Environmental Impact Statement for the Long Bridge Project in Washington, DC, 59036-59038 [2016-20481]
Download as PDF
59036
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2016 / Notices
boarding and exiting the motorcoach
and to use the handrail when ascending
or descending steps. Encourage
passengers to remain seated as much as
possible while the motorcoach is in
motion. If it is necessary to walk while
the motorcoach is moving, passengers
should always use handrails and
supports.
Methods of Presenting the Amended
Safety Information
The following presentation methods
are examples of how to present safety
information to motorcoach passengers.
The list below should not be construed
to restrict combinations of the following
methods or additional presentation
methods.
1. During passenger boarding—
Informational pamphlets or printed
materials could be distributed to
motorcoach passengers during boarding.
2. After passenger boarding and
immediately prior to moving the
motorcoach—
a. The driver requests the passengers
to review informational pamphlets/
printed materials located in the seat
back pocket.
b. The driver provides an oral
presentation (similar to the
presentations by airline flight attendants
prior to take-off) with or without
informational pamphlets/printed
materials as visual aids.
c. An automated presentation over the
motorcoach audio system.
d. An automated presentation over the
motorcoach video system.
Timing and Frequency of the
Presentation
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Demand-responsive motorcoach
operations, such as charters and tour
services, should present the safety
information to motorcoach passengers
after boarding and prior to movement of
the motorcoach.
Fixed route motorcoach service
operations should present the safety
information at all major stops or
terminals, after any new passengers
have boarded and prior to movement of
the motorcoach.
Issued on: August 18, 2016.
T.F. Scott, Darling, III,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–20493 Filed 8–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:17 Aug 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Long Bridge Project in
Washington, DC
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare
an environmental impact statement
(EIS).
AGENCY:
FRA announces its intent to
prepare an EIS for the Long Bridge
Project jointly with the District
Department of Transportation (DDOT).
The Long Bridge Project (Proposed
Action) consists of potential
improvements to bridge and related
railroad infrastructure located between
the Virginia Railway Express (VRE)
Crystal City Station in Arlington,
Virginia and Control Point (CP) Virginia
in Washington, DC. FRA and DDOT will
develop the EIS in compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
FRA and DDOT invite the public and
Federal, state, and local agencies to
provide comments on the scope of the
EIS, including the purpose and need;
alternatives to analyze; environmental
effects to consider and evaluate;
methodologies to use for evaluating
effects; and the approach for public and
agency involvement.
DATES: Persons interested in providing
written comments on the scope of the
EIS (scoping comments) must do so by
September 26, 2016. Please submit
written comments via the methods
specified below.
A public scoping meeting is
scheduled on Wednesday, September
14, 2016, between 3:00 p.m. and 6:00
p.m. in Washington, DC. The meeting
will be held at the L’Enfant Plaza Club
Room, Promenade Level, 470 L’Enfant
Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024. Oral
and written comments will be accepted
at the September 14, 2016 meeting. The
meeting facilities will be accessible to
persons with disabilities. If special
translation, signing services, or other
special accommodations are needed,
please email: info@
longbridgeproject.com, or call 202–671–
2829 at least one week prior to the
meeting.
ADDRESSES: The public and other
interested parties are encouraged to
submit written scoping comments by
mail, the Internet, email, or in person at
the scoping meeting. Scoping comments
can be mailed to the address identified
in the ‘‘For Further Information
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Contact’’ paragraph below. Internet and
email correspondence may be submitted
through the Long Bridge Project Web
site (https://longbridgeproject.com/) or at
info@longbridgeproject.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Murphy, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Office of Railroad
Policy and Development, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., (Mail Stop–20),
Washington, DC 20590; telephone: (202)
493–0624.
FRA is an
operating administration of DOT and is
responsible for overseeing the safety of
railroad operations, including the safety
of any proposed rail ground
transportation system. FRA is also
authorized to provide, subject to
appropriations, funding for intercity
passenger and rail capital investments
and to provide loans and other financial
support for railroad investment. In 2016,
FRA awarded DDOT a grant to prepare
an EIS for the Proposed Action, and
FRA may provide funding or financing
for the rehabilitation or replacement of
the Long Bridge in the future.
