Proposed Changes to the Black Lung Clinics Program, 56660-56662 [2016-19938]
Download as PDF
56660
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2016 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section
516.20;
516.26;
516.27;
516.29;
516.30;
516.36;
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
Total hours
content and format of MUMS request ....................
requirements for amending MUMS designation .....
change in sponsorship ............................................
termination of MUMS designation ..........................
requirements of annual reports ..............................
insufficient quantities ..............................................
15
3
1
2
15
1
5
1
1
1
5
1
75
3
1
2
75
1
16
2
1
1
2
3
1200
6
1
2
150
3
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
1,362
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The burden estimate for this reporting
requirement was derived in our Office
of Minor Use and Minor Species Animal
Drug Development by extrapolating the
investigational new animal drug/new
animal drug application reporting
requirements for similar actions by this
same segment of the regulated industry
and from previous interactions with the
minor use/minor species community.
Dated: August 16, 2016.
Jeremy Sharp,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning,
Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2016–19919 Filed 8–19–16; 8:45 am]
their families, given the available data,
and how to better equip future BLCP
grantees to meet those needs.
Submit written comments no
later than September 21, 2016.
DATES:
Written comments should
be submitted to Blacklung@hrsa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Hutchings, Program
Coordinator, Black Lung Clinics
Program, Federal Office of Rural Health
Policy, Health Resources and Services
Administration, Blacklung@hrsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
I. Background
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
a. Authorizing Legislation and Program
Regulations
Health Resources and Services
Administration
BLCP is authorized by Section 427(a)
of the Federal Mine Safety and Health
Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 937(a)), as
amended, and accompanying
regulations found at 42 CFR part 55a
(‘‘BLCP regulations’’). HRSA began
administering the program in FY 1979,
when $7.5 million was appropriated.
HRSA awarded approximately $6.5
million to clinics in FY 2015.
The primary goal of the BLCP is to
reduce the morbidity and mortality
associated with occupationally-related
coal mine dust lung disease. The BLCP
regulations (42 CFR part 55a) state that
BLCP grantees must provide for the
following services to active and inactive
miners, in consultation with a physician
with special training or experience in
the diagnosis and treatment of
respiratory diseases: primary care;
patient and family education and
counseling; outreach; patient care
coordination; antismoking advice; and
other symptomatic treatments.
Additionally, BLCP grantees must serve
as payers of last resort and be able to
administer, or provide referrals for, U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL) disability
examinations.
Proposed Changes to the Black Lung
Clinics Program
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Request for Public Comment on
Proposed Changes to the Black Lung
Clinics Program for Consideration for
the FY 2017 Funding Opportunity
Announcement Development.
AGENCY:
This notice seeks comments
on a range of issues pertaining to the
Black Lung Clinics Program (BLCP),
which will be competitive in Fiscal Year
(FY) 2017. HRSA’s Federal Office of
Rural Health Policy allocates funds for
state, public, or private entities that
provide medical, educational, and
outreach services to active, inactive, and
retired coal miners with disabilities.
Funding allocations take into account
the number of miners to be served; their
medical, outreach, and educational
needs; and the quality and breadth of
services that are provided. HRSA
requests feedback on how to best
determine the needs of coal miners and
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Aug 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
b. Eligibility and Funding Criteria
The BLCP funding opportunity is
open to any state or public or private
entity that meets the requirements of the
BLCP as described above. These entities
include faith-based and communitybased organizations, as well as federally
recognized Tribes and Tribal
organizations.
The BLCP regulations state that the
funding criteria for applicants should
take into account: (1) The number of
miners to be served and their needs; and
(2) the quality and breadth of services to
be provided. The regulations also state
that ‘‘the Secretary will give preference
to a State, which meets the requirement
of this part and applies for a grant under
this part, over other applications in that
State’’.
c. Application Cycle
HRSA administers the BLCP over 3year grant cycles. The program was last
competitive in FY 2014, and current
BLCP grantees finished their second
year of the cycle on June 30, 2016. The
program will be competitive again in FY
2017.
