Dietary Supplements: New Dietary Ingredient Notifications and Related Issues; Revised Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability, 53486-53489 [2016-19306]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
53486
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
business purposes. Staff believes that
the above requirements necessitate
ongoing, regular training so that covered
entities stay current and have a clear
understanding of federal mandates, but
that this would be a small portion of
and subsumed within the ordinary
training that employees receive apart
from that associated with the
information collected under the HSR
Rules and the corresponding
Notification and Report Form.
Request for Comment: Pursuant to
Section 3506(c)(2)(A), the FTC invites
comments on: (1) Whether the
disclosure requirements are necessary,
including whether the information will
be practically useful; (2) the accuracy of
our burden estimates, including
whether the methodology and
assumptions used are valid; (3) how to
improve the quality, utility, and clarity
of the disclosure requirements; and (4)
how to minimize the burden of
providing the required information to
consumers.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before October 11, 2016. Write ‘‘HSR
PRA Clearance Extension, P169300’’ on
your comment. Your comment—
including your name and your state—
will be placed on the public record of
this proceeding, including to the extent
practicable, on the public Commission
Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of
discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals’ home contact
information from comments before
placing them on the Commission Web
site.
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive personal
information, like anyone’s Social
Security number, date of birth, driver’s
license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, do not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is . . .
privileged or confidential’’ as provided
in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns devices,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
If you want the Commission to give
your comment confidential treatment,
you must file it in paper form, with a
request for confidential treatment, and
you have to follow the procedure
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c).3 Your
comment will be kept confidential only
if the FTC General Counsel grants your
request in accordance with the law and
the public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at your
comment and file your comment online
at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/
ftc/hsrrulespra by following the
instructions on the web-based form.
When this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘HSR PRA Clearance Extension,
P169300’’ on your comment and on the
envelope, mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
CC–5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex J),
Washington, DC 20024. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
The FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before October 11, 2016. For
information on the Commission’s
privacy policy, including routine uses
permitted by the Privacy Act, see https://
www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
David C. Shonka,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016–19230 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
3 In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must
include the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record. See
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–D–0376]
Dietary Supplements: New Dietary
Ingredient Notifications and Related
Issues; Revised Draft Guidance for
Industry; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
announcing the issuance of a revised
draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Dietary Supplements: New Dietary
Ingredient Notifications and Related
Issues.’’ The revised draft guidance
supersedes FDA’s July 2011 draft
guidance on the same topic. The revised
draft guidance, when finalized, will
help industry in evaluating whether to
submit a premarket safety notification
for a new dietary ingredient (NDI), or for
a dietary supplement containing an NDI,
and in preparing such premarket safety
notifications (also referred to as NDI
notifications).
SUMMARY:
Although you may comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that FDA
considers your comment on the draft
guidance before we begin work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by October 11,
2016.
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments
as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2011–D–0376 for ‘‘Dietary Supplements:
New Dietary Ingredient Notifications
and Related Issues; Revised Draft
Guidance for Industry.’’ Received
comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single
copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Dietary Supplement
Programs, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–810), Food and
Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Drive, College Park, MD 20740. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ali
Abdel-Rahman, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–810), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–
1853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
We are announcing the availability of
a revised draft guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Dietary Supplements: New
Dietary Ingredient Notifications and
Related Issues.’’ This draft guidance
supersedes the July 2011 draft guidance
on this topic (76 FR 39111; July 5, 2011)
and is being issued consistent with our
good guidance practices regulation (21
CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent our current
thinking on this topic. It will not create
or confer any rights for or on any person
and will not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be
used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
On October 25, 1994, the Dietary
Supplement Health and Education Act
of 1994 (DSHEA) (Pub. L. 103–417) was
signed into law. DSHEA amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the FD&C Act) by adding, among other
provisions: (1) Section 201(ff) (21 U.S.C.
