Medicare Program; Request for an Exception to the Prohibition on Expansion of Facility Capacity Under the Hospital Ownership and Rural Provider Exceptions to the Physician Self-Referral Prohibition, 49662-49664 [2016-17928]
Download as PDF
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
49662
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 145 / Thursday, July 28, 2016 / Notices
implements a corrective action plan to
bring its procedures to process
eligibility determinations under its
Medicaid program into compliance with
the federal requirements.
The state has 30 days from the date of
this letter to request a hearing. As
specified in the accompanying Federal
Register notice, the Arkansas DHS has
an opportunity for an administrative
hearing prior to this determination
becoming final. However, the Arkansas
DHS must request a hearing. If a request
for a hearing is submitted timely, the
hearing will be convened by the Hearing
Officer designated below no later than
60 days after the date of the Federal
Register notice, or a later date by
agreement of the parties and the Hearing
Officer, at the CMS Regional Office in
Dallas, Texas, in accordance with the
procedures set forth in federal
regulations at 42 CFR part 430, subpart
D. The issue in any such hearing will be
whether benefits are being provided
during a reasonable opportunity period
to individuals who have declared under
penalty of perjury that they are in a to
a satisfactory immigration status
pending verification of such status, if
they meet all other eligibility
requirements, in accordance with the
state plan and 42 CFR 435.911(c). Any
request for such a hearing should be
sent to the designated Hearing Officer.
The Hearing Officer also should be
notified if the Arkansas DHS requests a
hearing but cannot meet the timeframe
expressed in this notice. The Hearing
Officer designated for this matter is:
Benjamin R. Cohen, Hearing Officer,
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive,
Suite L, Baltimore, MD 21244.
If the Arkansas DHS plans to come
into compliance with the approved state
plan, the Arkansas DHS should submit,
within 30 days of the date of this letter,
an explanation of how the Arkansas
DHS plans to come into compliance
with federal requirements and the
timeframe for doing so. If that
explanation is satisfactory, CMS may
consider postponing any requested
hearing, which could also delay the
imposition of the withholding of funds
as described above. Our goal is to have
the Arkansas DHS come into
compliance, and CMS continues to be
available to provide technical assistance
to the Arkansas DHS in achieving this
outcome.
Should you not request a hearing
within 30 days, a notice of withholding
will be sent to you and the withholding
of federal funds will begin as described
above.
If you have any questions or wish to
discuss this determination further,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Jul 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
please contact: Bill Brooks, Associate
Regional Administrator, Division of
Medicaid and Children’s Health
Operations, CMS Dallas Regional Office,
1301 Young Street, Suite 714, Dallas, TX
75202, 214–767–4461.
Sincerely,
Andrew M. Slavitt
Acting Administrator
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 13.714, Medicaid Assistance
Program.)
Dated: July 22, 2016.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2016–17923 Filed 7–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–1667–PN]
Medicare Program; Request for an
Exception to the Prohibition on
Expansion of Facility Capacity Under
the Hospital Ownership and Rural
Provider Exceptions to the Physician
Self-Referral Prohibition
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed notice.
AGENCY:
The Social Security Act
prohibits a physician-owned hospital
from expanding its facility capacity,
unless the Secretary of the Department
of Health and Human Services (the
Secretary) grants the hospital’s request
for an exception to that prohibition after
considering input on the hospital’s
request from individuals and entities in
the community where the hospital is
located. The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) has received a
request from a physician-owned
hospital for an exception to the
prohibition against expansion of facility
capacity. This notice solicits comments
on the request from individuals and
entities in the community in which the
physician-owned hospital is located.
Community input may inform our
determination regarding whether the
requesting hospital qualifies for an
exception to the prohibition against
expansion of facility capacity.