II. Current Challenges
a. Growing Need for Black Lung Services
In FY 2000, surveillance data from the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention’s National Institute of
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) showed an unexpected
increase in the national prevalence of
coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP),
also known as black lung disease, after
nearly three decades of steady decline
following the enactment of the Federal
Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of
1969. The overall CWP prevalence
among U.S. coal workers declined from
11 percent in 1970 to 2 percent in 1999.
However, since 2000, the prevalence of
CWP has increased to 3 percent and
continues to rise. According to NIOSH
surveillance data, the rise in CWP has
been the most severe among coal miners
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
in Kentucky, Virginia, and West
Virginia. Compared with coal miners in
other states, these miners tend to be
younger, with fewer years of work
experience in underground mines.
Investigators from NIOSH reported that
the prevalence of progressive massive
fibrosis (PMF), the most severe form of
black lung disease, increased 900
percent between 2000 and 2012,
affecting over 3 percent of miners with
over 25 years of work. This level of
prevalence of PMF has not been seen
since the 1970s. Additionally, NIOSH
has reported that coal miners are
developing severe CWP at relatively
young ages.
Finally, the U.S. coal industry is
currently experiencing a downturn.
Industry analysts estimate that nearly 50
coal companies have sought bankruptcy
court protection since 2012, resulting in
layoffs and, in some cases, lost
retirement benefits for coal miners.
According to a 2016 report by the
Appalachian Regional Commission,
Appalachian Kentucky experienced a
coal mining job decline of 56 percent
between 2011 and 2015, while
Tennessee and Virginia both
experienced declines of approximately
40 percent during the same time period.
The West Virginia Office of Miners
Health Safety and Training has
estimated that there are currently 12,000
coal miners employed in the state, down
from 22,000 in 2011. Widespread coal
mining job losses have also been
reported in other states such as
Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Alabama.
These trends have the potential to affect
coal miners’ economic welfare and, by
extension, their ability to access or
afford health care. Indeed, some current
BLCP grantees have noted in their
annual progress reports to HRSA,
submitted April 2016, and in written
email communication ahead of the
March 2016 HRSA BLCP Grantee
Workshop, that they have witnessed a
recent uptick in the number of coal
miners visiting their clinics, which
some attribute to industry layoffs.
b. Ongoing Challenges in Meeting Those
Needs
Current BLCP grantees reported facing
several challenges in meeting the needs
of coal miners in their service areas
during a March 2016 BLCP Grantee
Workshop hosted by HRSA. First,
recruitment, training, and retention of
qualified clinical and benefits
counseling staff remain difficult,
particularly in rural areas. Second, coal
miners often face transportation and
other barriers to accessing health
services, which is problematic given
that many suffer from chronic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Aug 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
conditions that require regular
management and treatment. Third,
BLCP grantees have indicated that some
miners, including those who have been
laid off or are not part of a union, are
difficult to locate, which can complicate
outreach and service delivery efforts.
Finally, there continues to be a shortage
of clinicians willing and able to perform
exams related to the emerging DOL
standards for x-rays, pulmonary testing,
and medical documentation,
particularly in rural areas.
c. Limited Available Data
Overarching these challenges is the
lack of a single, comprehensive,
national dataset that contains
information on active, inactive and
retired, and disabled U.S. coal miners
who have worked in surface and
underground mines. DOL’s Office of
Workers’ Compensation Programs and
Mine Safety and Health Administration,
along with NIOSH’s Coal Workers’
Health Surveillance Program, each
regularly collect health and safety data
on coal miners, but these data address
specific and separate aspects of this
population. HRSA also collects yearly
performance data from BLCP grantees,
but these data are in aggregate form
making it problematic to analyze
patient-level data or link to DOL or
NIOSH’s datasets. As a result, it is
difficult to ascertain both the total
number of active, inactive and retired,
and coal miners with disabilities in a
given service area, as well as the
complete health and wellness profile of
U.S. coal miners. This makes it difficult
for HRSA to assess where U.S. coal
miners reside and what their needs are.
