Safety Zone; Columbia River, Sand Island, WA, 57507-57509 [2016-20132]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(this is not a toll-free number). Hearingor speech-impaired individuals may
access this number via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 1–
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Native American Housing and
Assistance and Self-Determination Act
of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.)
(NAHASDA) changed the way that
housing assistance is provided to Native
Americans. NAHASDA eliminated
several separate assistance programs
and replaced them with a single block
grant program, known as the Indian
Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program.
The regulations governing the IHBG
formula allocation are codified in
subpart D of part 1000 of HUD’s
regulations in title 24 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. In accordance with
section 106 of NAHASDA, HUD
developed the regulations with active
tribal participation using the procedures
of the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of
1990 (5 U.S.C. 561–570).
Under the IHBG program, HUD makes
assistance available to eligible Indian
tribes for affordable housing activities.
The amount of assistance made
available to each Indian tribe is
determined using a formula that was
developed as part of the NAHASDA
negotiated process. Based on the
amount of funding appropriated for the
IHBG program, HUD calculates the
annual grant for each Indian tribe and
provides this information to the Indian
tribes. An Indian Housing Plan for the
Indian tribe is then submitted to HUD.
If the Indian Housing Plan is found to
be in compliance with statutory and
regulatory requirements, the grant is
made.
On June 5, 2013, HUD announced in
the Federal Register the list of proposed
members for the negotiated rulemaking
committee, and requested additional
public comment on the proposed
membership.
The first eight meetings of the
negotiated rulemaking committee were
held on the following dates:
• August 27, 2013, and August 28,
2013;
• Tuesday, September 17, 2013,
Wednesday, September 18, 2013, and
Thursday, September 19, 2013;
• Wednesday, April 23, 2014,
Thursday, April 24, 2014, and Friday,
April 25, 2014;
• Wednesday, June 11, 2014,
Thursday, June 12, 2014, and Friday,
June 13, 2014;
• Tuesday, July 29, 2014, Wednesday,
July 30, 2014, and Thursday, July 31,
2014;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
• Tuesday, August 26, 2014,
Wednesday, August 27, 2014, and
Thursday, August 28, 2014;
• Tuesday, August 11, 2015,
Wednesday, August 12, 2015, and
Thursday, August 13, 2015; and
• Tuesday, January 26, 2016, and
Wednesday, January 27, 2016.
II. Ninth Committee Meeting
The ninth meeting will be held on
Tuesday, September 20, 2016, and
Wednesday, September 21, 2016. On
each day, the session will begin at
approximately 8:30 a.m., and adjourn at
approximately 5:30 p.m. The meeting is
scheduled to take place at the Sheraton
Midwest City Hotel at the Reed
Conference Center, 5750 Will Rogers Rd,
Midwest City, OK, 73110.
The meetings will be open to the
public without advance registration.
Public attendance may be limited to the
space available. Members of the public
may make statements during the
meetings, to the extent time permits,
and file written statements with the
committee for its consideration. Written
statements should be submitted to the
address listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
Dated: August 17, 2016.
´
Lourdes Castro Ramırez,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. 2016–20115 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0818]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Columbia River, Sand
Island, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters of the Columbia River
within a 500-yard radius of the small
boat ‘‘Nessy,’’ while in the area of Sand
Island, near Chinook, WA, and all
involved associated vessels in support
of Double-Crested Cormorant removal
operations conducted by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and U.S. Department
of Agriculture Wildlife Services. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57507
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Columbia River, or
a designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 12, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0818 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Kenneth
Lawrenson, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–
9319, email msupdxwwm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and U.S. Department of Agriculture
Wildlife Services notified the Coast
Guard that they intend to conduct
federally permitted removal operations
of the Double-Crested Cormorant
starting September 21, 2016. This
operation will involve the use of
firearms and live ammunition. The
Captain of the Port Sector Columbia
River (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the
removal operations will be a safety
concern for anyone within a 500-yard
radius of the small boat ‘‘Nessy,’’ and all
involved associated support vessel(s).
The safety zone is needed to protect
personnel and vessels in the navigable
waters within the safety zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters before, during, and
after the scheduled operations. The
Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone regulation from September
21, 2016, through October 21, 2016. The
safety zone will cover all navigable
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
57508
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
waters of the Columbia River within 500
yards of the small boat ‘‘Nessy,’’ and all
involved associated support vessels
being used by personnel during the
removal operation, conducted in the
area encompassed by these points:
46°15′45″ N., 123°59′39″ W.; 46°15′24″
N., 123°59′42″ W.; 46°13′32″ N.,
123°57′18″ W.; 46°15′9″ N., 123°55′24″
W.; and 46°15′54″ N., 123°58′6″ W. The
500 yard radius area of the safety zone
is intended to protect persons and
vessels from the dangerous combined
effects of live gunfire, unpredictable
animal behavior, and a highly dynamic
marine environment characterized by
strong tides, river currents and wind.
