Establishment of the Champlain Valley of New York Viticultural Area, 56490-56492 [2016-19992]
Download as PDF
56490
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
administrative determination affirms the
initial determination as to evasion, then
no further CBP action is needed. If the
final administrative determination
reverses the initial determination, then
CBP will take appropriate actions
consistent with the final administrative
determination.
§ 165.47 Potential penalties and other
actions.
CBP and other government agencies
reserve the right to undertake additional
investigations or enforcement actions in
cases covered by these provisions.
Nothing within this part prevents CBP
from assessing penalties of any sort
related to such cases or taking action
under any other relevant laws.
R. Gil Kerlikowske,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border,
Protection.
Approved: August 17, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2016–20007 Filed 8–18–16; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2015–0010: T.D. TTB–142;
Ref: Notice No. 154]
RIN 1513–AC19
Establishment of the Champlain Valley
of New York Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 500-square mile
‘‘Champlain Valley of New York’’
viticultural area in Clinton and Essex
Counties, New York. The Champlain
Valley of New York viticultural area is
not located within any other established
viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 21, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
M. Bresnahan, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box
12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202–
453–1039, ext. 151.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:11 Aug 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Requirements
Background on Viticultural Areas
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes standards for petitions for the
establishment or modification of AVAs.
Petitions to establish an AVA must
include the following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed AVA boundary is nationally
or locally known by the viticultural area
name specified in the petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
AVA;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed AVA affecting
viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation,
that make the proposed AVA distinctive
and distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
AVA, with the boundary of the
proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon;
and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed AVA boundary based on
USGS map markings.
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Order 120–01, dated January
24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to
perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these
laws.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission to TTB of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Champlain Valley of New York Petition
TTB received a petition from Colin
Read, owner of North Star Vineyard, on
behalf of the Lake Champlain Grape
Growers Association, proposing the
establishment of the ‘‘Champlain Valley
of New York’’ AVA in Clinton and Essex
Counties, New York. The proposed
Champlain Valley of New York AVA
covers approximately 500 square miles
and is not located within any other
AVA. There are 11 commercial
vineyards covering a total of
approximately 15.47 acres within the
proposed AVA, as well as 6 wineries.
According to the petition, the
distinguishing feature of the proposed
Champlain Valley of New York AVA is
its short growing season, which is
conducive to growing cold-hardy North
American hybrid grape varieties (such
as Frontenac, La Crescent, and
Marquette) but not the Vitis vinifera
grapes that are grown in the
surrounding areas. The petition
provides information comparing the
length of the growing season within the
AVA to those of the surrounding areas.
In South Hero, Vermont, to the east of
the proposed AVA, the growing season
is four weeks longer than that in the
proposed AVA. In Whitehall, New York,
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
to the south of the proposed AVA, the
growing season is two weeks longer
than that in the proposed AVA. The
growing season in the Adirondack
Mountains, to the west of the proposed
AVA, is too short for commercial grape
growth. The proposed AVA also has a
later last-frost date and an earlier firstfrost date than the areas to its east and
south. TTB notes that the area directly
north of the proposed AVA is in Canada
and, therefore, is not eligible to be part
of an AVA.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 154 in the
Federal Register on July 2, 2015 (80 FR
38147), proposing to establish the
Champlain Valley of New York AVA. In
the notice, TTB summarized the
evidence from the petition regarding the
name, boundary, and distinguishing
features for the proposed AVA. For a
detailed description of such evidence,
see Notice No. 154. In Notice No. 154,
TTB solicited comments on the
accuracy of the name, boundary, and
other required information submitted in
support of the petition. The comment
period closed on August 31, 2015. TTB
received no comments in response to
Notice No. 154.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition,
TTB finds that the evidence provided by
the petitioner supports the
establishment of the Champlain Valley
of New York AVA. Accordingly, under
the authority of the FAA Act, section
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of
2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the TTB
regulations, TTB establishes the
‘‘Champlain Valley of New York’’ AVA
in Clinton and Essex Counties, New
York, effective 30 days from the
publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the Champlain Valley of
New York AVA in the regulatory text
published at the end of this final rule.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:11 Aug 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for
labeling with an AVA name and that
name appears in the brand name, then
the label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of this AVA,
its name, ‘‘Champlain Valley of New
York,’’ will be recognized as a name of
viticultural significance under
§ 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the
regulation clarifies this point.
