Request for Information: Inappropriate Steering of Individuals Eligible for or Receiving Medicare and Medicaid Benefits to Individual Market Plans, 57554-57558 [2016-20034]
Download as PDF
57554
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
V. Proposed Action
With the exception of interstate
transport provisions pertaining to the
contribution to nonattainment or
interference with maintenance in other
states and visibility protection
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
and (II) (prongs 1, 2, and 4), EPA is
proposing to approve Georgia’s
December 14, 2015, SIP submission, for
the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the
above described infrastructure SIP
requirements. EPA is proposing to
approve Georgia’s infrastructure SIP
submission for the 2012 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS because the submission is
consistent with section 110 of the CAA.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 9, 2016.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2016–20139 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 402, 420, and, 455
[CMS–6074–NC]
RIN 0938–ZB31
Request for Information: Inappropriate
Steering of Individuals Eligible for or
Receiving Medicare and Medicaid
Benefits to Individual Market Plans
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
This request for information
seeks public comment regarding
concerns about health care providers
and provider-affiliated organizations
steering people eligible for or receiving
Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits to an
individual market plan for the purpose
of obtaining higher payment rates. CMS
is concerned about reports of this
practice and is requesting comments on
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the frequency and impact of this issue
from the public. We believe this practice
not only could raise overall health
system costs, but could potentially be
harmful to patient care and service
coordination because of changes to
provider networks and drug formularies,
result in higher out-of-pocket costs for
enrollees, and have a negative impact on
the individual market single risk pool
(or the combined risk pool in states that
have chosen to merge their risk pools).
We are seeking input from stakeholders
and the public regarding the frequency
and impact of this practice, and options
to limit this practice.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on September 22, 2016.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, refer to file
code CMS–6074–NC. Because of staff
and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–6074–NC, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244–8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address ONLY: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–6074–NC,
Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments ONLY to the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–
1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address, call
telephone number (410) 786–9994 in
advance to schedule your arrival with
one of our staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the
addresses indicated as appropriate for
hand or courier delivery may be delayed
and received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Morgan Burns, 301–492–4493.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately three weeks after
publication of a document, at the
headquarters of the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
Monday through Friday of each week
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
This is a request for information only.
Respondents are encouraged to provide
complete but concise responses to the
questions listed in the sections outlined
below. Please note that a response to
every question is not required. This RFI
is issued solely for information and
planning purposes; it does not
constitute a Request for Proposal,
applications, proposal abstracts, or
quotations. This RFI does not commit
the Government to contract for any
supplies or services or make a grant
award. Further, CMS is not seeking
proposals through this RFI and will not
accept unsolicited proposals.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
Responders are advised that the U.S.
Government will not pay for any
information or administrative costs
incurred in response to this RFI; all
costs associated with responding to this
RFI will be solely at the interested
party’s expense. Not responding to this
RFI does not preclude participation in
any future procurement, if conducted. It
is the responsibility of the potential
responders to monitor this RFI
announcement for additional
information pertaining to this request.
Please note that CMS will not respond
to questions about the policy issues
raised in this RFI. CMS may or may not
choose to contact individual responders.
Such communications would only serve
to further clarify written responses.
Contractor support personnel may be
used to review RFI responses.
Responses to this notice are not offers
and cannot be accepted by the
Government to form a binding contract
or issue a grant. Information obtained as
a result of this RFI may be used by the
Government for program planning on a
non-attribution basis. Respondents
should not include any information that
might be considered proprietary or
confidential. This RFI should not be
construed as a commitment or
authorization to incur cost for which
reimbursement would be required or
sought. All submissions become
Government property and will not be
returned. CMS may publically post the
comments received, or a summary
thereof.
