National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry, 48356-48362 [2016-17293]
Download as PDF
48356
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.247 Control strategy and regulations:
Fine Particle Matter.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Determination of Attainment:
Effective August 24, 2016, the EPA has
determined that, based on 2011 to 2013
ambient air quality data, the South
Coast PM2.5 nonattainment area has
attained the 1997 annual and 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination
suspends the requirements for this area
to submit an attainment demonstration,
associated reasonably available control
measures, a reasonable further progress
plan, contingency measures and other
planning SIPs related to attainment for
as long as this area continues to attain
the 1997 annual and 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS. If the EPA determines, after
notice-and-comment rulemaking, that
this area no longer meets the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS, the corresponding
determination of attainment for the area
shall be withdrawn.
[FR Doc. 2016–17410 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0817; FRL–9949–46–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AS98
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for the
Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to amend the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for the Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry. This direct final rule provides,
for a period of 1 year, an additional
compliance alternative for sources that
would otherwise be required to use an
HCl CEMS to demonstrate compliance
with the HCl emissions limit. This
compliance alternative is needed due to
the current unavailability of a
calibration gas used for quality
assurance purposes. This direct final
rule also restores regulatory text
requiring the reporting of clinker
production and kiln feed rates that was
deleted inadvertently.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 8, 2016 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives
significant adverse comment by August
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
24, 2016. If the EPA receives significant
adverse comment, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2011–0817, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Sharon Nizich, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243–02), Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
2825; fax number: (919) 541–5450; and
email address: nizich.sharon@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Organization of This Document. The
information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for the EPA?
II. What are the amendments made by this
direct final rule?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final
rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and do not
anticipate significant adverse comment.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of this Federal Register, we are
publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposed rule to amend
the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for the
Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry, if EPA receives significant
adverse comments on this direct final
rule. We will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. For further
information about commenting on this
rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this
document.
If the EPA receives significant adverse
comment on all or a distinct portion of
this direct final rule, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that some
or all of this direct final rule will not
take effect. We would address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule.
B. Does this direct final rule apply to
me?
Categories and entities potentially
regulated by this direct final rule
include:
Category
NAICS Code 1
Portland cement manufacturing facilities ...................
327310
1 North
American
Industry
Classification
System.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this direct final rule. To
determine whether your facility is
affected, you should examine the
applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.1340.
If you have questions regarding the
applicability of any aspect of this action
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
to a particular entity, consult either the
air permitting authority for the entity or
your EPA Regional representative as
listed in 40 CFR 63.13.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for the EPA?
Do not submit information containing
CBI to the EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information on a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to the EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comments that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comments that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver
information identified as CBI only to the
following address: OAQPS Document
Control Officer (C404–02), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2011–0817.
II. What are the amendments made by
this direct final rule?
In response to a concern raised by a
stakeholder regarding the availability of
calibration gases for HCl continuous
monitoring compliance, this direct final
rule amends 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(6) of the
performance testing requirements for
HCl by adding an alternative method for
performance testing. Under the current
rule, the owner or operator of a kiln
subject to the emission limits for HCl in
40 CFR 63.1343 may demonstrate
compliance by one of the following
methods:
• An owner or operator of a kiln may
demonstrate compliance by operating a
continuous emissions monitoring
system (CEMS) meeting the
requirements of performance
specification 15 (PS–15), PS–18, or any
other PS for HCl CEMS in appendix B
to part 60, with compliance based on a
30-kiln operating day rolling average.
• If the kiln is controlled using a wet
scrubber, tray tower, or dry scrubber,
the owner or operator, as an alternative
to using a CEMS, may demonstrate
compliance with the HCl limit using
one of two options, described below.
Under both options, a performance
test must be conducted by the owner or
operator using Method 321. Under the
first option, while conducting the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
Method 321 performance test (note
Method 321 is the HCl stack testing
performance method required by this
rule), the owner or operator
simultaneously measures a control
device parameter and establishes a sitespecific parameter limit that will be
continuously monitored to determine
compliance. If the kiln is controlled
using a wet scrubber or tray tower, the
owner or operator would monitor the
pressure drop across the scrubber and/
or liquid flow rate and pH during the
HCl performance test. If the kiln is
controlled using a dry scrubber, the
sorbent injection rate would be
monitored during the performance test.
Under the second option, the owner or
operator may establish sulfur dioxide
(SO2) as the operating parameter by
measuring SO2 emissions using a CEMS
simultaneously with the Method 321
test and establishing the site-specific
SO2 limit that will be continuously
monitored to determine compliance
with the HCl limit.
The current rule requires that if a
source chooses to monitor HCl
emissions using a CEMS, they must do
so in accordance with PS–15, PS–18, or
any other PS for HCl CEMS in appendix
B to part 60 of this chapter. (See 40 CFR
part 60 appendix B.) Quality assurance
procedures for HCl CEMS require that
they be capable of reading HCl
concentrations that span a range of
possible emission levels below as well
as above expected HCl emission
concentrations. These quality assurance
procedures require the use of National
Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST)-traceable calibration gases for
HCl.
Following our decision to create PS–
18 and Procedure 6 for HCl continuous
monitoring in 2012, the EPA worked
with NIST and commercial gas vendors
on development of NIST-traceable HCl
gas standards to support the PS–18 and
Portland Cement Maximum Achievable
Control Technology (MACT)
rulemaking. While some of the low HCl
concentration (<10 parts per million, or
ppm) NIST-traceable gases have been
available on a limited basis since 2013,
the full range of HCl concentrations
required to support all HCl emissions
monitoring technologies (including
integrated path that requires
concentrations 100 times higher) are not
widely available at this time.
The approach used by NIST in 2013
was to certify the Research Gas Material
(RGM) cylinders as primary gas
standards. These cylinders contain HCl
gas and are provided to NIST by
vendors for NIST certification, and
subsequently used by the vendors as
transfer standards to prepare the Gas
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48357
Manufacturer Intermediate Standards
(GMIS). The GMIS cylinders are then
used to produce NIST-traceable gas
cylinders that are sold commercially.1
The initial approach used by NIST to
certify the RGM cylinders was not
viable in the long term as the
instrumentation used by NIST largely
depleted the HCl RGM gas volume,
leaving little gas in the cylinder for the
vendors to use in preparing GMIS
materials. Because of this concern, NIST
initiated development of an improved
RGM certification procedure. The
development of both the initial and
more recently improved approach has
been hampered by the challenges
presented in handling HCl gas. HCl gas
is extremely reactive and difficult to
handle in both gas cylinders and
analytically. As such, it has taken
considerable time for NIST to optimize
the new analytical equipment and
approach to achieve the necessary
uncertainty requirements (e.g., <1
percent uncertainty).