FRA is the lead Federal agency under
NEPA; DDOT, as project sponsor, is a
joint lead agency. FRA and DDOT will
prepare the EIS consistent with NEPA,
the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of NEPA in 40
CFR parts 1500–1508; FRA’s Procedures
for Considering Environmental Impacts
in 64 FR 28545, dated May 26, 1999;
and 23 U.S.C. 139. After release and
circulation of a Draft EIS for public
comment, FRA will issue a single
document consisting of the Final EIS
and a Record of Decision under the
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
Act (Pub. L. 114–94, section 1304(n)(2))
unless it determines that statutory
criteria or practicability considerations
preclude issuing a combined document.
The EIS will also document
compliance with other applicable
Federal, state, and local environmental
laws and regulations, including: section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act; the Clean Water Act;
section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act of 1966; the
Endangered Species Act; Executive
Order 11988 and USDOT Order 5650.2
on Floodplain Management; Executive
Order 11990 on Protection of Wetlands;
the Magnuson-Stevens Act related to
Essential Fish Habitat; the Coastal Zone
Management Act; and Executive Order
12898 on Environmental Justice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2016 / Notices
Project Background
The current Long Bridge, dating from
1904, is owned and maintained by CSX
Transportation (CSXT). It is the only
freight railroad crossing over the
Potomac River between the District of
Columbia and the Commonwealth of
Virginia. The two-track bridge serves
CSXT freight trains, National Railroad
Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
passenger rail trains, and VRE
commuter rail trains. Norfolk-Southern
(NS) has trackage rights on the bridge
and connecting CSXT tracks but does
not currently exercise those rights.
In 2011, DDOT received a High Speed
Intercity Passenger Rail grant from FRA
to complete a two-phase feasibility
study of the rehabilitation or
replacement of the Long Bridge. Long
Bridge Study Phase I included a
preliminary operations plan; visual
inspection of the corridor; initial
evaluation of existing and future
capacity needs; and preliminary
development of conceptual alternatives.
Phase II of the Long Bridge Study
developed a draft Purpose and Need
Statement; developed a service plan
based on future demand in the corridor;
further refined conceptual alternatives;
and defined evaluation criteria to screen
and identify alternatives which will be
carried forward for analysis. In 2016,
DDOT received a Transportation
Investment Generating Economic
Recovery grant from FRA for the
preparation of the Long Bridge EIS
(Phase III).
The Long Bridge is located within the
Washington Monumental Core. The EIS
Study Area extends approximately 3.2
miles from the VRE Crystal City Station
in Arlington, Virginia to CP Virginia
located near Third Street SW., in
Washington, DC. The EIS Study Area
includes Federal park land managed by
the National Park Service; historic and
cultural properties; the Potomac River;
offices, hotels, and apartment buildings;
transportation facilities (VRE Crystal
City Station, VRE L’Enfant Station, Long
Bridge, eleven other railroad bridges,
and four roadway bridges); and
numerous pedestrian and bicycle trails.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the Proposed Action
is to address reliability and long-term
railroad capacity issues for the Long
Bridge corridor. The Proposed Action is
needed to identify alternatives that
would increase capacity to meet
projected demand for passenger and
freight rail services; improve operational
flexibility and resiliency; and provide
redundancy for this critical link in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:17 Aug 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
local, regional, and national railroad
network.