321(ff)), which defines the term ‘‘dietary
supplement’’ and (2) section 413 (21
U.S.C. 350b), which describes
requirements for NDIs. Among other
things, section 413 of the FD&C Act
requires the manufacturer or distributor
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53487
of an NDI, or of a dietary supplement
containing the NDI, to submit a
premarket notification to FDA (as
delegate for the Secretary of Health and
Human Services) at least 75 days before
introducing the NDI or dietary
supplement into interstate commerce,
unless the NDI and any other
ingredients in the dietary supplement
have been present in the food supply as
an article used for food in a form in
which the food has not been chemically
altered (21 U.S.C. 350b(a)(1)). The
notification must contain the
information, including any citation to
published articles, which is the
manufacturer or distributor’s basis for
concluding that a dietary supplement
containing the NDI will reasonably be
expected to be safe.
This draft guidance has several
purposes. First, it is intended to help
dietary supplement manufacturers and
distributors decide whether to submit
an NDI notification. In addition, the
draft guidance is intended to provide
recommendations on how to conduct a
safety assessment for an NDI
notification and what to include in the
notification. In question and answer
form, the draft guidance presents FDA’s
views on what qualifies as an NDI;
when an NDI notification is required;
the procedures for submitting an NDI
notification; the types of data and
information that manufacturers and
distributors should consider when
evaluating the safety of a dietary
supplement containing an NDI; and
what should be included in an NDI
notification. In addition, the draft
guidance contains questions and
answers about parts of the dietary
supplement definition (section 201(ff) of
the FD&C Act) that can affect whether
a particular substance may be marketed
as a dietary ingredient in a dietary
supplement.
We issued the original version of this
draft guidance in the Federal Register of
July 5, 2011 (the 2011 draft guidance).
We gave interested parties an
opportunity to submit comments by
October 3, 2011. In the Federal Register
of September 9, 2011 (76 FR 55927), we
extended the comment period to
December 2, 2011. We received
numerous comments on the 2011 draft
guidance.
Based on those comments and on
meetings with industry and other
stakeholders, we realized that the 2011
draft guidance contained gaps and
unclear statements that were subject to
confusion and misinterpretation.
Therefore, we decided to clarify and
better explain our thinking on some
critical issues, in addition to explaining
their public health significance, and to
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
53488
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
request additional comments on these
issues before publishing a final
guidance. We have revised certain
questions and answers and added a
number of new questions and answers.
The major topics on which we have
revised or added questions and answers
are as follows:
• Chemical alteration—Dietary
supplements containing an NDI are
exempt from the notification
requirement when they contain only
dietary ingredients that have been
present in the food supply as an article
used for food in a form in which the
food has not been chemically altered.
Section IV.B of the revised draft
guidance explains FDA’s interpretation
of ‘‘present in the food supply as an
article used for food’’ and the public
health basis for that interpretation. In
addition, section IV.B has been revised
to address the question of what
constitutes ‘‘chemical alteration’’ more
fully and to explain FDA’s reasoning on
this issue, as well as discussing
additional examples of when chemical
alteration occurs and when it does not.
Because no guidance document can
cover every possible manufacturing
scenario, the draft guidance encourages
industry to consult with FDA in
advance on such matters.
• Manufacturing changes that create
an NDI—A related issue addressed in
section IV.A of the draft guidance is
when a manufacturing change alters the
structure or properties of an ingredient
and creates an NDI for which a
notification must be submitted. The
revised draft guidance provides
examples of manufacturing changes that
alter the identity of the ingredient, the
key factor in determining whether they
also change the regulatory status of the
ingredient.
• Synthetic substances—Section IV.D
of the revised draft guidance contains an
expanded discussion clarifying FDA’s
views on when synthetic copies of
botanical and other dietary ingredients
qualify as dietary ingredients under the
FD&C Act. FDA’s thinking is based on
the text of section 201(ff)(1) of the FD&C
Act, which defines some types of
dietary ingredients by identity and
others by function.
• New dietary ingredient definition
and list of ‘‘grandfathered’’ dietary
ingredients—In section IV.A of the draft
guidance, we revised our response to
the question about whether there is an
authoritative list of dietary ingredients
marketed before October 15, 1994 (a socalled ‘‘grandfathered list’’ or ‘‘old
dietary ingredient list’’). Dietary
ingredients marketed before that date
are not NDIs and therefore are not
subject to the premarket notification
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
requirement in section 413 of the FD&C
Act. Although there is currently no
authoritative list of ‘‘grandfathered’’
ingredients, the revised answer notes
that FDA is prepared to compile such a
list based on independent and verifiable
data to be submitted by industry. The
revised answer also discusses FDA’s
thinking on the regulatory status of
dietary ingredients that would be on
such a list, as well as the status of
dietary ingredients not on such a list.
