Technical Correction to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter, 53006-53008 [2016-19034]
Download as PDF
53006
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 50
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0408; FRL–9950–48–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AS89
Technical Correction to the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to make a technical correction to
an equation in an appendix in the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) for Particle Pollution.
Equation 2 describes an intermediate
step in the calculation of the design
value for the annual PM2.5 (particles
with an aerodynamic diameter less than
or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers)
NAAQS. This action corrects a
scrivener’s error in one of the equations
used to calculate an annual mean PM2.5
concentration, to properly account for
cases where a site does not have four
complete quarters of data and passes
one of two substitution tests. This
change accurately reflects the intended
calculation of the annual mean PM2.5
design value and is consistent with the
text elsewhere in the appendix.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
11, 2016 without further notice, unless
the EPA receives adverse comment by
September 12, 2016. If the EPA receives
adverse comment, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2016–0408, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Aug 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
primary submission (e.g., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system).
For additional submission methods,
the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Brett Gantt, U.S. EPA, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air
Quality Assessment Division, Air
Quality Analysis Group (Mail Code:
C304–04), Research Triangle Park, NC
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
5274; fax number: (919) 541–3613;
email address: gantt.brett@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this action apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for the EPA?
II. This Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final
rule?
The EPA is publishing this rule
without a prior proposed rule because
we view this as a non-controversial
action and anticipate no adverse
comment. This action corrects a
scrivener’s error in an intermediate
equation in the calculation of the annual
PM2.5 design value to properly account
for cases where a site does not have four
complete quarters of data in a specific
year and passes the minimum quarterly
value substitution test. In the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of today’s Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Register, we are publishing a separate
proposed rule to correct this scrivener’s
error if any adverse comments are
received on this direct final rule. We
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. For further information about
commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
If EPA receives adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We would address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule.
B. Does this action apply to me?
This action applies to you if you are
calculating the annual PM2.5 design
value for a site which does not have four
complete quarters of data for a specific
year and passes the minimum quarterly
value substitution test.
C. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for the EPA?
(1) Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to the EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
part 2.
(2) Tips for Preparing Your
Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying information
(subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
• Follow directions—The agency may ask
you to respond to specific questions or
organize comments by referencing a CFR part
or section number.
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute language
for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumptions and provide
any technical information and/or data that
you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at your
estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to
be reproduced.
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
• Provide specific examples to illustrate
your concerns, and suggest alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity or
personal threats.
• Make sure to submit your comments by
the comment period deadline identified.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
II. This Action
On December 14, 2012, the EPA
revised the NAAQS for Particle
Pollution (78 FR 3086). Appendix N to
part 50 of this document described the
data handling conventions and
computations necessary for determining
when the NAAQS for PM2.5 are met.
Section 4.4 described the annual PM2.5
design value calculations, with
equations 1, 2, and 3 used to calculate
the quarterly, annual, and 3-year
average concentrations. Equation 2
erroneously described the annual mean
as the average of the four quarterly
values despite the availability of
substitution tests for cases when
quarterly values do not meet the
completeness requirements in section
4.1.
Specifically, the minimum quarterly
value substitution test described in
section 4.1(c)(i) allows for a valid
annual PM2.5 design value to be
calculated when a test design value,
having deficient quarters substituted
with quarter-specific low values, is
found to be greater than the level of the
standard. If the minimum quarterly
value substitution test is passed, the
annual PM2.5 design value is calculated
from annual means of the non-deficient
quarterly values, which can range in
number from one to four for a specific
year.
As currently written, equation 2 is not
appropriate for use during a minimum
quarterly value substitution test and
does not accurately reflect the intended
calculation of the annual mean PM2.5
concentration in these cases.1 Therefore,
this action generalizes equation 2 to
account for cases that pass the
minimum quarterly value substitution
test, yet do not have four non-deficient
quarterly values in each of the years in
the 3-year design value period. This
technical correction to equation 2 is
currently used in the calculation of the
PM2.5 annual design value, is consistent
with the text of section 4.1 within
appendix N to part 50, and does not
affect the calculation of annual mean
1 If read literally with the scrivener’s error, it
would be erroneous to use Equation 2 to calculate
the annual PM2.5 NAAQS for any year with a
deficient quarter of data because the equation
instructs the user to sum all four quarters when at
least one of those quarters contains missing data.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Aug 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
PM2.5 concentrations when four
complete quarters of data are available.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. This action generalizes the
calculation of the annual PM2.5 NAAQS
design values and does not impose
additional regulatory requirements on
organizations monitoring air quality.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action corrects the
calculation of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations and does not impose
additional regulatory requirements on
sources.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538, and does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
action imposes no enforceable duty on
any state, local or tribal governments, or
the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This regulatory action is a
technical correction to a previously
promulgated regulatory action and does
not have any impact on human health
or the environment. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53007
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action is
not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59
FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it
does not establish an environmental
health or safety standard. This
regulatory action is a technical
correction to a previously promulgated
regulatory action and does not have any
impact on human health or the
environment.