The need to make improvements to
the Long Bridge corridor is noted in
various studies. An Amtrak study in
1999 (Potential Improvements to the
Washington Richmond Railroad
Corridor) identifies the Washington
Metropolitan Area, including the Long
Bridge, as the most critical section of the
Southeast High Speed Rail (SEHSR)
corridor and stated the need for capacity
improvements. Following the 1999
infrastructure study, FRA completed a
Tier 1 EIS for the SEHSR corridor (May
2002). The Tier 1 EIS identified a
Preferred Alternative that utilized the
Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac
rail corridor, which includes the Long
Bridge. VRE’s System Plan 2040 states
that increasing the capacity at the Long
Bridge is critical to its long-term growth
and development. Additionally, the
Metropolitan Washington Council of
Governments’ National Capital Region
Freight Plan recommends a new rail
bridge over the Potomac to minimize
rail conflicts between passenger and
freight trains.
Current and projected rail demand
supports the need for capacity
improvements to the Long Bridge
corridor. Intercity passenger and
commuter services operate at or close to
capacity within the corridor during the
morning peak hour, with eight
passenger train movements scheduled
in 60 minutes. Over the course of a full
weekday, Amtrak and VRE currently
operate 24 and 32 trains across the Long
Bridge, respectively. CSXT freight trains
operate approximately 18 throughfreight trains each day on the same
tracks used by the two passenger train
operators.
Future rail demand during peak
periods is forecasted to exceed the
current capacity for Long Bridge.
According to the service plan developed
in Phase II of the Long Bridge Project,
over the course of the full day, the
number of trains crossing the bridge in
2040 is expected to increase to 44 trains
for Amtrak, 92 for VRE, eight for the
Maryland Area Regional Commuter
(MARC); 42 for CSXT, and six for NS.
The projected growth represents an
average increase of over 100 percent in
traffic on the bridge compared to 2015.
The existing track infrastructure, which
is limited by the two-track design of the
Long Bridge, cannot support the
increased demand.
The removal of additional rail
capacity bottlenecks east and south of
the Long Bridge, combined with
population and employment growth in
the Washington Metropolitan Area,
increases the need for greater railroad
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59037
capacity within the wider corridor.
Attempting to serve future intercity
passenger and freight rail demand solely
on the current Long Bridge would not
provide needed resiliency or
redundancy within the Virginia to DC
rail network. Limited capacity, coupled
with shared-use infrastructure within
the corridor, limits the flexibility of
commuter, intercity passenger, and
freight service to operate efficiently.
These conditions create a systemic
bottleneck that results in operational
conflicts and delays, decreasing
reliability and on-time performance of
train operations. Currently, there are no
reasonable detours to route rail traffic
around the Long Bridge for maintenance
or emergencies without extensive
service delays.
This bottleneck limits efficient
network connectivity for the rail
operators within the Long Bridge
corridor, including CSXT, VRE, Amtrak,
and potentially MARC, and the overall
transportation network. It also affects
rail operations well beyond the limits of
the Long Bridge corridor given the
extensive reach of freight, commuter,
and intercity passenger services along
the eastern U.S. and beyond.
Proposed Alternatives To Consider
The EIS will consider a range of
reasonable alternatives that FRA and
DDOT will develop based on the
purpose and need for the Proposed
Action, information obtained through
the scoping process, and previous
reports. The 2015 Long Bridge Study
Phase I identified concepts that are
included in the initial range of
alternatives to be considered in the EIS.
FRA and DDOT will evaluate and screen
the Phase I concepts and additional
concepts during the NEPA process for
elimination or further refinement.
Alternatives will include the No-Build
Alternative and Build Alternatives,
including potential rehabilitation and/or
replacement of the existing bridge.
Possible Effects
The EIS will analyze the potential
direct, indirect, and cumulative effects
of the alternatives on the social,
economic, and environmental resources
in the Study Area. Environmental
resources include, but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Transportation;
Social and economic conditions;
Property acquisition;
Parks and recreational resources;
Visual and aesthetic resources;
Historic and archaeological resources;
Air quality;
Aquatic navigation;
Greenhouse gas emissions and resilience;
Noise and vibration;
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
59038
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2016 / Notices
• Ecology (including wetlands, water and
sediment quality, floodplains, and biological
resources);
• Threatened and endangered species;
• Contaminated materials; and
• Environmental Justice.
