Revisions to Rules of Conduct and Standards of Responsibility for Appointed Representatives, 54520-54531 [2016-19384]
Download as PDF
54520
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 158
Tuesday, August 16, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–16–0057; SC16–983–1
CR]
Pistachios Grown in California,
Arizona, and New Mexico; Continuance
Referendum
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Referendum order.
AGENCY:
This document directs that a
referendum be conducted among
eligible producers of pistachios grown
in California, Arizona, and New Mexico
to determine whether they favor
continuance of the marketing order that
regulates the handling of pistachios
produced in the production area.
DATES: The referendum will be
conducted from November 1 through
November 18, 2016. To vote in this
referendum, producers must have
produced pistachios within the
designated production area during the
period September 1, 2015, through
August 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the marketing
order may be obtained from the
referendum agents at the California
Marketing Field Office, 2202 Monterey
Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, California
93721–3129, or the Office of the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist, or
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Peter.Sommers@ams.usda.gov or
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
Pursuant
to Marketing Order No. 983 (7 CFR part
983), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order,’’ and the applicable provisions
of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act,’’ it is hereby directed that
a referendum be conducted to ascertain
whether continuance of the order is
favored by the producers. The
referendum shall be conducted from
November 1 through November 18,
2016, among pistachio producers in the
production area. Only pistachio
producers who were engaged in the
production of pistachios during the
period of September 1, 2015, through
August 31, 2016, may participate in the
continuance referendum.
USDA has determined that
continuance referenda are an effective
means for determining whether
producers favor the continuation of
marketing order programs. USDA would
consider termination of the order if
continuance is not favored by a twothirds majority of voting producers or a
two-thirds majority of the volume
represented in the referendum.
In evaluating the merits of
continuance versus termination, USDA
will consider the results of the
continuance referendum and other
relevant information regarding
operation of the order. USDA will
evaluate the order’s relative benefits and
disadvantages to growers, handlers, and
consumers to determine whether
continuing the order would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the ballot materials used in
the referendum have been approved by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), under OMB No. 0581–0215,
Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona,
and New Mexico. It has been estimated
that it will take an average of 20 minutes
for each of the approximately 1,150
growers of California, Arizona, and New
Mexico pistachios to cast a ballot.
Participation is voluntary. Ballots
postmarked after November 18, 2016,
will not be included in the vote
tabulation.
Peter Sommers and Jeffrey Smutny of
the California Marketing Field Office,
Specialty Crop Programs, AMS, USDA,
are hereby designated as the referendum
agents of the Secretary of Agriculture to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
conduct this referendum. The procedure
applicable to the referendum shall be
the ‘‘Procedure for the Conduct of
Referenda in Connection With
Marketing Orders for Fruits, Vegetables,
and Nuts Pursuant to the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
Amended’’ (7 CFR part 900.400–
900.407).
Ballots will be mailed to all producers
of record and may also be obtained from
the referendum agents or from their
appointees.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements and orders,
Pistachios, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
Dated: August 10, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–19531 Filed 8–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA–2013–0044]
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
RIN 0960–AH63
Revisions to Rules of Conduct and
Standards of Responsibility for
Appointed Representatives
Social Security Administration.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We propose to revise our
rules of conduct and standards of
responsibility for representatives. We
also propose to update and clarify
procedures we use when we bring
charges against a representative for
violating our rules of conduct and
standards of responsibilities for
representatives. These changes are
necessary to better protect the integrity
of our administrative process and
further clarify representatives’ currently
existing responsibilities in their conduct
with us. The changes to our rules are
not meant to suggest that any specific
conduct is permissible under our
existing rules; instead, we seek to
ensure that our rules of conduct and
standards of responsibility are clearer as
a whole and directly address a broader
range of inappropriate conduct.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
To ensure that your comments
are considered, we must receive them
no later than October 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of three methods—Internet,
fax, or mail. Do not submit the same
comments multiple times or by more
than one method. Regardless of which
method you choose, please state that
your comments refer to Docket No.
SSA–2013–0044 so that we may
associate your comments with the
correct rule.
Caution: You should be careful to
include in your comments only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. We strongly urge you
not to include in your comments any
personal information, such as Social
Security numbers or medical
information.
1. Internet: We strongly recommend
that you submit your comments via the
Internet. Please visit the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Use the Search
function to find docket number SSA–
2013–0044. The system will issue a
tracking number to confirm your
submission. You will not be able to
view your comment immediately
because we must post each comment
manually. It may take up to a week for
your comment to be viewable.
2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966–
2830.
3. Mail: Mail your comments to the
Office of Regulations, Social Security
Administration, 3100 West High Rise
Building, 6401 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21235–6401.
Comments are available for public
viewing on the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov or
in person, during regular business
hours, by arranging with the contact
person identified below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maren Weight, Office of Appellate
Operations, Social Security
Administration, 5107 Leesburg Pike,
Falls Church, VA 22041, (703) 605–
7100. For information on eligibility or
filing for benefits, call our national tollfree number, 1–800–772–1213 or TTY
1–800–325–0778, or visit our Internet
site, Social Security Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We may issue rules and regulations to
administer the Social Security Act (Act).
42 U.S.C. 405(a), 406(a)(1), 902(a)(5),
1010(a), and 1383(d). We are revising
our rules of conduct and standards of
responsibility for representatives and
other rules about the representation of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
parties in 20 CFR part 404 subpart R and
part 416 subpart O.
Although the vast majority of
representatives conduct business before
us ethically, and conscientiously assist
their clients, these changes are
prompted by our concerns that some
representatives are using our processes
in a way that undermines the integrity
of our programs. We seek to clarify that
certain actions are prohibited and to
provide additional means to address
representative actions that affect the
integrity of our programs and our ability
to provide the best possible service to
the public.
Clarification to Qualifications for NonAttorney Representatives
Our current regulations specify in
§ 404.1705(b)(1) that a non-attorney
must generally be known to have a good
character and reputation to serve as a
representative. In proposed
§ 404.1705(b)(4), we specify that certain
convictions will preclude a nonattorney representative from
demonstrating this requisite good
character and reputation. We have noted
in our existing policy that neither the
Act nor our regulations define the terms
‘‘good character and reputation.’’ In
these rules, we propose to clarify these
terms by including a non-exclusive list
of examples that show that a person
lacks good character and reputation, and
which, if present, will demonstrate to us
that a non-attorney is unqualified to
serve as a representative.
New Rules of Conduct for
Representatives and Clarification of
Existing Rules
We are revising our rules of conduct
for representatives to clarify their
existing responsibilities under our
regulations and to ensure their
compliance with procedures designed to
provide fair and efficient claim
adjudication. We propose these changes
to save limited administrative resources,
process claims more efficiently, and
protect the integrity of our programs.
Current § 404.1740(b)(3)(i) states that
competent representation requires the
‘‘knowledge, skill, thoroughness and
preparation reasonably necessary for the
representation.’’ In proposed
§ 404.1740(b)(3)(i), we specify that, in
addition to the other requirements
already listed, competent representation
also includes reasonable and adequate
familiarity with the evidence in a case,
as well as knowledge of the applicable
provisions of the Act, our regulations,
and Social Security Rulings.
Consistent with regulatory changes in
our 2014 final rules to scheduling and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54521
appearing at hearings,1 we propose
adding an affirmative duty in
§ 404.1740(b)(3) requiring
representatives to provide to us, on our
request, a specified number of dates and
times the representative is available for
a hearing. We also propose specifying as
an affirmative duty the requirement that
representatives withdraw from
representation at a time and in a manner
that does not disrupt claim processing;
and, in particular, not to withdraw once
we have scheduled a hearing unless the
representative can show that a
withdrawal is necessary due to
extraordinary circumstances, as we
determine on a case-by-case basis. We
also added a paragraph in proposed
§ 404.1740(b)(3)(v) clarifying that a
representative has an obligation to
maintain prompt and timely
communication with the claimant. This
proposed new paragraph is consistent
with many of the principles found in
American Bar Association (ABA) Model
Rule of Professional Conduct 1.4.2
In addition, for consistency with our
2015 final rules regarding submission of
evidence in disability claims, we
propose adding affirmative duties in
proposed § 404.1740(b)(5) requiring that
a representative, when he or she
submits a medical or vocational opinion
to us, disclose in writing whether the
medical or vocational opinion is
drafted, prepared, or issued by: An
employee of the representative; an
individual contracting with the
representative for services; or an
individual to whom the representative
referred the claimant for suggested
treatment.3 In doing so, we clarify that
1 In our 2014 final rules regarding changes to
scheduling and appearing at hearings, we made
changes to when a claimant may object to appearing
at a hearing by video teleconferencing, or to the
time and place of a hearing. 79 FR 39526 at 35931
(June 25, 2014).
2 We acknowledge the ABA model rules apply
only to attorneys, and our rules and regulations
govern both attorney and non-attorney
representatives. However, the ABA model rules are
a helpful resource, as they address representation
principles and practices relevant to our programs.
The principles we cite in this proposed rule apply
equally to attorney and non-attorney
representatives.
3 In our recent 2015 final rules regarding
submission of evidence, we require a claimant to
inform us about or submit all evidence that relates
to whether or not he or she is blind or disabled,
with certain exceptions for information subject to
the attorney work product doctrine and
communications subject to attorney-client privilege.
Consistent with these recent rules regarding
submission of evidence, the affirmative duty set
forth in proposed § 404.1740(b)(5) will not require
a representative to disclose attorney work product
or communication subject to the attorney-client
privilege as defined by § 404.1512(b)(2). In
particular, the 2015 final rules provide that ‘‘if you
tell your representative about the medical sources
you have seen, your representative cannot refuse to
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
Continued
16AUP1
54522
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
we do not find the behavior of referring
a claimant to a medical or vocational
provider in and of itself problematic,
even in the particularly noted
circumstances. By adding this
requirement, we are merely indicating
that, in the noted circumstances, a
representative must disclose such a
referral to us.
We also propose § 404.1740(b)(6)
specifying that a representative must
inform the agency if a claimant used the
representative’s services to commit
fraud against us. This is consistent with
requirements set forth by portions of
ABA Model Rule 3.3 regarding the duty
of candor toward the tribunal. We
acknowledge that attorney
representatives may be subject to state
bar and ethics rules, which vary from
state to state. However, all states
recognize a version of the common law
crime or fraud exception to privileged
communications between an attorney
and client. Furthermore, even if a state’s
rules conflicted with our rules, under
the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy
Clause, the federal rules take
precedence when the representative is
appearing in federal proceedings before
us. Therefore, our rules would preempt
any conflicting state bar and ethics
rules.
In proposed § 404.1740(b)(7) and (8),
we add affirmative duties that require a
representative to disclose whether the
representative is or has been disbarred
or suspended from any bar or court to
which he or she was previously
admitted to practice. This includes
instances in which a bar or court took
administrative action to disbar or
suspend the representative in lieu of
disciplinary proceedings (e.g.
acceptance of voluntary resignation
pending disciplinary action); and also
disclose whether the representative is or
has been disqualified from participating
in or appearing before any Federal
program or agency, again including
instances in which the representative
was disqualified in lieu of disciplinary
disclose the identity of those medical sources to us
based on the attorney-client privilege,’’ and ‘‘if your
representative asks a medical source to complete an
opinion form related to your impairment(s),
symptoms, or limitations, your representative
cannot withhold the completed opinion form from
us based on the attorney work product doctrine.’’
20 CFR 404.1512(b)(2)(iv). In the course of this
rulemaking, we acknowledged that ‘‘state bar rules
generally require client confidentiality and zealous
representation,’’ but we stated that we did not
believe that ‘‘state bar rules prevent an attorney
from complying with our Federal rule, which
requires a representative to help a claimant satisfy
his or her disclosure obligation,’’ under our
regulations. 80 FR 14828, 14832–33 (March 20,
2015); see also ABA Model Rule of Professional
Conduct 1.6(b)(6) (attorney can reveal information
relating to representation of a client ‘‘to comply
with other law or a court order’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
proceedings. Our current regulations
specify in § 404.1745(d) that such
disbarments, suspensions, or
disqualifications based upon
misconduct constitute grounds for
sanctions. While our current
Appointment of Representative form
(Form SSA–1696) requires a
representative to disclose this
information, our current policy does not
require representatives to use this form,
and, in some matters, a representative
may be disbarred, suspended, or
disqualified following appointment as a
representative. Therefore, we proposed
these new affirmative duties setting
forth ongoing disclosure requirements.
Similarly, in proposed § 404.1740(b)(9),
we also require that a representative
disclose to us whether he or she has
been removed or suspended from
practice by a professional licensing
authority.
Current § 404.1740(c)(10) addresses
instances in which a representative may
be working with employees or assistants
to commit misconduct. The current rule
prohibits a representative from
suggesting, assisting, or directing
another person to violate our rules or
regulations. We have proposed adding
an affirmative duty in proposed
§ 404.1740(b)(10) which requires a
representative to ensure that all of the
representative’s employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any other
person assisting the representative will
be compliant with our rules of conduct
and standards of responsibility. We
have also specified in proposed
§ 404.1740(c)(14) that, within the scope
of employment, failure by a
representative to properly oversee the
representative’s employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any person
assisting the representative, constitutes
sanctionable behavior. This provision
applies where the representative has
managerial or supervisory authority
over the individual(s) in question, the
individual’s conduct would be a
violation of our rules, the representative
has reason to believe that misconduct
has occurred or may occur, and, when
possible, the representative fails to take
remedial action.4 Because many
representatives associated with large
organizations rely extensively on other
employees and assistants when
providing representational services to
claimants, we believe that these new
4 These proposed affirmative duties and
prohibited actions are consistent with ABA Model
Rule 5.1, which requires that a partner in a law
firm, or others with comparable managerial
authority, make reasonable efforts to ensure that the
firm has in effect measures giving reasonable
assurance that all lawyers in the firm conform to the
Rules of Professional Conduct.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rules are necessary to ensure that
claimants receive competent and
effective representation and to protect
the integrity of our administrative
processes.
In proposed § 404.1740(c)(1), we
specify that misleading a claimant,
prospective claimant, or beneficiary
regarding benefits or other rights under
the Act includes misleading the
claimant, prospective claimant, or
beneficiary about that representative’s
services and qualifications. Both the Act
and our rules provide claimants with a
right to a representative, and, therefore,
misleading statements about the
representative’s services and
qualifications are material to the
claimant’s rights under the Act.
