Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine Into Schedule I, 59929-59934 [2016-20803]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules
simplify these disclosure items in view
of the objectives of the Regulation S–K
study set forth in Section 72003 of the
FAST Act and whether additional
disclosures in these areas are necessary
or appropriate to facilitate investor
protection, to maintain fair, orderly, and
efficient markets, and/or to facilitate
capital formation. In addition to the
substance of the disclosure
requirements, the Commission
welcomes comments on how
information can be presented to
improve its readability, navigability and
comparability and how technology and
structured data can facilitate data
aggregation and analysis. All interested
parties are invited to submit their views
and any data, in writing, on any matter
relating to Subpart 400 of Regulation
S–K.
By the Commission.
Dated: August 25, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–20906 Filed 8–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–442]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of Mitragynine
and 7-Hydroxymitragynine Into
Schedule I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration is issuing
this notice of intent to temporarily
schedule the opioids mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, which are the
main active constituents of the plant
kratom, into schedule I pursuant to the
temporary scheduling provisions of the
Controlled Substances Act. This action
is based on a finding by the
Administrator that the placement of
these opioids into schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act is necessary
to avoid an imminent hazard to the
public safety. Any final order will
impose the administrative, civil, and
criminal sanctions and regulatory
controls applicable to schedule I
controlled substances under the
Controlled Substances Act on the
manufacture, distribution, possession,
importation, and exportation of, and
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:16 Aug 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
research and conduct of instructional
activities of these opioids.
DATES: August 31, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Lewis, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any final
order will be published in the Federal
Register and may not be effective prior
to September 30, 2016.
Legal Authority
The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) implements and
enforces titles II and III of the
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention
and Control Act of 1970, as amended. 21
U.S.C. 801–971. Titles II and III are
referred to as the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Act’’ and the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act,’’
respectively, and are collectively
referred to as the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Act’’ or the ‘‘CSA’’ for the
purpose of this action. The DEA
publishes the implementing regulations
for these statutes in title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), chapter II.
The CSA and its implementing
regulations are designed to prevent,
detect, and eliminate the diversion of
controlled substances and listed
chemicals into the illicit market while
providing for the legitimate medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States. Controlled
substances have the potential for abuse
and dependence and are controlled to
protect the public health and safety.
Under the CSA, each controlled
substance is classified into one of five
schedules based upon its potential for
abuse, its currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and the degree of dependence the drug
or other substance may cause. 21 U.S.C.
812. The initial schedules of controlled
substances established by Congress are
found at 21 U.S.C. 812(c), and the
current list of all scheduled substances
is published at 21 CFR part 1308.
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811,
provides the Attorney General with the
authority to temporarily place a
substance into schedule I of the CSA for
two years without regard to the
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if she
finds that such action is necessary to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition,
if proceedings to control a substance are
initiated under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the
Attorney General may extend the
temporary scheduling for up to one
year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59929
Where the necessary findings are
made, a substance may be temporarily
scheduled if it is not listed in any other
schedule under section 202 of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no
exemption or approval in effect for the
substance under section 505 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1). The Attorney General has
delegated scheduling authority under 21
U.S.C. 811 to the Administrator of the
DEA. 28 CFR 0.100.
Background
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), requires the
Administrator to notify the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) of his intention to
temporarily place a substance into
schedule I of the CSA.1 The
Administrator transmitted notice of his
intent to place mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine in schedule I on a
temporary basis to the Assistant
Secretary by letter dated May 6, 2016.
The Assistant Secretary responded to
this notice by letter dated May 18, 2016,
and advised that based on review by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
there are currently no investigational
new drug applications or approved new
drug applications for mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine. The Assistant
Secretary also stated that the HHS has
no objection to the temporary placement
of mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine into schedule I of
the CSA. Neither mitragynine nor 7hydroxymitragynine is currently listed
in any schedule under the CSA, and no
approved new drug applications or
investigational new drug applications
for mitragynine or 7hydroxymitragynine exist, 21 U.S.C.
355. The DEA has found that the control
of mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine in schedule I on a
temporary basis is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to public safety.
To find that placing a substance
temporarily into schedule I of the CSA
is necessary to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety, the
Administrator is required to consider
three of the eight factors set forth in
section 201(c) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
1 As discussed in a memorandum of
understanding entered into by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and the National Institute on
Drug Abuse (NIDA), the FDA acts as the lead agency
within the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) in carrying out the Secretary’s
scheduling responsibilities under the CSA, with the
concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518, Mar. 8, 1985.
The Secretary of the HHS has delegated to the
Assistant Secretary for Health of the HHS the
authority to make domestic drug scheduling
recommendations. 58 FR 35460, July 1, 1993.
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
59930
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
811(c): the substance’s history and
current pattern of abuse; the scope,
duration and significance of abuse; and
what, if any, risk there is to the public
health. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
Consideration of these factors includes
actual abuse, diversion from legitimate
channels, and clandestine importation,
manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling
may only be placed in schedule I. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1). Substances in schedule
I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(1).
Mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, the Main Active
Constituents of the Plant Kratom
Mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine are the main active
constituents of the plant Mitragyna
speciosa Korth (commonly known as
kratom), an indigenous plant of
Southeast Asia. Kratom is the only
known species of Mitragyna to contain
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine.
Kratom is abused for its ability to
produce opioid-like effects. Kratom is
available in several different forms to
include dried/crushed leaves, powder,
capsules, tablets, liquids, and gum/
resin. Consequently, kratom, which
contains the main active constituents
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine,
is an increasingly popular drug of abuse
and readily available on the recreational
drug market in the United States.
Attempted importations of kratom are
routinely misdeclared and falsely
labeled. This is similar to other attempts
to import controlled substances or
substances intended to mimic
controlled substances. The amount of
kratom material seized by law
enforcement for the first half of 2016
greatly exceeds any previous year totals
and easily accounts for millions of
dosage units intended for the
recreational market.2 Available data and
information for mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, the main active
constituents of the plant kratom, and the
plant kratom, are summarized below.
Available information indicates that
these opioid substances, constituents of
the plant kratom, have a high potential
for abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
2 2015–CDER–DEA Memorandum of
Understanding for sharing information (Provided
under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:16 Aug 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
under medical supervision. The DEA’s
three-factor analysis is available in its
entirety under of the public docket of
this action as a supporting document at
www.regulations.gov under Docket
Number DEA–442.
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of
Abuse
Kratom, which contains the main
active alkaloids mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, has a long history
of use in Southeast Asia as an opium
substitute. Kratom is also known in
Southeast Asia as thang, thom, krathom,
kakuam, ketum, and biak. In recent
years, the presence of the psychoactive
plant kratom has increased dramatically
on the recreational market in the United
States due to its opioid-like effects.
Numerous vendors selling kratom have
appeared in the past few years,
markedly increasing its availability.
Kratom preparations, which contain
the main active alkaloids mitragynine
and 7-hydroxymitragynine, are easily
obtained from smoke shops and over the
Internet. The Internet is the most
utilized source for the purchase of
kratom products, making kratom just ‘‘a
click’’ away for users. In the United
States, law enforcement has seized
kratom/mitragynine products in the
following forms: powder/plant, powder,
plant or vegetable material, capsules,
tablets, liquids, gum/resin, and drug
patch.