We also revised several questions and
answers in section IV.A to clarify
various matters regarding FDA’s
interpretation of the terms ‘‘marketed’’
and ‘‘dietary ingredient’’ in section
413(d) of the FD&C Act, which defines
an NDI as a dietary ingredient that was
not marketed in the United States before
October 15, 1994, and we added more
examples of documentation that can be
used to show that a dietary ingredient
was marketed prior to October 15, 1994.
• Structuring notifications efficiently
and relying on data from prior
notifications and master files—We
added several questions and answers in
section IV.C of this draft guidance to
suggest ways manufacturers and
distributors can reduce the number of
NDI notifications they must file and to
clarify when data and information from
a previous notification or ‘‘master file’’
may be used in a notification. For
example, the answer to a new question
clarifies that firms may submit an NDI
notification that covers the use of the
NDI in multiple dietary supplements
and includes safety data for a range of
doses and/or differing conditions of use.
This answer also explains that a firm
may submit a confidential ‘‘master file’’
containing specifications,
manufacturing procedures, and other
identity information for an NDI, and
may incorporate information from the
master file into its own NDI notification
or may authorize another firm to rely on
information from the master file in a
notification for a dietary supplement
containing the NDI. We also added a
question and answer to describe when
a firm may rely on data in another
notification. In addition, section IV.C
now includes a question and answer
with six examples distinguishing
situations in which separate
notifications are required for different
dietary supplements containing the
same NDI from situations in which a
single NDI notification covers multiple
dietary supplements containing the
same NDI. Finally, section IV.C now
clarifies that, although a combination of
NDIs is itself an NDI, a combination of
grandfathered dietary ingredients is not,
even if that combination has not been
used in a dietary supplement before.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Identity information to include in
an NDI notification—We revised several
questions and answers in section VI.A
in consideration of comments regarding
chemical and botanical information
necessary to determine the identity of
an NDI. We also added a new question
and answer with recommendations
about what chemistry information
should be included in a notification for
an enzyme NDI. In addition, since some
of the standard references on
nomenclature of plants and
microorganisms have been renamed or
updated since the 2011 draft guidance,
we updated the citations to refer to the
most recent edition.
• Electronic submission—We updated
the question and answer in section V.A
about electronic submission of NDI
notifications. The updated answer states
that we are accepting NDI notifications
electronically and provides the Internet
address for the electronic submission
gateway. As before, the answer notes
that firms still have the option to submit
paper notifications to FDA using the
procedure described in 21 CFR 190.6.
• PDF form for NDI notifications
submitted on paper—Because our
electronic submission gateway for NDI
notifications is now available, we have
decided not to provide a competing
form for paper notifications. Therefore,
we have removed ‘‘Appendix B: 75-Day
Pre-Market New Dietary Ingredient
Notification Form’’ from the draft
guidance.
• Safety information to include in an
NDI notification—We revised several
questions and answers in sections VI.B
and VI.C to clarify our thinking on
compiling and evaluating scientific
evidence about the safety of NDIs and
dietary supplements that contain NDIs.
In section VI.B, we clarified our
thinking on the use of foreign history of
use data. We also added a
recommendation to consult ‘‘Principles
and Methods for the Risk Assessment of
Chemicals in Food,’’ a joint publication
of the World Health Organization and
the Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations, as a useful source
of information on conducting human
clinical studies for NDIs and dietary
supplements. In response to comments,
we removed all references to FDA’s
‘‘Redbook’’ guidance, which contains
recommendations on toxicity studies
and other scientific evidence needed to
determine the safety of food additives.
We also revised section VI.B to explain
that the NDI safety standard is different
from the standards for other FDAregulated products and clarify that
evidence for an NDI safety evaluation
should be compiled to meet that
standard. Although the revised draft
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
guidance no longer cites the Redbook,
we continue to recommend the use of
the dietary exposure assessment
methodology and some toxicology tests
that are also used for the evaluation of
food additives because these are
standard scientific methods not specific
to any particular safety assessment
paradigm. Finally, we added a new
question at the end of section VI.C to
emphasize that this draft guidance
contains recommendations about safety
information to include in an NDI
notification, but these recommendations
are not requirements.
