Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 49653-49657 [2016-17876]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 145 / Thursday, July 28, 2016 / Notices
with the standards of section 4 of the
BHC Act.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding the applications must be
received at the Reserve Bank indicated
or the offices of the Board of Governors
not later than August 11, 2016.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier,
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin
Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55480–0291:
1. Vermillion Bancshares, Inc.,
Vermillion, Minnesota; retroactive
notice to engage, de novo, in extending
credit and servicing loans pursuant to
section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, July 22, 2016.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–17768 Filed 7–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System
ACTION: Notice for comment regarding
the Federal Reserve proposal to extend,
with revision, the clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act for the
following information collection
activity.
AGENCY:
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board or
Federal Reserve) invites comment on a
proposal to extend for three years, with
revision, the Capital Assessments and
Stress Testing information collection
applicable to bank holding companies
(BHCs) with total consolidated assets of
$50 billion or more and U.S.
intermediate holding companies (IHCs)
established by foreign banking
organizations under 12 CFR 252.153 (FR
Y–14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100–0341).
On June 15, 1984, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
delegated to the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (Board) its
approval authority under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), to approve of and
assign OMB numbers to collection of
information requests and requirements
conducted or sponsored by the Board.
Board-approved collections of
information are incorporated into the
official OMB inventory of currently
approved collections of information.
Copies of the PRA Submission,
supporting statements and approved
collection of information instruments
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Jul 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
are placed into OMB’s public docket
files. The Federal Reserve may not
conduct or sponsor, and the respondent
is not required to respond to, an
information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or
after October 1, 1995, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before September 26, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by FR Y–14A/Q/M, by any of
the following methods:
• Agency Web site: https://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/
foia/proposedregs.aspx .
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: regs.comments@
federalreserve.gov. Include OMB
number in the subject line of the
message.
• FAX: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
• Mail: Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments are available
from the Board’s Web site at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/
proposedregs.aspx as submitted, unless
modified for technical reasons.
Accordingly, your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information. Public comments
may also be viewed electronically or in
paper form in Room 3515, 1801 K Street
(between 18th and 19th Streets NW.)
Washington, DC 20006 between 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays.
Additionally, commenters may send a
copy of their comments to the OMB
Desk Officer, Shagufta Ahmed, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503 or by fax to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
copy of the PRA OMB submission,
including the proposed reporting form
and instructions, supporting statement,
and other documentation will be placed
into OMB’s public docket files, once
approved. These documents will also be
made available on the Federal Reserve
Board’s public Web site at: https://
www.federalreserve.gov/apps/
reportforms/review.aspx or may be
requested from the agency clearance
officer, whose name appears below.
Federal Reserve Board Clearance
Officer, Nuha Elmaghrabi, Office of the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49653
Chief Data Officer, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, DC 20551 (202) 452–3884.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD) users may contact (202) 263–
4869, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comment on Information
Collection Proposal
The following information collection,
which is being handled under this
delegated authority, has received initial
Board approval and is hereby published
for comment. At the end of the comment
period, the proposed information
collection, along with an analysis of
comments and recommendations
received, will be submitted to the Board
for final approval under OMB delegated
authority. Comments are invited on the
following:
a. Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the Federal Reserve’s
functions; including whether the
information has practical utility;
b. The accuracy of the Federal
Reserve’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of
information collection on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or start-up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
Proposal to approve under OMB
delegated authority the extension for
three years with revision of the
following report:
1. Report title: Capital Assessments
and Stress Testing information
collection.
Agency form number: FR Y–14A/
Q/M.
OMB control number: 7100–0341.
Effective Dates: December 31, 2016
and December 31, 2017.
Frequency: Annually, semi-annually,
quarterly, and monthly.
Respondents: The respondent panel
consists of any top-tier bank holding
company (BHC) or intermediate holding
company (IHC) that has $50 billion or
more in total consolidated assets, as
determined based on: (i) The average of
the firm’s total consolidated assets in
the four most recent quarters as reported
quarterly on the firm’s Consolidated
Financial Statements for Bank Holding
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
49654
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 145 / Thursday, July 28, 2016 / Notices
Companies (FR Y–9C) (OMB No. 7100–
0128); or (ii) the average of the firm’s
total consolidated assets in the most
recent consecutive quarters as reported
quarterly on the firm’s FR Y–9Cs, if the
firm has not filed an FR Y–9C for each
of the most recent four quarters.
Reporting is required as of the first day
of the quarter immediately following the
quarter in which it meets this asset
threshold, unless otherwise directed by
the Board.
Estimated annual reporting hours: FR
Y–14A: Summary, 77,454 hours; Macro
Scenario, 2,418 hours; Operational Risk,
702 hours; Regulatory Capital
Transitions; 897 hours, Regulatory
Capital Instruments, 819 hours; Retail
Repurchase Exposures, 1,560 hours;
Business Plan Changes, 390 hours; and
Adjusted capital plan submission, 500
hours. FR Y–14Q: Retail, 2,496 hours;
Securities, 2,184 hours; Pre-provision
net revenue (PPNR), 110,916 hours;
Wholesale, 23,712 hours; Trading,
46,224 hours; Regulatory Capital
Transitions, 3,588 hours; Regulatory
Capital Instruments, 8,112 hours;
Operational risk, 7,800 hours; Mortgage
Servicing Rights (MSR) Valuation, 1,728
hours; Supplemental, 624 hours; Retail
Fair Value Option/Held for Sale (Retail
FVO/HFS), 1,792 hours; Counterparty,
12,192 hours; and Balances, 2,496
hours; FR Y–14M: 1st lien mortgage,
228,660 hours; Home Equity, 197,760
hours; and Credit Card, 153,000 hours.
FR Y–14 On-going automation revisions,
18,720 hours. FR Y–14 Attestation
implementation, 14,400 hours; and Ongoing audit and review, 30,720 hours.
Estimated average hours per response:
FR Y–14A: Summary, 993 hours; Macro
Scenario, 31 hours; Operational Risk, 18
hours; Regulatory Capital Transitions,
23 hours; Regulatory Capital
Instruments, 21 hours; Retail
Repurchase Exposures, 20 hours;
Business Plan Changes, 10 hours and
Adjusted capital plan submission, 100
hours. FR Y–14Q: Retail, 16 hours;
Securities, 14 hours; PPNR, 711 hours;
Wholesale, 152 hours; Trading, 1,926
hours; Regulatory Capital Transitions,
23 hours; Regulatory Capital
Instruments, 52 hours; Operational risk,
50 hours; MSR Valuation, 24 hours;
Supplemental, 4 hours; Retail FVO/
HFS, 16 hours; Counterparty, 508 hours;
and Balances, 16 hours; FR Y–14M: 1st
Lien Mortgage, 515 hours; Home Equity,
515 hours; and Credit Card, 510 hours.
FR Y–14 On-Going automation
revisions, 480 hours. FR Y–14
Attestation Implementation, 4,800
hours; and On-going audit and review,
2,560 hours.