In addition, the commercial
establishment of NIST-traceable gases is
dependent on collaboration between
NIST and the specialty gas vendors.
There are a limited number of vendors
providing the stable, accurate, low and
high concentration cylinder gases to
NIST to certify as RGMs. NIST is now
receiving a regular supply of candidate
RGM cylinders from these vendors and
is beginning work on higher
concentration HCl gas standards needed
to support integrated path HCl monitors
(IP–CEMS). Once the RGMs are
available, the specialty gas vendors
must complete a series of procedures to
establish the certainty of their products
which adds to the time to achieve wide
commercial availability.
As a result, the EPA is providing, for
a period of 1 year, an additional
compliance alternative for sources that
would otherwise be required to use an
HCl CEMS. In this alternative, the HCl
CEMS is still required to be installed
and operated, but actual compliance
with the HCl emissions limit is
determined by a three run stack test.
The HCl CEMS will still provide a
continuous readout of HCl emissions,
but because the CEMS will not be
calibrated with the required NISTtraceable calibration gases, the HCl
measurement is not considered to be
sufficiently accurate on an absolute
basis for compliance, but would be
sufficient to indicate any relative change
in HCl emissions occurring subsequent
1 EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and
Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Office of
Research and Development, EPA/600/R–12/531,
May 2012.
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
48358
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
to the compliance test. Therefore, the
HCl CEMS under this alternative would
function as a continuous parameter
monitor system (CPMS) as in the case of
the particulate matter (PM) CPMS
requirement (see 78 FR 10014–10015,
10019–10020, February 12, 2013). Based
on conversations with gas vendors and
NIST, we anticipate that NIST-traceable
calibration gases for HCl will be
available in sufficient quantities within
one year of this notice (see J. Ryan,
memo to S. Johnson, Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0817, Status of
NIST-Traceable Hydrogen Chloride
(HCl) Calibration Gases for Use With
HCl Continuous Emissions Monitoring
Systems (CEMS) Under 40 CFR part 63,
subpart LLL, June 22, 2016). Thus, this
alternative will expire on July 25, 2017
and owner/operators must have in place
one of the original HCl compliance
demonstration alternatives (we
anticipate HCl CEMS operated
monitoring equipment according to 40
CFR 63.1350(l)) by this date.
Under this new, temporary
alternative, the owner or operator would
demonstrate initial compliance by
conducting a performance test using
Method 321 and would monitor
compliance with an operating parameter
limit through use of an HCl CPMS. For
the HCl CPMS, the owner operator
would use the average HCl CPMS
indicated output, typically displayed as
parts per million volume, wet basis HCl
recorded at in-stack oxygen
concentration during the HCl
performance test to establish the
operating limit. To determine
continuous compliance with the
operating limit, the owner or operator
would record the indicated HCl CPMS
output data for all periods when the
process is operating and use all the HCl
CPMS data, except data obtained during
times of monitor malfunctions. Thus,
continuous compliance with the
operating limit would be demonstrated
by using all valid hourly average data
collected by the HCl CPMS for all
operating hours to calculate the
arithmetic average operating parameter
in units of the operating limit (indicated
ppm) on a 30-kiln operating day rolling
average basis, updated at the end of
each new kiln operating day. An
exceedance of the kiln 30-day operating
limit would trigger evaluation of the
control system operation and resetting
the operating limit based on a new
correlation with performance testing.
For kilns with inline raw mills,
performance testing and monitoring HCl
to establish the site specific operating
limit must be conducted during both
raw mill on and raw mill off conditions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
As is the case for the PM CPMS
requirements (see 40 CFR
63.1349(b)(1)(i)), this alternative
includes a scaling factor of 75 percent
of the emission standard as a benchmark
(2.25 parts per million volume, dry basis
@ 7-percent oxygen). Sources that
choose this option will conduct a
Method 321 test to determine
compliance with the HCl emissions
standard and during this testing will
also monitor their HCl CPMS output in
indicated ppm to determine where their
HCl CPMS output would intersect 75
percent of their allowed HCl emissions,
and set their operating level at that ppm
output. This scaling procedure
alleviates re-testing concerns for sources
that operate well below the emission
limit and provides greater operational
flexibility while assuring continuous
compliance with the HCl emission
standard. For sources whose Method
321 compliance tests place them at or
above 75 percent of the emission
standard, their operating limit is
determined by the average of three
Method 321 test runs (for sources with
no inline raw mill) or the time weighted
average of six Method 321 test runs (for
kilns with inline raw mills). We believe
that by adopting a scaling factor as well
as the use of 30 days of averaged HCl
CPMS measurements, the parametric
limit in no way imposes a stringency
level higher than the level of the HCl
emissions standard and will avoid
triggering unnecessary retests for many
facilities, especially for the loweremitting sources.
In addition to adding the interim
testing and monitoring provisions for
HCl, we are restoring a recordkeeping
regulatory provision that was deleted
inadvertently during one of the recent
rule revisions. The provision in
question is the former 40 CFR
63.1355(e). This provision relates to the
recordkeeping requirements for clinker
production and kiln feed rates. This
requirement was added in the 2010 final
amendments and was not removed or
revised in subsequent amendments to
the rule. This rulemaking restores this
provision in the regulatory text to
ensure that the regulated community
has a clear understanding of the
applicable compliance requirements.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden under the
PRA. OMB has previously approved the
information collection activities
contained in the existing regulation (40
CFR part 63, subpart RRR) and has
assigned OMB control number 2060–
0416. This action does not change the
information collection requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action does not create any
new requirements or burdens and no
costs are associated with this direct final
action.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. It will neither impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
federally recognized tribal governments,
nor preempt tribal law. The EPA is
aware of one tribally owned Portland
cement facility currently subject to 40
CFR part 63, subpart LLL that will be
subject to this direct final rule.
