Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision, 52516-52518 [2016-18733]
Download as PDF
52516
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2016 / Notices
following screen. Choose whether you
are submitting your comment as an
individual or on behalf of a third party
and then submit. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the
facility, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard or envelope.
FMCSA will consider all comments
and material received during the
comment period. FMCSA may issue a
final determination at any time after the
close of the comment period.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and insert
the docket number FMCSA–2016–0031
in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, click ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ button and choose the
document listed to review. If you do not
have access to the Internet, you may
view the docket online by visiting the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
a level of safety that is equivalent to or
greater than the level of safety
maintained without the exemptions for
these CMV drivers.
DATES: The exemptions were granted
April 28, 2016. The exemptions expire
on April 28, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64–
113, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. If you have questions
regarding viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Electronic Access
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and/or Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
[Docket No. FMCSA–2015–0351]
II. Background
Issued on: July 27, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–18735 Filed 8–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt 22 individuals from
the vision requirement in the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the
vision requirement in one eye for
various reasons. The exemptions will
enable these individuals to operate
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in
interstate commerce without meeting
the prescribed vision requirement in
one eye. The Agency has concluded that
granting these exemptions will provide
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:23 Aug 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
On March 28, 2016, FMCSA
published a notice of receipt of
exemption applications from certain
individuals, and requested comments
from the public (81 FR 17237). That
notice listed 22 applicants’ case
histories. The 22 individuals applied for
exemptions from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who
operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a
two-year period if it finds ‘‘such
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to or greater
than the level that would be achieved
absent such exemption.’’ The statute
also allows the Agency to renew
exemptions at the end of the 2-year
period. Accordingly, FMCSA has
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
evaluated the 22 applications on their
merits and made a determination to
grant exemptions to each of them.
III. Vision and Driving Experience of
the Applicants
The vision requirement in the
FMCSRs provides: A person is
physically qualified to drive a
commercial motor vehicle if that person
has distant visual acuity of at least 20/
40 (Snellen) in each eye without
corrective lenses or visual acuity
separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen)
or better with corrective lenses, distant
binocular acuity of a least 20/40
(Snellen) in both eyes with or without
corrective lenses, field of vision of at
least 70° in the horizontal meridian in
each eye, and the ability to recognize
the colors of traffic signals and devices
showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR
391.41(b)(10)).
FMCSA recognizes that some drivers
do not meet the vision requirement but
have adapted their driving to
accommodate their limitation and
demonstrated their ability to drive
safely. The 22 exemption applicants
listed in this notice are in this category.
They are unable to meet the vision
requirement in one eye for various
reasons, including amblyopia, aphakia,
central scotoma, complete loss of vision,
corneal scar, macular scar, open angle
glaucoma, optic nerve damage,
prosthetic eye, retinal detachment, and
strabismic amblyopia. In most cases,
their eye conditions were not recently
developed. Fifteen of the applicants
were either born with their vision
impairments or have had them since
childhood.
The 7 individuals that sustained their
vision conditions as adults have had it
for a range of 5 to 30 years.
Although each applicant has one eye
which does not meet the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
each has at least 20/40 corrected vision
in the other eye, and in a doctor’s
opinion, has sufficient vision to perform
all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV.
Doctors’ opinions are supported by the
applicants’ possession of valid
commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) or
non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to
knowledge and skills tests designed to
evaluate their qualifications to operate a
CMV.
All of these applicants satisfied the
testing requirements for their State of
residence. By meeting State licensing
requirements, the applicants
demonstrated their ability to operate a
CMV, with their limited vision, to the
satisfaction of the State.
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
While possessing a valid CDL or nonCDL, these 22 drivers have been
authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate
commerce, even though their vision
disqualified them from driving in
interstate commerce. They have driven
CMVs with their limited vision in
careers ranging for 5 to 41 years. In the
past three years, 3 drivers were involved
in crashes, and 1 driver was convicted
of a moving violation in a CMV.
The qualifications, experience, and
medical condition of each applicant
were stated and discussed in detail in
the March 28, 2016 notice (81 FR
17237).
IV. Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the vision requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely
to achieve an equivalent or greater level
of safety than would be achieved
without the exemption. Without the
exemption, applicants will continue to
be restricted to intrastate driving. With
the exemption, applicants can drive in
interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis
focuses on whether an equal or greater
level of safety is likely to be achieved by
permitting each of these drivers to drive
in interstate commerce as opposed to
restricting him or her to driving in
intrastate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these
exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered the medical reports about
the applicants’ vision as well as their
driving records and experience with the
vision deficiency.