Per statute, HRSA is required to allocate
BLCP grant funds based in part on ‘‘the
number of miners to be served and their
needs.’’ Additionally, the lack of
comprehensive data on coal miners is a
challenge to current BLCP grantees that
use BLCP funds to target and deliver
services to miners.
III. FY 2014 Funding Approach and
Current BLCP Cohort
a. Overview of FY 2014 Funding
Approach
In FY 2014, HRSA tested a new
funding approach that aimed to respond
to the growing national need for BLCP
services, as well as the BLCP
regulations’ requirement to allocate
BLCP grant funds according to: (1) The
number of miners to be served and their
needs; and (2) the quality and breadth
of services to be provided. The new
funding approach enabled individual
applicants to apply for a specific tier of
funding, depending on the level of
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56661
services they intended to provide (see
pp. 6–9 of the FY 2014 Funding
Opportunity Announcement).
Historically, the mix of BLCP grantees
and applicants has been broad in terms
of those who are very clinically focused
and those who are more geared towards
outreach, education, and counseling.
The tiered-based funding approach was
designed, in part, to account for these
differences. Additionally, the funding
methodology took into account available
data on the number of coal miners and
coal mines in a service area, as reported
by the U.S. Department of Energy’s
Energy Information Administration
(EIA) and other national, state, and
local resources.
b. Current BLCP Cohort
Following a competitive application
process, HRSA allocated approximately
$6.5 million among 15 BLCP grantees.
These grantees provided medical,
outreach, educational, and counseling
services to 11,843 miners across 14
states in FY 2014.
c. Black Lung Center of Excellence
HRSA also funded one Black Lung
Center of Excellence (BLCE) through a
cooperative agreement in FY 2014 to
strengthen the quality of the BLCP and
respond to some of the challenges faced
by BLCP grantees and the program as a
whole, including around the emerging
clinical requirements related to DOL’s
black lung claims process.
IV. Request for Public Comment on
Next Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA)
a. Background
The BLCP will be competitive again
in FY 2017, and HRSA is seeking public
comment on issues pertaining to the
program, including:
b. Funding Approach
Following the release of the new
funding approach in FY 2014, some
stakeholders expressed concern that the
funding tiers increased the
administrative burden on applicants
and, in some cases, reduced funding for
applicants that experienced a high
demand for black lung services in their
service areas. With this request, HRSA
invites public comment on the FY 2014
funding approach and suggestions for
other funding methodologies that will
allocate BLCP grant funds based on the
healthcare needs of coal miners and the
ability of applicants to meet those
needs, while minimizing service
disruption, aligning with the program’s
statutory and regulatory requirements,
and taking into account the amount of
available funding.
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
56662
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2016 / Notices
One approach HRSA would like to
seek feedback on includes a service area
competition whereby HRSA allocates
funds to states based on the need for
services (which includes the number of
miners in the state) and the implications
of taking into account historical funding
amounts in administering the program.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
c. Determining Need
HRSA’s FY 2014 funding
methodology aimed to better align the
BLCP with the regulations, which
require HRSA to allocate funds based
on: (1) The number of miners to be
served and their needs; and (2) the
quality and breadth of services to be
provided. To that end, the FY 2014
funding methodology took into account
the number of coal miners and coal
mines in a service area, as reported by
EIA and other national, state, and local
resources, as well as the level of services
an applicant intended to provide. HRSA
recognizes that these data do not
necessarily encapsulate important
factors like disease severity and
comorbidity, disability, and
employment status, all of which could
affect the time and resources grantees
must devote to delivering health and
social services to coal miners. With the
recent downturn of the U.S. coal
industry, and the corresponding layoffs
of coal miners, the numbers of active
coal miners and coal mines in a service
area may not be the most accurate
indicators of need for services.