DATES: Comment Date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
August 29, 2016.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–1667–PN. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
three ways (please choose only one of
the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this exception
request to https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions under the ‘‘More
Search Options’’ tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–1667–PN, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address ONLY: Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–1667–PN, Mail Stop C4–26–05,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
POH-ExceptionRequests@cms.hhs.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments
All comments received before the
close of the comment period are
available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or
confidential business information that is
included in a comment. We post all
comments received before the close of
the comment period on the following
Web site as soon as possible after they
have been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
We will allow stakeholders 30 days
from the date of this notice to submit
written comments. Comments received
timely will be available for public
inspection as they are received,
generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of this notice, at
the headquarters of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244, Monday through
Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to
view public comments, please phone 1–
800–743–3951.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 145 / Thursday, July 28, 2016 / Notices
I. Background
Section 1877 of the Social Security
Act (the Act), also known as the
physician self-referral law—(1) prohibits
a physician from making referrals for
certain ‘‘designated health services’’
(DHS) payable by Medicare to an entity
with which he or she (or an immediate
family member) has a financial
relationship (ownership or
compensation), unless the requirements
of an applicable exception are satisfied;
and (2) prohibits the entity from filing
claims with Medicare (or billing another
individual, entity, or third party payer)
for those DHS furnished as a result of a
prohibited referral.
Section 1877(d)(2) of the Act provides
an exception for physician ownership or
investment interests in rural providers
(the ‘‘rural provider exception’’). In
order for an entity to qualify for the
rural provider exception, the DHS must
be furnished in a rural area (as defined
in section 1886(d)(2) of the Act) and
substantially all the DHS furnished by
the entity must be furnished to
individuals residing in a rural area.
Section 1877(d)(3) of the Act provides
an exception, known as the hospital
ownership exception, for physician
ownership or investment interests held
in a hospital located outside of Puerto
Rico, provided that the referring
physician is authorized to perform
services at the hospital and the
ownership or investment interest is in
the hospital itself (and not merely in a
subdivision of the hospital).
Section 6001(a)(3) of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Pub. L. 111–148) as amended by the
Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
152) (hereafter referred to together as
‘‘the Affordable Care Act’’) amended the
rural provider and hospital ownership
exceptions to the physician self-referral
prohibition to impose additional
restrictions on physician ownership and
investment in hospitals and rural
providers. Since March 23, 2010, a
physician-owned hospital that seeks to
avail itself of either exception is
prohibited from expanding facility
capacity unless it qualifies as an
‘‘applicable hospital’’ or ‘‘high Medicaid
facility’’ (as defined in sections
1877(i)(3)(E), (F) of the Act and 42 CFR
411.362(c)(2), (3) of our regulations) and
has been granted an exception to the
prohibition by the Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (the Secretary). Section
1877(i)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that
individuals and entities in the
community in which the provider
requesting the exception is located must
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Jul 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
have an opportunity to provide input
with respect to the provider’s
application for the exception. For
further information, we refer readers to
the CMS Web site at: https://
www.cms.gov/Medicare/Fraud-andAbuse/PhysicianSelfReferral/Physician_
Owned_Hospitals.html.
II. Exception Request Process
On November 30, 2011, we published
a final rule in the Federal Register (76
FR 74122, 74517 through 74525) that,
among other things, finalized
§ 411.362(c), which specified the
process for submitting, commenting on,
and reviewing a request for an exception
to the prohibition on expansion of
facility capacity. We published a
subsequent final rule in the Federal
Register on November 10, 2014 (79 FR
66770) that made certain revisions.
These revisions included, among other
things, permitting the use of data from
an external data source or data from the
Hospital Cost Report Information
System (HCRIS) for specific eligibility
criteria.
As stated in regulations at
§ 411.362(c)(5), we will solicit
community input on the request for an
exception by publishing a notice of the
request in the Federal Register.
Individuals and entities in the hospital’s
community will have 30 days to submit
comments on the request. Community
input must take the form of written
comments and may include
documentation demonstrating that the
physician-owned hospital requesting
the exception does or does not qualify
as an ‘‘applicable hospital’’ or ‘‘high
Medicaid facility,’’ as such terms are
defined in § 411.362(c)(2) and (3). In the
November 30, 2011 final rule (76 FR
74522), we gave examples of community
input, such as documentation
demonstrating that the hospital does not
satisfy one or more of the data criteria
or that the hospital discriminates
against beneficiaries of Federal health
programs; however, we noted that these
were examples only and that we will
not restrict the type of community input
that may be submitted. If we receive
timely comments from the community,
we will notify the hospital, and the
hospital will have 30 days after such
notice to submit a rebuttal statement
(§ 411.362(c)(5)).
