Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska; Modifications to Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 50436-50444 [2016-18110]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
50436
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Developing New Requirements for
Public Notice of CSO Events in the Great
Lakes Basin
Section 425 requires EPA to work
with the Great Lakes states to create
public notice requirements for
combined sewer overflow discharges to
the Great Lakes. Section 425(b)(2)
provides that the notice requirements
are to address the method of the notice,
the contents of the notice, and
requirements for public availability of
the notice. Section 425(b)(3)(A) provides
that at a minimum, the contents of the
notice are to include the dates and times
of the applicable discharge; the volume
of the discharge; and a description of
any public access areas impacted by the
discharge. Section 425(b)(3)(B) provides
that the minimum content requirements
are to be consistent for all affected
States.
Section 425(b)(4)(A) calls for followup notice requirements that provide a
description of each applicable
discharge; the cause of the discharge;
and plans to prevent a reoccurrence of
a combined sewer overflow discharge to
the Great Lakes consistent with section
402 of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) or an
administrative order or consent decree
under such Act. Section 425(b)(4)(B)
provides for annual publication
requirements that list each treatment
works from which the Administrator or
the affected State receive a follow-up
notice.
Section 425(b)(5) requires that the
notice and publication requirements
described in Section 425 shall be
implemented by not later than
December 18, 2017. However, the
Administrator of the EPA may extend
the implementation deadline for
individual communities if the
Administrator determines the
community needs additional time to
comply in order to avoid undue
economic hardship. Finally, Section
425(b)(6) clarifies that ‘‘Nothing in this
subsection prohibits an affected State
from establishing a State notice
requirement in the event of a discharge
that is more stringent than the
requirements described in this
subsection.’’
EPA is working with the Great Lakes
States to identify and evaluate options
for implementing Section 425. EPA has
also met with various stakeholder
groups that represent municipalities,
industry practitioners, and
environmental organizations to hear
each of their perspectives. EPA will
continue to meet with interested
stakeholder groups throughout the
rulemaking process. In addition, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
public ‘‘listening session’’ on September
14, 2016 will provide stakeholders and
other members of the public with an
opportunity to share their views
regarding potential new public
notification requirements for CSOs in
the Great Lakes Basin.
III. Input on Public Notice
Considerations
EPA and the Great Lake States will
consider several options for creating
public notice requirements for CSOs in
the Great Lakes Basin under Section
425. In general, EPA and the Great Lake
States are requesting comment on public
notice requirements that provide for:
• Immediate notice of CSO discharge
events to local public health officials
and drinking water facilities. This
notice is intended to alert public health
officials and drinking water facilities to
specific CSO discharges and support the
development of appropriate responses
to the discharges.
• Immediate notice of CSO discharge
events to the public via text alerts, Web
site notice, or other appropriate means.
This notice is intended to alert the
public to CSO discharges which may
allow them to take steps to reduce their
potential exposure to pathogens
associated with the discharges.
• Immediate notice of CSO discharge
events to the NPDES permitting
authority. NPDES permits establish
requirements to report CSO discharges
to the NPDES authority. 40 CFR
122.41(l)(6) provides minimum
requirements to report certain CSO
discharges to the NPDES authority
within 24 hours.
• Annual CSO notice. The annual
CSO notice is intended to provide the
public with a description of the current
performance of their system as well as
progress being made to reduce CSOs.
EPA solicits information from the
public regarding any aspect of Section
425 of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act of 2016, including:
(1) What means of receiving
immediate notice of CSO discharge
events is most helpful to the public?
(2) What should ‘‘immediate’’ mean in
this context? How soon after a CSO
discharge event commences should the
public and local public health agencies
be given notice?
(3) What type of information would be
most appropriate for immediate notices?
In addition to the statutorily required
elements of (i) the dates and times of the
applicable discharge; (ii) the volume of
the discharge; and (iii) a description of
any public access areas impacted by the
discharge; what other pieces of
information would be beneficial for the
public, local public health agencies,
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
public drinking water providers, etc. to
receive as part of the public notice?
(4) What role should local public
health agencies have in identifying
immediate notification requirements?
(5) How should annual notices be
made available to the public?
(6) What information should be
included in annual notices and who
should prepare the annual notices?
(7) Do EPA’s requirements to notify
NPDES permitting authorities under 40
CFR 122.41(l)(4), (6) and (7) have a role
in the new public notice requirements?
(8) What regulatory framework is most
appropriate for immediate notification
requirements? For annual notices?
In addition to participation in the
meeting, members of the public may
share input through written comments
to the public docket (see ADDRESSES).
Dated: July 26, 2016.
Andrew D. Sawyers,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 2016–18133 Filed 7–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 160225147–6147–01]
RIN 0648–BF83
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone off Alaska; Modifications to
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues a proposed rule
that would modify the recordkeeping
and reporting requirements for the
groundfish fisheries in the Gulf of
Alaska and the Bering Sea/Aleutian
Islands management areas. This
proposed rule is organized into four
actions. Under the first action, NMFS
would implement a requirement for
tender vessel operators to use the
applications software ‘‘tLandings’’ to
prepare electronic landing reports. This
action is necessary to improve
timeliness and reliability of landing
reports for catcher vessels delivering to
tender vessels for use in catch
accounting and inseason management.
Under the second action, NMFS would
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
modify the definition of a buying
station. This action is necessary to
clarify the different requirements that
apply to tender vessels and land-based
buying stations. Under the third action,
NMFS would remove the requirement
for buying stations to complete the
buying station report because this report
is no longer necessary. Under the fourth
action, NMFS would revise the
definition of a mothership to remove
unnecessary formatting without
changing the substance of the definition.
This proposed rule is intended to
promote the goals and objectives of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area
(BSAI FMP), the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (GOA FMP), and other
applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
August 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2016–0021,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20160021, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personally
identifiable information (e.g., name,
address), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive
information submitted voluntarily by
the sender will be publicly accessible.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required
fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Electronic copies of the Regulatory
Impact Review/Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (RIR/IRFA)
(collectively referred to as the
‘‘Analysis’’) and the Categorical
Exclusion prepared for this proposed
rule may be obtained from https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS
Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202)
395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keeley Kent, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS Alaska Region manages the
U.S. groundfish fisheries in the
Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska
under the BSAI FMP and the GOA FMP.
The FMPs were prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council,
under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) and other
applicable laws, and approved by the
Secretary of Commerce. NMFS is
authorized under both groundfish FMPs
to implement recordkeeping and
reporting requirements that are
necessary to provide the information
needed to conserve and manage the
groundfish fisheries off Alaska.
Regulations implementing the FMPs
appear at 50 CFR part 679. General
regulations that pertain to U.S. fisheries
appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600.
Recordkeeping and reporting
regulations appear at § 679.5.
Background
This proposed rule is organized into
four actions. Under the first action,
NMFS would implement a requirement
for tender vessel operators to use
tLandings. Under the second action,
NMFS would modify the definition of
buying station so that tender vessels and
land-based buying stations are
differentiated under the regulations.
Under the third action, NMFS would
remove the requirement for buying
stations to complete the buying station
report. Under the fourth action, NMFS
would modify the definition of a
mothership to simplify the unnecessary
paragraph formatting. The following
sections of the preamble describe: (1)
Background on the Interagency
Electronic Reporting System, tendering,
and tLandings; (2) the need for action;
and (3) the proposed rule and its
anticipated effects.
Interagency Electronic Reporting System
The Interagency Electronic Reporting
System (IERS) is a collaborative program
for reporting commercial fishery
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50437
landings administered by NMFS, Alaska
Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G),
and the International Pacific Halibut
Commission. The IERS consists of three
main components: eLandings—a webbased application for immediate harvest
data upload from internet-capable
vessels or processors; seaLandings—a
desktop application for vessels at sea
without internet capability which
transmits reports by satellite phone; and
tLandings—a software application for
tender vessels that records landings data
on a USB flash drive (‘‘thumb-drive’’)
that includes all of the data fields
required under IERS. Current
regulations require that landing reports
be submitted via eLandings, or
seaLandings for halibut, sablefish, and
crab fisheries (§ 679.5(e)(5)). NMFS
requires all shoreside or floating
processors that hold a Federal
processing permit (FPP) to use
eLandings or other NMFS-approved
software to submit landing reports for
all groundfish species. All motherships
holding a Federal fisheries permit (FFP)
are required to enter landing
information in eLandings, unless an
internet connection is not available.
seaLandings may be used when an
internet connection is not available.
Catcher/processors with an FFP are
required to use eLandings, or
seaLandings (when no internet
connection is available), to submit Daily
Production Reports.
NMFS has identified electronic
reporting through eLandings as a way to
improve data quality, automate
processing of data, improve the process
for correcting or updating information,
allow for the availability of more timely
data for fishery managers, and reduce
duplicative reporting of similar
information to multiple agencies.
Tendering
A tender vessel is defined under
§ 679.2 as a vessel that is used to
transport unprocessed fish or shellfish
received from another vessel to an
associated processor. An associated
processor is defined under § 679.2 as
having a contractual relationship with a
buying station to conduct groundfish
buying station activities for that
processor. The contractual relationship
in the Federal regulations creates joint
responsibility for recordkeeping and
reporting. A tender vessel is also
included under the definition of a
buying station, which receives
unprocessed groundfish from a vessel
for delivery to a shoreside processor,
stationary floating processor, or
mothership, but does not process fish
(§ 679.2). Buying stations include both
tender vessels and land-based entities.
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
50438
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
The practice of tendering allows a
fishing vessel to deliver its catch to
another vessel and resume fishing
without the delay associated with
traveling to port and returning to the
fishing area. One tender vessel can
service multiple fishing vessels,
depending on its capacity and the
regulations that limit tendering. For
more information on tendering, see
Section 1.5 of the Analysis.