Therefore, HRSA invites public
comment on how to better define and
measure the diverse needs of coal
miners based on publicly available data
to ensure that HRSA allocates BLCP
grant funds to areas of the country
where they are most needed.
d. Data Collection
Currently, BLCP grantees report
performance data on the number of coal
miners they serve and the number and
type of services they provide to HRSA.
These aggregated data provide little
insight into the quality of services
clinics provide, nor relevant factors
such as comorbid conditions, smoking
history, and insurance coverage.
Requiring BLCP grantees to collect and
report on patient-level data would
strengthen the quality of the BLCP by
enabling HRSA to better understand
coal miners’ needs, the ability of BLCP
grantees to meet those needs, and,
importantly, how to better allocate
BLCP grant funds. Additionally, given
that the majority of coal miners served
by BLCP grantees are retired, collecting
patient-level data would enable HRSA
to add to the limited body of knowledge
on this population.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Aug 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
However, despite the benefits of
patient-level data collection, HRSA
recognizes that this process may be
administratively and financially
burdensome for BLCP grantees.
Therefore, HRSA invites public
comment on whether it should require
grantees to collect and report patientlevel data, either through the current
performance measurement system or a
separate black lung clinical database.
e. The Black Lung Center of Excellence
(BLCE)
In FY 2014, HRSA funded one BLCE
through a cooperative agreement to
focus on the quality aspect of the BLCP.
The current BLCE grantee, with
assistance from HRSA, has implemented
a number of activities aimed at
achieving HRSA’s goals around quality,
including:
• Developing and launching the BLCE
Web site to provide BLCP grantees,
miners, and others who provide services
to miners with educational expertise
and resources on coal mine dust lung
disease;
• Creating four training modules in
collaboration with the DOL, Division of
Coal Mine Workers Compensation, for
medical providers and Black Lung
examiners that provide in-depth
information on screening, diagnosis,
and treatment of coal mine lung dust
disease;
• Providing technical assistance to
BLCP grantees; and
• Developing and piloting the Black
Lung Clinical Research Database
(REDCap) to standardize clinical data
collection and performance data
submission by HRSA BLCP grantees.
HRSA invites public comment on how
HRSA can better leverage the BLCE’s
expertise and quantify the BLCE’s
impact on BLCP grantees and the coal
miners they serve through performance
measures.
f. Timeliness and Quality of DOL Exams
One of the goals of the BLCP, as
outlined in the FY 2014 funding
opportunity announcement, is to
‘‘provide well-reasoned medical
opinions and timely scheduling/
completion of DOL medical exams to
facilitate the filing of Federal Black
Lung Benefits claims.’’ HRSA proposes
to work with DOL’s Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs (OWCP) to
hold BLCP grantees to standards for
medical exam timeliness. In particular,
these standards would require clinicians
performing 413(b) examinations, who
are affiliated with BLCP clinics, to
complete initial 413(b) requests within
90 days and 413(b) supplemental
medical evidence development within
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60 days. Additionally, to strengthen the
quality of services provided by BLCP
grantees, HRSA proposes requiring
medical and non-medical personnel
from all BLCP clinics to complete the
OWCP-sponsored training modules
entitled ‘‘Black Lung Disability
Evaluation and Claims Training for
Medical Examiners’’ prior to applying
for BLCP grant funds. HRSA invites
public comment on whether these
requirements are reasonable and
attentive approaches to strengthening
the quality of medical services provided
by BLCP grantees.
g. Grantee Collaboration
The current BLCP grantees and
applicants are mixed in terms of those
who are clinically focused and those
who are service focused. Encouraging
grantees to share best practices and
provide technical assistance to one
another could help strengthen the
quality of the BLCP. Proposed
mechanisms for achieving greater
collaboration include allowing grantees
to allocate a portion of their award
towards providing on-site or remote
technical assistance to other clinics and/
or encouraging grantees to participate in
a yearly peer learning workshop hosted
by HRSA. HRSA invites public
comment on these strategies as well as
how the BLCE can play a role in
facilitating grantee collaboration.
