Safety Zone; Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa, 59163-59165 [2016-20591]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0749]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Pago Pago Harbor,
American Samoa
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone during the 2016
Fautasi Ocean Challenge canoe race in
Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa, on
November 11 and 25, 2016. This action
is necessary to safeguard the
participants and spectators, including
all crews, vessels, and persons on the
water in Pago Pago Harbor during the
event. This regulation will functionally
close the port to vessel traffic during the
race, but will not require the evacuation
of any vessels from the harbor. Entry
into, transiting, or anchoring in the
harbor would be prohibited to all
vessels not registered with the sponsor
as participants or not part of the race
patrol, unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port (COTP) Honolulu
or a designated representative. Vessels
who are already moored or anchored in
the harbor seeking permission to remain
there shall request permission from
COTP unless deemed a spectator vessel
that is moored to a waterfront facility
within the safety zone. We invite your
comments on this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM).
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0749 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Commander Nicolas Jarboe, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Honolulu; telephone (808) 541–
4359, email nicolas.a.jarboe@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP
Captain of the Port, Honolulu
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
On June 1, 2016, the Coast Guard
received formal notification from the
American Samoa Government that the
2016 Fautasi Ocean Challenge is
scheduled to occur in Pago Pago Harbor
on November 11 and 25, 2016. This
annual event has strengthened local
tradition for over a century. The event
will consist of a series of races entirely
within Pago Pago Harbor between
longboats with paddling crews of 32–48
persons each. It is anticipated that a
large number of spectator pleasure craft
will be drawn to the event. Spectator
vessels and commercial vessel traffic
will pose a significant safety hazard to
the longboats, longboat crew members,
and other persons and vessels involved
with the event.
The purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to minimize vessel traffic
in Pago Pago Harbor before, during, and
after the scheduled event to safeguard
persons and vessels during the longboat
races. The Captain of the Port, Honolulu
(COTP), proposes to establish a
temporary safety zone for Pago Pago
Harbor. A safety zone is a water area,
shore area, or water and shore area, for
safety or environmental purposes, of
which access is limited to authorized
persons, vehicles, or vessels. The
statutory basis for this rulemaking is 33
U.S.C. 1231, which gives the Coast
Guard, under a delegation from the
Secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security, regulatory authority
to enforce the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
This rule will create a temporary
safety zone in Pago Pago Harbor. The
safety zone will close the harbor to all
vessels not authorized by the COTP for
entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the port for the duration of the
event. The COTP will authorize
registered participants, support vessels,
and enforcement vessels to enter and
remain in the zone. No other vessels
would be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated
representative. The harbor will remain
closed until the Coast Guard issues an
‘‘All Clear’’ after races have concluded
and the harbor is deemed safe for
normal operations. This rule will not
require any vessel already moored to
evacuate the port, provided that they are
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59163
moored in such a way that they do not
interfere with the progress of the event.
The proposed regulatory text appears at
the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
This determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of
the safety zone. Accordingly, this NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Under this NPRM, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners with information pertaining to
the safety zone via VHF–FM marine
channel 16.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Some owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit the safety zone may
be small entities and may not be
authorized to do so. However, given the
short duration of this proposed
temporary rule, this would not create a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of these entities.
Moreover, the rule would allow all
vessels to seek permission from the
Coast Guard to enter the safety zone.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
59164
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule
would have substantial direct effects on
federalism or tribal governments, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a temporary and limited safety
zone in Pago Pago Harbor. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document
for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS.
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T14–0749 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T14–0749 Safety Zone; Pago Pago
Harbor, America Samoa.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: Breakers Point (eastern edge
of Pago Pago Harbor entrance) thence
southeast to 14°18′47″ S., 170°38′54.5″
W., thence southwest to 14°19′03″ S.,
170°39′14″ W., thence northwest to
Tulutulu Point and then following the
coastline encompassing Pago Pago
Harbor. This regulated area extends
from the surface of the water to the
ocean floor.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
on November 11, 2016 and from 10:00
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on November 25, 2016.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels not
registered with the sponsor as
participants or support/enforcement
vessels are considered spectators. The
‘‘support/enforcement vessels’’ consist
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
of any territory, or local law
enforcement and sponsor provided
vessels assigned or approved by the
Captain of the Port Honolulu to patrol
the safety zone.
