Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project, Multnomah and Washington Counties, Oregon, 60774-60777 [2016-21160]
Download as PDF
60774
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
Orlando, FL 32822. Written comments
on the Sponsor’s request must be
delivered or mailed to: Stephen Wilson,
Program Manager, Orlando Airports
District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National
Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822–
5024.
In addition, a copy of any comments
submitted to the FAA must be mailed or
delivered to Mr. Eric Menger, Airport
Director, Vero Beach Regional Airport,
P.O. Box 1389, 3400 Cherokee Drive,
Vero Beach, FL 32961–1389.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Wilson, Program Manager,
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950
Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400,
Orlando, FL 32822–5024.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st
Century (AIR–21) requires the FAA to
provide an opportunity for public notice
and comment prior to the ‘‘waiver’’ or
modification’’ of a sponsor’s Federal
obligation to use certain airport land for
non-aeronautical purposes.
Issued in Orlando, FL, on August 23, 2016.
Bart Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office,
Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2016–21225 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2010–0061]
Union Pacific Railroad’s Request for
Positive Train Control Safety Plan
Approval and System Certification
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
This document provides the
public with notice that the Union
Pacific Railroad (UP) submitted to FRA
its Positive Train Control (PTC) Safety
Plan (PTCSP) Version 1.0, dated June 1,
2016. UP requests that FRA approve its
PTCSP and issue a PTC System
Certification for UP’s Interoperable
Electronic Train Management System
(I–ETMS).
DATES: FRA will consider
communications received by October 3,
2016 before taking final action on the
PTCSP. FRA will consider comments
received after that date if practicable.
ADDRESSES: All communications
concerning this proceeding should
identify Docket Number FRA–2010–
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 01, 2016
Jkt 238001
0061 and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mark Hartong, Senior Scientific
Technical Advisor, at (202) 493–1332,
Mark.Hartong@dot.gov; or Mr. David
Blackmore, Staff Director, Positive Train
Control Division, at (312) 835–3903,
David.Blackmore@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In its
PTCSP, UP asserts that the I–ETMS
system it is implementing is designed as
a vital overlay PTC system as defined in
49 CFR 236.1015(e)(2). The PTCSP
describes UP’s I–ETMS implementation
and the associated I–ETMS safety
processes, safety analyses, and test,
validation, and verification processes
used during development of I–ETMS.
The PTCSP also contains UP’s
operational and support requirements
and procedures.
UP’s PTCSP and the accompanying
request for approval and system
certification are available for review
online at www.regulations.gov (Docket
No. FRA–2010–0061) and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on the PTCSP by submitting
written comments or data. See 49 CFR
236.1011(e). During its review of the
PTCSP, FRA will consider any
comments or data submitted. However,
FRA may elect not to respond to any
particular comment and, under 49 CFR
236.1009(d)(3), FRA maintains the
authority to approve or disapprove the
PTCSP at its sole discretion. FRA does
not anticipate scheduling a public
hearing regarding UP’s PTCSP because
the circumstances do not appear to
warrant a hearing. If any interested
party desires an opportunity for oral
comment, the party should notify FRA
in writing before the end of the
comment period and specify the basis
for his or her request.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Privacy Act Notice
Anyone can search the electronic
form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
In accordance with 49 CFR 211.3, FRA
solicits comments from the public to
better inform its decisions. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the
commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which you can review at
www.dot.gov/privacy. See https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for
the privacy notice of regulations.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 29,
2016.
Patrick T. Warren,
Acting Associate Administrator for Railroad
Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–21139 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Southwest Corridor Light Rail
Project, Multnomah and Washington
Counties, Oregon
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), Metro (the
regional government and metropolitan
planning organization that serves the
cities and counties of the Portland,
Oregon metropolitan area) and the TriCounty Metropolitan Transportation
District of Oregon (TriMet) intend to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to evaluate the benefits
and impacts of the proposed Southwest
Corridor Light Rail Project (Project). The
Project would improve public
transportation between and through
southwest Portland, Tigard and
Tualatin. FTA may provide funding for
the Project through its Capital
Investment Grant program. FTA, Metro
and TriMet will prepare the EIS in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), FTA
environmental regulations, and the
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
Act (FAST Act). This Notice initiates
formal scoping for the EIS, provides
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
information on the nature of the
proposed transit Project, invites
participation in the EIS process, and
identifies potential environmental
effects to be considered. It also invites
comments from interested members of
the public, tribes, and agencies on the
scope of the EIS and announces
upcoming public scoping meetings.
Comments should address (1) feasible
alternatives that may better achieve the
Project’s need and purposes with fewer
adverse impacts and (2) any significant
environmental impacts relating to the
alternatives.
DATES: The public scoping period will
begin on the date of publication of this
Notice and will continue through
September 30, 2016 or 30 days from the
date of publication, whichever is later.