However, the provisions of this direct
final rule are not expected to impose
new or substantial direct compliance
costs on Tribal governments since the
provisions in this direct final rule are
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
adding an alternative to the HCl
monitoring provisions, adding an option
which provides operational flexibility.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying to those regulatory
actions that concern environmental
health or safety risks that the EPA has
reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations, or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Jkt 238001
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart LLL—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for the Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry
2. Section 63.1349 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(6)(v) to read as
follows:
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
17:30 Jul 22, 2016
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency is amending title 40, chapter I,
part 63 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) as follows:
■
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: July 14, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
§ 63.1349 Performance testing
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(v) As an alternative to paragraph
(b)(6)(ii) of this section, the owner or
operator may demonstrate initial
compliance by conducting a
performance test using Method 321 of
appendix A to this part. You must also
monitor continuous performance
through use of an HCl CPMS according
to paragraphs (b)(6)(v)(A) through (H) of
this section. For kilns with inline raw
mills, compliance testing and
monitoring HCl to establish the site
specific operating limit must be
conducted during both raw mill on and
raw mill off conditions.
(A) For your HCl CPMS, you must
establish a 30 kiln operating day sitespecific operating limit. If your HCl
performance test demonstrates your HCl
emission levels to be less than 75
percent of your emission limit (2.25
ppmvd @7% O2), you must use the time
weighted average HCl CPMS indicated
value recorded during the HCl
compliance test (typically measured as
ppmvw HCl at stack O2 concentration,
but a dry, oxygen corrected value would
also suffice), your HCl instrument zero
output value, and the time weighted
average HCl result of your compliance
test to establish your operating limit. If
your HCl compliance test demonstrates
your HCl emission levels to be at or
above 75 percent of your emission limit
(2.25 ppmvd @7% O2), you must use the
time weighted average HCl CPMS
indicated value recorded during the HCl
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48359
compliance test as your operating limit.
You must use the HCl CPMS indicated
signal data to demonstrate continuous
compliance with your operating limit.
(1) Your HCl CPMS must provide a
ppm HCl concentration output and the
establishment of its relationship to
manual reference method measurements
must be determined in units of
indicated ppm. The instrument signal
may be in ppmvw or ppmvd and the
signal may be a measurement of HCl at
in-stack concentration or a corrected
oxygen concentration. Once the
relationship between the indicated
output of the HCl CPMS and the
reference method test results is
established, the HCl CPMS instrument
measurement basis (ppmvw or ppmvd,
or oxygen correction basis) must not be
altered. Likewise, any setting that
impacts the HCl CPMS indicated HCl
response must remain fixed after the
site-specific operating limit is set.
(2) Your HCl CPMS operating range
must be capable of reading HCl
concentrations from zero to a level
equivalent to 125 percent of the highest
expected value during mill off
operation. If your HCl CPMS is an autoranging instrument capable of multiple
scales, the primary range of the
instrument must be capable of reading
an indicated HCl concentration from
zero to 10 ppm.
(3) During the initial performance test
of a kiln with an inline raw mill, or any
such subsequent performance test that
demonstrates compliance with the HCl
limit, record and average the indicated
ppm HCl output values from the HCl
CPMS for each of the six periods
corresponding to the compliance test
runs (e.g., average each of your HCl
CPMS output values for six
corresponding Method 321 test runs).
With the average values of the six test
runs, calculate the average of the three
mill on test runs and the average of the
three mill off test runs. Calculate the
time weighted result using the average
of the three mill on tests and the average
of the three mill off tests and the
previous annual ratio of mill on/mill off
operations. Kilns without an inline raw
mill will conduct three compliance tests
and calculate the average monitor
output values corresponding to these
three test runs and not use time
weighted values to determine their site
specific operating limit.
(B) Determine your operating limit as
specified in paragraphs (b)(6)(i) or (iii)
of this section. If your HCl performance
test demonstrates your HCl emission
levels to be below 75 percent of your
emission limit, kilns with inline raw
mills will use the time weighted average
indicated HCl ppm concentration CPMS
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
48360
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
value recorded during the HCl
compliance test, the zero value output
from your HCl CPMS, and the time
weighted average HCl result of your
compliance test to establish your
operating limit. Kilns without inline
raw mills will not use a time weighted
average value to establish their
operating limit. If your time weighted
HCl compliance test demonstrates your
HCl emission levels to be at or above 75
percent of your emission limit, you will
use the time weighted HCl CPMS
indicated ppm value recorded during
the HCl compliance test to establish
your operating limit. Kilns without
inline raw mills will not use time
weighted compliance test results to
make this determination. You must
verify an existing operating limit or
establish a new operating limit for each
kiln, after each repeated performance
test.
(C) If the average of your three
Method 321 compliance test runs (for
kilns without an inline raw mill) or the
time weighted average of your six
Method 321 compliance test runs (for an
kiln with an inline raw mill) is below
75 percent of your HCl emission limit,
you must calculate an operating limit by
establishing a relationship of the
average HCl CPMS indicated ppm to the
Method 321 test average HCl
concentration using the HCl CPMS
instrument zero, the average HCl CPMS
indicated values corresponding to the
three (for kilns without inline raw mills)
or time weighted HCl CPMS indicated
values corresponding to the six (for
kilns with inline raw mills) compliance
test runs, and the average HCl
concentration (for kilns without raw
mills) or average time weighted HCl
concentration (for kilns with inline raw
mills) from the Method 321 compliance
test with the procedures in paragraphs
(b)(6)(v)(C)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) Determine your HCl CPMS
instrument zero output with one of the
following procedures:
(i) Zero point data for in situ
instruments should be obtained by
removing the instrument from the stack
and monitoring ambient air on a test
bench.
(ii) If neither of the steps in
paragraphs (b)(6)(v)(C)(1)(i) through (ii)
of this section are possible, you must
use a zero output value provided by the
manufacturer.
(2) If your facility does not have an
inline raw mill you will determine your
HCl CPMS indicated average in HCl
ppm, and the average of your
corresponding three HCl compliance
test runs, using equation 11a.
Where:
Xi = The HCl CPMS data points for the three
(or six) runs constituting the
performance test;
Yi = The HCl concentration value for the
three (or six) runs constituting the
performance test; and
n = The number of data points.
and the average of your corresponding
HCl compliance test runs, using
equation 11b. If you have an inline raw
mill, use this same equation to calculate
a second three-test average for your mill
off CPMS and compliance test data.