Since tender vessels transport
harvested fish to a processor and do not
process the fish themselves, they are
currently not required to participate in
the IERS. Currently, tender vessels
provide a written landing report for
each delivery, commonly known as a
‘‘fish ticket’’ to the processor on
delivery; the processor then prepares a
cumulative landing report in eLandings.
Although there is an optional field in
the eLandings landing report for tender
vessel identification number, processors
are not required to identify tender vessel
deliveries. If the tender vessel is not
identified, NMFS cannot distinguish a
tender vessel delivery to a processor
from a vessel delivery to a processor.
The State of Alaska (State) allows
vessels to contract with other vessels to
receive fish from some fisheries
managed by the State and deliver that
fish to processors located within the
State’s jurisdiction. Unlike tenders,
these vessels do not have a contract or
association with a processor to transport
unprocessed fish received from another
vessel to a processor. Vessels engaging
in this activity are called ‘‘transporters’’
under State regulations. The State
created the statutory and regulatory
authority for vessels to operate as
transporters in 2003. Transporters must
have a transporter permit from ADF&G,
and, under a contractual arrangement
with the vessel, are considered agents of
the vessel. Because of the requirement
in § 679.2 for a contractual relationship
with a processor, a vessel acting as a
transporter under the State definition
would not be categorized as a tender
vessel under the Federal regulations.
Therefore, none of the requirements that
apply to tenders would apply to vessels
operating as a transporter under State
regulations, and the provisions of this
proposed rule that apply to tenders
would not apply to transporters. See
Sections 1.5.3 and 1.6.1 of the Analysis
for further description and discussion of
transporters.
tLandings
tLandings is a computer application
used on computers onboard tender
vessels. tLandings was developed for
use on tender vessels without internet
access. The tLandings application is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
loaded onto a thumb drive and
configured with a list of the authorized
users, the processor’s vessel list, and a
species list, and includes the option for
the processor to add a price list. The
tender vessel operator would create the
landing reports and store them on the
thumb drive. Once the tender vessel trip
is completed, the tender vessel operator
would provide the thumb drive to the
processor for upload into the eLandings
repository database. The processor
would then upload the eLandings
landing report to a NMFS central server.
This system requires one-time data
entry on the tender vessel and the
information is transferred to the
processor, and then to the agency via
eLandings. Digital harvest reports
improve catch accounting and
streamline the process. Though the use
of tLandings is currently voluntary, a
growing number of tender vessels and
processors are using tLandings (see
Section 1.4 of the Analysis).
Under the current regulations, the
processor is responsible for reporting
the information provided by the tender
vessel on the fish ticket. The processor
provides a booklet of fish tickets to
associated tender vessels with the
processor identification number printed
on them. The tender vessel operator
completes the fish ticket for each
delivery and returns the fish tickets to
the processor at the time of offload.
Should the tender vessel submit an
incorrect fish ticket, the processor
would be responsible for tracking down
the tender vessel to correct the
information.
In November 2015, ADF&G adopted
State regulations to require the use of
tLandings for tender vessels who have
submitted more than 2,000 salmon fish
tickets or bought over 20 million
pounds of salmon in 2012, 2013, or
2014, and for all groundfish delivered to
tender vessels. ADF&G estimated that
roughly 55 tender vessels would meet
the threshold for the new regulation, but
many already used tLandings for halibut
and sablefish, salmon, and groundfish
reporting. The State tLandings
requirement became effective January
2016.
Need for Action
When a tender vessel receives catch
from a vessel, the tender vessel operator
completes a paper fish ticket. Once the
transfer is complete, the vessel operator
signs the paper fish ticket
acknowledging the transfer of catch and
agreeing to the information provided.
When the tender vessel delivers the
catch to the processor, the tender vessel
operator provides the paper fish ticket
to the processor. The processor then
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
verifies the information and manually
enters the fish ticket data into eLandings
to create a landing report. Landing
reports are required to be submitted to
NMFS by noon of the day following the
delivery. The processor’s manual entry
of fish ticket data, including review and
correction of the data, sometimes makes
it difficult for the processor to meet this
submission deadline and can delay the
availability of the tender vessel landing
data to NMFS.
The lack of electronic data from
tenders reduces data reliability and
timeliness. Additionally, with the lack
of electronic data from tenders, NMFS is
unable to differentiate deliveries to
tender vessels from deliveries to
processors unless the processor
voluntarily enters the tender vessel
identification number in the eLandings
report. NMFS has, in the past, raised
concerns about landings data reliability
and timeliness in analyses presented to
the Council and fishery participants.
Data timeliness and reliability are
paramount to effective inseason
management. Almost real-time access to
the data is particularly important for
fast-paced fisheries that operate under
small total allowable catch limits,
constraining prohibited species catch
(PSC) limits, or that have inconsistent
and unpredictable levels of fishing
effort. NMFS requires timely data for the
successful management of these
fisheries. In addition, NMFS uses timely
data for any catch share program that
involves transferable allocations of
target species. NMFS inseason
management and Office of Law
Enforcement (OLE) rely on the data
provided through eLandings to monitor
compliance with requirements that
quota holders not exceed their
allocations. Management and
enforcement of PSC-limited and catch
share fisheries become more difficult
when data access is delayed. For more
information on the potential
implications of the lack of electronic
data entry on management, see Sections
1.3 and 2.4 of the Analysis.
This proposed rule would require
tenders to use tLandings. The
mandatory use of tLandings would
provide a streamlined data entry
mechanism that ensures efficient,
precise data transmission. This action is
necessary to enable NMFS to identify
tender vessel deliveries and to provide
reliable, expeditious data for catch
accounting and inseason management of
fisheries with tender vessel deliveries.
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
This Proposed Rule and the Anticipated
Effects
Action 1: Require Tender Vessel
Operators To Use tLandings
Under Action 1 of this proposed rule,
tender vessel operators would be
required to use tLandings to prepare
electronic landing reports. Action 1 is
necessary to improve data quality for
deliveries made to tender vessels.
Under this proposed rule, the
eLandings user (defined as a
representative of a processor under
§ 679.2, i.e. an employee) would be
required to supply the tender vessel
operator with a ‘‘configured’’ tLandings
application for computer installation
prior to the tender vessel operator taking
delivery of fish or shellfish from a
fishing vessel. A configured tLandings
application would be preloaded with a
list of the authorized users, the
processor’s vessel list, a species list, and
other useful data for the associated
processor and tender vessel operator.
The tender vessel operator would record
the required information in tLandings
for each delivery the tender vessel
accepted. Once the tender vessel
delivered the catch to the associated
processor, the user (as defined at 679.2)
would be required to complete the
eLandings landing report by uploading
the tLandings data through the
Processor Tender Interface component
of eLandings by 1200 hours, Alaska
local time, of the day following the
completion of the delivery. The
processor would be subject to the time
limits for data submission specified
under § 679.5(e). Different time limits
for data submission would apply
depending on the type of processor,
(i.e., there are differing submission time
limit requirements for shoreside
processors or stationary floating
processors, motherships, individual
fishing quota (IFQ) registered buyers, or
registered crab receivers).
The tender vessel operator would be
responsible for completing the
tLandings landing report and submitting
it to the processor. This would create a
joint responsibility for the tLandings
landing report information for the
tender vessel operator and the
processor. Section 1.9.4 of the Analysis
provides additional detail on the
monitoring and enforcement of the
tLandings requirements.
Under this proposed rule, the general
costs associated with requiring tender
vessels to enter landing reports into
tLandings are mainly attributable to
equipment and training. NMFS assumes
that tender vessels are likely to pay the
costs for equipment and training (see
Section 1.9.1.1 of the Analysis). To use
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
tLandings, each tender vessel would
need a laptop computer with a numeric
key pad, a basic laser printer with ink
cartridges and paper, a magstripe reader,
and thumb drives that contain the
tLandings application. NMFS estimates
that using tLandings would increase the
annual cost to tender vessels from
$1,000 to $2,300. See Section 1.9.1.1 of
the Analysis for more information on
the estimated cost of equipment.
Operating the tLandings application
requires some training and practice for
both the tender vessel operators and
processor staff. NMFS assumes that the
initial and ongoing training costs to use
tLandings would likely be shared by
NMFS and the processor using tender
vessels. NMFS may bear an initial cost
for training processors on the use of
tLandings, after which it would be the
processors’ responsibility to provide
training for their tender vessel
operators. NMFS estimates that it would
require a full day of initial training for
new tLandings users. Section 1.9.1.2 of
the Analysis describes projected
training costs in more detail.
Under this proposed rule, the
tLandings requirement would reduce
data entry errors and the time required
to manually enter fish tickets. Requiring
tLandings would reduce the likelihood
of a processor needing to recall a tender
vessel if a fish ticket is illegible or
incorrectly filled out. Additionally,
requiring tLandings would eliminate the
need for comprehensive manual data
entry by processor staff, simplifying and
expediting the data transmission to
NMFS. Because processors are already
subject to an eLandings reporting
requirement, processors likely have staff
proficient with the IERS software, so
there would be little additional training
required for the tLandings requirement.
The ability for processors to upload
the completed data from tLandings into
IERS through eLandings means that
landing data can be provided to NMFS
more quickly and with greater reliability
than the current paper-based reporting
system. As Section 1.9 of the Analysis
describes, the use of electronic data
greatly reduces the likelihood of data
entry errors and ensures data
consistency and reliability, thereby
reducing the costs and time required for
NMFS or ADF&G staff to correct and
verify data. Additionally, the data
provided by the tLandings requirement
would allow the Observer Program to
more effectively identify deliveries to
tenders for purposes of observer
deployment to vessels within the partial
coverage category.
