New Animal Drug Applications; Contents of Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing; Correction, 52995-52997 [2016-18809]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
effective date for a proposed ban.1
However, the SMDA did not eliminate
the informal hearing provision for a
proposed ban issued with a special
effective date. Thus, section 516(b) of
the FD&C Act continues to require that
FDA ‘‘provide reasonable opportunity
for an informal hearing’’ on a proposed
ban with a special effective date (21
U.S.C. 360f(b)) while subsection (a), the
general rule for medical device bans,
does not (see 21 U.S.C. 360f(a)).
On December 10, 1992 (57 FR 58400),
FDA published a final rule
implementing the SMDA. The final rule
of 1992 amended § 895.21(d), which
covers the procedures for issuing a ban
without a special effective date, by
removing the requirement that FDA
provide an opportunity for an informal
hearing when there is no special
effective date.2 FDA incorrectly
removed the same language from
§ 895.30, which covers the procedures
for issuing bans with special effective
dates; the Agency issued a technical
amendment restoring this language in
the Federal Register of June 2, 2015 (80
FR 31299). However, FDA did not
correct the language in § 16.1 to list
section 516(b) of the FD&C Act and
§ 895.30(c) as the provisions that
provide for regulatory (informal)
hearings, nor did the Agency remove the
reference to § 895.21(d). FDA does so
now.
FDA finds good cause for issuing this
amendment to § 16.1(b)(1) as a final rule
without notice and comment because
this amendment corrects the regulations
to restate the statute (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)).
‘‘[W]hen regulations merely restate the
statute they implement, notice-andcomment procedures are unnecessary.’’
Gray Panthers Advocacy Committee v.
Sullivan, 936 F.2d 1284, 1291 (D.C. Cir.
1991); see also Komjathy v. Nat. Trans.
Safety Bd., 832 F.2d 1294, 1296 (D.C.
Cir. 1987) (when a rule ‘‘does no more
than repeat, virtually verbatim, the
statutory grant of authority,’’ notice-andcomment procedures are not required).
Further, the change to remove the
erroneous cross-reference to § 895.21(d)
and add the correct cross-reference
1 Specifically, the SMDA deleted the then-last
sentence of section 516(a). See Public Law 101–629,
section 18(d)(2) (‘‘Section 516(a) (21 U.S.C. 360f(a))
is amended . . . by striking out the last sentence.’’);
21 U.S.C. 360f(a) (1989) (stating, in the last
sentence, ‘‘The Secretary shall afford all interested
persons opportunity for an informal hearing on a
regulation proposed under this subsection.’’).
2 Although the hearing provision was validly
removed from § 895.21(d)(8) in 1992, the removed
language erroneously reappeared in the Code of
Federal Regulations beginning in 1994. On March
5, 2015 (80 FR 11865), the Office of the Federal
Register published a correction document fixing
this publication error.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Aug 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
to§ 895.30(c) is merely technical,
insignificant in nature and impact, and
inconsequential to industry and the
public. See Mack Trucks, Inc. v. EPA,
682 F.3d 87, 94 (D.C. Cir. 2012). This is
because this correction in no way
changes when FDA is required to
provide an opportunity for a hearing,
which is determined by section 516 of
the FD&C Act and part 895, nor does it
impact the availability of such a hearing
to any entity impacted by the proposed
ban. It merely corrects a citation error to
avoid confusion. This amendment to
§ 16.1(b) thus merely corrects the
references to the applicable
requirements of the FD&C Act and its
implementing regulations, making
notice-and-comment procedures
unnecessary in this case. Therefore,
publication of this document constitutes
final action on this change under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553).
In addition, FDA finds good cause for
this amendment to become effective on
the date of publication of this action.
The APA allows an effective date less
than 30 days after publication as
‘‘provided by the agency for good cause
found and published with the rule’’ (5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3)). A delayed effective
date is unnecessary in this case because
the amendment to § 16.1 does not
impose any new regulatory
requirements on affected parties. As a
result, affected parties do not need time
to prepare before the rule takes effect.
Therefore, FDA finds good cause for this
correction to become effective on the
date of publication of this action.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 16
Administrative practice and
procedure.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 16 is
amended as follows:
PART 16—REGULATORY HEARING
BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
1. The authority citation for part 16
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1451–1461; 21 U.S.C.