Yi = The HCl concentration value for the
three runs constituting the mill on OR
mill off performance test; and
n = The number of data points.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(4) With your instrument zero
expressed in ppm, your average HCl
Where:
R = The relative performance test
concentration per indicated ppm for
your HCl CPMS;
Y1 = The average HCl concentration as
ppmvd @7% O2 during the performance
test;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
X1 = The average indicated ppm output from
your HCl CPMS; and
z = The ppm of your instrument zero
determined from paragraph
(b)(6)(v)(C)(1) of this section.
(5) Determine your source specific 30
kiln operating day operating limit using
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
CPMS ppm value, and your HCl
compliance test average, determine a
relationship of performance test HCl (as
ppmvd @7% O2) concentration per HCl
CPMS indicated ppm with Equation
11c.
HC1 CPMS indicated value from
Equation 11c in Equation 11d, below.
This sets your operating limit at the HC1
CPMS output value corresponding to 75
percent of your emission limit.
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
ER25JY16.019 ER25JY16.020
Where:
Xi = The HCl CPMS data points for the three
runs constituting the mill on OR mill off
performance test;
ER25JY16.018
(3) You will determine your HCl
CPMS indicated average in HCl ppm,
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
48361
Where:
Ol = The operating limit for your HCl CPMS
on a 30 kiln operating day average, as
indicated ppm;
L = 3 ppmvd @7% O2;
z = Your instrument zero, determined from
paragraph (b)(6)(v)(C)(1) of this section ;
and
R = The relative performance test
concentration per indicated ppm for
your HCl CPMS, from Equation 11c.
Where:
Oh = Your site specific HCl CPMS operating
limit, in indicated ppm.
Xi = The HCl CPMS data points for all runs
i.
n = The number of data points.
indicated output data for all periods
when the process is operating and use
all the HCl CPMS data for calculations
when the source is not out of control.
You must demonstrate continuous
compliance with the operating limit by
using all quality-assured hourly average
data collected by the HCl CPMS for all
operating hours to calculate the
arithmetic average operating parameter
in units of the operating limit (ppmvw)
on a 30 kiln operating day rolling
average basis, updated at the end of
each new kiln operating day. Use
Equation 11f to determine the 30 kiln
operating day average.
Where:
30 kiln operating day parameter average =
The average indicated value for the
CPMS parameter over the previous 30
days of kiln operation;
Hpvi = The hourly parameter value for hour
i; and
n = The number of valid hourly parameter
values collected over 30 kiln operating
days.
(F) If you exceed the 30 kiln operating
day operating limit, you must evaluate
the control system operation and re-set
the operating limit.
(G) The owner or operator of a kiln
with an inline raw mill and subject to
limitations on HCl emissions must
demonstrate initial compliance by
conducting separate performance tests
while the raw mill is on and while the
raw mill is off. Using the fraction of
time the raw mill is on calculate your
HCl CPMS limit as a weighted average
of the HCl CPMS indicated values
measured during raw mill on and raw
mill off compliance testing using
Equation 11g.
Where:
R = HCl CPMS operating limit;
b = Average indicated HCl CPMS value
during mill on operations, ppm;
t = Fraction of operating time with mill on;
a = Average indicated HCl CPMS value
during mill off operations ppm; and
(1¥t) = Fraction of operating time with mill
off.
■
3. Section 63.1350 is amended by
adding paragraph (l)(4) to read as
follows:
(i) Within 48 hours of the exceedance,
visually inspect the APCD;
(ii) If inspection of the APCD
identifies the cause of the exceedance,
take corrective action as soon as
possible and return the HCl CPMS
measurement to within the established
value; and
(iii) Within 30 days of the exceedance
or at the time of the annual compliance
test, whichever comes first, conduct an
HCl emissions compliance test to
determine compliance with the HCl
emissions limit and to verify or
reestablish the HCl CPMS operating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(4) If you monitor continuous
performance through the use of an HCl
CPMS according to paragraphs
(b)(6)(v)(A) through (H) of § 63.1349, for
any exceedance of the 30 kiln operating
day HCl CPMS average value from the
established operating limit, you must:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
ER25JY16.024
Monitoring requirements.
*
ER25JY16.022 ER25JY16.023
(H) Paragraph (b)(6)(v) of this section
expires on July 25, 2017 at which
time the owner or operator must
demonstrate compliance with
paragraphs (b)(6)(i), (ii), or (iii).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 63.1350
ER25JY16.021
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(E) To determine continuous
compliance with the operating limit,
you must record the HCl CPMS
(D) If the average of your HCl
compliance test runs is at or above 75
percent of your HCl emission limit (2.25
ppmvd@7% O2) you must determine
your operating limit by averaging the
HCl CPMS output corresponding to your
HCl performance test runs that
demonstrate compliance with the
emission limit using Equation 11e.
48362
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
limit within 45 days. You are not
required to conduct additional testing
for any exceedances that occur between
the time of the original exceedance and
the HCl emissions compliance test
required under this paragraph.
(iv) HCl CPMS exceedances leading to
more than four required performance
tests in a 12-month process operating
period (rolling monthly) constitute a
presumptive violation of this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 63.1355 is amended by
adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 63.1355
Recordkeeping requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) You must keep records of the daily
clinker production rates and kiln feed
rates.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–17293 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 5
[ET Docket Nos. 10–236 and 06–155; FCC
16–86]
Radio Experimentation and Market
Trials—Streamlining Rules
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission modifies its rules to permit
program experimental radio licensees
(program licensees) to experiment with
radio frequency (RF)-based medical
devices on certain restricted
frequencies, if the medical device being
tested is designed to comply with
applicable Commission service rules.
Adoption of this proposal facilitates
access to spectrum that can be used
under an experimental program license
to improve the utility of this type of
licensing scheme for those entities
experimenting with RF-based medical
devices, and thereby help to advance
innovation in this area. This action will
result in no harm to any qualified
license applicant or licensee.
DATES: Effective August 24, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rodney Small, Office of Engineering
and Technology, 202–418–2452,
Rodney.Small@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Second
Report and Order, ET Docket No. 10–
236 and 06–155, FCC 16–86, adopted
June 29, 2016, and released June 30,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
2016. The full text of this document is
available for inspection and copying
during normal business hours in the
FCC Reference Center (Room CY–A257),
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554. The complete text of this
document also may be purchased from
the Commission’s copy contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street
SW., Room, CY–B402, Washington, DC
20554. The full text may also be
downloaded at: https://apps.fcc.gov/
edocs_public/Query.do?numberFld=1686&numberFld2=&docket=&dateFld=
&docTitleDesc.
