Notice of Policy on the Implementation of the Phased Increase in Domestic Content Under the Buy America Waiver for Rolling Stock and Notice of Public Interest Waiver of Buy America Domestic Content Requirements for Rolling Stock Procurement in Limited Circumstances, 60278-60285 [2016-21007]
Download as PDF
60278
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 52.385—EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS
Dates
Connecticut state citation
Title/subject
*
22a–174–1 .................
*
Definitions .................
*
2/1/10
*
22a–174–17 (formerly
19–508–17).
*
Control of Open
Burning.
*
4/4/72
9/1/16
*
22a–174–43 ...............
*
Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control.
*
5/10/04
9/1/16
*
Connecticut General
Statute, Title 446c,
Section 22a–174(f).
*
Powers of the commissioner. Open
Burning.
*
3/30/00
9/1/16
[FR Doc. 2016–21012 Filed 8–31–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 661
[Docket Nos. FTA–2016–0019 & FTA–2016–
0020]
Notice of Policy on the Implementation
of the Phased Increase in Domestic
Content Under the Buy America Waiver
for Rolling Stock and Notice of Public
Interest Waiver of Buy America
Domestic Content Requirements for
Rolling Stock Procurement in Limited
Circumstances
AGENCY:
Federal Transit Administration,
DOT.
Notice of final policy and public
interest waiver.
ACTION:
This final policy consists of
the Federal Transit Administration’s
(FTA) policy statement regarding its
implementation of the phased-in
increase in domestic content for rolling
stock under the FTA’s Buy America
statute, as amended by the Fixing
America’s Surface Transportation
(FAST) Act. Through this final policy,
FTA is providing guidance to transit
SUMMARY:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal
Register
citation
9/1/16
Date
adopted by
state
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Aug 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
Date
approved by
EPA
*
Section 52.370
*
[Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
(c)(113)
*
[Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
(b)(2)
*
[Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
(c)(95)
*
[Insert Federal
Register citation].
agencies and transit vehicle
manufacturers regarding how they are to
implement the FAST Act’s statutory
amendments. Additionally, FTA is
providing notice of public interest
waivers of Buy America domestic
content requirements for rolling stock
procurements in limited circumstances.
DATES: The final policy takes effect on
September 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cecelia Comito, Assistant Chief
Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel,
phone: (202) 366–2217, or email,
Cecelia.Comito@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Proposed Policy Guidance and Public
Interest Waiver
A. Proposed Policy
B. Proposed Public Interest Waiver
III. Response to Comments
A. What date controls the percentage of
domestic content?
B. How do the new requirements apply to
options, joint procurements, and
piggyback procurements?
C. Do the increased domestic content
requirements extend to subcomponents?
D. Do the changes also apply to train
control, communication, and traction
power systems?
E. Does the increase in domestic content
requirements apply to remanufactured,
overhauled, or rebuilt transit vehicles?
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(c)(113)
Comments/description
*
*
Approved 22a–174–1(19) definition of
‘‘brush’’ for purposes of Connecticut General Statutes (CGS) Section 22a–174(f);
see paragraph (c)(113)(A) of this section.
*
*
DEEP regulation to control open burning.
Paragraph (b) was revised 9/1/16 by redesignating paragraph (b) as (b)(1) and
adding paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows: This rule, formerly known as Section 19–508–17, which was approved in
paragraph (b)(1), is removed from the
SIP and replaced by Connecticut General
Statute (CGS) section 22a–174(f) and
RCSA section 22a–174–1(19); see paragraph (c)(113)(A) of this section.
*
*
DEEP regulation to control portable fuel
container spillage. Paragraph (c)(95) was
revised 9/1/16 by removing and reserving
paragraph (c)(95)(i)(C).
*
*
Control of open burning; see paragraph
(c)(113)(A) of this section.
F. Do the FAST Act amendments apply to
passenger ferry vessels?
G. How do the new rules apply to
reimported domestic steel and iron?
H. Will FTA issue public interest waivers
for vehicle procurements underway
when the FAST Act was enacted?
IV. Final Policy Guidance and Public Interest
Waivers
A. Final Policy Guidance
B. Final Public Interest Waivers
I. Introduction
This Notice provides guidance and
clarification to transit agencies and
transit vehicle manufacturers regarding
FTA’s implementation of the FAST
Act’s amendments to 49 U.S.C.
5323(j)(2)(C).
Section 3011 of the FAST Act (Pub. L.
114–94, enacted December 4, 2015)
amended the rolling stock waiver in 49
U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C) to require a two-step
increase in the domestic content of
rolling stock as follows:
When procuring rolling stock with
FTA financial assistance (including
train control, communication, traction
power, and rolling stock prototypes), the
cost of components and subcomponents
produced in the United States for fiscal
years 2016 and 2017, is more than 60
percent of the cost of all components of
the rolling stock; for fiscal years 2018
and 2019, is more than 65 percent of the
cost of all components of the rolling
stock; and for fiscal year 2020 and each
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
fiscal year thereafter, is more than 70
percent of the cost of all components of
the rolling stock.
Given the potential effect of the FAST
Act changes to vehicle procurements by
the statutory use of the term
‘‘produced,’’ transit agencies and transit
vehicle manufacturers asked FTA to
provide specific guidance on the
applicability of the FAST Act’s new Buy
America provisions to contracts entered
into before, on, or after October 1, 2015,
the effective date set forth in section
1003 of the FAST Act.
Under existing law (49 U.S.C.
5325(e)), recipients of FTA financial
assistance may enter into rolling stock
contracts for up to five years for buses
and seven years for railcars. In FTA
Circular 4220.1F, ‘‘Third Party
Contracting Guidance,’’ FTA permits
these five- and seven-year periods to
cover the recipient’s ‘‘material
requirements’’ for rolling stock and
replacement needs from the effective
date of the contract through the end of
the fifth or seventh year. FTA does not
require that ‘‘the recipient must obtain
delivery, acceptance, or even fabrication
in five or seven years—instead, it means
only that FTA limits a contract to
purchasing no more than the recipient’s
material requirements for rolling stock
or replacement parts for five or seven
years, based on the effective date of the
contract.’’ See FTA Circular 4220.1F,
Chapter IV, page 23. Under this rule,
options for vehicles must be exercised
within the five- or seven-year contract
term, although the vehicles may be
produced and delivered after the
contract term.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Proposed Policy and Public Interest
Waiver
A. Proposed Policy Guidance
The FAST Act identified two points
in time: (1) ‘‘when procuring rolling
stock,’’ which FTA’s proposed policy
interpreted as the date the vehicle
procurement contract was signed; and
(2) ‘‘the cost of components and
subcomponents produced in the United
States for fiscal years . . .’’, which FTA
interpreted as the delivery date of the
vehicle.
Individual and Joint Procurements.
FTA proposed to implement the FAST
Act by requiring that if a recipient (or
a group of recipients under a joint
procurement) enters into a contract for
rolling stock after the effective date of
the FAST Act, i.e., October 1, 2015, the
new FAST Act provisions for domestic
content of the rolling stock would apply
based on the delivery date of the
vehicle. Thus, for vehicles delivered in
FY2018 and FY2019, the domestic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Aug 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
content would have to be more than 65
percent, and for vehicles delivered in
FY2020 and beyond, the domestic
content would have to be more than 70
percent. These higher domestic content
requirements would apply to all
contracts signed after the effective date
of the FAST Act unless FTA issues a
waiver, which FTA addressed in a
separate Federal Register Notice (81 FR
20051, April 6, 2016).
In its proposed policy statement, FTA
proposed that the FAST Act
amendments would not apply to a
contract entered into before the effective
date of the FAST Act, i.e., October 1,
2015, even if the contract provides for
the delivery of vehicles after FY2017. In
addition, the policy statement proposed
to continue to permit options to be
exercised for those contracts entered
into before October 1, 2015, even if the
vehicles would be delivered outside the
five- or seven-year contract term,
consistent with Circular 4220.1F.
However, recipients who were not
direct parties to a contract executed
before October 1, 2015, would not be
allowed to exercise options (a/k/a
‘‘piggybacking’’) on those contracts and
thereby could not take advantage of the
lower domestic content requirement.
Because the assignment of options to a
third party results in the third party and
the vendor entering into a new contract
that would be entered into after the
effective date of the FAST Act, FTA
proposed to apply the increased
domestic content requirements to
vehicles scheduled for delivery in FY
2018 and beyond.
State Purchasing Schedules. In the
proposed policy statement, FTA
recognized that some recipients and
subrecipients purchase rolling stock
from a State purchasing schedule (i.e.,
an arrangement that a State has
negotiated with multiple vendors in
which those vendors essentially agree to
provide an option to the State, as well
as subordinate and local governmental
entities allowed to participate in the
schedule, to acquire specific property or
services in the future at established
prices). Because the purchasing
schedule does not commit the State to
procuring a minimum number of
vehicles, a ‘‘contract’’ does not exist
until a State, recipient, or subrecipient
enters into a purchase order with a
vendor listed on the schedule.
Therefore, the proposed policy
statement proposed to retain the 60
percent domestic content requirement
for purchase orders placed against State
purchasing schedules before October 1,
2015, regardless of the ultimate delivery
date(s). However, for purchase orders
placed against State purchasing
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60279
schedules on or after October 1, 2015,
FTA proposed to adopt the elevated
FAST Act content requirements.
This interpretation is consistent with
the language of the statute, follows
Congress’ intention to increase the
domestic content for vehicles produced
in FY2018 or later, and adheres to basic
principles of statutory construction.
Calculation of Domestic Content for
Components and Subcomponents. In its
proposed policy statement, FTA
proposed to adjust the calculation for
determining whether a component is of
domestic origin under 49 CFR 661.11 to
mirror the increase in domestic content
for FY2018 and beyond. Currently
under 49 CFR 661.11(g), ‘‘for a
component to be of domestic origin,
more that 60 percent of the
subcomponents of that component, by
cost, must be of domestic origin, and the
manufacture of the component must
take place in the United States. If, under
the terms of this part, a component is
determined to be of domestic origin, its
entire cost may be used in calculating
the cost of domestic content of an end
product.’’
Thus, for vehicles to be delivered in
FY2018 and 2019, FTA proposed that
more than 65 percent of the
subcomponents of that component, by
cost, must be of domestic origin, and for
FY2020 and beyond, more than 70
percent of the subcomponents of the
component must be of domestic origin.
The existing requirement that
manufacture of the component take
place in the United States would
continue to apply, as well as the
provision that states that if a component
is determined to be of domestic origin,
its entire cost may be used in
calculating the domestic value of the
rolling stock, regardless of the value of
its individual subcomponents.
