Trade Monitoring Procedures for Fishery Products; International Trade in Seafood; Permit Requirements for Importers and Exporters, 51126-51138 [2016-18401]
Download as PDF
51126
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
5. In section 609.406–3, revise
paragraphs (a), (b)(2) through (7), (c)(2),
and (d) to read as follows:
■
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
609.406–3
Procedures.
(a) Investigation and referral. (1) DOS
employees aware of any cause that
might serve as the basis for debarment
shall refer those cases through the
contracting officer to the debarring
official. The debarring official shall refer
to the Office of the Inspector General all
reported cases that involve possible
criminal or fraudulent activities for
investigation by that office.
(2) Referrals for consideration of
debarment shall include, as appropriate
and available—
(i) The cause for debarment (see FAR
9.406–2);
(ii) A statement of facts;
(iii) Copies of supporting
documentary evidence and a list of all
necessary or probable witnesses,
including addresses and telephone
numbers, together with a statement
concerning their availability to appear at
a fact-finding proceeding and the
subject matter of their testimony;
(iv) A list of all contractors involved,
either as principals or as affiliates,
including current or last known home
and business addresses and ZIP codes;
(v) A statement of the acquisition
history with such contractors;
(vi) A statement concerning any
known pertinent active or potential
criminal investigation, criminal or civil
court proceedings, or administrative
claim before Boards of Contract
Appeals; and
(vii) A statement from each DOS
organizational element affected by the
debarment action as to the impact of a
debarment on DOS programs.
(3) As deemed appropriate, the
debarring official may conduct
investigations to supplement the
information provided in the referral, or
may request investigations by the Office
of the Inspector General or other
Department office.
(b) * * *
(2) In response to the debarment
notice, if the contractor or its
representative notifies the debarring
official within 30 days after receipt of
the notice that it wants to present
information and arguments in person to
the debarring official, that official, or a
designee, shall chair such a meeting.
The oral presentation shall be
conducted informally and a transcript
need not be made. However, the
contractor may supplement its oral
presentation with written information
and arguments for inclusion in the
administrative record.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
(3) Pursuant to FAR 9.406–3(b)(2), the
contractor may request a fact-finding
proceeding.
(4) The debarring official shall
designate a fact-finding official and
shall provide the fact-finding official
with a copy of all documentary
evidence considered in proposing
debarment. Upon receipt of such
material, the fact-finding official shall
notify the contractor and schedule a
hearing date.
(5) In addition to the purposes
provided in FAR 9.406–3(b)(2), the
hearing is intended to provide the
debarring official with findings of fact
based on a preponderance of evidence
submitted to the fact-finding official and
to provide the debarring official with a
determination as to whether a cause for
debarment exists, based on the facts as
found.
(6) The fact-finding proceeding shall
be conducted in accordance with
procedures determined by the factfinding official. The rules shall be as
informal as is practicable, consistent
with FAR 9.406–3(b). The fact-finding
official is responsible for making the
transcribed record of the hearing, unless
the contractor and the fact-finding
official agree to waive the requirement
for a transcript.
(7) The fact-finding official shall
deliver written findings and the
transcribed record, if made, to the
debarring official. The findings shall
resolve any facts in dispute based on a
preponderance of the evidence
presented and recommend whether a
cause for debarment exists.
(c) * * *
(2) When a determination is made to
initiate action, the debarring official
shall provide to the contractor and any
specifically named affiliates written
notice in accordance with FAR 9.406–
3(c).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Debarring official’s decision. In
addition to complying with FAR 9.406–
3(d) and (e), the debarring official shall
provide single copies of the decision to
each DOS organizational element
affected by the decision.
609.407–3
[Amended]
6. In section 609.407–3:
a. In paragraph (b)(2), remove the
word ‘‘panel’’ and add in its place
‘‘official’’.
■ b. In paragraph (d), remove ‘‘and to
the General Services Administration in
accordance with 609.404’’.
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 649—TERMINATION OF
CONTRACTS
7. Add section 649.101 to read as
follows:
■
649.101
Authorities and responsibilities.
649.101–70
[Amended]
8. Revise the heading of newly
redesignated section 649.101–70 to read
as follows:
■
649.101–70 Termination action decisions
after debarment.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 22, 2016.
Eric N. Moore,
Acting, Procurement Executive, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 2016–18280 Filed 8–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 216, 300, 600, and 660
[Docket No. 090223227–6560–03]
RIN 0648–AX63
Trade Monitoring Procedures for
Fishery Products; International Trade
in Seafood; Permit Requirements for
Importers and Exporters
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule sets forth
regulations to revise procedures and
requirements for filing import, export,
and re-export documentation for certain
fishery products to meet requirements
for the SAFE Port Act of 2006, the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA), other applicable statutes, and
obligations that arise from U.S.
participation in regional fishery
management organizations (RFMOs) and
other arrangements to which the United
States is a member or contracting party.
Specifically, NMFS sets forth
regulations to integrate the collection of
trade documentation within the
government-wide International Trade
Data System (ITDS) and require
electronic information collection
through the automated portal
maintained by the Department of
Homeland Security, Customs and
Border Protection (CBP). Under this
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
integration, NMFS will require annually
renewable International Fisheries Trade
Permits (IFTP) for the import, export,
and re-export of certain regulated
seafood commodities that are subject to
trade monitoring programs of RFMOs
and/or subject to trade documentation
requirements under domestic law.
These trade monitoring programs enable
the United States to exclude products
that do not meet the criteria for
admissibility to U.S. markets, including
products resulting from illegal,
unregulated, and unreported (IUU)
fishing activities. This final rule
consolidates existing international trade
permits for regulated seafood products
under the Antarctic Marine Living
Resources (AMLR) and Highly
Migratory Species International Trade
Permit (HMS ITP) programs and
expands the scope of the permit
requirement to include regulated
seafood products under the Tuna
Tracking and Verification Program
(TTVP). This final rule also stipulates
data and trade documentation for the
above programs which must be
provided electronically to CBP and
addresses recordkeeping requirements
for these programs in light of these
changes. Trade documentation excludes
any programmatic documents that are
not required at the time of entry/export
(e.g., biweekly dealer reports).
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 20, 2016, except for the
revision to § 300.184, which is effective
August 3, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Rogers, Office for
International Affairs and Seafood
Inspection, NOAA Fisheries (phone
301–427–8350, or email
christopher.rogers@noaa.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Security and Accountability for
Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE Port Act,
Pub. L. 109–347) requires all Federal
agencies with a role in import
admissibility decisions to collect
information electronically through the
ITDS. The Department of the Treasury
has the U.S. Government lead on ITDS
development and Federal agency
integration. CBP developed Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE) as an
internet-based system for the collection
information for ITDS. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB),
through its e-government initiative,
oversees Federal agency participation in
ITDS, with a focus on reducing
duplicate reporting across agencies and
migrating paper-based reporting systems
to electronic information collection.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
The term ITDS refers to the integrated,
government-wide project for the
electronic collection, use, and
dissemination of the international trade
and transportation data Federal agencies
need to perform their missions, while
the term ACE refers to the ‘‘single
window’’ system through which the
trade community will submit data
related to imports and exports. Detailed
information on ITDS is available at:
https://www.itds.gov.
Numerous Federal agencies are
involved in the regulation of
international trade and many of these
agencies participate in the import,
export and transportation-related
decision-making process. Agencies also
use trade data to monitor and report on
trade activity. NMFS is a partner
government agency in the ITDS project
because of its role in monitoring the
trade of certain fishery products.
Electronic collection of seafood trade
data through a single portal will result
in an overall reduction of the public
reporting burden and the agency’s data
collection costs, will improve the
timeliness and accuracy of admissibility
decisions, and increase the effectiveness
of applicable trade restrictive measures.
On December 29, 2015, NMFS
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking for this action (80 FR 81251)
to codify NMFS procedures for
collecting information electronically
through the ITDS. NMFS prepared a
regulatory impact review of this action,
which is available from NMFS (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). This
analysis describes the economic impact
this action will have on the United
States. Responses to public comments
received on the proposed rule are set
forth below.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
A number of changes from the
proposed rule were made to clarify the
regulatory text and to take account of
other final rules affecting 50 CFR part
300 that became effective after the
proposed rule for ITDS integration was
published.
Export Requirements
Although the ITDS single window
concept is built on the ACE platform as
the reporting mechanism for the trade
sector and the source for accessing trade
data by the partner agencies, there is a
distinction between reporting
procedures for imports and exports. The
system used to electronically transmit
export filings is called the Automated
Export System (AES). The primary
document for instructing the trade
sector on the data requirements for
export filing is the Automated Export
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51127
System Trade Interface Requirements
(AESTIR). The primary instructional
document for Partner Government
Agency (PGA) export requirements is
the ‘‘Appendix Q’’ to AESTIR. This
document is comparable to the Customs
and Trade Automated Interface
Requirements (CATAIR) ‘‘Appendix
PGA’’ for import transactions. While
each PGA has issued a separate
Implementation Guide for import
requirements as a supplement to
CATAIR, all guidance to the trade sector
for PGA export requirements is detailed
within the AESTIR Appendix Q
documents.
The CBP Web page that contains the
primary information on export
requirements is: https://www.cbp.gov/
trade/aes. Details on how to submit
export data via AES are available at:
https://www.cbp.gov/trade/aes/aestir/
introduction-and-guidelines. PGA
record formats are listed at: https://
www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/
aestir-draft-appendix-q-pga-recordformats. The Appendix Q Record Lay
Out Key details how each record
required should be structured: https://
www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/
appendix-q-record-layout-key. NMFS
has included references to the CBP
import and export documentation in
§ 300.323 of the regulatory text.
Electronic System for Atlantic Bluefin
Tuna
NMFS amended the regulatory text for
the HMS ITP at 50 CFR 300.181 through
300.189 to reflect the implementation of
the electronic bluefin tuna catch
document program (81 FR 18796, April
1, 2016).
Biweekly Reporting and Import
Documentation for Bigeye Tuna
NMFS amended 50 CFR 300.184 to
address the exemption for bigeye tuna
described in the Response to Comments
section below under the heading ‘‘Biweekly Reporting.’’
Issuance of Permits Restricted to
Residents
NMFS amended 50 CFR part
300.322(a) to clarify that only resident
agents in the United States are eligible
to be issued the International Fisheries
Trade Permit (IFTP). Entities that are
not resident in the United States may
obtain the IFTP only via a resident agent
application.
Entry Types Subject to Rule
NMFS amended 50 CFR 300.322(a)
and 300.323 to clarify the various
transactions which pertain to seafood
previously imported for purposes other
than immediate consumption and for
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
51128
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
which the permitting, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements apply.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Exception to Low Value Exemptions
NMFS revised 50 CFR 300.323 to
clarify that all imports and exports of
covered commodities, including
shipments otherwise eligible for the de
minimis value exemption, must be filed
in ACE or AES, as applicable, in order
to collect the NMFS-required
information. NMFS also revised 50 CFR
300.324(b) to clarify that de minimis
value imports (valued at $800 or less;
see 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C)) and exports
(valued at $2500 or less; see 15 CFR
30.37(a) and 15 CFR 30.2(a)(iv)(F)) are
subject to the prohibition on importing/
exporting fish or fish products regulated
under 50 CFR 300 subpart Q without a
valid IFTP or without submitting
complete and accurate information
through ACE or AES, as applicable.
Low value shipments are not exempt
from statutory and regulatory
requirements to collect information to
support admissibility determinations
and to report to the respective regional
fishery management organizations on
U.S. trade in fish products within the
scope of each program. Under the SAFE
Port Act, NMFS is required to collect
information electronically and through
the single window. Therefore, NMFS
requires the use of ACE or AES, as
applicable, to submit required
information. However, CBP may provide
other reporting mechanisms for different
entry types and/or de minimis value
shipments. If these alternative CBP
mechanisms can collect all of the
NMFS-required information and
transmit that information to NMFS,
importers and exporters may use these
mechanisms to fulfill NMFS reporting
requirements.
Redesignation of 50 CFR part 300
Subpart Q
In publishing the proposed rule for
ITDS integration of current trade
monitoring programs, NMFS incorrectly
numbered the sections of the proposed
new subpart R to 50 CFR part 300. A
final rule amending regulations
implementing the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act (HSFCA) was
published on October 16, 2015 (80 FR
62488). That final rule added a new
subpart Q to 50 CFR part 300, with
sections numbered §§ 300.330 through
300.341. In subsequently proposing a
new Subpart R for the ITDS integration
regulations, NMFS numbered sections
from 300.320 through 300.324.
In order to maintain the correct
sequence of section numbers, NMFS is
now redesignating existing subpart Q as
new subpart R. This final rule then
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
inserts a new subpart Q for the ITDS
regulations with sections numbered in
the correct order. Given the placement
of HSFCA regulations in the new
subpart R, conforming amendments are
needed for cross-references to HSFCA
requirements which exist in 50 CFR
600.705 and 50 CFR 660.2.
Responses to Public Comments
NMFS received 12 public comments
on the proposed rule. Comments were
received from the National Customs
Brokers and Forwarders Association of
America (NCBFAA), Traffic/World
Wildlife Fund/Oceana, Bumble Bee
Seafoods, Tri Marine Management
Company LLC, and two individuals
potentially affected by new
requirements in this rule.
Data Elements
Comment 1: NCBFAA noted that
although the data submission
requirements under the proposed rule
are not new, this data has not previously
been required to be submitted at the
time of entry/release. They noted that
submitting data at the time of entry/
release not only increases processing
costs for the importer, but also raises the
potential for disruptions as the data
moves through the ACE pipeline to CBP
and NMFS. NCBFAA questioned the
need for NMFS to collect all data
elements at the time of entry/release and
asked whether NMFS’ requirements
could be met if the information was
provided via the entry summary which
may be filed electronically within 10
days after entry/release. NCBFAA noted
that moving these data submission
requirements to entry summary would
provide much needed flexibility for
importers and customs brokers to
handle complex entries without slowing
down trade and would suit NMFS needs
because NMFS would not be able to
review data until after entry/release.
Response: NMFS believes that
submission of data at the time of entry/
release is necessary to ensure only
admissible products are permitted entry
into the U.S. market. Allowing data
entry for these three programs after
product has been admitted into the
United States would make efforts to
interdict problematic entries extremely
difficult. NMFS also emphasizes that it
is only requiring the minimum amount
of data necessary to determine whether
a product is admissible at the time of
entry be provided as a data set at the
time of entry. This approach should
expedite the release of product
associated with the three NMFS trade
monitoring programs.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Permits and the Importer of Record
Comment 2: NCBFAA noted it does
not object to consolidating the existing
trade permits as proposed in the rule;
however they noted that in some
instances, particularly along land
borders, customs brokers serve as the
importer of record. NCBFAA stated its
view that the IFTP should not be
required for an importer of record who
is not a beneficial party in interest, such
as a customs broker. NCBFAA therefore
suggested the rule be modified to clarify
that the permit obligation, and
associated recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, belong to the ‘‘beneficial
party in interest’’ which should be
defined as a party with a financial
interest in the imported goods such as
the owner, purchaser, or distributor of
the merchandise.
Response: NMFS believes it is
important for enforcement purposes that
the importer of record, regardless of
whether said importer has a direct
financial interest in the imported goods,
be the responsible party accountable in
the event of a shipment entry problem.
Thus, the IFTP obligation and
associated recordkeeping and reporting
requirements in this rule will reside
with the importer of record. Related to
this, NMFS clarifies that entities not
resident in the United States are
ineligible to apply for the IFTP.
Nonresident importers must have a U.S.
resident agent apply for the IFTP and
have the customs broker provide the
resident agent’s permit number in the
entry data. NMFS has clarified the
regulatory text at 50 CFR 300.322(a)
accordingly.
‘‘De Minimis’’ Levels and Informal
Entries
Comment 3: NCBFAA noted that the
rule does not address NMFS
requirements with regard to Informal
Entries (valued at $2,500) or Section 321
entries (shipments of ‘‘de minimis
value’’, increased from $200 to $800 by
Section 601 of the Trade Facilitation
and Trade Enforcement Act, Pub. L.
114–376). NCBFAA noted that with the
de minimis threshold raised to $800, the
practice of breaking commercial
shipments into lower-value increments
will likewise increase, in effect allowing
these imports to bypass the more
formalized requirements of entry
processing. NCBFAA stated its view that
NMFS needs to address how it will meet
this contingency.
Response: NMFS’ requirement with
regard to Informal Entries will be the
same as those for all other entries,
namely all entries associated with the
HTS codes corresponding to the three
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
seafood import monitoring programs
will need to supply message sets and
documentation into ACE via the
Document Imaging System (DIS).
Similarly, de minimis shipments
corresponding to the relevant HTS
codes which are valued at less than
$800 will also need to supply message
sets and documentation into ACE via
the DIS to ensure that no inadmissible
products are granted entry into the U.S.
market. NMFS therefore revised 50 CFR
300.323 to clarify that all imports and
exports of covered commodities,
including shipments otherwise eligible
for the de minimis value exemption,
must be filed in ACE or AES, as
applicable, in order to collect the
NMFS-required information. NMFS also
revised 50 CFR 300.324(b) to clarify that
de minimis value imports are also
subject to the prohibition on importing
fish or fish products regulated under 50
CFR part 300 subpart Q without a valid
IFTP or without submitting complete
and accurate information. Likewise, low
value exports are subject to AES filing
to meet the NMFS requirements for
permitting and reporting (see 15 CFR
30.2(a)(iv)(F)). However, NMFS has
made provisions for cases where CBP
reporting alternatives can capture and
transmit the NMFS-required
information without a formal entry or
export filing in ACE or AES, as
applicable.