I. Background
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) believes that when
health care providers or provideraffiliated organizations steer or
influence people eligible for or receiving
Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits, it
may not be in the best interests of the
individual, it may have deleterious
effects on the insurance market,
including disruptions to the individual
market risk pool, and it is likely to raise
overall healthcare costs. Individuals
eligible for Medicare and/or Medicaid
benefits are not required to enroll in
these programs.1 However, individuals
eligible for Medicaid or Medicare Part A
benefits are generally ineligible for the
premium tax credit (PTC), including
advance payments thereof (APTC), and
for cost-sharing reductions (CSR) for
their Qualified Health Plan (QHP)
coverage for the months they have
access to minimum essential coverage
1 Individuals eligible to receive premium free
Medicare Part A benefits may not decline Medicare
Part A entitlement if they accept Social Security
benefits.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57555
(MEC) through the Medicare or
Medicaid programs.2
We have heard anecdotal reports that
individuals who are eligible for
Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits are
receiving premium and other costsharing assistance from a third party so
that the individual can enroll in
individual market plans for the
provider’s financial benefit. In some
cases, a health care provider may
estimate that the higher payment rate
from an individual market plan
compared to Medicare or Medicaid is
sufficient to allow it to pay a patient’s
premiums and still financially gain from
the higher reimbursement rates. Issuers
are not required to accept such
payments from health care providers or
provider-affiliated organizations, as
described below. Enrollment decisions
should be made, without influence, by
the individual based on their specific
circumstances, and health and financial
needs. CMS has established standards
for enrollment assisters, including
navigators, which prohibit gifts of any
value as an inducement for enrollment,
and require information and services to
be provided in a fair, accurate, and
impartial manner.3 Additionally, CMS
has established standards for insurance
agents and brokers that register with the
Federal Marketplace, including training
about the interaction of Medicare and
Medicaid eligibility with eligibility for
individual market plans and financial
assistance, and has remedies for
insurance agents that provide inaccurate
or incorrect information to consumers,
such as misinformation about the
impact of not enrolling in Medicare
when an individual first becomes
eligible, including termination of the
Marketplace agreement, civil monetary
penalties, and denial of right to enter
agreements in future years.4
We believe there is potential for
financial harm to a consumer when a
health care provider or provideraffiliated organization (including a nonprofit organization affiliated with the
provider) steers people who could
receive or are receiving benefits under
Medicare and/or Medicaid to enroll in
an individual market plan. The
potential harm is particularly acute
when the steering occurs for the
financial gain of the health care
provider through higher payment rates
2 See 26 U.S.C. 36B. In general, an individual who
is eligible for minimum essential coverage (other
than coverage in the individual market) for a month
is ineligible for the premium tax credit for that
month. Medicare part A and most Medicaid
programs are minimum essential coverage. See 26
U.S.C. 5000A(f) and 26 CFR 1.5000A–2(b).
3 45 CFR 155.210.
4 45 CFR 155.220.
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
57556
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
without taking into account the needs of
these beneficiaries. People who are
steered from Medicare and Medicaid to
the individual market may also
experience a disruption in the
continuity and coordination of their
care as a result of changes in access to
their network of providers, changes in
prescription drug benefits, and loss of
dental care for certain Medicaid
beneficiaries. If an individual receives
the benefit of APTC for a month he or
she is eligible for minimum essential
coverage, the individual (or the person
who claims the individual as a tax
dependent) may be required to repay
some or all of the APTC at the time such
person files his or her federal income
tax return. Moreover, it is unlawful to
enroll an individual in individual
market coverage if they are known to be
entitled to benefits under Medicare Part
A, enrolled in Medicare Part B, or
receiving Medicaid benefits.
Importantly, those eligible for Medicare
may be subject to late enrollment
penalties if they do not enroll in
Medicare when first eligible to do so—
a monthly premium for Part B may go
up 10 percent for each full 12-month
period an individual could have had
Part B, but did not sign up for it.5
Individuals who become eligible for
Medicare based on receipt of Social
Security benefits based on age or Social
Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)
must forgo and if received repay their
Social Security cash benefits if they
wish to decline Medicare Part A
benefits.6 Additionally, individuals who
are steered into an individual market
plan for renal dialysis services and then
have a kidney transplant while enrolled
in the individual market plan will not
be eligible for Medicare Part B coverage
of their immunosuppressant drugs if
they enroll in Medicare at a later date.7
Federal regulations at 45 CFR
156.1250 require that issuers offering
Qualified Health Plans (QHPs),
including stand-alone dental plans, and
their downstream entities, accept
premium and cost-sharing payments on
behalf of QHP enrollees from the
following third-party entities (in the
case of a downstream entity, to the
extent the entity routinely collects
premiums or cost sharing): (a) A Ryan
White HIV/AIDS Program under title
XXVI of the Public Health Service Act;
5 https://www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/
part-b-costs/penalty/part-b-late-enrollmentpenalty.html.
6 https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/
Find-Your-Provider-Type/Employers-and-Unions/
Top-5-things-you-need-to-know-about-MedicareEnrollment.html.