B. Proposed Public Interest Waiver
FTA recognized that the FAST Act
amendments may produce significant
hardship for two categories of recipients
and manufacturers: (1) Recipients who
entered into contracts or placed
purchase orders against State schedules
between October 1, 2015 and December
4, 2015 (i.e., the effective date of the Act
and its enactment date, respectively);
and (2) recipients who entered into
contracts after December 4, 2015, as a
result of solicitations for bids or
requests for proposals that were
advertised before December 4, 2015.
Under 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(A), the
Secretary of Transportation may waive
the Buy America requirements if the
Secretary finds that applying the Buy
America requirements would be
‘‘inconsistent with the public interest.’’
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
60280
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
This function has been delegated to the
FTA Administrator by 49 CFR 1.91, and
section 661.7(b) of FTA’s implementing
regulation (49 CFR part 661) provides:
‘‘In determining whether the conditions
exist to grant this public interest waiver,
the Administrator will consider all
appropriate factors on a case-by-case
basis . . . . When granting a public
interest waiver, the Administrator shall
issue a detailed written statement
justifying why the waiver is in the
public interest. The Administrator shall
publish this justification in the Federal
Register, providing the public with a
reasonable time for notice and comment
of not more than seven calendar days.’’
In a separate Notice accompanying
the proposed policy statement (Docket
FTA–2016–0020), FTA sought comment
on a general public interest waiver for
those affected parties (81 FR 20051,
April 6, 2016). FTA proposed a public
interest waiver for the following
categories of contracts: (1) For contracts
entered into between the FAST Act’s
effective date and date of enactment
(i.e., from October 1, 2015 through
December 4, 2015), the increased
domestic content requirements for
FY2018 and beyond would not apply,
regardless of when the vehicles were
delivered; and (2) for contracts entered
into after December 4, 2015 as a result
of solicitations for bids or requests for
proposals that were advertised before
December 4, 2015, the increased
domestic content requirements for
FY2018 and beyond would not apply,
regardless of when the vehicles were
delivered.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Response to Comments
FTA received comments from 24
entities in Docket FTA–2016–0019 and
comments from 14 entities in Docket
FTA–2016–0020 from a broad crosssection of transit agencies, transit
vehicle manufacturers, transit industry
trade associations, the passenger vessel
industry, an alliance of domestic
manufacturing interests, compliance
auditors, and the general public. The
comments and proposals were diverse.
The comments and questions can be
categorized into the following primary
categories:
A. What date controls the percentage of
domestic content?
Numerous commenters objected to the
proposed policy statement’s use of the
delivery schedule as the determining
factor. Some suggested that domestic
content should be based on the
solicitation date, which establishes the
transit agency’s domestic content
expectations for prospective bidders,
and allows suppliers to begin
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Aug 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
identifying domestic suppliers. They
claimed that using the solicitation date
of an invitation for bids or a request for
proposals provides certainty to transit
vehicle manufacturers, as transit
agencies and transit vehicle
manufacturers cannot forecast when a
contract will be signed or when the
vehicles will be delivered.
As an alternative to the solicitation
date, a significant number of
commenters proposed that FTA apply
the domestic content requirements
based upon the date a contract was
entered into, for three primary reasons—
consistency in vehicle components to
avoid cardinal changes and increased
pricing risks, reduction of
administrative burdens, and consistency
with the approach Congress used in
implementing the last legislative
increase in domestic content, which
took place in 1987.
According to transit vehicle
manufacturers, their vehicle bid quotes
are based on the price of components
known at the time the vehicle
manufacturer receives the transit
agency’s solicitation and begins
planning its supply chain by contacting
potential suppliers. According to
commenters, FTA’s proposed policy had
the potential of requiring three different
component calculations based on a
multi-year delivery schedule stemming
from a single contract—one for vehicles
delivered during FYs 2016–2017,
another for FYs 2018–2019, and a third
for FYs 2020 and beyond. This would
require the vehicle manufacturer to
identify new and potentially untried
domestic suppliers for each successive
configuration, integrate those new
components in the midst of an ongoing
production line, and incur the risk of
price increases for those new
components, as well as the possibility
that the replacement or substitution of
components might be characterized by
some competitors as a ‘‘cardinal
change.’’ Commenters also noted that a
vehicle scheduled for delivery during
the FY 2018–2019 time frame with a 65
percent domestic content requirement
could find itself subject to a 70 percent
domestic content requirement if delays
and slippages beyond the control of the
transit agency and the transit vehicle
manufacturer resulted in the vehicle
being delivered in FY 2020 or later.
They requested a constant domestic
content level that would exist for the
duration of the production contract.
In addition, transit agencies expressed
concerns regarding the administrative
costs and burdens of performing three
separate pre-award audits and three
separate post-award audits on three
potentially different vehicle
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
configurations. As a term and condition
of assistance, recipients of FTA funding
must conduct a pre-award and postdelivery audit on every rolling stock
model they procure. If domestic content
was based on the delivery date, a transit
agency with a multi-year delivery
schedule faced the possibility that their
vehicles could have three different
levels of domestic content, which they
would need to verify and confirm. In
addition, unforeseen delays in
production could result in a vehicle
delivery occurring in a subsequent fiscal
year with a higher domestic content
obligation.
Several commenters pointed out that
when Congress elevated the domestic
content requirement from 50 percent to
60 percent in section 337 of Title III of
the Surface Transportation and Urban
Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Pub.
L. 100–17) (STURAA), Congress
provided that a vehicle’s domestic
content percentage would be based on
the date the procurement contract was
signed. Commenters suggested that FTA
follow that approach.
Finally, one commenter requested
clarification on the Notice’s use of the
term ‘‘advertised’’ when referring to
‘‘solicitations for bids or requests for
proposals that were advertised before
December 4, 2015.’’ FTA will address
this request in the discussion of the
public interest waiver, below.
FTA’s Response:
Basing domestic content standards on
the date the solicitation is made
available to the public and potential
bidders or on the date the contract is
executed is contrary to language in the
FAST Act. Using the date of solicitation
would allow transit agencies to lock in
a lower domestic content threshold for
a contract that may be signed at a date
when the higher domestic content
standards are in effect, contrary to the
statutory language. FTA believes
Congress provided adequate advance
notice in the FAST Act regarding the
increase in domestic content, such that
manufacturers and vendors have
sufficient time to amend open
solicitations for bids prior to the
submission of bid proposals or the
execution of a contract, and in fact, FTA
is aware of transit agencies that have
amended solicitations after they have
been published. FTA also is aware that
some vehicle manufacturers have
indicated through a survey of pre-award
audit data that they are already capable
of meeting a higher domestic content
threshold.
FTA does not find the request to
follow the language used in earlier
revisions to domestic content
requirements to be persuasive. When
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Congress enacted STURRA in 1987, it
amended the statutory language in the
authorizing statute to increase the
domestic content requirement from 50
percent to 55 percent effective October
1, 1989, and section 337(a)(1)(B)
increased the domestic content from 55
percent to 60 percent effective October
1, 1991. Specifically, section
337(a)(2)(B) provided that the
amendments shall not apply with
respect to any supplier or contractor or
any successor in interest or assignee
which qualified under the provisions of
section 165(b)(3) of the Surface
Transportation Assistance Act of 1982
prior to the date of enactment of this Act
under a contract entered into prior to
April 1, 1992.
UMTA (FTA’s predecessor agency)
quickly published an implementing
Notice that stated:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
The Buy America domestic content
requirement for buses, rolling stock and
associated equipment will be increased from
its existing 50 percent to 55 percent at the
end of three years, and to 60 percent at the
end of five years, except that any company
that has met the existing Buy America
requirement would be exempted from these
increases for all contracts entered into before
April 1, 1992. In addition, the rolling stock
price differential waiver is increased from its
current 10 percent to 25 percent, and the
definition of ‘‘components’’ is specifically to
include ‘‘subcomponents.’’ UMTA will be
revising its Buy America regulation to reflect
these changes. (52 FR 15440, April 28, 1987)
UMTA then published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to implement
these new provisions (53 FR 32994,
August 29, 1988), issuing its Final Rule
on January 9, 1991 (56 FR 926). In the
Final Rule, UMTA stated that it
‘‘believes that Congress intended to
apply the increased domestic content
requirements on an accelerated basis to
firms entering the marketplace after
April 2, 1987, and that it intended to
grandfather existing firms that had
complied with previous Buy America
requirements regardless of the number
of contracts or the product supplied
(e.g., a bus versus a rail car).’’
Although Congress had the precedent
of the timing language used in STURAA
when it drafted the FAST Act, Congress
declined to reintroduce that language.
However, FTA finds the requests that
the domestic content of a vehicle be
fixed upon a single date that establishes
the domestic content level for the
duration of the contract to be
persuasive, for the reasons articulated
by the commenters. For those reasons,
the applicable domestic content
percentage will be based on the
scheduled delivery date of the first
production vehicle (i.e., the first vehicle
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Aug 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
intended to carry passengers in revenue
service), final acceptance
notwithstanding. This approach is
closest to the FAST Act’s statutory
language and to Congress’ clear
direction. If the delivery date slips into
a subsequent FY due to unforeseen
circumstances, FTA will address those
situations on a case-by-case basis. (Note
that FTA is basing the domestic content
requirement on the delivery date of the
first production vehicle, rather than on
the delivery date of a prototype unit, for
several reasons. First, prototype units
are constructed by the manufacturer for
the limited purpose of design
qualification testing, and may not
necessary represent the finalized car
design or car content. Second,
prototypes are produced for testing
purposes, and do not typically enter
revenue (i.e., passenger) service in their
prototype configuration. Finally,
prototype units are delivered several
months before the scheduled delivery
date of the first production model and
may not necessarily represent the final
vehicle configuration, although the
scheduled delivery date of the first
production unit will undoubtedly
control the components contained in the
prototype unit. Consistent with the
FAST Act, however, prototype units
must contain an identical percentage of
domestic content as the production
units.)
This approach of using the date of
first production vehicle delivery best
reflects the statutory language of the
FAST Act, while providing the
consistency in componentry and
relieving the need to conduct multiple
pre-award and post-delivery audits
raised as concerns by numerous
commenters. The FAST Act’s phased-in
approach provides adequate notice to
transit agencies and transit vehicle
manufacturer suppliers of the domestic
content requirements.
B. How do the new requirements apply
to options, joint procurements, and
piggyback procurements?
FTA received numerous comments
regarding the effect of the higher
domestic content provisions on options,
joint procurements, and piggyback
procurements. One commenter objected
to extending the domestic content
percentages throughout the life of a
multi-year contract, including the
exercise of any options, believing that
Congress intended to increase domestic
content as soon as possible, and that
allowing the exercise of options would
lock in a lower domestic content
threshold well through FY 2020 and
beyond. In contrast, several transit
agencies and vehicle manufacturers
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60281
proposed that the domestic content for
rolling stock extend to the exercise of
options for additional vehicles of
identical manufacture, citing the
benefits to rolling stock manufacturers
and transit agencies, such as the
predictability of pricing, the availability
of components, consistency within the
supply chain, and facilitating the
ongoing manufacturing of rolling stock.