However, we clarify that in situations
where a misleading statement about the
representative’s services and
qualifications adversely affects claim
processing, to the extent permitted by
our other rules, we will not
disadvantage a claimant, potential
claimant, or beneficiary because of a
representative’s misconduct. In
addition, in proposed § 404.1740(c)(2),
we specify that knowingly charging,
collecting, or retaining an improper fee
also includes soliciting a gift or other
item of value other than what is
authorized by law.
We have also proposed revising our
current rules regarding submission of
false or misleading evidence. In current
§ 404.1740(c)(3), we prohibit a
representative from knowingly making,
presenting, or participating in the
making or presenting of certain false or
misleading statements, assertions, or
representations. In our 1998 final rules,5
we stated that we based this rule in part
on the criminal prohibitions in 18
U.S.C. 1001, which prohibit knowingly
and willfully making materially false
statements. The intent requirement set
forth in the current rule is also
consistent with ABA Model Rule
3.3(a)(1), which prohibits an attorney
from knowingly making false statements
of fact or law to a tribunal. As we
emphasized in connection with the
2015 final rules on submission of
evidence, the non-adversarial nature of
the disability adjudication process
requires that we maintain a high level
of cooperation from claimants and, by
extension, their representatives, in order
to ensure that the agency obtains the
information needed to make accurate
disability determinations.6 Therefore, in
order to protect the integrity of our
programs, we propose strengthening our
current rule to prohibit the submission
5 63
FR 41404 at 41416 (August 4, 1998).
80 FR 14828 at 14831 (March 20, 2015).
6 See
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
of false or misleading evidence in
matters where the representative has or
should have reason to believe that the
evidence is false or misleading and to
prohibit any written statements,
assertions, or representations, which the
representative has or should have
reason to believe are false or misleading.
Likewise, in proposed
§ 404.1740(c)(7)(ii)(B), we specify that
providing misleading information or
misrepresenting facts that affect how we
process a claim may also be
sanctionable where the representative
has or should have reason to believe the
information or facts would mislead the
agency or constitute a
misrepresentation.
Our regulations currently prohibit
attempts to influence the outcome of a
decision, determination, or other
administrative action by offering or
granting an item of value to a presiding
official, agency employee, or witness
who is or may reasonably be involved
in the decision making process, with
certain exemptions. In proposed
§ 404.1740(c)(6), we specify that in
addition to the current prohibitions on
offering or granting items of value to
agency employees or witnesses, we also
may sanction a representative who
influences or attempts to influence such
an agency employee or presiding official
by any means prohibited by law.
Current § 404.1740(c)(7)(ii) and (iii)
addresses disruptive, threatening, and
obstructive behavior by representatives.
In our proposed rules, we have
renumbered and proposed revisions to
these rules. Current § 404.1740(c)(7)(iii)
prohibits ‘‘threatening or intimidating
language, gestures, or actions directed at
a presiding official, witness, or agency
employee that result in a disruption of
the orderly presentation and reception
of evidence.’’ In our proposed rules, we
have eliminated the requirement that
such threats or intimidation result in a
disruption of the orderly presentation
and receipt of evidence, since such
threats and intimidations are inherently
prejudicial to the administrative
proceedings. In proposed
§ 404.1740(c)(ii)(C), we add that a
representative may not communicate
with an agency employee or adjudicator
outside the normal course of business or
prescribed procedures in an attempt to
influence the processing or outcome of
a case.
Violations of Our Requirements
Under our current rules, we may
begin proceedings to suspend or
disqualify a representative when we
have evidence that the representative
fails to meet our qualification
requirements or has violated our rules of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
conduct. We propose revising
§ 404.1745 to clarify that we may
disqualify a non-attorney representative
who has been removed from practice or
suspended by a professional licensing
authority for reasons that reflect on the
person’s character, integrity, judgment,
reliability, or fitness to serve as a
fiduciary.
Notice of Charges Against a
Representative
In § 404.1750, we propose reducing
the amount of time a representative has
to respond to our notice of charges from
30 days to 14 days because it will help
us timely adjudicate possible
representative misconduct matters and
provide efficient service to claimants,
potential claimants, recipients, and
beneficiaries. This 14-day timeframe
provides the representative ample time
to respond to the charges, which usually
consist of simply affirming or denying a
series of factual allegations.
Additionally, there is public interest in
resolving these matters as quickly as
possible because representatives may
continue to represent claimants during
the time that charges are pending.
Reducing this timeframe will allow us
to better protect the public by allowing
less time for a representative who is
found to have violated our rules to
continue to represent claimants while
charges are pending. Furthermore,
quicker processing of these cases is also
of particular interest to the person
against whom we bring charges because
it results in a more timely resolution of
the matter. Finally, we note that
irrespective of the reduced timeframe to
respond to the charges, the
representative will still have the
opportunity to defend himself or herself
before the hearing officer conducting the
hearing, when a hearing is needed.
In regards to any fairness concerns,
we expect that most individuals subject
to this rule will easily be able to
respond within the proposed timeframe,
as it is not uncommon for us to seek
disqualification based on a single charge
involving legal or factual issues that are
not complex, such as disbarment or
improper retention of a fee. As we stated
previously, charges usually consist of
simply affirming or denying a series of
factual allegations. However, because
we propose reducing the standard time
for a representative to respond to our
notice of charges, we also propose
retaining the rule to allow a
representative to seek an extension of
time for filing an answer upon a
showing of good cause. Therefore, if a
person against whom we brought
charges indicates that he or she required
additional time to respond, we would
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54523
consider that information in
determining whether to extend the
period for filing an answer. Our current
rules specify that the General Counsel or
other delegated official may extend the
period for filing an answer for good
cause in accordance with § 404.911.
Hearing on the Charges
We propose clarifying in § 404.1765
that a hearing on the charges may be
conducted at our discretion in person,
by video teleconferencing, or by
telephone. We add that we will not
consider objections to the manner of
appearance unless a party shows good
cause why he or she cannot appear in
the prescribed manner. We also propose
to codify our existing policy by
clarifying that a hearing officer may
reopen the hearing for the receipt of
additional evidence at any time before
mailing the notice of the decision,
subject to our limitations on submitting
an answer to the charges. In addition,
we propose requiring a hearing officer to
mail the notice of hearing to the parties
no later than 14 days prior to the
hearing, rather than 20 days, so that we
can conduct sanction proceedings in a
timely manner. We have also proposed
to codify our existing policy regarding
hearing notices by specifying that a
hearing officer will include the
requirements and instructions for filing
motions, requesting witnesses, and
entering exhibits.
In addition, we propose rules
clarifying the standard upon which
motions for decisions on the record may
be granted. We use a similar standard to
that stated in Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 56 for summary judgment,
specifying that a hearing officer may
grant a motion for decision on the
record if there is no genuine dispute as
to any material fact and the movant is
entitled to a decision as a matter of law.
We have specified that before granting
a motion for decision on the record, the
hearing officer must first provide both
parties with the opportunity to submit
evidence and briefs. We propose this
rule because, in our experience, many
cases can be decided based on the
record, and a hearing will often be
unnecessary and delay any final
decision. These proposed rules are
consistent with the requirements of
Section 206 of the Act, which specifies
that we may suspend or disqualify a
representative ‘‘after due notice and
opportunity for hearing.’’ Our proposed
rules provide for an opportunity for a
hearing, and the hearing officer may
only grant a motion for decision on the
record if a party demonstrates that there
is no genuine dispute as to any material
fact, such that any evidence or argument
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
54524
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
presented at the hearing would not alter
the outcome of the case.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Requesting Review of the Hearing
Officer’s Decision
We propose reducing the amount of
time to request Appeals Council review
of a hearing officer’s decision from 30 to
14 days in proposed § 404.1775. In our
experience, representatives will often
decline to seek review of adverse
sanctions decisions. However, our
sanctions decision is not final until the
time to seek review has expired. During
this time, a representative may continue
to represent claimants. We believe that
reducing the amount of time to seek
Appeals Council review from 30 to 14
days will enable us to better protect the
claimants we serve while providing
sufficient protections for representatives
in our sanctions process. Federal Rule of
Appellate Procedure 4(b) provides for a
comparable 14-day period to file a
notice of appeal in criminal matters, in
which significant liberty interests are at
stake. In addition, our rules provide for
submission of briefs to the Appeals
Council subsequent to the filing of the
request for review, allowing a
representative additional time to
formulate his or her arguments on
appeal.
Clarifications to the Appeals Council
Review Process
We propose clarifying in § 404.1780
that in the event a party appeals the
hearing officer’s decision and requests
to appear at an oral argument, the
Appeals Council will determine
whether the parties will appear at a
requested oral argument in person, by
video teleconferencing, or by telephone.
Furthermore, we propose revising the
rules about presenting evidence at the
Appeals Council level. Based on our
experience, some individuals are
confused about whether the Appeals
Council will accept additional evidence
that was not submitted to the hearing
officer. We propose revising the
language in § 404.1785 to clarify that the
Appeals Council, at its discretion, may
accept additional evidence it finds
material to the issues that existed when
an individual filed an answer to the
charges. When it does so, the Appeals
Council will give the opposing party the
opportunity to comment on the
evidence prior to admitting it into the
record. We also added language in
proposed § 404.1790 stating the Appeals
Council will determine whether
additional material evidence warrants
remand to a hearing officer for review or
whether the Appeals Council will
consider the evidence as part of its
review of the case. In addition, we
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
propose adding clarifying language in
§ 404.1790 that explains the Appeals
Council will affirm the hearing officer’s
decision if the action, findings, and
conclusions are supported by
substantial evidence. We also propose
adding that the Appeals Council may
designate and publish final decisions as
precedent for other actions brought
against individuals charged with
violating our rules.
Finally, we propose revising our rules
in § 404.1799 about when and how a
disqualified or suspended
representative may seek the right to
request reinstatement. Most individuals
do not request reinstatement until they
are in full compliance with our
requirements. However, individuals
who seek reinstatement prematurely
waste valuable agency resources.
Therefore, in addition to retaining our
existing rule that a disqualified or
suspended representative must wait at
least one year from the effective date of
the suspension or disqualification to
request reinstatement, we propose
revising our rules to state that a
disqualified or sanctioned
representative who has requested and
been denied reinstatement by the
Appeals Council must wait an
additional three years before he or she
can again request reinstatement. We are
proposing this change because our
experience shows that when the
Appeals Council denies a request for
reinstatement, the representative
requesting reinstatement has usually not
taken the appropriate actions to remedy
the violation or does not understand the
severity of the violation committed.
Therefore, we are proposing this change
to save valuable resources and ensure
individuals take the necessary measures
before submitting the initial or
successive request for reinstatement. We
also made a minor clarification in
§ 404.1799 that the Appeals Council
uses the same procedures outlined in
§ 404.1776 for assigning a reviewing
panel and processing a request for
reinstatement after a suspension or
disqualification.
In addition to these proposed changes
to 20 CFR part 404, we are proposing
changes to the rules set forth in 20 CFR
part 416 to conform to our changes in
part 404.
Clarity of These Rules
Executive Order 12866 as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563 requires each agency to write all
rules in plain language. In addition to
your substantive comments on this
NPRM, we invite your comments on
how to make rules easier to understand.
For example:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Would more, but shorter, sections
be better?
• Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
• Have we organized the material to
suit your needs?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rule easier to understand?
• Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear?
• Would a different format make the
rule easier to understand, e.g. grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing?
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866 as
Supplemented by Executive Order
13563
We consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these proposed rules do
meet the criteria for a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive
Order 13563 and are subject to OMB
review.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these proposed rules
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because they affect individuals
only. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These proposed rules contain
reporting requirements in the regulation
sections listed below. For some sections
in these rules, we previously accounted
for the public reporting burdens in the
Information Collection Requests for the
various forms the public uses to submit
the information to SSA. Consequently,
we are not reporting those sections
below. Further, these proposed rules
contain information collection activities
at 20 CFR 404.1750 ((c), (e)(1), and
(e)(2)), 404.1765(g)(1), 404.1775(b),
404.1799(d)(2), 416.1750 ((c), (e)(1), and
(e)(2)), 416.1565(g)(1), 404.1575(b), and
416.1599(d)(2). However, 44 U.S.C.
3518(c)(1)(B)(ii) exempts these activities
from the OMB clearance requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
The sections below pose new public
reporting burdens not covered by an
existing OMB-approved form, and we
provide burden estimates for them.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
54525
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Number of
respondents
(annually)
Average
burden per
response
(minutes)
Description of public reporting
requirement
404.1740(b)(5); 416.1540(b)(5) ...
Disclose in writing, at the time a medical or vocational opinion is submitted
to us or as soon as the representative is aware of the submission to us,
if: The representative’s employee or
any individual contracting with the
representative drafted, prepared, or
issued the medical or vocational
opinion; or.
The representative referred or suggested that the claimant seek an examination from, treatment by, or the
assistance of the individual providing
opinion evidence.
Disclose to us in writing immediately if
the representative discovers that his
or her services are or were used by
the claimant to commit fraud.
Disclose to us in writing whether the
representative is or has been disbarred or suspended from any bar or
court to which he or she was previously admitted to practice.
Disclose to us in writing whether the
representative is or has been disqualified from participating in or appearing before any Federal program
or agency.
Disclose to us in writing whether the
representative has been removed
from practice or suspended by a professional licensing authority for reasons that reflect on the person’s
character, integrity, judgement, reliability, or fitness to serve as a fiduciary.
43,600
1
5
3,633
50
1
5
4
50
1
5
4
10
1
5
1
10
1
5
1
................................................................
436,120
........................
........................
3,643
404.1740(b)(6); 416.1540(b)(6) ...
404.1740(b)(7); 416.1540(b)(7) ...
404.1740(b)(8); 416.1540(b)(8) ...
404.1740(b)(9); 416.1540(b)(9) ...
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Totals .............................
