Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2017 Atlantic Shark Commercial Fishing Season, 59167-59177 [2016-20505]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
12014, 2 T.W., Alexander Drive,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
requests to establish a tolerance in 40
CFR part 180.626 for residues of the
fungicide, prothioconazole in or on
cotton, gin by-products at 4.0 parts per
million (ppm). The liquid
chromatography/mass spectrometry
(LC/MS/MS) is used to measure and
evaluate the chemical prothioconazole.
Contact: RD.
5. PP 6F8461. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–
0255). Bayer CropScience, P.O. Box
12014, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709, requests to establish a tolerance
in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the
insecticide spirotetramat in or on sugar
beet, root at 0.15 ppm; and sugar beet,
molasses at 0.20 ppm. The high pressure
liquid chromatography/triple stage
quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC/MS/
MS) analytical method is used to
measure and evaluate the chemical
spirotetramat. Contact: RD.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Amended Tolerances
1. PP 5F8400. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–
0695). Isagro S.P.A. (d/b/a Isagro USA,
Inc.), 430 Davis Drive, Suite 240,
Morrisville, NC 27560, requests to
amend the tolerances in 40 CFR 180.557
for residues of the fungicide
tetraconazole in or on beet sugar, dried
pulp at 0.20 parts per million (ppm),
beet sugar, molasses at 0.25 ppm, and
beet sugar, root at 0.15 ppm. The
capillary gas chromatography with
electron capture detector (GC/ECD)) as
well as a QuEChERS multi-residue
method (LC/MS–MS detection) is used
to measure and evaluate the chemical
tetraconazole. Contact: RD.
2. PP 6F8465. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–
0307). Nichino America, Inc., 4550 New
Linden Hill Road, Suite 501,
Wilmington, DE 19808, requests to
amend the tolerances in 40 CFR 180.566
for residues of the insecticide
fenpyroximate in or on fruit, citrus,
Group 10–10 at 1.0 parts per million
(ppm), citrus dried pulp at 4.0 ppm, and
citrus oil at 14 ppm. The high
performance liquid chromatography
using tandem mass spectrometric
detection (LC/MS/MS) is used to
measure and evaluate the chemical
fenpyroximate and the M–1 Metabolite.
Contact: RD.
New Tolerance Exemptions
1. PP 6F8444. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–
0348). Marrone Bio Innovations, 1540
Drew Ave., Davis, CA 95618, requests to
establish an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
part 180 for residues of the bactericide
and fungicide Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens strain F727 in or on
all food commodities. The petitioner
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
believes no analytical method is needed
because when used as proposed,
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain F727
would not result in residues that are of
toxicological concern. Contact: BPPD.
2. PP 6F8459. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–
0259). Spring Trading Co., 203 Dogwood
Trl., Magnolia, TX 77354 (on behalf of
CH Biotech R&D Co. Ltd., No. 121 Xian
An Rd., Xianxi Township, Changhua
County 50741 Taiwan R.O.C.), requests
to establish an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
part 180 for residues of the plant
regulator 1-Triacontanol in or on raw
agricultural commodity growing crops
on in products to treat animals. The
petitioner believes no analytical method
is needed because the 10X standard
safety factor is unnecessary for 1Triacontanol since it is a compound
found in plant cuticle waxes and
beeswax. Contact: BPPD.
3. PP IN–10851. (EPA–HQ–OPP–
2016–0378). Technology Sciences
Group, 1150 18th Street, Suite 1000,
Washington, DC 20036, on behalf of
Jeneil Biosurfactant Company, 400 N.
Dekora Woods Blvd., Saukville, WI
53080, requests to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of isoamyl acetate
(CAS Reg. No. 123–92–2) when used as
an inert ingredient (solvent) in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops
and raw agricultural commodities after
harvest under 40 CFR 180.910. The
petitioner believes no analytical method
is needed because the request is for an
exemption from the requirements of a
pesticide tolerance. Contact: RD.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a.
Dated: August 16, 2016.
Michael Goodis,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016–20653 Filed 8–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 160620545–6545–01]
RIN 0648–XE696
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
2017 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Season
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59167
Proposed rule; request for
comments.
ACTION:
This proposed rule would
establish quotas, opening dates, and
retention limits for the 2017 fishing
season for the Atlantic commercial
shark fisheries. Quotas would be
adjusted as required or allowable based
on any over- and/or underharvests
experienced during 2016 and previous
fishing seasons. In addition, NMFS
proposes season opening dates and
commercial retention limits based on
adaptive management measures to
provide, to the extent practicable,
fishing opportunities for commercial
shark fishermen in all regions and areas.
The proposed measures could affect
fishing opportunities for commercial
shark fishermen in the northwestern
Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf of
Mexico and Caribbean Sea.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by September 28, 2016. An
operator-assisted, public conference call
and webinar will be held on September
22, 2016, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., EST.
ADDRESSES: The conference call
information is phone number (888) 635–
5002; participant passcode 5315520.
NMFS will show a brief presentation via
webinar followed by public comment.
To join the webinar, go to: https://noaa
events2.webex.com/noaaevents2/
onstage/g.php?MTID=ea9172a6c190
7b6efc462ce9117952e21, event
password: NOAA. Participants are
strongly encouraged to log/dial in 15
minutes prior to the meeting.
Participants that have not used WebEx
before will be prompted to download
and run a plug-in program that will
enable them to view the webinar.
You may submit comments on this
document, identified by NOAA–NMFS–
2016–0096, by any of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
NOAA-NMFS-2016-0096, click the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Margo Schulze-Haugen, NMFS/SF1,
1315 East-West Highway, National
Marine Fisheries Service, SSMC3, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
59168
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Presentation materials and copies of
the supporting documents are available
from the HMS Management Division
Web site at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
´
sfa/hms/ or by contacting Guy DuBeck
by phone at 301–427–8503.
´
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Guy
DuBeck or Karyl Brewster-Geisz at 301–
427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic commercial shark
fisheries are managed under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006
Consolidated Highly Migratory Species
(HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
and its amendments are implemented
by regulations at 50 CFR part 635. For
the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries,
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments established, among
other things, commercial shark retention
limits, commercial quotas for species
and management groups, accounting
measures for under- and overharvests
for the shark fisheries, and adaptive
management measures such as flexible
opening dates for the fishing season and
inseason adjustments to shark trip
limits, which provide management
flexibility in furtherance of equitable
fishing opportunities, to the extent
practicable, for commercial shark
fishermen in all regions and areas.
2017 Proposed Quotas
This proposed rule would adjust the
quota levels for the different shark
stocks and management groups for the
2017 Atlantic commercial shark fishing
season based on over- and
underharvests that occurred during
2016 and previous fishing seasons,
consistent with existing regulations at
50 CFR 635.27(b). Over- and
underharvests are accounted for in the
same region, sub-region, and/or fishery
in which they occurred the following
year, except that large overharvests may
be spread over a number of subsequent
fishing years up to a maximum of 5
years. Shark stocks or management
groups that contain one or more stocks
that are overfished, have overfishing
occurring, or have an unknown status,
will not have underharvest carried over
in the following year. Stocks that are not
overfished and have no overfishing
occurring may have any underharvest
carried over in the following year, up to
50 percent of the base quota.
The quotas in this proposed rule are
based on dealer reports received as of
July 15, 2016. In the final rule, NMFS
will adjust the quotas as needed based
on dealer reports received as of a date
in mid-October 2016. Thus, all of the
2017 proposed quotas for the respective
stocks and management groups will be
subject to further adjustment after
NMFS considers the mid-October dealer
reports. All dealer reports that are
received after the October date will be
used to adjust the 2018 quotas, as
appropriate.
For the sandbar shark, aggregated
LCS, hammerhead shark, non-blacknose
SCS, blacknose shark, blue shark,
porbeagle shark, and pelagic shark
(other than porbeagle or blue sharks)
management groups, the 2016
underharvests cannot be carried over to
the 2017 fishing season because those
stocks or management groups have been
determined to be overfished, overfished
with overfishing occurring, or have an
unknown status. Thus, for all of these
management groups, the 2017 proposed
quotas would be equal to the applicable
base quota minus any overharvests that
occurred in 2016 and/or previous
fishing seasons, as applicable.
Because the Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark management group and
smoothhound shark management groups
in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
regions have been determined not to be
overfished and to have no overfishing
occurring, available underharvest (up to
50 percent of the base quota) from the
2016 fishing season for these
management groups may be applied to
the respective 2017 quotas, and NMFS
proposes to do so.
The proposed 2017 quotas by species
and management group are summarized
in Table 1; the description of the
calculations for each stock and
management group can be found below.
TABLE 1—2017 PROPOSED QUOTAS AND OPENING DATES FOR THE ATLANTIC SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUPS
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. Table includes landings data as of July 15,
2016; final quotas are subject to change based on landings as of October 2016. 1 mt = 2,204.6 lb.]
Management
group
2016 annual
quota
Preliminary 2016
landings 1
Adjustments 2
2017 base
annual quota
2017 proposed
annual quota
(A)
Region or sub-region
(B)
(C)
(D)
(D + C)
10.9 mt dw
(23,961 lb
dw) 3.
............................
25.1 mt dw
(55,439 lb dw).
36.0 mt dw
(79,400 lb dw).
85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb
dw).
13.4 mt dw
(29,421 lb dw).
231.5 mt dw
(510,261 lb
dw).
72.0 mt dw
(158,724 lb
dw).
11.9 mt dw
(23,301 lb dw).
112.6 mt dw
(248,215 lb
dw).
336.4 mt dw
(741,627).
85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb
dw).
13.4 mt dw
(29,421 lb dw).
331.8 mt dw
(730,803 lb
dw).
72.0 mt dw
(158,724 lb
dw).
11.9 mt dw
(23,301 lb dw).
112.6 mt dw
(248,215 lb
dw).
504.6 mt dw
(1,112,441 lb
dw).
Blacktip Sharks ..
28.9 mt dw
(63,189 lb dw).
18.0 mt dw
(39,584 lb dw).
Aggregated
Large Coastal
Sharks.
Hammerhead
Sharks.
Blacktip Sharks ..
85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb
dw).
13.4 mt dw
(29,421 lb dw).
266.5 mt dw
(587,396 lb
dw).
72.0 mt dw
(158,724 lb
dw).
11.9 mt dw
(26,301 lb dw).
107.3 mt dw
(236,603 lb
dw).
336.4 mt dw
(741,627).
42.9 mt dw
(93,593 lb dw).
Western Gulf of Mexico ...
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Eastern Gulf of Mexico ....
Gulf of Mexico ..................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Aggregated
Large Coastal
Sharks.
Hammerhead
Sharks.
Non-Blacknose
Small Coastal
Sharks.
Smoothhound
Sharks.
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
6.7 mt dw
............................
(14,865 lb dw).
166.2 mt dw
100.3 mt dw
(366497 lb dw).
(220,542 lb
dw) 3.
66.1 mt dw
............................
(145,624 lb
dw).
16.8 mt dw
............................
(37,063 lb dw).
41.0 mt dw
............................
(90,320 lb dw).
0 mt dw (0 lb dw)
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
168.2 mt dw
(370,814 lb
dw).
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Season opening
dates
January 1, 2017.
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
59169
TABLE 1—2017 PROPOSED QUOTAS AND OPENING DATES FOR THE ATLANTIC SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUPS—
Continued
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. Table includes landings data as of July 15,
2016; final quotas are subject to change based on landings as of October 2016. 1 mt = 2,204.6 lb.]
Atlantic .............................
No regional quotas ..........
Management
group
Aggregated
Large Coastal
Sharks.
Hammerhead
Sharks.
Non-Blacknose
Small Coastal
Sharks.
Blacknose
Sharks (South
of 34° N. lat.
only).
Smoothhound
Sharks.
Non-Sandbar
LCS Research.
Sandbar Shark
Research.
Blue Sharks .......
Porbeagle
Sharks.
Pelagic Sharks
Other Than
Porbeagle or
Blue.
2016 annual
quota
Preliminary 2016
landings 1
Adjustments 2
2017 base
annual quota
2017 proposed
annual quota
(A)
Region or sub-region
(B)
(C)
(D)
(D + C)
168.9 mt dw
(372,552 lb
dw).
27.1 mt dw
(59,736 lb dw).
264.1 mt dw
(582,333 lb
dw).
15.7 mt dw
(34,653 lb dw).
42.0 mt dw
(92,692 lb dw).
............................
9.6 mt dw
(21,122 lb dw).
40.4 mt dw
(89,048 lb dw).
............................
12.2 mt dw
(26,916 lb dw).
............................
168.9 mt dw
(372,552 lb
dw).
27.1 mt dw
(59,736 lb dw).
264.1 mt dw
(582,333 lb
dw).
17.2 mt dw
(37,921 lb dw).
168.9 mt dw
(372,552 lb
dw).
27.1 mt dw
(59,736 lb dw).
264.1 mt dw
(582,333 lb
dw).
17.2 mt dw
(37,921 lb
dw) 4.
1,201.7 mt dw
(2,647,725 lb
dw).
50.0 mt dw
(110,230 lb
dw).
90.7 mt dw
(199,943 lb
dw).
273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb
dw).
0 mt dw (0 lb dw)
183.2 mt dw
(403,795 lb
dw).
7.2 mt dw
(15,829 lb dw).
600.9 mt dw
(1,323,862 lb
dw).
............................
34.9 mt dw
(77,050 lb dw).
............................
0 mt dw (0 lb dw)
............................
0 mt dw (0 lb dw)
............................
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb
dw).
54.1 mt dw
(119,336 lb
dw).
............................
1,201.7 mt dw
(2,647,725 lb
dw).
50.0 mt dw
(110,230 lb
dw).
90.7 mt dw
(199,943 lb
dw).
273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb
dw).
1.7 mt dw (3,748
lb dw).
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb
dw).
1,802.6 mt dw
(3,971,587 lb
dw).
50.0 mt dw
(110,230 lb
dw).
