Almonds Grown in California; Change in Quality Control Requirements, 54719-54721 [2016-19625]
Download as PDF
54719
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 159
Wednesday, August 17, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–16–0047; SC16–981–3
IR]
Almonds Grown in California; Change
in Quality Control Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the Almond
Board of California (Board) to change
the quality control requirements
currently prescribed under the
California almond marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of almonds grown in California. The
Board locally administers the order and
is comprised of growers and handlers
operating within California. This rule
relaxes incoming quality requirements
by increasing the inedible kernel
tolerance from 0.50 percent to 2 percent.
This relaxation decreases California
almond handlers’ disposition obligation.
This change also allows handlers more
flexibility in their operations while
continuing to maintain quality control
and ensuring compliance with the
order’s requirements.
DATES: Effective August 18, 2016;
comments received by October 17, 2016
will be considered prior to issuance of
a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this
issue of the Federal Register and will be
made available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during
regular business hours, or can be viewed
at: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist or
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Andrea.Ricci@ams.usda.gov or
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),
regulating the handling of almonds
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule implements a
recommendation from the Almond
Board of California (Board) to change
the quality control requirements
currently prescribed under the order.
This rule relaxes incoming quality
requirements by increasing the inedible
kernel tolerance from 0.50 percent to 2
percent. This relaxation would decrease
California almond handler’s disposition
obligation. This will allow handlers
more flexibility in their operations
while continuing to maintain quality
control. In addition, this change will
ensure that the reporting and outgoing
quality requirements of the order are
met. The Board unanimously
recommended this change at its April
12, 2016, meeting.
Section 981.42 of the almond
marketing order provides authority for
quality control regulations. Paragraph
(a) of that section requires that almonds
must be inspected prior to processing to
determine the percentage of inedible
kernels in each lot. Inedible kernels are
defined in § 981.408. The Board, with
the approval of the Secretary, may
change the approved percentage of
inedible kernels for any crop year.
Inedible kernels in excess of the
approved percentage of the kernel
weight constitute the handlers’ inedible
disposition weight obligation. Handlers
must satisfy their obligation by
disposing of inedible kernels in Boardaccepted, non-human outlets such as
animal feed or oil.
Section 981.442(a)(4)(i) of the order’s
rules and regulations currently specifies
that the weight of inedible kernels in
excess of 0.50 percent of kernel weight
shall constitute the handler’s
disposition obligation. Pursuant to
§ 981.442(a)(5), handlers must meet
their disposition obligation by
delivering inedible kernels to crushers,
feed manufacturers, feeders, or dealers
in nut wastes on record with the Board
as accepted users.
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
54720
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
In the past several years, the total
inedible kernel percentages have been
trending lower. This is partially due to
good agricultural practices used by
growers and better technologies in
handler facilities. At the same time, the
market value of almonds has increased
significantly. As a result, some Boardaccepted outlets have started to clean
and repurpose the disposition obligation
delivered by handlers. After the inedible
disposition is delivered to Boardaccepted outlets, these accepted outlets
provide to the Board a record of
disposition receipt, which indicates
what was received by the accepted
outlet from handlers and how the
accepted outlet disposed of the inedible
disposition. However, such record of
disposition receipt does not indicate
whether the almonds have been
pasteurized or treated for human
consumption. Thus the action of
repurposing has led to concern that the
order’s outgoing quality requirements
are not being met.
By increasing the inedible kernel
tolerance, handlers’ disposition
obligation will decrease or become zero,
therefore reducing the quantity of
product delivered to those specified
outlets. This action will also provide
handlers with more control over low
quality product allowing one handler
the flexibility to transfer the larger
portion of low quality product to
another handler for further cleaning.
This action will require completion of
an interhandler transfer form and help
with traceability of low quality product.
It also will help ensure that any product
destined for human consumption was in
compliance with the pertinent
regulations under the order.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 6,800
almond growers in the production area
and approximately 100 handlers subject
to regulation under the marketing order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
Small agricultural producers are defined
by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
The National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS) reported in its 2012
Agricultural Census that there were
6,841 almond farms in the production
area (California), of which 6,204 had
bearing acres. The following
computation provides an estimate of the
proportion of producers (farms) and
agricultural service firms (handlers) that
would be considered small under the
SBA definitions.
The NASS Census data indicates that
out of the 6,204 California farms with
bearing acres of almonds, 4,471 (72
percent) have fewer than 100 bearing
acres.
