Draft Outline for the Proposed Joint U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid Strategy, 47160-47162 [2016-17133]
Download as PDF
47160
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Notices
Issued at Washington, DC, on July 14,
2016.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–17128 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Draft Outline for the Proposed Joint
U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid Strategy
Office of Electricity Delivery
and Energy Reliability, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
With this notice, the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) seeks
public comment on the proposed
content and scope of the Joint U.S.Canadian Electric Grid Strategy as
indicated by the draft outline presented
here.
DOE seeks public comment including
the following: (1) Suggestions for how
best to describe the cyber and physical
risks to electric grid systems, as well as
ways to address and mitigate those
risks; (2) suggestions for ensuring that
the outlined strategic goals and
objectives are at the appropriate level
for a joint U.S.-Canadian strategy; (3)
suggestions for actions under the
proposed joint strategy that Federal
departments and agencies should take to
make the grid more secure and resilient;
(4) suggestions for new ways to secure
the future grid across North America, as
outlined in the final section; and (5)
suggestions for timelines to use when
considering future planning and
investment opportunities.
Supplementary background
information, additional details, and
instructions for submitting comments
can be found below.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments can be submitted
by either of the following methods and
must be identified as ‘‘Joint Strategy.’’
By email: jointgridstrategy@hq.doe.gov.
Include ‘‘Joint Strategy’’ in subject line
of the message. Submitters may enter
text or upload files in response to this
notice. By mail: Stewart Cedres, Office
of Electricity Delivery & Energy
Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy,
Forrestal Building, Room 6E–092, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. Note: Delivery
of the U.S. Postal Service mail to DOE
may be delayed by several weeks due to
security screening. DOE, therefore,
encourages those wishing to comment to
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Jul 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
submit comments electronically by
email.
Instructions: Response to this Request
for Comment is voluntary. Respondents
need not reply to all questions or topics;
however, they should clearly indicate
the question or topic to which they are
responding. Responses may be used by
the U.S. Government for program
planning on a non-attribution basis.
DOE therefore requests that no business
proprietary information or copyrighted
information be submitted in response to
this Request for Comment. Please note
that the U.S. Government will not pay
for response preparation, or for the use
of any information contained in the
response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Stewart Cedres,
Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy
Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, 202–586–2066,
jointgridstrategy@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the
March 2016 visit by Canadian Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau, in the ‘‘U.S.Canada Joint Statement on Climate,
Energy, and Arctic Leadership,’’ the
U.S. and Canada agreed to ‘‘[d]evelop a
joint U.S.-Canadian strategy for
strengthening the security and resilience
of the North American electricity grid
[and] work together to strengthen the
security and resilience of the electric
grid, including against the growing
threat from cyber-attacks and climate
change impacts.’’ The Departments of
Energy and Homeland Security are coleading an interagency effort, including
our Canadian colleagues, to develop this
proposed joint strategy.
As a first step, Federal interagency
writing teams have developed an
outline for the proposed joint strategy
that consists of three overarching
strategic goals and objectives in support
of achieving those goals. The purpose of
the draft outline is to give the public an
initial view of potential goals,
objectives, and actions that could be
taken to strengthen the security and
resilience of the electric grid. In
developing the outline, the writing
teams used a ‘‘baseline’’ document
consisting of analytical work that
supports both the development of this
proposed strategy and the next iteration
of the Quadrennial Energy Review.
DOE will collate public comments
received on the outline. The comments
will inform the preparation of the full
draft joint strategy and accompanying
action plan, which is scheduled to be
released in December 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments are sought on the proposed
overarching outline that will frame the
joint strategy. Additional suggestions
will be reviewed as they relate to the
proposed structure of the document.
Following is a proposed high-level
and draft outline intended to guide the
scope and content of the Joint U.S.Canadian Electric Grid Strategy. DOE
seeks public comments on all aspects of
this draft outline. The proposed outline
is presented here in five parts: (1)
Introduction and Context for the Joint
U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid Strategy; (2)
Goal 1: Protect Today’s Grid and
Enhance Preparedness; (3) Goal 2:
Manage Contingencies and Enhance
Response and Recovery; (4) Goal 3:
Build a More Secure and Resilient
Future Grid; and (5) Conclusion.
1. Introduction and Context for the
Joint U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid
Strategy
The introductory and context-setting
sections of the joint strategy will
describe the context for the joint
strategy.