This analysis will include
identification of study areas appropriate
for each resource; documentation of the
affected environment; and identification
of measures to avoid and/or mitigate
significant adverse impacts.
This Notice initiates the scoping
process under NEPA, which helps guide
the development of the Draft EIS. The
FRA and DDOT invite comments from
the public and all interested parties
regarding the scope of the EIS to ensure
that relevant issues, applicable planning
efforts, constraints, and reasonable
alternatives are addressed early in the
development of the EIS. FRA and DDOT
will also directly contact appropriate
Federal, state, and local agencies as well
as and private organizations that have
previously expressed or that are known
to have an interest in the Proposed
Action.
FRA and DDOT will coordinate with
participating agencies during
development of the Draft EIS under 23
U.S.C. 139. FRA will invite all agencies
and Native American Tribes that may
have an interest in the Proposed Action
to become participating agencies for the
EIS. If an agency or Native American
Tribe is not invited and would like to
participate, please contact FRA (‘‘For
Further Information Contact’’ section).
The lead agencies will develop a
Coordination Plan summarizing how the
public and other agencies will be
engaged in the process. The
Coordination Plan will be posted to the
Project Web site (https://longbridge
project.com/) and to FRA’s Web site
(www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0214).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Future Public Participation and
Outreach
At various milestones during the
development of the Long Bridge EIS,
FRA and DDOT will provide additional
opportunities for public and interested
party consultation, such as public
meetings, open houses, newsletters, and
requests for comments/review of the
EIS. Dates, times, and locations for
public meetings and other opportunities
for public participation will be
announced through the Long Bridge
Project Web site (https://longbridge
project.com/), mailings, public notices,
advertisements, and press releases.
21:17 Aug 25, 2016
[FR Doc. 2016–20481 Filed 8–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA—2016–0084; Notice 2]
Scoping and Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 19,
2016.
Felicia Young,
Acting Director, Office of Program Delivery.
Jkt 238001
Withdrawal of Amendments to
Highway Safety Program Guidelines
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice withdrawal.
AGENCY:
On August 23, 2016, NHTSA
inadvertently published, at 81 FR
57646, a notice seeking comments on a
new uniform guideline for State
highway safety programs, issued
pursuant to section 402 of title 23 of the
United States Code requires the
Secretary of Transportation to
promulgate uniform guidelines for State
highway safety programs. NHTSA is
withdrawing the August 23, 2016
notice.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
Issued on: August 23, 2016.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2016–20578 Filed 8–24–16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2016–0069]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Request for Comments;
Clearance of a New Information
Collection(s): U.S. Department of
Transportation Accessibility Concern
Form
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1994, (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces the U.S. Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) intention to
request the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval for the
utilization of the U.S. Department of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Transportation Accessibility Concern
Form when reporting accessibility
challenges faced during travel on our
Nation’s streets, sidewalks, crosswalks,
buses, trains, airports, and planes. The
system will provide an accessible,
coordinated, and seamless web-based
portal for the traveling public to submit
accessibility problems or challenges
they face during travel on the Nation’s
streets, sidewalks, crosswalks, buses,
trains, airports, and planes. The
establishment of the system is in
response the President’s National
Council on Disability (NCD) Report,
‘‘Transition Update: Where We’ve Been
and What We’ve Learned,’’ released in
2015, as well as a letter to the Secretary
of Transportation from the NCD dated
May 12, 2015. The information received
through the system will strengthen
DOT’s ability to understand the
challenges and impacts that passengers
with disabilities face every day when
they use our nation’ transportation
systems. A Federal Register Notice with
a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on this information
collection was published on June 13,
2016 (81 FR 38264). No comments were
received.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by September 26, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding
the burden estimate, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to
the Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of
the Secretary of Transportation, 725
17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
Comments may also be sent via email to
OMB at the following address: oira_
submissions@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yvette Rivera, Departmental Office of
Civil Rights, Office of the Secretary, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590; 202–366–4648;
adaconcerns@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: XXXX–NEW.
