Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards, 47001-47004 [2016-16776]
Download as PDF
47001
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 139
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
6 CFR Part 27
[Docket No. DHS–2016–0039]
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism
Standards
Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Suspension and modification of
certain submission requirements for
chemical facilities of interest and
covered chemical facilities under
agency regulations.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS or
Department) is publishing this
document to inform the public of the
Department’s actions to implement an
improved tiering methodology for the
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism
Standards (CFATS) program that
incorporates the relevant elements of
risk mandated by section 2102(e)(2) of
title XXI of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002 (as amended). Implementation
of the improved tiering methodology
required changes to an Information
Collection Request (ICR), which has
recently been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: This document goes into effect
July 20, 2016, or as otherwise specified
in this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Falcon, Chief, Compliance
Branch, Department of Homeland
Security, 245 Murray Lane SW., Mail
Stop 0610, Arlington, VA 20598–0610;
Phone: 703–235–5263, Fax: 866–731–
2728.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background & History
In December 2014, the President
signed into law the Protecting and
Securing Chemical Facilities from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Jul 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 1 or
‘‘CFATS Act of 2014’’ (Pub. L. 113–254,
6 U.S.C. 621, et seq.). The CFATS Act
of 2014 amended the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 2 (6 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.) with the addition of Title XXI—
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism
Standards—authorizing the Department
to regulate chemical facilities of
interest.3
Section 2102(e)(2) of Title XXI of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (as
amended) requires that the Department
incorporate the relevant elements of risk
in determining the risk of terrorism
associated with a covered chemical
facility.4 The improved tiering
methodology will require the
submission by facilities of information
that differs in some respects from the
information that has previously been
collected. Accordingly, the Department
published two notices, one in November
2015 and one in April of 2016, that
requested comments about the recently
approved ICR for the Chemical Security
Assessment Tool (CSAT).5 Among the
approved revisions, the ICR describes a
revised Top-Screen that will enable the
Department to comply with Section
2102(e)(2) of Title XXI of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 (as amended).6
1 Public Law 113–254, 128 Stat. 2898, Dec. 18,
2014, is available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/
113th-congress/house-bill/4007?q=%7B%22search
%22%3A%5B%22HR+4007%22%5D%7D (CFATS
Act of 2014).
2 Public Law 107–296 Stat. 2135, Nov. 25, 2002
is available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/
PLAW-107publ296/pdf/PLAW-107publ296.pdf.
(Homeland Security Act of 2002)
3 Section 2101(2) of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002, as enacted on December 18, 2014, defined
chemical facility of interest as a facility that holds,
or that the Secretary has a reasonable basis to
believe holds, a chemical of interest at a set
threshold quantity pursuant to relevant risk related
security principles and is not an excluded facility.
4 Section 2101(3) of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002 as enacted on December 18, 2014 defined
covered chemical facility as a chemical facility of
interest that based upon a review of the facility’s
top screen meets the risk criteria developed under
section 2102(e)(2)(B) of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002 and is not an excluded facility.
5 See https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/
2015/11/18/2015-29457/chemical-securityassessment-tool-csat#p-25.
6 The Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT)
OMB Information Collection Request for 1670–0007
may be viewed at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201604-1670-001.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Department’s Transition to a Revised
Top-Screen, Security Vulnerability
Assessment, and Site Security Plan
Applications
The Department will transition to the
revised CSAT Top-Screen application, a
revised CSAT Security Vulnerability
Assessment (SVA) application, and a
revised CSAT Site Security Plan (SSP)
application, hereafter described as
‘‘CSAT 2.0’’. The Department expects to
begin collecting information using
CSAT 2.0 from chemical facilities of
interest in the near future using a
phased approach.
The Department considered several
alternatives for transitioning from the
existing CSAT applications to CSAT 2.0
to minimize undue effort and
unnecessary complexity that could
inadvertently cause confusion. The
Department believes that the actions
taken in this document represent a
reasonable transition process.
The transition from the existing CSAT
applications to CSAT 2.0 will be a threestep process. The first step is to
temporarily suspend, effective July 20,
2016, the requirement for CFATS
chemical facilities of interest to submit
a Top-Screen and SVA. This suspension
is designed to help chemical facilities of
interest avoid expending time and
resources on Top-Screen and SVA
submissions during the transition to
CSAT 2.0. The Department will
continue to allow covered chemical
facilities to submit new or revised SSPs
and Alternative Security Programs
(ASPs) in lieu of an SSP using the
current CSAT SSP application up until
the date of transition to CSAT 2.0.
The second step will be to replace the
current CSAT Top-Screen, SVA, and
SSP applications with CSAT 2.0 (i.e.,
the revised CSAT Top-Screen, SVA, and
SSP applications). The Department
currently plans to take this step in
September 2016. Soon after
transitioning to CSAT 2.0, the
Department will, in a phased approach,
begin individually notifying chemical
facilities of interest to submit a TopScreen using the revised CSAT TopScreen application. Notification will be
sent to facilities that either (a) have
previously submitted a Top-Screen with
COI above the STQ, or (b) the
Department has reason to believe have
COI at or above the STQ. Section III and
IV of this document describe which
chemical facilities of interest will and
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
47002
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
will not be required to submit a TopScreen.