K. Congressional Review Act
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 50
Air pollution control, Carbon
monoxide, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
53008
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
1. The authority citation for part 50
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In appendix N to part 50, in section
4.4, Equation 2 is revised to read as
follows:
■
Appendix N to Part 50—Interpretation
of the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for PM2.5
*
*
*
*
*
4.4 Equations for the Annual PM2.5
NAAQS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Where:
Xy = the annual mean concentration for year
y (y = 1, 2, or 3);
nQy = the number of complete quarters Q in
year y; and
Xqy = the mean for quarter q of year y (result
of equation 1).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–19034 Filed 8–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0539; FRL–9950–29–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Prevention of Significant
Deterioration and Approval of
Infrastructure State Implementation
Plans for Specific National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection
(WVDEP) for the State of West Virginia
on June 3, 2015. This revision pertains
to West Virginia’s Prevention of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Aug 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit
program regulations for preconstruction
permitting requirements for major
sources. The revision includes a change
in West Virginia’s PSD regulations
related to emissions of fine particulate
matter (PM2.5). The State’s June 3, 2015
submittal satisfies its obligations
pursuant to an earlier rulemaking in
which EPA granted final conditional
approval of West Virginia’s PSD
implementing regulations. This action
also addresses specific infrastructure
program elements specified in Clean Air
Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2) necessary to
implement, maintain, and enforce
several national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). This action is being
taken under the CAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 12, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0539. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through www.regulations.gov
or may be viewed during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the West Virginia
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street SE., Charleston, West
Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Paul Wentworth, (215) 814–2183, or by
email at Wentworth.paul@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On January 11, 2016 (81 FR 1133),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of West
Virginia. In the NPR, EPA proposed
approval of a revision to West Virginia’s
PSD permit program regulations for
preconstruction permitting
requirements for major sources. The
revision includes revised West Virginia
PSD regulations related to emissions of
PM2.5. The formal SIP revision was
submitted by the State of West Virginia
on June 3, 2015.
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
The SIP revision submitted by
WVDEP on June 3, 2015 pertains to
revisions to its PSD permit program
regulations at 45CSR14–16.7.c that
establish a significant monitoring
concentration (SMC) value of zero
micrograms per cubic meter for PM2.5.
The submission of this revision allows
EPA to change its conditional approval
of 45CSR14 to a full approval. Because
this submission fulfills the commitment
made by West Virginia in the final
conditional approval of West Virginia’s
earlier submittals of revisions to
45CSR14 as discussed in the NPR, EPA
is now fully approving West Virginia’s
PSD regulations at 45CSR14 in its
entirety as 45CSR14 meets requirements
in the CAA and its implementing
regulations and removing the prior
conditional approval. See 80 FR 36483
(final conditional approval of prior SIP
submissions of revisions to 45CSR14).
With its submittal, West Virginia has
made all of the changes to its PSD
implementing regulations necessary to
address PM2.5 as prescribed by the CAA,
40 CFR 51.166, and the May 16, 2008
new source review implementation rule
for PM2.5 at 73 FR 28321. Because West
Virginia’s regulations at 45CSR14 fully
meet the federal requirements for PSD
in the CAA, EPA also found that West
Virginia’s PSD program now addresses
specific PSD-related portions of the
infrastructure program elements in
section 110(a)(2) of the CAA for the
1997 ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS, the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS, the 2008 lead and ozone
NAAQS, and the 2010 nitrogen dioxide
(NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) NAAQS.
Other specific requirements of and the
rationale for EPA’s approval action of
West Virginia’s revised PSD regulations
and relevant infrastructure SIP revisions
for several NAAQS are explained in the
NPR and will not be restated here. No
public comments were received on the
NPR.
