proposed changes to the
instructions and report form caption for Schedule HI, item 5(k).
Accordingly, the changes would take effect March 31, 2017.
[[Page 62134]]
D. New and Revised Data Items
1. Increase in the Time Deposit Size Threshold
The Federal Reserve proposed to increase the time deposit size
threshold from $100,000 to $250,000 in Schedule HC-E, memorandum item
3, Time Deposits of $100,000 or more with a remaining maturity of one
year or less. The comparable line item on the Call Report is being
revised to reflect the permanent $250,000 deposit insurance limit.
Therefore, the Federal Reserve proposed this change to maintain
consistency between the two reports.
The agencies received comments on the proposed increases in time
deposit thresholds from four banking organizations, one consulting firm
and two bankers' associations. Three banking organizations and two
bankers' associations supported the proposed increase and further
recommended increasing the deposit size threshold on brokered deposit
items and time deposits of less than $100,000.
In response to these comments, the Federal Reserve reviewed the
collection and use of brokered deposit information reported in HC-E
Memorandum items and has determined that HC-E Memorandum item 1,
Brokered Deposits less than $100,000 with a remaining maturity of one
year or less and HC-E Memorandum 2, Brokered deposits less than
$100,000 with a remaining maturity of more than one year can be revised
to reflect the $250,000 deposit size threshold. The Federal Reserve
also reviewed the use of deposit information reported in HC-E 1(d) and
1(e) and HC-E 2(d) and (2e), time deposits of less than $100,000 and
time deposits greater than $100,000 in domestic offices of commercial
bank subsidiaries of the reporting holding company, and time deposits
held in domestic offices of other depository institutions that are
subsidiaries of the reporting holding company, and determined that
these items can be revised to reflect the $250,000 threshold.
One commenter questioned why the FR Y-9C proposal did not modify
Schedule HI to reflect the increased deposit threshold similar to the
Call Report. The commenter stated that by not aligning the reports may
create confusion and delays as banks would have to maintain separate
reporting systems. The Federal Reserve has reviewed the data collection
and use of the deposit information reported in Schedule HI line item
2(a)1(a), Interest on Time Deposits of $100,000 or more and HI 2(a)1(b)
Interest on Time Deposits of less than $100,000 and determined that
these items can also be revised to reflect the $250,000 threshold.
The proposed changes to Schedule HC-E as well as the proposed
change to HI would take effect March 31, 2017.
2. Changes to Schedule RC-Q, Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair
Value on a Recurring Basis
Holding companies reporting on Schedule HC-Q are currently required
to treat securities they have elected to report at fair value under a
fair value option as part of their trading securities. As a
consequence, institutions must include fair value information for their
fair value option securities, if any, in Schedule HC-Q two times:
First, as part of the fair value information they report for their
``Other trading assets'' in item 5(b) of the schedule, and then on a
standalone basis in item 5(b)(1), ``Nontrading securities at fair value
with changes in fair value reported in current earnings.'' This
reporting treatment flows from the existing provision of the Glossary
entry for ``Trading Account'' that, as discussed above, requires an
institution that has elected to report securities at fair value under a
fair value option to classify the securities as trading securities.
However, as discussed above, the Federal Reserve proposed to remove
this requirement, which would have permitted an institution to classify
fair value option securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale,
or trading securities.
In its current form, Schedule HC-Q contains an item for available-
for-sale securities along with the items identified above for ``Other
trading assets,'' which includes securities designated as trading
securities, and ``Nontrading securities at fair value with changes in
fair value reported in current earnings.'' However, given the existing
instructional requirements for fair value option securities, Schedule
HC-Q does not include an item for reporting held-to-maturity securities
because only securities reported at amortized cost are included in this
category of securities. Along with proposing to remove the requirement
to report fair value option securities as trading securities, as
discussed earlier in this notice, the Federal Reserve also proposed to
replace item 5(b)(1) of Schedule HC-Q for nontrading securities
accounted for under a fair value option with a new item for any ``Held-
to-Maturity securities'' to which a fair value option is applied.
In addition, at present, holding companies that have elected to
measure loans (not held for trading) at fair value under a fair value
option are required to report the fair value and unpaid principal
balance of such loans in Memorandum items 10 and 11 of Schedule HC-C,
Loans and Lease Financing Receivables. This information is also
collected on the Call Report Schedule RC-C Loans and Leases. The FDIC
and the OCC (the agencies) have proposed to move this information in
the Call Report from Schedule RC-C to Schedule RC-Q, Assets and
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis. Holding
companies have commented in the past that retaining a consistent format
between the Call Report and the FR Y-9C on the reporting of comparable
information reduces reporting burden to the holding companies.