h. Pulmonary Rehabilitation
The current BLCP grant guidance
requires grantees to provide for
accredited pulmonary rehabilitation
services. The first two funding tiers
require BLCP grantees to provide ‘‘onsite or contracted accredited Phase II or
Phase III rehabilitation services,’’ while
the third and highest funding tier
requires BLCP grantees to provide an
‘‘on-site’’ and ‘‘American Association of
Cardiovascular and Pulmonary
Rehabilitation (AACVPR)-certified’’
pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Current BLCP grantees have expressed
concerns that these standards are
difficult to meet, particularly in rural
areas where miners have to travel long
distances to attend multiple sessions a
week. Thus, HRSA invites public
comment on how to revise the BLCP
requirements around pulmonary
rehabilitation such that they are feasible
but still ensure that miners receive a
variation of this beneficial service.
Dated: August 15, 2016.
James Macrae,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–19938 Filed 8–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56660-56662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19938]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
Proposed Changes to the Black Lung Clinics Program
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Request for Public Comment on Proposed Changes to the Black
Lung Clinics Program for Consideration for the FY 2017 Funding
Opportunity Announcement Development.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice seeks comments on a range of issues pertaining to
the Black Lung Clinics Program (BLCP), which will be competitive in
Fiscal Year (FY) 2017. HRSA's Federal Office of Rural Health Policy
allocates funds for state, public, or private entities that provide
medical, educational, and outreach services to active, inactive, and
retired coal miners with disabilities. Funding allocations take into
account the number of miners to be served; their medical, outreach, and
educational needs; and the quality and breadth of services that are
provided. HRSA requests feedback on how to best determine the needs of
coal miners and their families, given the available data, and how to
better equip future BLCP grantees to meet those needs.
DATES: Submit written comments no later than September 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to Blacklung@hrsa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Hutchings, Program
Coordinator, Black Lung Clinics Program, Federal Office of Rural Health
Policy, Health Resources and Services Administration,
Blacklung@hrsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
a. Authorizing Legislation and Program Regulations
BLCP is authorized by Section 427(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 937(a)), as amended, and accompanying
regulations found at 42 CFR part 55a (``BLCP regulations''). HRSA began
administering the program in FY 1979, when $7.5 million was
appropriated. HRSA awarded approximately $6.5 million to clinics in FY
2015.
The primary goal of the BLCP is to reduce the morbidity and
mortality associated with occupationally-related coal mine dust lung
disease. The BLCP regulations (42 CFR part 55a) state that BLCP
grantees must provide for the following services to active and inactive
miners, in consultation with a physician with special training or
experience in the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases:
primary care; patient and family education and counseling; outreach;
patient care coordination; antismoking advice; and other symptomatic
treatments. Additionally, BLCP grantees must serve as payers of last
resort and be able to administer, or provide referrals for, U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL) disability examinations.
b. Eligibility and Funding Criteria
The BLCP funding opportunity is open to any state or public or
private entity that meets the requirements of the BLCP as described
above. These entities include faith-based and community-based
organizations, as well as federally recognized Tribes and Tribal
organizations.
The BLCP regulations state that the funding criteria for applicants
should take into account: (1) The number of miners to be served and
their needs; and (2) the quality and breadth of services to be
provided. The regulations also state that ``the Secretary will give
preference to a State, which meets the requirement of this part and
applies for a grant under this part, over other applications in that
State''.
c. Application Cycle
HRSA administers the BLCP over 3-year grant cycles. The program was
last competitive in FY 2014, and current BLCP grantees finished their
second year of the cycle on June 30, 2016. The program will be
competitive again in FY 2017.