• Other changes—We made clarifying
changes, explanatory changes, and
editorial changes throughout the
document. We also updated references
and links and added new references
where appropriate.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), Federal agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
This draft guidance contains proposed
collections of information. ‘‘Collection
of information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C.
3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and
includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies
to publish a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register soliciting public
comment on each proposed collection of
information before submitting the
collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we
intend to publish a 60-day notice on the
proposed collections of information in
this draft guidance in a future issue of
the Federal Register.
This draft guidance also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
These collections of information are
subject to review by OMB under the
PRA. The collections of information in
21 CFR part 111 have been approved
under OMB control number 0901–0606,
and the collections of information in
§ 190.6 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0330.
III. Other Issues for Consideration
Although FDA welcomes comments
on any aspect of this draft guidance, we
particularly invite comment on the
following:
• What processes alter the identity of
an ingredient marketed prior to October
15, 1994, and thus create an NDI? We
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
are especially interested in
recommendations for clearer examples
or criteria to differentiate changes in
manufacturing methods and starting
materials that alter the identity of the
ingredient from changes that do not.
• What processes ‘‘chemically alter’’
an ingredient within the meaning of
section 413(a)(1) of the FD&C Act, and
why? Conversely, what processes do not
cause chemical alteration, and why? Are
there certain processes, such as
tinctures, that sometimes result in
chemical alteration and sometimes do
not? What criteria should be used to
evaluate whether an ingredient has been
chemically altered? We are especially
interested in receiving scientific
information that shows whether a
particular process actually results in
chemical alteration.
• What method of compiling
independent and verifiable data on the
marketing of dietary ingredients before
October 15, 1994, would be most
effective? How should an authoritative
list of ‘‘grandfathered’’ ingredients
based on such data be developed and
implemented?
As FDA considers the development of
final guidance, we will review
comments received on this revised
version, as well as comments on the
2011 draft guidance that are still
relevant.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the guidance at either https://
www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or https://
www.regulations.gov. Use the FDA Web
site listed in the previous sentence to
find the most current version of the
draft guidance.
V. References
The following references are on
display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) and are
available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday; they are also
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. FDA has verified
the Web site addresses, as of the date
this document publishes in the Federal
Register, but Web sites are subject to
change over time.
1. International Programme on Chemical
Safety, ‘‘Principles and Methods for the
Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food,’’
Environmental Health Criteria 240
(2009), available at: https://www.who.int/
foodsafety/publications/chemical-food/
en/.
2. The official name of the Redbook is
‘‘Guidance for Industry and Other
Stakeholders: Toxicological Principles
for the Safety Assessment of Food
Ingredients,’’ available at: https://www.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53489
fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/
GuidanceDocumentsRegulatory
Information/IngredientsAdditivesGRAS
Packaging/ucm2006826.htm.
Dated: August 9, 2016.
Jeremy Sharp,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning,
Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2016–19306 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Public Comment
Request; Health Center Program
Application Forms
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with Section
3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Health
Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA) has submitted an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. Comments
submitted during the first public review
of this ICR will be provided to OMB.
OMB will accept further comments from
the public during the review and
approval period.
DATES: Comments on this ICR should be
received no later than September 12,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
including the ICR Title, to the desk
officer for HRSA, either by email to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request a copy of the clearance requests
submitted to OMB for review, email the
HRSA Information Collection Clearance
Officer at paperwork@hrsa.gov or call
(301) 443–1984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Collection Request Title:
Health Center Program Application
Forms OMB No. 0915–0285—Revision.
Abstract: Health centers (those
entities funded under Public Health
Service Act section 330 and Health
Center Program look-alikes) deliver
comprehensive, high quality, costeffective primary health care to patients
regardless of their ability to pay. Health
centers are an essential primary care
provider for America’s most vulnerable
populations. Health centers provide
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53486-53489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19306]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-D-0376]
Dietary Supplements: New Dietary Ingredient Notifications and
Related Issues; Revised Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the
issuance of a revised draft guidance for industry entitled ``Dietary
Supplements: New Dietary Ingredient Notifications and Related Issues.''