For those listed above, SSA submitted
an Information Collection Request for
clearance to OMB. We are soliciting
comments on the burden estimate; the
need for the information; its practical
utility; ways to enhance its quality,
utility, and clarity; and ways to
minimize the burden on respondents,
including the use of automated
techniques or other forms of information
technology. If you would like to submit
comments, please send them to the
following locations:
Office of Management and Budget, Attn:
Desk Officer for SSA, Fax Number:
202–395–6974, Email address: OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov
Social Security Administration, Attn:
Reports Clearance Officer, 1333
Annex, 6401 Security Blvd.,
Baltimore, MD 21235–0001, Fax
Number: 410–965–6400, Email:
OR.Reports.Clearance@ssa.gov
You can submit comments until
October 17, 2016, which is 60 days after
the publication of this notice. However,
your comments will be most useful if
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
Frequency of
response
Estimated
annual
burden
(hours)
Regulation section
you send them to SSA by September 15,
2016, which is 30 days after publication.
To receive a copy of the OMB clearance
package, contact the SSA Reports
Clearance Officer using any of the above
contact methods. We prefer to receive
comments by email or fax.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security—
Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social
Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004,
Social Security—Survivors Insurance; and
96.006, Supplemental Security Income)
List of Subjects
requirements, Supplemental Security
Income (SSI).
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend 20 CFR
chapter III parts 404 and part 416 as set
forth below:
PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE,
SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
INSURANCE (1950– )
Subpart R—Representation of Parties
20 CFR Part 404
1. The authority citation for subpart R
of part 404 continues to read as follows:
Administrative practice and
procedure, Blind, Disability benefits;
Old-age, Survivors, and Disability
Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Social security.
■
20 CFR Part 416
■
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
§ 404.1705 Who may be your
representative
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority: Secs. 205(a), 206, 702(a)(5), and
1127 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
405(a), 406, 902(a)(5), and 1320a–6).
2. Revise § 404.1705(b) to read as
follows:
*
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
*
*
16AUP1
*
*
54526
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(b) You may appoint any person who
is not an attorney to be your
representative in dealings with us if the
person—
(1) Is capable of giving valuable help
to you in connection with your claim;
(2) Is not disqualified or suspended
from acting as a representative in
dealings with us;
(3) Is not prohibited by any law from
acting as a representative; and
(4) Is generally known to have a good
character and reputation. Persons
lacking good character and reputation,
include, but are not limited to, persons
convicted of a felony (as defined by
§ 404.1506(c)), or any crime involving
moral turpitude, dishonesty, false
statements, misrepresentation, deceit, or
theft.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 404.1740 by
■ a. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(i);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (b)(3)(iii)
through (v) and (b)(5) through (10);
■ c. Revising paragraphs (c)(1) through
(3) and (6) and (7);
■ d. Removing from the end of
paragraph (c)(12) the word ‘‘or’’;
■ e. Removing from paragraph (c)(13)
the final period and adding in its place
‘‘; or’’; and
■ f. Adding paragraph (c)(14).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 404.1740 Rules of conduct and
standards of responsibility for
representatives.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Conduct his or her dealings in a
manner that furthers the efficient, fair
and orderly conduct of the
administrative decision making process,
including duties to:
(i) Provide competent representation
to a claimant. Competent representation
requires the knowledge, skill,
thoroughness, and preparation
reasonably necessary for the
representation. A representative must
know the significant issue(s) in a claim,
have reasonable and adequate
familiarity with the evidence in the
case, and have a working knowledge of
the applicable provisions of the Social
Security Act, as amended, the
regulations, and Social Security Rulings.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) When requested, provide us, in a
manner we specify, potential dates and
times that the representative will be
available for a hearing. We will inform
you how many potential dates and times
we require to coordinate the hearing
schedule.
(iv) Only withdraw representation at
a time and in a manner that does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
disrupt the processing or adjudication of
a claim and provides the claimant
adequate time to find new
representation, if desired. A
representative should not withdraw
after a hearing is scheduled unless the
representative can show that a
withdrawal is necessary due to
extraordinary circumstances, as we
determine on a case-by-case basis.
(v) Maintain prompt and timely
communication with the claimant,
which includes, but is not limited to,
reasonably informing the claimant of all
matters concerning the representation,
consulting with the claimant on an
ongoing basis during the entire
representational period, and promptly
responding to a claimant’s reasonable
requests for information.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Disclose in writing, at the time a
medical or vocational opinion is
submitted to us or as soon as the
representative is aware of the
submission to us, if:
(i) The representative’s employee or
any individual contracting with the
representative drafted, prepared, or
issued the medical or vocational
opinion; or
(ii) The representative referred or
suggested that the claimant seek an
examination from, treatment by, or the
assistance of the individual providing
opinion evidence.
(6) Disclose to us immediately if the
representative discovers that his or her
services are or were used by the
claimant to commit fraud against us.
(7) Disclose to us whether the
representative is or has been disbarred
or suspended from any bar or court to
which he or she was previously
admitted to practice, including
instances in which a bar or court took
administrative action to disbar or
suspend the representative in lieu of
disciplinary proceedings (e.g.
acceptance of voluntary resignation
pending disciplinary action). If the
disbarment or suspension occurs after
the appointment of the representative,
the representative will immediately
disclose the disbarment or suspension
to us.
(8) Disclose to us whether the
representative is or has been
disqualified from participating in or
appearing before any Federal program or
agency, including instances in which a
Federal program or agency took
administrative action to disqualify the
representative in lieu of disciplinary
proceedings (e.g. acceptance of
voluntary resignation pending
disciplinary action). If the
disqualification occurs after the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
appointment of the representative, the
representative will immediately disclose
the disqualification to us.
(9) Disclose to us whether the
representative has been removed from
practice or suspended by a professional
licensing authority for reasons that
reflect on the person’s character,
integrity, judgment, reliability, or fitness
to serve as a fiduciary. If the removal or
suspension occurs after the appointment
of the representative, the representative
will immediately disclose the removal
or suspension to us.
(10) Ensure that all of the
representative’s employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any person
assisting the representative on claims
for which the representative has been
appointed, are compliant with these
rules of conduct and standards of
responsibility for representatives.
(c) * * *
(1) In any manner or by any means
threaten, coerce, intimidate, deceive, or
knowingly mislead a claimant, or
prospective claimant or beneficiary,
regarding benefits or other rights under
the Act. This prohibition includes
misleading a claimant, or prospective
claimant or beneficiary, about the
representative’s services and
qualifications.
(2) Knowingly charge, collect, or
retain, or make any arrangement to
charge, collect, or retain, from any
source, directly or indirectly, any fee for
representational services in violation of
applicable law or regulation. This
prohibition includes soliciting any gift
or any other item of value, other than is
what is authorized by law.
(3) Make or present, or participate in
the making or presentation of, false or
misleading oral or written statements,
evidence, assertions, or representations
about a material fact or law concerning
a matter within our jurisdiction, in
matters where the representative has or
should have reason to believe that those
statements, evidence, assertions or
representations are false or misleading.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Attempt to influence, directly or
indirectly, the outcome of a decision,
determination, or other administrative
action by any means prohibited by law,
or by offering or granting a loan, gift,
entertainment, or anything of value to a
presiding official, agency employee, or
witness who is or may reasonably be
expected to be involved in the
administrative decision making process,
except as reimbursement for
legitimately incurred expenses or lawful
compensation for the services of an
expert witness retained on a noncontingency basis to provide evidence.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(7) Engage in actions or behavior
prejudicial to the fair and orderly
conduct of administrative proceedings,
including but not limited to:
(i) Repeated absences from or
persistent tardiness at scheduled
proceedings without good cause (see
§ 404.911(b));
(ii) Behavior that has the effect of
improperly disrupting proceedings or
obstructing the adjudicative process,
including but not limited to:
(A) Directing threatening or
intimidating language, gestures, or
actions at a presiding official, witness,
contractor, or agency employee;
(B) Providing misleading information
or misrepresenting facts that affect how
we process a claim, including but not
limited to information relating to the
claimant’s work activity or the
claimant’s place of residence or mailing
address in matters where the
representative has or should have
reason to believe that the information
was misleading and the facts would
constitute a misrepresentation;
(C) Communicating with agency staff
or adjudicators outside the normal
course of business or other prescribed
procedures in an attempt to
inappropriately influence the processing
or outcome of a claim(s);
*
*
*
*
*
(14) Fail to oversee the
representative’s employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any other
person assisting the representative on
claims for which the representative has
been appointed, when the
representative has managerial or
supervisory authority over these
individuals and:
(i) The individual’s conduct would be
a violation of these rules of conduct and
standards of responsibility;
(ii) The representative has reason to
believe that a violation of our rules of
conduct and standards of responsibility
would occur; and
(iii) When possible, the representative
fails to take remedial action.
■ 4. Amend § 404.1745 by revising
paragraphs (d) and (e) and adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 404.1745 Violations of our requirements,
rules, or standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Has been, by reason of
misconduct, disbarred or suspended
from any bar or court to which he or she
was previously admitted to practice (see
§ 404.1770(a));
(e) Has been, by reason of misconduct,
disqualified from participating in or
appearing before any Federal program or
agency (see § 404.1770(a)); or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
(f) Who is a non-attorney, has been
removed from practice or suspended by
a professional licensing authority for
reasons that reflect on the person’s
character, integrity, judgment,
reliability, or fitness to serve as a
fiduciary.
■ 5. Revise § 404.1750(c) through (f) to
read as follows:
§ 404.1750 Notice of charges against a
representative.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) We will advise the representative
to file an answer, within 14 days from
the date of the notice, or from the date
the notice was delivered personally,
stating why he or she should not be
suspended or disqualified from acting as
a representative in dealings with us.
(d) The General Counsel or other
delegated official may extend the 14-day
period for good cause in accordance
with § 404.911.
(e) The representative must—
(1) Answer the notice in writing
under oath (or affirmation); and
(2) File the answer with the Social
Security Administration, at the address
specified on the notice, within the 14day time period.
(f) If the representative does not file
an answer within the 14-day time
period, he or she does not have the right
to present evidence, except as may be
provided in § 404.1765(g).
■ 6. Amend § 404.1765 by revising
paragraphs (c), (d)(1) and (3), and (g) to
read as follows:
§ 404.1765
Hearing on charges.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Time and place of hearing. The
hearing officer will mail the parties a
written notice of the hearing at their last
known addresses, at least 14 days before
the date set for the hearing. The notice
will inform the parties whether the
appearance of the parties or any
witnesses will be in person, by video
teleconferencing, or by telephone. The
notice will also include requirements
and instructions for filing motions,
requesting witnesses, and entering
exhibits.
(d) * * * (1) The hearing officer may
change the time and place for the
hearing, either on his or her own
initiative, or at the request of the
representative or the other party to the
hearing. The hearing officer will not
consider objections to the manner of
appearance of parties or witnesses,
unless the party shows good cause not
to appear in the prescribed manner.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Subject to the limitations in
paragraph (g)(2) of this section, the
hearing officer may reopen the hearing
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54527
for the receipt of additional evidence at
any time before mailing notice of the
decision.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Conduct of the hearing. (1) The
representative or the other party may
file a motion for decision on the basis
of the record prior to the hearing. The
hearing officer will give the
representative and the other party a
reasonable amount of time to submit
any evidence and to file briefs or other
written statements as to fact and law
prior to deciding the motion. If the
hearing officer concludes that there is
no genuine dispute as to any material
fact and the movant is entitled to a
decision as a matter of law, the hearing
officer may grant the motion and issue
a decision in accordance with the
provisions of § 404.1770.
(2) If the representative did not file an
answer to the charges, he or she has no
right to present evidence at the hearing.
The hearing officer may make or
recommend a decision on the basis of
the record, or permit the representative
to present a statement about the
sufficiency of the evidence or the
validity of the proceedings upon which
the suspension or disqualification, if it
occurred, would be based.
(3) The hearing officer will make the
hearing open to the representative, to
the other party, and to any persons the
hearing officer or the parties consider
necessary or proper. The hearing officer
will inquire fully into the matters being
considered, hear the testimony of
witnesses, and accept any documents
that are material.
(4) The hearing officer has the right to
decide the order in which the evidence
and the allegations will be presented
and the conduct of the hearing.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Revise § 404.1775(b) to read as
follows:
§ 404.1775 Requesting review of the
hearing officer’s decision.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Time and place of filing request for
review. The party requesting review will
file the request for review in writing
with the Appeals Council within 14
days from the date the hearing officer
mailed the notice. The party requesting
review will certify that a copy of the
request for review and of any
documents that are submitted have been
mailed to the opposing party.
■ 8. Revise § 404.1780(a) to read as
follows:
§ 404.1780 Appeals Council’s review of
hearing officer’s decision.
(a) Upon request, the Appeals Council
will give the parties a reasonable time
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
54528
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
to file briefs or other written statements
as to fact and law, and to request to
appear before the Appeals Council to
present oral argument. When oral
argument is requested within the time
designated by the Appeals Council, the
Appeals Council will grant the request
for oral argument and determine
whether the parties will appear at the
oral argument in person, by video
teleconferencing, or by telephone. If oral
argument is not requested within the
time designated by the Appeals Council,
the Appeals Council may deny the
request.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Revise § 404.1785 to read as
follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 404.1785
Evidence permitted on review.
(a) General. Generally, the Appeals
Council will not consider evidence in
addition to that introduced at the
hearing. However, if the Appeals
Council finds the evidence offered is
material to an issue it is considering, it
may consider that evidence as described
in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Individual charged filed an
answer. (1) When the Appeals Council
finds that additional material evidence
to the charges is available, and the
individual charged filed an answer to
the charges, the Appeals Council will
allow the party with the information to
submit the additional evidence.
(2) Before the additional evidence is
admitted into the record, the Appeals
Council will mail a notice to the parties,
informing them that evidence about
certain issues was submitted. The
Appeals Council will give each party a
reasonable opportunity to comment on
the evidence and to present other
evidence that is material to the issue it
is considering.
(3) The Appeals Council will
determine whether the additional
evidence warrants a new review by a
hearing officer or whether the Appeals
Council will consider the additional
evidence as part of its review of the
case.
(c) Individual charged did not file an
answer. If the representative did not file
an answer to the charges, the
representative may not introduce
evidence that was not considered at the
hearing.
■ 10. Amend § 404.1790 by revising
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (f)
to read as follows:
§ 404.1790
Appeals Council’s decision.
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
§ 404.1799 Reinstatement after
suspension or disqualification—period of
suspension not expired.