II. Current Challenges
a. Growing Need for Black Lung Services
In FY 2000, surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention's National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) showed an unexpected increase in the national prevalence of
coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP), also known as black lung disease,
after nearly three decades of steady decline following the enactment of
the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. The overall CWP
prevalence among U.S. coal workers declined from 11 percent in 1970 to
2 percent in 1999. However, since 2000, the prevalence of CWP has
increased to 3 percent and continues to rise. According to NIOSH
surveillance data, the rise in CWP has been the most severe among coal
miners
[[Page 56661]]
in Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia. Compared with coal miners in
other states, these miners tend to be younger, with fewer years of work
experience in underground mines. Investigators from NIOSH reported that
the prevalence of progressive massive fibrosis (PMF), the most severe
form of black lung disease, increased 900 percent between 2000 and
2012, affecting over 3 percent of miners with over 25 years of work.
This level of prevalence of PMF has not been seen since the 1970s.
Additionally, NIOSH has reported that coal miners are developing severe
CWP at relatively young ages.
Finally, the U.S. coal industry is currently experiencing a
downturn. Industry analysts estimate that nearly 50 coal companies have
sought bankruptcy court protection since 2012, resulting in layoffs
and, in some cases, lost retirement benefits for coal miners. According
to a 2016 report by the Appalachian Regional Commission, Appalachian
Kentucky experienced a coal mining job decline of 56 percent between
2011 and 2015, while Tennessee and Virginia both experienced declines
of approximately 40 percent during the same time period. The West
Virginia Office of Miners Health Safety and Training has estimated that
there are currently 12,000 coal miners employed in the state, down from
22,000 in 2011. Widespread coal mining job losses have also been
reported in other states such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Alabama. These
trends have the potential to affect coal miners' economic welfare and,
by extension, their ability to access or afford health care. Indeed,
some current BLCP grantees have noted in their annual progress reports
to HRSA, submitted April 2016, and in written email communication ahead
of the March 2016 HRSA BLCP Grantee Workshop, that they have witnessed
a recent uptick in the number of coal miners visiting their clinics,
which some attribute to industry layoffs.
b. Ongoing Challenges in Meeting Those Needs
Current BLCP grantees reported facing several challenges in meeting
the needs of coal miners in their service areas during a March 2016
BLCP Grantee Workshop hosted by HRSA. First, recruitment, training, and
retention of qualified clinical and benefits counseling staff remain
difficult, particularly in rural areas. Second, coal miners often face
transportation and other barriers to accessing health services, which
is problematic given that many suffer from chronic conditions that
require regular management and treatment. Third, BLCP grantees have
indicated that some miners, including those who have been laid off or
are not part of a union, are difficult to locate, which can complicate
outreach and service delivery efforts. Finally, there continues to be a
shortage of clinicians willing and able to perform exams related to the
emerging DOL standards for x-rays, pulmonary testing, and medical
documentation, particularly in rural areas.
c. Limited Available Data
Overarching these challenges is the lack of a single,
comprehensive, national dataset that contains information on active,
inactive and retired, and disabled U.S. coal miners who have worked in
surface and underground mines. DOL's Office of Workers' Compensation
Programs and Mine Safety and Health Administration, along with NIOSH's
Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program, each regularly collect
health and safety data on coal miners, but these data address specific
and separate aspects of this population. HRSA also collects yearly
performance data from BLCP grantees, but these data are in aggregate
form making it problematic to analyze patient-level data or link to DOL
or NIOSH's datasets. As a result, it is difficult to ascertain both the
total number of active, inactive and retired, and coal miners with
disabilities in a given service area, as well as the complete health
and wellness profile of U.S. coal miners. This makes it difficult for
HRSA to assess where U.S. coal miners reside and what their needs are.
Per statute, HRSA is required to allocate BLCP grant funds based in
part on ``the number of miners to be served and their needs.''
Additionally, the lack of comprehensive data on coal miners is a
challenge to current BLCP grantees that use BLCP funds to target and
deliver services to miners.