Since abusers obtain kratom, which
contains the main active alkaloids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragyine,
through unknown sources, the identity,
purity, and quantity of these substances
are uncertain and inconsistent, thus
posing significant adverse health risks
to users. Several studies have analyzed
the concentrations of mitragynine 3 and/
or 7-hydroxymitragynine 4 in different
kratom products. The studies showed
that there were inconsistencies in the
levels of the opioid mitragynine present
in similar kratom products, and some
products contained other psychoactive
substances (see 3-factor analysis). Based
3 Mitragynine is the most abundant alkaloid in
kratom and constitutes about 66 percent of the total
alkaloid content of the plant. The alkaloid content
of mitragynine was 45 percent of all alkaloids
detected during analyses performed. Such large
relative differences in proportions of plant alkaloids
(66%:45%) are common among plant species and
will lead to variations in potency and the risk of
overdose.
4 7-Hydroxymitragynine is a more potent agonist
than mitragynine although it only comprises about
1.6 percent of the total alkaloid content of the plant.
The alkaloid content of 7-hydroxymitragynine was
4 percent of all alkaloids detected in analyses
performed. Such large relative differences in
proportions of plant alkaloids (4.0%:1.6%) are
common among plant species and will lead to
variations in potency and the risk of overdose.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
on the variability of the mitragynine
concentration in each product, users
may experience differing effects when
consuming similar amounts of different
products.
Evidence suggests that kratom, which
contains the main active alkaloids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine,
is abused individually, and with other
psychoactive substances. In a 2016
publication, the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) characterized kratom
exposures reported to poison centers
and uploaded to the National Poison
Data System (NPDS) 5 from January 2010
through December 2015. During the
stated timeframe, U.S. poison centers
received 660 calls related to kratom
exposure. Of the calls reported, 487
(73.8%) reported intentional exposure
to kratom, and 595 (90.2%) reported
ingestion of the drug. In addition to
reports of isolated exposures to kratom
(428 (64.8%)), reports of kratom being
used with other substances (ethanol,
benzodiazepines, narcotics,
acetaminophen, and other botanicals)
were also recorded. Additionally,
forensic laboratory analyses of drug
evidence have identified kratom/
mitragynine, along with synthetic
cannabinoids and synthetic opioids
during the analyses of products seized
on the illicit market. The consumption
of kratom individually, or in
conjunction with alcohol or other drugs,
is of serious concern as it can lead to
severe adverse effects and death.
Kratom does not have an approved
medical use in the United States and
has not been studied as a treatment
agent in the United States. Kratom has
a history of being used as an opium
substitute in Southeast Asia. Kratom has
also been used to self-treat chronic pain
and withdrawal symptoms from opioid
use. Especially concerning, reports note
users have turned to kratom as a
replacement for other opioids, such as
heroin.
In the United States, kratom is
misused to self-treat chronic pain and
opioid withdrawal symptoms, with
users reporting its effects to be
comparable to prescription opioids.
Users have also reported dosedependent psychoactive effects to
include euphoria, simultaneous
stimulation and relaxation, analgesia,
vivid dreams, and sedation (at higher
5 The National Poison Data System (NPDS) is a
national database of information logged by the
country’s regional poison centers serving all 50
United States, Puerto Rico and the District of
Columbia. The NPDS is maintained by the
American Association of Poison Control Centers.
NPDS case records are the result of call reports
made by users (i.e., self-reports), friends and family
members, and health care providers.
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules
doses). As noted in the actions by the
United States Food and Drug
Administration,6 kratom products have
been encountered with false claims, an
extremely concerning issue for public
health and safety. These products are
marketed as safe for self-medication, but
have not been approved by the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) for any
medical uses.
Information from the published
literature, poison control centers data,
and medical examiner data, suggests
that kratom, which contains the main
active alkaloids mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, is abused by a
diverse population to include
recreational opioid users, young adults,
and adults. The most commonly
described route of administration of
kratom, which contains the main active
alkaloids mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, is oral. The leaves
are typically brewed and ingested as a
tea; however, smoking, chewing the raw
leaves (done traditionally), and
ingestion of kratom capsules or resin
extracts have also been reported.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and
Significance of Abuse
The abuse of kratom, containing the
main active alkaloids mitragynine and
7-hydroxymitragynine, is increasing in
the United States and remains extremely
concerning for law enforcement and
public health. As the abuse of the plant
increases, as demonstrated by the
increasing availability per border
encounters,7 it has been noted that
physicians should be aware of the
kratom’s adverse health effects, toxicity,
dependence, and withdrawal .is.
Reports from law enforcement
indicate that kratom is being imported
for widespread distribution to the
public within the United States.8
Between February 2014 and July 2016,
over 55,000 kilograms (kg) of kratom
material were encountered by law
enforcement at various ports of entry
within the United States.9 Additionally,
over 57,000 kg of kratom material
offered for import at numerous ports of
entry, between 2014 and 2016, are
6 2015–CDER–DEA Memorandum of
Understanding for sharing information (Provided
under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
7 2015–CDER–DEA Memorandum of
Understanding for sharing information (Provided
under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
8 2015–CDER–DEA Memorandum of
Understanding for sharing information (Provided
under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
Represents Customs and Border Patrol (CBP)
seizures from February 2014 through July 2016.
9 2015–CDER–DEA Memorandum of
Understanding for sharing information (Provided
under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
Represents Customs and Border Patrol (CBP)
seizures from February 2014 through July 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:16 Aug 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
awaiting an FDA admissibility
decision.10 The amount of kratom
currently seized or awaiting an
admissibility decision by law
enforcement, between 2014 and 2016, is
enough to produce over 12 million
doses of kratom.11 Such alarming
quantities create an imminent public
health and safety threat.
According to press announcements
released in 2014 and 2016, the FDA
requested the seizure, by US Marshals,
of more than 25,000 pounds of raw
kratom material, nearly 90,000 bottles of
dietary supplements labeled as
containing kratom, and over 100 cases
of products labeled as kratom,
respectively.12 The FDA stated that
kratom products ‘‘pose a risk to the
public health and have the potential for
abuse’’ and the seizure of certain kratom
products was necessary ‘‘to safeguard
the public from a dangerous product’’.13
The FDA has also warned the public not
to use any products labeled as
containing kratom due to serious
concerns about toxicity and potential
health impacts.14 To further protect the
public health and safety from the large
influx of kratom materials, the FDA
issued and updated two import alerts
related to numerous kratom and kratomcontaining products.15 These import
alerts allow for detention without
physical examination of dietary
supplements and bulk ingredients that
are or contain kratom, and detention
without physical examination of
unapproved new drugs promoted in the
United States, which includes kratom
products that make false health claims.
Since 2014, 121 firms have been added
to these import alerts for importing
kratom products.16
10 2015–CDER–DEA Memorandum of
Understanding for sharing information (Provided
under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
11 2015–CDER–DEA Memorandum of
Understanding for sharing information (Provided
under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
Assuming a high dose of 9 g of kratom.
12 Relevant press release can be found online at:
www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/ucm416318.htm; https://
www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/ucm480344.htm; and https://
www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/ucm515085.htm.
13 Relevant press release can be found online at:
www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/ucm416318.htm.
14 Relevant press release can be found online at:
https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/ucm515085.htm.
15 Relevant Import alerts (#’s 54–15 and 66–41)
can be found online at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/
cms_ia/importalert_1137.html.and
www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_
190.html.
16 2015–CDER–DEA Memorandum of
Understanding for sharing information (Provided
under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59931
Drug reports pertaining to the
trafficking, distribution, and abuse of
kratom/mitragynine 17 were analyzed by
Federal, State, and local forensic
laboratories.18 According to data from
the System to Retrieve Information from
Drug Evidence (STRIDE) and
STARLiMS (a web-based, commercial
laboratory information management
system), from January 2006 through
March 2016, there were 293 records for
kratom and/or mitragynine. From
January 2010 through May 2016, the
National Forensic Laboratory
Information System (NFLIS) registered
720 reports containing mitragynine (See
3-Factor analysis). NFLIS and STRIDE/
STARLiMS records/reports were
reported across 43 States, thus showing
the widespread abuse and trafficking of
kratom/mitragynine.19 The presence of
these substances during drug evidence
analyses demonstrates the presence of
these substances on the recreational
drug market.