(2) No spectator shall anchor, block,
loiter or impede the transit of
participants or support/enforcement
vessels in the safety zone during the
enforcement dates and times, unless
cleared for entry by or through a
support/enforcement vessel.
(3) Spectator vessels may be moored
to a waterfront facility within the safety
zone in such a way that they shall not
interfere with the progress of the event.
Such mooring must be complete at least
30 minutes prior to the establishment of
the safety zone and remain moored
through the duration of the event.
(d) Informational Broadcasts. The
safety zones shall be effective between
10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (SST) on
November 11 and 25, 2016. If
circumstances render enforcement of
the safety zone unnecessary for the
entirety of these periods, the Captain of
the Port or his designated representative
will inform the public through
broadcast notices to mariners that the
safety zone is no longer being enforced.
The harbor will remain closed until the
Coast Guard issues an ‘‘All Clear’’ for
the harbor after the race has concluded
and the harbor is deemed safe for
normal operations.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule may be subject to the
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
Dated: August 23, 2016.
M.C. Long,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2016–20591 Filed 8–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire;
Approval of Single Source Orders
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of New
Hampshire. The revisions consist of
single source orders that establish
reasonably available control technology
SUMMARY:
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Written comments must be
received on or before September 28,
2016.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
OAR–2013–0260 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Anne Arnold at: arnold.anne@epa.gov.
For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
For either manner of submission, the
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
McConnell, Environmental Engineer,
Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs
Branch (Mail Code OEP05–02), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite
100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109–
3912; (617) 918–1046;
mcconnell.robert@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
In the
Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, EPA is approving the
State’s SIP submittals as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views these as noncontroversial
submittals and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action rule,
no further activity is contemplated. If
EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[EPA–R01–OAR–2013–0260; A–1–FRL–
9951–45–Region 1]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
for sources of volatile organic
compounds.
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59165
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule which is located in the
Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register.
Dated: August 15, 2016.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2016–20539 Filed 8–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0032; FRL–9950–22]
Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions
Filed for Residues of Pesticide
Chemicals in or on Various
Commodities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
This document announces the
Agency’s receipt of several initial filings
of pesticide petitions requesting the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by the docket identification
(ID) number and the pesticide petition
number (PP) of interest as shown in the
body of this document, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 167 (Monday, August 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59163-59165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20591]
[[Page 59163]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0749]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone during the
2016 Fautasi Ocean Challenge canoe race in Pago Pago Harbor, American
Samoa, on November 11 and 25, 2016. This action is necessary to
safeguard the participants and spectators, including all crews,
vessels, and persons on the water in Pago Pago Harbor during the event.
This regulation will functionally close the port to vessel traffic
during the race, but will not require the evacuation of any vessels
from the harbor. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring in the harbor
would be prohibited to all vessels not registered with the sponsor as
participants or not part of the race patrol, unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Honolulu or a designated
representative. Vessels who are already moored or anchored in the
harbor seeking permission to remain there shall request permission from
COTP unless deemed a spectator vessel that is moored to a waterfront
facility within the safety zone. We invite your comments on this notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0749 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Commander Nicolas Jarboe,
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu;
telephone (808) 541-4359, email nicolas.a.jarboe@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port, Honolulu
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On June 1, 2016, the Coast Guard received formal notification from
the American Samoa Government that the 2016 Fautasi Ocean Challenge is
scheduled to occur in Pago Pago Harbor on November 11 and 25, 2016.
This annual event has strengthened local tradition for over a century.