For the almond industry’s most
recently reported crop year (2014),
NASS reported an average yield of 2,150
pounds per acre, and a season average
grower price of $3.19 per pound. A 100acre farm with an average yield of 2,150
pounds per acre would produce about
215,000 pounds of almonds. At $3.19
per pound, that farm’s production
would be valued at $685,850. Since
Census of Agriculture indicates that the
majority of California’s almond farms
are smaller than 100 acres, it could be
concluded that the majority of growers
had annual receipts from the sale of
almonds in 2014–15 of less than
$685,850, which is below the SBA
threshold of $750,000. Thus, over 70
percent of California’s almond growers
would be considered small growers
according to SBA’s definition.
According to information supplied by
the Board, approximately 30 percent of
California’s almond handlers shipped
almonds valued under $7,500,000
during the 2014–15 crop year, and
would, therefore, be considered small
handlers according to the SBA
definition.
This rule revises § 981.442(a)(4)(i) of
the order’s administrative rules and
regulations regarding inedible kernel
tolerance. Specifically, this action
increases the inedible kernel tolerance
from 0.50 percent to 2 percent,
effectively decreasing handler’s
disposition obligation. Authority for this
action is provided in § 981.42(a) of the
order.
Regarding the impact of this action on
affected entities, increasing the inedible
kernel tolerance reduces disposition
obligation on handlers and provides
handlers with more flexibility and
control over the poor quality product.
This rule is not expected to change
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
handler inspection costs, as handlers
currently are required to have all lots
inspected to determine the percentage of
inedible kernels.
The Board considered alternatives to
this action. It formed a taskforce to
examine the current inedible program
and investigate alternatives. The
taskforce reviewed the program and
recent data, surveyed handlers, and
reported their findings to the Almond
Quality and Food Safety Committee
(Committee). Recent data showed that
the overall inedible kernel percentages
have been trending lower, regardless of
crop size. Surveyed handlers who did
not agree with the change raised the
concern that increasing the tolerance
could result in more poor quality
almonds entering the market. The
Committee discussed the concerns
raised and concluded that changing the
tolerance would give handlers more
flexibility in maintaining quality. After
discussing the taskforce’s findings, the
Committee unanimously recommended
this increase in inedible tolerance to the
Board.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178
(Vegetable and Specialty Crops.) No
changes are necessary in those
requirements as a result of this action.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
almond handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the Board’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
almond industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Board
deliberations. Like all Board meetings,
the April 12, 2016, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
small, were able to express their views
on this issue.
Also, the Board has a number of
appointed committees to review certain
issues and make recommendations to
the Board. The Board’s Almond Quality
and Food Safety Committee met on
April 5, 2016, and discussed this issue
in detail. That meeting was also a public
meeting, and both large and small
entities were able to participate and
express their views. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments
on this interim rule, including the
regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on a
change to the quality control
requirements currently prescribed under
the order. Any comments timely
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Board’s recommendation, and other
information, it is found that this interim
rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the
Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule relaxes the current
rules and regulations; (2) this rule
should be in place in time for the
beginning of the crop year on August 1;
(3) the Board unanimously
recommended these changes at a public
meeting and interested parties had an
opportunity to provide input; and (4)
this rule provides a 60-day comment
period and any comments timely
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is amended as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 981 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 981.442(a)(4)(i) is revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 981.442
Quality Control.
(a) * * *
(4) Disposition obligation. (i)
Beginning August 1, 2016, the weight of
inedible kernels in excess of 2 percent
of kernel weight reported to the Board
of any variety received by a handler
shall constitute that handler’s
disposition obligation. For any almonds
sold inshell, the weight may be reported
to the Board and the disposition
obligation for that variety reduced
proportionately.
*
*
*
*
*
54721
Telephone: (202) 586–7796. Email:
elizabeth.kohl@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) published
a final rule in the Federal Register on
July 25, 2016 (‘‘the July 2016 final rule’’)
amending test procedures for ceiling
fans. 81 FR 48619. This correction
addresses an amendatory term error in
that final rule. Specifically, the
instructions amending appendix U to
subpart B of part 430—Uniform Test
Method for Measuring the Energy
Consumption of Ceiling Fans, stated
that appendix U is ‘‘added’’. Since 10
CFR part 430 already includes appendix
U, the instruction amending appendix U
should use the amendatory term
‘‘revised.’’ This document corrects
appendix U instructions to use the
correct amendatory term ‘‘revised.’’