90.7 mt dw
(199,943 lb
dw).
273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb
dw).
1.7 mt dw (3,748
lb dw).
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb
dw).
............................
Season opening
dates
January 1, 2017.
January 1, 2017.
1 Landings
are from January 1, 2016, through July 15, 2016, and are subject to change.
adjustments can only be applied to stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring. Also, the underharvest
adjustments cannot exceed 50 percent of the base quota.
3 This adjustment accounts for underharvest in 2016. This proposed rule would increase the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 111.2 mt dw (244,504 lb
dw). Since any underharvest would be divided based on the sub-regional quota percentage split, the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota would be increased
by 10.9 mt dw, or 9.8 percent of the underharvest, while the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota would be increased by 100.3 mt dw, or 90.2 percent of the
underharvest.
4 Based on overharvest in 2012 and 2015, NMFS had previously reduced the Atlantic blacknose shark base annual quota by 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb dw) each year
through 2018. However, in 2016, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,737 lb dw). NMFS is proposing to use the 2016 underharvest to cover the remaining overharvest amount of 3.0 mt dw (6,536 lb dw) and not to adjust the 2017 Atlantic blacknose shark base annual quota.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2 Underharvest
1. Proposed 2017 Quotas for the
Blacktip Sharks in the Gulf of Mexico
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for blacktip sharks in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region is 36.0 mt dw (79,400
lb dw) and the western Gulf of Mexico
sub-region is 331.8 mt dw (730,803 lb
dw). As of July 15, 2016, preliminary
reported landings for blacktip sharks in
the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region
were at 62 percent (18.0 mt dw) of their
2016 quota levels (28.9 mt dw), while
the blacktip sharks in the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region were also at 62
percent (166.2 mt dw) of their 2016
quota levels (266.5 mt dw). Reported
landings have not exceeded the 2016
quota to date, and the western Gulf of
Mexico sub-region fishery was closed on
March 12, 2016 (81 FR 12602). Gulf of
Mexico blacktip sharks have not been
declared to be overfished, to have
overfishing occurring, or to have an
unknown status. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
blacktip sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico region therefore could be
applied to the 2017 quotas up to 50
percent of the base quota. Any
underharvest would be split based on
the sub-regional quota percentages of
9.8 percent for eastern Gulf of Mexico
blacktip sharks and 90.2 percent for
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip sharks
(§ 635.27(b)(1)(ii)). To date, the overall
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group was underharvested
by 111.2 mt dw (244,504 lb dw).
Accordingly, NMFS proposes to
increase the 2017 eastern Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark quota by 10.9 mt dw
(111.2 mt dw underharvest in 2016 * 9.8
percent = 10.9 mt dw eastern sub-region
underharvest) and increase the 2017
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
quota by 100.3 mt dw (111.2 mt dw
underharvest in 2016 * 90.2 percent =
100.3 mt dw western sub-region
underharvest). Thus, the proposed
eastern sub-regional Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark commercial quota is 36.0
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
mt dw and the proposed western subregional Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
commercial quota is 331.8 mt dw.
2. Proposed 2017 Quotas for the
Aggregated LCS in the Gulf of Mexico
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for aggregated LCS in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region is 85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb dw) and the western Gulf of
Mexico sub-region is 72.0 mt dw
(158,724 lb dw). As of July 15, 2016,
preliminary reported landings for
aggregated LCS in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region were at 50 percent
(42.5 mt dw) of their 2016 quota levels
(85.5 mt dw), while the aggregated LCS
in the western Gulf of Mexico subregion were at 92 percent (66.1 mt dw)
of their 2016 quota levels (72.0 mt dw).
Reported landings have not exceeded
the 2016 quota to date, and the western
aggregated LCS sub-region fishery was
closed on March 12, 2016 (81 FR
12602). Given the unknown status of
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
59170
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
some of the shark species within the
Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS
management group, underharvests
cannot be carried over pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2017 quotas for aggregated LCS in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico and western Gulf
of Mexico sub-regions be equal to their
annual base quotas without adjustment,
because there have not been any
overharvests and because underharvests
cannot be carried over due to stock
status.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Proposed 2017 Quota for the
Aggregated LCS in the Atlantic Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for aggregated LCS in the Atlantic region
is 168.9 mt dw (372,552 lb dw). As of
July 15, 2016, the aggregated LCS
fishery in the Atlantic region is still
open and preliminary landings indicate
that only 25 percent of the quota has
been harvested. Given the unknown
status of some of the shark species
within the Atlantic aggregated LCS
management group, underharvests
cannot be carried over pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates and consistent
with current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2017 quota for aggregated LCS in the
Atlantic region be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests
and underharvests cannot be carried
over due to stock status.
4. Proposed 2017 Quotas for
Hammerhead Sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico Region
In the Gulf of Mexico, hammerhead
shark quotas are divided into two subregions: Western and eastern. The 2017
proposed commercial quotas for
hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf
of Mexico sub-region and western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region are 13.4 mt dw
(29,421 lb dw) and 11.9 mt dw (23,301
lb dw), respectively. As of July 15, 2016,
preliminary reported landings for
hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf
of Mexico sub-region were at 50 percent
(6.7 mt dw) of their 2016 quota levels
(13.4 mt dw), while landings of
hammerhead sharks in the western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region were at 141
percent (16.8 mt dw) of their 2016 quota
levels (11.9 mt dw). Even though the
reported landings in the western Gulf of
Mexico exceed the 2016 sub-regional
quota, which was closed on March 12,
2016 (81 FR 12602), the total regional
Gulf of Mexico reported landings have
not exceeded the 2016 quota to date.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
Consistent with the regulations
implemented through Amendment 6 to
the Consolidated HMS FMP, subregional quota overages (e.g., western
Gulf of Mexico sub-region) are only
deducted in the next year if the total
regional quota (e.g., Gulf of Mexico
region) is also exceeded. Thus, pursuant
to § 635.27(b)(2)(i), at this time, because
the overall regional quota has not been
overharvested, NMFS is not proposing
to adjust the western Gulf of Mexico
sub-region quota to account for the
overharvest. However, because the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region is
open and quota is still available in that
sub-region, NMFS expects that landings
will continue to occur. If landings in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region
exceed 8.5 mt dw (18,659 lb dw) (i.e.,
the remainder of the total regional Gulf
of Mexico quota), then NMFS would
reduce the western Gulf of Mexico subregion quota to account for overharvests,
pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2)(i). If the quota
is not fully harvested, given the
overfished status of hammerhead
sharks, NMFS would not carry forward
any underharvests, pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), at this time, NMFS
proposes that the 2017 quotas for
hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf
of Mexico and western Gulf of Mexico
sub-regions be equal to their annual
base quotas without adjustment,
because there have not been any
overharvests and because underharvests
cannot be carried over due to stock
status. However, as noted above, if
landings in the eastern Gulf of Mexico
sub-region exceed 8.5 mt dw, NMFS
would adjust the western Gulf of
Mexico sub-region quota accordingly in
the final rule.
5. Proposed 2017 Quotas for
Hammerhead Sharks in the Atlantic
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for hammerhead sharks in the Atlantic
region is 27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb dw).
Currently, the hammerhead shark
fishery in the Atlantic region is still
open and preliminary landings as of
July 15, 2016, indicate that only 35
percent of the quota has been harvested.
Given the overfished status of
hammerhead sharks, underharvests
cannot be carried forward pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2017 quota for hammerhead sharks in
the Atlantic region be equal to the
annual base quota without adjustment,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
because there have not been any
overharvests and because underharvests
cannot be carried over due to stock
status.
6. Proposed 2017 Quotas for Research
LCS and Sandbar Sharks Within the
Shark Research Fishery
The 2017 proposed commercial
quotas within the shark research fishery
are 50.0 mt dw (110,230 lb dw) for
research LCS and 90.7 mt dw (199,943
lb dw) for sandbar sharks. Within the
shark research fishery, as of July 15,
2016, preliminary reported landings of
research LCS were at 14 percent (7.2 mt
dw) of their 2016 quota levels (50.0 mt
dw), and sandbar shark reported
landings were at 39 percent (34.9 mt
dw) of their 2016 quota levels (27.1 mt
dw). Reported landings have not
exceeded the 2016 quotas to date. Under
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), because sandbar
sharks and scalloped hammerhead
sharks within the research LCS
management group have been
determined to be either overfished or
overfished with overfishing occurring,
underharvests for these management
groups cannot be carried forward to the
2017 quotas. Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2017 quota in the shark research fishery
be equal to the annual base quota
without adjustment because there have
not been any overharvests and because
underharvests cannot be carried over
due to stock status.
7. Proposed 2017 Quota for the NonBlacknose SCS in the Gulf of Mexico
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for non-blacknose SCS in the Gulf of
Mexico region is 112.6 mt dw (248,215
lb dw). As of July 15, 2016, preliminary
reported landings of non-blacknose SCS
were at 38 percent (41.0 mt dw) of their
2016 quota level (107.3 mt dw) in the
Gulf of Mexico region. Reported
landings have not exceeded the 2016
quota to date. Given the unknown status
of bonnethead sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico non-blacknose SCS management
group, underharvests cannot be carried
forward pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2)(ii).
Therefore, based on preliminary
estimates and consistent with the
current regulations at § 635.27(b)(2),
NMFS proposes that the 2017 quota for
non-blacknose SCS in the Gulf of
Mexico region be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests
and because underharvests cannot be
carried over due to stock status.
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8. Proposed 2016 Quota for the NonBlacknose SCS in the Atlantic Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for non-blacknose SCS in the Atlantic
region is 264.1 mt dw (582,333 lb dw).
As of July 15, 2016, preliminary
reported landings of non-blacknose SCS
were at 15 percent (40.4 mt dw) of their
2016 quota level (264.1 mt dw) in the
Atlantic region. Though reported
landings had not yet reached or
exceeded the 2016 quota, the fishery
south of 34° N. latitude was closed on
May 29, 2016 (81 FR 18541), due to the
quota linkage with blacknose sharks in
the Atlantic region. The non-blacknose
SCS fishery north of 34° N. latitude
remains open at this time. Given the
unknown status of bonnethead sharks
within the Atlantic non-blacknose SCS
management group, underharvests
cannot be carried forward pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on
preliminary estimates and consistent
with the current regulations at
§ 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the
2017 quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Atlantic region be equal to the annual
base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests
and because underharvests cannot be
carried over due to stock status.
9. Proposed 2017 Quota for the
Blacknose Sharks in the Atlantic Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for blacknose sharks in the Atlantic
region is 17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb dw). As
of July 15, 2016, preliminary reported
landings of blacknose sharks were at 78
percent (12.2 mt dw) of their 2016 quota
levels (15.7 mt dw) in the Atlantic
region. The fishery was closed on May
29, 2016 (81 FR 18541). In the final rule
establishing quotas for the 2014 shark
season (78 FR 70500; November 26,
2013), NMFS spread out the 2012
overharvest (2.5 mt dw; 5,555 lb dw) of
the blacknose shark quota across 5 years
(2014 through 2018) in the Atlantic
region by 0.5 mt dw (1,111 lb dw) each
year. This approach for spreading large
overharvests over several years up to 5
years is consistent with the approach
adopted in Amendment 2 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP (see
§ 635.27(b)(2)(i)), which determined to
spread out the pay back over five years
depending on the magnitude of the
overharvest and the potential impact on
the fishery (73 FR 40658; July 15, 2008).
In 2015, the blacknose shark quota was
overharvested by 3.0 mt dw (6,471 lb
dw). In the final rule establishing quotas
for the 2016 shark season (80 FR 74999;
December 1, 2015), NMFS spread this
2015 overharvest amount over 3 years at
1.0 mt dw (2,157 lb dw) each year from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
2016 through 2018. Thus, in the final
rule establishing quotas for the 2016
shark season, NMFS decided to reduce
the blacknose shark base annual quota
by 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb dw), based on the
2012 and 2015 overharvest amount, in
2016, 2017, and 2018. On May 29, 2016,
NMFS closed the Atlantic blacknose
shark management group because the
quota was projected to exceed 80
percent. However, as of July 15, 2016,
the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was
underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,737 lb
dw). This underharvest (3.5 mt dw) is
greater than the remaining amount of
the 2012 and 2015 overharvests (3.0 mt
dw)(6,636 lb dw). As such, NMFS is
proposing to use the 2016 underharvest
to cover the remaining 2012 and 2015
overharvest. Pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2),
because blacknose sharks have been
declared to be overfished with
overfishing occurring in the Atlantic
region, NMFS could not carry forward
the remaining underharvest (0.5 mt dw).
Therefore, NMFS proposes that the 2017
Atlantic blacknose shark quota be equal
to the annual base quota without
adjustment. Note, the blacknose shark
quota is available in the Atlantic region
only for those vessels operating south of
34° N. latitude. North of 34° N. latitude,
retention, landing, and sale of blacknose
sharks are prohibited.
10. Proposed 2017 Quotas for the
Smoothhound Sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region is 504.6 mt dw (1,112,441
lb dw). As of July 15, 2016, there are no
preliminary reported landings of
smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region. Gulf of Mexico
smoothhound sharks have not been
declared to be overfished, to have
overfishing occurring, or to have an
unknown status. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico region therefore could be
applied to the 2017 quotas up to 50
percent of the base quota. Accordingly,
NMFS proposes to increase the 2017
Gulf of Mexico smoothhound shark
quota to adjust for anticipated
underharvests in 2016 as allowed. The
proposed 2017 adjusted base annual
quota for Gulf of Mexico smoothhound
sharks is 504.6 mt dw (1,112,441 lb dw)
(336.4 mt dw annual base quota + 168.2
mt dw 2016 underharvest = 504.6 mt dw
2017 adjusted annual quota).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59171
11. Proposed 2017 Quotas for the
Smoothhound Sharks in the Atlantic
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota
for smoothhound sharks in the Atlantic
region is 1,802.6 mt dw (1,323,862 lb
dw). As of July 15, 2016, preliminary
reported landings of smoothhound
sharks were at 15 percent (183.2 mt dw)
of their 2016 quota levels (1,201.7 mt
dw) in the Atlantic region. Atlantic
smoothhound sharks have not been
declared to be overfished, to have
overfishing occurring, or to have an
unknown status. Pursuant to
§ 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Atlantic
region therefore could be applied to the
2017 quotas up to 50 percent of the base
quota. Accordingly, NMFS proposes to
increase the 2017 Atlantic smoothhound
shark quota to adjust for anticipated
underharvests in 2016 as allowed. The
proposed 2017 adjusted base annual
quota for Atlantic smoothhound sharks
is 1,802.6 mt dw (1,323,862 lb dw)
(1,201.7 mt dw annual base quota +
600.9 mt dw 2016 underharvest =
1,802.6 mt dw 2017 adjusted annual
quota).
