Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review, Comment Request, 55183-55184 [2016-19655]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2016 / Notices
Society’s World IPv6 Day to test the
IPv6 functionality of Web sites and
services.
Moving forward, NTIA intends to
engage more directly in promoting IPv6
deployment and use, with a particular
focus on implementation. To assist in
this purpose, NTIA is asking those who
have implemented IPv6 to share their
experiences and to highlight in
particular the factors and circumstances
that supported their decision to move
ahead and adopt the protocol. NTIA
hopes to utilize input received through
this request for comments to guide and
inform future promotion efforts,
including the IPv6 Best Practice Forum
being organized for the 2016 Internet
Governance Forum, which will be held
in December 2016, in Guadalajara,
Mexico.4
Request for Comment
NTIA invites comment on the
following questions, in whole or in part:
Benefits
1. What are the benefits of
implementing IPv6? For example, what
are the direct performance benefits of
implementing IPv6 for end users, or for
enhanced network security, as
compared to IPv4?
2. What are the expected or
unexpected benefits of implementing
IPv6?
Obstacles
1. What are the biggest obstacles
related to IPv6 implementation? For
example, is it difficult to access
adequate vendor support for IPv6
hardware and/or software? Does
successful implementation depend
directly on another service provider?
2. How does an organization
overcome those obstacles?
1. What factors contribute to an
organization’s decision to implement
IPv6?
2. What additional incentives would
be helpful in a decision to implement
IPv6?
3. If one factor made the crucial
difference in deciding to implement
IPv6, as opposed to not implementing
IPv6, what is that factor?
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Motivation
1. What is typically the driving
motivation behind an organization’s
decision to implement IPv6?
2. What are the job titles and/or roles
of the people within an organization
4 Internet Governance Forum 2016, available at:
https://www.igf2016.mx/.
15:05 Aug 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
Return on Investment
1. What is the anticipated return on
an IPv6-related investment? How
quickly is a return on investment
expected?
2. Is return on investment a reason to
implement IPv6, or is implementation
considered a cost of doing business?
Implementation
1. How long does the planning
process for IPv6 implementation take?
2. How long does actual
implementation of IPv6 typically take?
Is implementation a single event or
evolutionary?
Cost of Implementation
1. What are the different types of costs
involved in implementing IPv6? What
are the typical magnitudes of each type
of cost?
2. How does an organization cover
those costs?
3. How does an organization justify
those costs?
4. What considerations are there for
cost-saving?
5. What implication does the size of
an organization implementing IPv6 have
on cost?
Promotional Efforts
Incentives
VerDate Sep<11>2014
typically involved in a decision to
implement IPv6? What are those
individuals’ primary motivations when
it comes to implementing IPv6?
1. What promotional efforts, if any,
should NTIA take? What would have
the most impact?
2. What promotional efforts, if any,
are being led by the private sector? Have
they been effective?
3. Which additional stakeholders
should NTIA target? What is the most
effective forum?
4. Should NTIA partner with any
particular stakeholder group?
Additional Issues: NTIA invites
commenters to provide any additional
information on other issues not
identified in this RFC that could
contribute to NTIA’s understanding of
the considerations that organizations
take into account when deciding to
proceed with IPv6 implementation, as
well as future IPv6 promotional efforts
that NTIA may undertake.
Dated: August 15, 2016.
Angela M. Simpson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Communications and Information.
[FR Doc. 2016–19722 Filed 8–17–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–60–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55183
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Information Collection; Submission for
OMB Review, Comment Request
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (CNCS) has
submitted a public information
collection request (ICR) entitled
AmeriCorps NCCC’s (National Civilian
Community Corps) Member Experience
Survey for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of
this ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained by
calling the Corporation for National and
Community Service, Terry Grant, at 202
606 6899 or email to tgrant@cns.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY–TDD) may call 1–800–833–3722
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
DATES: Comments may be submitted,
identified by the title of the information
collection activity, within September
19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB
Desk Officer for the Corporation for
National and Community Service, by
any of the following two methods
within 30 days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register:
(1) By fax to: 202–395–6974,
Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
Officer for the Corporation for National
and Community Service; or
(2) By email to: smar@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB
is particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of CNCS, including whether
the information will have practical
utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
55184
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2016 / Notices
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A 60-day Notice requesting public
comment was published in the Federal
Register on March 30, 2016, at Vol. 81,
No. 61 FR 17686–17687. This comment
period ended May 31, 2016. No public
comments were received from this
Notice.
Description: This is a new information
collection request. This survey was
developed to support NCCC
performance measurement for use in
program development, funding, and
evaluation. The survey instrument will
be completed by NCCC Members
following the completion of their
service term. In particular, this survey
will be administered to NCCC Members
who are exiting early or have already
exited early from the AmeriCorps NCCC
program. Completion of this information
collection is not required for the
completion of a service term with
NCCC.
Type of Review: New.
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: NCCC Member Experience
Survey.
OMB Number: TBD.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: The NCCC Member
Experience Survey will be administered
to former NCCC Members.
Total Respondents: Approximately
450.
Frequency: Each respondent will
complete only one survey for their most
recent service term.
Average Time per Response: 25
minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 187.5
hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): None.
Dated: August 11, 2016.
Charles Davenport,
Acting Director, National Civilian Community
Corps.
[FR Doc. 2016–19655 Filed 8–17–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Aug 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Flood Risk Management
Project for the Souris River Basin,
North Dakota
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
ACTION:
Notice of intent.