Correction
In FR Doc. 2016–17139, appearing on
page 48640, in the issue of Monday, July
25, 2016, amendatory instruction 7. is
corrected to read as follows:
Dated: August 12, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
■
[FR Doc. 2016–19625 Filed 8–16–16; 8:45 am]
Appendix U to Subpart B of Part 430
[Corrected]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
7. Appendix U to subpart B of part
430 is revised to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2013–BT–TP–0050]
RIN 1904–AD10
Energy Conservation Program: Test
Procedures for Ceiling Fans;
Correction
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
Issued in Washington, DC on August 11,
2016.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
[FR Doc. 2016–19621 Filed 8–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
AGENCY:
On July 25, 2016, the U.S.
Department of Energy published a final
rule amending test procedures for
ceiling fans. 81 FR 48619. This
correction addresses an amendatory
term error in that final rule.
DATES: The correction is effective
August 24, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Lucy deButts, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC, 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–1604. Email:
ceiling_fans@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC, 20585–0121.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15 CFR Part 758
[Docket No. 150107020–6464–02]
RIN 0694–AG47
Revisions to the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR): Harmonization of
the Destination Control Statements
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule implements
changes that were proposed on May 22,
2015, in a proposed rule entitled
Revisions to the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR): Harmonization of
the Destination Control Statements.
This final rule revises the destination
control statement in § 758.6 of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54719-54721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19625]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 54719]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-16-0047; SC16-981-3 IR]
Almonds Grown in California; Change in Quality Control
Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements a recommendation from the Almond Board of
California (Board) to change the quality control requirements currently
prescribed under the California almond marketing order (order). The
order regulates the handling of almonds grown in California. The Board
locally administers the order and is comprised of growers and handlers
operating within California. This rule relaxes incoming quality
requirements by increasing the inedible kernel tolerance from 0.50
percent to 2 percent. This relaxation decreases California almond
handlers' disposition obligation. This change also allows handlers more
flexibility in their operations while continuing to maintain quality
control and ensuring compliance with the order's requirements.
DATES: Effective August 18, 2016; comments received by October 17, 2016
will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-
0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the document number and the date and page
number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made available
for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this rule will be included in the
record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that
the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments
will be made public on the internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist or
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS,
USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email:
Andrea.Ricci@ams.usda.gov or Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of
almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule implements a recommendation from the Almond Board of
California (Board) to change the quality control requirements currently
prescribed under the order. This rule relaxes incoming quality
requirements by increasing the inedible kernel tolerance from 0.50
percent to 2 percent. This relaxation would decrease California almond
handler's disposition obligation. This will allow handlers more
flexibility in their operations while continuing to maintain quality
control. In addition, this change will ensure that the reporting and
outgoing quality requirements of the order are met. The Board
unanimously recommended this change at its April 12, 2016, meeting.
Section 981.42 of the almond marketing order provides authority for
quality control regulations. Paragraph (a) of that section requires
that almonds must be inspected prior to processing to determine the
percentage of inedible kernels in each lot. Inedible kernels are
defined in Sec. 981.408. The Board, with the approval of the
Secretary, may change the approved percentage of inedible kernels for
any crop year. Inedible kernels in excess of the approved percentage of
the kernel weight constitute the handlers' inedible disposition weight
obligation. Handlers must satisfy their obligation by disposing of
inedible kernels in Board-accepted, non-human outlets such as animal
feed or oil.
Section 981.442(a)(4)(i) of the order's rules and regulations
currently specifies that the weight of inedible kernels in excess of
0.50 percent of kernel weight shall constitute the handler's
disposition obligation. Pursuant to Sec. 981.442(a)(5), handlers must
meet their disposition obligation by delivering inedible kernels to
crushers, feed manufacturers, feeders, or dealers in nut wastes on
record with the Board as accepted users.
[[Page 54720]]
In the past several years, the total inedible kernel percentages
have been trending lower. This is partially due to good agricultural
practices used by growers and better technologies in handler
facilities. At the same time, the market value of almonds has increased
significantly. As a result, some Board-accepted outlets have started to
clean and repurpose the disposition obligation delivered by handlers.
After the inedible disposition is delivered to Board-accepted outlets,
these accepted outlets provide to the Board a record of disposition
receipt, which indicates what was received by the accepted outlet from
handlers and how the accepted outlet disposed of the inedible
disposition. However, such record of disposition receipt does not
indicate whether the almonds have been pasteurized or treated for human
consumption. Thus the action of repurposing has led to concern that the
order's outgoing quality requirements are not being met.