A request for an exception to the
facility expansion prohibition is
considered complete as follows:
• If the request, any written
comments, and any rebuttal statement
include only HCRIS data: (1) The end of
the 30-day comment period if CMS
receives no written comments from the
community; or (2) the end of the 30-day
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49663
rebuttal period if CMS receives written
comments from the community,
regardless of whether the physicianowned hospital submitting the request
submits a rebuttal statement
(§ 411.362(c)(5)(i)).
• If the request, any written
comments, or any rebuttal statement
include data from an external data
source, no later than: (1) 180 Days after
the end of the 30-day comment period
if CMS receives no written comments
from the community; and (2) 180 days
after the end of the 30-day rebuttal
period if CMS receives written
comments from the community,
regardless of whether the physicianowned hospital submitting the request
submits a rebuttal statement
(§ 411.362(c)(5)(ii)).
If we grant the request for an
exception to the prohibition on
expansion of facility capacity, the
expansion may occur only in facilities
on the hospital’s main campus and may
not result in the number of operating
rooms, procedure rooms, and beds for
which the hospital is licensed to exceed
200 percent of the hospital’s baseline
number of operating rooms, procedure
rooms, and beds (§ 411.362(c)(6)). The
CMS decision to grant or deny a
hospital’s request for an exception to the
prohibition on expansion of facility
capacity must be published in the
Federal Register in accordance with our
regulations at § 411.362(c)(7).
III. Hospital Exception Request
As permitted by section 1877(i)(3) of
the Act and our regulations at
§ 411.362(c), the following physicianowned hospital has requested an
exception to the prohibition on
expansion of facility capacity:
Name of Facility: Deaconess Women’s
Hospital of Southern Indiana d/b/a The
Women’s Hospital.
Location: 4199 Gateway Blvd.,
Newburgh, IN 47630.
Basis for Exception Request: High
Medicaid Facility.
We seek comments on this request
from individuals and entities in the
community in which the hospital is
located. We encourage interested parties
to review the hospital’s request, which
is posted on the CMS Web site at: https://
www.cms.gov/Medicare/Fraud-andAbuse/PhysicianSelfReferral/Physician_
Owned_Hospitals.html. We especially
welcome comments regarding whether
the hospital qualifies as a high Medicaid
facility. Under § 411.362(c)(3), a high
Medicaid facility is a hospital that
satisfies all of the following criteria:
• Is not the sole hospital in the
county in which the hospital is located.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
49664
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 145 / Thursday, July 28, 2016 / Notices
• With respect to each of the 3 most
recent 12-month periods for which data
are available as of the date the hospital
submits its request, has an annual
percent of total inpatient admissions
under Medicaid that is estimated to be
greater than such percent with respect
to such admissions for any other
hospital located in the county in which
the hospital is located.
• Does not discriminate against
beneficiaries of federal health care
programs and does not permit
physicians practicing at the hospital to
discriminate against such beneficiaries.
Individuals and entities wishing to
submit comments on the hospital’s
request should review the DATES and
ADDRESSES sections and state whether or
not they are in the community in which
the hospital is located.
IV. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection requirements,
that is, reporting, recordkeeping or
third-party disclosure requirements.
Consequently, there is no need for
review by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
V. Response to Public Comments
We will consider all comments we
receive by the date and time specified
in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a
subsequent document, we will respond
to the comments in the preamble to that
document.
Dated: July 14, 2016.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2016–17928 Filed 7–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–0007]
Animal Drug User Fee Rates and
Payment Procedures for Fiscal Year
2017
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
rates and payment procedures for fiscal
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Jul 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
year (FY) 2017 animal drug user fees.