Title: Transportation Accessibility
Concern Form.
Form Numbers: None.
Type of Review: OMB Approval.
Background: The current process for
submitting concerns about American
with Disabilities Act, as amended,
(ADA) and other related civil rights
violations is fragmented across the
Department—sometimes being time
consuming and cumbersome for the
traveling public. Establishing a
streamlined and consistent process
would respond directly to the
President’s National Council on
Disability, and more importantly, the
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 166 (Friday, August 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59036-59038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20481]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for the Long Bridge Project in
Washington, DC
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FRA announces its intent to prepare an EIS for the Long Bridge
Project jointly with the District Department of Transportation (DDOT).
The Long Bridge Project (Proposed Action) consists of potential
improvements to bridge and related railroad infrastructure located
between the Virginia Railway Express (VRE) Crystal City Station in
Arlington, Virginia and Control Point (CP) Virginia in Washington, DC.
FRA and DDOT will develop the EIS in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. FRA and
DDOT invite the public and Federal, state, and local agencies to
provide comments on the scope of the EIS, including the purpose and
need; alternatives to analyze; environmental effects to consider and
evaluate; methodologies to use for evaluating effects; and the approach
for public and agency involvement.
DATES: Persons interested in providing written comments on the scope of
the EIS (scoping comments) must do so by September 26, 2016. Please
submit written comments via the methods specified below.
A public scoping meeting is scheduled on Wednesday, September 14,
2016, between 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. in Washington, DC. The meeting
will be held at the L'Enfant Plaza Club Room, Promenade Level, 470
L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024. Oral and written comments
will be accepted at the September 14, 2016 meeting. The meeting
facilities will be accessible to persons with disabilities. If special
translation, signing services, or other special accommodations are
needed, please email: info@longbridgeproject.com, or call 202-671-2829
at least one week prior to the meeting.
ADDRESSES: The public and other interested parties are encouraged to
submit written scoping comments by mail, the Internet, email, or in
person at the scoping meeting. Scoping comments can be mailed to the
address identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' paragraph
below. Internet and email correspondence may be submitted through the
Long Bridge Project Web site (https://longbridgeproject.com/) or at
info@longbridgeproject.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Murphy, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Office of Railroad Policy and Development,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., (Mail
Stop-20), Washington, DC 20590; telephone: (202) 493-0624.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FRA is an operating administration of DOT
and is responsible for overseeing the safety of railroad operations,
including the safety of any proposed rail ground transportation system.
FRA is also authorized to provide, subject to appropriations, funding
for intercity passenger and rail capital investments and to provide
loans and other financial support for railroad investment. In 2016, FRA
awarded DDOT a grant to prepare an EIS for the Proposed Action, and FRA
may provide funding or financing for the rehabilitation or replacement
of the Long Bridge in the future.
FRA is the lead Federal agency under NEPA; DDOT, as project
sponsor, is a joint lead agency. FRA and DDOT will prepare the EIS
consistent with NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations
for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA in 40 CFR parts
1500-1508; FRA's Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts in 64
FR 28545, dated May 26, 1999; and 23 U.S.C. 139. After release and
circulation of a Draft EIS for public comment, FRA will issue a single
document consisting of the Final EIS and a Record of Decision under the
Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (Pub. L. 114-94, section
1304(n)(2)) unless it determines that statutory criteria or
practicability considerations preclude issuing a combined document.
The EIS will also document compliance with other applicable
Federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations,
including: section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; the
Clean Water Act; section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act
of 1966; the Endangered Species Act; Executive Order 11988 and USDOT
Order 5650.2 on Floodplain Management; Executive Order 11990 on
Protection of Wetlands; the Magnuson-Stevens Act related to Essential
Fish Habitat; the Coastal Zone Management Act; and Executive Order
12898 on Environmental Justice.