To qualify for an exemption from the
vision requirement, FMCSA requires a
person to present verifiable evidence
that he/she has driven a commercial
vehicle safely with the vision deficiency
for the past 3 years. Recent driving
performance is especially important in
evaluating future safety, according to
several research studies designed to
correlate past and future driving
performance. Results of these studies
support the principle that the best
predictor of future performance by a
driver is his/her past record of crashes
and traffic violations. Copies of the
studies may be found at Docket Number
FMCSA–1998–3637.
FMCSA believes it can properly apply
the principle to monocular drivers,
because data from the Federal Highway
Administration’s (FHWA) former waiver
study program clearly demonstrate the
driving performance of experienced
monocular drivers in the program is
better than that of all CMV drivers
collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345,
March 26, 1996). The fact that
experienced monocular drivers
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:23 Aug 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
demonstrated safe driving records in the
waiver program supports a conclusion
that other monocular drivers, meeting
the same qualifying conditions as those
required by the waiver program, are also
likely to have adapted to their vision
deficiency and will continue to operate
safely.
The first major research correlating
past and future performance was done
in England by Greenwood and Yule in
1920. Subsequent studies, building on
that model, concluded that crash rates
for the same individual exposed to
certain risks for two different time
periods vary only slightly (See Bates
and Neyman, University of California
Publications in Statistics, April 1952).
Other studies demonstrated theories of
predicting crash proneness from crash
history coupled with other factors.
These factors—such as age, sex,
geographic location, mileage driven and
conviction history—are used every day
by insurance companies and motor
vehicle bureaus to predict the
probability of an individual
experiencing future crashes (See Weber,
Donald C., ‘‘Accident Rate Potential: An
Application of Multiple Regression
Analysis of a Poisson Process,’’ Journal
of American Statistical Association,
June 1971). A 1964 California Driver
Record Study prepared by the California
Department of Motor Vehicles
concluded that the best overall crash
predictor for both concurrent and
nonconcurrent events is the number of
single convictions. This study used 3
consecutive years of data, comparing the
experiences of drivers in the first 2 years
with their experiences in the final year.
Applying principles from these
studies to the past 3-year record of the
22 applicants, 3 drivers were involved
in crashes, and 1 driver was convicted
of a moving violation in a CMV. All the
applicants achieved a record of safety
while driving with their vision
impairment, demonstrating the
likelihood that they have adapted their
driving skills to accommodate their
condition. As the applicants’ ample
driving histories with their vision
deficiencies are good predictors of
future performance, FMCSA concludes
their ability to drive safely can be
projected into the future.
We believe that the applicants’
intrastate driving experience and history
provide an adequate basis for predicting
their ability to drive safely in interstate
commerce. Intrastate driving, like
interstate operations, involves
substantial driving on highways on the
interstate system and on other roads
built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas
exposes the driver to more pedestrian
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52517
and vehicular traffic than exists on
interstate highways. Faster reaction to
traffic and traffic signals is generally
required because distances between
them are more compact. These
conditions tax visual capacity and
driver response just as intensely as
interstate driving conditions. The
veteran drivers in this proceeding have
operated CMVs safely under those
conditions for at least 3 years, most for
much longer. Their experience and
driving records lead us to believe that
each applicant is capable of operating in
interstate commerce as safely as he/she
has been performing in intrastate
commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds
that exempting these applicants from
the vision requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption. For this reason, the
Agency is granting the exemptions for
the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to the 22 applicants
listed in the notice of March 28, 2016
(81 FR 17237).
We recognize that the vision of an
applicant may change and affect his/her
ability to operate a CMV as safely as in
the past. As a condition of the
exemption, therefore, FMCSA will
impose requirements on the 22
individuals consistent with the
grandfathering provisions applied to
drivers who participated in the
Agency’s vision waiver program.
Those requirements are found at 49
CFR 391.64(b) and include the
following:
(1) That each individual be physically
examined every year (a) by an
ophthalmologist or optometrist who
attests that the vision in the better eye
continues to meet the requirement in 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10) and (b) by a medical
examiner who attests that the individual
is otherwise physically qualified under
49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (3) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must have a copy
of the certification when driving, for
presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
V. Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received three comments in
this proceeding. Austen Barlow stated
she is in favor of granting the
exemptions because she believes these
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
52518
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 152 / Monday, August 8, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
drivers will exercise more caution than
those who meet the standards. Roy
Hegland stated that he is in favor of
granting the exemptions based on the
professional experience of his daughter
who has a vision deficiency. An
anonymous commenter stated that they
are against granting the exemptions
because of safety concerns related to the
vision deficiencies of the drivers,
specifically regarding depth perception
of the drivers and larger blind spots
while operating CMVs. As stated in
section four of this notice, medical
evaluations from each driver, their
driving records, driving experience with
the vision deficiency, and safety
concerns, are all considered when
determining if an exemption should be
granted. Studies pertaining to the
efficacy of these considerations are also
referenced in section four.