Consequently, wine bottlers using the
name ‘‘Champlain Valley of New York’’
in a brand name, including a trademark,
or in another label reference as to the
origin of the wine, will have to ensure
that the product is eligible to use the
AVA name as an appellation of origin.
TTB is not designating ‘‘Champlain
Valley,’’ standing alone, as a term of
viticultural significance because the
term ‘‘Champlain Valley’’ also applies to
the parts of the valley located in
Vermont and Canada. The petitioner
proposed the name ‘‘Champlain Valley
of New York’’ to more accurately
describe the location of the AVA. The
establishment of the Champlain Valley
of New York AVA will not affect any
existing AVA. The establishment of the
Champlain Valley of New York AVA
will allow vintners to use ‘‘Champlain
Valley of New York’’ as an appellation
of origin for wines made primarily from
grapes grown within the Champlain
Valley of New York AVA if the wines
meet the eligibility requirements for the
appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56491
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Kate M. Bresnahan of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Subpart C is amended by adding
§ 9.258 to read as follows:
■
§ 9.258
Champlain Valley of New York.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is
‘‘Champlain Valley of New York’’. For
purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
‘‘Champlain Valley of New York’’ is a
term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The two United
States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:100,000 scale topographic maps used
to determine the boundary of the
Champlain Valley of New York
viticultural area are titled:
(1) Lake Champlain, N.Y.; VT.; N.H.;
U.S.; CAN., 1962; revised (U.S. area)
1972; and
(2) Glens Falls, N.Y.; VT.; N.H., 1956;
revised 1972.
(c) Boundary. The Champlain Valley
of New York viticultural area is located
in Clinton and Essex Counties, New
York. The boundary of the Champlain
Valley of New York viticultural area is
as described below:
(1) The beginning point is found on
the Lake Champlain map at the
intersection of the western shore of Lake
Champlain and the U.S.-Canada border,
just north of the town of Rouses Point.
(2) From the beginning point, proceed
south along the western shore of Lake
Champlain approximately 109.4 miles,
crossing onto the Glens Falls map, to a
road marked on the map as State Route
73 (now known as State Route 74) and
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
56492
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
known locally as Fort Ti Road, at the
Fort Ticonderoga–Larrabees Point Ferry
landing; then
(3) Proceed west along State Route 73
(State Route 74/Fort Ti Road)
approximately 1.6 miles to State Route
22; then
(4) Proceed north along State Route 22
approximately 21 miles, crossing onto
the Lake Champlain map and passing
through the town of Port Henry, to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally
as County Road 44 (Stevenson Road);
then
(5) Proceed north along County Road
44 (Stevenson Road) approximately 5.8
miles to a railroad track; then
(6) Proceed northerly along the
railroad track approximately 1.6 miles
to State Route 9N, west of the town of
Westport; then
(7) Proceed westerly along State Route
9N approximately 4.1 miles to Interstate
87; then
(8) Proceed north along Interstate 87
approximately 21 miles to the Ausable
River, southwest of the town of
Keeseville; then
(9) Proceed west (upstream) along the
Ausable River approximately 6 miles to
a bridge connecting two unnamed lightduty roads known locally as Burke Road
and Lower Road in the town of
Clintonville, and proceed north along
the bridge to Lower Road; then
(10) Proceed west along Lower Road
approximately 0.6 mile to State Route
9N; then
(11) Proceed west along State Route
9N approximately 0.8 mile to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally
as County Route 39 (Clintonville Road);
then
(12) Proceed north along County
Route 39 (Clintonville Road)
approximately 1.5 miles to the second
crossing of the Little Ausable River,
west of Cook Mountain; then
(13) Proceed northeast along the Little
Ausable River approximately 3.5 miles
to the confluence of the river with
Furnace Brook, near the town of
Harkness; then
(14) Proceed west along Furnace
Brook approximately 0.17 mile to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally
as County Route 40 (Calkins Road); then
(15) Proceed north along County
Route 40 (Calkins Road) approximately
5.8 miles to an unnamed light-duty road
known locally as County Route 35
(Peasleeville Road), south of an
unnamed creek known locally as Arnold
Brook; then
(16) Proceed west along County Route
35 (Peasleeville Road) approximately
0.1 mile to an unnamed light-duty road
known locally as Connors Road; then