12. Proposed 2017 Quotas for Pelagic
Sharks
The 2017 proposed commercial
quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle sharks,
and pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle
or blue sharks) are 273 mt dw (601,856
lb dw), 1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb dw), and 488
mt dw (1,075,856 lb dw), respectively.
As of July 15, 2016, there are no
preliminary reported landings of blue
sharks and porbeagle sharks, while
preliminary reported landings of pelagic
sharks (other than porbeagle and blue
sharks) were at 11 percent (54.1 mt dw)
of their 2016 quota level (488.0 mt dw).
Given that these pelagic species are
overfished, have overfishing occurring,
or have an unknown status,
underharvests cannot be carried forward
pursuant to § 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore,
based on preliminary estimates and
consistent with the current regulations
at § 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that
the 2017 quotas for blue sharks,
porbeagle sharks, and pelagic sharks
(other than porbeagle and blue sharks)
be equal to their annual base quotas
without adjustment, because there have
not been any overharvests and because
underharvests cannot be carried over
due to stock status.
Proposed Opening Dates and Retention
Limits for the 2017 Atlantic Commercial
Shark Fishing Season
For each fishery, NMFS considered
the seven ‘‘Opening Commercial Fishing
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
59172
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Season Criteria’’ listed at § 635.27(b)(3).
The ‘‘Opening Fishing Season’’ criteria
consider factors such as the available
annual quotas for the current fishing
season, estimated season length and
average weekly catch rates from
previous years, length of the season and
fishermen participation in past years,
impacts to accomplishing objectives of
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments, temporal variation in
behavior or biology target species (e.g.,
seasonal distribution or abundance),
impact of catch rates in one region on
another, and effects of delayed season
openings.
Specifically, as described above and
below, NMFS examined the 2016 and
previous fishing years’ over- and/or
underharvests of the different
management groups to determine the
effects of the 2017 proposed commercial
quotas on the shark stocks and
fishermen across regional and subregional fishing areas. NMFS also
examined the potential season length
and previous catch rates to ensure, to
the extent practicable, that equitable
fishing opportunities be provided to
fishermen in all areas. Lastly, NMFS
examined the seasonal variation of the
different species/management groups
and the effects on fishing opportunities.
As described below, NMFS also
considered the six ‘‘Inseason trip limit
adjustment criteria’’ listed at
§ 635.24(a)(8) for directed shark limited
access permit holders intending to land
LCS other than sandbar sharks. Those
criteria are: The amount of remaining
shark quota in the relevant area or
region, to date, based on dealer reports;
the catch rates of the relevant shark
species/complexes, to date, based on
dealer reports; estimated date of fishery
closure based on when the landings are
projected to reach 80 percent of the
quota given the realized catch rates;
effects of the adjustment on
accomplishing the objectives of the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments; variations in seasonal
distribution, abundance, or migratory
patterns of the relevant shark species
based on scientific and fishery-based
knowledge; and/or effects of catch rates
in one part of a region precluding
vessels in another part of that region
from having a reasonable opportunity to
harvest a portion of the relevant quota.
After considering these criteria,
NMFS is proposing that the 2017
Atlantic commercial shark fishing
season for all shark management groups
in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean,
including the Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean Sea, open on or about January
1, 2017, after the publication of the final
rule for this action (Table 2). NMFS is
also proposing to start the 2017
commercial shark fishing season with
the commercial retention limit of 30
LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip in the western Gulf of
Mexico sub-region, 45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region, and
36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip in the Atlantic region
(Table 2). However, at the time of
writing this proposed rule, some
management groups remain open and,
for those management groups that are
already closed, landings are still being
calculated and checked for quality
control and assurance. Thus, NMFS may
implement different opening dates and
commercial retention limits in the final
rule if there are underharvested quotas
or quota exceedances in 2016 that are
not accounted for in this proposed rule.
TABLE 2—QUOTA LINKAGES, SEASON OPENING DATES, AND COMMERCIAL RETENTION LIMIT BY REGIONAL OR SUBREGIONAL SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP
Region or sub-region
Management group
Quota
linkages
Season
opening dates
Commercial retention limits for directed shark
limited access permit holders
(inseason adjustments are possible)
Eastern Gulf of Mexico ..
Blacktip Sharks ............
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks.
Blacktip Sharks ............
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks.
Non-Blacknose Small
Coastal Sharks.
Smoothhound Sharks ..
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks.
Not Linked ....
Linked ...........
January 1, 2017 ...........
45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel
per trip.
Not Linked ....
Linked ...........
January 1, 2017 ...........
30 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel
per trip.
Not Linked ....
January 1, 2017 ...........
N/A.
Not Linked ....
Linked ...........
January 1, 2017 ...........
January 1, 2017 ...........
Non-Blacknose Small
Coastal Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks
(South of 34° N. lat.
only).
Smoothhound Sharks ..
Non-Sandbar LCS Research.
Sandbar Shark Research.
Blue Sharks ..................
Porbeagle Sharks.
Linked (South
of 34° N.
lat. only).
January 1, 2017 ...........
N/A.
36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel
per trip.
If quota is landed quickly (e.g., if approximately
20 percent of quota is caught at the beginning of the year), NMFS anticipates an
inseason reduction (e.g., to 3 or fewer LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip), then an inseason increase to 45 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip
around July 15, 2017.
N/A.
Not Linked ....
Linked ...........
January 1, 2017 ...........
January 1, 2017 ...........
N/A.
N/A.
Not Linked ....
January 1, 2017 ...........
N/A.
Western Gulf of Mexico
Gulf of Mexico ................
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Atlantic ...........................
No regional quotas .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
59173
TABLE 2—QUOTA LINKAGES, SEASON OPENING DATES, AND COMMERCIAL RETENTION LIMIT BY REGIONAL OR SUBREGIONAL SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP—Continued
Region or sub-region
Management group
Quota
linkages
Season
opening dates
Commercial retention limits for directed shark
limited access permit holders
(inseason adjustments are possible)
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Pelagic Sharks Other
Than Porbeagle or
Blue.
In the Gulf of Mexico region, we are
opening the fishing season on or about
January 1, 2017, for the aggregated LCS,
blacktip sharks, and hammerhead shark
management groups with the
commercial retention limits of 30 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip for directed shark permit holders in
the western sub-region—and 45 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip for directed shark permit holders in
the eastern sub-region. This would
provide, to the extent practicable,
equitable opportunities across the
fisheries management sub-regions. This
opening date takes into account all the
season opening criteria listed in
§ 635.27(b)(3), and particularly the
criteria that NMFS consider the length
of the season for the different species
and/or management group in the
previous years (§ 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and
(iii)) and whether fishermen were able
to participate in the fishery in those
years (§ 635.27(b)(3)(v)). The proposed
commercial retention limits take into
account the criteria listed in § 635.24
(a)(8), and particularly the criterion that
NMFS consider the catch rates of the
relevant shark species/complexes based
on dealer reports to date
(§ 635.24(a)(8)(ii)). Similar to the
retention limit adjustment process
described for the Atlantic region, NMFS
may consider adjusting the retention
limit in the Gulf of Mexico region
throughout the season to ensure
fishermen in all parts of the region have
an opportunity to harvest aggregated
LCS, blacktip sharks, and hammerhead
sharks (see the criteria listed at
§ 635.27(b)(3)(v) and § 635.24(a)(8)(ii),
(v), and (vi)). In 2016, the quota in the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region was
harvested quickly and NMFS closed
these management groups on March 12,
2016 (81 FR 12602) (see the criteria
listed at § 635.27(b)(3)(i), (ii), and (iii)
and § 635.24(a)(8)(i) and (iii)). As such,
in 2017, NMFS is proposing a slightly
lower trip limit in order to slow the
harvest level and ensure the
management group is open until at least
April 2017, which is when the State of
Louisiana closes state waters to shark
fishing and when that State has asked
that we close Federal shark fisheries to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
match state regulations if quotas are
limited (see the criteria listed at
§ 635.27(b)(3)(vii) and 635.24(a)(8)(iii)).
In the eastern Gulf of Mexico, NMFS is
proposing the same commercial trip
limit for these management groups that
was set in 2016. Currently, the
aggregated LCS, blacktip shark, and
hammerhead shark management groups
are still open in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region (see the criteria listed
at § 635.27(b)(3)(i), (ii), (iii), and (v), and
§ 635.24(a)(8)(i), (ii), (iii), (v), and (vi)).
If those fisheries close, and after the
overall preliminary landings for the Gulf
of Mexico region are estimated for the
2016 fishing season, NMFS could make
changes to the 2017 opening dates and
commercial retention limits if necessary
to ensure equitable fishing
opportunities.
In the Atlantic region, NMFS
proposes opening the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management
groups on or about January 1, 2017. This
opening date is the same date that these
management groups opened in 2016,
although that decision later attracted
significant attention and opposition
from shark advocates, particularly
within the scuba diving community,
with respect to what they argue to be a
lemon shark aggregation site (see
discussion below). As described below,
this opening date also takes into account
all the criteria listed in § 635.27(b)(3),
and particularly the criterion that NMFS
consider the effects of catch rates in one
part of a region precluding vessels in
another part of that region from having
a reasonable opportunity to harvest a
portion of the different species and/or
management quotas (§ 635.27(b)(3)(v)).
In 2016, the data indicate that an
opening date of January 1 provided a
reasonable opportunity for every part of
each region to harvest a portion of the
available quotas (§ 635.27(b)(3)(i)) while
accounting for variations in seasonal
distribution of the different species in
the management groups
(§ 635.27(b)(3)(iv)). Furthermore, in
2016, the fishing season for the
aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark
management groups remains currently
open with 25 percent of the quotas
available as of July 15, 2016. Because
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the quotas in 2017 are proposed to be
the same as the quotas in 2016, NMFS
expects that the season lengths and
therefore the participation of various
fishermen throughout the region, would
be similar in 2017 (§ 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and
(iii)). Based on the recent performance
of the fishery, the January 1 opening
date appears to be meet the objectives of
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments ((§ 635.27(b)(3)(vi)).
Therefore, there is no information that
indicates changing the opening date is
necessary.
After the final rule for the 2016 shark
season published on December 1, 2015
(80 FR 74999), and well outside the
close of the public comment period for
that rule (September 17, 2015), NMFS
received extensive public comments
opposing the January 1 opening date (for
the aggregated LCS and hammerhead
shark management groups) because of
their concerns about a lemon shark
aggregation site off the east coast of
Florida which has become a popular
local shark scuba diving site.
Commenters requested that NMFS
change the opening date to the summer
months (e.g., June or July) to protect this
lemon shark aggregation. NMFS also
received a petition to postpone the
opening date in the Atlantic region
signed by more than 18,000 people.
NMFS responded to the petition as a
petition for emergency rulemaking but
did not change the January 1 start date
in response. Based on these comments
and the petition, NMFS held a public
conference call on December 11, 2015,
to answer public questions regarding the
Atlantic commercial shark fishery.
NMFS also gave a presentation on the
biology and current stock status of
lemon sharks at the March 2016 HMS
Advisory Panel meeting. Data presented
at the Advisory Panel meeting indicated
that lemon sharks may be more
productive than previously thought, the
commercial shark fishery is not having
a significant impact on lemon sharks in
the aggregation area or elsewhere, and
current data on relative abundance
suggest population is stable. Landings of
lemon sharks to date in the Atlantic
region are approximately 4,855 mt dw
(2.2 lb dw), which are less than the
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
59174
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
average landings over the past 6 years
(see the criteria at § 635.27(b)(3)(iv), (v),
and (vi) and § 635.24(a)(8)(ii), (iv), and
(v)). There is no evidence that these
landings have negatively impacted the
lemon shark population according to the
Southeast Fisheries Science Center
scientists. Furthermore, NMFS
considered information in the
comments received on the December
2015 final rule in proposing a start date
for 2017 and has determined they
presented no new or additional
information that was not previously
considered by the agency that would
warrant a different opening date.
Therefore, NMFS is proposing the same
opening dates for the 2017 fishing
season. This opening date meets the
management objectives of the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments (see the criteria at
§ 635.27(b)(3)(vi)) particularly in regard
to ensuring fishermen throughout the
region have reasonable opportunities to
harvest a portion of the different species
and/or management group quotas (see
the criteria at § 635.27(b)(3)(v) and (vii))
while also considering important
scientific information on the seasonal
distribution, abundance, and migratory
patterns of the different species within
the management group (see the criteria
at § 635.27(b)(3)(ii)). As described
above, the fishery has performed well,
and in accordance with the objectives of
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, under
the January 1 opening date. Therefore,
there is no information suggesting that
changing the opening date is necessary.
However, NMFS will consider through
this rulemaking any comments on the
opening date and any new information
on lemon sharks (or other species) not
previously considered, and may in the
final rule, adjust the opening dates if
warranted. The Notice of Availability
for Amendment 10 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP, which should
be publishing soon, will address
essential fish habitat and potential
habitat areas of particular concern for
HMS species, including lemon sharks.