Technical Language
Comment 4: NCBFAA noted that the
proposed regulatory text at §§ 300.322(a)
and 300.323 refers to persons who
import ‘‘for consumption or nonconsumption.’’ NCBFAA noted that the
term ‘‘import for consumption’’ has a
very specific legal meaning under
customs law, whereas, the term ‘‘import
for non-consumption’’ has no particular
meaning under customs law. NCBFAA
therefore suggested that commonly used
customs terms be used to clarify the
application of the proposed rule.
Response: NMFS agrees that the term
‘‘import for non-consumption’’ should
be clarified and has therefore amended
the regulatory text at §§ 300.322(a) and
300.323 to specify the various
transactions which pertain to seafood
previously imported for purposes other
than immediate consumption, e.g.
withdrawal from a foreign trade zone or
bonded warehouse for entry into U.S.
commerce.
Elimination of Paper-Based
Documentation
Comment 5: Traffic et al. conveyed its
understanding that in the initial phases
of ITDS implementation, document
image scans will be used to transmit the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
catch documentation forms. Traffic et al.
stated its view that the key goal must be
to eventually move away from paperbased documentation, including imaged
documents, to truly electronic data.
Traffic et al. stated its hope that NMFS,
in conjunction with CBP, will put in
place systems to receive all information
in a truly electronic format, at least
before the implementation date of the
proposed seafood import monitoring
program or at some set time thereafter,
noting that the value of this system, in
terms of real-time verification and
compliance risk assessment, cannot be
achieved without that change.
Response: Many of the paper-based
catch documentation forms referenced
in this comment are created by regional
fishery management organizations
(RFMOs) or arrangements that are
comprised of different member
countries including the United States.
ITDS therefore cannot be made fully
electronic until action in this direction
is taken by the relevant RFMOs or
arrangements. For example, the TTVP
requires certification from tuna captains
from all over the world, including many
that fish in remote artisanal fisheries
where Internet connectivity is not
commonplace, even today. Having said
that, however, NMFS agrees it is
important to move to a fully electronic
system as soon as the relevant
international catch documentation
schemes go electronic. NMFS notes that
the Commission for the Conservation of
Antarctic Marine Living Resources
(CCAMLR) and the International
Convention for the Conservation of
Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) have moved in
the direction of electronic catch
documentation systems which have
simplified import/export processes for
the trade and NMFS expects this trend
in other organizations in the future.
Need for Capacity Development
Comment 6: Traffic et al. noted its
view that capacity building to assist
some countries with implementing the
new rules will be necessary. Traffic et
al. noted its hope that NMFS, USAID,
the State Department and other agencies
will be able to work with countries to
help develop electronic reporting
systems that can produce the
information needed at the point of catch
and feed into traceability systems that
will follow the product throughout the
supply chain.
Response: NMFS agrees and is taking
steps to do this. For example, NMFS is
working with the Department of State
and USAID on a Regional Development
Mission Asia project in Southeast Asia
to enhance seafood traceability
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51129
infrastructure among the developing
countries of this region.
Need To Apply Traceability to All
Species
Comment 7: Traffic et al. noted its
view that similar requirements for
electronic submission of catch
documentation eventually be applied to
all species to effectively combat fraud
and the flow of IUU products.
Response: Although not germane to
this rule, NMFS agrees (as noted in the
Seafood Import Monitoring Program
proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on February 5, 2016) that
seafood traceability requirements
should eventually be applied to all
species in an effort to combat seafood
fraud and IUU fishing. As noted in the
March 2015 Presidential Task Force
report, the National Oceans Committee
will issue a report by December 2016
that includes an evaluation of the
program as implemented to date as well
as recommendations of how and under
what timeframe it would be expanded.
TTVP ‘‘Reduced Data Set’’ Reporting
Comment 8: Bumble Bee noted that
the proposed rule includes provisions
for the submission of a ‘‘reduced data
set’’ for domestic canners who import
frozen tuna loins with the stated
objective of preventing duplicative
report for companies that submit
monthly reports associated with the
TTVP. Bumble Bee further noted that
the recently released Seafood Import
Monitoring Program proposed rule also
references collection of data via a
‘‘NMFS message set’’ but the content,
specific format, and timing to begin
reporting of both the ‘‘reduced data set’’
and the ‘‘NMFS message set’’ appear to
not yet be defined. Bumble Bee urged
that the rollout of the ‘‘reduced data set’’
reporting proposed in the ITDS
implementation rule not be
implemented prior to the rollout of the
‘‘NMFS Message Set’’ reporting
requirement in the Seafood Import
Monitoring Program proposed rule and
that NMFS ensures that content and
data serve both purposes. Bumble Bee
stated its view that implementing a
‘‘reduced data set’’ reporting
requirement under the ITDS
implementation rule to meet the needs
of the TTVP and then implementing
another data requirement shortly
thereafter to meet traceability reporting
requirements seems wasteful and will
create additional burden on the trade.
Response: As noted in the NMFS
ITDS implementation guidelines (see
https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/ACE%20NMFS%20PGA
%20MS%20Guidelines%20-%20July
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
51130
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
%2022%202015.pdf), for cannery
processed products that are imported
into the U.S. Customs District from
American Samoa and for imports of
frozen cooked tuna loins, not in airtight
containers, not in oil and with contents
over 6.8 kilograms from any country of
origin, certain data usually or otherwise
required at the time of filing need not
be submitted if provided to NMFS
under the regulations found at 50 CFR
216.93(d)(2). Under these specific
conditions, NMFS will only require a
‘‘reduced data set’’ consisting of an
acknowledgement that an electronic
image is associated with the shipment
and also that the document images of
the NOAA Form 370(s) associated with
the shipment have been uploaded into
the CBP DIS. Given the different
timelines for implementation of these
two regulations, it will not be possible
to implement requirements
simultaneously; however, NMFS will
make every effort to avoid creating
additional burdens on the trade in the
course of implementing these programs.
Bi-Weekly Reporting Requirements
Comment 9: Bumble Bee stated its
understanding that under the proposed
rule, companies who are part of the
TTVP would now need to obtain an
IFTP. Bumble Bee does not object to this
requirement, but noted that in the
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements in section 300.183 of the
proposed rule that biweekly reporting is
required for holders of the IFTP. Bumble
Bee requested confirmation that the
existing bi-weekly reporting
requirements associated with the IFTP
will remain limited to species currently
part of the HMS ITP with the existing
reporting exemption for bigeye tuna
destined for canneries.
Response: NMFS confirms that the
import documentation requirements, as
well as the bi-weekly reporting
requirements, associated with the HMS
ITP will remain limited to species
currently part of that program. The
reporting exemption for bigeye tuna
destined for canneries harvested by
either purse seiners or pole and line
(bait) vessels will continue. The
regulations pertaining to this exemption
were inadvertently removed during a
previous rulemaking (77 FR 52259,
August 29, 2012) and have been restored
in the regulatory text at 50 CFR 300.184.
NMFS would also like to clarify that
under this rule, documentation such as
the HMS ITP biweekly dealer reports,
which are not required at the time of
entry/export, will continue to be
provided to the HMS ITP office and are
not submitted to CBP via the ACE
portal.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
Administrative/Financial Burdens
Imposed by Rule
Comment 10: Tri Marine voiced its
concern about the administrative and
financial burden the proposed rule may
pose and that this aspect was not
adequately addressed in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act section of the proposed
rule. Tri Marine noted that direct and
indirect costs associated with new
requirements under the rule are difficult
to determine at this time and that the
primary beneficiary of the efficiencies
gained would be U.S. government
agencies and companies that also trade
in non-TTVP species/products. Tri
Marine encouraged NMFS to reconsider
options that best mitigate potential
economic impacts to industries that
trade exclusively in TTVP species while
still achieving desired outcomes. Tri
Marine agrees TTVP companies should
be required to obtain the IFTP, but
without a fee and with minimal filing
burden. Tri Marine suggested updated
templates for the NOAA 370 form and
Captain’s Statements should be
designed that readily integrate into ACE.
Tri Marine noted information required
should always include the market name
and scientific names of all species used
in the product, not only simplified
names such as light meat tuna that can
mask the actual inputs used. Tri Marine
encouraged NMFS to engage with the
FDA to change the standard of identity
for canned tuna to require the species
name of all inputs be provided on
canned tuna labels.
Response: In determining its preferred
alternative for this rulemaking, NMFS
made best efforts to balance potential
economic impacts on the trade with the
rulemaking’s desired outcomes. NMFS
believes extending the IFTP requirement
to TTVP-related companies to be both
the most equitable and effective
alternative among those presented in the
proposed rule. The cost of the IFTP is
only $30 and is calculated solely based
upon the administrative cost to NMFS
of issuing the permit. Requiring the
permit for all three programs also allows
NMFS to easily notify permit holders of
any changes to the relevant regulations
or import monitoring program
procedures. NMFS appreciates the
suggestion to update templates for the
TTVP 370 form and Captain’s
Statements for improved integration
with ACE and will work with CBP to
consider this suggestion further.
Although the comment regarding market
and scientific names is outside the
scope of this rulemaking, this issue has
been discussed by NMFS, the FDA, and
other agencies in response to
Recommendation 10 of the Presidential
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Task Force to Combat IUU Fishing and
Seafood Fraud. (See
www.iuufishing.noaa.gov).
Import Data for Frozen Cooked Tuna
Loins and Tuna in Airtight Containers
Comment 11: Tri Marine recognized
the proposed rule allows for a reduced
data set for imports of 1) frozen cooked
tuna loins used in cannery operations
and 2) tuna products in airtight
containers manufactured in American
Samoa. Although Tri Marine agreed
with the intent to prevent duplicative
reporting and apply this to imports from
American Samoa, it opposed reduced
data collection from frozen loin
importers. Tri Marine noted that tuna
cans from American Samoa are typically
produced from fish delivered directly to
canneries from the fishing vessel
allowing direct traceability from the
vessel to processing line to finished
product. Tuna loins imported into the
United States, however, are typically
caught in distant waters, transshipped
onto carrier vessels, offloaded into
foreign ports, trucked to large cold
stores, transferred to foreign processing
facilities and then shipped by container
vessel to the United States where they
are stored and undergo final secondary
processing, all of which makes
traceability more challenging. Tri
Marine therefore recommends more
rigorous data sets be required for
imported tuna loins.
Response: These comments are
germane to the chain of custody
requirements proposed under the
Seafood Import Monitoring Program (81
FR 6210) rather than under this ITDS
implementation rule. However, NMFS
notes that the reduced data set applies
to all U.S. tuna canning facilities in
order to reduce duplication of data
elements required under 50 CFR
219.93(d)(2). NMFS will take these
comments into consideration when
formulating its final rule for the Seafood
Import Monitoring Program.
Overlap With Proposed Seafood Import
Monitoring Program
Comment 12: Tri Marine stated its
view that there is significant overlap
between the ITDS implementation
proposed rule and the proposed rule for
the Seafood Import Monitoring Program.
Tri Marine’s view is that since it is
highly likely that comments on the
Seafood Import Monitoring Program
will be useful in guiding the
development of a final rule for ITDS
implementation, it would be prudent to
integrate the final rule for these two
initiatives, taking into account
comments on both proposed rules.
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Response: Although NMFS recognizes
there is overlap between the two rules,
it will not be possible to integrate the
two rules primarily because they have
different timelines for implementation
with NMFS implementation of ITDS
required by July 23, 2016, in order to
meet the requirements specified for all
Federal agencies in Executive Order
13659 (Streamlining the Export/Import
Process) whereas implementation of the
Seafood Import Monitoring Program is
not expected to occur until the fall of
2016 at the earliest.
Classification
This rule is published under the
authority of AMLRCA of 1984, 16 U.S.C.
2431 et seq.; ATCA of 1975, 16 U.S.C.
971 et seq.; TCA of 1950, 16 U.S.C. 951–
961; MSA, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.;
MMPA of 1972, 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407;
DPCIA, 16 U.S.C. 1385; HSDFMPA, 16
U.S.C. 1826d–k; and HSDFEA, 16 U.S.C.
1826a–c. Other relevant authorities
include the Pelly Amendment to the
Fishermen’s Protective Act, 22 U.S.C.
1978, and the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. 3371.
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this final rule is
consistent with the provisions of these
and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Administrative Procedure Act
As explained above, this final rule
revises text at 50 CFR 300.184 that
provides an exemption from
documentation requirements for bigeye
tuna destined for canneries. Pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), there is good cause
to waive prior notice and an
opportunity for public comment on this
specific provision of the final rule,
because notice and comment would be
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest. This text was inadvertently
removed in an August 29, 2012 final
rule (77 FR 52259), and NMFS only
became aware of that fact as it was
reviewing and responding to public
comments on this current rulemaking.
Providing for public comment at this
time is unnecessary and contrary to the
public interest, as NMFS and industry
have been operating as if the exemption
remained in place. Further, NMFS never
intended to change the exemption and
thus never analyzed its removal.
Because this aspect of the rule relieves
a restriction by reinserting an exemption
to documentation requirements, it is not
subject to the 30-day delayed
effectiveness provision of the APA
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulations
certified that this rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of U.S. small
entities (80 FR 81255, December 29,
2015).
Although a new IFTP will be
established for the import, export or reexport of regulated products under the
AMLR, HMS ITP and TTVP programs,
this new permit generally represents a
consolidation of information contained
in existing permits and should actually
result in fewer reporting or
recordkeeping requirements. Data sets to
be entered electronically to determine
product admissibility are already
required to be submitted in paper form
under the respective trade programs.
Thus, NMFS anticipates that U.S.
entities will not be significantly affected
by this action because it generally does
not pose new or additional burdens
with regard to the collection and
submission of information necessary to
determine product admissibility.
With regard to the possible economic
effects of this action, per the response to
Question 13 of the supporting statement
prepared for the Paperwork Reduction
Act analysis (available from
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain),
NMFS estimates there will be 751
applicants for the new IFTP with an
estimated net increase in annual costs of
$16,255 for obtaining those permits,
based on the combined number of
permit holders and respondents under
NMFS’ existing trade monitoring
programs. Although NMFS does not
have access to data about the business
sizes of importers and receivers that
would be impacted by this rule, it is
likely that the majority may be classified
as small entities. However, when overall
total new burdens for the three
requirements under this rule (IFTP, data
set submission, and admissibility
document(s) submission) are compared
to current burdens, the new
consolidated burdens are estimated to
result in an overall net burden decrease
of 4,225 hours and $63,650. A no-action
alternative, where NMFS would not
promulgate the rule, was not considered
as all applicable U.S. government
agencies are required to implement
ITDS under the authority of section 405
of the SAFE Port Act and Executive
Order 13659 on Streamlining the
Export/Import Process, dated February
19, 2014.
This action will not affect the volume
of seafood trade or alter trade flows in
the U.S. market. Although the rule will
require traders under the TTVP to
obtain an IFTP, which they are not
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51131
currently required to do, NMFS expects
that the consolidated IFTP will have no
impact on, or will actually reduce, the
overall administrative burden on the
public; those parties currently required
to obtain two separate permits under the
AMLR and HMS ITP programs will be
required to obtain only one consolidated
permit under this rule.
The consolidated permitting and
electronic reporting program established
under this rulemaking will not have
significant adverse or long-term
economic impacts on small U.S.
entities. This rule has also been
determined not to duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules.
Thus, the requirements and prohibitions
in the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Consequently,
a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains a collection-ofinformation requirement subject to
review and approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This
requirement has been approved by OMB
under control number 0648–0732. When
new reporting burdens for the three
electronic reporting requirements under
this rule (IFTP, data set submission, and
admissibility document submission) are
compared to current reporting burdens
approved for the separate paper-based
programs, it is estimated to result in an
overall net burden decrease of 4,225
hours and $63,650.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 216
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Fish, Imports,
Indians, Labeling, Marine mammals.
50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and
procedure, Antarctica, Canada, Exports,
Fish, Fisheries, Fishing, Imports,
Indians, Labeling, Marine resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Russian Federation,
Transportation, Treaties, Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 600
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing
regulations, Fishing vessels, Foreign
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
51132
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
relations, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Statistics.
50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian natives,
Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 27, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR parts 216, 300, 600,
and 660 are amended as follows:
PART 216—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE TAKING AND
IMPORTING OF MARINE MAMMALS
1. The authority citation for part 216
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et. seq., unless
otherwise noted.
2. In § 216.24, revise paragraphs (f)(2)
introductory text, (f)(2)(i)(A) and (D),
(f)(2)(ii)(A) and (D), (f)(2)(iii)(A) through
(C), (f)(3) introductory text, and (f)(3)(i)
through (iii) to read as follows:
■
§ 216.24 Taking and related acts incidental
to commercial fishing operations by tuna
purse seine vessels in the eastern tropical
Pacific Ocean.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) Imports requiring a Fisheries
Certificate of Origin and an
International Fisheries Trade Permit.