They also cited the retroactive effect of
such an approach, stating that applying
a higher domestic content standard to a
pre-existing contract that established a
lower threshold was inconsistent with
public interest and general principles of
contract law.
One commenter sought clarity
regarding the applicability of the
proposed policy guidance to joint
procurement contracts executed prior to
the effective date of the FAST Act.
Several commenters objected to FTA’s
proposed guidance that would not allow
recipients to piggyback on another
agency’s contract unless the vehicles
being produced under the original
contract met the domestic content
requirements at the time the optioned
vehicles are delivered.
FTA’s Response:
FTA’s proposed policy recognized the
differences between the exercise of
options by the original parties to a
contract or a joint procurement between
two or more purchasers and a single
vehicle manufacturer, and piggyback
procurements by third parties who were
not parties to the original contract. With
regard to the exercise of options, FTA is
persuaded that the predictability of
pricing and consistency within the
supply chain outweighs any risks that
the FAST Act is being circumvented.
Therefore, FTA is modifying its final
policy guidance to reflect that the date
of the delivery of the first production
vehicle under the contract controls the
domestic content of all vehicles
delivered under the contract, including
vehicles delivered pursuant to the
exercise of options. The exercise of
options by the original parties to the
contract or joint procurement
establishes a predictable contract price
for the buyers, and provides a
standardized component list for the
transit vehicle manufacturer, while at
the same time it allows the transit
vehicle manufacturer to keep its
production line open, ensuring
American jobs. However, only the
original parties to a contract (including
signatories to a joint procurement) are
entitled to the benefits of exercising
rights under that procurement.
FTA is not persuaded by the
commenters who objected to FTA’s
limitations on the use of piggyback
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
60282
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
procurements during this transition
period. The right to exercise an option
does not create a contractual obligation
until that contract is actually signed.
Thus, assigning contract options to a
third party will result in a new contract
between that third party and the transit
vehicle manufacturer, negating
commenters’ concerns that an increase
in domestic content might be viewed as
a ‘‘cardinal change.’’ Third parties
seeking the assignment of procurement
options (a/k/a ‘‘piggybacking’’) have no
contractual or statutory right to that
option, and FTA considers that
procurement to be a ‘‘new’’ contract and
therefore subject to the applicable FAST
Act standard based upon the scheduled
delivery date of the first production
vehicle under the new contract.
C. Do the increased domestic content
requirements extend to subcomponents?
In its April 6 publication, FTA
proposed to extend the elevated
domestic content requirements to the
subcomponents that constitute a
component. FTA received relatively
little comment on this specific
provision. Several commenters
proposed that a component’s domestic
content be based upon the date the
component was offered in response to a
solicitation, rather than upon the
component’s actual date of manufacture
or the vehicle’s intended delivery date.
In support of their position, transit
vehicle manufacturers said that they
solicit bids for vendors for specific
vehicle components. The prices
submitted by those bidders are based
upon quotes received from their
suppliers and sub-suppliers, and the
transit vehicle manufacturer has limited
ability to leverage that bidder to
increase the domestic content of its
subcomponents. In addition, changing
suppliers midway through a production
schedule would be disruptive to
production schedules, particularly if a
manufacturer must switch to an
untested supplier solely to meet a
gradual increase in domestic content. In
contrast, the association supporting
domestic manufacturing expressed
concerns that maintaining fixed
domestic component and subcomponent
levels throughout the life of the contract
discourages new rolling stock suppliers
from entering the market.
FTA’s Response:
With the exception of components
manufactured by the transit vehicle
manufacturer itself, the vehicle
manufacturer has little influence over
the subcomponent content of a given
component, and given the prevalence of
multi-year vehicle delivery schedules,
the effective date for a component’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Aug 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
domestic content will be based upon the
requirements in the contract. For
solicitations advertised after the
effective date of this Notice, however,
the solicitation must include the
appropriate statutory domestic content
percentages for both components and
subcomponents.
FTA is sensitive to the position that
the elevated domestic content
requirements eventually will encourage
new entrants into the vehicle supply
chain. All contracts signed after the
FAST Act’s effective date, including
piggyback procurements and
procurements off a state’s procurement
schedule, will be subject to the higher
domestic content standards, resulting in
more domestic suppliers entering the
supply chain and the incorporation of
more domestic content into vehicles
funded with FTA financial assistance.
D. Do the changes also apply to train
control, communication, and traction
power systems?
For purposes of Buy America, rolling
stock includes train control,
communication, and traction power
equipment. 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C). See
also 49 CFR 661.11(t), (u), and (v). One
commenter pointed out that the delivery
of components on a construction
contract differs from the delivery
schedule of a rolling stock contract.
Unlike rolling stock procurements
where the transit agency is contracting
for a fleet of homogenous transit
vehicles, a construction contract may
encompass a communication system, a
traction power system, and a train
control system, all of which may have
differing construction schedules and
varying component lists. Attempting to
impose a domestic content based on
when components are delivered to a job
site, or the completion date of a
particular construction segment may
force the substitution of materials
midway through a construction project,
or in a worse-case scenario, may force
the removal and replacement of
components if delays push the
completion of the contract into a
subsequent fiscal year. The commenter
proposed that the contracting date for
the construction project would be a
better determinant of the domestic
content requirement, rather than one
based on the installation date of each
component or the completion of a
particular portion of a construction
contract.
FTA’s Response:
FTA agrees with the commenter that
there are significant differences between
procurements for identical units of
rolling stock, and a construction
contract consisting of multiple
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
deliverables, and therefore, the
contracting award dates for train
control, communication, and traction
power systems will determine the
contract’s domestic content percentage.
If a contract was signed in FY2016 or
FY2017, the resulting components must
consist of at least 60 percent
domestically-manufactured
components. If a construction contract
is awarded during FY 2018 or FY 2019,
the contract must include a domestic
content percentage for that project that
exceeds the 65 percent threshold. And
if a construction contract is awarded in
FY 2020 or beyond, the percentage of
domestically-manufactured components
must exceed 70 percent.
E. Does the increase in domestic content
requirements apply to remanufactured,
overhauled, or rebuilt transit vehicles?
A transit vehicle rebuilder proposed
that the FAST Act amendments should
not apply to overhauls, rebuilds or
remanufacture of any buses procured
prior to the effective date of the FAST
Act. The commenter also asked that the
requirements be applied consistently
throughout the duration of a contract so
that the resulting vehicles will have
consistent Buy America content. The
commenter argues that the FAST Act
amendments should not be interpreted
in any manner that decreases transit
agencies’ abilities to complete their
intended overhauls by forcing a higher
standard of American content at the
time of overhaul than when the bus was
originally manufactured.
FTA’s Response:
Consistent with the commenter’s
recommendation, FTA agrees that the
domestic content in effect at the time
the vehicle was delivered will apply to
any future contracts for overhaul,
rebuild, or remanufacturing projects,
limited to the parties on the original
contract.
F. Do the FAST Act amendments apply
to passenger ferry vessels?
FTA received two comments from the
passenger ferry vessel industry and a
ferry operator that proposed an
implementation process for ferry vessels
that based the domestic content
requirement on the date of vessel
contracting, rather than on the delivery
date of the vessel. Commenters argued
that it can be hard at the time of the
contract’s execution to anticipate with
specificity exactly when the constructed
ferry vessel will be finished, pass
required regulatory inspections and sea
trials, and be delivered to the customer.
For vessels scheduled to be delivered
over a multi-year program, they noted
the difficulty and inefficiency in
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
maintaining multiple component lists
for identical vessels that would be
delivered across different fiscal years.
FTA’s Response:
FTA acknowledges that the long lead
times associated with issuing design
specifications, obtaining Coast Guard
and other regulatory approval, bid
solicitations, and construction of a ferry
vessel exceed that required for other
traditional types of rolling stock.
Accordingly, for ferry vessels, the date
on which a transit agency signs the
procurement contract will govern the
domestic content for all vessels
delivered under that contract.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
G. How do the new rules apply to
reimported domestic steel and iron?
One commenter asked that FTA
address the applicability of section 3011
of the FAST Act, which added 49 U.S.C.
5323(j)(5), allowing the inclusion of
steel and iron produced in the United
States and incorporated into a rolling
stock frame or car shell outside the
United States, provided that the frame
or car shell is imported back into the
United States for final assembly.
FTA’s Response:
Consistent with the statutory
provision, the cost of any domestic steel
and iron may be included in the
calculation of the transit vehicle’s
domestic content, provided that the
average cost of the vehicle exceeds
$300,000, as provided by the FAST Act.
Manufacturers may include the cost of
domestic steel and iron on vehicles
produced after October 1, 2015, the
effective date of the FAST Act.
H. Will FTA issue public interest
waivers for vehicle procurements
underway when the FAST Act was
enacted?
In a Notice published concurrently
with the proposed policy statement (81
FR 20051, April 6, 2016), FTA invited
the public to comment on a proposed
public interest waiver that would apply
the current domestic content standard to
rolling stock contracts entered into
between October 1, 2015 (the effective
date of the FAST Act) and December 4,
2015, (the date on which the Act was
enacted), and for contracts entered into
after December 4, 2015, as a result of
solicitations for bids or requests for
proposals that were advertised before
December 4, 2015.
FTA received 14 comments on the
proposed waiver from: A transit
industry trade association, a passenger
vessel trade group, several public
transportation agencies, numerous
transit vehicle manufacturers and
remanufacturers, and Buy America
consultants, all of whom supported the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Aug 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
proposed waiver. Among the cited
benefits of a waiver were the avoidance
of additional costs to transit agencies
that would have to rewrite and readvertise existing solicitations to
incorporate the new domestic content
thresholds, the administrative costs to
vehicle manufacturers who would need
to identify and solicit new domestic
suppliers, and most importantly,
predictable delays in the acquisition of
new transit vehicles, which would pose
a disservice to transit riders.
The passenger vessel group asked that
FTA extend the waiver to ferry vessel
procurements for which the vessel
design was substantially complete
before the enactment of the FAST Act;
vehicle remanufacturers asked that the
waiver extend to contracts for rebuilds,
overhauls, and remanufacturing entered
into prior to the enactment date of the
FAST Act; and several transit agencies
and vehicle manufacturers asked that
the waiver extend to contract options
assigned to another transit agency if the
contract was entered into prior to the
FAST Act’s enactment date.
FTA’s Response:
Based on the foregoing discussion of
the FAST Act’s implementation and
input from commenters, FTA believes
that a request for a public interest
waiver to address contracts signed
before the date the FAST Act was
enacted is reasonable, and is extending
the waiver to contracts for ferry vessels
and to contracts for the
remanufacturing, rebuilding, and
overhaul of a recipient’s existing fleet.