[[Page 59037]]
Project Background
The current Long Bridge, dating from 1904, is owned and maintained
by CSX Transportation (CSXT). It is the only freight railroad crossing
over the Potomac River between the District of Columbia and the
Commonwealth of Virginia. The two-track bridge serves CSXT freight
trains, National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) passenger rail
trains, and VRE commuter rail trains. Norfolk-Southern (NS) has
trackage rights on the bridge and connecting CSXT tracks but does not
currently exercise those rights.
In 2011, DDOT received a High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail grant
from FRA to complete a two-phase feasibility study of the
rehabilitation or replacement of the Long Bridge. Long Bridge Study
Phase I included a preliminary operations plan; visual inspection of
the corridor; initial evaluation of existing and future capacity needs;
and preliminary development of conceptual alternatives. Phase II of the
Long Bridge Study developed a draft Purpose and Need Statement;
developed a service plan based on future demand in the corridor;
further refined conceptual alternatives; and defined evaluation
criteria to screen and identify alternatives which will be carried
forward for analysis. In 2016, DDOT received a Transportation
Investment Generating Economic Recovery grant from FRA for the
preparation of the Long Bridge EIS (Phase III).
The Long Bridge is located within the Washington Monumental Core.
The EIS Study Area extends approximately 3.2 miles from the VRE Crystal
City Station in Arlington, Virginia to CP Virginia located near Third
Street SW., in Washington, DC. The EIS Study Area includes Federal park
land managed by the National Park Service; historic and cultural
properties; the Potomac River; offices, hotels, and apartment
buildings; transportation facilities (VRE Crystal City Station, VRE
L'Enfant Station, Long Bridge, eleven other railroad bridges, and four
roadway bridges); and numerous pedestrian and bicycle trails.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the Proposed Action is to address reliability and
long-term railroad capacity issues for the Long Bridge corridor. The
Proposed Action is needed to identify alternatives that would increase
capacity to meet projected demand for passenger and freight rail
services; improve operational flexibility and resiliency; and provide
redundancy for this critical link in the local, regional, and national
railroad network.
The need to make improvements to the Long Bridge corridor is noted
in various studies. An Amtrak study in 1999 (Potential Improvements to
the Washington Richmond Railroad Corridor) identifies the Washington
Metropolitan Area, including the Long Bridge, as the most critical
section of the Southeast High Speed Rail (SEHSR) corridor and stated
the need for capacity improvements. Following the 1999 infrastructure
study, FRA completed a Tier 1 EIS for the SEHSR corridor (May 2002).
The Tier 1 EIS identified a Preferred Alternative that utilized the
Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac rail corridor, which includes the
Long Bridge. VRE's System Plan 2040 states that increasing the capacity
at the Long Bridge is critical to its long-term growth and development.
Additionally, the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments'
National Capital Region Freight Plan recommends a new rail bridge over
the Potomac to minimize rail conflicts between passenger and freight
trains.
Current and projected rail demand supports the need for capacity
improvements to the Long Bridge corridor. Intercity passenger and
commuter services operate at or close to capacity within the corridor
during the morning peak hour, with eight passenger train movements
scheduled in 60 minutes. Over the course of a full weekday, Amtrak and
VRE currently operate 24 and 32 trains across the Long Bridge,
respectively. CSXT freight trains operate approximately 18 through-
freight trains each day on the same tracks used by the two passenger
train operators.
Future rail demand during peak periods is forecasted to exceed the
current capacity for Long Bridge. According to the service plan
developed in Phase II of the Long Bridge Project, over the course of
the full day, the number of trains crossing the bridge in 2040 is
expected to increase to 44 trains for Amtrak, 92 for VRE, eight for the
Maryland Area Regional Commuter (MARC); 42 for CSXT, and six for NS.
The projected growth represents an average increase of over 100 percent
in traffic on the bridge compared to 2015. The existing track
infrastructure, which is limited by the two-track design of the Long
Bridge, cannot support the increased demand.