Shipments of tuna, tuna products, and
certain other fish products identified in
paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (iii) of this
section may not be imported into the
United States unless: a scanned copy of
a properly completed Fisheries
Certificate of Origin (FCO), NOAA Form
370, associated certifications and
statements described in § 216.91(a), and
required data set are filed electronically
with U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) at the time of, or in
advance of, importation as required
under § 300.323; and the importer of
record designated on the entry summary
(Customs Form 7501) holds a valid
International Fisheries Trade Permit as
specified at § 300.322 of this title.
‘‘Required data set’’ has the same
meaning as § 300.321 of this title (see
definition of ‘‘Documentation and data
sets required’’).
(i) * * *
(A) Frozen: (products containing
Yellowfin).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
0303.42.0020 Yellowfin tunas, whole,
frozen
0303.42.0040 Yellowfin tunas, headon, frozen, except whole
0303.42.0060 Yellowfin tunas, other,
frozen, except whole, head-on,
fillets, livers and roes
0304.87.0000 Tuna fish fillets, frozen,
not elsewhere specified or indicated
(NESOI)
0304.99.1190 Tuna, frozen, in bulk or
in immediate containers weighing
with their contents over 6.8 kg each
*
*
*
*
*
(D) Other: (products containing
Yellowfin).
0511.91.0090 Fish, shellfish products
unfit for human consumption
1604.20.1000 Fish pastes
1604.20.1500 Fish balls, cakes and
puddings, in oil
1604.20.2000 Fish balls, cakes and
puddings, not in oil, less than 6.8
kg, in airtight containers
1604.20.2500 Fish balls, cakes and
puddings, not in oil, not in airtight
containers, in immediate containers
weighing with their contents not
over 6.8 kg each
1604.20.3000 Fish balls, cakes and
puddings, NESOI
1604.20.4000 Fish sticks, not cooked,
nor in oil
1604.20.5010 Fish sticks, cooked and
frozen
1604.20.5090 Fish sticks, NESOI
2309.10.0010 Dog or cat food, in
airtight containers
(ii) * * *
(A) Frozen: (other than Yellowfin).
0303.41.0000 Albacore or longfinned
tunas, frozen, except fillets, livers
and roes
0303.43.0000 Skipjack tunas or stripebellied bonito, frozen, except fillets,
livers and roes
0303.44.0000 Bigeye tunas, frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.45.0110 Atlantic Bluefin, frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.45.0150 Pacific Bluefin, frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.46.0000 Southern bluefin tunas,
frozen, except fillets, livers and roes
0303.49.0200 Tunas, frozen, except
fillets, livers and roes, NESOI
0304.87.0000 Tuna fish fillets, frozen,
NESOI
0304.99.1190 Tuna, frozen, in bulk or
in immediate containers weighing
with their contents over 6.8 kg each,
NESOI
*
*
*
*
*
(D) Other: (only if the product
contains tuna).
0511.91.0090 Fish, shellfish products
unfit for human consumption
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1604.20.1000 Fish pastes
1604.20.1500 Fish balls, cakes and
puddings, in oil
1604.20.2000 Fish balls, cakes and
puddings, not in oil, less than 6.8
kg, in airtight containers
1604.20.2500 Fish balls, cakes and
puddings, not in oil, not in airtight
containers, in immediate containers
weighing with their contents not
over 6.8 kg each
1604.20.3000 Fish balls, cakes and
puddings, NESOI
1604.20.4000 Fish sticks, not cooked,
nor in oil
1604.20.5010 Fish sticks, cooked and
frozen
1604.20.5090 Fish sticks, NESOI
2309.10.0010 Dog or cat food, in
airtight containers
(iii) * * *
(A) Frozen:
0303.11.0000 Sockeye (red) salmon
(Oncorhynchus nerka), frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0012 Chinook (King) salmon
(Oncorhynchus tschawytscha),
frozen, except fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0022 Chum (dog) salmon
(Oncorhynchus keta), frozen, except
fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0032 Pink (humpie) salmon
(Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0052 Coho (silver) salmon
(Oncorhynchus kisutch), frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0062 Pacific salmon
(Oncorhynchus masou,
Oncorhynchus rhodurus), frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes,
NESOI
0303.13.0000 Atlantic salmon (Salmo
salar) and Danube salmon (Hucho
hucho), frozen, except fillets, livers
and roes
0303.14.0000 Trout (Salmo trutta;
Oncorhynchus mykiss, clarki,
aguabonita, gilae, apache, and
chrysogaster), frozen, except fillets,
livers and roes
0303.19.0100 Salmonidae, frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes,
NESOI
0303.57.0010 Swordfish steaks, frozen,
except fillets
0303.57.0090 Swordfish, frozen,
except steaks, fillets, livers and roes
0303.81.0010 Dogfish (Squalus spp.),
frozen, except fillets, livers and roes
0303.81.0090 Sharks, frozen, except
dogfish, fillets, livers and roes
0303.89.0079 Fish, other, frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes,
NESOI
0304.81.5010 Atlantic Salmonidae
(Salmo salar) fillets, frozen, NESOI
0304.81.5090 Salmonidae fillets,
frozen, except Atlantic salmon,
NESOI
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
0304.89.1090 Fish fillets, skinned,
frozen blocks weighing over 4.5 kg
each, to be minced, ground or cut
into pieces of uniform weights and
dimensions, NESOI
0304.91.1000 Swordfish, frozen, in
bulk or in immediate containers
weighing over 6.8 kg each
0304.91.9000 Swordfish, frozen,
NESOI
0304.99.9191 Fish fillets, ocean,
frozen, NESOI
0307.49.0010 Squid fillets, frozen
0307.49.0022 Squid, Loligo
opalescens, NESOI
0307.49.0024 Squid, Loligo pealei,
NESOI
0307.49.0029 Squid, Loligo, other,
NESOI
0307.49.0050 Squid, other, NESOI
(B) Canned:
1604.11.2020 Pink (humpie) salmon,
whole or in pieces, but not minced,
in oil, in airtight containers
1604.11.2030 Sockeye (red) salmon,
whole or in pieces, but not minced,
in oil, in airtight containers
1604.11.2090 Salmon NESOI, whole or
in pieces, but not minced, in oil, in
airtight containers
1604.11.4010 Chum (dog) salmon, not
in oil, canned
1604.11.4020 Pink (humpie) salmon,
not in oil, canned
1604.11.4030 Sockeye (red) salmon,
not in oil, canned
1604.11.4040 Salmon, NESOI, not in
oil, canned
1604.11.4050 Salmon, whole or in
pieces, but not minced, NESOI
1604.19.2100 Fish, NESOI, not in oil,
in airtight containers
1604.19.3100 Fish, NESOI, in oil, in
airtight containers
1605.54.6020 Squid, Loligo, prepared
or preserved
1605.54.6030 Squid, except Loligo,
prepared or preserved
(C) Other:
0305.39.6080 Fish fillets, dried, salted
or in brine, but not smoked, NESOI
0305.41.0000 Pacific salmon
(Oncorhynchus spp.), Atlantic
salmon (Salmo salar), and Danube
salmon (Hucho hucho), including
fillets, smoked
0305.49.4041 Fish including fillets,
smoked, NESOI
0305.59.0000 Fish, dried, whether or
not salted but not smoked, NESOI
0305.69.4000 Salmon, salted but not
dried or smoked; in brine
0305.69.5001 Fish in immediate
containers weighing with their
contents 6.8 kg or less each, salted
but not dried or smoked; in brine,
NESOI
0305.69.6001 Fish, salted but not dried
or smoked; in brine, NESOI
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
0305.71.0000 Shark fins, dried,
whether or not salted but not
smoked
0305.49.0010 Squid, frozen, fillets
0307.49.0022 Squid, Loligo
opalescens, frozen (except fillets),
dried, salted or in brine
0307.49.0024 Squid, Loligo pealei,
frozen (except fillets), dried, salted
or in brine
0307.49.0029 Squid, Loligo, frozen
(except fillets), dried, salted or in
brine, NESOI
0307.49.0050 Squid, other, frozen
(except fillets), dried, salted or in
brine, except Loligo squid
0307.49.0060 Cuttle fish (Sepia
officinalis, Rossia macrosoma,
Sepiola spp.), frozen, dried, salted
or in brine
(3) Disposition of Fisheries
Certificates of Origin. The FCO
described in paragraph (f)(4) of this
section may be obtained from the
Administrator, West Coast Region, or
downloaded from the Internet at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/dolphinsafe/
noaa370.htm.
(i) A properly completed FCO, and its
attached certifications and statements as
described in § 216.91(a), must
accompany the required CBP entry
documents that are filed at the time of,
or in advance of, importation.
(ii) FCOs and associated certifications
and statements as described in
§ 216.91(a) must be provided
electronically to CBP as indicated in
paragraph (f)(2) of this section.
(iii) FCOs that accompany imported
shipments of tuna destined for further
processing in the United States must be
endorsed at each change in ownership
and submitted to the Administrator,
West Coast Region, by the last endorser
when all required endorsements are
completed. Such FCOs must be
submitted as specified in § 216.93(d)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 216.93, revise paragraphs (f)
and (g)(2) to read as follows:
§ 216.93 Tracking and verification
program.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Tracking imports. All tuna
products, except fresh tuna, that are
imported into the United States must be
accompanied as described in
§ 216.24(f)(3) by a properly certified
FCO as required by § 216.24(f)(2). For
tuna tracking purposes, copies of FCOs
and associated certifications and
statements must be submitted by the
importer of record to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection as described in and
required by § 216.24(f)(2).
(g) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51133
(2) Record submission. At the time of,
or in advance of, importation of a
shipment of tuna or tuna products, any
importer of tuna or tuna products must
submit all corresponding FCOs and
required certifications and statements
for those tuna or tuna products as
required by § 216.24(f)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
4. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
2431 et seq.; 31 U.S.C. 9701 et seq.
5. In § 300.4:
a. Revise paragraph (o);
b. Redesignate paragraphs (p) and (q)
as (q) and (r); and
■ c. Add a new paragraph (p).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 300.4
General prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Ship, transport, offer for sale, sell,
purchase, import, export, or have
custody, control, or possession of, any
fish imported, exported or re-exported
in violation of this part.
(p) Import, export, or re-export any
fish regulated under this part without a
valid International Fisheries Trade
Permit as required under § 300.322 or
applicable shipment documentation as
required under § 300.323.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 300.107, revise paragraphs (b)
introductory text, (b)(1) and (3),
(c)(6)(i)(A)(5), and (c)(7)(i)(A)(4) to read
as follows:
§ 300.107 Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Dealers. Dealers of AMLR required
under § 300.114 to have an International
Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP) issued
under § 300.322 must:
(1) Accurately maintain all reports
and records required by their IFTP and
this subpart;
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Within the time specified in the
IFTP requirements, submit a copy of
such reports and records to NMFS at an
address designated by NMFS.
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(5) The dealer/exporter’s name,
address, and IFTP number; and
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
51134
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(4) The dealer/exporter’s name,
address, and IFTP permit number;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 300.114:
■ a. Revise paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and
(4), (b), (d) through (f), (g)(1) and (2), (h),
and (j); and
■ b. Remove paragraph (k).
The revisions read as follows:
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 300.114
Dealer permits and preapproval.
(a) * * *
(1) A dealer importing, or re-exporting
AMLR, or a person exporting AMLR,
must possess a valid IFTP issued under
§ 300.322 and file, as specified under
§ 300.323, the required data sets
electronically with CBP at the time of,
or in advance of importation or
exportation. Required data set has the
same meaning as § 300.321 (see
definition of ‘‘Documentation and data
sets required.’’) See § 300.322 for IFTP
application procedures and permit
regulations. The IFTP holder may only
conduct those specific activities
stipulated by the IFTP. Preapproval
from NMFS is required for each
shipment of frozen Dissostichus species.
(2) An AMLR may be imported into
the United States if its harvest has been
authorized by a U.S.-issued individual
permit or its importation has been
authorized by an IFTP and, in the case
of frozen Dissostichus species,
preapproval issued under
§ 300.114(a)(1). AMLRs may not be
released for entry into the United States
unless accompanied by the harvesting
permit, the individual permit, or IFTP
and, in the case of frozen Dissostichus
species, the preapproval certification
granted by NMFS to allow import.
NMFS will only accept electronic catch
documents for toothfish imports.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) An IFTP or preapproval issued
under this section does not authorize
the harvest or transshipment of any
AMLR by or to a vessel of the United
States.
(b) Application. Application forms for
preapproval are available from NMFS.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Issuance. NMFS may issue a
preapproval if it determines that the
activity proposed by the dealer meets
the requirements of the Act and that the
resources were not or will not be
harvested in violation of any CCAMLR
conservation measure in force with
respect to the United States or in
violation of any regulation in this
subpart. * * *
(e) Duration. A preapproval is valid
until the product is imported. Each
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
export or re-export document created by
NMFS in the CDS is valid only for that
particular shipment.
(f) Transfer. A preapproval issued
under this section is not transferable or
assignable.
(g) * * *
(1) Pending applications. Applicants
for preapproval under this section must
report in writing to NMFS any change
in the information submitted in
preapproval applications. * * *
(2) Issued preapprovals. Any entity
issued a preapproval under this section
must report in writing to NMFS any
changes in previously submitted
information. * * *
(h) Revision, suspension, or
revocation. A preapproval issued under
this section may be revised, suspended,
or revoked, based upon a violation of
the IFTP, the Act, or this subpart.
Failure to report a change in the
information contained in a preapproval
application voids the application or
preapproval. Title 15 CFR part 904
governs sanctions under this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) SVDCD. Preapprovals will not be
issued for Dissostichus spp. offered for
sale or other disposition under a
Specially Validated DCD.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 300.117, revise paragraphs (b)
and (r) and add paragraph (ii) to read as
follows:
§ 300.117
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Import into, or export or re-export
from, the United States any AMLRs
without applicable catch documentation
as required by § 300.107(c), without an
IFTP as required by § 300.114(a)(1), or
in violation of the terms and conditions
for such import, export or re-export as
specified on the IFTP.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) Without a valid first receiver
permit issued under this subpart,
receive AMLRs from a vessel or receive
AMLRs from a vessel without a valid
harvesting permit issued under this
subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Import into, or export or re-export
from, the United States any AMLRs
harvest by a vessel of the United States
without a valid harvesting permit issued
under this subpart.
■ 9. In § 300.181:
■ a. Add in alphabetical order
definitions for ‘‘Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE)’’ and ‘‘Automated
Export System (AES)’’;
■ b. Revise the definition for ‘‘CBP’’;
■ c. Add in alphabetical order
definitions for ‘‘Document Imaging
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
System (DIS)’’ and ‘‘International
Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP) or trade
permit’’;
■ d. Revise the definition for ‘‘Permit
holder’’;
■ e. Add in alphabetical order a
definition for ‘‘Required data set’’; and
■ f. Remove the definition for ‘‘Trade
Permit’’.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 300.181
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Automated Commercial Environment
(ACE) has the same meaning as that
term is defined in § 300.321 of this part.
Automated Export System (AES) has
the same meaning as that term is
defined in § 300.321 of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
CBP means U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
*
*
*
*
*
Document Imaging System (DIS)
means the system established by CBP to
receive image files of paper documents
in ACE or AES and associate the image
files with specific trade transactions.
*
*
*
*
*
International Fisheries Trade Permit
(IFTP) or trade permit means the permit
issued by NMFS under § 300.322.
*
*
*
*
*
Permit holder, for purposes of this
subpart, means, unless otherwise
specified, a person who is required to
obtain an International Fisheries Trade
Permit (IFTP) under § 300.322.
*
*
*
*
*
Required data set has the same
meaning as § 300.321 (see definition of
‘‘Documentation and data sets
required’’).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Section 300.182 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 300.182
permit.
International fisheries trade
An importer, entering for
consumption any fish or fish products
regulated under this subpart, harvested
from any ocean area, into the United
States, or an exporter exporting or reexporting such product, must possess a
valid International Fisheries Trade
Permit (IFTP) issued under § 300.322.
■ 11. In § 300.183, revise paragraphs (a)
introductory text, (a)(3), and (b) through
(e) to read as follows:
§ 300.183 Permit holder reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
(a) Biweekly reports. Any person
trading fish and fish products regulated
under this subpart and required to
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
obtain a trade permit under § 300.322
must submit to NMFS, on forms
supplied by NMFS, a biweekly report of
entries for consumption, exports and reexports of fish and fish products
regulated under this subpart, except
shark fins.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) A biweekly report is not required
for export consignments of bluefin tuna
when the information required on the
biweekly report has been previously
supplied on a biweekly report submitted
under § 635.5(b)(2)(i)(B) of this title. The
person required to obtain a trade permit
under § 300.322 must retain, at his/her
principal place of business, a copy of
the biweekly report which includes the
required information and is submitted
under § 635.5(b)(2)(i)(B) of this title, for
a period of 2 years from the date on
which each report was submitted to
NMFS.
(b) Recordkeeping. Any person
trading fish and fish products regulated
under this subpart and required to
submit biweekly reports under
paragraph (a) of this section must retain,
at his/her principal place of business, a
copy of each biweekly report and all
supporting records for a period of 2
years from the date on which each
report was submitted to NMFS.
(c) Other requirements. Any person
trading fish and fish products regulated
under this subpart and required to
obtain a trade permit under § 300.322 is
also subject to the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements identified
in § 300.185.