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the
Animal Drug User Fee Amendments of
2013 (ADUFA III), authorizes FDA to
collect user fees for certain animal drug
applications and supplements, for
certain animal drug products, for certain
establishments where such products are
made, and for certain sponsors of such
animal drug applications and/or
investigational animal drug
submissions. This notice establishes the
fee rates for FY 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit
FDA’s Web site at https://www.fda.gov/
ForIndustry/UserFees/
AnimalDrugUserFeeActADUFA/
default.htm or contact Lisa Kable,
Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV–
10), Food and Drug Administration,
7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,
240–402–6888. For general questions,
you may also email the Center for
Veterinary Medicine (CVM) at:
cvmadufa@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
application; $175,350 for a
supplemental animal drug application
for which safety or effectiveness data are
required and for an animal drug
application subject to the criteria set
forth in section 512(d)(4) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(d)(4)); $8,195 for an
annual product fee; $111,900 for an
annual establishment fee; and $103,100
for an annual sponsor fee. FDA will
issue invoices for FY 2017 product,
establishment, and sponsor fees by
December 31, 2016, and payment will
be due by January 31, 2017. The
application fee rates are effective for
applications submitted on or after
October 1, 2016, and will remain in
effect through September 30, 2017.
Applications will not be accepted for
review until FDA has received full
payment of application fees and any
other animal drug user fees owed under
the Animal Drug User Fee program
(ADUFA program).
I. Background
Section 740 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 379j–12) establishes four
different types of user fees: (1) Fees for
certain types of animal drug
applications and supplements; (2)
annual fees for certain animal drug
products; (3) annual fees for certain
establishments where such products are
made; and (4) annual fees for certain
sponsors of animal drug applications
and/or investigational animal drug
submissions (21 U.S.C. 379j–12(a)).
When certain conditions are met, FDA
will waive or reduce fees (21 U.S.C.
379j–12(d)).
For FY 2014 through FY 2018, the
FD&C Act establishes aggregate yearly
base revenue amounts for each fiscal
year (21 U.S.C. 379j–12(b)(1)). Base
revenue amounts established for years
after FY 2014 are subject to adjustment
for inflation and workload (21 U.S.C.
379j–12(c)). Fees for applications,
establishments, products, and sponsors
are to be established each year by FDA
so that the percentages of the total
revenue that are derived from each type
of user fee will be as follows: Revenue
from application fees shall be 20 percent
of total fee revenue; revenue from
product fees shall be 27 percent of total
fee revenue; revenue from establishment
fees shall be 26 percent of total fee
revenue; and revenue from sponsor fees
shall be 27 percent of total fee revenue
(21 U.S.C. 379j–12(b)(2)).
For FY 2017, the animal drug user fee
rates are: $350,700 for an animal drug
ADUFA III, Title I of Public Law 113–
14, specifies that the aggregate fee
revenue amount for FY 2017 for all
animal drug user fee categories is
$21,600,000 (21 U.S.C. 379j–
12(b)(1)(B).).
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Revenue Amount for FY 2017
A. Statutory Fee Revenue Amounts
B. Inflation Adjustment to Fee Revenue
Amount
The fee revenue amount established
in ADUFA III for FY 2015 and
subsequent fiscal years are subject to an
inflation adjustment (21 U.S.C. 379j–
12(c)(2)).
The component of the inflation
adjustment for payroll costs shall be one
plus the average annual percent change
in the cost of all personnel
compensation and benefits (PC&B) paid
per full-time equivalent position (FTE)
at FDA for the first three of the four
preceding fiscal years, multiplied by the
proportion of PC&B costs to total FDA
costs for the first three of the four
preceding fiscal years (see 21 U.S.C.
379j–12(c)(2)(A) and (B)). The data on
total PC&B paid and numbers of FTE
paid, from which the average cost per
FTE can be derived, are published in
FDA’s Justification of Estimates for
Appropriations Committees.