The third step will be to reinstate the
Top-Screen and SVA submission
requirements in 6 CFR 27.210(a) on
October 1, 2016.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Facilities That Will Be Required To
Submit a Top-Screen
After the transition to CSAT 2.0, the
Department will begin individually
notifying chemical facilities of interest
(to include facilities previously
determined not to be high-risk), unless
otherwise described in Section IV of this
document, to submit a Top-Screen using
the revised CSAT Top-Screen
application. The Department will send a
specific written notification in this
regard, pursuant to its authority under
6 CFR 27.210(a)(1)(ii). These letters will
be issued in a phased manner over the
course of several months.
A facility that does not possess any
chemical of interest (COI) at or above
the Screening Threshold Quantity (STQ)
and as applicable, at or above the
minimum concentration specified in
Appendix A will not need to submit a
Top-Screen. However, any such facility,
if provided with written notice to
submit a Top-Screen, must notify the
Department why it is not submitting a
Top-Screen. Notification may be done
either by (a) accessing CSAT and
submitting a Top-Screen with no COI
selected 7 or (b) by sending a letter or fax
to the contact listed in the contact
section of this document.
A covered chemical facility does not
have to wait for written notification
from the Department to submit a TopScreen after the Department transitions
to CSAT 2.0. A covered chemical
facility may find it advantageous to
submit a Top-Screen prior to receiving
specific notification from the
Department if it believes its tier might
be lowered under the improved tiering
methodology.
Chemical facilities of interest that
come into reportable amounts of COI
listed on Appendix A during the
temporary suspension must submit a
Top-Screen within 60 days of
reinstatement. The reinstatement of the
submission requirements also means
that chemical facilities of interest that
either: (a) Come into possession of
reportable amounts of COI listed on
Appendix A after the reinstatement of
7 It is common practice for a covered chemical
facility that no longer possesses COI at or above the
(STQ) and at or above the minimum concentration
specified in Appendix A to submit a revised TopScreen with no COI selected. Upon receiving the
revised Top-Screen and confirming the information,
the Department determines the facility no longer is
a high risk chemical facility.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Jul 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
submission, or (b) have not complied
with the existing reporting requirement
since November 20, 2007 have an
obligation to submit a Top-Screen
within 60 days of reinstatement.
IV. Facilities That Will Not Be Required
To Submit a Top-Screen
If a facility described below receives
a notification letter directing it to
submit a Top-Screen, it should contact
the Department for further guidance—
using either the contact information
contained in the contact section of this
document or by contacting the CFATS
Helpdesk.8
A. Agricultural Production Facilities
and Miscellaneous Extensions
This document does not modify the
existing Top-Screen submission
extension applicable to Agricultural
Production Facilities that use COI in
preparation for the treatment of crops,
feed, land, livestock (including poultry),
or other areas of an Agricultural
Production Facility or during
application to or treatment of crops,
feed, land, livestock (including poultry),
or other areas of the facility.9 Similarly,
this document does not modify any
other extension issued by the
Department for submitting a TopScreen.
B. Chemical Facilities of Interest With
Reportable COI That Is Present in a
Gasoline Mixture
The Department’s practice has been to
indefinitely extend the due dates for
submission of Top-Screens, and as
applicable SVAs and SSPs, for chemical
facilities of interest whose only
reportable COI is present in a gasoline
mixture. Nothing in this document is
intended to alter that practice; however,
chemical facilities of interest that
reported or have come into possession
of one or more COI above the STQ in
addition to the COI present in gasoline
will be required to submit a Top-Screen
in the revised CSAT Top-Screen
application for that COI. The
Department does not intend to send
written notifications requesting revised
Top-Screens from facilities that have
8 The CFATS Helpdesk may be contacted at 866–
323–2957 Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. (EST). The CFATS Helpdesk is closed on
Federal Holidays.
9 The Department of Homeland Security
published a letter that it issued on December 21,
2007. Through this letter, the Department granted
a time extension for farmers and other agricultural
end-users who would otherwise have been required
to submit a Top-Screen consequence assessment
through the secure online CSAT Top-Screen. See 73
FR 1640, Jan. 9, 2008 is available at https://
federalregister.gov/a/E8-199.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
previously submitted a Top-Screen with
only COI present in gasoline.
C. Statutorily Excluded Facilities
Facilities that are statutorily excluded
from CFATS are not required to submit
a Top-Screen, and the Department does
not intend to send written notifications
requesting statutorily-excluded facilities
to submit a Top-Screen.10
D. Untiered Facilities That Previously
Notified the Department They Had No
Reportable COI
The Department does not intend to
require untiered facilities that
previously submitted a Top-Screen with
no COI selected to submit another TopScreen; however, the Department does
expect such facilities to submit a TopScreen if they have come into
possession of a reportable amount of
COI since submitting their previous
Top-Screen.
V. Unsubmitted SVAs and SSPs in the
Current CSAT SVA and SSP
Applications
The Department notes that (a) some
SVAs that have been initiated in the
current CSAT SVA application have not
yet been submitted, and similarly that
(b) some SSPs that have been initiated
in the current CSAT SSP application
have not yet been submitted. Only
complete and submitted SVAs and
complete and submitted SSPs will be
retained in CSAT 2.0.11
Upon transitioning to CSAT 2.0, the
Department will delete any partially
completed SVA (i.e., unsubmitted SVA)
found in the current CSAT SVA
application. Any covered chemical
facility that has either (a) an
unsubmitted SVA within the current
CSAT SVA application or (b) has
submitted an SVA but not received a
final tier determination based on its
most recent SVA submission, will
10 Section 2101(4) of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002, as enacted on December 18, 2014 defined
excluded facility as: (A) A facility regulated under
the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002
(Pub. L. 107–295; 116 Stat. 2064); (B) a public water
system, as that term is defined in section 1401 of
the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f); (C) a
Treatment Works, as that term is defined in section
212 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33
U.S.C. 1292); (D) a facility owned or operated by the
Department of Defense or the Department of Energy;
or (E) a facility subject to regulation by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, or by a State that has
entered into an agreement with the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission under section 274 b. of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2021(b)) to
protect against unauthorized access of any material,
activity, or structure licensed by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission.