2. Goal 1: Protect Today’s Grid and
Enhance Preparedness
This section will outline
opportunities to avoid, deter, and
mitigate risks before they impact the
grid. This includes information sharing
between and among owners, operators,
public, private and third-party
participants whose protection of critical
assets would benefit from actionable
threat and hazard information and
would provide information utilization
for prudent and efficient security
investments. This section will also
highlight the importance of coordinating
ongoing law enforcement, emergency
management, reliability coordination,
and monitoring and detection activities,
the practice of which will improve
protection capabilities.
This section will also address the
method of preparedness that identifies
can’t-lose aspects of the system to
mitigate the outer limit of tolerable
impacts to the grid. This section will
address major isolated as well as
potentially cascading events that create
out-and-out system failure or balloon
into major regional or multi-system
impacts. This section will examine how
to create necessary incentives and
investments to engage the protective
measures for outlier events. The section
will close by examining the electric
grid’s interdependencies with other
critical systems and functions of the
nations’ economies and societies. Given
our economic and social reliance on
electricity, the strategy will identify the
importance of securing the grid in the
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Notices
broader context of our joint and
domestic national security goals.
Æ Objective 1. Enhance Information
Sharing
i. Enhance information sharing
between government and industry.
ii. Build organizational capacity to
improve government, and industry
information sharing and support to
improve management of risk critical to
the success of business mission and
goals.
Æ Objective 2. Develop and Coordinate
Existing Forensic and Law Enforcement
Capabilities
i. Improve tools, processes, and
coordination among relevant
government entities and industries for
monitoring, detecting, analyzing,
reporting, defending and mitigating
threats to the electric grid.
will highlight the importance of
adaptation through recovery and
rebuilding efforts, restoring capabilities
through smarter, more efficient, and
forward-looking solutions.
Æ Objective 1. Improve Emergency
Response and Continuity
i. Enhance public and private
resources for response to and recovery
from major loss-of-power events.
Æ Objective 2. Develop or Enhance
Mutual Assistance for Physical and
Cyber Threats
i. Foster robust mutual assistance
programs for physical grid assets, and
develop a cybersecurity mutual
assistance program.
Æ Objective 3. Identify Dependencies
and Supply Chain Needs During an
Emergency
Æ Objective 3. Deter Major Isolated and
Cascading Events
i. Address effects from power outages,
such as loss of services.
i. Protect critical assets from relevant
adversarial, natural, and technological
threats to prevent and mitigate power
loss and system failure.
ii. Develop guiding principles for
automatic and manual means of
preventing cascading blackouts (System
Operations).
Æ Objective 4. Recover and Rebuild
Æ Objective 4. Align Standards,
Incentives and Investment with Security
Goals
i. Align utility incentives for planning
and investment with regulatory
processes and tools for prudent cost
recovery, including tools for security
valuation.
Æ Objective 5. Understand and Mitigate
Vulnerabilities From Interdependencies
With Other Critical Infrastructures
i. Mitigate and reduce security risks/
vulnerabilities caused by
interdependence between grid
technologies and other infrastructures,
including telecom, water, and natural
gas.
ii. Identify and manage impacts to
other critical societal functions (e.g.,
defense).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
3. Goal 2: Manage Contingencies and
Enhance Response and Recovery Efforts
This section will address response
and recovery options during and after
an incident, examining public and
private resources available, including
through mutual assistance efforts for
physical and cyber capabilities. This
section will also highlight the
complexity and potential issues with
supply chains, which are compounded
in an emergency. Finally, this section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Jul 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
i. Adapt via recovery to result in more
resilient investments, practices and
processes.
4. Goal 3: Build a More Secure and
Resilient Future Grid
The final section of the strategy will
take on the challenge and opportunities
to adapting through recovery efforts,
underscoring the end-goal of grid
resilience. The first part of the final
section will explore post-incident
actions in the context of evolving grid
design, technologies, and a changing
climate (that is, the potential impact of
more frequent and severe natural
disasters). The first part of this section
will also address the opportunities to
develop and advance the deployment of
tools and technologies to address the
security vulnerabilities addressed in
this strategy.
The second part of this final section
will outline opportunities to integrate
security and resilience into planning,
investment, regulatory- and policydecision making for joint, cross-border
security goals. This includes enhancing
modeling and risk analysis capabilities
to characterize vulnerabilities for
decision-making and investments,
suggesting ways to align utility and
market incentives, and addressing
workforce risks and opportunities for
evolving technical knowledge needs.