(a) * * * The Appeals Council will
assign and process a request for
reinstatement using the same general
procedures described in § 404.1776.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) If a person was disqualified
because he or she had been disbarred,
suspended, or removed from practice for
the reasons described in § 404.1745(d)
through (f), the Appeals Council will
grant a request for reinstatement as a
representative only if the criterion in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section is met
and the disqualified person shows that
he or she has been admitted (or
readmitted) to and is in good standing
with the court, bar, or other
governmental or professional licensing
authority from which he or she had
been disbarred, suspended, or removed
from practice.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) If the Appeals Council decides not
to grant the request, it will not consider
another request before the end of 3 years
from the date of the notice of the
previous denial.
PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
BLIND, AND DISABLED
Subpart O—Representation of Parties
12. The authority citation for subpart
O of part 416 continues to read as
follows:
■
(a) The Appeals Council will base its
decision upon the evidence in the
hearing record and any other evidence
it may permit on review. The Appeals
Council will affirm the hearing officer’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
decision if the action, findings, and
conclusions are supported by
substantial evidence. If the hearing
officer’s decision is not supported by
substantial evidence, the Appeals
Council will either:
(1) Reverse or modify the hearing
officer’s decision; or
(2) Return the case to the hearing
officer for further proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The Appeals Council may
designate and publish certain final
decisions as precedent for other actions
brought under our representative
conduct provisions. Prior to making a
decision public, we may remove or
redact information from the decision.
■ 11. Amend § 404.1799 by:
■ a. Adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (a); and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (d)(2) and (f).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1127 and
1631(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1320a–6 and 1383(d)).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13. Revise § 416.1505(b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 416.1505 Who may be your
representative.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) You may appoint any person who
is not an attorney to be your
representative in dealings with us if the
person—
(1) Is capable of giving valuable help
to you in connection with your claim;
(2) Is not disqualified or suspended
from acting as a representative in
dealings with us;
(3) Is not prohibited by any law from
acting as a representative; and
(4) Is generally known to have a good
character and reputation. Persons
lacking good character and reputation,
include, but are not limited to, persons
convicted of a felony (as defined by
§ 404.1506(c)) of this chapter, or any
crime involving moral turpitude,
dishonesty, false statement,
misrepresentations, deceit, or theft.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Amend § 416.1540 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (b)(3)
introductory text and (b)(3)(i);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (b)(3)(iii)
through (v) and (b)(5) through (10);
■ c. Revising paragraphs (c)(1) through
(3), (c)(6), and (c)(7)(i) and (ii); and
■ d. Adding paragraph (c)(14).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 416.1540 Rules of conduct and
standards of responsibility for
representatives.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Conduct his or her dealings in a
manner that furthers the efficient, fair
and orderly conduct of the
administrative decision making process,
including duties to:
(i) Provide competent representation
to a claimant. Competent representation
requires the knowledge, skill,
thoroughness, and preparation
reasonably necessary for the
representation. A representative must
know the significant issue(s) in a claim,
have reasonable and adequate
familiarity with the evidence in the
case, and have a working knowledge of
the applicable provisions of the Social
Security Act, as amended, the
regulations, and Social Security Rulings.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) When requested, provide us, in a
manner we specify, potential dates and
times that the representative will be
available for a hearing. We will inform
you how many potential dates and times
we require to coordinate the hearing
schedule.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(iv) Only withdraw representation at
a time and in a manner that does not
disrupt the processing or adjudication of
a claim and provides the claimant
adequate time to find new
representation, if desired. A
representative should not withdraw
after a hearing is scheduled unless the
representative can show that a
withdrawal is necessary due to
extraordinary circumstances, as we
determine on a case-by-case basis.
(v) Maintain prompt and timely
communication with the claimant,
which includes, but is not limited to,
reasonably informing the claimant of all
matters concerning the representation,
consulting with the claimant on an
ongoing basis during the entire
representational period, and promptly
responding to a claimant’s reasonable
requests for information.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Disclose in writing, at the time a
medical or vocational opinion is
submitted to us or as soon as the
representative is aware of the
submission to us, if:
(i) The representative’s employee or
any individual contracting with the
representative drafted, prepared, or
issued the medical or vocational
opinion; or
(ii) The representative referred or
suggested that the claimant seek an
examination from, treatment by, or the
assistance of the individual providing
opinion evidence.
(6) Disclose to us immediately if the
representative discovers that his or her
services are or were used by the
claimant to commit fraud against us.
(7) Disclose to us if the representative
is or has been disbarred or suspended
from any bar or court to which he or she
was previously admitted to practice,
including instances in which a bar or
court took administrative action to
disbar or suspend the representative in
lieu of disciplinary proceedings (e.g.
acceptance of voluntary resignation
pending disciplinary action). If the
disbarment or suspension occurs after
the appointment of the representative,
the representative will immediately
disclose the disbarment or suspension
to us.
(8) Disclose to us whether the
representative is or has been
disqualified from participating in or
appearing before any Federal program or
agency, including instances in which a
Federal program or agency took
administrative action to disqualify the
representative in lieu of disciplinary
proceedings (e.g. acceptance of
voluntary resignation pending
disciplinary action). If the disbarment or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
suspension occurs after the appointment
of the representative, the representative
will immediately disclose the
disqualification to us.
(9) Disclose to us whether the
representative has been removed from
practice or suspended by a professional
licensing authority for reasons that
reflect on the person’s character,
integrity, judgment, reliability, or fitness
to serve as a fiduciary. If the removal or
suspension occurs after the appointment
of the representative, the representative
will immediately disclose the removal
or suspension to us.
(10) Ensure that all of the
representative’s employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any person
assisting the representative on claims
for which the representative has been
appointed, are compliant with these
rules of conduct and standards of
responsibility for representatives.
(c) * * *
(1) In any manner or by any means
threaten, coerce, intimidate, deceive, or
knowingly mislead a claimant, or
prospective claimant or beneficiary,
regarding benefits or other rights under
the Act. This prohibition includes
misleading a claimant, or prospective
claimant or beneficiary, about the
representative’s services and
qualifications.
(2) Knowingly charge, collect, or
retain, or make any arrangement to
charge, collect, or retain, from any
source, directly or indirectly, any fee for
representational services in violation of
applicable law or regulation. This
prohibition includes soliciting any gift
or any other item of value, other than is
what is authorized by law.
(3) Make or present, or participate in
the making or presentation of, false or
misleading oral or written statements,
evidence, assertions, or representations
about a material fact or law concerning
a matter within our jurisdiction, in
matters where the representative has or
should have reason to believe that those
statements, evidence, assertions or
representations are false or misleading.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Attempt to influence, directly or
indirectly, the outcome of a decision,
determination, or other administrative
action by any means prohibited by law,
or by offering or granting a loan, gift,
entertainment, or anything of value to a
presiding official, agency employee, or
witness who is or may reasonably be
expected to be involved in the
administrative decision making process,
except as reimbursement for
legitimately incurred expenses or lawful
compensation for the services of an
expert witness retained on a noncontingency basis to provide evidence.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54529
(7) * * *
(i) Repeated absences from or
persistent tardiness at scheduled
proceedings without good cause (see
§ 416.1411(b));
(ii) Behavior that has the effect of
improperly disrupting proceedings or
obstructing the adjudicative process,
including but not limited to:
(A) Directing threatening or
intimidating language, gestures, or
actions at a presiding official, witness,
contractor, or agency employee;
(B) Providing misleading information
or misrepresenting facts that affect how
we process a claim, including but not
limited to information relating to the
claimant’s work activity or the
claimant’s place of residence or mailing
address in matters where the
representative has or should have
reason to believe that the information
was misleading and the facts would
constitute a misrepresentation;
(C) Communicating with agency staff
or adjudicators outside the normal
course of business or other prescribed
procedures in an attempt to
inappropriately influence the processing
or outcome of a claim(s);
*
*
*
*
*
(14) Fail to oversee the
representative’s employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any other
person assisting the representative on
claims for which the representative has
been appointed, when the
representative has managerial or
supervisory authority over these
individuals and:
(i) The individual’s conduct would be
a violation of these rules of conduct and
standards of responsibility;
(ii) The representative has reason to
believe a violation of our rules of
conduct and standards of responsibility
would occur; and
(iii) When possible, the representative
fails to take remedial action.
■ 15. Amend § 416.1545 by revising
paragraphs (d) and (e) and adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 416.1545 Violations of our requirements,
rules, or standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Has been, by reason of
misconduct, disbarred or suspended
from any bar or court to which he or she
was previously admitted to practice (see
§ 416.1570(a));
(e) Has been, by reason of misconduct,
disqualified from participating in or
appearing before any Federal program or
agency (see § 416.1570(a)); or
(f) Who is a non-attorney, has been
removed from practice or suspended by
a professional licensing authority for
reasons that reflect on the person’s
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
54530
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
character, integrity, judgment,
reliability, or fitness to serve as a
fiduciary.
■ 16. Revise § 416.1550(c) through (f) to
read as follows:
§ 416.1550 Notice of charges against a
representative.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) We will advise the representative
to file an answer, within 14 days from
the date of the notice, or from the date
the notice was delivered personally,
stating why he or she should not be
suspended or disqualified from acting as
a representative in dealings with us.
(d) The General Counsel or other
delegated official may extend the 14-day
period for good cause in accordance
with § 416.1411.
(e) The representative must—
(1) Answer the notice in writing
under oath (or affirmation); and
(2) File the answer with the Social
Security Administration, at the address
specified on the notice, within the 14day time period.
(f) If the representative does not file
an answer within the 14-day time
period, he or she does not have the right
to present evidence, except as may be
provided in § 416.1565(g).
■ 17. Amend § 416.1565 by revising
paragraphs (c), (d)(1) and (2), and (g) to
read as follows:
§ 416.1565
Hearing on charges.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Time and place of hearing. The
hearing officer will mail the parties a
written notice of the hearing at their last
known addresses, at least 14 days before
the date set for the hearing. The notice
will inform the parties whether the
appearance of the parties or any
witnesses will be in person, by video
teleconferencing, or by telephone. The
notice will also include requirements
and instructions for filing motions,
requesting witnesses, and entering
exhibits.
(d) * * * (1) The hearing officer may
change the time and place for the
hearing, either on his or her own
initiative, or at the request of the
representative or the other party to the
hearing. The hearing officer will not
consider objections to the manner of
appearance of parties or witnesses,
unless the party shows good cause not
to appear in the prescribed manner.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Subject to the limitations in
paragraph (g)(2) of this section, the
hearing officer may reopen the hearing
for the receipt of additional evidence at
any time before mailing notice of the
decision.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
(g) Conduct of the hearing. (1) The
representative or the other party may
file a motion for decision on the basis
of the record prior to the hearing. The
hearing officer will give the
representative and the other party a
reasonable amount of time to submit
any evidence and to file briefs or other
written statements as to fact and law
prior to deciding the motion. If the
hearing officer concludes that there is
no genuine dispute as to any material
fact and the movant is entitled to a
decision as a matter of law, the hearing
officer may grant the motion and issue
a decision in accordance with the
provisions of § 416.1570.
(2) If the representative did not file an
answer to the charges, he or she has no
right to present evidence at the hearing.
The hearing officer may make or
recommend a decision on the basis of
the record, or permit the representative
to present a statement about the
sufficiency of the evidence or the
validity of the proceedings upon which
the suspension or disqualification, if it
occurred, would be based.
(3) The hearing officer will make the
hearing open to the representative, to
the other party, and to any persons the
hearing officer or the parties consider
necessary or proper. The hearing officer
will inquire fully into the matters being
considered, hear the testimony of
witnesses, and accept any documents
that are material.
(4) The hearing officer has the right to
decide the order in which the evidence
and the allegations will be presented
and the conduct of the hearing.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. Revise § 416.1575(b) to read as
follows:
§ 416.1575 Requesting review of the
hearing officer’s decision.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Time and place of filing request for
review. The party requesting review will
file the request for review in writing
with the Appeals Council within 14
days from the date the hearing officer
mailed the notice. The party requesting
review will certify that a copy of the
request for review and of any
documents that are submitted have been
mailed to the opposing party.
■ 19. Revise § 416.1580(a) to read as
follows:
§ 416.1580 Appeals Council’s review of
hearing officer’s decision.
(a) Upon request, the Appeals Council
will give the parties a reasonable time
to file briefs or other written statements
as to fact and law, and to request to
appear before the Appeals Council to
present oral argument. When oral
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
argument is requested within the time
designated by the Appeals Council, the
Appeals Council will grant the request
for oral argument, and determine
whether the parties will appear at the
oral argument in person, by video
teleconferencing, or by telephone. If oral
argument is not requested within the
time designated by the Appeals Council,
the Appeals Council may deny the
request.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. Revise § 416.1585 to read as
follows:
§ 416.1585
Evidence permitted on review.
(a) General. Generally, the Appeals
Council will not consider evidence in
addition to that introduced at the
hearing. However, if the Appeals
Council finds the evidence offered is
material to an issue it is considering, it
may consider that evidence as described
in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Individual charged filed an
answer. (1) When the Appeals Council
finds that additional material evidence
to the charges is available, and the
individual charged filed an answer to
the charges, the Appeals Council will
allow the party with the information to
submit the additional evidence.
(2) Before the additional evidence is
admitted into the record, the Appeals
Council will mail a notice to the parties,
informing them that evidence about
certain issues was submitted. The
Appeals Council will give each party a
reasonable opportunity to comment on
the evidence and to present other
evidence that is material to the issue it
is considering.
(3) The Appeals Council will
determine whether the additional
evidence warrants a new review by a
hearing officer or whether the Appeals
Council will consider the additional
evidence as part of its review of the
case.
(c) Individual charged did not file an
answer. If the representative did not file
an answer to the charges, the
representative may not introduce
evidence that was not considered at the
hearing.
■ 21. Amend § 416.1590 by revising
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (f)
to read as follows:
§ 416.1590
Appeals Council’s decision.
(a) The Appeals Council will base its
decision upon the evidence in the
hearing record and any other evidence
it may permit on review. The Appeals
Council will affirm the hearing officer’s
decision if the action, findings, and
conclusions are supported by
substantial evidence. If the hearing
officer’s decision is not supported by
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
substantial evidence, the Appeals
Council will either:
(1) Reverse or modify the hearing
officer’s decision; or
(2) Return the case to the hearing
officer for further proceedings.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The Appeals Council may
designate and publish certain final
decisions as precedent for other actions
brought under our representative
conduct provisions. Prior to making a
decision public, we may remove or
redact information from the decision.