11 A covered chemical facility that would like to
preserve information within the current CSAT SSP
application prior to the transition to CSAT 2.0 may
consider generating a PDF of the partially SSP.
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
receive written notification from the
Department to submit a Top-Screen
using the revised CSAT Top-Screen
application.
Upon transitioning to CSAT 2.0, the
Department will delete any partially
completed SSP (i.e., unsubmitted SSPs)
in the current CSAT SSP application.
This means that if a covered chemical
facility has not submitted its SSP prior
to the transition to CSAT 2.0, any data
in its partially completed SSP (i.e.,
unsubmitted SSP) within the current
CSAT SSP application will be deleted
and will no longer be retrievable. Any
data from a SSP previously submitted
through the current CSAT SSP
application will be available and prepopulated in CSAT 2.0.
VI. Changes to Submission Schedule for
SVAs and SSPs
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Impacts to ‘‘Initial Submission’’
Schedule at 6 CFR 27.210(a)
As described in the November 2015
CSAT ICR Notice, the Department
expects that because of the revisions in
CSAT 2.0:
• Chemical facilities will spend 90
percent less time logged into the SVA
application, and
• Chemical facilities will spend 70
percent less time logged into the SSP
application.
Furthermore, as mentioned in the
November 2015 CSAT ICR Notice one of
the expected outcomes of the revisions
is a greater confidence in the tiering
results conducted after the Top-Screen.
Hence, while the Department reserves
the right to modify a facility’s tier
following review of the facility’s SVA,
generally speaking, the Department will
rely on the information submitted in a
facility’s Top-Screen to make a single
tiering determination for the facility, as
described in 6 CFR 27.220(a). The
Department will indicate confirmation
of or, in extremely rare cases, alteration
of, the facility’s tier in a Letter of
Authorization (or, in the case of a
facility electing to submit an SSP under
the Expedited Approval Program, a
Letter of Acceptance).
In large part due to (a) the
Department’s reliance on a single tiering
determination based on a facility’s TopScreen, and (b) an improved integration
between the CSAT SVA application and
the CSAT SSP application, the revised
CSAT SVA application and revised
CSAT SSP application have been
designed to be completed and submitted
together. The Department also believes
that the revised CSAT SVA application
aligns substantially better with 6 CFR
27.215 (the requirements of an SVA)
compared to the current CSAT SVA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Jul 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
47003
application. Therefore, the Department,
in this document, is streamlining the
submission requirements to align with
the revised CSAT SVA application and
revised CSAT SSP application
efficiencies described in the CSAT ICR
by aligning the submission requirements
and having them run in parallel. Based
on these changes, the SVA start date and
due date will be the same as the SSP
start date and due date, respectively.
Specifically, in this document, the
Department is using its authorities:
• Under 6 CFR 27.210(a)(2), when the
Department transitions to CSAT 2.0, to
require covered chemical facilities to
submit their initial SVA within 120
days of written notification of the
Department’s determination under 6
CFR 27.205(a) that they are high-risk.
• under 6 CFR 27.210(a)(3), when the
Department transitions to CSAT 2.0, to
require covered chemical facilities to
submit their initial SSP within 120 days
of written notification of the
Department’s determination under 6
CFR 27.205(a) that they are high-risk.
Therefore, the deadline for a covered
chemical facility to submit an initial
SVA and an initial SSP will be 120 days
after the Department’s tiering
determination described in 6 CFR
27.205(a). Facilities may request
extensions to the due dates for the SVA
and SSP. All requests will be considered
by the Department on a case by case
basis.
Department. The Department selected
the 30 day deadline because it has been
allowing covered chemical facilities 30
days to complete revisions to their SVAs
and SSPs for the past several years and
found that it is a sufficient amount of
time for most facilities. The Department
will consider requests for extensions to
the due dates for revised SVAs and
SSPs.
B. Impacts to ‘‘Resubmission Schedule
for Covered Facilities’’ at 6 CFR
27.210(b)
As previously explained, the
Department expects to maintain the
ability to have data from the most
recently submitted CSAT SSP prepopulate into an SSP that will be
available in the CSAT 2.0 SSP
application. As a result, after the
transition to CSAT 2.0, covered
chemical facilities that need to revise
their SSPs will need to (a) review a prepopulated SSP for completeness and
accuracy; and (b) make any necessary
updates or corrections to their SSP
before submission using the revised
CSAT SSP application. Because the new
CSAT 2.0 design contemplates the
submission of the SVA and SSP
together, covered chemical facilities will
also be required to revise their SVAs
if/when they revise their SSPs.
Furthermore, the start date and due date
for a revised SVA will be the same as
the start date and due date, respectively,
for the covered chemical facility’s
revised SSP. Covered chemical facilities
will be required to submit revised SVAs
and revised SSP within 30 days of
written notification from the
To access CSAT, a CSAT User must
be a Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability
Information (CVI) authorized user.