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:11 Aug 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
(17) Proceed north along Connors
Road approximately 2.1 miles, crossing
the Salmon River, to an unnamed lightduty road known locally as County
Route 33 (Norrisville Road); then
(18) Proceed west along County Route
33 (Norrisville Road) approximately 1.2
miles to an unnamed light-duty road
known locally as Shingle Street; then
(19) Proceed north along Shingle
Street approximately 4 miles to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally
as County Route 31 (Rabideau Street);
then
(20) Proceed west along County Route
31 (Rabideau Street) approximately 0.4
mile to an unnamed light-duty road
known locally as Goddeau Street; then
(21) Proceed north along Goddeau
Street approximately 0.9 mile, crossing
the Saranac River, to State Route 3 just
east of the town of Cadyville; then
(22) Proceed east along State Route 3
approximately 0.5 mile to an unnamed
light-duty road known locally as Akey
Road; then
(23) Proceed north on Akey Road
approximately 0.2 mile to State Route
374; then
(24) Proceed east along State Route
374 approximately 3.6 miles to State
Route 190, also known locally as
Military Turnpike; then
(25) Proceed northwest along State
Route 190 (Military Turnpike)
approximately 15.2 miles to an
unnamed light-duty road just east of
Park Brook known locally as County
Route 12 (Alder Bend Road), northwest
of Miner Lake State Park; then
(26) Proceed north along County
Route 12 (Alder Bend Road)
approximately 3 miles to U.S. Highway
11; then
(27) Proceed west along U.S. Highway
11 approximately 1.7 miles to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally
as County Route 10 (Cannon Corners
Road); then
(28) Proceed north along County
Route 10 (Cannon Corners Road)
approximately 6 miles to the U.S.Canada border; then
(29) Proceed east along the U.S.Canada border approximately 19.8
miles, returning to the beginning point.
Signed: June 27, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: August 8, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–19992 Filed 8–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2014–0007: T.D. TTB–141;
Ref: Notice No. 145]
RIN 1513–AC10
Expansion of the Sta. Rita Hills
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding
the approximately 33,380-acre ‘‘Sta. Rita
Hills’’ viticultural area in Santa Barbara
County, California, by approximately
2,296 acres. The established viticultural
area and the expansion area are both
located entirely within the larger Santa
Ynez Valley viticultural area and the
multicounty Central Coast viticultural
area. TTB designates viticultural areas
to allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they
may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 21, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Order 120–01, dated January
E:\FR\FM\22AUR1.SGM
22AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56490-56492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19992]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2015-0010: T.D. TTB-142; Ref: Notice No. 154]
RIN 1513-AC19
Establishment of the Champlain Valley of New York Viticultural
Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes
the approximately 500-square mile ``Champlain Valley of New York''
viticultural area in Clinton and Essex Counties, New York. The
Champlain Valley of New York viticultural area is not located within
any other established viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural
areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective September 21, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate M. Bresnahan, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated December
10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120-01, dated January 24, 2003),
to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these laws.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission to TTB of petitions
for the establishment or modification of American viticultural areas
(AVAs) and lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9
of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes
standards for petitions for the establishment or modification of AVAs.
Petitions to establish an AVA must include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is
nationally or locally known by the viticultural area name specified in
the petition;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed AVA;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
AVA affecting viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical
features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and
distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the boundary of
the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA
boundary based on USGS map markings.