People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
This document does not contain new
or modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public
Law 104–13.
Synopsis
1. In 2013, the Commission
established in the Report and Order in
this proceeding, 78 FR 25137, April 29,
2013, three new kinds of experimental
licenses—including program licenses—
designed to benefit the development of
new technologies and expedite their
introduction to the marketplace. In this
Second Report and Order, the
Commission adopts the proposal set
forth in the Further NPRM, 80 FR 52437,
August 31, 2015, by modifying section
5.303 of its rules for program licenses to
permit experimentation in the restricted
frequency bands for medical devices
that comply with the service rules in
Part 18 (Industrial, Scientific, and
Medical Equipment), Part 95 Subpart H
(Wireless Medical Telemetry Service),
or Part 95 Subpart I (Medical Device
Radiocommunication Service). This rule
change will establish parity between all
qualified medical device manufacturers
and developers—whether they are
health care institutions or medical
device manufacturers—as to permissible
frequencies of operation for conducting
basic research and clinical trials with
RF-based medical devices. Accordingly,
because the Commission finds that the
proposal will serve the public interest
by promoting medical innovation with
no detriment to the public, it adopts that
proposal. Revised section 5.303 of the
rules is set forth at the end of this
summary.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Flexibility Certification
2. The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) 1 requires that agencies prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for noticeand-comment rulemaking proceedings,
unless the agency certifies that ‘‘the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.’’ 2 Modification of section 5.303
of the Commission’s Rules establishes
parity between all qualified medical
device manufacturers as to permissible
frequencies of operation for conducting
basic research and clinical trials with
RF-based medical devices. The
Commission previously determined that
‘‘[t]he entities affected by the proposed
rule change are equipment
manufacturers seeking to test medical
equipment designed to operate in the
restricted frequency bands listed in
section 15.205(a) of the rules, and such
manufacturers are limited in number,’’
and certified that the proposed rules
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The Commission received no
comments that addressed this
determination or that claimed that the
proposal requires additional RFA
analysis. The Commission therefore
certifies that the rule revisions set forth
herein will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Congressional Review Act
3. The Commission will send a copy
of this Second Report and Order in a
report to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
Ordering Clauses
4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that,
pursuant to sections 301 and 303 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 301 and 303, and
§§ 1.1 and 1.425 of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 1.1, 1.425, this Second
Report and Order IS ADOPTED.
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that part
5 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR
part 5, IS AMENDED, as set forth in the
Rule Changes. These revisions will be
effective August 24, 2016.
6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if
no applications for review are timely
filed, this proceeding SHALL BE
TERMINATED and the docket CLOSED.
1 See 5 U.S.C. 604. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq., has been amended by the Contract with
America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law
104–121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of
the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA).
2 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 142 (Monday, July 25, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48356-48362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17293]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0817; FRL-9949-46-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS98
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to amend the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry. This direct
final rule provides, for a period of 1 year, an additional compliance
alternative for sources that would otherwise be required to use an HCl
CEMS to demonstrate compliance with the HCl emissions limit. This
compliance alternative is needed due to the current unavailability of a
calibration gas used for quality assurance purposes. This direct final
rule also restores regulatory text requiring the reporting of clinker
production and kiln feed rates that was deleted inadvertently.
DATES: This rule is effective on September 8, 2016 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives significant adverse comment by August
24, 2016. If the EPA receives significant adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2011-0817, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sharon Nizich, Sector Policies and
Programs Division (D243-02), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina, 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-2825; fax
number: (919) 541-5450; and email address: nizich.sharon@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Organization of This Document. The information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
II. What are the amendments made by this direct final rule?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and do
not anticipate significant adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed
Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we are publishing a separate
document that will serve as the proposed rule to amend the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement
Manufacturing Industry, if EPA receives significant adverse comments on
this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period
on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
If the EPA receives significant adverse comment on all or a
distinct portion of this direct final rule, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that some or
all of this direct final rule will not take effect. We would address
all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed
rule.
B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
Categories and entities potentially regulated by this direct final
rule include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category NAICS Code \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portland cement manufacturing facilities............... 327310
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
direct final rule. To determine whether your facility is affected, you
should examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.1340. If you
have questions regarding the applicability of any aspect of this action
[[Page 48357]]
to a particular entity, consult either the air permitting authority for
the entity or your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR
63.13.
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
Do not submit information containing CBI to the EPA through https://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comments that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comments that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver information
identified as CBI only to the following address: OAQPS Document Control
Officer (C404-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2011-0817.
II. What are the amendments made by this direct final rule?
In response to a concern raised by a stakeholder regarding the
availability of calibration gases for HCl continuous monitoring
compliance, this direct final rule amends 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(6) of the
performance testing requirements for HCl by adding an alternative
method for performance testing. Under the current rule, the owner or
operator of a kiln subject to the emission limits for HCl in 40 CFR
63.1343 may demonstrate compliance by one of the following methods:
An owner or operator of a kiln may demonstrate compliance
by operating a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) meeting
the requirements of performance specification 15 (PS-15), PS-18, or any
other PS for HCl CEMS in appendix B to part 60, with compliance based
on a 30-kiln operating day rolling average.
If the kiln is controlled using a wet scrubber, tray
tower, or dry scrubber, the owner or operator, as an alternative to
using a CEMS, may demonstrate compliance with the HCl limit using one
of two options, described below.
Under both options, a performance test must be conducted by the
owner or operator using Method 321. Under the first option, while
conducting the Method 321 performance test (note Method 321 is the HCl
stack testing performance method required by this rule), the owner or
operator simultaneously measures a control device parameter and
establishes a site-specific parameter limit that will be continuously
monitored to determine compliance. If the kiln is controlled using a
wet scrubber or tray tower, the owner or operator would monitor the
pressure drop across the scrubber and/or liquid flow rate and pH during
the HCl performance test. If the kiln is controlled using a dry
scrubber, the sorbent injection rate would be monitored during the
performance test. Under the second option, the owner or operator may
establish sulfur dioxide (SO2) as the operating parameter by
measuring SO2 emissions using a CEMS simultaneously with the
Method 321 test and establishing the site-specific SO2 limit
that will be continuously monitored to determine compliance with the
HCl limit.