However, as stated previously, FTA will
not extend pre-FAST Act domestic
content percentages to options exercised
by a third party after the effective date
of the Act.
Further, to avoid the disruption of
ongoing contract solicitations and to
facilitate the delivery of transit vehicles
to the public, FTA is extending the
waiver to contract solicitations
advertised on or after December 4, 2015,
provided the contract is awarded within
60 days after the publication date of this
Notice. If a solicitation was advertised
(i.e., published or distributed to
potential bidders in manner that
constitutes constructive notice) on or
after the enactment date of the FAST
Act and the parties are unable to
execute a contract within 60 days of this
Notice, the solicitation must be
amended to reflect the applicable
domestic content standard that will be
in effect when the first production
vehicle is scheduled to be delivered. If
compliance with this requirement
would pose an undue hardship, FTA
will evaluate requests for a waiver on a
case-by-case basis.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60283
A request for a public interest waiver
should set forth the detailed
justification for the proposed waiver,
including information about the history
of the procurement and the burden on
the recipient and/or the industry in
complying with the FAST Act. Public
interest waivers should be narrowly
tailored and FTA will not generally look
favorably on waivers that provide for
contracts that include the exercise of
options for vehicles that will be
delivered beyond FY2020. FTA will act
expeditiously on public interest waiver
requests that provide the information
requested.
IV. Final Policy Guidance and Public
Interest Waiver
A. Final Policy Guidance
Individual and Joint Procurements of
Buses and Railcars. For rolling stock
contracts entered into on or after
October 1, 2015, i.e., the effective date
of the FAST Act, the applicable
domestic content percentage under
section 5323(j)(2)(C) will be based on
the scheduled delivery date of the first
production vehicle (i.e., the first vehicle
intended to carry passengers in revenue
service), final acceptance
notwithstanding. Thus, if a recipient or
group of recipients as part of a joint
procurement enter into a contract for
rolling stock on or after October 1, 2015,
then the new FAST Act provisions
applicable for the date of delivery of the
first production vehicle shall apply.
Accordingly, if the first production
vehicle is delivered in FY2018 or
FY2019, the domestic content must be
more than 65 percent, and if the first
production vehicle is delivered in
FY2020 or beyond, the domestic content
must be more than 70 percent. These
delivery provisions apply to contracts
entered into on or after October 1, 2015,
unless a waiver is granted. If the
delivery date of the first production
vehicle is delayed such that it will be
delivered in a year with a higher
domestic content, FTA will address
those situations on a case-by-case basis.
The FAST Act amendments do not
apply to contracts entered into before
October 1, 2015, even if the contract
provides for the delivery of the first
production vehicle after FY2017. For
contracts entered into before October 1,
2015, all vehicles delivered under the
original contract base order and any
properly exercised options by recipients
who are direct parties to the contract
may contain a domestic content of more
than 60 percent, per the pre-FAST Act
requirements. Recipients who are not
direct parties to a contract executed
before October 1, 2015, however, may
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
60284
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
not exercise assigned options (a/k/a
‘‘piggybacking’’) on such contracts.
Procurements of Ferry Vessels. Due to
the long lead time in establishing vessel
design specifications, obtaining Coast
Guard certifications and other
regulatory approval, and the bid
solicitation and review process that
exceeds that required for other
traditional types of rolling stock, the
date on which a transit agency signs the
vessel contract will govern the domestic
content for all vessels delivered under
that contract. Therefore, for vessel
contracts signed during FYs 2016 or
2017, the vessels must contain a
minimum of 60 percent domestic
content; contracts signed in FYs 2018 or
2019 must require no less than 65
percent domestic content; and contracts
signed in FY 2020 or beyond must
mandate a domestic content of no less
than 70 percent.
Train Control, Communication and
Traction Power Equipment. For
purposes of Buy America, rolling stock
includes train control, communication,
and traction power equipment. 49
U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C). See also 49 CFR
661.11(t), (u), and (v). The domestic
content requirement in effect on the
date a contract was signed for train
control, communication, and traction
power equipment will control. If the
contract is signed in FY2016 or FY2017,
the contract shall require an overall
domestic content that exceeds 60
percent; if a contract is signed in FYs
2018 or 2019, the contract must include
an overall domestic content percentage
that exceeds 65 percent; and if a
contract is signed in FY2020 or beyond,
the domestic content must exceed 70
percent.
State Purchasing Schedules. Some
recipients purchase rolling stock from a
State purchasing schedule. A State
purchasing schedule is an arrangement
that a State has established with
multiple vendors in which those
vendors agree to provide essentially an
option to the State and its subordinate
governmental entities and others it
might include in its programs, to
acquire specific property or services in
the future at established prices. Because
the purchasing schedule does not
commit the State to procuring a
minimum number of vehicles, a
‘‘contract’’ does not exist until a State,
recipient or subrecipient enters into a
purchase order with a vendor listed on
the schedule.
Therefore, for purchase orders placed
against State purchasing schedules
before October 1, 2015, for the delivery
of rolling stock in FY2018 and beyond,
the increased domestic content
requirements will not apply. For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Aug 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
purchase orders placed against State
schedules on or after October 1, 2015,
for rolling stock that will be delivered
in FY 2016 or 2017, the domestic
content requirement must exceed 60%.
For purchase orders placed against State
schedules for rolling stock that will be
delivered in FYs 2018 or 2019, the
domestic content must exceed 65%, and
for purchase orders placed against State
schedules for rolling stock that will be
delivered in FY 2020 or beyond, the
domestic content must exceed 70%.
Calculation of Domestic Content. FTA
will adjust the calculation for
determining whether a component is of
domestic origin under 49 CFR 661.11 to
accommodate the increase in domestic
content for FY2018 and beyond.
Currently under 49 CFR 661.11(g), ‘‘for
a component to be of domestic origin,
more that 60 percent of the
subcomponents of that component, by
cost, must be of domestic origin, and the
manufacture of the component must
take place in the United States. If, under
the terms of this part, a component is
determined to be of domestic origin, its
entire cost may be used in calculating
the cost of domestic content of an end
product.’’
Thus, for vehicles to be delivered in
FY2018 or 2019, for a component to be
of domestic content, more than 65
percent of the subcomponents of that
component, by cost, must be of
domestic origin, and for FY2020 or
beyond, more than 70 percent of the
subcomponents of the component must
be of domestic origin. The requirement
that manufacture of the component take
place in the United States still applies.
Additionally, if a component is
determined to be of domestic origin, its
entire cost may be used in calculating
the cost of content of an end product.
Cost of Domestic Steel and Iron for
Rolling Stock Frame or Car Shell.
Section 3011 of the FAST Act, which
added 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(5), allows
domestic content to include steel and
iron produced in the United States and
incorporated into a rolling stock frame
or car shell outside the United States,
provided that the frame or car shell is
imported back into the United States for
final assembly. Consistent with the
statutory provision, the cost of any
domestic steel and iron may be included
in the calculation of the transit vehicle’s
domestic content, provided that the
average cost of the vehicles exceeds
$300,000, as provided by the FAST Act.
Manufacturers may include the cost of
domestic steel and iron on vehicles
produced after October 1, 2015, the
effective date of the FAST Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. General Public Interest Waivers
FTA is issuing two general public
interest waivers to address two
categories of recipients and
manufacturers: (1) Recipients who
entered into contracts or placed
purchase orders against State schedules
between October 1, 2015 and December
4, 2015; and (2) recipients who have
entered into contracts after December 4,
2015, as a result of solicitations for bids
or requests for proposals that were
advertised before December 4, 2015. In
addition, FTA is issuing a third public
interest waiver for recipients who
solicited contracts on or after December
4, 2015, provided they enter into a
contract within 60 days of publication
of this Notice.
Under 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(A), the
Administrator may waive the Buy
America requirements if the
Administrator finds that applying the
Buy America requirements would be
inconsistent with the public interest.
‘‘In determining whether the conditions
exist to grant a public interest waiver,
the Administrator will consider all
appropriate factors on a case-by-case
basis . . . When granting a public
interest waiver, the Administrator shall
issue a detailed written statement
justifying why the waiver is in the
public interest. The Administrator shall
publish this justification in the Federal
Register, providing the public with a
reasonable time for notice and comment
of not more than seven calendar days.’’
49 CFR 661.7(b).
Public interest waiver for contracts
entered into between October 1, 2015
and December 4, 2015. FTA grants a
general public interest waiver for
contracts entered into between the
FAST Act’s effective date and date of
enactment (i.e., between October 1, 2015
and December 4, 2015). For these
contracts, the increased domestic
content requirements for FY2018 and
beyond will not apply, regardless of
when the first production vehicle is
delivered. However, consistent with
FTA’s policy statement above, parties to
the contracts may exercise options
under the contract, but recipients will
not be permitted to piggyback on the
contracts.
Public interest waiver for contracts
entered into after December 4, 2015 as
a result of solicitations advertised before
December 4, 2015. FTA grants a general
public interest waiver for contracts
entered into after December 4, 2015 as
a result of solicitations for bids or
requests for proposals that were
advertised (i.e., published or distributed
to potential bidders in a manner that
constitutes constructive notice) before
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
December 4, 2015. Under these
circumstances, the increased domestic
content requirements for FY2018 and
beyond will not apply, regardless of
when the first production vehicle is
delivered. However, consistent with
FTA’s policy statement above, parties to
the contracts may exercise options
under the contract, but recipients will
not be permitted to piggyback on the
contracts.
Public interest waiver for contract
solicitations advertised on or after
December 4, 2015 and entered into
within 60 days of publication of this
notice. To avoid the disruption of
ongoing contract solicitations and to
facilitate the delivery of transit vehicles
to the public, FTA is extending the
waiver to contract solicitations
advertised on or after December 4, 2015,
and entered into within 60 days after
the publication date of this Notice. If a
solicitation was advertised (i.e.,
published or distributed to potential
bidders in a manner that constitutes
constructive notice) after the enactment
date of the FAST Act and the parties are
unable to execute a contract within 60
days of this Notice, the solicitation must
be amended to reflect the applicable
domestic content standard that will be
in effect when the first production
vehicle is scheduled to be delivered. If
compliance with this requirement
would pose an undue hardship, FTA
will evaluate requests for a waiver on a
case-by-case basis.
Recipients may apply to FTA for
individual public interest waivers for
contracts that do not fall within the
scope of a general public interest
waiver. A request for a public interest
waiver should set forth the detailed
justification for the proposed waiver,
including information about the history
of the procurement and the burden on
the recipient and/or the industry in
complying with the FAST Act. Public
interest waivers should be narrowly
tailored and FTA will not generally look
favorably on waivers that provide for
contracts that include the exercise of
options for vehicles that will be
delivered beyond FY2020. FTA will act
expeditiously on public interest waiver
requests that provide the information
requested.