Section 1.4 of the Analysis describes
that some tender vessels are voluntarily
using tLandings to report federal
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50439
groundfish landings, and many are
required to use tLandings to report
landings made in State-managed
fisheries. Therefore, the total additional
costs and burden on tender vessel
operations may be limited. Section 1.5.1
of the Analysis estimates that 30 tender
vessels received Federal groundfish in
the BSAI and GOA in 2015. Those
tender vessels delivered to eight
processors. Many tender vessels that
operate in the Federal groundfish
fisheries also operate in the State
groundfish fisheries. Under State
regulations these tender vessels are
already subject to a State tLandings
requirement and may already be
equipped with tLandings from ADF&G.
In 2015, 21 of the 30 tender vessels also
took delivery of State groundfish. NMFS
expects that there would be minimal
additional cost for these tender vessels
to also use tLandings for Federal
groundfish. The eight processors that
received Federal groundfish from tender
vessels in 2015 also received State
groundfish from tender vessels;
therefore the effect of this proposed rule
on processors is estimated to be
minimal. Based on the most recent data
from 2015, the tLandings requirement
under this proposed rule would affect
nine tender vessels.
Under this proposed rule, NMFS
would add a data field to the tLandings
application to track the location of
tenders when they take deliveries from
vessels. The tender vessel operator
would be required to report the vessel’s
latitude and longitude at the time of
each vessel delivery. This data is
necessary to improve information on
tender vessel activity in the GOA and
vessel delivery patterns when delivering
to a tender vessel as opposed to a
processor. This data field is not
expected to add a reporting burden on
tender vessel operators.
Action 2: Differentiate Tender Vessels
From Buying Stations
Under Action 2 of this proposed rule,
NMFS would revise the definitions of
tender vessel and buying station for
improved clarity. Currently, under
§ 679.2, the definition of a buying
station includes both tender vessels and
land-based buying stations. Under
§ 679.2, tender vessel is separately
defined as a vessel used to transport
unprocessed fish or shellfish received
from another vessel to an associated
processor. While many recordkeeping
and reporting requirements that apply to
buying stations should include both
tender vessels and land-based buying
stations, not all of the reporting
requirements that apply to buying
stations should apply to both tender
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
50440
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
vessels and land-based buying stations.
Additionally, while a tender vessel may
be associated with a shoreside
processor, stationary floating processor,
or mothership, a land-based buying
station is only associated with a
shoreside processor. Under Action 2,
this proposed rule would revise the
definitions of buying station and tender
vessel to ensure that the reporting
requirements that are applicable to
tender vessels and land-based buying
stations are clear to the public. Action
2 would not revise or modify the
specific provisions of reporting
requirements, but provide clarity on
who is responsible for each
requirement.
Action 3: Remove the Buying Station
Report Requirement
Under Action 3 of this proposed rule,
NMFS would remove the requirement in
§ 679.5(d) for a buying station to submit
a Buying Station Report. The most
recent year of landing report data in
2015, show that all 54 active buying
stations are associated with shoreside
processors that use eLandings. NMFS
receives the landing data it needs
through eLandings, and so does not
need to require that the data be
submitted in a Buying Station Report.
The Buying Station Report would be
removed from the regulations.
Removing the requirement to submit a
Buying Station Report removes a
duplicative reporting requirement and
reduces the burden on the regulated
public. Buying stations will continue to
be required to submit landing reports
using eLandings.
To implement proposed Action 3,
NMFS would modify references in the
regulations to clarify whether certain
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements apply to tender vessels,
buying stations, or both. Additionally,
NMFS will remove the qualifier ‘landbased’ from references to buying
stations where found in the regulations
because buying station is defined in the
regulations as a land-based entity.
Finally, NMFS will revise the definition
of ‘‘manager’’ to effectively include
‘‘stationary floating processor’’
managers.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Action 4: Revise Mothership Definition
Under Action 4 of this proposed rule,
the definition of mothership in § 679.2
would be revised to simplify the
structure of the definition by moving the
text of paragraph (1) into the main body
of the definition and deleting reserved
paragraph (2). This minor technical
correction does not substantively
change the definition of a mothership.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) and
section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule
is consistent with the BSAI FMP, the
GOA FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration of comments received
during the public comment period.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA was prepared, as required by
section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. The IRFA describes the economic
impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. Copies of
the IRFA are available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
The IRFA describes this proposed
rule, why this rule is being proposed,
the objectives and legal basis for this
proposed rule, the type and number of
small entities to which this proposed
rule would apply, and the projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of this
proposed rule. It also identifies any
overlapping, duplicative, or conflicting
Federal rules and describes any
significant alternatives to this proposed
rule that would accomplish the stated
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and other applicable statues and that
would minimize any significant adverse
economic impact of this proposed rule
on small entities. The description of this
proposed rule, its purpose, and its legal
basis are described in the preamble and
are not repeated here.
Number and Description of Small
Entities Regulated by This Proposed
Rule
For Regulatory Flexibility Act
purposes only, NMFS has established a
small business size standard for
businesses, including their affiliates,
whose primary industry is commercial
fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2). A business
primarily engaged in commercial fishing
(NAICS code 11411) is classified as a
small business if it is independently
owned and operated, is not dominant in
its field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $11 million for
all its affiliated operations worldwide.
The Small Business Act (SBA) has
established size criteria for all other
major industry sectors in the United
States, including fish processing
businesses. A seafood processor is a
small business if it is independently
owned and operated, not dominant in
its field of operation, and employs 750
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
or fewer persons on a full-time, parttime, temporary, or other basis, at all its
affiliated operations worldwide. A
wholesale business servicing the fishing
industry is a small business if it
employs 100 or fewer persons on a fulltime, part-time, temporary, or other
basis, at all its affiliated operations
worldwide.
Action 1 of the proposed rule would
affect tender vessels and processors that
receive deliveries of groundfish from
tender vessels. For the purposes of the
IRFA, a tender vessel is categorized as
a wholesale business servicing the
fishing industry. Most tender vessels are
independently owned and operated
entities that are contracted with
processors. The exceptions are tender
vessels owned by processors. NMFS
does not have data on the number of
employees on tender vessels, and
therefore will conservatively assume all
tender vessels that are independently
owned and operated are small entities.
Of the 30 tender vessels affected by
this action, five are owned by processors
so do not qualify as a small entity.
Therefore, there are 25 tender vessels
that are small entities under the SBA
definition. In 2015, there were 8
processors that received groundfish
deliveries from tender vessels. None of
these processors affected by this action
qualify as small entities for the purposes
of the SBA.
Action 2 of the proposed rule would
not add new requirements for tender
vessels or buying stations; it would only
clarify which requirements the entities
are subject to. Therefore this action
would be expected to have a small
positive impact. This action would
affect the 30 tender vessels and 54
buying stations that were active in 2015.
Action 3 of the proposed rule would
remove a requirement on participants
that is not currently used; therefore, it
would be expected to have no effect on
participants.
Action 4 of the proposed rule would
revise the definition of mothership to
make it more straightforward and would
not modify the definition in a
substantive way; therefore, it would be
expected to have no effect on
participants.
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements
This proposed rule would require
modifications to the current
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements in the Alaska Interagency
Electronic Reporting System collection
(OMB Control Number 0648–0515). The
modifications would include requiring
tender vessel operators to complete the
data fields on the tLandings tender
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
workstation application for each
delivery the tender vessel accepts from
a vessel. Additionally, the tender vessel
operator would be required to provide
the completed tLandings application to
the processor on delivery. The processor
would then be required to upload the
information provided by the tender
vessel operator in the tLandings
application into the eLandings landing
report.
This proposed rule would remove the
Buying Station Report requirement.
NMFS receives the landing data it needs
through eLandings, and does not need
the data submitted in the Buying Station
Report. The Buying Station Report
would be discontinued from any future
use. Removing the requirement to
submit a Buying Station Report removes
a duplicative reporting requirement and
reduces the burden on the regulated
public. Buying stations will continue to
be required to submit landing reports
using eLandings.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With This Proposed
Rule
The Analysis did not reveal any
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
Description of Significant Alternatives
to This Proposed Rule That Minimize
Economic Impacts on Small Entities
An IRFA also requires a description of
any significant alternatives to this
proposed rule that would accomplish
the stated objectives, are consistent with
applicable statutes, and that would
minimize any significant economic
impact of this proposed rule on small
entities. Under each action, NMFS
considered two alternatives—the no
action alternative and the action
alternative. NMFS did not identify any
other alternatives that would meet the
objectives of these actions at a lower
cost and reduced economic impact on
small entities. The no action alternative
for Action 1 would maintain the
existing process of tender vessel
operators completing paper fish tickets
for each delivery and giving the
information to the processor to
transcribe and upload into eLandings.
Maintaining the manual writing and
submission of tender delivery data
would not meet the objective of
providing timely and accurate landing
data. To help reduce the burden of this
proposed regulation on small entities for
electronic recordkeeping and reporting,
NMFS would minimize the cost by
developing the tLandings tender
workstation application and providing
that at no cost to participants to provide
services and products useful to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
industry, and by providing user support
and training. The action alternatives for
Actions 2, 3, and 4 have been
determined to have either a small
positive effect or no effect on
participants, and therefore are not
discussed further.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). NMFS has submitted these
requirements to OMB for approval
under Control Number 0648–0515.