Number of respondents: 39.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Jul 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
Legal authorization and
confidentiality: The FR Y–14 series of
reports are authorized by section 165 of
the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires the
Board to ensure that certain firms and
nonbank financial companies
supervised by the Board are subject to
enhanced risk-based and leverage
standards in order to mitigate risks to
the financial stability of the United
States (12 U.S.C. 5365). Additionally,
Section 5 of the Bank Holding Company
Act authorizes the Board to issue
regulations and conduct information
collections with regard to the
supervision of BHCs (12 U.S.C. 1844).
With regard to the CFO-level
attestation requirement, which is
intended to improve accountability and
accuracy and heighten requirements for
internal control, the Board has provided
sufficient description and justification
to require such attestation from
respondents, consistent with the
aforementioned statutory authorities.
As these data are collected as part of
the supervisory process, they are subject
to confidential treatment under
exemption 8 of the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C.
552(b)(8)). In addition, commercial and
financial information contained in these
information collections may be exempt
from disclosure under exemption 4 of
FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)), if disclosure
would likely have the effect of (1)
impairing the government’s ability to
obtain the necessary information in the
future, or (2) causing substantial harm to
the competitive position of the
respondent. Such exemptions would be
made on a case-by-case basis. Such
exemptions would be made on a caseby-case basis.
Abstract: The data collected through
the FR Y–14A/Q/M schedules provide
the Board with the additional
information and perspective needed to
help ensure that large BHCs and IHCs
have strong, firm-wide risk
measurement and management
processes supporting their internal
assessments of capital adequacy and
that their capital resources are sufficient
given their business focus, activities,
and resulting risk exposures. The
annual CCAR exercise is also
complemented by other Board
supervisory efforts aimed at enhancing
the continued viability of large firms,
including continuous monitoring of
firms’ planning and management of
liquidity and funding resources and
regular assessments of credit, market
and operational risks, and associated
risk management practices. Information
gathered in this data collection is also
used in the supervision and regulation
of these financial institutions. In order
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to fully evaluate the data submissions,
the Board may conduct follow-up
discussions with or request responses to
follow up questions from respondents,
as needed.
The Capital Assessments and Stress
Testing information collection consists
of the FR Y–14A, Q, and M reports. The
semi-annual FR Y–14A collects
quantitative projections of balance
sheet, income, losses, and capital across
a range of macroeconomic scenarios and
qualitative information on
methodologies used to develop internal
projections of capital across scenarios.1
The quarterly FR Y–14Q collects
granular data on various asset classes,
including loans, securities, and trading
assets, and pre-provision net revenue
(PPNR) for the reporting period. The
monthly FR Y–14M comprises three
retail portfolio- and loan-level
collections, and one detailed address
matching collection to supplement two
of the portfolio and loan-level
collections.
Current Actions: The Board proposes
revising general FR Y–14 requirements
and several schedules of the FR Y–14A/
Q/M reports. The revisions would be
effective with the FR Y–14 reports as-of
December 31, 2016, or December 31,
2017, as noted below. For reports as-of
December 31, 2017, the proposed
changes include applying the attestation
requirement to U.S. IHCs that will be
subject to the Large Institution
Supervision Coordinating Committee
(LISCC) framework (‘‘LISCC U.S.
IHCs’’) 2. For reports as-of December 31,
2016, the Board proposes adding a
requirement for firms electing to
undertake planned capital adjustments
or incremental capital distribution
requests to provide updated
submissions of the FR Y–14A Schedule
A (Summary—Capital) and Schedule C
(Regulatory Capital Instruments, RCI)
reflecting these adjustments (as detailed
below). To facilitate this collection, the
Board proposes adding additional items
to the FR Y–14A Schedule C (RCI).
Finally, the Board proposes to update
the FR Y–14A, Schedule A.1.d.
(Summary—Capital) to collect items
related to the supplementary leverage
ratio (SLR), remove and add subschedules to the FR Y–14A Schedule E
(Operational Risk) to align with
applicable guidance, add one item to
Schedule A.5 (Summary—
Counterparty), and modify items on the
1 BHCs that must re-submit their capital plan
generally also must provide a revised FR Y–14A in
connection with their resubmission.
2 Further information regarding the LISCC
designation is available on the Board’s public Web
site: https://www.federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/
large-institution-supervision.htm
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 145 / Thursday, July 28, 2016 / Notices
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
FR Y–14A/Q/M reports to address
inconsistencies across schedules and
ensure the collection of accurate
information. These changes are
explained in further detail in the
schedule specific sections below.
The FR Y–14A Schedule A.1.d.
(Summary—Capital) would be revised
for December 31, 2016, to (1) add certain
items used to calculate the SLR in
alignment with the Board’s extension of
the initial application of the SLR
requirement in the capital plan rule; 3
(2) modify two items; and (3) remove
one item. In addition, one item to
capture Other Counterparty Losses
would be added to Schedule A.5
(Summary—Counterparty) effective
December 31, 2016. Finally, Schedule E
(Operational Risk) would be revised for
December 31, 2016, to (1) remove subschedule E.1, BHC Operational Risk
Historical Capital, (2) add two new subschedules: E.2, Material Risk
Identification and E.3, Operational Risk
Scenarios, and (3) update outdated
methodologies and references.
The FR Y–14Q (quarterly collection)
would be revised for December 31,
2016, to add a new column to Schedule
B (Securities) to collect the price of the
security as a percent of par to enhance
supervisory modeling.
Finally, the FR Y–14M (monthly
collection) would be revised for
December 31, 2016, to modify the
definition of Gross Charge-Off Amount
on Schedule D (Credit Cards) in order to
ensure proper reporting across firms.
These data are, or will be, used to
assess the capital adequacy of BHCs and
U.S. IHCs using forward-looking
projections of revenue and losses to
support supervisory stress test models
and continuous monitoring efforts, as
well as to inform the Board’s
operational decision-making as it
continues to implement the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act.
Proposed Revision to the FR Y–14A/Q/
M
The Board proposes to add an
attestation requirement to the FR Y–
14A/Q/M reports for U.S. IHC
respondents that will be subject to the
LISCC framework. Foreign banking
organizations with non-branch assets of
$50 billion or more were required to
form a U.S. IHC by July 1, 2016. As of
April 2016, the IHCs established by
Barclays, Credit Suisse, UBS and
Deutsche Bank are expected to be the
LISCC U.S. IHC respondents. This
requirement would be consistent with
the existing attestation requirement
3 See
12 CFR 225.8(c)(3), 12 CFR 252.53(b)(3).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Jul 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
applicable to U.S. BHCs subject to the
LISCC framework (LISCC respondents).
