Remove NASA FAR Supplement Clause, Engineering Change Proposals (2016-N030), 54783-54785 [2016-19566]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
The affected sources covered by
Kentucky’s Stage II vapor recovery
requirements are sources of VOC. Other
criteria pollutants (carbon monoxide,
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide,
particulate matter, and lead) are not
emitted by gasoline dispensing facilities
and will not be affected by the removal
of Stage II controls.
The proposed revisions to 401 KAR
59:174 include that gasoline dispensing
facilities located in Boone, Campbell
and Kenton Counties shall
decommission and remove the systems
no later than December 31, 2018.
Kentucky noted in its submission that
the decommissioning procedures in the
revised version of 401 KAR 59:174
follow Petroleum Equipment Institute
(PEI) guidance, ‘‘Recommended
Practices for Installation and Testing of
Vapor Recovery Systems at Vehicle
Refueling Sites,’’ PEI/RP300–09.
EPA is proposing to determine that
Kentucky’s technical analysis is
consistent with EPA’s guidance on
removing Stage II requirements from a
SIP, including as it relates to the
decommissioning and phasing out of the
Stage II requirements for the Northern
Kentucky Area. EPA is also making the
preliminary determination that
Kentucky’s SIP revision is consistent
with the CAA and with EPA’s
regulations related to removal of Stage
II requirements from the SIP and that
these changes will not interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning
attainment or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA, and therefore
satisfy section 110(l).
IV. Incorporation by Reference
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
Kentucky Regulation 401 KAR 59:174—
Stage II controls at gasoline dispensing
facilities, effective March 4, 2016. EPA
has made, and will continue to make,
these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and/or at
the EPA Region 4 office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
the UST. Unless it is lost as a fugitive emission, any
tank pressure in excess of the rating of the pressure/
vacuum valve is vented to the atmosphere over the
course of a day. See EPA, Guidance on Removing
Stage II Gasoline Vapor Control Programs from State
Implementation Plans and Assessing Comparable
Measures, EPA–457/B–12–001 (Aug. 7, 2012),
available at: https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/
ozone-stage-two-vapor-recovery-rule-and-guidance.
Thus, as ORVR technology is phased in, the amount
of emission control that is gained through Stage II
systems decreases.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
section of this
preamble for more information).
INFORMATION CONTACT
V. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
Commonwealth of Kentucky’s May 3,
2016, SIP revision that changes
Kentucky’s Stage II rule, 401 KAR
59:174, to allow for the removal of the
Stage II requirement and the orderly
decommissioning of Stage II equipment.
EPA is proposing this approval because
the Agency has made the preliminary
determination that the Commonwealth
of Kentucky’s May 3, 2016, SIP revision
related to the Commonwealth’s Stage II
rule is consistent with the CAA and
with EPA’s regulations and guidance.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely proposes to approve state
law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this proposed
action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54783
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 8, 2016.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2016–19538 Filed 8–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1801, 1815, and 1852
RIN 2700–AE35
Remove NASA FAR Supplement
Clause, Engineering Change Proposals
(2016–N030)
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA) is
proposing to amend the NASA FAR
Supplement (NFS) to remove NFS
clause 1852.243–70, Engineering
Change Proposals (ECPs) basic clause
with its Alternate I & II and associated
information collection from the NFS.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
October 17, 2016 to be considered in
formulation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by NFS Case 2016–N030,
using any of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
54784
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Æ Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
entering ‘‘NFS Case 2016–N030’’ under
the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or ID’’ and
selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘NFS Case 2016–N030.’’ Follow
the instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit
a Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘NFS Case 2016–N030’’ on your
attached document.
Æ Email: andrew.orourke@nasa.gov.
Include NFS Case 2016–N030 in the
subject line of the message.
Æ Fax: (202) 358–3082.
Æ Mail: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, Headquarters,
Office of Procurement, Contract and
Grant Policy Division, Attn: Andrew
O’Rourke, LP–011, Suite 5L32, 300 E.
Street SW., Washington, DC 20546–
0001.
collection under OMB Control Number
2700–054.
II. Discussion
NASA is proposing the following
revisions to eliminate unnecessary NFS
requirements:
• Delete NFS segment 1843 and OMB
Control Number 2700–054 from
1801.106–1.
• Remove the prescription at NFS
1843.205–70(a).
• Delete NFS clause 1852.243–70,
Engineering Change Proposals.