The revised draft guidance supersedes FDA's July 2011 draft guidance on
the same topic. The revised draft guidance, when finalized, will help
industry in evaluating whether to submit a premarket safety
notification for a new dietary ingredient (NDI), or for a dietary
supplement containing an NDI, and in preparing such premarket safety
notifications (also referred to as NDI notifications).
DATES: Although you may comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that FDA considers your comment on the draft
guidance before we begin work on the final version of the guidance,
submit either electronic or written comments on the draft guidance by
October 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 53487]]
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2011-D-0376 for ``Dietary Supplements: New Dietary Ingredient
Notifications and Related Issues; Revised Draft Guidance for
Industry.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except
for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Division of Dietary Supplement Programs, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS-810), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Drive, College Park, MD 20740. Send one self-addressed adhesive label
to assist that office in processing your requests. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft
guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ali Abdel-Rahman, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-810), Food and Drug Administration,
5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
We are announcing the availability of a revised draft guidance for
industry entitled ``Dietary Supplements: New Dietary Ingredient
Notifications and Related Issues.'' This draft guidance supersedes the
July 2011 draft guidance on this topic (76 FR 39111; July 5, 2011) and
is being issued consistent with our good guidance practices regulation
(21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when finalized, will represent our
current thinking on this topic. It will not create or confer any rights
for or on any person and will not operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
On October 25, 1994, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education
Act of 1994 (DSHEA) (Pub. L. 103-417) was signed into law. DSHEA
amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) by
adding, among other provisions: (1) Section 201(ff) (21 U.S.C.
321(ff)), which defines the term ``dietary supplement'' and (2) section
413 (21 U.S.C. 350b), which describes requirements for NDIs. Among
other things, section 413 of the FD&C Act requires the manufacturer or
distributor of an NDI, or of a dietary supplement containing the NDI,
to submit a premarket notification to FDA (as delegate for the
Secretary of Health and Human Services) at least 75 days before
introducing the NDI or dietary supplement into interstate commerce,
unless the NDI and any other ingredients in the dietary supplement have
been present in the food supply as an article used for food in a form
in which the food has not been chemically altered (21 U.S.C.
350b(a)(1)). The notification must contain the information, including
any citation to published articles, which is the manufacturer or
distributor's basis for concluding that a dietary supplement containing
the NDI will reasonably be expected to be safe.
This draft guidance has several purposes. First, it is intended to
help dietary supplement manufacturers and distributors decide whether
to submit an NDI notification. In addition, the draft guidance is
intended to provide recommendations on how to conduct a safety
assessment for an NDI notification and what to include in the
notification. In question and answer form, the draft guidance presents
FDA's views on what qualifies as an NDI; when an NDI notification is
required; the procedures for submitting an NDI notification; the types
of data and information that manufacturers and distributors should
consider when evaluating the safety of a dietary supplement containing
an NDI; and what should be included in an NDI notification. In
addition, the draft guidance contains questions and answers about parts
of the dietary supplement definition (section 201(ff) of the FD&C Act)
that can affect whether a particular substance may be marketed as a
dietary ingredient in a dietary supplement.
We issued the original version of this draft guidance in the
Federal Register of July 5, 2011 (the 2011 draft guidance). We gave
interested parties an opportunity to submit comments by October 3,
2011. In the Federal Register of September 9, 2011 (76 FR 55927), we
extended the comment period to December 2, 2011. We received numerous
comments on the 2011 draft guidance.
Based on those comments and on meetings with industry and other
stakeholders, we realized that the 2011 draft guidance contained gaps
and unclear statements that were subject to confusion and
misinterpretation. Therefore, we decided to clarify and better explain
our thinking on some critical issues, in addition to explaining their
public health significance, and to
[[Page 53488]]
request additional comments on these issues before publishing a final
guidance. We have revised certain questions and answers and added a
number of new questions and answers.