III. FY 2014 Funding Approach and Current BLCP Cohort
a. Overview of FY 2014 Funding Approach
In FY 2014, HRSA tested a new funding approach that aimed to
respond to the growing national need for BLCP services, as well as the
BLCP regulations' requirement to allocate BLCP grant funds according
to: (1) The number of miners to be served and their needs; and (2) the
quality and breadth of services to be provided. The new funding
approach enabled individual applicants to apply for a specific tier of
funding, depending on the level of services they intended to provide
(see pp. 6-9 of the FY 2014 Funding Opportunity Announcement).
Historically, the mix of BLCP grantees and applicants has been broad in
terms of those who are very clinically focused and those who are more
geared towards outreach, education, and counseling. The tiered-based
funding approach was designed, in part, to account for these
differences. Additionally, the funding methodology took into account
available data on the number of coal miners and coal mines in a service
area, as reported by the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Information
Administration (EIA) and other national, state, and local resources.
b. Current BLCP Cohort
Following a competitive application process, HRSA allocated
approximately $6.5 million among 15 BLCP grantees. These grantees
provided medical, outreach, educational, and counseling services to
11,843 miners across 14 states in FY 2014.
c. Black Lung Center of Excellence
HRSA also funded one Black Lung Center of Excellence (BLCE) through
a cooperative agreement in FY 2014 to strengthen the quality of the
BLCP and respond to some of the challenges faced by BLCP grantees and
the program as a whole, including around the emerging clinical
requirements related to DOL's black lung claims process.
IV. Request for Public Comment on Next Funding Opportunity Announcement
(FOA)
a. Background
The BLCP will be competitive again in FY 2017, and HRSA is seeking
public comment on issues pertaining to the program, including:
b. Funding Approach
Following the release of the new funding approach in FY 2014, some
stakeholders expressed concern that the funding tiers increased the
administrative burden on applicants and, in some cases, reduced funding
for applicants that experienced a high demand for black lung services
in their service areas. With this request, HRSA invites public comment
on the FY 2014 funding approach and suggestions for other funding
methodologies that will allocate BLCP grant funds based on the
healthcare needs of coal miners and the ability of applicants to meet
those needs, while minimizing service disruption, aligning with the
program's statutory and regulatory requirements, and taking into
account the amount of available funding.
[[Page 56662]]
One approach HRSA would like to seek feedback on includes a service
area competition whereby HRSA allocates funds to states based on the
need for services (which includes the number of miners in the state)
and the implications of taking into account historical funding amounts
in administering the program.
c. Determining Need
HRSA's FY 2014 funding methodology aimed to better align the BLCP
with the regulations, which require HRSA to allocate funds based on:
(1) The number of miners to be served and their needs; and (2) the
quality and breadth of services to be provided. To that end, the FY
2014 funding methodology took into account the number of coal miners
and coal mines in a service area, as reported by EIA and other
national, state, and local resources, as well as the level of services
an applicant intended to provide. HRSA recognizes that these data do
not necessarily encapsulate important factors like disease severity and
comorbidity, disability, and employment status, all of which could
affect the time and resources grantees must devote to delivering health
and social services to coal miners. With the recent downturn of the
U.S. coal industry, and the corresponding layoffs of coal miners, the
numbers of active coal miners and coal mines in a service area may not
be the most accurate indicators of need for services. Therefore, HRSA
invites public comment on how to better define and measure the diverse
needs of coal miners based on publicly available data to ensure that
HRSA allocates BLCP grant funds to areas of the country where they are
most needed.
d. Data Collection
Currently, BLCP grantees report performance data on the number of
coal miners they serve and the number and type of services they provide
to HRSA. These aggregated data provide little insight into the quality
of services clinics provide, nor relevant factors such as comorbid
conditions, smoking history, and insurance coverage. Requiring BLCP
grantees to collect and report on patient-level data would strengthen
the quality of the BLCP by enabling HRSA to better understand coal
miners' needs, the ability of BLCP grantees to meet those needs, and,
importantly, how to better allocate BLCP grant funds. Additionally,
given that the majority of coal miners served by BLCP grantees are
retired, collecting patient-level data would enable HRSA to add to the
limited body of knowledge on this population.