Public reporting burden is estimated to
average per response: 15 minutes for
IERS application processor registration;
35 minutes for eLandings landing
report; 35 minutes for manual landing
report; 15 minutes for catcher/processor
or mothership eLandings production
report; and 35 minutes for tLandings
landing report.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether these proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden statement;
ways to enhance quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES), and by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202–
395–5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirement of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/
services_programs/prasubs.html.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50441
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 679 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L.
111–281.
2. In § 679.2, revise the definitions for
‘‘Buying station’’, ‘‘Manager’’,
‘‘Mothership’’, ‘‘Tender vessel’’, and
‘‘User’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 679.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Buying station means a land-based
entity that receives unprocessed
groundfish from a vessel for delivery to
a shoreside processor and that does not
process those fish.
*
*
*
*
*
Manager, with respect to any
shoreside processor, stationary floating
processor, or buying station, means the
individual responsible for the operation
of the processor or buying station.
*
*
*
*
*
Mothership means a vessel that
receives and processes groundfish from
other vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
Tender vessel means a vessel that is
used to transport unprocessed fish or
shellfish received from another vessel to
an associated processor.
*
*
*
*
*
User means, for purposes of IERS and
its components including eLandings
and tLandings, an individual
representative of a Registered Buyer; a
Registered Crab Receiver; a mothership
or catcher/processor that is required to
have a Federal Fisheries Permit (FFP)
under § 679.4; a shoreside processor or
SFP and mothership that receives
groundfish from vessels issued an FFP
under § 679.4; any shoreside processor
or SFP that is required to have a Federal
processor permit under § 679.4; and his
or her designee(s).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 679.5,
■ a. Revise paragraph (c)(6)(i),
■ b. Remove paragraphs (c)(6)(viii)(E)
■ c. Revise paragraphs (e)(3)(i), and
(e)(5)(i)(A)(7);
■ d. Add paragraph (e)(14)
■ e. Remove and reserve paragraph (d).
The addition and revisions to read as
follows:
§ 679.5
(R&R).
Recordkeeping and reporting
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) Responsibility. Except as described
in paragraph (f)(1)(v) of this section, the
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
50442
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
operator of a mothership that is required
to have an FFP under § 679.4(b), or the
operator of a CQE floating processor that
receives or processes any groundfish
from the GOA or BSAI from vessels
issued an FFP under § 679.4(b), is
required to use a combination of
mothership DCPL and eLandings to
record and report daily processor
identification information, delivery
information, groundfish production
data, and groundfish and prohibited
species discard or disposition data. The
operator must enter into the DCPL any
information for groundfish received
from catcher vessels, groundfish
received from processors for
reprocessing or rehandling, and
groundfish received from a tender
vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Operation type. Select the
operation type from the dropdown list.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(7) If the delivery is received from a
buying station, indicate the name of the
buying station. If the delivery is
received from a tender vessel, enter the
ADF&G vessel registration number.
*
*
*
*
*
(14) Tender vessel landing report
(‘‘tLandings’’). (i) tLandings is an
applications software for preparing
electronic landing reports for
commercial fishery landings to tender
vessels.
(ii) The operator of a tender vessel
taking delivery of fish or shellfish that
is required to be reported to NMFS on
a landing report under § 679.5(e)(5)
must use tLandings to enter information
about each landing of fish or shellfish
and must provide that information to
the User defined under § 679.2.
(iii) The User must configure and
provide the tender vessel operator with
the most recent version of the tLandings
tender workstation application prior to
the tender vessel taking delivery of fish
or shellfish.
(iv) The tender vessel operator must
log into the configured tLandings tender
workstation application and provide the
information required on the computer
screen. Additional instructions for
tLandings is on the Alaska Region Web
site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
(v) Submittal time limit. (A) The
tender vessel operator must provide the
landing information in tLandings to the
User at the commencement of the
transfer or offload of fish or shellfish
from the tender vessel to the processor.
(B) The User must upload the data
recorded in tLandings by the tender
vessel to prepare the initial landing
report for a catcher vessel delivering to
a tender vessel that is required under
§ 679.5(e) within the submittal time
limit specified under § 679.5(e).
(vi) Compliance. By using tLandings,
the User and the tender vessel operator
providing information to the User
accept the responsibility of and
acknowledge compliance with
§ 679.7(a)(10).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 679.7, revise paragraph (a)(11)
to read as follows:
§ 679.7
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(11) Buying station or tender vessel—
(i) Tender vessel. Use a catcher vessel or
catcher/processor as a tender vessel
before offloading all groundfish or
groundfish product harvested or
processed by that vessel.
(ii) Associated processor. Function as
a tender vessel or buying station
without an associated processor.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Revise table 13 to part 679 to read
as follows:
TABLE 13 TO PART 679—TRANSFER FORM SUMMARY
If participant type is
* * *
Catcher vessel greater
than 60 ft LOA,
mothership, or catcher/processor.
Catcher vessel greater
than 60 ft LOA,
mothership, or catcher/processor.
Catcher vessel greater
than 60 ft LOA,
mothership, or catcher/processor.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Mothership, catcher/
processor, shoreside
processor, or SFP.
Mothership, catcher/
processor, shoreside
processor, or SFP.
Buying station or tender
vessel.
Registered Buyer .........
A person holding a
valid IFQ permit, IFQ
hired master permit,
or Registered Buyer
permit.
Registered Buyer .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
And has * * * Fish
product onboard
And is involved in this
activity
VAR 1
Only non-IFQ groundfish.
Vessel leaving or entering Alaska.
X
Only IFQ sablefish, IFQ
halibut, CDQ halibut,
or CR crab.
Vessel leaving Alaska ..
Combination of IFQ sablefish, IFQ halibut,
CDQ halibut, or CR
crab and non-IFQ
groundfish.
Non-IFQ groundfish .....
Dockside
sales
receipt 5
PTR 2
Trans-ship 3
Departure
report 4
....................
....................
....................
X
Vessel leaving Alaska ..
X
....................
....................
X
Shipment of groundfish
product.
....................
X
Donated PSC ...............
Shipment of donated
PSC.
....................
X
Groundfish ...................
Receive or deliver
groundfish in association with a shoreside processor, SFP,
or mothership.
Transfer of product ......
....................
X
Transfer of product ......
....................
....................
....................
....................
XXX
Transfer from landing
site to Registered
Buyer’s processing
facility.
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
IFQ sablefish, IFQ halibut, or CDQ halibut.
IFQ sablefish, IFQ halibut, or CDQ halibut.
IFQ sablefish, IFQ halibut, or CDQ halibut.
19:11 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Landing
receipt 6
XX
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
50443
TABLE 13 TO PART 679—TRANSFER FORM SUMMARY—Continued
If participant type is
* * *
And has * * * Fish
product onboard
And is involved in this
activity
VAR 1
PTR 2
Vessel operator ............
Processed IFQ sablefish, IFQ halibut,
CDQ halibut, or CR
crab.
CR crab ........................
Transshipment between
vessels.
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Landing
receipt 6
....................
....................
XX
X
Transfer from landing
site to RCR’s processing facility.
Dockside
sales
receipt 5
XXXX
Transfer of product ......
Departure
report 4
Trans-ship 3
Registered Crab Receiver.
Registered Crab Receiver.
CR crab ........................
....................
1A
vessel activity report (VAR) is described at § 679.5(k).
product transfer report (PTR) is described at § 679.5(g).
IFQ transshipment authorization is described at § 679.5(l)(3).
4 An IFQ departure report is described at § 679.5(l)(4).
5 An IFQ dockside sales receipt is described at § 679.5(g)(2)(iv).
6 A landing receipt is described at § 679.5(e)(8)(vii).
X indicates under what circumstances each report is submitted.
XX indicates that the document must accompany the transfer of IFQ species from landing site to processor.
XXX indicates receipt must be issued to each receiver in a dockside sale.
XXXX indicates authorization must be obtained 24 hours in advance.
2A
3 An
*
*
*
*
§ § 679.2, 679.5, 679.7, 679.51
*
[Amended]
6. At each of the locations shown in
the ‘‘Location’’ column, remove the
phrase indicated in the ‘‘Remove’’
■
column and replace it with the phrase
indicated in the ‘‘Add’’ column for the
number of times indicated in the
‘‘Frequency’’ column.
Remove
Add
§ 679.2 ‘‘Agent’’ (1) ..................................
§ 679.2 ‘‘Agent’’ (2) ..................................
§ 679.2 ‘‘Associated processor’’ ..............
§ 679.2 ‘‘Shoreside processor’’ ................
§ 679.5(a)(2)(i) .........................................
§ 679.5(a)(2)(ii) ........................................
§ 679.5(a)(3)(ii) ........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying stations ........................................
or buying station ......................................
or buying station ......................................
catcher vessels and buying stations .......
§ 679.5(a)(3)(iii) ........................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Location
catcher vessel or buying station .............
§ 679.5(b) .................................................
§ 679.5(c)(1)(vi)(B)(4) ..............................
§ 679.5(c)(3)(ii)(A)(3) ...............................
§ 679.5(c)(3)(viii) ......................................
§ 679.5(c)(3)(x) ........................................
§ 679.5(c)(4)(ii)(A)(3) ...............................
§ 679.5(c)(4)(viii) ......................................
§ 679.5(c)(4)(x) ........................................
§ 679.5(c)(6)(ii)(A) ....................................
§ 679.5(c)(6)(vi) introductory text .............
§ 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(A) ...................................
§ 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(B) ...................................
§ 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(C) ...................................
§ 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(F) ...................................
§ 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(H) ...................................
§ 679.5(c)(6)(vii) .......................................
§ 679.5(c)(6)(viii)(A) .................................
§ 679.5(e)(3)(viii) ......................................