On September 16, 2015, the Board
published a notice in the Federal
Register proposing to require a Chief
Financial Officer (CFO) level attestation
for LISCC respondents.4 On January 21,
2016, the Board finalized the attestation
requirement for LISCC respondents,
with a phased-in implementation
approach beginning with the reports asof December 31, 2016.5 The Board
proposes applying an attestation
requirement to LISCC U.S. IHCs
following a similar phased-in
implementation approach, effective
beginning December 31, 2017, and fully
phased in by December 31, 2018. The
proposed effective date would provide
LISCC U.S. IHCs with time to develop
the appropriate internal processes and
procedures to fully implement the
proposed attestation following the
creation of their U.S. IHCs in July 2016,
and the first filing of FR Y–14 reports
as-of December 31, 2016.
As discussed in the final Federal
Register notice adopting the attestation
requirement for domestic LISCC
respondents, the attestation requirement
was designed to help ensure that the
data reported to the Board were reliable
and accurately reflect the firm’s
exposures.6 These data are integral to
the Board’s assessment of the safety and
soundness of a banking organization, as
the Board uses financial data reported
by a banking organization to assess
whether the banking organization has
the capital necessary to absorb losses
under stress.
The Board initially applied the
attestation requirement to only LISCC
respondents given the added resources
required to implement the attestation.7
Similarly, the Board would propose to
apply the attestation requirement only
to those U.S. IHCs that will be subject
to the LISCC framework, as the
resources needed to ensure accurate
data are appropriate in light of the risks
that the U.S. operations of these firms
pose to the financial system.
Under the proposal the attestation
would include three parts. First, for
projected data reported on the FR Y–
80 FR 55621 (September 16, 2015).
81 FR 3412 (January 21, 2016).
6 See 80 FR 55621 (September 16, 2015).
7 As noted in the preamble to the Federal Register
notice (80 FR 55621, September 16, 2015), the
attestation requirement may require respondents to
enhance certain systems and processes in order to
meet the attestation requirement, such as enhancing
information technology infrastructure and adding or
modifying internal control frameworks and data
governance committees to include accountability
and escalation processes, as well as to increase the
frequency of audits of internal controls over the FR
Y–14A/Q/M reports.
PO 00000
4 See
5 See
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49655
14A/Q and for actual data reported on
the FR Y–14A/Q/M reports, collectively,
the CFO (or equivalent senior officer 8)
of a LISCC U.S. IHC would be required
to attest that the reports have been
prepared in conformance with the
instructions issued by the Board.9
Second, for actual data, the CFO (or
equivalent senior officer) of a LISCC
U.S. IHC would be required to attest that
senior management is responsible for
the internal controls over the reporting
of these data, and that the data reported
are materially correct to the best of
senior management’s knowledge. The
CFO would also be required to attest
that the controls are effective and
include those practices necessary to
provide reasonable assurance as to the
accuracy of these data. The CFO would
be required to attest that the controls are
audited annually by internal audit or
compliance staff, and are assessed
regularly by management of the named
institution. For the third part, the CFO
would be required to agree to report
material weaknesses in these internal
controls and any material errors or
omissions in the data submitted to the
Board promptly as they are identified.
Both domestic LISCC firms and LISCC
U.S. IHCs subject to the attestation
requirement should have a policy in
place for determining materiality in the
context of attesting to material
correctness and internal controls.10
As indicated above, the Board
proposes that the attestation for LISCC
U.S. IHCs would follow a phased-in
implementation approach beginning
December 31, 2017. The attestation
submitted with reports as-of December
31, 2017, would relate to the
effectiveness of internal controls over
submissions for the as-of date and
would not include an attestation to
8 ‘‘An equivalent senior officer’’ refers to a senior
officer who functions as the CFO but carries a
different title.
9 The instructions define the scope and content of
items that must be reported, and specify that the
reports must be filed in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
The instructions further state that respondents
should maintain financial records in such a manner
and scope to ensure the FR Y–14A/Q/M reports
reflect a fair presentation of the HCs’ financial
condition and assessment of performance under
stressed scenarios.
10 The materiality policy should include a robust
analysis of all relevant quantitative and qualitative
considerations, including, but not limited to, the
size and effect of the omission or misstatement on
firms’ projected regulatory capital ratios in stressed
scenarios. Qualitative factors may result in a
conclusion that a small change in regulatory capital
ratios is considered material. Those circumstances
might include the repeat occurrence of errors and
omissions, the proximity of a firm’s regulatory
capital ratios to minimum capital requirements, and
whether errors and omissions could change a
knowledgeable person’s view of the adequacy of
internal controls over the capital adequacy process.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
49656
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 145 / Thursday, July 28, 2016 / Notices
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
submissions through the year.
Beginning with the monthly FR Y–14M
report submitted on January 31, 2018,
and for each monthly, quarterly and
semi-annual FR Y–14 report submitted
thereafter, respondents would attest to
conformance with the FR Y–14
instructions and to the material
correctness of data to the best of the
respondent’s knowledge, and agree to
report material weaknesses and any
material errors in the data as they are
identified. The full attestation
requirement, including attestation to the
effectiveness of internal controls
throughout the previous year, would be
effective starting with the reports
submitted as-of December 31, 2018. The
attestation pages submitted by LISCC
U.S. IHCs would be the same as those
used by LISCC BHCs.
Proposed Requirement To Submit
Adjusted Capital Action Data
The Board proposes to require
additional submissions of certain FR Y–
14 schedules to collect information on
adjustments to planned capital actions
and incremental capital distribution
from firms that have elected to make
such adjustments, effective with the
reports as-of December 31, 2016. An adhoc process is currently used to collect
this information, which is necessary if,
for example, firms intend to exercise the
option to adjust their planned capital
distributions based on the preliminary
results of the supervisory quantitative
assessment in CCAR.11 Given the timesensitive nature of the collection,
current manual collection processes,
and ongoing need for firms to submit
the data, formalizing the requirement as
part of the FR Y–14 would reduce
operational risk, establish a regular,
standard submission process, and
account for the burden of providing
these data. Additionally, it would
formalize a standard process for firms to
employ in submitting information
regarding requests to make incremental
capital distributions above those
included in their capital plans.
The proposed requirement includes
two components. First, for adjustments
to planned capital actions, firms would
be required to submit an updated FR Y–
14A Schedule A.1.d (Summary,
Capital—CCAR) for the BHC Baseline,
Supervisory Adverse, and Supervisory
Severely Adverse scenarios and an
updated FR Y–14A Schedule C (RCI).
These submissions would be collected
subsequent to the firms’ annual FR Y–
11 The CCAR Instructions provide further
information regarding adjustments a BHC may make
to its planned capital distributions: https://
www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/
bcreg20160128a1.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Jul 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
14 submission in a timeframe
communicated by the Board of at least
14 calendar days in advance of the
submission. Second, for incremental
capital action requests (i.e. requests for
additional capital distributions in the
period between CCAR exercises), firms
would be required to resubmit the FR
Y–14A Schedule C (RCI). The
incremental capital action requests
would be submitted at the time a firm
seeks approval for or notifies the Board
of its intention to make additional
capital distributions.