III. Final Action
I. Background
PO 00000
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Sfmt 4700
EPA is approving this SIP revision
submitted by WVDEP as a revision to
the West Virginia SIP for its PSD
program and removing a prior
conditional approval on the PSD
program. In this action, EPA is also
approving several of West Virginia’s
infrastructure SIP revisions as meeting
the PSD elements of section 110(a)(2) of
the CAA for the 1997 ozone and PM2.5
NAAQS, the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, the
2008 lead and ozone NAAQS, and the
2010 NO2 and SO2 NAAQS.
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
ER11AU16.002
PART 50—NATIONAL PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53006-53008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19034]
[[Page 53006]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 50
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0408; FRL-9950-48-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS89
Technical Correction to the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to make a technical correction to an equation in an
appendix in the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
Particle Pollution. Equation 2 describes an intermediate step in the
calculation of the design value for the annual PM2.5
(particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal
2.5 micrometers) NAAQS. This action corrects a scrivener's error in one
of the equations used to calculate an annual mean PM2.5
concentration, to properly account for cases where a site does not have
four complete quarters of data and passes one of two substitution
tests. This change accurately reflects the intended calculation of the
annual mean PM2.5 design value and is consistent with the
text elsewhere in the appendix.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 11, 2016 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comment by September 12, 2016.
If the EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0408, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (e.g., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system).
For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brett Gantt, U.S. EPA, Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division,
Air Quality Analysis Group (Mail Code: C304-04), Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-5274; fax number: (919)
541-3613; email address: gantt.brett@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this action apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
II. This Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a non-controversial action and anticipate no
adverse comment. This action corrects a scrivener's error in an
intermediate equation in the calculation of the annual PM2.5
design value to properly account for cases where a site does not have
four complete quarters of data in a specific year and passes the
minimum quarterly value substitution test. In the ``Proposed Rules''
section of today's Federal Register, we are publishing a separate
proposed rule to correct this scrivener's error if any adverse comments
are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on
this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document.
If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect. We would address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.
B. Does this action apply to me?
This action applies to you if you are calculating the annual
PM2.5 design value for a site which does not have four
complete quarters of data for a specific year and passes the minimum
quarterly value substitution test.
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
(1) Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 2.
(2) Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a CFR part or
section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to
be reproduced.
[[Page 53007]]
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns,
and suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. This Action
On December 14, 2012, the EPA revised the NAAQS for Particle
Pollution (78 FR 3086). Appendix N to part 50 of this document
described the data handling conventions and computations necessary for
determining when the NAAQS for PM2.5 are met. Section 4.4
described the annual PM2.5 design value calculations, with
equations 1, 2, and 3 used to calculate the quarterly, annual, and 3-
year average concentrations. Equation 2 erroneously described the
annual mean as the average of the four quarterly values despite the
availability of substitution tests for cases when quarterly values do
not meet the completeness requirements in section 4.1.
Specifically, the minimum quarterly value substitution test
described in section 4.1(c)(i) allows for a valid annual
PM2.5 design value to be calculated when a test design
value, having deficient quarters substituted with quarter-specific low
values, is found to be greater than the level of the standard. If the
minimum quarterly value substitution test is passed, the annual
PM2.5 design value is calculated from annual means of the
non-deficient quarterly values, which can range in number from one to
four for a specific year.
As currently written, equation 2 is not appropriate for use during
a minimum quarterly value substitution test and does not accurately
reflect the intended calculation of the annual mean PM2.5
concentration in these cases.\1\ Therefore, this action generalizes
equation 2 to account for cases that pass the minimum quarterly value
substitution test, yet do not have four non-deficient quarterly values
in each of the years in the 3-year design value period. This technical
correction to equation 2 is currently used in the calculation of the
PM2.5 annual design value, is consistent with the text of
section 4.1 within appendix N to part 50, and does not affect the
calculation of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations when four
complete quarters of data are available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If read literally with the scrivener's error, it would be
erroneous to use Equation 2 to calculate the annual PM2.5
NAAQS for any year with a deficient quarter of data because the
equation instructs the user to sum all four quarters when at least
one of those quarters contains missing data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. This action generalizes the calculation of the annual
PM2.5 NAAQS design values and does not impose additional
regulatory requirements on organizations monitoring air quality.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
corrects the calculation of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations
and does not impose additional regulatory requirements on sources.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate of $100 million
or more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action imposes
no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments, or the
private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This regulatory action is a technical correction
to a previously promulgated regulatory action and does not have any
impact on human health or the environment. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an
environmental health or safety standard. This regulatory action is a
technical correction to a previously promulgated regulatory action and
does not have any impact on human health or the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 50
Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
[[Page 53008]]
PART 50--NATIONAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 50 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In appendix N to part 50, in section 4.4, Equation 2 is revised to
read as follows:
Appendix N to Part 50--Interpretation of the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for PM2.5
* * * * *
4.4 Equations for the Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
* * * * *
(b) * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11AU16.002
Where:
Xy = the annual mean concentration for year y (y = 1, 2, or 3);
nQy = the number of complete quarters Q in year y; and
Xqy = the mean for quarter q of year y (result of equation 1).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-19034 Filed 8-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P