141–149, 321–394, 467f, 679, 821, 1034; 28
U.S.C. 2112; 42 U.S.C. 201–262, 263b, 364.
2. Amend § 16.1 as follows:
a. In paragraph (b)(1), remove from the
list the entry ‘‘Section 516 of the act
relating to a proposed banned device
regulations (see § 895.21(d) of this
chapter).’’ and add in its place ‘‘Section
516(b) of the act regarding a proposed
regulation to ban a medical device with
a special effective date.’’
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52995
b. In paragraph (b)(2), add an entry in
numerical sequence for ‘‘§ 895.30(c),
regarding a proposed regulation to ban
a medical device with a special effective
date.’’
■
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–18787 Filed 8–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 514
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–1943]
New Animal Drug Applications;
Contents of Notice of Opportunity for
a Hearing; Correction
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Final rule; correcting
amendments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is making technical corrections to
its regulations for hearing procedures
for denial of approval or withdrawal of
approval of new animal drug
applications. The Agency is taking this
action to harmonize terminology and to
improve the organization and clarity of
the regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective August 11,
2016.
ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this final rule into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts,
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vernon Toelle, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–234), Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–5637,
vernon.toelle@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Legal Authority
III. Effective Date
IV. Economic Analysis of Impacts
V. Analysis of Environmental Impact
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
VII. Federalism
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
52996
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
I. Background
This regulation is intended to make
technical amendments to § 514.200 (21
CFR 514.200) to harmonize the
terminology with part 12 (21 CFR part
12), as well as to update § 514.200 in
accordance with plain language
principles to make it easier for the
public to understand and follow.
When the Agency issued procedural
regulations for formal evidentiary public
hearings, originally published in part 2
(21 CFR part 2) and later redesignated
to part 12,1 we intended those
provisions to apply to all formal
evidentiary hearings on new product
applications, including new animal
drug applications. As explained in the
proposed rule, once the specific
provisions in 21 CFR parts 511 and 514
relating to investigational and marketed
new animal drugs were revised in the
same way as their counterpart
provisions relating to investigational
and marketed new drugs, to refer to the
new procedural provisions in part 2, the
prior procedural provisions relating to
hearings would be revoked.2
Consequently, when part 12 was
finalized, we revised the regulations
specific to new animal drugs. These
revisions included revoking certain
provisions and revising 21 CFR 514.201
to state that hearings related to new
animal drugs under section 512(d) and
(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360b(d) and (e)) shall be governed by
part 12 of this chapter. However, when
we made these revisions to part 514, we
neglected to update § 514.200 to match
the terminology used in part 12.
Therefore, we are now revising
§ 514.200 to make its language and
terminology consistent with the
language and terminology of the
procedural regulations for hearings in
part 12. Specifically, we are changing
the references to ‘‘administrative law
judge’’ in current § 514.200 to the term
‘‘presiding officer’’, which is defined in
21 CFR 10.3 3 and further explained in
21 CFR 12.60 as the presiding officer in
a hearing will be the Commissioner, a
member of the Commissioner’s office to
whom the responsibility for the matter
involved has been delegated, or an
administrative law judge qualified
under 5 U.S.C. 3105. Since the term
‘‘presiding officer’’ is used throughout
part 12, we are updating the language of
§ 514.200 to use the same terminology.
1 See 41 FR 51706, November 23, 1976, and 42
FR 4680, January 25, 1977.
2 See 40 FR 40682 at 40716, September 3, 1975.
3 ‘‘Presiding officer means the Commissioner or
the Commissioner’s designee or an administrative
law judge appointed as provided in 5 U.S.C. 3105.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Aug 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
We are also updating the language in
current § 514.200 from ‘‘written
appearance’’ to ‘‘objections and request
for a hearing’’ since the latter
terminology is used throughout part 12.
Finally, we are updating the language in
§ 514.200 on the contents of the
objections and request for hearing and
the contents of the Commissioner’s
notice granting a hearing to match the
language of part 12 and to make clear
what is required. These updates will
eliminate confusion that could be
caused by use of different terms to refer
to the same procedural requirements
and allow the reader to obtain necessary
information in one place. We anticipate
these technical changes will make
§ 514.200 easier for the public to
understand and follow.