To allow for the collection of the
information necessary to understand
these adjustments, the Board proposes
adding certain items to the FR Y–14A
Schedule C (RCI) including: (1) Cash
dividends declared on preferred stock,
(2) cash dividends declared on common
stock, (3) common shares outstanding
(Millions), and (4) common dividends
per share ($).
Proposed Revisions to the FR Y–14A
The proposed revisions to the FR Y–
14A consist of adding data items in
accordance with the finalized
modifications to the capital plan and
stress test rules (Regulation Y and
YY),12 and modifying existing data
items to provide more precise
information. The limited changes to
Schedule A.1.d (Capital) are expected to
require relatively minimal additional
burden on firms and in the case of the
SLR items are required in accordance
with mandatory capital planning
requirements. The proposed changes to
Schedule E (Operational Risk) would
balance the increase in burden due to
the addition and modification of items
to align with expectations outlined in
SR Letter 15–18 with the reduction in
burden from the elimination of the
outdated and unnecessary data
collection.
Schedule A (Summary)
Revisions to Schedule A.1.d (Capital)
In accordance with the finalized
amendments to the capital plan and
stress test rules, a firm will be required
to estimate its supplementary leverage
ratio (SLR) for the DFAST/CCAR
planning horizon beginning January 1,
2018.13 To facilitate the mandatory
reporting of this information, it is
necessary to add SLR items to the FR Y–
14A report. The Board proposes adding
two items to the FR Y–14A Summary
Schedule (A.1.d, Capital) report as-of
December 31, 2016: Supplementary
Leverage Ratio Exposure (SLR Exposure)
PO 00000
12 See
13 See
80 FR 75419 (December 2, 2015).
12 CFR 225.8(c)(3), 12 CFR 252.53(b)(3).
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Supplementary Leverage Ratio (the
SLR). The SLR would be a derived field.
In addition, to collect more precise
information regarding deferred tax
assets (DTAs), the Board proposes
modifying one existing item on the FR
Y–14A Schedule A.1.d (Summary—
Capital) as-of December 31, 2016. The
Board proposes changing existing item
111 on Schedule A.1.d. (Summary—
Capital), ‘‘Deferred tax assets arising
from temporary differences that could
not be realized through net operating
loss carrybacks, net of DTLs, but before
related valuation allowances’’, to
‘‘Deferred tax assets arising from
temporary differences, net of DTLs.’’ A
firm in a net deferred tax liability (DTL)
position would report this item as a
negative number. This modification
would provide more specific
information about the components of
the ‘‘DTAs arising from temporary
differences that could not be realized
through net operating loss carrybacks,
net of related valuation allowances and
net of DTLs’’ subject to the common
equity tier 1 capital deduction
threshold.
The Board also proposes removing
Schedule HC–M, Memoranda item 107,
‘‘Total number of bank holding
company common shares outstanding’’,
from the FR Y–14A Schedule A
(Summary—Capital) with the reports asof December 31, 2016, to reduce burden
on firms. This item provides minimal
additional value and therefore, is no
longer needed.
Finally, to reduce the risk of
inconsistencies in reporting and align
with other regulatory reports, certain
definitions in the instructions for the FR
Y–14A Schedule A.1.d (Summary—
Capital) would be clarified or
streamlined to reference comparable
items on the FR Y–9C.
Revisions to Schedule A.5
(Counterparty) The Board proposes
adding the item ‘‘Other counterparty
losses’’ to Schedule A.5 (Summary—
Counterparty), similar to the item that
was removed with the proposal
finalized October 1, 2014.14 The Board
provides guidance to respondents to
include risks not considered in the
supervisory scenarios and the addition
of this item will allow these risks to be
captured. This change is proposed to be
effective with the reports as-of
December 31, 2016.
Schedule E (Operational Risk)
The Board proposes several changes
to the FR Y–14A Schedule E
(Operational Risk) for the reports as-of
December 31, 2016, to align with the
14 See
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
79 FR 59264 (October 1, 2014).
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 145 / Thursday, July 28, 2016 / Notices
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
guidance and expectations contained in
recent supervisory letters, notably SR
Letter 15–18. SR Letter 15–18 outlines
expectations regarding a firm’s risk
management infrastructure and strength
of associated processes.
In order to capture the information
surrounding the risk management
infrastructure and processes as outlined
in SR Letter 15–18, the Board proposes
adding two sub-schedules to the FR Y–
14A Schedule E (Operational Risk) and
modifying the supporting
documentation requirements for this
schedule effective with the reports as-of
December 31, 2016. First, new subschedule E.2, Material Risk
Identification, would collect
information on a firm’s material
operational risks included in loss
projections based on their risk
management framework, a component
of risk management emphasized in SR
Letter 15–18. Second, new sub-schedule
E.3, Operational Risk Scenarios, would
collect a firm’s operational risk
scenarios included in the BHC Baseline
and BHC Stress projections, a
fundamental element of the framework.
Finally, the Board recommends
updating the requirements for
supporting documentation and
modifying certain terminology,
definitions, and references to align with
SR Letter 15–18.
Certain information related to the
previous methodology are no longer
necessary to collect given the
aforementioned change in guidance,
resulting in the proposed removal of
these items and updating of associated
terminology. Sub-schedule E.1 (BHC
Operational Risk Historical Capital)
would be removed as this schedule
pertains to Advanced Measurement
Approaches (AMA) methodology and
these data are no longer necessary. This
change in methodology also results in
the removal of two associated columns
on the FR Y–14A Schedule A.6
(Operational Risk Scenario Inputs and
Projections): Type of Data and Brief
Description. References to previous
methodology would be updated,
including changing the name of a
column on the FR Y–14A Schedule A.6
(Operational Risk Scenario Inputs and
Projections) from Units of Measure to
Risk Segment. These changes would
also be effective with the report as-of
December 31, 2016.
Proposed Revisions to the FR Y–14Q
The proposed revision to the FR Y–
14Q consists of adding an item to more
accurately collect information that is
currently derived. This proposed change
would allow for more accurate and
consistent reporting of information with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Jul 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
minimal anticipated burden on
respondents.
Schedule B (Securities)
For reports as-of December 31, 2016,
the Board proposes adding a new
column to the FR Y–14Q Schedule B.1
(Securities 1—Main Schedule) to collect
the price of the security to more
accurately collect price information and
thereby enhance supervisory modeling.
Because this information is believed to
be readily available, the Board estimates
this revision would impose minimal
additional burden while improving the
ability to use these data.
Proposed Revisions to the FR Y–14M
Schedule D (Credit Card)
For reports as-of December 31, 2016,
the Board proposes modifying the
definition of Item 62, Gross Charge-off
Amount—Current month to reflect the
intended method of reporting the item
and in response to industry comments.
The definition would be modified to
indicate that all gross charge-offs must
be reported regardless of whether they
are from purchased or impaired loans by
eliminating the reference to allowance
for loan and lease losses (ALLL).