VI. Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 22
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the
vision requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), subject to the
requirements cited above (49 CFR
391.64(b)):
Lee R. Boykin (TX)
Donald Carrillo (NM)
Carl F. Cryer (AL)
Steven W. Day (MO)
Roger M. Dunaway (KY)
Horace N. Goss (TX)
Matt A. Guilmain (NH)
Hugo N. Gutierrez (IN)
Edward R. Hunt (NC)
William J. Kanaris (NY)
Harvey Klein (NJ)
Ronnie L. McHugh (KS)
Walter J. Musty (MN)
John O’Boyle (PA)
Michael L. Robinson (MO)
Donald P. Ruckinger (PA)
Mark A. Sanders (OK)
Michael J. Scarano (NJ)
Edward P. Schrader II (WA)
Charles H. Strople (MA)
Eddie Walker (NC)
Trent Wipf (SC)
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each exemption will be valid
for 2 years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the
exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
If the exemption is still effective at the
end of the 2-year period, the person may
apply to FMCSA for a renewal under
procedures in effect at that time.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:23 Aug 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
Issued on: July 29, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–18733 Filed 8–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
National Hazardous Materials Route
Registry Revisions and Procedures
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice
AGENCY:
This notice provides the most
current revisions to the National
Hazardous Materials Route Registry
(NHMRR) and procedures to facilitate
the update of the NHMRR by State and
Tribal government routing agencies. The
NHMRR is a listing, as reported by
States and Tribal governments, of all
designated and restricted road and
preferred highway routes for
transportation of highway route
controlled quantities (HRCQ) of Class 7
radioactive materials (RAM) (HRCQ/
RAM) and non-radioactive hazardous
materials (NRHMs).
DATES: Effective date: August 8, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Vincent Babich (202) 366–4871,
or vincent.babich@dot.gov, Hazardous
Materials Division, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance, Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Office hours are from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday,
except for Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Paragraphs (a)(2) and (b) of section
5112 of title 49, United States Code
(U.S.C.) permit States and Tribal
governments to designate and limit
highway routes over which HRCQ/RAM
and NRHM may be transported,
provided that the State or Tribal
government complies with standards
prescribed by the Secretary of
Transportation (the Secretary) and
meets publication requirements in
section 5112(c). To establish standards
under paragraph (b), the Secretary must
consult with the States, and, under
section 5112(c), coordinate with the
States to publish periodically a list of
currently effective HRCQ/RAM and
NRHM highway routing designations
and restrictions. The requirements that
States and Tribal governments must
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
follow to establish, maintain, or enforce
routing designations for the transport of
placardable quantities of NRHM are set
forth in 49 CFR part 397, subpart C.
Subpart D of part 397 sets out the
requirements for designating preferred
routes for HRCQ/RAM shipments as an
alternative, or in addition, to Interstate
System highways. For HRCQ/RAM
shipments, § 397.101 defines a preferred
route as an Interstate Highway for which
no alternative route is designated by the
State; a route specifically designated by
the State; or both. See § 397.65 for the
definition of ‘‘NRHM’’ and ‘‘routing
designations.’’
Under a delegation from the
Secretary,1 FMCSA has authority to
implement 49 U.S.C. 5112.
Currently, 49 CFR part 397, subpart C,
(Routing of NRHM) and subpart D
(Routing of Class 7 RAM) address the
routing requirements and procedures
that State and tribal government are
required to follow. Section 397.73
establishes public information and
reporting requirements for NRHM.
States or Tribal governments are
required to furnish information
regarding any new or changed routes to
FMCSA within 60 days after
establishment. Under 49 CFR 397.103, a
State routing designation for HRCQ/
RAM routes (preferred routes) as an
alternative, or in addition, to an
Interstate System highway, is effective
when the authorized routing agency
provides FMCSA with written
notification, FMCSA acknowledges
receipt in writing, and the route is
published in FMCSA’s Hazardous
Material Route Registry. The Office of
Management and Budget has approved
these collections of information under
control number 2126–0014,
Transportation of Hazardous Materials,
Highway Routing. This notice serves
only to provide the most current
updates to the NHMRR, and to
communicate to States and Tribal
government routing agencies procedures
to facilitate timely reporting and
efficient update of the NHMRR as
required by 49 U.S.C. 5112 and 49 CFR
part 397; it does not establish any new
public information and reporting
requirements.