§ 679.5(e)(5)(i) introductory text ..............
§ 679.5(e)(5)(i)(A)(6) ................................
§ 679.5(e)(5)(i)(C)(1) ................................
§ 679.5(e)(5)(iii) ........................................
§ 679.5(e)(6)(i) introductory text ..............
§ 679.5(e)(6)(i)(B)(1) ................................
§ 679.5(e)(6)(iii) ........................................
§ 679.5(f)(1)(v) .........................................
§ 679.5(f)(5)(ii) .........................................
§ 679.5(p)(1) ............................................
§ 679.7(d)(4)(i)(C) ....................................
§ 679.51(e)(3) ..........................................
Table 1b to Part 679 ...............................
or buying station ......................................
or buying station ......................................
or buying station ......................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
or buying station ......................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
buying station ..........................................
or buying station ......................................
and buying stations .................................
buying station, tender vessel ..................
buying station or tender vessel ...............
buying station or tender vessel ...............
buying stations, tender vessels ...............
buying station, or tender vessel ..............
buying station, or tender vessel ..............
catcher vessels, buying stations, and
tender vessels.
catcher vessel, buying station, or tender
vessel.
buying station, or tender vessel ..............
buying station, or tender vessel ..............
buying station, or tender vessel ..............
buying station, tender vessel ..................
buying station, tender vessel ..................
buying station, or tender vessel ..............
buying station, tender vessel ..................
buying station, tender vessel ..................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
buying station, tender vessel, .................
buying station or tender vessel ...............
buying station or tender vessel ...............
buying station or tender vessel ...............
buying station or tender vessel ...............
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
tender vessel ...........................................
buyer station or tender vessel .................
tender vessel ...........................................
buying station or tender vessel ...............
buying station, or tender vessel ..............
buying stations, and tender vessels ........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Frequency
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
50444
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
[FR Doc. 2016–18110 Filed 7–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 151113999–6620–01]
RIN 0648–BF54
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area;
American Fisheries Act; Amendment
113
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations to
implement Amendment 113 to the
Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area
(FMP). This proposed rule would
modify the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands (BSAI) Pacific cod fishery to set
aside a portion of the Aleutian Islands
Pacific cod total allowable catch for
harvest by vessels directed fishing for
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod and
delivering their catch for processing to
shoreside processors located on land
west of 170 W. longitude in the Aleutian
Islands (Aleutian Islands shoreplants).
The harvest set-aside would apply only
if specific notification and performance
requirements are met, and only during
the first few months of the fishing year.
This harvest set-aside would provide
the opportunity for vessels, Aleutian
Islands shoreplants, and the
communities where Aleutian Islands
shoreplants are located to receive
benefits from a portion of the Aleutian
Islands Pacific cod fishery, while the
notification and performance
requirements would preserve an
opportunity for the complete harvest of
the BSAI Pacific cod resource should
complications arise with participation
in the harvest set-aside fishery. This
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
proposed rule is intended to promote
the goals and objectives of Amendment
113, the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, and other applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
August 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2015–0155,
by any one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150155, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Address written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter N/
A in the required fields, if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of Amendment 113
to the FMP and the Environmental
Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(collectively, Analysis) prepared for this
action may be obtained from https://
www.regulations.gov or from the Alaska
Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted by mail to NMFS
at the above address; emailed to OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov; or faxed to
202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish and
Pacific cod fisheries in the Exclusive
Economic Zone of the BSAI under the
FMP. The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
prepared, and the Secretary of
Commerce approved, the FMP pursuant
to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) and other
applicable laws. Regulations
implementing the FMP appear at 50
CFR part 679. General regulations that
pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at 50
CFR part 600.
The Council submitted Amendment
113 for review by the Secretary of
Commerce. A notice of availability of
Amendment 113 was published in the
Federal Register on July 19, 2016, with
comments invited through September
19, 2016. All relevant written comments
received by that time, whether
specifically directed to Amendment 113
or to this proposed rule, will be
considered in the decision to approve or
disapprove Amendment 113.
Background
This proposed rule would modify the
BSAI Pacific cod fishery to set aside a
portion of the Aleutian Islands Pacific
cod total allowable catch (TAC) for
harvest by vessels directed fishing for
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod and
delivering their catch to Aleutian
Islands shoreplants for processing. The
harvest set-aside would apply only if
specific notification and performance
requirements are met, and only during
the first few months of the fishing year.
The following sections of this preamble
provide a description of (1) the BSAI
Pacific cod fishery; (2) the need for the
proposed rule; and (3) the proposed
rule.
To aid the reader, the following
glossary table (Table 1) lists the
abbreviations, acronyms, and other
technical terms most commonly used
throughout this document. These terms
are defined and discussed further in the
following sections of this preamble.
TABLE 1—GLOSSARY OF TERMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND ACRONYMS FREQUENTLY USED IN THIS PROPOSED RULE
ABC ..............
AFA ..............
AI ..................
BS ................
BSAI .............
CDQ .............
Council .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
acceptable biological catch.
American Fisheries Act.
Aleutian Islands subarea (see definition in § 679.2).
Bering Sea subarea (see definition in § 679.2).
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (see definition in § 679.2).
Western Alaska Community Development Quota.
North Pacific Fishery Management Council.
18:44 Jul 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Julie
Scheurer, 907–586–7228.
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50436-50444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18110]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 160225147-6147-01]
RIN 0648-BF83
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska;
Modifications to Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues a proposed rule that would modify the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the groundfish fisheries
in the Gulf of Alaska and the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands management
areas. This proposed rule is organized into four actions. Under the
first action, NMFS would implement a requirement for tender vessel
operators to use the applications software ``tLandings'' to prepare
electronic landing reports. This action is necessary to improve
timeliness and reliability of landing reports for catcher vessels
delivering to tender vessels for use in catch accounting and inseason
management. Under the second action, NMFS would
[[Page 50437]]
modify the definition of a buying station. This action is necessary to
clarify the different requirements that apply to tender vessels and
land-based buying stations. Under the third action, NMFS would remove
the requirement for buying stations to complete the buying station
report because this report is no longer necessary. Under the fourth
action, NMFS would revise the definition of a mothership to remove
unnecessary formatting without changing the substance of the
definition. This proposed rule is intended to promote the goals and
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI FMP), the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA FMP), and other
applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before August 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2016-0021,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0021, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802-1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personally identifiable
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of the Regulatory Impact Review/Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (RIR/IRFA) (collectively referred to as
the ``Analysis'') and the Categorical Exclusion prepared for this
proposed rule may be obtained from https://www.regulations.gov or from
the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395-5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keeley Kent, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS Alaska Region manages the U.S. groundfish fisheries in the
Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska under the BSAI FMP and the GOA FMP.
The FMPs were prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council,
under authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. (Magnuson-Stevens Act) and other
applicable laws, and approved by the Secretary of Commerce. NMFS is
authorized under both groundfish FMPs to implement recordkeeping and
reporting requirements that are necessary to provide the information
needed to conserve and manage the groundfish fisheries off Alaska.
Regulations implementing the FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679. General
regulations that pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at subpart H of 50
CFR part 600. Recordkeeping and reporting regulations appear at Sec.
679.5.
Background
This proposed rule is organized into four actions. Under the first
action, NMFS would implement a requirement for tender vessel operators
to use tLandings. Under the second action, NMFS would modify the
definition of buying station so that tender vessels and land-based
buying stations are differentiated under the regulations. Under the
third action, NMFS would remove the requirement for buying stations to
complete the buying station report. Under the fourth action, NMFS would
modify the definition of a mothership to simplify the unnecessary
paragraph formatting. The following sections of the preamble describe:
(1) Background on the Interagency Electronic Reporting System,
tendering, and tLandings; (2) the need for action; and (3) the proposed
rule and its anticipated effects.
Interagency Electronic Reporting System
The Interagency Electronic Reporting System (IERS) is a
collaborative program for reporting commercial fishery landings
administered by NMFS, Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G), and
the International Pacific Halibut Commission. The IERS consists of
three main components: eLandings--a web-based application for immediate
harvest data upload from internet-capable vessels or processors;
seaLandings--a desktop application for vessels at sea without internet
capability which transmits reports by satellite phone; and tLandings--a
software application for tender vessels that records landings data on a
USB flash drive (``thumb-drive'') that includes all of the data fields
required under IERS. Current regulations require that landing reports
be submitted via eLandings, or seaLandings for halibut, sablefish, and
crab fisheries (Sec. 679.5(e)(5)). NMFS requires all shoreside or
floating processors that hold a Federal processing permit (FPP) to use
eLandings or other NMFS-approved software to submit landing reports for
all groundfish species. All motherships holding a Federal fisheries
permit (FFP) are required to enter landing information in eLandings,
unless an internet connection is not available. seaLandings may be used
when an internet connection is not available. Catcher/processors with
an FFP are required to use eLandings, or seaLandings (when no internet
connection is available), to submit Daily Production Reports.
NMFS has identified electronic reporting through eLandings as a way
to improve data quality, automate processing of data, improve the
process for correcting or updating information, allow for the
availability of more timely data for fishery managers, and reduce
duplicative reporting of similar information to multiple agencies.
Tendering
A tender vessel is defined under Sec. 679.2 as a vessel that is
used to transport unprocessed fish or shellfish received from another
vessel to an associated processor. An associated processor is defined
under Sec. 679.2 as having a contractual relationship with a buying
station to conduct groundfish buying station activities for that
processor. The contractual relationship in the Federal regulations
creates joint responsibility for recordkeeping and reporting. A tender
vessel is also included under the definition of a buying station, which
receives unprocessed groundfish from a vessel for delivery to a
shoreside processor, stationary floating processor, or mothership, but
does not process fish (Sec. 679.2). Buying stations include both
tender vessels and land-based entities.