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, July 25, 2016.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–17876 Filed 7–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
49657
for Health (ASH), the Director, CDC, and
the Director, Office of Public Health
Preparedness and Response (OPHPR),
concerning strategies and goals for the
programs and research within OPHPR,
monitoring the overall strategic
direction and focus of the OPHPR
Divisions and Offices, and
administration and oversight of peer
review of OPHPR scientific programs.
For additional information about the
Board, please visit: https://www.cdc.gov/
phpr/science/counselors.htm.
Matters for Discussion: The meeting
will cover administrative updates;
updates from the Director, OPHPR;
status updates on BSC
recommendations from the April 11–12,
2016 BSC Meeting; and deliberation on
potential topics for the October 25–26,
2016 BSC Meeting. Agenda items are
subject to change as priorities dictate.
Contact Person for More Information:
Dometa Ouisley, Office of Science and
Public Health Practice, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D–44,
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone:
(404) 639–7450; Facsimile: (404)639–
7977; Email: OPHPR.BSC.Questions@
cdc.gov.
The Director, Management Analysis
and Services Office, has been delegated
the authority to sign Federal Register
notices pertaining to announcements of
meetings and other committee
management activities for both the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, and Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Catherine Ramadei,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and
Service Office, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
Board of Scientific Counselors, Office
of Public Health Preparedness and
Response; Meetings
[FR Doc. 2016–17826 Filed 7–27–16; 8:45 am]
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC),
announces the following meeting of the
aforementioned committee:
Time and Date: 3 p.m.–5 p.m., EDT,
August 19, 2016.
Place: Web conference via Adobe
Connect.
Link: https://ophprbsc.adobeconnect.com/august2016/.
Dial-In Number: (877)327–8109.
Participant Code: 2108386.
Status: This meeting is open to the
public.
Purpose: This Board is charged with
providing advice and guidance to the
Secretary, HHS, the Assistant Secretary
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
National Center for Injury Prevention
and Control (NCIPC), Board of
Scientific Counselors, National Center
for Injury Prevention and Control,
(BSC, NCIPC)
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) announce
the following meeting of the
aforementioned committee.
Times and Dates: 1:00 p.m.–4:45 p.m.
EDT, September 7, 2016 (OPEN); 8:30
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 145 (Thursday, July 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49653-49657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17876]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
ACTION: Notice for comment regarding the Federal Reserve proposal to
extend, with revision, the clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act
for the following information collection activity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board or
Federal Reserve) invites comment on a proposal to extend for three
years, with revision, the Capital Assessments and Stress Testing
information collection applicable to bank holding companies (BHCs) with
total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more and U.S. intermediate
holding companies (IHCs) established by foreign banking organizations
under 12 CFR 252.153 (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
On June 15, 1984, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
delegated to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board) its approval authority under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
to approve of and assign OMB numbers to collection of information
requests and requirements conducted or sponsored by the Board. Board-
approved collections of information are incorporated into the official
OMB inventory of currently approved collections of information. Copies
of the PRA Submission, supporting statements and approved collection of
information instruments are placed into OMB's public docket files. The
Federal Reserve may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not
required to respond to, an information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless
it displays a currently valid OMB number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 26, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by FR Y-14A/Q/M, by any
of the following methods:
Agency Web site: https://www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/proposedregs.aspx .
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov. Include OMB
number in the subject line of the message.
FAX: (202) 452-3819 or (202) 452-3102.
Mail: Robert deV. Frierson, Secretary, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20551.
All public comments are available from the Board's Web site at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/proposedregs.aspx as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons. Accordingly, your comments will
not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information. Public
comments may also be viewed electronically or in paper form in Room
3515, 1801 K Street (between 18th and 19th Streets NW.) Washington, DC
20006 between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays.
Additionally, commenters may send a copy of their comments to the
OMB Desk Officer, Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503 or by
fax to (202) 395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the PRA OMB submission,
including the proposed reporting form and instructions, supporting
statement, and other documentation will be placed into OMB's public
docket files, once approved. These documents will also be made
available on the Federal Reserve Board's public Web site at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/reportforms/review.aspx or may be requested
from the agency clearance officer, whose name appears below.
Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer, Nuha Elmaghrabi, Office of
the Chief Data Officer, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, DC 20551 (202) 452-3884. Telecommunications Device
for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact (202) 263-4869, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comment on Information Collection Proposal
The following information collection, which is being handled under
this delegated authority, has received initial Board approval and is
hereby published for comment. At the end of the comment period, the
proposed information collection, along with an analysis of comments and
recommendations received, will be submitted to the Board for final
approval under OMB delegated authority. Comments are invited on the
following:
a. Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the Federal Reserve's functions; including
whether the information has practical utility;
b. The accuracy of the Federal Reserve's estimate of the burden of
the proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of information collection on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
Proposal to approve under OMB delegated authority the extension for
three years with revision of the following report:
1. Report title: Capital Assessments and Stress Testing information
collection.
Agency form number: FR Y-14A/ Q/M.
OMB control number: 7100-0341.
Effective Dates: December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017.
Frequency: Annually, semi-annually, quarterly, and monthly.
Respondents: The respondent panel consists of any top-tier bank
holding company (BHC) or intermediate holding company (IHC) that has
$50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as determined based
on: (i) The average of the firm's total consolidated assets in the four
most recent quarters as reported quarterly on the firm's Consolidated
Financial Statements for Bank Holding
[[Page 49654]]
Companies (FR Y-9C) (OMB No. 7100-0128); or (ii) the average of the
firm's total consolidated assets in the most recent consecutive
quarters as reported quarterly on the firm's FR Y-9Cs, if the firm has
not filed an FR Y-9C for each of the most recent four quarters.
Reporting is required as of the first day of the quarter immediately
following the quarter in which it meets this asset threshold, unless
otherwise directed by the Board.
Estimated annual reporting hours: FR Y-14A: Summary, 77,454 hours;
Macro Scenario, 2,418 hours; Operational Risk, 702 hours; Regulatory
Capital Transitions; 897 hours, Regulatory Capital Instruments, 819
hours; Retail Repurchase Exposures, 1,560 hours; Business Plan Changes,
390 hours; and Adjusted capital plan submission, 500 hours. FR Y-14Q:
Retail, 2,496 hours; Securities, 2,184 hours; Pre-provision net revenue
(PPNR), 110,916 hours; Wholesale, 23,712 hours; Trading, 46,224 hours;
Regulatory Capital Transitions, 3,588 hours; Regulatory Capital
Instruments, 8,112 hours; Operational risk, 7,800 hours; Mortgage
Servicing Rights (MSR) Valuation, 1,728 hours; Supplemental, 624 hours;
Retail Fair Value Option/Held for Sale (Retail FVO/HFS), 1,792 hours;
Counterparty, 12,192 hours; and Balances, 2,496 hours; FR Y-14M: 1st
lien mortgage, 228,660 hours; Home Equity, 197,760 hours; and Credit
Card, 153,000 hours. FR Y-14 On-going automation revisions, 18,720
hours. FR Y-14 Attestation implementation, 14,400 hours; and On-going
audit and review, 30,720 hours.