Please send written comments on the
scope of the EIS, including the
preliminary statement of the purpose of
and need for the Project, the alternatives
to be considered in the EIS, the
environmental and community impacts
to be evaluated, and any other Projectrelated issues, to the address below.
Public scoping meetings will be held at
the times and locations indicated in
ADDRESSES below. FTA, Metro and
TriMet will take oral and written
comments at the scoping meeting. FTA,
Metro and TriMet have also scheduled
a meeting to collect comments of tribes
and agencies with an interest in the
proposed Project.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
scope of the EIS must be received by
September 30, 2016 or 30 days from the
publication date of this Notice,
whichever is later. Please send them to
Chris Ford, Investment Areas Project
Manager, Metro, 600 NE Grand Avenue,
Portland Oregon 97232 or to
swclrt.scoping@oregonmetro.gov .
Comments may also be offered at the
public scoping meeting, which will be
held at:
• Wilson High School, 1151 SW.
Vermont Street, Portland, Oregon, on
September 22, 2016, from 6 to 8 p.m.
A scoping meeting for interested
tribes and Federal and non-Federal
agencies will be at:
• TriMet, 1800 SW 1st Ave, 3rd Floor,
Columbia Conference Room, Portland,
Oregon on September 20 from 1 to 3
p.m.
All meeting places are accessible to
persons with disabilities. Any
individual with a disability who
requires special assistance, such as a
sign language interpreter, or any
individual who requires translation or
interpretation services, must contact
Yuliya Kharitonova at (503) 813–7535 at
least 48 hours before the meeting. A
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 01, 2016
Jkt 238001
scoping information packet will be
available before the meetings on the
Project Web site or by calling Yuliya
Kharitonova at (503) 813–7535; copies
will also be available at the public
scoping meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Witmer, FTA Community Planner,
John.Witmer@dot.gov, phone: (206)
220–7954.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. NEPA ‘‘scoping’’ (40
CFR 1501.7) has specific and fairly
limited objectives, one of which is to
identify the alternatives’ significant
issues that will be examined in detail in
the EIS, while simultaneously limiting
consideration and development of
issues that are not truly significant. The
NEPA scoping process should identify
potentially significant environmental
impacts caused by the Project and that
give rise to the need to prepare an EIS;
impacts that are deemed not to be
significant need not be developed
extensively in the context of the impact
statement. The EIS must be focused on
impacts of consequence consistent with
the ultimate objectives of the NEPA
implementing regulations—‘‘to make
the environmental impact statement
process more useful to decision makers
and the public; and to reduce
paperwork and the accumulation of
extraneous background data, in order to
emphasize the need to focus on real
environmental issues and
alternatives. . . [by requiring] impact
statements to be concise, clear, and to
the point, and supported by evidence
that agencies have made the necessary
environmental analyses.’’ Executive
Order 11991, of May 24, 1977. Transit
projects may also generate
environmental benefits, which should
also be highlighted; the EIS process
should draw attention to positive
impacts, not just negative impacts.
FTA, Metro and TriMet are
considering two alternatives for the
Project: (1) A No-Build Alternative, as
required by NEPA, that reflects the
existing transportation system plus the
future transportation improvements
included in the Metro Regional
Transportation Plan, but not including
the Project; and (2) a Light Rail Transit
(LRT) Alternative (Build Alternative)
that would extend the existing TriMet
MAX system 12 miles from the Transit
Mall in downtown Portland to
Bridgeport Village in Tualatin, generally
running along the SW Barbur
Boulevard/Interstate 5 corridor through
Southwest Portland, the Tigard Triangle
and downtown Tigard. The Build
Alternative has design options in
several locations.
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60775
Metro and TriMet developed the
proposed Build Alternative through an
early scoping process and an analysis of
a wide range of potential alternatives.
FTA and Metro published notice of the
early scoping process in the Federal
Register on Sept. 29, 2011. Please see
the Project Web site (https://
www.swcorridorplan.org) for
information about the early scoping and
other planning activities, the analysis of
alternatives, the decisions of the Project
steering committee, and background
technical reports.
The Southwest Corridor is a fastgrowing part of the Portland
metropolitan region. Its major
transportation facilities, including
Interstate 5 (I–5), Oregon State Highway
217, and Oregon State Highway 99W,
are congested and unreliable. As more
people and employers locate in the
corridor, worsening traffic conditions
will impact economic development and
livability. The corridor ranked as the
highest priority corridor in Metro’s 2009
High Capacity Transit System Plan, and
in May 2016 the Project’s steering
committee chose light rail as the
preferred mode to provide high capacity
transit (HCT) service.