V. Effective Date
Because the statute is selfeffectuating, the changes are effective
upon the FAST Act’s enactment. FTA
will be initiating a subsequent
rulemaking updating 49 CFR part 661 to
reflect these changes; however, today’s
Policy Statement and Waiver represents
FTA’s implementation of the FAST Act
provisions during this interim period.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Aug 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
Dated: August 26, 2016.
Ellen Partridge,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016–21007 Filed 8–31–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 120815345–3525–02]
RIN 0648–XE831
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic; 2016 Recreational
Accountability Measure and Closure
for the South Atlantic Other Porgies
Complex
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
AGENCY:
NMFS implements an
accountability measure (AM) for the
other porgies complex recreational
sector in the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) of the South Atlantic for the 2016
fishing year through this temporary rule.
In the South Atlantic, the other porgies
complex includes jolthead porgy,
knobbed porgy, whitebone porgy, scup,
and saucereye porgy. NMFS has
determined that recreational landings of
species in the other porgies complex
have reached the recreational annual
catch limit (ACL). Therefore, NMFS
closes the recreational sector for the
other porgies complex in the South
Atlantic EEZ on September 3, 2016.
This recreational closure is necessary to
protect the other porgies complex
resource.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective 12:01 a.m.,
local time, September 3, 2016, until
12:01 a.m., local time, January 1, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Vara, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727–824–5305, or
email: mary.vara@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
snapper-grouper fishery of the South
Atlantic includes species in the other
porgies complex and is managed under
the Fishery Management Plan for the
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic Region (FMP). The FMP was
prepared by the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council and is
implemented by NMFS under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60285
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by
regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
The recreational ACL for the other
porgies complex is 106,914 lb (48,495
kg), round weight. In accordance with
regulations at 50 CFR 622.193(w)(2)(i), if
the recreational ACL is met, or is
projected to be met, the NMFS Assistant
Administrator (AA) will file a
notification with the Office of the
Federal Register to close the recreational
sector for the remainder of the fishing
year. Recreational landings in 2016 from
the Southeast Fisheries Science Center
indicate that the recreational ACL has
already been harvested. As a result, the
recreational sector for the other porgies
complex will be closed effective 12:01
a.m., local time, September 3, 2016.
During the closure, the bag and
possession limits for species in the other
porgies complex in or from the South
Atlantic EEZ are zero. The recreational
sector for the other porgies complex will
reopen on January 1, 2017, the
beginning of the 2017 recreational
fishing year.
Classification
The Regional Administrator for the
NMFS Southeast Region has determined
this temporary rule is necessary for the
conservation and management of the
South Atlantic other porgies complex
and is consistent with the MagnusonStevens Act and other applicable laws.
This action is taken under 50 CFR
622.193(w)(2)(i) and is exempt from
review under Executive Order 12866.
These measures are exempt from the
procedures of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act because the temporary rule is issued
without opportunity for prior notice and
comment. This action responds to the
best scientific information available.
The AA finds that the need to
immediately implement this action to
close the recreational sector for the
other porgies complex constitutes good
cause to waive the requirements to
provide prior notice and opportunity for
public comment pursuant to the
authority set forth in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
as such procedures are unnecessary and
contrary to the public interest. Such
procedures are unnecessary because the
rule implementing the AM has already
been subject to notice and comment,
and all that remains is to notify the
public of the closure. Such procedures
are contrary to the public interest
because there is a need to immediately
implement this action to protect the
species in the other porgies complex.
Prior notice and opportunity for public
comment would require time and would
potentially allow the recreational sector
to further exceed its ACL.
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 170 (Thursday, September 1, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60278-60285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21007]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 661
[Docket Nos. FTA-2016-0019 & FTA-2016-0020]
Notice of Policy on the Implementation of the Phased Increase in
Domestic Content Under the Buy America Waiver for Rolling Stock and
Notice of Public Interest Waiver of Buy America Domestic Content
Requirements for Rolling Stock Procurement in Limited Circumstances
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final policy and public interest waiver.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final policy consists of the Federal Transit
Administration's (FTA) policy statement regarding its implementation of
the phased-in increase in domestic content for rolling stock under the
FTA's Buy America statute, as amended by the Fixing America's Surface
Transportation (FAST) Act. Through this final policy, FTA is providing
guidance to transit agencies and transit vehicle manufacturers
regarding how they are to implement the FAST Act's statutory
amendments. Additionally, FTA is providing notice of public interest
waivers of Buy America domestic content requirements for rolling stock
procurements in limited circumstances.
DATES: The final policy takes effect on September 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cecelia Comito, Assistant Chief
Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, phone: (202) 366-2217, or email,
Cecelia.Comito@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Proposed Policy Guidance and Public Interest Waiver
A. Proposed Policy
B. Proposed Public Interest Waiver
III. Response to Comments
A. What date controls the percentage of domestic content?
B. How do the new requirements apply to options, joint
procurements, and piggyback procurements?
C. Do the increased domestic content requirements extend to
subcomponents?
D. Do the changes also apply to train control, communication,
and traction power systems?
E. Does the increase in domestic content requirements apply to
remanufactured, overhauled, or rebuilt transit vehicles?
F. Do the FAST Act amendments apply to passenger ferry vessels?
G. How do the new rules apply to reimported domestic steel and
iron?
H. Will FTA issue public interest waivers for vehicle
procurements underway when the FAST Act was enacted?
IV. Final Policy Guidance and Public Interest Waivers
A. Final Policy Guidance
B. Final Public Interest Waivers
I. Introduction
This Notice provides guidance and clarification to transit agencies
and transit vehicle manufacturers regarding FTA's implementation of the
FAST Act's amendments to 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C).
Section 3011 of the FAST Act (Pub. L. 114-94, enacted December 4,
2015) amended the rolling stock waiver in 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C) to
require a two-step increase in the domestic content of rolling stock as
follows:
When procuring rolling stock with FTA financial assistance
(including train control, communication, traction power, and rolling
stock prototypes), the cost of components and subcomponents produced in
the United States for fiscal years 2016 and 2017, is more than 60
percent of the cost of all components of the rolling stock; for fiscal
years 2018 and 2019, is more than 65 percent of the cost of all
components of the rolling stock; and for fiscal year 2020 and each
[[Page 60279]]
fiscal year thereafter, is more than 70 percent of the cost of all
components of the rolling stock.
Given the potential effect of the FAST Act changes to vehicle
procurements by the statutory use of the term ``produced,'' transit
agencies and transit vehicle manufacturers asked FTA to provide
specific guidance on the applicability of the FAST Act's new Buy
America provisions to contracts entered into before, on, or after
October 1, 2015, the effective date set forth in section 1003 of the
FAST Act.
Under existing law (49 U.S.C. 5325(e)), recipients of FTA financial
assistance may enter into rolling stock contracts for up to five years
for buses and seven years for railcars. In FTA Circular 4220.1F,
``Third Party Contracting Guidance,'' FTA permits these five- and
seven-year periods to cover the recipient's ``material requirements''
for rolling stock and replacement needs from the effective date of the
contract through the end of the fifth or seventh year. FTA does not
require that ``the recipient must obtain delivery, acceptance, or even
fabrication in five or seven years--instead, it means only that FTA
limits a contract to purchasing no more than the recipient's material
requirements for rolling stock or replacement parts for five or seven
years, based on the effective date of the contract.'' See FTA Circular
4220.1F, Chapter IV, page 23. Under this rule, options for vehicles
must be exercised within the five- or seven-year contract term,
although the vehicles may be produced and delivered after the contract
term.
II. Proposed Policy and Public Interest Waiver
A. Proposed Policy Guidance
The FAST Act identified two points in time: (1) ``when procuring
rolling stock,'' which FTA's proposed policy interpreted as the date
the vehicle procurement contract was signed; and (2) ``the cost of
components and subcomponents produced in the United States for fiscal
years . . .'', which FTA interpreted as the delivery date of the
vehicle.
Individual and Joint Procurements. FTA proposed to implement the
FAST Act by requiring that if a recipient (or a group of recipients
under a joint procurement) enters into a contract for rolling stock
after the effective date of the FAST Act, i.e., October 1, 2015, the
new FAST Act provisions for domestic content of the rolling stock would
apply based on the delivery date of the vehicle. Thus, for vehicles
delivered in FY2018 and FY2019, the domestic content would have to be
more than 65 percent, and for vehicles delivered in FY2020 and beyond,
the domestic content would have to be more than 70 percent. These
higher domestic content requirements would apply to all contracts
signed after the effective date of the FAST Act unless FTA issues a
waiver, which FTA addressed in a separate Federal Register Notice (81
FR 20051, April 6, 2016).
In its proposed policy statement, FTA proposed that the FAST Act
amendments would not apply to a contract entered into before the
effective date of the FAST Act, i.e., October 1, 2015, even if the
contract provides for the delivery of vehicles after FY2017. In
addition, the policy statement proposed to continue to permit options
to be exercised for those contracts entered into before October 1,
2015, even if the vehicles would be delivered outside the five- or
seven-year contract term, consistent with Circular 4220.1F.
However, recipients who were not direct parties to a contract
executed before October 1, 2015, would not be allowed to exercise
options (a/k/a ``piggybacking'') on those contracts and thereby could
not take advantage of the lower domestic content requirement. Because
the assignment of options to a third party results in the third party
and the vendor entering into a new contract that would be entered into
after the effective date of the FAST Act, FTA proposed to apply the
increased domestic content requirements to vehicles scheduled for
delivery in FY 2018 and beyond.
State Purchasing Schedules. In the proposed policy statement, FTA
recognized that some recipients and subrecipients purchase rolling
stock from a State purchasing schedule (i.e., an arrangement that a
State has negotiated with multiple vendors in which those vendors
essentially agree to provide an option to the State, as well as
subordinate and local governmental entities allowed to participate in
the schedule, to acquire specific property or services in the future at
established prices). Because the purchasing schedule does not commit
the State to procuring a minimum number of vehicles, a ``contract''
does not exist until a State, recipient, or subrecipient enters into a
purchase order with a vendor listed on the schedule.
Therefore, the proposed policy statement proposed to retain the 60
percent domestic content requirement for purchase orders placed against
State purchasing schedules before October 1, 2015, regardless of the
ultimate delivery date(s). However, for purchase orders placed against
State purchasing schedules on or after October 1, 2015, FTA proposed to
adopt the elevated FAST Act content requirements.
This interpretation is consistent with the language of the statute,
follows Congress' intention to increase the domestic content for
vehicles produced in FY2018 or later, and adheres to basic principles
of statutory construction.
Calculation of Domestic Content for Components and Subcomponents.