■ 22. Amend § 416.1599 by:
■ a. Adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (a); and
■ b. Revising paragraphs (d)(2) and (f).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 416.1599 Reinstatement after
suspension or disqualification—period of
suspension not expired.
(a) * * * The Appeals Council will
assign and process a request for
reinstatement using the same general
procedures described in § 416.1576.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) If a person was disqualified
because he or she had been disbarred,
suspended, or removed from practice for
the reasons described in § 416.1545(d)
through (f), the Appeals Council will
grant a request for reinstatement as a
representative only if the criterion in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section is met
and the disqualified person shows that
he or she has been admitted (or
readmitted) to and is in good standing
with the court, bar, or other
governmental or professional licensing
authority from which he or she had
been disbarred, suspended, or removed
from practice.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) If the Appeals Council decides not
to grant the request, it will not consider
another request before the end of 3 years
from the date of the notice of the
previous denial.
[FR Doc. 2016–19384 Filed 8–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG–2015–1118]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Lower
Chesapeake Bay, Cape Charles, VA
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Aug 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
Notice of public meeting and
reopening of comment period.
ACTION:
The Coast Guard announces
an August 17, 2016 public meeting to
receive comments on an advance notice
of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) for
anchorage grounds that was published
in the Federal Register on April 19,
2016. As stated in the ANPRM, the
Coast Guard is considering amending
the regulations for Hampton Roads, VA,
and adjacent waters anchorages by
establishing a new anchorage, near Cape
Charles, VA, on the Lower Chesapeake
Bay. We are reopening the comment
period on the ANPRM so that comments
may be received both at the public
meeting and up to 2 weeks after the
public meeting.
DATES: A public meeting will be held on
Wednesday, August 17, 2016, from 6
p.m. to 7:30 p.m., to provide an
opportunity for oral comments. Written
comments and related material may also
be submitted to Coast Guard personnel
specified at that meeting. All comments
and related material submitted after the
meeting must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at Cape Charles Civic Center, 500
Tazewell Avenue, Cape Charles, VA
23310.
You may submit written comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2015–1118 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments and
related material must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before August 31,
2016. If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
If your material cannot be submitted
using https://www.regulations.gov,
contact the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document for alternate instructions. We
accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions concerning the
meeting or the advance proposed rule,
please call or email LCDR Barbara Wilk,
Sector Hampton Roads Waterways
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54531
Management Officer, Coast Guard;
telephone 757–668–5581, email
Barbara.wilk@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose
We published an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) in the
Federal Register on April 19, 2016 (81
FR 22939), entitled ‘‘Anchorage
Grounds; Lower Chesapeake Bay, Cape
Charles, VA.’’ In it we stated our
intention to hold public meetings, and
to publish a notice announcing the
location and date (81 FR 22940). This
document is the notice of that meeting.
In the ANPRM, we stated that the
Coast Guard is considering amending
the regulations for Hampton Roads, VA
and adjacent waters anchorages by
establishing a new anchorage, near Cape
Charles, VA on the Lower Chesapeake
Bay.
You may view the ANPRM in our
online docket, in addition to supporting
documents prepared by the Coast Guard
(Illustration Contemplated Anchorage
R), and comments submitted thus far by
going to https://www.regulations.gov.
Once there, insert ‘‘USCG–2015–1118’’
in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box and click
‘‘Search.’’
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments either orally at the meeting or
in writing. If you bring written
comments to the meeting, you may
submit them to Coast Guard personnel
specified at the meeting to receive
written comments. These comments
will be submitted to our online public
docket. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Comments submitted after the
meeting must reach the Coast Guard on
or before August 31, 2016. We
encourage you to submit comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. If your
material cannot be submitted using
https://www.regulations.gov, contact the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the March 24, 2005, issue of the
Federal Register (70 FR 15086).
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54520-54531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19384]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA-2013-0044]
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
RIN 0960-AH63
Revisions to Rules of Conduct and Standards of Responsibility for
Appointed Representatives
AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to revise our rules of conduct and standards of
responsibility for representatives. We also propose to update and
clarify procedures we use when we bring charges against a
representative for violating our rules of conduct and standards of
responsibilities for representatives. These changes are necessary to
better protect the integrity of our administrative process and further
clarify representatives' currently existing responsibilities in their
conduct with us. The changes to our rules are not meant to suggest that
any specific conduct is permissible under our existing rules; instead,
we seek to ensure that our rules of conduct and standards of
responsibility are clearer as a whole and directly address a broader
range of inappropriate conduct.
[[Page 54521]]
DATES: To ensure that your comments are considered, we must receive
them no later than October 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of three methods--
Internet, fax, or mail. Do not submit the same comments multiple times
or by more than one method. Regardless of which method you choose,
please state that your comments refer to Docket No. SSA-2013-0044 so
that we may associate your comments with the correct rule.
Caution: You should be careful to include in your comments only
information that you wish to make publicly available. We strongly urge
you not to include in your comments any personal information, such as
Social Security numbers or medical information.
1. Internet: We strongly recommend that you submit your comments
via the Internet. Please visit the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Use the Search function to find docket number
SSA-2013-0044. The system will issue a tracking number to confirm your
submission. You will not be able to view your comment immediately
because we must post each comment manually. It may take up to a week
for your comment to be viewable.
2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966-2830.
3. Mail: Mail your comments to the Office of Regulations, Social
Security Administration, 3100 West High Rise Building, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401.
Comments are available for public viewing on the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov or in person, during
regular business hours, by arranging with the contact person identified
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maren Weight, Office of Appellate
Operations, Social Security Administration, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041, (703) 605-7100. For information on eligibility or
filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213
or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security
Online, at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We may issue rules and regulations to administer the Social
Security Act (Act). 42 U.S.C. 405(a), 406(a)(1), 902(a)(5), 1010(a),
and 1383(d). We are revising our rules of conduct and standards of
responsibility for representatives and other rules about the
representation of parties in 20 CFR part 404 subpart R and part 416
subpart O.
Although the vast majority of representatives conduct business
before us ethically, and conscientiously assist their clients, these
changes are prompted by our concerns that some representatives are
using our processes in a way that undermines the integrity of our
programs. We seek to clarify that certain actions are prohibited and to
provide additional means to address representative actions that affect
the integrity of our programs and our ability to provide the best
possible service to the public.
Clarification to Qualifications for Non-Attorney Representatives
Our current regulations specify in Sec. 404.1705(b)(1) that a non-
attorney must generally be known to have a good character and
reputation to serve as a representative. In proposed Sec.
404.1705(b)(4), we specify that certain convictions will preclude a
non-attorney representative from demonstrating this requisite good
character and reputation. We have noted in our existing policy that
neither the Act nor our regulations define the terms ``good character
and reputation.'' In these rules, we propose to clarify these terms by
including a non-exclusive list of examples that show that a person
lacks good character and reputation, and which, if present, will
demonstrate to us that a non-attorney is unqualified to serve as a
representative.
New Rules of Conduct for Representatives and Clarification of Existing
Rules
We are revising our rules of conduct for representatives to clarify
their existing responsibilities under our regulations and to ensure
their compliance with procedures designed to provide fair and efficient
claim adjudication. We propose these changes to save limited
administrative resources, process claims more efficiently, and protect
the integrity of our programs.
Current Sec. 404.1740(b)(3)(i) states that competent
representation requires the ``knowledge, skill, thoroughness and
preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.'' In proposed
Sec. 404.1740(b)(3)(i), we specify that, in addition to the other
requirements already listed, competent representation also includes
reasonable and adequate familiarity with the evidence in a case, as
well as knowledge of the applicable provisions of the Act, our
regulations, and Social Security Rulings.
Consistent with regulatory changes in our 2014 final rules to
scheduling and appearing at hearings,\1\ we propose adding an
affirmative duty in Sec. 404.1740(b)(3) requiring representatives to
provide to us, on our request, a specified number of dates and times
the representative is available for a hearing. We also propose
specifying as an affirmative duty the requirement that representatives
withdraw from representation at a time and in a manner that does not
disrupt claim processing; and, in particular, not to withdraw once we
have scheduled a hearing unless the representative can show that a
withdrawal is necessary due to extraordinary circumstances, as we
determine on a case-by-case basis. We also added a paragraph in
proposed Sec. 404.1740(b)(3)(v) clarifying that a representative has
an obligation to maintain prompt and timely communication with the
claimant. This proposed new paragraph is consistent with many of the
principles found in American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rule of
Professional Conduct 1.4.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In our 2014 final rules regarding changes to scheduling and
appearing at hearings, we made changes to when a claimant may object
to appearing at a hearing by video teleconferencing, or to the time
and place of a hearing. 79 FR 39526 at 35931 (June 25, 2014).
\2\ We acknowledge the ABA model rules apply only to attorneys,
and our rules and regulations govern both attorney and non-attorney
representatives. However, the ABA model rules are a helpful
resource, as they address representation principles and practices
relevant to our programs. The principles we cite in this proposed
rule apply equally to attorney and non-attorney representatives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, for consistency with our 2015 final rules regarding
submission of evidence in disability claims, we propose adding
affirmative duties in proposed Sec. 404.1740(b)(5) requiring that a
representative, when he or she submits a medical or vocational opinion
to us, disclose in writing whether the medical or vocational opinion is
drafted, prepared, or issued by: An employee of the representative; an
individual contracting with the representative for services; or an
individual to whom the representative referred the claimant for
suggested treatment.\3\ In doing so, we clarify that
[[Page 54522]]
we do not find the behavior of referring a claimant to a medical or
vocational provider in and of itself problematic, even in the
particularly noted circumstances. By adding this requirement, we are
merely indicating that, in the noted circumstances, a representative
must disclose such a referral to us.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In our recent 2015 final rules regarding submission of
evidence, we require a claimant to inform us about or submit all
evidence that relates to whether or not he or she is blind or
disabled, with certain exceptions for information subject to the
attorney work product doctrine and communications subject to
attorney-client privilege. Consistent with these recent rules
regarding submission of evidence, the affirmative duty set forth in
proposed Sec. 404.1740(b)(5) will not require a representative to
disclose attorney work product or communication subject to the
attorney-client privilege as defined by Sec. 404.1512(b)(2). In
particular, the 2015 final rules provide that ``if you tell your
representative about the medical sources you have seen, your
representative cannot refuse to disclose the identity of those
medical sources to us based on the attorney-client privilege,'' and
``if your representative asks a medical source to complete an
opinion form related to your impairment(s), symptoms, or
limitations, your representative cannot withhold the completed
opinion form from us based on the attorney work product doctrine.''
20 CFR 404.1512(b)(2)(iv). In the course of this rulemaking, we
acknowledged that ``state bar rules generally require client
confidentiality and zealous representation,'' but we stated that we
did not believe that ``state bar rules prevent an attorney from
complying with our Federal rule, which requires a representative to
help a claimant satisfy his or her disclosure obligation,'' under
our regulations. 80 FR 14828, 14832-33 (March 20, 2015); see also
ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6(b)(6) (attorney can
reveal information relating to representation of a client ``to
comply with other law or a court order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We also propose Sec. 404.1740(b)(6) specifying that a
representative must inform the agency if a claimant used the
representative's services to commit fraud against us. This is
consistent with requirements set forth by portions of ABA Model Rule
3.3 regarding the duty of candor toward the tribunal. We acknowledge
that attorney representatives may be subject to state bar and ethics
rules, which vary from state to state. However, all states recognize a
version of the common law crime or fraud exception to privileged
communications between an attorney and client. Furthermore, even if a
state's rules conflicted with our rules, under the U.S. Constitution's
Supremacy Clause, the federal rules take precedence when the
representative is appearing in federal proceedings before us.
Therefore, our rules would preempt any conflicting state bar and ethics
rules.
In proposed Sec. 404.1740(b)(7) and (8), we add affirmative duties
that require a representative to disclose whether the representative is
or has been disbarred or suspended from any bar or court to which he or
she was previously admitted to practice. This includes instances in
which a bar or court took administrative action to disbar or suspend
the representative in lieu of disciplinary proceedings (e.g. acceptance
of voluntary resignation pending disciplinary action); and also
disclose whether the representative is or has been disqualified from
participating in or appearing before any Federal program or agency,
again including instances in which the representative was disqualified
in lieu of disciplinary proceedings. Our current regulations specify in
Sec. 404.1745(d) that such disbarments, suspensions, or
disqualifications based upon misconduct constitute grounds for
sanctions. While our current Appointment of Representative form (Form
SSA-1696) requires a representative to disclose this information, our
current policy does not require representatives to use this form, and,
in some matters, a representative may be disbarred, suspended, or
disqualified following appointment as a representative. Therefore, we
proposed these new affirmative duties setting forth ongoing disclosure
requirements. Similarly, in proposed Sec. 404.1740(b)(9), we also
require that a representative disclose to us whether he or she has been
removed or suspended from practice by a professional licensing
authority.
Current Sec. 404.1740(c)(10) addresses instances in which a
representative may be working with employees or assistants to commit
misconduct. The current rule prohibits a representative from
suggesting, assisting, or directing another person to violate our rules
or regulations. We have proposed adding an affirmative duty in proposed
Sec. 404.1740(b)(10) which requires a representative to ensure that
all of the representative's employees, assistants, partners,
contractors, or any other person assisting the representative will be
compliant with our rules of conduct and standards of responsibility. We
have also specified in proposed Sec. 404.1740(c)(14) that, within the
scope of employment, failure by a representative to properly oversee
the representative's employees, assistants, partners, contractors, or
any person assisting the representative, constitutes sanctionable
behavior. This provision applies where the representative has
managerial or supervisory authority over the individual(s) in question,
the individual's conduct would be a violation of our rules, the
representative has reason to believe that misconduct has occurred or
may occur, and, when possible, the representative fails to take
remedial action.\4\ Because many representatives associated with large
organizations rely extensively on other employees and assistants when
providing representational services to claimants, we believe that these
new rules are necessary to ensure that claimants receive competent and
effective representation and to protect the integrity of our
administrative processes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ These proposed affirmative duties and prohibited actions are
consistent with ABA Model Rule 5.1, which requires that a partner in
a law firm, or others with comparable managerial authority, make
reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in effect measures
giving reasonable assurance that all lawyers in the firm conform to
the Rules of Professional Conduct.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In proposed Sec. 404.1740(c)(1), we specify that misleading a
claimant, prospective claimant, or beneficiary regarding benefits or
other rights under the Act includes misleading the claimant,
prospective claimant, or beneficiary about that representative's
services and qualifications. Both the Act and our rules provide
claimants with a right to a representative, and, therefore, misleading
statements about the representative's services and qualifications are
material to the claimant's rights under the Act. However, we clarify
that in situations where a misleading statement about the
representative's services and qualifications adversely affects claim
processing, to the extent permitted by our other rules, we will not
disadvantage a claimant, potential claimant, or beneficiary because of
a representative's misconduct. In addition, in proposed Sec.