(d) Inspection. Any person authorized
to carry out the enforcement activities
under the regulations in this subpart
(authorized person) has the authority,
without warrant or other process, to
inspect, at any reasonable time: fish or
fish products regulated under this
subpart, biweekly reports, statistical
documents, catch documents, re-export
certificates, relevant sales receipts,
import and export documentation, and
any other records or reports made,
retained, or submitted pursuant to this
subpart. A permit holder must allow
NMFS or an authorized person to
inspect any fish or fish products
regulated under this subpart, and
inspect and copy any import export, and
re-export documentation and any
reports required under this subpart, and
the records, in any form, on which the
completed reports are based, wherever
they exist. Any agent of a person trading
and required to obtain a trade permit
under § 300.322, or anyone responsible
for importing, exporting, re-exporting,
storing, packing, or selling fish or fish
products regulated under this subpart,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
shall be subject to the inspection
provisions of this section.
(e) Applicability of reporting and
recordkeeping requirements. Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements in this
subpart apply to any person engaging in
international trade regardless of whether
a trade permit has been issued to that
person.
■ 12. Effective August 3, 2016, revise
§ 300.184 to read as follows:
§ 300.184 Species subject to permitting,
documentation, reporting, and
recordkeeping requirements.
(a) Except as noted in paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this section, the following fish
or fish products are subject to the
documentation requirements of this
subpart, regardless of ocean area of
catch, and must be reported under the
appropriate heading or subheading
numbers from the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTS):
(1) Bluefin tuna,
(2) Southern bluefin tuna,
(3) Frozen bigeye tuna,
(4) Swordfish, and
(5) Shark fins.
(b) For bluefin tuna, southern bluefin
tuna, frozen bigeye tuna, and swordfish,
fish parts other than meat (e.g., heads,
eyes, roe, guts, and tails) may be
imported without the documentation
required under this subpart.
(c) Bigeye tuna caught by purse
seiners or pole and line (bait) vessels
and destined for canneries within the
United States, including all U.S.
commonwealths, territories, and
possessions, may be imported without
the documentation required under this
subpart.
■ 13. In § 300.185:
■ a. Revise paragraphs (a)(2)(i),
(a)(2)(ii)(A), and (a)(2)(iii)(A);
■ b. Remove paragraph (a)(2)(vii);
■ c. Revise paragraphs (a)(3), (b)(2) and
(3), (c)(2)(i) and (ii), and (c)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 300.185 Documentation, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for
consignment documents and re-export
certificates.
(a) * * *
(2) Documentation requirements. (i)
Except for shark fins, all fish or fish
products regulated under this subpart,
imported into the Customs territory of
the United States or entered for
consumption into a separate customs
territory of a U.S. insular possession,
must, at the time of presenting entry
documentation for clearance by customs
authorities (e.g., electronic filing via
ACE or other documentation required
by the port director) be accompanied by
an original, complete, accurate,
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51135
approved and properly validated,
species-specific consignment document.
An image of such document and the
required data set must be filed
electronically with CBP via ACE.
(ii) Bluefin tuna. (A) Imports that
were re-exported from another nation
must also be accompanied by an
original, complete, accurate, approved
and properly validated, species-specific
re-export certificate.
(1) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this
requirement must be satisfied by the
U.S. importer through electronic receipt
and completion of a re-export certificate
in the ICCAT eBCD system, unless
NMFS provides otherwise through
actual notice or Federal Register notice.
In cases where the documentation
requirements have been completed in
the ICCAT eBCD system, a reduced data
set consisting of the eBCD number or reexport certificate number, as applicable,
and the importer trade permit number
would suffice as an import filing,
without need to submit any forms via
DIS in ACE.
(2) For bluefin tuna harvested from
other than the Atlantic Ocean, or for
Atlantic Bluefin tuna entered pursuant
to a notified exception under
(a)(2)(ii)(A)(1), an image of the original
paper re-export certificate and the
supporting consignment documents
must be submitted to CBP via the ACE
DIS.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(A) Imports that were previously reexported and were subdivided or
consolidated with another consignment
before re-export, must also be
accompanied by an original, completed,
accurate, valid, approved and properly
validated, species-specific re-export
certificate. An image of such document,
an image of the original import
document, and the required data set
must be filed electronically with CBP
via ACE.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Reporting requirements. (i) For fish
or fish products regulated under this
subpart, except shark fins, that are
entered for consumption and whose
final destination is within the United
States, which includes U.S. insular
possessions, a permit holder must
submit an image of the original
consignment document that
accompanied the fish product as
completed under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section to CBP electronically through
the ACE DIS.
(ii) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this
requirement must be satisfied
electronically by entering the specified
information into the ICCAT eBCD
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
51136
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
system as directed in paragraph
(a)(2)(vi)(A) of this section, unless
NMFS provides otherwise through
actual notice or Federal Register notice.
In cases where the documentation
requirements have been completed in
the ICCAT eBCD system, a reduced data
set consisting of the eBCD number or
the re-export certificate number, as
applicable, and the importer trade
permit number would suffice as an
import filing, without need to submit
any forms via DIS in ACE.
(b) * * *
(2) Documentation requirements. A
permit holder must complete an
original, approved, numbered, speciesspecific consignment document issued
to that permit holder by NMFS for each
export referenced under paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, and electronically file an
image of such documentation and the
required data set with CBP via AES.
Such an individually numbered
document is not transferable and may be
used only once by the permit holder to
which it was issued to report on a
specific export consignment. A permit
holder must provide on the
consignment document the correct
information and exporter certification.
The consignment document must be
validated, as specified in § 300.187, by
NMFS, or another official authorized by
NMFS. A list of such officials may be
obtained by contacting NMFS. A permit
holder requesting U.S. validation for
exports should notify NMFS as soon as
possible after arrival of the vessel to
avoid delays in inspection and
validation of the export consignment.
(i) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this
requirement must be satisfied by
electronic completion of a consignment
document in the ICCAT eBCD system,
unless NMFS provides otherwise
through actual notice or Federal
Register notice. In cases where the
documentation requirements have been
completed in the ICCAT eBCD system,
a reduced data set consisting of the
eBCD number and the exporter trade
permit number would suffice as an
export filing, without need to submit
any forms in AES via DIS.
(ii) For non-Atlantic bluefin tuna, this
requirement must be satisfied by
completion of a paper consignment
document, and electronic filing of an
image of such documentation and the
required data set with CBP via AES.
(3) Reporting requirements. (i) A
permit holder must ensure that the
original, approved, consignment
document as completed under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section
accompanies the export of such
products to their export destination and
must electronically file an image of such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
documentation and the required data set
with CBP via AES.
(ii) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this
requirement must be satisfied
electronically by entering the specified
information into the eBCD system as
directed in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this
section, unless NMFS provides
otherwise through actual notice or
Federal Register notice. In cases where
the documentation requirements have
been completed in the ICCAT eBCD
system, a reduced data set consisting of
the eBCD number and the exporter trade
permit number would suffice as an
export filing without need to submit any
forms in AES via DIS.
(c) * * *
(2) Documentation requirements. (i) If
a permit holder re-exports a
consignment of bluefin tuna, or
subdivides or consolidates a
consignment of fish or fish products
regulated under this subpart, other than
shark fins, that was previously entered
for consumption as described in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the
permit holder must complete an
original, approved, individually
numbered, species-specific re-export
certificate issued to that permit holder
by NMFS for each re-export
consignment. Such an individually
numbered document is not transferable
and may be used only once by the
permit holder to which it was issued to
report on a specific re-export
consignment. A permit holder must
provide on the re-export certificate the
correct information and re-exporter
certification. The permit holder must
also attach the original consignment
documentation that accompanied the
import consignment or a copy of that
documentation, and must note on the
top of both the consignment documents
and the re-export certificates the entry
number assigned by CBP authorities at
the time of filing the entry for the
previously imported consignment. An
electronic image of these documents
and the required data set must be filed
electronically with CBP via AES at the
time of export.
(A) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, these
requirements must be satisfied by
electronic completion of a re-export
certificate in the ICCAT eBCD system,
unless NMFS provides otherwise
through actual notice or Federal
Register notice. In cases where the
documentation requirements have been
completed in the ICCAT eBCD system,
a reduced data set consisting of the
eBCD number and the exporter trade
permit number would suffice as a reexport filing, without need to submit
any forms in AES via DIS.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(B) For non-Atlantic bluefin tuna,
these requirements must be satisfied by
completion of a paper re-export
certificate, and electronic filing of an
image of such documentation and the
required data set with CBP via AES.
(ii) If a consignment of fish or fish
products regulated under this subpart,
except bluefin tuna or shark fins, that
was previously entered for consumption
as described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section is not subdivided into subconsignments or consolidated with
other consignments or parts thereof, for
each such re-export consignment, a
permit holder must complete the
intermediate importer’s certification on
the original consignment document and
note the entry number previously issued
by CBP for the consignment at the top
of the document. Such re-exports do not
need a re-export certificate and the reexport does not require validation. An
electronic image of the consignment
document with the completed
intermediate importer’s certification and
the required data set must be filed
electronically with CBP via AES at the
time of re-export.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Reporting requirements. (i) For
each re-export, a permit holder must
submit the original of the completed reexport certificate (if applicable) and the
original or a copy of the original
consignment document completed as
specified under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, to the shipper to accompany the
consignment of such products to their
re-export destination, and an image of
such documentation and the required
data set must be filed electronically
with CBP via AES.
(ii) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this
requirement must be satisfied
electronically by entering the specified
information into the ICCAT eBCD
system as directed in paragraph
(c)(2)(i)(A) of this section, unless NMF
provides otherwise through actual
notice or Federal Register notice. In
cases where the documentation
requirements have been completed in
the ICCAT eBCD system, a reduced data
set consisting of the eBCD number and
the exporter trade permit number would
suffice as an export filing, without need
to submit any forms in AES via DIS.
*
*
*
*
*
14. In § 300.189, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), (c), (m), and (n) to read as follows:
■
§ 300.189
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Falsify information required on an
application for a permit submitted
under § 300.322.
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Import as an entry for
consumption, purchase, receive for
export, export, or re-export any fish or
fish product regulated under this
subpart without a valid trade permit
issued under § 300.322.
(c) Fail to possess, and make available
for inspection, a trade permit at the
permit holder’s place of business, or
alter any such permit as specified in
§ 300.322.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Fail to electronically file via ACE
a validated consignment document and
the required data set for imports at time
of entry into the Customs territory of the
United States of fish or fish products
regulated under this subpart except
shark fins, regardless of whether the
importer, exporter, or re-exporter holds
a valid trade permit issued pursuant to
§ 300.322 or whether the fish products
are imported as an entry for
consumption.
(n) Import or accept an imported
consignment of fish or fish products
regulated under this subpart, except
shark fins, without an original,
complete, accurate, approved and
properly validated, species-specific
consignment document and re-export
certificate (if applicable) with the
required information and exporter’s
certification completed.
Subpart Q—[Redesignated as Subpart
R]
15. Redesignate subpart Q, consisting
of § 300.330 through 300.341, as subpart
R.
■ 16. Add new subpart Q to read as
follows:
■
Subpart Q—International Trade
Documentation and Tracking Programs
Sec.
300.320 Purpose and scope.
300.321 Definitions.
300.322 International Fisheries Trade
Permit.
300.323 Reporting requirements.
300.324 Prohibitions.
Subpart Q—International Trade
Documentation and Tracking
Programs
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 300.320
Purpose and scope.
The regulations in this subpart are
issued under the authority of the
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975
(ATCA), the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
Tuna Conventions Act of 1950, and the
Antarctic Marine Living Resources
Convention Act of 1984. These
regulations implement the applicable
recommendations of the International
Commission for the Conservation of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) for the
conservation and management of tuna
and tuna-like species in the Atlantic
Ocean, the Inter-American Tropical
Tuna Commission (IATTC) for the
conservation and management of highly
migratory fish resources in the eastern
Pacific Ocean, and the Commission for
the Conservation of Antarctic Marine
Living Resources so far as they affect
vessels and persons subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States. These
regulations are also issued under the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
the Dolphin Protection Consumer
Information Act and the Security and
Accountability for Every Port Act of
2006. The requirements in this subpart
may be incorporated by reference in
other regulations under this title.
§ 300.321
Definitions.
ACE Implementation Guide for NMFS
means the data set and document
imaging requirements set forth in the
Appendices to the Customs and Trade
Automated Interface Requirements
issued by Customs and Border
Protection.
AMLR trade program means the
program for monitoring trade in
Antarctic marine living resources
including, inter alia, Dissostichus
species as set forth in subpart G of this
part.
Automated Commercial Environment
(ACE) means, for purposes of this
subpart, the central point through which
import shipment data required by
multiple agencies is filed electronically
to Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Automated Export System (AES)
means, for purposes of this subpart, the
central point through which export
shipment data required by multiple
agencies is filed electronically to
Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Catch and Statistical Document/
Documentation means a document or
documentation accompanying regulated
seafood imports, exports and re-exports
that is submitted by importers and
exporters to document compliance with
TTVP, AMLR, and HMS ITP trade
documentation programs as described in
§ 216.24(f) of this title, and subparts G
and M of this part.
CBP means U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
Documentation and data sets required
under this subpart refers to
documentation and data that must be
submitted by an importer or exporter at
the time of, or in advance of, the import,
export or re-export of fish or fish
products as required under this subpart,
the AMLR trade program, the HMS ITP,
or the TTVP. The required data sets and
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51137
document images to be submitted for
specific programs and transactions are
posted by CBP as indicated in § 300.323.
Fish or fish products regulated under
this subpart means species and products
containing species regulated under this
subpart, the AMLR trade program, the
HMS ITP, or the TTVP.
HMS ITP means the Highly Migratory
Species International Trade Program
which includes trade monitoring and/or
reporting and consignment
documentation for trade of bluefin tuna,
southern bluefin tuna, frozen bigeye
tuna, swordfish, and shark fins as
described in subpart M of this part.
Import has the same meaning as 16
U.S.C. 1802(22). Import includes, but is
not limited to, customs entry for
consumption, withdrawal from customs
bonded warehouse for consumption, or
entry for consumption from a foreign
trade zone.
International Fisheries Trade Permit
(or IFTP) means the permit issued by
NMFS under § 300.222.
TTVP means the Tuna Tracking and
Verification Program, which regulates
trade in certain fishery products as set
forth in § 216.24(f)(2) of this title.
§ 300.322
Permit.
International Fisheries Trade
(a) General. Any person, including a
resident agent for a nonresident
corporation (see 19 CFR 141.18), who
imports as defined in § 300.321, exports,
or re-exports fish or fish products
regulated under this sub-part from any
ocean area, must possess a valid
International Fisheries Trade Permit
(IFTP) issued under this section. Fish or
fish products regulated under this
subpart may not be imported into, or
exported or re-exported from, the
United States unless the IFTP holder
files electronically the documentation
and the data sets required under this
subpart with U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) via ACE at the time of,
or in advance of, importation,
exportation or re-exportation. If
authorized under other regulations
under this title or other applicable laws
and regulations, a representative or
agent of the IFTP holder may make the
electronic filings. Only persons resident
in the United States are eligible to apply
for the IFTP.
(b) Application. A person must apply
for an IFTP electronically via a Web site
designated by NMFS. The application
must be submitted electronically with
the required permit fee payment, at least
30 days before the date upon which the
applicant wishes the permit to be made
effective.
(c) Issuance. Except as provided in
subpart D of 15 CFR part 904, NMFS
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
51138
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
will issue an IFTP within 30 days of
receipt of a completed application.
NMFS will notify the applicant of any
deficiency in the application, including
failure to provide information,
documentation or reports required
under this subpart. If the applicant fails
to correct the deficiency within 30 days
following the date of notification, the
application will be considered
abandoned.
(d) Duration. An IFTP issued under
this section is valid for a period of one
year from the permit effective date.
(e) Alteration. Any IFTP that is
substantially altered, erased, or
mutilated is invalid.
(f) Replacement. NMFS may issue
replacement permits. An application for
a replacement permit is not considered
a new application. An appropriate fee,
consistent with paragraph (j) of this
section, may be charged for issuance of
a replacement permit.
(g) Transfer. An IFTP issued under
this section is not transferable or
assignable; it is valid only for the permit
holder to whom it is issued.
(h) Inspection. The permit holder
must keep the IFTP issued under this
section at his/her principal place of
business. The IFTP must be displayed
for inspection upon request of any
authorized officer, or any employee of
NMFS designated by NMFS for such
purpose.
(i) Sanctions. The Assistant
Administrator may suspend, revoke,
modify, or deny a permit issued or
sought under this section. Procedures
governing permit sanctions and denials
are found at subpart D of 15 CFR part
904.
(j) Fees. NMFS will charge a fee to
recover the administrative expenses of
permit issuance. The amount of the fee
is calculated, at least annually, in
accordance with the procedures of the
NOAA Finance Handbook, available
from NMFS, for determining the
administrative costs of each special
product or service. The fee may not
exceed such costs and is specified on
each application form. The appropriate
fee must be submitted via a Web site
designated by NMFS at the time of
application. Failure to pay the fee will
preclude issuance of the permit.
Payment by a commercial instrument
later determined to be insufficiently
funded shall invalidate any permit.