Finally, this section will point to the
importance of pursuing optimal
domestic security goals to coordinate
cross-border where possible, and noting
where domestic-specific goals do not
lend themselves to joint coordination.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47161
Æ Objective 1. Understand and Manage
New and Evolving Risks From Grid
Technologies and Grid Design
i. Identify, understand, and, to the
extent possible, neutralize emerging
threats (including through supply
chains).
ii. Ensure that continued integration
of grid and IT infrastructures accounts
for the security benefits and challenges
of that enhanced integration.
iii. Meet national security goals in a
changing climate and energy landscape.
D Improve preparedness in the
context of increased natural disaster
intensity and frequency and
D Integrate security considerations
into energy policy making, as well as
utility and project planning, design, and
implementation.
Æ Objective 2. Develop and Deploy
Security and Resilience Tools and
Technologies
i. Ensure that the technological and
institutional and architectural evolution
of the grid enhances security and
resilience.
ii. Be resilient to, and secure against,
a range of grid threats.
iii. Coordinate with industry and
operator practices to detect and mitigate
grid anomalies quickly and effectively.
Æ Objective 3. Integrate Security and
Resilience Into Planning, Investment,
Regulatory- and Policy-Decision
Making, and Coordinate Cross-Border
Grid Integration Between the United
States and Canada
i. Enhance modeling and risk analysis
capabilities to better characterize grid
vulnerabilities, understand impacts of
loss-of-power events, and support riskinformed decisions, including
investments.
ii. Align utility and market participant
incentives for planning and investment
with regulatory processes and tools for
prudent cost recovery, including tools
for security valuation.
iii. Continue to pursue optimal
domestic planning, investment,
regulatory- and policy-decision making
for security and resilience, noting where
domestic-specific approach do not lend
themselves to joint coordination.
iv. Address the need to reinforce
existing and develop new workforce
capabilities.
5. Conclusion
The conclusion of the strategy will
summarize major findings and highlight
the way forward.
DOE seeks public comments on all of
the draft outline sections described
above for the Joint U.S.-Canadian
Electric Grid Strategy.
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
47162
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Notices
Authority: Presidential Policy Directive
21—Critical Infrastructure Security and
Resilience (PPD–21), Presidential Policy
Directive 8—National Preparedness (PPD–8),
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
(FAST) Act (Pub. L. 114–94) and Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance (Stafford) Act (Pub. L. 93–288) as
amended.
Issued at Washington, DC on July 14, 2016.
Patricia A. Hoffman,
Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2016–17133 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Issued in Washington, DC on July 14, 2016.
Christopher Lawrence,
Electricity Policy Analyst, Office of Electricity
Delivery and Energy Reliability.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Certification Notice—241]
Notice of Filing of Self-Certification of
Coal Capability Under the Powerplant
and Industrial Fuel Use Act
Office of Electricity Delivery
and Energy Reliability, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of filing.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Jul 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2016–17142 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
On June 30, 2016, C4GT, LLC,
as owner and operator of a new baseload
electric generating powerplant,
submitted a coal capability selfcertification to the Department of
Energy (DOE) pursuant to the
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act
of 1978 (FUA), as amended, and DOE
regulations. FUA and regulations
thereunder require DOE to publish a
notice of filing of self-certification in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of coal capability
self-certification filings are available for
public inspection, upon request, in the
Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability, Mail Code OE–20, Room
8G–024, Forrestal Building, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Lawrence at (202) 586–
5260.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of
FUA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 et
seq.), provides that no new base load
electric powerplant may be constructed
or operated without the capability to use
coal or another alternate fuel as a
primary energy source. Pursuant to FUA
in order to meet the requirement of coal
capability, the owner or operator of such
a facility proposing to use natural gas or
petroleum as its primary energy source
shall certify to the Secretary of Energy
(Secretary) prior to construction, or
prior to operation as a base load electric
powerplant, that such powerplant has
the capability to use coal or another
alternate fuel. Such certification
SUMMARY:
establishes compliance with FUA
section 201(a) as of the date it is filed
with the Secretary. 42 U.S.C. 8311.