404.1740(c)(2), we specify that knowingly charging, collecting, or
retaining an improper fee also includes soliciting a gift or other item
of value other than what is authorized by law.
We have also proposed revising our current rules regarding
submission of false or misleading evidence. In current Sec.
404.1740(c)(3), we prohibit a representative from knowingly making,
presenting, or participating in the making or presenting of certain
false or misleading statements, assertions, or representations. In our
1998 final rules,\5\ we stated that we based this rule in part on the
criminal prohibitions in 18 U.S.C. 1001, which prohibit knowingly and
willfully making materially false statements. The intent requirement
set forth in the current rule is also consistent with ABA Model Rule
3.3(a)(1), which prohibits an attorney from knowingly making false
statements of fact or law to a tribunal. As we emphasized in connection
with the 2015 final rules on submission of evidence, the non-
adversarial nature of the disability adjudication process requires that
we maintain a high level of cooperation from claimants and, by
extension, their representatives, in order to ensure that the agency
obtains the information needed to make accurate disability
determinations.\6\ Therefore, in order to protect the integrity of our
programs, we propose strengthening our current rule to prohibit the
submission
[[Page 54523]]
of false or misleading evidence in matters where the representative has
or should have reason to believe that the evidence is false or
misleading and to prohibit any written statements, assertions, or
representations, which the representative has or should have reason to
believe are false or misleading. Likewise, in proposed Sec.
404.1740(c)(7)(ii)(B), we specify that providing misleading information
or misrepresenting facts that affect how we process a claim may also be
sanctionable where the representative has or should have reason to
believe the information or facts would mislead the agency or constitute
a misrepresentation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 63 FR 41404 at 41416 (August 4, 1998).
\6\ See 80 FR 14828 at 14831 (March 20, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our regulations currently prohibit attempts to influence the
outcome of a decision, determination, or other administrative action by
offering or granting an item of value to a presiding official, agency
employee, or witness who is or may reasonably be involved in the
decision making process, with certain exemptions. In proposed Sec.
404.1740(c)(6), we specify that in addition to the current prohibitions
on offering or granting items of value to agency employees or
witnesses, we also may sanction a representative who influences or
attempts to influence such an agency employee or presiding official by
any means prohibited by law.
Current Sec. 404.1740(c)(7)(ii) and (iii) addresses disruptive,
threatening, and obstructive behavior by representatives. In our
proposed rules, we have renumbered and proposed revisions to these
rules. Current Sec. 404.1740(c)(7)(iii) prohibits ``threatening or
intimidating language, gestures, or actions directed at a presiding
official, witness, or agency employee that result in a disruption of
the orderly presentation and reception of evidence.'' In our proposed
rules, we have eliminated the requirement that such threats or
intimidation result in a disruption of the orderly presentation and
receipt of evidence, since such threats and intimidations are
inherently prejudicial to the administrative proceedings. In proposed
Sec. 404.1740(c)(ii)(C), we add that a representative may not
communicate with an agency employee or adjudicator outside the normal
course of business or prescribed procedures in an attempt to influence
the processing or outcome of a case.
Violations of Our Requirements
Under our current rules, we may begin proceedings to suspend or
disqualify a representative when we have evidence that the
representative fails to meet our qualification requirements or has
violated our rules of conduct. We propose revising Sec. 404.1745 to
clarify that we may disqualify a non-attorney representative who has
been removed from practice or suspended by a professional licensing
authority for reasons that reflect on the person's character,
integrity, judgment, reliability, or fitness to serve as a fiduciary.
Notice of Charges Against a Representative
In Sec. 404.1750, we propose reducing the amount of time a
representative has to respond to our notice of charges from 30 days to
14 days because it will help us timely adjudicate possible
representative misconduct matters and provide efficient service to
claimants, potential claimants, recipients, and beneficiaries. This 14-
day timeframe provides the representative ample time to respond to the
charges, which usually consist of simply affirming or denying a series
of factual allegations. Additionally, there is public interest in
resolving these matters as quickly as possible because representatives
may continue to represent claimants during the time that charges are
pending. Reducing this timeframe will allow us to better protect the
public by allowing less time for a representative who is found to have
violated our rules to continue to represent claimants while charges are
pending. Furthermore, quicker processing of these cases is also of
particular interest to the person against whom we bring charges because
it results in a more timely resolution of the matter. Finally, we note
that irrespective of the reduced timeframe to respond to the charges,
the representative will still have the opportunity to defend himself or
herself before the hearing officer conducting the hearing, when a
hearing is needed.
In regards to any fairness concerns, we expect that most
individuals subject to this rule will easily be able to respond within
the proposed timeframe, as it is not uncommon for us to seek
disqualification based on a single charge involving legal or factual
issues that are not complex, such as disbarment or improper retention
of a fee. As we stated previously, charges usually consist of simply
affirming or denying a series of factual allegations. However, because
we propose reducing the standard time for a representative to respond
to our notice of charges, we also propose retaining the rule to allow a
representative to seek an extension of time for filing an answer upon a
showing of good cause. Therefore, if a person against whom we brought
charges indicates that he or she required additional time to respond,
we would consider that information in determining whether to extend the
period for filing an answer. Our current rules specify that the General
Counsel or other delegated official may extend the period for filing an
answer for good cause in accordance with Sec. 404.911.
Hearing on the Charges
We propose clarifying in Sec. 404.1765 that a hearing on the
charges may be conducted at our discretion in person, by video
teleconferencing, or by telephone. We add that we will not consider
objections to the manner of appearance unless a party shows good cause
why he or she cannot appear in the prescribed manner. We also propose
to codify our existing policy by clarifying that a hearing officer may
reopen the hearing for the receipt of additional evidence at any time
before mailing the notice of the decision, subject to our limitations
on submitting an answer to the charges. In addition, we propose
requiring a hearing officer to mail the notice of hearing to the
parties no later than 14 days prior to the hearing, rather than 20
days, so that we can conduct sanction proceedings in a timely manner.
We have also proposed to codify our existing policy regarding hearing
notices by specifying that a hearing officer will include the
requirements and instructions for filing motions, requesting witnesses,
and entering exhibits.
In addition, we propose rules clarifying the standard upon which
motions for decisions on the record may be granted. We use a similar
standard to that stated in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for
summary judgment, specifying that a hearing officer may grant a motion
for decision on the record if there is no genuine dispute as to any
material fact and the movant is entitled to a decision as a matter of
law. We have specified that before granting a motion for decision on
the record, the hearing officer must first provide both parties with
the opportunity to submit evidence and briefs. We propose this rule
because, in our experience, many cases can be decided based on the
record, and a hearing will often be unnecessary and delay any final
decision. These proposed rules are consistent with the requirements of
Section 206 of the Act, which specifies that we may suspend or
disqualify a representative ``after due notice and opportunity for
hearing.'' Our proposed rules provide for an opportunity for a hearing,
and the hearing officer may only grant a motion for decision on the
record if a party demonstrates that there is no genuine dispute as to
any material fact, such that any evidence or argument
[[Page 54524]]
presented at the hearing would not alter the outcome of the case.
Requesting Review of the Hearing Officer's Decision
We propose reducing the amount of time to request Appeals Council
review of a hearing officer's decision from 30 to 14 days in proposed
Sec. 404.1775. In our experience, representatives will often decline
to seek review of adverse sanctions decisions. However, our sanctions
decision is not final until the time to seek review has expired. During
this time, a representative may continue to represent claimants. We
believe that reducing the amount of time to seek Appeals Council review
from 30 to 14 days will enable us to better protect the claimants we
serve while providing sufficient protections for representatives in our
sanctions process. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b) provides
for a comparable 14-day period to file a notice of appeal in criminal
matters, in which significant liberty interests are at stake. In
addition, our rules provide for submission of briefs to the Appeals
Council subsequent to the filing of the request for review, allowing a
representative additional time to formulate his or her arguments on
appeal.
Clarifications to the Appeals Council Review Process
We propose clarifying in Sec. 404.1780 that in the event a party
appeals the hearing officer's decision and requests to appear at an
oral argument, the Appeals Council will determine whether the parties
will appear at a requested oral argument in person, by video
teleconferencing, or by telephone.
Furthermore, we propose revising the rules about presenting
evidence at the Appeals Council level. Based on our experience, some
individuals are confused about whether the Appeals Council will accept
additional evidence that was not submitted to the hearing officer. We
propose revising the language in Sec. 404.1785 to clarify that the
Appeals Council, at its discretion, may accept additional evidence it
finds material to the issues that existed when an individual filed an
answer to the charges. When it does so, the Appeals Council will give
the opposing party the opportunity to comment on the evidence prior to
admitting it into the record. We also added language in proposed Sec.
404.1790 stating the Appeals Council will determine whether additional
material evidence warrants remand to a hearing officer for review or
whether the Appeals Council will consider the evidence as part of its
review of the case. In addition, we propose adding clarifying language
in Sec. 404.1790 that explains the Appeals Council will affirm the
hearing officer's decision if the action, findings, and conclusions are
supported by substantial evidence. We also propose adding that the
Appeals Council may designate and publish final decisions as precedent
for other actions brought against individuals charged with violating
our rules.
Finally, we propose revising our rules in Sec. 404.1799 about when
and how a disqualified or suspended representative may seek the right
to request reinstatement. Most individuals do not request reinstatement
until they are in full compliance with our requirements. However,
individuals who seek reinstatement prematurely waste valuable agency
resources. Therefore, in addition to retaining our existing rule that a
disqualified or suspended representative must wait at least one year
from the effective date of the suspension or disqualification to
request reinstatement, we propose revising our rules to state that a
disqualified or sanctioned representative who has requested and been
denied reinstatement by the Appeals Council must wait an additional
three years before he or she can again request reinstatement. We are
proposing this change because our experience shows that when the
Appeals Council denies a request for reinstatement, the representative
requesting reinstatement has usually not taken the appropriate actions
to remedy the violation or does not understand the severity of the
violation committed. Therefore, we are proposing this change to save
valuable resources and ensure individuals take the necessary measures
before submitting the initial or successive request for reinstatement.
We also made a minor clarification in Sec. 404.1799 that the Appeals
Council uses the same procedures outlined in Sec. 404.1776 for
assigning a reviewing panel and processing a request for reinstatement
after a suspension or disqualification.
In addition to these proposed changes to 20 CFR part 404, we are
proposing changes to the rules set forth in 20 CFR part 416 to conform
to our changes in part 404.
Clarity of These Rules
Executive Order 12866 as supplemented by Executive Order 13563
requires each agency to write all rules in plain language. In addition
to your substantive comments on this NPRM, we invite your comments on
how to make rules easier to understand.
For example:
Would more, but shorter, sections be better?
Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
Have we organized the material to suit your needs?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or
diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rule easier to
understand?
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is
not clear?
Would a different format make the rule easier to
understand, e.g. grouping and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing?
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866 as Supplemented by Executive Order 13563
We consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these proposed rules do meet the criteria for a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563 and are subject to OMB review.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these proposed rules will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
affect individuals only. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These proposed rules contain reporting requirements in the
regulation sections listed below. For some sections in these rules, we
previously accounted for the public reporting burdens in the
Information Collection Requests for the various forms the public uses
to submit the information to SSA. Consequently, we are not reporting
those sections below. Further, these proposed rules contain information
collection activities at 20 CFR 404.1750 ((c), (e)(1), and (e)(2)),
404.1765(g)(1), 404.1775(b), 404.1799(d)(2), 416.1750 ((c), (e)(1), and
(e)(2)), 416.1565(g)(1), 404.1575(b), and 416.1599(d)(2). However, 44
U.S.C. 3518(c)(1)(B)(ii) exempts these activities from the OMB
clearance requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The sections below pose new public reporting burdens not covered by
an existing OMB-approved form, and we provide burden estimates for
them.
[[Page 54525]]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden Estimated
Regulation section Description of public respondents Frequency of per response annual burden
reporting requirement (annually) response (minutes) (hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404.1740(b)(5); 416.1540(b)(5).......................... Disclose in writing, at the 43,600 1 5 3,633
time a medical or vocational
opinion is submitted to us or
as soon as the representative
is aware of the submission to
us, if: The representative's
employee or any individual
contracting with the
representative drafted,
prepared, or issued the
medical or vocational
opinion; or.
The representative referred or
suggested that the claimant
seek an examination from,
treatment by, or the
assistance of the individual
providing opinion evidence.
404.1740(b)(6); 416.1540(b)(6).......................... Disclose to us in writing 50 1 5 4
immediately if the
representative discovers that
his or her services are or
were used by the claimant to
commit fraud.
404.1740(b)(7); 416.1540(b)(7).......................... Disclose to us in writing 50 1 5 4
whether the representative is
or has been disbarred or
suspended from any bar or
court to which he or she was
previously admitted to
practice.
404.1740(b)(8); 416.1540(b)(8).......................... Disclose to us in writing 10 1 5 1
whether the representative is
or has been disqualified from
participating in or appearing
before any Federal program or
agency.