Preliminary purpose of and need for
the Project: The Project’s purpose is to
directly connect Tualatin, downtown
Tigard, Southwest Portland, and the
region’s central city with light rail, other
high-quality transit, and appropriate
community investments to improve
mobility and create the conditions that
will allow communities in the corridor
to achieve their land use vision.
Specifically, within the Southwest
Corridor, the Project aims to:
• Provide light rail transit service that
is cost-effective to build and operate,
and that can serve existing and
anticipated demand in the corridor;
• Improve transit reliability,
frequency, and travel times, and connect
to Westside Express Service (WES)
commuter rail and other existing and
future transit networks;
• Support adopted regional and local
plans including the 2040 Growth
Concept, the Barbur Concept Plan, the
Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan and the
Tigard Downtown Vision;
• Create multimodal transportation
networks to provide safe and convenient
access to transit and adjacent land uses;
• Advance active transportation and
encourage physical activity;
• Provide travel options that reduce
overall transportation costs;
• Improve multimodal access to
existing jobs, housing and educational
opportunities and foster opportunities
for commercial development and a
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
60776
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
range of housing types adjacent to
transit;
• Ensure that benefits and impacts
promote community equity; and
• Advance transportation projects
that are sensitive to the environment,
improve water and air quality, and help
achieve the sustainability goals in
applicable plans.
The Project is needed because:
• Transit service to important
destinations in the corridor is limited,
and unmet demand for transit is
increasing due to growth;
• Limited street connectivity and
gaps in pedestrian and bicycle networks
create barriers and unsafe conditions for
transit access and active transportation;
• Travel is slow and unreliable on
congested roadways;
• The corridor has a limited supply
and range of housing options with good
access to multimodal transportation
networks, and has inadequate
transportation between residences,
employment, and services;
• Regional and local plans call for
High Capacity Transit in the corridor to
meet land use goals; and
• State, regional and local goals
require investments to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.
Proposed alternatives: NEPA requires
the Draft EIS to analyze a No-Build
Alternative as a baseline against which
to assess the impacts of the proposed
project. The proposed Project in this
case is the Light Rail Transit (LRT)
Alternative. The Project steering
committee chose light rail as the
preferred mode because of its greater
long-term carrying capacity and
superior projected transit performance
compared to other modes, ability to
integrate into the existing light rail
system and higher level of public
support. The alignment and design
options proposed for the Draft EIS
resulted from several years of planning,
technical analysis, public engagement,
and input from affected jurisdictions.
The LRT Alternative travels generally
southwest from the south end of the
Downtown Portland Transit Mall
through southwest Portland and Tigard
to Bridgeport Village in Tualatin. The
route is about 12 miles long.
FTA, Metro and TriMet propose to
consider several design options for the
LRT Alternative. The scoping materials
(at https://www.swcorridorplan.org)
describe the primary alignment and the
possible options in detail. For purposes
of this Notice, the Project can be
generally described as follows:
In South Portland, the alignment runs
along either SW Barbur Boulevard or
SW Naito Parkway. Between SW 13th
Avenue and SW 60th Avenue, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 01, 2016
Jkt 238001
alignment could run either in the center
of SW Barbur, crossing I–5 at-grade at
SW Capitol Highway, or next to I–5,
crossing I–5 and SW Capitol Highway
with an above-grade structure. Near the
Portland-Tigard city limits the
alignment would turn south over I–5
into the Tigard Triangle on a new
structure and then proceed south and
west to SW 70th Avenue. There are two
options from SW 70th Avenue: (1)
Through-Routed LRT and (2) Branched
LRT. Through-Routed LRT would
extend south from the Portland Transit
Mall to downtown Tigard following one
of two routes—crossing Highway 217 on
a new structure extending from SW
Clinton Street to SW Hall Boulevard, or
extending from SW Beveland Street to
SW Ash Street—and then traveling to
Bridgeport Village following one of two
routes, either generally next to I–5 or
generally next to the existing WES and
freight rail line. Branched LRT would
diverge at the Tigard Triangle, with one
branch turning west to terminate in
downtown Tigard following one of three
routes—crossing Highway 217 on a new
structure extending from SW Clinton
Street to SW Hall Boulevard, from SW
Beveland Street to SW Ash Street, or
from SW Beveland Street to SW Wall
Street—and one branch continuing
south on a separate crossing of Highway
217 to terminate at Bridgeport Village
without traveling through downtown
Tigard.
