Safety Zone; Hudson River, Edgewater, NJ., 47293-47295 [2016-17332]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone area may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above this
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Jul 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves area
safety zone that would prohibit entry to
unauthorized vessels. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the U.S. Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47293
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231.
2. A new temporary § 165.35T08–0467
is added to read as follows:
■
§ 165.35T08–0467 Safety Zone; Tennessee
River Mile 385.0 to 387.0 Scottsboro, AL.
(a) Location. All waters of the
Tennessee River beginning at mile
marker 385.0 and ending at mile marker
387.0 Scottsboro, AL.
(b) Effective date. This rule is effective
from May 31, 2016 through August 1,
2016.
(c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule
will be enforced from 30 minutes prior
to and 30 minutes after all blasting
operations on the B.B. Comer Bridge.
The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or
a designated representative will inform
the public through Broadcast Notice to
Mariners (BNM), Local Notices to
Mariners (LNM), or through other public
notice and at least 12–24 in advance of
each enforcement period.
(d) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into this area is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Ohio Valley or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the area must
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Ohio Valley or a designated
representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Ohio Valley may be contacted on VHF
Channel 13 or 16, or at 1–800–253–
7465.
Dated: May 31, 2016.
R. V. Timme,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2016–17333 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0648]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Hudson River, Edgewater,
NJ.
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
47294
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the waters of the Hudson River in the
vicinity of Edgewater, NJ. This zone is
intended to restrict vessels from a
portion of the Hudson River due to the
presence of a dielectric oil leak from a
submerged power cable, and the hazards
associated with the cable repair vessels.
This temporary safety zone is necessary
to protect people and vessels from the
hazards associated with this event.
Entry of vessels or persons into this
zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
New York.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from July 21, 2016 through
July 10, 2017. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from July 10, 2016 through July 21,
2016.
SUMMARY:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0648 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST1 Kristina Pundt, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector New York; telephone 718–354–
4352, email Kristina.H.Pundt@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On January 2, 2016, the Coast Guard
received notification of a dielectric oil
release from a submerged power cable
in the Hudson River in the vicinity
Edgewater, NJ. In response, on February
5, 2016, the Coast Guard published a
temporary final rule at 33 CFR 165–
T01.0028 (81 FR 246181) establishing a
safety zone to be enforced until July 9,
2016 or until completion of cleanup and
cable repairs. On May 29, 2016, the
Coast Guard received notification that
cleanup operations and cable repairs
were completed. The Coast Guard
received notification of another
dielectric oil release from a submerged
power cable in the Hudson River in the
vicinity of Edgewater, NJ on June 28,
2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Jul 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable. Waiting for
a notice and comment period to run
would inhibit the Coast Guard from
protecting the public and vessels from
the possible hazards associated with
this dielectric oil leak and the hazards
associated with the cable repairs.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making it
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For
the same reasons as discussed in the
preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30
day notice and comment period to run
would be impracticable.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Captain of the Port New York (COTP)
has determined that a temporary safety
zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels from the hazards associated with
this dielectric oil leak and power cable
repairs.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from July 10, 2016 through July 10,
2017. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters of the Hudson River
extending 1700 feet from the New Jersey
shoreline and approximately 460 feet on
either side of the charted power cable
between Edgewater, NJ and W 110th
Street, Manhattan, NY.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative. Vessel
operators must contact the COTP or an
on-scene representative to obtain
permission to transit through this safety
zone. The COTP or an on-scene
representative may be contacted by VHF
Channel 16.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
based on a number of these statutes and
executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, and will
not adversely alter the budget of any
grant or loan recipients. Vessel traffic
will be able to safely transit around this
safety zone. This safety zone only affects
a small-designated area of the Hudson
River waterway. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 and publish the information in the
Local Notice to Mariners.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Jul 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone that will
prohibit entry within the dielectric oil
spill, cleanup, and power cable repair
area, and is therefore categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination
will be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
§ 165.T01–0648 Safety Zone: Hudson
River, Edgewater, NJ.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All U.S.
navigable waters of the Hudson River
bound by the following points:
40°48′40.088″ N., 073°58′53.026″ W.;
thence to 40°48′34.267″ N.,
073°58′37.096″ W.; thence to
40°48′26.404″ N., 073°58′42.270″ W.;
thence to 40°48′33.882″ N.,
073°59′01.955″ W., thence along the
western shoreline to the point of origin.