The following owner of a proposed
new baseload electric generating
powerplant has filed a self-certification
of coal-capability with DOE pursuant to
FUA section 201(d) and in accordance
with DOE regulations in 10 CFR 501.60,
61:
OWNER: C4GT, LLC,
CAPACITY: 1060 megawatts (MW)
PLANT LOCATION: Near Roxbury, VA
off of VA106
IN–SERVICE DATE: Second quarter
2020
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #2
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER12–2302–005.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: Compliance filing: 2016–
07–14_SSR 2016 Revisions Follow-Up
Compliance Filing to be effective 9/24/
2012.
Filed Date: 7/14/16.
Accession Number: 20160714–5045.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/4/16.
Docket Numbers: ER13–1896–010;
ER14–594–008.
Applicants: AEP Generation
Resources Inc., Ohio Power Company.
Description: Notice of change in status
of AEP Generation Resources Inc. and
Ohio Power Company, et al.
Filed Date: 5/27/16.
Accession Number: 20160527–5263.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/4/16.
Docket Numbers: ER16–2193–000.
Applicants: PacifiCorp.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Georgia-Pacific Construction
Agreement—Camas to be effective 9/13/
2016.
Filed Date: 7/14/16.
Accession Number: 20160714–5072.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/4/16.
Docket Numbers: ER16–2195–000.
Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
Description: Notice of Termination of
Service Agreement Nos. 13 and 14 of
Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Filed Date: 7/14/16.
Accession Number: 20160714–5089.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/4/16.
Docket Numbers: ER16–2196–000.
Applicants: Alabama Power
Company.
Description: Tariff Cancellation: GCL
Lincoln Power SGIA Termination Filing
to be effective 7/1/2016.
Filed Date: 7/14/16.
Accession Number: 20160714–5091.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/4/16.
Docket Numbers: ER16–2197–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Service Agreement No. 3831, Queue
Position Z1–072 to be effective 6/14/
2016.
Filed Date: 7/14/16.
Accession Number: 20160714–5108.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/4/16.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following qualifying
facility filings:
Docket Numbers: QF16–1046–000.
Applicants: Tate & Lyle Ingredients
Americas LLC.
Description: Form 556 of Tate & Lyle
Ingredients Americas LLC.
Filed Date: 7/13/16.
Accession Number: 20160713–5102.
Comments Due: None Applicable.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: July 14, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–17105 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47160-47162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17133]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Draft Outline for the Proposed Joint U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid
Strategy
AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability,
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With this notice, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) seeks
public comment on the proposed content and scope of the Joint U.S.-
Canadian Electric Grid Strategy as indicated by the draft outline
presented here.
DOE seeks public comment including the following: (1) Suggestions
for how best to describe the cyber and physical risks to electric grid
systems, as well as ways to address and mitigate those risks; (2)
suggestions for ensuring that the outlined strategic goals and
objectives are at the appropriate level for a joint U.S.-Canadian
strategy; (3) suggestions for actions under the proposed joint strategy
that Federal departments and agencies should take to make the grid more
secure and resilient; (4) suggestions for new ways to secure the future
grid across North America, as outlined in the final section; and (5)
suggestions for timelines to use when considering future planning and
investment opportunities.
Supplementary background information, additional details, and
instructions for submitting comments can be found below.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments can be submitted by either of the following methods
and must be identified as ``Joint Strategy.'' By email:
jointgridstrategy@hq.doe.gov. Include ``Joint Strategy'' in subject
line of the message. Submitters may enter text or upload files in
response to this notice. By mail: Stewart Cedres, Office of Electricity
Delivery & Energy Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal
Building, Room 6E-092, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20585. Note: Delivery of the U.S. Postal Service mail to DOE may be
delayed by several weeks due to security screening. DOE, therefore,
encourages those wishing to comment to submit comments electronically
by email.
Instructions: Response to this Request for Comment is voluntary.
Respondents need not reply to all questions or topics; however, they
should clearly indicate the question or topic to which they are
responding. Responses may be used by the U.S. Government for program
planning on a non-attribution basis. DOE therefore requests that no
business proprietary information or copyrighted information be
submitted in response to this Request for Comment. Please note that the
U.S. Government will not pay for response preparation, or for the use
of any information contained in the response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Stewart Cedres, Office of Electricity Delivery &
Energy Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585, 202-586-2066, jointgridstrategy@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the March 2016 visit by Canadian
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in the ``U.S.-Canada Joint Statement on
Climate, Energy, and Arctic Leadership,'' the U.S. and Canada agreed to
``[d]evelop a joint U.S.-Canadian strategy for strengthening the
security and resilience of the North American electricity grid [and]
work together to strengthen the security and resilience of the electric
grid, including against the growing threat from cyber-attacks and
climate change impacts.'' The Departments of Energy and Homeland
Security are co-leading an interagency effort, including our Canadian
colleagues, to develop this proposed joint strategy.