Growing concern over the use of
kratom is reflected in the increased
requests for analyses of mitragynine and
7-hydroxymitragynine in human
toxicology panels (blood/urine
samples) 20 to private analytical
laboratories.21 These analyses have been
requested by addiction treatment
facilities/pain management doctors,
drug courts, medical examiner/coroner
offices, drug testing facilities, state
laboratory systems, state police
department, and private entities.22 The
number of positive results from these
analyses increased as follows: 31
positive results from August 2012 to
July 2013 for mitragynine and/or 7hydroxymitragynine; 23 274 positive
results for mitragynine between July
2013 and May 2014; 24 555 positive
17 Mitrgynine is used to confirmatively identify
plant material as kratom.
18 While law enforcement data is not direct
evidence of abuse, it can lead to an inference that
a drug has been diverted and abused.
19 STRIDE, STARLiMS, and NFLIS data reflect
data reported by the forensic laboratory systems.
Encounters reported in these systems, and the
overall number of seizures, may be low because
kratom/mitragynine is not federally controlled
under the CSA. Typically, after control, these
numbers will increase.
20 The quantitative values for mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine were not available for all
positive results shown.
21 Substances are tested as part of a toxicology
panel that includes illicit or commonly abused
substances routinely analyzed.
22 Email correspondences with analytical
laboratories in Willow Grove, PA, Clearwater, FL,
and Santa Rosa, CA.
23 Located in Willow Grove, PA, analyzed blood/
urine samples from Canada and thirteen U.S. states.
Correspondences on file with DEA.
24 Located in Clearwater, FL, analyzed urine
samples from multiple states across the U.S.
Correspondences on file with DEA.
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
59932
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
results for mitragynine between
December 2014 and March 2016.25 The
increasing trend in the number of
positive results from these analyses
demonstrates the growing abuse and
popularity of these substances and the
concern related to the abuse of this
plant material and its psychoactive
constituents.
Evidence from poison control centers
in the United States also shows that
there is an increase in the number of
individuals abusing kratom, which
contains the main active alkaloids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine.
As such, there has been a steady
increase in the reporting of kratom
exposures by poison control centers.
The American Association of Poison
Control Centers identified two
exposures to kratom between 2000 and
2005. Additionally, the Texas Poison
Center Network (TPCN), which is
comprised of six poison centers that
service the State of Texas, reported 14
exposures to kratom between January
2009 and September 2013. Between
January 2010 and December 2015 U.S.
poison centers received 660 calls related
to kratom exposure. During this time,
there was a tenfold increase in the
number of calls received, from 26 in
2010 to 263 in 2015.
Furthermore, the abuse and addictive
properties of kratom, which contains the
main active alkaloids mitragynine, and
7-hydroxymitragynine, have prompted
at least 15 countries,26 and 6 states and
the District of Columbia to ban kratom,
mitragynine and/or 7hydroxymitragynine and two states
within the United States,27 to place
regulatory controls on these substances.
Six other States within the United States
have proposed to ban or place
regulatory controls on these
substances.28
25 Located in Santa Rosa, CA, analyzed urine
samples from multiple states across the United
States. Correspondences on file with DEA.
26 Z. Aziz, Kratom The Epidemiology, Use and
Abuse, Addiction Potential, and Legal Status, in
Kratom and Other Mitragynines The Chemistry and
Pharmacology of Opioids from a Non-Opium
Source 309–319 (Raffa, R.B., ed 2014); European
Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction,
Drug Profiles: Kratom, www.emcdda.europa.eu/
publications/drug-profiles/kratom (accessed 08/28/
2013); Misuse of Drugs Act 1977 Order 2011 (S.I.
No. 551/2011) (Ir.); Misuse of Drugs (Amendment
Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 552/2011) (Ir.).
27 Alabama—Ala. Code § 20–2–23; Arkansas—
Ark. Admin. Code 007.07.2; Illinois—IL ST CH 720
§ 642/5; Indiana—IC 35–31.5–2–321; Louisiana—
LA R.S. 40:989.3; Tennessee—T.C.A. § 39–17–452;
Vermont—Vt. Admin. Code 12–5–23:4.0;
Wisconsin—W.S.A. 961.14 and District of
Columbia—22–B DC ADC § 1201.
28 New Hampshire—2015 NH S.B. 540 and 2015
NH S.B. 540; New Jersey—2016 NJ A.B. 3281; New
York—2015 NY A.B. 9121, 2015 NY A.B. 9068,
2015 NY A.B. 8670, and 2015 NY S.B. 6345; North
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:16 Aug 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
Internationally, the increased
presence and abuse of kratom,
containing the main active alkaloids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine,
have garnered the attention of the
International Narcotics Control Board
(INCB).29 In a 2010 report, the INCB
noted the increased interest in the
recreational use of kratom. The INCB
recommended that governments
experiencing problems with persons
trafficking or using kratom 30
recreationally should consider
controlling kratom and kratom
preparations at the national level, where
necessary.
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to
the Public Health
The use of kratom and associated
products, which contains the main
active alkaloids mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragine, pose an imminent
hazard to public safety. These
substances produce opioid-like effects,
making their abuse a serious public
health concern. Information from
published literature, public health
officials, and poison control center data
demonstrate that the use of kratom,
which contains the main active
alkaloids mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, has caused
numerous adverse effects on users.
In a 2016 publication, the CDC
characterized kratom exposures
reported to poison centers and uploaded
to the NPDS from January 2010 through
December 2015.31 These exposures
resulted in medical outcomes that
varied in severity, ranging from minor
(having minimal signs or symptoms that
resolved rapidly with no residual
disability), moderate (having non-life
threatening and no residual disability,
but requiring some form of treatment),
major (having life-threatening signs or
symptoms with some residual
disability), and death. Additionally,
several adverse effects related to kratom
exposure were reported, which include
agitation or irritability, tachycardia,
nausea, drowsiness, and hypertension.
The severity of the reported outcomes,
health effects, and increased use of
Carolina—2015 NC H.B. 747 (NS) and 2015 NC S.B.
830 (NS); Florida—2016 FL S.B. 1182 and 2016 FL
H.B. 73; and Kentucky—2016 KY S.B. 136.
29 The INCB is an independent monitoring body
that is responsible for evaluating the
implementation of the United Nations international
drug controls conventions.
30 Kratom was listed as a plant material
containing psychoactive substances in the INCB
report for which recommendations were made for
specified plant materials.
31 Calls from healthcare providers comprised a
large portion of calls received, representing 75.2%
of calls reported.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
kratom suggests an emerging public
health threat.
Information from the scientific
literature also demonstrates the health
risks associated with kratom use.
Reports of hepatotoxicity, psychosis,
seizure, weight loss, insomnia,
tachycardia, vomiting, poor
concentration, hallucinations, and death
associated with kratom use have been
documented. Additionally, published
case reports describe events where
individuals sought medical care for the
purported use of kratom. Some
examples of the reported adverse events
involving kratom exposure are
described in the 3-factor analysis.
