Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement-015 LeadTrac System of Records, 52593-52595 [2016-18812]
Download as PDF
52593
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 153
Tuesday, August 9, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2016–0052]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; Department of Homeland
Security/U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement–015 LeadTrac
System of Records
Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), Privacy Office.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security is giving concurrent notice of a
newly established system of records
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for
the ‘‘Department of Homeland Security/
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement–015 LeadTrac System of
Records’’ and this proposed rulemaking.
In this proposed rulemaking, the
Department proposes to exempt
portions of the system of records from
one or more provisions of the Privacy
Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before September 9, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2016–0052, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–343–4010.
• Mail: Jonathan Cantor, Acting Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Aug 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amber Smith, Privacy Officer, (202–
732–3300), U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, 500 12th Street
SW., Mail Stop 5004, Washington, DC
20536, email: ICEPrivacy@dhs.gov, or
Jonathan R. Cantor (202–343–1717),
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy
Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) is giving concurrent
notice of a newly established system of
records pursuant to the Privacy Act of
1974 for the ‘‘DHS/U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE)–015
LeadTrac System of Records’’ and this
proposed rule. In this rulemaking, the
Department proposes to exempt
portions of the system of records from
one or more provisions of the Privacy
Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement
requirements.
The LeadTrac System of Records
describes the operation of an ICE
information technology system of the
same name, which is owned by ICE’s
Homeland Security Investigations (HSI)
directorate. This system contains a
repository of data that is ingested on a
routine or ad hoc basis from other
existing sources, and an index created
from that data. LeadTrac incorporates
tools that allow the data to be queried,
analyzed, and presented in a variety of
formats that can help illuminate
relationships among the various data
elements. The purpose of LeadTrac is to
help ICE HSI personnel conduct
research and analysis using advanced
analytic tools in support of their law
enforcement mission.
LeadTrac Overview
This record system allows DHS to
collect and maintain information about
foreign students, exchange visitors, and
other non-immigrant visitors to the
United Sates who overstay their period
of admission or otherwise violate the
terms of their visa, immigrant, or nonimmigrant status (collectively, status
violators), and associated organizations
and individuals. Using LeadTrac, the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Counterterrorism and Criminal
Exploitation Unit (CTCEU) collects
personally identifiable information (PII)
from key Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) databases and analyzes
it to identify individuals who are
suspected status violators. The
Counterterrorism and Criminal
Exploitation Unit will also use LeadTrac
to collect information about
organizations such as schools,
universities, and exchange visitor
programs being investigated by CTCEU,
as well as information about
individuals, including designated
school officials (DSOs) and associates of
suspected status violators.
ICE collects information in LeadTrac
about suspected status violators and
organizations to help enforce
compliance with U.S. immigration laws.
Specifically, the information is collected
and used to support the following DHS
activities: Investigating and determining
immigration status and criminal history
information of individuals; carrying out
the appropriate enforcement activity
required; identifying fraudulent schools
and/or organizations and the people
affiliated with the school or
organization; providing HSI and ICE
Enforcement and Removal Operations
(ERO) with viable lead information to
further investigate suspected status
violators; and carrying out the required
enforcement activity.
The CTCEU and Overstay Analysis
Unit (OAU) personnel query a variety of
DHS and non-DHS information systems
and enter the results into LeadTrac to
build a unified picture of an
individual’s entry/exit, visa, criminal
and immigration history, and will
comparably process information about
associated individuals and
organizations. Using this assembled
information, CTCEU will determine
which individuals or organizations
warrant additional investigation for
possible status violations or the
operation of fraudulent institutions, and
will request that the appropriate HSI
field offices initiate investigations.
Some of the individuals about whom
ICE collects information in LeadTrac,
such as DSOs and associates of
suspected status violators, may have
lawful permanent resident (LPR) status
or be U.S. citizens.