All coordinates are based on the NAD
83.
(b) Enforcement period. The safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced from July 10,
2016 through July 10, 2017, unless
terminated sooner by the COTP.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR
165.23, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
COTP or a designated on scene
representative.
(3) An ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the COTP is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
or a Federal, State or local law
enforcement officer designated by or
assisting the COTP to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators must contact the
COTP via the Command Center to
obtain permission to enter or operate
within the safety zone. The COTP may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at
(718) 354–4353. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate within
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP,
via the Command Center or an on-scene
representative.
Dated: July 8, 2016.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2016–17332 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0648 to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
47295
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47293-47295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17332]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0648]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Hudson River, Edgewater, NJ.
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 47294]]
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
waters of the Hudson River in the vicinity of Edgewater, NJ. This zone
is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of the Hudson River due
to the presence of a dielectric oil leak from a submerged power cable,
and the hazards associated with the cable repair vessels. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to protect people and vessels from
the hazards associated with this event. Entry of vessels or persons
into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port New York.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from July 21, 2016
through July 10, 2017. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from July 10, 2016 through July 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0648 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST1 Kristina Pundt, Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector New York; telephone 718-354-4352, email
Kristina.H.Pundt@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On January 2, 2016, the Coast Guard received notification of a
dielectric oil release from a submerged power cable in the Hudson River
in the vicinity Edgewater, NJ. In response, on February 5, 2016, the
Coast Guard published a temporary final rule at 33 CFR 165-T01.0028 (81
FR 246181) establishing a safety zone to be enforced until July 9, 2016
or until completion of cleanup and cable repairs. On May 29, 2016, the
Coast Guard received notification that cleanup operations and cable
repairs were completed. The Coast Guard received notification of
another dielectric oil release from a submerged power cable in the
Hudson River in the vicinity of Edgewater, NJ on June 28, 2016.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable.
Waiting for a notice and comment period to run would inhibit the Coast
Guard from protecting the public and vessels from the possible hazards
associated with this dielectric oil leak and the hazards associated
with the cable repairs.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons as
discussed in the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice and
comment period to run would be impracticable.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port New York (COTP) has determined that a
temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of vessels from
the hazards associated with this dielectric oil leak and power cable
repairs.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from July 10, 2016 through July
10, 2017. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters of the Hudson
River extending 1700 feet from the New Jersey shoreline and
approximately 460 feet on either side of the charted power cable
between Edgewater, NJ and W 110th Street, Manhattan, NY.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative. Vessel operators must contact the COTP or an on-scene
representative to obtain permission to transit through this safety
zone. The COTP or an on-scene representative may be contacted by VHF
Channel 16.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, and will not adversely alter
the budget of any grant or loan recipients. Vessel traffic will be able
to safely transit around this safety zone. This safety zone only
affects a small-designated area of the Hudson River waterway. Moreover,
the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM
marine channel 16 and publish the information in the Local Notice to
Mariners.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for
[[Page 47295]]
compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves the establishment of a safety zone that will prohibit
entry within the dielectric oil spill, cleanup, and power cable repair
area, and is therefore categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0648 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0648 Safety Zone: Hudson River, Edgewater, NJ.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
U.S. navigable waters of the Hudson River bound by the following
points: 40[deg]48'40.088'' N., 073[deg]58'53.026'' W.; thence to
40[deg]48'34.267'' N., 073[deg]58'37.096'' W.; thence to
40[deg]48'26.404'' N., 073[deg]58'42.270'' W.; thence to
40[deg]48'33.882'' N., 073[deg]59'01.955'' W., thence along the western
shoreline to the point of origin. All coordinates are based on the NAD
83.
(b) Enforcement period. The safety zone described in paragraph (a)
of this section will be enforced from July 10, 2016 through July 10,
2017, unless terminated sooner by the COTP.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
33 CFR 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated on
scene representative.
(3) An ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer or a Federal, State or local law
enforcement officer designated by or assisting the COTP to act on his
behalf.
(4) Vessel operators must contact the COTP via the Command Center
to obtain permission to enter or operate within the safety zone. The
COTP may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at (718) 354-4353. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or operate within the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP, via the
Command Center or an on-scene representative.
Dated: July 8, 2016.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2016-17332 Filed 7-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P