Numerous deaths associated with
kratom, which contains the main active
constituents mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, have been
reported indicating that this substance
is a serious public health threat. In
2016, DEA has received
correspondences from public/state
officials which indicate that there were
a significant number of overdoses and
traffic fatalities directly, or indirectly,
involving kratom.32 Deaths related to
kratom exposure have been reported in
the scientific literature beginning in
2009–2010, with a cluster of nine deaths
in Sweden from use of the kratom
product ‘‘Krypton’’. Since then, five
more deaths related to kratom exposure
were reported in the scientific literature,
and sixteen other deaths related to
kratom exposure, have been confirmed
by autopsy/medical examiner reports
(mitragynine and/or 7hydroxymitragynine were identified in
biological samples).33 Of these deaths,
15 occurred between 2014 and 2016.
This information demonstrates the
severe risks associated with kratom
misuse and the increasing occurrence of
fatal outcomes related to kratom
exposure. Details of some of these
events are summarized in the 3-factor
analysis.
Since abusers obtain kratom, which
contains the main active alkaloids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragyine,
through unknown sources, the identity,
purity, and quantity of these substances
are uncertain and inconsistent, thus
posing significant adverse health risks
to users. According to the FDA, in a
letter dated May 18, 2016, there are no
approved new drug applications, or
investigational new drug applications
for mitragynine or 7hydroxymitragynine. As such, kratom
products have no accepted medical use
32 Correspondences on file with DEA (dated April
19, 2016).
33 Autopsy/Medical Examiner (ME) reports on file
with DEA.
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules
within the United States. Despite FDA
warnings, kratom products continue to
be easily available and abused by
diverse populations. Distributors of
kratom are knowingly putting the public
at risk. Unknown factors including
detailed product analysis and dosage
variations between various packages
present a significant danger to an
abusing individual. With no accepted
medical use, the abuse of kratom, which
contains mitragynine and 7hydroxymitragynine, poses an imminent
hazard to the public safety.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I
Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
In accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3), based on the available data
and information, summarized above, the
continued uncontrolled manufacture,
distribution, reverse distribution,
importation, exportation, conduct of
research and chemical analysis,
possession, and abuse of mitragynine
and 7-hydroxymitragynine pose an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
The DEA is not aware of any currently
accepted medical uses for these
substances in the United States. A
substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling,
21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1), may only be placed
in schedule I. Substances in schedule I
are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. Available
data and information for mitragynine
and 7-hydroxymitragynine indicate that
these substances have a high potential
for abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. As required
by section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Administrator,
through a letter dated May 6, 2016,
notified the Assistant Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human
Services of the DEA’s intention to
temporarily place these substances in
schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent initiates an
expedited temporary scheduling action
and provides the 30-day notice pursuant
to section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(h). In accordance with the
provisions of section 201(h) of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 811(h), the Administrator
considered available data and
information, herein set forth the
grounds for his determination that it is
necessary to temporarily schedule
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:16 Aug 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
in schedule I of the CSA, and finds that
placement of these opioid substances
into schedule I of the CSA is necessary
in order to avoid an imminent hazard to
the public safety.
Because the Administrator hereby
finds that it is necessary to temporarily
place these opioids into schedule I to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety, any subsequent final order
temporarily scheduling these substances
will be effective on the date of
publication in the Federal Register, and
will be in effect for a period of two
years, with a possible extension of one
additional year, pending completion of
the regular scheduling process. 21
U.S.C. 811(h) (1) and (2). It is the
intention of the Administrator to issue
such a final order as soon as possible
after the expiration of 30 days from the
date of publication of this notice.
Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine
will then be subject to the regulatory
controls and administrative, civil, and
criminal sanctions applicable to the
manufacture, distribution, reverse
distribution, importation, exportation,
research, conduct of instructional
activities and chemical analysis, and
possession of a schedule I controlled
substance.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for
scheduling a drug or other substance.
Regular scheduling actions in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a) are
subject to formal rulemaking procedures
done ‘‘on the record after opportunity
for a hearing’’ conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.
21 U.S.C. 811. The regular scheduling
process of formal rulemaking affords
interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any
additional relevant information needed
to make a determination. Final
decisions that conclude the regular
scheduling process of formal
rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877. Temporary
scheduling orders are not subject to
judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
Regulatory Matters
Section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(h), provides for an expedited
temporary scheduling action where
such action is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
As provided in this subsection, the
Attorney General may, by order,
schedule a substance in schedule I on a
temporary basis. Such an order may not
be issued before the expiration of 30
days from (1) the publication of a notice
in the Federal Register of the intention
to issue such order and the grounds
upon which such order is to be issued,
and (2) the date that notice of the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59933
proposed temporary scheduling order is
transmitted to the Assistant Secretary of
HHS. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the
CSA directs that temporary scheduling
actions be issued by order and sets forth
the procedures by which such orders are
to be issued, the DEA believes that the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, do
not apply to this notice of intent. In the
alternative, even assuming that this
notice of intent might be subject to
section 553 of the APA, the
Administrator finds that there is good
cause to forgo the notice and comment
requirements of section 553, as any
further delays in the process for
issuance of temporary scheduling orders
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest in view of the
manifest urgency to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety.
Although the DEA believes this notice
of intent to issue a temporary
scheduling order is not subject to the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553 of the APA, the DEA notes
that in accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(4), the Administrator will take
into consideration any comments
submitted by the Assistant Secretary
with regard to the proposed temporary
scheduling order.
Further, the DEA believes that this
temporary scheduling action is not a
‘‘rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2),
and, accordingly, is not subject to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). The requirements
for the preparation of an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C.
603(a) are not applicable where, as here,
the DEA is not required by section 553
of the APA or any other law to publish
a general notice of proposed
rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), section 3(f), and,
accordingly, this action has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) it is determined that this
action does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
59934
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out above, the DEA
proposes to amend 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for part 1308
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
unless otherwise noted.
2. In § 1308.11, add paragraphs (h)(28)
and (29) to read as follows:
■
§ 1308.11
Schedule I
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(28) Mitragynine (to include synthetic
equivalents as well as mitragynine
naturally contained in the plant of the
genus and species name: Mitragyna
speciosa Korth, also known as kratom)
its isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts
of isomers, esters and ethers . . . (9823)
(29) 7-Hydroxymitragynine (to
include synthetic equivalents as well as
7-hydroxymitragynine naturally
contained in the plant of the genus and
species name: Mitragyna speciosa
Korth, also known as kratom) its
isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts of
isomers, esters and ethers . . . (9838)
Dated: August 25, 2016.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–20803 Filed 8–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[Docket ID: DOD–2012–HA–0146]
RIN 0720–AB47
TRICARE; Reimbursement of Long
Term Care Hospitals and Inpatient
Rehabilitation Facilities
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense,
Defense Health Agency, is proposing to
revise its reimbursement of Long Term
Care Hospitals (LTCHs) and Inpatient
Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs).
Proposed revisions are in accordance
with the statutory provision at title 10,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:16 Aug 30, 2016
Jkt 238001
United States Code (U.S.C.), section
1079(i)(2) that requires TRICARE
payment methods for institutional care
be determined, to the extent practicable,
in accordance with the same
reimbursement rules as apply to
payments to providers of services of the
same type under Medicare. Our
regulation includes a definition for
‘‘Hospital, long-term (tuberculosis,
chronic care, or rehabilitation).’’ This
rule proposes to delete this definition
and create separate definitions for
‘‘Long Term Care Hospital’’ and
‘‘Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility’’ in
accordance with Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) classification
criteria. Under TRICARE, LTCHs and
IRFs (both freestanding rehabilitation
hospitals and rehabilitation hospital
units) are currently paid the lower of a
negotiated rate (if they are a network
provider) or billed charges (if they are
a non-network provider). Although
Medicare’s reimbursement methods for
LTCHs and IRFs are different, it is
prudent to propose adopting both the
Medicare LTCH and IRF Prospective
Payment System (PPS) methods
simultaneously to align with our
statutory requirement to utilize the same
reimbursement system as Medicare.