Since we are revising § 514.200 to
harmonize the language and
terminology with part 12, we are also
taking this opportunity to update the
language of § 514.200 in accordance
with the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–274) and Executive Order 13563.
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 requires
that all Federal agencies use ‘‘clear
government communication that the
public can understand and use.’’
Executive Order 13563 mandates that all
regulations be ‘‘accessible, consistent,
written in plain language, and easy to
understand.’’ Therefore, we are
eliminating gender-specific pronouns,
passive voice, complicated sentence
structure, and archaic language, and
updating the language to make it more
reader-friendly and accessible. We
anticipate that these changes will make
§ 514.200 clearer and easier to read.
Additionally, we are updating the title
of that section from ‘‘Contents of notice
of opportunity for a hearing’’ to ‘‘Notice
of opportunity for hearing; notice of
participation and requests for hearing;
grant or denial of hearing’’ because the
latter title more accurately describes the
type of information found in § 514.200.
The latter title also harmonizes with an
analogous section for new drug
applications in 21 CFR 314.200.
All of these corrections are
nonsubstantive, technical amendments
designed to harmonize the language and
terminology of § 514.200 with the
governing regulation on formal
evidentiary public hearings in part 12
and to make the language of § 514.200
easier for the public to understand and
follow. We are taking this action as a
part of our Retrospective Review
Initiative 4 to clarify and harmonize the
regulations and to update the language
4 See
PO 00000
E.O. 13563, section 6.
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in accordance with the Plain Writing
Act of 2010 and Executive Order 13563.
II. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing these regulations
under section 512(e) of the FD&C Act.
This section gives the Secretary of
Health and Human Services the
authority to grant approval, deny
approval, or withdraw approval of new
animal drug applications. In addition,
section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 371(a)) gives FDA general
rulemaking authority to issue
regulations for the efficient enforcement
of the FD&C Act.
Section 6 of Executive Order 13563
states that FDA is under a continuing
obligation to review its existing
regulations periodically to determine
whether any such regulations should be
modified, streamlined, expanded, or
repealed to improve regulatory
effectiveness and reduce public burden.
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 mandates
that all regulations be written in clear
language that is easy for the public to
understand and use.
This rule makes technical
amendments to § 514.200 to harmonize
the language and terminology with the
governing regulation on administrative
hearings in part 12 and to update the
language in accordance with the Plain
Writing Act of 2010 and Executive
Order 13563. Publication of this
document constitutes final action on
these changes under the Agency’s
original intent with respect to the
hearing provisions for new animal drug
applications. Therefore, for good cause,
FDA finds under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)
and (d)(3) that notice and public
comment are unnecessary.
III. Effective Date
These regulations are effective upon
publication.
IV. Economic Analysis of Impacts
We have examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866,
Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct us to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). We have
developed a comprehensive Economic
Analysis of Impacts that assesses the
impacts of the final rule. We believe that
this final rule is not a significant
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires us to analyze regulatory options
that would minimize any significant
impact of a rule on small entities.
Because this rule is making only
technical amendments, we certify that
the final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires us to
prepare a written statement, which
includes an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits, before issuing ‘‘any
rule that includes any Federal mandate
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any one year.’’
The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $146 million, using the
most current (2015) Implicit Price
Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product.
This final rule would not result in an
expenditure in any year that meets or
exceeds this amount.
V. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.31(i) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection
of information. Therefore, FDA is not
required to seek clearance by the Office
of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
VII. Federalism
We have analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. FDA has
determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, we
conclude that the rule does not contain
policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive
order and, consequently, a federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Aug 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 514
Administrative practice and
procedure, Animal drugs, Confidential
business information, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 514 is
amended as follows:
PART 514—NEW ANIMAL DRUG
APPLICATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 514
continues to read:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
354, 356a, 360b, 371, 379e, 381.
■
2. Revise § 514.200 to read as follows:
§ 514.200 Notice of opportunity for
hearing; notice of participation and
requests for hearing; grant or denial of
hearing.