Consistent with the Department’s
information sharing mission,
information stored in the DHS/ICE–015
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
52594
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
LeadTrac System of Records may be
shared with other DHS components that
have a need to know the information to
carry out their national security, law
enforcement, immigration, intelligence,
or other homeland security functions. In
addition, DHS/ICE information may be
shared with appropriate federal, state,
local, tribal, territorial, foreign, or
international government agencies
consistent with the routine uses set
forth in the system of records notice and
as otherwise authorized under the
Privacy Act.
This newly established system will be
included in DHS’s inventory of record
systems.
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair
information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the
means by which Federal Government
agencies collect, maintain, use, and
disseminate individuals’ records. The
Privacy Act applies to information that
is maintained in a ‘‘system of records.’’
A ‘‘system of records’’ is a group of any
records under the control of an agency
from which information is retrieved by
the name of an individual or by some
identifying number, symbol, or other
identifying particular assigned to the
individual. In the Privacy Act, an
individual is defined to encompass U.S.
citizens and lawful permanent
residents. As a matter of policy, DHS
extends administrative Privacy Act
protections to all individuals when
systems of records maintain information
on U.S. citizens, lawful permanent
residents, and visitors.
The Privacy Act allows Government
agencies to exempt certain records from
the access and amendment provisions. If
an agency claims an exemption, it must
issue a rule to make clear to the public
the reasons why a particular exemption
is claimed, and provide an opportunity
to comment.
DHS is claiming exemptions from
certain requirements of the Privacy Act
for DHS/ICE–015 LeadTrac System of
Records. Some information in this
system of records relates to official DHS
national security, law enforcement, and
immigration activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS activities
from disclosure to subjects or others
related to these activities. Specifically,
the exemptions are required to preclude
subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes; to avoid
disclosure of activity techniques; to
protect the identities and physical safety
of confidential informants and law
enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS’s
ability to obtain information from third
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Aug 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
parties and other sources; and to protect
the privacy of third parties. Disclosure
of information to the subject of the
inquiry could also permit the subject to
avoid detection or apprehension.
In appropriate circumstances, when
compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement purposes of this system
and the overall law enforcement
process, the applicable exemptions may
be waived on a case-by-case basis.
A system of records notice for DHS/
ICE–015 LeadTrac System of Records is
also published in this issue of the
Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135;
(6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.); 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart
A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart B
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Add paragraph 74 to Appendix C to
read as follows:
■
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
*
*
*
*
*
74. The DHS/ICE–015 LeadTrac System of
Records consists of electronic and paper
records and will be used by ICE investigative
and homeland security personnel. The DHS/
ICE–015 LeadTrac System of Records
contains aggregated data from ICE and DHS
law enforcement and homeland security IT
systems, as well as data uploaded by ICE
personnel for analysis from various public,
private, and commercial sources during the
course of an investigation or analytical
project. This information may include some
or all of the following types of personally
identifiable information: Identifying and
biographic data such as name and date of
birth; citizenship and immigration data;
border crossing data; customs import-export
history; criminal history; contact
information; criminal associates; family
relationships; photographs and other media;
and employment and education information.
The records also include tips received by ICE
from the public concerning suspicious or
potentially illegal activity, as well as
telephone call detail records, which contain
call transactions and subscriber data,
obtained via lawful process during the course
of an investigation. This information is
maintained by ICE for analytical and
investigative purposes and is made accessible
to ICE personnel via the LeadTrac system
interface. The system is used to conduct
research supporting the production of law
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
enforcement activities; provide lead
information for investigative inquiry and
follow-up; assist in the conduct of ICE
criminal and administrative investigations;
assist in the disruption of terrorist or other
criminal activity; and discover previously
unknown connections among existing ICE
investigations.
The Secretary of Homeland Security,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted
this system from the following provisions of
the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4);
(d); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8); (f); and (g).
Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland
Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has
exempted this system from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f). When a record
received from another system has been
exempted in that source system under 5
U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or (k)(2), DHS will claim the
same exemptions for those records that are
claimed for the original primary systems of
records from which they originated and
claims any additional exemptions set forth
here.