The current rule requires that if a source chooses to monitor HCl
emissions using a CEMS, they must do so in accordance with PS-15, PS-
18, or any other PS for HCl CEMS in appendix B to part 60 of this
chapter. (See 40 CFR part 60 appendix B.) Quality assurance procedures
for HCl CEMS require that they be capable of reading HCl concentrations
that span a range of possible emission levels below as well as above
expected HCl emission concentrations. These quality assurance
procedures require the use of National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST)-traceable calibration gases for HCl.
Following our decision to create PS-18 and Procedure 6 for HCl
continuous monitoring in 2012, the EPA worked with NIST and commercial
gas vendors on development of NIST-traceable HCl gas standards to
support the PS-18 and Portland Cement Maximum Achievable Control
Technology (MACT) rulemaking. While some of the low HCl concentration
(<10 parts per million, or ppm) NIST-traceable gases have been
available on a limited basis since 2013, the full range of HCl
concentrations required to support all HCl emissions monitoring
technologies (including integrated path that requires concentrations
100 times higher) are not widely available at this time.
The approach used by NIST in 2013 was to certify the Research Gas
Material (RGM) cylinders as primary gas standards. These cylinders
contain HCl gas and are provided to NIST by vendors for NIST
certification, and subsequently used by the vendors as transfer
standards to prepare the Gas Manufacturer Intermediate Standards
(GMIS). The GMIS cylinders are then used to produce NIST-traceable gas
cylinders that are sold commercially.\1\ The initial approach used by
NIST to certify the RGM cylinders was not viable in the long term as
the instrumentation used by NIST largely depleted the HCl RGM gas
volume, leaving little gas in the cylinder for the vendors to use in
preparing GMIS materials. Because of this concern, NIST initiated
development of an improved RGM certification procedure. The development
of both the initial and more recently improved approach has been
hampered by the challenges presented in handling HCl gas. HCl gas is
extremely reactive and difficult to handle in both gas cylinders and
analytically. As such, it has taken considerable time for NIST to
optimize the new analytical equipment and approach to achieve the
necessary uncertainty requirements (e.g., <1 percent uncertainty).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of
Gaseous Calibration Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-12/531, May 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the commercial establishment of NIST-traceable gases
is dependent on collaboration between NIST and the specialty gas
vendors. There are a limited number of vendors providing the stable,
accurate, low and high concentration cylinder gases to NIST to certify
as RGMs. NIST is now receiving a regular supply of candidate RGM
cylinders from these vendors and is beginning work on higher
concentration HCl gas standards needed to support integrated path HCl
monitors (IP-CEMS). Once the RGMs are available, the specialty gas
vendors must complete a series of procedures to establish the certainty
of their products which adds to the time to achieve wide commercial
availability.
As a result, the EPA is providing, for a period of 1 year, an
additional compliance alternative for sources that would otherwise be
required to use an HCl CEMS. In this alternative, the HCl CEMS is still
required to be installed and operated, but actual compliance with the
HCl emissions limit is determined by a three run stack test. The HCl
CEMS will still provide a continuous readout of HCl emissions, but
because the CEMS will not be calibrated with the required NIST-
traceable calibration gases, the HCl measurement is not considered to
be sufficiently accurate on an absolute basis for compliance, but would
be sufficient to indicate any relative change in HCl emissions
occurring subsequent
[[Page 48358]]
to the compliance test. Therefore, the HCl CEMS under this alternative
would function as a continuous parameter monitor system (CPMS) as in
the case of the particulate matter (PM) CPMS requirement (see 78 FR
10014-10015, 10019-10020, February 12, 2013). Based on conversations
with gas vendors and NIST, we anticipate that NIST-traceable
calibration gases for HCl will be available in sufficient quantities
within one year of this notice (see J. Ryan, memo to S. Johnson, Docket
ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0817, Status of NIST-Traceable Hydrogen Chloride
(HCl) Calibration Gases for Use With HCl Continuous Emissions
Monitoring Systems (CEMS) Under 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL, June 22,
2016). Thus, this alternative will expire on July 25, 2017 and owner/
operators must have in place one of the original HCl compliance
demonstration alternatives (we anticipate HCl CEMS operated monitoring
equipment according to 40 CFR 63.1350(l)) by this date.
Under this new, temporary alternative, the owner or operator would
demonstrate initial compliance by conducting a performance test using
Method 321 and would monitor compliance with an operating parameter
limit through use of an HCl CPMS. For the HCl CPMS, the owner operator
would use the average HCl CPMS indicated output, typically displayed as
parts per million volume, wet basis HCl recorded at in-stack oxygen
concentration during the HCl performance test to establish the
operating limit. To determine continuous compliance with the operating
limit, the owner or operator would record the indicated HCl CPMS output
data for all periods when the process is operating and use all the HCl
CPMS data, except data obtained during times of monitor malfunctions.
Thus, continuous compliance with the operating limit would be
demonstrated by using all valid hourly average data collected by the
HCl CPMS for all operating hours to calculate the arithmetic average
operating parameter in units of the operating limit (indicated ppm) on
a 30-kiln operating day rolling average basis, updated at the end of
each new kiln operating day. An exceedance of the kiln 30-day operating
limit would trigger evaluation of the control system operation and
resetting the operating limit based on a new correlation with
performance testing. For kilns with inline raw mills, performance
testing and monitoring HCl to establish the site specific operating
limit must be conducted during both raw mill on and raw mill off
conditions.
As is the case for the PM CPMS requirements (see 40 CFR
63.1349(b)(1)(i)), this alternative includes a scaling factor of 75
percent of the emission standard as a benchmark (2.25 parts per million
volume, dry basis @ 7-percent oxygen). Sources that choose this option
will conduct a Method 321 test to determine compliance with the HCl
emissions standard and during this testing will also monitor their HCl
CPMS output in indicated ppm to determine where their HCl CPMS output
would intersect 75 percent of their allowed HCl emissions, and set
their operating level at that ppm output. This scaling procedure
alleviates re-testing concerns for sources that operate well below the
emission limit and provides greater operational flexibility while
assuring continuous compliance with the HCl emission standard. For
sources whose Method 321 compliance tests place them at or above 75
percent of the emission standard, their operating limit is determined
by the average of three Method 321 test runs (for sources with no
inline raw mill) or the time weighted average of six Method 321 test
runs (for kilns with inline raw mills). We believe that by adopting a
scaling factor as well as the use of 30 days of averaged HCl CPMS
measurements, the parametric limit in no way imposes a stringency level
higher than the level of the HCl emissions standard and will avoid
triggering unnecessary retests for many facilities, especially for the
lower-emitting sources.