(a) The notice to the applicant of
opportunity for a hearing on a proposal
by the Commissioner to refuse to
approve an application or to withdraw
the approval of an application will be
published in the Federal Register
together with an explanation of the
grounds for the proposed action. The
notice will describe how to request a
hearing. An applicant has 30 days after
publication of the notice to request a
hearing.
(b) If the applicant fails to request a
hearing within the 30-day timeframe,
the Commissioner, without further
notice, will publish a final order
denying or withdrawing approval of the
application.
(c) If the applicant desires to request
a hearing:
(1) Within 30 days after publication of
the notice of opportunity for hearing,
the applicant must submit to the
Division of Dockets Management
written objections and a request for a
hearing in accordance with §§ 12.20 and
12.22. This request for a hearing must
include each specific objection to the
proposal on which a hearing is
requested, together with a detailed
description and analysis of the factual
information (including all relevant
clinical and other investigational data)
the applicant will present in support of
that objection. A request for a hearing
may not rest upon mere allegations or
denials or general descriptions of
positions or contentions, but must set
forth specific reliable evidence showing
there is a genuine and substantial issue
of fact that requires a hearing.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52997
(2) If the Commissioner determines
upon review of the data and information
submitted in the objections and request
for a hearing that a hearing is not
justified because no genuine and
substantial issue of fact precludes the
refusal to approve the application or the
withdrawal of approval of the
application (for example, the applicant
has not identified any adequate and
well-controlled clinical investigations to
support the claims of effectiveness), the
Commissioner will enter an order
denying the hearing and stating the final
findings and conclusions.
(3) If the Commissioner determines
upon review of the data and information
submitted in the objections and request
for a hearing that a hearing is justified,
the Commissioner will publish a notice
setting forth the following:
(i) The regulation or order that is the
subject of the hearing;
(ii) A statement specifying any part of
the regulation or order that has been
stayed by operation of law or in the
Commissioner’s discretion;
(iii) The parties to the hearing;
(iv) The specific issues of fact for
resolution at the hearing;
(v) The presiding officer, or a
statement that the presiding officer will
be designated in a later notice; and
(vi) The date, time, and place of the
prehearing conference, or a statement
that the date, time, and place will be
announced in a later notice. However,
in the case of a denial of approval, the
hearing must not occur more than 90
days after expiration of the 30-day time
period in which to request a hearing,
unless the presiding officer and the
applicant otherwise agree; and in the
case of withdrawal of approval, the
hearing will occur as soon as
practicable.
(d) The hearing will be open to the
public; however, if the Commissioner
finds that portions of the application
which serve as a basis for the hearing
contain information concerning a
method or process entitled to protection
as a trade secret, the part of the hearing
involving such portions will not be
public, unless the respondent so
specifies in the request for a hearing.
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–18809 Filed 8–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52995-52997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18809]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 514
[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-1943]
New Animal Drug Applications; Contents of Notice of Opportunity
for a Hearing; Correction
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is
making technical corrections to its regulations for hearing procedures
for denial of approval or withdrawal of approval of new animal drug
applications. The Agency is taking this action to harmonize terminology
and to improve the organization and clarity of the regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective August 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number found in brackets in the heading of this final rule into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts, and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vernon Toelle, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-234), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-402-5637, vernon.toelle@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Legal Authority
III. Effective Date
IV. Economic Analysis of Impacts
V. Analysis of Environmental Impact
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
VII. Federalism
[[Page 52996]]
I. Background
This regulation is intended to make technical amendments to Sec.
514.200 (21 CFR 514.200) to harmonize the terminology with part 12 (21
CFR part 12), as well as to update Sec. 514.200 in accordance with
plain language principles to make it easier for the public to
understand and follow.
When the Agency issued procedural regulations for formal
evidentiary public hearings, originally published in part 2 (21 CFR
part 2) and later redesignated to part 12,\1\ we intended those
provisions to apply to all formal evidentiary hearings on new product
applications, including new animal drug applications. As explained in
the proposed rule, once the specific provisions in 21 CFR parts 511 and
514 relating to investigational and marketed new animal drugs were
revised in the same way as their counterpart provisions relating to
investigational and marketed new drugs, to refer to the new procedural
provisions in part 2, the prior procedural provisions relating to
hearings would be revoked.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 41 FR 51706, November 23, 1976, and 42 FR 4680, January
25, 1977.