By increasing the inedible kernel tolerance, handlers' disposition
obligation will decrease or become zero, therefore reducing the
quantity of product delivered to those specified outlets. This action
will also provide handlers with more control over low quality product
allowing one handler the flexibility to transfer the larger portion of
low quality product to another handler for further cleaning. This
action will require completion of an interhandler transfer form and
help with traceability of low quality product. It also will help ensure
that any product destined for human consumption was in compliance with
the pertinent regulations under the order.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 6,800 almond growers in the production area
and approximately 100 handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reported in its
2012 Agricultural Census that there were 6,841 almond farms in the
production area (California), of which 6,204 had bearing acres. The
following computation provides an estimate of the proportion of
producers (farms) and agricultural service firms (handlers) that would
be considered small under the SBA definitions.
The NASS Census data indicates that out of the 6,204 California
farms with bearing acres of almonds, 4,471 (72 percent) have fewer than
100 bearing acres.
For the almond industry's most recently reported crop year (2014),
NASS reported an average yield of 2,150 pounds per acre, and a season
average grower price of $3.19 per pound. A 100-acre farm with an
average yield of 2,150 pounds per acre would produce about 215,000
pounds of almonds. At $3.19 per pound, that farm's production would be
valued at $685,850. Since Census of Agriculture indicates that the
majority of California's almond farms are smaller than 100 acres, it
could be concluded that the majority of growers had annual receipts
from the sale of almonds in 2014-15 of less than $685,850, which is
below the SBA threshold of $750,000. Thus, over 70 percent of
California's almond growers would be considered small growers according
to SBA's definition.
According to information supplied by the Board, approximately 30
percent of California's almond handlers shipped almonds valued under
$7,500,000 during the 2014-15 crop year, and would, therefore, be
considered small handlers according to the SBA definition.
This rule revises Sec. 981.442(a)(4)(i) of the order's
administrative rules and regulations regarding inedible kernel
tolerance. Specifically, this action increases the inedible kernel
tolerance from 0.50 percent to 2 percent, effectively decreasing
handler's disposition obligation. Authority for this action is provided
in Sec. 981.42(a) of the order.
Regarding the impact of this action on affected entities,
increasing the inedible kernel tolerance reduces disposition obligation
on handlers and provides handlers with more flexibility and control
over the poor quality product. This rule is not expected to change
handler inspection costs, as handlers currently are required to have
all lots inspected to determine the percentage of inedible kernels.
The Board considered alternatives to this action. It formed a
taskforce to examine the current inedible program and investigate
alternatives. The taskforce reviewed the program and recent data,
surveyed handlers, and reported their findings to the Almond Quality
and Food Safety Committee (Committee). Recent data showed that the
overall inedible kernel percentages have been trending lower,
regardless of crop size. Surveyed handlers who did not agree with the
change raised the concern that increasing the tolerance could result in
more poor quality almonds entering the market. The Committee discussed
the concerns raised and concluded that changing the tolerance would
give handlers more flexibility in maintaining quality. After discussing
the taskforce's findings, the Committee unanimously recommended this
increase in inedible tolerance to the Board.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 (Vegetable and Specialty Crops.) No changes
are necessary in those requirements as a result of this action. Should
any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large almond handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
Further, the Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
almond industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Board deliberations. Like all Board
meetings, the April 12, 2016, meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and
[[Page 54721]]
small, were able to express their views on this issue.
Also, the Board has a number of appointed committees to review
certain issues and make recommendations to the Board. The Board's
Almond Quality and Food Safety Committee met on April 5, 2016, and
discussed this issue in detail. That meeting was also a public meeting,
and both large and small entities were able to participate and express
their views. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments
on this interim rule, including the regulatory and informational
impacts of this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on a change to the quality control
requirements currently prescribed under the order. Any comments timely
received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Board's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
this interim rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule relaxes the current rules and regulations; (2)
this rule should be in place in time for the beginning of the crop year
on August 1; (3) the Board unanimously recommended these changes at a
public meeting and interested parties had an opportunity to provide
input; and (4) this rule provides a 60-day comment period and any
comments timely received will be considered prior to finalization of
this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is
amended as follows:
PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 981.442(a)(4)(i) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 981.442 Quality Control.
(a) * * *
(4) Disposition obligation. (i) Beginning August 1, 2016, the
weight of inedible kernels in excess of 2 percent of kernel weight
reported to the Board of any variety received by a handler shall
constitute that handler's disposition obligation. For any almonds sold
inshell, the weight may be reported to the Board and the disposition
obligation for that variety reduced proportionately.
* * * * *
Dated: August 12, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-19625 Filed 8-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P