404.1740(b)(9); 416.1540(b)(9).......................... Disclose to us in writing 10 1 5 1
whether the representative
has been removed from
practice or suspended by a
professional licensing
authority for reasons that
reflect on the person's
character, integrity,
judgement, reliability, or
fitness to serve as a
fiduciary.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Totals.............................................. .............................. 436,120 .............. .............. 3,643
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For those listed above, SSA submitted an Information Collection
Request for clearance to OMB. We are soliciting comments on the burden
estimate; the need for the information; its practical utility; ways to
enhance its quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to minimize the
burden on respondents, including the use of automated techniques or
other forms of information technology. If you would like to submit
comments, please send them to the following locations:
Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA, Fax
Number: 202-395-6974, Email address: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov
Social Security Administration, Attn: Reports Clearance Officer, 1333
Annex, 6401 Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235-0001, Fax Number: 410-
965-6400, Email: OR.Reports.Clearance@ssa.gov
You can submit comments until October 17, 2016, which is 60 days
after the publication of this notice. However, your comments will be
most useful if you send them to SSA by September 15, 2016, which is 30
days after publication. To receive a copy of the OMB clearance package,
contact the SSA Reports Clearance Officer using any of the above
contact methods. We prefer to receive comments by email or fax.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 96.001, Social
Security--Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security--Retirement
Insurance; 96.004, Social Security--Survivors Insurance; and 96.006,
Supplemental Security Income)
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and procedure, Blind, Disability benefits;
Old-age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Social security.
20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend 20 CFR
chapter III parts 404 and part 416 as set forth below:
PART 404--FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE
(1950- )
Subpart R--Representation of Parties
0
1. The authority citation for subpart R of part 404 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: Secs. 205(a), 206, 702(a)(5), and 1127 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(a), 406, 902(a)(5), and 1320a-6).
0
2. Revise Sec. 404.1705(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1705 Who may be your representative
* * * * *
[[Page 54526]]
(b) You may appoint any person who is not an attorney to be your
representative in dealings with us if the person--
(1) Is capable of giving valuable help to you in connection with
your claim;
(2) Is not disqualified or suspended from acting as a
representative in dealings with us;
(3) Is not prohibited by any law from acting as a representative;
and
(4) Is generally known to have a good character and reputation.
Persons lacking good character and reputation, include, but are not
limited to, persons convicted of a felony (as defined by Sec.
404.1506(c)), or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, false
statements, misrepresentation, deceit, or theft.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 404.1740 by
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(i);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (b)(3)(iii) through (v) and (b)(5) through (10);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) and (6) and (7);
0
d. Removing from the end of paragraph (c)(12) the word ``or'';
0
e. Removing from paragraph (c)(13) the final period and adding in its
place ``; or''; and
0
f. Adding paragraph (c)(14).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 404.1740 Rules of conduct and standards of responsibility for
representatives.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Conduct his or her dealings in a manner that furthers the
efficient, fair and orderly conduct of the administrative decision
making process, including duties to:
(i) Provide competent representation to a claimant. Competent
representation requires the knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and
preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. A
representative must know the significant issue(s) in a claim, have
reasonable and adequate familiarity with the evidence in the case, and
have a working knowledge of the applicable provisions of the Social
Security Act, as amended, the regulations, and Social Security Rulings.
* * * * *
(iii) When requested, provide us, in a manner we specify, potential
dates and times that the representative will be available for a
hearing. We will inform you how many potential dates and times we
require to coordinate the hearing schedule.
(iv) Only withdraw representation at a time and in a manner that
does not disrupt the processing or adjudication of a claim and provides
the claimant adequate time to find new representation, if desired. A
representative should not withdraw after a hearing is scheduled unless
the representative can show that a withdrawal is necessary due to
extraordinary circumstances, as we determine on a case-by-case basis.
(v) Maintain prompt and timely communication with the claimant,
which includes, but is not limited to, reasonably informing the
claimant of all matters concerning the representation, consulting with
the claimant on an ongoing basis during the entire representational
period, and promptly responding to a claimant's reasonable requests for
information.
* * * * *
(5) Disclose in writing, at the time a medical or vocational
opinion is submitted to us or as soon as the representative is aware of
the submission to us, if:
(i) The representative's employee or any individual contracting
with the representative drafted, prepared, or issued the medical or
vocational opinion; or
(ii) The representative referred or suggested that the claimant
seek an examination from, treatment by, or the assistance of the
individual providing opinion evidence.
(6) Disclose to us immediately if the representative discovers that
his or her services are or were used by the claimant to commit fraud
against us.
(7) Disclose to us whether the representative is or has been
disbarred or suspended from any bar or court to which he or she was
previously admitted to practice, including instances in which a bar or
court took administrative action to disbar or suspend the
representative in lieu of disciplinary proceedings (e.g. acceptance of
voluntary resignation pending disciplinary action). If the disbarment
or suspension occurs after the appointment of the representative, the
representative will immediately disclose the disbarment or suspension
to us.
(8) Disclose to us whether the representative is or has been
disqualified from participating in or appearing before any Federal
program or agency, including instances in which a Federal program or
agency took administrative action to disqualify the representative in
lieu of disciplinary proceedings (e.g. acceptance of voluntary
resignation pending disciplinary action). If the disqualification
occurs after the appointment of the representative, the representative
will immediately disclose the disqualification to us.
(9) Disclose to us whether the representative has been removed from
practice or suspended by a professional licensing authority for reasons
that reflect on the person's character, integrity, judgment,
reliability, or fitness to serve as a fiduciary. If the removal or
suspension occurs after the appointment of the representative, the
representative will immediately disclose the removal or suspension to
us.
(10) Ensure that all of the representative's employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any person assisting the representative on
claims for which the representative has been appointed, are compliant
with these rules of conduct and standards of responsibility for
representatives.
(c) * * *
(1) In any manner or by any means threaten, coerce, intimidate,
deceive, or knowingly mislead a claimant, or prospective claimant or
beneficiary, regarding benefits or other rights under the Act. This
prohibition includes misleading a claimant, or prospective claimant or
beneficiary, about the representative's services and qualifications.
(2) Knowingly charge, collect, or retain, or make any arrangement
to charge, collect, or retain, from any source, directly or indirectly,
any fee for representational services in violation of applicable law or
regulation. This prohibition includes soliciting any gift or any other
item of value, other than is what is authorized by law.
(3) Make or present, or participate in the making or presentation
of, false or misleading oral or written statements, evidence,
assertions, or representations about a material fact or law concerning
a matter within our jurisdiction, in matters where the representative
has or should have reason to believe that those statements, evidence,
assertions or representations are false or misleading.
* * * * *
(6) Attempt to influence, directly or indirectly, the outcome of a
decision, determination, or other administrative action by any means
prohibited by law, or by offering or granting a loan, gift,
entertainment, or anything of value to a presiding official, agency
employee, or witness who is or may reasonably be expected to be
involved in the administrative decision making process, except as
reimbursement for legitimately incurred expenses or lawful compensation
for the services of an expert witness retained on a non-contingency
basis to provide evidence.
[[Page 54527]]
(7) Engage in actions or behavior prejudicial to the fair and
orderly conduct of administrative proceedings, including but not
limited to:
(i) Repeated absences from or persistent tardiness at scheduled
proceedings without good cause (see Sec. 404.911(b));
(ii) Behavior that has the effect of improperly disrupting
proceedings or obstructing the adjudicative process, including but not
limited to:
(A) Directing threatening or intimidating language, gestures, or
actions at a presiding official, witness, contractor, or agency
employee;
(B) Providing misleading information or misrepresenting facts that
affect how we process a claim, including but not limited to information
relating to the claimant's work activity or the claimant's place of
residence or mailing address in matters where the representative has or
should have reason to believe that the information was misleading and
the facts would constitute a misrepresentation;
(C) Communicating with agency staff or adjudicators outside the
normal course of business or other prescribed procedures in an attempt
to inappropriately influence the processing or outcome of a claim(s);
* * * * *
(14) Fail to oversee the representative's employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any other person assisting the representative
on claims for which the representative has been appointed, when the
representative has managerial or supervisory authority over these
individuals and:
(i) The individual's conduct would be a violation of these rules of
conduct and standards of responsibility;
(ii) The representative has reason to believe that a violation of
our rules of conduct and standards of responsibility would occur; and
(iii) When possible, the representative fails to take remedial
action.
0
4. Amend Sec. 404.1745 by revising paragraphs (d) and (e) and adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1745 Violations of our requirements, rules, or standards.
* * * * *
(d) Has been, by reason of misconduct, disbarred or suspended from
any bar or court to which he or she was previously admitted to practice
(see Sec. 404.1770(a));
(e) Has been, by reason of misconduct, disqualified from
participating in or appearing before any Federal program or agency (see
Sec. 404.1770(a)); or
(f) Who is a non-attorney, has been removed from practice or
suspended by a professional licensing authority for reasons that
reflect on the person's character, integrity, judgment, reliability, or
fitness to serve as a fiduciary.
0
5. Revise Sec. 404.1750(c) through (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1750 Notice of charges against a representative.
* * * * *
(c) We will advise the representative to file an answer, within 14
days from the date of the notice, or from the date the notice was
delivered personally, stating why he or she should not be suspended or
disqualified from acting as a representative in dealings with us.
(d) The General Counsel or other delegated official may extend the
14-day period for good cause in accordance with Sec. 404.911.
(e) The representative must--
(1) Answer the notice in writing under oath (or affirmation); and
(2) File the answer with the Social Security Administration, at the
address specified on the notice, within the 14-day time period.
(f) If the representative does not file an answer within the 14-day
time period, he or she does not have the right to present evidence,
except as may be provided in Sec. 404.1765(g).
0
6. Amend Sec. 404.1765 by revising paragraphs (c), (d)(1) and (3), and
(g) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1765 Hearing on charges.
* * * * *
(c) Time and place of hearing. The hearing officer will mail the
parties a written notice of the hearing at their last known addresses,
at least 14 days before the date set for the hearing. The notice will
inform the parties whether the appearance of the parties or any
witnesses will be in person, by video teleconferencing, or by
telephone. The notice will also include requirements and instructions
for filing motions, requesting witnesses, and entering exhibits.
(d) * * * (1) The hearing officer may change the time and place for
the hearing, either on his or her own initiative, or at the request of
the representative or the other party to the hearing. The hearing
officer will not consider objections to the manner of appearance of
parties or witnesses, unless the party shows good cause not to appear
in the prescribed manner.
* * * * *
(3) Subject to the limitations in paragraph (g)(2) of this section,
the hearing officer may reopen the hearing for the receipt of
additional evidence at any time before mailing notice of the decision.
* * * * *
(g) Conduct of the hearing. (1) The representative or the other
party may file a motion for decision on the basis of the record prior
to the hearing. The hearing officer will give the representative and
the other party a reasonable amount of time to submit any evidence and
to file briefs or other written statements as to fact and law prior to
deciding the motion. If the hearing officer concludes that there is no
genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to a
decision as a matter of law, the hearing officer may grant the motion
and issue a decision in accordance with the provisions of Sec.
404.1770.
(2) If the representative did not file an answer to the charges, he
or she has no right to present evidence at the hearing. The hearing
officer may make or recommend a decision on the basis of the record, or
permit the representative to present a statement about the sufficiency
of the evidence or the validity of the proceedings upon which the
suspension or disqualification, if it occurred, would be based.
(3) The hearing officer will make the hearing open to the
representative, to the other party, and to any persons the hearing
officer or the parties consider necessary or proper. The hearing
officer will inquire fully into the matters being considered, hear the
testimony of witnesses, and accept any documents that are material.
(4) The hearing officer has the right to decide the order in which
the evidence and the allegations will be presented and the conduct of
the hearing.
* * * * *
0
7. Revise Sec. 404.1775(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1775 Requesting review of the hearing officer's decision.
* * * * *
(b) Time and place of filing request for review. The party
requesting review will file the request for review in writing with the
Appeals Council within 14 days from the date the hearing officer mailed
the notice. The party requesting review will certify that a copy of the
request for review and of any documents that are submitted have been
mailed to the opposing party.
0
8. Revise Sec. 404.1780(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1780 Appeals Council's review of hearing officer's decision.
(a) Upon request, the Appeals Council will give the parties a
reasonable time
[[Page 54528]]
to file briefs or other written statements as to fact and law, and to
request to appear before the Appeals Council to present oral argument.
When oral argument is requested within the time designated by the
Appeals Council, the Appeals Council will grant the request for oral
argument and determine whether the parties will appear at the oral
argument in person, by video teleconferencing, or by telephone. If oral
argument is not requested within the time designated by the Appeals
Council, the Appeals Council may deny the request.
* * * * *
0
9. Revise Sec. 404.1785 to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1785 Evidence permitted on review.
(a) General. Generally, the Appeals Council will not consider
evidence in addition to that introduced at the hearing. However, if the
Appeals Council finds the evidence offered is material to an issue it
is considering, it may consider that evidence as described in paragraph
(b) of this section.
(b) Individual charged filed an answer. (1) When the Appeals
Council finds that additional material evidence to the charges is
available, and the individual charged filed an answer to the charges,
the Appeals Council will allow the party with the information to submit
the additional evidence.
(2) Before the additional evidence is admitted into the record, the
Appeals Council will mail a notice to the parties, informing them that
evidence about certain issues was submitted. The Appeals Council will
give each party a reasonable opportunity to comment on the evidence and
to present other evidence that is material to the issue it is
considering.
(3) The Appeals Council will determine whether the additional
evidence warrants a new review by a hearing officer or whether the
Appeals Council will consider the additional evidence as part of its
review of the case.
(c) Individual charged did not file an answer. If the
representative did not file an answer to the charges, the
representative may not introduce evidence that was not considered at
the hearing.
0
10. Amend Sec. 404.1790 by revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1790 Appeals Council's decision.
(a) The Appeals Council will base its decision upon the evidence in
the hearing record and any other evidence it may permit on review. The
Appeals Council will affirm the hearing officer's decision if the
action, findings, and conclusions are supported by substantial
evidence. If the hearing officer's decision is not supported by
substantial evidence, the Appeals Council will either:
(1) Reverse or modify the hearing officer's decision; or
(2) Return the case to the hearing officer for further proceedings.
* * * * *
(f) The Appeals Council may designate and publish certain final
decisions as precedent for other actions brought under our
representative conduct provisions. Prior to making a decision public,
we may remove or redact information from the decision.
0
11. Amend Sec. 404.1799 by:
0
a. Adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (a); and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (d)(2) and (f).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 404.1799 Reinstatement after suspension or disqualification--
period of suspension not expired.
(a) * * * The Appeals Council will assign and process a request for
reinstatement using the same general procedures described in Sec.