\2\ See 40 FR 40682 at 40716, September 3, 1975.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consequently, when part 12 was finalized, we revised the
regulations specific to new animal drugs. These revisions included
revoking certain provisions and revising 21 CFR 514.201 to state that
hearings related to new animal drugs under section 512(d) and (e) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360b(d) and (e)) shall be governed by part 12 of this chapter. However,
when we made these revisions to part 514, we neglected to update Sec.
514.200 to match the terminology used in part 12.
Therefore, we are now revising Sec. 514.200 to make its language
and terminology consistent with the language and terminology of the
procedural regulations for hearings in part 12. Specifically, we are
changing the references to ``administrative law judge'' in current
Sec. 514.200 to the term ``presiding officer'', which is defined in 21
CFR 10.3 \3\ and further explained in 21 CFR 12.60 as the presiding
officer in a hearing will be the Commissioner, a member of the
Commissioner's office to whom the responsibility for the matter
involved has been delegated, or an administrative law judge qualified
under 5 U.S.C. 3105. Since the term ``presiding officer'' is used
throughout part 12, we are updating the language of Sec. 514.200 to
use the same terminology. We are also updating the language in current
Sec. 514.200 from ``written appearance'' to ``objections and request
for a hearing'' since the latter terminology is used throughout part
12. Finally, we are updating the language in Sec. 514.200 on the
contents of the objections and request for hearing and the contents of
the Commissioner's notice granting a hearing to match the language of
part 12 and to make clear what is required. These updates will
eliminate confusion that could be caused by use of different terms to
refer to the same procedural requirements and allow the reader to
obtain necessary information in one place. We anticipate these
technical changes will make Sec. 514.200 easier for the public to
understand and follow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``Presiding officer means the Commissioner or the
Commissioner's designee or an administrative law judge appointed as
provided in 5 U.S.C. 3105.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since we are revising Sec. 514.200 to harmonize the language and
terminology with part 12, we are also taking this opportunity to update
the language of Sec. 514.200 in accordance with the Plain Writing Act
of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274) and Executive Order 13563. The Plain Writing
Act of 2010 requires that all Federal agencies use ``clear government
communication that the public can understand and use.'' Executive Order
13563 mandates that all regulations be ``accessible, consistent,
written in plain language, and easy to understand.'' Therefore, we are
eliminating gender-specific pronouns, passive voice, complicated
sentence structure, and archaic language, and updating the language to
make it more reader-friendly and accessible. We anticipate that these
changes will make Sec. 514.200 clearer and easier to read.
Additionally, we are updating the title of that section from ``Contents
of notice of opportunity for a hearing'' to ``Notice of opportunity for
hearing; notice of participation and requests for hearing; grant or
denial of hearing'' because the latter title more accurately describes
the type of information found in Sec. 514.200. The latter title also
harmonizes with an analogous section for new drug applications in 21
CFR 314.200.
All of these corrections are nonsubstantive, technical amendments
designed to harmonize the language and terminology of Sec. 514.200
with the governing regulation on formal evidentiary public hearings in
part 12 and to make the language of Sec. 514.200 easier for the public
to understand and follow. We are taking this action as a part of our
Retrospective Review Initiative \4\ to clarify and harmonize the
regulations and to update the language in accordance with the Plain
Writing Act of 2010 and Executive Order 13563.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See E.O. 13563, section 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing these regulations under section 512(e) of the FD&C
Act. This section gives the Secretary of Health and Human Services the
authority to grant approval, deny approval, or withdraw approval of new
animal drug applications. In addition, section 701(a) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 371(a)) gives FDA general rulemaking authority to issue
regulations for the efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act.
Section 6 of Executive Order 13563 states that FDA is under a
continuing obligation to review its existing regulations periodically
to determine whether any such regulations should be modified,
streamlined, expanded, or repealed to improve regulatory effectiveness
and reduce public burden. The Plain Writing Act of 2010 mandates that
all regulations be written in clear language that is easy for the
public to understand and use.