[[Page 50438]]
The practice of tendering allows a fishing vessel to deliver its catch
to another vessel and resume fishing without the delay associated with
traveling to port and returning to the fishing area. One tender vessel
can service multiple fishing vessels, depending on its capacity and the
regulations that limit tendering. For more information on tendering,
see Section 1.5 of the Analysis.
Since tender vessels transport harvested fish to a processor and do
not process the fish themselves, they are currently not required to
participate in the IERS. Currently, tender vessels provide a written
landing report for each delivery, commonly known as a ``fish ticket''
to the processor on delivery; the processor then prepares a cumulative
landing report in eLandings. Although there is an optional field in the
eLandings landing report for tender vessel identification number,
processors are not required to identify tender vessel deliveries. If
the tender vessel is not identified, NMFS cannot distinguish a tender
vessel delivery to a processor from a vessel delivery to a processor.
The State of Alaska (State) allows vessels to contract with other
vessels to receive fish from some fisheries managed by the State and
deliver that fish to processors located within the State's
jurisdiction. Unlike tenders, these vessels do not have a contract or
association with a processor to transport unprocessed fish received
from another vessel to a processor. Vessels engaging in this activity
are called ``transporters'' under State regulations. The State created
the statutory and regulatory authority for vessels to operate as
transporters in 2003. Transporters must have a transporter permit from
ADF&G, and, under a contractual arrangement with the vessel, are
considered agents of the vessel. Because of the requirement in Sec.
679.2 for a contractual relationship with a processor, a vessel acting
as a transporter under the State definition would not be categorized as
a tender vessel under the Federal regulations. Therefore, none of the
requirements that apply to tenders would apply to vessels operating as
a transporter under State regulations, and the provisions of this
proposed rule that apply to tenders would not apply to transporters.
See Sections 1.5.3 and 1.6.1 of the Analysis for further description
and discussion of transporters.
tLandings
tLandings is a computer application used on computers onboard
tender vessels. tLandings was developed for use on tender vessels
without internet access. The tLandings application is loaded onto a
thumb drive and configured with a list of the authorized users, the
processor's vessel list, and a species list, and includes the option
for the processor to add a price list. The tender vessel operator would
create the landing reports and store them on the thumb drive. Once the
tender vessel trip is completed, the tender vessel operator would
provide the thumb drive to the processor for upload into the eLandings
repository database. The processor would then upload the eLandings
landing report to a NMFS central server. This system requires one-time
data entry on the tender vessel and the information is transferred to
the processor, and then to the agency via eLandings. Digital harvest
reports improve catch accounting and streamline the process. Though the
use of tLandings is currently voluntary, a growing number of tender
vessels and processors are using tLandings (see Section 1.4 of the
Analysis).
Under the current regulations, the processor is responsible for
reporting the information provided by the tender vessel on the fish
ticket. The processor provides a booklet of fish tickets to associated
tender vessels with the processor identification number printed on
them. The tender vessel operator completes the fish ticket for each
delivery and returns the fish tickets to the processor at the time of
offload. Should the tender vessel submit an incorrect fish ticket, the
processor would be responsible for tracking down the tender vessel to
correct the information.
In November 2015, ADF&G adopted State regulations to require the
use of tLandings for tender vessels who have submitted more than 2,000
salmon fish tickets or bought over 20 million pounds of salmon in 2012,
2013, or 2014, and for all groundfish delivered to tender vessels.
ADF&G estimated that roughly 55 tender vessels would meet the threshold
for the new regulation, but many already used tLandings for halibut and
sablefish, salmon, and groundfish reporting. The State tLandings
requirement became effective January 2016.
Need for Action
When a tender vessel receives catch from a vessel, the tender
vessel operator completes a paper fish ticket. Once the transfer is
complete, the vessel operator signs the paper fish ticket acknowledging
the transfer of catch and agreeing to the information provided. When
the tender vessel delivers the catch to the processor, the tender
vessel operator provides the paper fish ticket to the processor. The
processor then verifies the information and manually enters the fish
ticket data into eLandings to create a landing report. Landing reports
are required to be submitted to NMFS by noon of the day following the
delivery. The processor's manual entry of fish ticket data, including
review and correction of the data, sometimes makes it difficult for the
processor to meet this submission deadline and can delay the
availability of the tender vessel landing data to NMFS.
The lack of electronic data from tenders reduces data reliability
and timeliness. Additionally, with the lack of electronic data from
tenders, NMFS is unable to differentiate deliveries to tender vessels
from deliveries to processors unless the processor voluntarily enters
the tender vessel identification number in the eLandings report. NMFS
has, in the past, raised concerns about landings data reliability and
timeliness in analyses presented to the Council and fishery
participants.
Data timeliness and reliability are paramount to effective inseason
management. Almost real-time access to the data is particularly
important for fast-paced fisheries that operate under small total
allowable catch limits, constraining prohibited species catch (PSC)
limits, or that have inconsistent and unpredictable levels of fishing
effort. NMFS requires timely data for the successful management of
these fisheries. In addition, NMFS uses timely data for any catch share
program that involves transferable allocations of target species. NMFS
inseason management and Office of Law Enforcement (OLE) rely on the
data provided through eLandings to monitor compliance with requirements
that quota holders not exceed their allocations. Management and
enforcement of PSC-limited and catch share fisheries become more
difficult when data access is delayed. For more information on the
potential implications of the lack of electronic data entry on
management, see Sections 1.3 and 2.4 of the Analysis.
This proposed rule would require tenders to use tLandings. The
mandatory use of tLandings would provide a streamlined data entry
mechanism that ensures efficient, precise data transmission. This
action is necessary to enable NMFS to identify tender vessel deliveries
and to provide reliable, expeditious data for catch accounting and
inseason management of fisheries with tender vessel deliveries.
[[Page 50439]]
This Proposed Rule and the Anticipated Effects
Action 1: Require Tender Vessel Operators To Use tLandings
Under Action 1 of this proposed rule, tender vessel operators would
be required to use tLandings to prepare electronic landing reports.
Action 1 is necessary to improve data quality for deliveries made to
tender vessels.
Under this proposed rule, the eLandings user (defined as a
representative of a processor under Sec. 679.2, i.e. an employee)
would be required to supply the tender vessel operator with a
``configured'' tLandings application for computer installation prior to
the tender vessel operator taking delivery of fish or shellfish from a
fishing vessel. A configured tLandings application would be preloaded
with a list of the authorized users, the processor's vessel list, a
species list, and other useful data for the associated processor and
tender vessel operator. The tender vessel operator would record the
required information in tLandings for each delivery the tender vessel
accepted. Once the tender vessel delivered the catch to the associated
processor, the user (as defined at 679.2) would be required to complete
the eLandings landing report by uploading the tLandings data through
the Processor Tender Interface component of eLandings by 1200 hours,
Alaska local time, of the day following the completion of the delivery.
The processor would be subject to the time limits for data submission
specified under Sec. 679.5(e). Different time limits for data
submission would apply depending on the type of processor, (i.e., there
are differing submission time limit requirements for shoreside
processors or stationary floating processors, motherships, individual
fishing quota (IFQ) registered buyers, or registered crab receivers).
The tender vessel operator would be responsible for completing the
tLandings landing report and submitting it to the processor. This would
create a joint responsibility for the tLandings landing report
information for the tender vessel operator and the processor. Section
1.9.4 of the Analysis provides additional detail on the monitoring and
enforcement of the tLandings requirements.
Under this proposed rule, the general costs associated with
requiring tender vessels to enter landing reports into tLandings are
mainly attributable to equipment and training. NMFS assumes that tender
vessels are likely to pay the costs for equipment and training (see
Section 1.9.1.1 of the Analysis). To use tLandings, each tender vessel
would need a laptop computer with a numeric key pad, a basic laser
printer with ink cartridges and paper, a magstripe reader, and thumb
drives that contain the tLandings application. NMFS estimates that
using tLandings would increase the annual cost to tender vessels from
$1,000 to $2,300. See Section 1.9.1.1 of the Analysis for more
information on the estimated cost of equipment.
Operating the tLandings application requires some training and
practice for both the tender vessel operators and processor staff. NMFS
assumes that the initial and ongoing training costs to use tLandings
would likely be shared by NMFS and the processor using tender vessels.
NMFS may bear an initial cost for training processors on the use of
tLandings, after which it would be the processors' responsibility to
provide training for their tender vessel operators. NMFS estimates that
it would require a full day of initial training for new tLandings
users. Section 1.9.1.2 of the Analysis describes projected training
costs in more detail.
Under this proposed rule, the tLandings requirement would reduce
data entry errors and the time required to manually enter fish tickets.
Requiring tLandings would reduce the likelihood of a processor needing
to recall a tender vessel if a fish ticket is illegible or incorrectly
filled out. Additionally, requiring tLandings would eliminate the need
for comprehensive manual data entry by processor staff, simplifying and
expediting the data transmission to NMFS. Because processors are
already subject to an eLandings reporting requirement, processors
likely have staff proficient with the IERS software, so there would be
little additional training required for the tLandings requirement.
The ability for processors to upload the completed data from
tLandings into IERS through eLandings means that landing data can be
provided to NMFS more quickly and with greater reliability than the
current paper-based reporting system. As Section 1.9 of the Analysis
describes, the use of electronic data greatly reduces the likelihood of
data entry errors and ensures data consistency and reliability, thereby
reducing the costs and time required for NMFS or ADF&G staff to correct
and verify data. Additionally, the data provided by the tLandings
requirement would allow the Observer Program to more effectively
identify deliveries to tenders for purposes of observer deployment to
vessels within the partial coverage category.