The major topics on which we have revised or added questions and
answers are as follows:
Chemical alteration--Dietary supplements containing an NDI
are exempt from the notification requirement when they contain only
dietary ingredients that have been present in the food supply as an
article used for food in a form in which the food has not been
chemically altered. Section IV.B of the revised draft guidance explains
FDA's interpretation of ``present in the food supply as an article used
for food'' and the public health basis for that interpretation. In
addition, section IV.B has been revised to address the question of what
constitutes ``chemical alteration'' more fully and to explain FDA's
reasoning on this issue, as well as discussing additional examples of
when chemical alteration occurs and when it does not. Because no
guidance document can cover every possible manufacturing scenario, the
draft guidance encourages industry to consult with FDA in advance on
such matters.
Manufacturing changes that create an NDI--A related issue
addressed in section IV.A of the draft guidance is when a manufacturing
change alters the structure or properties of an ingredient and creates
an NDI for which a notification must be submitted. The revised draft
guidance provides examples of manufacturing changes that alter the
identity of the ingredient, the key factor in determining whether they
also change the regulatory status of the ingredient.
Synthetic substances--Section IV.D of the revised draft
guidance contains an expanded discussion clarifying FDA's views on when
synthetic copies of botanical and other dietary ingredients qualify as
dietary ingredients under the FD&C Act. FDA's thinking is based on the
text of section 201(ff)(1) of the FD&C Act, which defines some types of
dietary ingredients by identity and others by function.
New dietary ingredient definition and list of
``grandfathered'' dietary ingredients--In section IV.A of the draft
guidance, we revised our response to the question about whether there
is an authoritative list of dietary ingredients marketed before October
15, 1994 (a so-called ``grandfathered list'' or ``old dietary
ingredient list''). Dietary ingredients marketed before that date are
not NDIs and therefore are not subject to the premarket notification
requirement in section 413 of the FD&C Act. Although there is currently
no authoritative list of ``grandfathered'' ingredients, the revised
answer notes that FDA is prepared to compile such a list based on
independent and verifiable data to be submitted by industry. The
revised answer also discusses FDA's thinking on the regulatory status
of dietary ingredients that would be on such a list, as well as the
status of dietary ingredients not on such a list.
We also revised several questions and answers in section IV.A to
clarify various matters regarding FDA's interpretation of the terms
``marketed'' and ``dietary ingredient'' in section 413(d) of the FD&C
Act, which defines an NDI as a dietary ingredient that was not marketed
in the United States before October 15, 1994, and we added more
examples of documentation that can be used to show that a dietary
ingredient was marketed prior to October 15, 1994.
Structuring notifications efficiently and relying on data
from prior notifications and master files--We added several questions
and answers in section IV.C of this draft guidance to suggest ways
manufacturers and distributors can reduce the number of NDI
notifications they must file and to clarify when data and information
from a previous notification or ``master file'' may be used in a
notification. For example, the answer to a new question clarifies that
firms may submit an NDI notification that covers the use of the NDI in
multiple dietary supplements and includes safety data for a range of
doses and/or differing conditions of use. This answer also explains
that a firm may submit a confidential ``master file'' containing
specifications, manufacturing procedures, and other identity
information for an NDI, and may incorporate information from the master
file into its own NDI notification or may authorize another firm to
rely on information from the master file in a notification for a
dietary supplement containing the NDI. We also added a question and
answer to describe when a firm may rely on data in another
notification. In addition, section IV.C now includes a question and
answer with six examples distinguishing situations in which separate
notifications are required for different dietary supplements containing
the same NDI from situations in which a single NDI notification covers
multiple dietary supplements containing the same NDI. Finally, section
IV.C now clarifies that, although a combination of NDIs is itself an
NDI, a combination of grandfathered dietary ingredients is not, even if
that combination has not been used in a dietary supplement before.
Identity information to include in an NDI notification--We
revised several questions and answers in section VI.A in consideration
of comments regarding chemical and botanical information necessary to
determine the identity of an NDI. We also added a new question and
answer with recommendations about what chemistry information should be
included in a notification for an enzyme NDI. In addition, since some
of the standard references on nomenclature of plants and microorganisms
have been renamed or updated since the 2011 draft guidance, we updated
the citations to refer to the most recent edition.
Electronic submission--We updated the question and answer
in section V.A about electronic submission of NDI notifications. The
updated answer states that we are accepting NDI notifications
electronically and provides the Internet address for the electronic
submission gateway. As before, the answer notes that firms still have
the option to submit paper notifications to FDA using the procedure
described in 21 CFR 190.6.