The event will consist of a series of races entirely within Pago Pago
Harbor between longboats with paddling crews of 32-48 persons each. It
is anticipated that a large number of spectator pleasure craft will be
drawn to the event. Spectator vessels and commercial vessel traffic
will pose a significant safety hazard to the longboats, longboat crew
members, and other persons and vessels involved with the event.
The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to minimize vessel
traffic in Pago Pago Harbor before, during, and after the scheduled
event to safeguard persons and vessels during the longboat races. The
Captain of the Port, Honolulu (COTP), proposes to establish a temporary
safety zone for Pago Pago Harbor. A safety zone is a water area, shore
area, or water and shore area, for safety or environmental purposes, of
which access is limited to authorized persons, vehicles, or vessels.
The statutory basis for this rulemaking is 33 U.S.C. 1231, which gives
the Coast Guard, under a delegation from the Secretary of the
Department of Homeland Security, regulatory authority to enforce the
Ports and Waterways Safety Act.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
This rule will create a temporary safety zone in Pago Pago Harbor.
The safety zone will close the harbor to all vessels not authorized by
the COTP for entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the port for
the duration of the event. The COTP will authorize registered
participants, support vessels, and enforcement vessels to enter and
remain in the zone. No other vessels would be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. The harbor will remain closed until the Coast Guard
issues an ``All Clear'' after races have concluded and the harbor is
deemed safe for normal operations. This rule will not require any
vessel already moored to evacuate the port, provided that they are
moored in such a way that they do not interfere with the progress of
the event. The proposed regulatory text appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. This
determination is based on the size, location, duration, and time-of-day
of the safety zone. Accordingly, this NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Under this NPRM, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners with information pertaining to the safety zone via VHF-FM
marine channel 16.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities and may not be authorized to do so. However,
given the short duration of this proposed temporary rule, this would
not create a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
these entities. Moreover, the rule would allow all vessels to seek
permission from the Coast Guard to enter the safety zone.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
[[Page 59164]]
and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically
affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule would have substantial direct
effects on federalism or tribal governments, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a
temporary and limited safety zone in Pago Pago Harbor. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.1D. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS.
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T14-0749 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T14-0749 Safety Zone; Pago Pago Harbor, America Samoa.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: Breakers Point
(eastern edge of Pago Pago Harbor entrance) thence southeast to
14[deg]18'47'' S., 170[deg]38'54.5'' W., thence southwest to
14[deg]19'03'' S., 170[deg]39'14'' W., thence northwest to Tulutulu
Point and then following the coastline encompassing Pago Pago Harbor.
This regulated area extends from the surface of the water to the ocean
floor.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 10:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m. on November 11, 2016 and from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on
November 25, 2016.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels not registered with the sponsor as
participants or support/enforcement vessels are considered spectators.
The ``support/enforcement vessels'' consist
[[Page 59165]]
of any territory, or local law enforcement and sponsor provided vessels
assigned or approved by the Captain of the Port Honolulu to patrol the
safety zone.
(2) No spectator shall anchor, block, loiter or impede the transit
of participants or support/enforcement vessels in the safety zone
during the enforcement dates and times, unless cleared for entry by or
through a support/enforcement vessel.
(3) Spectator vessels may be moored to a waterfront facility within
the safety zone in such a way that they shall not interfere with the
progress of the event. Such mooring must be complete at least 30
minutes prior to the establishment of the safety zone and remain moored
through the duration of the event.
(d) Informational Broadcasts. The safety zones shall be effective
between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (SST) on November 11 and 25, 2016. If
circumstances render enforcement of the safety zone unnecessary for the
entirety of these periods, the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to
mariners that the safety zone is no longer being enforced. The harbor
will remain closed until the Coast Guard issues an ``All Clear'' for
the harbor after the race has concluded and the harbor is deemed safe
for normal operations.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule may be
subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
Dated: August 23, 2016.
M.C. Long,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2016-20591 Filed 8-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P