In addition, for the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management
groups in the Atlantic region, NMFS is
proposing that the commercial retention
trip limit for directed shark limited
access permit holders on the proposed
opening date be 36 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. This
retention limit should allow fishermen
to harvest some of the 2017 quota at the
beginning of the year when sharks are
more prevalent in the South Atlantic
area (see the criteria at § 635.24(a)(3)(i),
(ii), (v), and (vi)). As was done in 2016,
if it appears that the quota is being
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
harvested too quickly (i.e., about 20
percent) to allow directed fishermen
throughout the entire region an
opportunity to fish and ensure enough
quota remains until later in the year,
NMFS would reduce the commercial
retention limits to incidental levels (3
LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip) or another level
calculated to reduce the harvest of LCS
taking into account § 635.27(b)(3) and
the inseason trip limit adjustment
criteria listed in § 635.24(a)(8),
particularly the consideration of
whether catch rates in one part of a
region or sub-region are precluding
vessels in another part of that region or
sub-region from having a reasonable
opportunity to harvest a portion of the
relevant quota (§ 635.24(a)(8)(vi)). If the
quota continues to be harvested quickly,
NMFS could reduce the retention limit
to 0 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip to ensure enough quota
remains until later in the year. If either
situation occurs, NMFS would publish
in the Federal Register notification of
any inseason adjustments of the
retention limit to an appropriate limit of
sharks per trip. In 2016, NMFS reduced
the retention limit to 3 LCS other than
sandbar sharks on April 2, 2016 (81 FR
18541) when hammerhead shark
landings reached approximately 24
percent of the hammerhead quota, and
did not need to reduce it further.
Also, as was done in 2016, NMFS will
consider increasing the commercial
retention limits per trip at a later date
if necessary to provide fishermen in the
northern portion of the Atlantic region
an opportunity to retain non-sandbar
LCS after considering the appropriate
inseason adjustment criteria. Similarly,
at some point later in the year (e.g., July
15), potentially equivalent to how the
2016 fishing season operated, NMFS
may consider increasing the retention
limit to the default level (45 LCS other
than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip)
or another amount, as deemed
appropriate, after considering the
inseason trip limit adjustment criteria. If
the quota is being harvested too quickly
or too slowly, NMFS could adjust the
retention limit appropriately to ensure
the fishery remains open most of the
rest of the year. Since the fishery is still
open with majority of the quota
available, NMFS will monitor the rest of
the fishing season and could make
changes to the proposed 2017 opening
date if necessary to ensure equitable
fishing opportunities.
All of the shark management groups
would remain open until December 31,
2017, or until NMFS determines that the
fishing season landings for any shark
management group have reached, or are
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
projected to reach, 80 percent of the
available quota. If NMFS determines
that a non-linked shark species or
management group must be closed,
then, consistent with § 635.28(b)(2) for
non-linked quotas (e.g., eastern Gulf of
Mexico blacktip, western Gulf of Mexico
blacktip, Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose
SCS, pelagic sharks, or the Atlantic or
Gulf of Mexico smoothhound sharks),
NMFS will publish in the Federal
Register a notice of closure for that
shark species, shark management group,
region, and/or sub-region that will be
effective no fewer than 5 days from date
of filing. For the blacktip shark
management group, regulations at
§ 635.28(b)(5)(i) through (v) authorize
NMFS to close the management group
before landings reach, or are expected to
reach, 80 percent of the quota after
considering the following criteria and
other relevant factors: Season length
based on available sub-regional quota
and average sub-regional catch rates;
variability in regional and/or subregional seasonal distribution,
abundance, and migratory patterns;
effects on accomplishing the objectives
of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments; amount of remaining
shark quotas in the relevant sub-region;
and regional and/or sub-regional catch
rates of the relevant shark species or
management groups. From the effective
date and time of the closure until NMFS
announces, via the publication of a
notice in the Federal Register, that
additional quota is available and the
season is reopened, the fisheries for the
shark species or management group are
closed, even across fishing years.
If NMFS determines that a linked
shark species or management group
must be closed, then, consistent with
§ 635.28(b)(3) for linked quotas, NMFS
will publish in the Federal Register a
notice of closure for all of the species
and/or management groups in a linked
group that will be effective no fewer
than 5 days from date of filing. From the
effective date and time of the closure
until NMFS announces, via the
publication of a notice in the Federal
Register, that additional quota is
available and the season is reopened,
the fisheries for all linked species and/
or management groups are closed, even
across fishing years. The linked quotas
of the species and/or management
groups are Atlantic hammerhead sharks
and Atlantic aggregated LCS; eastern
Gulf of Mexico hammerhead sharks and
eastern Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS;
western Gulf of Mexico hammerhead
sharks and western Gulf of Mexico
aggregated LCS; and Atlantic blacknose
and Atlantic non-blacknose SCS south
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
of 34° N. latitude. NMFS may close the
fishery for the Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark before landings reach, or are
expected to reach, 80 percent of the
quota, after considering the criteria
listed at § 635.28(b)(5).
Request for Comments
Comments on this proposed rule may
be submitted via https://
www.regulations.gov by mail, and at a
public hearing. NMFS solicits
comments on this proposed rule by
September 27, 2016 (see DATES and
ADDRESSES).
In addition to comments on the entire
proposed rule, NMFS is specifically
requesting comments on the proposed
accounting of the 2012 and 2015
overharvest of Atlantic blacknose sharks
from the 2016 underharvest. As
described above, in 2016, NMFS closed
the Atlantic blacknose shark
management group once the quota was
projected to exceed 80 percent. As of
July 15, 2016, the Atlantic blacknose
shark quota was underharvested by 3.5
mt dw (7,737 lb dw). This underharvest
(3.5 mt dw) is greater than the
remaining amounts of the 2012 and
2015 overharvests (3.0 mt dw) (6,636 lb
dw). As such, NMFS is proposing to use
the 2016 underharvest to cover the
remaining 2012 and 2015 overharvest.
This proposal would reduce potential
negative social and economic impacts
on the blacknose shark and nonblacknose SCS fisheries, which are
linked fisheries in the Atlantic region
south of 34° N. latitude while
maintaining the ecological benefits of
the current blacknose shark rebuilding
plan. If NMFS continued to spread the
overharvest from 2012 and 2015 through
2018, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota
in 2017 would be reduced by 1.5 mt dw
(3,268 lb dw) in 2017 and the 2017
adjusted quota would be 15.7 mt dw
(34,653 lb dw). However, if NMFS uses
the 2016 underharvest to cover the
remaining overharvest 2012 and 2015
overharvest, the blacknose shark quota
would not be reduced in 2017 or 2018
as a result of the 2012 and 2015
overharvests. As a result of this
proposal, the 2017 annual base quota
would be 17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb dw),
which could result in the fishery
remaining open longer in the Atlantic
region south of 34° N. latitude and have
social and economic beneficial impacts
for blacknose and non-blacknose
fishermen and dealers.
During the comment period, NMFS
will hold one conference call and
webinar for this proposed rule. NMFS is
requesting comments on any of the
measures or analyses described in this
proposed rule. The conference call and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
webinar will be held on September 22,
2016, from 2–4 p.m. EST. Please see the
DATES and ADDRESSES headings for more
information.
The public is reminded that NMFS
expects participants on phone
conferences to conduct themselves
appropriately. At the beginning of the
conference call, a representative of
NMFS will explain the ground rules
(e.g., all comments are to be directed to
the agency on the proposed action;
attendees will be called to give their
comments in the order in which they
registered to speak; each attendee will
have an equal amount of time to speak;
attendees may not interrupt one
another; etc.). NMFS representative(s)
will structure the meeting so that all
attending members of the public will be
able to comment, if they so choose,
regardless of the controversial nature of
the subject(s). Attendees are expected to
respect the ground rules, and those that
do not may be removed from the
conference call.
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that the proposed rule is
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866.
NMFS determined that the final rules
to implement Amendment 2 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP (June 24, 2008,
73 FR 35778; corrected on July 15, 2008,
73 FR 40658), Amendment 5a to the
2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (78 FR
40318; July 3, 2013), Amendment 6 to
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (80 FR
50073; August 18, 2015), and
Amendment 9 to the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP (80 FR 73128; November 24,
2015) are consistent to the maximum
extent practicable with the enforceable
policies of the approved coastal
management program of coastal states
on the Atlantic including the Gulf of
Mexico and the Caribbean Sea as
required under the Coastal Zone
Management Act. Pursuant to 15 CFR
930.41(a), NMFS provided the Coastal
Zone Management Program of each
coastal state a 60-day period to review
the consistency determination and to
advise the Agency of their concurrence.
NMFS received concurrence with the
consistency determinations from several
states and inferred consistency from
those states that did not respond within
the 60-day time period. This proposed
action to establish opening dates and
adjust quotas for the 2017 fishing season
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59175
for the Atlantic commercial shark
fisheries does not change the framework
previously consulted upon; therefore,
no additional consultation is required.
An initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact
this proposed rule, if adopted, would
have on small entities. The IRFA
analysis follows.
Section 603(b)(1) of the RFA requires
agencies to explain the purpose of the
rule. This rule, consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments, is being proposed to
establish the 2017 commercial shark
fishing quotas, retention limits, and
fishing seasons. Without this rule, the
commercial shark fisheries would close
on December 31, 2016, and would not
open until another action was taken.
This proposed rule would be
implemented according to the
regulations implementing the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments. Thus, NMFS expects few,
if any, economic impacts to fishermen
other than those already analyzed in the
2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments, based on the quota
adjustments.
Section 603(b)(2) of the RFA requires
agencies to explain the rule’s objectives.
The objectives of this rule are to: Adjust
the baseline quotas for all Atlantic shark
management groups based on any overand/or underharvests from the previous
fishing year(s); establish the opening
dates of the various management
groups; and establish the retention
limits for the blacktip shark, aggregated
large coastal shark, and hammerhead
shark management groups in order to
provide, to the extent practicable,
equitable opportunities across the
fishing management regions and/or subregions while also considering the
ecological needs of the different shark
species.
Section 603(b)(3) of the RFA requires
agencies to provide an estimate of the
number of small entities to which the
rule would apply. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) has established
size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the United States, including
fish harvesters. Provision is made under
SBA’s regulations for an agency to
develop its own industry-specific size
standards after consultation with
Advocacy and an opportunity for public
comment (see 13 CFR 121.903(c)).
Under this provision, NMFS may
establish size standards that differ from
those established by the SBA Office of
Size Standards, but only for use by
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
59176
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
NMFS and only for the purpose of
conducting an analysis of economic
effects in fulfillment of the agency’s
obligations under the RFA. To utilize
this provision, NMFS must publish such
size standards in the Federal Register
(FR), which NMFS did on December 29,
2015 (80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015).
In this final rule effective on July 1,
2016, NMFS established a small
business size standard of $11 million in
annual gross receipts for all businesses
in the commercial fishing industry
(NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance
purposes. NMFS considers all HMS
permit holders to be small entities
because they had average annual
receipts of less than $11 million for
commercial fishing.
As of July 2016, the proposed rule
would apply to the approximately 224
directed commercial shark permit
holders, 272 incidental commercial
shark permit holders, 89 smoothhound
shark permit holders, and 108
commercial shark dealers. Not all
permit holders are active in the fishery
in any given year. Active directed
commercial shark permit holders are
defined as those with valid permits that
landed one shark based on HMS
electronic dealer reports. Of the 496
directed and incidental commercial
shark permit holders, only 23 permit
holders landed sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico region and only 88 landed
sharks in the Atlantic region. Of the 89
smoothhound shark permit holders,
only 49 permit holders landed
smoothhound sharks in the Atlantic
region and none landed smoothhound
sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region.
NMFS has determined that the proposed
rule would not likely affect any small
governmental jurisdictions.
This proposed rule does not contain
any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements (5 U.S.C.
603(b)(4)). Similarly, this proposed rule
would not conflict, duplicate, or overlap
with other relevant Federal rules (5
U.S.C. 603(b)(5)). Fishermen, dealers,
and managers in these fisheries must
comply with a number of international
agreements as domestically
implemented, domestic laws, and FMPs.
These include, but are not limited to,
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Atlantic
Tunas Convention Act, the High Seas
Fishing Compliance Act, the Marine
Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered
Species Act, the National
Environmental Policy Act, the
Paperwork Reduction Act, and the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
Section 603(c) of the RFA requires
each IRFA to contain a description of
any significant alternatives to the
proposed rule which would accomplish
the stated objectives of applicable
statutes and minimize any significant
economic impact of the proposed rule
on small entities. Additionally, the RFA
(5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)–(4)) lists four general
categories of significant alternatives that
would assist an agency in the
development of significant alternatives.
These categories of alternatives are: (1)
Establishment of differing compliance
or reporting requirements or timetables
that take into account the resources
available to small entities; (2)
clarification, consolidation, or
simplification of compliance and
reporting requirements under the rule
for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design
standards; and, (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule for small entities. In
order to meet the objectives of this
proposed rule, consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS cannot
exempt small entities or change the
reporting requirements only for small
entities because all the entities affected
are considered small entities; therefore,
there are no alternatives discussed that
fall under the first and fourth categories
described above. NMFS does not know
of any performance or design standards
that would satisfy the aforementioned
objectives of this rulemaking while,
concurrently, complying with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act; therefore, there
are no alternatives considered under the
third category.
This rulemaking does not establish
management measures to be
implemented, but rather implements
previously adopted and analyzed
measures with adjustments, as specified
in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments and the Environmental
Assessment (EA) that accompanied the
2011 shark quota specifications rule (75
FR 76302; December 8, 2010). Thus,
NMFS proposes to adjust quotas
established and analyzed in the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments by subtracting the
underharvest or adding the overharvest
as allowable. Thus, NMFS has limited
flexibility to modify the quotas in this
rule, the impacts of which were
analyzed in previous regulatory
flexibility analyses.
Based on the 2015 ex-vessel price,
fully harvesting the unadjusted 2017
Atlantic shark commercial baseline
quotas could result in total fleet
revenues of $8,265,467 (see Table 3).