CSAT Users, in particular CSAT users
affiliated with chemical facilities of
interest previously determined not to be
high risk, may need to complete CVI
training and apply to be a CVI
Authorized User prior to their ability to
access CSAT. To verify your status as a
CVI Authorized User you may contact
the CFATS Helpdesk.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VII. Additional Considerations for
Chemical Facilities of Interest
A. Inactive CSAT User Accounts
Many chemical facilities of interest
previously determined not to be high
risk will need to reactivate the CSAT
account(s) of their designated
representative(s) or register a new
representative. All chemical facilities of
interest affected by this document, in
particular chemical facilities of interest
previously determined not to be high
risk, should verify what, if any, steps
they need to take in order to ensure that
an appropriate representative has an
active CSAT account. For assistance on
how to reactivate a CSAT account
please contact the CFATS Help Desk.
Information about how to register for a
new CSAT account can be found on the
CFATS Knowledge Center at
www.dhs.gov/chemicalsecurity.
B. Need for Chemical-Terrorism
Vulnerability Information (CVI)
Certification
VIII. Regulatory Actions This
Document Exercises Under Part 27 of
Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations
This document exercises the
following regulatory actions:
• Temporarily suspends the
requirement to submit a Top-Screen and
SVA on July 20, 2016. The Department
is authorized to take this action under
§ 27.210(a)(1)(ii) and (a)(2) of part 27 of
title 6, Code of Federal Regulations.
• Notifies the public that when the
Department transitions to CSAT 2.0, a
covered chemical facility will be
required to submit its initial SVA within
120 days of notification of the
Department’s determination under 6
CFR 27.205(a) that they are high-risk.
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
47004
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
The Department is authorized to take
this action under § 27.210(a)(2) of part
27 of title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations.
• Notifies the public that when the
Department transitions to CSAT 2.0, a
covered chemical facility will be
required to submit its initial SSP within
120 days of notification of the
Department’s determination under 6
CFR 27.205(a) that they are high-risk.
The Department is authorized to take
this action under § 27.210(a)(3) of part
27 of title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations.
• Notifies the public that when the
Department transitions to CSAT 2.0,
covered chemical facilities seeking to
revise an SSP will also be required to
revise their SVA. The Department is
authorized to take this action under
§ 27.210(b)(2) of part 27 of title 6, Code
of Federal Regulations.
• Notifies the public that when the
Department transitions to CSAT 2.0, a
covered chemical facility submitting a
revised SVA will have 30 days to submit
its revised SVA. The Department is
authorized to take this action under
§ 27.210(a)(2) of part 27 of title 6, Code
of Federal Regulations.
• Notifies the public that when the
Department transitions to CSAT 2.0, a
covered chemical facility submitting a
revised SSP will have 30 days to submit
its revised SSP. The Department is
authorized to take this action under
§ 27.210(a)(3) of part 27 of title 6, Code
of Federal Regulations.
• Notifies the public of the
reinstatement of the Top-Screen and
SVA submission requirements on
October 1, 2016. This means that
chemical facilities of interest that
acquire reportable amounts of COI listed
on Appendix A after the reinstatement
of the requirement to submit a TopScreen and SVA must submit a TopScreen within 60 days. The
reinstatement of the submission
requirements also means that chemical
facilities of interest that have not
complied with the existing reporting
requirement since November 20, 2007
must also submit a Top-Screen with 60
days. The Department is authorized to
take this action under § 27.210(a)(1)(ii)
and (a)(2) of part 27 of title 6, Code of
Federal Regulations.
• Notifies the public that a chemical
facility of interest will have 60 days
following the reinstatement of the
submission requirements under 6 CFR
27.210(a) to submit a Top-Screen if the
chemical of facility of interest have
come into possession of a reportable
amount of COI after July 20, 2016 but
before reinstatement of the submission
requirements. The Department is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Jul 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
authorized to take this action under
§ 27.210(a)(1)(ii) of part 27 of title 6,
Code of Federal Regulations.
This document does not require
chemical facilities to immediately
submit a Top-Screen after the transition
to the revised CSAT Top-Screen
application. Rather, this document
publicizes the Department’s intent to
begin individually notifying chemical
facilities of interest. After the transition
to CSAT 2.0, the Department will begin
sending written notification to chemical
facilities of interest requiring them to
submit a Top-Screen using the revised
CSAT Top-Screen application. Finally,
the Department (1) reemphasizes that
once the Department transitions to
CSAT 2.0, any chemical facility of
interest can submit a Top-Screen using
the revised CSAT Top-Screen
application, regardless of whether it has
received written notification from the
Department, and (2) continues to be
available for consultation to any
chemical facility of interest before,
during, or after the transition to CSAT
2.0. In particular the Department is
available for consultation to any
chemical facilities of interest that
acquire COI for the first time. Requests
for consultation can be made through
the CFATS Helpdesk.
Taken together the process and steps
outlined in this document will enable
the Department to collect the necessary
information to implement the improved
tiering methodology required in Section
2102(e)(2) of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002.
Dated: July 11, 2016.
David M. Wulf,
Director, Infrastructure Security Compliance
Division, Office of Infrastructure Protection,
National Protection and Programs
Directorate, Department of Homeland
Security.
[FR Doc. 2016–16776 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
On February 23, 2016, a
document directing that a referendum
be conducted in August 2016 among
eligible domestic manufacturers and
importers of softwood lumber to
determine whether they favor
continuance of the Softwood Lumber
Research, Promotion, Consumer
Education and Industry Information
Order (Order) was published in the
Federal Register (81 FR 8822). The
document is hereby withdrawn. The
referendum has been postponed until a
future date to be determined by the
Secretary.
