Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Integrated Photonics Institute for Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of the American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics, 48450 [2016-17435]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
48450
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Notices
MD, have been added as parties to this
venture.
Also, MOG Solutions SA, Maia,
PORTUGAL; and National
TeleConsultants, Glendale, CA, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and Advanced
Media Workflow Association, Inc.
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media
Workflow Association, Inc. filed its
original notification pursuant to section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on March 23, 2016. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on April 18, 2016 (81 FR 22633).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2016–17434 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Integrated Photonics
Institute for Manufacturing Innovation
Operating Under the Name of the
American Institute for Manufacturing
Integrated Photonics
Notice is hereby given that, on June
16, 2016, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the Integrated
Photonics Institute for Manufacturing
Innovation operating under the name of
the American Institute for
Manufacturing Integrated Photonics
(‘‘AIM Photonics’’), has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the
nature and objectives of the venture.
The notifications were filed for the
purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: The Research Foundation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:27 Jul 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
for the State University of New York,
acting on behalf of the State University
of New York Polytechnic Institute,
Albany, NY; The Trustees of Columbia
University in the City of New York, New
York, NY; The Regents of the University
of California, on behalf of its Santa
Barbara campus, Santa Barbara, CA;
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA; Arizona Board of
Regents on behalf of the University of
Arizona, Tucson, AZ; The Rector and
Visitors of the University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, VA; and SunEdison
Semiconductor Limited, St. Peters, MO.
The general area of AIM Photonics’
planned activity is research,
development and demonstration in the
manufacture of integrated photonics.
AIM Photonics seeks to (1) advance
integrated photonic circuit
manufacturing technology development
while simultaneously providing access
to state-of-the-art fabrication, packaging,
and testing capabilities for commercial
enterprises, academia and the
government; (2) create an adaptive
integrated photonic circuit workforce
capable of meeting industry needs and
thus further increasing domestic
competitiveness; and (3) meet
participating commercial, defense and
civilian agency needs in this burgeoning
technology area. AIM Photonics became
the sixth Institute for Manufacturing
Innovation. Its objective is to increase
manufacturing in the United States.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2016–17435 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am]
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement.
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
United States v. VA Partners I, LLC,
ValueAct Capital Master Fund, LP, and
ValueAct Co-Invest International, LP;
Proposed Final Judgment and
Competitive Impact Statement
Notice is hereby given pursuant to the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed
Final Judgment, Stipulation, and
Competitive Impact Statement have
been filed with the United States
District Court for the Northern District
of California in United States of
America v. VA Partners I, LLC, et al.,
Civil Action No. 16-cv-01672. On April
4, 2016, the United States filed a
Complaint against VA Partners I, LLC,
ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. and
ValueAct Co-Invest International, L.P.
(collectively ‘‘ValueAct’’ or
PO 00000
Frm 00076
‘‘Defendants’’) alleging that ValueAct’s
acquisitions of voting securities of
Halliburton Company and Baker Hughes
Incorporated violated Section 7A of the
Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18a, commonly
known as the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 (the
‘‘HSR Act’’). The proposed Final
Judgment requires the Defendants to pay
a civil penalty of $11,000,000 and
further prohibits Defendants from
engaging in conduct of the sort alleged
in the Complaint, in violation of the
HSR Act.
Copies of the Complaint, proposed
Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact
Statement are available for inspection
on the Antitrust Division’s Web site at
https://www.justice.gov/atr and at the
Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District
of California. Copies of these materials
may be obtained from the Antitrust
Division upon request and payment of
the copying fee set by Department of
Justice regulations.
Public comment is invited within 60
days of the date of this notice. Such
comments, including the name of the
submitter, and responses thereto, will be
posted on the Antitrust Division’s Web
site, filed with the Court, and, under
certain circumstances, published in the
Federal Register. Comments should be
directed to Kathleen S. O’Neill, Chief,
Transportation, Energy & Agriculture
Section, Antitrust Division, Department
of Justice, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite
8000, Washington, DC 20530
(telephone: 202–307–2931).
/s/ lllllllllllllllll
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Kathleen S. O’Neill (PA Bar No. 82785)
Joseph Chandra Mazumdar (WI Bar No.
1030967)
Brian E. Hanna (VA Bar No. 80439)
Robert A. Lepore (AZ Bar No. 028137)
Tai Milder (CABN 267070)
United States Department of Justice,
Antitrust Division
450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 8000
Washington, DC 20530
Telephone: (202) 307–2931
Fax: (202) 307–2874
Email: kathleen.oneill@usdoj.gov
Brian J. Stretch (CABN 163973)
United States Attorney
[Additional counsel listed on signature
page]
Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of
America
United States District Court for the
Northern District of California San
Francisco Division
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. VA
Partners I, LLC, Valueact Capital Master
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 142 (Monday, July 25, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 48450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17435]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--Integrated Photonics Institute for
Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of the American
Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics
Notice is hereby given that, on June 16, 2016, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Integrated Photonics
Institute for Manufacturing Innovation operating under the name of the
American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics (``AIM
Photonics''), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the
identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties
to the venture are: The Research Foundation for the State University of
New York, acting on behalf of the State University of New York
Polytechnic Institute, Albany, NY; The Trustees of Columbia University
in the City of New York, New York, NY; The Regents of the University of
California, on behalf of its Santa Barbara campus, Santa Barbara, CA;
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; Arizona Board of
Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; The Rector
and Visitors of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; and
SunEdison Semiconductor Limited, St. Peters, MO.
The general area of AIM Photonics' planned activity is research,
development and demonstration in the manufacture of integrated
photonics. AIM Photonics seeks to (1) advance integrated photonic
circuit manufacturing technology development while simultaneously
providing access to state-of-the-art fabrication, packaging, and
testing capabilities for commercial enterprises, academia and the
government; (2) create an adaptive integrated photonic circuit
workforce capable of meeting industry needs and thus further increasing
domestic competitiveness; and (3) meet participating commercial,
defense and civilian agency needs in this burgeoning technology area.
AIM Photonics became the sixth Institute for Manufacturing Innovation.
Its objective is to increase manufacturing in the United States.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-17435 Filed 7-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