The removal of additional rail capacity bottlenecks east and south
of the Long Bridge, combined with population and employment growth in
the Washington Metropolitan Area, increases the need for greater
railroad capacity within the wider corridor. Attempting to serve future
intercity passenger and freight rail demand solely on the current Long
Bridge would not provide needed resiliency or redundancy within the
Virginia to DC rail network. Limited capacity, coupled with shared-use
infrastructure within the corridor, limits the flexibility of commuter,
intercity passenger, and freight service to operate efficiently. These
conditions create a systemic bottleneck that results in operational
conflicts and delays, decreasing reliability and on-time performance of
train operations. Currently, there are no reasonable detours to route
rail traffic around the Long Bridge for maintenance or emergencies
without extensive service delays.
This bottleneck limits efficient network connectivity for the rail
operators within the Long Bridge corridor, including CSXT, VRE, Amtrak,
and potentially MARC, and the overall transportation network. It also
affects rail operations well beyond the limits of the Long Bridge
corridor given the extensive reach of freight, commuter, and intercity
passenger services along the eastern U.S. and beyond.
Proposed Alternatives To Consider
The EIS will consider a range of reasonable alternatives that FRA
and DDOT will develop based on the purpose and need for the Proposed
Action, information obtained through the scoping process, and previous
reports. The 2015 Long Bridge Study Phase I identified concepts that
are included in the initial range of alternatives to be considered in
the EIS. FRA and DDOT will evaluate and screen the Phase I concepts and
additional concepts during the NEPA process for elimination or further
refinement. Alternatives will include the No-Build Alternative and
Build Alternatives, including potential rehabilitation and/or
replacement of the existing bridge.
Possible Effects
The EIS will analyze the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects of the alternatives on the social, economic, and environmental
resources in the Study Area. Environmental resources include, but are
not limited to:
Transportation;
Social and economic conditions;
Property acquisition;
Parks and recreational resources;
Visual and aesthetic resources;
Historic and archaeological resources;
Air quality;
Aquatic navigation;
Greenhouse gas emissions and resilience;
Noise and vibration;
[[Page 59038]]
Ecology (including wetlands, water and sediment
quality, floodplains, and biological resources);
Threatened and endangered species;
Contaminated materials; and
Environmental Justice.
This analysis will include identification of study areas
appropriate for each resource; documentation of the affected
environment; and identification of measures to avoid and/or mitigate
significant adverse impacts.
Scoping and Comments
This Notice initiates the scoping process under NEPA, which helps
guide the development of the Draft EIS. The FRA and DDOT invite
comments from the public and all interested parties regarding the scope
of the EIS to ensure that relevant issues, applicable planning efforts,
constraints, and reasonable alternatives are addressed early in the
development of the EIS. FRA and DDOT will also directly contact
appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies as well as and private
organizations that have previously expressed or that are known to have
an interest in the Proposed Action.
FRA and DDOT will coordinate with participating agencies during
development of the Draft EIS under 23 U.S.C. 139. FRA will invite all
agencies and Native American Tribes that may have an interest in the
Proposed Action to become participating agencies for the EIS. If an
agency or Native American Tribe is not invited and would like to
participate, please contact FRA (``For Further Information Contact''
section). The lead agencies will develop a Coordination Plan
summarizing how the public and other agencies will be engaged in the
process. The Coordination Plan will be posted to the Project Web site
(https://longbridgeproject.com/) and to FRA's Web site (www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0214).
Future Public Participation and Outreach
At various milestones during the development of the Long Bridge
EIS, FRA and DDOT will provide additional opportunities for public and
interested party consultation, such as public meetings, open houses,
newsletters, and requests for comments/review of the EIS. Dates, times,
and locations for public meetings and other opportunities for public
participation will be announced through the Long Bridge Project Web
site (https://longbridgeproject.com/), mailings, public notices,
advertisements, and press releases.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 19, 2016.
Felicia Young,
Acting Director, Office of Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 2016-20481 Filed 8-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P