In addition to adding the interim testing and monitoring provisions
for HCl, we are restoring a recordkeeping regulatory provision that was
deleted inadvertently during one of the recent rule revisions. The
provision in question is the former 40 CFR 63.1355(e). This provision
relates to the recordkeeping requirements for clinker production and
kiln feed rates. This requirement was added in the 2010 final
amendments and was not removed or revised in subsequent amendments to
the rule. This rulemaking restores this provision in the regulatory
text to ensure that the regulated community has a clear understanding
of the applicable compliance requirements.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing regulation (40 CFR part 63,
subpart RRR) and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0416. This action
does not change the information collection requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
does not create any new requirements or burdens and no costs are
associated with this direct final action.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will neither impose substantial direct
compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments, nor
preempt tribal law. The EPA is aware of one tribally owned Portland
cement facility currently subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLL that
will be subject to this direct final rule. However, the provisions of
this direct final rule are not expected to impose new or substantial
direct compliance costs on Tribal governments since the provisions in
this direct final rule are
[[Page 48359]]
adding an alternative to the HCl monitoring provisions, adding an
option which provides operational flexibility. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not affect the level of protection provided to human
health or the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 14, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency is amending title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) as follows:
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart LLL--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry
0
2. Section 63.1349 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(6)(v) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.1349 Performance testing requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(v) As an alternative to paragraph (b)(6)(ii) of this section, the
owner or operator may demonstrate initial compliance by conducting a
performance test using Method 321 of appendix A to this part. You must
also monitor continuous performance through use of an HCl CPMS
according to paragraphs (b)(6)(v)(A) through (H) of this section. For
kilns with inline raw mills, compliance testing and monitoring HCl to
establish the site specific operating limit must be conducted during
both raw mill on and raw mill off conditions.
(A) For your HCl CPMS, you must establish a 30 kiln operating day
site-specific operating limit. If your HCl performance test
demonstrates your HCl emission levels to be less than 75 percent of
your emission limit (2.25 ppmvd @7% O2), you must use the
time weighted average HCl CPMS indicated value recorded during the HCl
compliance test (typically measured as ppmvw HCl at stack O2
concentration, but a dry, oxygen corrected value would also suffice),
your HCl instrument zero output value, and the time weighted average
HCl result of your compliance test to establish your operating limit.
If your HCl compliance test demonstrates your HCl emission levels to be
at or above 75 percent of your emission limit (2.25 ppmvd @7%
O2), you must use the time weighted average HCl CPMS
indicated value recorded during the HCl compliance test as your
operating limit. You must use the HCl CPMS indicated signal data to
demonstrate continuous compliance with your operating limit.
(1) Your HCl CPMS must provide a ppm HCl concentration output and
the establishment of its relationship to manual reference method
measurements must be determined in units of indicated ppm. The
instrument signal may be in ppmvw or ppmvd and the signal may be a
measurement of HCl at in-stack concentration or a corrected oxygen
concentration. Once the relationship between the indicated output of
the HCl CPMS and the reference method test results is established, the
HCl CPMS instrument measurement basis (ppmvw or ppmvd, or oxygen
correction basis) must not be altered. Likewise, any setting that
impacts the HCl CPMS indicated HCl response must remain fixed after the
site-specific operating limit is set.
(2) Your HCl CPMS operating range must be capable of reading HCl
concentrations from zero to a level equivalent to 125 percent of the
highest expected value during mill off operation. If your HCl CPMS is
an auto-ranging instrument capable of multiple scales, the primary
range of the instrument must be capable of reading an indicated HCl
concentration from zero to 10 ppm.
(3) During the initial performance test of a kiln with an inline
raw mill, or any such subsequent performance test that demonstrates
compliance with the HCl limit, record and average the indicated ppm HCl
output values from the HCl CPMS for each of the six periods
corresponding to the compliance test runs (e.g., average each of your
HCl CPMS output values for six corresponding Method 321 test runs).
With the average values of the six test runs, calculate the average of
the three mill on test runs and the average of the three mill off test
runs. Calculate the time weighted result using the average of the three
mill on tests and the average of the three mill off tests and the
previous annual ratio of mill on/mill off operations. Kilns without an
inline raw mill will conduct three compliance tests and calculate the
average monitor output values corresponding to these three test runs
and not use time weighted values to determine their site specific
operating limit.
(B) Determine your operating limit as specified in paragraphs
(b)(6)(i) or (iii) of this section. If your HCl performance test
demonstrates your HCl emission levels to be below 75 percent of your
emission limit, kilns with inline raw mills will use the time weighted
average indicated HCl ppm concentration CPMS
[[Page 48360]]
value recorded during the HCl compliance test, the zero value output
from your HCl CPMS, and the time weighted average HCl result of your
compliance test to establish your operating limit. Kilns without inline
raw mills will not use a time weighted average value to establish their
operating limit. If your time weighted HCl compliance test demonstrates
your HCl emission levels to be at or above 75 percent of your emission
limit, you will use the time weighted HCl CPMS indicated ppm value
recorded during the HCl compliance test to establish your operating
limit. Kilns without inline raw mills will not use time weighted
compliance test results to make this determination. You must verify an
existing operating limit or establish a new operating limit for each
kiln, after each repeated performance test.
(C) If the average of your three Method 321 compliance test runs
(for kilns without an inline raw mill) or the time weighted average of
your six Method 321 compliance test runs (for an kiln with an inline
raw mill) is below 75 percent of your HCl emission limit, you must
calculate an operating limit by establishing a relationship of the
average HCl CPMS indicated ppm to the Method 321 test average HCl
concentration using the HCl CPMS instrument zero, the average HCl CPMS
indicated values corresponding to the three (for kilns without inline
raw mills) or time weighted HCl CPMS indicated values corresponding to
the six (for kilns with inline raw mills) compliance test runs, and the
average HCl concentration (for kilns without raw mills) or average time
weighted HCl concentration (for kilns with inline raw mills) from the
Method 321 compliance test with the procedures in paragraphs
(b)(6)(v)(C)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) Determine your HCl CPMS instrument zero output with one of the
following procedures:
(i) Zero point data for in situ instruments should be obtained by
removing the instrument from the stack and monitoring ambient air on a
test bench.