7 https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/
prescription-drugs-outpatient.html.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
(b) an Indian tribe, tribal organization,
or urban Indian organization; and (c) a
local, state, or Federal government
program, including a grantee directed by
a government program to make
payments on its behalf.8 Issuers are not
required to accept such payments from
other entities. These regulations were
finalized in the 2017 HHS Notice of
Benefit and Payment Parameters Final
Rule, which made several amendments
to the regulations previously codified
through a March 19, 2014, HHS Interim
final rule (IFR) with comment period
titled, Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act; Third Party Payment of
Qualified Health Plan Premiums (79 FR
15240).
Prior to publishing the IFR, HHS
issued two ‘‘Frequently Asked
Questions’’ (FAQ) documents regarding
premium and cost-sharing payments
made by third parties on behalf of
individual market plan enrollees. In an
FAQ issued on November 4, 2013 (the
November FAQ), HHS discouraged QHP
issuers from accepting third-party
payments made on behalf of enrollees
by hospitals, other health care
providers, and other commercial entities
due to concerns that such practices
could skew the insurance risk pool and
create an unlevel field in the Exchanges.
The FAQ also noted that HHS intended
to monitor this practice and to take
appropriate action, if necessary.
On February 7, 2014, HHS issued
another FAQ (the February FAQ)
clarifying that the November FAQ did
not apply to third party premium and
cost-sharing payments made on behalf
of enrollees by Indian tribes, tribal
organizations, and urban Indian
organizations; state and Federal
government programs (such as the Ryan
White HIV/AIDS Program); or private,
not-for-profit foundations that base
eligibility on financial status, do not
consider enrollees’ health status, and
provide assistance for an entire year. In
the February FAQ, HHS affirmatively
encouraged QHP issuers to accept
payments from Indian tribes, tribal
organizations, and urban Indian
organizations; and state and Federal
government programs (such as the Ryan
White HIV/AIDS Program) given that
Federal or state law or policy
specifically envisions third party
payment of premium and cost-sharing
amounts by these entities.
CMS seeks to clarify that offering
premium and cost-sharing assistance in
order to steer people eligible for or
receiving Medicare and/or Medicaid
benefits to individual market plans for
a provider’s financial gain is an
8 2017
PO 00000
HHS Payment Notice Final Rule.
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
inappropriate action that may have
negative impacts on patients. CMS is
strongly encouraging any provider or
provider-affiliated organization that may
be currently engaged in such a practice
to end the practice. As noted above,
enrollment decisions should be made
based on an individual’s particular
financial and health needs.
As we assess the extent of potential
steering activities, its impact on
beneficiaries and enrollees and the
individual market single risk pool, CMS
reminds healthcare providers and other
entities that may be engaged in such
behavior that we have several regulatory
and operational tools that we may use
to discourage premium payments and
routine waiver of cost-sharing for
individual market plans by health care
providers, including, but not limited to,
revisions to Medicare and Medicaid
provider conditions of participation and
enrollment rules, and imposition of civil
monetary penalties for individuals who
failed to provide correct information to
the Exchange when enrolling consumers
into QHPs.9 CMS is also working closely
with federal, state and local law
enforcement to investigate instances of
potential fraud and abuse, as well as
collaborating with private and public
health plans on provider fraud in the
Healthcare Fraud Prevention
Partnership.10 We are exploring ways to
use our existing authorities to impose
civil monetary penalties on health care
providers when their actions result in
late enrollment penalties for Medicare
eligible individuals who were steered to
an individual market plan and delayed
Medicare enrollment.
II. Solicitation of Comments
We are seeking information from the
public about circumstances in which
steering into individual market plans
may be taking place and the extent of
such practices. We are particularly
interested in transparency around the
current practices providers may be
using to enroll consumers in coverage.
Our goal is to protect consumers from
inappropriate health care provider
behavior. People eligible for or receiving
Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits
should not be unduly influenced in
their decisions about their health
coverage options. We also seek to
maintain continuity of care for these
beneficiaries and ensure patient choice
is the primary reason for any change in
health coverage. We also want to ensure
healthcare is being provided efficiently
9 45 CFR 155.285 Bases and process for imposing
civil penalties for provision of false or fraudulent
information to an Exchange or improper use or
disclosure of information.
10 See https://hfpp.cms.gov/ for more information.
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
and affordably. Accordingly, to more
fully understand the types of situations
in which steering may occur as we
develop regulatory or operational
changes to address these problems, we
request comments on the following:
• In what types of circumstances are
healthcare providers or provideraffiliated organizations in a position to
steer people to individual market plans?
How, and to what extent, are health care
providers actively engaged in such
steering?