As a first step, Federal interagency writing teams have developed
an outline for the proposed joint strategy that consists of three
overarching strategic goals and objectives in support of achieving
those goals. The purpose of the draft outline is to give the public an
initial view of potential goals, objectives, and actions that could be
taken to strengthen the security and resilience of the electric grid.
In developing the outline, the writing teams used a ``baseline''
document consisting of analytical work that supports both the
development of this proposed strategy and the next iteration of the
Quadrennial Energy Review.
DOE will collate public comments received on the outline. The
comments will inform the preparation of the full draft joint strategy
and accompanying action plan, which is scheduled to be released in
December 2016.
Comments are sought on the proposed overarching outline that will
frame the joint strategy. Additional suggestions will be reviewed as
they relate to the proposed structure of the document.
Following is a proposed high-level and draft outline intended to
guide the scope and content of the Joint U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid
Strategy. DOE seeks public comments on all aspects of this draft
outline. The proposed outline is presented here in five parts: (1)
Introduction and Context for the Joint U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid
Strategy; (2) Goal 1: Protect Today's Grid and Enhance Preparedness;
(3) Goal 2: Manage Contingencies and Enhance Response and Recovery; (4)
Goal 3: Build a More Secure and Resilient Future Grid; and (5)
Conclusion.
1. Introduction and Context for the Joint U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid
Strategy
The introductory and context-setting sections of the joint strategy
will describe the context for the joint strategy.
2. Goal 1: Protect Today's Grid and Enhance Preparedness
This section will outline opportunities to avoid, deter, and
mitigate risks before they impact the grid. This includes information
sharing between and among owners, operators, public, private and third-
party participants whose protection of critical assets would benefit
from actionable threat and hazard information and would provide
information utilization for prudent and efficient security investments.
This section will also highlight the importance of coordinating ongoing
law enforcement, emergency management, reliability coordination, and
monitoring and detection activities, the practice of which will improve
protection capabilities.
This section will also address the method of preparedness that
identifies can't-lose aspects of the system to mitigate the outer limit
of tolerable impacts to the grid. This section will address major
isolated as well as potentially cascading events that create out-and-
out system failure or balloon into major regional or multi-system
impacts. This section will examine how to create necessary incentives
and investments to engage the protective measures for outlier events.
The section will close by examining the electric grid's
interdependencies with other critical systems and functions of the
nations' economies and societies. Given our economic and social
reliance on electricity, the strategy will identify the importance of
securing the grid in the
[[Page 47161]]
broader context of our joint and domestic national security goals.
[cir] Objective 1. Enhance Information Sharing
i. Enhance information sharing between government and industry.
ii. Build organizational capacity to improve government, and
industry information sharing and support to improve management of risk
critical to the success of business mission and goals.
[cir] Objective 2. Develop and Coordinate Existing Forensic and Law
Enforcement Capabilities
i. Improve tools, processes, and coordination among relevant
government entities and industries for monitoring, detecting,
analyzing, reporting, defending and mitigating threats to the electric
grid.
[cir] Objective 3. Deter Major Isolated and Cascading Events
i. Protect critical assets from relevant adversarial, natural, and
technological threats to prevent and mitigate power loss and system
failure.
ii. Develop guiding principles for automatic and manual means of
preventing cascading blackouts (System Operations).
[cir] Objective 4. Align Standards, Incentives and Investment with
Security Goals
i. Align utility incentives for planning and investment with
regulatory processes and tools for prudent cost recovery, including
tools for security valuation.
[cir] Objective 5. Understand and Mitigate Vulnerabilities From
Interdependencies With Other Critical Infrastructures
i. Mitigate and reduce security risks/vulnerabilities caused by
interdependence between grid technologies and other infrastructures,
including telecom, water, and natural gas.
ii. Identify and manage impacts to other critical societal
functions (e.g., defense).