In its proposed policy statement, FTA proposed to adjust the
calculation for determining whether a component is of domestic origin
under 49 CFR 661.11 to mirror the increase in domestic content for
FY2018 and beyond. Currently under 49 CFR 661.11(g), ``for a component
to be of domestic origin, more that 60 percent of the subcomponents of
that component, by cost, must be of domestic origin, and the
manufacture of the component must take place in the United States. If,
under the terms of this part, a component is determined to be of
domestic origin, its entire cost may be used in calculating the cost of
domestic content of an end product.''
Thus, for vehicles to be delivered in FY2018 and 2019, FTA proposed
that more than 65 percent of the subcomponents of that component, by
cost, must be of domestic origin, and for FY2020 and beyond, more than
70 percent of the subcomponents of the component must be of domestic
origin. The existing requirement that manufacture of the component take
place in the United States would continue to apply, as well as the
provision that states that if a component is determined to be of
domestic origin, its entire cost may be used in calculating the
domestic value of the rolling stock, regardless of the value of its
individual subcomponents.
B. Proposed Public Interest Waiver
FTA recognized that the FAST Act amendments may produce significant
hardship for two categories of recipients and manufacturers: (1)
Recipients who entered into contracts or placed purchase orders against
State schedules between October 1, 2015 and December 4, 2015 (i.e., the
effective date of the Act and its enactment date, respectively); and
(2) recipients who entered into contracts after December 4, 2015, as a
result of solicitations for bids or requests for proposals that were
advertised before December 4, 2015.
Under 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(A), the Secretary of Transportation may
waive the Buy America requirements if the Secretary finds that applying
the Buy America requirements would be ``inconsistent with the public
interest.''
[[Page 60280]]
This function has been delegated to the FTA Administrator by 49 CFR
1.91, and section 661.7(b) of FTA's implementing regulation (49 CFR
part 661) provides: ``In determining whether the conditions exist to
grant this public interest waiver, the Administrator will consider all
appropriate factors on a case-by-case basis . . . . When granting a
public interest waiver, the Administrator shall issue a detailed
written statement justifying why the waiver is in the public interest.
The Administrator shall publish this justification in the Federal
Register, providing the public with a reasonable time for notice and
comment of not more than seven calendar days.''
In a separate Notice accompanying the proposed policy statement
(Docket FTA-2016-0020), FTA sought comment on a general public interest
waiver for those affected parties (81 FR 20051, April 6, 2016). FTA
proposed a public interest waiver for the following categories of
contracts: (1) For contracts entered into between the FAST Act's
effective date and date of enactment (i.e., from October 1, 2015
through December 4, 2015), the increased domestic content requirements
for FY2018 and beyond would not apply, regardless of when the vehicles
were delivered; and (2) for contracts entered into after December 4,
2015 as a result of solicitations for bids or requests for proposals
that were advertised before December 4, 2015, the increased domestic
content requirements for FY2018 and beyond would not apply, regardless
of when the vehicles were delivered.
III. Response to Comments
FTA received comments from 24 entities in Docket FTA-2016-0019 and
comments from 14 entities in Docket FTA-2016-0020 from a broad cross-
section of transit agencies, transit vehicle manufacturers, transit
industry trade associations, the passenger vessel industry, an alliance
of domestic manufacturing interests, compliance auditors, and the
general public. The comments and proposals were diverse. The comments
and questions can be categorized into the following primary categories:
A. What date controls the percentage of domestic content?
Numerous commenters objected to the proposed policy statement's use
of the delivery schedule as the determining factor. Some suggested that
domestic content should be based on the solicitation date, which
establishes the transit agency's domestic content expectations for
prospective bidders, and allows suppliers to begin identifying domestic
suppliers. They claimed that using the solicitation date of an
invitation for bids or a request for proposals provides certainty to
transit vehicle manufacturers, as transit agencies and transit vehicle
manufacturers cannot forecast when a contract will be signed or when
the vehicles will be delivered.
As an alternative to the solicitation date, a significant number of
commenters proposed that FTA apply the domestic content requirements
based upon the date a contract was entered into, for three primary
reasons--consistency in vehicle components to avoid cardinal changes
and increased pricing risks, reduction of administrative burdens, and
consistency with the approach Congress used in implementing the last
legislative increase in domestic content, which took place in 1987.
According to transit vehicle manufacturers, their vehicle bid
quotes are based on the price of components known at the time the
vehicle manufacturer receives the transit agency's solicitation and
begins planning its supply chain by contacting potential suppliers.
According to commenters, FTA's proposed policy had the potential of
requiring three different component calculations based on a multi-year
delivery schedule stemming from a single contract--one for vehicles
delivered during FYs 2016-2017, another for FYs 2018-2019, and a third
for FYs 2020 and beyond. This would require the vehicle manufacturer to
identify new and potentially untried domestic suppliers for each
successive configuration, integrate those new components in the midst
of an ongoing production line, and incur the risk of price increases
for those new components, as well as the possibility that the
replacement or substitution of components might be characterized by
some competitors as a ``cardinal change.'' Commenters also noted that a
vehicle scheduled for delivery during the FY 2018-2019 time frame with
a 65 percent domestic content requirement could find itself subject to
a 70 percent domestic content requirement if delays and slippages
beyond the control of the transit agency and the transit vehicle
manufacturer resulted in the vehicle being delivered in FY 2020 or
later. They requested a constant domestic content level that would
exist for the duration of the production contract.
In addition, transit agencies expressed concerns regarding the
administrative costs and burdens of performing three separate pre-award
audits and three separate post-award audits on three potentially
different vehicle configurations. As a term and condition of
assistance, recipients of FTA funding must conduct a pre-award and
post-delivery audit on every rolling stock model they procure. If
domestic content was based on the delivery date, a transit agency with
a multi-year delivery schedule faced the possibility that their
vehicles could have three different levels of domestic content, which
they would need to verify and confirm. In addition, unforeseen delays
in production could result in a vehicle delivery occurring in a
subsequent fiscal year with a higher domestic content obligation.
Several commenters pointed out that when Congress elevated the
domestic content requirement from 50 percent to 60 percent in section
337 of Title III of the Surface Transportation and Urban Relocation
Assistance Act of 1987 (Pub. L. 100-17) (STURAA), Congress provided
that a vehicle's domestic content percentage would be based on the date
the procurement contract was signed. Commenters suggested that FTA
follow that approach.
Finally, one commenter requested clarification on the Notice's use
of the term ``advertised'' when referring to ``solicitations for bids
or requests for proposals that were advertised before December 4,
2015.'' FTA will address this request in the discussion of the public
interest waiver, below.
FTA's Response:
Basing domestic content standards on the date the solicitation is
made available to the public and potential bidders or on the date the
contract is executed is contrary to language in the FAST Act. Using the
date of solicitation would allow transit agencies to lock in a lower
domestic content threshold for a contract that may be signed at a date
when the higher domestic content standards are in effect, contrary to
the statutory language. FTA believes Congress provided adequate advance
notice in the FAST Act regarding the increase in domestic content, such
that manufacturers and vendors have sufficient time to amend open
solicitations for bids prior to the submission of bid proposals or the
execution of a contract, and in fact, FTA is aware of transit agencies
that have amended solicitations after they have been published. FTA
also is aware that some vehicle manufacturers have indicated through a
survey of pre-award audit data that they are already capable of meeting
a higher domestic content threshold.
FTA does not find the request to follow the language used in
earlier revisions to domestic content requirements to be persuasive.
When
[[Page 60281]]
Congress enacted STURRA in 1987, it amended the statutory language in
the authorizing statute to increase the domestic content requirement
from 50 percent to 55 percent effective October 1, 1989, and section
337(a)(1)(B) increased the domestic content from 55 percent to 60
percent effective October 1, 1991. Specifically, section 337(a)(2)(B)
provided that the amendments shall not apply with respect to any
supplier or contractor or any successor in interest or assignee which
qualified under the provisions of section 165(b)(3) of the Surface
Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 prior to the date of enactment of
this Act under a contract entered into prior to April 1, 1992.
UMTA (FTA's predecessor agency) quickly published an implementing
Notice that stated:
The Buy America domestic content requirement for buses, rolling
stock and associated equipment will be increased from its existing
50 percent to 55 percent at the end of three years, and to 60
percent at the end of five years, except that any company that has
met the existing Buy America requirement would be exempted from
these increases for all contracts entered into before April 1, 1992.
In addition, the rolling stock price differential waiver is
increased from its current 10 percent to 25 percent, and the
definition of ``components'' is specifically to include
``subcomponents.'' UMTA will be revising its Buy America regulation
to reflect these changes. (52 FR 15440, April 28, 1987)
UMTA then published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to implement
these new provisions (53 FR 32994, August 29, 1988), issuing its Final
Rule on January 9, 1991 (56 FR 926). In the Final Rule, UMTA stated
that it ``believes that Congress intended to apply the increased
domestic content requirements on an accelerated basis to firms entering
the marketplace after April 2, 1987, and that it intended to
grandfather existing firms that had complied with previous Buy America
requirements regardless of the number of contracts or the product
supplied (e.g., a bus versus a rail car).''
Although Congress had the precedent of the timing language used in
STURAA when it drafted the FAST Act, Congress declined to reintroduce
that language.
However, FTA finds the requests that the domestic content of a
vehicle be fixed upon a single date that establishes the domestic
content level for the duration of the contract to be persuasive, for
the reasons articulated by the commenters. For those reasons, the
applicable domestic content percentage will be based on the scheduled
delivery date of the first production vehicle (i.e., the first vehicle
intended to carry passengers in revenue service), final acceptance
notwithstanding. This approach is closest to the FAST Act's statutory
language and to Congress' clear direction. If the delivery date slips
into a subsequent FY due to unforeseen circumstances, FTA will address
those situations on a case-by-case basis. (Note that FTA is basing the
domestic content requirement on the delivery date of the first
production vehicle, rather than on the delivery date of a prototype
unit, for several reasons. First, prototype units are constructed by
the manufacturer for the limited purpose of design qualification
testing, and may not necessary represent the finalized car design or
car content. Second, prototypes are produced for testing purposes, and
do not typically enter revenue (i.e., passenger) service in their
prototype configuration. Finally, prototype units are delivered several
months before the scheduled delivery date of the first production model
and may not necessarily represent the final vehicle configuration,
although the scheduled delivery date of the first production unit will
undoubtedly control the components contained in the prototype unit.
Consistent with the FAST Act, however, prototype units must contain an
identical percentage of domestic content as the production units.)
This approach of using the date of first production vehicle
delivery best reflects the statutory language of the FAST Act, while
providing the consistency in componentry and relieving the need to
conduct multiple pre-award and post-delivery audits raised as concerns
by numerous commenters. The FAST Act's phased-in approach provides
adequate notice to transit agencies and transit vehicle manufacturer
suppliers of the domestic content requirements.
B. How do the new requirements apply to options, joint procurements,
and piggyback procurements?