For the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group, NMFS is proposing
to increase the baseline sub-regional
quotas due to the underharvests in 2016.
The increase for the eastern Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark management
group could result in a $24,141 gain in
total revenues for fishermen in that subregion, while the increase for the
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group could result in a
$222,196 gain in total revenues for
fishermen in that sub-region. For the
Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
smoothhound shark management
groups, NMFS is proposing to increase
the baseline quotas due to the
underharvest in 2016. This would cause
a potential gain in revenue of $270,323
for the fleet in the Gulf of Mexico region
and a potential gain in revenue of
$965,095 for the fleet in the Atlantic
region.
All of these changes in gross revenues
are similar to the changes in gross
revenues analyzed in the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments. The final regulatory
flexibility analyses for those
amendments concluded that the
economic impacts on these small
entities are expected to be minimal. In
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments and the EA for the 2011
shark quota specifications rule, NMFS
stated it would be conducting annual
rulemakings and considering the
potential economic impacts of adjusting
the quotas for under- and overharvests
at that time.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 3—AVERAGE EX-VESSEL PRICES PER LB DW FOR EACH SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2015
Average
ex-vessel
meat price
Region
Species
Gulf of Mexico ..............................................................
Blacktip Shark ...............................................................
Aggregated LCS ...........................................................
Hammerhead Shark .....................................................
Non-Blacknose SCS .....................................................
Smoothhound Shark * ...................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
$0.51
0.55
0.61
0.35
0.65
Average
ex-vessel
fin price
$9.95
9.96
11.98
6.72
1.58
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
59177
TABLE 3—AVERAGE EX-VESSEL PRICES PER LB DW FOR EACH SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2015—Continued
Average
ex-vessel
meat price
Region
Species
Atlantic ..........................................................................
Aggregated LCS ...........................................................
Hammerhead Shark .....................................................
Non-Blacknose SCS .....................................................
Blacknose Shark ...........................................................
Smoothhound Shark * ...................................................
Shark Research Fishery (Aggregated LCS) ................
Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar only) ......................
Blue shark .....................................................................
Porbeagle shark ...........................................................
Other Pelagic sharks ....................................................
No Region .....................................................................
Average
ex-vessel
fin price
0.80
0.65
0.73
0.97
0.65
0.68
0.76
0.60
1.50
1.50
4.73
10.25
4.36
4.00
1.58
9.24
10.62
2.93
2.93
2.93
* Ex-vessel prices for smoothhound sharks come from HMS dealers who submitted landings data voluntarily before it was a requirement on
March 15, 2016.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
For this proposed rule, NMFS also
reviewed the criteria at § 635.27(b)(3) to
determine when opening each fishery
would provide equitable opportunities
for fishermen, to the extent practicable,
while also considering the ecological
needs of the different species. The
opening dates of the fishing season(s)
could vary depending upon the
available annual quota, catch rates, and
number of fishing participants during
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Aug 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
the year. For the 2017 fishing season,
NMFS is proposing to open all of the
shark management groups on the
effective date of the final rule for this
action (expected to be on or about
January 1). The direct and indirect
economic impacts would be neutral on
a short- and long-term basis because
NMFS is not proposing to change the
opening dates of these fisheries from the
status quo.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
Dated: August 22, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–20505 Filed 8–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 167 (Monday, August 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59167-59177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20505]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 160620545-6545-01]
RIN 0648-XE696
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2017 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Season
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish quotas, opening dates, and
retention limits for the 2017 fishing season for the Atlantic
commercial shark fisheries. Quotas would be adjusted as required or
allowable based on any over- and/or underharvests experienced during
2016 and previous fishing seasons. In addition, NMFS proposes season
opening dates and commercial retention limits based on adaptive
management measures to provide, to the extent practicable, fishing
opportunities for commercial shark fishermen in all regions and areas.
The proposed measures could affect fishing opportunities for commercial
shark fishermen in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf
of Mexico and Caribbean Sea.
DATES: Written comments must be received by September 28, 2016. An
operator-assisted, public conference call and webinar will be held on
September 22, 2016, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., EST.
ADDRESSES: The conference call information is phone number (888) 635-
5002; participant passcode 5315520. NMFS will show a brief presentation
via webinar followed by public comment. To join the webinar, go to:
https://noaaevents2.webex.com/noaaevents2/onstage/g.php?MTID=ea9172a6c1907b6efc462ce9117952e21, event password: NOAA.
Participants are strongly encouraged to log/dial in 15 minutes prior to
the meeting. Participants that have not used WebEx before will be
prompted to download and run a plug-in program that will enable them to
view the webinar.
You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA-NMFS-
2016-0096, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0096, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Margo Schulze-Haugen,
NMFS/SF1, 1315 East-West Highway, National Marine Fisheries Service,
SSMC3, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov
[[Page 59168]]
without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name,
address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise
sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A''
in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Presentation materials and copies of the supporting documents are
available from the HMS Management Division Web site at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/ or by contacting Gu[yacute] DuBeck by phone
at 301-427-8503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gu[yacute] DuBeck or Karyl Brewster-
Geisz at 301-427-8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic commercial shark fisheries are managed under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006 Consolidated Highly Migratory
Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and its amendments are
implemented by regulations at 50 CFR part 635. For the Atlantic
commercial shark fisheries, the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments established, among other things, commercial shark retention
limits, commercial quotas for species and management groups, accounting
measures for under- and overharvests for the shark fisheries, and
adaptive management measures such as flexible opening dates for the
fishing season and inseason adjustments to shark trip limits, which
provide management flexibility in furtherance of equitable fishing
opportunities, to the extent practicable, for commercial shark
fishermen in all regions and areas.
2017 Proposed Quotas
This proposed rule would adjust the quota levels for the different
shark stocks and management groups for the 2017 Atlantic commercial
shark fishing season based on over- and underharvests that occurred
during 2016 and previous fishing seasons, consistent with existing
regulations at 50 CFR 635.27(b). Over- and underharvests are accounted
for in the same region, sub-region, and/or fishery in which they
occurred the following year, except that large overharvests may be
spread over a number of subsequent fishing years up to a maximum of 5
years. Shark stocks or management groups that contain one or more
stocks that are overfished, have overfishing occurring, or have an
unknown status, will not have underharvest carried over in the
following year. Stocks that are not overfished and have no overfishing
occurring may have any underharvest carried over in the following year,
up to 50 percent of the base quota.
The quotas in this proposed rule are based on dealer reports
received as of July 15, 2016. In the final rule, NMFS will adjust the
quotas as needed based on dealer reports received as of a date in mid-
October 2016. Thus, all of the 2017 proposed quotas for the respective
stocks and management groups will be subject to further adjustment
after NMFS considers the mid-October dealer reports. All dealer reports
that are received after the October date will be used to adjust the
2018 quotas, as appropriate.
For the sandbar shark, aggregated LCS, hammerhead shark, non-
blacknose SCS, blacknose shark, blue shark, porbeagle shark, and
pelagic shark (other than porbeagle or blue sharks) management groups,
the 2016 underharvests cannot be carried over to the 2017 fishing
season because those stocks or management groups have been determined
to be overfished, overfished with overfishing occurring, or have an
unknown status. Thus, for all of these management groups, the 2017
proposed quotas would be equal to the applicable base quota minus any
overharvests that occurred in 2016 and/or previous fishing seasons, as
applicable.
Because the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group and
smoothhound shark management groups in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
regions have been determined not to be overfished and to have no
overfishing occurring, available underharvest (up to 50 percent of the
base quota) from the 2016 fishing season for these management groups
may be applied to the respective 2017 quotas, and NMFS proposes to do
so.
The proposed 2017 quotas by species and management group are
summarized in Table 1; the description of the calculations for each
stock and management group can be found below.
Table 1--2017 Proposed Quotas and Opening Dates for the Atlantic Shark Management Groups
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. Table includes landings data as of July 15, 2016;
final quotas are subject to change based on landings as of October 2016. 1 mt = 2,204.6 lb.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary
Region or sub-region Management group 2016 annual 2016 landings Adjustments \2\ 2017 base 2017 proposed Season opening
quota \1\ annual quota annual quota dates
................ (A)............ (B)............ (C)............ (D)............ (D + C)........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Gulf of Mexico....... Blacktip Sharks. 28.9 mt dw 18.0 mt dw 10.9 mt dw 25.1 mt dw 36.0 mt dw January 1, 2017.
(63,189 lb dw). (39,584 lb dw). (23,961 lb dw) (55,439 lb dw). (79,400 lb dw).
\3\.
Aggregated Large 85.5 mt dw 42.9 mt dw ............... 85.5 mt dw 85.5 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (188,593 lb (93,593 lb dw). (188,593 lb (188,593 lb
dw). dw). dw).
Hammerhead 13.4 mt dw 6.7 mt dw ............... 13.4 mt dw 13.4 mt dw
Sharks. (29,421 lb dw). (14,865 lb dw). (29,421 lb dw). (29,421 lb dw).
Western Gulf of Mexico....... Blacktip Sharks. 266.5 mt dw 166.2 mt dw 100.3 mt dw 231.5 mt dw 331.8 mt dw
(587,396 lb (366497 lb dw). (220,542 lb (510,261 lb (730,803 lb
dw). dw) \3\. dw). dw).
Aggregated Large 72.0 mt dw 66.1 mt dw ............... 72.0 mt dw 72.0 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (158,724 lb (145,624 lb (158,724 lb (158,724 lb
dw). dw). dw). dw).
Hammerhead 11.9 mt dw 16.8 mt dw ............... 11.9 mt dw 11.9 mt dw
Sharks. (26,301 lb dw). (37,063 lb dw). (23,301 lb dw). (23,301 lb dw).
Gulf of Mexico............... Non-Blacknose 107.3 mt dw 41.0 mt dw ............... 112.6 mt dw 112.6 mt dw
Small Coastal (236,603 lb (90,320 lb dw). (248,215 lb (248,215 lb
Sharks. dw). dw). dw).
Smoothhound 336.4 mt dw 0 mt dw (0 lb 168.2 mt dw 336.4 mt dw 504.6 mt dw
Sharks. (741,627). dw). (370,814 lb (741,627). (1,112,441 lb
dw). dw).
[[Page 59169]]
Atlantic..................... Aggregated Large 168.9 mt dw 42.0 mt dw ............... 168.9 mt dw 168.9 mt dw January 1, 2017.
Coastal Sharks. (372,552 lb (92,692 lb dw). (372,552 lb (372,552 lb
dw). dw). dw).
Hammerhead 27.1 mt dw 9.6 mt dw ............... 27.1 mt dw 27.1 mt dw
Sharks. (59,736 lb dw). (21,122 lb dw). (59,736 lb dw). (59,736 lb dw).
Non-Blacknose 264.1 mt dw 40.4 mt dw ............... 264.1 mt dw 264.1 mt dw
Small Coastal (582,333 lb (89,048 lb dw). (582,333 lb (582,333 lb
Sharks. dw). dw). dw).
Blacknose Sharks 15.7 mt dw 12.2 mt dw ............... 17.2 mt dw 17.2 mt dw
(South of (34,653 lb dw). (26,916 lb dw). (37,921 lb dw). (37,921 lb dw)
34[deg] N. lat. \4\.
only).
Smoothhound 1,201.7 mt dw 183.2 mt dw 600.9 mt dw 1,201.7 mt dw 1,802.6 mt dw
Sharks. (2,647,725 lb (403,795 lb (1,323,862 lb (2,647,725 lb (3,971,587 lb
dw). dw). dw). dw). dw).
No regional quotas........... Non-Sandbar LCS 50.0 mt dw 7.2 mt dw ............... 50.0 mt dw 50.0 mt dw January 1, 2017.
Research. (110,230 lb (15,829 lb dw). (110,230 lb (110,230 lb
dw). dw). dw).
Sandbar Shark 90.7 mt dw 34.9 mt dw ............... 90.7 mt dw 90.7 mt dw
Research. (199,943 lb (77,050 lb dw). (199,943 lb (199,943 lb
dw). dw). dw).
Blue Sharks..... 273.0 mt dw 0 mt dw (0 lb ............... 273.0 mt dw 273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb dw). (601,856 lb (601,856 lb
dw). dw). dw).
Porbeagle Sharks 0 mt dw (0 lb 0 mt dw (0 lb ............... 1.7 mt dw 1.7 mt dw
dw). dw). (3,748 lb dw). (3,748 lb dw).
Pelagic Sharks 488.0 mt dw 54.1 mt dw ............... 488.0 mt dw 488.0 mt dw
Other Than (1,075,856 lb (119,336 lb (1,075,856 lb (1,075,856 lb
Porbeagle or dw). dw). dw). dw).
Blue.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Landings are from January 1, 2016, through July 15, 2016, and are subject to change.
\2\ Underharvest adjustments can only be applied to stocks or management groups that are not overfished and have no overfishing occurring. Also, the
underharvest adjustments cannot exceed 50 percent of the base quota.
\3\ This adjustment accounts for underharvest in 2016. This proposed rule would increase the overall Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 111.2 mt dw
(244,504 lb dw). Since any underharvest would be divided based on the sub-regional quota percentage split, the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
quota would be increased by 10.9 mt dw, or 9.8 percent of the underharvest, while the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota would be increased
by 100.3 mt dw, or 90.2 percent of the underharvest.
\4\ Based on overharvest in 2012 and 2015, NMFS had previously reduced the Atlantic blacknose shark base annual quota by 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb dw) each
year through 2018. However, in 2016, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,737 lb dw). NMFS is proposing to use the
2016 underharvest to cover the remaining overharvest amount of 3.0 mt dw (6,536 lb dw) and not to adjust the 2017 Atlantic blacknose shark base annual
quota.