Table 1 summarizes that actual cost
and FTE data for the specified fiscal
years, and provides the percent change
from the previous fiscal year and the
average percent change over the first
three of the four fiscal years preceding
FY 2017. The 3-year average is 1.8759
percent.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 145 (Thursday, July 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49662-49664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17928]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-1667-PN]
Medicare Program; Request for an Exception to the Prohibition on
Expansion of Facility Capacity Under the Hospital Ownership and Rural
Provider Exceptions to the Physician Self-Referral Prohibition
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Social Security Act prohibits a physician-owned hospital
from expanding its facility capacity, unless the Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) grants the
hospital's request for an exception to that prohibition after
considering input on the hospital's request from individuals and
entities in the community where the hospital is located. The Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has received a request from a
physician-owned hospital for an exception to the prohibition against
expansion of facility capacity. This notice solicits comments on the
request from individuals and entities in the community in which the
physician-owned hospital is located. Community input may inform our
determination regarding whether the requesting hospital qualifies for
an exception to the prohibition against expansion of facility capacity.
DATES: Comment Date: To be assured consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on August 29, 2016.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-1667-PN.
Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of three ways (please choose only
one of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
exception request to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions under the ``More Search Options'' tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1667-PN, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received before
the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address ONLY: Department of Health and Human Services,
Attention: CMS-1667-PN, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: POH-ExceptionRequests@cms.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments
All comments received before the close of the comment period are
available for viewing by the public, including any personally
identifiable or confidential business information that is included in a
comment. We post all comments received before the close of the comment
period on the following Web site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view public comments.
We will allow stakeholders 30 days from the date of this notice to
submit written comments. Comments received timely will be available for
public inspection as they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication of this notice, at the
headquarters of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of
each week from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view
public comments, please phone 1-800-743-3951.
[[Page 49663]]
I. Background
Section 1877 of the Social Security Act (the Act), also known as
the physician self-referral law--(1) prohibits a physician from making
referrals for certain ``designated health services'' (DHS) payable by
Medicare to an entity with which he or she (or an immediate family
member) has a financial relationship (ownership or compensation),
unless the requirements of an applicable exception are satisfied; and
(2) prohibits the entity from filing claims with Medicare (or billing
another individual, entity, or third party payer) for those DHS
furnished as a result of a prohibited referral.
Section 1877(d)(2) of the Act provides an exception for physician
ownership or investment interests in rural providers (the ``rural
provider exception''). In order for an entity to qualify for the rural
provider exception, the DHS must be furnished in a rural area (as
defined in section 1886(d)(2) of the Act) and substantially all the DHS
furnished by the entity must be furnished to individuals residing in a
rural area.
Section 1877(d)(3) of the Act provides an exception, known as the
hospital ownership exception, for physician ownership or investment
interests held in a hospital located outside of Puerto Rico, provided
that the referring physician is authorized to perform services at the
hospital and the ownership or investment interest is in the hospital
itself (and not merely in a subdivision of the hospital).
Section 6001(a)(3) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (Pub. L. 111-148) as amended by the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-152) (hereafter referred to
together as ``the Affordable Care Act'') amended the rural provider and
hospital ownership exceptions to the physician self-referral
prohibition to impose additional restrictions on physician ownership
and investment in hospitals and rural providers. Since March 23, 2010,
a physician-owned hospital that seeks to avail itself of either
exception is prohibited from expanding facility capacity unless it
qualifies as an ``applicable hospital'' or ``high Medicaid facility''
(as defined in sections 1877(i)(3)(E), (F) of the Act and 42 CFR
411.362(c)(2), (3) of our regulations) and has been granted an
exception to the prohibition by the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (the Secretary). Section 1877(i)(3)(A)(ii) of
the Act provides that individuals and entities in the community in
which the provider requesting the exception is located must have an
opportunity to provide input with respect to the provider's application
for the exception. For further information, we refer readers to the CMS
Web site at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Fraud-and-Abuse/PhysicianSelfReferral/Physician_Owned_Hospitals.html.
II. Exception Request Process
On November 30, 2011, we published a final rule in the Federal
Register (76 FR 74122, 74517 through 74525) that, among other things,
finalized Sec. 411.362(c), which specified the process for submitting,
commenting on, and reviewing a request for an exception to the
prohibition on expansion of facility capacity. We published a
subsequent final rule in the Federal Register on November 10, 2014 (79
FR 66770) that made certain revisions. These revisions included, among
other things, permitting the use of data from an external data source
or data from the Hospital Cost Report Information System (HCRIS) for
specific eligibility criteria.