Under any of the options, the Project
would include stations at these
locations:
• Between SW Gibbs Street and SW
Grover Street (on SW Barbur or SW
Naito)
• Between SW Custer Street and SW
13th Avenue (on SW Barbur or adjacent
to I–5)
• At the Barbur Transit Center with a
modified or expanded park-and-ride
• At SW 53rd Avenue with a new
park-and-ride (on SW Barbur or adjacent
to I–5)
• On SW 70th Avenue between SW
Atlanta Street and SW Baylor Street
(could include a new park-and-ride)
• At SW Bonita Road (adjacent to
freight rail or adjacent to I–5) (at
location next to I–5, could include a
new park-and-ride)
• At SW Upper Boones Ferry Road
(adjacent to freight rail or adjacent to I–
5) (could include a park-and-ride)
• Bridgeport Village (could include
an expanded park-and-ride)
In addition, depending on the option,
there would be stations at these
locations:
• SW Capitol Hill Road and SW
Barbur Boulevard
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• SW 19th Avenue and SW Barbur
Boulevard
• SW 26th or SW 30th Avenue and
SW Barbur Boulevard
• SW Spring Garden Street and
adjacent to I–5
• SW 26th Avenue and adjacent to I–
5
• On SW Beveland Street near SW
70th Avenue,
• Adjacent to the WES commuter rail
tracks near the existing Tigard Transit
Center, (could include an expanded
park-and-ride)
• On SW Ash Street near SW
Commercial Street (could include an
expanded park-and-ride for the nearby
Tigard Transit Center)
• Near SW Wall Street and SW
Hunziker Street (could include a new
park-and-ride)
The LRT Alternative will include a
light rail maintenance facility. This
could be a new facility, either near SW
Wall Street and the WES Commuter Rail
line, or just west of I–5 north of SW
Bonita Road, or an expansion of the
existing Ruby Junction maintenance
facility in Gresham.
The LRT Alternative also includes
associated roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian projects that may be eligible
for federal funding and could be
constructed together with the transit
Project, thereby meriting joint
environmental analysis. Among the
most notable are mechanized bike/ped
connections to Marquam Hill (Oregon
Health Sciences University) and Mt.
Sylvania (Portland Community College);
new opportunities for bicycles and
pedestrians to cross I–405; new and
upgraded sidewalks, bike lanes, and safe
crossings on SW Barbur Boulevard from
SW 3rd Avenue to SW 60th Avenue,
including reconstruction of the Vermont
and Newbury viaducts; and both major
and minor roadway improvements along
the alignment, including possible
revisions to the west end of the Ross
Island Bridge, crossings of I–5, and
crossings of Highway 217. Please refer
to the scoping materials for detailed
information about these and many other
potential improvements.
Public and agency input received
during scoping will help FTA, Metro
and TriMet select a range of reasonable
alternatives and options to evaluate in
the Draft EIS. FTA, Metro and TriMet
also invite comment on potential Joint
Development opportunities along the
alignment.
Possible adverse effects: Consistent
with NEPA, FTA, Metro and TriMet will
evaluate, with input from the public and
tribes and agencies, the potential
impacts of the alternatives on the
physical, human, and natural
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
environment. Likely areas of
investigation include effects on air
quality and greenhouse gas emissions,
property acquisition and displacements,
ecosystems (including threatened and
endangered species), community
livability, energy use, environmental
justice, geology and soils, hazardous
materials, historic and cultural
resources, land use and economic
effects, noise and vibration, parks and
recreation, safety and security,
transportation, utilities and public
services, visual and aesthetic qualities,
water quality and hydrology, and
wetlands. Significant impacts prior to
the development of mitigation measures
may occur in the areas of property
acquisition and displacements, historic
and cultural resources, noise and
vibration, parks and recreation,
transportation, visual and aesthetic
qualities, water quality and hydrology,
and wetlands. Significant beneficial
impacts could occur in the areas of air
quality and greenhouse gas emissions,
energy use, environmental justice, safety
and security, and transportation. The
EIS will evaluate short-term
construction impacts and long-term
operating impacts and will also consider
indirect and cumulative impacts. The
EIS will propose measures to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate adverse impacts.
In accordance with FTA policy and
regulations, FTA, Metro and TriMet will
comply with all Federal environmental
laws, regulations, and executive orders
applicable to the proposed project
during the environmental review
process.
Roles of Agencies and the Public:
NEPA, and FTA’s regulations for
implementing NEPA, call for broad
involvement in the EIS process. FTA,
Metro and TriMet therefore invite
Federal and non-Federal agencies and
Indian tribes to participate in the NEPA
process. Any agency or tribe interested
in the Project that does not receive such
an invitation should promptly notify the
Metro Investment Area Project Manager
identified above under ADDRESSES.
Interested parties may review a draft
Coordination Plan for public and agency
involvement at the Project Web site. It
identifies the Project’s coordination
approach and structure, details the
major milestones for agency and public
involvement, and includes an initial list
of interested agencies and organizations.
Combined FEIS and Record of
Decision: Under 23 U.S.C. 139, FTA
should combine the Final EIS and
Record of Decision if it is practicable.