• What impact is there to the single
risk pool and to rates when people enter
the single risk pool who might not
otherwise have been in the pool because
they would normally be covered under
another government program? Are
issuers accounting for this uncertainty
when they are setting rates?
• Are there examples of steering
practices that specifically target people
eligible for or receiving Medicare and/
or Medicaid benefits to enroll in
individual market plans? In what ways
are people eligible for or receiving
Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits
particularly vulnerable to steering? To
what extent, if any, are providers
steering people eligible for or receiving
Medicare and/or Medicaid to individual
market plans because they are
prohibited from billing the Medicare
and Medicaid programs, through
exclusion by the HHS Office of
Inspector General, termination from
State Medicaid plans or the revocation
of Medicare billing privileges?
• Is the payment of premiums and
cost-sharing commonly used to steer
individuals to individual market plans,
or are other methods leading to
Medicare and Medicaid eligible
individuals being enrolled in individual
market plans? Specifically, how often
are issuers receiving payments directly
from health care providers and/or
provider affiliated organizations? Are
issuers capable of determining when
third party payments are made directly
to a beneficiary and then transferred to
the issuer? What actions could CMS
consider to add transparency to third
party payments?
• How are enrollees impacted by the
practice of a health care provider or
provider-affiliated organizations
enrolling an individual into an
individual market plan and paying
premiums for that individual market
plan, when the individual was
previously or concurrently receiving
Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits? We
are concerned about instances where
individuals eligible for Medicare and/or
Medicaid benefits may have been
disadvantaged by unscrupulous
practices aimed at increasing provider
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
payments, including impacts to the
enrollee’s continuity of care. We would
be interested in knowing more about
these practices and the extent to which
they may be more widespread or varied
than we have identified.
• How are enrollees impacted by the
practice of a health care provider
enrolling an individual into an
individual market plan and paying
premiums for individual market plans,
when the individual was eligible for
Medicare and/or Medicaid, but not
enrolled? We are particularly interested
in information about how to measure
negative impacts on beneficiaries and
enrollees, and what data sources and
measurement methodologies are
available to assess the impact of this
behavior described in this request for
information on beneficiaries and
enrollees. We are seeking information
on any financial impacts that are in
addition to Medicare late enrollment
penalties. For example, differentials in
copayments and deductibles paid by
enrollees in individual market plans,
Medicare or Medicaid, and the impact
of individual market plan network
limitations on the financial obligations
of enrollees, such as increased
copayments and deductibles where the
enrollee’s chosen provider is out-ofnetwork to the individual market plan.
• What remedies could effectively
deter health care providers or provideraffiliated organizations from steering
people eligible for or enrolled in
Medicare and/or Medicaid to individual
market plans and paying premiums for
the provider’s financial gain? CMS is
considering modifying regulations
regarding civil monetary penalties and
authority related to individual market
plans.
• What steps do third party payers
take to effectively screen for Medicare
and/or Medicaid eligibility before
offering premium assistance? What
steps do these entities take to make sure
that any such individuals understand
the impact of signing up for an
individual market plan if they are
already eligible for or receiving
Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits?
• For providers that offer premium
assistance, who is interacting with
beneficiaries to determine proper
enrollment? What questions are asked of
the consumer to determine eligibility
pathways? How are consumers
connected to foundations or others who
are in the position to provide premium
assistance? How are premiums paid by
providers or foundations for consumers?
• We seek comment on policies
prohibiting providers from making
offers of premium assistance and
routine cost-sharing waivers for
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57557
individual market plans when a
beneficiary is currently enrolled or
could become enrolled in Medicare Part
A and other adjustments to federal
policy on premium assistance programs
in the individual market to prevent
negative impact to beneficiaries and the
single risk pool.
• We seek comments on changes to
Medicare and Medicaid provider
enrollment requirements and conditions
of participation that would potentially
restrict the ability of health care
providers to manipulate patient
enrollment in various health plans for
their own benefit. We are also interested
in information on the extent steering is
associated with other inappropriate
behavior, such as billing for services not
provided, or quality of care concerns.
We seek comment on the advisability of
such restrictions, as well as
considerations of how such restrictions
would affect health care providers and
beneficiaries.
• We seek comment on policies to
require Medicare and Medicaid-enrolled
providers to report premium assistance
and cost-sharing waivers for individual
market enrollees to CMS or issuers.
• We seek comments on whether
individual market plans considered
limiting their payment to health care
providers to Medicare-based amounts
for particular services and items of care
and on potential approaches that would
allow individual market plans to limit
their payment to health care providers
to Medicare-based amounts for
particular services and items of care.