As stated in regulations at Sec. 411.362(c)(5), we will solicit
community input on the request for an exception by publishing a notice
of the request in the Federal Register. Individuals and entities in the
hospital's community will have 30 days to submit comments on the
request. Community input must take the form of written comments and may
include documentation demonstrating that the physician-owned hospital
requesting the exception does or does not qualify as an ``applicable
hospital'' or ``high Medicaid facility,'' as such terms are defined in
Sec. 411.362(c)(2) and (3). In the November 30, 2011 final rule (76 FR
74522), we gave examples of community input, such as documentation
demonstrating that the hospital does not satisfy one or more of the
data criteria or that the hospital discriminates against beneficiaries
of Federal health programs; however, we noted that these were examples
only and that we will not restrict the type of community input that may
be submitted. If we receive timely comments from the community, we will
notify the hospital, and the hospital will have 30 days after such
notice to submit a rebuttal statement (Sec. 411.362(c)(5)).
A request for an exception to the facility expansion prohibition is
considered complete as follows:
If the request, any written comments, and any rebuttal
statement include only HCRIS data: (1) The end of the 30-day comment
period if CMS receives no written comments from the community; or (2)
the end of the 30-day rebuttal period if CMS receives written comments
from the community, regardless of whether the physician-owned hospital
submitting the request submits a rebuttal statement (Sec.
411.362(c)(5)(i)).
If the request, any written comments, or any rebuttal
statement include data from an external data source, no later than: (1)
180 Days after the end of the 30-day comment period if CMS receives no
written comments from the community; and (2) 180 days after the end of
the 30-day rebuttal period if CMS receives written comments from the
community, regardless of whether the physician-owned hospital
submitting the request submits a rebuttal statement (Sec.
411.362(c)(5)(ii)).
If we grant the request for an exception to the prohibition on
expansion of facility capacity, the expansion may occur only in
facilities on the hospital's main campus and may not result in the
number of operating rooms, procedure rooms, and beds for which the
hospital is licensed to exceed 200 percent of the hospital's baseline
number of operating rooms, procedure rooms, and beds (Sec.
411.362(c)(6)). The CMS decision to grant or deny a hospital's request
for an exception to the prohibition on expansion of facility capacity
must be published in the Federal Register in accordance with our
regulations at Sec. 411.362(c)(7).
III. Hospital Exception Request
As permitted by section 1877(i)(3) of the Act and our regulations
at Sec. 411.362(c), the following physician-owned hospital has
requested an exception to the prohibition on expansion of facility
capacity:
Name of Facility: Deaconess Women's Hospital of Southern Indiana d/
b/a The Women's Hospital.
Location: 4199 Gateway Blvd., Newburgh, IN 47630.
Basis for Exception Request: High Medicaid Facility.
We seek comments on this request from individuals and entities in
the community in which the hospital is located. We encourage interested
parties to review the hospital's request, which is posted on the CMS
Web site at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Fraud-and-Abuse/PhysicianSelfReferral/Physician_Owned_Hospitals.html. We especially
welcome comments regarding whether the hospital qualifies as a high
Medicaid facility. Under Sec. 411.362(c)(3), a high Medicaid facility
is a hospital that satisfies all of the following criteria:
Is not the sole hospital in the county in which the
hospital is located.
[[Page 49664]]
With respect to each of the 3 most recent 12-month periods
for which data are available as of the date the hospital submits its
request, has an annual percent of total inpatient admissions under
Medicaid that is estimated to be greater than such percent with respect
to such admissions for any other hospital located in the county in
which the hospital is located.
Does not discriminate against beneficiaries of federal
health care programs and does not permit physicians practicing at the
hospital to discriminate against such beneficiaries.
Individuals and entities wishing to submit comments on the
hospital's request should review the DATES and ADDRESSES sections and
state whether or not they are in the community in which the hospital is
located.
IV. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection requirements,
that is, reporting, recordkeeping or third-party disclosure
requirements. Consequently, there is no need for review by the Office
of Management and Budget under the authority of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
V. Response to Public Comments
We will consider all comments we receive by the date and time
specified in the DATES section of this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
Dated: July 14, 2016.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-17928 Filed 7-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P