FTA invites interested parties to
comment on a combined FEIS/ROD for
the Project to help FTA decide whether
combining the FEIS/ROD is practicable.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 01, 2016
Jkt 238001
Paperwork Reduction. The Paperwork
Reduction Act seeks, in part, to
minimize the cost to the taxpayer of the
creation, collection, maintenance, use,
dissemination, and disposition of
information. Consistent with this goal
and with principles of economy and
efficiency in government, FTA tries to
limit insofar as possible distribution of
complete printed sets of NEPA
documents. Accordingly, unless a
specific request for a complete printed
set of the NEPA document is received
before the document is printed, FTA,
Metro and TriMet will distribute only
electronic copies of the NEPA
document. A complete printed set of the
environmental document will be
available for review at Metro’s offices;
an electronic copy of the complete
environmental document will be
available on the Project Web site.
Other: Metro and TriMet may seek
funding for the proposed Project under
FTA’s Capital Investment Grant
Program, 49 U.S.C. 5309, and would
therefore be subject to New Starts
regulations (49 CFR part 611). The New
Starts regulations also require the
submission of certain projectjustification information to support a
request to initiate preliminary
engineering. This information is
normally developed in conjunction with
the NEPA process. The EIS will include
pertinent New Starts evaluation criteria.
Dated: August 25, 2016.
Kenneth A. Feldman,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Federal
Transit Administration, Region 10, Seattle,
WA.
[FR Doc. 2016–21160 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0097; PDA–
38(R)]
Hazardous Materials: California Meal
and Rest Break Requirements
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Public notice and invitation to
comment.
AGENCY:
Interested parties are invited
to comment on an application by the
National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc.
(NTTC) for an administrative
determination as to whether Federal
hazardous material transportation law
preempts regulations of the State of
California that prohibit an employer
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60777
from requiring an employee to work
during any mandatory meal or rest
period.
Comments received on or before
October 17, 2016 and rebuttal comments
received on or before December 1, 2016
will be considered before an
administrative determination is issued
by PHMSA’s Chief Counsel. Rebuttal
comments may discuss only those
issues raised by comments received
during the initial comment period and
may not discuss new issues.
ADDRESSES: The NTTC’s application and
all comments received may be reviewed
in the Docket Operations Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The application
and all comments are available on the
U.S. Government Regulations.gov Web
site: https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments must refer to Docket No.
PHMSA–2016–0097 and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Docket Operations
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
A copy of each comment must also be
sent to (1) Prasad Sharma, Esq.,
Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson &
Feary, 1850 M Street, NW., Suite 280,
Washington, DC 20036, and (2) Kamala
D. Harris, Attorney General, Office of
the Attorney General, 1300 ‘‘I’’ Street,
Sacramento, CA 95814–2919. A
certification that a copy has been sent to
these persons must also be included
with the comment. (The following
format is suggested: ‘‘I certify that
copies of this comment have been sent
to Mr. Sharma and Ms. Harris at the
addresses specified in the Federal
Register.’’)
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing a comment
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 171 (Friday, September 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60774-60777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21160]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project, Multnomah and Washington
Counties, Oregon
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Metro (the regional
government and metropolitan planning organization that serves the
cities and counties of the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area) and the
Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet)
intend to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate
the benefits and impacts of the proposed Southwest Corridor Light Rail
Project (Project). The Project would improve public transportation
between and through southwest Portland, Tigard and Tualatin. FTA may
provide funding for the Project through its Capital Investment Grant
program. FTA, Metro and TriMet will prepare the EIS in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), FTA environmental
regulations, and the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST
Act). This Notice initiates formal scoping for the EIS, provides
[[Page 60775]]
information on the nature of the proposed transit Project, invites
participation in the EIS process, and identifies potential
environmental effects to be considered. It also invites comments from
interested members of the public, tribes, and agencies on the scope of
the EIS and announces upcoming public scoping meetings. Comments should
address (1) feasible alternatives that may better achieve the Project's
need and purposes with fewer adverse impacts and (2) any significant
environmental impacts relating to the alternatives.
DATES: The public scoping period will begin on the date of publication
of this Notice and will continue through September 30, 2016 or 30 days
from the date of publication, whichever is later. Please send written
comments on the scope of the EIS, including the preliminary statement
of the purpose of and need for the Project, the alternatives to be
considered in the EIS, the environmental and community impacts to be
evaluated, and any other Project-related issues, to the address below.