SUMMARY:
The document published
February 23, 2016 (81 FR 8822) is
withdrawn as of July 20, 2016.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maureen Pello, Marketing Specialist,
PED, SC, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Room
1406–S, Stop 0244, Washington, DC
20250–0244; telephone: (202) 720–9915,
(503) 632–8848 (direct line); facsimile:
(202) 205–2800; or electronic mail:
Maureen.Pello@ams.usda.gov.
This
document is issued under the Order (7
CFR part 1217). The Order is authorized
under the Commodity Promotion,
Research and Information Act of 1996 (7
U.S.C. 7411–7425).
This document withdrawals a
referendum order that was published in
the Federal Register on February 23,
2016, directing that a referendum be
conducted in August 2016 among
eligible softwood lumber domestic
manufacturers and importers to
determine whether they favor
continuance of the Order. The
referendum has been postponed until a
future date to be determined by the
Secretary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 14, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–17038 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
Agricultural Marketing Service
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
7 CFR Part 1217
[Document No. AMS–SC–15–0079]
Softwood Lumber Research,
Promotion, Consumer Education and
Industry Information Order; Withdrawal
for a Continuance Referendum
Agricultural Marketing Service,
Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Withdrawal of referendum
order.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47001-47004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16776]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 47001]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
6 CFR Part 27
[Docket No. DHS-2016-0039]
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards
AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Suspension and modification of certain submission requirements
for chemical facilities of interest and covered chemical facilities
under agency regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS or Department)
is publishing this document to inform the public of the Department's
actions to implement an improved tiering methodology for the Chemical
Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) program that incorporates the
relevant elements of risk mandated by section 2102(e)(2) of title XXI
of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (as amended). Implementation of
the improved tiering methodology required changes to an Information
Collection Request (ICR), which has recently been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: This document goes into effect July 20, 2016, or as otherwise
specified in this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Falcon, Chief, Compliance
Branch, Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane SW., Mail Stop
0610, Arlington, VA 20598-0610; Phone: 703-235-5263, Fax: 866-731-2728.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background & History
In December 2014, the President signed into law the Protecting and
Securing Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 \1\ or
``CFATS Act of 2014'' (Pub. L. 113-254, 6 U.S.C. 621, et seq.). The
CFATS Act of 2014 amended the Homeland Security Act of 2002 \2\ (6
U.S.C. 101 et seq.) with the addition of Title XXI--Chemical Facility
Anti-Terrorism Standards--authorizing the Department to regulate
chemical facilities of interest.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 113-254, 128 Stat. 2898, Dec. 18, 2014, is
available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/4007?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22HR+4007%22%5D%7D (CFATS Act of
2014).
\2\ Public Law 107-296 Stat. 2135, Nov. 25, 2002 is available
at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ296/pdf/PLAW-107publ296.pdf. (Homeland Security Act of 2002)
\3\ Section 2101(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as
enacted on December 18, 2014, defined chemical facility of interest
as a facility that holds, or that the Secretary has a reasonable
basis to believe holds, a chemical of interest at a set threshold
quantity pursuant to relevant risk related security principles and
is not an excluded facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 2102(e)(2) of Title XXI of the Homeland Security Act of
2002 (as amended) requires that the Department incorporate the relevant
elements of risk in determining the risk of terrorism associated with a
covered chemical facility.\4\ The improved tiering methodology will
require the submission by facilities of information that differs in
some respects from the information that has previously been collected.
Accordingly, the Department published two notices, one in November 2015
and one in April of 2016, that requested comments about the recently
approved ICR for the Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT).\5\ Among
the approved revisions, the ICR describes a revised Top-Screen that
will enable the Department to comply with Section 2102(e)(2) of Title
XXI of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (as amended).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 2101(3) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 as
enacted on December 18, 2014 defined covered chemical facility as a
chemical facility of interest that based upon a review of the
facility's top screen meets the risk criteria developed under
section 2102(e)(2)(B) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and is
not an excluded facility.
\5\ See https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/11/18/2015-29457/chemical-security-assessment-tool-csat#p-25.
\6\ The Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT) OMB Information
Collection Request for 1670-0007 may be viewed at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201604-1670-001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Department's Transition to a Revised Top-Screen, Security
Vulnerability Assessment, and Site Security Plan Applications
The Department will transition to the revised CSAT Top-Screen
application, a revised CSAT Security Vulnerability Assessment (SVA)
application, and a revised CSAT Site Security Plan (SSP) application,
hereafter described as ``CSAT 2.0''. The Department expects to begin
collecting information using CSAT 2.0 from chemical facilities of
interest in the near future using a phased approach.
The Department considered several alternatives for transitioning
from the existing CSAT applications to CSAT 2.0 to minimize undue
effort and unnecessary complexity that could inadvertently cause
confusion. The Department believes that the actions taken in this
document represent a reasonable transition process.
The transition from the existing CSAT applications to CSAT 2.0 will
be a three-step process. The first step is to temporarily suspend,
effective July 20, 2016, the requirement for CFATS chemical facilities
of interest to submit a Top-Screen and SVA. This suspension is designed
to help chemical facilities of interest avoid expending time and
resources on Top-Screen and SVA submissions during the transition to
CSAT 2.0. The Department will continue to allow covered chemical
facilities to submit new or revised SSPs and Alternative Security
Programs (ASPs) in lieu of an SSP using the current CSAT SSP
application up until the date of transition to CSAT 2.0.