(ii) If neither of the steps in paragraphs (b)(6)(v)(C)(1)(i)
through (ii) of this section are possible, you must use a zero output
value provided by the manufacturer.
(2) If your facility does not have an inline raw mill you will
determine your HCl CPMS indicated average in HCl ppm, and the average
of your corresponding three HCl compliance test runs, using equation
11a.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25JY16.018
Where:
Xi = The HCl CPMS data points for the three (or six) runs
constituting the performance test;
Yi = The HCl concentration value for the three (or six)
runs constituting the performance test; and
n = The number of data points.
(3) You will determine your HCl CPMS indicated average in HCl ppm,
and the average of your corresponding HCl compliance test runs, using
equation 11b. If you have an inline raw mill, use this same equation to
calculate a second three-test average for your mill off CPMS and
compliance test data.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25JY16.019
Where:
Xi = The HCl CPMS data points for the three runs
constituting the mill on OR mill off performance test;
Yi = The HCl concentration value for the three runs
constituting the mill on OR mill off performance test; and
n = The number of data points.
(4) With your instrument zero expressed in ppm, your average HCl
CPMS ppm value, and your HCl compliance test average, determine a
relationship of performance test HCl (as ppmvd @7% O2)
concentration per HCl CPMS indicated ppm with Equation 11c.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25JY16.020
Where:
R = The relative performance test concentration per indicated ppm
for your HCl CPMS;
Y1 = The average HCl concentration as ppmvd @7%
O2 during the performance test;
X1 = The average indicated ppm output from your HCl CPMS;
and
z = The ppm of your instrument zero determined from paragraph
(b)(6)(v)(C)(1) of this section.
(5) Determine your source specific 30 kiln operating day operating
limit using HC1 CPMS indicated value from Equation 11c in Equation 11d,
below. This sets your operating limit at the HC1 CPMS output value
corresponding to 75 percent of your emission limit.
[[Page 48361]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25JY16.021
Where:
Ol = The operating limit for your HCl CPMS on a 30 kiln
operating day average, as indicated ppm;
L = 3 ppmvd @7% O2;
z = Your instrument zero, determined from paragraph (b)(6)(v)(C)(1)
of this section ; and
R = The relative performance test concentration per indicated ppm
for your HCl CPMS, from Equation 11c.
(D) If the average of your HCl compliance test runs is at or above
75 percent of your HCl emission limit (2.25 ppmvd@7% O2) you
must determine your operating limit by averaging the HCl CPMS output
corresponding to your HCl performance test runs that demonstrate
compliance with the emission limit using Equation 11e.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25JY16.022
Where:
Oh = Your site specific HCl CPMS operating limit, in
indicated ppm.
Xi = The HCl CPMS data points for all runs i.
n = The number of data points.
(E) To determine continuous compliance with the operating limit,
you must record the HCl CPMS indicated output data for all periods when
the process is operating and use all the HCl CPMS data for calculations
when the source is not out of control. You must demonstrate continuous
compliance with the operating limit by using all quality-assured hourly
average data collected by the HCl CPMS for all operating hours to
calculate the arithmetic average operating parameter in units of the
operating limit (ppmvw) on a 30 kiln operating day rolling average
basis, updated at the end of each new kiln operating day. Use Equation
11f to determine the 30 kiln operating day average.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25JY16.023
Where:
30 kiln operating day parameter average = The average indicated
value for the CPMS parameter over the previous 30 days of kiln
operation;
Hpvi = The hourly parameter value for hour i; and
n = The number of valid hourly parameter values collected over 30
kiln operating days.
(F) If you exceed the 30 kiln operating day operating limit, you
must evaluate the control system operation and re-set the operating
limit.
(G) The owner or operator of a kiln with an inline raw mill and
subject to limitations on HCl emissions must demonstrate initial
compliance by conducting separate performance tests while the raw mill
is on and while the raw mill is off. Using the fraction of time the raw
mill is on calculate your HCl CPMS limit as a weighted average of the
HCl CPMS indicated values measured during raw mill on and raw mill off
compliance testing using Equation 11g.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25JY16.024
Where:
R = HCl CPMS operating limit;
b = Average indicated HCl CPMS value during mill on operations, ppm;
t = Fraction of operating time with mill on;
a = Average indicated HCl CPMS value during mill off operations ppm;
and
(1-t) = Fraction of operating time with mill off.
(H) Paragraph (b)(6)(v) of this section expires on July 25, 2017 at
which time the owner or operator must demonstrate compliance with
paragraphs (b)(6)(i), (ii), or (iii).
* * * * *
0
3. Section 63.1350 is amended by adding paragraph (l)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.1350 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(4) If you monitor continuous performance through the use of an HCl
CPMS according to paragraphs (b)(6)(v)(A) through (H) of Sec. 63.1349,
for any exceedance of the 30 kiln operating day HCl CPMS average value
from the established operating limit, you must:
(i) Within 48 hours of the exceedance, visually inspect the APCD;
(ii) If inspection of the APCD identifies the cause of the
exceedance, take corrective action as soon as possible and return the
HCl CPMS measurement to within the established value; and
(iii) Within 30 days of the exceedance or at the time of the annual
compliance test, whichever comes first, conduct an HCl emissions
compliance test to determine compliance with the HCl emissions limit
and to verify or reestablish the HCl CPMS operating
[[Page 48362]]
limit within 45 days. You are not required to conduct additional
testing for any exceedances that occur between the time of the original
exceedance and the HCl emissions compliance test required under this
paragraph.
(iv) HCl CPMS exceedances leading to more than four required
performance tests in a 12-month process operating period (rolling
monthly) constitute a presumptive violation of this subpart.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 63.1355 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.1355 Recordkeeping requirements.
* * * * *
(e) You must keep records of the daily clinker production rates and
kiln feed rates.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-17293 Filed 7-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P