Section 1.4 of the Analysis describes that some tender vessels are
voluntarily using tLandings to report federal groundfish landings, and
many are required to use tLandings to report landings made in State-
managed fisheries. Therefore, the total additional costs and burden on
tender vessel operations may be limited. Section 1.5.1 of the Analysis
estimates that 30 tender vessels received Federal groundfish in the
BSAI and GOA in 2015. Those tender vessels delivered to eight
processors. Many tender vessels that operate in the Federal groundfish
fisheries also operate in the State groundfish fisheries. Under State
regulations these tender vessels are already subject to a State
tLandings requirement and may already be equipped with tLandings from
ADF&G. In 2015, 21 of the 30 tender vessels also took delivery of State
groundfish. NMFS expects that there would be minimal additional cost
for these tender vessels to also use tLandings for Federal groundfish.
The eight processors that received Federal groundfish from tender
vessels in 2015 also received State groundfish from tender vessels;
therefore the effect of this proposed rule on processors is estimated
to be minimal. Based on the most recent data from 2015, the tLandings
requirement under this proposed rule would affect nine tender vessels.
Under this proposed rule, NMFS would add a data field to the
tLandings application to track the location of tenders when they take
deliveries from vessels. The tender vessel operator would be required
to report the vessel's latitude and longitude at the time of each
vessel delivery. This data is necessary to improve information on
tender vessel activity in the GOA and vessel delivery patterns when
delivering to a tender vessel as opposed to a processor. This data
field is not expected to add a reporting burden on tender vessel
operators.
Action 2: Differentiate Tender Vessels From Buying Stations
Under Action 2 of this proposed rule, NMFS would revise the
definitions of tender vessel and buying station for improved clarity.
Currently, under Sec. 679.2, the definition of a buying station
includes both tender vessels and land-based buying stations. Under
Sec. 679.2, tender vessel is separately defined as a vessel used to
transport unprocessed fish or shellfish received from another vessel to
an associated processor. While many recordkeeping and reporting
requirements that apply to buying stations should include both tender
vessels and land-based buying stations, not all of the reporting
requirements that apply to buying stations should apply to both tender
[[Page 50440]]
vessels and land-based buying stations. Additionally, while a tender
vessel may be associated with a shoreside processor, stationary
floating processor, or mothership, a land-based buying station is only
associated with a shoreside processor. Under Action 2, this proposed
rule would revise the definitions of buying station and tender vessel
to ensure that the reporting requirements that are applicable to tender
vessels and land-based buying stations are clear to the public. Action
2 would not revise or modify the specific provisions of reporting
requirements, but provide clarity on who is responsible for each
requirement.
Action 3: Remove the Buying Station Report Requirement
Under Action 3 of this proposed rule, NMFS would remove the
requirement in Sec. 679.5(d) for a buying station to submit a Buying
Station Report. The most recent year of landing report data in 2015,
show that all 54 active buying stations are associated with shoreside
processors that use eLandings. NMFS receives the landing data it needs
through eLandings, and so does not need to require that the data be
submitted in a Buying Station Report. The Buying Station Report would
be removed from the regulations. Removing the requirement to submit a
Buying Station Report removes a duplicative reporting requirement and
reduces the burden on the regulated public. Buying stations will
continue to be required to submit landing reports using eLandings.
To implement proposed Action 3, NMFS would modify references in the
regulations to clarify whether certain recordkeeping and reporting
requirements apply to tender vessels, buying stations, or both.
Additionally, NMFS will remove the qualifier `land-based' from
references to buying stations where found in the regulations because
buying station is defined in the regulations as a land-based entity.
Finally, NMFS will revise the definition of ``manager'' to effectively
include ``stationary floating processor'' managers.
Action 4: Revise Mothership Definition
Under Action 4 of this proposed rule, the definition of mothership
in Sec. 679.2 would be revised to simplify the structure of the
definition by moving the text of paragraph (1) into the main body of
the definition and deleting reserved paragraph (2). This minor
technical correction does not substantively change the definition of a
mothership.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) and section 305(d) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent with the BSAI FMP, the GOA FMP,
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law,
subject to further consideration of comments received during the public
comment period.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA was prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed
rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. Copies of the IRFA are
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
The IRFA describes this proposed rule, why this rule is being
proposed, the objectives and legal basis for this proposed rule, the
type and number of small entities to which this proposed rule would
apply, and the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements of this proposed rule. It also identifies any overlapping,
duplicative, or conflicting Federal rules and describes any significant
alternatives to this proposed rule that would accomplish the stated
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable statues and
that would minimize any significant adverse economic impact of this
proposed rule on small entities. The description of this proposed rule,
its purpose, and its legal basis are described in the preamble and are
not repeated here.
Number and Description of Small Entities Regulated by This Proposed
Rule
For Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes only, NMFS has established
a small business size standard for businesses, including their
affiliates, whose primary industry is commercial fishing (see 50 CFR
200.2). A business primarily engaged in commercial fishing (NAICS code
11411) is classified as a small business if it is independently owned
and operated, is not dominant in its field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual receipts not in excess of $11
million for all its affiliated operations worldwide.
The Small Business Act (SBA) has established size criteria for all
other major industry sectors in the United States, including fish
processing businesses. A seafood processor is a small business if it is
independently owned and operated, not dominant in its field of
operation, and employs 750 or fewer persons on a full-time, part-time,
temporary, or other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide.
A wholesale business servicing the fishing industry is a small business
if it employs 100 or fewer persons on a full-time, part-time,
temporary, or other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide.
Action 1 of the proposed rule would affect tender vessels and
processors that receive deliveries of groundfish from tender vessels.
For the purposes of the IRFA, a tender vessel is categorized as a
wholesale business servicing the fishing industry. Most tender vessels
are independently owned and operated entities that are contracted with
processors. The exceptions are tender vessels owned by processors. NMFS
does not have data on the number of employees on tender vessels, and
therefore will conservatively assume all tender vessels that are
independently owned and operated are small entities.
Of the 30 tender vessels affected by this action, five are owned by
processors so do not qualify as a small entity. Therefore, there are 25
tender vessels that are small entities under the SBA definition. In
2015, there were 8 processors that received groundfish deliveries from
tender vessels. None of these processors affected by this action
qualify as small entities for the purposes of the SBA.
Action 2 of the proposed rule would not add new requirements for
tender vessels or buying stations; it would only clarify which
requirements the entities are subject to. Therefore this action would
be expected to have a small positive impact. This action would affect
the 30 tender vessels and 54 buying stations that were active in 2015.
Action 3 of the proposed rule would remove a requirement on
participants that is not currently used; therefore, it would be
expected to have no effect on participants.
Action 4 of the proposed rule would revise the definition of
mothership to make it more straightforward and would not modify the
definition in a substantive way; therefore, it would be expected to
have no effect on participants.
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
This proposed rule would require modifications to the current
recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the Alaska Interagency
Electronic Reporting System collection (OMB Control Number 0648-0515).
The modifications would include requiring tender vessel operators to
complete the data fields on the tLandings tender
[[Page 50441]]
workstation application for each delivery the tender vessel accepts
from a vessel. Additionally, the tender vessel operator would be
required to provide the completed tLandings application to the
processor on delivery. The processor would then be required to upload
the information provided by the tender vessel operator in the tLandings
application into the eLandings landing report.
This proposed rule would remove the Buying Station Report
requirement. NMFS receives the landing data it needs through eLandings,
and does not need the data submitted in the Buying Station Report. The
Buying Station Report would be discontinued from any future use.
Removing the requirement to submit a Buying Station Report removes a
duplicative reporting requirement and reduces the burden on the
regulated public. Buying stations will continue to be required to
submit landing reports using eLandings.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With This
Proposed Rule
The Analysis did not reveal any Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
Description of Significant Alternatives to This Proposed Rule That
Minimize Economic Impacts on Small Entities
An IRFA also requires a description of any significant alternatives
to this proposed rule that would accomplish the stated objectives, are
consistent with applicable statutes, and that would minimize any
significant economic impact of this proposed rule on small entities.
Under each action, NMFS considered two alternatives--the no action
alternative and the action alternative. NMFS did not identify any other
alternatives that would meet the objectives of these actions at a lower
cost and reduced economic impact on small entities. The no action
alternative for Action 1 would maintain the existing process of tender
vessel operators completing paper fish tickets for each delivery and
giving the information to the processor to transcribe and upload into
eLandings. Maintaining the manual writing and submission of tender
delivery data would not meet the objective of providing timely and
accurate landing data. To help reduce the burden of this proposed
regulation on small entities for electronic recordkeeping and
reporting, NMFS would minimize the cost by developing the tLandings
tender workstation application and providing that at no cost to
participants to provide services and products useful to the industry,
and by providing user support and training. The action alternatives for
Actions 2, 3, and 4 have been determined to have either a small
positive effect or no effect on participants, and therefore are not
discussed further.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). NMFS has submitted these
requirements to OMB for approval under Control Number 0648-0515. Public
reporting burden is estimated to average per response: 15 minutes for
IERS application processor registration; 35 minutes for eLandings
landing report; 35 minutes for manual landing report; 15 minutes for
catcher/processor or mothership eLandings production report; and 35
minutes for tLandings landing report.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether these proposed
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden statement; ways to
enhance quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection of information, to NMFS
(see ADDRESSES), and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to
202-395-5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirement of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number. All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 679 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.