• We seek comment on policies that
would allow individual market plans to
make retroactive payment adjustments
to providers, when health care providers
are found to have steered Medicare or
Medicaid beneficiaries and enrollees to
enroll in an individual market plan for
the provider’s financial gain.
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
This request for information
constitutes a general solicitation of
public comments as stated in the
implementing regulations of the
Paperwork Reduction Act at 5 CFR
1320.3(h)(4). Therefore, this request for
information does not impose
information collection requirements,
that is, reporting, recordkeeping or
third-party disclosure requirements.
Consequently, there is no need for
review by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
57558
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Dated: August 16, 2016.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2016–20034 Filed 8–18–16; 4:15 pm]
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\23AUP1.SGM
23AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57554-57558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20034]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Part 402, 420, and, 455
[CMS-6074-NC]
RIN 0938-ZB31
Request for Information: Inappropriate Steering of Individuals
Eligible for or Receiving Medicare and Medicaid Benefits to Individual
Market Plans
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This request for information seeks public comment regarding
concerns about health care providers and provider-affiliated
organizations steering people eligible for or receiving Medicare and/or
Medicaid benefits to an individual market plan for the purpose of
obtaining higher payment rates. CMS is concerned about reports of this
practice and is requesting comments on the frequency and impact of this
issue from the public. We believe this practice not only could raise
overall health system costs, but could potentially be harmful to
patient care and service coordination because of changes to provider
networks and drug formularies, result in higher out-of-pocket costs for
enrollees, and have a negative impact on the individual market single
risk pool (or the combined risk pool in states that have chosen to
merge their risk pools). We are seeking input from stakeholders and the
public regarding the frequency and impact of this practice, and options
to limit this practice.
DATES: To be assured consideration, comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on September 22,
2016.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, refer to file code CMS-6074-NC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by facsimile
(FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a
comment'' instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-6074-NC, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-6074-NC, Mail
Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments ONLY to the following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots
[[Page 57555]]
located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock is
available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing by stamping
in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
call telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the addresses indicated as
appropriate for hand or courier delivery may be delayed and received
after the comment period.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Morgan Burns, 301-492-4493.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately
three weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
This is a request for information only. Respondents are encouraged
to provide complete but concise responses to the questions listed in
the sections outlined below. Please note that a response to every
question is not required. This RFI is issued solely for information and
planning purposes; it does not constitute a Request for Proposal,
applications, proposal abstracts, or quotations. This RFI does not
commit the Government to contract for any supplies or services or make
a grant award. Further, CMS is not seeking proposals through this RFI
and will not accept unsolicited proposals. Responders are advised that
the U.S. Government will not pay for any information or administrative
costs incurred in response to this RFI; all costs associated with
responding to this RFI will be solely at the interested party's
expense. Not responding to this RFI does not preclude participation in
any future procurement, if conducted. It is the responsibility of the
potential responders to monitor this RFI announcement for additional
information pertaining to this request. Please note that CMS will not
respond to questions about the policy issues raised in this RFI. CMS
may or may not choose to contact individual responders. Such
communications would only serve to further clarify written responses.
Contractor support personnel may be used to review RFI responses.
Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the
Government to form a binding contract or issue a grant. Information
obtained as a result of this RFI may be used by the Government for
program planning on a non-attribution basis. Respondents should not
include any information that might be considered proprietary or
confidential. This RFI should not be construed as a commitment or
authorization to incur cost for which reimbursement would be required
or sought. All submissions become Government property and will not be
returned. CMS may publically post the comments received, or a summary
thereof.
I. Background
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) believes that
when health care providers or provider-affiliated organizations steer
or influence people eligible for or receiving Medicare and/or Medicaid
benefits, it may not be in the best interests of the individual, it may
have deleterious effects on the insurance market, including disruptions
to the individual market risk pool, and it is likely to raise overall
healthcare costs. Individuals eligible for Medicare and/or Medicaid
benefits are not required to enroll in these programs.\1\ However,
individuals eligible for Medicaid or Medicare Part A benefits are
generally ineligible for the premium tax credit (PTC), including
advance payments thereof (APTC), and for cost-sharing reductions (CSR)
for their Qualified Health Plan (QHP) coverage for the months they have
access to minimum essential coverage (MEC) through the Medicare or
Medicaid programs.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Individuals eligible to receive premium free Medicare Part A
benefits may not decline Medicare Part A entitlement if they accept
Social Security benefits.