(k) Change in application
information. Within 15 days after any
change in the information contained in
an application submitted under this
section, the permit holder must report
the change to NMFS via a Web site
designated by NMFS. If a change in
permit information is not reported
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Aug 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
within 30 days, the permit is void as of
the 30th day after such change.
(l) Renewal. Persons must apply
annually for an IFTP issued under this
section. A renewal application must be
submitted via a Web site designated by
NMFS, at least 15 days before the permit
expiration date to avoid a lapse in
permitted status. NMFS will renew a
permit provided that: The application
for the requested permit renewal is
complete; all documentation and reports
required under this subpart and the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, Atlantic Tuna
Conventions Act, the Tuna Conventions
Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act,
the Dolphin Consumer Protection
Information Act, and the Antarctic
Marine Living Resources Act have been
submitted, including those required
under §§ 216.24, 216.93, 300.114,
300.183, 300.185, 300.186, 300.187 and
635.5 of this title; and the applicant is
not subject to a permit sanction or
denial under paragraph (i) of this
section.
§ 300.323
Reporting requirements.
Any person, including a resident
agent for a nonresident entity (see 19
CFR 141.18), who imports as defined in
§ 300.321, exports, or re-exports fish or
fish products regulated under this subpart from any ocean area, must file all
reports and documentation required
under the AMLR trade program, HMS
ITP, and TTVP as specified under this
title and under other regulations that
incorporate by reference the
requirements of this subpart. For
imports, specific instructions for
electronic filing are found in Customs
and Trade Automated Interface
Requirements (CATAIR) Appendix PGA
(https://www.cbp.gov/document/
guidance/appendix-pga). For exports,
specific instructions for electronic filing
are found in Automated Export System
Trade Interface Requirements (AESTIR)
Appendix Q (https://www.cbp.gov/
document/guidance/aestir-draftappendix-q-pga-record-formats). For
fish and fish products regulated under
this subpart, an ACE entry filing or AES
export filing, as applicable, is required
regardless of value, except in cases
where CBP provides alternate means of
collecting NMFS-required data and/or
document images.
§ 300.324
Prohibitions.
In addition to the prohibitions
specified in §§ 300.4, 300.117, 300.189,
600.725 and 635.71 of this title, it is
unlawful for any person subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States to:
(a) Violate any provision of this
subpart, or the conditions of any IFTP
issued under this subpart,
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(b) Import, export or re-export fish or
fish products regulated under this
subpart, including imports or exports
otherwise eligible for the de minimis
value exemption from filing
requirements under CBP procedures,
without a valid IFTP as required under
§ 300.322 or without submitting
complete and accurate information as
required under § 300.323.
PART 600—MAGNUSON-STEVENS
ACT PROVISIONS
17. The authority citation for part 600
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.
18. In § 600.705, revise the first
sentence of paragraph (g) to read as
follows:
■
§ 600.705
Relation to other laws,
*
*
*
*
*
(g) High seas fishing activities.
Regulations governing permits and
requirements for fishing activities on the
high seas are set forth in 50 CFR part
300, subparts A and R.* * *
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
19. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
20. In § 660.2, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 660.2
Relation to other laws.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Fishing activities on the high seas
are governed by regulations of the High
Seas Fishing Compliance Act set forth
in 50 CFR part 300, subparts A and R.
[FR Doc. 2016–18401 Filed 8–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 120815345–3525–02]
RIN 0648–XE754
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic; 2016 Commercial
Accountability Measure and Closure
for the South Atlantic Lesser
Amberjack, Almaco Jack, and Banded
Rudderfish Complex
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 3, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51126-51138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18401]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 216, 300, 600, and 660
[Docket No. 090223227-6560-03]
RIN 0648-AX63
Trade Monitoring Procedures for Fishery Products; International
Trade in Seafood; Permit Requirements for Importers and Exporters
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule sets forth regulations to revise procedures
and requirements for filing import, export, and re-export documentation
for certain fishery products to meet requirements for the SAFE Port Act
of 2006, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(MSA), other applicable statutes, and obligations that arise from U.S.
participation in regional fishery management organizations (RFMOs) and
other arrangements to which the United States is a member or
contracting party. Specifically, NMFS sets forth regulations to
integrate the collection of trade documentation within the government-
wide International Trade Data System (ITDS) and require electronic
information collection through the automated portal maintained by the
Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Under this
[[Page 51127]]
integration, NMFS will require annually renewable International
Fisheries Trade Permits (IFTP) for the import, export, and re-export of
certain regulated seafood commodities that are subject to trade
monitoring programs of RFMOs and/or subject to trade documentation
requirements under domestic law. These trade monitoring programs enable
the United States to exclude products that do not meet the criteria for
admissibility to U.S. markets, including products resulting from
illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing activities. This
final rule consolidates existing international trade permits for
regulated seafood products under the Antarctic Marine Living Resources
(AMLR) and Highly Migratory Species International Trade Permit (HMS
ITP) programs and expands the scope of the permit requirement to
include regulated seafood products under the Tuna Tracking and
Verification Program (TTVP). This final rule also stipulates data and
trade documentation for the above programs which must be provided
electronically to CBP and addresses recordkeeping requirements for
these programs in light of these changes. Trade documentation excludes
any programmatic documents that are not required at the time of entry/
export (e.g., biweekly dealer reports).
DATES: This final rule is effective September 20, 2016, except for the
revision to Sec. 300.184, which is effective August 3, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Rogers, Office for
International Affairs and Seafood Inspection, NOAA Fisheries (phone
301-427-8350, or email christopher.rogers@noaa.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE
Port Act, Pub. L. 109-347) requires all Federal agencies with a role in
import admissibility decisions to collect information electronically
through the ITDS. The Department of the Treasury has the U.S.
Government lead on ITDS development and Federal agency integration. CBP
developed Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) as an internet-based
system for the collection information for ITDS. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), through its e-government initiative,
oversees Federal agency participation in ITDS, with a focus on reducing
duplicate reporting across agencies and migrating paper-based reporting
systems to electronic information collection.
The term ITDS refers to the integrated, government-wide project for
the electronic collection, use, and dissemination of the international
trade and transportation data Federal agencies need to perform their
missions, while the term ACE refers to the ``single window'' system
through which the trade community will submit data related to imports
and exports. Detailed information on ITDS is available at: https://www.itds.gov.
Numerous Federal agencies are involved in the regulation of
international trade and many of these agencies participate in the
import, export and transportation-related decision-making process.
Agencies also use trade data to monitor and report on trade activity.
NMFS is a partner government agency in the ITDS project because of its
role in monitoring the trade of certain fishery products. Electronic
collection of seafood trade data through a single portal will result in
an overall reduction of the public reporting burden and the agency's
data collection costs, will improve the timeliness and accuracy of
admissibility decisions, and increase the effectiveness of applicable
trade restrictive measures.
On December 29, 2015, NMFS published a notice of proposed
rulemaking for this action (80 FR 81251) to codify NMFS procedures for
collecting information electronically through the ITDS. NMFS prepared a
regulatory impact review of this action, which is available from NMFS
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). This analysis describes the
economic impact this action will have on the United States. Responses
to public comments received on the proposed rule are set forth below.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
A number of changes from the proposed rule were made to clarify the
regulatory text and to take account of other final rules affecting 50
CFR part 300 that became effective after the proposed rule for ITDS
integration was published.
Export Requirements
Although the ITDS single window concept is built on the ACE
platform as the reporting mechanism for the trade sector and the source
for accessing trade data by the partner agencies, there is a
distinction between reporting procedures for imports and exports. The
system used to electronically transmit export filings is called the
Automated Export System (AES). The primary document for instructing the
trade sector on the data requirements for export filing is the
Automated Export System Trade Interface Requirements (AESTIR). The
primary instructional document for Partner Government Agency (PGA)
export requirements is the ``Appendix Q'' to AESTIR. This document is
comparable to the Customs and Trade Automated Interface Requirements
(CATAIR) ``Appendix PGA'' for import transactions. While each PGA has
issued a separate Implementation Guide for import requirements as a
supplement to CATAIR, all guidance to the trade sector for PGA export
requirements is detailed within the AESTIR Appendix Q documents.
The CBP Web page that contains the primary information on export
requirements is: https://www.cbp.gov/trade/aes. Details on how to
submit export data via AES are available at: https://www.cbp.gov/trade/aes/aestir/introduction-and-guidelines. PGA record formats are listed
at: https://www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/aestir-draft-appendix-q-pga-record-formats. The Appendix Q Record Lay Out Key details how each
record required should be structured: https://www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/appendix-q-record-layout-key. NMFS has included references to
the CBP import and export documentation in Sec. 300.323 of the
regulatory text.
Electronic System for Atlantic Bluefin Tuna
NMFS amended the regulatory text for the HMS ITP at 50 CFR 300.181
through 300.189 to reflect the implementation of the electronic bluefin
tuna catch document program (81 FR 18796, April 1, 2016).
Biweekly Reporting and Import Documentation for Bigeye Tuna
NMFS amended 50 CFR 300.184 to address the exemption for bigeye
tuna described in the Response to Comments section below under the
heading ``Bi-weekly Reporting.''
Issuance of Permits Restricted to Residents
NMFS amended 50 CFR part 300.322(a) to clarify that only resident
agents in the United States are eligible to be issued the International
Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP). Entities that are not resident in the
United States may obtain the IFTP only via a resident agent
application.
Entry Types Subject to Rule
NMFS amended 50 CFR 300.322(a) and 300.323 to clarify the various
transactions which pertain to seafood previously imported for purposes
other than immediate consumption and for
[[Page 51128]]
which the permitting, reporting and recordkeeping requirements apply.
Exception to Low Value Exemptions
NMFS revised 50 CFR 300.323 to clarify that all imports and exports
of covered commodities, including shipments otherwise eligible for the
de minimis value exemption, must be filed in ACE or AES, as applicable,
in order to collect the NMFS-required information. NMFS also revised 50
CFR 300.324(b) to clarify that de minimis value imports (valued at $800
or less; see 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C)) and exports (valued at $2500 or
less; see 15 CFR 30.37(a) and 15 CFR 30.2(a)(iv)(F)) are subject to the
prohibition on importing/exporting fish or fish products regulated
under 50 CFR 300 subpart Q without a valid IFTP or without submitting
complete and accurate information through ACE or AES, as applicable.
Low value shipments are not exempt from statutory and regulatory
requirements to collect information to support admissibility
determinations and to report to the respective regional fishery
management organizations on U.S. trade in fish products within the
scope of each program. Under the SAFE Port Act, NMFS is required to
collect information electronically and through the single window.
Therefore, NMFS requires the use of ACE or AES, as applicable, to
submit required information. However, CBP may provide other reporting
mechanisms for different entry types and/or de minimis value shipments.
If these alternative CBP mechanisms can collect all of the NMFS-
required information and transmit that information to NMFS, importers
and exporters may use these mechanisms to fulfill NMFS reporting
requirements.
Redesignation of 50 CFR part 300 Subpart Q
In publishing the proposed rule for ITDS integration of current
trade monitoring programs, NMFS incorrectly numbered the sections of
the proposed new subpart R to 50 CFR part 300. A final rule amending
regulations implementing the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act (HSFCA)
was published on October 16, 2015 (80 FR 62488). That final rule added
a new subpart Q to 50 CFR part 300, with sections numbered Sec. Sec.
300.330 through 300.341. In subsequently proposing a new Subpart R for
the ITDS integration regulations, NMFS numbered sections from 300.320
through 300.324.
In order to maintain the correct sequence of section numbers, NMFS
is now redesignating existing subpart Q as new subpart R. This final
rule then inserts a new subpart Q for the ITDS regulations with
sections numbered in the correct order. Given the placement of HSFCA
regulations in the new subpart R, conforming amendments are needed for
cross-references to HSFCA requirements which exist in 50 CFR 600.705
and 50 CFR 660.2.
Responses to Public Comments
NMFS received 12 public comments on the proposed rule. Comments
were received from the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders
Association of America (NCBFAA), Traffic/World Wildlife Fund/Oceana,
Bumble Bee Seafoods, Tri Marine Management Company LLC, and two
individuals potentially affected by new requirements in this rule.
Data Elements
Comment 1: NCBFAA noted that although the data submission
requirements under the proposed rule are not new, this data has not
previously been required to be submitted at the time of entry/release.
They noted that submitting data at the time of entry/release not only
increases processing costs for the importer, but also raises the
potential for disruptions as the data moves through the ACE pipeline to
CBP and NMFS. NCBFAA questioned the need for NMFS to collect all data
elements at the time of entry/release and asked whether NMFS'
requirements could be met if the information was provided via the entry
summary which may be filed electronically within 10 days after entry/
release. NCBFAA noted that moving these data submission requirements to
entry summary would provide much needed flexibility for importers and
customs brokers to handle complex entries without slowing down trade
and would suit NMFS needs because NMFS would not be able to review data
until after entry/release.
Response: NMFS believes that submission of data at the time of
entry/release is necessary to ensure only admissible products are
permitted entry into the U.S. market. Allowing data entry for these
three programs after product has been admitted into the United States
would make efforts to interdict problematic entries extremely
difficult. NMFS also emphasizes that it is only requiring the minimum
amount of data necessary to determine whether a product is admissible
at the time of entry be provided as a data set at the time of entry.
This approach should expedite the release of product associated with
the three NMFS trade monitoring programs.
Permits and the Importer of Record
Comment 2: NCBFAA noted it does not object to consolidating the
existing trade permits as proposed in the rule; however they noted that
in some instances, particularly along land borders, customs brokers
serve as the importer of record. NCBFAA stated its view that the IFTP
should not be required for an importer of record who is not a
beneficial party in interest, such as a customs broker. NCBFAA
therefore suggested the rule be modified to clarify that the permit
obligation, and associated recordkeeping and reporting requirements,
belong to the ``beneficial party in interest'' which should be defined
as a party with a financial interest in the imported goods such as the
owner, purchaser, or distributor of the merchandise.
Response: NMFS believes it is important for enforcement purposes
that the importer of record, regardless of whether said importer has a
direct financial interest in the imported goods, be the responsible
party accountable in the event of a shipment entry problem. Thus, the
IFTP obligation and associated recordkeeping and reporting requirements
in this rule will reside with the importer of record. Related to this,
NMFS clarifies that entities not resident in the United States are
ineligible to apply for the IFTP. Nonresident importers must have a
U.S. resident agent apply for the IFTP and have the customs broker
provide the resident agent's permit number in the entry data. NMFS has
clarified the regulatory text at 50 CFR 300.322(a) accordingly.
``De Minimis'' Levels and Informal Entries
Comment 3: NCBFAA noted that the rule does not address NMFS
requirements with regard to Informal Entries (valued at $2,500) or
Section 321 entries (shipments of ``de minimis value'', increased from
$200 to $800 by Section 601 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade
Enforcement Act, Pub. L. 114-376). NCBFAA noted that with the de
minimis threshold raised to $800, the practice of breaking commercial
shipments into lower-value increments will likewise increase, in effect
allowing these imports to bypass the more formalized requirements of
entry processing. NCBFAA stated its view that NMFS needs to address how
it will meet this contingency.
Response: NMFS' requirement with regard to Informal Entries will be
the same as those for all other entries, namely all entries associated
with the HTS codes corresponding to the three
[[Page 51129]]
seafood import monitoring programs will need to supply message sets and
documentation into ACE via the Document Imaging System (DIS).
Similarly, de minimis shipments corresponding to the relevant HTS codes
which are valued at less than $800 will also need to supply message
sets and documentation into ACE via the DIS to ensure that no
inadmissible products are granted entry into the U.S. market. NMFS
therefore revised 50 CFR 300.323 to clarify that all imports and
exports of covered commodities, including shipments otherwise eligible
for the de minimis value exemption, must be filed in ACE or AES, as
applicable, in order to collect the NMFS-required information. NMFS
also revised 50 CFR 300.324(b) to clarify that de minimis value imports
are also subject to the prohibition on importing fish or fish products
regulated under 50 CFR part 300 subpart Q without a valid IFTP or
without submitting complete and accurate information. Likewise, low
value exports are subject to AES filing to meet the NMFS requirements
for permitting and reporting (see 15 CFR 30.2(a)(iv)(F)). However, NMFS
has made provisions for cases where CBP reporting alternatives can
capture and transmit the NMFS-required information without a formal
entry or export filing in ACE or AES, as applicable.
Technical Language
Comment 4: NCBFAA noted that the proposed regulatory text at
Sec. Sec. 300.322(a) and 300.323 refers to persons who import ``for
consumption or non-consumption.'' NCBFAA noted that the term ``import
for consumption'' has a very specific legal meaning under customs law,
whereas, the term ``import for non-consumption'' has no particular
meaning under customs law. NCBFAA therefore suggested that commonly
used customs terms be used to clarify the application of the proposed
rule.
Response: NMFS agrees that the term ``import for non-consumption''
should be clarified and has therefore amended the regulatory text at
Sec. Sec. 300.322(a) and 300.323 to specify the various transactions
which pertain to seafood previously imported for purposes other than
immediate consumption, e.g. withdrawal from a foreign trade zone or
bonded warehouse for entry into U.S. commerce.