Public scoping meetings will be held at the times and locations
indicated in ADDRESSES below. FTA, Metro and TriMet will take oral and
written comments at the scoping meeting. FTA, Metro and TriMet have
also scheduled a meeting to collect comments of tribes and agencies
with an interest in the proposed Project.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS must be received by
September 30, 2016 or 30 days from the publication date of this Notice,
whichever is later. Please send them to Chris Ford, Investment Areas
Project Manager, Metro, 600 NE Grand Avenue, Portland Oregon 97232 or
to swclrt.scoping@oregonmetro.gov . Comments may also be offered at the
public scoping meeting, which will be held at:
Wilson High School, 1151 SW. Vermont Street, Portland,
Oregon, on September 22, 2016, from 6 to 8 p.m.
A scoping meeting for interested tribes and Federal and non-Federal
agencies will be at:
TriMet, 1800 SW 1st Ave, 3rd Floor, Columbia Conference
Room, Portland, Oregon on September 20 from 1 to 3 p.m.
All meeting places are accessible to persons with disabilities. Any
individual with a disability who requires special assistance, such as a
sign language interpreter, or any individual who requires translation
or interpretation services, must contact Yuliya Kharitonova at (503)
813-7535 at least 48 hours before the meeting. A scoping information
packet will be available before the meetings on the Project Web site or
by calling Yuliya Kharitonova at (503) 813-7535; copies will also be
available at the public scoping meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Witmer, FTA Community Planner,
John.Witmer@dot.gov, phone: (206) 220-7954.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. NEPA ``scoping'' (40 CFR 1501.7) has specific and
fairly limited objectives, one of which is to identify the
alternatives' significant issues that will be examined in detail in the
EIS, while simultaneously limiting consideration and development of
issues that are not truly significant. The NEPA scoping process should
identify potentially significant environmental impacts caused by the
Project and that give rise to the need to prepare an EIS; impacts that
are deemed not to be significant need not be developed extensively in
the context of the impact statement. The EIS must be focused on impacts
of consequence consistent with the ultimate objectives of the NEPA
implementing regulations--``to make the environmental impact statement
process more useful to decision makers and the public; and to reduce
paperwork and the accumulation of extraneous background data, in order
to emphasize the need to focus on real environmental issues and
alternatives. . . [by requiring] impact statements to be concise,
clear, and to the point, and supported by evidence that agencies have
made the necessary environmental analyses.'' Executive Order 11991, of
May 24, 1977. Transit projects may also generate environmental
benefits, which should also be highlighted; the EIS process should draw
attention to positive impacts, not just negative impacts.
FTA, Metro and TriMet are considering two alternatives for the
Project: (1) A No-Build Alternative, as required by NEPA, that reflects
the existing transportation system plus the future transportation
improvements included in the Metro Regional Transportation Plan, but
not including the Project; and (2) a Light Rail Transit (LRT)
Alternative (Build Alternative) that would extend the existing TriMet
MAX system 12 miles from the Transit Mall in downtown Portland to
Bridgeport Village in Tualatin, generally running along the SW Barbur
Boulevard/Interstate 5 corridor through Southwest Portland, the Tigard
Triangle and downtown Tigard. The Build Alternative has design options
in several locations.
Metro and TriMet developed the proposed Build Alternative through
an early scoping process and an analysis of a wide range of potential
alternatives. FTA and Metro published notice of the early scoping
process in the Federal Register on Sept. 29, 2011. Please see the
Project Web site (https://www.swcorridorplan.org) for information about
the early scoping and other planning activities, the analysis of
alternatives, the decisions of the Project steering committee, and
background technical reports.
The Southwest Corridor is a fast-growing part of the Portland
metropolitan region. Its major transportation facilities, including
Interstate 5 (I-5), Oregon State Highway 217, and Oregon State Highway
99W, are congested and unreliable. As more people and employers locate
in the corridor, worsening traffic conditions will impact economic
development and livability. The corridor ranked as the highest priority
corridor in Metro's 2009 High Capacity Transit System Plan, and in May
2016 the Project's steering committee chose light rail as the preferred
mode to provide high capacity transit (HCT) service.
Preliminary purpose of and need for the Project: The Project's
purpose is to directly connect Tualatin, downtown Tigard, Southwest
Portland, and the region's central city with light rail, other high-
quality transit, and appropriate community investments to improve
mobility and create the conditions that will allow communities in the
corridor to achieve their land use vision. Specifically, within the
Southwest Corridor, the Project aims to:
Provide light rail transit service that is cost-effective
to build and operate, and that can serve existing and anticipated
demand in the corridor;
Improve transit reliability, frequency, and travel times,
and connect to Westside Express Service (WES) commuter rail and other
existing and future transit networks;
Support adopted regional and local plans including the
2040 Growth Concept, the Barbur Concept Plan, the Tigard Triangle
Strategic Plan and the Tigard Downtown Vision;
Create multimodal transportation networks to provide safe
and convenient access to transit and adjacent land uses;
Advance active transportation and encourage physical
activity;
Provide travel options that reduce overall transportation
costs;
Improve multimodal access to existing jobs, housing and
educational opportunities and foster opportunities for commercial
development and a
[[Page 60776]]
range of housing types adjacent to transit;
Ensure that benefits and impacts promote community equity;
and
Advance transportation projects that are sensitive to the
environment, improve water and air quality, and help achieve the
sustainability goals in applicable plans.