FTA received numerous comments regarding the effect of the higher
domestic content provisions on options, joint procurements, and
piggyback procurements. One commenter objected to extending the
domestic content percentages throughout the life of a multi-year
contract, including the exercise of any options, believing that
Congress intended to increase domestic content as soon as possible, and
that allowing the exercise of options would lock in a lower domestic
content threshold well through FY 2020 and beyond. In contrast, several
transit agencies and vehicle manufacturers proposed that the domestic
content for rolling stock extend to the exercise of options for
additional vehicles of identical manufacture, citing the benefits to
rolling stock manufacturers and transit agencies, such as the
predictability of pricing, the availability of components, consistency
within the supply chain, and facilitating the ongoing manufacturing of
rolling stock. They also cited the retroactive effect of such an
approach, stating that applying a higher domestic content standard to a
pre-existing contract that established a lower threshold was
inconsistent with public interest and general principles of contract
law.
One commenter sought clarity regarding the applicability of the
proposed policy guidance to joint procurement contracts executed prior
to the effective date of the FAST Act.
Several commenters objected to FTA's proposed guidance that would
not allow recipients to piggyback on another agency's contract unless
the vehicles being produced under the original contract met the
domestic content requirements at the time the optioned vehicles are
delivered.
FTA's Response:
FTA's proposed policy recognized the differences between the
exercise of options by the original parties to a contract or a joint
procurement between two or more purchasers and a single vehicle
manufacturer, and piggyback procurements by third parties who were not
parties to the original contract. With regard to the exercise of
options, FTA is persuaded that the predictability of pricing and
consistency within the supply chain outweighs any risks that the FAST
Act is being circumvented. Therefore, FTA is modifying its final policy
guidance to reflect that the date of the delivery of the first
production vehicle under the contract controls the domestic content of
all vehicles delivered under the contract, including vehicles delivered
pursuant to the exercise of options. The exercise of options by the
original parties to the contract or joint procurement establishes a
predictable contract price for the buyers, and provides a standardized
component list for the transit vehicle manufacturer, while at the same
time it allows the transit vehicle manufacturer to keep its production
line open, ensuring American jobs. However, only the original parties
to a contract (including signatories to a joint procurement) are
entitled to the benefits of exercising rights under that procurement.
FTA is not persuaded by the commenters who objected to FTA's
limitations on the use of piggyback
[[Page 60282]]
procurements during this transition period. The right to exercise an
option does not create a contractual obligation until that contract is
actually signed. Thus, assigning contract options to a third party will
result in a new contract between that third party and the transit
vehicle manufacturer, negating commenters' concerns that an increase in
domestic content might be viewed as a ``cardinal change.'' Third
parties seeking the assignment of procurement options (a/k/a
``piggybacking'') have no contractual or statutory right to that
option, and FTA considers that procurement to be a ``new'' contract and
therefore subject to the applicable FAST Act standard based upon the
scheduled delivery date of the first production vehicle under the new
contract.
C. Do the increased domestic content requirements extend to
subcomponents?
In its April 6 publication, FTA proposed to extend the elevated
domestic content requirements to the subcomponents that constitute a
component. FTA received relatively little comment on this specific
provision. Several commenters proposed that a component's domestic
content be based upon the date the component was offered in response to
a solicitation, rather than upon the component's actual date of
manufacture or the vehicle's intended delivery date. In support of
their position, transit vehicle manufacturers said that they solicit
bids for vendors for specific vehicle components. The prices submitted
by those bidders are based upon quotes received from their suppliers
and sub-suppliers, and the transit vehicle manufacturer has limited
ability to leverage that bidder to increase the domestic content of its
subcomponents. In addition, changing suppliers midway through a
production schedule would be disruptive to production schedules,
particularly if a manufacturer must switch to an untested supplier
solely to meet a gradual increase in domestic content. In contrast, the
association supporting domestic manufacturing expressed concerns that
maintaining fixed domestic component and subcomponent levels throughout
the life of the contract discourages new rolling stock suppliers from
entering the market.
FTA's Response:
With the exception of components manufactured by the transit
vehicle manufacturer itself, the vehicle manufacturer has little
influence over the subcomponent content of a given component, and given
the prevalence of multi-year vehicle delivery schedules, the effective
date for a component's domestic content will be based upon the
requirements in the contract. For solicitations advertised after the
effective date of this Notice, however, the solicitation must include
the appropriate statutory domestic content percentages for both
components and subcomponents.
FTA is sensitive to the position that the elevated domestic content
requirements eventually will encourage new entrants into the vehicle
supply chain. All contracts signed after the FAST Act's effective date,
including piggyback procurements and procurements off a state's
procurement schedule, will be subject to the higher domestic content
standards, resulting in more domestic suppliers entering the supply
chain and the incorporation of more domestic content into vehicles
funded with FTA financial assistance.
D. Do the changes also apply to train control, communication, and
traction power systems?
For purposes of Buy America, rolling stock includes train control,
communication, and traction power equipment. 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C).
See also 49 CFR 661.11(t), (u), and (v). One commenter pointed out that
the delivery of components on a construction contract differs from the
delivery schedule of a rolling stock contract. Unlike rolling stock
procurements where the transit agency is contracting for a fleet of
homogenous transit vehicles, a construction contract may encompass a
communication system, a traction power system, and a train control
system, all of which may have differing construction schedules and
varying component lists. Attempting to impose a domestic content based
on when components are delivered to a job site, or the completion date
of a particular construction segment may force the substitution of
materials midway through a construction project, or in a worse-case
scenario, may force the removal and replacement of components if delays
push the completion of the contract into a subsequent fiscal year. The
commenter proposed that the contracting date for the construction
project would be a better determinant of the domestic content
requirement, rather than one based on the installation date of each
component or the completion of a particular portion of a construction
contract.
FTA's Response:
FTA agrees with the commenter that there are significant
differences between procurements for identical units of rolling stock,
and a construction contract consisting of multiple deliverables, and
therefore, the contracting award dates for train control,
communication, and traction power systems will determine the contract's
domestic content percentage. If a contract was signed in FY2016 or
FY2017, the resulting components must consist of at least 60 percent
domestically-manufactured components. If a construction contract is
awarded during FY 2018 or FY 2019, the contract must include a domestic
content percentage for that project that exceeds the 65 percent
threshold. And if a construction contract is awarded in FY 2020 or
beyond, the percentage of domestically-manufactured components must
exceed 70 percent.
E. Does the increase in domestic content requirements apply to
remanufactured, overhauled, or rebuilt transit vehicles?
A transit vehicle rebuilder proposed that the FAST Act amendments
should not apply to overhauls, rebuilds or remanufacture of any buses
procured prior to the effective date of the FAST Act. The commenter
also asked that the requirements be applied consistently throughout the
duration of a contract so that the resulting vehicles will have
consistent Buy America content. The commenter argues that the FAST Act
amendments should not be interpreted in any manner that decreases
transit agencies' abilities to complete their intended overhauls by
forcing a higher standard of American content at the time of overhaul
than when the bus was originally manufactured.
FTA's Response:
Consistent with the commenter's recommendation, FTA agrees that the
domestic content in effect at the time the vehicle was delivered will
apply to any future contracts for overhaul, rebuild, or remanufacturing
projects, limited to the parties on the original contract.
F. Do the FAST Act amendments apply to passenger ferry vessels?
FTA received two comments from the passenger ferry vessel industry
and a ferry operator that proposed an implementation process for ferry
vessels that based the domestic content requirement on the date of
vessel contracting, rather than on the delivery date of the vessel.
Commenters argued that it can be hard at the time of the contract's
execution to anticipate with specificity exactly when the constructed
ferry vessel will be finished, pass required regulatory inspections and
sea trials, and be delivered to the customer. For vessels scheduled to
be delivered over a multi-year program, they noted the difficulty and
inefficiency in
[[Page 60283]]
maintaining multiple component lists for identical vessels that would
be delivered across different fiscal years.
FTA's Response:
FTA acknowledges that the long lead times associated with issuing
design specifications, obtaining Coast Guard and other regulatory
approval, bid solicitations, and construction of a ferry vessel exceed
that required for other traditional types of rolling stock.
Accordingly, for ferry vessels, the date on which a transit agency
signs the procurement contract will govern the domestic content for all
vessels delivered under that contract.
G. How do the new rules apply to reimported domestic steel and iron?
One commenter asked that FTA address the applicability of section
3011 of the FAST Act, which added 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(5), allowing the
inclusion of steel and iron produced in the United States and
incorporated into a rolling stock frame or car shell outside the United
States, provided that the frame or car shell is imported back into the
United States for final assembly.
FTA's Response:
Consistent with the statutory provision, the cost of any domestic
steel and iron may be included in the calculation of the transit
vehicle's domestic content, provided that the average cost of the
vehicle exceeds $300,000, as provided by the FAST Act. Manufacturers
may include the cost of domestic steel and iron on vehicles produced
after October 1, 2015, the effective date of the FAST Act.
H. Will FTA issue public interest waivers for vehicle procurements
underway when the FAST Act was enacted?
In a Notice published concurrently with the proposed policy
statement (81 FR 20051, April 6, 2016), FTA invited the public to
comment on a proposed public interest waiver that would apply the
current domestic content standard to rolling stock contracts entered
into between October 1, 2015 (the effective date of the FAST Act) and
December 4, 2015, (the date on which the Act was enacted), and for
contracts entered into after December 4, 2015, as a result of
solicitations for bids or requests for proposals that were advertised
before December 4, 2015.
FTA received 14 comments on the proposed waiver from: A transit
industry trade association, a passenger vessel trade group, several
public transportation agencies, numerous transit vehicle manufacturers
and remanufacturers, and Buy America consultants, all of whom supported
the proposed waiver. Among the cited benefits of a waiver were the
avoidance of additional costs to transit agencies that would have to
rewrite and re-advertise existing solicitations to incorporate the new
domestic content thresholds, the administrative costs to vehicle
manufacturers who would need to identify and solicit new domestic
suppliers, and most importantly, predictable delays in the acquisition
of new transit vehicles, which would pose a disservice to transit
riders.
The passenger vessel group asked that FTA extend the waiver to
ferry vessel procurements for which the vessel design was substantially
complete before the enactment of the FAST Act; vehicle remanufacturers
asked that the waiver extend to contracts for rebuilds, overhauls, and
remanufacturing entered into prior to the enactment date of the FAST
Act; and several transit agencies and vehicle manufacturers asked that
the waiver extend to contract options assigned to another transit
agency if the contract was entered into prior to the FAST Act's
enactment date.
FTA's Response:
Based on the foregoing discussion of the FAST Act's implementation
and input from commenters, FTA believes that a request for a public
interest waiver to address contracts signed before the date the FAST
Act was enacted is reasonable, and is extending the waiver to contracts
for ferry vessels and to contracts for the remanufacturing, rebuilding,
and overhaul of a recipient's existing fleet. However, as stated
previously, FTA will not extend pre-FAST Act domestic content
percentages to options exercised by a third party after the effective
date of the Act.