404.1776.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) If a person was disqualified because he or she had been
disbarred, suspended, or removed from practice for the reasons
described in Sec. 404.1745(d) through (f), the Appeals Council will
grant a request for reinstatement as a representative only if the
criterion in paragraph (d)(1) of this section is met and the
disqualified person shows that he or she has been admitted (or
readmitted) to and is in good standing with the court, bar, or other
governmental or professional licensing authority from which he or she
had been disbarred, suspended, or removed from practice.
* * * * *
(f) If the Appeals Council decides not to grant the request, it
will not consider another request before the end of 3 years from the
date of the notice of the previous denial.
PART 416--SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND
DISABLED
Subpart O--Representation of Parties
0
12. The authority citation for subpart O of part 416 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1127 and 1631(d) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5), 1320a-6 and 1383(d)).
0
13. Revise Sec. 416.1505(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1505 Who may be your representative.
* * * * *
(b) You may appoint any person who is not an attorney to be your
representative in dealings with us if the person--
(1) Is capable of giving valuable help to you in connection with
your claim;
(2) Is not disqualified or suspended from acting as a
representative in dealings with us;
(3) Is not prohibited by any law from acting as a representative;
and
(4) Is generally known to have a good character and reputation.
Persons lacking good character and reputation, include, but are not
limited to, persons convicted of a felony (as defined by Sec.
404.1506(c)) of this chapter, or any crime involving moral turpitude,
dishonesty, false statement, misrepresentations, deceit, or theft.
* * * * *
0
14. Amend Sec. 416.1540 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(3) introductory text and (b)(3)(i);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (b)(3)(iii) through (v) and (b)(5) through (10);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (c)(1) through (3), (c)(6), and (c)(7)(i) and
(ii); and
0
d. Adding paragraph (c)(14).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 416.1540 Rules of conduct and standards of responsibility for
representatives.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Conduct his or her dealings in a manner that furthers the
efficient, fair and orderly conduct of the administrative decision
making process, including duties to:
(i) Provide competent representation to a claimant. Competent
representation requires the knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and
preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. A
representative must know the significant issue(s) in a claim, have
reasonable and adequate familiarity with the evidence in the case, and
have a working knowledge of the applicable provisions of the Social
Security Act, as amended, the regulations, and Social Security Rulings.
* * * * *
(iii) When requested, provide us, in a manner we specify, potential
dates and times that the representative will be available for a
hearing. We will inform you how many potential dates and times we
require to coordinate the hearing schedule.
[[Page 54529]]
(iv) Only withdraw representation at a time and in a manner that
does not disrupt the processing or adjudication of a claim and provides
the claimant adequate time to find new representation, if desired. A
representative should not withdraw after a hearing is scheduled unless
the representative can show that a withdrawal is necessary due to
extraordinary circumstances, as we determine on a case-by-case basis.
(v) Maintain prompt and timely communication with the claimant,
which includes, but is not limited to, reasonably informing the
claimant of all matters concerning the representation, consulting with
the claimant on an ongoing basis during the entire representational
period, and promptly responding to a claimant's reasonable requests for
information.
* * * * *
(5) Disclose in writing, at the time a medical or vocational
opinion is submitted to us or as soon as the representative is aware of
the submission to us, if:
(i) The representative's employee or any individual contracting
with the representative drafted, prepared, or issued the medical or
vocational opinion; or
(ii) The representative referred or suggested that the claimant
seek an examination from, treatment by, or the assistance of the
individual providing opinion evidence.
(6) Disclose to us immediately if the representative discovers that
his or her services are or were used by the claimant to commit fraud
against us.
(7) Disclose to us if the representative is or has been disbarred
or suspended from any bar or court to which he or she was previously
admitted to practice, including instances in which a bar or court took
administrative action to disbar or suspend the representative in lieu
of disciplinary proceedings (e.g. acceptance of voluntary resignation
pending disciplinary action). If the disbarment or suspension occurs
after the appointment of the representative, the representative will
immediately disclose the disbarment or suspension to us.
(8) Disclose to us whether the representative is or has been
disqualified from participating in or appearing before any Federal
program or agency, including instances in which a Federal program or
agency took administrative action to disqualify the representative in
lieu of disciplinary proceedings (e.g. acceptance of voluntary
resignation pending disciplinary action). If the disbarment or
suspension occurs after the appointment of the representative, the
representative will immediately disclose the disqualification to us.
(9) Disclose to us whether the representative has been removed from
practice or suspended by a professional licensing authority for reasons
that reflect on the person's character, integrity, judgment,
reliability, or fitness to serve as a fiduciary. If the removal or
suspension occurs after the appointment of the representative, the
representative will immediately disclose the removal or suspension to
us.
(10) Ensure that all of the representative's employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any person assisting the representative on
claims for which the representative has been appointed, are compliant
with these rules of conduct and standards of responsibility for
representatives.
(c) * * *
(1) In any manner or by any means threaten, coerce, intimidate,
deceive, or knowingly mislead a claimant, or prospective claimant or
beneficiary, regarding benefits or other rights under the Act. This
prohibition includes misleading a claimant, or prospective claimant or
beneficiary, about the representative's services and qualifications.
(2) Knowingly charge, collect, or retain, or make any arrangement
to charge, collect, or retain, from any source, directly or indirectly,
any fee for representational services in violation of applicable law or
regulation. This prohibition includes soliciting any gift or any other
item of value, other than is what is authorized by law.
(3) Make or present, or participate in the making or presentation
of, false or misleading oral or written statements, evidence,
assertions, or representations about a material fact or law concerning
a matter within our jurisdiction, in matters where the representative
has or should have reason to believe that those statements, evidence,
assertions or representations are false or misleading.
* * * * *
(6) Attempt to influence, directly or indirectly, the outcome of a
decision, determination, or other administrative action by any means
prohibited by law, or by offering or granting a loan, gift,
entertainment, or anything of value to a presiding official, agency
employee, or witness who is or may reasonably be expected to be
involved in the administrative decision making process, except as
reimbursement for legitimately incurred expenses or lawful compensation
for the services of an expert witness retained on a non-contingency
basis to provide evidence.
(7) * * *
(i) Repeated absences from or persistent tardiness at scheduled
proceedings without good cause (see Sec. 416.1411(b));
(ii) Behavior that has the effect of improperly disrupting
proceedings or obstructing the adjudicative process, including but not
limited to:
(A) Directing threatening or intimidating language, gestures, or
actions at a presiding official, witness, contractor, or agency
employee;
(B) Providing misleading information or misrepresenting facts that
affect how we process a claim, including but not limited to information
relating to the claimant's work activity or the claimant's place of
residence or mailing address in matters where the representative has or
should have reason to believe that the information was misleading and
the facts would constitute a misrepresentation;
(C) Communicating with agency staff or adjudicators outside the
normal course of business or other prescribed procedures in an attempt
to inappropriately influence the processing or outcome of a claim(s);
* * * * *
(14) Fail to oversee the representative's employees, assistants,
partners, contractors, or any other person assisting the representative
on claims for which the representative has been appointed, when the
representative has managerial or supervisory authority over these
individuals and:
(i) The individual's conduct would be a violation of these rules of
conduct and standards of responsibility;
(ii) The representative has reason to believe a violation of our
rules of conduct and standards of responsibility would occur; and
(iii) When possible, the representative fails to take remedial
action.
0
15. Amend Sec. 416.1545 by revising paragraphs (d) and (e) and adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1545 Violations of our requirements, rules, or standards.
* * * * *
(d) Has been, by reason of misconduct, disbarred or suspended from
any bar or court to which he or she was previously admitted to practice
(see Sec. 416.1570(a));
(e) Has been, by reason of misconduct, disqualified from
participating in or appearing before any Federal program or agency (see
Sec. 416.1570(a)); or
(f) Who is a non-attorney, has been removed from practice or
suspended by a professional licensing authority for reasons that
reflect on the person's
[[Page 54530]]
character, integrity, judgment, reliability, or fitness to serve as a
fiduciary.
0
16. Revise Sec. 416.1550(c) through (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1550 Notice of charges against a representative.
* * * * *
(c) We will advise the representative to file an answer, within 14
days from the date of the notice, or from the date the notice was
delivered personally, stating why he or she should not be suspended or
disqualified from acting as a representative in dealings with us.
(d) The General Counsel or other delegated official may extend the
14-day period for good cause in accordance with Sec. 416.1411.
(e) The representative must--
(1) Answer the notice in writing under oath (or affirmation); and
(2) File the answer with the Social Security Administration, at the
address specified on the notice, within the 14-day time period.
(f) If the representative does not file an answer within the 14-day
time period, he or she does not have the right to present evidence,
except as may be provided in Sec. 416.1565(g).
0
17. Amend Sec. 416.1565 by revising paragraphs (c), (d)(1) and (2),
and (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1565 Hearing on charges.
* * * * *
(c) Time and place of hearing. The hearing officer will mail the
parties a written notice of the hearing at their last known addresses,
at least 14 days before the date set for the hearing. The notice will
inform the parties whether the appearance of the parties or any
witnesses will be in person, by video teleconferencing, or by
telephone. The notice will also include requirements and instructions
for filing motions, requesting witnesses, and entering exhibits.
(d) * * * (1) The hearing officer may change the time and place for
the hearing, either on his or her own initiative, or at the request of
the representative or the other party to the hearing. The hearing
officer will not consider objections to the manner of appearance of
parties or witnesses, unless the party shows good cause not to appear
in the prescribed manner.
* * * * *
(3) Subject to the limitations in paragraph (g)(2) of this section,
the hearing officer may reopen the hearing for the receipt of
additional evidence at any time before mailing notice of the decision.
* * * * *
(g) Conduct of the hearing. (1) The representative or the other
party may file a motion for decision on the basis of the record prior
to the hearing. The hearing officer will give the representative and
the other party a reasonable amount of time to submit any evidence and
to file briefs or other written statements as to fact and law prior to
deciding the motion. If the hearing officer concludes that there is no
genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to a
decision as a matter of law, the hearing officer may grant the motion
and issue a decision in accordance with the provisions of Sec.
416.1570.
(2) If the representative did not file an answer to the charges, he
or she has no right to present evidence at the hearing. The hearing
officer may make or recommend a decision on the basis of the record, or
permit the representative to present a statement about the sufficiency
of the evidence or the validity of the proceedings upon which the
suspension or disqualification, if it occurred, would be based.
(3) The hearing officer will make the hearing open to the
representative, to the other party, and to any persons the hearing
officer or the parties consider necessary or proper. The hearing
officer will inquire fully into the matters being considered, hear the
testimony of witnesses, and accept any documents that are material.
(4) The hearing officer has the right to decide the order in which
the evidence and the allegations will be presented and the conduct of
the hearing.
* * * * *
0
18. Revise Sec. 416.1575(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1575 Requesting review of the hearing officer's decision.
* * * * *
(b) Time and place of filing request for review. The party
requesting review will file the request for review in writing with the
Appeals Council within 14 days from the date the hearing officer mailed
the notice. The party requesting review will certify that a copy of the
request for review and of any documents that are submitted have been
mailed to the opposing party.
0
19. Revise Sec. 416.1580(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1580 Appeals Council's review of hearing officer's decision.
(a) Upon request, the Appeals Council will give the parties a
reasonable time to file briefs or other written statements as to fact
and law, and to request to appear before the Appeals Council to present
oral argument. When oral argument is requested within the time
designated by the Appeals Council, the Appeals Council will grant the
request for oral argument, and determine whether the parties will
appear at the oral argument in person, by video teleconferencing, or by
telephone. If oral argument is not requested within the time designated
by the Appeals Council, the Appeals Council may deny the request.
* * * * *
0
20. Revise Sec. 416.1585 to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1585 Evidence permitted on review.
(a) General. Generally, the Appeals Council will not consider
evidence in addition to that introduced at the hearing. However, if the
Appeals Council finds the evidence offered is material to an issue it
is considering, it may consider that evidence as described in paragraph
(b) of this section.
(b) Individual charged filed an answer. (1) When the Appeals
Council finds that additional material evidence to the charges is
available, and the individual charged filed an answer to the charges,
the Appeals Council will allow the party with the information to submit
the additional evidence.
(2) Before the additional evidence is admitted into the record, the
Appeals Council will mail a notice to the parties, informing them that
evidence about certain issues was submitted. The Appeals Council will
give each party a reasonable opportunity to comment on the evidence and
to present other evidence that is material to the issue it is
considering.
(3) The Appeals Council will determine whether the additional
evidence warrants a new review by a hearing officer or whether the
Appeals Council will consider the additional evidence as part of its
review of the case.
(c) Individual charged did not file an answer. If the
representative did not file an answer to the charges, the
representative may not introduce evidence that was not considered at
the hearing.
0
21. Amend Sec. 416.1590 by revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1590 Appeals Council's decision.
(a) The Appeals Council will base its decision upon the evidence in
the hearing record and any other evidence it may permit on review. The
Appeals Council will affirm the hearing officer's decision if the
action, findings, and conclusions are supported by substantial
evidence. If the hearing officer's decision is not supported by
[[Page 54531]]
substantial evidence, the Appeals Council will either:
(1) Reverse or modify the hearing officer's decision; or
(2) Return the case to the hearing officer for further proceedings.
* * * * *
(f) The Appeals Council may designate and publish certain final
decisions as precedent for other actions brought under our
representative conduct provisions. Prior to making a decision public,
we may remove or redact information from the decision.
0
22. Amend Sec. 416.1599 by:
0
a. Adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (a); and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (d)(2) and (f).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 416.1599 Reinstatement after suspension or disqualification--
period of suspension not expired.
(a) * * * The Appeals Council will assign and process a request for
reinstatement using the same general procedures described in Sec.
416.1576.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) If a person was disqualified because he or she had been
disbarred, suspended, or removed from practice for the reasons
described in Sec. 416.1545(d) through (f), the Appeals Council will
grant a request for reinstatement as a representative only if the
criterion in paragraph (d)(1) of this section is met and the
disqualified person shows that he or she has been admitted (or
readmitted) to and is in good standing with the court, bar, or other
governmental or professional licensing authority from which he or she
had been disbarred, suspended, or removed from practice.
* * * * *
(f) If the Appeals Council decides not to grant the request, it
will not consider another request before the end of 3 years from the
date of the notice of the previous denial.
[FR Doc. 2016-19384 Filed 8-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P