The Project is needed because:
Transit service to important destinations in the corridor
is limited, and unmet demand for transit is increasing due to growth;
Limited street connectivity and gaps in pedestrian and
bicycle networks create barriers and unsafe conditions for transit
access and active transportation;
Travel is slow and unreliable on congested roadways;
The corridor has a limited supply and range of housing
options with good access to multimodal transportation networks, and has
inadequate transportation between residences, employment, and services;
Regional and local plans call for High Capacity Transit in
the corridor to meet land use goals; and
State, regional and local goals require investments to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Proposed alternatives: NEPA requires the Draft EIS to analyze a No-
Build Alternative as a baseline against which to assess the impacts of
the proposed project. The proposed Project in this case is the Light
Rail Transit (LRT) Alternative. The Project steering committee chose
light rail as the preferred mode because of its greater long-term
carrying capacity and superior projected transit performance compared
to other modes, ability to integrate into the existing light rail
system and higher level of public support. The alignment and design
options proposed for the Draft EIS resulted from several years of
planning, technical analysis, public engagement, and input from
affected jurisdictions.
The LRT Alternative travels generally southwest from the south end
of the Downtown Portland Transit Mall through southwest Portland and
Tigard to Bridgeport Village in Tualatin. The route is about 12 miles
long.
FTA, Metro and TriMet propose to consider several design options
for the LRT Alternative. The scoping materials (at https://www.swcorridorplan.org) describe the primary alignment and the possible
options in detail. For purposes of this Notice, the Project can be
generally described as follows:
In South Portland, the alignment runs along either SW Barbur
Boulevard or SW Naito Parkway. Between SW 13th Avenue and SW 60th
Avenue, the alignment could run either in the center of SW Barbur,
crossing I-5 at-grade at SW Capitol Highway, or next to I-5, crossing
I-5 and SW Capitol Highway with an above-grade structure. Near the
Portland-Tigard city limits the alignment would turn south over I-5
into the Tigard Triangle on a new structure and then proceed south and
west to SW 70th Avenue. There are two options from SW 70th Avenue: (1)
Through-Routed LRT and (2) Branched LRT. Through-Routed LRT would
extend south from the Portland Transit Mall to downtown Tigard
following one of two routes--crossing Highway 217 on a new structure
extending from SW Clinton Street to SW Hall Boulevard, or extending
from SW Beveland Street to SW Ash Street--and then traveling to
Bridgeport Village following one of two routes, either generally next
to I-5 or generally next to the existing WES and freight rail line.
Branched LRT would diverge at the Tigard Triangle, with one branch
turning west to terminate in downtown Tigard following one of three
routes--crossing Highway 217 on a new structure extending from SW
Clinton Street to SW Hall Boulevard, from SW Beveland Street to SW Ash
Street, or from SW Beveland Street to SW Wall Street--and one branch
continuing south on a separate crossing of Highway 217 to terminate at
Bridgeport Village without traveling through downtown Tigard.
Under any of the options, the Project would include stations at
these locations:
Between SW Gibbs Street and SW Grover Street (on SW Barbur
or SW Naito)
Between SW Custer Street and SW 13th Avenue (on SW Barbur
or adjacent to I-5)
At the Barbur Transit Center with a modified or expanded
park-and-ride
At SW 53rd Avenue with a new park-and-ride (on SW Barbur
or adjacent to I-5)
On SW 70th Avenue between SW Atlanta Street and SW Baylor
Street (could include a new park-and-ride)
At SW Bonita Road (adjacent to freight rail or adjacent to
I-5) (at location next to I-5, could include a new park-and-ride)
At SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (adjacent to freight rail or
adjacent to I-5) (could include a park-and-ride)
Bridgeport Village (could include an expanded park-and-
ride)
In addition, depending on the option, there would be stations at
these locations:
SW Capitol Hill Road and SW Barbur Boulevard
SW 19th Avenue and SW Barbur Boulevard
SW 26th or SW 30th Avenue and SW Barbur Boulevard
SW Spring Garden Street and adjacent to I-5
SW 26th Avenue and adjacent to I-5
On SW Beveland Street near SW 70th Avenue,
Adjacent to the WES commuter rail tracks near the existing
Tigard Transit Center, (could include an expanded park-and-ride)
On SW Ash Street near SW Commercial Street (could include
an expanded park-and-ride for the nearby Tigard Transit Center)
Near SW Wall Street and SW Hunziker Street (could include
a new park-and-ride)
The LRT Alternative will include a light rail maintenance facility.