I. Background
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health, and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
proposed rule is not a major rule under
5 U.S.C. 804.
NASA FAR Supplement clause
1852.243–70, Engineering Change
Proposals, requires NASA contractors
and vendors to submit contract change
proposal information. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the collection of this
information via OMB Control Number
2700–054 that expires on September 30,
2017. In processing the request for
renewal of this information collection
under OMB Control Number 2700–054
and as part of NASA’s continuing
retrospective review of existing
regulations to reduce unnecessary,
outdated and/or burdensome
requirements, NASA Office of
Procurement (OP) surveyed its
procurement offices to ascertain
whether or not NFS clause 1852.243–70,
Engineering Change Proposals, was
necessary. The results of the review
indicated that NFS clause 1852.243–70
was no longer utilized in procurements.
Instead, the FAR Changes clauses (FAR
52.243–1 through 52.243–5) were being
utilized to process engineering change
proposals in lieu of this NFS clause.
Thus, NASA is proposing to delete NFS
clause 1852.243–70, Engineering
Change Proposals, with its Alternate I &
II and the corresponding information
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because we are removing a NFS
clause and its associated information
collection requirements for contractors.
By removing this clause, the
information collection requirement on
contractors will be eliminated, thus
providing all entities, both large and
small, with a positive benefit. However,
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
has been performed and is summarized
as follows:
In preparing the request for renewal of
this information collection under OMB
Control Number 2700–054 and as part of
NASA’s continuing retrospective review
of existing regulations to reduce
unnecessary, outdated and/or
burdensome requirements, NASA Office
of Procurement its procurement offices
to ascertain whether or not NFS clause
1852.243–70, Engineering Change
Proposals, was necessary. The results of
the review indicated that NFS clause
1852.243–70 was no longer utilized in
procurements. Instead, the FAR changes
clauses were being utilized to process
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Andrew O’Rourke, NASA, Office of
Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy
Division, Suite 5L32, 300 E. Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20456–0001.
Telephone (202) 358–4560; facsimile
(202) 358–3082; email:
andrew.orourke@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
engineering change proposals in lieu of
this NFS clause. Thus, NASA is
proposing to delete NFS clause
1852.243–70, Engineering Change
Proposals, with its Alternate I & II and
the corresponding information
collection under OMB Control Number
2700–054. This proposed rule does not
include any new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements for small businesses. The
proposed rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules. No alternative approaches
were considered.
NASA invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
NASA will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (NFS case 2016–N030) in
correspondence.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C
chapter 35); however, the proposed
changes to the NFS would remove the
information collection requirements
previously approved under OMB
Control Number 2700–0054, entitled
NFS 1843 Contract Modifications for
Engineering Change Proposals (ECP).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1801,
1843, and 1852
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
NASA FAR Supplement Manager.
Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1801, 1843,
and 1852 are proposed to be amended
as follows:
1. The authority citation for parts
1801, 1843 and 1852 continues to read
as follows:
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(a) and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 1801—FEDERAL ACQUISITION
REGULATIONS SYSTEM
2. Revise Section 1801.106 to read as
follows:
■
1801.106 OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
The following OMB control numbers
apply:
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
NFS segment
OMB Control
No.
1843.205–70
NASA contract clauses.
The contracting officer may insert a
1823 ......................................
2700–0089 clause substantially as stated at
1827 ......................................
2700–0052 1852.243–72, Equitable Adjustments, in
1852.223–70 .........................
2700–0160 solicitations and contracts for—
NF 533 ..................................
2700–0003
(a) Dismantling, demolishing, or
NF 1018 ................................
2700–0017 removing improvements; or
(b) Construction, when the contract
PART 1843—CONTRACT
amount is expected to exceed the
MODIFICATIONS
simplified acquisition threshold and a
fixed-price contract is contemplated.
■ 3. Revise Section 1843.205–70 to read
as follows:
PART 1852—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
1852.243–70
[Removed and reserved]
4. Section 1852.243–70 is removed
and reserved.
■
1852.243–72
[Amended]
5. Amend section 1852.243–72 by
removing ‘‘1843.205–70(b)’’ and adding
‘‘1843.205–70’’ in its place in the
introductory text.
■
[FR Doc. 2016–19566 Filed 8–16–16; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Aug 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
54785
E:\FR\FM\17AUP1.SGM
17AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54783-54785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19566]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1801, 1815, and 1852
RIN 2700-AE35
Remove NASA FAR Supplement Clause, Engineering Change Proposals
(2016-N030)
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is
proposing to amend the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) to remove NFS clause
1852.243-70, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) basic clause with its
Alternate I & II and associated information collection from the NFS.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before October 17, 2016 to be considered
in formulation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by NFS Case 2016-N030, using any
of the following methods:
[[Page 54784]]
[cir] Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``NFS Case 2016-N030''
under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.''
Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``NFS Case
2016-N030.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``NFS Case 2016-N030'' on your attached document.