Elimination of Paper-Based Documentation
Comment 5: Traffic et al. conveyed its understanding that in the
initial phases of ITDS implementation, document image scans will be
used to transmit the catch documentation forms. Traffic et al. stated
its view that the key goal must be to eventually move away from paper-
based documentation, including imaged documents, to truly electronic
data. Traffic et al. stated its hope that NMFS, in conjunction with
CBP, will put in place systems to receive all information in a truly
electronic format, at least before the implementation date of the
proposed seafood import monitoring program or at some set time
thereafter, noting that the value of this system, in terms of real-time
verification and compliance risk assessment, cannot be achieved without
that change.
Response: Many of the paper-based catch documentation forms
referenced in this comment are created by regional fishery management
organizations (RFMOs) or arrangements that are comprised of different
member countries including the United States. ITDS therefore cannot be
made fully electronic until action in this direction is taken by the
relevant RFMOs or arrangements. For example, the TTVP requires
certification from tuna captains from all over the world, including
many that fish in remote artisanal fisheries where Internet
connectivity is not commonplace, even today. Having said that, however,
NMFS agrees it is important to move to a fully electronic system as
soon as the relevant international catch documentation schemes go
electronic. NMFS notes that the Commission for the Conservation of
Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) and the International
Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) have moved in
the direction of electronic catch documentation systems which have
simplified import/export processes for the trade and NMFS expects this
trend in other organizations in the future.
Need for Capacity Development
Comment 6: Traffic et al. noted its view that capacity building to
assist some countries with implementing the new rules will be
necessary. Traffic et al. noted its hope that NMFS, USAID, the State
Department and other agencies will be able to work with countries to
help develop electronic reporting systems that can produce the
information needed at the point of catch and feed into traceability
systems that will follow the product throughout the supply chain.
Response: NMFS agrees and is taking steps to do this. For example,
NMFS is working with the Department of State and USAID on a Regional
Development Mission Asia project in Southeast Asia to enhance seafood
traceability infrastructure among the developing countries of this
region.
Need To Apply Traceability to All Species
Comment 7: Traffic et al. noted its view that similar requirements
for electronic submission of catch documentation eventually be applied
to all species to effectively combat fraud and the flow of IUU
products.
Response: Although not germane to this rule, NMFS agrees (as noted
in the Seafood Import Monitoring Program proposed rule published in the
Federal Register on February 5, 2016) that seafood traceability
requirements should eventually be applied to all species in an effort
to combat seafood fraud and IUU fishing. As noted in the March 2015
Presidential Task Force report, the National Oceans Committee will
issue a report by December 2016 that includes an evaluation of the
program as implemented to date as well as recommendations of how and
under what timeframe it would be expanded.
TTVP ``Reduced Data Set'' Reporting
Comment 8: Bumble Bee noted that the proposed rule includes
provisions for the submission of a ``reduced data set'' for domestic
canners who import frozen tuna loins with the stated objective of
preventing duplicative report for companies that submit monthly reports
associated with the TTVP. Bumble Bee further noted that the recently
released Seafood Import Monitoring Program proposed rule also
references collection of data via a ``NMFS message set'' but the
content, specific format, and timing to begin reporting of both the
``reduced data set'' and the ``NMFS message set'' appear to not yet be
defined. Bumble Bee urged that the rollout of the ``reduced data set''
reporting proposed in the ITDS implementation rule not be implemented
prior to the rollout of the ``NMFS Message Set'' reporting requirement
in the Seafood Import Monitoring Program proposed rule and that NMFS
ensures that content and data serve both purposes. Bumble Bee stated
its view that implementing a ``reduced data set'' reporting requirement
under the ITDS implementation rule to meet the needs of the TTVP and
then implementing another data requirement shortly thereafter to meet
traceability reporting requirements seems wasteful and will create
additional burden on the trade.
Response: As noted in the NMFS ITDS implementation guidelines (see
https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/
ACE%20NMFS%20PGA%20MS%20Guidelines%20-%20July
[[Page 51130]]
%2022%202015.pdf), for cannery processed products that are imported
into the U.S. Customs District from American Samoa and for imports of
frozen cooked tuna loins, not in airtight containers, not in oil and
with contents over 6.8 kilograms from any country of origin, certain
data usually or otherwise required at the time of filing need not be
submitted if provided to NMFS under the regulations found at 50 CFR
216.93(d)(2). Under these specific conditions, NMFS will only require a
``reduced data set'' consisting of an acknowledgement that an
electronic image is associated with the shipment and also that the
document images of the NOAA Form 370(s) associated with the shipment
have been uploaded into the CBP DIS. Given the different timelines for
implementation of these two regulations, it will not be possible to
implement requirements simultaneously; however, NMFS will make every
effort to avoid creating additional burdens on the trade in the course
of implementing these programs.
Bi-Weekly Reporting Requirements
Comment 9: Bumble Bee stated its understanding that under the
proposed rule, companies who are part of the TTVP would now need to
obtain an IFTP. Bumble Bee does not object to this requirement, but
noted that in the reporting and recordkeeping requirements in section
300.183 of the proposed rule that biweekly reporting is required for
holders of the IFTP. Bumble Bee requested confirmation that the
existing bi-weekly reporting requirements associated with the IFTP will
remain limited to species currently part of the HMS ITP with the
existing reporting exemption for bigeye tuna destined for canneries.
Response: NMFS confirms that the import documentation requirements,
as well as the bi-weekly reporting requirements, associated with the
HMS ITP will remain limited to species currently part of that program.
The reporting exemption for bigeye tuna destined for canneries
harvested by either purse seiners or pole and line (bait) vessels will
continue. The regulations pertaining to this exemption were
inadvertently removed during a previous rulemaking (77 FR 52259, August
29, 2012) and have been restored in the regulatory text at 50 CFR
300.184. NMFS would also like to clarify that under this rule,
documentation such as the HMS ITP biweekly dealer reports, which are
not required at the time of entry/export, will continue to be provided
to the HMS ITP office and are not submitted to CBP via the ACE portal.
Administrative/Financial Burdens Imposed by Rule
Comment 10: Tri Marine voiced its concern about the administrative
and financial burden the proposed rule may pose and that this aspect
was not adequately addressed in the Regulatory Flexibility Act section
of the proposed rule. Tri Marine noted that direct and indirect costs
associated with new requirements under the rule are difficult to
determine at this time and that the primary beneficiary of the
efficiencies gained would be U.S. government agencies and companies
that also trade in non-TTVP species/products. Tri Marine encouraged
NMFS to reconsider options that best mitigate potential economic
impacts to industries that trade exclusively in TTVP species while
still achieving desired outcomes. Tri Marine agrees TTVP companies
should be required to obtain the IFTP, but without a fee and with
minimal filing burden. Tri Marine suggested updated templates for the
NOAA 370 form and Captain's Statements should be designed that readily
integrate into ACE. Tri Marine noted information required should always
include the market name and scientific names of all species used in the
product, not only simplified names such as light meat tuna that can
mask the actual inputs used. Tri Marine encouraged NMFS to engage with
the FDA to change the standard of identity for canned tuna to require
the species name of all inputs be provided on canned tuna labels.
Response: In determining its preferred alternative for this
rulemaking, NMFS made best efforts to balance potential economic
impacts on the trade with the rulemaking's desired outcomes. NMFS
believes extending the IFTP requirement to TTVP-related companies to be
both the most equitable and effective alternative among those presented
in the proposed rule. The cost of the IFTP is only $30 and is
calculated solely based upon the administrative cost to NMFS of issuing
the permit. Requiring the permit for all three programs also allows
NMFS to easily notify permit holders of any changes to the relevant
regulations or import monitoring program procedures. NMFS appreciates
the suggestion to update templates for the TTVP 370 form and Captain's
Statements for improved integration with ACE and will work with CBP to
consider this suggestion further. Although the comment regarding market
and scientific names is outside the scope of this rulemaking, this
issue has been discussed by NMFS, the FDA, and other agencies in
response to Recommendation 10 of the Presidential Task Force to Combat
IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud. (See www.iuufishing.noaa.gov).
Import Data for Frozen Cooked Tuna Loins and Tuna in Airtight
Containers
Comment 11: Tri Marine recognized the proposed rule allows for a
reduced data set for imports of 1) frozen cooked tuna loins used in
cannery operations and 2) tuna products in airtight containers
manufactured in American Samoa. Although Tri Marine agreed with the
intent to prevent duplicative reporting and apply this to imports from
American Samoa, it opposed reduced data collection from frozen loin
importers. Tri Marine noted that tuna cans from American Samoa are
typically produced from fish delivered directly to canneries from the
fishing vessel allowing direct traceability from the vessel to
processing line to finished product. Tuna loins imported into the
United States, however, are typically caught in distant waters,
transshipped onto carrier vessels, offloaded into foreign ports,
trucked to large cold stores, transferred to foreign processing
facilities and then shipped by container vessel to the United States
where they are stored and undergo final secondary processing, all of
which makes traceability more challenging. Tri Marine therefore
recommends more rigorous data sets be required for imported tuna loins.
Response: These comments are germane to the chain of custody
requirements proposed under the Seafood Import Monitoring Program (81
FR 6210) rather than under this ITDS implementation rule. However, NMFS
notes that the reduced data set applies to all U.S. tuna canning
facilities in order to reduce duplication of data elements required
under 50 CFR 219.93(d)(2). NMFS will take these comments into
consideration when formulating its final rule for the Seafood Import
Monitoring Program.
Overlap With Proposed Seafood Import Monitoring Program
Comment 12: Tri Marine stated its view that there is significant
overlap between the ITDS implementation proposed rule and the proposed
rule for the Seafood Import Monitoring Program. Tri Marine's view is
that since it is highly likely that comments on the Seafood Import
Monitoring Program will be useful in guiding the development of a final
rule for ITDS implementation, it would be prudent to integrate the
final rule for these two initiatives, taking into account comments on
both proposed rules.
[[Page 51131]]
Response: Although NMFS recognizes there is overlap between the two
rules, it will not be possible to integrate the two rules primarily
because they have different timelines for implementation with NMFS
implementation of ITDS required by July 23, 2016, in order to meet the
requirements specified for all Federal agencies in Executive Order
13659 (Streamlining the Export/Import Process) whereas implementation
of the Seafood Import Monitoring Program is not expected to occur until
the fall of 2016 at the earliest.
Classification
This rule is published under the authority of AMLRCA of 1984, 16
U.S.C. 2431 et seq.; ATCA of 1975, 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; TCA of 1950,
16 U.S.C. 951-961; MSA, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.; MMPA of 1972, 16 U.S.C.
1361-1407; DPCIA, 16 U.S.C. 1385; HSDFMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1826d-k; and
HSDFEA, 16 U.S.C. 1826a-c. Other relevant authorities include the Pelly
Amendment to the Fishermen's Protective Act, 22 U.S.C. 1978, and the
Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. 3371.
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this final
rule is consistent with the provisions of these and other applicable
laws.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Administrative Procedure Act
As explained above, this final rule revises text at 50 CFR 300.184
that provides an exemption from documentation requirements for bigeye
tuna destined for canneries. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), there is
good cause to waive prior notice and an opportunity for public comment
on this specific provision of the final rule, because notice and
comment would be unnecessary and contrary to the public interest. This
text was inadvertently removed in an August 29, 2012 final rule (77 FR
52259), and NMFS only became aware of that fact as it was reviewing and
responding to public comments on this current rulemaking. Providing for
public comment at this time is unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest, as NMFS and industry have been operating as if the exemption
remained in place. Further, NMFS never intended to change the exemption
and thus never analyzed its removal. Because this aspect of the rule
relieves a restriction by reinserting an exemption to documentation
requirements, it is not subject to the 30-day delayed effectiveness
provision of the APA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulations certified that this rule is not
expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of U.S. small entities (80 FR 81255, December 29, 2015).
Although a new IFTP will be established for the import, export or
re-export of regulated products under the AMLR, HMS ITP and TTVP
programs, this new permit generally represents a consolidation of
information contained in existing permits and should actually result in
fewer reporting or recordkeeping requirements. Data sets to be entered
electronically to determine product admissibility are already required
to be submitted in paper form under the respective trade programs.
Thus, NMFS anticipates that U.S. entities will not be significantly
affected by this action because it generally does not pose new or
additional burdens with regard to the collection and submission of
information necessary to determine product admissibility.
With regard to the possible economic effects of this action, per
the response to Question 13 of the supporting statement prepared for
the Paperwork Reduction Act analysis (available from www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain), NMFS estimates there will be 751 applicants for the
new IFTP with an estimated net increase in annual costs of $16,255 for
obtaining those permits, based on the combined number of permit holders
and respondents under NMFS' existing trade monitoring programs.
Although NMFS does not have access to data about the business sizes of
importers and receivers that would be impacted by this rule, it is
likely that the majority may be classified as small entities. However,
when overall total new burdens for the three requirements under this
rule (IFTP, data set submission, and admissibility document(s)
submission) are compared to current burdens, the new consolidated
burdens are estimated to result in an overall net burden decrease of
4,225 hours and $63,650. A no-action alternative, where NMFS would not
promulgate the rule, was not considered as all applicable U.S.
government agencies are required to implement ITDS under the authority
of section 405 of the SAFE Port Act and Executive Order 13659 on
Streamlining the Export/Import Process, dated February 19, 2014.
This action will not affect the volume of seafood trade or alter
trade flows in the U.S. market. Although the rule will require traders
under the TTVP to obtain an IFTP, which they are not currently required
to do, NMFS expects that the consolidated IFTP will have no impact on,
or will actually reduce, the overall administrative burden on the
public; those parties currently required to obtain two separate permits
under the AMLR and HMS ITP programs will be required to obtain only one
consolidated permit under this rule.
The consolidated permitting and electronic reporting program
established under this rulemaking will not have significant adverse or
long-term economic impacts on small U.S. entities. This rule has also
been determined not to duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules. Thus, the requirements and prohibitions in the rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Consequently, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains a collection-of-information requirement subject
to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
This requirement has been approved by OMB under control number 0648-
0732. When new reporting burdens for the three electronic reporting
requirements under this rule (IFTP, data set submission, and
admissibility document submission) are compared to current reporting
burdens approved for the separate paper-based programs, it is estimated
to result in an overall net burden decrease of 4,225 hours and $63,650.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 216
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Fish, Imports,
Indians, Labeling, Marine mammals.
50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and procedure, Antarctica, Canada, Exports,
Fish, Fisheries, Fishing, Imports, Indians, Labeling, Marine resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Russian Federation,
Transportation, Treaties, Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 600
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing regulations, Fishing vessels,
Foreign
[[Page 51132]]
relations, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Statistics.
50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian natives, Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 27, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR parts 216, 300,
600, and 660 are amended as follows:
PART 216--REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE TAKING AND IMPORTING OF MARINE
MAMMALS
0
1. The authority citation for part 216 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et. seq., unless otherwise noted.
0
2. In Sec. 216.24, revise paragraphs (f)(2) introductory text,
(f)(2)(i)(A) and (D), (f)(2)(ii)(A) and (D), (f)(2)(iii)(A) through
(C), (f)(3) introductory text, and (f)(3)(i) through (iii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 216.24 Taking and related acts incidental to commercial fishing
operations by tuna purse seine vessels in the eastern tropical Pacific
Ocean.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) Imports requiring a Fisheries Certificate of Origin and an
International Fisheries Trade Permit. Shipments of tuna, tuna products,
and certain other fish products identified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i)
through (iii) of this section may not be imported into the United
States unless: a scanned copy of a properly completed Fisheries
Certificate of Origin (FCO), NOAA Form 370, associated certifications
and statements described in Sec. 216.91(a), and required data set are
filed electronically with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at
the time of, or in advance of, importation as required under Sec.
300.323; and the importer of record designated on the entry summary
(Customs Form 7501) holds a valid International Fisheries Trade Permit
as specified at Sec. 300.322 of this title. ``Required data set'' has
the same meaning as Sec. 300.321 of this title (see definition of
``Documentation and data sets required'').
(i) * * *
(A) Frozen: (products containing Yellowfin).
0303.42.0020 Yellowfin tunas, whole, frozen
0303.42.0040 Yellowfin tunas, head-on, frozen, except whole
0303.42.0060 Yellowfin tunas, other, frozen, except whole, head-on,
fillets, livers and roes
0304.87.0000 Tuna fish fillets, frozen, not elsewhere specified or
indicated (NESOI)
0304.99.1190 Tuna, frozen, in bulk or in immediate containers weighing
with their contents over 6.8 kg each
* * * * *
(D) Other: (products containing Yellowfin).
0511.91.0090 Fish, shellfish products unfit for human consumption
1604.20.1000 Fish pastes
1604.20.1500 Fish balls, cakes and puddings, in oil
1604.20.2000 Fish balls, cakes and puddings, not in oil, less than 6.8
kg, in airtight containers
1604.20.2500 Fish balls, cakes and puddings, not in oil, not in
airtight containers, in immediate containers weighing with their
contents not over 6.8 kg each
1604.20.3000 Fish balls, cakes and puddings, NESOI
1604.20.4000 Fish sticks, not cooked, nor in oil
1604.20.5010 Fish sticks, cooked and frozen
1604.20.5090 Fish sticks, NESOI
2309.10.0010 Dog or cat food, in airtight containers
(ii) * * *
(A) Frozen: (other than Yellowfin).