\2\ See 26 U.S.C. 36B. In general, an individual who is eligible
for minimum essential coverage (other than coverage in the
individual market) for a month is ineligible for the premium tax
credit for that month. Medicare part A and most Medicaid programs
are minimum essential coverage. See 26 U.S.C. 5000A(f) and 26 CFR
1.5000A-2(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have heard anecdotal reports that individuals who are eligible
for Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits are receiving premium and other
cost-sharing assistance from a third party so that the individual can
enroll in individual market plans for the provider's financial benefit.
In some cases, a health care provider may estimate that the higher
payment rate from an individual market plan compared to Medicare or
Medicaid is sufficient to allow it to pay a patient's premiums and
still financially gain from the higher reimbursement rates. Issuers are
not required to accept such payments from health care providers or
provider-affiliated organizations, as described below. Enrollment
decisions should be made, without influence, by the individual based on
their specific circumstances, and health and financial needs. CMS has
established standards for enrollment assisters, including navigators,
which prohibit gifts of any value as an inducement for enrollment, and
require information and services to be provided in a fair, accurate,
and impartial manner.\3\ Additionally, CMS has established standards
for insurance agents and brokers that register with the Federal
Marketplace, including training about the interaction of Medicare and
Medicaid eligibility with eligibility for individual market plans and
financial assistance, and has remedies for insurance agents that
provide inaccurate or incorrect information to consumers, such as
misinformation about the impact of not enrolling in Medicare when an
individual first becomes eligible, including termination of the
Marketplace agreement, civil monetary penalties, and denial of right to
enter agreements in future years.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 45 CFR 155.210.
\4\ 45 CFR 155.220.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We believe there is potential for financial harm to a consumer when
a health care provider or provider-affiliated organization (including a
non-profit organization affiliated with the provider) steers people who
could receive or are receiving benefits under Medicare and/or Medicaid
to enroll in an individual market plan. The potential harm is
particularly acute when the steering occurs for the financial gain of
the health care provider through higher payment rates
[[Page 57556]]
without taking into account the needs of these beneficiaries. People
who are steered from Medicare and Medicaid to the individual market may
also experience a disruption in the continuity and coordination of
their care as a result of changes in access to their network of
providers, changes in prescription drug benefits, and loss of dental
care for certain Medicaid beneficiaries. If an individual receives the
benefit of APTC for a month he or she is eligible for minimum essential
coverage, the individual (or the person who claims the individual as a
tax dependent) may be required to repay some or all of the APTC at the
time such person files his or her federal income tax return. Moreover,
it is unlawful to enroll an individual in individual market coverage if
they are known to be entitled to benefits under Medicare Part A,
enrolled in Medicare Part B, or receiving Medicaid benefits.
Importantly, those eligible for Medicare may be subject to late
enrollment penalties if they do not enroll in Medicare when first
eligible to do so--a monthly premium for Part B may go up 10 percent
for each full 12-month period an individual could have had Part B, but
did not sign up for it.\5\ Individuals who become eligible for Medicare
based on receipt of Social Security benefits based on age or Social
Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) must forgo and if received repay
their Social Security cash benefits if they wish to decline Medicare
Part A benefits.\6\ Additionally, individuals who are steered into an
individual market plan for renal dialysis services and then have a
kidney transplant while enrolled in the individual market plan will not
be eligible for Medicare Part B coverage of their immunosuppressant
drugs if they enroll in Medicare at a later date.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ https://www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/part-b-costs/penalty/part-b-late-enrollment-penalty.html.
\6\ https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Find-Your-Provider-Type/Employers-and-Unions/Top-5-things-you-need-to-know-about-Medicare-Enrollment.html.
\7\ https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/prescription-drugs-outpatient.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal regulations at 45 CFR 156.1250 require that issuers
offering Qualified Health Plans (QHPs), including stand-alone dental
plans, and their downstream entities, accept premium and cost-sharing
payments on behalf of QHP enrollees from the following third-party
entities (in the case of a downstream entity, to the extent the entity
routinely collects premiums or cost sharing): (a) A Ryan White HIV/AIDS
Program under title XXVI of the Public Health Service Act; (b) an
Indian tribe, tribal organization, or urban Indian organization; and
(c) a local, state, or Federal government program, including a grantee
directed by a government program to make payments on its behalf.\8\
Issuers are not required to accept such payments from other entities.