The St. Paul District, Army
Corps of Engineers, in partnership with
the Souris River Joint Water Resources
Board (SRJB), is conducting a flood risk
management feasibility study for the
Souris River Basin within the
continental United States. The
feasibility study will include an
Environmental Impact Statement and
consider opportunities to reduce flood
risk within Bonnineau, McHenry, Ward,
and Renville counties, North Dakota.
The study will evaluate several
alternative measures, including, but not
limited to: Levees and floodwalls,
diversion channels, non-structural flood
proofing, relocation of flood-prone
structures, and flood storage.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and Environmental Impact Statement
may be directed to: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, St. Paul District, ATTN: Mr.
Terry J. Birkenstock, Deputy Chief,
Regional Planning & Environment
Division North, 180 Fifth Street East,
Suite 700, St. Paul, MN 55101–1678;
telephone: (651) 290–5264; email
terry.birkenstock@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Souris River (alternatively known as the
Mouse River) is approximately 435
miles long. The river begins in the
southeastern portion of the Canadian
province of Saskatchewan, flows south
and east through Renville, Ward,
McHenry, and Bottineau counties, North
Dakota, and then turns north before
returning to Canada in southwest
Manitoba. The river flows through the
cities of Burlington, Minot, Sawyer, and
Velva, North Dakota. Key features
associated with the river include the
Lake Darling Dam, the Upper Souris
National Wildlife Refuge, and the J.
Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge.
The Des Lacs River is a major tributary
that joins the Souris River at Burlington,
North Dakota.
The purpose of this study is to collect
and evaluate pertinent engineering,
economic, social, and environmental
information in order to assess the
potential for a federal flood risk
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
management project within the basin.
The study objective is to define a
feasible and implementable project to
reduce flood risk which is relatively
high within the basin. In June 2011,
heavy rains in the upstream portions of
the watershed exceeded the storage
capacity of upstream reservoirs already
full from the April snowmelt. Flows in
excess of 26,900 cubic feet per second
(cfs) overwhelmed the existing Federal
flood risk management projects
(designed to pass 5,000 cfs from
Burlington to Minot) and emergency
flood fighting efforts, causing over $690
million in damages to more than 4,700
structures.
Following the 2011 flood, a nonFederal local flood risk management
study was initiated by the North Dakota
State Water Commission in response to
a request for assistance from the SRJB.
The scope of the non-Federal study,
identified as the Mouse River Enhanced
Flood Protection Plan (MREFPP), differs
from the Federal study and is primarily
focused on flood protection specifically
for the city of Minot. Because of its
influence on an existing federal flood
project, this non-federal effort has
requested permission from the Corps of
Engineers to pursue actions under 33
U.S.C. 408 (frequently referred to as
Section 408). A separate Notice of Intent
was published (FR Doc. 2015–17670
Filed 7–16–15) for an EIS associated
with the Corps of Engineers’ decision on
the Section 408 request. However, this
Notice of Intent involves an EIS with
broader consideration of flood risk
across the basin. Additional details on
the local, non-federal flood MREFPP can
be found at mouseriverplan.com.
This Souris River Basin Flood Risk
Management Feasibility Study and its
associated NEPA documentation will be
prepared by the Corps. The Corps will
act as the lead agency and coordinate
with other agencies to discuss their
participation in the NEPA process. The
study will broadly evaluate several
alternative measures including, but not
limited to: levees and floodwalls along
the river through towns, diversion
channels, non-structural flood-proofing,
relocation of flood-prone structures, and
flood storage.
Significant resources and issues to be
addressed in the draft Environmental
Impact Statement will be determined
through coordination with Federal
agencies, State agencies, local
governments, the general public,
interested private organizations, and
industry. Anyone who has an interest in
participating in the development of the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
is invited to contact the St. Paul District,
Corps of Engineers.
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 160 (Thursday, August 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55183-55184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19655]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review, Comment
Request
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) has
submitted a public information collection request (ICR) entitled
AmeriCorps NCCC's (National Civilian Community Corps) Member Experience
Survey for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Copies of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be
obtained by calling the Corporation for National and Community Service,
Terry Grant, at 202 606 6899 or email to tgrant@cns.gov. Individuals
who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TTY-TDD) may call 1-
800-833-3722 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday.
DATES: Comments may be submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, within September 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk Officer for the
Corporation for National and Community Service, by any of the following
two methods within 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal
Register:
(1) By fax to: 202-395-6974, Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
Officer for the Corporation for National and Community Service; or
(2) By email to: smar@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of CNCS,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Propose ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
Propose ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including
[[Page 55184]]
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments
A 60-day Notice requesting public comment was published in the
Federal Register on March 30, 2016, at Vol. 81, No. 61 FR 17686-17687.
This comment period ended May 31, 2016. No public comments were
received from this Notice.
Description: This is a new information collection request. This
survey was developed to support NCCC performance measurement for use in
program development, funding, and evaluation. The survey instrument
will be completed by NCCC Members following the completion of their
service term. In particular, this survey will be administered to NCCC
Members who are exiting early or have already exited early from the
AmeriCorps NCCC program. Completion of this information collection is
not required for the completion of a service term with NCCC.
Type of Review: New.
Agency: Corporation for National and Community Service.
Title: NCCC Member Experience Survey.
OMB Number: TBD.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: The NCCC Member Experience Survey will be
administered to former NCCC Members.
Total Respondents: Approximately 450.
Frequency: Each respondent will complete only one survey for their
most recent service term.
Average Time per Response: 25 minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 187.5 hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): None.
Dated: August 11, 2016.
Charles Davenport,
Acting Director, National Civilian Community Corps.
[FR Doc. 2016-19655 Filed 8-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P