The second step will be to replace the current CSAT Top-Screen,
SVA, and SSP applications with CSAT 2.0 (i.e., the revised CSAT Top-
Screen, SVA, and SSP applications). The Department currently plans to
take this step in September 2016. Soon after transitioning to CSAT 2.0,
the Department will, in a phased approach, begin individually notifying
chemical facilities of interest to submit a Top-Screen using the
revised CSAT Top-Screen application. Notification will be sent to
facilities that either (a) have previously submitted a Top-Screen with
COI above the STQ, or (b) the Department has reason to believe have COI
at or above the STQ. Section III and IV of this document describe which
chemical facilities of interest will and
[[Page 47002]]
will not be required to submit a Top-Screen.
The third step will be to reinstate the Top-Screen and SVA
submission requirements in 6 CFR 27.210(a) on October 1, 2016.
III. Facilities That Will Be Required To Submit a Top-Screen
After the transition to CSAT 2.0, the Department will begin
individually notifying chemical facilities of interest (to include
facilities previously determined not to be high-risk), unless otherwise
described in Section IV of this document, to submit a Top-Screen using
the revised CSAT Top-Screen application. The Department will send a
specific written notification in this regard, pursuant to its authority
under 6 CFR 27.210(a)(1)(ii). These letters will be issued in a phased
manner over the course of several months.
A facility that does not possess any chemical of interest (COI) at
or above the Screening Threshold Quantity (STQ) and as applicable, at
or above the minimum concentration specified in Appendix A will not
need to submit a Top-Screen. However, any such facility, if provided
with written notice to submit a Top-Screen, must notify the Department
why it is not submitting a Top-Screen. Notification may be done either
by (a) accessing CSAT and submitting a Top-Screen with no COI selected
\7\ or (b) by sending a letter or fax to the contact listed in the
contact section of this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ It is common practice for a covered chemical facility that
no longer possesses COI at or above the (STQ) and at or above the
minimum concentration specified in Appendix A to submit a revised
Top-Screen with no COI selected. Upon receiving the revised Top-
Screen and confirming the information, the Department determines the
facility no longer is a high risk chemical facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A covered chemical facility does not have to wait for written
notification from the Department to submit a Top-Screen after the
Department transitions to CSAT 2.0. A covered chemical facility may
find it advantageous to submit a Top-Screen prior to receiving specific
notification from the Department if it believes its tier might be
lowered under the improved tiering methodology.
Chemical facilities of interest that come into reportable amounts
of COI listed on Appendix A during the temporary suspension must submit
a Top-Screen within 60 days of reinstatement. The reinstatement of the
submission requirements also means that chemical facilities of interest
that either: (a) Come into possession of reportable amounts of COI
listed on Appendix A after the reinstatement of submission, or (b) have
not complied with the existing reporting requirement since November 20,
2007 have an obligation to submit a Top-Screen within 60 days of
reinstatement.
IV. Facilities That Will Not Be Required To Submit a Top-Screen
If a facility described below receives a notification letter
directing it to submit a Top-Screen, it should contact the Department
for further guidance--using either the contact information contained in
the contact section of this document or by contacting the CFATS
Helpdesk.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The CFATS Helpdesk may be contacted at 866-323-2957 Monday
through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST). The CFATS Helpdesk
is closed on Federal Holidays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Agricultural Production Facilities and Miscellaneous Extensions
This document does not modify the existing Top-Screen submission
extension applicable to Agricultural Production Facilities that use COI
in preparation for the treatment of crops, feed, land, livestock
(including poultry), or other areas of an Agricultural Production
Facility or during application to or treatment of crops, feed, land,
livestock (including poultry), or other areas of the facility.\9\
Similarly, this document does not modify any other extension issued by
the Department for submitting a Top-Screen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The Department of Homeland Security published a letter that
it issued on December 21, 2007. Through this letter, the Department
granted a time extension for farmers and other agricultural end-
users who would otherwise have been required to submit a Top-Screen
consequence assessment through the secure online CSAT Top-Screen.
See 73 FR 1640, Jan. 9, 2008 is available at https://federalregister.gov/a/E8-199.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Chemical Facilities of Interest With Reportable COI That Is Present
in a Gasoline Mixture
The Department's practice has been to indefinitely extend the due
dates for submission of Top-Screens, and as applicable SVAs and SSPs,
for chemical facilities of interest whose only reportable COI is
present in a gasoline mixture. Nothing in this document is intended to
alter that practice; however, chemical facilities of interest that
reported or have come into possession of one or more COI above the STQ
in addition to the COI present in gasoline will be required to submit a
Top-Screen in the revised CSAT Top-Screen application for that COI. The
Department does not intend to send written notifications requesting
revised Top-Screens from facilities that have previously submitted a
Top-Screen with only COI present in gasoline.
C. Statutorily Excluded Facilities
Facilities that are statutorily excluded from CFATS are not
required to submit a Top-Screen, and the Department does not intend to
send written notifications requesting statutorily-excluded facilities
to submit a Top-Screen.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Section 2101(4) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as
enacted on December 18, 2014 defined excluded facility as: (A) A
facility regulated under the Maritime Transportation Security Act of
2002 (Pub. L. 107-295; 116 Stat. 2064); (B) a public water system,
as that term is defined in section 1401 of the Safe Drinking Water
Act (42 U.S.C. 300f); (C) a Treatment Works, as that term is defined
in section 212 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.