These regulations were finalized in the 2017 HHS Notice of Benefit and
Payment Parameters Final Rule, which made several amendments to the
regulations previously codified through a March 19, 2014, HHS Interim
final rule (IFR) with comment period titled, Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act; Third Party Payment of Qualified Health Plan
Premiums (79 FR 15240).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 2017 HHS Payment Notice Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to publishing the IFR, HHS issued two ``Frequently Asked
Questions'' (FAQ) documents regarding premium and cost-sharing payments
made by third parties on behalf of individual market plan enrollees. In
an FAQ issued on November 4, 2013 (the November FAQ), HHS discouraged
QHP issuers from accepting third-party payments made on behalf of
enrollees by hospitals, other health care providers, and other
commercial entities due to concerns that such practices could skew the
insurance risk pool and create an unlevel field in the Exchanges. The
FAQ also noted that HHS intended to monitor this practice and to take
appropriate action, if necessary.
On February 7, 2014, HHS issued another FAQ (the February FAQ)
clarifying that the November FAQ did not apply to third party premium
and cost-sharing payments made on behalf of enrollees by Indian tribes,
tribal organizations, and urban Indian organizations; state and Federal
government programs (such as the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program); or
private, not-for-profit foundations that base eligibility on financial
status, do not consider enrollees' health status, and provide
assistance for an entire year. In the February FAQ, HHS affirmatively
encouraged QHP issuers to accept payments from Indian tribes, tribal
organizations, and urban Indian organizations; and state and Federal
government programs (such as the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program) given
that Federal or state law or policy specifically envisions third party
payment of premium and cost-sharing amounts by these entities.
CMS seeks to clarify that offering premium and cost-sharing
assistance in order to steer people eligible for or receiving Medicare
and/or Medicaid benefits to individual market plans for a provider's
financial gain is an inappropriate action that may have negative
impacts on patients. CMS is strongly encouraging any provider or
provider-affiliated organization that may be currently engaged in such
a practice to end the practice. As noted above, enrollment decisions
should be made based on an individual's particular financial and health
needs.
As we assess the extent of potential steering activities, its
impact on beneficiaries and enrollees and the individual market single
risk pool, CMS reminds healthcare providers and other entities that may
be engaged in such behavior that we have several regulatory and
operational tools that we may use to discourage premium payments and
routine waiver of cost-sharing for individual market plans by health
care providers, including, but not limited to, revisions to Medicare
and Medicaid provider conditions of participation and enrollment rules,
and imposition of civil monetary penalties for individuals who failed
to provide correct information to the Exchange when enrolling consumers
into QHPs.\9\ CMS is also working closely with federal, state and local
law enforcement to investigate instances of potential fraud and abuse,
as well as collaborating with private and public health plans on
provider fraud in the Healthcare Fraud Prevention Partnership.\10\ We
are exploring ways to use our existing authorities to impose civil
monetary penalties on health care providers when their actions result
in late enrollment penalties for Medicare eligible individuals who were
steered to an individual market plan and delayed Medicare enrollment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 45 CFR 155.285 Bases and process for imposing civil
penalties for provision of false or fraudulent information to an
Exchange or improper use or disclosure of information.
\10\ See https://hfpp.cms.gov/ for more information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Solicitation of Comments
We are seeking information from the public about circumstances in
which steering into individual market plans may be taking place and the
extent of such practices. We are particularly interested in
transparency around the current practices providers may be using to
enroll consumers in coverage. Our goal is to protect consumers from
inappropriate health care provider behavior. People eligible for or
receiving Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits should not be unduly
influenced in their decisions about their health coverage options. We
also seek to maintain continuity of care for these beneficiaries and
ensure patient choice is the primary reason for any change in health
coverage. We also want to ensure healthcare is being provided
efficiently
[[Page 57557]]
and affordably. Accordingly, to more fully understand the types of
situations in which steering may occur as we develop regulatory or
operational changes to address these problems, we request comments on
the following:
In what types of circumstances are healthcare providers or
provider-affiliated organizations in a position to steer people to
individual market plans? How, and to what extent, are health care
providers actively engaged in such steering?
What impact is there to the single risk pool and to rates
when people enter the single risk pool who might not otherwise have
been in the pool because they would normally be covered under another
government program? Are issuers accounting for this uncertainty when
they are setting rates?
Are there examples of steering practices that specifically
target people eligible for or receiving Medicare and/or Medicaid
benefits to enroll in individual market plans? In what ways are people
eligible for or receiving Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits
particularly vulnerable to steering? To what extent, if any, are
providers steering people eligible for or receiving Medicare and/or
Medicaid to individual market plans because they are prohibited from
billing the Medicare and Medicaid programs, through exclusion by the
HHS Office of Inspector General, termination from State Medicaid plans
or the revocation of Medicare billing privileges?