0303.41.0000 Albacore or longfinned tunas, frozen, except fillets,
livers and roes
0303.43.0000 Skipjack tunas or stripe-bellied bonito, frozen, except
fillets, livers and roes
0303.44.0000 Bigeye tunas, frozen, except fillets, livers and roes
0303.45.0110 Atlantic Bluefin, frozen, except fillets, livers and roes
0303.45.0150 Pacific Bluefin, frozen, except fillets, livers and roes
0303.46.0000 Southern bluefin tunas, frozen, except fillets, livers and
roes
0303.49.0200 Tunas, frozen, except fillets, livers and roes, NESOI
0304.87.0000 Tuna fish fillets, frozen, NESOI
0304.99.1190 Tuna, frozen, in bulk or in immediate containers weighing
with their contents over 6.8 kg each, NESOI
* * * * *
(D) Other: (only if the product contains tuna).
0511.91.0090 Fish, shellfish products unfit for human consumption
1604.20.1000 Fish pastes
1604.20.1500 Fish balls, cakes and puddings, in oil
1604.20.2000 Fish balls, cakes and puddings, not in oil, less than 6.8
kg, in airtight containers
1604.20.2500 Fish balls, cakes and puddings, not in oil, not in
airtight containers, in immediate containers weighing with their
contents not over 6.8 kg each
1604.20.3000 Fish balls, cakes and puddings, NESOI
1604.20.4000 Fish sticks, not cooked, nor in oil
1604.20.5010 Fish sticks, cooked and frozen
1604.20.5090 Fish sticks, NESOI
2309.10.0010 Dog or cat food, in airtight containers
(iii) * * *
(A) Frozen:
0303.11.0000 Sockeye (red) salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka), frozen, except
fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0012 Chinook (King) salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha), frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0022 Chum (dog) salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), frozen, except
fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0032 Pink (humpie) salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0052 Coho (silver) salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), frozen,
except fillets, livers and roes
0303.12.0062 Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus masou, Oncorhynchus
rhodurus), frozen, except fillets, livers and roes, NESOI
0303.13.0000 Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and Danube salmon (Hucho
hucho), frozen, except fillets, livers and roes
0303.14.0000 Trout (Salmo trutta; Oncorhynchus mykiss, clarki,
aguabonita, gilae, apache, and chrysogaster), frozen, except fillets,
livers and roes
0303.19.0100 Salmonidae, frozen, except fillets, livers and roes, NESOI
0303.57.0010 Swordfish steaks, frozen, except fillets
0303.57.0090 Swordfish, frozen, except steaks, fillets, livers and roes
0303.81.0010 Dogfish (Squalus spp.), frozen, except fillets, livers and
roes
0303.81.0090 Sharks, frozen, except dogfish, fillets, livers and roes
0303.89.0079 Fish, other, frozen, except fillets, livers and roes,
NESOI
0304.81.5010 Atlantic Salmonidae (Salmo salar) fillets, frozen, NESOI
0304.81.5090 Salmonidae fillets, frozen, except Atlantic salmon, NESOI
[[Page 51133]]
0304.89.1090 Fish fillets, skinned, frozen blocks weighing over 4.5 kg
each, to be minced, ground or cut into pieces of uniform weights and
dimensions, NESOI
0304.91.1000 Swordfish, frozen, in bulk or in immediate containers
weighing over 6.8 kg each
0304.91.9000 Swordfish, frozen, NESOI
0304.99.9191 Fish fillets, ocean, frozen, NESOI
0307.49.0010 Squid fillets, frozen
0307.49.0022 Squid, Loligo opalescens, NESOI
0307.49.0024 Squid, Loligo pealei, NESOI
0307.49.0029 Squid, Loligo, other, NESOI
0307.49.0050 Squid, other, NESOI
(B) Canned:
1604.11.2020 Pink (humpie) salmon, whole or in pieces, but not minced,
in oil, in airtight containers
1604.11.2030 Sockeye (red) salmon, whole or in pieces, but not minced,
in oil, in airtight containers
1604.11.2090 Salmon NESOI, whole or in pieces, but not minced, in oil,
in airtight containers
1604.11.4010 Chum (dog) salmon, not in oil, canned
1604.11.4020 Pink (humpie) salmon, not in oil, canned
1604.11.4030 Sockeye (red) salmon, not in oil, canned
1604.11.4040 Salmon, NESOI, not in oil, canned
1604.11.4050 Salmon, whole or in pieces, but not minced, NESOI
1604.19.2100 Fish, NESOI, not in oil, in airtight containers
1604.19.3100 Fish, NESOI, in oil, in airtight containers
1605.54.6020 Squid, Loligo, prepared or preserved
1605.54.6030 Squid, except Loligo, prepared or preserved
(C) Other:
0305.39.6080 Fish fillets, dried, salted or in brine, but not smoked,
NESOI
0305.41.0000 Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), Atlantic salmon (Salmo
salar), and Danube salmon (Hucho hucho), including fillets, smoked
0305.49.4041 Fish including fillets, smoked, NESOI
0305.59.0000 Fish, dried, whether or not salted but not smoked, NESOI
0305.69.4000 Salmon, salted but not dried or smoked; in brine
0305.69.5001 Fish in immediate containers weighing with their contents
6.8 kg or less each, salted but not dried or smoked; in brine, NESOI
0305.69.6001 Fish, salted but not dried or smoked; in brine, NESOI
0305.71.0000 Shark fins, dried, whether or not salted but not smoked
0305.49.0010 Squid, frozen, fillets
0307.49.0022 Squid, Loligo opalescens, frozen (except fillets), dried,
salted or in brine
0307.49.0024 Squid, Loligo pealei, frozen (except fillets), dried,
salted or in brine
0307.49.0029 Squid, Loligo, frozen (except fillets), dried, salted or
in brine, NESOI
0307.49.0050 Squid, other, frozen (except fillets), dried, salted or in
brine, except Loligo squid
0307.49.0060 Cuttle fish (Sepia officinalis, Rossia macrosoma, Sepiola
spp.), frozen, dried, salted or in brine
(3) Disposition of Fisheries Certificates of Origin. The FCO
described in paragraph (f)(4) of this section may be obtained from the
Administrator, West Coast Region, or downloaded from the Internet at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/dolphinsafe/noaa370.htm.
(i) A properly completed FCO, and its attached certifications and
statements as described in Sec. 216.91(a), must accompany the required
CBP entry documents that are filed at the time of, or in advance of,
importation.
(ii) FCOs and associated certifications and statements as described
in Sec. 216.91(a) must be provided electronically to CBP as indicated
in paragraph (f)(2) of this section.
(iii) FCOs that accompany imported shipments of tuna destined for
further processing in the United States must be endorsed at each change
in ownership and submitted to the Administrator, West Coast Region, by
the last endorser when all required endorsements are completed. Such
FCOs must be submitted as specified in Sec. 216.93(d)(2).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 216.93, revise paragraphs (f) and (g)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 216.93 Tracking and verification program.
* * * * *
(f) Tracking imports. All tuna products, except fresh tuna, that
are imported into the United States must be accompanied as described in
Sec. 216.24(f)(3) by a properly certified FCO as required by Sec.
216.24(f)(2). For tuna tracking purposes, copies of FCOs and associated
certifications and statements must be submitted by the importer of
record to U.S. Customs and Border Protection as described in and
required by Sec. 216.24(f)(2).
(g) * * *
(2) Record submission. At the time of, or in advance of,
importation of a shipment of tuna or tuna products, any importer of
tuna or tuna products must submit all corresponding FCOs and required
certifications and statements for those tuna or tuna products as
required by Sec. 216.24(f)(2).
* * * * *
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
0
4. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.; 16
U.S.C. 5501 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.; 31 U.S.C. 9701 et seq.
0
5. In Sec. 300.4:
0
a. Revise paragraph (o);
0
b. Redesignate paragraphs (p) and (q) as (q) and (r); and
0
c. Add a new paragraph (p).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 300.4 General prohibitions.
* * * * *
(o) Ship, transport, offer for sale, sell, purchase, import,
export, or have custody, control, or possession of, any fish imported,
exported or re-exported in violation of this part.
(p) Import, export, or re-export any fish regulated under this part
without a valid International Fisheries Trade Permit as required under
Sec. 300.322 or applicable shipment documentation as required under
Sec. 300.323.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 300.107, revise paragraphs (b) introductory text, (b)(1)
and (3), (c)(6)(i)(A)(5), and (c)(7)(i)(A)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.107 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
* * * * *
(b) Dealers. Dealers of AMLR required under Sec. 300.114 to have
an International Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP) issued under Sec.
300.322 must:
(1) Accurately maintain all reports and records required by their
IFTP and this subpart;
* * * * *
(3) Within the time specified in the IFTP requirements, submit a
copy of such reports and records to NMFS at an address designated by
NMFS.
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(5) The dealer/exporter's name, address, and IFTP number; and
* * * * *
(7) * * *
[[Page 51134]]
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(4) The dealer/exporter's name, address, and IFTP permit number;
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 300.114:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and (4), (b), (d) through (f), (g)(1)
and (2), (h), and (j); and
0
b. Remove paragraph (k).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 300.114 Dealer permits and preapproval.
(a) * * *
(1) A dealer importing, or re-exporting AMLR, or a person exporting
AMLR, must possess a valid IFTP issued under Sec. 300.322 and file, as
specified under Sec. 300.323, the required data sets electronically
with CBP at the time of, or in advance of importation or exportation.
Required data set has the same meaning as Sec. 300.321 (see definition
of ``Documentation and data sets required.'') See Sec. 300.322 for
IFTP application procedures and permit regulations. The IFTP holder may
only conduct those specific activities stipulated by the IFTP.
Preapproval from NMFS is required for each shipment of frozen
Dissostichus species.
(2) An AMLR may be imported into the United States if its harvest
has been authorized by a U.S.-issued individual permit or its
importation has been authorized by an IFTP and, in the case of frozen
Dissostichus species, preapproval issued under Sec. 300.114(a)(1).
AMLRs may not be released for entry into the United States unless
accompanied by the harvesting permit, the individual permit, or IFTP
and, in the case of frozen Dissostichus species, the preapproval
certification granted by NMFS to allow import. NMFS will only accept
electronic catch documents for toothfish imports.
* * * * *
(4) An IFTP or preapproval issued under this section does not
authorize the harvest or transshipment of any AMLR by or to a vessel of
the United States.
(b) Application. Application forms for preapproval are available
from NMFS. * * *
* * * * *
(d) Issuance. NMFS may issue a preapproval if it determines that
the activity proposed by the dealer meets the requirements of the Act
and that the resources were not or will not be harvested in violation
of any CCAMLR conservation measure in force with respect to the United
States or in violation of any regulation in this subpart. * * *
(e) Duration. A preapproval is valid until the product is imported.
Each export or re-export document created by NMFS in the CDS is valid
only for that particular shipment.
(f) Transfer. A preapproval issued under this section is not
transferable or assignable.
(g) * * *
(1) Pending applications. Applicants for preapproval under this
section must report in writing to NMFS any change in the information
submitted in preapproval applications. * * *
(2) Issued preapprovals. Any entity issued a preapproval under this
section must report in writing to NMFS any changes in previously
submitted information. * * *
(h) Revision, suspension, or revocation. A preapproval issued under
this section may be revised, suspended, or revoked, based upon a
violation of the IFTP, the Act, or this subpart. Failure to report a
change in the information contained in a preapproval application voids
the application or preapproval. Title 15 CFR part 904 governs sanctions
under this subpart.
* * * * *
(j) SVDCD. Preapprovals will not be issued for Dissostichus spp.
offered for sale or other disposition under a Specially Validated DCD.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 300.117, revise paragraphs (b) and (r) and add paragraph
(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.117 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(b) Import into, or export or re-export from, the United States any
AMLRs without applicable catch documentation as required by Sec.
300.107(c), without an IFTP as required by Sec. 300.114(a)(1), or in
violation of the terms and conditions for such import, export or re-
export as specified on the IFTP.
* * * * *
(r) Without a valid first receiver permit issued under this
subpart, receive AMLRs from a vessel or receive AMLRs from a vessel
without a valid harvesting permit issued under this subpart.
* * * * *
(ii) Import into, or export or re-export from, the United States
any AMLRs harvest by a vessel of the United States without a valid
harvesting permit issued under this subpart.
0
9. In Sec. 300.181:
0
a. Add in alphabetical order definitions for ``Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE)'' and ``Automated Export System (AES)'';
0
b. Revise the definition for ``CBP'';
0
c. Add in alphabetical order definitions for ``Document Imaging System
(DIS)'' and ``International Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP) or trade
permit'';
0
d. Revise the definition for ``Permit holder'';
0
e. Add in alphabetical order a definition for ``Required data set'';
and
0
f. Remove the definition for ``Trade Permit''.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 300.181 Definitions.
* * * * *
Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) has the same meaning as that
term is defined in Sec. 300.321 of this part.
Automated Export System (AES) has the same meaning as that term is
defined in Sec. 300.321 of this part.
* * * * *
CBP means U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security.
* * * * *
Document Imaging System (DIS) means the system established by CBP
to receive image files of paper documents in ACE or AES and associate
the image files with specific trade transactions.
* * * * *
International Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP) or trade permit means
the permit issued by NMFS under Sec. 300.322.
* * * * *
Permit holder, for purposes of this subpart, means, unless
otherwise specified, a person who is required to obtain an
International Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP) under Sec. 300.322.
* * * * *
Required data set has the same meaning as Sec. 300.321 (see
definition of ``Documentation and data sets required'').
* * * * *
0
10. Section 300.182 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.182 International fisheries trade permit.
An importer, entering for consumption any fish or fish products
regulated under this subpart, harvested from any ocean area, into the
United States, or an exporter exporting or re-exporting such product,
must possess a valid International Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP) issued
under Sec. 300.322.
0
11. In Sec. 300.183, revise paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(3),
and (b) through (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.183 Permit holder reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
(a) Biweekly reports. Any person trading fish and fish products
regulated under this subpart and required to
[[Page 51135]]
obtain a trade permit under Sec. 300.322 must submit to NMFS, on forms
supplied by NMFS, a biweekly report of entries for consumption, exports
and re-exports of fish and fish products regulated under this subpart,
except shark fins.
* * * * *
(3) A biweekly report is not required for export consignments of
bluefin tuna when the information required on the biweekly report has
been previously supplied on a biweekly report submitted under Sec.
635.5(b)(2)(i)(B) of this title. The person required to obtain a trade
permit under Sec. 300.322 must retain, at his/her principal place of
business, a copy of the biweekly report which includes the required
information and is submitted under Sec. 635.5(b)(2)(i)(B) of this
title, for a period of 2 years from the date on which each report was
submitted to NMFS.
(b) Recordkeeping. Any person trading fish and fish products
regulated under this subpart and required to submit biweekly reports
under paragraph (a) of this section must retain, at his/her principal
place of business, a copy of each biweekly report and all supporting
records for a period of 2 years from the date on which each report was
submitted to NMFS.
(c) Other requirements. Any person trading fish and fish products
regulated under this subpart and required to obtain a trade permit
under Sec. 300.322 is also subject to the reporting and recordkeeping
requirements identified in Sec. 300.185.
(d) Inspection. Any person authorized to carry out the enforcement
activities under the regulations in this subpart (authorized person)
has the authority, without warrant or other process, to inspect, at any
reasonable time: fish or fish products regulated under this subpart,
biweekly reports, statistical documents, catch documents, re-export
certificates, relevant sales receipts, import and export documentation,
and any other records or reports made, retained, or submitted pursuant
to this subpart. A permit holder must allow NMFS or an authorized
person to inspect any fish or fish products regulated under this
subpart, and inspect and copy any import export, and re-export
documentation and any reports required under this subpart, and the
records, in any form, on which the completed reports are based,
wherever they exist. Any agent of a person trading and required to
obtain a trade permit under Sec. 300.322, or anyone responsible for
importing, exporting, re-exporting, storing, packing, or selling fish
or fish products regulated under this subpart, shall be subject to the
inspection provisions of this section.
(e) Applicability of reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements in this subpart apply to any
person engaging in international trade regardless of whether a trade
permit has been issued to that person.
0
12. Effective August 3, 2016, revise Sec. 300.184 to read as follows:
Sec. 300.184 Species subject to permitting, documentation,
reporting, and recordkeeping requirements.
(a) Except as noted in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the
following fish or fish products are subject to the documentation
requirements of this subpart, regardless of ocean area of catch, and
must be reported under the appropriate heading or subheading numbers
from the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS):
(1) Bluefin tuna,
(2) Southern bluefin tuna,
(3) Frozen bigeye tuna,
(4) Swordfish, and
(5) Shark fins.
(b) For bluefin tuna, southern bluefin tuna, frozen bigeye tuna,
and swordfish, fish parts other than meat (e.g., heads, eyes, roe,
guts, and tails) may be imported without the documentation required
under this subpart.
(c) Bigeye tuna caught by purse seiners or pole and line (bait)
vessels and destined for canneries within the United States, including
all U.S. commonwealths, territories, and possessions, may be imported
without the documentation required under this subpart.
0
13. In Sec. 300.185:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii)(A), and (a)(2)(iii)(A);
0
b. Remove paragraph (a)(2)(vii);
0
c. Revise paragraphs (a)(3), (b)(2) and (3), (c)(2)(i) and (ii), and
(c)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 300.185 Documentation, reporting and recordkeeping requirements
for consignment documents and re-export certificates.