Estimated average hours per response: FR Y-14A: Summary, 993 hours;
Macro Scenario, 31 hours; Operational Risk, 18 hours; Regulatory
Capital Transitions, 23 hours; Regulatory Capital Instruments, 21
hours; Retail Repurchase Exposures, 20 hours; Business Plan Changes, 10
hours and Adjusted capital plan submission, 100 hours. FR Y-14Q:
Retail, 16 hours; Securities, 14 hours; PPNR, 711 hours; Wholesale, 152
hours; Trading, 1,926 hours; Regulatory Capital Transitions, 23 hours;
Regulatory Capital Instruments, 52 hours; Operational risk, 50 hours;
MSR Valuation, 24 hours; Supplemental, 4 hours; Retail FVO/HFS, 16
hours; Counterparty, 508 hours; and Balances, 16 hours; FR Y-14M: 1st
Lien Mortgage, 515 hours; Home Equity, 515 hours; and Credit Card, 510
hours. FR Y-14 On-Going automation revisions, 480 hours. FR Y-14
Attestation Implementation, 4,800 hours; and On-going audit and review,
2,560 hours.
Number of respondents: 39.
Legal authorization and confidentiality: The FR Y-14 series of
reports are authorized by section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which
requires the Board to ensure that certain firms and nonbank financial
companies supervised by the Board are subject to enhanced risk-based
and leverage standards in order to mitigate risks to the financial
stability of the United States (12 U.S.C. 5365). Additionally, Section
5 of the Bank Holding Company Act authorizes the Board to issue
regulations and conduct information collections with regard to the
supervision of BHCs (12 U.S.C. 1844).
With regard to the CFO-level attestation requirement, which is
intended to improve accountability and accuracy and heighten
requirements for internal control, the Board has provided sufficient
description and justification to require such attestation from
respondents, consistent with the aforementioned statutory authorities.
As these data are collected as part of the supervisory process,
they are subject to confidential treatment under exemption 8 of the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8)). In addition,
commercial and financial information contained in these information
collections may be exempt from disclosure under exemption 4 of FOIA (5
U.S.C. 552(b)(4)), if disclosure would likely have the effect of (1)
impairing the government's ability to obtain the necessary information
in the future, or (2) causing substantial harm to the competitive
position of the respondent. Such exemptions would be made on a case-by-
case basis. Such exemptions would be made on a case-by-case basis.
Abstract: The data collected through the FR Y-14A/Q/M schedules
provide the Board with the additional information and perspective
needed to help ensure that large BHCs and IHCs have strong,
firm[hyphen]wide risk measurement and management processes supporting
their internal assessments of capital adequacy and that their capital
resources are sufficient given their business focus, activities, and
resulting risk exposures. The annual CCAR exercise is also complemented
by other Board supervisory efforts aimed at enhancing the continued
viability of large firms, including continuous monitoring of firms'
planning and management of liquidity and funding resources and regular
assessments of credit, market and operational risks, and associated
risk management practices. Information gathered in this data collection
is also used in the supervision and regulation of these financial
institutions. In order to fully evaluate the data submissions, the
Board may conduct follow-up discussions with or request responses to
follow up questions from respondents, as needed.
The Capital Assessments and Stress Testing information collection
consists of the FR Y-14A, Q, and M reports. The semi-annual FR Y-14A
collects quantitative projections of balance sheet, income, losses, and
capital across a range of macroeconomic scenarios and qualitative
information on methodologies used to develop internal projections of
capital across scenarios.\1\ The quarterly FR Y-14Q collects granular
data on various asset classes, including loans, securities, and trading
assets, and pre-provision net revenue (PPNR) for the reporting period.
The monthly FR Y-14M comprises three retail portfolio- and loan-level
collections, and one detailed address matching collection to supplement
two of the portfolio and loan-level collections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ BHCs that must re-submit their capital plan generally also
must provide a revised FR Y-14A in connection with their
resubmission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Actions: The Board proposes revising general FR Y-14
requirements and several schedules of the FR Y-14A/Q/M reports. The
revisions would be effective with the FR Y-14 reports as-of December
31, 2016, or December 31, 2017, as noted below. For reports as-of
December 31, 2017, the proposed changes include applying the
attestation requirement to U.S. IHCs that will be subject to the Large
Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee (LISCC) framework
(``LISCC U.S. IHCs'') \2\. For reports as-of December 31, 2016, the
Board proposes adding a requirement for firms electing to undertake
planned capital adjustments or incremental capital distribution
requests to provide updated submissions of the FR Y-14A Schedule A
(Summary--Capital) and Schedule C (Regulatory Capital Instruments, RCI)
reflecting these adjustments (as detailed below). To facilitate this
collection, the Board proposes adding additional items to the FR Y-14A
Schedule C (RCI). Finally, the Board proposes to update the FR Y-14A,
Schedule A.1.d. (Summary--Capital) to collect items related to the
supplementary leverage ratio (SLR), remove and add sub-schedules to the
FR Y-14A Schedule E (Operational Risk) to align with applicable
guidance, add one item to Schedule A.5 (Summary--Counterparty), and
modify items on the
[[Page 49655]]
FR Y-14A/Q/M reports to address inconsistencies across schedules and
ensure the collection of accurate information. These changes are
explained in further detail in the schedule specific sections below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Further information regarding the LISCC designation is
available on the Board's public Web site: https://www.federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/large-institution-supervision.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FR Y-14A Schedule A.1.d. (Summary--Capital) would be revised
for December 31, 2016, to (1) add certain items used to calculate the
SLR in alignment with the Board's extension of the initial application
of the SLR requirement in the capital plan rule; \3\ (2) modify two
items; and (3) remove one item. In addition, one item to capture Other
Counterparty Losses would be added to Schedule A.5 (Summary--
Counterparty) effective December 31, 2016. Finally, Schedule E
(Operational Risk) would be revised for December 31, 2016, to (1)
remove sub-schedule E.1, BHC Operational Risk Historical Capital, (2)
add two new sub-schedules: E.2, Material Risk Identification and E.3,
Operational Risk Scenarios, and (3) update outdated methodologies and
references.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 12 CFR 225.8(c)(3), 12 CFR 252.53(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FR Y-14Q (quarterly collection) would be revised for December
31, 2016, to add a new column to Schedule B (Securities) to collect the
price of the security as a percent of par to enhance supervisory
modeling.
Finally, the FR Y-14M (monthly collection) would be revised for
December 31, 2016, to modify the definition of Gross Charge-Off Amount
on Schedule D (Credit Cards) in order to ensure proper reporting across
firms.