This safety zone would be enforced only
when the small boat ‘‘Nessy,’’ and all
involved associated support vessels, are
conducting the removal operations. The
duration of the zone is intended to
protect personnel, vessels, and activists
wanting to protest the event in these
navigable waters while the removal
operations are being conducted. No
vessel or person will be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
We learned of the need for the safety
zone regulation we are proposing on
August 11 2016. We have provided an
18-day comment period for this
proposed rule. If after considering
comments we decide to issue a
temporary final rule, we would need to
make that rule effective less than 30
days after publication and would state
our good cause for doing so under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
would impact a small designated area of
the Columbia River in the area
encompassing these points: 46°15′45″
N., 123°59′39″ W.; 46°15′24″ N.,
123°59′42″ W.; 46°13′32″ N., 123°57′18″
W.; 46°15′9″ N., 123°55′24″ W.; and
46°15′54″ N., 123°58′6″ W. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16 about the zone,
and the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
involves a safety zone lasting four
weeks, for three days a week, that will
prohibit entry within 500 yards of the
small boat ‘‘Nessy’’ and all involved
associated support vessels, while in the
area encompassing these points:
46°15′45″ N., 123°59′39″ W.; 46°15′24″
N., 123°59′42″ W.; 46°13′32″ N.,
123°57′18″ W.; 46°15′9″ N., 123°55′24″
W.; and 46°15′54″ N., 123°58′6″ W.,
while personnel are conducting the
removal operations of the DoubleCrested Cormorant. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–0818 to read as
follows:
57509
rules contained in this section pursuant
to 46 U.S.C. 70118. In addition, the
Captain of the Port may be assisted by
members of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and U.S. Department of
Agriculture Wildlife Services onboard
the small boat ‘‘Nessy,’’ and other
federal, state, or local agencies in
enforcing this section.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
is effective from September 21, 2016,
through October 21, 2016. It will be
enforced when the small boat ‘‘Nessy,’’
and all involved associated support
vessels, are conducting the removal
operations of the Double-Crested
Cormorant. The small boat ‘‘Nessy’’ is
described as a 20-foot black and gray
aluminum work skiff with an overhead
light arch. The Coast Guard will inform
mariners of any change to this period of
enforcement via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
Dated: August 17, 2016.
W. R. Timmons,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2016–20132 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
§ 165.T13–0818
River.
Safety Zone; Columbia
(a) Location. The safety zone covered
by this rule will cover all navigable
waters of the Columbia River within 500
yards of the small boat ‘‘Nessy,’’ and all
involved associated support vessels,
while in the area encompassing these
points: 46°15′45″ N., 123°59′39″ W.;
46°15′24″ N., 123°59′42″ W.; 46°13′32″
N., 123°57′18″ W.; 46°15′9″ N.,
123°55′24″ W.; and 46°15′54″ N.,
123°58′6″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in subpart C of
this part, no person may enter or remain
in the safety zone created in this section
or bring, cause to be brought, or allow
to remain in the safety zone created in
this section any vehicle, vessel, or object
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative.