1. Proposed 2017 Quotas for the Blacktip Sharks in the Gulf of Mexico
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for blacktip sharks in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 36.0 mt dw (79,400 lb dw) and the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 331.8 mt dw (730,803 lb dw). As of
July 15, 2016, preliminary reported landings for blacktip sharks in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 62 percent (18.0 mt dw) of
their 2016 quota levels (28.9 mt dw), while the blacktip sharks in the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region were also at 62 percent (166.2 mt dw)
of their 2016 quota levels (266.5 mt dw). Reported landings have not
exceeded the 2016 quota to date, and the western Gulf of Mexico sub-
region fishery was closed on March 12, 2016 (81 FR 12602). Gulf of
Mexico blacktip sharks have not been declared to be overfished, to have
overfishing occurring, or to have an unknown status. Pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for blacktip sharks within the Gulf of
Mexico region therefore could be applied to the 2017 quotas up to 50
percent of the base quota. Any underharvest would be split based on the
sub-regional quota percentages of 9.8 percent for eastern Gulf of
Mexico blacktip sharks and 90.2 percent for western Gulf of Mexico
blacktip sharks (Sec. 635.27(b)(1)(ii)). To date, the overall Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark management group was underharvested by 111.2 mt
dw (244,504 lb dw). Accordingly, NMFS proposes to increase the 2017
eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 10.9 mt dw (111.2 mt dw
underharvest in 2016 * 9.8 percent = 10.9 mt dw eastern sub-region
underharvest) and increase the 2017 western Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark quota by 100.3 mt dw (111.2 mt dw underharvest in 2016 * 90.2
percent = 100.3 mt dw western sub-region underharvest). Thus, the
proposed eastern sub-regional Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark commercial
quota is 36.0 mt dw and the proposed western sub-regional Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark commercial quota is 331.8 mt dw.
2. Proposed 2017 Quotas for the Aggregated LCS in the Gulf of Mexico
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for aggregated LCS in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 85.5 mt dw (188,593 lb dw) and the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region is 72.0 mt dw (158,724 lb dw). As of
July 15, 2016, preliminary reported landings for aggregated LCS in the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 50 percent (42.5 mt dw) of
their 2016 quota levels (85.5 mt dw), while the aggregated LCS in the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 92 percent (66.1 mt dw) of
their 2016 quota levels (72.0 mt dw). Reported landings have not
exceeded the 2016 quota to date, and the western aggregated LCS sub-
region fishery was closed on March 12, 2016 (81 FR 12602). Given the
unknown status of
[[Page 59170]]
some of the shark species within the Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS
management group, underharvests cannot be carried over pursuant to
Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on preliminary estimates and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2017 quotas for aggregated LCS in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico and western Gulf of Mexico sub-regions be equal to their annual
base quotas without adjustment, because there have not been any
overharvests and because underharvests cannot be carried over due to
stock status.
3. Proposed 2017 Quota for the Aggregated LCS in the Atlantic Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for aggregated LCS in the
Atlantic region is 168.9 mt dw (372,552 lb dw). As of July 15, 2016,
the aggregated LCS fishery in the Atlantic region is still open and
preliminary landings indicate that only 25 percent of the quota has
been harvested. Given the unknown status of some of the shark species
within the Atlantic aggregated LCS management group, underharvests
cannot be carried over pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore,
based on preliminary estimates and consistent with current regulations
at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2017 quota for aggregated
LCS in the Atlantic region be equal to the annual base quota without
adjustment, because there have not been any overharvests and
underharvests cannot be carried over due to stock status.
4. Proposed 2017 Quotas for Hammerhead Sharks in the Gulf of Mexico
Region
In the Gulf of Mexico, hammerhead shark quotas are divided into two
sub-regions: Western and eastern. The 2017 proposed commercial quotas
for hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region and
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region are 13.4 mt dw (29,421 lb dw) and
11.9 mt dw (23,301 lb dw), respectively. As of July 15, 2016,
preliminary reported landings for hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf
of Mexico sub-region were at 50 percent (6.7 mt dw) of their 2016 quota
levels (13.4 mt dw), while landings of hammerhead sharks in the western
Gulf of Mexico sub-region were at 141 percent (16.8 mt dw) of their
2016 quota levels (11.9 mt dw). Even though the reported landings in
the western Gulf of Mexico exceed the 2016 sub-regional quota, which
was closed on March 12, 2016 (81 FR 12602), the total regional Gulf of
Mexico reported landings have not exceeded the 2016 quota to date.
Consistent with the regulations implemented through Amendment 6 to the
Consolidated HMS FMP, sub-regional quota overages (e.g., western Gulf
of Mexico sub-region) are only deducted in the next year if the total
regional quota (e.g., Gulf of Mexico region) is also exceeded. Thus,
pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(i), at this time, because the overall
regional quota has not been overharvested, NMFS is not proposing to
adjust the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region quota to account for the
overharvest. However, because the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region is
open and quota is still available in that sub-region, NMFS expects that
landings will continue to occur. If landings in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico sub-region exceed 8.5 mt dw (18,659 lb dw) (i.e., the remainder
of the total regional Gulf of Mexico quota), then NMFS would reduce the
western Gulf of Mexico sub-region quota to account for overharvests,
pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(i). If the quota is not fully harvested,
given the overfished status of hammerhead sharks, NMFS would not carry
forward any underharvests, pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii).
Therefore, based on preliminary estimates and consistent with the
current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), at this time, NMFS proposes
that the 2017 quotas for hammerhead sharks in the eastern Gulf of
Mexico and western Gulf of Mexico sub-regions be equal to their annual
base quotas without adjustment, because there have not been any
overharvests and because underharvests cannot be carried over due to
stock status. However, as noted above, if landings in the eastern Gulf
of Mexico sub-region exceed 8.5 mt dw, NMFS would adjust the western
Gulf of Mexico sub-region quota accordingly in the final rule.
5. Proposed 2017 Quotas for Hammerhead Sharks in the Atlantic Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for hammerhead sharks in the
Atlantic region is 27.1 mt dw (59,736 lb dw). Currently, the hammerhead
shark fishery in the Atlantic region is still open and preliminary
landings as of July 15, 2016, indicate that only 35 percent of the
quota has been harvested. Given the overfished status of hammerhead
sharks, underharvests cannot be carried forward pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on preliminary estimates and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2017 quota for hammerhead sharks in the Atlantic
region be equal to the annual base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests and because underharvests cannot
be carried over due to stock status.
6. Proposed 2017 Quotas for Research LCS and Sandbar Sharks Within the
Shark Research Fishery
The 2017 proposed commercial quotas within the shark research
fishery are 50.0 mt dw (110,230 lb dw) for research LCS and 90.7 mt dw
(199,943 lb dw) for sandbar sharks. Within the shark research fishery,
as of July 15, 2016, preliminary reported landings of research LCS were
at 14 percent (7.2 mt dw) of their 2016 quota levels (50.0 mt dw), and
sandbar shark reported landings were at 39 percent (34.9 mt dw) of
their 2016 quota levels (27.1 mt dw). Reported landings have not
exceeded the 2016 quotas to date. Under Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), because
sandbar sharks and scalloped hammerhead sharks within the research LCS
management group have been determined to be either overfished or
overfished with overfishing occurring, underharvests for these
management groups cannot be carried forward to the 2017 quotas.
Therefore, based on preliminary estimates and consistent with the
current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2017
quota in the shark research fishery be equal to the annual base quota
without adjustment because there have not been any overharvests and
because underharvests cannot be carried over due to stock status.
7. Proposed 2017 Quota for the Non-Blacknose SCS in the Gulf of Mexico
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Gulf of Mexico region is 112.6 mt dw (248,215 lb dw). As of July 15,
2016, preliminary reported landings of non-blacknose SCS were at 38
percent (41.0 mt dw) of their 2016 quota level (107.3 mt dw) in the
Gulf of Mexico region. Reported landings have not exceeded the 2016
quota to date. Given the unknown status of bonnethead sharks within the
Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose SCS management group, underharvests cannot
be carried forward pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based
on preliminary estimates and consistent with the current regulations at
Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS proposes that the 2017 quota for non-blacknose
SCS in the Gulf of Mexico region be equal to the annual base quota
without adjustment, because there have not been any overharvests and
because underharvests cannot be carried over due to stock status.
[[Page 59171]]
8. Proposed 2016 Quota for the Non-Blacknose SCS in the Atlantic Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for non-blacknose SCS in the
Atlantic region is 264.1 mt dw (582,333 lb dw). As of July 15, 2016,
preliminary reported landings of non-blacknose SCS were at 15 percent
(40.4 mt dw) of their 2016 quota level (264.1 mt dw) in the Atlantic
region. Though reported landings had not yet reached or exceeded the
2016 quota, the fishery south of 34[deg] N. latitude was closed on May
29, 2016 (81 FR 18541), due to the quota linkage with blacknose sharks
in the Atlantic region. The non-blacknose SCS fishery north of 34[deg]
N. latitude remains open at this time. Given the unknown status of
bonnethead sharks within the Atlantic non-blacknose SCS management
group, underharvests cannot be carried forward pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on preliminary estimates and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2017 quota for non-blacknose SCS in the Atlantic
region be equal to the annual base quota without adjustment, because
there have not been any overharvests and because underharvests cannot
be carried over due to stock status.
9. Proposed 2017 Quota for the Blacknose Sharks in the Atlantic Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for blacknose sharks in the
Atlantic region is 17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb dw). As of July 15, 2016,
preliminary reported landings of blacknose sharks were at 78 percent
(12.2 mt dw) of their 2016 quota levels (15.7 mt dw) in the Atlantic
region. The fishery was closed on May 29, 2016 (81 FR 18541). In the
final rule establishing quotas for the 2014 shark season (78 FR 70500;
November 26, 2013), NMFS spread out the 2012 overharvest (2.5 mt dw;
5,555 lb dw) of the blacknose shark quota across 5 years (2014 through
2018) in the Atlantic region by 0.5 mt dw (1,111 lb dw) each year. This
approach for spreading large overharvests over several years up to 5
years is consistent with the approach adopted in Amendment 2 to the
2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (see Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(i)), which determined
to spread out the pay back over five years depending on the magnitude
of the overharvest and the potential impact on the fishery (73 FR
40658; July 15, 2008). In 2015, the blacknose shark quota was
overharvested by 3.0 mt dw (6,471 lb dw). In the final rule
establishing quotas for the 2016 shark season (80 FR 74999; December 1,
2015), NMFS spread this 2015 overharvest amount over 3 years at 1.0 mt
dw (2,157 lb dw) each year from 2016 through 2018. Thus, in the final
rule establishing quotas for the 2016 shark season, NMFS decided to
reduce the blacknose shark base annual quota by 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb
dw), based on the 2012 and 2015 overharvest amount, in 2016, 2017, and
2018. On May 29, 2016, NMFS closed the Atlantic blacknose shark
management group because the quota was projected to exceed 80 percent.
However, as of July 15, 2016, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was
underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,737 lb dw). This underharvest (3.5 mt
dw) is greater than the remaining amount of the 2012 and 2015
overharvests (3.0 mt dw)(6,636 lb dw). As such, NMFS is proposing to
use the 2016 underharvest to cover the remaining 2012 and 2015
overharvest. Pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2), because blacknose sharks
have been declared to be overfished with overfishing occurring in the
Atlantic region, NMFS could not carry forward the remaining
underharvest (0.5 mt dw). Therefore, NMFS proposes that the 2017
Atlantic blacknose shark quota be equal to the annual base quota
without adjustment. Note, the blacknose shark quota is available in the
Atlantic region only for those vessels operating south of 34[deg] N.
latitude. North of 34[deg] N. latitude, retention, landing, and sale of
blacknose sharks are prohibited.
10. Proposed 2017 Quotas for the Smoothhound Sharks in the Gulf of
Mexico Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for smoothhound sharks in the
Gulf of Mexico region is 504.6 mt dw (1,112,441 lb dw). As of July 15,
2016, there are no preliminary reported landings of smoothhound sharks
in the Gulf of Mexico region. Gulf of Mexico smoothhound sharks have
not been declared to be overfished, to have overfishing occurring, or
to have an unknown status. Pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii),
underharvests for smoothhound sharks within the Gulf of Mexico region
therefore could be applied to the 2017 quotas up to 50 percent of the
base quota. Accordingly, NMFS proposes to increase the 2017 Gulf of
Mexico smoothhound shark quota to adjust for anticipated underharvests
in 2016 as allowed. The proposed 2017 adjusted base annual quota for
Gulf of Mexico smoothhound sharks is 504.6 mt dw (1,112,441 lb dw)
(336.4 mt dw annual base quota + 168.2 mt dw 2016 underharvest = 504.6
mt dw 2017 adjusted annual quota).
11. Proposed 2017 Quotas for the Smoothhound Sharks in the Atlantic
Region
The 2017 proposed commercial quota for smoothhound sharks in the
Atlantic region is 1,802.6 mt dw (1,323,862 lb dw). As of July 15,
2016, preliminary reported landings of smoothhound sharks were at 15
percent (183.2 mt dw) of their 2016 quota levels (1,201.7 mt dw) in the
Atlantic region. Atlantic smoothhound sharks have not been declared to
be overfished, to have overfishing occurring, or to have an unknown
status. Pursuant to Sec. 635.27(b)(2)(ii), underharvests for
smoothhound sharks within the Atlantic region therefore could be
applied to the 2017 quotas up to 50 percent of the base quota.
Accordingly, NMFS proposes to increase the 2017 Atlantic smoothhound
shark quota to adjust for anticipated underharvests in 2016 as allowed.
The proposed 2017 adjusted base annual quota for Atlantic smoothhound
sharks is 1,802.6 mt dw (1,323,862 lb dw) (1,201.7 mt dw annual base
quota + 600.9 mt dw 2016 underharvest = 1,802.6 mt dw 2017 adjusted
annual quota).