[cir] Email: andrew.orourke@nasa.gov. Include NFS Case 2016-N030 in
the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: (202) 358-3082.
[cir] Mail: National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
Headquarters, Office of Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy
Division, Attn: Andrew O'Rourke, LP-011, Suite 5L32, 300 E. Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20546-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew O'Rourke, NASA, Office of
Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy Division, Suite 5L32, 300 E.
Street SW., Washington, DC 20456-0001. Telephone (202) 358-4560;
facsimile (202) 358-3082; email: andrew.orourke@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
NASA FAR Supplement clause 1852.243-70, Engineering Change
Proposals, requires NASA contractors and vendors to submit contract
change proposal information. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the collection of this information via OMB Control Number
2700-054 that expires on September 30, 2017. In processing the request
for renewal of this information collection under OMB Control Number
2700-054 and as part of NASA's continuing retrospective review of
existing regulations to reduce unnecessary, outdated and/or burdensome
requirements, NASA Office of Procurement (OP) surveyed its procurement
offices to ascertain whether or not NFS clause 1852.243-70, Engineering
Change Proposals, was necessary. The results of the review indicated
that NFS clause 1852.243-70 was no longer utilized in procurements.
Instead, the FAR Changes clauses (FAR 52.243-1 through 52.243-5) were
being utilized to process engineering change proposals in lieu of this
NFS clause. Thus, NASA is proposing to delete NFS clause 1852.243-70,
Engineering Change Proposals, with its Alternate I & II and the
corresponding information collection under OMB Control Number 2700-054.
II. Discussion
NASA is proposing the following revisions to eliminate unnecessary
NFS requirements:
Delete NFS segment 1843 and OMB Control Number 2700-054
from 1801.106-1.
Remove the prescription at NFS 1843.205-70(a).
Delete NFS clause 1852.243-70, Engineering Change
Proposals.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health, and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This proposed rule is not a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because we are removing a NFS clause and its associated information
collection requirements for contractors. By removing this clause, the
information collection requirement on contractors will be eliminated,
thus providing all entities, both large and small, with a positive
benefit. However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been
performed and is summarized as follows:
In preparing the request for renewal of this information collection
under OMB Control Number 2700-054 and as part of NASA's continuing
retrospective review of existing regulations to reduce unnecessary,
outdated and/or burdensome requirements, NASA Office of Procurement its
procurement offices to ascertain whether or not NFS clause 1852.243-70,
Engineering Change Proposals, was necessary. The results of the review
indicated that NFS clause 1852.243-70 was no longer utilized in
procurements. Instead, the FAR changes clauses were being utilized to
process engineering change proposals in lieu of this NFS clause. Thus,
NASA is proposing to delete NFS clause 1852.243-70, Engineering Change
Proposals, with its Alternate I & II and the corresponding information
collection under OMB Control Number 2700-054. This proposed rule does
not include any new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements for small businesses. The proposed rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other Federal rules. No
alternative approaches were considered.
NASA invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
NASA will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (NFS case 2016-N030) in
correspondence.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information collection requirements that require
the approval of the OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C
chapter 35); however, the proposed changes to the NFS would remove the
information collection requirements previously approved under OMB
Control Number 2700-0054, entitled NFS 1843 Contract Modifications for
Engineering Change Proposals (ECP).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1801, 1843, and 1852
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
NASA FAR Supplement Manager.
Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1801, 1843, and 1852 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for parts 1801, 1843 and 1852 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(a) and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 1801--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM
0
2. Revise Section 1801.106 to read as follows:
1801.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The following OMB control numbers apply:
[[Page 54785]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB Control
NFS segment No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1823.................................................... 2700-0089
1827.................................................... 2700-0052
1852.223-70............................................. 2700-0160
NF 533.................................................. 2700-0003
NF 1018................................................. 2700-0017
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 1843--CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS
0
3. Revise Section 1843.205-70 to read as follows:
1843.205-70 NASA contract clauses.
The contracting officer may insert a clause substantially as stated
at 1852.243-72, Equitable Adjustments, in solicitations and contracts
for--
(a) Dismantling, demolishing, or removing improvements; or
(b) Construction, when the contract amount is expected to exceed
the simplified acquisition threshold and a fixed-price contract is
contemplated.
PART 1852--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
1852.243-70 [Removed and reserved]
0
4. Section 1852.243-70 is removed and reserved.
1852.243-72 [Amended]
0
5. Amend section 1852.243-72 by removing ``1843.205-70(b)'' and adding
``1843.205-70'' in its place in the introductory text.
[FR Doc. 2016-19566 Filed 8-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P