Champlain Valley of New York Petition
TTB received a petition from Colin Read, owner of North Star
Vineyard, on behalf of the Lake Champlain Grape Growers Association,
proposing the establishment of the ``Champlain Valley of New York'' AVA
in Clinton and Essex Counties, New York. The proposed Champlain Valley
of New York AVA covers approximately 500 square miles and is not
located within any other AVA. There are 11 commercial vineyards
covering a total of approximately 15.47 acres within the proposed AVA,
as well as 6 wineries.
According to the petition, the distinguishing feature of the
proposed Champlain Valley of New York AVA is its short growing season,
which is conducive to growing cold-hardy North American hybrid grape
varieties (such as Frontenac, La Crescent, and Marquette) but not the
Vitis vinifera grapes that are grown in the surrounding areas. The
petition provides information comparing the length of the growing
season within the AVA to those of the surrounding areas. In South Hero,
Vermont, to the east of the proposed AVA, the growing season is four
weeks longer than that in the proposed AVA. In Whitehall, New York,
[[Page 56491]]
to the south of the proposed AVA, the growing season is two weeks
longer than that in the proposed AVA. The growing season in the
Adirondack Mountains, to the west of the proposed AVA, is too short for
commercial grape growth. The proposed AVA also has a later last-frost
date and an earlier first-frost date than the areas to its east and
south. TTB notes that the area directly north of the proposed AVA is in
Canada and, therefore, is not eligible to be part of an AVA.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 154 in the Federal Register on July 2,
2015 (80 FR 38147), proposing to establish the Champlain Valley of New
York AVA. In the notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition
regarding the name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the
proposed AVA. For a detailed description of such evidence, see Notice
No. 154. In Notice No. 154, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of
the name, boundary, and other required information submitted in support
of the petition. The comment period closed on August 31, 2015. TTB
received no comments in response to Notice No. 154.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the evidence
provided by the petitioner supports the establishment of the Champlain
Valley of New York AVA. Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA
Act, section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and parts 4
and 9 of the TTB regulations, TTB establishes the ``Champlain Valley of
New York'' AVA in Clinton and Essex Counties, New York, effective 30
days from the publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the Champlain
Valley of New York AVA in the regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another
reference on the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have
to obtain approval of a new label. Different rules apply if a wine has
a brand name containing an AVA name that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of this AVA, its name, ``Champlain Valley of
New York,'' will be recognized as a name of viticultural significance
under Sec. 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The
text of the regulation clarifies this point. Consequently, wine
bottlers using the name ``Champlain Valley of New York'' in a brand
name, including a trademark, or in another label reference as to the
origin of the wine, will have to ensure that the product is eligible to
use the AVA name as an appellation of origin. TTB is not designating
``Champlain Valley,'' standing alone, as a term of viticultural
significance because the term ``Champlain Valley'' also applies to the
parts of the valley located in Vermont and Canada. The petitioner
proposed the name ``Champlain Valley of New York'' to more accurately
describe the location of the AVA. The establishment of the Champlain
Valley of New York AVA will not affect any existing AVA. The
establishment of the Champlain Valley of New York AVA will allow
vintners to use ``Champlain Valley of New York'' as an appellation of
origin for wines made primarily from grapes grown within the Champlain
Valley of New York AVA if the wines meet the eligibility requirements
for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Kate M. Bresnahan of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted
this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Subpart C is amended by adding Sec. 9.258 to read as follows:
Sec. 9.258 Champlain Valley of New York.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Champlain Valley of New York''. For purposes of part 4 of
this chapter, ``Champlain Valley of New York'' is a term of
viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The two United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:100,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the
Champlain Valley of New York viticultural area are titled:
(1) Lake Champlain, N.Y.; VT.; N.H.; U.S.; CAN., 1962; revised
(U.S. area) 1972; and
(2) Glens Falls, N.Y.; VT.; N.H., 1956; revised 1972.
(c) Boundary. The Champlain Valley of New York viticultural area is
located in Clinton and Essex Counties, New York. The boundary of the
Champlain Valley of New York viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is found on the Lake Champlain map at the
intersection of the western shore of Lake Champlain and the U.S.-Canada
border, just north of the town of Rouses Point.