12. Proposed 2017 Quotas for Pelagic Sharks
The 2017 proposed commercial quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle
sharks, and pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle or blue sharks) are
273 mt dw (601,856 lb dw), 1.7 mt dw (3,748 lb dw), and 488 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb dw), respectively. As of July 15, 2016, there are no
preliminary reported landings of blue sharks and porbeagle sharks,
while preliminary reported landings of pelagic sharks (other than
porbeagle and blue sharks) were at 11 percent (54.1 mt dw) of their
2016 quota level (488.0 mt dw). Given that these pelagic species are
overfished, have overfishing occurring, or have an unknown status,
underharvests cannot be carried forward pursuant to Sec.
635.27(b)(2)(ii). Therefore, based on preliminary estimates and
consistent with the current regulations at Sec. 635.27(b)(2), NMFS
proposes that the 2017 quotas for blue sharks, porbeagle sharks, and
pelagic sharks (other than porbeagle and blue sharks) be equal to their
annual base quotas without adjustment, because there have not been any
overharvests and because underharvests cannot be carried over due to
stock status.
Proposed Opening Dates and Retention Limits for the 2017 Atlantic
Commercial Shark Fishing Season
For each fishery, NMFS considered the seven ``Opening Commercial
Fishing
[[Page 59172]]
Season Criteria'' listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3). The ``Opening Fishing
Season'' criteria consider factors such as the available annual quotas
for the current fishing season, estimated season length and average
weekly catch rates from previous years, length of the season and
fishermen participation in past years, impacts to accomplishing
objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments,
temporal variation in behavior or biology target species (e.g.,
seasonal distribution or abundance), impact of catch rates in one
region on another, and effects of delayed season openings.
Specifically, as described above and below, NMFS examined the 2016
and previous fishing years' over- and/or underharvests of the different
management groups to determine the effects of the 2017 proposed
commercial quotas on the shark stocks and fishermen across regional and
sub-regional fishing areas. NMFS also examined the potential season
length and previous catch rates to ensure, to the extent practicable,
that equitable fishing opportunities be provided to fishermen in all
areas. Lastly, NMFS examined the seasonal variation of the different
species/management groups and the effects on fishing opportunities.
As described below, NMFS also considered the six ``Inseason trip
limit adjustment criteria'' listed at Sec. 635.24(a)(8) for directed
shark limited access permit holders intending to land LCS other than
sandbar sharks. Those criteria are: The amount of remaining shark quota
in the relevant area or region, to date, based on dealer reports; the
catch rates of the relevant shark species/complexes, to date, based on
dealer reports; estimated date of fishery closure based on when the
landings are projected to reach 80 percent of the quota given the
realized catch rates; effects of the adjustment on accomplishing the
objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments;
variations in seasonal distribution, abundance, or migratory patterns
of the relevant shark species based on scientific and fishery-based
knowledge; and/or effects of catch rates in one part of a region
precluding vessels in another part of that region from having a
reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the relevant quota.
After considering these criteria, NMFS is proposing that the 2017
Atlantic commercial shark fishing season for all shark management
groups in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico
and the Caribbean Sea, open on or about January 1, 2017, after the
publication of the final rule for this action (Table 2). NMFS is also
proposing to start the 2017 commercial shark fishing season with the
commercial retention limit of 30 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region, 45 LCS other
than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip in the eastern Gulf of Mexico
sub-region, and 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip in
the Atlantic region (Table 2). However, at the time of writing this
proposed rule, some management groups remain open and, for those
management groups that are already closed, landings are still being
calculated and checked for quality control and assurance. Thus, NMFS
may implement different opening dates and commercial retention limits
in the final rule if there are underharvested quotas or quota
exceedances in 2016 that are not accounted for in this proposed rule.
Table 2--Quota Linkages, Season Opening Dates, and Commercial Retention Limit by Regional or Sub-Regional Shark
Management Group
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial retention
limits for directed
Season opening shark limited access
Region or sub-region Management group Quota linkages dates permit holders
(inseason adjustments
are possible)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Gulf of Mexico......... Blacktip Sharks.. Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. 45 LCS other than
Aggregated Large Linked........... sandbar sharks per
Coastal Sharks. vessel per trip.
Hammerhead
Sharks..
Western Gulf of Mexico......... Blacktip Sharks.. Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. 30 LCS other than
Aggregated Large Linked........... sandbar sharks per
Coastal Sharks. vessel per trip.
Hammerhead
Sharks..
Gulf of Mexico................. Non-Blacknose Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. N/A.
Small Coastal
Sharks.
Smoothhound Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. N/A.
Sharks.
Atlantic....................... Aggregated Large Linked........... January 1, 2017.. 36 LCS other than
Coastal Sharks. sandbar sharks per
Hammerhead vessel per trip.
Sharks.. If quota is landed
quickly (e.g., if
approximately 20
percent of quota is
caught at the
beginning of the
year), NMFS
anticipates an
inseason reduction
(e.g., to 3 or fewer
LCS other than
sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip),
then an inseason
increase to 45 LCS
other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per
trip around July 15,
2017.
Non-Blacknose Linked (South of January 1, 2017.. N/A.
Small Coastal 34[deg] N. lat.
Sharks. only).
Blacknose Sharks
(South of
34[deg] N. lat.
only)..
Smoothhound Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. N/A.
Sharks.
No regional quotas............. Non-Sandbar LCS Linked........... January 1, 2017.. N/A.
Research.
Sandbar Shark
Research.
Blue Sharks...... Not Linked....... January 1, 2017.. N/A.
Porbeagle Sharks.
[[Page 59173]]
Pelagic Sharks
Other Than
Porbeagle or
Blue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Gulf of Mexico region, we are opening the fishing season on
or about January 1, 2017, for the aggregated LCS, blacktip sharks, and
hammerhead shark management groups with the commercial retention limits
of 30 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for directed
shark permit holders in the western sub-region--and 45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for directed shark permit holders in
the eastern sub-region. This would provide, to the extent practicable,
equitable opportunities across the fisheries management sub-regions.
This opening date takes into account all the season opening criteria
listed in Sec. 635.27(b)(3), and particularly the criteria that NMFS
consider the length of the season for the different species and/or
management group in the previous years (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and
(iii)) and whether fishermen were able to participate in the fishery in
those years (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v)). The proposed commercial retention
limits take into account the criteria listed in Sec. 635.24 (a)(8),
and particularly the criterion that NMFS consider the catch rates of
the relevant shark species/complexes based on dealer reports to date
(Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(ii)). Similar to the retention limit adjustment
process described for the Atlantic region, NMFS may consider adjusting
the retention limit in the Gulf of Mexico region throughout the season
to ensure fishermen in all parts of the region have an opportunity to
harvest aggregated LCS, blacktip sharks, and hammerhead sharks (see the
criteria listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v) and Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(ii),
(v), and (vi)). In 2016, the quota in the western Gulf of Mexico sub-
region was harvested quickly and NMFS closed these management groups on
March 12, 2016 (81 FR 12602) (see the criteria listed at Sec.
635.27(b)(3)(i), (ii), and (iii) and Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(i) and (iii)).
As such, in 2017, NMFS is proposing a slightly lower trip limit in
order to slow the harvest level and ensure the management group is open
until at least April 2017, which is when the State of Louisiana closes
state waters to shark fishing and when that State has asked that we
close Federal shark fisheries to match state regulations if quotas are
limited (see the criteria listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(vii) and
635.24(a)(8)(iii)). In the eastern Gulf of Mexico, NMFS is proposing
the same commercial trip limit for these management groups that was set
in 2016. Currently, the aggregated LCS, blacktip shark, and hammerhead
shark management groups are still open in the eastern Gulf of Mexico
sub-region (see the criteria listed at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(i), (ii),
(iii), and (v), and Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(i), (ii), (iii), (v), and (vi)).
If those fisheries close, and after the overall preliminary landings
for the Gulf of Mexico region are estimated for the 2016 fishing
season, NMFS could make changes to the 2017 opening dates and
commercial retention limits if necessary to ensure equitable fishing
opportunities.
In the Atlantic region, NMFS proposes opening the aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management groups on or about January 1, 2017.
This opening date is the same date that these management groups opened
in 2016, although that decision later attracted significant attention
and opposition from shark advocates, particularly within the scuba
diving community, with respect to what they argue to be a lemon shark
aggregation site (see discussion below). As described below, this
opening date also takes into account all the criteria listed in Sec.
635.27(b)(3), and particularly the criterion that NMFS consider the
effects of catch rates in one part of a region precluding vessels in
another part of that region from having a reasonable opportunity to
harvest a portion of the different species and/or management quotas
(Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v)). In 2016, the data indicate that an opening
date of January 1 provided a reasonable opportunity for every part of
each region to harvest a portion of the available quotas (Sec.
635.27(b)(3)(i)) while accounting for variations in seasonal
distribution of the different species in the management groups (Sec.
635.27(b)(3)(iv)). Furthermore, in 2016, the fishing season for the
aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups remains currently
open with 25 percent of the quotas available as of July 15, 2016.
Because the quotas in 2017 are proposed to be the same as the quotas in
2016, NMFS expects that the season lengths and therefore the
participation of various fishermen throughout the region, would be
similar in 2017 (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)). Based on the recent
performance of the fishery, the January 1 opening date appears to be
meet the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments
((Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(vi)). Therefore, there is no information that
indicates changing the opening date is necessary.
After the final rule for the 2016 shark season published on
December 1, 2015 (80 FR 74999), and well outside the close of the
public comment period for that rule (September 17, 2015), NMFS received
extensive public comments opposing the January 1 opening date (for the
aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups) because of their
concerns about a lemon shark aggregation site off the east coast of
Florida which has become a popular local shark scuba diving site.
Commenters requested that NMFS change the opening date to the summer
months (e.g., June or July) to protect this lemon shark aggregation.
NMFS also received a petition to postpone the opening date in the
Atlantic region signed by more than 18,000 people. NMFS responded to
the petition as a petition for emergency rulemaking but did not change
the January 1 start date in response. Based on these comments and the
petition, NMFS held a public conference call on December 11, 2015, to
answer public questions regarding the Atlantic commercial shark
fishery. NMFS also gave a presentation on the biology and current stock
status of lemon sharks at the March 2016 HMS Advisory Panel meeting.
Data presented at the Advisory Panel meeting indicated that lemon
sharks may be more productive than previously thought, the commercial
shark fishery is not having a significant impact on lemon sharks in the
aggregation area or elsewhere, and current data on relative abundance
suggest population is stable. Landings of lemon sharks to date in the
Atlantic region are approximately 4,855 mt dw (2.2 lb dw), which are
less than the
[[Page 59174]]
average landings over the past 6 years (see the criteria at Sec.
635.27(b)(3)(iv), (v), and (vi) and Sec. 635.24(a)(8)(ii), (iv), and
(v)). There is no evidence that these landings have negatively impacted
the lemon shark population according to the Southeast Fisheries Science
Center scientists. Furthermore, NMFS considered information in the
comments received on the December 2015 final rule in proposing a start
date for 2017 and has determined they presented no new or additional
information that was not previously considered by the agency that would
warrant a different opening date. Therefore, NMFS is proposing the same
opening dates for the 2017 fishing season. This opening date meets the
management objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments (see the criteria at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(vi)) particularly in
regard to ensuring fishermen throughout the region have reasonable
opportunities to harvest a portion of the different species and/or
management group quotas (see the criteria at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(v) and
(vii)) while also considering important scientific information on the
seasonal distribution, abundance, and migratory patterns of the
different species within the management group (see the criteria at
Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(ii)). As described above, the fishery has performed
well, and in accordance with the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP, under the January 1 opening date. Therefore, there is no
information suggesting that changing the opening date is necessary.
However, NMFS will consider through this rulemaking any comments on the
opening date and any new information on lemon sharks (or other species)
not previously considered, and may in the final rule, adjust the
opening dates if warranted. The Notice of Availability for Amendment 10
to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, which should be publishing soon, will
address essential fish habitat and potential habitat areas of
particular concern for HMS species, including lemon sharks.
In addition, for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management
groups in the Atlantic region, NMFS is proposing that the commercial
retention trip limit for directed shark limited access permit holders
on the proposed opening date be 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip. This retention limit should allow fishermen to harvest
some of the 2017 quota at the beginning of the year when sharks are
more prevalent in the South Atlantic area (see the criteria at Sec.
635.24(a)(3)(i), (ii), (v), and (vi)). As was done in 2016, if it
appears that the quota is being harvested too quickly (i.e., about 20
percent) to allow directed fishermen throughout the entire region an
opportunity to fish and ensure enough quota remains until later in the
year, NMFS would reduce the commercial retention limits to incidental
levels (3 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip) or another
level calculated to reduce the harvest of LCS taking into account Sec.
635.27(b)(3) and the inseason trip limit adjustment criteria listed in
Sec. 635.24(a)(8), particularly the consideration of whether catch
rates in one part of a region or sub-region are precluding vessels in
another part of that region or sub-region from having a reasonable
opportunity to harvest a portion of the relevant quota (Sec.
635.24(a)(8)(vi)). If the quota continues to be harvested quickly, NMFS
could reduce the retention limit to 0 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip to ensure enough quota remains until later in the year.
If either situation occurs, NMFS would publish in the Federal Register
notification of any inseason adjustments of the retention limit to an
appropriate limit of sharks per trip. In 2016, NMFS reduced the
retention limit to 3 LCS other than sandbar sharks on April 2, 2016 (81
FR 18541) when hammerhead shark landings reached approximately 24
percent of the hammerhead quota, and did not need to reduce it further.
Also, as was done in 2016, NMFS will consider increasing the
commercial retention limits per trip at a later date if necessary to
provide fishermen in the northern portion of the Atlantic region an
opportunity to retain non-sandbar LCS after considering the appropriate
inseason adjustment criteria. Similarly, at some point later in the
year (e.g., July 15), potentially equivalent to how the 2016 fishing
season operated, NMFS may consider increasing the retention limit to
the default level (45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip) or another amount, as deemed appropriate, after considering the
inseason trip limit adjustment criteria. If the quota is being
harvested too quickly or too slowly, NMFS could adjust the retention
limit appropriately to ensure the fishery remains open most of the rest
of the year. Since the fishery is still open with majority of the quota
available, NMFS will monitor the rest of the fishing season and could
make changes to the proposed 2017 opening date if necessary to ensure
equitable fishing opportunities.