Accordingly, the Federal Reserve proposed to move Memorandum items 10
and 11 on the fair value and unpaid principal balance of fair value
option loans from Schedule HC-C, to Schedule HC-Q effective March 31,
2017, and to designate them as Memorandum items 3 and 4.
Two bankers' association requested clarification on the proposed
reporting of held-to-maturity securities, available-for-sale securities
and securities for which a trading measurement classification has been
elected in Schedule HC-Q. As stated above, the Federal Reserve
reconsidered, and decided not to implement, the proposed instructional
revision that would no longer have required an institution to classify
fair value option securities as trading securities. Based on this
decision, the Federal Reserve also will not implement the proposed
elimination of the existing Schedule HC-Q item for nontrading
securities accounted for under a fair value option and their proposed
addition to the schedule of a new item for held-to-maturity securities.
No comments were received on the proposal to move the Memorandum
items in Schedule HC-C, on the fair value and unpaid principal balance
of fair value option loans to Schedule HC-Q, where they would be
designated as Memorandum items 3 and 4. Therefore, the Federal Reserve
will proceed with this change effective March 31, 2017.
3. Extraordinary Items
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, ``Simplifying
Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of
Extraordinary Items.'' This ASU eliminates the concept of extraordinary
items from U.S. GAAP. At present, ASC Subtopic 225-20, Income
Statement--Extraordinary and Unusual Items (formerly Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 30, ``Reporting the Results of
Operations''), requires an entity to separately classify, present,
[[Page 62135]]
and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. An event or
transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the
reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as
an extraordinary item.
ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Thus, for
example, holding companies with a calendar year fiscal year must begin
to apply the ASU in their FR Y-9C for March 31, 2016.\6\ After a
holding company adopts ASU 2015-01, any event or transaction that would
have met the criteria for extraordinary classification before the
adoption of the ASU should be reported in Schedule HI, item 5(l),
``Other noninterest income,'' or item 7(d), ``Other noninterest
expense,'' as appropriate, unless the event or transaction would
otherwise be reportable in another item of Schedule HI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Early adoption of ASU 2015-01 is permitted provided that the
guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of
adoption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the elimination of the concept of extraordinary
items in ASU 2015-01, the Federal Reserve proposed to revise the
instructions for Schedule HI, item 11, and remove the term
``extraordinary items'' and revise the captions for Schedule HI, item
8, ``Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary items and
other adjustments,'' item 10, ``Income (loss) before extraordinary
items and other adjustments'' and item 11, ``Extraordinary items and
other adjustment, net of income taxes effective March 31, 2016. After
the concept of extraordinary items has been eliminated and such items
would no longer be reportable in Schedule HI, item 11, only the results
of discontinued operations would be reportable in item 11. Accordingly,
effective March 31, 2016, the revised captions for Schedule HI, items
8, 10 and 11 would become ``Income (loss) before income taxes and
discontinued operations,'' ``Income (loss) before discontinued
operations,'' and ``discontinued operations, net of applicable income
taxes'' respectively. The captions for Schedule HI, memorandum items 2
and 8, and items 8 and 11 on the Predecessor Financial Items and
applicable Glossary references would also be revised to eliminate the
concept of extraordinary items.
No comments were received on the planned changes related to
extraordinary items. Accordingly, effective September 30, 2016, the
captions for Schedule HI, items 8, 10, and 11, would be revised to say
``Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations,''
``Income (loss) before discontinued operations,'' and ``Discontinued
operations, net of applicable income taxes,'' respectively. Similarly,
the captions for Schedule HI, memorandum items 2 and 8, and items 8 and
11 on the Predecessor Financial Items and applicable Glossary
references would also be revised to eliminate the concept of
extraordinary items.
Additional Comments
One commenter requested clarification on why the proposed change to
the Call Report regarding trading revenues due to changes in credit and
debit valuation adjustments was not proposed on the FR Y-9C report. The
Federal Reserve reviewed this information and determined that the
proposed changes are not necessary for the FR Y-9C and that the current
information is adequate to meet the Federal Reserve's supervisory
needs.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 1,
2016.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016-21524 Filed 9-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P