This rule makes technical amendments to Sec. 514.200 to harmonize
the language and terminology with the governing regulation on
administrative hearings in part 12 and to update the language in
accordance with the Plain Writing Act of 2010 and Executive Order
13563. Publication of this document constitutes final action on these
changes under the Agency's original intent with respect to the hearing
provisions for new animal drug applications. Therefore, for good cause,
FDA finds under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3) that notice and public
comment are unnecessary.
III. Effective Date
These regulations are effective upon publication.
IV. Economic Analysis of Impacts
We have examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct us to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net
benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). We
have developed a comprehensive Economic Analysis of Impacts that
assesses the impacts of the final rule. We believe that this final rule
is not a significant
[[Page 52997]]
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires us to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this rule is making only technical amendments, we
certify that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires
us to prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits, before issuing ``any rule that includes
any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one
year.'' The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $146
million, using the most current (2015) Implicit Price Deflator for the
Gross Domestic Product. This final rule would not result in an
expenditure in any year that meets or exceeds this amount.
V. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.31(i) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore,
FDA is not required to seek clearance by the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
VII. Federalism
We have analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule
does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Accordingly, we conclude that the rule
does not contain policies that have federalism implications as defined
in the Executive order and, consequently, a federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 514
Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Confidential
business information, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
514 is amended as follows:
PART 514--NEW ANIMAL DRUG APPLICATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 514 continues to read:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 354, 356a, 360b, 371,
379e, 381.
0
2. Revise Sec. 514.200 to read as follows:
Sec. 514.200 Notice of opportunity for hearing; notice of
participation and requests for hearing; grant or denial of hearing.
(a) The notice to the applicant of opportunity for a hearing on a
proposal by the Commissioner to refuse to approve an application or to
withdraw the approval of an application will be published in the
Federal Register together with an explanation of the grounds for the
proposed action. The notice will describe how to request a hearing. An
applicant has 30 days after publication of the notice to request a
hearing.
(b) If the applicant fails to request a hearing within the 30-day
timeframe, the Commissioner, without further notice, will publish a
final order denying or withdrawing approval of the application.
(c) If the applicant desires to request a hearing:
(1) Within 30 days after publication of the notice of opportunity
for hearing, the applicant must submit to the Division of Dockets
Management written objections and a request for a hearing in accordance
with Sec. Sec. 12.20 and 12.22. This request for a hearing must
include each specific objection to the proposal on which a hearing is
requested, together with a detailed description and analysis of the
factual information (including all relevant clinical and other
investigational data) the applicant will present in support of that
objection. A request for a hearing may not rest upon mere allegations
or denials or general descriptions of positions or contentions, but
must set forth specific reliable evidence showing there is a genuine
and substantial issue of fact that requires a hearing.
(2) If the Commissioner determines upon review of the data and
information submitted in the objections and request for a hearing that
a hearing is not justified because no genuine and substantial issue of
fact precludes the refusal to approve the application or the withdrawal
of approval of the application (for example, the applicant has not
identified any adequate and well-controlled clinical investigations to
support the claims of effectiveness), the Commissioner will enter an
order denying the hearing and stating the final findings and
conclusions.
(3) If the Commissioner determines upon review of the data and
information submitted in the objections and request for a hearing that
a hearing is justified, the Commissioner will publish a notice setting
forth the following:
(i) The regulation or order that is the subject of the hearing;
(ii) A statement specifying any part of the regulation or order
that has been stayed by operation of law or in the Commissioner's
discretion;
(iii) The parties to the hearing;
(iv) The specific issues of fact for resolution at the hearing;
(v) The presiding officer, or a statement that the presiding
officer will be designated in a later notice; and
(vi) The date, time, and place of the prehearing conference, or a
statement that the date, time, and place will be announced in a later
notice. However, in the case of a denial of approval, the hearing must
not occur more than 90 days after expiration of the 30-day time period
in which to request a hearing, unless the presiding officer and the
applicant otherwise agree; and in the case of withdrawal of approval,
the hearing will occur as soon as practicable.
(d) The hearing will be open to the public; however, if the
Commissioner finds that portions of the application which serve as a
basis for the hearing contain information concerning a method or
process entitled to protection as a trade secret, the part of the
hearing involving such portions will not be public, unless the
respondent so specifies in the request for a hearing.
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-18809 Filed 8-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P