Exemptions from these particular
subsections are justified, on a case-by-case
basis to be determined at the time a request
is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process. Disclosure of
corrections or notations of dispute may
impede investigations by requiring DHS to
inform each witness or individual contacted
during the investigation of each correction or
notation pertaining to information provided
them during the investigation.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the
records could permit the individual who is
the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would
impose an unreasonable administrative
burden by requiring investigations to be
continually reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose classified and
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
other security-sensitive information that
could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear, or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of the
investigation, thereby interfering with that
investigation and related law enforcement
activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information could impede law enforcement
by compromising the existence of a
confidential investigation or reveal the
identity of witnesses or confidential
informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f)
(Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons
noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or
procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in
the system of records or otherwise setting up
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may access and view records pertaining to
themselves in the system would undermine
investigative efforts and reveal the identities
of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because with the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their
investigative training and exercise of good
judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(i) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies)
to the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Jonathan R. Cantor,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016–18812 Filed 8–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–28–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Aug 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 115 and 120
RIN 3245–AF85
Miscellaneous Amendments to
Business Loan Programs and Surety
Bond Guarantee Program
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) continues to
review the regulations governing the
delivery and oversight of its business
lending programs. SBA is proposing
changes to some of these regulations for
clarity and to increase participation in:
The Surety Bond Guarantee (SBG)
Program, the 7(a) Loan Program, the
Microloan Program, and the
Development Company Loan Program
(504 Loan Program). In addition, the
proposed changes will streamline the
regulations by removing or revising any
outdated regulations.
DATES: SBA must receive comments to
the proposed rule on or before October
11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3245–AF85, by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Mary Frias, Office of
Financial Assistance, Office of Capital
Access, Small Business Administration,
409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC
20416.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Mary Frias,
Office of Financial Assistance, Office of
Capital Access, Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
submit the information to Office of
Financial Assistance, Office of Capital
Access, 409 Third Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416. Highlight the
information that you consider to be CBI
and explain why you believe SBA
should hold this information as
confidential. SBA will review the
information and make the final
determination whether it will publish
the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Carpenter, Financial Analyst,
Office of Financial Assistance, Office of
Capital Access, Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52595
Washington, DC 20416; telephone: (202)
205–7654; email: robert.carpenter@
sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, 76
FR 3821 (January 21, 2011), directs
agencies to ensure that regulations are
accessible, consistent, written in plain
language, and easy to understand in
order to foster economic growth and job
creation. Executive Order 13563
provides that our regulatory system
‘‘must identify and use the best, most
innovative and least burdensome tools
for achieving regulatory ends.’’
Executive Order 13563 further provides
that ‘‘[t]o facilitate the periodic review
of existing significant regulations,
agencies shall consider how best to
promote retrospective analysis of rules
that may be outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively burdensome,
and to modify, streamline, expand, or
repeal them in accordance with what
has been learned.’’ SBA has reviewed its
regulations with regard to the Business
Loan Programs, as defined below, and is
proposing a number of amendments and
revisions to accomplish this goal.
The SBA programs affected by this
proposed rule are the 7(a) Loan Program
authorized pursuant to section 7(a) of
the Small Business Act (the Act) (15
U.S.C. 636(a)), the Microloan Program
authorized pursuant to section 7(m) of
the Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)), the Surety
Bond Guarantee Program authorized
pursuant to part B of title IV of the
Small Business Investment Act of 1958
(15 U.S.C. 694b et seq.), and the
Development Company Program (the
504 Loan Program) authorized pursuant
to title V of the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695
et seq.) (collectively referred to as the
Business Loan Programs).
The Agency requests comments on all
aspects of the regulatory revisions in
this proposed rule and on any related
issues affecting the Business Loan
Programs.