(a) * * *
(2) Documentation requirements. (i) Except for shark fins, all fish
or fish products regulated under this subpart, imported into the
Customs territory of the United States or entered for consumption into
a separate customs territory of a U.S. insular possession, must, at the
time of presenting entry documentation for clearance by customs
authorities (e.g., electronic filing via ACE or other documentation
required by the port director) be accompanied by an original, complete,
accurate, approved and properly validated, species-specific consignment
document. An image of such document and the required data set must be
filed electronically with CBP via ACE.
(ii) Bluefin tuna. (A) Imports that were re-exported from another
nation must also be accompanied by an original, complete, accurate,
approved and properly validated, species-specific re-export
certificate.
(1) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this requirement must be satisfied
by the U.S. importer through electronic receipt and completion of a re-
export certificate in the ICCAT eBCD system, unless NMFS provides
otherwise through actual notice or Federal Register notice. In cases
where the documentation requirements have been completed in the ICCAT
eBCD system, a reduced data set consisting of the eBCD number or re-
export certificate number, as applicable, and the importer trade permit
number would suffice as an import filing, without need to submit any
forms via DIS in ACE.
(2) For bluefin tuna harvested from other than the Atlantic Ocean,
or for Atlantic Bluefin tuna entered pursuant to a notified exception
under (a)(2)(ii)(A)(1), an image of the original paper re-export
certificate and the supporting consignment documents must be submitted
to CBP via the ACE DIS.
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Imports that were previously re-exported and were subdivided or
consolidated with another consignment before re-export, must also be
accompanied by an original, completed, accurate, valid, approved and
properly validated, species-specific re-export certificate. An image of
such document, an image of the original import document, and the
required data set must be filed electronically with CBP via ACE.
* * * * *
(3) Reporting requirements. (i) For fish or fish products regulated
under this subpart, except shark fins, that are entered for consumption
and whose final destination is within the United States, which includes
U.S. insular possessions, a permit holder must submit an image of the
original consignment document that accompanied the fish product as
completed under paragraph (a)(2) of this section to CBP electronically
through the ACE DIS.
(ii) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this requirement must be satisfied
electronically by entering the specified information into the ICCAT
eBCD
[[Page 51136]]
system as directed in paragraph (a)(2)(vi)(A) of this section, unless
NMFS provides otherwise through actual notice or Federal Register
notice. In cases where the documentation requirements have been
completed in the ICCAT eBCD system, a reduced data set consisting of
the eBCD number or the re-export certificate number, as applicable, and
the importer trade permit number would suffice as an import filing,
without need to submit any forms via DIS in ACE.
(b) * * *
(2) Documentation requirements. A permit holder must complete an
original, approved, numbered, species-specific consignment document
issued to that permit holder by NMFS for each export referenced under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and electronically file an image of
such documentation and the required data set with CBP via AES. Such an
individually numbered document is not transferable and may be used only
once by the permit holder to which it was issued to report on a
specific export consignment. A permit holder must provide on the
consignment document the correct information and exporter
certification. The consignment document must be validated, as specified
in Sec. 300.187, by NMFS, or another official authorized by NMFS. A
list of such officials may be obtained by contacting NMFS. A permit
holder requesting U.S. validation for exports should notify NMFS as
soon as possible after arrival of the vessel to avoid delays in
inspection and validation of the export consignment.
(i) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this requirement must be satisfied
by electronic completion of a consignment document in the ICCAT eBCD
system, unless NMFS provides otherwise through actual notice or Federal
Register notice. In cases where the documentation requirements have
been completed in the ICCAT eBCD system, a reduced data set consisting
of the eBCD number and the exporter trade permit number would suffice
as an export filing, without need to submit any forms in AES via DIS.
(ii) For non-Atlantic bluefin tuna, this requirement must be
satisfied by completion of a paper consignment document, and electronic
filing of an image of such documentation and the required data set with
CBP via AES.
(3) Reporting requirements. (i) A permit holder must ensure that
the original, approved, consignment document as completed under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section accompanies the export of such
products to their export destination and must electronically file an
image of such documentation and the required data set with CBP via AES.
(ii) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this requirement must be satisfied
electronically by entering the specified information into the eBCD
system as directed in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, unless NMFS
provides otherwise through actual notice or Federal Register notice. In
cases where the documentation requirements have been completed in the
ICCAT eBCD system, a reduced data set consisting of the eBCD number and
the exporter trade permit number would suffice as an export filing
without need to submit any forms in AES via DIS.
(c) * * *
(2) Documentation requirements. (i) If a permit holder re-exports a
consignment of bluefin tuna, or subdivides or consolidates a
consignment of fish or fish products regulated under this subpart,
other than shark fins, that was previously entered for consumption as
described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the permit holder must
complete an original, approved, individually numbered, species-specific
re-export certificate issued to that permit holder by NMFS for each re-
export consignment. Such an individually numbered document is not
transferable and may be used only once by the permit holder to which it
was issued to report on a specific re-export consignment. A permit
holder must provide on the re-export certificate the correct
information and re-exporter certification. The permit holder must also
attach the original consignment documentation that accompanied the
import consignment or a copy of that documentation, and must note on
the top of both the consignment documents and the re-export
certificates the entry number assigned by CBP authorities at the time
of filing the entry for the previously imported consignment. An
electronic image of these documents and the required data set must be
filed electronically with CBP via AES at the time of export.
(A) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, these requirements must be satisfied
by electronic completion of a re-export certificate in the ICCAT eBCD
system, unless NMFS provides otherwise through actual notice or Federal
Register notice. In cases where the documentation requirements have
been completed in the ICCAT eBCD system, a reduced data set consisting
of the eBCD number and the exporter trade permit number would suffice
as a re-export filing, without need to submit any forms in AES via DIS.
(B) For non-Atlantic bluefin tuna, these requirements must be
satisfied by completion of a paper re-export certificate, and
electronic filing of an image of such documentation and the required
data set with CBP via AES.
(ii) If a consignment of fish or fish products regulated under this
subpart, except bluefin tuna or shark fins, that was previously entered
for consumption as described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section is not
subdivided into sub-consignments or consolidated with other
consignments or parts thereof, for each such re-export consignment, a
permit holder must complete the intermediate importer's certification
on the original consignment document and note the entry number
previously issued by CBP for the consignment at the top of the
document. Such re-exports do not need a re-export certificate and the
re-export does not require validation. An electronic image of the
consignment document with the completed intermediate importer's
certification and the required data set must be filed electronically
with CBP via AES at the time of re-export.
* * * * *
(3) Reporting requirements. (i) For each re-export, a permit holder
must submit the original of the completed re-export certificate (if
applicable) and the original or a copy of the original consignment
document completed as specified under paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
to the shipper to accompany the consignment of such products to their
re-export destination, and an image of such documentation and the
required data set must be filed electronically with CBP via AES.
(ii) For Atlantic bluefin tuna, this requirement must be satisfied
electronically by entering the specified information into the ICCAT
eBCD system as directed in paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) of this section,
unless NMF provides otherwise through actual notice or Federal Register
notice. In cases where the documentation requirements have been
completed in the ICCAT eBCD system, a reduced data set consisting of
the eBCD number and the exporter trade permit number would suffice as
an export filing, without need to submit any forms in AES via DIS.
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 300.189, revise paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (m), and (n) to
read as follows:
Sec. 300.189 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(a) Falsify information required on an application for a permit
submitted under Sec. 300.322.
[[Page 51137]]
(b) Import as an entry for consumption, purchase, receive for
export, export, or re-export any fish or fish product regulated under
this subpart without a valid trade permit issued under Sec. 300.322.
(c) Fail to possess, and make available for inspection, a trade
permit at the permit holder's place of business, or alter any such
permit as specified in Sec. 300.322.
* * * * *
(m) Fail to electronically file via ACE a validated consignment
document and the required data set for imports at time of entry into
the Customs territory of the United States of fish or fish products
regulated under this subpart except shark fins, regardless of whether
the importer, exporter, or re-exporter holds a valid trade permit
issued pursuant to Sec. 300.322 or whether the fish products are
imported as an entry for consumption.
(n) Import or accept an imported consignment of fish or fish
products regulated under this subpart, except shark fins, without an
original, complete, accurate, approved and properly validated, species-
specific consignment document and re-export certificate (if applicable)
with the required information and exporter's certification completed.
Subpart Q--[Redesignated as Subpart R]
0
15. Redesignate subpart Q, consisting of Sec. 300.330 through 300.341,
as subpart R.
0
16. Add new subpart Q to read as follows:
Subpart Q--International Trade Documentation and Tracking Programs
Sec.
300.320 Purpose and scope.
300.321 Definitions.
300.322 International Fisheries Trade Permit.
300.323 Reporting requirements.
300.324 Prohibitions.
Subpart Q--International Trade Documentation and Tracking Programs
Sec. 300.320 Purpose and scope.
The regulations in this subpart are issued under the authority of
the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975 (ATCA), the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Tuna Conventions Act of
1950, and the Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention Act of 1984.
These regulations implement the applicable recommendations of the
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
for the conservation and management of tuna and tuna-like species in
the Atlantic Ocean, the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
for the conservation and management of highly migratory fish resources
in the eastern Pacific Ocean, and the Commission for the Conservation
of Antarctic Marine Living Resources so far as they affect vessels and
persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. These
regulations are also issued under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of
1972, the Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act and the Security
and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006. The requirements in this
subpart may be incorporated by reference in other regulations under
this title.
Sec. 300.321 Definitions.
ACE Implementation Guide for NMFS means the data set and document
imaging requirements set forth in the Appendices to the Customs and
Trade Automated Interface Requirements issued by Customs and Border
Protection.
AMLR trade program means the program for monitoring trade in
Antarctic marine living resources including, inter alia, Dissostichus
species as set forth in subpart G of this part.
Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) means, for purposes of this
subpart, the central point through which import shipment data required
by multiple agencies is filed electronically to Customs and Border
Protection (CBP).
Automated Export System (AES) means, for purposes of this subpart,
the central point through which export shipment data required by
multiple agencies is filed electronically to Customs and Border
Protection (CBP).
Catch and Statistical Document/Documentation means a document or
documentation accompanying regulated seafood imports, exports and re-
exports that is submitted by importers and exporters to document
compliance with TTVP, AMLR, and HMS ITP trade documentation programs as
described in Sec. 216.24(f) of this title, and subparts G and M of
this part.
CBP means U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security.
Documentation and data sets required under this subpart refers to
documentation and data that must be submitted by an importer or
exporter at the time of, or in advance of, the import, export or re-
export of fish or fish products as required under this subpart, the
AMLR trade program, the HMS ITP, or the TTVP. The required data sets
and document images to be submitted for specific programs and
transactions are posted by CBP as indicated in Sec. 300.323.
Fish or fish products regulated under this subpart means species
and products containing species regulated under this subpart, the AMLR
trade program, the HMS ITP, or the TTVP.
HMS ITP means the Highly Migratory Species International Trade
Program which includes trade monitoring and/or reporting and
consignment documentation for trade of bluefin tuna, southern bluefin
tuna, frozen bigeye tuna, swordfish, and shark fins as described in
subpart M of this part.
Import has the same meaning as 16 U.S.C. 1802(22). Import includes,
but is not limited to, customs entry for consumption, withdrawal from
customs bonded warehouse for consumption, or entry for consumption from
a foreign trade zone.
International Fisheries Trade Permit (or IFTP) means the permit
issued by NMFS under Sec. 300.222.
TTVP means the Tuna Tracking and Verification Program, which
regulates trade in certain fishery products as set forth in Sec.
216.24(f)(2) of this title.
Sec. 300.322 International Fisheries Trade Permit.
(a) General. Any person, including a resident agent for a
nonresident corporation (see 19 CFR 141.18), who imports as defined in
Sec. 300.321, exports, or re-exports fish or fish products regulated
under this sub-part from any ocean area, must possess a valid
International Fisheries Trade Permit (IFTP) issued under this section.
Fish or fish products regulated under this subpart may not be imported
into, or exported or re-exported from, the United States unless the
IFTP holder files electronically the documentation and the data sets
required under this subpart with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) via ACE at the time of, or in advance of, importation,
exportation or re-exportation. If authorized under other regulations
under this title or other applicable laws and regulations, a
representative or agent of the IFTP holder may make the electronic
filings. Only persons resident in the United States are eligible to
apply for the IFTP.
(b) Application. A person must apply for an IFTP electronically via
a Web site designated by NMFS. The application must be submitted
electronically with the required permit fee payment, at least 30 days
before the date upon which the applicant wishes the permit to be made
effective.
(c) Issuance. Except as provided in subpart D of 15 CFR part 904,
NMFS
[[Page 51138]]
will issue an IFTP within 30 days of receipt of a completed
application. NMFS will notify the applicant of any deficiency in the
application, including failure to provide information, documentation or
reports required under this subpart. If the applicant fails to correct
the deficiency within 30 days following the date of notification, the
application will be considered abandoned.
(d) Duration. An IFTP issued under this section is valid for a
period of one year from the permit effective date.
(e) Alteration. Any IFTP that is substantially altered, erased, or
mutilated is invalid.
(f) Replacement. NMFS may issue replacement permits. An application
for a replacement permit is not considered a new application. An
appropriate fee, consistent with paragraph (j) of this section, may be
charged for issuance of a replacement permit.
(g) Transfer. An IFTP issued under this section is not transferable
or assignable; it is valid only for the permit holder to whom it is
issued.
(h) Inspection. The permit holder must keep the IFTP issued under
this section at his/her principal place of business. The IFTP must be
displayed for inspection upon request of any authorized officer, or any
employee of NMFS designated by NMFS for such purpose.
(i) Sanctions. The Assistant Administrator may suspend, revoke,
modify, or deny a permit issued or sought under this section.
Procedures governing permit sanctions and denials are found at subpart
D of 15 CFR part 904.
(j) Fees. NMFS will charge a fee to recover the administrative
expenses of permit issuance. The amount of the fee is calculated, at
least annually, in accordance with the procedures of the NOAA Finance
Handbook, available from NMFS, for determining the administrative costs
of each special product or service. The fee may not exceed such costs
and is specified on each application form. The appropriate fee must be
submitted via a Web site designated by NMFS at the time of application.
Failure to pay the fee will preclude issuance of the permit. Payment by
a commercial instrument later determined to be insufficiently funded
shall invalidate any permit.
(k) Change in application information. Within 15 days after any
change in the information contained in an application submitted under
this section, the permit holder must report the change to NMFS via a
Web site designated by NMFS. If a change in permit information is not
reported within 30 days, the permit is void as of the 30th day after
such change.
(l) Renewal. Persons must apply annually for an IFTP issued under
this section. A renewal application must be submitted via a Web site
designated by NMFS, at least 15 days before the permit expiration date
to avoid a lapse in permitted status. NMFS will renew a permit provided
that: The application for the requested permit renewal is complete; all
documentation and reports required under this subpart and the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, Atlantic Tuna Conventions Act, the Tuna Conventions Act,
the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Dolphin Consumer Protection
Information Act, and the Antarctic Marine Living Resources Act have
been submitted, including those required under Sec. Sec. 216.24,
216.93, 300.114, 300.183, 300.185, 300.186, 300.187 and 635.5 of this
title; and the applicant is not subject to a permit sanction or denial
under paragraph (i) of this section.
Sec. 300.323 Reporting requirements.
Any person, including a resident agent for a nonresident entity
(see 19 CFR 141.18), who imports as defined in Sec. 300.321, exports,
or re-exports fish or fish products regulated under this sub-part from
any ocean area, must file all reports and documentation required under
the AMLR trade program, HMS ITP, and TTVP as specified under this title
and under other regulations that incorporate by reference the
requirements of this subpart. For imports, specific instructions for
electronic filing are found in Customs and Trade Automated Interface
Requirements (CATAIR) Appendix PGA (https://www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/appendix-pga). For exports, specific instructions for
electronic filing are found in Automated Export System Trade Interface
Requirements (AESTIR) Appendix Q (https://www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/aestir-draft-appendix-q-pga-record-formats). For fish and fish
products regulated under this subpart, an ACE entry filing or AES
export filing, as applicable, is required regardless of value, except
in cases where CBP provides alternate means of collecting NMFS-required
data and/or document images.
Sec. 300.324 Prohibitions.
In addition to the prohibitions specified in Sec. Sec. 300.4,
300.117, 300.189, 600.725 and 635.71 of this title, it is unlawful for
any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to:
(a) Violate any provision of this subpart, or the conditions of any
IFTP issued under this subpart,
(b) Import, export or re-export fish or fish products regulated
under this subpart, including imports or exports otherwise eligible for
the de minimis value exemption from filing requirements under CBP
procedures, without a valid IFTP as required under Sec. 300.322 or
without submitting complete and accurate information as required under
Sec. 300.323.
PART 600--MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT PROVISIONS
0
17. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
18. In Sec. 600.705, revise the first sentence of paragraph (g) to
read as follows:
Sec. 600.705 Relation to other laws,
* * * * *
(g) High seas fishing activities. Regulations governing permits and
requirements for fishing activities on the high seas are set forth in
50 CFR part 300, subparts A and R.* * *
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
19. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and
16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
20. In Sec. 660.2, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.2 Relation to other laws.
* * * * *
(c) Fishing activities on the high seas are governed by regulations
of the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act set forth in 50 CFR part 300,
subparts A and R.
[FR Doc. 2016-18401 Filed 8-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P