1292); (D) a facility owned or operated by the Department of Defense
or the Department of Energy; or (E) a facility subject to regulation
by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or by a State that has entered
into an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under
section 274 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2021(b))
to protect against unauthorized access of any material, activity, or
structure licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Untiered Facilities That Previously Notified the Department They Had
No Reportable COI
The Department does not intend to require untiered facilities that
previously submitted a Top-Screen with no COI selected to submit
another Top-Screen; however, the Department does expect such facilities
to submit a Top-Screen if they have come into possession of a
reportable amount of COI since submitting their previous Top-Screen.
V. Unsubmitted SVAs and SSPs in the Current CSAT SVA and SSP
Applications
The Department notes that (a) some SVAs that have been initiated in
the current CSAT SVA application have not yet been submitted, and
similarly that (b) some SSPs that have been initiated in the current
CSAT SSP application have not yet been submitted. Only complete and
submitted SVAs and complete and submitted SSPs will be retained in CSAT
2.0.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ A covered chemical facility that would like to preserve
information within the current CSAT SSP application prior to the
transition to CSAT 2.0 may consider generating a PDF of the
partially SSP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon transitioning to CSAT 2.0, the Department will delete any
partially completed SVA (i.e., unsubmitted SVA) found in the current
CSAT SVA application. Any covered chemical facility that has either (a)
an unsubmitted SVA within the current CSAT SVA application or (b) has
submitted an SVA but not received a final tier determination based on
its most recent SVA submission, will
[[Page 47003]]
receive written notification from the Department to submit a Top-Screen
using the revised CSAT Top-Screen application.
Upon transitioning to CSAT 2.0, the Department will delete any
partially completed SSP (i.e., unsubmitted SSPs) in the current CSAT
SSP application. This means that if a covered chemical facility has not
submitted its SSP prior to the transition to CSAT 2.0, any data in its
partially completed SSP (i.e., unsubmitted SSP) within the current CSAT
SSP application will be deleted and will no longer be retrievable. Any
data from a SSP previously submitted through the current CSAT SSP
application will be available and pre-populated in CSAT 2.0.
VI. Changes to Submission Schedule for SVAs and SSPs
A. Impacts to ``Initial Submission'' Schedule at 6 CFR 27.210(a)
As described in the November 2015 CSAT ICR Notice, the Department
expects that because of the revisions in CSAT 2.0:
Chemical facilities will spend 90 percent less time logged
into the SVA application, and
Chemical facilities will spend 70 percent less time logged
into the SSP application.
Furthermore, as mentioned in the November 2015 CSAT ICR Notice one
of the expected outcomes of the revisions is a greater confidence in
the tiering results conducted after the Top-Screen. Hence, while the
Department reserves the right to modify a facility's tier following
review of the facility's SVA, generally speaking, the Department will
rely on the information submitted in a facility's Top-Screen to make a
single tiering determination for the facility, as described in 6 CFR
27.220(a). The Department will indicate confirmation of or, in
extremely rare cases, alteration of, the facility's tier in a Letter of
Authorization (or, in the case of a facility electing to submit an SSP
under the Expedited Approval Program, a Letter of Acceptance).
In large part due to (a) the Department's reliance on a single
tiering determination based on a facility's Top-Screen, and (b) an
improved integration between the CSAT SVA application and the CSAT SSP
application, the revised CSAT SVA application and revised CSAT SSP
application have been designed to be completed and submitted together.
The Department also believes that the revised CSAT SVA application
aligns substantially better with 6 CFR 27.215 (the requirements of an
SVA) compared to the current CSAT SVA application. Therefore, the
Department, in this document, is streamlining the submission
requirements to align with the revised CSAT SVA application and revised
CSAT SSP application efficiencies described in the CSAT ICR by aligning
the submission requirements and having them run in parallel. Based on
these changes, the SVA start date and due date will be the same as the
SSP start date and due date, respectively. Specifically, in this
document, the Department is using its authorities:
Under 6 CFR 27.210(a)(2), when the Department transitions
to CSAT 2.0, to require covered chemical facilities to submit their
initial SVA within 120 days of written notification of the Department's
determination under 6 CFR 27.205(a) that they are high-risk.
under 6 CFR 27.210(a)(3), when the Department transitions
to CSAT 2.0, to require covered chemical facilities to submit their
initial SSP within 120 days of written notification of the Department's
determination under 6 CFR 27.205(a) that they are high-risk.
Therefore, the deadline for a covered chemical facility to submit
an initial SVA and an initial SSP will be 120 days after the
Department's tiering determination described in 6 CFR 27.205(a).
Facilities may request extensions to the due dates for the SVA and SSP.
All requests will be considered by the Department on a case by case
basis.
B. Impacts to ``Resubmission Schedule for Covered Facilities'' at 6 CFR
27.210(b)
As previously explained, the Department expects to maintain the
ability to have data from the most recently submitted CSAT SSP pre-
populate into an SSP that will be available in the CSAT 2.0 SSP
application. As a result, after the transition to CSAT 2.0, covered
chemical facilities that need to revise their SSPs will need to (a)
review a pre-populated SSP for completeness and accuracy; and (b) make
any necessary updates or corrections to their SSP before submission
using the revised CSAT SSP application. Because the new CSAT 2.0 design
contemplates the submission of the SVA and SSP together, covered
chemical facilities will also be required to revise their SVAs if/when
they revise their SSPs. Furthermore, the start date and due date for a
revised SVA will be the same as the start date and due date,
respectively, for the covered chemical facility's revised SSP. Covered
chemical facilities will be required to submit revised SVAs and revised
SSP within 30 days of written notification from the Department. The
Department selected the 30 day deadline because it has been allowing
covered chemical facilities 30 days to complete revisions to their SVAs
and SSPs for the past several years and found that it is a sufficient
amount of time for most facilities. The Department will consider
requests for extensions to the due dates for revised SVAs and SSPs.