II. Summary of Proposed Business Loan
Program Changes
SBA’s proposed changes are described
in this section, with additional details
on each located in the section-bysection analysis that follows:
A. Surety Bond Guarantee Program
1. Threshold Change. SBA proposes
to change the threshold amounts set
forth in §§ 115.19, 115.32, and 115.67
under which Sureties are required to
notify SBA, or obtain SBA’s prior
written approval, of changes in the
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52593-52595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18812]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 52593]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2016-0052]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of
Homeland Security/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement-015 LeadTrac
System of Records
AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Privacy Office.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent
notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy
Act of 1974 for the ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement-015 LeadTrac System of Records'' and this
proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department
proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 9, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2016-0052, by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-343-4010.
Mail: Jonathan Cantor, Acting Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Smith, Privacy Officer, (202-
732-3300), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 500 12th Street
SW., Mail Stop 5004, Washington, DC 20536, email: ICEPrivacy@dhs.gov,
or Jonathan R. Cantor (202-343-1717), Acting Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is giving concurrent
notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy
Act of 1974 for the ``DHS/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE)-015 LeadTrac System of Records'' and this proposed rule. In this
rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of
records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of
criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements.
The LeadTrac System of Records describes the operation of an ICE
information technology system of the same name, which is owned by ICE's
Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) directorate. This system
contains a repository of data that is ingested on a routine or ad hoc
basis from other existing sources, and an index created from that data.
LeadTrac incorporates tools that allow the data to be queried,
analyzed, and presented in a variety of formats that can help
illuminate relationships among the various data elements. The purpose
of LeadTrac is to help ICE HSI personnel conduct research and analysis
using advanced analytic tools in support of their law enforcement
mission.
LeadTrac Overview
This record system allows DHS to collect and maintain information
about foreign students, exchange visitors, and other non-immigrant
visitors to the United Sates who overstay their period of admission or
otherwise violate the terms of their visa, immigrant, or non-immigrant
status (collectively, status violators), and associated organizations
and individuals. Using LeadTrac, the Counterterrorism and Criminal
Exploitation Unit (CTCEU) collects personally identifiable information
(PII) from key Department of Homeland Security (DHS) databases and
analyzes it to identify individuals who are suspected status violators.
The Counterterrorism and Criminal Exploitation Unit will also use
LeadTrac to collect information about organizations such as schools,
universities, and exchange visitor programs being investigated by
CTCEU, as well as information about individuals, including designated
school officials (DSOs) and associates of suspected status violators.
ICE collects information in LeadTrac about suspected status
violators and organizations to help enforce compliance with U.S.
immigration laws. Specifically, the information is collected and used
to support the following DHS activities: Investigating and determining
immigration status and criminal history information of individuals;
carrying out the appropriate enforcement activity required; identifying
fraudulent schools and/or organizations and the people affiliated with
the school or organization; providing HSI and ICE Enforcement and
Removal Operations (ERO) with viable lead information to further
investigate suspected status violators; and carrying out the required
enforcement activity.
The CTCEU and Overstay Analysis Unit (OAU) personnel query a
variety of DHS and non-DHS information systems and enter the results
into LeadTrac to build a unified picture of an individual's entry/exit,
visa, criminal and immigration history, and will comparably process
information about associated individuals and organizations. Using this
assembled information, CTCEU will determine which individuals or
organizations warrant additional investigation for possible status
violations or the operation of fraudulent institutions, and will
request that the appropriate HSI field offices initiate investigations.
Some of the individuals about whom ICE collects information in
LeadTrac, such as DSOs and associates of suspected status violators,
may have lawful permanent resident (LPR) status or be U.S. citizens.
Consistent with the Department's information sharing mission,
information stored in the DHS/ICE-015
[[Page 52594]]
LeadTrac System of Records may be shared with other DHS components that
have a need to know the information to carry out their national
security, law enforcement, immigration, intelligence, or other homeland
security functions. In addition, DHS/ICE information may be shared with
appropriate federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, foreign, or
international government agencies consistent with the routine uses set
forth in the system of records notice and as otherwise authorized under
the Privacy Act.