Is the payment of premiums and cost-sharing commonly used
to steer individuals to individual market plans, or are other methods
leading to Medicare and Medicaid eligible individuals being enrolled in
individual market plans? Specifically, how often are issuers receiving
payments directly from health care providers and/or provider affiliated
organizations? Are issuers capable of determining when third party
payments are made directly to a beneficiary and then transferred to the
issuer? What actions could CMS consider to add transparency to third
party payments?
How are enrollees impacted by the practice of a health
care provider or provider-affiliated organizations enrolling an
individual into an individual market plan and paying premiums for that
individual market plan, when the individual was previously or
concurrently receiving Medicare and/or Medicaid benefits? We are
concerned about instances where individuals eligible for Medicare and/
or Medicaid benefits may have been disadvantaged by unscrupulous
practices aimed at increasing provider payments, including impacts to
the enrollee's continuity of care. We would be interested in knowing
more about these practices and the extent to which they may be more
widespread or varied than we have identified.
How are enrollees impacted by the practice of a health
care provider enrolling an individual into an individual market plan
and paying premiums for individual market plans, when the individual
was eligible for Medicare and/or Medicaid, but not enrolled? We are
particularly interested in information about how to measure negative
impacts on beneficiaries and enrollees, and what data sources and
measurement methodologies are available to assess the impact of this
behavior described in this request for information on beneficiaries and
enrollees. We are seeking information on any financial impacts that are
in addition to Medicare late enrollment penalties. For example,
differentials in copayments and deductibles paid by enrollees in
individual market plans, Medicare or Medicaid, and the impact of
individual market plan network limitations on the financial obligations
of enrollees, such as increased copayments and deductibles where the
enrollee's chosen provider is out-of-network to the individual market
plan.
What remedies could effectively deter health care
providers or provider-affiliated organizations from steering people
eligible for or enrolled in Medicare and/or Medicaid to individual
market plans and paying premiums for the provider's financial gain? CMS
is considering modifying regulations regarding civil monetary penalties
and authority related to individual market plans.
What steps do third party payers take to effectively
screen for Medicare and/or Medicaid eligibility before offering premium
assistance? What steps do these entities take to make sure that any
such individuals understand the impact of signing up for an individual
market plan if they are already eligible for or receiving Medicare and/
or Medicaid benefits?
For providers that offer premium assistance, who is
interacting with beneficiaries to determine proper enrollment? What
questions are asked of the consumer to determine eligibility pathways?
How are consumers connected to foundations or others who are in the
position to provide premium assistance? How are premiums paid by
providers or foundations for consumers?
We seek comment on policies prohibiting providers from
making offers of premium assistance and routine cost-sharing waivers
for individual market plans when a beneficiary is currently enrolled or
could become enrolled in Medicare Part A and other adjustments to
federal policy on premium assistance programs in the individual market
to prevent negative impact to beneficiaries and the single risk pool.
We seek comments on changes to Medicare and Medicaid
provider enrollment requirements and conditions of participation that
would potentially restrict the ability of health care providers to
manipulate patient enrollment in various health plans for their own
benefit. We are also interested in information on the extent steering
is associated with other inappropriate behavior, such as billing for
services not provided, or quality of care concerns. We seek comment on
the advisability of such restrictions, as well as considerations of how
such restrictions would affect health care providers and beneficiaries.
We seek comment on policies to require Medicare and
Medicaid-enrolled providers to report premium assistance and cost-
sharing waivers for individual market enrollees to CMS or issuers.
We seek comments on whether individual market plans
considered limiting their payment to health care providers to Medicare-
based amounts for particular services and items of care and on
potential approaches that would allow individual market plans to limit
their payment to health care providers to Medicare-based amounts for
particular services and items of care.
We seek comment on policies that would allow individual
market plans to make retroactive payment adjustments to providers, when
health care providers are found to have steered Medicare or Medicaid
beneficiaries and enrollees to enroll in an individual market plan for
the provider's financial gain.
III. Collection of Information Requirements
This request for information constitutes a general solicitation of
public comments as stated in the implementing regulations of the
Paperwork Reduction Act at 5 CFR 1320.3(h)(4). Therefore, this request
for information does not impose information collection requirements,
that is, reporting, recordkeeping or third-party disclosure
requirements. Consequently, there is no need for review by the Office
of Management and Budget under the authority of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
[[Page 57558]]
Dated: August 16, 2016.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-20034 Filed 8-18-16; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P