This proposed rule sets forth the
proposed regulation modifications
necessary for TRICARE to adopt
Medicare’s LTCH and IRF Prospective
Payment Systems and rates applicable
for inpatient services provided by
LTCHs and IRFs to TRICARE
beneficiaries.
DATES: Written comments received at
the address indicated below by October
31, 2016 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
and title, by either of the following
methods:
The Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Deputy
Chief Management Officer, Directorate
for Oversight and Compliance, 4800
Mark Center Drive, ATTN: Box 24,
Alexandria, VA 22350–1700.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Seelmeyer, Defense Health
Agency (DHA), Medical Benefits and
Reimbursement Section, telephone (303)
676–3690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
1. Long Term Care Hospitals (LTCHs)
This rule publishes TRICARE’s
proposed modifications to our
regulation that are necessary to adopt
the Medicare LTCH Prospective
Payment System and rates. This is in
accordance with the statutory
requirement that for TRICARE
institutional services ‘‘payments shall
be determined to the extent practicable
in accordance with the same
reimbursement rules as apply to
payments to providers of services of the
same type under [Medicare].’’ Medicare
pays LTCHs using a LTCH Prospective
Payment System (PPS) which classifies
LTCH patients into distinct DiagnosisRelated Groups (DRGs). The patient
classification system groupings are
called Medicare Severity Long Term
Care Diagnosis Related Groups (MS–
LTC–DRGs), which are the same DRG
groupings used under the Medicare
acute hospital inpatient prospective
payment system (IPPS), but that have
been weighted to reflect the resources
required to treat the medically complex
patients treated at LTCHs.
On January 26, 2015, a TRICARE
proposed rule was published in the
Federal Register [79 FR 51127],
proposing to adopt a TRICARE LTCH
PPS similar to the CMS’ reimbursement
system for LTCHs, with the exception of
not adopting Medicare’s LTCH 25
percent rule. However, that proposed
rule acknowledged that the Department
of Health and Human Services intended
to address implementation of Section
1206(a) of the Pathway for Sustainable
Growth Rate (SGR) Reform Act of 2013
(Pub. L. 113–67) in their FY 2016
rulemaking process. As a result, the
TRICARE proposed rule included a
statement that DoD would ‘‘defer action
on this issue pending review of the final
Medicare policy.’’ This review has been
completed and we have changed our
approach regarding implementation of
the TRICARE LTCH PPS. Consequently,
we are withdrawing the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register on
January 26, 2015, and publishing this
new proposed rule to inform the public
of our intent to adopt the CMS LTCH
PPS system with no modifications or
exceptions. We have determined that it
is practicable to adopt Medicare’s LTCH
E:\FR\FM\31AUP1.SGM
31AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 169 (Wednesday, August 31, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59929-59934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20803]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-442]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of
Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine Into Schedule I
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration is
issuing this notice of intent to temporarily schedule the opioids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, which are the main active
constituents of the plant kratom, into schedule I pursuant to the
temporary scheduling provisions of the Controlled Substances Act. This
action is based on a finding by the Administrator that the placement of
these opioids into schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act is
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. Any final
order will impose the administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions and
regulatory controls applicable to schedule I controlled substances
under the Controlled Substances Act on the manufacture, distribution,
possession, importation, and exportation of, and research and conduct
of instructional activities of these opioids.
DATES: August 31, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Lewis, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (202) 598-
6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any final order will be published in the
Federal Register and may not be effective prior to September 30, 2016.
Legal Authority
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) implements and enforces
titles II and III of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and
Control Act of 1970, as amended. 21 U.S.C. 801-971. Titles II and III
are referred to as the ``Controlled Substances Act'' and the
``Controlled Substances Import and Export Act,'' respectively, and are
collectively referred to as the ``Controlled Substances Act'' or the
``CSA'' for the purpose of this action. The DEA publishes the
implementing regulations for these statutes in title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), chapter II. The CSA and its implementing
regulations are designed to prevent, detect, and eliminate the
diversion of controlled substances and listed chemicals into the
illicit market while providing for the legitimate medical, scientific,
research, and industrial needs of the United States. Controlled
substances have the potential for abuse and dependence and are
controlled to protect the public health and safety.
Under the CSA, each controlled substance is classified into one of
five schedules based upon its potential for abuse, its currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and the degree
of dependence the drug or other substance may cause. 21 U.S.C. 812. The
initial schedules of controlled substances established by Congress are
found at 21 U.S.C. 812(c), and the current list of all scheduled
substances is published at 21 CFR part 1308.
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811, provides the Attorney
General with the authority to temporarily place a substance into
schedule I of the CSA for two years without regard to the requirements
of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if she finds that such action is necessary to avoid
an imminent hazard to the public safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In
addition, if proceedings to control a substance are initiated under 21
U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the Attorney General may extend the temporary
scheduling for up to one year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are made, a substance may be
temporarily scheduled if it is not listed in any other schedule under
section 202 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no exemption or
approval in effect for the substance under section 505 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1). The Attorney General has delegated scheduling authority
under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the Administrator of the DEA. 28 CFR 0.100.
Background
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), requires the
Administrator to notify the Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) of his intention to temporarily place a substance
into schedule I of the CSA.\1\ The Administrator transmitted notice of
his intent to place mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine in schedule I
on a temporary basis to the Assistant Secretary by letter dated May 6,
2016. The Assistant Secretary responded to this notice by letter dated
May 18, 2016, and advised that based on review by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), there are currently no investigational new drug
applications or approved new drug applications for mitragynine and 7-
hydroxymitragynine. The Assistant Secretary also stated that the HHS
has no objection to the temporary placement of mitragynine and 7-
hydroxymitragynine into schedule I of the CSA. Neither mitragynine nor
7-hydroxymitragynine is currently listed in any schedule under the CSA,
and no approved new drug applications or investigational new drug
applications for mitragynine or 7-hydroxymitragynine exist, 21 U.S.C.
355. The DEA has found that the control of mitragynine and 7-
hydroxymitragynine in schedule I on a temporary basis is necessary to
avoid an imminent hazard to public safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As discussed in a memorandum of understanding entered into
by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institute
on Drug Abuse (NIDA), the FDA acts as the lead agency within the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in carrying out the
Secretary's scheduling responsibilities under the CSA, with the
concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518, Mar. 8, 1985. The Secretary of the
HHS has delegated to the Assistant Secretary for Health of the HHS
the authority to make domestic drug scheduling recommendations. 58
FR 35460, July 1, 1993.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find that placing a substance temporarily into schedule I of the
CSA is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety, the
Administrator is required to consider three of the eight factors set
forth in section 201(c) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
[[Page 59930]]
811(c): the substance's history and current pattern of abuse; the
scope, duration and significance of abuse; and what, if any, risk there
is to the public health. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3). Consideration of these
factors includes actual abuse, diversion from legitimate channels, and
clandestine importation, manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling may only be placed in schedule I. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Substances in schedule I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United
States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1).
Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, the Main Active Constituents of
the Plant Kratom
Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine are the main active
constituents of the plant Mitragyna speciosa Korth (commonly known as
kratom), an indigenous plant of Southeast Asia. Kratom is the only
known species of Mitragyna to contain mitragynine and 7-
hydroxymitragynine. Kratom is abused for its ability to produce opioid-
like effects. Kratom is available in several different forms to include
dried/crushed leaves, powder, capsules, tablets, liquids, and gum/
resin. Consequently, kratom, which contains the main active
constituents mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, is an increasingly
popular drug of abuse and readily available on the recreational drug
market in the United States. Attempted importations of kratom are
routinely misdeclared and falsely labeled. This is similar to other
attempts to import controlled substances or substances intended to
mimic controlled substances. The amount of kratom material seized by
law enforcement for the first half of 2016 greatly exceeds any previous
year totals and easily accounts for millions of dosage units intended
for the recreational market.\2\ Available data and information for
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, the main active constituents of
the plant kratom, and the plant kratom, are summarized below. Available
information indicates that these opioid substances, constituents of the
plant kratom, have a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical supervision. The DEA's three-factor
analysis is available in its entirety under of the public docket of
this action as a supporting document at www.regulations.gov under
Docket Number DEA-442.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 2015-CDER-DEA Memorandum of Understanding for sharing
information (Provided under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of Abuse
Kratom, which contains the main active alkaloids mitragynine and 7-
hydroxymitragynine, has a long history of use in Southeast Asia as an
opium substitute. Kratom is also known in Southeast Asia as thang,
thom, krathom, kakuam, ketum, and biak. In recent years, the presence
of the psychoactive plant kratom has increased dramatically on the
recreational market in the United States due to its opioid-like
effects. Numerous vendors selling kratom have appeared in the past few
years, markedly increasing its availability.
Kratom preparations, which contain the main active alkaloids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, are easily obtained from smoke
shops and over the Internet. The Internet is the most utilized source
for the purchase of kratom products, making kratom just ``a click''
away for users. In the United States, law enforcement has seized
kratom/mitragynine products in the following forms: powder/plant,
powder, plant or vegetable material, capsules, tablets, liquids, gum/
resin, and drug patch.
Since abusers obtain kratom, which contains the main active
alkaloids mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragyine, through unknown sources,
the identity, purity, and quantity of these substances are uncertain
and inconsistent, thus posing significant adverse health risks to
users. Several studies have analyzed the concentrations of mitragynine
\3\ and/or 7-hydroxymitragynine \4\ in different kratom products. The
studies showed that there were inconsistencies in the levels of the
opioid mitragynine present in similar kratom products, and some
products contained other psychoactive substances (see 3-factor
analysis). Based on the variability of the mitragynine concentration in
each product, users may experience differing effects when consuming
similar amounts of different products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Mitragynine is the most abundant alkaloid in kratom and
constitutes about 66 percent of the total alkaloid content of the
plant. The alkaloid content of mitragynine was 45 percent of all
alkaloids detected during analyses performed. Such large relative
differences in proportions of plant alkaloids (66%:45%) are common
among plant species and will lead to variations in potency and the
risk of overdose.
\4\ 7-Hydroxymitragynine is a more potent agonist than
mitragynine although it only comprises about 1.6 percent of the
total alkaloid content of the plant. The alkaloid content of 7-
hydroxymitragynine was 4 percent of all alkaloids detected in
analyses performed. Such large relative differences in proportions
of plant alkaloids (4.0%:1.6%) are common among plant species and
will lead to variations in potency and the risk of overdose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evidence suggests that kratom, which contains the main active
alkaloids mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, is abused individually,
and with other psychoactive substances. In a 2016 publication, the
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) characterized kratom exposures
reported to poison centers and uploaded to the National Poison Data
System (NPDS) \5\ from January 2010 through December 2015. During the
stated timeframe, U.S. poison centers received 660 calls related to
kratom exposure. Of the calls reported, 487 (73.8%) reported
intentional exposure to kratom, and 595 (90.2%) reported ingestion of
the drug. In addition to reports of isolated exposures to kratom (428
(64.8%)), reports of kratom being used with other substances (ethanol,
benzodiazepines, narcotics, acetaminophen, and other botanicals) were
also recorded. Additionally, forensic laboratory analyses of drug
evidence have identified kratom/mitragynine, along with synthetic
cannabinoids and synthetic opioids during the analyses of products
seized on the illicit market. The consumption of kratom individually,
or in conjunction with alcohol or other drugs, is of serious concern as
it can lead to severe adverse effects and death.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The National Poison Data System (NPDS) is a national
database of information logged by the country's regional poison
centers serving all 50 United States, Puerto Rico and the District
of Columbia. The NPDS is maintained by the American Association of
Poison Control Centers. NPDS case records are the result of call
reports made by users (i.e., self-reports), friends and family
members, and health care providers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kratom does not have an approved medical use in the United States
and has not been studied as a treatment agent in the United States.
Kratom has a history of being used as an opium substitute in Southeast
Asia. Kratom has also been used to self-treat chronic pain and
withdrawal symptoms from opioid use. Especially concerning, reports
note users have turned to kratom as a replacement for other opioids,
such as heroin.
In the United States, kratom is misused to self-treat chronic pain
and opioid withdrawal symptoms, with users reporting its effects to be
comparable to prescription opioids. Users have also reported dose-
dependent psychoactive effects to include euphoria, simultaneous
stimulation and relaxation, analgesia, vivid dreams, and sedation (at
higher
[[Page 59931]]
doses). As noted in the actions by the United States Food and Drug
Administration,\6\ kratom products have been encountered with false
claims, an extremely concerning issue for public health and safety.
These products are marketed as safe for self-medication, but have not
been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for any medical
uses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 2015-CDER-DEA Memorandum of Understanding for sharing
information (Provided under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information from the published literature, poison control centers
data, and medical examiner data, suggests that kratom, which contains
the main active alkaloids mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, is
abused by a diverse population to include recreational opioid users,
young adults, and adults. The most commonly described route of
administration of kratom, which contains the main active alkaloids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, is oral. The leaves are typically
brewed and ingested as a tea; however, smoking, chewing the raw leaves
(done traditionally), and ingestion of kratom capsules or resin
extracts have also been reported.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and Significance of Abuse
The abuse of kratom, containing the main active alkaloids
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, is increasing in the United
States and remains extremely concerning for law enforcement and public
health. As the abuse of the plant increases, as demonstrated by the
increasing availability per border encounters,\7\ it has been noted
that physicians should be aware of the kratom's adverse health effects,
toxicity, dependence, and withdrawal .is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 2015-CDER-DEA Memorandum of Understanding for sharing
information (Provided under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reports from law enforcement indicate that kratom is being imported
for widespread distribution to the public within the United States.\8\
Between February 2014 and July 2016, over 55,000 kilograms (kg) of
kratom material were encountered by law enforcement at various ports of
entry within the United States.\9\ Additionally, over 57,000 kg of
kratom material offered for import at numerous ports of entry, between
2014 and 2016, are awaiting an FDA admissibility decision.\10\ The
amount of kratom currently seized or awaiting an admissibility decision
by law enforcement, between 2014 and 2016, is enough to produce over 12
million doses of kratom.\11\ Such alarming quantities create an
imminent public health and safety threat.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 2015-CDER-DEA Memorandum of Understanding for sharing
information (Provided under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
Represents Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) seizures from February
2014 through July 2016.
\9\ 2015-CDER-DEA Memorandum of Understanding for sharing
information (Provided under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
Represents Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) seizures from February
2014 through July 2016.