3. Goal 2: Manage Contingencies and Enhance Response and Recovery
Efforts
This section will address response and recovery options during and
after an incident, examining public and private resources available,
including through mutual assistance efforts for physical and cyber
capabilities. This section will also highlight the complexity and
potential issues with supply chains, which are compounded in an
emergency. Finally, this section will highlight the importance of
adaptation through recovery and rebuilding efforts, restoring
capabilities through smarter, more efficient, and forward-looking
solutions.
[cir] Objective 1. Improve Emergency Response and Continuity
i. Enhance public and private resources for response to and
recovery from major loss-of-power events.
[cir] Objective 2. Develop or Enhance Mutual Assistance for Physical
and Cyber Threats
i. Foster robust mutual assistance programs for physical grid
assets, and develop a cybersecurity mutual assistance program.
[cir] Objective 3. Identify Dependencies and Supply Chain Needs During
an Emergency
i. Address effects from power outages, such as loss of services.
[cir] Objective 4. Recover and Rebuild
i. Adapt via recovery to result in more resilient investments,
practices and processes.
4. Goal 3: Build a More Secure and Resilient Future Grid
The final section of the strategy will take on the challenge and
opportunities to adapting through recovery efforts, underscoring the
end-goal of grid resilience. The first part of the final section will
explore post-incident actions in the context of evolving grid design,
technologies, and a changing climate (that is, the potential impact of
more frequent and severe natural disasters). The first part of this
section will also address the opportunities to develop and advance the
deployment of tools and technologies to address the security
vulnerabilities addressed in this strategy.
The second part of this final section will outline opportunities to
integrate security and resilience into planning, investment,
regulatory- and policy-decision making for joint, cross-border security
goals. This includes enhancing modeling and risk analysis capabilities
to characterize vulnerabilities for decision-making and investments,
suggesting ways to align utility and market incentives, and addressing
workforce risks and opportunities for evolving technical knowledge
needs. Finally, this section will point to the importance of pursuing
optimal domestic security goals to coordinate cross-border where
possible, and noting where domestic-specific goals do not lend
themselves to joint coordination.
[cir] Objective 1. Understand and Manage New and Evolving Risks From
Grid Technologies and Grid Design
i. Identify, understand, and, to the extent possible, neutralize
emerging threats (including through supply chains).
ii. Ensure that continued integration of grid and IT
infrastructures accounts for the security benefits and challenges of
that enhanced integration.
iii. Meet national security goals in a changing climate and energy
landscape.
[ssquf] Improve preparedness in the context of increased natural
disaster intensity and frequency and
[ssquf] Integrate security considerations into energy policy
making, as well as utility and project planning, design, and
implementation.
[cir] Objective 2. Develop and Deploy Security and Resilience Tools and
Technologies
i. Ensure that the technological and institutional and
architectural evolution of the grid enhances security and resilience.
ii. Be resilient to, and secure against, a range of grid threats.
iii. Coordinate with industry and operator practices to detect and
mitigate grid anomalies quickly and effectively.
[cir] Objective 3. Integrate Security and Resilience Into Planning,
Investment, Regulatory- and Policy-Decision Making, and Coordinate
Cross-Border Grid Integration Between the United States and Canada
i. Enhance modeling and risk analysis capabilities to better
characterize grid vulnerabilities, understand impacts of loss-of-power
events, and support risk-informed decisions, including investments.
ii. Align utility and market participant incentives for planning
and investment with regulatory processes and tools for prudent cost
recovery, including tools for security valuation.
iii. Continue to pursue optimal domestic planning, investment,
regulatory- and policy-decision making for security and resilience,
noting where domestic-specific approach do not lend themselves to joint
coordination.
iv. Address the need to reinforce existing and develop new
workforce capabilities.
5. Conclusion
The conclusion of the strategy will summarize major findings and
highlight the way forward.
DOE seeks public comments on all of the draft outline sections
described above for the Joint U.S.-Canadian Electric Grid Strategy.
[[Page 47162]]
Authority: Presidential Policy Directive 21--Critical
Infrastructure Security and Resilience (PPD-21), Presidential Policy
Directive 8--National Preparedness (PPD-8), Fixing America's Surface
Transportation (FAST) Act (Pub. L. 114-94) and Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance (Stafford) Act (Pub. L. 93-
288) as amended.
Issued at Washington, DC on July 14, 2016.
Patricia A. Hoffman,
Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity
Delivery and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2016-17133 Filed 7-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P