These data are, or will be, used to assess the capital adequacy of
BHCs and U.S. IHCs using forward-looking projections of revenue and
losses to support supervisory stress test models and continuous
monitoring efforts, as well as to inform the Board's operational
decision-making as it continues to implement the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
Proposed Revision to the FR Y-14A/Q/M
The Board proposes to add an attestation requirement to the FR Y-
14A/Q/M reports for U.S. IHC respondents that will be subject to the
LISCC framework. Foreign banking organizations with non-branch assets
of $50 billion or more were required to form a U.S. IHC by July 1,
2016. As of April 2016, the IHCs established by Barclays, Credit
Suisse, UBS and Deutsche Bank are expected to be the LISCC U.S. IHC
respondents. This requirement would be consistent with the existing
attestation requirement applicable to U.S. BHCs subject to the LISCC
framework (LISCC respondents).
On September 16, 2015, the Board published a notice in the Federal
Register proposing to require a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) level
attestation for LISCC respondents.\4\ On January 21, 2016, the Board
finalized the attestation requirement for LISCC respondents, with a
phased-in implementation approach beginning with the reports as-of
December 31, 2016.\5\ The Board proposes applying an attestation
requirement to LISCC U.S. IHCs following a similar phased-in
implementation approach, effective beginning December 31, 2017, and
fully phased in by December 31, 2018. The proposed effective date would
provide LISCC U.S. IHCs with time to develop the appropriate internal
processes and procedures to fully implement the proposed attestation
following the creation of their U.S. IHCs in July 2016, and the first
filing of FR Y-14 reports as-of December 31, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 80 FR 55621 (September 16, 2015).
\5\ See 81 FR 3412 (January 21, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the final Federal Register notice adopting the
attestation requirement for domestic LISCC respondents, the attestation
requirement was designed to help ensure that the data reported to the
Board were reliable and accurately reflect the firm's exposures.\6\
These data are integral to the Board's assessment of the safety and
soundness of a banking organization, as the Board uses financial data
reported by a banking organization to assess whether the banking
organization has the capital necessary to absorb losses under stress.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 80 FR 55621 (September 16, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board initially applied the attestation requirement to only
LISCC respondents given the added resources required to implement the
attestation.\7\ Similarly, the Board would propose to apply the
attestation requirement only to those U.S. IHCs that will be subject to
the LISCC framework, as the resources needed to ensure accurate data
are appropriate in light of the risks that the U.S. operations of these
firms pose to the financial system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ As noted in the preamble to the Federal Register notice (80
FR 55621, September 16, 2015), the attestation requirement may
require respondents to enhance certain systems and processes in
order to meet the attestation requirement, such as enhancing
information technology infrastructure and adding or modifying
internal control frameworks and data governance committees to
include accountability and escalation processes, as well as to
increase the frequency of audits of internal controls over the FR Y-
14A/Q/M reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposal the attestation would include three parts.
First, for projected data reported on the FR Y-14A/Q and for actual
data reported on the FR Y-14A/Q/M reports, collectively, the CFO (or
equivalent senior officer \8\) of a LISCC U.S. IHC would be required to
attest that the reports have been prepared in conformance with the
instructions issued by the Board.\9\ Second, for actual data, the CFO
(or equivalent senior officer) of a LISCC U.S. IHC would be required to
attest that senior management is responsible for the internal controls
over the reporting of these data, and that the data reported are
materially correct to the best of senior management's knowledge. The
CFO would also be required to attest that the controls are effective
and include those practices necessary to provide reasonable assurance
as to the accuracy of these data. The CFO would be required to attest
that the controls are audited annually by internal audit or compliance
staff, and are assessed regularly by management of the named
institution. For the third part, the CFO would be required to agree to
report material weaknesses in these internal controls and any material
errors or omissions in the data submitted to the Board promptly as they
are identified. Both domestic LISCC firms and LISCC U.S. IHCs subject
to the attestation requirement should have a policy in place for
determining materiality in the context of attesting to material
correctness and internal controls.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``An equivalent senior officer'' refers to a senior officer
who functions as the CFO but carries a different title.
\9\ The instructions define the scope and content of items that
must be reported, and specify that the reports must be filed in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). The instructions further state that respondents should
maintain financial records in such a manner and scope to ensure the
FR Y-14A/Q/M reports reflect a fair presentation of the HCs'
financial condition and assessment of performance under stressed
scenarios.
\10\ The materiality policy should include a robust analysis of
all relevant quantitative and qualitative considerations, including,
but not limited to, the size and effect of the omission or
misstatement on firms' projected regulatory capital ratios in
stressed scenarios. Qualitative factors may result in a conclusion
that a small change in regulatory capital ratios is considered
material. Those circumstances might include the repeat occurrence of
errors and omissions, the proximity of a firm's regulatory capital
ratios to minimum capital requirements, and whether errors and
omissions could change a knowledgeable person's view of the adequacy
of internal controls over the capital adequacy process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As indicated above, the Board proposes that the attestation for
LISCC U.S. IHCs would follow a phased-in implementation approach
beginning December 31, 2017. The attestation submitted with reports as-
of December 31, 2017, would relate to the effectiveness of internal
controls over submissions for the as-of date and would not include an
attestation to
[[Page 49656]]
submissions through the year. Beginning with the monthly FR Y-14M
report submitted on January 31, 2018, and for each monthly, quarterly
and semi-annual FR Y-14 report submitted thereafter, respondents would
attest to conformance with the FR Y-14 instructions and to the material
correctness of data to the best of the respondent's knowledge, and
agree to report material weaknesses and any material errors in the data
as they are identified. The full attestation requirement, including
attestation to the effectiveness of internal controls throughout the
previous year, would be effective starting with the reports submitted
as-of December 31, 2018. The attestation pages submitted by LISCC U.S.
IHCs would be the same as those used by LISCC BHCs.
Proposed Requirement To Submit Adjusted Capital Action Data
The Board proposes to require additional submissions of certain FR
Y-14 schedules to collect information on adjustments to planned capital
actions and incremental capital distribution from firms that have
elected to make such adjustments, effective with the reports as-of
December 31, 2016. An ad-hoc process is currently used to collect this
information, which is necessary if, for example, firms intend to
exercise the option to adjust their planned capital distributions based
on the preliminary results of the supervisory quantitative assessment
in CCAR.\11\ Given the time-sensitive nature of the collection, current
manual collection processes, and ongoing need for firms to submit the
data, formalizing the requirement as part of the FR Y-14 would reduce
operational risk, establish a regular, standard submission process, and
account for the burden of providing these data. Additionally, it would
formalize a standard process for firms to employ in submitting
information regarding requests to make incremental capital
distributions above those included in their capital plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The CCAR Instructions provide further information regarding
adjustments a BHC may make to its planned capital distributions:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20160128a1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed requirement includes two components. First, for
adjustments to planned capital actions, firms would be required to
submit an updated FR Y-14A Schedule A.1.d (Summary, Capital--CCAR) for
the BHC Baseline, Supervisory Adverse, and Supervisory Severely Adverse
scenarios and an updated FR Y-14A Schedule C (RCI). These submissions
would be collected subsequent to the firms' annual FR Y-14 submission
in a timeframe communicated by the Board of at least 14 calendar days
in advance of the submission. Second, for incremental capital action
requests (i.e. requests for additional capital distributions in the
period between CCAR exercises), firms would be required to resubmit the
FR Y-14A Schedule C (RCI). The incremental capital action requests
would be submitted at the time a firm seeks approval for or notifies
the Board of its intention to make additional capital distributions.
