Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Automotive Security Review Board, Inc., 55233 [2016-19705]

Download as PDF rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2016 / Notices than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party who is an interested party shall submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.23 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is November 30, 2016. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.25 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is December 14, 2016. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the investigation may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the investigation, including statements of support or opposition to the petition, on or before December 14, 2016. On January 3, 2017, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before January 5, 2017, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.30 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s Web site at https:// edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigation must be served on all other parties to the investigation (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: This investigation is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:05 Aug 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE By order of the Commission. Issued: August 15, 2016. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. 55233 Antitrust Division [FR Doc. 2016–19729 Filed 8–17–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—UHD Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 19, 2016, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), UHD Alliance, Inc. (‘‘UHD Alliance’’) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Vestel Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Manisa, TURKEY; Ittiam Systems Inc., Plano, TX; Eutelsat SA, Paris, Cedex, FRANCE; Quatius Ltd., Kwai Chung, HONG KONG-CHINA; SPI International, Inc., New York, NY; and Amlogic (Shanghai), Ltd., Shanghai, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have been added as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and UHD Alliance intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On June 17, 2015, UHD Alliance filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 17, 2015 (80 FR 42537). The last notification was filed with the Department on May 11, 2016. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 9, 2016 (81 FR 37212). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2016–19703 Filed 8–17–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Automotive Security Review Board, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 27, 2016, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Automotive Security Review Board, Inc. (‘‘ASRB’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Aeris Communications, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; and Uber Technologies Inc., San Francisco, CA. The general area of ASRB’s planned activity is research focused on mitigation of future automotive cybersecurity risks. Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2016–19705 Filed 8–17–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Allseen Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 26, 2016, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), AllSeen Alliance, Inc. (‘‘AllSeen Alliance’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Seluxit ApS, Hjulmagervej, Aalborg, DENMARK; Trend Micro, Taipei, TAIWAN; Ashiemymy Technology Limited, Croyodn, Greater London, UNITED KINGDOM; Xiamen Hualin E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 160 (Thursday, August 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 55233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Automotive Security Review Board, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 27, 2016, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Automotive Security Review Board, 
Inc. (``ASRB'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Aeris Communications, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Intel 
Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; and Uber Technologies Inc., San 
Francisco, CA. The general area of ASRB's planned activity is research 
focused on mitigation of future automotive cybersecurity risks.

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-19705 Filed 8-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.