Procedural Changes
Section 33013 of the Moving Ahead
for Progress in the 21st Century Act of
2012 (MAP–21) [Pub. L. 112–141, July 6,
2012, 126 Stat. 405, 839] amended 49
U.S.C. 5112(c), which addresses the
form, manner, and timetable for State
and Tribal Governments to issue and
update routing information for
1 49
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
CFR 1.87(d)(2).
08AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 152 (Monday, August 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52516-52518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18733]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0351]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 22 individuals from the
vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for
various reasons. The exemptions will enable these individuals to
operate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce without
meeting the prescribed vision requirement in one eye. The Agency has
concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety
that is equivalent to or greater than the level of safety maintained
without the exemptions for these CMV drivers.
DATES: The exemptions were granted April 28, 2016. The exemptions
expire on April 28, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-113,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions
regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
II. Background
On March 28, 2016, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of exemption
applications from certain individuals, and requested comments from the
public (81 FR 17237). That notice listed 22 applicants' case histories.
The 22 individuals applied for exemptions from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for a two-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve
a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period.
Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the 22 applications on their merits
and made a determination to grant exemptions to each of them.
III. Vision and Driving Experience of the Applicants
The vision requirement in the FMCSRs provides: A person is
physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle if that person
has distant visual acuity of at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye
without corrective lenses or visual acuity separately corrected to 20/
40 (Snellen) or better with corrective lenses, distant binocular acuity
of a least 20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or without corrective
lenses, field of vision of at least 70[deg] in the horizontal meridian
in each eye, and the ability to recognize the colors of traffic signals
and devices showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)).
FMCSA recognizes that some drivers do not meet the vision
requirement but have adapted their driving to accommodate their
limitation and demonstrated their ability to drive safely. The 22
exemption applicants listed in this notice are in this category. They
are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various
reasons, including amblyopia, aphakia, central scotoma, complete loss
of vision, corneal scar, macular scar, open angle glaucoma, optic nerve
damage, prosthetic eye, retinal detachment, and strabismic amblyopia.
In most cases, their eye conditions were not recently developed.
Fifteen of the applicants were either born with their vision
impairments or have had them since childhood.
The 7 individuals that sustained their vision conditions as adults
have had it for a range of 5 to 30 years.
Although each applicant has one eye which does not meet the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at least 20/40 corrected
vision in the other eye, and in a doctor's opinion, has sufficient
vision to perform all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors'
opinions are supported by the applicants' possession of valid
commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) or non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to knowledge and skills tests
designed to evaluate their qualifications to operate a CMV.
All of these applicants satisfied the testing requirements for
their State of residence. By meeting State licensing requirements, the
applicants demonstrated their ability to operate a CMV, with their
limited vision, to the satisfaction of the State.
[[Page 52517]]
While possessing a valid CDL or non-CDL, these 22 drivers have been
authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate commerce, even though their
vision disqualified them from driving in interstate commerce. They have
driven CMVs with their limited vision in careers ranging for 5 to 41
years. In the past three years, 3 drivers were involved in crashes, and
1 driver was convicted of a moving violation in a CMV.
The qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each
applicant were stated and discussed in detail in the March 28, 2016
notice (81 FR 17237).
IV. Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is
likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would
be achieved without the exemption. Without the exemption, applicants
will continue to be restricted to intrastate driving. With the
exemption, applicants can drive in interstate commerce. Thus, our
analysis focuses on whether an equal or greater level of safety is
likely to be achieved by permitting each of these drivers to drive in
interstate commerce as opposed to restricting him or her to driving in
intrastate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered the medical reports about the applicants' vision as well as
their driving records and experience with the vision deficiency.
To qualify for an exemption from the vision requirement, FMCSA
requires a person to present verifiable evidence that he/she has driven
a commercial vehicle safely with the vision deficiency for the past 3
years. Recent driving performance is especially important in evaluating
future safety, according to several research studies designed to
correlate past and future driving performance. Results of these studies
support the principle that the best predictor of future performance by
a driver is his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations.
Copies of the studies may be found at Docket Number FMCSA-1998-3637.
FMCSA believes it can properly apply the principle to monocular
drivers, because data from the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA)
former waiver study program clearly demonstrate the driving performance
of experienced monocular drivers in the program is better than that of
all CMV drivers collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345, March 26, 1996).
The fact that experienced monocular drivers demonstrated safe driving
records in the waiver program supports a conclusion that other
monocular drivers, meeting the same qualifying conditions as those
required by the waiver program, are also likely to have adapted to
their vision deficiency and will continue to operate safely.