(c) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
may enforce the rules in this section. In
the navigable waters of the United
States to which this section applies,
when immediate action is required and
representatives of the Coast Guard are
not present or are not present in
sufficient force to provide effective
enforcement of this section, any Federal
Law Enforcement Officer or Oregon Law
Enforcement Officer or Washington Law
Enforcement Officer may enforce the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0429; FRL–9951–16–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; SC; Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
portions of the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submission, submitted by the
State of South Carolina, through the
South Carolina Department of Health
and Environmental Control (SC DHEC),
on December 18, 2015, to demonstrate
that the State meets the infrastructure
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) for the 2012 Annual Fine
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
The CAA requires that each state adopt
and submit a SIP for the
implementation, maintenance and
enforcement of each NAAQS
promulgated by EPA, which is
commonly referred to as an
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. SC DHEC certified
that the South Carolina SIP contains
provisions that ensure the 2012 Annual
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57507-57509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20132]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0818]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Columbia River, Sand Island, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for navigable waters of the Columbia River within a 500-yard radius of
the small boat ``Nessy,'' while in the area of Sand Island, near
Chinook, WA, and all involved associated vessels in support of Double-
Crested Cormorant removal operations conducted by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers and U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Columbia
River, or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 12, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0818 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Kenneth Lawrenson, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 503-240-9319, email msupdxwwm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Department of Agriculture
Wildlife Services notified the Coast Guard that they intend to conduct
federally permitted removal operations of the Double-Crested Cormorant
starting September 21, 2016. This operation will involve the use of
firearms and live ammunition. The Captain of the Port Sector Columbia
River (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the
removal operations will be a safety concern for anyone within a 500-
yard radius of the small boat ``Nessy,'' and all involved associated
support vessel(s). The safety zone is needed to protect personnel and
vessels in the navigable waters within the safety zone.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled
operations. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in
33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone regulation from
September 21, 2016, through October 21, 2016. The safety zone will
cover all navigable
[[Page 57508]]
waters of the Columbia River within 500 yards of the small boat
``Nessy,'' and all involved associated support vessels being used by
personnel during the removal operation, conducted in the area
encompassed by these points: 46[deg]15'45'' N., 123[deg]59'39'' W.;
46[deg]15'24'' N., 123[deg]59'42'' W.; 46[deg]13'32'' N.,
123[deg]57'18'' W.; 46[deg]15'9'' N., 123[deg]55'24'' W.; and
46[deg]15'54'' N., 123[deg]58'6'' W. The 500 yard radius area of the
safety zone is intended to protect persons and vessels from the
dangerous combined effects of live gunfire, unpredictable animal
behavior, and a highly dynamic marine environment characterized by
strong tides, river currents and wind. This safety zone would be
enforced only when the small boat ``Nessy,'' and all involved
associated support vessels, are conducting the removal operations. The
duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and
activists wanting to protest the event in these navigable waters while
the removal operations are being conducted. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative.
We learned of the need for the safety zone regulation we are
proposing on August 11 2016. We have provided an 18-day comment period
for this proposed rule. If after considering comments we decide to
issue a temporary final rule, we would need to make that rule effective
less than 30 days after publication and would state our good cause for
doing so under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the Columbia River in the area
encompassing these points: 46[deg]15'45'' N., 123[deg]59'39'' W.;
46[deg]15'24'' N., 123[deg]59'42'' W.; 46[deg]13'32'' N.,
123[deg]57'18'' W.; 46[deg]15'9'' N., 123[deg]55'24'' W.; and
46[deg]15'54'' N., 123[deg]58'6'' W. Moreover, the Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about
the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
[[Page 57509]]
involves a safety zone lasting four weeks, for three days a week, that
will prohibit entry within 500 yards of the small boat ``Nessy'' and
all involved associated support vessels, while in the area encompassing
these points: 46[deg]15'45'' N., 123[deg]59'39'' W.; 46[deg]15'24'' N.,
123[deg]59'42'' W.; 46[deg]13'32'' N., 123[deg]57'18'' W.;
46[deg]15'9'' N., 123[deg]55'24'' W.; and 46[deg]15'54'' N.,
123[deg]58'6'' W., while personnel are conducting the removal
operations of the Double-Crested Cormorant. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0818 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-0818 Safety Zone; Columbia River.
(a) Location. The safety zone covered by this rule will cover all
navigable waters of the Columbia River within 500 yards of the small
boat ``Nessy,'' and all involved associated support vessels, while in
the area encompassing these points: 46[deg]15'45'' N., 123[deg]59'39''
W.; 46[deg]15'24'' N., 123[deg]59'42'' W.; 46[deg]13'32'' N.,
123[deg]57'18'' W.; 46[deg]15'9'' N., 123[deg]55'24'' W.; and
46[deg]15'54'' N., 123[deg]58'6'' W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
subpart C of this part, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in this section or bring, cause to be brought, or allow to
remain in the safety zone created in this section any vehicle, vessel,
or object unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(c) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer may enforce the rules in this section. In the navigable waters
of the United States to which this section applies, when immediate
action is required and representatives of the Coast Guard are not
present or are not present in sufficient force to provide effective
enforcement of this section, any Federal Law Enforcement Officer or
Oregon Law Enforcement Officer or Washington Law Enforcement Officer
may enforce the rules contained in this section pursuant to 46 U.S.C.
70118. In addition, the Captain of the Port may be assisted by members
of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Department of Agriculture
Wildlife Services onboard the small boat ``Nessy,'' and other federal,
state, or local agencies in enforcing this section.
(d) Enforcement period. This section is effective from September
21, 2016, through October 21, 2016. It will be enforced when the small
boat ``Nessy,'' and all involved associated support vessels, are
conducting the removal operations of the Double-Crested Cormorant. The
small boat ``Nessy'' is described as a 20-foot black and gray aluminum
work skiff with an overhead light arch. The Coast Guard will inform
mariners of any change to this period of enforcement via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
Dated: August 17, 2016.
W. R. Timmons,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2016-20132 Filed 8-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P