PDF form for NDI notifications submitted on paper--Because
our electronic submission gateway for NDI notifications is now
available, we have decided not to provide a competing form for paper
notifications. Therefore, we have removed ``Appendix B: 75-Day Pre-
Market New Dietary Ingredient Notification Form'' from the draft
guidance.
Safety information to include in an NDI notification--We
revised several questions and answers in sections VI.B and VI.C to
clarify our thinking on compiling and evaluating scientific evidence
about the safety of NDIs and dietary supplements that contain NDIs. In
section VI.B, we clarified our thinking on the use of foreign history
of use data. We also added a recommendation to consult ``Principles and
Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food,'' a joint
publication of the World Health Organization and the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, as a useful source of
information on conducting human clinical studies for NDIs and dietary
supplements. In response to comments, we removed all references to
FDA's ``Redbook'' guidance, which contains recommendations on toxicity
studies and other scientific evidence needed to determine the safety of
food additives. We also revised section VI.B to explain that the NDI
safety standard is different from the standards for other FDA-regulated
products and clarify that evidence for an NDI safety evaluation should
be compiled to meet that standard. Although the revised draft
[[Page 53489]]
guidance no longer cites the Redbook, we continue to recommend the use
of the dietary exposure assessment methodology and some toxicology
tests that are also used for the evaluation of food additives because
these are standard scientific methods not specific to any particular
safety assessment paradigm. Finally, we added a new question at the end
of section VI.C to emphasize that this draft guidance contains
recommendations about safety information to include in an NDI
notification, but these recommendations are not requirements.
Other changes--We made clarifying changes, explanatory
changes, and editorial changes throughout the document. We also updated
references and links and added new references where appropriate.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they
conduct or sponsor. This draft guidance contains proposed collections
of information. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C.
3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies to publish a
60-day notice in the Federal Register soliciting public comment on each
proposed collection of information before submitting the collection to
OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, we intend to publish
a 60-day notice on the proposed collections of information in this
draft guidance in a future issue of the Federal Register.
This draft guidance also refers to previously approved collections
of information found in FDA regulations. These collections of
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 111 have been approved under OMB control
number 0901-0606, and the collections of information in Sec. 190.6
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0330.
III. Other Issues for Consideration
Although FDA welcomes comments on any aspect of this draft
guidance, we particularly invite comment on the following:
What processes alter the identity of an ingredient
marketed prior to October 15, 1994, and thus create an NDI? We are
especially interested in recommendations for clearer examples or
criteria to differentiate changes in manufacturing methods and starting
materials that alter the identity of the ingredient from changes that
do not.
What processes ``chemically alter'' an ingredient within
the meaning of section 413(a)(1) of the FD&C Act, and why? Conversely,
what processes do not cause chemical alteration, and why? Are there
certain processes, such as tinctures, that sometimes result in chemical
alteration and sometimes do not? What criteria should be used to
evaluate whether an ingredient has been chemically altered? We are
especially interested in receiving scientific information that shows
whether a particular process actually results in chemical alteration.
What method of compiling independent and verifiable data
on the marketing of dietary ingredients before October 15, 1994, would
be most effective? How should an authoritative list of
``grandfathered'' ingredients based on such data be developed and
implemented?
As FDA considers the development of final guidance, we will review
comments received on this revised version, as well as comments on the
2011 draft guidance that are still relevant.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the guidance at
either https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or https://www.regulations.gov.
Use the FDA Web site listed in the previous sentence to find the most
current version of the draft guidance.
V. References
The following references are on display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) and are available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; they are also
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the Web site addresses, as of the date this document publishes
in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change over time.
1. International Programme on Chemical Safety, ``Principles and
Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food,''
Environmental Health Criteria 240 (2009), available at: https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/chemical-food/en/.
2. The official name of the Redbook is ``Guidance for Industry and
Other Stakeholders: Toxicological Principles for the Safety
Assessment of Food Ingredients,'' available at: https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/IngredientsAdditivesGRASPackaging/ucm2006826.htm.
Dated: August 9, 2016.
Jeremy Sharp,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2016-19306 Filed 8-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P