The first major research correlating past and future performance
was done in England by Greenwood and Yule in 1920. Subsequent studies,
building on that model, concluded that crash rates for the same
individual exposed to certain risks for two different time periods vary
only slightly (See Bates and Neyman, University of California
Publications in Statistics, April 1952). Other studies demonstrated
theories of predicting crash proneness from crash history coupled with
other factors. These factors--such as age, sex, geographic location,
mileage driven and conviction history--are used every day by insurance
companies and motor vehicle bureaus to predict the probability of an
individual experiencing future crashes (See Weber, Donald C.,
``Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression
Analysis of a Poisson Process,'' Journal of American Statistical
Association, June 1971). A 1964 California Driver Record Study prepared
by the California Department of Motor Vehicles concluded that the best
overall crash predictor for both concurrent and nonconcurrent events is
the number of single convictions. This study used 3 consecutive years
of data, comparing the experiences of drivers in the first 2 years with
their experiences in the final year.
Applying principles from these studies to the past 3-year record of
the 22 applicants, 3 drivers were involved in crashes, and 1 driver was
convicted of a moving violation in a CMV. All the applicants achieved a
record of safety while driving with their vision impairment,
demonstrating the likelihood that they have adapted their driving
skills to accommodate their condition. As the applicants' ample driving
histories with their vision deficiencies are good predictors of future
performance, FMCSA concludes their ability to drive safely can be
projected into the future.
We believe that the applicants' intrastate driving experience and
history provide an adequate basis for predicting their ability to drive
safely in interstate commerce. Intrastate driving, like interstate
operations, involves substantial driving on highways on the interstate
system and on other roads built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas exposes the driver to more pedestrian
and vehicular traffic than exists on interstate highways. Faster
reaction to traffic and traffic signals is generally required because
distances between them are more compact. These conditions tax visual
capacity and driver response just as intensely as interstate driving
conditions. The veteran drivers in this proceeding have operated CMVs
safely under those conditions for at least 3 years, most for much
longer. Their experience and driving records lead us to believe that
each applicant is capable of operating in interstate commerce as safely
as he/she has been performing in intrastate commerce. Consequently,
FMCSA finds that exempting these applicants from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to
that existing without the exemption. For this reason, the Agency is
granting the exemptions for the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to the 22 applicants listed in the notice of March
28, 2016 (81 FR 17237).
We recognize that the vision of an applicant may change and affect
his/her ability to operate a CMV as safely as in the past. As a
condition of the exemption, therefore, FMCSA will impose requirements
on the 22 individuals consistent with the grandfathering provisions
applied to drivers who participated in the Agency's vision waiver
program.
Those requirements are found at 49 CFR 391.64(b) and include the
following:
(1) That each individual be physically examined every year (a) by
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the
better eye continues to meet the requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)
and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is
otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each
individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's
report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical
examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's
qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification
file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must have a copy of the
certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement official.
V. Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received three comments in this proceeding. Austen Barlow
stated she is in favor of granting the exemptions because she believes
these
[[Page 52518]]
drivers will exercise more caution than those who meet the standards.
Roy Hegland stated that he is in favor of granting the exemptions based
on the professional experience of his daughter who has a vision
deficiency. An anonymous commenter stated that they are against
granting the exemptions because of safety concerns related to the
vision deficiencies of the drivers, specifically regarding depth
perception of the drivers and larger blind spots while operating CMVs.
As stated in section four of this notice, medical evaluations from each
driver, their driving records, driving experience with the vision
deficiency, and safety concerns, are all considered when determining if
an exemption should be granted. Studies pertaining to the efficacy of
these considerations are also referenced in section four.
VI. Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 22 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the vision requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above (49 CFR
391.64(b)):
Lee R. Boykin (TX)
Donald Carrillo (NM)
Carl F. Cryer (AL)
Steven W. Day (MO)
Roger M. Dunaway (KY)
Horace N. Goss (TX)
Matt A. Guilmain (NH)
Hugo N. Gutierrez (IN)
Edward R. Hunt (NC)
William J. Kanaris (NY)
Harvey Klein (NJ)
Ronnie L. McHugh (KS)
Walter J. Musty (MN)
John O'Boyle (PA)
Michael L. Robinson (MO)
Donald P. Ruckinger (PA)
Mark A. Sanders (OK)
Michael J. Scarano (NJ)
Edward P. Schrader II (WA)
Charles H. Strople (MA)
Eddie Walker (NC)
Trent Wipf (SC)
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption
will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The
exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the
terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted
in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted;
or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the
goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year
period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in
effect at that time.
Issued on: July 29, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-18733 Filed 8-5-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P