\10\ 2015-CDER-DEA Memorandum of Understanding for sharing
information (Provided under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
\11\ 2015-CDER-DEA Memorandum of Understanding for sharing
information (Provided under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
Assuming a high dose of 9 g of kratom.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to press announcements released in 2014 and 2016, the FDA
requested the seizure, by US Marshals, of more than 25,000 pounds of
raw kratom material, nearly 90,000 bottles of dietary supplements
labeled as containing kratom, and over 100 cases of products labeled as
kratom, respectively.\12\ The FDA stated that kratom products ``pose a
risk to the public health and have the potential for abuse'' and the
seizure of certain kratom products was necessary ``to safeguard the
public from a dangerous product''.\13\ The FDA has also warned the
public not to use any products labeled as containing kratom due to
serious concerns about toxicity and potential health impacts.\14\ To
further protect the public health and safety from the large influx of
kratom materials, the FDA issued and updated two import alerts related
to numerous kratom and kratom-containing products.\15\ These import
alerts allow for detention without physical examination of dietary
supplements and bulk ingredients that are or contain kratom, and
detention without physical examination of unapproved new drugs promoted
in the United States, which includes kratom products that make false
health claims. Since 2014, 121 firms have been added to these import
alerts for importing kratom products.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Relevant press release can be found online at: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm416318.htm; https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm480344.htm;
and https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm515085.htm.
\13\ Relevant press release can be found online at: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm416318.htm.
\14\ Relevant press release can be found online at: https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm515085.htm.
\15\ Relevant Import alerts (#'s 54-15 and 66-41) can be found
online at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_1137.html.and
www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_190.html.
\16\ 2015-CDER-DEA Memorandum of Understanding for sharing
information (Provided under 21 CFR 20.85) dated August 4, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drug reports pertaining to the trafficking, distribution, and abuse
of kratom/mitragynine \17\ were analyzed by Federal, State, and local
forensic laboratories.\18\ According to data from the System to
Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) and STARLiMS (a web-
based, commercial laboratory information management system), from
January 2006 through March 2016, there were 293 records for kratom and/
or mitragynine. From January 2010 through May 2016, the National
Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) registered 720 reports
containing mitragynine (See 3-Factor analysis). NFLIS and STRIDE/
STARLiMS records/reports were reported across 43 States, thus showing
the widespread abuse and trafficking of kratom/mitragynine.\19\ The
presence of these substances during drug evidence analyses demonstrates
the presence of these substances on the recreational drug market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Mitrgynine is used to confirmatively identify plant
material as kratom.
\18\ While law enforcement data is not direct evidence of abuse,
it can lead to an inference that a drug has been diverted and
abused.
\19\ STRIDE, STARLiMS, and NFLIS data reflect data reported by
the forensic laboratory systems. Encounters reported in these
systems, and the overall number of seizures, may be low because
kratom/mitragynine is not federally controlled under the CSA.
Typically, after control, these numbers will increase.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Growing concern over the use of kratom is reflected in the
increased requests for analyses of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine
in human toxicology panels (blood/urine samples) \20\ to private
analytical laboratories.\21\ These analyses have been requested by
addiction treatment facilities/pain management doctors, drug courts,
medical examiner/coroner offices, drug testing facilities, state
laboratory systems, state police department, and private entities.\22\
The number of positive results from these analyses increased as
follows: 31 positive results from August 2012 to July 2013 for
mitragynine and/or 7-hydroxymitragynine; \23\ 274 positive results for
mitragynine between July 2013 and May 2014; \24\ 555 positive
[[Page 59932]]
results for mitragynine between December 2014 and March 2016.\25\ The
increasing trend in the number of positive results from these analyses
demonstrates the growing abuse and popularity of these substances and
the concern related to the abuse of this plant material and its
psychoactive constituents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The quantitative values for mitragynine and 7-
hydroxymitragynine were not available for all positive results
shown.
\21\ Substances are tested as part of a toxicology panel that
includes illicit or commonly abused substances routinely analyzed.
\22\ Email correspondences with analytical laboratories in
Willow Grove, PA, Clearwater, FL, and Santa Rosa, CA.
\23\ Located in Willow Grove, PA, analyzed blood/urine samples
from Canada and thirteen U.S. states. Correspondences on file with
DEA.
\24\ Located in Clearwater, FL, analyzed urine samples from
multiple states across the U.S. Correspondences on file with DEA.
\25\ Located in Santa Rosa, CA, analyzed urine samples from
multiple states across the United States. Correspondences on file
with DEA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evidence from poison control centers in the United States also
shows that there is an increase in the number of individuals abusing
kratom, which contains the main active alkaloids mitragynine and 7-
hydroxymitragynine. As such, there has been a steady increase in the
reporting of kratom exposures by poison control centers. The American
Association of Poison Control Centers identified two exposures to
kratom between 2000 and 2005. Additionally, the Texas Poison Center
Network (TPCN), which is comprised of six poison centers that service
the State of Texas, reported 14 exposures to kratom between January
2009 and September 2013. Between January 2010 and December 2015 U.S.
poison centers received 660 calls related to kratom exposure. During
this time, there was a tenfold increase in the number of calls
received, from 26 in 2010 to 263 in 2015.
Furthermore, the abuse and addictive properties of kratom, which
contains the main active alkaloids mitragynine, and 7-
hydroxymitragynine, have prompted at least 15 countries,\26\ and 6
states and the District of Columbia to ban kratom, mitragynine and/or
7-hydroxymitragynine and two states within the United States,\27\ to
place regulatory controls on these substances. Six other States within
the United States have proposed to ban or place regulatory controls on
these substances.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Z. Aziz, Kratom The Epidemiology, Use and Abuse, Addiction
Potential, and Legal Status, in Kratom and Other Mitragynines The
Chemistry and Pharmacology of Opioids from a Non-Opium Source 309-
319 (Raffa, R.B., ed 2014); European Monitoring Center for Drugs and
Drug Addiction, Drug Profiles: Kratom, www.emcdda.europa.eu/
publications/drug-profiles/kratom (accessed 08/28/2013); Misuse of
Drugs Act 1977 Order 2011 (S.I. No. 551/2011) (Ir.); Misuse of Drugs
(Amendment Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 552/2011) (Ir.).
\27\ Alabama--Ala. Code Sec. 20-2-23; Arkansas--Ark. Admin.
Code 007.07.2; Illinois--IL ST CH 720 Sec. 642/5; Indiana--IC 35-
31.5-2-321; Louisiana--LA R.S. 40:989.3; Tennessee--T.C.A. Sec. 39-
17-452; Vermont--Vt. Admin. Code 12-5-23:4.0; Wisconsin--W.S.A.
961.14 and District of Columbia--22-B DC ADC Sec. 1201.
\28\ New Hampshire--2015 NH S.B. 540 and 2015 NH S.B. 540; New
Jersey--2016 NJ A.B. 3281; New York--2015 NY A.B. 9121, 2015 NY A.B.
9068, 2015 NY A.B. 8670, and 2015 NY S.B. 6345; North Carolina--2015
NC H.B. 747 (NS) and 2015 NC S.B. 830 (NS); Florida--2016 FL S.B.
1182 and 2016 FL H.B. 73; and Kentucky--2016 KY S.B. 136.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internationally, the increased presence and abuse of kratom,
containing the main active alkaloids mitragynine and 7-
hydroxymitragynine, have garnered the attention of the International
Narcotics Control Board (INCB).\29\ In a 2010 report, the INCB noted
the increased interest in the recreational use of kratom. The INCB
recommended that governments experiencing problems with persons
trafficking or using kratom \30\ recreationally should consider
controlling kratom and kratom preparations at the national level, where
necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ The INCB is an independent monitoring body that is
responsible for evaluating the implementation of the United Nations
international drug controls conventions.
\30\ Kratom was listed as a plant material containing
psychoactive substances in the INCB report for which recommendations
were made for specified plant materials.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to the Public Health
The use of kratom and associated products, which contains the main
active alkaloids mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragine, pose an imminent
hazard to public safety. These substances produce opioid-like effects,
making their abuse a serious public health concern. Information from
published literature, public health officials, and poison control
center data demonstrate that the use of kratom, which contains the main
active alkaloids mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, has caused
numerous adverse effects on users.