0
2. In Sec. 679.2, revise the definitions for ``Buying station'',
``Manager'', ``Mothership'', ``Tender vessel'', and ``User'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 679.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Buying station means a land-based entity that receives unprocessed
groundfish from a vessel for delivery to a shoreside processor and that
does not process those fish.
* * * * *
Manager, with respect to any shoreside processor, stationary
floating processor, or buying station, means the individual responsible
for the operation of the processor or buying station.
* * * * *
Mothership means a vessel that receives and processes groundfish
from other vessels.
* * * * *
Tender vessel means a vessel that is used to transport unprocessed
fish or shellfish received from another vessel to an associated
processor.
* * * * *
User means, for purposes of IERS and its components including
eLandings and tLandings, an individual representative of a Registered
Buyer; a Registered Crab Receiver; a mothership or catcher/processor
that is required to have a Federal Fisheries Permit (FFP) under Sec.
679.4; a shoreside processor or SFP and mothership that receives
groundfish from vessels issued an FFP under Sec. 679.4; any shoreside
processor or SFP that is required to have a Federal processor permit
under Sec. 679.4; and his or her designee(s).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 679.5,
0
a. Revise paragraph (c)(6)(i),
0
b. Remove paragraphs (c)(6)(viii)(E)
0
c. Revise paragraphs (e)(3)(i), and (e)(5)(i)(A)(7);
0
d. Add paragraph (e)(14)
0
e. Remove and reserve paragraph (d).
The addition and revisions to read as follows:
Sec. 679.5 Recordkeeping and reporting (R&R).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) Responsibility. Except as described in paragraph (f)(1)(v) of
this section, the
[[Page 50442]]
operator of a mothership that is required to have an FFP under Sec.
679.4(b), or the operator of a CQE floating processor that receives or
processes any groundfish from the GOA or BSAI from vessels issued an
FFP under Sec. 679.4(b), is required to use a combination of
mothership DCPL and eLandings to record and report daily processor
identification information, delivery information, groundfish production
data, and groundfish and prohibited species discard or disposition
data. The operator must enter into the DCPL any information for
groundfish received from catcher vessels, groundfish received from
processors for reprocessing or rehandling, and groundfish received from
a tender vessel.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Operation type. Select the operation type from the dropdown
list.
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(7) If the delivery is received from a buying station, indicate the
name of the buying station. If the delivery is received from a tender
vessel, enter the ADF&G vessel registration number.
* * * * *
(14) Tender vessel landing report (``tLandings''). (i) tLandings is
an applications software for preparing electronic landing reports for
commercial fishery landings to tender vessels.
(ii) The operator of a tender vessel taking delivery of fish or
shellfish that is required to be reported to NMFS on a landing report
under Sec. 679.5(e)(5) must use tLandings to enter information about
each landing of fish or shellfish and must provide that information to
the User defined under Sec. 679.2.
(iii) The User must configure and provide the tender vessel
operator with the most recent version of the tLandings tender
workstation application prior to the tender vessel taking delivery of
fish or shellfish.
(iv) The tender vessel operator must log into the configured
tLandings tender workstation application and provide the information
required on the computer screen. Additional instructions for tLandings
is on the Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
(v) Submittal time limit. (A) The tender vessel operator must
provide the landing information in tLandings to the User at the
commencement of the transfer or offload of fish or shellfish from the
tender vessel to the processor.
(B) The User must upload the data recorded in tLandings by the
tender vessel to prepare the initial landing report for a catcher
vessel delivering to a tender vessel that is required under Sec.
679.5(e) within the submittal time limit specified under Sec.
679.5(e).
(vi) Compliance. By using tLandings, the User and the tender vessel
operator providing information to the User accept the responsibility of
and acknowledge compliance with Sec. 679.7(a)(10).
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 679.7, revise paragraph (a)(11) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(11) Buying station or tender vessel--(i) Tender vessel. Use a
catcher vessel or catcher/processor as a tender vessel before
offloading all groundfish or groundfish product harvested or processed
by that vessel.
(ii) Associated processor. Function as a tender vessel or buying
station without an associated processor.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise table 13 to part 679 to read as follows:
Table 13 to Part 679--Transfer Form Summary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And has * * * Dockside
If participant type is * * * Fish product And is involved VAR \1\ PTR \2\ Trans-ship Departure sales Landing
onboard in this activity \3\ report \4\ receipt \5\ receipt \6\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catcher vessel greater than 60 Only non-IFQ Vessel leaving or X
ft LOA, mothership, or groundfish. entering Alaska.
catcher/processor.
Catcher vessel greater than 60 Only IFQ Vessel leaving ............ ............ ............ X
ft LOA, mothership, or sablefish, IFQ Alaska.
catcher/processor. halibut, CDQ
halibut, or CR
crab.
Catcher vessel greater than 60 Combination of Vessel leaving X ............ ............ X
ft LOA, mothership, or IFQ sablefish, Alaska.
catcher/processor. IFQ halibut, CDQ
halibut, or CR
crab and non-IFQ
groundfish.
Mothership, catcher/processor, Non-IFQ Shipment of ............ X
shoreside processor, or SFP. groundfish. groundfish
product.
Mothership, catcher/processor, Donated PSC...... Shipment of ............ X
shoreside processor, or SFP. donated PSC.
Buying station or tender Groundfish....... Receive or
vessel. deliver
groundfish in
association with
a shoreside
processor, SFP,
or mothership.
Registered Buyer.............. IFQ sablefish, Transfer of ............ X
IFQ halibut, or product.
CDQ halibut.
A person holding a valid IFQ IFQ sablefish, Transfer of ............ ............ ............ ............ XXX
permit, IFQ hired master IFQ halibut, or product.
permit, or Registered Buyer CDQ halibut.
permit.
Registered Buyer.............. IFQ sablefish, Transfer from ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ XX
IFQ halibut, or landing site to
CDQ halibut. Registered
Buyer's
processing
facility.
[[Page 50443]]
Vessel operator............... Processed IFQ Transshipment ............ ............ XXXX
sablefish, IFQ between vessels.
halibut, CDQ
halibut, or CR
crab.
Registered Crab Receiver...... CR crab.......... Transfer of ............ X
product.
Registered Crab Receiver...... CR crab.......... Transfer from ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ XX
landing site to
RCR's processing
facility.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A vessel activity report (VAR) is described at Sec. 679.5(k).
\2\ A product transfer report (PTR) is described at Sec. 679.5(g).
\3\ An IFQ transshipment authorization is described at Sec. 679.5(l)(3).
\4\ An IFQ departure report is described at Sec. 679.5(l)(4).
\5\ An IFQ dockside sales receipt is described at Sec. 679.5(g)(2)(iv).
\6\ A landing receipt is described at Sec. 679.5(e)(8)(vii).
X indicates under what circumstances each report is submitted.
XX indicates that the document must accompany the transfer of IFQ species from landing site to processor.
XXX indicates receipt must be issued to each receiver in a dockside sale.
XXXX indicates authorization must be obtained 24 hours in advance.
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 679.2, 679.5, 679.7, 679.51 [Amended]
0
6. At each of the locations shown in the ``Location'' column, remove
the phrase indicated in the ``Remove'' column and replace it with the
phrase indicated in the ``Add'' column for the number of times
indicated in the ``Frequency'' column.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Remove Add Frequency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 679.2 ``Agent'' (1).............. buying station............ buying station, tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.2 ``Agent'' (2).............. buying station............ buying station or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.2 ``Associated processor''... buying station............ buying station or tender 3
vessel.
Sec. 679.2 ``Shoreside processor''.... buying stations........... buying stations, tender 1
vessels.
Sec. 679.5(a)(2)(i)................... or buying station......... buying station, or tender 2
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(a)(2)(ii).................. or buying station......... buying station, or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(a)(3)(ii).................. catcher vessels and buying catcher vessels, buying 1
stations. stations, and tender
vessels.
Sec. 679.5(a)(3)(iii)................. catcher vessel or buying catcher vessel, buying 1
station. station, or tender vessel.
Sec. 679.5(b)......................... or buying station......... buying station, or tender 2
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(c)(1)(vi)(B)(4)............ or buying station......... buying station, or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(c)(3)(ii)(A)(3)............ or buying station......... buying station, or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(c)(3)(viii)................ buying station............ buying station, tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(c)(3)(x)................... buying station............ buying station, tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(c)(4)(ii)(A)(3)............ or buying station......... buying station, or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(c)(4)(viii)................ buying station............ buying station, tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(c)(4)(x)................... buying station............ buying station, tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(ii)(A)............... buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(vi) introductory text buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(A)............... buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(B)............... buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(C)............... buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(F)............... buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(vi)(H)............... buying station............ tender vessel............. 2
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(vii)................. buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(viii)(A)............. buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(e)(3)(viii)................ buying station............ buying station, tender 1
vessel,.
Sec. 679.5(e)(5)(i) introductory text. buying station............ buying station or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(e)(5)(i)(A)(6)............. buying station............ buying station or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(e)(5)(i)(C)(1)............. buying station............ buying station or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(e)(5)(iii)................. buying station............ buying station or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(e)(6)(i) introductory text. buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(e)(6)(i)(B)(1)............. buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(e)(6)(iii)................. buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(f)(1)(v)................... buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.5(f)(5)(ii).................. buying station............ buyer station or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.5(p)(1)...................... buying station............ tender vessel............. 1
Sec. 679.7(d)(4)(i)(C)................ buying station............ buying station or tender 1
vessel.
Sec. 679.51(e)(3)..................... or buying station......... buying station, or tender 1
vessel.
Table 1b to Part 679.................... and buying stations....... buying stations, and 1
tender vessels.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 50444]]
[FR Doc. 2016-18110 Filed 7-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P