Further, to avoid the disruption of ongoing contract solicitations
and to facilitate the delivery of transit vehicles to the public, FTA
is extending the waiver to contract solicitations advertised on or
after December 4, 2015, provided the contract is awarded within 60 days
after the publication date of this Notice. If a solicitation was
advertised (i.e., published or distributed to potential bidders in
manner that constitutes constructive notice) on or after the enactment
date of the FAST Act and the parties are unable to execute a contract
within 60 days of this Notice, the solicitation must be amended to
reflect the applicable domestic content standard that will be in effect
when the first production vehicle is scheduled to be delivered. If
compliance with this requirement would pose an undue hardship, FTA will
evaluate requests for a waiver on a case-by-case basis.
A request for a public interest waiver should set forth the
detailed justification for the proposed waiver, including information
about the history of the procurement and the burden on the recipient
and/or the industry in complying with the FAST Act. Public interest
waivers should be narrowly tailored and FTA will not generally look
favorably on waivers that provide for contracts that include the
exercise of options for vehicles that will be delivered beyond FY2020.
FTA will act expeditiously on public interest waiver requests that
provide the information requested.
IV. Final Policy Guidance and Public Interest Waiver
A. Final Policy Guidance
Individual and Joint Procurements of Buses and Railcars. For
rolling stock contracts entered into on or after October 1, 2015, i.e.,
the effective date of the FAST Act, the applicable domestic content
percentage under section 5323(j)(2)(C) will be based on the scheduled
delivery date of the first production vehicle (i.e., the first vehicle
intended to carry passengers in revenue service), final acceptance
notwithstanding. Thus, if a recipient or group of recipients as part of
a joint procurement enter into a contract for rolling stock on or after
October 1, 2015, then the new FAST Act provisions applicable for the
date of delivery of the first production vehicle shall apply.
Accordingly, if the first production vehicle is delivered in FY2018 or
FY2019, the domestic content must be more than 65 percent, and if the
first production vehicle is delivered in FY2020 or beyond, the domestic
content must be more than 70 percent. These delivery provisions apply
to contracts entered into on or after October 1, 2015, unless a waiver
is granted. If the delivery date of the first production vehicle is
delayed such that it will be delivered in a year with a higher domestic
content, FTA will address those situations on a case-by-case basis.
The FAST Act amendments do not apply to contracts entered into
before October 1, 2015, even if the contract provides for the delivery
of the first production vehicle after FY2017. For contracts entered
into before October 1, 2015, all vehicles delivered under the original
contract base order and any properly exercised options by recipients
who are direct parties to the contract may contain a domestic content
of more than 60 percent, per the pre-FAST Act requirements. Recipients
who are not direct parties to a contract executed before October 1,
2015, however, may
[[Page 60284]]
not exercise assigned options (a/k/a ``piggybacking'') on such
contracts.
Procurements of Ferry Vessels. Due to the long lead time in
establishing vessel design specifications, obtaining Coast Guard
certifications and other regulatory approval, and the bid solicitation
and review process that exceeds that required for other traditional
types of rolling stock, the date on which a transit agency signs the
vessel contract will govern the domestic content for all vessels
delivered under that contract. Therefore, for vessel contracts signed
during FYs 2016 or 2017, the vessels must contain a minimum of 60
percent domestic content; contracts signed in FYs 2018 or 2019 must
require no less than 65 percent domestic content; and contracts signed
in FY 2020 or beyond must mandate a domestic content of no less than 70
percent.
Train Control, Communication and Traction Power Equipment. For
purposes of Buy America, rolling stock includes train control,
communication, and traction power equipment. 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(C).
See also 49 CFR 661.11(t), (u), and (v). The domestic content
requirement in effect on the date a contract was signed for train
control, communication, and traction power equipment will control. If
the contract is signed in FY2016 or FY2017, the contract shall require
an overall domestic content that exceeds 60 percent; if a contract is
signed in FYs 2018 or 2019, the contract must include an overall
domestic content percentage that exceeds 65 percent; and if a contract
is signed in FY2020 or beyond, the domestic content must exceed 70
percent.
State Purchasing Schedules. Some recipients purchase rolling stock
from a State purchasing schedule. A State purchasing schedule is an
arrangement that a State has established with multiple vendors in which
those vendors agree to provide essentially an option to the State and
its subordinate governmental entities and others it might include in
its programs, to acquire specific property or services in the future at
established prices. Because the purchasing schedule does not commit the
State to procuring a minimum number of vehicles, a ``contract'' does
not exist until a State, recipient or subrecipient enters into a
purchase order with a vendor listed on the schedule.
Therefore, for purchase orders placed against State purchasing
schedules before October 1, 2015, for the delivery of rolling stock in
FY2018 and beyond, the increased domestic content requirements will not
apply. For purchase orders placed against State schedules on or after
October 1, 2015, for rolling stock that will be delivered in FY 2016 or
2017, the domestic content requirement must exceed 60%. For purchase
orders placed against State schedules for rolling stock that will be
delivered in FYs 2018 or 2019, the domestic content must exceed 65%,
and for purchase orders placed against State schedules for rolling
stock that will be delivered in FY 2020 or beyond, the domestic content
must exceed 70%.
Calculation of Domestic Content. FTA will adjust the calculation
for determining whether a component is of domestic origin under 49 CFR
661.11 to accommodate the increase in domestic content for FY2018 and
beyond. Currently under 49 CFR 661.11(g), ``for a component to be of
domestic origin, more that 60 percent of the subcomponents of that
component, by cost, must be of domestic origin, and the manufacture of
the component must take place in the United States. If, under the terms
of this part, a component is determined to be of domestic origin, its
entire cost may be used in calculating the cost of domestic content of
an end product.''
Thus, for vehicles to be delivered in FY2018 or 2019, for a
component to be of domestic content, more than 65 percent of the
subcomponents of that component, by cost, must be of domestic origin,
and for FY2020 or beyond, more than 70 percent of the subcomponents of
the component must be of domestic origin. The requirement that
manufacture of the component take place in the United States still
applies. Additionally, if a component is determined to be of domestic
origin, its entire cost may be used in calculating the cost of content
of an end product.
Cost of Domestic Steel and Iron for Rolling Stock Frame or Car
Shell. Section 3011 of the FAST Act, which added 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(5),
allows domestic content to include steel and iron produced in the
United States and incorporated into a rolling stock frame or car shell
outside the United States, provided that the frame or car shell is
imported back into the United States for final assembly. Consistent
with the statutory provision, the cost of any domestic steel and iron
may be included in the calculation of the transit vehicle's domestic
content, provided that the average cost of the vehicles exceeds
$300,000, as provided by the FAST Act. Manufacturers may include the
cost of domestic steel and iron on vehicles produced after October 1,
2015, the effective date of the FAST Act.
B. General Public Interest Waivers
FTA is issuing two general public interest waivers to address two
categories of recipients and manufacturers: (1) Recipients who entered
into contracts or placed purchase orders against State schedules
between October 1, 2015 and December 4, 2015; and (2) recipients who
have entered into contracts after December 4, 2015, as a result of
solicitations for bids or requests for proposals that were advertised
before December 4, 2015. In addition, FTA is issuing a third public
interest waiver for recipients who solicited contracts on or after
December 4, 2015, provided they enter into a contract within 60 days of
publication of this Notice.
Under 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)(2)(A), the Administrator may waive the Buy
America requirements if the Administrator finds that applying the Buy
America requirements would be inconsistent with the public interest.
``In determining whether the conditions exist to grant a public
interest waiver, the Administrator will consider all appropriate
factors on a case-by-case basis . . . When granting a public interest
waiver, the Administrator shall issue a detailed written statement
justifying why the waiver is in the public interest. The Administrator
shall publish this justification in the Federal Register, providing the
public with a reasonable time for notice and comment of not more than
seven calendar days.'' 49 CFR 661.7(b).
Public interest waiver for contracts entered into between October
1, 2015 and December 4, 2015. FTA grants a general public interest
waiver for contracts entered into between the FAST Act's effective date
and date of enactment (i.e., between October 1, 2015 and December 4,
2015). For these contracts, the increased domestic content requirements
for FY2018 and beyond will not apply, regardless of when the first
production vehicle is delivered. However, consistent with FTA's policy
statement above, parties to the contracts may exercise options under
the contract, but recipients will not be permitted to piggyback on the
contracts.
Public interest waiver for contracts entered into after December 4,
2015 as a result of solicitations advertised before December 4, 2015.
FTA grants a general public interest waiver for contracts entered into
after December 4, 2015 as a result of solicitations for bids or
requests for proposals that were advertised (i.e., published or
distributed to potential bidders in a manner that constitutes
constructive notice) before
[[Page 60285]]
December 4, 2015. Under these circumstances, the increased domestic
content requirements for FY2018 and beyond will not apply, regardless
of when the first production vehicle is delivered. However, consistent
with FTA's policy statement above, parties to the contracts may
exercise options under the contract, but recipients will not be
permitted to piggyback on the contracts.
Public interest waiver for contract solicitations advertised on or
after December 4, 2015 and entered into within 60 days of publication
of this notice. To avoid the disruption of ongoing contract
solicitations and to facilitate the delivery of transit vehicles to the
public, FTA is extending the waiver to contract solicitations
advertised on or after December 4, 2015, and entered into within 60
days after the publication date of this Notice. If a solicitation was
advertised (i.e., published or distributed to potential bidders in a
manner that constitutes constructive notice) after the enactment date
of the FAST Act and the parties are unable to execute a contract within
60 days of this Notice, the solicitation must be amended to reflect the
applicable domestic content standard that will be in effect when the
first production vehicle is scheduled to be delivered. If compliance
with this requirement would pose an undue hardship, FTA will evaluate
requests for a waiver on a case-by-case basis.
Recipients may apply to FTA for individual public interest waivers
for contracts that do not fall within the scope of a general public
interest waiver. A request for a public interest waiver should set
forth the detailed justification for the proposed waiver, including
information about the history of the procurement and the burden on the
recipient and/or the industry in complying with the FAST Act. Public
interest waivers should be narrowly tailored and FTA will not generally
look favorably on waivers that provide for contracts that include the
exercise of options for vehicles that will be delivered beyond FY2020.
FTA will act expeditiously on public interest waiver requests that
provide the information requested.
V. Effective Date
Because the statute is self-effectuating, the changes are effective
upon the FAST Act's enactment. FTA will be initiating a subsequent
rulemaking updating 49 CFR part 661 to reflect these changes; however,
today's Policy Statement and Waiver represents FTA's implementation of
the FAST Act provisions during this interim period.
Dated: August 26, 2016.
Ellen Partridge,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016-21007 Filed 8-31-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P