To allow for the collection of the information necessary to
understand these adjustments, the Board proposes adding certain items
to the FR Y-14A Schedule C (RCI) including: (1) Cash dividends declared
on preferred stock, (2) cash dividends declared on common stock, (3)
common shares outstanding (Millions), and (4) common dividends per
share ($).
Proposed Revisions to the FR Y-14A
The proposed revisions to the FR Y-14A consist of adding data items
in accordance with the finalized modifications to the capital plan and
stress test rules (Regulation Y and YY),\12\ and modifying existing
data items to provide more precise information. The limited changes to
Schedule A.1.d (Capital) are expected to require relatively minimal
additional burden on firms and in the case of the SLR items are
required in accordance with mandatory capital planning requirements.
The proposed changes to Schedule E (Operational Risk) would balance the
increase in burden due to the addition and modification of items to
align with expectations outlined in SR Letter 15-18 with the reduction
in burden from the elimination of the outdated and unnecessary data
collection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 80 FR 75419 (December 2, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule A (Summary)
Revisions to Schedule A.1.d (Capital) In accordance with the
finalized amendments to the capital plan and stress test rules, a firm
will be required to estimate its supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) for
the DFAST/CCAR planning horizon beginning January 1, 2018.\13\ To
facilitate the mandatory reporting of this information, it is necessary
to add SLR items to the FR Y-14A report. The Board proposes adding two
items to the FR Y-14A Summary Schedule (A.1.d, Capital) report as-of
December 31, 2016: Supplementary Leverage Ratio Exposure (SLR Exposure)
and Supplementary Leverage Ratio (the SLR). The SLR would be a derived
field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 12 CFR 225.8(c)(3), 12 CFR 252.53(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, to collect more precise information regarding deferred
tax assets (DTAs), the Board proposes modifying one existing item on
the FR Y-14A Schedule A.1.d (Summary--Capital) as-of December 31, 2016.
The Board proposes changing existing item 111 on Schedule A.1.d.
(Summary--Capital), ``Deferred tax assets arising from temporary
differences that could not be realized through net operating loss
carrybacks, net of DTLs, but before related valuation allowances'', to
``Deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences, net of
DTLs.'' A firm in a net deferred tax liability (DTL) position would
report this item as a negative number. This modification would provide
more specific information about the components of the ``DTAs arising
from temporary differences that could not be realized through net
operating loss carrybacks, net of related valuation allowances and net
of DTLs'' subject to the common equity tier 1 capital deduction
threshold.
The Board also proposes removing Schedule HC-M, Memoranda item 107,
``Total number of bank holding company common shares outstanding'',
from the FR Y-14A Schedule A (Summary--Capital) with the reports as-of
December 31, 2016, to reduce burden on firms. This item provides
minimal additional value and therefore, is no longer needed.
Finally, to reduce the risk of inconsistencies in reporting and
align with other regulatory reports, certain definitions in the
instructions for the FR Y-14A Schedule A.1.d (Summary--Capital) would
be clarified or streamlined to reference comparable items on the FR Y-
9C.
Revisions to Schedule A.5 (Counterparty) The Board proposes adding
the item ``Other counterparty losses'' to Schedule A.5 (Summary--
Counterparty), similar to the item that was removed with the proposal
finalized October 1, 2014.\14\ The Board provides guidance to
respondents to include risks not considered in the supervisory
scenarios and the addition of this item will allow these risks to be
captured. This change is proposed to be effective with the reports as-
of December 31, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 79 FR 59264 (October 1, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule E (Operational Risk)
The Board proposes several changes to the FR Y-14A Schedule E
(Operational Risk) for the reports as-of December 31, 2016, to align
with the
[[Page 49657]]
guidance and expectations contained in recent supervisory letters,
notably SR Letter 15-18. SR Letter 15-18 outlines expectations
regarding a firm's risk management infrastructure and strength of
associated processes.
In order to capture the information surrounding the risk management
infrastructure and processes as outlined in SR Letter 15-18, the Board
proposes adding two sub-schedules to the FR Y-14A Schedule E
(Operational Risk) and modifying the supporting documentation
requirements for this schedule effective with the reports as-of
December 31, 2016. First, new sub-schedule E.2, Material Risk
Identification, would collect information on a firm's material
operational risks included in loss projections based on their risk
management framework, a component of risk management emphasized in SR
Letter 15-18. Second, new sub-schedule E.3, Operational Risk Scenarios,
would collect a firm's operational risk scenarios included in the BHC
Baseline and BHC Stress projections, a fundamental element of the
framework. Finally, the Board recommends updating the requirements for
supporting documentation and modifying certain terminology,
definitions, and references to align with SR Letter 15-18.
Certain information related to the previous methodology are no
longer necessary to collect given the aforementioned change in
guidance, resulting in the proposed removal of these items and updating
of associated terminology. Sub-schedule E.1 (BHC Operational Risk
Historical Capital) would be removed as this schedule pertains to
Advanced Measurement Approaches (AMA) methodology and these data are no
longer necessary. This change in methodology also results in the
removal of two associated columns on the FR Y-14A Schedule A.6
(Operational Risk Scenario Inputs and Projections): Type of Data and
Brief Description. References to previous methodology would be updated,
including changing the name of a column on the FR Y-14A Schedule A.6
(Operational Risk Scenario Inputs and Projections) from Units of
Measure to Risk Segment. These changes would also be effective with the
report as-of December 31, 2016.
Proposed Revisions to the FR Y-14Q
The proposed revision to the FR Y-14Q consists of adding an item to
more accurately collect information that is currently derived. This
proposed change would allow for more accurate and consistent reporting
of information with minimal anticipated burden on respondents.
Schedule B (Securities)
For reports as-of December 31, 2016, the Board proposes adding a
new column to the FR Y-14Q Schedule B.1 (Securities 1--Main Schedule)
to collect the price of the security to more accurately collect price
information and thereby enhance supervisory modeling. Because this
information is believed to be readily available, the Board estimates
this revision would impose minimal additional burden while improving
the ability to use these data.
Proposed Revisions to the FR Y-14M
Schedule D (Credit Card)
For reports as-of December 31, 2016, the Board proposes modifying
the definition of Item 62, Gross Charge-off Amount--Current month to
reflect the intended method of reporting the item and in response to
industry comments. The definition would be modified to indicate that
all gross charge-offs must be reported regardless of whether they are
from purchased or impaired loans by eliminating the reference to
allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL).
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 25, 2016.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016-17876 Filed 7-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P