In a 2016 publication, the CDC characterized kratom exposures
reported to poison centers and uploaded to the NPDS from January 2010
through December 2015.\31\ These exposures resulted in medical outcomes
that varied in severity, ranging from minor (having minimal signs or
symptoms that resolved rapidly with no residual disability), moderate
(having non-life threatening and no residual disability, but requiring
some form of treatment), major (having life-threatening signs or
symptoms with some residual disability), and death. Additionally,
several adverse effects related to kratom exposure were reported, which
include agitation or irritability, tachycardia, nausea, drowsiness, and
hypertension. The severity of the reported outcomes, health effects,
and increased use of kratom suggests an emerging public health threat.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Calls from healthcare providers comprised a large portion
of calls received, representing 75.2% of calls reported.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information from the scientific literature also demonstrates the
health risks associated with kratom use. Reports of hepatotoxicity,
psychosis, seizure, weight loss, insomnia, tachycardia, vomiting, poor
concentration, hallucinations, and death associated with kratom use
have been documented. Additionally, published case reports describe
events where individuals sought medical care for the purported use of
kratom. Some examples of the reported adverse events involving kratom
exposure are described in the 3-factor analysis.
Numerous deaths associated with kratom, which contains the main
active constituents mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, have been
reported indicating that this substance is a serious public health
threat. In 2016, DEA has received correspondences from public/state
officials which indicate that there were a significant number of
overdoses and traffic fatalities directly, or indirectly, involving
kratom.\32\ Deaths related to kratom exposure have been reported in the
scientific literature beginning in 2009-2010, with a cluster of nine
deaths in Sweden from use of the kratom product ``Krypton''. Since
then, five more deaths related to kratom exposure were reported in the
scientific literature, and sixteen other deaths related to kratom
exposure, have been confirmed by autopsy/medical examiner reports
(mitragynine and/or 7-hydroxymitragynine were identified in biological
samples).\33\ Of these deaths, 15 occurred between 2014 and 2016. This
information demonstrates the severe risks associated with kratom misuse
and the increasing occurrence of fatal outcomes related to kratom
exposure. Details of some of these events are summarized in the 3-
factor analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ Correspondences on file with DEA (dated April 19, 2016).
\33\ Autopsy/Medical Examiner (ME) reports on file with DEA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since abusers obtain kratom, which contains the main active
alkaloids mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragyine, through unknown sources,
the identity, purity, and quantity of these substances are uncertain
and inconsistent, thus posing significant adverse health risks to
users. According to the FDA, in a letter dated May 18, 2016, there are
no approved new drug applications, or investigational new drug
applications for mitragynine or 7-hydroxymitragynine. As such, kratom
products have no accepted medical use
[[Page 59933]]
within the United States. Despite FDA warnings, kratom products
continue to be easily available and abused by diverse populations.
Distributors of kratom are knowingly putting the public at risk.
Unknown factors including detailed product analysis and dosage
variations between various packages present a significant danger to an
abusing individual. With no accepted medical use, the abuse of kratom,
which contains mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, poses an imminent
hazard to the public safety.
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3), based on the available data
and information, summarized above, the continued uncontrolled
manufacture, distribution, reverse distribution, importation,
exportation, conduct of research and chemical analysis, possession, and
abuse of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine pose an imminent hazard
to the public safety. The DEA is not aware of any currently accepted
medical uses for these substances in the United States. A substance
meeting the statutory requirements for temporary scheduling, 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1), may only be placed in schedule I. Substances in schedule I
are those that have a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical supervision. Available data and
information for mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine indicate that
these substances have a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical supervision. As required by section
201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Administrator, through a
letter dated May 6, 2016, notified the Assistant Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human Services of the DEA's intention to
temporarily place these substances in schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent initiates an expedited temporary scheduling
action and provides the 30-day notice pursuant to section 201(h) of the
CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h). In accordance with the provisions of section
201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h), the Administrator considered
available data and information, herein set forth the grounds for his
determination that it is necessary to temporarily schedule mitragynine
and 7-hydroxymitragynine in schedule I of the CSA, and finds that
placement of these opioid substances into schedule I of the CSA is
necessary in order to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
Because the Administrator hereby finds that it is necessary to
temporarily place these opioids into schedule I to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety, any subsequent final order temporarily
scheduling these substances will be effective on the date of
publication in the Federal Register, and will be in effect for a period
of two years, with a possible extension of one additional year, pending
completion of the regular scheduling process. 21 U.S.C. 811(h) (1) and
(2). It is the intention of the Administrator to issue such a final
order as soon as possible after the expiration of 30 days from the date
of publication of this notice. Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine
will then be subject to the regulatory controls and administrative,
civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to the manufacture,
distribution, reverse distribution, importation, exportation, research,
conduct of instructional activities and chemical analysis, and
possession of a schedule I controlled substance.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for scheduling a drug or other
substance. Regular scheduling actions in accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(a) are subject to formal rulemaking procedures done ``on the record
after opportunity for a hearing'' conducted pursuant to the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. 21 U.S.C. 811. The regular scheduling process
of formal rulemaking affords interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any additional relevant information
needed to make a determination. Final decisions that conclude the
regular scheduling process of formal rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877. Temporary scheduling orders are not subject to
judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
Regulatory Matters
Section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h), provides for an
expedited temporary scheduling action where such action is necessary to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. As provided in this
subsection, the Attorney General may, by order, schedule a substance in
schedule I on a temporary basis. Such an order may not be issued before
the expiration of 30 days from (1) the publication of a notice in the
Federal Register of the intention to issue such order and the grounds
upon which such order is to be issued, and (2) the date that notice of
the proposed temporary scheduling order is transmitted to the Assistant
Secretary of HHS. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the CSA directs that temporary
scheduling actions be issued by order and sets forth the procedures by
which such orders are to be issued, the DEA believes that the notice
and comment requirements of section 553 of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, do not apply to this notice of intent. In the
alternative, even assuming that this notice of intent might be subject
to section 553 of the APA, the Administrator finds that there is good
cause to forgo the notice and comment requirements of section 553, as
any further delays in the process for issuance of temporary scheduling
orders would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest in
view of the manifest urgency to avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety.
Although the DEA believes this notice of intent to issue a
temporary scheduling order is not subject to the notice and comment
requirements of section 553 of the APA, the DEA notes that in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Administrator will take into
consideration any comments submitted by the Assistant Secretary with
regard to the proposed temporary scheduling order.
Further, the DEA believes that this temporary scheduling action is
not a ``rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2), and, accordingly, is not
subject to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
The requirements for the preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are not applicable where, as
here, the DEA is not required by section 553 of the APA or any other
law to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
section 3(f), and, accordingly, this action has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132 (Federalism) it is determined that this action does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
[[Page 59934]]
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out above, the DEA proposes to amend 21 CFR
part 1308 as follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. In Sec. 1308.11, add paragraphs (h)(28) and (29) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1308.11 Schedule I
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(28) Mitragynine (to include synthetic equivalents as well as
mitragynine naturally contained in the plant of the genus and species
name: Mitragyna speciosa Korth, also known as kratom) its isomers,
esters, ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters and ethers . . .
(9823)
(29) 7-Hydroxymitragynine (to include synthetic equivalents as well
as 7-hydroxymitragynine naturally contained in the plant of the genus
and species name: Mitragyna speciosa Korth, also known as kratom) its
isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters and ethers
. . . (9838)
Dated: August 25, 2016.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-20803 Filed 8-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P