VII. Additional Considerations for Chemical Facilities of Interest
A. Inactive CSAT User Accounts
Many chemical facilities of interest previously determined not to
be high risk will need to reactivate the CSAT account(s) of their
designated representative(s) or register a new representative. All
chemical facilities of interest affected by this document, in
particular chemical facilities of interest previously determined not to
be high risk, should verify what, if any, steps they need to take in
order to ensure that an appropriate representative has an active CSAT
account. For assistance on how to reactivate a CSAT account please
contact the CFATS Help Desk. Information about how to register for a
new CSAT account can be found on the CFATS Knowledge Center at
www.dhs.gov/chemicalsecurity.
B. Need for Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information (CVI)
Certification
To access CSAT, a CSAT User must be a Chemical-terrorism
Vulnerability Information (CVI) authorized user. CSAT Users, in
particular CSAT users affiliated with chemical facilities of interest
previously determined not to be high risk, may need to complete CVI
training and apply to be a CVI Authorized User prior to their ability
to access CSAT. To verify your status as a CVI Authorized User you may
contact the CFATS Helpdesk.
VIII. Regulatory Actions This Document Exercises Under Part 27 of Title
6, Code of Federal Regulations
This document exercises the following regulatory actions:
Temporarily suspends the requirement to submit a Top-
Screen and SVA on July 20, 2016. The Department is authorized to take
this action under Sec. 27.210(a)(1)(ii) and (a)(2) of part 27 of title
6, Code of Federal Regulations.
Notifies the public that when the Department transitions
to CSAT 2.0, a covered chemical facility will be required to submit its
initial SVA within 120 days of notification of the Department's
determination under 6 CFR 27.205(a) that they are high-risk.
[[Page 47004]]
The Department is authorized to take this action under Sec.
27.210(a)(2) of part 27 of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations.
Notifies the public that when the Department transitions
to CSAT 2.0, a covered chemical facility will be required to submit its
initial SSP within 120 days of notification of the Department's
determination under 6 CFR 27.205(a) that they are high-risk. The
Department is authorized to take this action under Sec. 27.210(a)(3)
of part 27 of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations.
Notifies the public that when the Department transitions
to CSAT 2.0, covered chemical facilities seeking to revise an SSP will
also be required to revise their SVA. The Department is authorized to
take this action under Sec. 27.210(b)(2) of part 27 of title 6, Code
of Federal Regulations.
Notifies the public that when the Department transitions
to CSAT 2.0, a covered chemical facility submitting a revised SVA will
have 30 days to submit its revised SVA. The Department is authorized to
take this action under Sec. 27.210(a)(2) of part 27 of title 6, Code
of Federal Regulations.
Notifies the public that when the Department transitions
to CSAT 2.0, a covered chemical facility submitting a revised SSP will
have 30 days to submit its revised SSP. The Department is authorized to
take this action under Sec. 27.210(a)(3) of part 27 of title 6, Code
of Federal Regulations.
Notifies the public of the reinstatement of the Top-Screen
and SVA submission requirements on October 1, 2016. This means that
chemical facilities of interest that acquire reportable amounts of COI
listed on Appendix A after the reinstatement of the requirement to
submit a Top-Screen and SVA must submit a Top-Screen within 60 days.
The reinstatement of the submission requirements also means that
chemical facilities of interest that have not complied with the
existing reporting requirement since November 20, 2007 must also submit
a Top-Screen with 60 days. The Department is authorized to take this
action under Sec. 27.210(a)(1)(ii) and (a)(2) of part 27 of title 6,
Code of Federal Regulations.
Notifies the public that a chemical facility of interest
will have 60 days following the reinstatement of the submission
requirements under 6 CFR 27.210(a) to submit a Top-Screen if the
chemical of facility of interest have come into possession of a
reportable amount of COI after July 20, 2016 but before reinstatement
of the submission requirements. The Department is authorized to take
this action under Sec. 27.210(a)(1)(ii) of part 27 of title 6, Code of
Federal Regulations.
This document does not require chemical facilities to immediately
submit a Top-Screen after the transition to the revised CSAT Top-Screen
application. Rather, this document publicizes the Department's intent
to begin individually notifying chemical facilities of interest. After
the transition to CSAT 2.0, the Department will begin sending written
notification to chemical facilities of interest requiring them to
submit a Top-Screen using the revised CSAT Top-Screen application.
Finally, the Department (1) reemphasizes that once the Department
transitions to CSAT 2.0, any chemical facility of interest can submit a
Top-Screen using the revised CSAT Top-Screen application, regardless of
whether it has received written notification from the Department, and
(2) continues to be available for consultation to any chemical facility
of interest before, during, or after the transition to CSAT 2.0. In
particular the Department is available for consultation to any chemical
facilities of interest that acquire COI for the first time. Requests
for consultation can be made through the CFATS Helpdesk.
Taken together the process and steps outlined in this document will
enable the Department to collect the necessary information to implement
the improved tiering methodology required in Section 2102(e)(2) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Dated: July 11, 2016.
David M. Wulf,
Director, Infrastructure Security Compliance Division, Office of
Infrastructure Protection, National Protection and Programs
Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016-16776 Filed 7-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9P-P