(2) From the beginning point, proceed south along the western shore
of Lake Champlain approximately 109.4 miles, crossing onto the Glens
Falls map, to a road marked on the map as State Route 73 (now known as
State Route 74) and
[[Page 56492]]
known locally as Fort Ti Road, at the Fort Ticonderoga-Larrabees Point
Ferry landing; then
(3) Proceed west along State Route 73 (State Route 74/Fort Ti Road)
approximately 1.6 miles to State Route 22; then
(4) Proceed north along State Route 22 approximately 21 miles,
crossing onto the Lake Champlain map and passing through the town of
Port Henry, to an unnamed light-duty road known locally as County Road
44 (Stevenson Road); then
(5) Proceed north along County Road 44 (Stevenson Road)
approximately 5.8 miles to a railroad track; then
(6) Proceed northerly along the railroad track approximately 1.6
miles to State Route 9N, west of the town of Westport; then
(7) Proceed westerly along State Route 9N approximately 4.1 miles
to Interstate 87; then
(8) Proceed north along Interstate 87 approximately 21 miles to the
Ausable River, southwest of the town of Keeseville; then
(9) Proceed west (upstream) along the Ausable River approximately 6
miles to a bridge connecting two unnamed light-duty roads known locally
as Burke Road and Lower Road in the town of Clintonville, and proceed
north along the bridge to Lower Road; then
(10) Proceed west along Lower Road approximately 0.6 mile to State
Route 9N; then
(11) Proceed west along State Route 9N approximately 0.8 mile to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as County Route 39 (Clintonville
Road); then
(12) Proceed north along County Route 39 (Clintonville Road)
approximately 1.5 miles to the second crossing of the Little Ausable
River, west of Cook Mountain; then
(13) Proceed northeast along the Little Ausable River approximately
3.5 miles to the confluence of the river with Furnace Brook, near the
town of Harkness; then
(14) Proceed west along Furnace Brook approximately 0.17 mile to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as County Route 40 (Calkins
Road); then
(15) Proceed north along County Route 40 (Calkins Road)
approximately 5.8 miles to an unnamed light-duty road known locally as
County Route 35 (Peasleeville Road), south of an unnamed creek known
locally as Arnold Brook; then
(16) Proceed west along County Route 35 (Peasleeville Road)
approximately 0.1 mile to an unnamed light-duty road known locally as
Connors Road; then
(17) Proceed north along Connors Road approximately 2.1 miles,
crossing the Salmon River, to an unnamed light-duty road known locally
as County Route 33 (Norrisville Road); then
(18) Proceed west along County Route 33 (Norrisville Road)
approximately 1.2 miles to an unnamed light-duty road known locally as
Shingle Street; then
(19) Proceed north along Shingle Street approximately 4 miles to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as County Route 31 (Rabideau
Street); then
(20) Proceed west along County Route 31 (Rabideau Street)
approximately 0.4 mile to an unnamed light-duty road known locally as
Goddeau Street; then
(21) Proceed north along Goddeau Street approximately 0.9 mile,
crossing the Saranac River, to State Route 3 just east of the town of
Cadyville; then
(22) Proceed east along State Route 3 approximately 0.5 mile to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as Akey Road; then
(23) Proceed north on Akey Road approximately 0.2 mile to State
Route 374; then
(24) Proceed east along State Route 374 approximately 3.6 miles to
State Route 190, also known locally as Military Turnpike; then
(25) Proceed northwest along State Route 190 (Military Turnpike)
approximately 15.2 miles to an unnamed light-duty road just east of
Park Brook known locally as County Route 12 (Alder Bend Road),
northwest of Miner Lake State Park; then
(26) Proceed north along County Route 12 (Alder Bend Road)
approximately 3 miles to U.S. Highway 11; then
(27) Proceed west along U.S. Highway 11 approximately 1.7 miles to
an unnamed light-duty road known locally as County Route 10 (Cannon
Corners Road); then
(28) Proceed north along County Route 10 (Cannon Corners Road)
approximately 6 miles to the U.S.-Canada border; then
(29) Proceed east along the U.S.-Canada border approximately 19.8
miles, returning to the beginning point.
Signed: June 27, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: August 8, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-19992 Filed 8-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P