All of the shark management groups would remain open until December
31, 2017, or until NMFS determines that the fishing season landings for
any shark management group have reached, or are projected to reach, 80
percent of the available quota. If NMFS determines that a non-linked
shark species or management group must be closed, then, consistent with
Sec. 635.28(b)(2) for non-linked quotas (e.g., eastern Gulf of Mexico
blacktip, western Gulf of Mexico blacktip, Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose
SCS, pelagic sharks, or the Atlantic or Gulf of Mexico smoothhound
sharks), NMFS will publish in the Federal Register a notice of closure
for that shark species, shark management group, region, and/or sub-
region that will be effective no fewer than 5 days from date of filing.
For the blacktip shark management group, regulations at Sec.
635.28(b)(5)(i) through (v) authorize NMFS to close the management
group before landings reach, or are expected to reach, 80 percent of
the quota after considering the following criteria and other relevant
factors: Season length based on available sub-regional quota and
average sub-regional catch rates; variability in regional and/or sub-
regional seasonal distribution, abundance, and migratory patterns;
effects on accomplishing the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS
FMP and its amendments; amount of remaining shark quotas in the
relevant sub-region; and regional and/or sub-regional catch rates of
the relevant shark species or management groups. From the effective
date and time of the closure until NMFS announces, via the publication
of a notice in the Federal Register, that additional quota is available
and the season is reopened, the fisheries for the shark species or
management group are closed, even across fishing years.
If NMFS determines that a linked shark species or management group
must be closed, then, consistent with Sec. 635.28(b)(3) for linked
quotas, NMFS will publish in the Federal Register a notice of closure
for all of the species and/or management groups in a linked group that
will be effective no fewer than 5 days from date of filing. From the
effective date and time of the closure until NMFS announces, via the
publication of a notice in the Federal Register, that additional quota
is available and the season is reopened, the fisheries for all linked
species and/or management groups are closed, even across fishing years.
The linked quotas of the species and/or management groups are Atlantic
hammerhead sharks and Atlantic aggregated LCS; eastern Gulf of Mexico
hammerhead sharks and eastern Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS; western
Gulf of Mexico hammerhead sharks and western Gulf of Mexico aggregated
LCS; and Atlantic blacknose and Atlantic non-blacknose SCS south
[[Page 59175]]
of 34[deg] N. latitude. NMFS may close the fishery for the Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark before landings reach, or are expected to reach,
80 percent of the quota, after considering the criteria listed at Sec.
635.28(b)(5).
Request for Comments
Comments on this proposed rule may be submitted via https://www.regulations.gov by mail, and at a public hearing. NMFS solicits
comments on this proposed rule by September 27, 2016 (see DATES and
ADDRESSES).
In addition to comments on the entire proposed rule, NMFS is
specifically requesting comments on the proposed accounting of the 2012
and 2015 overharvest of Atlantic blacknose sharks from the 2016
underharvest. As described above, in 2016, NMFS closed the Atlantic
blacknose shark management group once the quota was projected to exceed
80 percent. As of July 15, 2016, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was
underharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,737 lb dw). This underharvest (3.5 mt
dw) is greater than the remaining amounts of the 2012 and 2015
overharvests (3.0 mt dw) (6,636 lb dw). As such, NMFS is proposing to
use the 2016 underharvest to cover the remaining 2012 and 2015
overharvest. This proposal would reduce potential negative social and
economic impacts on the blacknose shark and non-blacknose SCS
fisheries, which are linked fisheries in the Atlantic region south of
34[deg] N. latitude while maintaining the ecological benefits of the
current blacknose shark rebuilding plan. If NMFS continued to spread
the overharvest from 2012 and 2015 through 2018, the Atlantic blacknose
shark quota in 2017 would be reduced by 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb dw) in 2017
and the 2017 adjusted quota would be 15.7 mt dw (34,653 lb dw).
However, if NMFS uses the 2016 underharvest to cover the remaining
overharvest 2012 and 2015 overharvest, the blacknose shark quota would
not be reduced in 2017 or 2018 as a result of the 2012 and 2015
overharvests. As a result of this proposal, the 2017 annual base quota
would be 17.2 mt dw (37,921 lb dw), which could result in the fishery
remaining open longer in the Atlantic region south of 34[deg] N.
latitude and have social and economic beneficial impacts for blacknose
and non-blacknose fishermen and dealers.
During the comment period, NMFS will hold one conference call and
webinar for this proposed rule. NMFS is requesting comments on any of
the measures or analyses described in this proposed rule. The
conference call and webinar will be held on September 22, 2016, from 2-
4 p.m. EST. Please see the DATES and ADDRESSES headings for more
information.
The public is reminded that NMFS expects participants on phone
conferences to conduct themselves appropriately. At the beginning of
the conference call, a representative of NMFS will explain the ground
rules (e.g., all comments are to be directed to the agency on the
proposed action; attendees will be called to give their comments in the
order in which they registered to speak; each attendee will have an
equal amount of time to speak; attendees may not interrupt one another;
etc.). NMFS representative(s) will structure the meeting so that all
attending members of the public will be able to comment, if they so
choose, regardless of the controversial nature of the subject(s).
Attendees are expected to respect the ground rules, and those that do
not may be removed from the conference call.
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that the proposed
rule is consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject
to further consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
NMFS determined that the final rules to implement Amendment 2 to
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (June 24, 2008, 73 FR 35778; corrected on
July 15, 2008, 73 FR 40658), Amendment 5a to the 2006 Consolidated HMS
FMP (78 FR 40318; July 3, 2013), Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP (80 FR 50073; August 18, 2015), and Amendment 9 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP (80 FR 73128; November 24, 2015) are consistent to
the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable policies of the
approved coastal management program of coastal states on the Atlantic
including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea as required under
the Coastal Zone Management Act. Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.41(a), NMFS
provided the Coastal Zone Management Program of each coastal state a
60-day period to review the consistency determination and to advise the
Agency of their concurrence. NMFS received concurrence with the
consistency determinations from several states and inferred consistency
from those states that did not respond within the 60-day time period.
This proposed action to establish opening dates and adjust quotas for
the 2017 fishing season for the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries
does not change the framework previously consulted upon; therefore, no
additional consultation is required.
An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. The IRFA analysis follows.
Section 603(b)(1) of the RFA requires agencies to explain the
purpose of the rule. This rule, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments, is being
proposed to establish the 2017 commercial shark fishing quotas,
retention limits, and fishing seasons. Without this rule, the
commercial shark fisheries would close on December 31, 2016, and would
not open until another action was taken. This proposed rule would be
implemented according to the regulations implementing the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments. Thus, NMFS expects few, if
any, economic impacts to fishermen other than those already analyzed in
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments, based on the quota
adjustments.
Section 603(b)(2) of the RFA requires agencies to explain the
rule's objectives. The objectives of this rule are to: Adjust the
baseline quotas for all Atlantic shark management groups based on any
over- and/or underharvests from the previous fishing year(s); establish
the opening dates of the various management groups; and establish the
retention limits for the blacktip shark, aggregated large coastal
shark, and hammerhead shark management groups in order to provide, to
the extent practicable, equitable opportunities across the fishing
management regions and/or sub-regions while also considering the
ecological needs of the different shark species.
Section 603(b)(3) of the RFA requires agencies to provide an
estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule would apply.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size criteria
for all major industry sectors in the United States, including fish
harvesters. Provision is made under SBA's regulations for an agency to
develop its own industry-specific size standards after consultation
with Advocacy and an opportunity for public comment (see 13 CFR
121.903(c)). Under this provision, NMFS may establish size standards
that differ from those established by the SBA Office of Size Standards,
but only for use by
[[Page 59176]]
NMFS and only for the purpose of conducting an analysis of economic
effects in fulfillment of the agency's obligations under the RFA. To
utilize this provision, NMFS must publish such size standards in the
Federal Register (FR), which NMFS did on December 29, 2015 (80 FR
81194, December 29, 2015). In this final rule effective on July 1,
2016, NMFS established a small business size standard of $11 million in
annual gross receipts for all businesses in the commercial fishing
industry (NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance purposes. NMFS considers all
HMS permit holders to be small entities because they had average annual
receipts of less than $11 million for commercial fishing.
As of July 2016, the proposed rule would apply to the approximately
224 directed commercial shark permit holders, 272 incidental commercial
shark permit holders, 89 smoothhound shark permit holders, and 108
commercial shark dealers. Not all permit holders are active in the
fishery in any given year. Active directed commercial shark permit
holders are defined as those with valid permits that landed one shark
based on HMS electronic dealer reports. Of the 496 directed and
incidental commercial shark permit holders, only 23 permit holders
landed sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region and only 88 landed sharks in
the Atlantic region. Of the 89 smoothhound shark permit holders, only
49 permit holders landed smoothhound sharks in the Atlantic region and
none landed smoothhound sharks in the Gulf of Mexico region. NMFS has
determined that the proposed rule would not likely affect any small
governmental jurisdictions.
This proposed rule does not contain any new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements (5 U.S.C. 603(b)(4)).
Similarly, this proposed rule would not conflict, duplicate, or overlap
with other relevant Federal rules (5 U.S.C. 603(b)(5)). Fishermen,
dealers, and managers in these fisheries must comply with a number of
international agreements as domestically implemented, domestic laws,
and FMPs. These include, but are not limited to, the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act, the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered
Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Paperwork
Reduction Act, and the Coastal Zone Management Act.
Section 603(c) of the RFA requires each IRFA to contain a
description of any significant alternatives to the proposed rule which
would accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and
minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small
entities. Additionally, the RFA (5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)-(4)) lists four
general categories of significant alternatives that would assist an
agency in the development of significant alternatives. These categories
of alternatives are: (1) Establishment of differing compliance or
reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the
resources available to small entities; (2) clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting
requirements under the rule for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design standards; and, (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule for small entities. In order to meet the
objectives of this proposed rule, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, NMFS cannot exempt small entities or change the reporting
requirements only for small entities because all the entities affected
are considered small entities; therefore, there are no alternatives
discussed that fall under the first and fourth categories described
above. NMFS does not know of any performance or design standards that
would satisfy the aforementioned objectives of this rulemaking while,
concurrently, complying with the Magnuson-Stevens Act; therefore, there
are no alternatives considered under the third category.
This rulemaking does not establish management measures to be
implemented, but rather implements previously adopted and analyzed
measures with adjustments, as specified in the 2006 Consolidated HMS
FMP and its amendments and the Environmental Assessment (EA) that
accompanied the 2011 shark quota specifications rule (75 FR 76302;
December 8, 2010). Thus, NMFS proposes to adjust quotas established and
analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments by
subtracting the underharvest or adding the overharvest as allowable.
Thus, NMFS has limited flexibility to modify the quotas in this rule,
the impacts of which were analyzed in previous regulatory flexibility
analyses.
Based on the 2015 ex-vessel price, fully harvesting the unadjusted
2017 Atlantic shark commercial baseline quotas could result in total
fleet revenues of $8,265,467 (see Table 3). For the Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark management group, NMFS is proposing to increase the
baseline sub-regional quotas due to the underharvests in 2016. The
increase for the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group
could result in a $24,141 gain in total revenues for fishermen in that
sub-region, while the increase for the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark management group could result in a $222,196 gain in total
revenues for fishermen in that sub-region. For the Gulf of Mexico and
Atlantic smoothhound shark management groups, NMFS is proposing to
increase the baseline quotas due to the underharvest in 2016. This
would cause a potential gain in revenue of $270,323 for the fleet in
the Gulf of Mexico region and a potential gain in revenue of $965,095
for the fleet in the Atlantic region.
All of these changes in gross revenues are similar to the changes
in gross revenues analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments. The final regulatory flexibility analyses for those
amendments concluded that the economic impacts on these small entities
are expected to be minimal. In the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments and the EA for the 2011 shark quota specifications rule,
NMFS stated it would be conducting annual rulemakings and considering
the potential economic impacts of adjusting the quotas for under- and
overharvests at that time.
Table 3--Average Ex-Vessel Prices per lb dw for Each Shark Management Group, 2015
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average ex- Average ex-
Region Species vessel meat vessel fin
price price
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gulf of Mexico................................ Blacktip Shark.................. $0.51 $9.95
Aggregated LCS.................. 0.55 9.96
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.61 11.98
Non-Blacknose SCS............... 0.35 6.72
Smoothhound Shark *............. 0.65 1.58
[[Page 59177]]
Atlantic...................................... Aggregated LCS.................. 0.80 4.73
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.65 10.25
Non-Blacknose SCS............... 0.73 4.36
Blacknose Shark................. 0.97 4.00
Smoothhound Shark *............. 0.65 1.58
No Region..................................... Shark Research Fishery 0.68 9.24
(Aggregated LCS).
Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar 0.76 10.62
only).
Blue shark...................... 0.60 2.93
Porbeagle shark................. 1.50 2.93
Other Pelagic sharks............ 1.50 2.93
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Ex-vessel prices for smoothhound sharks come from HMS dealers who submitted landings data voluntarily before
it was a requirement on March 15, 2016.
For this proposed rule, NMFS also reviewed the criteria at Sec.
635.27(b)(3) to determine when opening each fishery would provide
equitable opportunities for fishermen, to the extent practicable, while
also considering the ecological needs of the different species. The
opening dates of the fishing season(s) could vary depending upon the
available annual quota, catch rates, and number of fishing participants
during the year. For the 2017 fishing season, NMFS is proposing to open
all of the shark management groups on the effective date of the final
rule for this action (expected to be on or about January 1). The direct
and indirect economic impacts would be neutral on a short- and long-
term basis because NMFS is not proposing to change the opening dates of
these fisheries from the status quo.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: August 22, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-20505 Filed 8-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P