This could be a new facility, either near SW Wall Street and the WES
Commuter Rail line, or just west of I-5 north of SW Bonita Road, or an
expansion of the existing Ruby Junction maintenance facility in
Gresham.
The LRT Alternative also includes associated roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian projects that may be eligible for federal funding and could
be constructed together with the transit Project, thereby meriting
joint environmental analysis. Among the most notable are mechanized
bike/ped connections to Marquam Hill (Oregon Health Sciences
University) and Mt. Sylvania (Portland Community College); new
opportunities for bicycles and pedestrians to cross I-405; new and
upgraded sidewalks, bike lanes, and safe crossings on SW Barbur
Boulevard from SW 3rd Avenue to SW 60th Avenue, including
reconstruction of the Vermont and Newbury viaducts; and both major and
minor roadway improvements along the alignment, including possible
revisions to the west end of the Ross Island Bridge, crossings of I-5,
and crossings of Highway 217. Please refer to the scoping materials for
detailed information about these and many other potential improvements.
Public and agency input received during scoping will help FTA,
Metro and TriMet select a range of reasonable alternatives and options
to evaluate in the Draft EIS. FTA, Metro and TriMet also invite comment
on potential Joint Development opportunities along the alignment.
Possible adverse effects: Consistent with NEPA, FTA, Metro and
TriMet will evaluate, with input from the public and tribes and
agencies, the potential impacts of the alternatives on the physical,
human, and natural
[[Page 60777]]
environment. Likely areas of investigation include effects on air
quality and greenhouse gas emissions, property acquisition and
displacements, ecosystems (including threatened and endangered
species), community livability, energy use, environmental justice,
geology and soils, hazardous materials, historic and cultural
resources, land use and economic effects, noise and vibration, parks
and recreation, safety and security, transportation, utilities and
public services, visual and aesthetic qualities, water quality and
hydrology, and wetlands. Significant impacts prior to the development
of mitigation measures may occur in the areas of property acquisition
and displacements, historic and cultural resources, noise and
vibration, parks and recreation, transportation, visual and aesthetic
qualities, water quality and hydrology, and wetlands. Significant
beneficial impacts could occur in the areas of air quality and
greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, environmental justice, safety and
security, and transportation. The EIS will evaluate short-term
construction impacts and long-term operating impacts and will also
consider indirect and cumulative impacts. The EIS will propose measures
to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse impacts.
In accordance with FTA policy and regulations, FTA, Metro and
TriMet will comply with all Federal environmental laws, regulations,
and executive orders applicable to the proposed project during the
environmental review process.
Roles of Agencies and the Public: NEPA, and FTA's regulations for
implementing NEPA, call for broad involvement in the EIS process. FTA,
Metro and TriMet therefore invite Federal and non-Federal agencies and
Indian tribes to participate in the NEPA process. Any agency or tribe
interested in the Project that does not receive such an invitation
should promptly notify the Metro Investment Area Project Manager
identified above under ADDRESSES.
Interested parties may review a draft Coordination Plan for public
and agency involvement at the Project Web site. It identifies the
Project's coordination approach and structure, details the major
milestones for agency and public involvement, and includes an initial
list of interested agencies and organizations.
Combined FEIS and Record of Decision: Under 23 U.S.C. 139, FTA
should combine the Final EIS and Record of Decision if it is
practicable. FTA invites interested parties to comment on a combined
FEIS/ROD for the Project to help FTA decide whether combining the FEIS/
ROD is practicable.
Paperwork Reduction. The Paperwork Reduction Act seeks, in part, to
minimize the cost to the taxpayer of the creation, collection,
maintenance, use, dissemination, and disposition of information.
Consistent with this goal and with principles of economy and efficiency
in government, FTA tries to limit insofar as possible distribution of
complete printed sets of NEPA documents. Accordingly, unless a specific
request for a complete printed set of the NEPA document is received
before the document is printed, FTA, Metro and TriMet will distribute
only electronic copies of the NEPA document. A complete printed set of
the environmental document will be available for review at Metro's
offices; an electronic copy of the complete environmental document will
be available on the Project Web site.
Other: Metro and TriMet may seek funding for the proposed Project
under FTA's Capital Investment Grant Program, 49 U.S.C. 5309, and would
therefore be subject to New Starts regulations (49 CFR part 611). The
New Starts regulations also require the submission of certain project-
justification information to support a request to initiate preliminary
engineering. This information is normally developed in conjunction with
the NEPA process. The EIS will include pertinent New Starts evaluation
criteria.
Dated: August 25, 2016.
Kenneth A. Feldman,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Federal Transit Administration, Region
10, Seattle, WA.
[FR Doc. 2016-21160 Filed 9-1-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P