However, despite the benefits of patient-level data collection,
HRSA recognizes that this process may be administratively and
financially burdensome for BLCP grantees. Therefore, HRSA invites
public comment on whether it should require grantees to collect and
report patient-level data, either through the current performance
measurement system or a separate black lung clinical database.
e. The Black Lung Center of Excellence (BLCE)
In FY 2014, HRSA funded one BLCE through a cooperative agreement to
focus on the quality aspect of the BLCP. The current BLCE grantee, with
assistance from HRSA, has implemented a number of activities aimed at
achieving HRSA's goals around quality, including:
Developing and launching the BLCE Web site to provide BLCP
grantees, miners, and others who provide services to miners with
educational expertise and resources on coal mine dust lung disease;
Creating four training modules in collaboration with the
DOL, Division of Coal Mine Workers Compensation, for medical providers
and Black Lung examiners that provide in-depth information on
screening, diagnosis, and treatment of coal mine lung dust disease;
Providing technical assistance to BLCP grantees; and
Developing and piloting the Black Lung Clinical Research
Database (REDCap) to standardize clinical data collection and
performance data submission by HRSA BLCP grantees.
HRSA invites public comment on how HRSA can better leverage the BLCE's
expertise and quantify the BLCE's impact on BLCP grantees and the coal
miners they serve through performance measures.
f. Timeliness and Quality of DOL Exams
One of the goals of the BLCP, as outlined in the FY 2014 funding
opportunity announcement, is to ``provide well-reasoned medical
opinions and timely scheduling/completion of DOL medical exams to
facilitate the filing of Federal Black Lung Benefits claims.'' HRSA
proposes to work with DOL's Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
(OWCP) to hold BLCP grantees to standards for medical exam timeliness.
In particular, these standards would require clinicians performing
413(b) examinations, who are affiliated with BLCP clinics, to complete
initial 413(b) requests within 90 days and 413(b) supplemental medical
evidence development within 60 days. Additionally, to strengthen the
quality of services provided by BLCP grantees, HRSA proposes requiring
medical and non-medical personnel from all BLCP clinics to complete the
OWCP-sponsored training modules entitled ``Black Lung Disability
Evaluation and Claims Training for Medical Examiners'' prior to
applying for BLCP grant funds. HRSA invites public comment on whether
these requirements are reasonable and attentive approaches to
strengthening the quality of medical services provided by BLCP
grantees.
g. Grantee Collaboration
The current BLCP grantees and applicants are mixed in terms of
those who are clinically focused and those who are service focused.
Encouraging grantees to share best practices and provide technical
assistance to one another could help strengthen the quality of the
BLCP. Proposed mechanisms for achieving greater collaboration include
allowing grantees to allocate a portion of their award towards
providing on-site or remote technical assistance to other clinics and/
or encouraging grantees to participate in a yearly peer learning
workshop hosted by HRSA. HRSA invites public comment on these
strategies as well as how the BLCE can play a role in facilitating
grantee collaboration.
h. Pulmonary Rehabilitation
The current BLCP grant guidance requires grantees to provide for
accredited pulmonary rehabilitation services. The first two funding
tiers require BLCP grantees to provide ``on-site or contracted
accredited Phase II or Phase III rehabilitation services,'' while the
third and highest funding tier requires BLCP grantees to provide an
``on-site'' and ``American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary
Rehabilitation (AACVPR)-certified'' pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Current BLCP grantees have expressed concerns that these standards are
difficult to meet, particularly in rural areas where miners have to
travel long distances to attend multiple sessions a week. Thus, HRSA
invites public comment on how to revise the BLCP requirements around
pulmonary rehabilitation such that they are feasible but still ensure
that miners receive a variation of this beneficial service.
Dated: August 15, 2016.
James Macrae,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-19938 Filed 8-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P