This newly established system will be included in DHS's inventory
of record systems.
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the means by which Federal Government
agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate individuals' records.
The Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained in a ``system
of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a group of any records under
the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the
name of an individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other
identifying particular assigned to the individual. In the Privacy Act,
an individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful
permanent residents. As a matter of policy, DHS extends administrative
Privacy Act protections to all individuals when systems of records
maintain information on U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and
visitors.
The Privacy Act allows Government agencies to exempt certain
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims
an exemption, it must issue a rule to make clear to the public the
reasons why a particular exemption is claimed, and provide an
opportunity to comment.
DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy
Act for DHS/ICE-015 LeadTrac System of Records. Some information in
this system of records relates to official DHS national security, law
enforcement, and immigration activities. These exemptions are needed to
protect information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to
subjects or others related to these activities. Specifically, the
exemptions are required to preclude subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes; to avoid disclosure of activity
techniques; to protect the identities and physical safety of
confidential informants and law enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS's
ability to obtain information from third parties and other sources; and
to protect the privacy of third parties. Disclosure of information to
the subject of the inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid
detection or apprehension.
In appropriate circumstances, when compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this
system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived on a case-by-case basis.
A system of records notice for DHS/ICE-015 LeadTrac System of
Records is also published in this issue of the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135; (6 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.); 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Add paragraph 74 to Appendix C to read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
74. The DHS/ICE-015 LeadTrac System of Records consists of
electronic and paper records and will be used by ICE investigative
and homeland security personnel. The DHS/ICE-015 LeadTrac System of
Records contains aggregated data from ICE and DHS law enforcement
and homeland security IT systems, as well as data uploaded by ICE
personnel for analysis from various public, private, and commercial
sources during the course of an investigation or analytical project.
This information may include some or all of the following types of
personally identifiable information: Identifying and biographic data
such as name and date of birth; citizenship and immigration data;
border crossing data; customs import-export history; criminal
history; contact information; criminal associates; family
relationships; photographs and other media; and employment and
education information. The records also include tips received by ICE
from the public concerning suspicious or potentially illegal
activity, as well as telephone call detail records, which contain
call transactions and subscriber data, obtained via lawful process
during the course of an investigation. This information is
maintained by ICE for analytical and investigative purposes and is
made accessible to ICE personnel via the LeadTrac system interface.
The system is used to conduct research supporting the production of
law enforcement activities; provide lead information for
investigative inquiry and follow-up; assist in the conduct of ICE
criminal and administrative investigations; assist in the disruption
of terrorist or other criminal activity; and discover previously
unknown connections among existing ICE investigations.
The Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions
of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1),
(e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8);
(f); and (g). Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has exempted this system from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3),
(c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f). When
a record received from another system has been exempted in that
source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or (k)(2), DHS will claim
the same exemptions for those records that are claimed for the
original primary systems of records from which they originated and
claims any additional exemptions set forth here.
Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified, on a
case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a request is made,
for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures)
because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would
therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts
and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would
undermine the entire investigative process. Disclosure of
corrections or notations of dispute may impede investigations by
requiring DHS to inform each witness or individual contacted during
the investigation of each correction or notation pertaining to
information provided them during the investigation.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to
tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing
investigations and law enforcement activities and would impose an
unreasonable administrative burden by requiring investigations to be
continually reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and
amendment to such information could disclose classified and
[[Page 52595]]
other security-sensitive information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In
the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to
retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of
unlawful activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from
Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the
nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with
that investigation and related law enforcement activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because
providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by
compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal
the identity of witnesses or confidential informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency
Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access provisions of
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because
with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training
and exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(i) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that
the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy
Act.
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Jonathan R. Cantor,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016-18812 Filed 8-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-28-P